OO/V6E t6 / LIExamination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Target Chief Date* Task Description...
24
ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Target Chief Date* Task Description (Reference) Examiner’s Initials -180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1 a; C.2.a and b) -120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (CA .d; C.2.e) -120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) -120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2d) [-90] [5. Reference material due (C.1 e; C.3.c; Attachment 3)] {-75} 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-l’s, ES-401-112, ES-401-3, and ES-401-4, as applicable (C.1 .e and f; C3.d) {-ZO} {Z Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)} {-45} 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6, and any Form ES-201-3 updates), and reference materials due (C.1.e, 1, g and h; C.3.d) -30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398’s) due (Cli; C.2.g; #Zy ES-202) -14 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (Cli; C.2.i; ES-202) -14 11 . Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review , (C.2.h; C.3.f) -14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1J; C.2fand h; C.3.g) -7 13 Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor (C.2.i; C.3h) -7 14. Final applications reviewed; I or 2 (if >10) applications audited to confirm qualifications I eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2i; Attachment 5; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204) -7 15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed with facility licensee (C3k) -7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i) . * Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by- case basis in coordination with the facility licensee. [Applies onlyJ {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC. Facility: OO/V6E t6’/ SW7iJIJ Date of Examination: Developed by: Written - Facility NRC LI ii Operating - Facility’ NRCD , Page 25 of 28
Transcript of OO/V6E t6 / LIExamination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Target Chief Date* Task Description...
ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1
Target ChiefDate* Task Description (Reference) Examiner’sInitials
-180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1 a; C.2.a and b)
-120 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (CA .d; C.2.e)
-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c)
-120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2d)
[-90] [5. Reference material due (C.1 e; C.3.c; Attachment 3)]
{-75} 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3,ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, ES-D-l’s, ES-401-112, ES-401-3, andES-401-4, as applicable (C.1 .e and f; C3.d)
{-ZO} {Z Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facilitylicensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)}
{-45} 8. Proposed examinations (including written, walk-through JPMs, andscenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including FormsES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, and ES-401-6, and any FormES-201-3 updates), and reference materials due (C.1.e, 1, g and h; C.3.d)
-30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398’s) due (Cli; C.2.g; #ZyES-202)
-14 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (Cli; C.2.i;ES-202)
-14 11 . Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review ,(C.2.h; C.3.f)
-14 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1J; C.2fand h; C.3.g)
-7 13 Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supervisor(C.2.i; C.3h)
-7 14. Final applications reviewed; I or 2 (if >10) applications audited to confirmqualifications I eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent(C.2i; Attachment 5; ES-202, C.2.e; ES-204)
-7 15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewedwith facility licensee (C3k)
-7 16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questionsdistributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i) .
* Target dates are generally based on facility-prepared examinations and are keyed to the examination dateidentified in the corporate notification letter. They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.[Applies onlyJ {Does not apply} to examinations prepared by the NRC.
Facility: OO/V6E t6’/ SW7iJIJ Date of Examination:
_______
Developed by: Written - Facility NRC LI ii Operating - Facility’ NRCD
, Page 25 of 28
- WRITTEN EXAM SAMPLE PLAN ONLY -
Examination Outline Quality Checklist
Facility: OCONEE Date of Examination: DECEMBER 2014
InitialsItem Task Description
a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 . N/A
R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with N/A •
I Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.TT c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. N/AEN d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate. ‘ N/A
2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number N/A N/A N/Aof normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications,
S and major transients.
M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number N/A N/A N/AU and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotationL schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can beA tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios areT duplicated from the applicants’ audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on0 subsequentdays.R
c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative N/A N/A N/Aand quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.
3. a. Verify thatthe systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2: N/A N/A N/A(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks
w distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form/ (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the formT (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants’ audit test(s)
(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form(5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria
on the form.
b. Verify thatthe administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1 : N/A N/A N/A(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form(2) at least one task is new or significantly modified(3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations
c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix N/A N/A N/Aof applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered ,% N/Ain the appropriate exam sections. ‘Hf
b. Assess whether the rn CFR 55A1/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.%
N/A
E c. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. N/A yR d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. N/A N/A WAAL e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
7N/A-yf. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). N/A (J4
a. Author Michael K. Meeks / 03/10/2014b. Facility Reviewer (*) N/A
A . . vi .
c. NRC Chief Examiner(#) JpQ P1. £ea /LIFIAJPt.
d. NRC Supervisor ttfJdt4 %?<‘4 ‘
(%:77A’6 ) fo,? . 1vtII/,’gA/A/Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column “c’; chief examiner concurrence required.
* Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines
ES-201 Form ES201-2
I
- WRITTEN EXAM SAMPLE PLAN ONLY -
ES-201 ExaminationOutline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2
FacUlty: Oconee Nuclear Station Date of Examination: 12/8/2014
InitialsItem Task Description
a b* c#
1 . a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 . * Z’wA b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with ç
I Section Di of ES-401 and whether all K/A categories are appropriately sampled.TT c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
‘
d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected K/A statements are appropriate.
2. a. Using Form ES-301 -5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required numberof normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications,
S andmajortransients.
M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected numberU and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation scheduleL without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested usingA at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicatedT from the applicants’ audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. (OLc
c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitativeand quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301 -4 and described in Appendix D.
%
3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks
w distributed among the safety functions as specified on the formI (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the formT (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants’ audit test(s)
(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form(5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria
ontheform. j)
b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301 -1 : -S
(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form(2) at least one task is new or significantly modified(3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations
c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mixof applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are coveredin the appropriate exam sections.
b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
Ec. Ensure that K/A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. 127L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. b)
1. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).
a. Author cccà% ffri41’4b. Facility Reviewer (*) Zi/% ,VC/6It /c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) #1JCW/1E 4IEEI</ 1fo%pgiy
d. NRC Supervisor GC(.ALt Rc.L I XQ kJ..4>-
Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column ‘c”; chief examiner concurrence required.* Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines
5cLA€ 2ckv 10 &
IL
T’2
ES
-201
Exam
inat
ion
Sec
uri
tyA
gre
emen
tF
orm
ES
-201
-3
1.P
re-E
xam
inat
ion
Iack
now
ledg
eth
atha
veac
quir
edsp
ecia
lize
dkn
owle
dge
abou
tth
eN
RC
lice
nsin
gex
amin
atio
nssc
hedu
led
for
the
wee
k(s)
of12
/081
2014
asof
the
date
ofm
ysi
gnat
ure.
Iagre
eth
atIw
illno
tkn
owin
gly
divu
lge
any
info
rmat
ion
abou
tth
ese
exam
inat
ions
toan
yper
sons
who
have
not
been
auth
oriz
edby
the
NR
Cch
ief
exam
iner
.Iu
nder
stan
dth
atIa
mno
tto
inst
ruct
,ev
alua
te,
orpr
ovid
epe
rfor
man
cefe
edba
ckto
thos
eap
plic
ants
sche
dule
dto
bead
min
iste
red
thes
eli
cens
ing
exam
inat
ions
from
this
date
until
com
plet
ion
ofex
amin
atio
nad
min
istr
atio
n,ex
cept
assp
ecif
ical
lyno
ted
belo
wan
dau
thor
ized
byth
eN
RC
(e.g
.,ac
ting
asa
sim
ulat
orbo
oth
oper
ator
orco
mm
unic
ator
isac
cept
able
ifth
ein
divi
dual
does
not
sele
ctth
etr
aini
ngco
nten
tor
prov
ide
dire
ctor
indi
rect
feed
back
).F
urth
erm
ore,
Iam
awar
eof
the
phys
ical
secu
rity
mea
sure
san
dre
quir
emen
ts(a
sdo
cum
ente
din
the
faci
lity
lice
nsee
’spr
oced
ures
)an
d
unde
rsta
ndth
atvi
olat
ion
ofth
eco
ndit
ions
ofth
isag
reem
ent
may
resu
ltin
canc
ella
tion
ofth
eex
amin
atio
nsan
d/or
anen
forc
emen
tac
tion
agai
nst
me
or
the
faci
lity
lice
nsee
.Iw
illim
med
iate
lyre
port
tofa
cilit
ym
anag
emen
tor
the
NR
Cch
ief
exam
iner
any
indi
cati
ons
orsu
gges
tion
sth
atex
amin
atio
nse
curi
ty
may
have
been
com
prom
ised
.
2.P
ost-
Exa
min
atio
n
belo
wan
dau
thor
ized
byth
eN
RC
.
PRIN
TE
DN
AM
E
1. 2. 3.sV
2%
4.A
ti1Q
1F
t5k’,
5JV
v’
6.(e
v-c
7.<
Orer
8.]
’4iC
SG
tLJT
9.Ia
.e,
Sc,J
vtpq
io:-rais
LJ’4L
1j_
R1k_
i2J)
%14F
12.7
Zi,
\V
’a4-
Vt,
13i3
;1R
f)5+
r-V
--14
.)‘
t47’
6
15
1:::
ElT
AC
LcP
6
To
the
bes
tof
my
know
ledg
e,Id
idno
tdi
vulg
eto
any
unau
thor
ized
per
sons
any
info
rmat
ion
conc
erni
ngth
eN
RC
lice
nsin
gex
amin
atio
nsad
min
iste
red
duri
ngth
ew
eek(
s)of
12/0
W20
14.
From
the
dat
eth
atIe
nter
edin
toth
isse
curi
tyag
reem
ent
until
the
com
plet
ion
ofex
amin
atio
nad
min
istr
atio
n,Id
idno
t
inst
ruct
,ev
alua
te,
orpr
ovid
epe
rfor
man
cefe
edba
ckto
thos
eap
plic
ants
who
wer
ead
min
iste
red
thes
eli
cens
ing
exam
inat
ions
,ex
cept
assp
ecif
ical
lyno
ted
JOB
TIT
LE
IRE
SPO
NSI
BIL
ITY
‘4’L
Lyc*t
,9:)
+L10
,
—ábM
i6u;
P/&
fif
CL
x’
%;,ec
,
\j2
—tJ
\1N
I7Il
LktR
c(j
SIG
NA
TU
RE
(1)
r
- -S
•
‘r
1’
UIt
NtT
L6
St.1
oi
A-i
tn1 n
DA
TE
SIG
NA
TU
RE
(2)
DA
TE
NO
TE
5:’
”
S
ti/C
l/i4
I
!1JI
ot/
IL/
7tfo
/NC
c%
l222(L j
Cf
‘/%
1iIi
Wk1
Zf’
tfiy
I2
_?
f2Y
f(L
/I
,
,J,4
)j((
_______
:2I
,/s,
t
stn
lS
4W
#
c4A
S%
h5%
\‘—
rccdL
‘c;6
’-oX
ES
-201
Exa
min
atio
nS
ecuri
tyA
gre
emen
tF
orm
ES
-201
-3
1.P
re-E
xam
inat
ion
I ack
now
!edge
that
Ihav
eac
quir
edsp
ecia
lize
dkn
owle
dge
about
the
NR
Cli
cens
ing
exam
inat
ions
sch
edule
dfo
rth
ew
eek(
s)of
1210
8/20
14as
ofth
ed
ate
ofm
ysi
gn
atu
re.
Iag
ree
that
Iwill
not
know
ingl
ydi
vulg
ean
yin
form
atio
nab
out
thes
eex
amin
atio
nsto
any
per
son
sw
hohav
eno
tbee
nau
thor
ized
byth
eN
RC
chie
fex
amin
er.
Iun
der
stan
dth
atI a
mno
tto
inst
ruct
,ev
aluat
e,or
prov
ide
per
form
ance
feed
bac
kto
tho
seap
plic
ants
sched
ule
dto
bead
min
iste
red
thes
eli
cens
ing
exam
inat
ions
from
this
dat
eun
tilco
mpl
etio
nof
exam
inat
ion
adm
inis
trat
ion,
exce
pt
assp
ecif
ical
lyno
ted
belo
wan
dau
thor
ized
byth
eN
RC
(e.g
.,ac
ting
asa
sim
ulat
orbo
oth
op
erat
or
orco
mm
unic
ator
isac
cepta
ble
ifth
ein
divi
dual
does
not
sele
ctth
etr
aini
ngco
nten
tor
prov
ide
dire
ctor
indi
rect
feed
bac
k).
Fur
ther
mor
e,I a
maw
are
ofth
eph
ysic
alse
curi
tym
easu
res
and
requir
emen
ts(a
sdocu
men
ted
inth
efa
cilit
yli
cens
ee’s
pro
cedure
s)an
du
nd
erst
and
that
viol
atio
nof
the
cond
itio
nsof
this
agre
emen
tm
ayre
sult
inca
ncel
lati
onof
the
exam
inat
ions
and/
oran
enfo
rcem
ent
acti
onag
ainst
me
orth
efa
cili
tyli
cense
e.Iw
illim
med
iate
lyre
port
tofa
cili
tym
anag
emen
tor
the
NR
Cch
ief
exam
iner
any
indi
cati
ons
orsu
gg
esti
on
sth
atex
amin
atio
nse
curi
tym
ayh
ave
bee
nco
mpro
mis
ed.
2.P
ost-
Exa
min
atio
n
PR
INT
ED
NA
ME
1.:s
;e7
2.J4
/4t5
iL’!.iA
3.3
54. 5.trhc
6.L%
ui i
%ii,j
7.ci1
rcL
C:;8. 9.
t?k
#,
1o
.o
Ffk
i(
11 .J4
Sm
%12’C
(-IW
__D
IYH
LtZ
ib
13.
siP
’
JOB
TIT
LE
/R
ES
PO
NS
IBIL
ITY
Slp
3R
+
%p
!rn
-c-
Adf
P7i
)o/v
’-rc
s
tcV
itr,
so
f”?N
Etvi
JfC
.rV
’
MA
JS2cT
hw
-m
cpec/%
4
DA
TE
SIG
NA
TU
RE
(2)
DA
TE
NO
TE
1)2
9/i
q,
2f3
3ti
f/a
//’cW
?vi
/
.7I
NM
t
.,/g
4/2
2?/
q5—
f’/
%(—
2I
—O
Y/S
‘7’-c
1--
-/5
I \-7.’
-3-4
L/
5%
_
__
__
/
qb_.
Th,
g%
6r’ii
*/%
dIt?
JI
jri
,y9
-,9‘H
1-r
)/L
f
__
__
__
__
__
i2/z
/1zL
_
To
the
bes
tof
my
know
ledg
e,Id
idno
tdi
vulg
eto
any
unau
thor
ized
per
son
san
yin
form
atio
nco
ncer
ning
the
NR
Cli
cens
ing
exam
inat
ions
adm
inis
tere
ddu
ring
the
wee
k(s)
of12
1081
2014
.F
rom
the
dat
eth
atIe
nte
red
into
this
secu
rity
agre
emen
tun
tilth
eco
mpl
etio
nof
exam
inat
ion
adm
inis
trat
ion,
I did
not
inst
ruct
,ev
alu
ate,
orpr
ovid
ep
erfo
rman
cefe
edbac
kto
tho
seap
plic
ants
who
wer
ead
min
iste
red
thes
eli
cens
ing
exam
inat
ions
,ex
cept
assp
ecif
ical
lyno
ted
belo
wan
dau
thor
ized
byth
eN
RC
.
SIG
NA
TU
RE
(1)
iq
-
‘1n&
__
4’L
14.c2
41
5g’
c,IL
15.
ck.4
eii
c-
c_fl
.,tL
ES
-201
Exam
inat
ion
Sec
uri
tyA
gre
emen
tF
orm
ES
-201
-3
1.P
re-E
xam
inat
ion
ackn
owle
dge
that
Ihav
eac
quir
edsp
ecia
lize
dkn
owle
dge
abou
tth
eN
RC
lice
nsin
gex
amin
atio
nssc
hedu
led
for
the
wee
k(s)
of12
/08/
2014
asof
the
date
ofm
ysi
gnat
ure.
I ag
ree
that
Iwill
not
know
ingl
ydi
vulg
ean
yin
form
atio
nab
out
thes
eex
amin
atio
nsto
any
per
son
sw
hoha
veno
tbe
enau
thor
ized
byth
eN
RC
chie
fex
amin
er.
I und
erst
and
that
I am
not
toin
stru
ct,
eval
uate
,or
prov
ide
perf
orm
ance
feed
back
toth
ose
appl
ican
tssc
hedu
led
tobe
adm
inis
tere
dth
ese
lice
nsin
gex
amin
atio
nsfr
omth
isda
teun
tilco
mpl
etio
nof
exam
inat
ion
adm
inis
trat
ion,
exce
ptas
spec
ific
ally
note
dbe
low
and
auth
oriz
edby
the
NR
C(e
.g,
acti
ngas
asi
mul
ator
boot
hop
erat
oror
com
mun
icat
oris
acce
ptab
leif
the
indi
vidu
aldoes
not
sele
ctth
etr
aini
ngco
nten
tor
prov
ide
dire
ctor
indi
rect
feed
back
).F
urth
erm
ore,
Iam
awar
eof
the
phys
ical
secu
rity
mea
sure
san
dre
quir
emen
ts(a
sdo
cum
ente
din
the
faci
lity
lice
nsee
’spr
oced
ures
)an
dun
ders
tand
that
viol
atio
nof
the
cond
itio
nsof
this
agre
emen
tm
ayre
sult
inca
ncel
lati
onof
the
exam
inat
ions
and/
oran
enfo
rcem
ent
acti
onag
ains
tm
eor
the
faci
lity
lice
nsee
.Iw
illim
med
iate
lyre
port
tofa
cilit
ym
anag
emen
tor
the
NR
Cch
ief
exam
iner
any
indi
cati
ons
orsu
gges
tion
sth
atex
amin
atio
nse
curi
tym
ayha
vebe
enco
mpr
omis
ed.
2.P
ost-
Exa
min
atio
n
PRIN
TE
DN
AM
E
iS
wtL
Ak
2O
A’Q
JI
Jfts
b4
J
7.Jo
\1Q
8.-
VV
V(c
.1t
9./V
Ü5f
1av
io
.t;.
11.‘?;ic
12C
bS
.
DA
TE
,S
IGN
AT
IjR
E(2
)D
AT
EN
OT
E
izA
sii
st
,t’%
1IL
1;:;E
2E
t
_q/3
0i,1
41
I27
/9’
_ø
Sy
/,%
/,/4L
f
__:/
soji
tI
ttzti
s’—
to-t
--tV
__
__
__
__
_
_)O
-P
q.
‘1Ia
lJt1
JoIY
4y,
__
__
__
__
_
foqc
t•d
r7-i
r
LC
Z-(
IA’
1’,’
w
toz/f7f4-
t3(1
(z:
to1ztf
Z/;
2tK
J’7
To
the
bes
tof
my
know
ledg
e,Id
idno
tdi
vulg
eto
any
unau
thor
ized
per
son
san
yin
form
atio
nco
ncer
ning
the
NR
Cli
cens
ing
exam
inat
ions
adm
inis
tere
ddu
ring
the
wee
k(s)
of12
/08/
2014
.Fr
omth
eda
teth
atI e
nter
edin
toth
isse
curi
tyag
reem
ent
until
the
com
plet
ion
ofex
amin
atio
nad
min
istr
atio
n,Id
idno
tin
stru
ct,
eval
uate
,or
prov
ide
perf
orm
ance
feed
back
toth
ose
appl
ican
tsw
how
ere
adm
inis
tere
dth
ese
lice
nsin
gex
amin
atio
ns,
exce
ptas
spec
ific
ally
note
dbe
low
and
auth
oriz
edby
the
NR
C. JO
BT
ITL
EI
RE
SPO
NSI
BIL
ITY
iE
)ck
nA
L’r
dP
(1)
•7_
ioe.
.0v
qt
,]j
Js
1k
r1
:dit
L&
t
I:o 0
fy—
13.5
r6.I)o
Li
5O
1 4.4A
Ft(
A-
1’%
L,e0/.
r1
5.5
LjC
—esL
5g
/
ES
-201
Exam
inat
ion
Sec
uri
tyA
gre
emen
tF
orm
ES
-20
1-3
1.P
re-E
xam
inat
ion
Iack
no
wle
dg
eth
atIh
ave
acquir
edsp
ecia
lize
dkn
owle
dge
about
the
NR
Cli
cens
ing
exam
inaf
lons
sch
edule
dfo
rth
ew
eek(
s)of
1210
8/20
14as
ofth
ed
ate
ofm
ysi
gn
atu
re.
Iag
ree
that
I will
not
know
ingl
ydi
vulg
ean
yin
form
atio
nab
out
thes
eex
amin
atio
nsto
any
per
son
sw
hohav
eno
tbee
nau
thor
ized
byth
eN
RC
chie
fex
amin
er.
I un
der
stan
dth
atIa
mno
tto
inst
ruct
,ev
aluat
e,or
prov
ide
perf
orm
ance
feed
bac
kto
tho
seap
plic
ants
sched
ule
dto
bead
min
iste
red
thes
eli
cens
ing
exam
inat
ions
from
this
dat
eun
tilco
mpl
etio
nof
exam
inat
ion
adm
inis
trat
ion,
exce
pt
assp
ecif
ical
lyno
ted
belo
wan
dau
thor
ized
byth
eN
RC
(e.g
.,ac
ting
asa
sim
ulat
orbo
oth
op
erat
or
orco
mm
unic
ator
isac
cepta
ble
ifth
ein
divi
dual
does
not
sele
ctth
etr
aini
ngco
nten
tor
prov
ide
dire
ctor
indi
rect
feed
bac
k).
Fur
ther
mor
e,Ia
maw
are
ofth
eph
ysic
alse
curi
tym
easu
res
and
requir
emen
ts(a
sdocu
men
ted
inth
efa
cilit
yli
cens
ee’s
pro
cedure
s)an
du
nd
erst
and
that
viol
atio
nof
the
cond
itio
nsof
this
agre
emen
tm
ayre
sult
inca
ncel
lati
onof
the
exam
inat
ions
and/
oran
enfo
rcem
ent
acti
onag
ainst
me
orth
efa
cili
tyli
cense
e.Iw
illim
med
iate
lyre
port
tofa
cili
tym
anag
emen
tor
the
NR
Cch
ief
exam
iner
any
indi
cati
ons
orsu
gg
esti
on
sth
atex
amin
atio
nse
curi
tym
ayh
ave
bee
nco
mpro
mis
ed.
2.P
ost
-Exam
inat
ion
PR
INT
ED
NA
ME
To
the
bes
tof
my
know
ledg
e,Id
idno
tdi
vulg
eto
any
unau
thor
ized
per
son
san
yin
form
atio
nco
ncer
ning
the
NR
Cli
cens
ing
exam
inat
ions
adm
inis
tere
ddu
ring
the
wee
k(s)
of12
1081
2014
.F
rom
the
dat
eth
atI e
nte
red
into
this
secu
rity
agre
emen
tun
tilth
eco
mpl
etio
nof
exam
inat
ion
adm
inis
trat
ion,
Idid
not
inst
ruct
,ev
alu
ate,
orpr
ovid
eper
form
ance
feed
bac
kto
those
appl
ican
tsw
how
ere
adm
inis
tere
dth
ese
lice
nsin
gex
amin
atio
ns,
exce
pt
assp
ecif
ical
lyno
ted
belo
wan
dau
thori
zed
byth
eN
RC
. JOB
TIT
LE
/R
ES
PO
NS
IBIL
ITY
5&
,av4-
SIG
NA
TU
RE
(1)
1.f
LJft
SfJ
Sf4
JJ11
2.i
bS
WA
A)L
7Y
/p
-3
.btf
i:-.
CIe
tiiA
zo
70ff
s:/d
P/V
/-#-
4.\9
LvS
zop
6.1
LOA)
5:r’
NLO
Tca
nij
(i.
7.
c(
OA
w
r%i1r
c,‘,
-
---
tt5tg
4%
iJ
SIW
DA
TE
SIG
NA
TU
RE
(2)
DA
TE
NO
TE
i,-
tfrtO
.
__
__
)L
t1
_)/
__
__
________________-
__
__
__
__
_
8.7
frl1
Cri)O
9.‘C
Lfl
10.
1(A
)it
ifm
sii
j1._
c_
P’w
612
.R
tAV
13.frtiI
14.
15.
fHO
Ukt
A.e
S4i
,/,1
Jluck
frV-
7/J
/)o
/’&
%1
AC
i
jf-j
Z-P
4
‘%
:.If
rzq_
1yI
c’
2:
-,
-‘1
b-
•
‘-
Zc?
Cf5L
tS
y--
/i4
5r1
7.1,
05
t,v,c
T,€
1,cT
o’&
--
F’.F
I2.-
t:;4
q
,z1lte
b’f
lz2)-
if
1
)2-/
p-i
q.
%g
,%2
%4
frL
7E(
,2-;
r’-/
_1fJi4____
__
__
__
am
___
I
ES
-201
Exam
inat
ion
Sec
uri
tyA
gre
emen
tF
orm
ES
-201
-3
1.P
re-E
xam
inat
ion
I ack
now
ledge
that
I hav
eac
quir
edsp
ecia
lize
dkn
owle
dge
about
the
NR
Cli
cens
ing
exam
inat
ions
sch
edule
dfo
rth
ew
eek(
s)of
12/0
8/20
14as
ofth
edat
eof
my
sig
nat
ure
.Ia
gre
eth
atiw
illno
tkn
owin
gly
divu
lge
any
info
rmat
ion
about
thes
eex
amin
atio
nsto
any
per
son
sw
hoha
veno
tbee
nau
thor
ized
byth
eN
RC
chie
fex
amin
er.
I un
der
stan
dth
atI a
mno
tto
inst
ruct
,ev
aluat
e,or
prov
ide
per
form
ance
feed
bac
kto
tho
seap
plic
ants
sched
ule
dto
bead
min
iste
red
thes
eli
cens
ing
exam
inat
ions
from
this
dat
eun
tilco
mpl
etio
nof
exam
inat
ion
adm
inis
trat
ion,
exce
pt
assp
ecif
ical
lyno
ted
belo
wan
dau
thor
ized
byth
eN
RC
(e.g
.,ac
ting
asa
sim
ulat
orbo
oth
op
erat
or
orco
mm
unic
ator
isac
cepta
ble
ifth
ein
divi
dual
does
not
sele
ctth
etr
aini
ngco
nten
tor
prov
ide
dire
ctor
indi
rect
feed
bac
k).
Fur
ther
mor
e,Ia
maw
are
ofth
eph
ysic
alse
curi
tym
easu
res
and
requir
emen
ts(a
sdocu
men
ted
inth
efa
cilit
yli
cens
ee’s
pro
cedure
s)an
dun
der
stan
dth
atvi
olat
ion
ofth
eco
ndit
ions
ofth
isag
reem
ent
may
resu
ltin
canc
ella
tion
ofth
eex
amin
atio
nsan
d/or
anen
forc
emen
tac
tion
agai
nst
me
orth
efa
cili
tyli
cense
e.Iw
illim
med
iate
lyre
port
tofa
cili
tym
anag
emen
tor
the
NR
Cch
ief
exam
iner
any
indi
cati
ons
orsu
gges
tions
that
exam
inat
ion
secu
rity
may
hav
eb
een
com
pro
mis
ed.
2.P
ost-
Exa
min
atio
n
PR
INT
ED
NA
ME
W?tt
’4-A
15
2.f2
k/
‘mff
i’3jT
2tt//L
4.4&
‘c::E
’s5.
d.i
tyvc
.
6.I
(C2
(Ry
/%P
E7.
IIH
/tts
-3D
-
8. 9. 10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
-
It:7z
fvL
4C
QC
4&M
—??,4
t’J
/1C
,
TL
TS
c)P
J9I(
To
the
bes
tof
my
know
ledg
e,Id
idno
tdi
vulg
eto
any
unau
thor
ized
per
son
san
yin
form
atio
nco
ncer
ning
the
NR
Cli
cens
ing
exam
inat
ions
adm
inis
tere
ddu
ring
the
wee
k(s)
of12
1081
2014
.F
rom
the
dat
eth
atI e
nte
red
into
this
secu
rity
agre
emen
tun
tilth
eco
mpl
etio
nof
exam
inat
ion
adm
inis
trat
ion,
Idid
not
inst
ruct
,ev
alu
ate,
orpr
ovid
eper
form
ance
feed
bac
kto
those
appl
ican
tsw
how
ere
adm
inis
tere
dth
ese
lice
nsin
gex
amin
atio
ns,
exce
pt
assp
ecif
ical
lyno
ted
belo
wan
dau
thor
ized
byth
eN
RC
. JOB
TIT
LE
IR
ES
PO
NS
IBIL
ITY
SIG
NA
TU
RE
(1)
Fr
&rY
i‘
ZL
7.2
:4’3
’?;;
-uc-
,&L
4’C
go4rC
/Z:r
(A
rL
LL
-k
DA
TE
NO
TE
/2-/1
’11_
___
DA
TE
-1
jzfL
7L
(Z
tr-,
-?
:r)%
/11L
fJ4
_tz%
A7*1
-
/2
//tL
/)l
r(4
‘A
A
7/i
sfi+
‘;#-,c
jjl9
tz-‘K
/t2-/‘
ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3
Facility: Date of Examination: Operating Test Number:
Initials1 . General Criteria
a b* c#
a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent withsampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safetyfunction distribution).
b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administeredduring this examination.
c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants’ audittest(s). (see Section D.1 a.) Ld. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within
acceptable limits.
e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent- -
applicants at the designated license level.
2. Walk-Through Criteria --
a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:. initial conditions. initiating cues. references and tools, including associated procedures. reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific
designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee. operationally important specific performance criteria that include:
— detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature— system response and other examiner cues— statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant— criteria for successful completion of the task— identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards— restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable $)
b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-throughoutlines (Forms ES-301 -1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptancecriteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specifiedon those forms and Form ES-201-2.
3. Simulator Criteria --
The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance withForm ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.
\PrintedName/Signature / Date
a. Author \IU(c\ t’-o —i L-i
b. Facility Reviewer(*) JW7 //I!1€ / Cj,j’ ,i jJp/,c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) //CNI1ELd. NRC Supervisor Q2f2)C) 1 kLC4 ) kX.u_ t2JocJ/2oJf
NOTE: * The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.# Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column c chief examiner concurrence required
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4
Facility: Oconee Date of Exam: 72108/74 Scenario Numbers: 1 I 2 I 3 Operating Test No.: 1
QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES InWals
a b* c#
1 . The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be outof service, but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
2. The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
3. Each event description consists of. the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated. the malfunction(s) that are entered to initiate the event. the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew. the expected operator actions (by shift position). the event termination point (if applicable) -
4. No more than one non-mechanistic failure (e.g. , pipe break) is incorporated into the scenariowithout a credible preceding incident such as a seismic event. 5J
5. The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
6. Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtaincomplete evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
7. If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. U \Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.Cuesaregiven.
8. The simulator modeling is not altered.
9. The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 1 0 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulatorperformance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluatedto ensure that functional fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
1 0. Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario.All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301 .
1 1 . All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6(submit the form along with the simulator scenarios).
12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number oftransients and eventsspecified on Form ES-301-5 (submitthe form with the simulator scenarios).
1 3. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.
Target Quantitative Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d) ActualAttributes -- --
1 . Total malfunctions (5—8) 8 7 6
2. Malfunctions after EOP entry (1—2) 2 1 2 43. Abnormal events (2—4) 4 2 2
4. Major transients (1—2) 1 2 1
5. EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1—2) 2 1 1
6. EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0—2) 2 1 1
7. Critical tasks (2—3) 3 2 2
(—/
ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES3O1-5
t
Facility: Oconee Date of Exam: 12/08/14 Operating Test No.: 1
A E ScenariosP V
2 3 4 T MP E
0 IL N CREW CREW CREW CREW T NI T POSrflON POSIrION POSrflON POSITION A
C S A B S A B S A B S A BLA T R T 0 P T 0 R T 0 R I 0 M*)N Y 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P 0 C P
T P RU
ERO RX 1 110
NOR 3 111SRO-I ————
D I/C 2,6 2,4 3,5 4 4 2SRO-U 7 5
D MAJ 8 7,8 6,7 221
TS 022
RO RX
x NOR 1 111
1OI I/C 4,5 1,3,6 2,3,4 4 4 2
SRO-U MAJ 8 7,8 6,7 2 2 1
D TS
SROINOR
D I/C 2,4,5 1,2,3 2,3,4 4 4 2SRO-U 6,7 4,5,6 5
x MAJ 8 7,8 6,7 221
TS 4,5,6 2,3,5 2,3,4 0 2 2
Instructions:
1 . Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for eachevent type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the “at-the-controls (ATC)”and “balance-of-plant (BOP)” positions; Instant SROs must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions,including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATCposition. If an Instant SRO additionallyserves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be creditedtoward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.
2. Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer toSection D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normalevolutions may be replaced with additional instrument or component malfunctions on a 1 -for-i basis.
3. Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only thosethat require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant’s competence count toward the minimumrequirements specified for the applicant’s license level in the right-hand columns.
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301 -6
Facility: Oconee Date of Examination: 12/08/14 Operating Test No.: 1
APPLICANTS
RO X RO X RO D ROSRO-I D SRO-I D SRO-I D SRO-I El
SRO-U El SRO-U El SRO-U X SRO-U El
Competencies SCENARK CEJO_ JO_ CENARO
1234123412341234
Interpret/Diagnose Events 2,3, 2,4, 1,3, 1,4, 1,3, 2,3, 1,2, 1,2, 1,2,
. . 67 57 56 58 56 45 34 34 34and Conditions 8 8 7 7,8 6,7 5,6, 5,6, 5,6,7,8 7,8 7
Comply With and 2,3, 2,4, 1,3, 1,4, 1,3, 2,3, 1,2, 1,2, 1,2,67 57 56 56 56 45 34 34 34Use Procedures (1) 8 8 7 8 78 67 56 56 56
7,8 7,8 7
Operate Control 2,3, 2,4, 1,3, 1,4, 1,3, 2,3,ID ,.i I’i\ 6,7, 5,7 5,6, 5,6 5,6, 4,5Doarus ) 8 8 7 8 7,8 6,7
Communicate 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, 1,2, 1,2,34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34and Interact 5,6, 5,6, 5,6, 5,6, 5,6, 5,6, 5,6, 5,6, 5,6,7,8 7,8 7 7,8 7,8 7 7,8 7,8 7
Demonstrate Supervisory 1,2, 1,2, 1,2,. . 34 34 34Ability (3) 5,6, 5,6 5,6,
8 7,8 7
Comply With and 5, 2,3 2,3
Use Tech. Specs. (3)
Notes:(1) Includes Technical Specification compliance for an RO.(2) Optional for an SRO-U.(3) Only applicable to SROs.
Instructions:
Check the applicants’ license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allowthe examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant.
ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1Quality Checklist
Facility: OCoAJE Date of Exam: f7//’/ Exam Level: RO B’ SRO L’
Initials
Item Description a b c
1 . Clean answer sheets copied before grading L9/ “%i %22. Answer key changes and question deletions justified ,, ,t.i
and documented (W (43. Applicants’ scores checked for addition errors , ,.I,y
(reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) (44. Grading for all borderline cases (80 ±2% overall and 70 or 80, , ,,/
as applicable, ±4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail (A5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades
arejustified (46. Performance on missed questions checked for training ,
deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity (7 /,of questions missed by half or more of the applicants .
Printed Name/Signature Date
a. Grader D iJ i)icb. Facility Reviewer(*) /
c. NRCChiefExaminer(*) ///#%EL
d. NRC Supervisor (*) GEAu ‘3 )(*) The facility reviewer’s signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC;
two independent NRC reviews are required.
(IIb) DUKE Scott L. Batson
‘ ENERGY Wce President® Oconee Nuclear Station
ONS-201 4-1 25 Duke EnergyONOIVP I 7800 Rochester Hwy
Seneca, SC 29672September 19, 2014
0: 864.873.3274Mr. Victor McCree Regional Administrator f: 864.873. 4208
us. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II ScotLBatsonduke-energy.com
Marquis One lower245 Peachtree Center Ave. , NE, Suite I 200Atlanta, GA 30303-1257
Subject: OCONEE NUCLEAR STATIONOperating Exam Outlines - 75 day submittal
Dear Mr. McCree:
In accordance with the provisions of NUREG-1021, Duke Energy is submitting the operating examoutlines, quality checklists, and other documentation as required for the initial license operatingexam scheduled for the week of December 8, 2014 at the Oconee Training Center, Oconee NuclearSite. Submitted for review are:
. Form ES-201-2, Examination Outline Quality Checklist
. Form ES-201-3, Examination Security Agreement
. Form ES-301-1, RO Administrative Topics Outline
. Form ES-301 -1 , SRO Administrative Topics Outline
. Form ES-301-2, RO Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline
. Form ES-301-2, SRO (U) Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline
. Form ES-301-2, SRO (I) Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline
. Form ES-301-5, Transient and Event Checklist
. Form ES-D-1 , Scenario outline (three)
. Form ES-401 -4, Record of Rejected K/As
If you require any additional information, or have any questions, please contactCliff Witherspoon at (864) 873-4330 or Gabriel Washburn at (864) 873-4490.
Sincerely,
Scott L. BatsonVice PresidentOconee Nuclear Station
Attachments
www.duke-energy.com
us. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IISeptember 19, 2014Page 2
cc: Mr. Eugene F. Guthrie, ChiefU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IIDivision of Reactor SafetyOperations BranchMarquis One Tower245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200Atlanta, GA 30303-1257
Mr. Michael MeeksU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IIDivision of Reactor SafetyOperations BranchMarquis One Tower245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200Atlanta, GA 30303-1257
-% DUKEENERGY®
ONS-201 4-129
October2, 2014
Mr. Victor McCree, Regional AdministratoruPs. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IIMarquis One Tower245 Peachtree CenterAve., NE, Suite 1200Atlanta, GA 30303-1257
Subject: Oconee Nuclear StationWritten Exam - 45 day submittal
Scott L BatsonVice President
Oconee Nuclear Station
Duke EnergyONOIVP I 7800 Rochester Hwy
Seneca, SC 29672
0: 8648733274n 864873. 4208
ScatLBatsonduke-energy corn
Dear Mr. McCree:
In accordance with the provisions of NUREG-1 021 , Duke Energy is submitting the written exam,quality checklists, and other documentation as required for the initial license written exam scheduledfor December 17, 2014 atthe Operatorlraining Center, Oconee Nuclear Station. Submitted forreview are:
. Form ES-201-3, Examination Security Agreement
. Form ES-401 -4, Record of Rejected K/As
. Form ES-401-6, Written Examination Quality Checklist
. RO written exam (with reference package)
. RO written exam key
. SRO written exam (with reference package)
. SRO written exam key
. Reference material on a DVD
If you require any additional information, or have any questions, please contact Cliff Witherspoon at(864) 873-4330.
Sincerely,
Scott L. BatsonVice PresidentOconee Nuclear Station
wwwduke-energy.com
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IIOctober 2, 2014Page 2
cc: Gerald J. McCoy, Chiefus. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IIDivision of Reactor SafetyOperations BranchMarquis One Tower245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200Atlanta, GA 30303-1257
Michael MeeksUS. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IIDivision of Reactor SafetyOperations BranchMarquis One Tower245 Peachtree Center Ave. , NE, Suite I 200Atlanta, GA 30303-1257
-‘% DUKEENERGY
Scott L. BatsonWce President
Oconee Nuclear Station
QNS-2014-1 39
October 22, 2014
Mr. Victor McCree, Regional Administratorus. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IIMarquis One Tower245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200Atlanta, GA 30303-1257
Subject: OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION1LT46 Operating Exam - 45 day submittal
Duke EnergyONOIVP I 7800 Rochester Hwy
Seneca, SC 29672
o: 864.873.3274I 864.873. 4208
ScoftBatsonduke-energy.com
Dear Mr. McCree:
In accordance with the provisions of NUREG-1 021 , Operator Licensing ExaminationStandards for Power Reactors, Duke Energy is submitting the operating exam, qualitychecklists, and other documentation as required for the initial license exam scheduled forthe week of December 8, 2014 at the Operator Training Center, Oconee Nuclear Site.Submitted for review are:
. One set of Administrative JPM’s with handouts
. One set of Control Room/In-Plant JPM’s with handouts
. Form ES-DI for Three Simulator Scenarios
. Form ES-D2 for Three Simulator Scenarios
. Form ES-201-2,
. Form ES-201-3,
. Form ES-301-1,
. Form ES-301-1,
. Form ES-301-2,
. Form ES-301-2,
. Form ES-301-2,
. Form ES-301-3,
. Form ES-301-4,
. Form ES-301-5,
. Form ES-301-6,
Examination Outline Quality ChecklistExamination Security AgreementRO Administrative Topics OutlineSRO Administrative Topics OutlineRO Control Room/In-Plant Systems OutlineSRO (U) Control Room/In-Plant Systems OutlineSRO (I) Control Room/In-Plant Systems OutlineOperating Test Quality ChecklistSimulator Scenario Quality ChecklistTransient and Event ChecklistCompetencies Checklist
wwwduke-energy.com
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IIOctober 22, 2014Page 2
If you require any additional information, or have any questions, please contactCliff Witherspoon at (864) 873-4330 or Sam Lark at (864) 873-3642.
Sincerely,
j>e,--Scott L. BatsonVice PresidentOconee Nuclear Station
Attachments
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IIOctober22, 2014Page 3
cc: Mr. Gerald J. McCoy, ChiefU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IIDivision of Reactor SafetyOperations BranchMarquis One Tower245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200Atlanta, GA 30303-1257
Mr. Michael MeeksU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IIDivision of Reactor SafetyOperations BranchMarquis One Tower245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200Atlanta, GA 30303-1257
w(*: DUKEScott L.
ENERGY Wce PresidentceOconee Nuclear Station
ONS-201 4-1 52 Duke EnergyONOIVP I 7800 Rochester Hwy
Seneca, SC 29612November25, 2014
0: 864.873.3274t 864.873. 4208
[email protected]. Victor McCree, Regional AdministratorU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IIMarquis One Tower245 Peachtree CenterAve., NE, Suite 1200Atlanta, GA 30303-1257
Subject: Oconee Nuclear StationILT46 Final Submittal
Dear Mr. McCree:
In accordance with the provisions of NUREG-1 021 , Duke Energy is submitting the writtenexam, operating exam, quality checklists, and other documentation as required for the initiallicense exam scheduled for the weeks of December 8, 201 4, and December 1 5, 201 4, atthe Operator Training Center, Oconee Nuclear Station. Submitted for review are:
. One set of Administrative JPM’s with handouts
. One set of Control Room/In-Plant JPM’s with handouts
. Form ES-DI for Three Simulator Scenarios
. Form ES-D2 for Three Simulator Scenarios
. Form ES-201-2, Examination Outline Quality Checklist
. Form ES-201-3, Examination Security Agreement
. Form ES-301-1, RO Administrative Topics Outline
. Form ES-301 -1 , SRO Administrative Topics Outline
. Form ES-301-2, RO Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline
. Form ES-301-2, SRO (U) Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline
. Form ES-301-2, SRO (I) Control Room/In-Plant Systems Outline
. Form ES-301 -3, Operating Test Quality Checklist
. Form ES-301-4, Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist
. Form ES-301-5, Transient and Event Checklist
. Form ES-301-6, Competencies Checklist
. Form ES-401 -4, Record of Rejected K/As
. Form ES-401-6, Written Examination Quality Checklist
. RO written exam
. RO written exam key
. SRO written exam (with reference package)
. SRO written exam key
www.duke-enetgy.com
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IINovember25, 2014Page 2
If you require any additional information, or have any questions, please contact CliffWitherspoon at (864) 873-4330.
Sincerely,
Scott L. BatsonVice PresidentOconee Nuclear Station
cc: Gerald J. McCoy, ChiefU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IIDivision of Reactor SafetyOperations BranchMarquis One Tower245 Peachtree Center Ave., NE, Suite 1200Atlanta, GA 30303-1257
Michael MeeksU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IIDivision of Reactor SafetyOperations BranchMarquis One Tower245 Peachtree CenterAve., NE, Suite 1200Atlanta, GA 30303-1257
DUKE Scott L. Batson
ENERGY Vice President® Oconee Nuclear Station
Duke EnergyONOIVP I 7800 Rochester Hwy
Seneca, SC 29672
ONS-201 4-1 58 o 864.873.3274I 864.873.4208
ScotLBatsonduke-energy.comDecember 19, 2014
Mr. Victor McCree, Regional AdministratorU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IIMarquis One Tower245 Peachtree CenterAve., NE, Suite 1200Atlanta, GA 30303-1257
Subject: OCONEE NUCLEAR STATlQf1LT46 Post Exam Submittal
Dear Mr. McCree:
An NRC initial license operating exam was administered the week of December 8, 2014.The associated written exam was administered on December 17, 2014. Oconee has twopost exam comments included with this submittal letter as Attachment I . Enclosed for yourreview as directed by NUREG-1021 are the following:
. A student seating chart,
. The original student answer sheets,
. The original signed exam cover sheets,
. Two clean copies of the student answer sheets,
. A copy of the RO exam,
. A copy of the SRO exam,
. An RO exam key,
. An SRO exam key,
. A compiled list of student comments and proctor answers.
If you require any additional information or have any questions, please contact CliffWitherspoon at (864) 873-4330 or Sam Lark at (864) 873-3642.
Sincerely,
Scott L. BatsonVice PresidentOconee Nuclear Station
Attachment (1)Enclosures (9)
www.duke-energy.com
DEC 29 2014
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IIDecember 19, 2014Page 2
cc: Gerald J. McCoy, ChiefU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IIDivision of Reactor SafetyOperations BranchMarquis One Tower245 Peachtree CenterAve., NE, Suite 1200Atlanta, GA 30303-1257
Mr. Michael MeeksU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IIDivision of Reactor SafetyOperations BranchMarquis One Tower245 Peachtree CenterAve., NE, Suite 1200Atlanta, GA 30303-1257
