OIL & GAS Well Integrity and QRA of the shut-in wells or .... Identify the well attributes and well...

21
SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER DNV GL © 2014 26 October 2015 Tobias V. Alvarenga OIL & GAS Well Integrity and QRA of the shut-in wells or wells producing with degraded barrier 1 – how to optimize your decisions

Transcript of OIL & GAS Well Integrity and QRA of the shut-in wells or .... Identify the well attributes and well...

DNV GL © 2014 26 October 2015 SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER DNV GL © 2014

26 October 2015 Tobias V. Alvarenga

OIL & GAS

Well Integrity and QRA of the shut-in wells or wells producing with degraded barrier

1

– how to optimize your decisions

DNV GL © 2014 26 October 2015

Outline

Introduction Late Life

Wells

Well Integrity and

QRA Methodology

Case Study

Remarks

2

DNV GL © 2014 26 October 2015

3

Introduction

DNV GL © 2014 26 October 2015 4

Macondo – A Game Changer

“Leaders – CEOs, COOs, presidents and senior VPs – of drilling contractors, operators and service companies are taking an active interest in the Well Control Institute”

-Moe Plaisance

New EU Offshore Safety Directive introduced to bring “North Sea” best practices into force across Europe

DNV GL © 2014 26 October 2015

Well Integrity

NORSOK STANDARD D-010 ”Well Integrity in drilling and well operations” (2013)

5

Well Integrity is the application of technical, operational and organizational solutions to reduce risk of uncontrolled release of formation fluids throughout the life cycle of a well

DNV GL © 2014 26 October 2015

Challenges – Late Life Well Integrity

1. Difficult to assess the well integrity status – Loss/lack of instrumentation

– Different operating conditions

– Lack of information

2. Risks and uncertainties related to the well integrity during a workover / well intervention operations

3. Limited economic return on investment for a workover / well intervention operation

6

DNV GL © 2014 26 October 2015

7

Well Integrity and QRA Methodology

DNV GL © 2014 26 October 2015

Step 1 – Assess the Well Integrity Status

Identify Well Barriers – current status of the well

8

Identify Leak-paths and Failure Scenarios

Node: 12

Date: 7/3/2013

Function: To maintain the required back pressure during the operation of RGH system

IDFUNCTION FAILURE MODE

FAILURE

MECHANISM

SYSTEM FAILURE

EFFECT

FAILURE DETECTION /

SAFEGUARD

Cons

eque

nce

Like

lihoo

d

Criti

calit

y

COMMENTSACTION

ITEMS

1PT201, 202

To provide input

to M1 and M2

PCV valves and

required back

pressure during

RGH operation

(300psi)

incorrect reading diaphragm seal rupture

Needs to be a logic to

manage different sets of

readings from PT201 and 202

System:

Sub System:

DNV GL © 2014 26 October 2015

Step 2 – Conduct a Risk Assessment

Consequence Analysis

9

Reliability models

9

Dispersion and consequence modelling

DNV GL © 2014 26 October 2015

Step 3 – Decision Making and Economic Evaluation

Better basis for decision making

10

DNV GL © 2014 26 October 2015

11

Case Study

DNV GL © 2014 26 October 2015

Well Integrity and QRA Working Flow

1. Assess and Group the wells according to their well type, operational status and architecture;

2. Creating well barrier schematics for each group of wells;

3. Identify the well attributes and well barrier elements which influence the level of risk;

4. Workshop on well groupings and well barrier schematics;

5. Perform a Fault Tree Analysis for Likelihood Assessment, quantify the likelihood a leak/release

6. Performing Consequence Analysis for all the wells, assess the consequence related to a leak/release

7. Evaluate the economic consequence related to the leak/release scenario

8. Present the findings and conclusions from the QRA in risk matrix

12

DNV GL © 2014 26 October 2015

Prioritizing Well Intervention Operations

13

Overview:

Wellhead platform with 9 wells in operation

Workover and well intervention operations are performed with a jack-up rig

Well Integrity issues related to leakage in tubing and casing hangers in several of the wells

Focus on potential hydrocarbon release and blowout

13

Current Available Assessment:

DNV GL © 2014 26 October 2015

Results and Conclusions

14

As a result of the study, the wells were grouped into:

Close-in and plan workover operation

Continue production and plan workover operation

No intervention or workvoer required (additional risk mitigation measures)

DNV GL © 2014 26 October 2015

15

Remarks

DNV GL © 2014 26 October 2015

“What would come next?”

How long current “acceptable” risk last for?

– Some damage mechanisms are time driven

– Some well characteristics can change overtime

– Are all wells monitored?

– How would risks evolve in the next 10 years?

– Zero leakage or “zero” environment harm?

16

DNV GL © 2014 26 October 2015

Risk

Time

Acceptable Risk Level

Residual Risk

Workover too late Taking too much Risk

Long term Workover Plan

DNV GL © 2014 26 October 2015

Risk

Time

Acceptable Risk Level

Residual Risk

Anticipated Workover Excessive Costs

Long term Workover Plan

DNV GL © 2014 26 October 2015

Risk

Time

Acceptable Risk Level

Residual Risk

Cost Efficient Workover

Long term Workover Plan

DNV GL © 2014 26 October 2015

Managing Well Integrity

A well integrity assessment provides a systematic review and evaluation of the status of the well Need to address not just…

– The technical barriers – The operational barriers But also…

– The organisational barriers Nevertheless, by quantifying risks you

have a better basis for comparing and prioritizing your decisions

20

DNV GL © 2014 26 October 2015

SAFER, SMARTER, GREENER

www.dnvgl.com

Thank you for your attention!

21

Tobias V. Alvarenga [email protected] +55 21 3722 7260