Oil Revenue Shocks and Government Spending Behavior in Iran Mohammad Reza Farzanegan Research Fellow...
-
Upload
xavier-kennedy -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
3
Transcript of Oil Revenue Shocks and Government Spending Behavior in Iran Mohammad Reza Farzanegan Research Fellow...
Oil Revenue Shocks and Government Spending Behavior in Iran
Mohammad Reza FarzaneganResearch Fellow of the Alexander von Humboldt-Foundation
TU Dresden & ZEW Mannheim
Collaborative Conversations
22 June 2011, 34th IAEE International Conference, Stockholm , Sweden
Fakultät Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Lehrstuhl für Volkswirtschaftslehre insbesondere Finanzwissenschaft
Plan of Talk
1. Stylized Facts
2. Why I Did This Study?
3. How I Did It?
4. What Are My Findings?
5. Conclusion
2 von 20
Stylized Facts
►On average, 60% of the Iranian government revenues and 90% of export
revenues originate from oil and gas resources.
► Increasing oil prices in the past years have boosted populist expenditures,
especially under the government of Ahmadinejad.
► Current international sanctions on Iran have mainly targeted the oil production
capacity of Iran and its exports to the global markets.
►Enjoying the high oil prices, Ahmadinejad reaction to the UN Security Council
resolutions: “…Today they (the Western countries) just aim to scare the Iranian
people with this piece of trash paper…"
3 von 20
Sanctions & The Iranian Oil
4 von 20
►In July 2010, the engineering and construction arm of the Revolutionary Guard
Corps, Khatam al-Anbia, which is also under new U.N. and U.S. sanctions,
unexpectedly withdrew from two key gas refinery projects in the world’s largest
gas field, South Pars. The reason given on their website is current sanctions.
►European Union leaders agreed on significant sanctions against energy related
investments in Iran on June 2010, prohibiting "new investment, technical
assistance and transfers of technologies, equipment and services related to
energy areas, in particular related to refining, liquefaction and liquefied
natural gas technology”.
►The Financial Times reports the reduction of oil production in Iran to be about
300,000 barrels per day due to international sanctions.
Share of Oil Revenues, Current & Capital Expenditures
5 von 20
0102030405060708090
100
1965
1967
1969
1971
1973
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
oil revenues/total revenuescurrent payments/total paymentsdevelopment payments/total payments
ShahIR-IQ War
Post- War
Absolute Spending of Government in Different Groups (US dollar) - current prices
6 von 20
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
0
2,000,000,000
4,000,000,000
6,000,000,000
8,000,000,000
10,000,000,000
12,000,000,000
Military spending (USD) Security spending (USD)Health spending (USD) Education spending (USD)
Government Expenditures in Different Functions (% of TGE)
6 von 20
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
1001
95
9
19
61
19
63
19
65
19
67
19
69
19
71
19
73
19
75
19
77
19
79
19
81
19
83
19
85
19
87
19
89
19
91
19
93
19
95
19
97
19
99
20
01
20
03
20
05
20
07
General Services MilitarySecurity Services EducationHealth and Medical Services Social AffairsHousing CulturalEconomic Affairs Others
Why I Did This Study?
► Chun (2010) study from Strategic Studies Institute (SSI), part of the U.S. Army
War College, motivates me to do this investigation!
►Chun (2010) estimates the elasticity of demand of military spending in five oil
rich economies, namely Iran, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Venezuela, and Nigeria
►Using data of 10 years from 1997-2007, Chun suggests that each of these
countries shows a mainly inelastic demand for military spending.
►…“attempts to limit defence spending by tinkering with a producer of oil
revenues are likely to fail”.
►Opposing energy sanctions on Iran: “forcing oil exports may artificially pit
Washington against other oil importers”8 von 20
Sanctions & The Iranian Oil: Media & Iran Energy Project
9 von 16
Sanctions & The Iranian Oil: Media & Iran Energy Project
10 von 16
Sanctions & The Iranian Oil: Media & Iran Energy Project
11 von 16
How I Did This Study?
► We examine the dynamic effects of shocks for Iranian oil revenues on different categories of government expenditures in Iran.
►Method: Unrestricted VAR, Impulse Response Analysis (IRF) & Variance Decomposition Analysis (VDC).
►Time period: 1959-2007, Annual Data.
►Endogenous variables: oil export revenues per capita (and/or oil prices, shock variable), military, security services, education, health and medical services, and cultural and recreational services expenditures (per capita and as a share of total EXP)
►Exogenous variables: Iranian revolution (1979), and the Iran-Iraq war (1980-1988) dummy variables.
►All variables in constant prices and in logarithmic form. Oil revenues and prices are transformed into Iranian rials to control for volatility of exchange rate.
►Source: expenditure variables from the Iranian National Account. Oil variables: BP, OPEC, Iran National Accounts.
►Specification:12 von 20
1 . .pt i i t i t ty A y B X e
Findings 1: Impulse responses to one standard deviation shock in oil export revenues per capita
Folie 13 von 15
Findings 2: Impulse responses to one standard deviation shock in oil prices (oilp)- share in total spending
Folie 14 von 15
Findings 3: Impulse responses to one standard deviation shock in oil prices (oilp) - per capita spending
Folie 15 von 15
Findings 4: Impulse responses to one standard deviation shock in oil export revenues per capita (oilexppc)- per capita spending
Folie 16 von 15
Findings 5: Impulse responses to one standard deviation shock in negative changes of energy rents - per capita spending
Folie 17 von 15
Findings 6: Impulse responses to one standard deviation shock in negative changes of energy rents - share of spending
Folie 18 von 15
Findings 7: Variance decomposition
19 von 20
Years ahead
oil revenues
Health Military Security Education Culture
Variance decomposition for Health 1 0.01 99.98 0 0 0 0 5 0.67 34.16 12.47 32.56 1.43 18.68 10 1.51 28.62 10.74 33.66 4.21 21.23 Variance decomposition for Military 1 7.60 6.65 84.74 0 0 0 5 17.09 25.82 44 7.08 2.84 3.14 10 15.29 22.88 32.35 15.29 5.84 8.31 Variance decomposition for Security 1 6.64 21.69 0.55 71.10 0 0 5 9.13 14.64 2.10 56.96 0.88 16.27 10 7.92 13.22 1.97 53.99 4.42 18.50 Variance decomposition for Education 1 0.71 30.60 0.34 16.867 51.46 0 5 0.33 17.86 4.69 7.51 50.11 19.47 10 3.60 13.36 5.20 6.72 48.28 22.82 Variance decomposition for Culture 1 0.89 3.04 3.54 6.29 1.52 84.68 5 5.70 5.33 5.63 9.62 7.04 66.66 10 7.75 6.21 7.17 19.69 5.90 53.25
Summary & Conclusion
20 von 20
► Main Question: To what extent a shock in the Iranian oil export revenues affects different categories of Iranian government spending, and whether such shocks affect the military ambitions of the Iranian government or whether it only affects the government’s social, health, and education efforts.
►To answer this critical question, we have used an unrestricted VAR model and estimated the impulse response functions (IRF) and variance decomposition analysis, using annual data from 1959-2007.
►The main results show that the government’s military and security spending responds positively and statistically significantly to shocks in oil revenues (or oil prices).
►Other social spending of the Iranian government does not show a significant response to oil shocks.
►Policy implications: Those sanctions aiming to restrict the Iranian government’s oil export capacities and consequently oil export revenues may affect the military spending of Iran and not the social, education, and health efforts.