Okfn 30.06.2011

39
Europeana and Open Cultural Heritage Data [email protected] OKCon 1st July 2011

Transcript of Okfn 30.06.2011

Page 1: Okfn 30.06.2011

Europeana and Open Cultural Heritage

Data

[email protected] 1st July 2011

Page 2: Okfn 30.06.2011

What is Europeana?

Page 3: Okfn 30.06.2011
Page 4: Okfn 30.06.2011
Page 5: Okfn 30.06.2011

“A digital library that is a single, direct and multilingual access point to the European cultural heritage.”

European Parliament, 27 September 2007

Page 6: Okfn 30.06.2011

2011

91 direct providers and aggregatorsmore than 1500 individual institutions19+m items

Page 7: Okfn 30.06.2011
Page 8: Okfn 30.06.2011
Page 9: Okfn 30.06.2011
Page 10: Okfn 30.06.2011

CC-BY-NC(like)

Page 11: Okfn 30.06.2011

CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication

Page 12: Okfn 30.06.2011

Why?

Page 13: Okfn 30.06.2011

Users:Trusted sourceEase of use

Re-use

In my workflow

Page 14: Okfn 30.06.2011

Cultural Institutions:VisibilityServices Revenue

Page 15: Okfn 30.06.2011

Politicians:Inclusion Education Leadership

Economic growth

Page 16: Okfn 30.06.2011

Market:Straightforward route to content

Access to the networkPremium servicesBrand Association

Page 17: Okfn 30.06.2011
Page 18: Okfn 30.06.2011

Why drop NC and BY?• Most of the metadata is factual information

• Most has been created with taxpayers’ money and everyone should have the right to use it

• It is very difficult to define the boundaries of NC

• There is much more to gain by giving up something

• Attribution is very hard to enforce especially when a long chain of intermediaries are involved

• We believe in a standardised license that will allow a minimum threshold for re-use

Page 19: Okfn 30.06.2011

The Rewards• Increased data use & visibility drives traffic to content

holder’s site.

• Providers can still commercially exploit own metadata.

• Europeana LOD helps populate linked data cloud with trusted, quality resource.

• Enhances context of information through increased data interlinking.

• Enriched data back to provider, for own applications & users.

• Shows cultural heritage organisations at vanguard of innovation & stimulating digital research. Leads to funding

• Reinforces relevance of their cultural heritage to new generations.

Page 20: Okfn 30.06.2011

The Risks• Loss of control over the channels of access and of

authority

• Loss of potential income

• Loss of reputation

• Loss of branding

• Loss of context and of the control over the integrity of the data

• Additional work required

…workshop participants acknowledged that rather than real risks, these are fears related to change…

Page 21: Okfn 30.06.2011

The Process• Workshops on risks and rewards of open licenses –

(September 2010-December 2010)

• Workshops and presentations (APENET, ATHENA, EFG, EUSCREEN)

• Workshop with directors of museums, libraries, archives and av on the business models of open data

• Online consultation with the network between December 2010 and January 2011

• Second round of consultation with whole network in May

• 4 Hackathons in June (Barcelona, Poznan, London, Stockholm)

• LOD pilot

• Paper commissioned on the compatibility of CC0 with German jurisdiction

• Dedicated website about open data and our new agreement

Page 22: Okfn 30.06.2011
Page 23: Okfn 30.06.2011
Page 24: Okfn 30.06.2011
Page 25: Okfn 30.06.2011
Page 26: Okfn 30.06.2011

Metadata related to the digitised objects produced by the cultural institutions

should be widely and freely available for re-use.

Key recommendations, p5

Page 27: Okfn 30.06.2011
Page 28: Okfn 30.06.2011

Europeana Linked Open Data Pilot

• 9 direct providers representing

• 300 libraries, museums, archives and av collections

• 16 countries

• 3,5 m records

• Pilot went live in June

• Proof that nothing bad will happen

• It’s a pilot- it’s still subject to change

• We are in the process of clearing CC0 for this data

• Check it out: Data.europeana.eu

Page 29: Okfn 30.06.2011

Digital Agenda Day API Hackathons

Hack4Europe!

•About 85 developers participated•With a majority being independent developers or representing SMEs

•Creating 48 prototypes•Why: to showcase the social and commercial value of open cultural data

•With 14 winners in the categories and local special awards

Page 31: Okfn 30.06.2011

Winner of the Innovation Award: TimeMash

Page 32: Okfn 30.06.2011

Winner of the Audience Award: TimeBook

Page 33: Okfn 30.06.2011

Where are we now?

Page 34: Okfn 30.06.2011

My organization will sign the new DEA (N=104):

Overall response clearly positive

Page 35: Okfn 30.06.2011

My organization will sign the new DEA (libraries N=51)

Libraries

Page 36: Okfn 30.06.2011

Museums

My organization will sign the new DEA (museums N=14)

Page 37: Okfn 30.06.2011

New CC0 agreement will take effect from September onwards

Page 38: Okfn 30.06.2011

More activities…

• LOD animation

• Individual meetings with providers

• Lots of workshops

• Operationalise some of the apps

• Paper on the Business Models of Open Data for the Cultural Heritage Sector

• Advocacy towards politicians: ie all EU-funded projects have to make their data available under open licenses and publicly funded digitisation should deliver CC0 metadata