Omega Algebra Model of Clinical Waste Incineration...
Transcript of Omega Algebra Model of Clinical Waste Incineration...
OMEGA ALGEBRA MODEL OF CLINICAL WASTE INCINERATION
PROCESS
LIEW SIAW YEE
A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the
requirements for the award of the degree of
Doctor of Philosophy (Mathematics)
Faculty of Science
Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
JUNE 2015
iii
To my beloved mother and father.
iv
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
In particular, I would like to express my heartfelt appreciation to my
supervisor, Professor Dr. Tahir bin Ahmad, for his encouragement, guidance and
advice. Without his continued support and motivation, this thesis would not even
exist.
Next I wish to thank Ibnu Sina Institute for Fundamental Science Studies,
UTM for providing the facilities. Thank you to friendly administration stuffs who
always ready and willing to help.
Also thanks to my friends for their helping hand, advices and friendship
throughout the completion of this thesis.
Last but not least, I would love to thank my parents, my family members and
Andrew Jason Flavel for their love, understanding and continued emotional support.
v
ABSTRACT
This research shows how the Fuzzy Autocatalytic Set (FACS) is transformed
into a semigroup. Omega algebra is used as the main aspect to relate the FACS to the
transformation semigroup of omega algebra of the FACS. Clinical waste
incineration process is used as an example in supporting the developed theorems and
lemmas. C++ programming is used to develop a customized program that computes
the necessary data in supporting new theorems and lemmas. First, the FACS is
defined in terms of omega algebra, giving the omega algebra of FACS. Next, the
semigroup of omega algebra of FACS is constructed using the omega algebra of
FACS. The membership value of fuzzy edge connectivity is also determined to
complete the definition of the omega algebra of FACS. New definitions and
terminologies are used to model the clinical waste incineration process in terms of
omega algebra. As a result, the new model is shown to be able to comprehensively
explain the catalytic relation amongst the chemical elements in the clinical waste
incineration process. The established semigroup of omega algebra of FACS is then
defined to be a transformation semigroup of omega algebra of FACS. The results
show that FACS of the clinical waste incineration process and the structure of
transformation semigroup of omega algebra of the clinical waste incineration process
are “compatible”. In addition, the manifold representation of the transformation
semigroup of omega algebra of FACS is proposed for further studies.
vi
ABSTRAK
Kajian ini menunjukkan bagaimana Set Automangkinan Kabur (FACS)
ditransformasi kepada semikumpulan. Aljabar omega digunakan sebagai aspek
utama untuk menghubungkan FACS kepada transformasi semikumpulan aljabar
omega. Proses pembakaran sisa buangan klinikal digunakan sebagai satu contoh
untuk menyokong teorem dan lema yang telah dibangunkan. Pengaturcaraan C++
digunakan untuk membangunkan satu pengaturcaraan bagi mengira data yang
diperlukan dalam menyokong teorem dan lema baharu tersebut. Pada permulaanya,
FACS ditakrifkan dalam sebutan aljabar omega, yang memberikan aljabar omega
FACS. Seterusnya, semikumpulan aljabar omega FACS dibangunkan dengan
menggunakan aljabar omega FACS. Nilai keahlian kabur juga ditentukan untuk
menyempurnakan definisi aljabar omega FACS. Definisi dan istilah baharu ini
digunakan untuk memodelkan proses pembakaran sisa buangan klinikal. Natijahnya,
model baharu yang dibangunkan berupaya memaparkan hubungan pemangkinan
antara unsur kimia dalam proses pembakaran sisa buangan klinikal dengan lebih
menyeluruh. Semikumpulan aljabar omega FACS yang telah diperkenalkan
kemudiannya ditarifkan sebagai transformasi semikumpulan aljabar omega FACS.
Keputusan menunjukkan bahawa FACS dari proses pembakaran sisa buangan
klinikal dan struktur transformasi semikumpulan aljabar omega adalah “serasi”.
Sebagai tambahan, perwakilan manifold kepada transformasi semikumpulan aljabar
omega FACS telah dicadangkan untuk kajian pada masa hadapan.
vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER TITLE PAGE
DECLARATION ii
DEDICATION iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT iv
ABSTRACT v
ABSTRAK vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS vii
LIST OF TABLES x
LIST OF FIGURES xi
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS xiii
LIST OF SYMBOLS xiv
LIST OF APPENDICES xvii
1 INTRODUCTION 1
1.0 Background of the Research 1
1.1 Statement of the Problem 6
1.2 Objectives of the Study 6
1.3 Scope of Study 7
1.4 Significance of Study 7
1.5 Summary and Outline of Thesis 8
2 LITERATURE REVIEW 9
2.0 Introduction 9
2.1 Crisp Graph 9
2.2 Fuzzy Theory 14
2.2.1 Fuzzy Set and Fuzzy Number 14
viii
2.2.2 Fuzzy Relation and Fuzzy Interval Analysis 15
2.2.3 Fuzzy Graph 20
2.3 Autocatalytic Set and Fuzzy Autocatalytic Set 21
2.3.1 Autocatalytic Set 21
2.3.2 Fuzzy Autocatalytic Set 23
2.4 Fuzzy Autocatalytic Set of Clinical Waste Incineration
Process 25
2.5 Omega Algebra 26
2.6 Semigroup and Transformation Semigroup 26
2.7 Manifold, Tangent Space and Tangent Bundle 28
2.8 Conclusion 29
3 OMEGA ALGEBRA OF THE FUZZY
AUTOCATALYTIC SET 30
3.0 Introduction 30
3.1 Research Methodology 30
3.1.1 Omega Algebra and Graph 31
3.1.2 Programming Language C++ 32
3.2 Omega Algebra of FACS 33
3.3 Fuzzy Edge Connectivity of FACS 40
3.3.1 Membership Value of Fuzzy Edge Connectivity 42
3.4 Implementation: Omega Algebra Representation of
FACS 45
3.4.1 Omega algebra of FG 46
3.5 Conclusion 53
4 TRANSFORMATION SEMIGROUP OF OMEGA
ALGEBRA OF FUZZY AUTOCATALYTIC SET 55
4.0 Introduction 55
4.1 Transformation Semigroup of FACS 55
4.1.1 Transformation Semigroup of Omega Algebra of
Clinical Waste Incineration Process 58
4.2 Manifold Representation of ),( SQts FACS 62
ix
4.3 Conclusion 66
5 CONCLUSION AND FUTURE RESEARCH 68
5.0 Introduction 68
5.1 Conclusion of Thesis 68
5.2 Suggestions for Future Research 70
REFERENCES 71
Appendices A-E 75-107
x
LIST OF TABLE
TABLE NO. TITLE PAGE
2.1 Path between vertices of Graph 3G 13
3.1 Membership value of fuzzy edge connectivity between
any pair of vertices 45
3.2 Catalytic relation between vertices of FG 48
3.3 Paths and respective membership value of fuzzy edge
connectivity of 24* 51
3.4 Maximal membership value of fuzzy edge connectivity of FG 52
xi
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE NO. TITLE PAGE
1.1 Illustration of a clinical waste incinerator
(Sabariah et al., 2002) 2
1.2 A Graph showing the association between input-output
parameters and different components of the incineration process
(Sabariah et al, 2002) 3
1.3 A Crisp Graph, dG of the incineration process 4
1.4 Fuzzy Graph of Type 3 FdG for the clinical incineration process 5
2.1 Example of graph 10
2.2 Labeled and unlabeled graphs 10
2.3 Directed graph 3G 11
2.4 Examples of walks in 3G 11
2.5 Example of closed walk of 3G 12
2.6 Irreducible graph 13
2.7 Fuzzy graph ),( EVG 20
2.8 Image of H2O molecule 22
2.9 Image of Autocatalysis 22
2.10 Examples of Autocatalytic Set (ACS) 23
2.11 Fuzzy head and fuzzy tail 23
2.12 Tangent space on a point P in a manifold M 29
xii
3.1 -algebra for M 32
3.2 Research flow 34
3.3 Graphical representation of ( , )i jk v v 35
3.4 Unary operation for FACSFACS VV :1 35
3.5 Binary operation for FACSFACSFACS VVV :2 36
3.6 Ternary operation for FACSFACSFACSFACS VVVV :3 36
3.7 n-ary operation for 2n , FACS
n
FACSn VV : 37
3.8 Graphical representation of operation in FACS 38
3.9 Illustration of closure and associativity properties of in
the combustion chamber 40
3.10 Fuzzy head and tail of -operation 43
3.11 Example of membership value of fuzzy edge connectivity 44
4.1 Semigroup action and semigroup operation 57
4.2 Mapping between FACS of the clinical waste incineration
process (Sabariah, 2006) and transformation semigroup of
omega algebra of the clinical waste incineration process 59
4.3 Projection of for 22 )),(:(: ji vvW 63
4.4 Projection of for (a) 33 )),,(:(: kji vvvW and
(b) 44 )),,,(:(: lkji vvvvW 63
4.5 Projection of (a) 55 )),,,,(:(: mlkji vvvvvW and
(b) 66 )),,,,,(:(: nmlkji vvvvvvW 63
4.6 Projection of FGSW : 64
4.7 Path between elements ),( njmi vvvv 65
xiii
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
ACS - Autocatalytic Set
FACS - Fuzzy Autocatalytic Set
FGFACS - Fuzzy autocatalytic set of the clinical waste incineration
process
max - Maximal
max-av - Maximal average
max-prod - Maximal product
min - Minimum
PF(Q) - Partial function of Q
sup - Supreme
ts - Transformation semigroup
xiv
LIST OF SYMBOLS
rA~ - Assignment function of gradual number r~
nA~ - Assignment function of left profile over fuzzy interval N
nA~ - Assignment function of right profile over fuzzy interval N
],[ ba - Closed interval
],( ba / ),[ ba - Semi-open interval
C - Set of fuzzy edge connectivity
ijFC - Fuzzy edge connectivity between node i and node j
E - Set of edges
)( FwE - Edges have fuzzy weights
E(x, y) - Strength/ membership value of arc or edge between vertex x
and vertex y
ie - The thi edge/arc
G - Graph
dG - Crisp graph representation of clinical waste incineration
process
FG - Fuzzy graph representation of clinical waste incineration
process
i
FG - ith
type fuzziness of fuzzy graph
g - Mapping between fuzzy interval
xv
g - United extension of g
)( ieh - Fuzzy head of the thi edge
M - Manifold
N - Fuzzy interval
n~ - Fuzzy upper bound/ right profile over fuzzy interval N
n~ - Fuzzy lower bound/ left profile over fuzzy interval N
- Real number
r~ - Gradual number
TS, - Semigroup
),( S - Semigroup with semigroup operation
)(NS - Subset of fuzzy interval N
)( iet - Fuzzy tail of the thi edge
FGts - Transformation semigroup of clinical waste incineration
process
V - Set of vertices
V(x) - Strength / membership value of vertex x
FACSV - Set of vertices for FACS
iv - The thi vertex
kW - Walk with k-number of vertices
( , )i jk v v - Omega operation of k-operand from iv to jv
n - Omega operation of n-operand
X - Left endpoint of interval X
X - Right endpoint of interval X
+ - Addition function of vector space
xvi
• - Multiple function of vector space
-cut - Alpha-cut
- Composition of fuzzy relation
* - Omega operation of clinical waste incineration process
- Semigroup action
- Semigroup operation
- Element of
- Equal or greater than
- Every/ each
> - Greater than
- Less or equal
< - Less than
- Maximal
- Minimal
- Max-av composition
- Max-prod composition
)(xN - Membership function of fuzzy interval N
)( ij - Membership value of fuzzy edge connectivity between
vertex iv and vertexjv
)( ie - Membership value for fuzzy edge connectivity for edge i
-algebra - Set of omega algebra
FG - Omega algebra of clinical waste incineration process
FACS - Omega algebra of FACS
- Union
xvii
LIST OF APPENDICES
APPENDIX TITLE PAGE
A C++ Programming Code used to determine the
possible path of FG 75
B Possible path of every vertex of FG 82
C C++ Programming Code used to determine the
membership value of fuzzy edge connectivity of ( , )*i jk v v 88
D Membership value of fuzzy edge connectivity
of ( , )*i jk v v 98
E List of Publications 107
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.0 Background of the Research
From the time when Zadeh (1965) brought the inspiration of fuzzy set theory
by utilizing the concept of grade membership, many researchers and mathematicians
have been concerned with the properties and applications of fuzzy sets (Gitman &
Levine,1970; Tamura et al., 1971; Kandel and Yelowitz, 1974; Pathak and Pal, 1986;
Keller and Tahani, 1992). This is due to the fact that most crisp mathematical
models are always unable to model some details of reality including complexity and
ill-defined circumstances. Therefore the crisp models are generally insufficient in
describing the whole process of a system. On the other hand, the fuzziness concept
is proficient in modelling, explaining as well as predicting real life issues, such as
weather prediction (Riordan and Hansen, 2002). As a result, more and more studies
have been carried out by utilizing this idea.
The concept of fuzzy sets provide a natural way of dealing with problems in
which the source of imprecision is the absence of sharply defined criteria of class
membership rather than the presence of a random variable. The fuzzy graph was one
of the examples in fuzzy theory extensive application in its relation to graph theory.
Fuzzy graph theory was first introduced by Azriel Rosenfeld in 1975. Since then, it
has been quickly expanding and has several applications in various fields.
2
Modeling an incineration process is one of its applications to the real life
problem. Any waste or remaining supplies from medical, dental, veterinary,
pharmaceutical, treatment, hospital that may result in contamination to any
individual after exposure is defined as clinical waste. The waste incineration process
is a waste treatment process which underwent some controlled conditions which
included operating temperature, oxygen level, fuel supply and residence time.
Sabariah et al. (2002) embarked to model an incineration process of a
regional clinical waste incinerator facility in Malacca that is owned by Pantai
Medivest Sdn Bhd. Even though the incineration process seems simple, but as the
research was carried out in the year 2002, there was no essential mathematical model
to give details of the underlying principles involved in the process and operational
control of the incinerator. The schematic diagram of the facility is shown in Figure
1.1.
Figure 1.1 Illustration of a clinical waste incinerator (Sabariah et al., 2002)
A graphical representation in Figure 1.2 demonstrating the relation between
input-output variables of the incineration process was successfully achieved using a
3
graph. However, this graph model in Figure 1.2 was not able to describe the
incineration in detail.
Figure 1.2 A Graph showing the association between input-output parameter and
different components of the incineration process (Sabariah et al, 2002).
v1
v2
v3
v4
e1
e2
e3
e4
e5
e6
e7
e10 e11
e9
e12
e13
e14
e15
e19 e20
e8 e16
e18
e17
4
After some assumptions and refinements, a crisp model (Figure 1.3) was
created (Sabariah, 2006) whereby },,,,,{ 654321 vvvvvvV is the set of vertices
representing six variables that play a crucial part in the clinical waste incineration
process, namely waste, fuel, oxygen, carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide and other
gases including water, respectively.
Figure 1.3 A Crisp Graph, dG of the incineration process
The edges represent the connection between the variables in the process
which indicate their catalytic relationship and are denoted by the set E, ( , )i jv v which
means there is a catalytic relation between iv and jv where iv catalyzed the
production of jv . However, the crisp graph in Figure 1.3 was not able to illustrate
the waste incineration process in detail.
Due to some discrepancies of this crisp model (Figure 1.3) in explaining the
system has urged the study to look into the use of fuzzy theory, particularly the fuzzy
graph. Sabariah (2006) then applied the concept of the fuzzy graph into the
modeling of the clinical waste incineration process. The development and the results
of the model have been presented in Figure 1.4 (Tahir et al, 2010).
On the other hand, Blue et al. (1997; 2002) generalized a catalogue of various
possible types of fuzziness in a graph, which they named taxonomy of fuzzy graphs.
There are 5 types of graph in total that are characterized below:
5
Type 1: Fuzzy Set of Graphs,
Type 2: Crisp Set of Vertices and Fuzzy Edges,
Type 3: Crisp Set of Vertices and Edges with Fuzzy Connectivity,
Type 4: Fuzzy Vertex set and Crisp Edge Set,
Type 5: Crisp Graph with Fuzzy Weight.
The fuzzy graph in Figure 1.4 is proved to be a fuzzy graph Type 3 (Tahir et
al., 2010).
Figure 1.4 Fuzzy Graph of Type 3, FG for the clinical incineration process.
A clinical waste incineration process modeled using this new concept (Figure
1.4) was more precise than when modeled with a crisp graph (Figure 1.3) (Tahir et
al. 2010). As compared to the same color and thickness of each link in the crisp
graph (Figure 1.3), the different color of edges in Figure 1.4 signifies the different
range of membership values for the fuzzy edge connectivity. The changes in the
concentration of the chemical elements are demonstrated more precisely with the
changes in the thickness of the edges of each pair of elements in the process.
This graphical representation is found to be an Autocatalytic Set (ACS). A
new concept known as the Fuzzy Autocatalytic Set (FACS) was then fashioned
under the mishmash of fuzzy graph theory into ACS. Sabariah (2006) also showed
that this representation enlightens the clinical waste incineration process more
precisely.
6
The highlight of the investigation was the introduction of a fresh idea called
the Fuzzy Autocatalytic Set (FACS). This relation between fuzzy graphs to
autocatalytic sets has produced a few results in the forms of proven theorem
(Sabariah, 2006).
1.1 Statement of the problem
The crisp graph (Figure 1.3) representation of the clinical waste incineration
process gives the idea of connectivity between two elements of the process, while the
fuzzy graph representation of the clinical waste incineration process (Figure 1.4)
provides the changes of the concentration of the parameters during the process.
However, these two graphs representations were not able to tell the details of the
process as of yet. For example, the system cannot give information regarding the
catalytic interaction and relation amongst each and every parameter in the system,
not only among the pair.
In addition, the previous study was also unable to present all the possible
catalytic reactions between variables of the system. The main interest in this
research is the creation of the algebraic model to observe the system such that the
interaction between parameters can be observed and built more comprehensively.
1.2 Objectives of the Study
The goal of this research is to extend the algebraic structure of the fuzzy
autocatalytic set. In order to accomplish the goal, the following objectives are set as
research tactics. The objectives are:
a) to transform the graphical representation of the fuzzy autocatalytic set
to omega algebra.
7
b) to prove that the omega algebra of fuzzy autocatalytic set is a
semigroup.
c) to model the omega algebra of the fuzzy autocatalytic set in terms of
transformation semigroup.
d) to propose the manifold representation of the fuzzy autocatalytic set.
1.3 Scope of the Study
For this research, the emphasis is on the exploration of algebraic structures
behind the clinical incineration reaction process that was modeled using FACS. The
main interest is to model this model of FACS into few possible algebraic structures
in order to study and algebraically explain the changes of the variable.
The omega algebra concept would be the foundation and the main aspect of
the proposed algebraic model. The algebraic model assembled will then be analyzed
in terms of validity in explaining the clinical waste incineration process.
1.4 Significance of Study
The main aim of this research is to extend the algebraic structure of the fuzzy
autocatalytic set of the fuzzy graph. The omega algebra concept would be the
foundation and the main aspect of the proposed algebraic model of the clinical waste
incineration process. This new structure is called omega algebra of fuzzy
autocatalytic set of the clinical waste incineration process. The new structure
subsequently yields some physical interpretations in the form of proven lemmas and
theorems for the clinical incineration process which has been modeled as a fuzzy
autocatalytic set.
8
1.5 Summary and Outline of Thesis
The first chapter provides the general background and information regarding
the research.
Chapter 2 gives the published literature of relevant topics to the research
which includes graph theory, fuzzy theory, fuzzy graph, the autocatalytic set and
Fuzzy Autocatalytic Set, the Fuzzy Autocatalytic Set of the clinical waste
incineration process as well as omega algebra, the transformation semigroup and
manifold.
The third chapter presents the construction of the omega algebra structure of
the Fuzzy Autocatalytic Set. Then the omega algebra of the Fuzzy Autocatalytic Set
is applied into clinical waste incineration as an example in explaining this algebraic
structure. The same chapter also provides the definition of the membership value of
fuzzy edge connectivity of the omega algebra of the Fuzzy Autocatalytic Set of the
clinical waste incineration process.
Chapter 4 presents the extension algebraic model of omega algebra of the
Fuzzy Autocatalytic Set which is constructed in the previous chapter. This includes
the transformation semigroup of omega algebra of the Fuzzy Autocatalytic Set and
manifold representation of transformation semigroup of omega algebra of the clinical
waste incineration process.
Chapter 5 concludes the results and findings presented in the preceding
chapters and suggest several ideas for further research on this topic.
REFERENCES
Abraham, R. and Marsden, J. E., (1978). Foundation of Mechanics. (2nd
ed.). London:
The Benjamin / Cummings Publishing Company, Inc.
Blue, M., Bush B. and Puckett, J. (1997). Applications of Fuzzy Logic to Graph
Theory. Los Alamos National Laboratory. LA-UR-96-4792.
Blue, M., Bush B. and Puckett, J. (2002). Unified Approach to Fuzzy Graph
Problems. Fuzzy Sets and Systems. 125: 355-368.
Chaplin, M. (2006). Do we underestimate the importance of water in cell biology?
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 7: 861-866.
Ding, C., He, X., Xiong, H., Peng, H. and Holbrook, S. R. (2006). Transitive Closure
and Metric Inequality of Weighted Graphs: Detecting Protein Interaction
Modules Using Cliques. Int. J. Data Mining and Bioinformatics. 1(2): 162-
177.
Dubois, D. and Prade, H. (2005). Fuzzy elements in the fuzzy set. Proceedings of the
10th
International Fuzzy System Association (IFSA) Congress. 28-31 July.
China, Beijing. Pp. 55-60.
Eilenberg, S. (1976). Automata, languages, and machines. Vol B. New York:
Academic Press.
Egry-Nagy, A., Nehaniv, C. L., Rhodes, J. L. and Schilstra M. J. (2008). Automatic
Analysis of Computation in Biochemical Reactions. Biosystem. 94: 126-134.
Fortin, J., Dudois D. and Fargier, H. (2008). Gradual numbers and their Application
to Fuzzy Interval Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems. 6(2): 388-
402.
72
Gitman, I. and Levine, M.D. (1970). An Algorithm for Detecting Unimodal Fuzzy
Sets and Its Application As A Clustering Technique. IEEE Transaction on
Computers. 19(7): 583-593.
Halmos, P.R. (1960). Naïve Set Theory, New York: Van Nostrand.
Harary, F. (1969). Graph Theory. California, USA: Addison Wesley Publishing
Company.
Howie, J. M., (1976). An introduction To Semigroup Theory. (1st ed.). London:
Academic Press Inc. Ltd.
Jain, S. and Krishna, S. (1998). Autocatalytic Sets and the Growth of Complexity in
an Evolutionary model. Physical Review Letters. 81: 5684-5687.
Jain, S. and Krishna, S. (1999). Emergence and the Growth of Complexity Networks
in an Adaptive Systems. Computer Physics Communications. 121-122: 116-
121.
Jain, S. and Krishna, S. (2003). Graph Theory and the Evolution of Autocatalytic
Networks. In Bornholdt, S. & Schuster, H.G. eds. Handbook of Graphs and
Network. (355-395). Berlin: John Wiley and VCH Publishers.
Kandel, A. and Yelowitz, L. (1974). Fuzzy Chains. IEEE Transactions on Systems,
Man and Cybernetics. 4(5): 472-475.
Kauffman, S. A. (1971). Cellular Homeostasis, Epigenesist and Replication in
Randomly Aggregated Macromolecular Systems. Journal of Cybernetics. 1:
71-97.
Kauffman, S. A. (1995). At Home in the Universe- the Search for the Laws of Self-
Organization and Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Keller, J.M. and Tahani, H. (1992). Implementation of Conjunctive and Disjunctive
Fuzzy Logic Rules with Neural Networks. International Journal of
Approximate Reasoning. 6: 221-240.
Krohn, K. and Rhodes, J. (1965). Algebraic Theory of Machine. I. Prime
Decomposition Theorem for Finite Semigroup and Machine. Trans. Am.
Math. Soc. 116: 450-464.
73
Moore, R. E., Kearfott, R. B. and Cloud, M. J. (2009). Introduction to Interval
Analysis. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
Nur Izura Udzir, Razali Yaakob and Mohamed Nordin Zakaria (2002). C++:
Pengenalan Kepada Pengaturcaraan. Malaysia: Pearson Malaysia Sdn. Bhd.
Pathak, A. and Pal, S.K. (1986). Fuzzy Grammars in Syntactic Recognition of
Skeletal Maturity from X-Rays. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and
Cybernetics. 4(5): 657-667.
Plotkin, B.I., Greenglaz, L. Ja. and Gvaramija, A. A. (1992). Algebraic Structures in
Automata and Databases Theory. Singapore: World Scientific.
Rabin, M. O. and Scott, D. (1959). Finite Automata and Their Decision Problems.
IBM J. Res Develop. 3: 114-125.
Rhodes, J. L and Tilson B. R. (1968). Semigroup: Elementary Definitions and
Examples. In Arbib, M. A.. Algebraic Theory of Machines, Language, and
Semigroup. (1-13). New York: Academic Press Inc.
Riordan, D. and Hansen, B. K. (2002). A Fuzzy case-based System for Weather
Preditcion. Engineering Intelligent Systems. 3: 139-146.
Rosenfeld, A. (1975). Fuzzy Graphs. In Zadeh, L.A., Fu, K.S. and Shimura, M. eds.
Fuzzy Sets and Their Applications to Cognitive and Decision Processes. (pp.
77-95). New York: Academic Press.
Rossler, O. E. (1971). A System Theoretic Model of Biogenesis. Z. Naturforchung.
26b: 741-746.
Sabariah Baharun, Tahir Ahmad and Khairil Anuar Arshad (2002). Graphical
Presentation of a Clinical Waste Incineration Process. Proceedings of the 10th
National Symposium of Mathematical Sciences. 23-24 December. Johor
Bahru, Johor. Pp. 109-115.
Sabariah Baharun (2006). Modeling of Clinical Waste Incinerator Process Using
Novel Fuzzy Autocatalytic Set: Manifestation of Mathematical Thinking.
Doctor Philosophy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai.
74
Sabariah Baharun, Tahir Ahmad and Mohd Rashid Mohd Yusof (2009). Fuzzy Edge
Connectivity Relates the Variable in Clinical Waste Incineration Process.
Matematica 25(1): 31-38.
Tahir Ahmad (2000). Satu Kaitan Koszul Mendatar Untuk Berkas Tangen Unit Sfera
. Matematika 16(1): 41-46.
Tahir Ahmad, Sabariah Baharun and Khairil Anuar Arshad. (2010). Modeling A
Clinical Incineration Process Using Fuzzy Autocatalytic Set. Journal Math
Chem. 47:1263-1273.
Tamura, S., Higuchi, S. and Tanaka, K. (1971). Pattern Classification Based On
Fuzzy Relation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. 1(1):
61-66.
Tutte, W. T. (1984). Graph Theory. California, U.S.A.: Addison-Wesley Publishing
Company.
Watanabe, T. and Nakamura, A. (1983). On the Transformation Semigroup of Finite
Automata. J. Comput. System Sci. 26:107-138.
Yeh, R. T. and Bang, S. Y. (1975). Fuzzy relations, fuzzy graphs and their
applications to clustering analysis. In Zadeh, L.A., Fu, K.S. and Shimura, M.
eds. Fuzzy Sets and Their Applications to Cognitive and Decision Processes.
(pp. 125-149). New York: Academic Press.
Zadeh, L.A. (1965). Fuzzy set. Information and control. 8(3): 338-353.
2 2(T , , )S S