Online symposium

38
Selecting for Quality

description

CLRN presentation for the online learning symposium.

Transcript of Online symposium

Page 1: Online symposium

Selecting for Quality

Page 2: Online symposium

California Learning Resource Network

Your one-stop source for standards-aligned electronic

learning resources

Page 3: Online symposium

Electronic Learning Resources

Software, Internet, video, & online courses

Six subject areas

2600 posted reviews

250/yearly

Page 4: Online symposium

FreeWeb Information Links

• Reviews of 5,200 free and commercial-free web sites

• Primary, secondary, & reference materials

• Free software and web tools

• iPad & Android Apps

Page 5: Online symposium

Electronic Learning Assessment Resources

Data assessment and warehouses (39)

Page 6: Online symposium

Online Course Reviews

Page 7: Online symposium

Not everything you read on the Internet is

true.

Or why all educational resources should be vetted.

Page 8: Online symposium

Virginia Textbook Scandal

Our Virginia: Past and Present4th grade history text

Black soldiers fought for the South6K died at the Battle of Bull Run

Actually, 22K

Hundreds of factual errorsVirginia’s review committee did not

include any trained historians

Page 9: Online symposium

Online Course Quality

Content standard/Common Core alignment

Are they approved by the:NCAACollege Board

UC a-g requirements

Page 10: Online symposium

Self- Reviewing Resources

Just like you do now for high school textbooks.

Page 11: Online symposium

CCSESA TTSC Survey

Online Credit Recovery Programs

August 2010

Page 12: Online symposium

Survey Class

71 agencies

45 districts

20 county offices

Page 13: Online symposium

Describe the Selection Process

Vendor demonstrations

Committee review

Open bid to vendors

UC approved

Cost

Page 14: Online symposium

Standards for Online Courses

Southern Regional Education Board

iNACOL

Texas Virtual School Network

California Learning Resource Network

Page 15: Online symposium

California Online Course Reviews

•Search for standards

•CA stakeholder group selects and updates iNACOL’s standards

•Collaboration with TxVSN & iNACOL

•iNACOL national stakeholder group

•iNACOL published, October 2012

Page 16: Online symposium

iNACOL/TxVSN/CLRN Online Course Standards

Content

Instructional Design

Student Assessment

Technology

Course Evaluation and Support

Page 17: Online symposium

Content

Content depth and breadthInformation literacy skillsLearning resources and materialsCommunication process between teachers, parents, and students

Content accuracy and bias

Page 18: Online symposium

Instructional Design

Course design and organization Meaningful and authentic learning experiences

Multiple learning paths for students to master the content

Higher-order thinking skillsInstructor-student and student-student interactions; and supplemental tools and resources.

Page 19: Online symposium

Student Assessment

Alignment between the course goals and activities and its assessment strategies

Insure that there are adequate and appropriate methods to assess students

Assure that students are constantly aware of their progress.

Page 20: Online symposium

Technology

Course architecture

User interface

Accessibility

Interoperability

Page 21: Online symposium

Course Evaluation and Support

Evaluating course effectiveness

Accreditation

Teacher and Student preparation and support

Page 22: Online symposium

CLRN Online Course Reviews

HS ELA & Math courses

Common Core and the original recipe standards.

National standards for online courses

Expanding to HSS, Science, & VPA during spring, 2012

Page 23: Online symposium

CLRN Home Page

Page 24: Online symposium

CLRN Home 2

Page 25: Online symposium

OCR Browse All

Page 26: Online symposium

Math Browse

Page 27: Online symposium

ELA Browse

Page 28: Online symposium

Individual Course Review

Page 29: Online symposium

Feedback Questions: Educator

To what extent does the online course need to be supplemented with face-to-face instruction and student support?

To what extent was ongoing and periodic student performance assessment accessible online for you to monitor student progress?

Please list the major strengths or specific improvements needed.

Page 30: Online symposium

User Feedback: Complete Results

Page 31: Online symposium

Feedback Questions: Student

Page 32: Online symposium

Feedback: Students

Course procedures were clearly posted.

Necessary information and materials were received on time.

Instructions were clear for all materials and course activities.

Assignment and test grades were provided in a timely manner.

Instructor feedback was timely and frequent.

Students are offered an orientation

Page 33: Online symposium

Feedback: Students

Course was well organized. Activities supported course goals. Course provided opportunities for students to

learn from each other. There were frequent tests and quizzes that

reflected course content. Discussion groups were generally well

organized. Course is appropriate for an online environment.

Page 34: Online symposium

User Feedback: Complete Results

Page 35: Online symposium

Individual Course: Online

Standards Display

Page 36: Online symposium

Standards Display 2

Page 37: Online symposium

Has CLRN reviewed your

courses?

Page 38: Online symposium

December 7th and 8th, 2012

Hilton Orange County/Costa Mesa

http://elearns.org@elearns