OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL · PDF filecoated. This may involve copper, nickel,...
Transcript of OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL · PDF filecoated. This may involve copper, nickel,...
DRAFT
OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
AIR QUALITY DIVISION
MEMORANDUM February 22, 2010
TO: Phillip Fielder, P.E., Permits and Engineering Group Manager
THROUGH: Kendal Stegmann, Sr. Environmental Manager, Compliance and Enforcement
THROUGH: Phil Martin, P.E., Engineering Section
THROUGH: Peer Review, Hal Wright, ROAT
FROM: Herb Neumann, Regional Office at Tulsa (ROAT)
SUBJECT: Evaluation of Permit Application No. 2009-008-TVR
Southwest United Industries
Tulsa Facility
422 S. St. Louis, Tulsa, Tulsa County
I. INTRODUCTION
The facility has been in operation since 1953 and currently operates under Permit No. 2002-017-
TV, issued January 10, 2005. The facility now submits an application to renew the Part 70
permit. Several minor changes in the facility will be discussed at appropriate places in this
Memorandum.
II. PROCESS DESCRIPTION
While the description to follow concerns aircraft parts as the major activity at this facility, other
industry groups are involved. For instance, the facility processes such parts as fertilizer plungers
and washing machine pulleys. The facility does not manufacture parts, but is involved in the
production, rework, or repair of parts. Aircraft parts that come to the facility require various
treatments. Mechanical and chemical cleaning are the usual starting points in the process, but
the exact starting point for any specific part depends on what the final treatment is to be. After
cleaning, parts are taken to areas where surfaces are treated by anodizing or plating. Various
materials are used in these plating processes, but the desired result is typically related to hardness
and wear resistance. Non-destructive testing (NDT) may occur when parts are received and/or
before they are shipped. Finally, some parts are painted.
The facility consists of several large buildings and a few smaller support buildings. The large
buildings are divided into functional areas identified as Buildings 1 through 11, 5A, and 7A/7B.
Functional areas include mechanical cleaning, usually by grit blasting, anodizing, which requires
roughly twenty tanks, and chrome plating, with six tanks and related rectifiers. There is auxiliary
equipment close to the plating area, as well as a vapor degreaser, and a paint shop with several
PERMIT MEMORANDUM 2009-008-TVR DRAFT
2
booths. Most (approximately 80%) of the machined aircraft parts the facility processes are
aluminum, with the remainder roughly evenly divided among titanium, stainless steel, and
various alloys. Most parts are first cleaned and then pretreated. Pretreatment can include non-
destructive inspection, degreasing, solvent wiping, acid or alkaline etch, zincating, shotpeening,
electrolytic striking, or desmutting. Parts are then processed through one or more of thermal
spray, anodizing, plating, passivating, conversion coating, or painting. Post treatment
possibilities include conversion coating, dyeing, sealing, stress relief baking, machining,
grinding, polishing, and non-destructive inspection. The exact steps followed by each part
depend on many variables, such as the type of part, customer requirements, and part
composition. Slightly more detailed descriptions of some of the processes used at the facility
follow this paragraph.
Electroplating
This is the application of a metallic coating on a conductive surface. Metal ions provided by
anodes or metal salts travel through electroplating solutions to the work piece (cathode) to be
coated. This may involve copper, nickel, cadmium, or other metals, but chrome is the metal
most commonly applied in this industry. Practically all of the chrome plating at this facility is
classified as hard chrome, which generally refers to a fairly thick coating applied at a high
current density.
Electroless nickel plating
This process is the autocatalytic chemical deposition of a metal coating on a work piece by
immersion in a solution, but without the use of electric current. It is used for corrosion and wear
resistance where precisely controlled coating thicknesses are required. This process uniformly
deposits a nickel-phosphorous alloy on outer and inner surfaces without special tooling.
Anodizing
This is an electrolytic process by which an oxide layer is produced on the surface of a base metal
for purposes such as corrosion resistance or electrical insulation. The part to be anodized acts as
the anode and the electrolyte is generally sulfuric acid or chromic acid. The depth of the oxide
layer formed is a function of time spent in solution. The facility typically uses this process on
aluminum parts.
Conversion coating
These coatings are usually applied to prepare a part for further surface activity. Three
conversion coatings used at this facility are chromating, phosphatizing, and oxiding. Chromating
involves applying a protective film of hexavalent chrome and active organic or inorganic
compounds to the surface of parts. At this facility, chromating is performed on aluminum parts
and on cadmium-plated parts. Phosphatizing involves the immersion of cadmium-plated, steel,
iron, or titanium parts in a hot solution of dilute phosphoric acid, along with other reagents.
Formation of hydrous crystals on the surface generally prepares the part for painting. Oxiding
puts an iron piece into a superheated hydroxide salt to produce ferrous oxides known as brown,
black, or blue oxide. These coatings must be protected by wax or oil to prevent corrosion.
PERMIT MEMORANDUM 2009-008-TVR DRAFT
3
Passivation
This process removes unwanted iron from alloys to make the part less susceptible to corrosion
(passive). Typically, a stainless steel part is immersed in a nitric acid and/or sodium dichromate
solution.
Thermal spray
Various non-hazardous powdered metals can be applied at high temperatures to build up a metal
surface, somewhat similar to spray-painting. The facility uses high-velocity oxy fuel (HVOF),
plasma spray, and wire spray equipment to perform this operation.
III. EQUIPMENT
Emission units have been arranged into Emission Unit Groups (EUGs) as outlined following.
Emission units that emit the same regulated air pollutants, trigger the same applicable
requirements, share the same compliance demonstration methods, and share the same proposed
compliance assurance certifications are combined as one EUG.
EUG 1 Facility Wide
This emission unit group is facility-wide. It includes all emission units and is established to
discuss the applicability of those rules or compliance demonstrations that may affect all sources
within the facility.
EUG 2 Paint Booths
There are five booths. One is used for maskant operations, as well as for painting. These
maskants are not “chemical milling maskants,” as that term is defined in 40 CFR 63.742. Booths
#1 and #2 have been replaced and Booth #5 is new.
EU ID Point # Name Construction Date
PB 1 P 1 Paint Booth #1 2009
PB 2 P 2 Paint Booth #2 2009
PB 3 P 3 Paint Booth #3 1990
PB 4 P 4 Paint Booth #4 – Maskant Operations 1990
PB 5 P 5 Paint Booth #5 2009
EUG 3 Chrome Plating
There are five tanks in hard chrome service. Aggregated, they have a capacity of 3,690 gallons,
122 square feet of surface area, and 11,500 amperes of current capacity. The tanks vary in size
to accommodate the various demands placed on the facility. Each tank has a mesh pad mist
eliminator, and ventilation hoods flow all exhaust to complex dry scrubbers. The anodizing tank
has 1,340 gallons capacity, 43 square feet of surface area, and 750 amperes of current capacity.
The anodizing tank utilizes a fume suppressant to control emissions.
PERMIT MEMORANDUM 2009-008-TVR DRAFT
4
EU ID Point # Name Construction Date
T-1 P 7 Tank #1111-Chromic anodizing 2009
T-2 P 8 Tank #268-Hard chrome 1955
T-3 P 9 Tank #269-Hard chrome 1955
T-4 P 10 Tank #270-Hard chrome 1955
T-5 P 11 Tank #271-Hard chrome 1955
T-6 P 12 Tank #272-Hard chrome 1955
EUG 4 Vapor Degreaser
The batch degreaser has a surface area of 14.2 square feet and uses perchloroethylene.
EU ID Point # Name Construction Date
VD-1 P 5 Tank #300 – Vapor Degreaser 1992
EUG 5 Fugitives (Hand-wipe Cleaning)
EU ID Point # Name Construction Date
FUG-1 P 6 Hand-wipe Cleaning N/A
Stack data for some of the emission points follow. The scrubbers associated with EUG 3 are
located on the roof.
Source Height above
grade Diameter Temperature
Exhaust
(acfm)
Boiler 1 20´ 8" 550°F 600
Boiler 2 20´ 10" 425°F 1,499
Paint booth 1 29´ 34" Ambient 3,600
Paint booth 2 25´ 34" Ambient 5,000
Paint booth 3 26´ 42" Ambient 7,800
Paint booth 4 21´ 55" Ambient 32,500
IV. EMISSIONS
EUG 1 Facility Wide
There are no emissions directly associated with this EUG.
EUG 2 Paint Booths
The original operating permit for this facility analyzed 1994 data for coating operations and the
original Part 70 permit analyzed data for 2002. The original permit contained a VOC limit of
16.74 TPY, designed to allow for growth, and conservatively high assumptions made in
analyzing data for the original Part 70 permit resulted in granting a slightly higher emission limit
of 17.5 TPY for VOC. There have been no significant changes in operations at the facility and
review of emission data for the intervening five years shows that the 17.5 TPY limit is several
times larger than the highest actual VOC emissions for any year.
PERMIT MEMORANDUM 2009-008-TVR DRAFT
5
EUG 3 Chrome Plating
The highest emission standard that could apply to this source is 0.030 mg/dscm, per 40 CFR
63.342(c)(1)(ii). Combined with the exhaust rate of 41,025 cfm for each scrubber, facility-wide
total emissions of chrome would be 80 lbs/yr or 0.04 TPY. Reference Method testing of the
scrubber exhausts shows actual emissions to be less than even the more stringent 0.015 mg/dscm
standard of 63.342(c)(1)(i).
EUG 4 Vapor Degreaser
The degreaser has a surface area of 14.2 square feet and uses perchloroethylene. The original
Part 70 permit limit is based on the MACT standard of 150 kg/m2/month, which is approximately
2.6 TPY. Actual emissions for 2008 were 1.73 TPY.
EUG 5 Fugitives (Hand-wipe Cleaning)
The original Part 70 permit authorized 2 TPY of VOC as a conservatively high estimate. Data
from 2008 show 0.50 TPY of VOC, all of which was HAP.
V. INSIGNIFICANT ACTIVITIES
The insignificant activities identified and justified on Part 1b of the forms in the application and
duplicated below were confirmed by the initial operating permit inspection. Records were
available to confirm the insignificance of the activities. Appropriate recordkeeping of activities
indicated below with an asterisk is specified in the Specific Conditions.
(1) Space heaters, boilers, process heaters and emergency flares less than or equal to 5
MMBTU/hr heat input (commercial natural gas). The facility has two boilers rated at less
than 5 MMBTUH each. It also has 12 small drying or curing ovens, each rated at less than 5
MMBTUH.
(2) *Emissions from fuel storage/dispensing equipment operated solely for facility owned
vehicles if fuel throughput is not more than 2,175 gallons/day, averaged over a 30-day
period. There is a single 30-gallon gasoline storage tank on-site that is filled between once a
week and once a month. This is far below the 2,175 gallons per day threshold, so only
annual recordkeeping will be required for this tank.
(3) Additions or upgrades of instrumentation or control systems that result in emissions increases
less than the pollutant quantities specified in OAC 252:100-8-3(e)(1).
(4) Cold degreasing operations utilizing solvents that are denser than air. There is a small tank
that uses a blend of aliphatic naphtha and aromatic naphtha. The facility used 110 gallons
(approx. 730 pounds) of naphtha blend during 2008.
(5) *Welding and soldering operations utilizing less than 100 pounds of solder and 53 tons per
year of electrodes. Most of this activity is a maintenance operation, but there is a small
amount of process-related activity. Total annual consumption of electrodes for both purposes
is approximately 0.3 tons.
(6) Torch cutting and welding of less than 200,000 tons of steel fabricated. Any torch cutting or
welding at this facility is a maintenance activity. As such, it is a trivial activity and no
recordkeeping is required.
(7) Hazardous waste and hazardous materials drum staging areas.
PERMIT MEMORANDUM 2009-008-TVR DRAFT
6
(8) Sanitary sewage collection and treatment facilities other than incinerators and Publicly
Owned Treatment Works (POTW). Stacks or vents for sanitary sewer plumbing traps are
also included (i.e., lift station). The only related activity is pretreatment of wastewater before
disposal to the POTW.
(9) *Activities having the potential to emit no more than 5 TPY (actual) of any criteria pollutant.
VI. OKLAHOMA AIR POLLUTION CONTROL RULES
OAC 252:100-1 (General Provisions) [Applicable]
Subchapter 1 includes definitions but there are no regulatory requirements.
OAC 252:100-2 (Incorporation by Reference) [Applicable]
This subchapter incorporates by reference applicable provisions of Title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations listed in OAC 252:100, Appendix Q. These requirements are addressed in
the “Federal Regulations” section.
OAC 252:100-3 (Air Quality Standards and Increments) [Applicable]
Subchapter 3 enumerates the primary and secondary ambient air quality standards and the
significant deterioration increments. At this time, all of Oklahoma is in “attainment” of these
standards.
OAC 252:100-5 (Registration, Emissions Inventory and Annual Operating Fees) [Applicable]
Subchapter 5 requires sources of air contaminants to register with Air Quality, file emission
inventories annually, and pay annual operating fees based upon total annual emissions of
regulated pollutants. Emission inventories were submitted and fees paid for previous years as
required.
OAC 252:100-8 (Permits for Part 70 Sources) [Applicable]
Part 5 includes the general administrative requirements for Part 70 permits. Any planned
changes in the operation of the facility that result in emissions not authorized in the permit and
that exceed the “Insignificant Activities” or “Trivial Activities” thresholds require prior
notification to AQD and may require a permit modification. Insignificant activities refer to those
individual emission units either listed in Appendix I or whose actual calendar year emissions do
not exceed the following limits.
5 TPY of any one criteria pollutant
2 TPY of any one hazardous air pollutant (HAP) or 5 TPY of multiple HAP or 20%
of any threshold less than 10 TPY for a HAP that the EPA may establish by rule
Emission limitations and operational requirements necessary to assure compliance with all
applicable requirements for all sources are taken from the existing operating, from the permit
application, or are developed from the applicable requirement.
OAC 252:100-9 (Excess Emissions Reporting Requirements) [Applicable]
Except as provided in OAC 252:100-9-7(a)(1), the owner or operator of a source of excess
emissions shall notify the Director as soon as possible but no later than 4:30 p.m. the following
PERMIT MEMORANDUM 2009-008-TVR DRAFT
7
working day of the first occurrence of excess emissions in each excess emission event. No later
than thirty (30) calendar days after the start of any excess emission event, the owner or operator
of an air contaminant source from which excess emissions have occurred shall submit a report
for each excess emission event describing the extent of the event and the actions taken by the
owner or operator of the facility in response to this event. Request for affirmative defense, as
described in OAC 252:100-9-8, shall be included in the excess emission event report. Additional
reporting may be required in the case of ongoing emission events and in the case of excess
emissions reporting required by 40 CFR Parts 60, 61, or 63.
OAC 252:100-13 (Open Burning) [Applicable]
Open burning of refuse and other combustible material is prohibited except as authorized in the
specific examples and under the conditions listed in this subchapter.
OAC 252:100-19 (Particulate Matter (PM)) [Applicable]
Section 19-4 regulates emissions of PM from new and existing fuel-burning equipment, with
emission limits based on maximum design heat input rating. The only fuel-burning equipment
items are insignificant activities. Appendix C specifies a PM emission limitation of 0.60
lbs/MMBTU for all equipment at this facility with a heat input rating of 10 Million BTU per
hour (MMBTUH) or less. AP-42 (7/98) Table 1.4-1 lists natural gas TPM emissions to be 7.6
lbs/million scf or about 0.0076 lbs/MMBTU, which is in compliance.
Section 19-12 regulates emissions of PM from industrial processes. All such emissions are
negligible.
OAC 252:100-25 (Visible Emissions and Particulates) [Applicable]
No discharge of greater than 20% opacity is allowed except for short-term occurrences that
consist of not more than one six-minute period in any consecutive 60 minutes, not to exceed
three such periods in any consecutive 24 hours. In no case shall the average of any six-minute
period exceed 60% opacity. There are no units with emissions likely to exceed these standards.
OAC 252:100-29 (Fugitive Dust) [Applicable]
No person shall cause or permit the discharge of any visible fugitive dust emissions beyond the
property line on which the emissions originated in such a manner as to damage or to interfere
with the use of adjacent properties, or cause air quality standards to be exceeded, or to interfere
with the maintenance of air quality standards. Under normal operating conditions, this facility has
negligible potential to violate this requirement; therefore it is not necessary to require specific
precautions to be taken.
OAC 252:100-31 (Sulfur Compounds) [Applicable]
Part 2 limits emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO2) from any one existing source or any one new
petroleum and natural gas process source subject to OAC 252:100-31-26(a)(1). Ambient air
concentrations of SO2 at any given point shall not be greater than 1,300 g/m3 in a 5-minute
period of any hour, 1,200 g/m3 for a 1-hour average, 650 g/m
3 for a 3-hour average, 130 g/m
3
for a 24-hour average, or 80 g/m3
for an annual average. The two small boilers are insignificant
activities and burn commercial grade natural gas. SO2 emissions from these sources are
negligible.
PERMIT MEMORANDUM 2009-008-TVR DRAFT
8
OAC 252:100-33 (Nitrogen Oxides) [Not Applicable]
This subchapter limits new fuel-burning equipment with rated heat input greater than or equal to
50 MMBTUH to fuel-specific emissions of NOx per MMBTU, three-hour average. There are no
equipment items that exceed the 50 MMBTUH threshold.
OAC 252:100-35 (Carbon Monoxide) [Not Applicable]
This subchapter affects gray iron cupolas, blast furnaces, basic oxygen furnaces, petroleum
catalytic cracking units, and petroleum catalytic reforming units. There are no affected sources.
OAC 252:100-37 (Volatile Organic Compounds) [Part 7 Applicable]
Part 3 requires storage tanks constructed after December 28, 1974, with a capacity of 400 gallons
or more and storing a VOC with a vapor pressure greater than 1.5 psia to be equipped with a
permanent submerged fill pipe or with an organic vapor recovery system. The only storage tank
the facility has is a 30-gallon gasoline tank for refilling the forklifts.
Part 5 limits the VOC content of coatings used in coating lines and operations. All of the paint
booths in the facility are “new,” as that is defined in Section 37-3. Compliance with OAC
252:100-39-47 and 40 CFR 63 Subpart GG satisfies the requirements of Part 5. The facility shall
use compliant coatings for sources not addressed in 39-47 or GG. Routine maintenance of the
facility and equipment is exempt.
Part 7 requires fuel-burning equipment to be operated and maintained so as to minimize VOC
emissions. Temperature and available air must be sufficient to provide essentially complete
combustion. The small boilers are designed to provide essentially complete combustion of
organic materials.
OAC 252:100-39 (VOC in Nonattainment and Former Nonattainment Areas) [Applicable]
This subchapter imposes additional conditions beyond those of Subchapter 37 on emissions of
organic materials from new and existing facilities in Tulsa and Oklahoma Counties.
Part 7 covers Specific Operations.
Subsection 42(a) covers cold cleaning units, noting standards for construction and operation of
such equipment. Paragraph 1 outlines equipment standards, including doors or covers, closed
drainage, and conspicuous labeling. Paragraph 2 describes operating requirements; namely,
appropriate draining procedures and times, keeping the unit covered when not in use, proper
storage and disposal of waste solvent, and stipulates that spraying of VOC can only be in a solid
stream. Paragraph 3 outlines requirements for controls if the solvent’s vapor pressure exceeds
certain limits. Paragraph 4 lists compliance and recordkeeping criteria. The facility has two cold
units that comply with these requirements.
Subsection 42 (b) covers vapor type metal degreasers, noting standards for construction and
operation of such equipment. Paragraph 1 outlines equipment standards including doors and
covers in Subparagraph A; safety switches in Subparagraph B; equipment specifications such as
freeboard, chillers, etc., in Subparagraph C; and conspicuous labeling of the equipment in
Subparagraph D. Paragraph 2 describes the labeling information required to comply with
Subparagraph 1(D). Paragraph 3 lists compliance and recordkeeping criteria. The facility is in
compliance.
Section 46 covers the coating of parts and products, excluding architectural coating, aerospace
coating, and automobile refinishing. This facility processes parts for industries other than
aerospace and shall comply with the VOC content per gallon of as applied coating standards
PERMIT MEMORANDUM 2009-008-TVR DRAFT
9
described in 39-46(d). VOC-containing materials used in cleanup shall be included in the
calculations of VOC content per gallon applied unless the “housekeeping” requirements of 39-
46(g) are met. The facility is in compliance.
Section 47 covers VOC emissions from aerospace industries coating operations, with requirements
specifically applicable to aerospace vehicle and component coating operations at aerospace
manufacturing, rework, or repair facilities located in Tulsa County that have the potential to emit
more than 10 TPY of VOC from coating operations. Coating operations include associated
cleaning operations and surface preparation. This section is modeled on, and closely tracks, the
Aerospace MACT found in federal NESHAP, 40 CFR 63 Subpart GG. With the exception of
“specialty coatings,” as that term is defined in §39-47(c)(5), standards and requirements for VOC
content, application equipment, control equipment, housekeeping measures, solvent cleaning
operations, and general standards reference appropriate sections of GG. Standards for specialty
coatings are addressed in §39-47(d). With the exception of specialty coatings, each of these areas
has been addressed in Section VII (Federal Regulations). Note that the low volume exemption is
modified in §39-47 to include specialty coatings in the 50-gallon/200 gallon standard. In similar
fashion, monitoring, recordkeeping, and test methods reference appropriate sections of GG,
excepting specialty coatings. These topics were also addressed in Section V. The compliance
date provisions of §39-47(h) also reference GG, stating that compliance with GG constitutes a
demonstration of compliance with §39-47, again with particular attention paid to specialty
coatings.
The VOC content of specialty coatings must meet the specifications listed in OAC 252:100
Appendix N. These standards shall be met by as-applied coatings, but do not apply to touch-up,
aerosol, or DOD “classified” coatings. Compliance with the specialty coating VOC limits may
be achieved through the use of control equipment, provided that the equipment has a combined
capture and control efficiency of 81% or greater by weight. If control equipment is used to
comply with the Appendix N standards, a monitoring plan describing the parameter and its range
shall be submitted, and the equipment must be installed, calibrated, operated and maintained
according to the manufacturer’s specifications. Monitoring records of the parameter(s) shall be
maintained. Spray gun cleaners used for specialty coatings shall be visually inspected for leaks
and all other potential sources of leaks at least once per month, while the cleaner is in operation.
The facility shall maintain a current list of all Appendix N coatings in use, showing category, as-
applied VOC content, and 12-month usage.
OAC 252:100-42 (Toxic Air Contaminants (TAC)) [Applicable]
This subchapter regulates toxic air contaminants (TAC) that are emitted into the ambient air in
areas of concern (AOC). Any work practice, material substitution, or control equipment required
by the Department prior to June 11, 2004, to control a TAC, shall be retained, unless a
modification is approved by the Director. Since no AOC has been designated there are no
specific requirements for this facility at this time.
OAC 252:100-43 (Testing, Monitoring, and Recordkeeping) [Applicable]
This subchapter provides general requirements for testing, monitoring and recordkeeping and
applies to any testing, monitoring or recordkeeping activity conducted at any stationary source.
To determine compliance with emissions limitations or standards, the Air Quality Director may
require the owner or operator of any source in the state of Oklahoma to install, maintain and
PERMIT MEMORANDUM 2009-008-TVR DRAFT
10
operate monitoring equipment or to conduct tests, including stack tests, of the air contaminant
source. All required testing must be conducted by methods approved by the Air Quality Director
and under the direction of qualified personnel. A notice-of-intent to test and a testing protocol
shall be submitted to Air Quality at least 30 days prior to any EPA Reference Method stack tests.
Emissions and other data required to demonstrate compliance with any federal or state emission
limit or standard, or any requirement set forth in a valid permit shall be recorded, maintained,
and submitted as required by this subchapter, an applicable rule, or permit requirement. Data
from any required testing or monitoring not conducted in accordance with the provisions of this
subchapter shall be considered invalid. Nothing shall preclude the use, including the exclusive
use, of any credible evidence or information relevant to whether a source would have been in
compliance with applicable requirements if the appropriate performance or compliance test or
procedure had been performed.
The following Oklahoma Air Pollution Control Rules are not applicable to this facility:
OAC 252:100-11 Alternative Reduction not eligible
OAC 252:100-15 Mobile Sources not in source category
OAC 252:100-17 Incinerators not type of emission unit
OAC 252:100-23 Cotton Gins not type of emission unit
OAC 252:100-24 Feed & Grain Facility not in source category
OAC 252:100-47 Landfills not type of source category
VII. FEDERAL REGULATIONS
PSD, 40 CFR Part 52 [Not Applicable]
PSD does not apply. Final total emissions are less than the threshold of 250 TPY of any single
regulated pollutant and the facility is not one of the listed stationary sources with an emission
threshold of 100 TPY.
NSPS, 40 CFR Part 60 [Not Applicable]
There are no affected facilities or sources at this site covered under any subpart.
NESHAP, 40 CFR Part 61 [Not Applicable]
There are no emissions of any of the regulated pollutants: arsenic, asbestos, benzene, beryllium,
coke oven emissions, mercury, radionuclides, or vinyl chloride.
NESHAP, 40 CFR Part 63 [Subparts N, T, and GG Applicable]
Subpart N (Chromium Emissions From Hard and Decorative Chromium Electroplating and
Chromium Anodizing Tanks) affects the chrome plating and anodizing tanks of EUG 4. All
affected hard chrome tanks (#268, #269, #270, #271, and #272) have mist eliminators in their
hoods, and are exhausted to one of two three-stage composite mesh pad scrubbers. Combined
capacity of these tanks is 11,500 amperes, yielding a maximum cumulative potential rectifier
capacity, as defined in §63.341(a), of 11,500 amps 8,400 hrs/yr 0.7 = 67.6 million amp-
hrs/yr. This capacity would qualify the facility as a “large hard chrome electroplating facility,”
but they have maintained records required under §63.342(c)(2)(i)(B) to demonstrate that the
PERMIT MEMORANDUM 2009-008-TVR DRAFT
11
facility is “small.” The hard chrome tanks must meet the §63.342(c)(1)(i) chrome standard of
0.03 mg/dscm. The facility meets the anodizing tank standard found in §63.342(d)(2) for tanks
using fume suppressants, which requires that surface tension not exceed the standard of 45
dynes/cm at any time during tank operation. The facility shall also practice certain work practice
standards that must be described in a written operating and maintenance (O&M) plan. The
facility has such a plan.
Subpart T (Halogenated Solvent Cleaners) affects the perchloroethylene (perc or
tetrachloroethylene) vapor degreaser. Applicant demonstrates compliance using the alternative
standard of 40 CFR 63.464. Since the machine has a solvent/air interface, 464(a)(1) sets out the
relevant information. A log of solvent additions and deletions must be maintained, and these
data must be used to show that the emission limit of §464’s Table 5 is met. The Table 5 standard
for batch machines is a rolling three-month average not to exceed 150 kg/m2. Solvent
measurements and calculation methods are described in 40 CFR 63.465(b) & (c), and are
referenced in the Specific Conditions. Applicant is in compliance.
Subpart GG, (Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Facilities), applies to facilities engaged,
either in whole or in part, in the manufacture or rework of commercial, civil, or military aerospace
vehicles or components and that are major sources as defined in §63.2. Note that this facility is not
a general aviation rework facility, as that term is defined in §63.742. Affected sources within the
facility are enumerated in §63.741(c) (1), (2), (3) & (7). A discussion of each follows.
§63.741(c) (1) Each cleaning operation is an affected source, specifically including all hand-wipe
cleaning operations, each spray gun cleaning operation, and all flush cleaning operations. Specific
standards covering cleaning operations are found in §63.744. Housekeeping measures described in
§744(a) affect all solvents not specifically exempted by Table 1 of the section. General measures
include keeping used solvent-laden materials in closed bags or containers, storing solvents in
closed containers, and handling solvents so as to minimize spills. Solvents used in hand-wipe
cleaning must meet one of three criteria described in §744(b). The criteria are to: (A) meet the
composition requirements of Table 1; (B) have a composite vapor pressure less than 45 mm Hg; or
(C) demonstrate a reduction of 60% in use of solvents over a 1996/97 baseline. The facility has
chosen method B to achieve compliance, including the use of acetone, which has been delisted as a
VOC and HAP, and is not controlled by GG. Four methods for spray gun cleaning are listed in
§744(c). These methods include: (i) an enclosed system; (ii) nonatomized cleaning; (iii)
disassembled spray gun cleaning; and (iv) atomizing cleaning. The facility uses (ii), forcing
cleaning solvent through the gun with the atomizing cap in place. All operations shall be inspected
monthly, and all leaks repaired as soon as practicable. If leaks cannot be repaired within 15 days
of detection, the unit shall be drained and shut down until repairs are performed.
§63.741(c) (2) The General Standards contain requirements for primer and topcoat operations.
These Specific Standards are found in §63.745. The facility is required to identify each coating as a
topcoat or primer. Further, some coatings may qualify as specialty coatings as defined in 40 CFR
63.472 and are not controlled under the restrictions on topcoats or primers, or a particular coating
may satisfy the low-use exemption of §63.741(g). Handling and transfer of primers and topcoats
must be performed in such a manner as to minimize spills. Further standards are specified at
§63.745(c), because VOC emissions at these paint booths were not designed to be subject to add-
on controls. Organic HAP emissions and VOC emissions from primers are limited to 2.9 pounds
per gallon (ppg) of coating, less water, as applied. Compliance may be shown by maintaining all
coatings below the specified limits or by using monthly weighted averages. The facility has
chosen the former, as described in §63.745(e)(1). The use of HVLP is one of the specified
PERMIT MEMORANDUM 2009-008-TVR DRAFT
12
methods of application and hand-held spray cans for stenciling or for hard-to-reach spots are
specifically allowed per §63.745(f).
§63.741(c) (3) This discussion is essentially identical to that immediately preceding, except that
organic HAP emissions and VOC emissions from topcoats are limited to 3.5 pounds per gallon
(ppg) of coating, less water, as applied.
§63.741(c) (7) The standards for inorganic HAPs are described in §63.745(g), including provisions
requiring compliance with applicable portions of Subpart A; but exempt from compliance with the
start-up and shutdown provisions of §63.6 with the proviso that the dry filter is operated in
accordance with manufacturer’s specifications. Booths 3 and 4 are existing booths and booths 1, 2,
and 5 are new. All systems are downflow, with two-stage particulate filters that meet the challenge
criteria of Tables 1, 2, 3, and 4, and allow for continuous monitoring of pressure drop. Coating
must immediately cease whenever pressure drop falls outside a specified range. Per §744(g)(2)(iv)
all dry filter booths have differential pressure gauges, with readings taken at least once per shift.
Each booth is shut down and corrective action taken when readings fall outside the acceptable
range.
CAM, 40 CFR Part 64 [Not Applicable]
This part applies to any pollutant-specific emission unit at a major source that is required to
obtain an operating permit, for any application for an initial operating permit submitted after
April 18, 1998, that addresses “large emissions units,” or any application that addresses “large
emissions units” as a significant modification to an operating permit, or for any application for
renewal of an operating permit, if it meets all of the following criteria.
It is subject to an emission limit or standard for an applicable regulated air pollutant
It uses a control device to achieve compliance with the applicable emission limit or standard
It has potential emissions, prior to the control device, of the applicable regulated air
pollutant of 100 TPY
This facility contains no large emission units and is not subject.
Chemical Accident Prevention Provisions, 40 CFR Part 68 [Not Applicable]
This facility will not process or store more than the threshold quantity of any regulated substance
(Section 112r of the Clean Air Act 1990 Amendments). More information on this federal
program is available on the web page: www.epa.gov/ceppo.
Stratospheric Ozone Protection, 40 CFR Part 82 [Not Applicable]
These standards apply to Class I & II substances. This facility does not utilize any Class I & II
substances. To the extent it might use such substances in the future, it shall comply with
Standard Condition XX.
VIII. COMPLIANCE
Inspection
The most recent full compliance evaluation of this facility was performed by DEQ Regional Office
at Tulsa Environmental Specialist Helen King on February 13, 2008. Her report indicates that the
facility appeared to be in compliance at that time. Pamela Wood, Southwest’s EHS Coordinator
PERMIT MEMORANDUM 2009-008-TVR DRAFT
13
and Marcy Klass-Jones, Southwest’s consultant, provided a walk-through of the facility for DEQ
ROAT permit writer Herb Neumann on November 24, 2009, viewing the new equipment. All
equipment was in place, but due to production requirements, most items did not have first
operation until mid-February, 2010. All visits have confirmed the proper installation of equipment
and that required records are being maintained.
Testing Performance testing required by the Chrome MACT was performed on May 14 and 15, 1997.
Details were provided in the memorandum associated with the initial TV permit. Reference
Method 319 testing required to show compliance with the Aerospace MACT standards for spray
booths with inorganic HAP is not performed by the facility, but the following data for the Camfil
Farr SF95 5-Pocket Bag Filters in current use have been provided by the manufacturer, based on
independent testing performed in March, 2003.
Table 3 liquid-phase requirements for new sources
Aerodynamic diameter Required filtration efficiency Observed efficiency
> 2.0 > 95% 98%
> 1.0 > 80% 94%
> 0.42 > 65% 84%
Table 4 solid-phase requirements for new sources
Aerodynamic diameter Required filtration efficiency Observed efficiency
> 2.5 > 95% 99%
> 1.1 > 85% 96%
> 0.70 > 75% 93%
Tier Classification And Public Review This application has been classified as Tier II based on the request for a renewal Part 70 operating
permit for an existing major source. Public notice of filing of this application was published in
the Tulsa World on July 30, 2009. The application was available for review at the DEQ
Regional Office at Tulsa, 3105 E. Skelly Drive, Tulsa, and at the AQD office in Oklahoma City.
Notice of the 30-day public review opportunity for the draft permit will be published in a
newspaper of general circulation in Tulsa County. Information on all permit actions is available
for review by the public in the Air Quality section of the DEQ Web page: www.deq.state.ok.us/.
The applicant has submitted an affidavit that they are not seeking a permit for land use or for any
operation upon land owned by others without their knowledge. The affidavit certifies that the
applicant owns the real property. This site is not within 50 miles of the Oklahoma border.
Fee paid Renewal Title V operating permit fee of $1,000.
PERMIT MEMORANDUM 2009-008-TVR DRAFT
14
IX. SUMMARY
This facility was constructed as described in the application. There are no active Air Quality
compliance or enforcement issues that would affect the issuance of this permit. Issuance of the
operating permit is recommended, pending public comment and EPA review.
DRAFT
PERMIT TO OPERATE
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL FACILITY
SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
Southwest United Industries Permit No. 2009-008-TVR
Aviation Manufacturing and Rework Facility
The permittee is authorized to operate in conformity with the specifications submitted to Air
Quality on July 23, 2009. The Evaluation Memorandum dated February 22, 2010, explains the
derivation of applicable permit requirements and estimates of emissions; however, it does not
contain operating limitations or permit requirements. Continuing operations under this permit
constitutes acceptance of, and consent to, the conditions contained herein.
1. Points of emissions and emissions limitations for each point. [OAC 252:100-8-6(a)]
a) EUG-1 Facility-Wide
There are no emissions directly associated with this EUG.
b) EUG 2 Paint Booths
There are five booths. One is used for maskant operations, as well as for painting. The EUG is
authorized VOC emissions of 17.5 TPY.
EU ID Point # Name Construction Date
PB 1 P 1 Paint Booth #1 2009*
PB 2 P 2 Paint Booth #2 2009*
PB 3 P 3 Paint Booth #3 1990
PB 4 P 4 Paint Booth #4 – Maskant Operations 1990
PB5 P 5 Paint Booth #5 2009
* Booths replaced in 2009.
c) EUG 3 Chrome Plating
The five tanks in hard chrome service have an aggregate capacity of 3,690 gallons, 122 square
feet of surface area, and 11,500 amperes of current capacity. The hard chrome tanks have mist
eliminators and flow their exhaust to one of two identical mesh pad scrubbers. Anodizing tank
#1111, has capacity of 1,578 gallons, 31 square feet of surface area, and is expected to average
800 amps. The anodizing tank utilizes a fume suppressant to control emissions.
SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 2009-008-TVR DRAFT 2
EU ID Point # Name Construction Date
T-1 P 7 Tank #1111-Chromic anodizing 2009
T-2 P 8 Tank #268-Hard chrome 1955
T-3 P 9 Tank #269-Hard chrome 1955
T-4 P 10 Tank #270-Hard chrome 1955
T-5 P 11 Tank #271-Hard chrome 1955
T-6 P 12 Tank #272-Hard chrome 1955
No emission limits are set, but compliance with the MACT N limit of 0.03 mg/dscm is required
for the hard chrome scrubbers. Compliance with the MACT N surface tension standard of 45
dynes/cm is required for the anodizing tank. See Specific Condition #16 for more details.
d) EUG 4 Vapor Degreaser
The degreaser has a surface area of 14.2 square feet and uses perchloroethylene. Annual
authorized emissions are equivalent to those determined by compliance with a limit of 150
kg/m2/month , which is more stringent than the MACT T limit, and shall be demonstrated on a 3-
month-rolling basis. Also see Specific Conditions #14 and #15.
EU ID Point # Name Construction Date
VD-1 P 5 Tank #300 – Vapor Degreaser 1992
e) EUG 5 Fugitives (Hand-wipe Cleaning)
A level of 2 TPY of VOC is authorized.
EU ID Point # Name Construction Date
FUG-1 P 6 Hand-wipe Cleaning N/A
f) EUG 6 Insignificant Activities
1) Space heaters, boilers, process heaters and emergency flares less than or equal to 5
MMBTU/hr heat input (commercial natural gas). The facility has two boilers and 12
drying/curing ovens rated at less than 5 MMBTUH each.
2) *Emissions from fuel storage/dispensing equipment operated solely for facility owned
vehicles if fuel throughput is not more than 2,175 gallons/day, averaged over a 30-day
period. There is a single 30-gallon gasoline storage tank on site that is filled between once
a week and once a month. This is far below the 2,175 gallons per day threshold, so only
annual recordkeeping is required for this tank.
3) Additions or upgrades of instrumentation or control systems that result in emissions
increases less than the pollutant quantities specified in OAC 252:100-8-3(e)(1).
4) Cold degreasing operations utilizing solvents that are denser than air.
5) *Welding and soldering operations utilizing less than 100 pounds of solder and 53 tons per
year of electrodes. Most of this activity is a maintenance operation, but there is a small
amount of process-related activity.
SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 2009-008-TVR DRAFT 3
6) Torch cutting and welding of less than 200,000 tons of steel fabricated. Any torch cutting
or welding at this facility is a maintenance activity. As such, it is a trivial activity and no
recordkeeping is required.
7) Hazardous waste and hazardous materials drum staging areas.
8) Sanitary sewage collection and treatment facilities other than incinerators and Publicly
Owned Treatment Works (POTW). Stacks or vents for sanitary sewer plumbing traps are
also included (i.e., lift station). There is only pretreatment of wastewater before disposal to
the POTW.
9) *Activities having the potential to emit no more than 5 TPY (actual) of any criteria
pollutant.
2. The permittee shall be authorized to operate this facility continuously (24 hours per day, every
day of the year). [OAC 252:100-8-6(a)]
3. Fuel-burning equipment at this facility shall burn only commercial-grade natural gas.
[OAC 252:100-37-36]
4. Organic HAP emissions from primers shall be limited to an organic HAP content level of 2.9
pounds per gallon (ppg) as applied, less water. VOC emissions from primers shall be limited to
a VOC content level of 2.9 ppg (less water and exempt solvents) as applied. Organic HAP
emissions from topcoats and self-priming topcoats shall be limited to an organic HAP content
level of 3.5 ppg as applied, less water. VOC emissions from topcoats and self-priming topcoats
shall be limited to a VOC content level of 3.5 ppg (less water and exempt solvents) as applied.
The terms “primers,” “topcoats,” and “self-priming topcoats,” as used in this Specific Condition
(SC) and in SC #8 and SC #9 carry the definition of these terms found in OAC 252:100-39-47
and/or 40 CFR 63 Subpart GG. These HAP and VOC content standards do not apply to those
coatings that possess additional performance criteria beyond those of primers or topcoats. Such
coatings are identified as specialty coatings, and are addressed in Specific Condition No. 9 below.
[OAC 252:100-39-47(d)(1)(B), 40 CFR 63.745(c)]
5. The VOC content of specialty coatings, as specialty coating is defined in OAC 252:100-39-
47(c), with an equivalent definition in 40 CFR 63.742, shall not exceed the levels specified in OAC
252:100 Appendix N (as applied). [OAC 252:100-39-47(d)(1)(A)]
6. The requirements for primers, topcoats, specialty coatings, and chemical milling maskants
described in 40 CFR 63.745, 40 CFR 63.747, and OAC 252:100-39-47(d), do not apply to the
use of such coatings for which the annual total of each separate formulation used at the facility
does not exceed 50 gallons and the combined annual total of all such coatings does not exceed
200 gallons. Primers, topcoats, and specialty coatings exempted under §63.745(f)(3),
§63.745(g)(4), or §39-47(a) are not included in the 50- and 200-gallon limits. Since the
Oklahoma rule is more restrictive than the MACT, it is the primary citation.
[OAC 252:100-39-47(d)(1)(D)]
7. Primers and topcoats containing inorganic HAPs shall be sprayed only in booths meeting the
requirements of the Aerospace MACT, including the challenges of Tables 1 and 2 for booths #3
and #4 and of Tables 3 and 4 for booths #1, #2, and #5. More detail is found in the citation. The
SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 2009-008-TVR DRAFT 4
dry particulate filter systems on these booths shall be maintained in good working order. The
differential pressure gauge across the filter banks shall be continuously monitored and the
pressure drop ( P) read and recorded at least once per shift. If P exceeds the filter
manufacturer’s recommended limit(s), the booth shall be immediately shut down and corrective
action taken. [40 CFR 63.745(g)]
8. Coating operations shall use HVLP spray guns or one of the alternate methods listed in 40
CFR 63.745(f)(1). Exemptions to this requirement are specified in (f)(3), and include limited
access areas, fillers that adversely affect atomization, thin film applications, stenciling, lettering,
other identification markings, hand-held spray can applications, and touch-up and repair
operations. [40 CFR 63.745(f)]
9. A list of all aerospace coating products in current use (none older than 12 months is required)
shall be maintained, showing the type of coating (primer, topcoat, or individual specialty as
identified in Appendix N), and any information necessary to classify it further as to possible
exemption under SC #7. [OAC 252:100-43]
10. Any coatings that are not subject to MACT GG or to OAC 252:100-39-47 are subject to
OAC 252:100-39-46. Such coatings shall demonstrate compliance with the standards of 39-
46(d) on a daily weighted-average basis. Cleanup materials may be exempted from this
calculation only if the conditions of 39-46(g) are met. [OAC 252:100-39-46]
11. All hand-wipe cleaning solvents shall have composite vapor pressure no greater than 45 mm
Hg at 20ºC or shall meet the composition requirements of Table 1 of 40 CFR 63.744. Good
housekeeping shall be observed, with measures detailing proper handling of fresh and spent
solvents and solvent-laden materials being described in 40 CFR 63.744(a). Cleaning solvents with
HAP and VOC content below the de minimis levels of §63.741(f) are exempt from these
requirements. Thirteen cleaning operations exempt from these requirements are listed in 40 CFR
63.744(e). [OAC 252:100-39-47(d)(4), 40 CFR 63.744(a & b)]
12. Only the following methods shall be used for spray gun cleaning.
a) an enclosed system. The enclosed system shall be open only while inserting or removing
the gun, and cleaning consist of forcing solvent through the gun. Monthly inspections
shall be performed while the system is in operation, with visual inspection of the seals
and other potential sources of leaks. Leaks must be repaired as soon as practicable, but
always within 15 days. If repairs cannot be effected within 15 days, the unit shall be
drained and use discontinued.
b) nonatomized cleaning. Place cleaning solvent in the pressure pot and force it through the
gun with the atomizing cap in place. No atomizing air is to be used. Direct the cleaning
solvent from the gun into a waste container that is closed when not in use.
c) disassembled spray gun cleaning When the guns are disassembled, they may be cleaned by
hand in a vat, which shall remain closed except while in use, or allowed to soak in a vat,
which shall be opened only while inserting or removing the parts.
SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 2009-008-TVR DRAFT 5
d) atomizing cleaning. Force the cleaning solvent through the gun and direct the resulting
atomized spray into a waste container that is fitted with a device designed to capture the
atomized cleaning solvent emissions.
In all cases, good housekeeping shall be practiced, with measures detailing proper handling of
fresh and spent solvents and solvent-laden materials described in 40 CFR 63.744(a). Solvents with
HAP and VOC content below the de minimis levels of §63.741(f) are exempt from these
requirements. [OAC 252:100-39-47(d)(4), 40 CFR 63.744(a & c)]
13. Excluding those operations that use Table 1 or semi-aqueous solvents, the used cleaning
solvent from each cleaning of an aerospace part, assembly, or coating unit component (except
spray guns) shall be emptied into an enclosed container or collection system that is kept closed
while not in use. [40 CFR 63.744(d)]
14. The vapor degreaser of EUG 7 is subject to the Halogenated Solvent Cleaning MACT (40
CFR 63 Subpart T) and shall comply with the requirements of that subpart.
a) Standards are contained in §63.464 and require that a log of solvent additions and deletions
be maintained, and that the 3-month rolling average emissions not exceed 150 kg/m2/month.
b) Test methods described in §63.465 describe the method of measuring additions and deletions
and outline the formulas to be used in calculating the rolling average.
c) Recordkeeping described in §63.467 requires that all data recorded for use in the
calculations, as well as the calculations themselves, as these are described in (a) and (b)
preceding, be maintained in written or electronic form for a period of five years from the date of
recording.
Required reporting is described in §63.468. These reports include an initial notification of the
new machines, as detailed in §468(b), an initial statement of compliance, as detailed in §468(e),
and an annual solvent emission report, as detailed in §468(g). [40 CFR 63, Subpart T]
15. The permittee shall comply with the following outlined provisions for operation of the
degreaser, which are further detailed in OAC 252:100-39-42(b). [OAC 252:100-39-42]
a) The unit door shall operate easily and without disturbing the vapor zone.
b) The unit shall have safety switches to shut off sump heat if the coolant is not circulating
or exceeds the recommended level.
c) The unit shall have one or more of certain control devices or techniques, including a
freeboard ratio not less than 0.75, a chiller, enclosed design, carbon adsorption, or any
system whose efficiency is at least equal to any of the first four listed.
d) A conspicuous label summarizing the operating procedures shall be permanently
attached to the unit. At a minimum, this label shall include all of the provisions
described in OAC 252:100-39-42(b)(2).
16. This facility is subject to MACT N, Standards for Chromium Emissions from Hard and
Decorative Chromium Electroplating and Chromium Anodizing Tanks, as published in the
Federal Register on January 25, 1995. Records of capacity (amp-hrs) shall be maintained to
show that the facility continues to be a “small” existing source. Hard chrome tanks #268, 269,
SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 2009-008-TVR DRAFT 6
270, 271, and 272 are subject to the 0.03 mg/dscm standard of 40 CFR 63.342(c)(1)(ii).
Performance testing of the composite mesh pad scrubbers demonstrates that this level of
emissions is accomplished when the pressure drop for Scrubber #1 is within the range P = 3.36
1 and when the pressure drop for Scrubber #2 is within the range P = 3.08 1 . Pressure
drop for each scrubber shall be recorded at least once during each day in which the scrubber is
operated.
Anodizing tank #1111 employs a chemical fume suppressant containing a wetting agent. The
surface tension of the tank shall not exceed 45 dynes/cm at any time during operation of the tank.
Testing with a stalagmometer or tensiometer per Reference Method 306B shall be performed
every four hours of operation. If no exceedances occur during the first 40 operating hours, the
frequency of testing may be relaxed to every eight operating hours. If no exceedances occur
during the next 40 operating hours, the frequency of testing may be further relaxed to every 40
hours. At any time an exceedance occurs, the frequency will again revert to every four hours.
Workplace standards described in 40 CFR 63.342(f) shall be followed, including adherence to
the operation and maintenance (O&M) plan as detailed in §63.342(f)(3). [40 CFR 63, Subpart N]
17. Cold cleaning units shall comply with the standards for construction and operation of such
equipment, including doors or covers, closed drainage, and conspicuous labeling, appropriate
draining procedures and times, keeping the unit covered when not in use, proper storage and
disposal of waste solvent, and spraying of VOC only in a solid stream. Such units shall also
comply with requirements for controls if the solvent’s vapor pressure exceeds certain limits and
with all compliance and recordkeeping criteria. [OAC 252:100-39-42(a)]
18. All records necessary to demonstrate compliance with permit conditions will be maintained
on-site or at a readily accessible location and will be available for review by regulatory personnel
during normal business hours. Records shall be retained for at least five years from the date of
recording. Such records include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following.
a) A listing of all coating products used at the facility, identified as to topcoats or primers
subject to MACT GG, the type of specialty coating per OAC 252:100 Appendix N, or the
type of coating per OAC 252:100-39-46 for each non-aerospace coating.
b) Material Safety Data Sheets for all coating and cleaning products used. MSD Sheets for
coating products shall show the VOC and HAP contents of each product as applied, less
water or exempt solvents, as appropriate. Information supplied shall be sufficient to
demonstrate compliance with the VOC pound per gallon requirements of SC #4, SC #5,
and SC #10. MSD sheets for hand-wipe solvents shall contain vapor pressure
information sufficient to demonstrate compliance with SC #11.
c) Calculations supporting the average kilogram per square meter per month demonstration
required by SC #14 (3-month rolling average).
d) Pressure drop readings for dry filter spray booths per SC #7 (each shift, when operating).
e) Pressure drop readings for each mesh pad scrubber per SC #16 (once each day, when
operating).
f) Capacity records for all hard chrome tanks per SC #16, showing amp-hrs used each
month and for each 12-month rolling period.
g) Surface tension measurements of Tank #1111 per SC #16 (according to the schedule
described in SC #16).
SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 2009-008-TVR DRAFT 7
h) A copy of the operating and maintenance plan for the hard chrome plating operation, as
required by SC #16.
i) Records necessary to demonstrate the continued status of Insignificant Activities.
j) Records necessary to show compliance with the requirements for cold cleaning units, per
SC #17.
19. The Permit Shield (Standard Conditions, Section VI) is extended to the following
requirements that have been determined to be inapplicable to this facility.
[OAC 252:100-8-6(d)(2)]
OAC 252:100-7 Permits for Minor Facilities not in source category
OAC 252:100-11 Alternative Reduction not eligible
OAC 252:100-15 Mobile Sources not in source category
OAC 252:100-17 Incinerators not type of emission unit
OAC 252:100-23 Cotton Gins not type of emission unit
OAC 252:100-24 Feed & Grain Facility not in source category
OAC 252:100-47 Landfills not in source category
20. No later than 30 days after each anniversary date of the original Part 70 permit (January 10,
2005), the permittee shall submit to Air Quality Division of DEQ, with a copy to the US EPA,
Region 6, certification of compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit.
[OAC 252:100-8-6 (c)(5)(A) & (D)]
21. This permit supersedes all other existing permits for this facility and they are now null and
void.
MAJOR SOURCE AIR QUALITY PERMIT
STANDARD CONDITIONS
(July 21, 2009)
SECTION I. DUTY TO COMPLY
A. This is a permit to operate / construct this specific facility in accordance with the federal
Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7401, et al.) and under the authority of the Oklahoma Clean Air Act
and the rules promulgated there under. [Oklahoma Clean Air Act, 27A O.S. § 2-5-112]
B. The issuing Authority for the permit is the Air Quality Division (AQD) of the Oklahoma
Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). The permit does not relieve the holder of the
obligation to comply with other applicable federal, state, or local statutes, regulations, rules, or
ordinances. [Oklahoma Clean Air Act, 27A O.S. § 2-5-112]
C. The permittee shall comply with all conditions of this permit. Any permit noncompliance
shall constitute a violation of the Oklahoma Clean Air Act and shall be grounds for enforcement
action, permit termination, revocation and reissuance, or modification, or for denial of a permit
renewal application. All terms and conditions are enforceable by the DEQ, by the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and by citizens under section 304 of the Federal Clean
Air Act (excluding state-only requirements). This permit is valid for operations only at the
specific location listed.
[40 C.F.R. §70.6(b), OAC 252:100-8-1.3 and OAC 252:100-8-6(a)(7)(A) and (b)(1)]
D. It shall not be a defense for a permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been
necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the
conditions of the permit. However, nothing in this paragraph shall be construed as precluding
consideration of a need to halt or reduce activity as a mitigating factor in assessing penalties for
noncompliance if the health, safety, or environmental impacts of halting or reducing operations
would be more serious than the impacts of continuing operations. [OAC 252:100-8-6(a)(7)(B)]
SECTION II. REPORTING OF DEVIATIONS FROM PERMIT TERMS
A. Any exceedance resulting from an emergency and/or posing an imminent and substantial
danger to public health, safety, or the environment shall be reported in accordance with Section
XIV (Emergencies). [OAC 252:100-8-6(a)(3)(C)(iii)(I) & (II)]
B. Deviations that result in emissions exceeding those allowed in this permit shall be reported
consistent with the requirements of OAC 252:100-9, Excess Emission Reporting Requirements.
[OAC 252:100-8-6(a)(3)(C)(iv)]
C. Every written report submitted under this section shall be certified as required by Section III
(Monitoring, Testing, Recordkeeping & Reporting), Paragraph F.
[OAC 252:100-8-6(a)(3)(C)(iv)]
MAJOR SOURCE STANDARD CONDITIONS June 21, 2009
2
SECTION III. MONITORING, TESTING, RECORDKEEPING & REPORTING
A. The permittee shall keep records as specified in this permit. These records, including
monitoring data and necessary support information, shall be retained on-site or at a nearby field
office for a period of at least five years from the date of the monitoring sample, measurement,
report, or application, and shall be made available for inspection by regulatory personnel upon
request. Support information includes all original strip-chart recordings for continuous
monitoring instrumentation, and copies of all reports required by this permit. Where appropriate,
the permit may specify that records may be maintained in computerized form.
[OAC 252:100-8-6 (a)(3)(B)(ii), OAC 252:100-8-6(c)(1), and OAC 252:100-8-6(c)(2)(B)]
B. Records of required monitoring shall include:
(1) the date, place and time of sampling or measurement;
(2) the date or dates analyses were performed;
(3) the company or entity which performed the analyses;
(4) the analytical techniques or methods used;
(5) the results of such analyses; and
(6) the operating conditions existing at the time of sampling or measurement.
[OAC 252:100-8-6(a)(3)(B)(i)]
C. No later than 30 days after each six (6) month period, after the date of the issuance of the
original Part 70 operating permit or alternative date as specifically identified in a subsequent Part
70 operating permit, the permittee shall submit to AQD a report of the results of any required
monitoring. All instances of deviations from permit requirements since the previous report shall
be clearly identified in the report. Submission of these periodic reports will satisfy any reporting
requirement of Paragraph E below that is duplicative of the periodic reports, if so noted on the
submitted report. [OAC 252:100-8-6(a)(3)(C)(i) and (ii)]
D. If any testing shows emissions in excess of limitations specified in this permit, the owner or
operator shall comply with the provisions of Section II (Reporting Of Deviations From Permit
Terms) of these standard conditions. [OAC 252:100-8-6(a)(3)(C)(iii)]
E. In addition to any monitoring, recordkeeping or reporting requirement specified in this
permit, monitoring and reporting may be required under the provisions of OAC 252:100-43,
Testing, Monitoring, and Recordkeeping, or as required by any provision of the Federal Clean
Air Act or Oklahoma Clean Air Act. [OAC 252:100-43]
F. Any Annual Certification of Compliance, Semi Annual Monitoring and Deviation Report,
Excess Emission Report, and Annual Emission Inventory submitted in accordance with this
permit shall be certified by a responsible official. This certification shall be signed by a
responsible official, and shall contain the following language: “I certify, based on information
and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, the statements and information in the document are
true, accurate, and complete.”
[OAC 252:100-8-5(f), OAC 252:100-8-6(a)(3)(C)(iv), OAC 252:100-8-6(c)(1), OAC
252:100-9-7(e), and OAC 252:100-5-2.1(f)]
MAJOR SOURCE STANDARD CONDITIONS June 21, 2009
3
G. Any owner or operator subject to the provisions of New Source Performance Standards
(“NSPS”) under 40 CFR Part 60 or National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
(“NESHAPs”) under 40 CFR Parts 61 and 63 shall maintain a file of all measurements and other
information required by the applicable general provisions and subpart(s). These records shall be
maintained in a permanent file suitable for inspection, shall be retained for a period of at least
five years as required by Paragraph A of this Section, and shall include records of the occurrence
and duration of any start-up, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected facility,
any malfunction of the air pollution control equipment; and any periods during which a
continuous monitoring system or monitoring device is inoperative.
[40 C.F.R. §§60.7 and 63.10, 40 CFR Parts 61, Subpart A, and OAC 252:100, Appendix Q]
H. The permittee of a facility that is operating subject to a schedule of compliance shall submit
to the DEQ a progress report at least semi-annually. The progress reports shall contain dates for
achieving the activities, milestones or compliance required in the schedule of compliance and the
dates when such activities, milestones or compliance was achieved. The progress reports shall
also contain an explanation of why any dates in the schedule of compliance were not or will not
be met, and any preventive or corrective measures adopted. [OAC 252:100-8-6(c)(4)]
I. All testing must be conducted under the direction of qualified personnel by methods
approved by the Division Director. All tests shall be made and the results calculated in
accordance with standard test procedures. The use of alternative test procedures must be
approved by EPA. When a portable analyzer is used to measure emissions it shall be setup,
calibrated, and operated in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions and in accordance
with a protocol meeting the requirements of the “AQD Portable Analyzer Guidance” document
or an equivalent method approved by Air Quality.
[OAC 252:100-8-6(a)(3)(A)(iv), and OAC 252:100-43]
J. The reporting of total particulate matter emissions as required in Part 7 of OAC 252:100-8
(Permits for Part 70 Sources), OAC 252:100-19 (Control of Emission of Particulate Matter), and
OAC 252:100-5 (Emission Inventory), shall be conducted in accordance with applicable testing
or calculation procedures, modified to include back-half condensables, for the concentration of
particulate matter less than 10 microns in diameter (PM10). NSPS may allow reporting of only
particulate matter emissions caught in the filter (obtained using Reference Method 5).
K. The permittee shall submit to the AQD a copy of all reports submitted to the EPA as required
by 40 C.F.R. Part 60, 61, and 63, for all equipment constructed or operated under this permit
subject to such standards. [OAC 252:100-8-6(c)(1) and OAC 252:100, Appendix Q]
SECTION IV. COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATIONS
A. No later than 30 days after each anniversary date of the issuance of the original Part 70
operating permit or alternative date as specifically identified in a subsequent Part 70 operating
permit, the permittee shall submit to the AQD, with a copy to the US EPA, Region 6, a
certification of compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit and of any other
applicable requirements which have become effective since the issuance of this permit.
[OAC 252:100-8-6(c)(5)(A), and (D)]
MAJOR SOURCE STANDARD CONDITIONS June 21, 2009
4
B. The compliance certification shall describe the operating permit term or condition that is the
basis of the certification; the current compliance status; whether compliance was continuous or
intermittent; the methods used for determining compliance, currently and over the reporting
period. The compliance certification shall also include such other facts as the permitting
authority may require to determine the compliance status of the source.
[OAC 252:100-8-6(c)(5)(C)(i)-(v)]
C. The compliance certification shall contain a certification by a responsible official as to the
results of the required monitoring. This certification shall be signed by a responsible official,
and shall contain the following language: “I certify, based on information and belief formed
after reasonable inquiry, the statements and information in the document are true, accurate, and
complete.” [OAC 252:100-8-5(f) and OAC 252:100-8-6(c)(1)]
D. Any facility reporting noncompliance shall submit a schedule of compliance for emissions
units or stationary sources that are not in compliance with all applicable requirements. This
schedule shall include a schedule of remedial measures, including an enforceable sequence of
actions with milestones, leading to compliance with any applicable requirements for which the
emissions unit or stationary source is in noncompliance. This compliance schedule shall
resemble and be at least as stringent as that contained in any judicial consent decree or
administrative order to which the emissions unit or stationary source is subject. Any such
schedule of compliance shall be supplemental to, and shall not sanction noncompliance with, the
applicable requirements on which it is based, except that a compliance plan shall not be required
for any noncompliance condition which is corrected within 24 hours of discovery.
[OAC 252:100-8-5(e)(8)(B) and OAC 252:100-8-6(c)(3)]
SECTION V. REQUIREMENTS THAT BECOME APPLICABLE DURING THE
PERMIT TERM
The permittee shall comply with any additional requirements that become effective during the
permit term and that are applicable to the facility. Compliance with all new requirements shall
be certified in the next annual certification. [OAC 252:100-8-6(c)(6)]
SECTION VI. PERMIT SHIELD
A. Compliance with the terms and conditions of this permit (including terms and conditions
established for alternate operating scenarios, emissions trading, and emissions averaging, but
excluding terms and conditions for which the permit shield is expressly prohibited under OAC
252:100-8) shall be deemed compliance with the applicable requirements identified and included
in this permit. [OAC 252:100-8-6(d)(1)]
B. Those requirements that are applicable are listed in the Standard Conditions and the Specific
Conditions of this permit. Those requirements that the applicant requested be determined as not
applicable are summarized in the Specific Conditions of this permit. [OAC 252:100-8-6(d)(2)]
MAJOR SOURCE STANDARD CONDITIONS June 21, 2009
5
SECTION VII. ANNUAL EMISSIONS INVENTORY & FEE PAYMENT
The permittee shall file with the AQD an annual emission inventory and shall pay annual fees
based on emissions inventories. The methods used to calculate emissions for inventory purposes
shall be based on the best available information accepted by AQD.
[OAC 252:100-5-2.1, OAC 252:100-5-2.2, and OAC 252:100-8-6(a)(8)]
SECTION VIII. TERM OF PERMIT
A. Unless specified otherwise, the term of an operating permit shall be five years from the date
of issuance. [OAC 252:100-8-6(a)(2)(A)]
B. A source’s right to operate shall terminate upon the expiration of its permit unless a timely
and complete renewal application has been submitted at least 180 days before the date of
expiration. [OAC 252:100-8-7.1(d)(1)]
C. A duly issued construction permit or authorization to construct or modify will terminate and
become null and void (unless extended as provided in OAC 252:100-8-1.4(b)) if the construction
is not commenced within 18 months after the date the permit or authorization was issued, or if
work is suspended for more than 18 months after it is commenced. [OAC 252:100-8-1.4(a)]
D. The recipient of a construction permit shall apply for a permit to operate (or modified
operating permit) within 180 days following the first day of operation. [OAC 252:100-8-4(b)(5)]
SECTION IX. SEVERABILITY
The provisions of this permit are severable and if any provision of this permit, or the application
of any provision of this permit to any circumstance, is held invalid, the application of such
provision to other circumstances, and the remainder of this permit, shall not be affected thereby.
[OAC 252:100-8-6 (a)(6)]
SECTION X. PROPERTY RIGHTS
A. This permit does not convey any property rights of any sort, or any exclusive privilege.
[OAC 252:100-8-6(a)(7)(D)]
B. This permit shall not be considered in any manner affecting the title of the premises upon
which the equipment is located and does not release the permittee from any liability for damage
to persons or property caused by or resulting from the maintenance or operation of the equipment
for which the permit is issued. [OAC 252:100-8-6(c)(6)]
SECTION XI. DUTY TO PROVIDE INFORMATION
A. The permittee shall furnish to the DEQ, upon receipt of a written request and within sixty
(60) days of the request unless the DEQ specifies another time period, any information that the
DEQ may request to determine whether cause exists for modifying, reopening, revoking,
MAJOR SOURCE STANDARD CONDITIONS June 21, 2009
6
reissuing, terminating the permit or to determine compliance with the permit. Upon request, the
permittee shall also furnish to the DEQ copies of records required to be kept by the permit.
[OAC 252:100-8-6(a)(7)(E)]
B. The permittee may make a claim of confidentiality for any information or records submitted
pursuant to 27A O.S. § 2-5-105(18). Confidential information shall be clearly labeled as such
and shall be separable from the main body of the document such as in an attachment.
[OAC 252:100-8-6(a)(7)(E)]
C. Notification to the AQD of the sale or transfer of ownership of this facility is required and
shall be made in writing within thirty (30) days after such sale or transfer.
[Oklahoma Clean Air Act, 27A O.S. § 2-5-112(G)]
SECTION XII. REOPENING, MODIFICATION & REVOCATION
A. The permit may be modified, revoked, reopened and reissued, or terminated for cause.
Except as provided for minor permit modifications, the filing of a request by the permittee for a
permit modification, revocation and reissuance, termination, notification of planned changes, or
anticipated noncompliance does not stay any permit condition.
[OAC 252:100-8-6(a)(7)(C) and OAC 252:100-8-7.2(b)]
B. The DEQ will reopen and revise or revoke this permit prior to the expiration date in the
following circumstances: [OAC 252:100-8-7.3 and OAC 252:100-8-7.4(a)(2)]
(1) Additional requirements under the Clean Air Act become applicable to a major source
category three or more years prior to the expiration date of this permit. No such
reopening is required if the effective date of the requirement is later than the expiration
date of this permit.
(2) The DEQ or the EPA determines that this permit contains a material mistake or that the
permit must be revised or revoked to assure compliance with the applicable requirements.
(3) The DEQ or the EPA determines that inaccurate information was used in establishing the
emission standards, limitations, or other conditions of this permit. The DEQ may revoke
and not reissue this permit if it determines that the permittee has submitted false or
misleading information to the DEQ.
(4) DEQ determines that the permit should be amended under the discretionary reopening
provisions of OAC 252:100-8-7.3(b).
C. The permit may be reopened for cause by EPA, pursuant to the provisions of OAC 100-8-
7.3(d). [OAC 100-8-7.3(d)]
D. The permittee shall notify AQD before making changes other than those described in Section
XVIII (Operational Flexibility), those qualifying for administrative permit amendments, or those
defined as an Insignificant Activity (Section XVI) or Trivial Activity (Section XVII). The
notification should include any changes which may alter the status of a “grandfathered source,”
as defined under AQD rules. Such changes may require a permit modification.
[OAC 252:100-8-7.2(b) and OAC 252:100-5-1.1]
MAJOR SOURCE STANDARD CONDITIONS June 21, 2009
7
E. Activities that will result in air emissions that exceed the trivial/insignificant levels and that
are not specifically approved by this permit are prohibited. [OAC 252:100-8-6(c)(6)]
SECTION XIII. INSPECTION & ENTRY
A. Upon presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by law, the
permittee shall allow authorized regulatory officials to perform the following (subject to the
permittee's right to seek confidential treatment pursuant to 27A O.S. Supp. 1998, § 2-5-105(18)
for confidential information submitted to or obtained by the DEQ under this section):
(1) enter upon the permittee's premises during reasonable/normal working hours where a
source is located or emissions-related activity is conducted, or where records must be
kept under the conditions of the permit;
(2) have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the
conditions of the permit;
(3) inspect, at reasonable times and using reasonable safety practices, any facilities,
equipment (including monitoring and air pollution control equipment), practices, or
operations regulated or required under the permit; and
(4) as authorized by the Oklahoma Clean Air Act, sample or monitor at reasonable times
substances or parameters for the purpose of assuring compliance with the permit.
[OAC 252:100-8-6(c)(2)]
SECTION XIV. EMERGENCIES
A. Any exceedance resulting from an emergency shall be reported to AQD promptly but no later
than 4:30 p.m. on the next working day after the permittee first becomes aware of the
exceedance. This notice shall contain a description of the emergency, the probable cause of the
exceedance, any steps taken to mitigate emissions, and corrective actions taken.
[OAC 252:100-8-6 (a)(3)(C)(iii)(I) and (IV)]
B. Any exceedance that poses an imminent and substantial danger to public health, safety, or the
environment shall be reported to AQD as soon as is practicable; but under no circumstance shall
notification be more than 24 hours after the exceedance. [OAC 252:100-8-6(a)(3)(C)(iii)(II)]
C. An "emergency" means any situation arising from sudden and reasonably unforeseeable
events beyond the control of the source, including acts of God, which situation requires
immediate corrective action to restore normal operation, and that causes the source to exceed a
technology-based emission limitation under this permit, due to unavoidable increases in
emissions attributable to the emergency. An emergency shall not include noncompliance to the
extent caused by improperly designed equipment, lack of preventive maintenance, careless or
improper operation, or operator error. [OAC 252:100-8-2]
D. The affirmative defense of emergency shall be demonstrated through properly signed,
contemporaneous operating logs or other relevant evidence that: [OAC 252:100-8-6 (e)(2)]
MAJOR SOURCE STANDARD CONDITIONS June 21, 2009
8
(1) an emergency occurred and the permittee can identify the cause or causes of the
emergency;
(2) the permitted facility was at the time being properly operated;
(3) during the period of the emergency the permittee took all reasonable steps to minimize
levels of emissions that exceeded the emission standards or other requirements in this
permit.
E. In any enforcement proceeding, the permittee seeking to establish the occurrence of an
emergency shall have the burden of proof. [OAC 252:100-8-6(e)(3)]
F. Every written report or document submitted under this section shall be certified as required
by Section III (Monitoring, Testing, Recordkeeping & Reporting), Paragraph F.
[OAC 252:100-8-6(a)(3)(C)(iv)]
SECTION XV. RISK MANAGEMENT PLAN
The permittee, if subject to the provision of Section 112(r) of the Clean Air Act, shall develop
and register with the appropriate agency a risk management plan by June 20, 1999, or the
applicable effective date. [OAC 252:100-8-6(a)(4)]
SECTION XVI. INSIGNIFICANT ACTIVITIES
Except as otherwise prohibited or limited by this permit, the permittee is hereby authorized to
operate individual emissions units that are either on the list in Appendix I to OAC Title 252,
Chapter 100, or whose actual calendar year emissions do not exceed any of the limits below.
Any activity to which a State or Federal applicable requirement applies is not insignificant even
if it meets the criteria below or is included on the insignificant activities list.
(1) 5 tons per year of any one criteria pollutant.
(2) 2 tons per year for any one hazardous air pollutant (HAP) or 5 tons per year for an
aggregate of two or more HAP's, or 20 percent of any threshold less than 10 tons per year
for single HAP that the EPA may establish by rule.
[OAC 252:100-8-2 and OAC 252:100, Appendix I]
SECTION XVII. TRIVIAL ACTIVITIES
Except as otherwise prohibited or limited by this permit, the permittee is hereby authorized to
operate any individual or combination of air emissions units that are considered inconsequential
and are on the list in Appendix J. Any activity to which a State or Federal applicable
requirement applies is not trivial even if included on the trivial activities list.
[OAC 252:100-8-2 and OAC 252:100, Appendix J]
SECTION XVIII. OPERATIONAL FLEXIBILITY
A. A facility may implement any operating scenario allowed for in its Part 70 permit without the
need for any permit revision or any notification to the DEQ (unless specified otherwise in the
MAJOR SOURCE STANDARD CONDITIONS June 21, 2009
9
permit). When an operating scenario is changed, the permittee shall record in a log at the facility
the scenario under which it is operating. [OAC 252:100-8-6(a)(10) and (f)(1)]
B. The permittee may make changes within the facility that:
(1) result in no net emissions increases,
(2) are not modifications under any provision of Title I of the federal Clean Air Act, and
(3) do not cause any hourly or annual permitted emission rate of any existing emissions unit
to be exceeded;
provided that the facility provides the EPA and the DEQ with written notification as required
below in advance of the proposed changes, which shall be a minimum of seven (7) days, or
twenty four (24) hours for emergencies as defined in OAC 252:100-8-6 (e). The permittee, the
DEQ, and the EPA shall attach each such notice to their copy of the permit. For each such
change, the written notification required above shall include a brief description of the change
within the permitted facility, the date on which the change will occur, any change in emissions,
and any permit term or condition that is no longer applicable as a result of the change. The
permit shield provided by this permit does not apply to any change made pursuant to this
paragraph. [OAC 252:100-8-6(f)(2)]
SECTION XIX. OTHER APPLICABLE & STATE-ONLY REQUIREMENTS
A. The following applicable requirements and state-only requirements apply to the facility
unless elsewhere covered by a more restrictive requirement:
(1) Open burning of refuse and other combustible material is prohibited except as authorized
in the specific examples and under the conditions listed in the Open Burning Subchapter.
[OAC 252:100-13]
(2) No particulate emissions from any fuel-burning equipment with a rated heat input of 10
MMBTUH or less shall exceed 0.6 lb/MMBTU. [OAC 252:100-19]
(3) For all emissions units not subject to an opacity limit promulgated under 40 C.F.R., Part
60, NSPS, no discharge of greater than 20% opacity is allowed except for:
[OAC 252:100-25]
(a) Short-term occurrences which consist of not more than one six-minute period in any
consecutive 60 minutes, not to exceed three such periods in any consecutive 24 hours.
In no case shall the average of any six-minute period exceed 60% opacity;
(b) Smoke resulting from fires covered by the exceptions outlined in OAC 252:100-13-7;
(c) An emission, where the presence of uncombined water is the only reason for failure
to meet the requirements of OAC 252:100-25-3(a); or
(d) Smoke generated due to a malfunction in a facility, when the source of the fuel
producing the smoke is not under the direct and immediate control of the facility and
the immediate constriction of the fuel flow at the facility would produce a hazard to
life and/or property.
MAJOR SOURCE STANDARD CONDITIONS June 21, 2009
10
(4) No visible fugitive dust emissions shall be discharged beyond the property line on which
the emissions originate in such a manner as to damage or to interfere with the use of
adjacent properties, or cause air quality standards to be exceeded, or interfere with the
maintenance of air quality standards. [OAC 252:100-29]
(5) No sulfur oxide emissions from new gas-fired fuel-burning equipment shall exceed 0.2
lb/MMBTU. No existing source shall exceed the listed ambient air standards for sulfur
dioxide. [OAC 252:100-31]
(6) Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) storage tanks built after December 28, 1974, and
with a capacity of 400 gallons or more storing a liquid with a vapor pressure of 1.5 psia
or greater under actual conditions shall be equipped with a permanent submerged fill pipe
or with a vapor-recovery system. [OAC 252:100-37-15(b)]
(7) All fuel-burning equipment shall at all times be properly operated and maintained in a
manner that will minimize emissions of VOCs. [OAC 252:100-37-36]
SECTION XX. STRATOSPHERIC OZONE PROTECTION
A. The permittee shall comply with the following standards for production and consumption of
ozone-depleting substances: [40 CFR 82, Subpart A]
(1) Persons producing, importing, or placing an order for production or importation of certain
class I and class II substances, HCFC-22, or HCFC-141b shall be subject to the
requirements of §82.4;
(2) Producers, importers, exporters, purchasers, and persons who transform or destroy certain
class I and class II substances, HCFC-22, or HCFC-141b are subject to the recordkeeping
requirements at §82.13; and
(3) Class I substances (listed at Appendix A to Subpart A) include certain CFCs, Halons,
HBFCs, carbon tetrachloride, trichloroethane (methyl chloroform), and bromomethane
(Methyl Bromide). Class II substances (listed at Appendix B to Subpart A) include
HCFCs.
B. If the permittee performs a service on motor (fleet) vehicles when this service involves an
ozone-depleting substance refrigerant (or regulated substitute substance) in the motor vehicle air
conditioner (MVAC), the permittee is subject to all applicable requirements. Note: The term
“motor vehicle” as used in Subpart B does not include a vehicle in which final assembly of the
vehicle has not been completed. The term “MVAC” as used in Subpart B does not include the
air-tight sealed refrigeration system used as refrigerated cargo, or the system used on passenger
buses using HCFC-22 refrigerant. [40 CFR 82, Subpart B]
C. The permittee shall comply with the following standards for recycling and emissions
reduction except as provided for MVACs in Subpart B: [40 CFR 82, Subpart F]
(1) Persons opening appliances for maintenance, service, repair, or disposal must comply
with the required practices pursuant to § 82.156;
(2) Equipment used during the maintenance, service, repair, or disposal of appliances must
MAJOR SOURCE STANDARD CONDITIONS June 21, 2009
11
comply with the standards for recycling and recovery equipment pursuant to § 82.158;
(3) Persons performing maintenance, service, repair, or disposal of appliances must be
certified by an approved technician certification program pursuant to § 82.161;
(4) Persons disposing of small appliances, MVACs, and MVAC-like appliances must comply
with record-keeping requirements pursuant to § 82.166;
(5) Persons owning commercial or industrial process refrigeration equipment must comply
with leak repair requirements pursuant to § 82.158; and
(6) Owners/operators of appliances normally containing 50 or more pounds of refrigerant
must keep records of refrigerant purchased and added to such appliances pursuant to §
82.166.
SECTION XXI. TITLE V APPROVAL LANGUAGE
A. DEQ wishes to reduce the time and work associated with permit review and, wherever it is
not inconsistent with Federal requirements, to provide for incorporation of requirements
established through construction permitting into the Source’s Title V permit without causing
redundant review. Requirements from construction permits may be incorporated into the Title V
permit through the administrative amendment process set forth in OAC 252:100-8-7.2(a) only if
the following procedures are followed:
(1) The construction permit goes out for a 30-day public notice and comment using the
procedures set forth in 40 C.F.R. § 70.7(h)(1). This public notice shall include notice to
the public that this permit is subject to EPA review, EPA objection, and petition to
EPA, as provided by 40 C.F.R. § 70.8; that the requirements of the construction permit
will be incorporated into the Title V permit through the administrative amendment
process; that the public will not receive another opportunity to provide comments when
the requirements are incorporated into the Title V permit; and that EPA review, EPA
objection, and petitions to EPA will not be available to the public when requirements
from the construction permit are incorporated into the Title V permit.
(2) A copy of the construction permit application is sent to EPA, as provided by 40 CFR §
70.8(a)(1).
(3) A copy of the draft construction permit is sent to any affected State, as provided by 40
C.F.R. § 70.8(b).
(4) A copy of the proposed construction permit is sent to EPA for a 45-day review period
as provided by 40 C.F.R.§ 70.8(a) and (c).
(5) The DEQ complies with 40 C.F.R. § 70.8(c) upon the written receipt within the 45-day
comment period of any EPA objection to the construction permit. The DEQ shall not
issue the permit until EPA’s objections are resolved to the satisfaction of EPA.
(6) The DEQ complies with 40 C.F.R. § 70.8(d).
(7) A copy of the final construction permit is sent to EPA as provided by 40 CFR § 70.8(a).
(8) The DEQ shall not issue the proposed construction permit until any affected State and
EPA have had an opportunity to review the proposed permit, as provided by these
permit conditions.
(9) Any requirements of the construction permit may be reopened for cause after
incorporation into the Title V permit by the administrative amendment process, by
MAJOR SOURCE STANDARD CONDITIONS June 21, 2009
12
DEQ as provided in OAC 252:100-8-7.3(a), (b), and (c), and by EPA as provided in 40
C.F.R. § 70.7(f) and (g).
(10) The DEQ shall not issue the administrative permit amendment if performance tests fail
to demonstrate that the source is operating in substantial compliance with all permit
requirements.
B. To the extent that these conditions are not followed, the Title V permit must go through the
Title V review process.
SECTION XXII. CREDIBLE EVIDENCE
For the purpose of submitting compliance certifications or establishing whether or not a person
has violated or is in violation of any provision of the Oklahoma implementation plan, nothing
shall preclude the use, including the exclusive use, of any credible evidence or information,
relevant to whether a source would have been in compliance with applicable requirements if the
appropriate performance or compliance test or procedure had been performed.
[OAC 252:100-43-6]
PART 70 PERMIT
AIR QUALITY DIVISION
STATE OF OKLAHOMA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
707 N. ROBINSON STREET, SUITE 4100
P.O. BOX 1677
OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA 73101-1677
Permit No. 2009-008-TVR
Southwest United Industries,
having complied with the requirements of the law, is hereby granted permission to operate
the aerospace rework and repair facilities at 422 S. St. Louis, Tulsa, Tulsa County,
Oklahoma,
subject to standard conditions dated July 21, 2009, and specific conditions, both attached.
This permit shall expire five years from the date of issuance, except as Authorized under
Section VIII of the Standard Conditions.
_________________________________
Division Director Date
Pamela Wood, EHS Coordinator Permit Number: 2009-008-TVR
Southwest United Industries, Inc. Permit Writer: Herb Neumann
422 S. St. Louis Avenue Date:
Tulsa, OK 74120
Air Quality Division has completed the initial review of your permit application referenced
above. This application has been determined to be a Tier II. In accordance with 27A O.S. §2-
14-302 and OAC 252:004-7-13, the enclosed draft permit is now ready for public review. The
requirements for public review include the following steps that you must accomplish.
1. Publish at least one legal notice (one day) in at least one newspaper of general circulation
within the county where the facility is located. (Instructions enclosed)
2. Provide for public review (for a period of 30 days following the date of the newspaper
announcement) a copy of this draft permit and a copy of the application at a convenient location
within the county of the facility.
3. Send to AQD a copy of the proof of publication notice from Item #1 above together with any
additional comments or requested changes that you may have on the draft permit.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If we may be of further service, please contact
our office at (918) 293-1600. Air Quality personnel are located at the DEQ Regional Office at
Tulsa, 3105 E. Skelly Drive, Suite 200, Tulsa, OK, 74105.
Sincerely,
Herb Neumann
AIR QUALITY DIVISION
Encl.
Pamela Wood, EHS Coordinator
Southwest United Industries, Inc.
422 S. St. Louis Avenue
Tulsa, OK 74120
Re: Part 70 Permit No. 2009-008-TVR
Dear Ms. Wood:
Enclosed is the permit authorizing operation of the referenced facility. Please note that this
permit is issued subject to certain standard and specific conditions, which are attached. These
conditions must be carefully followed since they define the limits of the permit and will be
confirmed by periodic inspections.
Also note that you are required to annually submit an emissions inventory for this facility. An
emissions inventory must be completed on approved AQD forms and submitted (hardcopy or
electronically) by April 1st of every year. Any questions concerning the form or submittal
process should be referred to the Emissions Inventory Staff at 405-702-4100.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If we may be of further service, please contact
our office at (918) 293-1600. Air Quality personnel are located in the DEQ Regional Office at
Tulsa, 3105 E. Skelly Drive, Suite 200, Tulsa, OK, 74105-6370.
Sincerely,
Herb Neumann
AIR QUALITY DIVISION
Encl.