On Iohvidov's proofs of the Fischer-Frobenius theorem · On lohvidovs Proofs of the...

4
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH of the National Bureau of Standards-B. Mathematical Sciences Vol. 80B2, April-June 1976 On lohvidovs Proofs of the Fischer-Frobenius Theorem* R. C. Thompson** (March 12 , 1976) A short proo f is give n o f th eo re m of Fi sc her and Frob e niu s e xhibitin g a co njun c tiv e transformation mapping Toeplitz matri ces o nt o Ha nk el matri ces. Key words: Hankel matrix ; T oe plitz matrix. 1. Introduction A Hank el matrix H n- I is an n X n matJ;x with the struc ture H /I -I = [5 ,j< A To ep litz matrix Tn -I is an n X n matrix with the struc tur e It is easy to see that Toeplitz matrices may be co nv erted to Hank el matri ces in a uniform way by a matlix multipli cation. Indeed, if } 1 o 1 1 0 1 then jT" _1 is a Hankel matrix for all Toeplitz matri ces Tn - I' Thi s procedure, however, do es not carry Hermitian To ep Litz matri ces to Hermitian (i.e., real) Hank el matrices. The theorem of Fischer- Froebenius asserts that a class of transformations exist each of which uniformly carries Toeplitz matrices to Hankel matrices in such a way that Hermitian Toeplitz matrices are ca rried to Hermitian Hankel matrices. Recently I. C. Iohvidov has published three proofs of this result. One of these proofs is a direct but somewhat intricate calculation; it may be found on pages 211-213 of [1]1. A second proof, to be found on page 217 of [1] and also in [2], makes a preliminary reduction to the case of positive definite ToepLitz matrices, then takes advantage of a decomposition of definite Toeplitz matrices known from the theory of the trigonometric moment proble m. Th e third proof, in [2], avoids the . reduction to the positive definite case, and uses instead a more compli ca ted decomposition of Toeplitz matrices due to Iohvidov and Kre in [ 3, p. 338]. The purpose of this paper is to give a short and direc t proof of the Fi sc her-Frobenius theore m. Our proof is ba sed on a simple deco mposition of arb itrary Toeplitz matrices, for which the proof is almost a triviality and which was apparently not noticed in [1] and [2]. See equation (3). Iohvidov's techniques then may be applied to (3) to produce the des ired r es ult rapidl y. * An invited paper. "Prese nt address: In stitute for Applied AJgebra. Unive rs it y of California. Santa Barbara. CA 93 106. I Figures in brackets in dicate the lit era ture refe ren ces al the e nd of thi s paper. 269

Transcript of On Iohvidov's proofs of the Fischer-Frobenius theorem · On lohvidovs Proofs of the...

Page 1: On Iohvidov's proofs of the Fischer-Frobenius theorem · On lohvidovs Proofs of the Fischer-Frobenius Theorem* R. C. Thompson** (March 12, 1976) A short proof is given of theore m

JOURNAL OF RESEARCH of the National Bureau of Standards-B. Mathematical Sciences Vol. 80B2, April-June 1976

On lohvidovs Proofs of the Fischer-Frobenius Theorem*

R. C. Thompson**

(March 12, 1976)

A short proo f is give n o f th eo re m of Fi sche r and Frob e niu s e xhibitin g a co njun c tiv e transformation mapping Toeplitz m atri ces ont o Hanke l matrices.

Key words: Hankel matrix ; T oeplitz matrix.

1. Introduction

A Hankel matrix H n- I is an n X n matJ;x with the structure

H /I - I = [5 i+j]O ~i ,j<n·

A Toeplitz matrix Tn - I is an n X n matrix with the structure

It is easy to see that Toeplitz matrices may be converted to Hankel matrices in a uniform way by a matlix multiplication. Indeed, if

}

1

o 1

1 0

1

then jT"_1 is a Hankel matrix for all Toeplitz matrices Tn- I' Thi s proced ure, howe ver, does not carry Hermitian ToepLitz matrices to Hermitian (i.e., real) Hankel matrices. The theore m of Fischer­Froebenius asserts that a class of tran sformation s exist each of which uniformly carries Toeplitz matrices to Hankel matrices in such a way that Hermitian Toeplitz matrices are carried to Hermitian Hankel matrices. Recently I. C. Iohvidov has publi shed three proofs of this result. One of these proofs is a direct but somewhat intricate calculation; it may be found on pages 211-213 of [1]1. A second proof, to be found on page 217 of [1] and also in [2], makes a preliminary reduction to the case of positive definite ToepLitz matrices, then takes advantage of a decomposition of definite Toeplitz matrices known from the theory of the trigonometric moment problem. The third proof, in [2], avoids the .reduction to the positive definite case, and uses instead a more co mplicated decomposition of Toeplitz matrices due to Iohvidov and Krein [3, p. 338].

The purpose of this paper is to give a short and direct proof of the Fischer-Frobe nius theorem. Our proof is based on a simple decomposition of arbitrary Toeplitz matrices, for which the proof is almost a triviality and whic h was apparently not noticed in [1] and [2]. See equation (3). Iohvidov's techniques then may be applied to (3) to produce the des ired result rapidly.

* An invited pape r. "Present address: In s titute for Applied AJgebra. Unive rs it y of California. Santa Barbara. CA 93 106. I Figures in bracke ts in dicate the litera ture refe rences a l the end of thi s paper.

269

Page 2: On Iohvidov's proofs of the Fischer-Frobenius theorem · On lohvidovs Proofs of the Fischer-Frobenius Theorem* R. C. Thompson** (March 12, 1976) A short proof is given of theore m

2. A Decomposition of T oeplitz Matrices

Let Eo, Ej, ... , E2,,- 2 be distinct fixed numbers on the unit circle, and set

v = [E/] -(n- I)~i;;;n-I. O;§i~n-2'

This square matrix V is nonsingular since after removal of a factor from each column it becomes a Vandermonde. Alternatively, a nontrivial linear relation on the rows of V quickly leads to the impossible existence of a nonzero polynomial of degree at most 2n - 2 with 2n - 1 distinct roots.

Let T = [c i- i]O"i ,j"n- I be an arbitrary Toeplitz matrix and take

C = [C - In-Ih ' . " co, ... , CIl - IY

to be a column vector formed from the entries of T. Let

be an unknown column vector. Since V is non si ngular, we may choose d such that

C = Vd.

That is,

11 - 1 211 - 2

(1) Ci = L dtE/ + L dtE/, -n < i < n. t=o t=n

Equations (1) are the same as the matrix equation

(2) Tn- I = FDF* + C!::"C*,

where

D = diag(do, .. " d n- I ),

!::,. = diag(d", .. " d2n - 2),

Og~n- l'

Here F is square, C rectangular, and * denotes conjugate transpose. We shall deduce the Fischer­Frobenius theorem from (2). Note that both FDF* and C!::"C* are Toeplitz matrices.

3. The Fischer-Frobenius Theorem

Take a and b to be fixed complex numbers, with ab not real. Let

be column vectors, and'll. an indeterminate, If the right-hand side of the polynomial identity

270

Page 3: On Iohvidov's proofs of the Fischer-Frobenius theorem · On lohvidovs Proofs of the Fischer-Frobenius Theorem* R. C. Thompson** (March 12, 1976) A short proof is given of theore m

n - 1 1'1 - 1

(3) L gp'AP = I (a + ;i'A),, - I- j (b + bA)iYJj p=O j=O

is multiplied out, then compared with the left-hand side, each gp is linearly expressed in the YJj, j =

0, ... , n - 1,. with coefficients de pe nding on a and b. Thus we obtain a matrix A for which

(4) g = AYJ;

explicit -Formulas for the e ntries of A may be seen in [1 , p. 209]. (We shall not need these fo rmulas .) Let A = [apj] OSIJ,js n- I' This matrix A is nonsingular. Indeed, set g = 0 in (3) and (4), the n re place 'A in (3) with (a'A - b)/(b - ;i'A) to obtain

11 - 1

Y 'Aj-n = 0 __ 'I) ,

j=O

after cancelling a factor. Thus {; = 0 implies YJ = 0; he nce A is nonsingular.

In (3) and (4) set YJo = . YJi- 1 = YJi+ 1 YJ,, - I = 0, YJj = 1, for fixe d j. The n, by (4), {;IJ = apj, and he nce by (3)

/I - I

(5) I apj'A P = (a + ;i'A)"- 1 p=o

The theore m of Fische r and Frobe nius, slightly generalized is thi s: THEOREM 1: Let matrix A be defined as above. Then, for any Toeplitz matrix T il _ h the

matrix

(6)

is a Hankel rnatrix. Conversely, for any Hankel matrix H II - h the matrix T II _ 1 defined by (6) is a Toeplitz matrix.

PROOF: C hoose Eo, .. . , E2,, -2 on the unit circle, di stinct and unequal to - al;i. We then have the decomposition (2). Since Hankel matrices are closed unde r addition, it will suffi ce to prove that both A7FDF*A and ATCflC*i{ are Hankel matrices. We give the proof for the first of these, the proof for the other being similar. Letj{'A) = (b + b'A)/(a + ;i'A). This Mobius fun c tion f maps the unit circle to the extended real axis, and in particular maps Eo, ... , E2n __ 2 to finite r ea l values. Se t

o ~- i ~ 2n - 2,

o ~ i ~ 2n - 2.

The n each ri is real. The (j,l ) ele me nt ofATF is (by (5))

1/ - 1

L apj E/, = Ptj{Et )j = Ptr{ p=o

Thus

271

Page 4: On Iohvidov's proofs of the Fischer-Frobenius theorem · On lohvidovs Proofs of the Fischer-Frobenius Theorem* R. C. Thompson** (March 12, 1976) A short proof is given of theore m

where

Thus FI is a real Vandermonde matrix. We now have

where D2 = DIDDI* is diagonal. However, any matrix of the form FID2F2T with FI a Vandermonde matrix and D2 diagonal is a Hankel matrix.

Thus the transformation Tn- I ~ ATTn_IA carries Toeplitz matrices to Hankel matrices. This evidently is a nonsingular linear transformation from the (2n - I)-dimensional complex vector space of Toeplitz matrices into (and therefore onto) the 2n - 1 dimensional complex space of Hankel matrices. Thus any Hankel matrix Hn- I is (uniquely) realizable in the form ATTn_IX This completes the proof.

When Tn- I is Hermitian, H n - I is also Hermitian, being a conjuctive transform of T" _I'

Conversely, when H n- I is Hermitian, so is its conjunctive transform Tn - I = A _ IT H n- IA - I. Thus we have:

COROLLARY: Under the Fischer-Frobenius trans/ormation, Hermitian Toeplitz matrices map onto real Hankel matrices, and conversely.

The preparation of this paper was supported In part: by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, under Grant 72-2164.

3. References

[l] lohvidov, I. c., Toeplitz and Hankel matrices and form s, Moscow, 1974 (in Russ ian). [2] lohvidov, I. c., On the tran sformation of Fisc her·Frobeniu s, Theo ry of fun ction s, fun ctjonal analy sis and it s

applica tions, 15 (1972), 203-212 (in Russ ian). [3] lohvidov, I. C., and Krein, M. G. , Spectral theo ry of operators in spaces with an inde finit e metri c II, Ameri ca n

Math . Socie ty Translations, Series 2, vol. 34, pp. 283-373.

(Paper 8OB2-442)

272