Understanding consumer behaviour and industry

challenges to sell food groceries through e-commerce

By

Omair Nayyar 20120119041

PGDM(C)

In partial fulfillment of requirements of the Post Graduate Diploma in Management-

Communications

Dissertation Guide Prof. Kallol Das

February, 2014

Copyright 2014 by Omair B. Nayyar and Mudra Institute of Communications, Ahmedabad (MICA)

2

Acknowledgement

I would like to thank my guide, Prof. Kallol Das for his immense support and

guidance, which aided me in completing this study. His enthusiasm and interest was a source

of motivation and inspiration for me and I am deeply indebted to him for his valuable insights

and inputs. I would also like to thank Dr. Shailesh Yagnik, whose efforts have enabled me

and my colleagues to access any literature from around the world. The way you have

organised the KEIC at MICA continues to inspire us students everyday. Heartfelt gratitude to

all the respondents for their valuable time and inputs and without whom this study would be

complete. This acknowledgement is incomplete if I fail to thank my parents and my sister for

their unconditional love and support all these years. To my mother, for inculcating in me the

love for words and to my father, for teaching me that there is nothing that cannot be

accomplished through grit and determination.

3

Table of Contents Abstract .............................................................................................................................................. 4 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 5 Literature Review ........................................................................................................................... 7

Internet usage ........................................................................................................................................... 8 Food retail and shopping behaviour in India ................................................................................. 9 Consumer behaviour and e-commerce ........................................................................................... 12 F&B and e-commerce ............................................................................................................................ 15

Research Objectives .................................................................................................................... 17 Business Problem .................................................................................................................................. 17 Research Problem .................................................................................................................................. 18

Research Methodology and Design ........................................................................................ 18 Stage 1 Secondary Research ............................................................................................................ 19 Stage 2 - Primary Research ................................................................................................................. 19

Limitations of Research ............................................................................................................. 21 Findings and Analysis ................................................................................................................. 21

Consumer Behaviour ............................................................................................................................ 21 Un-organised food retail industry .................................................................................................... 27 Existing e-commerce stores selling F&B products online ........................................................ 28 Problems faced by online food grocery stores ......................................................................................... 29 Business Models of existing e-commerce store ....................................................................................... 31 Sources of revenue for e-commerce players ............................................................................................. 34 Large F&B players in India .................................................................................................................. 35

Conclusions .................................................................................................................................... 36 Bibliography .................................................................................................................................. 38 Appendix ......................................................................................................................................... 41

4

Abstract Today, more and more people are shopping for various products online. Even in India, in-

spite of the relatively low penetration of the Internet, consumers are increasingly visiting e-

commerce sites such Flipkart, Myntra, eBay and many others regularly. For certain categories

like books, electronics or movie tickets, online sales make up a substantial part of total sales

in India. Over the past few years, there has been an increasing trend around the world, and in

India, to shop for food groceries online as well. Factors such as convenience, time-saving,

low prices, door-to-door deliveries have helped customer move online for more and more

food grocery purchases. This study aims at understanding consumer behavior when it comes

to shopping for food groceries offline and online. The study also looks at the different

business models and revenue streams for food grocery e-commerce websites in India and

abroad. For a large Food and Beverage company in India, it looks at whether it makes sense

for them to enter the online grocery business and what are the challenges and opportunities in

the segment for any player.

5

Introduction In India, the Internet arrived in August 1995 in 6 cities, Mumbai, Delhi, Kolkata,

Chennai, Pune and Bangalore (The Indian Technonomist, 1995). By the end of 1998 there

were more than 1 million Internet users in India. This was further assisted by the huge

increase in sales of personal computers and opening of cyber-cafes across the country

(McKinsey&Company, 2012). In 1996 and 1997, several B2C and B2C businesses such as

online matrimony portals and job portals started moving online (Ernst & Young, 2012).

Companies such as Naukri.com and Shaadi.com were the founding members of Indias e-

commerce fraternity. 1997 also saw ICICI Bank launch the first ever Online Banking

facility and paved the way for online transactions. It was in the same year, which saw the

emergence of the poster boy of Indian Internet, Sabeer Bhatia with the launch of

Hotmail.com.

Today, there are between 150 to 200 Million Internet users in the country, depending on

which report one reads and the e-commerce industry is growing with leaps and bounds.

According to a report by the Internet and Mobile Association of India (IAMAI) and IMRB

International, by June 2014, India will have 243 Million Internet users and will have replaced

the United States as the country with the second highest number of users in the world. China

leads with over 300 Million Internet users today (Your Story, 2013). In 2012, e-commerce

earnings stood at a whopping $14 Billion (Hindustan Times, 2012), right from books and

apparel to movie tickets and pizzas, for more and more purchases, the Indian consumer has

moved online. In 2012, Indias Internet contribution was 1.6% of the GDP, which is expected

to grow to between 2.8 to 3%. According to an interview by Sandeep Komaravelly, Vice

President, Snapdeal, Internet penetration and the availability of more payment options, has

boosted the industry. Companies such as Flipkart continue to secure large investments and

the entry of Amazon in India last year has further enhanced the industry. A large number of

factors such as increase in annual disposable income, penetration of Internet, rise in the sales

of PCs, tablets and smartphones and increase in the number of payment options will continue

to enable the e-commerce business to grow in India.

Inspite of the large number of businesses moving online or atleast having an online presence,

one industry that has so to say failed to catch the bus is the Food & Beverage (F&B) industry.

There has not really been any one from the F&B industry, who has cracked a model for

6

selling food groceries online, neither the retailers nor the manufacturers. The industry

constitutes about 70% of the total $470 Million retail market in India. Although only 5-8

percent of the market is organised, the organised retail segment is growing at 3 times the rate

of unorganized retail in India. According to Mr. Raghav Gupta, Principal, Booz and Co.,

organized food retail is expected to grow over 4 times through stores, super-markets and

hyper-markets till 2018 (Poornima & Ashok, 2013). Online food grocery shopping has

already picked up in many developed markets already, in the UK 5% of the total grocery

shopping is through online channels, in France it is 3% and 4% in South Korea. The growth

rates of online shopping are between 20-50% in developed markets and should double in

many other markets by 2016 (BCG, 2013).

The F&B segment which, commands a lion share of around 20% (Ernst & Young, 2012) in

the organised retail industry has failed to find a substantial national level model in India

specially. According to a research carried out by BCG in eight different countries the global

online grocery market is expected to reach USD 100 Billion by 2018. The research goes on to

suggest that out of this 100 Billion, 8 Billion will come from nascent markets and 27 Billion

will come from developing markets. Evolved market will account for 65 Billion of the share

(BCG, 2013). While certain websites such as Flipkart.com have already begun selling

personal care products online, none of the leading Indian e-commerce portals apart from

Infibeam recently has forayed into food groceries. While there are around 15-20 companies

in the country such as bigbasket.com, aaramshop.com which sell food groceries online, most

of these are limited to fixed geographies such as Delhi or Bangalore and do not have a

national presence. In 2001, HUL launched a direct-to-home venture called Sangam wherein

they sold grocery and household products directly to the consumer. The products ranged from

brands of HUL to even other brands like Godrej. Customers could place orders through the

telephone or online and the groceries would be delivered to their homes. By 2007, HUL

exited the venture by selling the 100 Crore business to Wadhawan Retail which run the

Spinach stores in Mumbai. One of the major reasons for HUL selling off the business was the

costs involved in the last mile delivery and this is a problem plaguing many players in this

space. Margins in groceries have always low compared to other categories (15%) and costs of

manpower transportation, logistics etc. make it difficult for any player. (Vaid, 2007).

Not just in India, but even in the developed world companies have found it difficult to sustain

an online grocery delivery model. In the United States, Webvan was one of the darlings of

7

the Internet during the late 1990s. The company was an online credit and delivery store that

delivered to customer homes in 30-minute windows of the customers choice. In 2001, the

company however went bankrupt with an accumulated deficit of US$ 830 Million. Just a year

and a half after raising Millions of dollars through an IPO, aggressive expansion, a complex

website and most importantly lack of enough customers led to the companys downfall

(Glasner, 2001). In 2008, Webvan was named the largest dot-com flop in history (CNET,

2008). What has changed now that venture capitalists are again putting funds in food grocery

e-commerce stores? ZopNow received its first round of funding in 2012 from Accel and

Qualcomm and BCCL. Bigbasket too raised a funding of US$ 10 Million from Ascent

Capital in 2012 (Gulati, 2012).

The aim of this research will be to try and understand consumer behaviour while

shopping for food groceries online. The research will also aim at looking at whether it makes

sense for an F&B major to enter this space. Recently, HUL again announced that it is looking

at the prospects of e-commerce for sales of its products (Agarwal, 2013). Coca-Cola has also

recently launched the sale of its products online (Coke2home.com, 2013). Although this is

only limited to the city of Ahmedabad, such actions by F&B giants shows the opportunity in

the industry and the need is to find the right business model to approach and enter the grocery

e-commerce segment. The aim of the research is to find out what strategies need to be

adopted by F&B businesses to match the growth rates of around 20% (McKinsey&Company,

2012) established by online travel or consumer electronics and understanding what are the

areas of difficulty faced by manufacturers and retailers. A lot of factors such as thin margins,

supply-chain management, storage etc. continue to challenge e-grocery stores and the

research will aim to see how successful businesses are tackling these issues. Outside of India,

Amazon has successfully managed to increase their portfolio to include groceries and it will

need to be seen the model can be replicated in a country like India.

Literature Review

While there is no shortage of research papers on the Internet and e-commerce industry

in India, there seems to be lack of substantial research on the online F&B segment in the

Indian context. The following section will look at the literature available on the following

8

topics, Internet usage in India, consumer behaviour with respect to food shopping, online

shopping and F&B in e-commerce.

Internet usage

India has a base of over 120 Million Internet users, which is expected to treble by

2015 and will account for approximately 12% of the world Internet usage

(McKinsey&Company, 2012). The rate of growth of Internet users in the country has been a

lot quicker than many other developing countries such as Malaysia and South Africa. For

example in Malaysia, the number of Internet users grew by 1.8 times between 2005 and 2011

and even South Africa had a growth rate of 1.9 times, while in India in the same period, the

number of Internet users grew by more than 5 times. The numbers are varied and according

to certain sections, the number of Internet users has already touched 200 Million in 2013

(The Economic Times, 2013). In India, Internet users spend between 20-25 hours online per

month. (Abhimanyu Mishra, 2012). This is roughly the same amount of time spent by the

people of Latin America and our other counterpart nations. However, this contributes to only

a quarter of the time spent online in countries such as Malaysia or China. (Machado, 2005)

and (Sanjay Jain & Manika Jain, 2011). (Lohse et all, 1999) showed that online purchasing

habits are directly related to hours spent on the internet. The more time a person spends on

the Internet, the more chances of him and her shopping online. According to (Brendan

Hannah & Kristina M. Lybecker , 2010) as time increases the amount spent online also

increases and the time competes with other forms of online entertainment and social

networking. Studies have also shown that in developing countries like India, Egypt, Mexico

and other women are 25% less likely than men to be online (Intel, 2013) India like other

developing technologies has also undergone technology leapfrogging wherein there is a

large population, which has skipped accessing the Internet via desktops, and are now logging

in from their cell phones and other mobile devices like Tablets, Phablets etc. According to a

report by IAMAI, by the June 2014, that estimated number of mobile Internet users would

account for 60% of overall Internet users in the country (Forbes India, 2014). Rural Indians

make a substantial part of this population. The Internet in India has been able to define a clear

proposition for all stakeholders in rural India as well. These stakeholders include farmers,

Mandis, Panchayats, Sanchalaks and others. The Internet has been able to provide

information to the farmers and thus helped in growing of crops. It has also lead to the

9

organisation of the agricultural markets in rural India. Services like e-choupals have provided

a scientific method to old methods of farming (Basu and Banerjee, 2011)

Various studies have also been carried out to understand the reasons why people use the

Internet and what is the major source of gratification for users. According to a study carried

out in Hyderabad, India the gratifications for the use of Internet in India were user

friendliness, self-development, educational opportunities, convenience in communication,

enhancement of self-development, wide exposure and global exchange. Apart from these

Relaxation was one of the most dominant factor for user gratification of Internet use in

India. The study showed that the factors for motivation were the same across genders (Roy,

2007). Another study carried out in 2008 shows that most of the respondents used the Internet

for Work/Business. Respondents who were below 20 years of age used the Internet for

Entertainment; around 23% of urban respondents went online for communicating with

others (Kiran, Sharma & Mittal, 2008).

Food retail and shopping behaviour in India

The Indian food sector continues to be dominated by traditional outlets or Kirana stores.

These stores make up 98% of all sales in the category. Retail food sales were estimated at

USD 270 Billion, which was around 70% of the retail industry. Indians did not leave the

neighbourhood Kirana stores even with lots of modern retail outlets coming up. Modern

grocery stores accounted for only USD 5.4 Billion of the total pie (USDA Foreign

Agricultural Service, 2013). Research firm Frost & Sullivan mentioned the desire amongst

consumers to maintain a healthy lifestyle coupled with increase in awareness of ingredients

such as vitamins, minerals etc. as the reason for the increase in the fortunes of the foods and

beverage market.

Studies have shown that Indians purchase food items for both functional as well as hedonic

reasons. While the functional component was found to higher than the hedonic component

amongst food items, the purchase of food items is not always on the basis of rational factors

but is also dependent on emotional feelings (Gray, Gillpatrick, Marusic, Pantelic, &

Kuruvilla, 2010). Amongst various food categories, milk, sweet and savoury snacks and

processed poultry dominate the field. According to a report by CII and McKinsey, packaged

milk is expected to grow to USD 32.9 Billion by 2030 with an average growth rate of around

10

8%. Currently only 31% of the milk sold is branded, according to the report this number will

reach 73% by 2030. Similarly Sweets and savoury snacks will be the second largest category

at an estimated USD 16.39 Billion by 2030. The processed poultry products category is

expected to grow the fastest with growth rates of around 17% year-on-year and is expected to

be worth USD 8.34 Billion by 2030. The biscuits category is expected to reach over USD 13

Billion followed by Vegetables and Edible Oils at over USD 10 Billion by 2030 (CII and

McKinsey, 2013). According to Mr. Adil Zainulbhai, Chairman of McKinsey and Company

in India, branding will drive the next wave of growth in Indias food sector (Business Line,

2013). According to the report, the food consumption in India is expected to double by 20130

as standards of living improve in the country. The per capita consumption of food is expected

to grow by 3% annually from INR 9360 to INR 15, 390 in 2030 per annum.

Research has shown that one of the reasons Indians prefer Kirana stores is because of the

proximity to their homes. Around 90% of food purchases by Indians are made within a radius

of 1.5 Km from the customers home. (Goswami & Mishra, 2009) researched on the

differences between organised retailers and Kirana stores for customers. The study carried

out in two large and two small Indian cities showed that Kiranas was rated higher because of

travel distance but rated much lower for cleanliness, offers, quality and salespersons. The

Indian consumer is also very conscious of price, a study carried out by Tata Strategic

Management Group shows that manufacturers of packaged food need to drive down their

prices by around 40% to be able to be compared with home cooked food (K.C Mittal & Ella

Mittal, 2011). (Hemalatha et. all, 2009) categorized shoppers in the Indian retail context,

which has implications in the food retail space as well. According to their research shoppers

can be divided into three categories namely, (i) economic shoppers (ii) convenient shoppers

and (iii) elegant shoppers. (K.C Mittal & Ella Mittal, 2011) studied the impact of

demographics on the buying behaviour of food and groceries in the state of Punjab in India.

Their research showed that vegetables are the most frequently purchased items, while on the

other hand groceries were generally bought monthly. Monthly expenditure amongst the

respondents was highest for food groceries and was in the range of INR 500-1000. Younger

consumers bought vegetables more frequently than consumers who were of higher age. Older

consumers also preferred to travel lesser for groceries and fruits. A similar study carried out

in Navi Mumbai shows slightly contrasting results, according to the study 29% of the

respondents purchased fruits once a month, 27% purchased fruits once a week, 19.5% percent

bought it two to three times a week. 18.3 % bought fruits once in two weeks while only 9%

11

bought fruits daily. In the vegetable category as well, only 7.8% respondents said they bought

vegetables on a daily basis (Aggrawal, Manjrekar, & Aggrawal, 2011). 90% of respondents

of the same study said that merchandise display and quality, convenience of hours and

payment options were the most important retail characteristics. The number of people who

thought the clientele of a store are important were at 42%.

Another research carried out to study the diversity in retail purchase behaviour for food

categories showed that irrespective of location people preferred to purchase from nearby

grocery stores. The study also showed that apart from proximity, price is the most important

aspect for shoppers of food groceries. Perception and preference for Product Assortment,

Ambience, Communication and Service was different across different geographies (Mittal &

Prashar, 2010). (Ali, Kapoor and Moorthy) studied consumer preferences in Lucknow, Uttar

Pradesh and propounded that customers prefer cleanliness and freshness of food products

most. This was followed by costs, quality, variety, packaging and availability in non-season.

The research showed that the customers preference for a store depended on the convenience

while purchasing, additional services, children entertainment facilities, other amenities and

affordability. (Bishnoi, Bharti, & Gupta, 2009) postulated that based on psychographics,

shoppers in the National Capital Region (NCR) can be divided into nine different groups. The

first dimension of shoppers is those who show impulsiveness and price consciousness. They

purchase other brands if their preferred brand is not available and purchase items on impulse.

The second group consists of those people who are utility and variety seekers. The other

dimensions were those who were loyal to a particular store, consumers who loved spending

time while shopping, status conscious shoppers, opinion seekers, those who value quality of

the products over anything else, shoppers who enjoy the shopping experience as a form of

entertainment. Income of the respondent had a significant association with this dimension.

This study is validated by another similar study carried in Uttar Pradesh and NCR which

showed that all food purchase decisions can be put under the following factors (i) Store

Quality (ii) Marketing Mix (iii) Taste-flavour (iv) New offerings (v) Basic value and (vi)

Food safety (Gupta, 2009). The research also asked respondents what they felt about the

improvement in food quality related parameters. Maximum number of respondents didn't

have a great opinion on the improvement. The study mentioned how the rating for

Reasonableness of food prices with respect to quality had a mean of 2.92 on a maximum

rating of 5. As part of the same research, in order to find out what the perception was with

12

respect to food confidence, customers were asked to rate different food categories. Fresh

Fruits and Vegetables were assumed to be the safest (with a rating of 4.65) followed by Fish

Products and Eggs. Meat products had a rating of 2.90 while the lowest rating was for food

from fast food outlets and restaurants. The people were also asked about what changes had

occurred in their food purchase behaviour. The respondents strongly felt that they look at a

more options, which are now available for food items. In a family both the husband and wife

took decisions with respect to purchase (3.79) and even children had a huge amount of pester

power (3.47). The respondents preferred going to a place where the product displays are

better (3.39) and generally wanted to do all their shopping from one place (3.59). The role of

advertising in food purchase is still debatable as people disagreed to the statement that

advertisements play a role in their purchase (2.6).

Consumer behaviour and e-commerce While India does have a large Internet user population, according to a study by

ComScore only 9% of the users carried out e-commerce transactions. The most occurrence of

online shopping is found in South Korea (99%) followed by UK (97%), Germany (97%),

Japan (97%) and US (94%) (Kiran, Sharma & Mittal, 2008). Also, according to the same

study the largest growing category in online shopping was apparel followed by comparison

shopping. In India the size of the B2C e-commerce was USD13 Billion, which was just a

small percentage of the USD 400 Billion that was transacted in the US in 2013 (Khanna,

2013). However, inspite of the small current numbers the future of e-commerce in the

country has a bright outlook. Studies have shown that the more time a person spends on the

Internet the more chances of him or her purchasing something from the Internet. Research

suggests that heavy Internet usage show more intent to purchase for goods online (Citrin et

all, 2009).

According to a recent study by Nielsen, reveals that half of the countrys online respondents

have expressed a desire to purchase a mobile phone and accessories via a device such as a

computer, laptop or phone. Around 25% expressed intent to purchase foods and beverages

via a device supporting Internet (Terron, 2012). According to the same research more than

44% of online consumers spend between 10-25% of their time online looking at the various

prices and researching on products. Over 53% of Indian consumers spend time online in the

search for deals by even brick and mortar retailers while 46% research on online products.

For certain categories such as personal care the intention of purchasing among Indian

13

customers has risen to 21% on 2012 from 14% in 2010. This increase in intent has also

shifted to a lot more categories such as movie and theatre tickets, apparel and e-books.

Around one-fourth of online shoppers in India purchase clothing and accessories online while

a slightly higher number purchase and download e-books and digital magazines. Sanjay Jain

& Manika Jain (2011) have propounded that education, gender, recreational shopping

orientation and income are four variables that have impacted a consumers decision to shop

online. Education and income were found to be directly proportional to online shopping, i.e

the higher the education and income of an individual the more likely they were to shop

online. Amongst males and females it was found that more males have bought a product or

service online as compared to women. This is further reiterated by a study in the UK, which

showed that males had a greater bandwidth for Internet use than women. The study

propounded that gender differences on the use of Internet are a reflection of gender

differences in society (Richard Joiner, 2012). Wolfinbarger & Gilly (2001) carried out

research that showed that online shopping behaviour is more goal oriented than experiential

as is possible with a brick and mortar market where the consumer can be motivated by the

experience of the hunt. The goal-oriented shopper would place a lot of importance on

parameters such as convenience, information availability and lack of sociability. Cho & Jialin

(2008) researched on the role played by trust and efficacy on the online consumer in

Singapore and their results showed that women were less trustworthy for online shopping

sites.

Sanjay Jain & Manika Jain (2011) also showed that customers who view shopping as a

recreational activity preferred shopping in brick and mortar stores as compared to online

shopping. The three aspects that were positively related to online shopping and were

successful predictor variables were past online shopping satisfaction, past online frequency

and education. This shows that once a customer makes his first online purchase, it is not too

difficult to retain him or her assuming they had a good experience. The same holds true for

education, the more educated a person is the more chances of him or her shopping online in

the future. An analysis by Kiran Sharma & Mittal (2008) showed that four factors influenced

online shopping. The four factors were (i) Product information and reliability (ii) Website

design and nature factor (iii) Influence of Internet shopping and (iv) Future of E-shopping.

Another research paper published in 2008 discussed the factors influencing online shopping

in India. According to the paper the reasons for shopping online in India is the same as it is

worldwide. The factors listed by the paper were (i) Convenience (ii) Accessibility (iii) Scope

14

(iv) Attraction (v) Reliability (vi) Experience and (vii) Clarity (Rishi, 2008). These seven

factors explained 62% of the total variance. The research also showed that the Lack of

Tangibility was one of the main reasons for people not shopping online, another factor for

lack of penetration was the fact that online shopping did not provide customers with enough

variety. Another research by (PWC, 2013) does a comparison of online consumer behaviour

between India and China. According to the study, Chinese customers are more willing to

purchase products as compared to their Indian counterparts. Demographically, the online

shoppers are the youngest in the world and more affluent that counterparts from other

countries. (Booz&Co) Identified Online shopping as one of the game changers in the Retail

space in India and in their report highlighted cases of how retail can use strategy

development, commercial management, operations and support functions to leverage

ecommerce for its consumer base. Khare, Khare & Singh (2012) carried out a study in the

NCR region and showed that a consumers attitude towards online shopping depends on their

perception on how useful a particular e-commerce store is. It contributed to 36.8% of a

consumers attitude towards online shopping being enjoyable. The three attitudes discussed

in the study were (i) Perceived Usefulness (ii) Ease of Use and (iii) Perceived Risk. (Mishra

& Mathew, 2013) studied the perceived risks of internet use and respondents showed that risk

perception amongst all 8 parameters. The highest risk was associated with the fact that the

online product will be delivered damaged (mean = 6.70, maximum risk =7), followed by the

fear that the product will not match the online description (mean=6.67), followed by fear that

ones credit card information will be stolen and be used by someone else (6.58), non-timely

delivery (6.51), lack of trust of online retailers (6.49), lack of confidentiality of personal data

shared online (6.38). The research also asked respondents to rank how important the various

attributes of an online e-commerce website are. The following were the results in order of

rank (i) Quality of Information (ii) Range of products available (iii) After sales service (iv)

Design of the website (v) Atmosphere of Website (vi) Recommendation from relatives (vii)

Recommendation by friends and finally (viii) Fun. (Magesh, 2011) studied the preferences

towards online shopping with an emphasis on the city of Chennai. The results showed that

54.70% of respondents were in an undecided state whether or not to recommend online

shopping to others while 41% of online shoppers would recommend online shopping. More

than 90% of the online shoppers said that e-commerce provides helpful shopping

information. 66% of the respondents said that it wasnt easy how to learn shopping online

and 66.70% said that shopping for products online fits well with the lifestyle and shopping

needs.

15

A research carried out in Bangalore, India mapped different demographics (age, gender,

occupation and income) of online shoppers in consuming different categories of services

online. The three categories of services were defined as High involvement, Medium

involvement and Low involvement. High involvement online services included those such as

purchase of jewellery, house loans, investments etc. Medium services included transactions

such as domestic holiday packages, hotel bookings and others while low involvement

services consisted of purchase of cinema tickets, restaurant reservations. The research

showed that age had a significant impact on the consumption of all three kinds of services,

which shows the role of youngsters in e-commerce. It also showed that Gender had a

negative relationship for consuming any kind of service online while Occupation had a

positive relationship in the consumption of the medium involvement services. Income also

had a negative relationship for consumption of high and low involvement services but a

positive relationship for the consumption of medium level services (Sakkthivel, 2006).

F&B and e-commerce

While there is not too much primary research that has happened in the F&B e-

commerce sector in India, a large number of such studies can be found for international

markets. According to research agency Nielsen, global consumers intent to buy food and

beverages online had increased 44% in the two years leading upto 2012. Over a quarter of

them were planning to purchase F&B products online in the next three to six months of the

time the survey was taken (Clavis Study, 2012).

(Devi, 2008) discusses the entry of Amazon in the E-Grocery market in 2006 and tries to

look at the challenges faced by the organisation. (Belkud, 2013) talks about developing an e-

commerce strategy for Indians living in Finland based on their shopping habits and the

requirements of the customers and tries to decode internet grocery shopping behaviour in

Finland. (Robinson, 2007) shows how situational variables such as life events (having a baby,

caring for elderly patients) have become a trigger for starting online grocery shopping

because of the convenience of the mode. The research also shows that once a situational

variable ceases, customers fall back to their old shopping habits. In the case of offline

shopping, this appears to be easy because customers never completely stop shopping in

traditional stores. According to the Clavis eCommerce Insight Study which was designed

16

to look at food e-commerce websites in the UK on some basic as well as nutritional

attributes, 67% of the products that were listed on these websites were missing information

such as name of the brand, nutrition etc. Almost a quarter of the product pages did not have a

proper description and misspelling and misrepresentation of brands was a common

occurrence.

Amongst the Indian research, according to (Terron, 2012) over 50% of online

shoppers have begun comparing prices for grocery items on internet enabled devices, while

41% of shoppers have bought a product online in the last 30 days. (Malik, 2012) carried out

research on the shoppers from food e-commerce stores and found that 69% of the shoppers

are male which is inline with other studies regarding gender and Internet. Also, people

between the age group of 18-24 made up 24% of the total buyers. In terms of value of

shopping bag, men averaged INR 580 while women averaged INR 552. Women were ahead

of men in terms of the number of branded products bagged across all ages. With respect to

the number of the products according to the same study, the number was highest for 36 years

and above females who had an average of more than 7.5 products per shopping bag. With

respect to the timing of the shopping, most buying by Indian consumers in food e-commerce

stores happens on Monday (16.77%), closely followed by Sunday (16.57%), and Saturday

(14.99%).

The factors that have contributed the most to online grocery shopping are the increase in

prices of F&B products, health aspects, and increase in transportation costs. (Heejin Lim et

all, 2004) believe that the percentage of grocery shopping that is conducted over the internet,

shall remain small because of the challenge e-grocers face in developing strategies that

respond to the most important areas of customers, a sign of quality of the firm, a feeling of

product quality, range of products offered and customer service. A report on the online

grocery market in India by Nextbigwhat.com highlights the different reasons that online

customers in India shop or do not shop for groceries online. The main reasons why they shop

online are to avoid crowds and people (38%), convenience (35%), special deals (32%), fuel

savings (30%) and time saved (27%). The reasons people hesitated from buying groceries

online were shipping costs (65%), time spent in waiting for the delivery to arrive (40%),

security and privacy (38%), lack of touch and feel (20%). The article also talks about the

challenges faced by online companies such as ZopNow, Aaramshop, MyGrahak.com and

others. Issues such as maintaining a solid supply chain management and building a loyal

17

customer base are some of the challenges that are preventing them from scaling up to a

national presence.

According to (BCG, 2013), there are various strategies that food e-commerce players need to

adopt in order to be successful in this growing space. Amongst the eight countries surveyed

by BCG as part of the study, consumers said they would use an online food grocery e-

commerce site at an average of 13.5 times a year. The most important customer segments

would be young families and affluent couples. Large retail players such as Tesco already

make a substantial part of their revenues from sales through online channels, in Tescos case

it was 8%. According to BCG, click-and-collect models are getting popular in many

countries, especially in places where the last mile delivery is a problem. The second largest

grocery store in the UK, Asda, is investing 700 in 2013 in offering a same day click and

collect service which will be a first in the country. The home delivery model is also expected

to grow as large players try new models. Google is already testing same day delivery of food

groceries in the US, Wal-Mart is also looking at a crowd sourced solution wherein customers

are given the task of delivering groceries to get discount cards.

Based on the literature review done, there is a need for a primary research in the food

ecommerce sector in India because of the dearth of such literature and this research aims to

fill that gap.

Research Objectives

The objective of this research will be to find out if there lies an opportunity in selling food

groceries online in India, and what are the consumer behaviour patterns associated with it.

The research will also look if it makes sense for an F&B major (HUL, ITC, Coca-Cola) to

enter the online grocery space in India.

On the basis of the above objectives, the following will be the business questions the

researcher aims to answer:

Business Problem

18

1. Can a successful and sustainable F&B ecommerce business be run in India in the long

run?

2. Does it make sense for an F&B major to enter the online grocery space?

3. Are customers comfortable purchasing food groceries through ecommerce channels?

Research Problem In order to arrive at solutions for the above, it is important to define the research approach,

which will be as follows:

1. Define and evaluate the business models and strategies employed by current grocery

e-commerce sites in India and abroad

2. Identify the opportunities and challenges in selling of grocery products online

3. Evaluate the business opportunity for an F&B major in selling the product category

through ecommerce

4. Analyse online purchasing habits of customers and their intent in purchasing food

groceries online

Based on the literature review done and preliminary studies, the researcher feels that

it is indeed possible to run a successful F&B e-commerce business in India and that a

business model exists for a national level strategy. Whether the hypothesis holds true will be

determined by the results of the research.

Research Methodology and Design It is important to define the research methodology and the timelines involved in

carrying out the said research. The research will be predominantly exploratory in nature to try

and identify best practices in the ecommerce sector, predominantly F&B. Before we move

onto the stages of research it is also important to define who the major stakeholders of the

research are. There are four major stakeholders that have been identified, these are:

1. Existing e-commerce stores selling F&B products online

2. Large F&B players in India

3. Un-organised food grocery retailers

19

4. Customers in Tier I and II cities

Stage 1 Secondary Research

Secondary research involved studying of available literature on Internet consumption, online

shopping behaviour, food grocery shopping habits and online grocery shopping habits

predominantly in an Indian context. The findings of the literature review have been listed out

in the Literature Review section above and an analysis of the findings is mentioned in the

analysis section of this dissertation. The secondary research was carried out by looking at

academic journals, periodicals, conference proceedings and reports published in the above

mentioned domains.

Stage 2 - Primary Research

Stage 2 involved primary research and was carried out for all the 4 stakeholders mentioned

above. This was done by means of a mixture of in-depth interviews, semi-structured

interviews and an online questionnaire. For each of the mentioned stakeholders the following

is the research methodology:

1. Existing e-commerce stores selling F&B products online

India is still a nascent market for companies selling food groceries online. There are currently

around 15-20 players in India who are involved in the selling food groceries online. While

most of them are involved in just selling food groceries, a few websites like Infibeam and

Homeshop18 also carry other categories. The following is a list of the 10 most prominent

online grocery stores in India:

1. Bigbasket.com

2. Naturesbasket

3. Yzury.com

4. Zopnow.com

5. Aaaramshop

6. Mangoshoppers.com

20

7. Farm2kitchen

8. Infibeam

9. MyGrahak.com

10. Homeshop18

On the basis of convenience sampling two of the above companies (Aaaramshop.com and

Mangoshoppers.com) were selected and in-depth interviews were carried out. Transcripts of

the in-depth interviews were taken and analyzed by means of Textual Analysis.

1. Large F&B players in India

Currently there are more than 100 major companies who are involved in the sale of food and

beverages in India. These companies operate across categories such as staple foods (oils,

sugar etc.), beverages (soft drinks, alcohol, juices, milk and milk products), snacks and

confectionary (biscuits, chips etc.) and many more. In order to carry out interviews, the top

10 food and beverage industries were identified on the basis of market cap and brand share.

The following were the list of 10 companies in no particular order:

1. Hindustan Unilever Ltd.

2. PepsiCo India

3. Dabur

4. Britannia Industries Ltd.

5. Nestle India

6. Coca-Cola India

7. GCMMF (Amul)

8. ITC Limited

9. Cadburys India

10. Parle Agro

On the basis of convenience sampling, two companies (HUL and ITC Ltd.) were identified

and in-depth interview was carried out with senior personnel from within these companies.

Transcripts of the in-depth interviews will be taken and these will be analyzed by means of

Textual Analysis. Using textual analysis, educated inferences and interpretations were drawn

from the interviews to reach a solution to the business problem.

21

2. Un-organised food grocery retailers

98% of all food grocery sales are made through un-organised retailers in India and hence it

becomes extremely important to understand consumer-shopping behaviour in Kiranas and

other unorganized retail stores. Interviews were carried out with three stores in the Bopal area

of Ahmedabad. Using textual analysis, educated inferences and interpretations will be drawn

from the interviews to reach a solution to the business problem.

3. Customers in Tier I and II towns of India

A study was carried out to understand consumer behaviour in grocery shopping and online

shopping in India. The study was done by means of an online questionnaire sent to 50

respondents in Tier I and Tier II towns of India. Rating scales were used for questionnaire

design and mean and standard deviation were the analysis tools used post data collection. The

questionnaire was divided into three sections, the first section dealt with capturing the

demographics of the respondent, the second section dealt with understand their online

shopping habits and the final section dealt with understanding their purchase habits with

respect to the food groceries categories.

Limitations of Research The study falls short of coming up with a recommended business model for a food grocery e-

commerce website. The research also does not look at how the brick and mortar retail

industry can leverage their distribution networks and come up with an e-commerce model for

selling goods online.

Findings and Analysis

Consumer Behaviour

In order to understand the success of an industry, it is extremely important to understand how

consumers behave in that industry. The behaviour patterns of consumers in the online food

grocery industry is related a lot to how Indians spent time on the Internet and how they shop

for food groceries and for products online. Using studies done earlier, we can identify a

22

pattern of behaviour for these parameters. We will further strengthen this by means of the

results of the online survey. Out of the 50 respondents, majority of the respondents were

between the age group 21-25 (48%) and 26-30 (30%). The gender ratio was slightly skewed

in favour of males (59%). With respect to educational qualification, more than 50% of the

respondents were post-graduates and 75% were working professionals. The studies have been

mentioned in the earlier section on Literature Review. The following are the findings from

these sources:

1. In India, the average time spent online is between 20-25 hours per month. While this

has grown over the past decade, it is important to note that it is still quarter of the way

behind time spent online in China and Malaysia, other developing economies.

Research has shown that the time spent online in a country is an indicator of how

open the people are to online shopping, the more time spent online the more chances

of him or her shopping online. The average times have increased over the past 10

years thus ensuring that the e-commerce industry is also on the rise in India.

2. India has still a long way to go with respect to the number of online transactions.

Research has shown that only 9% of consumers shop online. According to the survey

carried out, it was seen that 30% of the respondents shopped online atleast once a

month. The number of people who were shopping online more than once a week was

at 7%. The majority of the respondents had shopped online once a month or lesser

(45%), which validates the fact that Indians have a lot of catching up to do with

respect to online transactions.

3. Amongst those who shopped online 19% of the Males said they shop online once a

week or more whereas there wasnt any Female respondent who shopped online

atleast once a week. This shows that if we consider gender, males are more open to

shopping online. This is also validated by various studies such as (Sanjay Jain &

Manika Jain, 2011) which found that males are more likely to shop online when

compared to women. Another study in the UK also found that males showed a greater

brand-width for the Internet as compared to women.

4. (Sakkthivel, 2006) showed that age has a role to play in online shopping with more

youngsters being open to online transactions. On the basis of the survey carried out it

23

was seen that amongst respondents who were between the age group of 21-25, 39%

shopped online more than once a month whereas amongst consumers that were of a

higher age group i.e between 26-30, only 13% of respondents shopped online.

Amongst respondents who were above the age of 30, there were no instances of them

having shopped online more than once a month.

5. The respondents were asked what asked what were the factors or attributes they

looked for while choosing an e-commerce site. The most important factor was low

prices, mean value 2.76 (most important = 1), followed by larger selection of brands

(mean value 2.90). The third most important factor was quick delivery times (mean

value 2.95). This is very similar to the results of a research carried out which shows

that the most important aspects of an e-commerce website are Quality of Information

(ii) Range of products available (iii) After sales service etc. This shows that in-order

for a online food grocery store to be successful, they need to (i) provide low prices (ii)

larger selection of products and (iii) quick delivery times.

Importance of attributes while choosing an e-commerce website

6. The Indian online shopper is most open to purchasing mobile phones and accessories

(50%) online according to research by Nielsen. Other categories include

Entertainment tickets (38%), books (36%), tickets for travelling (35%), digital

cameras and MP3 players (33%), apparel and accessories (25%). 25% of the

respondents of the study by Nielsen said they would be open to purchasing food and

3.24 3.1 3.05 2.29 2.19

1.14 Low Prices Larger selection of brands Quick delivery times Easy to use website Good customer support Multiple payment options

24

beverages online. The same results can be drawn from the online survey carried out.

Majority of the people (90%) said that in the past they have shopped for books, movie

tickets and train tickets online. Electronic items came next with 62% of the people

saying that they shopped for electronic devices in the past. Only 14% of the

respondents said they had shopped for food groceries online according to the primary

research carried out. This shows that food groceries as a category has low penetration

even amongst online shoppers in India. It was the lowest amongst all 10 categories

mentioned.

7. With respect to shopping for food groceries offline, 59% of the respondents said that

they shopped for different food categories from different stores. Categories like daily

essentials (eggs, bread etc.) and fruits and vegetables were mostly bought from nearby

Kirana stores and roadside vendors. The importance of Kirana stores is well

documented even in literature with most reports pegging the un-organised retail

industry at 98% of the total pie (USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, 2013). Staple

items like rice, flour, sugar etc. which, are required in bulk were mostly bought from

supermarkets which offer discounts. For any category of food item the maximum

percentage of respondents purchasing through online grocery stores was 9%.

8. Various studies conducted in India have shown that while choosing a store some of

the things consumers look for are (i) Convenience (ii) Store Quality (iii) Basic Value

or Prices (iv) Marketing Mix and (vi) Food Safety (Gupta, 2009). According to the

research carried out as part of this dissertation, travel time to store (mean value 1.73,

most important = 1) was the most important feature. This was followed by Prices

(2.36), and number of brands/categories (3.23). This validates available literature on

62% 29%

90% 90%

14% 29% 14%

90% 38%

14%

25

the topic. Also, it is important to note that since most of the respondents were under

30 years, convenience (time taken to travel to store) as well as prices were important

to them.

9. In India, 25% of Internet users are open to purchasing food groceries online (Basu and

Banerjee, 2011). According to primary research carried out, only 14% of the

respondents said that they had shopped for groceries online before. Studies show that

the main reasons people shop online for food are (i) in-order to avoid crowds (38%),

convenience (35%), special deals (32%), fuel savings (30%) and time saved (27%)

(Nextbigwhat.com, 2013). The reasons people didn't shop online were shipping costs

(65%), time spent in waiting for the delivery to arrive (40%), security and privacy

(38%), lack of touch and feel (20%). This is also validated by the primary research,

which asked customers what were the main reasons for them not adopting online

groceries. Lack of awareness was the most often repeated reason with 50% saying

that werent aware of any website that delivers food groceries online. The next reason

was trust, with 45% of the respondents they didn't trust any current player. 23% of the

respondents said that the prices were higher than their current stores. 18% said the

lack of flexible was the major concern and hence they didn't shop for food groceries

online.

26

Reasons for not shopping online for food groceries (Nextbigwhat.com, 2012)

Mr. Ashutosh Malik (COO, Aaaramshop.com) who was interviewed as part of

primary research said that just like people were slow to adopt phones for placing

orders with their local kirana stores, the adoption rates will be slow, however he sees

that the food e-commerce service offers enough of a need gap to customers for them

to adopt it. Some of the factors he listed out were Convenience and Pricing that

will ensure people will go online. He also mentioned that it is possible for all three

kinds of purchases to occur simultaneously and consumers will not leave one for the

other, (i) shopping physically at brick and mortar stores (ii) ordering on the phone

through the nearest kirana store and (iii) shopping online. According to Mr. Anmol

Aggarwal from Mangoshoppers.com, an upcoming online food grocery website based

in the NCR region, people use online groceries maximum for monthly groceries. This

is because of the discounts and the fact that they don't mind if the delivery happens

later in the day or the next day. According to him, For instantly required food items

consumers will continue to visit the local stores.

10. According to (Malik, 2012) the top 5 brands that were being bought by volume online

were (i) Amul (ii) Ashirwaad (iii) Maggi (iv) Treat and (v) Haldiram. The top 5

brands that were being bought by value were (i) Aashirwaad (ii) Saffola (iii) Pampers

(iv) Amul (v) Everyday. Amongst categories the highest categories that were bought

65% 40% 38% 32% 31% 22% 20% 18% 15%

27

by value were (i) Rice, Aata, Daals and Lentils (16.81%) followed by (ii) Edible Oils

(13.70%) and (iii) Coffee, Tea and Cocoa (9.69%). The paths to purchase for

different categories was also studied for various categories, 49.42% of the people who

bought Biscuits and Cookies also bought Snacks. Similarly 36.32% of the people who

shopped online for Rice, Lentils and Daals also bought Laundry supplies

Food categories bought online (Malik, 2012)

Un-organised food retail industry

The Kirana shops and other un-organised retail stores that sell food groceries are an

important stakeholder to understand consumer behaviour as these make 98% of the food

retail industry. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with Kirana stores in the Bopal

area of Ahmedabad, and the following were the salient features that emerged post textual

analysis of the transcripts/notes of the interviews:

1. Customers havent forgotten local kirana Stores

The proprietors of Kirana stores felt that inspite of many modern retail chains being

opened their sales havent really taken a hit. Even in the Bopal region new stores such

as Reliance Fresh, D-Mart have opened up in the near past, however according to the

shopkeepers, they still have a loyal customer base who keep visiting their store.

Rice, Atta, Lentils & Dals 17% Edible oils 14%

Coffee, Tea, Cocoa 10% Milk and Dairy products 6% Baby and Child-care products 5%

Others 48%

28

2. New age customer servicing techniques need to be started

The Kirana stores have had to evolve with the times in order to keep up with their

customers. One of the steps they have taken recently is deliver in housing localities

since a lot of customers call and place their order. While phone delivery was always

around, the number of customers who call and place their orders has increased

substantially over the past few years. Another new practice that is visible is that

people place orders from work and pick up monthly groceries while on the way home

at the end of the day. There are also a large number of consumers who take food items

on credit, which has substantially increased from the past.

3. Kirana stores have had to offer wider range of products

Earlier it wasnt necessary for the store owner to stock all variants of a shampoo or a

biscuit but with consumers becoming increasingly picky about their choices in food

items, the store owners need to ensure they stock all variants and packaging SKUs to

match the wide varieties offered in supermarkets and hypermarkets.

4. Look and feel of the store

According to the kirana shop owners, it has become important for them to improve

and maintain the look and feel of the shop since customers associate cleanliness and

orderliness of a shop with the quality of the products they are selling. According to

one shop owner who owns one of the largest kirana stores in Bopal, earlier he used to

stock a lot of items in a limited space and there was no orderliness but when he saw

that a lot of the customers were demanding cleanliness like the newly opened

Reliance Fresh, he too changed the interiors of the shop to improve lighting, displays

etc.

Existing e-commerce stores selling F&B products online

In depth interviews were taken with executives from current e-commerce websites in India,

selling food groceries. This has been coupled with findings from literature review on the

29

subject. The following are the recurring themes and observations from these sources. (The list

of questions posed to the e-commerce companies has been is added to the Appendix)

Problems faced by online food grocery stores

a. Working Capital Issues

The industry is still in in its initial stage and there are a lot of problems faced by the players.

According to Mr. Anmol Agarwal from Mangoshopper.com, one of the problems faced by

new entrants into the market is issues with working capital. Hardly any wholesaler is ready to

sell food items on credit to a new player and on the other hand the website has to tie up with

organisations such as Sodexo, to boost sales. These cannot be encased immediately and takes

15-30 days for the e-commerce store to see positive cash flow from a sale. This has led to

issues in inventory keeping and logistics, which are very capital intensive. Large e-commerce

stores in this space such as Bigbasket or Aaramshop.com have overcome this problem

because they have been operating for a long time plus they are very cash rich due to multiple

rounds of investing. Bigbasket has also tied with wholesales like Metro Cash and Carry to

have a dedicated team of individuals working on processing their orders. This is further

compounded by the fact that the e-commerce stores have a very low entry barrier, new e-

commerce stores have popped dime by the dozen in India. This makes it harder for a new

player to raise investments and compete in a very competitive space.

b. Wafer Thin Margins

Unlike the electronics or books category that demand margins in the range of 30-40%, the

food and beverage category has very low margins. According to an interview with Mr.

Ashutosh Malik (COO, Aaaramshop.com), the margins in the food and beverage industry are

in the range of 10-15%. With such low margins it becomes difficult for e-commerce websites

to offer substantial discounts that can be offered in other categories. Since of the main

reasons that consumers shop online is discounts offered on products which make up for the

lack of touch and feel of the product (Kiran, Sharma & Mittal, 2008), lack of substantial

discounts lead to slow adoption rates. Research by DEssence Consulting has also mentioned

that the wafer thin margins are one of the biggest issues faced by food grocery online stores

30

(Nextbigwhat.com, 2012). As a result of low margins, the growth has to be funded by capital

investments thus making the company very capital dependent (Mitra, 2013).

c. Last mile delivery costs

Food groceries, unlike other categories have additional issues of cold storage, perishability

and size for larger volume SKUs. All this has led to problems at the last mile delivery, that

from the warehouse to the customers home. According to (BCG, 2013) new entrants should

avoid the delivery model and instead have a click and collect service. Studies in eight

countries (Brazil, China, Russia, France, Germany, U.S, U.K and Denmark) have shown that

customers are willing to drive up to 13 minutes on average to pick up food ordered online. In

France, the online grocery market has grown by 30% till 2008, from 2008 to 2013 the

industry grew 50% thanks to new entrants and an innovative click and collect model

employed by companies such as Groupe Auchan and Systme U. The main reason that the

last mile delivery is problematic is because maximum care needs to be taken at this stage.

Websites like Webvan, Home Grocer and PeaPod were some of the companies that bet big on

online groceries. However, as was demonstrated by the collapse of these websites there was a

big gap between theory and on the ground application. These companies discovered that the

last mile delivery was a substantial challenge with cost and logistical issues. There are three

major concerns faced while doing home deliveries: (Dr. Boyer and Dr. Frohlich, 2002)

(i) Online grocery stores need to individually pick orders for customers as opposed to

a brick and mortar store where customers pick their own order. This leads to

additional time costs.

(ii) These stores need to deliver goods to the homes of customers i.e conquering the

last mile or hold orders for pick up. Both of these also lead to incremental costs

and operations complexity.

(iii) The third struggle is in convincing customers that the service is worth additional

cost. Customers in India have gotten used to Flipkart, Myntra and other stores

offering 30-35% discounts and will need convincing that these discounts are not

possible in the food grocery category as well as because of deliveries.

d. Customer Experience

31

One of the most important issues that e-commerce stores and in particular those dealing with

food groceries have to deal with is customer service. Right from the website interface to the

home delivery or pick up, it is important to give a good customer experience. For food

grocery e-commerce stores this proves to be slightly more difficult because of:

(i) Since there are a large number of products that need to showcased online and each

comes up many different variations and SKUs the website becomes cluttered which

leads to poor customer experience.

(ii) Another issue with the category is that as a result of the large number of SKUs of

different brands, inventory keeping needs to matched on the website. There are times

when a particular SKU is not available but is still visible online, that order needs to be

cancelled which again leads to poor customer experience

(iii) For a store like Aaramshop.com which has a retailer model wherein orders placed

online are delivered by their network of retailers, the customer experience cannot be

controlled at the delivery stage and hence retailer partnerships becomes very

important. According to Mr. Ashutosh Malik from Aaramshop.com, even retailers

will try and match customer standards because these same set of customers will visit

their brick and mortar stores in regular situations. Even for other online stores,

parameters like timely delivery, condition of delivery or how the delivery person

appears plays an important role in defining customer experience.

Business Models of existing e-commerce store

There are many different food e-commerce stores in India and abroad and they follow

different business models. This section will look at each of these business models and

identify advantages and disadvantages of each of these business models:

Business Model

Click-and-Collect This business model involves customer ordering online from an e-

commerce store and then picking up the order from the

warehouse/brick and mortar store at a time of their convenience

32

Advantages

No investments required in logistics and last mile delivery

Customers can collect groceries whenever they are free

Disadvantages

Food groceries not delivered to doorstep and hence not as convenient to customers

Examples

E.leclerc (France), Auchan (France)

Business Model

Retailer Network The store has a group of retailers in various cities. Orders placed

online are passed onto the retailer based on the location of the order.

The retailer from where it was bought fulfills the order and delivers to

the customer. The online customer has the choice of choosing the

retailer from his neighbourhood. Such firms aim to leverage the

already existent large base of retailers (organised and unorganized)

rather than act as a single retailer themselves.

Advantages

No investments required in logistics and last mile delivery

Cash on Delivery service adds benefit to consumer

Customer already has a relationship with the retailer in his neighbourhood and hence there is a feeling of trust

Disadvantages Customer experience such as delivery and quality of products cannot be controlled

Examples Aaaramshop.com, MyGrahak.com

33

Business Model

Door to Door Delivery This is the most common type of food groceries online stores.

Customers place orders via the website and the orders are delivered to

their doorsteps. Usually orders are only delivered only during specific

times of the day or the next day.

Advantages

Customers can get orders delivered to doorstep

Usually customers are free to choose time of their choosing which

increases customer satisfaction

Disadvantages Huge investments required in logistics and delivery Same day delivery not possible in some cases

Business Model

Limited inventory The business model is similar to that of home delivery e-commerce

stores. The only difference is that the online store does not stock all

categories. The limited number of categories can be due to ease in

delivery (Infibeam) or because of the fact that the website caters to a

nice sector, for e.g. Gourmet Goods (Natures Basket and

Yzury.com,) or fresh farm produce (Farm2kitchen.com).

Advantages

Limited inventory makes inventory and stock keeping easier

For gourmet products, the average ticket size is higher thus margins are also higher

Disadvantages

Limited choice for customers can lead to low penetration

Examples

Natures Basket, Yzury.com, Farm2kitchen.com, Infibeam, Homeshop18.com

34

Examples

Bigbasket.com, Mangoshoppers.com, Zopnow

As discussed above, each business model comes with different advantages and disadvantages.

Which model to follow will depend on (i) the location of the business for example in a

densely populated market like a Mumbai or an NCR it makes sense to apply a delivery

model. In newer markets according to (BCG, 2013) the Click and Collect model works best

and has been successful in France when e-commerce started burgeoning in 2008. The other

dependent factor is (ii) Expertise. Amazon Fresh in the US as well as Tesco have been able to

leverage their logistics expertise in running successful door-to-door delivery models.

MyGrahak is an online grocery store from Rei Six Ten Retail Ltd., a retail chain network of

about 350 stores in the NCR, Punjab, Baddi and Nagpur. This is one of the first attempts

from a retail grocery giant to enter the online space and leverage their existing network of

offline stores (MyGrahak.com, 2014). Infibeam in India has just started delivering dry items

such as coffee and tea leaves because these are easier to ship as compared to other items such

as milk etc. This has helped them employ a national strategy rather than be curtailed in one

location only.

Sources of revenue for e-commerce players As mentioned earlier, the margins in food and beverage products, unlike other categories

such as electronics, books or apparel is only in the range of 15-20% (Kiran, Sharma & Mittal,

2008). Various e-commerce players in India are following different revenue models to

monetize their websites apart from the small margins generated by buying in bulk from

wholesalers. Some of the common techniques used by these websites are:

1) Charging for deliveries

E-commerce websites have no option but to charge a certain premium for door-to-door

deliveries in light of the huge costs borne by them for logistics and transportation. Various

websites offer different packages for deliveries. For example Bangalore based Zopnow offers

free delivery for order above INR 500 (Zopnow.com, 2014) Yzury.com, which is also based

35

in Bangalore, offers free delivery over INR 1,000 in Bangalore and INR 2,000 anywhere else

in India (Yzury.com, 2014)

2) Brand and Retailer Services

Companies such as Aaramshop.com offer services to brands by which brands can have their

own pages on the website wherein they can showcase their products, the website also offers

advertisements for their brands on emails etc. from the company to customers. While the

company does not charge retailers to take their business online and list their products, it

offers premium services to these retailers by which they can create advertisements for their

store, have tools for increased interaction with their customers and be able to communicate

any discounts they might be offering (Aaaramshop.com, 2014).

3) Analytics and Reports

With the large number of shoppers visiting these e-commerce stores and browsing for

products, these sites leverage this data and create reports on consumer shopping habits in the

food e-commerce space. These reports are helpful to marketing and brand managers of the

FMCG products stocked by the websites.

Large F&B players in India Apart from existing e-commerce players it would be interesting to note if large F&B players

would be interested in entering the space of online food groceries. Recently, HUL announced

plans to look into the e-commerce space in the new digital era. Coca-Cola India is running a

test run in Ahmedabad wherein one can purchase their products online (Coke2home.com,

2013). According to in-depth interviews with senior executives from these companies the

following were some of the recurring themes

1) Even for a large food and beverage player the last mile delivery is a substantial cost.

According to Mr. Swapnil S. Kumar (Global Brand Manager, Hindustan Unilever

Ltd.) the costs involved are substantially high even for someone with a distribution

36

channel in place. For a national level strategy, there is a need for multiple warehouses,

which will have to be maintained and delivery of fresh stock will be a major challenge

2) There is no special reason that a customer will prefer to buy from a player like ITC or

an HUL over any other kirana/e-commerce store since the products offered will be the

same.

3) The ticket size in the food category is very small for a large F&B player to be

interested. A retailer is better suited to crack the food e-commerce model because it

will be able to provide range unlike a single company. However, the one positive is

that a company such as HUL, which offer products across categories, can use their e-

commerce stores to build loyalty about their products. For example, if a consumer

comes to

In light of these discussions, there are no substantial advantages for an F&B major to enter

the food grocery e-commerce sector.

Conclusions As penetration of Internet increases in India, Indians are spending more and more time online

and as a result of which the number of online transactions is also on the increase in India.

One sector, which is taking advantage of this digital era, is the food and groceries e-

commerce industry. Globally as well as in India people are becoming more and more open to

purchasing their groceries online. In order to save on time, lack of travel, cheaper prices,

home delivery options, websites such as Bigbasket, Aaaramshop, ZopNow etc. have build a

legion of loyal fans. The industry is plagued by many concerns such as logistical costs, or

low margins, last mile deliveries, but with the large investments made by VCs the industry is

flourishing. In order to understand the shopper behaviour online when it comes to online

shopping for food groceries, it is also important to study their shopping behaviour offline

which has been done through secondary research as well as primary research which included

a questionnaire and interviews with Kirana store owners in Ahmedabad. Each e-commerce

store in India has its own business model, some of them tie up with retailers and the retailers

is responsible for the final delivery, others directly deliver to homes while incurring logistical

costs themselves. Another model, that is new in India, is the concept of Click and Collect

37

which has been successfully implemented in UK and France. Some of the online stores do

not sell all categories under food and beverages and limit themselves to niche sectors. Today,

as a result of the thin margins these companies are looking at other areas such as brand tie-

ups, analytics and reports, premium services for retailers for their revenues. The dissertation

also looked at why it does not make too much sense for an F&B major to enter the space.

HUL tried to enter this area in 2001, through Project Sangam, which it sold off in a few years

and not much, has changed even now. There is no business sense for them to invest in

additional warehouses and delivery infrastructure because the added benefit will be minimal.

38

Bibliography Abhimanyu Mishra. (2012, April 2). Indians spend 8 hours a day on internet. Retrieved November 14, 2013, from Times of India: http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-04-02/computing/31274913_1_mobile-internet-mobile-phones-subscribers Agarwal, S. (2013, April 29). Now betting on e-commerce: HUL chief executive. Retrieved November 16, 2013, from Live Mint: http://www.livemint.com/Companies/dnHTG5HOv6IPEGGtQbgn0M/Now-betting-on-ecommerce-HUL-chief-executive.html Basu and Banerjee. (2011). Impact of Internet on Rural Development in India: A Case Study. Amity Journal of Media & Communication Studies , 1 (2). Belkud, R. S. (2013). Developing a new Internet grocery retail shop concept for the Indian customers . Finland: Laurea University of Applied Sciences . Booz&Co. Successful Innovations in Indian Retail. Retail Leadership Summit 2013 (pp. 2-10). Mumbai: RAI. Brendan Hannah & Kristina M. Lybecker . (2010). Determinants of Recent Online Purchasing and the Percentage of Income Spent Online . International Business Research , 60-71. Business Line. (2013, April 12). Milk, snacks, poultry to drive packaged food industry growth to 9% a year in 15 years. Retrieved February 14, 2014, from Business Line: http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/industry-and-economy/agri-biz/milk-snacks-poultry-to-drive-packaged-food-industry-growth-to-9-a-year-in-15-years/article4610841.ece CII and McKinsey. (2013, April). India as an agriculture and high value food powerhouse by 2030. McKinsey . CNET. (2008, June 5). The greatest defunct Web sites and dotcom disasters. Retrieved February 13, 2014, from CNET: cnet.co.uk Coke2home.com. (2013, November 17). Coke2home.com. Retrieved November 17, 2013, from http://www.coke2home.com/products.php?cc=10102013_1 Devi, B. R. (2008). Amazons Foray into E-Grocery Market: Successful Venture . Bangalore: ICFAI. Ernst & Young. (2012). Rebirth of e-Commerce in India. India: Ernst & Young. Forbes India. (2014, February 11). Rise of mobile internet in India Read more at: http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/features/risemobile-internetindia_1040934.html?utm_source=ref_article. Retrieved February 13, 2014, from Moneycontrol: http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/features/risemobile-internetindia_1040934.html Glasner, J. (2001, October 1). Why Webvan Drove Off a Cliff. Retrieved February 11, 2014, from Wired: http://www.wired.com/techbiz/media/news/2001/07/45098 Gray, Gillpatrick, Marusic, Pantelic, & Kuruvilla. (2010). Hedonic and Functional Shopping Values and Everyday Product Purchases: Findings from the Indian Study. International Journal of Business Insights & Transformation , 4 (1), 65-70. Gulati, S. (2012, July 17). E-grocery back in focus; Have investors changed mind? Retrieved February 13, 2014, from techcircle.in: http://techcircle.vccircle.com/2012/07/17/e-grocery-biz-getting-a-boost-what%E2%80%99s-the-investors%E2%80%99-take/ Heejin Lim et all. (2004, July ). Tracking the Evolution of E-Grocers: A Quantitative Assessment . Journal of Food Distribution Research , 66-76.

39

Hindustan Times. (2012, December 31). Online shopping touched new heights in India in 2012. Retrieved November 15, 2013, from Hindustan Times: http://www.hindustantimes.com/technology/industrytrends/online-shopping-touched-new-heights-in-india-in-2012/article1-983068.aspx Intel. (2013). Internet Consumption. N/A: Intel. Khanna, S. (2013, November 13). If India has 200 million Internet users, what are they doing? Retrieved February 12, 2014, from Livemint: http:///Opinion/lxse9gsLZjF5FvLLIMd0iJ/If-India-has-200-million-internet-users-what-are-they-doing.html Kiran, Sharma & Mittal. (2008, July 1). Attitudes, Preferences and Profile of Online Buyers in India: Changing Trends. South Asian Journal of Management , 34. Lohse et all. (1999). Predictors of Online buying. Communications of the ACM . Machado, A. T. (2005). Drivers of Shopping Online: A Literature Review. IADIS International Conference e-Commerce. McKinsey&Company. (2012). Online and upcoming: The Internets impact on India . India: McKinsey&Company. PWC. (2013). The Indian FMCG sector, The innovation imperative. India: PWC. Richard Joiner, J. G. (2012). Gender, Internet Experience, Internet Identication, and Internet Anxiety: A Ten-Year Followup. CYBERPSYCHOLOGY, BEHAVIOR, AND SOCIAL NETWORKING , 364. Rishi, B. J. (2008, January 1). An Empirical Study of Online Shopping Behaviour: A Factor Analysis Approach . Journal of Marketing & Communication , 40. Robinson, H. (2007). The role of situational variables in online grocery shopping in the UK . The Marketing Review , 7 (1), 89-106. Roy, S. K. (2007). Internet Uses and Gratifications Structure. ICFAI Journal of Management Research , 6 (12), 43-63. Sakkthivel, A. M. (2006, December). Impact Of Demographics On The Consumption Of Different Services Online In India. Journal of Internet Banking & Commerce. , 8. Sanjay Jain & Manika Jain. (2011). Exploring Impact of Consumer and Product Characteristics on E-Commerce Adoption: A Study of Consumers in India . Journal of Technology Management for Growing Economies , 2 (2), 35-64. Terron, A. (2012). The Advent of Me-tailing and how Indias shoppers are now buying online . Nielsen. India: Nielsen India. The Economic Times. (2013, November 13). Number of Internet users in India to reach 24.3 crore by 2014: IAMAI. Retrieved November 15, 2013, from The Economic Times: http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2013-11-13/news/44030903_1_mobile-internet-mobile-association-i-cube The Indian Technonomist. (1995, 8 14). VSNL starts India's first Internet service today. Retrieved 11 17, 2013, from The Indian Technonomist: http://dxm.org/techonomist/news/vsnlnow.html USDA Foreign Agricultural Service. (2013, December 12). India Retail Foods 2013. GAIN , 1. Vaid, M. (2007, April 19). A 'Sangam' that didn't deliver. Retrieved February 12, 2014, from Moneycontrol: http://www.moneycontrol.com/news/management/a-sangam-that-didnt-deliver_276919.html

40

Your Story. (2013, November 14). 200 Million Internet Users in India now! Retrieved February 12, 2014, from Yourstory.com: http://yourstory.com/2013/11/200-million-internet-users-in-india-now/

41

Appendix

1. Online questionnaire

Q1 Age m Upto 20 (1) m 21 to 25 (2) m 26 to 30 (3) m 31 to 35 (4) m 36 to 40 (5) m Above 40 (6) Q2 Gender m Male (1) m Female (2) Q3 Educational Qualification m Graduate (1) m Post Graduate (2) m Diploma (3) m PhD (4) m Other (5) ____________________ Q4 Marital Status m Single (1) m Married (2) Q5 Occupation m Student (1) m Working Professional (2) m Self Employed (3) m Homemaker (4) Q6 Where do you stay ? m Large Metro (Delhi, Mumbai, Bangalore etc.) (1) m Tier I (Jaipur, Lucknow, Surat etc.) (2) m Tier II (Gorakhpur, Aurangabad, Meerut etc.) (3)

42

Q7 How often do you shop online? m Never (1) m Less than Once a Month (2) m Once a Month (3) m 2-3 Times a Month (4) m Once a Week (5) m More than 2-3 Times a Week (6) Answer I