Ontario Ministry of the Environment - Record of Site Condition ... 214687.pdfPhase I Environmental...

Ontario Ministry of the Environment - Record of Site Condition # 214687

Record of Site Condition

Under Part XV.1 of the Environment Protection Act

Summary

Notice to Readers Concerning Due Diligence

This record of site condition has been filed in the Environmental Site Registry to which the public has

access and which contains a notice advising users of the Environmental Site Registry who have dealings

with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental

condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Environmental Site Registry.

Contents of this Record of Site Condition

This record of site condition consists (RSC) of this document which is available to be printed directly from

the Environmental Site Registry as well as all supporting documentation indicated in this RSC to have been

submitted in electronic format to the Ministry of the Environment.

Record of Site Condition Number 214687Date Filed to Environmental Site Registry 2014/08/28Certification Date 2013/12/27Current Property Use ResidentialIntended Property Use ResidentialCertificate of Property Use Number No CPUApplicable Site Condition Standards** Full Depth Generic Site Conditions Standard,

with Potable Ground Water, Coarse TexturedSoil, for Residential property use

Property Municipal Address 95 MORNING CALM DRIVE, CAMBRIDGE,ON, N1R 8H7, 350 DUNDAS STREET SOUTH,CAMBRIDGE, ON, N1R 5S2, 360 DUNDASSTEET SOUTH, CAMBRIDGE, ON, N1R 5S2

1 of 19Filed Record of Site Condition # 214687 on 2014/08/28

PART 1: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, PROPERTY INFORMATION AND OWNER'S CERTIFICATIONS

Information about the owner who is submitting or authorizing the submission of the RSC

Owner Name FREURE BLAIR CROSSING LIMITED

Authorized Person DAVID FREURE

Mailing Address 501 KRUG STREET, SUITE 201, KITCHENERONTARIO, CANADA

Postal Code N2B 1L3

Phone (519) 578-7771

Fax (519) 578-1981

Email Address [email protected]


RSC Property Location Information

Municipal Address(es) 350 DUNDAS STREET SOUTH, CAMBRIDGE, ON N1R 5S2

360 DUNDAS STEET SOUTH, CAMBRIDGE, ON N1R 5S2

95 MORNING CALM DRIVE, CAMBRIDGE, ON N1R 8H7

Municipality Cambridge

Legal Description See Attached Lawyer’s Letter

Assessment Roll Number(s)

30-06-070-066-1200-0000

30-06-070-066-12020-0000

30-06-070-066-12300-0000

Property Identifier Number(s)

03843-0009 (LT)

03843-0010 (LT)

03843-0013 (LT)

RSC Property Geographical References

Coordinate System UTM

Datum NAD 83

Zone 17

Easting 557,741.40

Northing 4,800,284.90

RSC Property Use Information

The following types of property uses are defined by the Regulation: Agricultural or other use, Commercial use, Community use, Industrial use, Institutional use, Parkland use, and Residential use.

Current Property Use Residential

Intended Property Use Residential

Certificate of Property Use has been issued under section 168.6 of the EPA

No


Please See the Signed Statements of Property Owner, or Agent, or Receiver at the End of this RSC

The rest of this page has been left intentionally blank


PART 2: LIST OF REPORTS, SUMMARY OF SITE CONDITIONS AND QUALIFIED PERSON’S STATEMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONSQualified Person's Information

Name MICHAEL L DUCHENE

Type of Licence Under Professional Engineers Act

Licence

Licence Number 90370818

QP Employer Name BLUMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL INC.

Mailing Address 171 VICTORIA STREET NORTH, KITCHENERONTARIO, N2H 5C5 CANADA

Phone (519) 742-6685

Fax (519) 742-9810

Email Address [email protected]

Municipal Information

Local or Single-Tier Municipality

Cambridge

Upper-Tier Municipality Waterloo

Ministry of the Environment District Office

District Office Guelph District Office

District Office Address 1 Stone Road W., Guelph ON N1G 4Y2


Phase One Environmental Site Assessment ReportDocument used as the phase one environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing

The date the last work on all of the records review, interviews and site reconnaissance components of the phase one environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 28(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04)

(YYYY/MM/DD)

2014/08/21

Type of Report

Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD)

Author of Report

Name of ConsultingCompany

P1 ESA Phase One Environmental Site Asessment, 350 Dundas Street South, Cambridge, ON

2014/08/21 Michael Duchene, Melanie Bombini, Melonie MacLaughlin

BLUMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL INC.

Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase One Environmental Site AssessmentReports and other documents relied upon in certifying the information set out in section 10 of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase one environmental site assessment


Author of Report


Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Freure Homes, 350 Dundas Street South, Cambridge, ON (Draft)

2011/04/09 Tanya Shanoff Stantec Consulting Ltd.


Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment ReportDocument used as the phase two environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing

The date the last work on all of the planning of the site investigation and conducting the site investigation components of the phase two environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 33.5(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04)

(YYYY/MM/DD)

2013/12/27

Type of Report


Author of Report


P2 ESA Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment, 350 Dundas Street South, Cambridge, ON

2014/08/21 Michael Duchene, Melonie Bombini, Melanie MacLaughlin

BLUMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL INC.

Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase Two Environmental Site AssessmentReports and other documents relied upon in making any certifications in the RSC for the purposes of Part IV of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase two environmental site assessment

Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD).

Author of Report


N/A


Environmental ConditionSection 41 applies? No

Section 43.1 applies? No

Site Condition InformationCertification date (YYYY/MM/DD) 2013/12/27

Total area of RSC property (in hectares) 1.20000

Number of any previously filed RSC that applies to any part of the RSC property

Number of any previously filed Transition Notice that applies to any part of the RSC property

Soil Texture Coarse

Assessment/Restoration Approach Full Depth Generic

Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of ground water? Yes

Is there soil present that is sufficient to investigate, sample and analyze soil on, in or under the property in accordance with s. 6, Schedule E of O.Reg. 153/04?

Yes

Site investigation includes the investigation, sampling and analysis of soil on, in or under the property which is used in the RSC?

Yes

Name of the laboratory used to analyze any samples collected of soil, ground water or sediment

MAXXAM ANALYTICS

Ground water condition (potable, non-potable) Potable

Applicable Site Condition Standard TABLE 2


Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards

Measured Concentration for Contaminants in Soil

ContaminantName

Maximum Concentration

Applicable Site Condition Standard

Unit of Measure

1 Acenaphthene 0.044 7.9 µg/g

2 Acenaphthylene 0.035 0.15 µg/g

3 Anthracene 0.14 0.67 µg/g

4 Benz[a]anthracene 0.29 0.5 µg/g

5 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.25 0.3 µg/g

6 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.3 0.78 µg/g

7 Benzo[ghi]perylene 0.16 6.6 µg/g

8 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.12 0.78 µg/g

9 Chrysene 0.24 7 µg/g

10 Dibenz[a h]anthracene 0.049 0.1 µg/g

11 Fluoranthene 0.6 0.69 µg/g

12 Fluorene 0.059 62 µg/g

13 Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene 0.18 0.38 µg/g

14 Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) *** 0.012 0.99 µg/g

15 Naphthalene 0.01 0.6 µg/g

16 Phenanthrene 0.43 6.2 µg/g

17 Pyrene 0.49 78 µg/g

18 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < 10 98 µg/g

19 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F3 130 300 µg/g

20 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F4 160 2800 µg/g

21 Antimony 0.22 7.5 µg/g

22 Arsenic 9.5 18 µg/g

23 Barium 89 390 µg/g

24 Beryllium 0.94 4 µg/g

25 Boron (total) 7 120 µg/g

26 Cadmium 0.54 1.2 µg/g

27 Chromium Total 23 160 µg/g

28 Cobalt 8.8 22 µg/g

29 Copper 29 140 µg/g

30 Lead 30 120 µg/g

31 Molybdenum 0.54 6.9 µg/g

32 Nickel 19 100 µg/g

33 Selenium < 0.5 2.4 µg/g

34 Silver < 0.2 20 µg/g

35 Thallium 0.17 1 µg/g

36 Uranium 0.87 23 µg/g

37 Vanadium 36 86 µg/g

38 Zinc 260 340 µg/g

39 Mercury 0.099 0.27 µg/g


38 Zinc 260 340 µg/g

39 Mercury 0.099 0.27 µg/g

40 Sodium Adsorption Ratio 0.24 5

41 Chromium VI < 0.2 8 µg/g

42 Electrical Conductivity 0.21 0.7 mS/cm

43 Cyanide (CN-) < 0.01 0.051 µg/g

44 Boron (Hot Water Soluble)* 0.11 1.5 µg/g

45 Benzene < 0.02 0.21 µg/g

46 Toluene < 0.02 2.3 µg/g

47 Ethylbenzene < 0.02 1.1 µg/g

48 Xylene Mixture < 0.04 3.1 µg/g

49 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 10 55 µg/g

50 Acetone 0.04 16 µg/g

51 Bromodichloromethane < 0.002 1.5 µg/g

52 Bromoform < 0.002 0.27 µg/g

53 Bromomethane < 0.003 0.05 µg/g

54 Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.002 0.05 µg/g

55 Chlorobenzene < 0.002 2.4 µg/g

56 Chloroform < 0.002 0.05 µg/g

57 Dibromochloromethane < 0.002 2.3 µg/g

58 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < 0.002 1.2 µg/g



61 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 0.005 16 µg/g

62 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < 0.002 0.47 µg/g

63 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < 0.002 0.05 µg/g

64 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < 0.002 0.05 µg/g

65 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < 0.002 1.9 µg/g

66 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < 0.002 0.084 µg/g

67 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < 0.002 0.05 µg/g

68 Dichloropropene,1,3- < 0.002 0.05 µg/g

69 Ethylene dibromide < 0.002 0.05 µg/g

70 Hexane (n) 0.026 2.8 µg/g

71 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < 0.03 16 µg/g

72 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < 0.03 1.7 µg/g

73 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) < 0.002 0.75 µg/g

74 Methylene Chloride < 0.003 0.1 µg/g

75 Styrene < 0.002 0.7 µg/g

76 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < 0.002 0.058 µg/g

77 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < 0.002 0.05 µg/g

78 Tetrachloroethylene < 0.002 0.28 µg/g

79 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < 0.002 0.38 µg/g

80 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < 0.002 0.05 µg/g

81 Trichloroethylene < 0.002 0.061 µg/g

82 Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.002 4 µg/g


81 Trichloroethylene < 0.002 0.061 µg/g

82 Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.002 4 µg/g

83 Vinyl Chloride < 0.002 0.02 µg/g


Table 1 – Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards (Continued)

Ground Water

ContaminantName

Maximum Concentration

Applicable Site Condition Standard

Unit of Measure

1 Benzene < 0.2 5 µg/L

2 Toluene 0.25 24 µg/L

3 Ethylbenzene < 0.2 2.4 µg/L

4 Xylene Mixture < 0.4 300 µg/L

5 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F1**** < 25 750 µg/L

6 Petroleum Hydrocarbons F2 < 100 150 µg/L



9 Chromium VI < 5 25 µg/L

10 Mercury < 0.1 0.29 µg/L

11 Antimony < 0.5 6 µg/L

12 Arsenic < 1 25 µg/L

13 Barium 70 1000 µg/L

14 Beryllium < 0.5 4 µg/L

15 Boron (total) 8 5000 µg/L

16 Cadmium < 0.1 2.7 µg/L

17 Chromium Total < 5 50 µg/L

18 Cobalt < 0.5 3.8 µg/L

19 Copper 0.9 87 µg/L

20 Lead 0.5 10 µg/L

21 Molybdenum 0.5 70 µg/L

22 Nickel 1 100 µg/L

23 Selenium < 2 10 µg/L

24 Silver < 0.1 1.5 µg/L

25 Sodium 10,000 490000 µg/L

26 Thallium < 0.05 2 µg/L

27 Uranium 0.82 20 µg/L

28 Vanadium 0.83 6.2 µg/L

29 Zinc 8 1100 µg/L

30 Acenaphthene < 0.05 4.1 µg/L

31 Acenaphthylene < 0.05 1 µg/L

32 Anthracene < 0.05 2.4 µg/L

33 Benz[a]anthracene < 0.05 1 µg/L

34 Benzo[a]pyrene < 0.01 0.01 µg/L

35 Benzo[b]fluoranthene < 0.05 0.1 µg/L

36 Benzo[ghi]perylene < 0.05 0.2 µg/L

37 Benzo[k]fluoranthene < 0.05 0.1 µg/L

38 Chrysene < 0.05 0.1 µg/L

39 Dibenz[a h]anthracene < 0.05 0.2 µg/L


39 Dibenz[a h]anthracene < 0.05 0.2 µg/L

40 Fluoranthene < 0.05 0.41 µg/L

41 Fluorene < 0.05 120 µg/L

42 Indeno[1 2 3-cd]pyrene < 0.05 0.2 µg/L

43 Methlynaphthalene, 2-(1-) *** < 0.071 3.2 µg/L

44 Naphthalene < 0.05 11 µg/L

45 Phenanthrene < 0.054 1 µg/L

46 Pyrene < 0.05 4.1 µg/L

47 Acetone < 10 2700 µg/L

48 Bromodichloromethane < 0.1 16 µg/L

49 Bromoform < 0.2 25 µg/L

50 Bromomethane < 0.5 0.89 µg/L

51 Carbon Tetrachloride < 0.1 0.79 µg/L

52 Chlorobenzene < 0.1 30 µg/L

53 Chloroform < 0.1 2.4 µg/L

54 Dibromochloromethane < 0.2 25 µg/L

55 Dichlorobenzene, 1,2- < 0.2 3 µg/L



58 Dichlorodifluoromethane < 0.5 590 µg/L

59 Dichloroethane, 1,1- < 0.1 5 µg/L

60 Dichloroethane, 1,2- < 0.2 1.6 µg/L

61 Dichloroethylene, 1,1- < 0.1 1.6 µg/L

62 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-cis- < 0.1 1.6 µg/L

63 Dichloroethylene, 1,2-trans- < 0.1 1.6 µg/L

64 Dichloropropane, 1,2- < 0.1 5 µg/L

65 Dichloropropene,1,3- < 0.28 0.5 µg/L

66 Ethylene dibromide < 0.2 0.2 µg/L

67 Hexane (n) < 0.5 51 µg/L

68 Methylene Chloride < 0.5 50 µg/L

69 Methyl Isobutyl Ketone < 5 640 µg/L

70 Methyl Ethyl Ketone < 5 1800 µg/L

71 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) < 0.2 15 µg/L

72 Styrene < 0.2 5.4 µg/L

73 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,1,2- < 0.2 1.1 µg/L

74 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2- < 0.2 1 µg/L

75 Tetrachloroethylene < 0.1 1.6 µg/L

76 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1- < 0.1 200 µg/L

77 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2- < 0.2 4.7 µg/L

78 Trichloroethylene < 0.1 1.6 µg/L

79 Vinyl Chloride < 0.2 0.5 µg/L

80 Trichlorofluoromethane < 0.2 150 µg/L


Remedial Action and Mitigation

Remediated Soils

Estimated quantities of the soil, if any, originating at and remaining on the RSC property that have been remediated, at a location either on or off the property, to reduce the concentration of contaminants in the soil. Indicate the remediation process or processes used and the estimated amount of soil remediated by each identified process.

Soil Remediation Process Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³)

None

Description of Remediation

Description of any action taken to reduce the concentration of contaminants (including soil removals) on, in or under the RSC property.

Soil excavated and removed from site. A total of 14,610.52 tonnes was disposed of off site.

Soil or Sediment Removed and Not Returned

Estimated quantities of soil or sediment, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.

Estimated Quantity of Soil (in-ground volume in m³) 6,780.0

Estimated Quantity of Sediment (in-ground volume in m³) 0.0

Soil Brought to the Property

Estimated quantity of the soil, if any, being brought from another property to and deposited at the RSC property, not including any soil that may have originated at but been remediated off the RSC property and that is identified in section 28 of Schedule A.

Estimated Quantity of Soil Brought to the Property(in-ground volume in m³)

0.0


Ground Water Control or Treatment Measures

Ground water control or treatment measures that were required for the RSC property prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing.

None

Ground water control or treatment measures that are required for the RSC property after the certification date.

None

Estimated volume of ground water, if any, removed from and not returned to the RSC property.

Estimated Volume of Ground Water (in litres) 0.0


Other Activities Including Risk Management Measures

Constructed works that prior to the certification date for the purpose of submitting the RSC for filing, were required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.

None

Constructed works that after the certification date, are required to control or otherwise mitigate the release or movement of known existing contaminants at the RSC property.

None

Monitoring or Maintenance

Soil Management Measures

Soil monitoring requirements or any requirements for care, maintenance or replacement or any monitoring or control works for known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.

None

Ground Water Management Measures

Ground water monitoring requirements or requirements for care, maintenance or replacement of any monitoring or control works or known existing contaminants, if any, on the RSC property, after the certification date.

None

Remediated or Removed Soil, Sediment or Ground Water From Near Property Boundary

Has any soil, sediment or ground water at the RSC property that is or was located within 3 metres of the RSC property boundary been remediated or removed for the purpose of remediation?

Yes


Qualified Person’s Statements and CertificationsAs the qualified person, I certify that:

A phase one environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from a records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, a report and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.

A phase two environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from planning and conducting a site investigation, a report, and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.

The information represents the site conditions at the sampling points at the time of sampling only and the conditions between and beyond the sampling points may vary.

As of 2013/12/27, in my opinion, based on the phase one environmental site assessment and the phase two environmental site assessment, and any confirmatory sampling, there is no evidence of any contaminants in the soil, ground water or sediment on, in or under the RSC property that would interfere with the type of property use to which the RSC property will be put, as specified in the RSC.

Ground water sampling has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation.

As of 2013/12/27, in my opinion, based on the phase one and phase two environmental site assessments and any confirmatory sampling, the RSC property meets the applicable full depth generic site condition standards prescribed by section 36 of the regulation for all contaminants prescribed by the regulation in relation to the type of property use for which this RSC is filed, except for those contaminants (if any) specified in this RSC at Table 2, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Standards Specified in a Risk Assessment.

As of 2013/12/27, the maximum known concentration of each contaminant in soil, sediment and ground water at the RSC property for which sampling and analysis has been performed is specified in this RSC at Table 1, Maximum Contaminant Concentrations Compared to Applicable Site Condition Standards.

I am a qualified person and have the qualifications required by section 5 of the regulation.

I have in place an insurance policy that satisfies the requirements of section 7 of the regulation.

I acknowledge that the RSC will be submitted for filing in the Environmental Site Registry, that records of site condition that are filed in the Registry are available for examination by the public and that the Registry contains a notice advising users of the Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Registry.

The opinions expressed in this RSC are engineering or scientific opinions made in accordance with generally accepted principles and practices as recognized by members of the environmental engineering or science profession or discipline practising at the same time and in the same or similar location.

I do not hold and have not held and my employer BLUMETRIC ENVIRONMENTAL INC.does not hold and has not held a direct or indirect interest in the RSC property or any property which includes the RSC property and was the subject of a phase one or two environmental site assessmentor risk assessment upon which this record of site condition is based

To the best of my knowledge, the certifications and statements in this part of the RSC are true as of 2013/12/27.

By signing this RSC, I make no express or implied warranties or guarantees.

By checking the boxes above, and entering my membership/licence number in this submission, I, MICHAEL L DUCHENE, a qualified person as defined in section 5 of O. Reg. 153/04 am, on 2014/08/25:

a) signing this record of site condition submission as a qualified person; and b) making all certifications required as a qualified person for this record of site condition.

I Agree


Additional Documentation Provided by Property Owner or AgentThe following documents have been submitted to the Ministry of the Environment as part of the record of site condition

Certificate of Status or equivalent for the owner

Lawyer’s letter consisting of a legal description of the property

Copy of any deed(s), transfer(s) or other document(s) by which the RSC property was acquired

A Current plan of Survey

Area(s) of Potential Environmental Concern

Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property

Phase 2 Conceptual Site Model

Owner or agent certification statements

v 4.1.1


Request ID: 016724767 Province of Ontario Date Report Produced: 2014/08/08Demande n° : Province de l'Ontario Document produit le :Transaction ID: 55039712 Ministry of Government Services Time Report Produced: 09:29:06Transaction n° : Ministère des Services gouvernementaux Imprimé à :Category ID: CTCatégorie :

CERTIFICATE OF STATUSATTESTATION DU STATUT JURIDIQUE

This is to certify that according to the D'après les dossiers du Ministère desrecords of the Ministry of Government Services gouvernementaux, nous attestonsServices que la société

F R E U R E B L A I R C R O S S I N G L I M I T E D

Ontario Corporation Number Numéro matricule de la société (Ontario)

0 0 1 4 4 5 1 6 9

is a corporation incorporated, est une société constituée, prorogée ou néeamalgamated or continued under d'une fusion aux termes des lois de lathe laws of the Province of Ontario. Province de l'Ontario.

The corporation came into existence on La société a été fondée le

N O V E M B E R 1 6 N O V E M B R E , 2 0 0 0

and has not been dissolved. et n'est pas dissoute.

Dated Fait le

A U G U S T 0 8 A O Û T , 2 0 1 4

DirectorDirecteur

The issuance of this certifcate in electronic form is authorized by the Ministry of Government Services.

La délivrance du présent certificat sous forme électronique est autorisée par le Ministère des Services gouvernementaux.

LRO # 58 Transfer Registered as WR761969 on 2013 06 27 at 14:53

The applicant(s) hereby applies to the Land Registrar. yyyy mm dd Page 1 of 3

Properties

PIN 03843 − 0009 LT Interest/Estate Fee SimpleDescription PT LT 5 CON 10 NORTH DUMFRIES PTS 1 & 4, 67R2634; S/T WS662858;

CAMBRIDGE

Address 350 DUNDAS ST SCAMBRIDGE

Consideration

Consideration

Transferor(s)

The transferor(s) hereby transfers the land to the transferee(s).

Name HOLLINGS, BONNIE LYNN

Address for Service 360 Dundas Street South, R. R. 1Cambridge, ON N1R 5S2

I am at least 18 years of age.

The property is not ordinarily occupied by me and my spouse, who is not separated from me, as our family residence.

This document is not authorized under Power of Attorney by this party.

Transferee(s) Capacity Share

Name FREURE BLAIR CROSSING LIMITED

Address for Service 501 Krug StreetSuite 201Kitchener, Ontario N2B 1L3

STATEMENT OF THE TRANSFEROR (S): The transferor(s) verifies that to the best of the transferor’s knowledge and belief, this transferdoes not contravene the Planning Act.

STATEMENT OF THE SOLICITOR FOR THE TRANSFEROR (S): I have explained the effect of the Planning Act to the transferor(s) and Ihave made inquiries of the transferor(s) to determine that this transfer does not contravene that Act and based on the information suppliedby the transferor(s), to the best of my knowledge and belief, this transfer does not contravene that Act. I am an Ontario solicitor in goodstanding.

STATEMENT OF THE SOLICITOR FOR THE TRANSFEREE (S): I have investigated the title to this land and to abutting land whererelevant and I am satisfied that the title records reveal no contravention as set out in the Planning Act, and to the best of my knowledgeand belief this transfer does not contravene the Planning Act. I act independently of the solicitor for the transferor(s) and I am an Ontariosolicitor in good standing.

Signed By

William Kurt Schwarz 403−73 Water St. N.CambridgeN1R 7L6

acting forTransferor(s)

Signed 2013 06 26

Tel 519−621−2450

Fax 519−621−5750

I am the solicitor for the transferor(s) and I am not one and the same as the solicitor for the transferee(s).

I have the authority to sign and register the document on behalf of the Transferor(s).

Andrew Douglas Robertson Graham 30 Duke Street West, Suite 1017KitchenerN2H 3W5

acting forTransferee(s)

Signed 2013 06 27

Tel 519−804−2350

Fax 519−342−0970

I am the solicitor for the transferee(s) and I am not one and the same as the solicitor for the transferor(s).

I have the authority to sign and register the document on behalf of the Transferee(s).

Submitted By

ANDREW D. R. GRAHAM, BARRISTER & SOLICITOR 30 Duke Street West, Suite 1017KitchenerN2H 3W5

2013 06 27

Tel 519−804−2350

LRO # 58 Transfer Registered as WR761969 on 2013 06 27 at 14:53

The applicant(s) hereby applies to the Land Registrar. yyyy mm dd Page 2 of 3

Submitted By

Fax 519−342−0970

Fees/Taxes/Payment

Statutory Registration Fee $60.00

Provincial Land Transfer Tax

Total Paid

File Number

Transferor Client File Number : 10−576

LAND TRANSFER TAX STATEMENTSIn the matter of the conveyance of: 03843 − 0009 PT LT 5 CON 10 NORTH DUMFRIES PTS 1 & 4, 67R2634; S/T

WS662858; CAMBRIDGE

BY: HOLLINGS, BONNIE LYNN

TO: FREURE BLAIR CROSSING LIMITED

1. DAVID FREURE

I am

(a) A person in trust for whom the land conveyed in the above−described conveyance is being conveyed;

(b) A trustee named in the above−described conveyance to whom the land is being conveyed;

(c) A transferee named in the above−described conveyance;

(d) The authorized agent or solicitor acting in this transaction for _____ described in paragraph(s) (_) above.

(e) The President, Vice−President, Manager, Secretary, Director, or Treasurer authorized to act for FREUREBLAIR CROSSING LIMITED described in paragraph(s) (c) above.

(f) A transferee described in paragraph() and am making these statements on my own behalf and on behalf of_____who is my spouse described in paragraph(_) and as such, I have personal knowledge of the facts hereindeposed to.

2. I have read and considered the definition of "single family residence" set out in subsection 1(1) of the Act. The land being conveyedherein:

contains at least one and not more than two single family residences.

3. The total consideration f or this transaction is allocated as follows:

(a) Monies paid or to be paid in cash

(b) Mortgages (i) assumed (show principal and interest to be credited against purchase price) 0.00

(ii) Given Back to Vendor

(c) Property transferred in exchange (detail below) 0.00

(d) Fair market value of the land(s) 0.00

(e) Liens, legacies, annuities and maintenance charges to which transfer is subject 0.00

(f) Other valuable consideration subject to land transfer tax (detail below) 0.00

(g) Value of land, building, fixtures and goodwill subject to land transfer tax (total of (a) to (f))

(h) VALUE OF ALL CHATTELS −items of tangible personal property 0.00

(i) Other considerations for transaction not included in (g) or (h) above 0.00

(j) Total consideration

PROPERTY Information Record

A. Nature of Instrument: Transfer

LRO 58 Registration No. WR761969 Date: 2013/06/27

B. Property(s): PIN 03843 − 0009 Address 350 DUNDAS ST S CAMBRIDGE

AssessmentRoll No

3006070 − 06612000

C. Address for Service: 501 Krug StreetSuite 201Kitchener, Ontario N2B 1L3

D. (i) Last Conveyance(s): PIN 03843 − 0009 Registration No. WR513872

(ii) Legal Description for Property Conveyed: Same as in last conveyance? Yes No Not known

E. Tax Statements Prepared By: Andrew Douglas Robertson Graham

30 Duke Street West, Suite 1017Kitchener N2H 3W5

mduchene

Polygon

mduchene

Text Box

PHASE ONE, PHASE TWO AND RSC PROPERTY

mduchene

Line

Table of Areas of Potential Environmental Concern

Area of Potential Environmental

Concern

Location of Area of Potential Environmental Concern on Phase

One Property

Potentially Contaminating Activity Location of PCA (on-site or off-site)

Contaminants of Potential

Concern

Media Potentially Impacted

(ground water, soil and/or sediment)

1. Imported fill of unknown origin

Central portion of phase two property

30. Importation of Fill Material of Unknown Quality

On-site PHC, Metals, PAH

Soil, groundwater

2. Potential heating oil UST or AST

Rear (southwest) of residential home on eastern portion of property (fill pipe).

28. Gasoline and Associated Products Storage in Fixed Tanks

On-site PHC, PAH Soil, groundwater

3. Maintenance of equipment on adjacent property to the north.

Area along northwest property boundary south of the southern corner of the building on adjacent property to the north.

52. Storage, maintenance, fuelling and repair of equipment, vehicles and material used to maintain transportation

Off-site PHC, PAH Soil

Notes: PHC - petroleum hydrocarbon fractions F1 to F4, including benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes VOC - volatile organic compounds PAH - polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons AST - above ground storage tank UST - underground storage tank

Table of Current and Past Uses of the RSC Property Year(s) Name of Owner Description of Property

Use Property Use Other Observations from Aerial

Photographs, Fire Insurance Plans, Etc.

350 and 360 Dundas Street South

1839 William Dickson Assumed agricultural Agricultural or other use No aerial photographs available.

1839 - 1847 Walter Hamilton Dickson

Assumed agricultural Agricultural or other use No aerial photographs available.

1847 - 1848 William McMillan Assumed agricultural Agricultural or other use No aerial photographs available.

1848 - 1858 James McMillan Assumed agricultural Agricultural or other use No aerial photographs available.

1858 - 1861 John McNaughton Assumed agricultural Agricultural or other use No aerial photographs available.

1861 - 1906 James McMillan Assumed agricultural Agricultural or other use No aerial photographs available.

1906 - 1947 Henry Horton and Sarah Horton


1947 - 1969 The Director of the Veterans’ Land Act

Assumed agricultural Agricultural or other use 1945 and 1955 aerial photographs show agricultural land use.

1969 - 1986 Clemens St. Clair and Audrey St. Clair

Residential Residential No aerial photographs available.

Year(s) Name of Owner Description of Property Use

Property Use Other Observations from Aerial Photographs, Fire Insurance Plans, Etc.

350 Dundas Street South

1986 - 2010 Clemens St. Clair and Audrey St. Clair

Residential Residential 1993 aerial photo shows single family home on property adjacent to Dundas Street South as well as earthworks being completed on property to the south and on RSC property. 2000, 2003, 2006 and 2009 aerial photos shows property site generally as it was in 2013.

2010 - June 2013

Audrey St. Clair (till 2010), Bonnie Hollings, Brian St. Clair (till 2013)

Residential Residential No aerial photographs available.

June 2013 Freure Blair Crossing Limited

Residential redevelopment (townhomes)

Residential No aerial photographs available.

Portion of 360 Dundas Street South

1986 - July 2014

Kenyon Hollings, Bonnie Hollings

Residential Residential 1993 aerial photo shows single family home on property adjacent to Dundas Street South as well as earthworks being completed on property to the south and on 350 Dundas property. 2000, 2003, 2006 and 2009 aerial photos shows property generally as it was in 2013.

July 2014 Freure Blair Crossing Limited



Year(s) Name of Owner Description of Property Use

Property Use Other Observations from Aerial Photographs, Fire Insurance Plans, Etc.

Portion of 95 Morning Calm Drive

Prior to December 1949

George Schultz Assumed agricultural Agricultural or other use No aerial photographs available.

December 1949 – November 1979

David C. Beattie Assumed agricultural Agricultural or other use No aerial photographs available.

November 1979 – March 1990

David S. Beattie, Dorothy Lee, Robert Beattie, Kenneth Beattie, Jean Morby

Assumed agricultural Agricultural or other use 1945 and 1955 aerial photographs show agricultural land use.

August 1990 – March 1993

861406 Ontario Inc. in Trust


March 1993 – July 2014

Lusitania Villas of Cambridge Incorporated

Townhome development Residential 1993 aerial photo shows earthworks being completed on property. 2000, 2003, 2006 and 2009 aerial photos shows property generally as it was in 2013.

July 2014 Freure Blair Crossing Limited



Phase Two Conceptual Site Model 350 Dundas Street South, Cambridge, Ontario

1

PHASE TWO CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL

The phase two conceptual site model makes reference to the following figures:

Figure 1 – Phase One Conceptual Site Model Figure 2 – Areas of Potential Environmental Concern Figure 3 – Test Pit, Borehole and Monitoring Well Location Plan Figure 4 – Cross Section A – A’ Figure 5 – Cross Section B – B’ Figure 6 – Ground Water Elevation Map Figure 7 – Soil Analytical Results for Contaminants of Concern Figure 8 – Limits of Excavation - Cross Section A – A’ Figure 9 – Limits of Excavation - Cross Section B – B’ Figure 10 – Confirmation Soil Sampling Figure 11 – Conceptual Exposure Model The phase two conceptual site model does not include figures to show the following types of information for the following reasons:

• There is no figure which illustrates areas of natural significance or water bodies within 30 m of the subject property since there are no areas of natural significance or water bodies within 30 m of the subject property;

• There is no figure which illustrates contaminants in sediment because there is no sediment at the subject property.

1. PHYSICAL SETTING OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY

The phase two property originally consisted of one whole property and parts of two other properties. The municipal address for the larger whole property is 350 Dundas Street South, Cambridge, Ontario. The phase two property also includes portions of the properties at 95 Morning Calm Drive and 360 Dundas Street South. All three properties are collectively referred to as the phase two property. Figure 1 shows the phase two property.

The property fronts on Dundas Street South and is located about 80 m southeast of the intersection of Franklin Boulevard and Dundas Street South. The 350 Dundas Street South property is approximately 1.1 ha in size, the portion of 95 Morning Calm Drive is approximately 0.1 ha in size, and the portion of 360 Dundas is approximately 0.03 ha in size, for a total area of 1.2 ha.

The phase two property is located in an urban area. The property generally slopes in a southwesterly direction from a high of 293 m above sea level (asl) in the northeast corner to a low of 284 m asl in the southwest corner. There are no permanent water bodies on the property.


2

There are no water bodies or areas of natural significance on the subject property or in a 30 m radius of the subject property. The nearest body of water is Moffat Creek located 180 m south of the southwest corner of the phase two property.

2. POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATING ACTIVITIES

The locations of potentially contaminating activities (both on and off site) identified in the phase one ESA are illustrated in the Phase One Conceptual Site Model shown in Figure 1.

2.1 PCAS ON THE PHASE ONE, PHASE TWO AND RSC PROPERTY

PCA No.

PCA Description PCA Location


Possible fuel oil storage tank associated with heating system of former house


Central portion of property

PCAs as per O. Reg. 153/04, Schedule D, Table 2

Both of these PCAs were considered to be areas of potential environmental concern.

2.2 PCAS IN THE PHASE ONE STUDY AREA

The following potentially contaminating activities have been identified in the phase one study area:

PCA No.

PCA Description PCA Location

(relative to phase two property)

10. Commercial Autobody Shops Dundas Autobody, 450 Dundas Street (~ 120 m SE),


Loblaws former retail fuel distribution, 200 Franklin Blvd (> 140 m N)

37. Operation of Dry Cleaning Equipment (where chemicals are used)

Patel Cleaning , 200 Franklin Blvd (> 140 m N)

52.

Storage, maintenance, fueling and repair of equipment, vehicles and material used to maintain transportation

E.M. Coleman Ltd., Milk Transport, 330 Dundas Street (immediately N)

PCAs as per O. Reg. 153/04, Schedule D, Table 2

The properties and associated PCAs at 450 Dundas Street and 200 Franklin Blvd are not adjacent to the RSC property and the only potential for contamination on the RSC property would be groundwater flow from the properties to the RSC site. The groundwater flow direction confirmed in the Phase Two ESA confirms that these properties and associated PCAs are cross gradient and therefore there are no APECs associated with the offsite PCAs Nos. 10,


3

28 and 37. PCA No. 52, potential maintenance of equipment is considered to be an area of potential environmental concern.

2.3 AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN

Areas of potential environmental concern identified at the phase two property are illustrated in Figure 2. The areas of potential environmental concern on the phase two property are as follows:

APEC No.

Potential Environmental Concern

Area Potentially Impacted Media

Contaminants of Potential Concern

1. Imported fill Central portion of property

Soil and ground water

PHC, PAHs, metals

2. Fuel oil storage associated with heating system for former house

Rear (southwest) of former residential house on north eastern portion of property.

Soil and Ground water

PHC, PAHs

3. Possible maintenance of vehicles on adjacent site to northwest of phase two property

Area along northwest property boundary south of the southern corner of the building on adjacent property to the north.

Soil PHCs, PAHs

2.4 SUBSURFACE STRUCTURES AND UTILITIES ON PHASE TWO PROPERTY

A single family residence was located on the property adjacent to Dundas Street South. This residence was demolished in October 2013. Underground utilities were limited to a water line and gas line connecting the residence to utilities on Dundas Street. Sanitary wastes were discharged to a concrete holding tank and this tank was removed in January 2014. No other subsurface structures or utilities were located on the phase two property.

2.5 STRATIGRAPHY

The stratigraphy was investigated by the installation of boreholes, monitoring wells and test pits. A preliminary phase two environmental investigation included the installation of four boreholes with three of these completed as monitoring wells and the excavation of nine test pits. Additional phase two investigation involved the installation of three additional boreholes with one of these completed as a monitoring well and the excavation of 18 test pits. Five boreholes were advanced for geotechnical investigation. The locations of all boreholes, monitoring wells and test pits are shown on Figure 3.

The surficial geology in this part of Cambridge largely consists of sand and gravel outwash deposits along the eastern side of the Grand River. The stratigraphy encountered during the subsurface investigation was generally consistent across the property, with an unconfined sand or sand and silt unit extending from ground surface to the maximum depth investigated


4

(15.2 m below ground surface (bgs) at MW11-2). The sand unit contained layers of sand and silt and layers of sand and gravel. A layer of fill was identified in the central portion of the property.

Figures 4 and 5 are cross sections showing the stratigraphy of the subject property from the ground surface to the deepest aquifer investigated. The orientations of the cross-sections are shown in Figure 3.

2.6 HYDROGEOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF HYDROSTRATIGRAPHIC UNITS

No contamination was identified in the surfical aquifer at the property; therefore only the surficial aquifer was investigated. The surficial water table is located at about 278 masl, which varies from 7 m bgs to 14 m bgs due to the topography. The sand and gravel overburden extends to a depth of about 35 m bgs based on the available literature and well records for the area.

The phase two property is located in the well head protection area (WHPA) for both the Elgin Street Well Field and the Middleton Street Well Field. Both of these well fields obtain water from the bedrock aquifer.

2.7 DEPTH TO BEDROCK

The dolostone of the Guelph formation is located at a depth of about 35 m below ground surface.

2.8 DEPTH TO WATER TABLE

The ground water contours for April 30, 2013 are shown in Figure 6. The depth to water varied from about 7 m bgs at MW11-4 and MW1-12 to about 14 m bgs at MW11-2. MW11-4 and MW1-12 were located in the lowest areas of the property. The ground water flow direction is inferred to be towards the southwest. The horizontal gradient was approximately 0.005 m/m on July 11, 2012 and approximately 0.004 m/m on April 30, 2013.

2.9 WITH RESPECT TO SECTION 41 OR 43.1 OF O. REG. 153

The phase two property is not considered to be environmentally sensitive as per the definitions provided in Section 41 of O.Reg.153/04. The phase two property is not part of or adjacent to an area of natural significance and the soil pH is within the permitted ranges of 5 to 11 for subsurface soils and 5 to 9 for surface soils. The property is not a shallow soil property and does not include or is within 30 m of a water body and therefore is not considered environmentally sensitive under Section 43.1 of O.Reg.153/04.

2.10 FILL MATERIAL

Fill material was identified on the phase two property and is identified as APEC 1 and described below.


5

2.11 LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED BUILDINGS AND OTHER STRUCTURES

The subject property will be redeveloped for residential use. Buildings (town homes) and their associated driveways and parking areas will cover a majority of the site. A total of 53 units in eight blocks are proposed.

3. CONTAMINANTS PRESENT ON PHASE TWO PROPERTY

3.1 AREAS OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN

APEC 1 Imported Fill of Unknown Origin

Fill material was identified in the central portion of the property. A total of 19 test pits and four boreholes / monitoring wells were completed in the area of the fill material to confirm the quality of the fill material and to delineate the fill material. The limits of the waste fill layer were delineated during the excavation of additional test pits by extending the test pit until the visual edge of the waste fill was encountered. Figure 7 shows the locations of the test pits and boreholes / monitoring wells completed and Figures 8 and 9 provide cross sections identifying the sample locations.

Two distinct types of fill material were identified. The overlying fill material was a sand and gravel material. Based on the type of material, evidence from a 1993 aerial photograph, and anecdotal evidence it is believed this overlying fill material originated from the property immediately to the south (95 Morning Calm Drive). The fill material beneath the overlying fill material contained various waste materials (household waste, construction waste and potentially foundry sand, etc.). The waste fill material was visually identifiable in that it had a distinctive dark colouring. The limits of the waste fill layer were confirmed both visually and through analytical testing. Soil samples were analyzed for petroleum hydrocarbons (PHC), metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The contaminants of concern (COC) were PHC F3, metals and PAHs. All of the samples where concentrations of compounds exceeded the SCS were associated with the waste fill material. Concentrations of PAHs were found to exceed the SCS on all samples from the waste fill layer and occasionally concentrations of metals and PHC exceeded the SCS in these samples. Figure 7 shows the concentrations of COCs in soil that exceeded Table 2 SCS.

It appears that either there was an existing depression on the property or excavation of the property occurred at some point in the past. Waste fill material consisting of various materials including household garbage, construction debris, fill and potentially foundry sand was placed in this depression/excavation. This material was then covered with a sand and gravel material that was likely moved from the town home development to the south of the property.

There were no subsurface structures or utilities in the area of the waste fill material (APEC 1) hence there was no potential to affect contaminant transportation and transport. The COCs in soil (PHC F3, metals and PAHs) have limited mobility and leaching to groundwater is not expected. MW11-3 was installed within the area of the fill. The groundwater was sampled and


6

analyzed for PHCs, PAHs and VOCs on three occasions with all results less than Table 2 SCS confirming leaching from the soil COCs had not occurred.

Figure 11 provides a conceptual exposure model for the COCs identified in soil (PHC F3, metals and PAHs). The COCs are not volatile so the distribution mechanisms would be direct contact, particles becoming airborne, and possibly leaching to groundwater. The potential receptors would be residents, workers and visitors for human health, and mammals and birds for ecological receptors. Plants could be exposed if the root system extended to the depth of the COCs and soil organisms could be exposed if they were present at depth.

APEC 2 Fuel Oil Storage Associated With Heating System for Former House

The former house had a natural gas furnace at the time of the phase two investigation but had historically used fuel oil as a heating source. A fuel oil aboveground storage tank (AST) was located in the house prior to demolition.

BH1 was advanced at the exterior fill pipe for the former heating oil AST. No staining was observed and results for soil analytical testing for PHCs, metals and PAHs were below Table 2 SCS.

There are no COCs associated with APEC 2. As well, there were no subsurface structures or utilities in APEC 2 hence there is no potential to affect contaminant transportation and transport.

APEC 3 Possible Maintenance of Vehicles on Adjacent Property

A trucking facility is located adjacent site to the north of phase two property. It is possible that vehicle maintenance has occurred in the past. There are no indications that there are underground storage tanks located on the property to the north. The environmental concern is limited to near surface contamination by oil and greases on the north property boundary at the west (rear) corner of the off-site building. Test pits were excavated adjacent to the property to the north which indicated that the fill material associated with APEC 1 extended to the northern property boundary. The remedial excavation for APEC 1 extended to the north property boundary in this area eliminating APEC 3 as an environmental concern. There were no subsurface structures or utilities at the property boundary at APEC 3 hence there is no potential to affect contaminant transportation and transport.

As all contaminants are associated with soil, any climatic or meteorological conditions would not have influenced the distribution and migration of the contaminants.

4. REMEDIATION PROGRAM

Figures 8, 9 and 10 show the extent of the soil excavation and locations of confirmatory soil sampling.

Remediation involved the removal and stockpiling of the overlying fill material. The total volume of this fill material was 2,550 m3. Sampling according to Section 36 of Schedule E of


7

O.Reg. 153/04 and analysis of this material was completed. A total of 17 samples were analyzed for the COCs and were confirmed to meet Table 2 SCS. The material will be used as part of the overall site grading. No fill will be required to be imported for the proposed development.

The waste fill material was excavated and stockpiled within the limits of the excavation. The limits of the waste fill material were visually evident. Samples were collected to confirm that the material had concentrations of COCs that exceed Table 2 SCS. A total of 6,780 m3 (14,610.52 tonnes) of waste material were disposed at an approved facility. All impacted soil was excavated and removed from the site. No soil treatment occurred on site. The area of the excavation was approximately 3,600 m2.

Confirmatory floor and wall samples were collected and analyzed for COCs according to Section 39.7 of Schedule E of O.Reg. 153/04. A total of 33 confirmatory soil samples were collected from the floor of the excavation. The sample density was about one sample per 110 m2 which exceeds the requirements. Samples were analyzed for PHC, PAHs and metals. Concentrations of PAHs in one confirmatory soil sample (F-12-5) were above the SCS. The excavation was deepened by 1 m in this area and the confirmation sample confirmed that all contaminated material had been removed. A total of 9 confirmatory samples were collected along the walls of the excavation. There were no walls of the excavation in some areas and the excavation extended to the property line on the northwest and southeast extents.

The excavation and removal of the waste fill material confirmed that the waste fill material was placed in a depression and/or excavation on the property and subsequently covered with a layer of sand and gravel material which was likely native material from the property to the south.

Residential

Residential Residential

Residential

Residential

Residential

Recreational

Residential

Moffat Creek

Commercial

PCA 10.

PCA 28.

205 Franklin Blvd.250-260 Dundas St.

PCA 52.

PCA 30.

3

1

2

PCA 28.

200 Franklin Blvd.

PCA 37.

Maple Bush Drive

Franklin

Blvd.

Elliot

Stree

t Dundas Street South

Taylor Drive

Commercial

Commercial

Commercial

Commercial

Address

Project Number:

Designed By:

Drawn By:

Verified By:

Revision:

Figure No:

W-B10506-00-00

MD

KC

MD

August 11, 2014

01

Client:

Project:

Figure:

Phase One Conceptual Site Model

Legend:

171 Victoria St. N.,Kitchener, Ontario, N2H 5C5Tel: 519-742-6685Fax: 519-742-9810

References:

O50 0 5025

Meters

Aerial Imagery provided by First Base Solution (2008).

Phase Two ESA350 Dundas Street South

Cambridge, Ontario

Freure Construction Ltd.

Inferred & Confirmed Groundwater Flow DirectionPhase One Study Area LimitPhase Two Property Boundary

PCA No. PCA Description

10. Commercial Autobody Shops



37. Operation of Dry Cleaning Equipment (where chemicals are used)

52. Storage, maintenance, fueling and repair of equipment, vehicles and material used to maintain transportation

APEC Description Contaminants of Potential Concern

1 Imported Fill Material PHC, PAH, Metals2 Fuel oil storage associated with heating system for former house PHC, PAH

5Off-site - possible maintenance of vehicles (adjacent site to north) PHC, PAH3

21

DWG NO. REVCHECKED

PROJECT # DATE

DRAWN

TITLE

PROJECT

CLIENT

LEGEND

REFERENCES

FIGURE 7

2014-08-11 W-B10506-00-00

MBB MD 0

SOIL ANALYTICAL RESULTSFOR CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN

PHASE TWO ESA350 DUNDAS STREET SOUTH

CAMBRIDGE ONTARIO

FREURE CONSTRUCTION LTD.

THIS SCALE TO BE USED TO OBTAIN

APPROXIMATE DIMENSIONS FOR INFORMATION

0 m 5 m 10 m 15 m 20 m 25 m

SCS: Site Condition Standard: Table 2, coarse grained, soil, residential Concentrations in µg/g

Approximate Extent of Dark Fill

Thickness of Dark Fill

Site Boundary

Test Pit Location (WESA)

Borehole Location (Stantec)

Monitoring Well Location (Stantec)

Test Pit Location (approximate) (Stantec)

Borehole Location (WESA)

Monitoring Well Location (WESA)

Building

B10506 SP Aug 2014.dwg

mbombini

Stamp

Ontario Ministry of the Environment - Record of Site Condition ... 214687.pdfPhase I Environmental...

Documents

Transcript of Ontario Ministry of the Environment - Record of Site Condition ... 214687.pdfPhase I Environmental...