Bruce Stuart, PhD* Becky Briesacher, PhD,**, Jalpa Doshi, PhD,***
Open Access Appointment Scheduling: Impact on Physicians & Patients Mark Linzer, MD Linda Baier...
-
Upload
angelina-hensley -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Open Access Appointment Scheduling: Impact on Physicians & Patients Mark Linzer, MD Linda Baier...
Open Access Appointment
Scheduling: Impact on Physicians & Patients
Mark Linzer, MD
Linda Baier Manwell, MS
Roger Brown, PhD
James Bobula, PhD
Eric Williams, PhDUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison & University of Alabama-
Tuscaloosa
Background on Open Access
Developed to improve patient access to care
Shown to improve: Missed appts for well-child visits & on-time immunizations
(O’Connor, 2006) Operational efficiency (Parente, 2005; O’Hare, 2004) Days between appt scheduling/being seen by an MD
(Parente, 2005; O’Hare, 2004) Continuity with primary MD (Parente, 2005; O’Hare, 2004) Increased MD compensation (O’Hare, 2004)
Background on Open Access
Conflicting evidence for patient satisfaction: No significant difference in patient satisfaction
(Parente, 2005)
Improved patient satisfaction (O’Hare, 2004)
Theoretically, open access will increase MD stress while working off the backlog; stress and satisfaction will improve thereafter.
Aims
To assess the impact of open access on MD stress and satisfaction
To assess the impact of open access on patient satisfaction
MEMO Study
Longitudinal, observational study of 422 general internists and family physicians
97 clinics in 5 regions: New York City, Chicago, Milwaukee area, Madison area, and rural/small town Wisconsin
Impact of the healthcare work environment on quality of care and role of physicians as mediators of this effect
1795 patients with hypertension, diabetes and/or CHF
MEMO Conceptual Model
WorkplaceCharacteristic
s
Structure
Culture
Workflow
Policies,
processes
Patient
demands
Patient satisfaction
Quality of care
Medical errors
Burnout
Mental health issues
MD
Stress
MD Satisfaction
MEMO Measures
Physician survey Work environment Mental health Job satisfaction Open access appointment scheduling
(y/n)
Patient survey Satisfaction with physician Satisfaction with clinic Trust in physician
Work-induced stress Time pressure Work control: e.g.
Deciding when to admit patients to the hospital Details of clinic schedule Hours worked Work interruptions Patient load Work pace
Intent to leave within 2 years Job satisfaction
MEMO Measures
422 primary care physicians (84.4% of target 500)
59.2% of those surveyed responded
51% GIM 49% FP
44% female
83% white
83% full-time
Age 44 (range 29-89)
Physician Participants
Results: Open Access
62 physicians stated they had open access 48% GIM 52% FP
113 physicians did not have open access 247 either didn’t specify, or physicians
within the clinic didn’t agree Duration of open access: 1-60 months
mean = 18 months (SD=13.22)
Results: MD Outcomes in Open Access Clinics
Lower MD stress in open access clinics (p<.05)
Less time pressure in open access clinics (p<.05)
More work control in open access clinics p<.05)
Less intent to leave in open access clinics p<.05)
Similar job satisfaction among all MDs
Of 788 patients with chronic conditions:
246 from open access clinics
542 not from open access clinics
Similar rates of satisfaction with the MD
Similar rates of satisfaction with the clinic
Similar rates of trust in the MD
Results: Patient Outcomes
Impact of Duration of Open Access
After controlling for MD age, gender, and other predictors of MD stress and job satisfaction...
The relationship between amount of time in open access and physician stress and satisfaction were negligible
The favorable impact of simply being in an open access clinic on MD stress and stressors was maintained
Next Steps
Determine the impact of open access on other patient outcomes: Disease control Medical errors Preventive care
Limitations
50% of physicians did not specify if open access available in their clinics
Open access has evolved in some cases into “advanced access” (different structure)
Only 5 regions included (NYC and upper Midwest)
Self-reported data
Conclusions
Open access is beneficial to physician worklife
Open access has little impact on satisfaction for patients with chronic conditions
Further analysis is necessary to determine the impact of open access on other patient outcomes
ConsultantsEric Williams Bob Konrad Elianne RiskaBill SchecklerStewart Babbott JudyAnn BigbyPeggy LeattSaid Ibrahim Jacqueline Wiltshire
MEMO Staff Jim Bobula Marlon Mundt Roger Brown Carolyn Egan
Chicago Region Anita Varkey Bernice Man Elizabeth Arce
Milwaukee Region Ann Maguire Barb Horner-Ibler Laura Paluch
Rural/Small Town WI Mary Beth Plane John Frey Jessica Grettie Mary Lamon-Smith
Madison Region Julia McMurray Jessica Sherrieb James Gesicki
New York Region Mark Schwartz Joe Rabatin Karla Felix Debby Dowell
MEMO Team