OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL - OAG · 3 Qualified Opinion In my opinion, except for the possible...
Transcript of OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL - OAG · 3 Qualified Opinion In my opinion, except for the possible...
OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL
THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA
REPORT OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL
ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF WAKISO DISTRICT LOCAL GOVERNMENT
FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR ENDED 30TH JUNE 2016
DECEMBER, 2016
OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL
UGANDA
ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF ACRONYMS ....................................................................................................... iii
REPORT OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ............................. 1
1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 4
2.0 BACK GROUND INFORMATION .................................................................................. 4
3.0 ENTITY FINANCING ................................................................................................. 4
4.0 OBJECTIVES OF WAKISO DISTRICT LOCAL GOVERNMENT .......................................... 4
5.0 AUDIT SCOPE .......................................................................................................... 5
6.0 AUDIT PROCEDURES PERFORMED ............................................................................ 6
7.0 FINDINGS................................................................................................................ 6
iii
LIST OF ACRONYMS
ACRONYM MEANING
DLG District Local Government
DPAC District Public Accounts Committee 2007
ICT Information Communication Technology
IPPS Integrated Payroll Payment System
ISA International Standards on Auditing
ISSAI International Standards for Supreme Audit Institutions
ISSAI International Standards for Supreme Audit Institutions
LGFAR Local Government Financial and Accounting Regulations
LRDP Luwero Rwenzori Development Programme
MoESTS Ministry of Education Science and Technology and Sports
MoFPED Ministry of Finance Planning and Economic Development
NMS National Medical Stores
PFMA Public Finance Management Act, 2015
PPDA Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets
UGX Uganda Shillings
URA Uganda Revenue Authority
VAT Value Added Tax
WHT Withholding Tax
1
REPORT OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL
ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF WAKISO DISTRICT LOCAL GOVERNMENT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30TH JUNE, 2016
THE RT. HON. SPEAKER OF PARLIAMENT
I have audited the financial statements of Wakiso District Local Government for the year ended
30th June 2016. These financial statements comprise of the Statement of Financial Position as at
30th June 2016, Statement of Financial Performance, Statement of Changes in equity, Cash flow
Statement together with other accompanying statements, notes and accounting policies.
Management Responsibility for the Financial Statements
Under Article 164 of the Constitution of the Republic of Uganda, 1995 (as amended) and
Section 45 of the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA), 2015, the Accounting Officer is
accountable to Parliament for the funds and resources of Wakiso District. The Accounting
Officer is also responsible for the preparation of financial statements in accordance with the
requirements of the Local Governments Financial and Accounting Manual, 2007, and the
Financial Reporting Guide, 2008, and for such internal control as management determines
necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material
misstatement whether due to fraud or error.
Auditor’s Responsibility
My responsibility as required by Article 163 of the Constitution of the Republic of Uganda (as
amended), Section 87 of the Local Governments Act Cap 243 (as amended) and Sections 13, 16
and 19 of the National Audit Act, 2008 is to audit and express an opinion on these statements
based on my audit. I conducted the audit in accordance with International Standards on
Auditing. Those standards require that I comply with the ethical requirements and plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free
from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing audit procedures to obtain evidence about the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements as well as evidence supporting compliance with relevant
laws and regulations. The procedures selected depend on the Auditor’s judgment including the
assessment of risks of material misstatement of financial statements whether due to fraud or
error. In making those risk assessments, the Auditor considers internal control relevant to the
2
entity’s preparation and fair presentation of financial statements in order to design audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances but not for purposes of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the
appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates
made by management as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.
Except as discussed below, I believe that the audit evidence I have obtained is sufficient and
appropriate to provide a basis for my opinion.
Part “A” of this report sets out my opinion on the financial statements. Part “B” which forms an
integral part of this report presents in detail all the significant audit findings made during the
audit which have been brought to the attention of management and form part of my Annual
Report to Parliament.
PART “A”
Basis for Qualified Opinion
Salary Over Payment - UGX.103,894,344
The District incurred overpayments of salary to staff amounting to UGX.103,894,344,
contrary to Section B (7) of the Uganda Public Standing Orders, 2010 which requires
correct payment of salary. Accordingly, this amount has been irregularly included in the
financial statements under employee costs.
Unsupported Pension Payments - UGX.155,740,590
A total of UGX.155,740,590 was paid in respect of pension claims without the supporting
files. There is uncertainty as to whether the amount in question was paid to genuine
pensioners.
Delayed Deletion of Employees - UGX.58,912,157
The district irregularly paid salary totalling to UGX.58,912,157 to staff who had been
earmarked for deletion as a result of either retirement, transfer of service or death. This
amount has been irregularly included in the financial statements under employee costs.
3
Qualified Opinion
In my opinion, except for the possible effects of matters described in the Basis for Qualified
Opinion paragraph, the financial statements of Wakiso District Local Government as at 30th
June, 2016 are prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with the Local Government
Financial and Accounting Manual, 2007, Section 51 (3) of the Public Finance Management Act,
2015, the Local Government Financial and Accounting Regulations, 2007 and the Local
Governments Act cap 243 (as amended), of the Laws of Uganda.
Other Matters
I consider it necessary to communicate the following matters other than those that are
presented or disclosed in the financial statements that, in my judgement, are relevant to users’
understanding of the audit, the auditor’s responsibilities or the auditor’s report.
Irregular Procurement of Contractor
Section 43 of the PPDA 2003, requires that all procurements are undertaken in a manner
that promotes transparency, accountability and fairness. However, contrary to this
provision, a firm was awarded a contract at a price of UGX.15,188,224,517, instead of
awarding it to a firm with the lowest bid of UGX.9,871,635,060 for work on Seguku-
Kasenge-Buddo road leading to an apparent loss of UGX.5,316,589,450.
Irregular Award of Framework Contracts – UGX.214,253,253
The districts awarded framework contracts for the supply of goods amounting to
UGX.146,429,768 for items that were not repetitive in nature and whose need could be
defined in advance, and repair of motor vehicles for UGX.67,823,485. It was observed
that the practice was used to circumvent the requirement to undertake proper
procurement procedures for the items in question hence compromising value for money
in the procurement process.
John F.S. Muwanga
22nd December, 2016
4
PART "B"
DETAILED REPORT OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENT OF
WAKISO DISTRICT LOCAL GOVERNMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30TH JUNE 2016
This Section outlines the detailed introduction, background information, entity financing, audit
findings, management responses and my recommendations in the respect thereof.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
In accordance with Article 163(3), of the Constitution of the Republic of Uganda, 1995
(as amended), I am required to audit and report on the public accounts of Uganda and
of all public offices, including the courts, the central and the local government
administrations, universities and public institutions of the like nature and any public
corporation or other bodies or organizations established by an Act of Parliament.
Accordingly, I carried out the audit of the Wakiso District Local Government (DLG) to
enable me report to Parliament.
2.0 BACK GROUND INFORMATION
Wakiso District was established in 1974 after splitting East Mengo District. The District
lies North of Kampala. It is boarded by Mukono and Wakiso Districts in the south,
Nakaseke in the West, Nakasongola in the North and Kayunga District in the East. It
has two counties of Bamunanika and Katikamu.
3.0 ENTITY FINANCING
Wakiso District was financed by grants (Conditional and Unconditional) from the Central
Government, donations and locally generated revenues from taxes, fees, licenses and
charges. During the year, the district received grants totaling to UGX.68,798,493,322
from the Central Government, UGX.632,621,594 from donations and UGX.2,479,238,002
from locally generated revenues. The total revenue of UGX.71,910,352,918 constituted
97% of its approved budget estimates of UGX.74,355,833,259.
4.0 OBJECTIVES OF WAKISO DISTRICT LOCAL GOVERNMENT
The district’s main objectives are to;
Increase household incomes and promoting equity
5
Increase access to quality social services
Improve stock and quality of economic infrastructure
Enhance the availability and quality of gainful employment
Enhance human capital Development
Strengthen Good governance, security and accountability
Promote sustainable population and use of environment and natural resources
Promote science, Technology innovation and ICT to enhance competitiveness
5.0 AUDIT SCOPE
The audit was carried out in accordance with International Standards on Auditing and
accordingly included a review of the accounting records and agreed procedures as was
considered necessary. The audit was carried out with regard to the following objectives;
a. To verify whether the financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with the requirements of the Local Governments Financial and Accounting
Manual 2007; and the Local Governments Financial and Accounting Regulations
2007; and fairly present the income and expenditures for the year and of the
financial position as at the end of the year.
b. To verify whether all the funds of the entity were utilized with due attention to
economy and efficiency and only for the purposes for which the funds were
provided.
c. To verify whether goods and services financed have been procured in
accordance with the PPDA Act, 2003 (as amended).
d. To evaluate and obtain sufficient understanding of the internal control structure
of the entity, assess control risk and identify reportable conditions, including
material internal control weaknesses.
e. To verify whether the management of the funds of the entity was in compliance
with the Government of Uganda Financial Regulations.
f. To verify whether all the necessary supporting documents, records and accounts
have been kept in respect of all activities, and are in agreement with the
financial statements presented.
6
6.0 AUDIT PROCEDURES PERFORMED
The following audit procedures were undertaken;
a. Revenue
Obtained all schedules of all revenues collected and reconciled the amounts to the
cashbooks and bank statements of the entity.
b. Expenditure
The payment vouchers of the entity were examined for proper authorization, eligibility
and budgetary provision, accountability and support documentation.
c. Internal Control System
Reviewed the internal control system and its operations to establish whether sound
controls were applied throughout the period
d. Procurement
Reviewed the procurement of goods and services under the various departments during
the period under review and reconciled with the approved procurement plan.
e. Fixed Assets Management
Reviewed the use and management of the assets of the entity during the period under
review.
f. Financial Statements
Examined, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements; assessed the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management; as well as evaluated the overall financial statement presentation.
7.0 FINDINGS
7.1 Categorization of Findings
The following system of profiling of the audit findings has been adopted to better
prioritize the implementation of audit recommendations;
7
Table showing categorization of findings
No Category Description
1. High
significance
Has a significant/material impact, has a high likelihood of reoccurrence,
and in the opinion of the Auditor General, it requires urgent remedial
action. It is a matter of high risk or high stakeholder interest.
2. Moderate
significance
Has a moderate impact, has a likelihood of reoccurrence, and in the
opinion of the Auditor General, it requires remedial action. It is a matter of
medium risk or moderate stakeholder interest.
3. Low
significance
Has a low impact, has a remote likelihood of reoccurrence, and in the
opinion of the Auditor General, may not require much attention, though its
remediation may add value to the entity. It is a matter of low risk or low
stakeholder interest.
Accordingly, the table below contains a categorized summary of the findings that follow
in the subsequent paragraphs of the report;
Table showing categorized summary of the findings
No Finding Significance
7.2 Overpayment of salary - UGX.103,894,344 High
7.3 Irregular Procurement of Contractor High
7.4 Irregular award of Framework Contracts - UGX.214,253,253 Moderate
7.5 Budget Performance Moderate
7.6 Unsupported Pension Payments Moderate
7.7.1 Staff in Acting Position Moderate
7.7.2 Delayed Deletions of Employees - UGX.58,912,157 High
7.7.3 Irregular Transfer of Service from other Local Governments High
7.8 Over Payment of Pensions - UGX.11,961,297 High
7.9 Award of procurement without confirmation of funds - UGX.30m Moderate
7.10 Irregular Contract Award UGX.181,689,257 High
7.11 Lack of District Land Titles High
7.12 Information Technology (IT) Policy Low
7.13.1 Staffing levels High
7.13.2 Health Facilities Moderate
7.13.3 Drug Management Moderate
7.14 Review of Internal Audit Function Moderate
7.15 Status of prior year audit recommendations Moderate
8
7.2 Salary Over Payment - UGX.103,894,344
Section B (7) of the Uganda Public Standing Orders, 2010 requires salaries to be fixed at
annual rates and paid in twelve (12) equal installments. Salaries shall be paid correctly,
promptly and as a lump sum in accordance with the approved salary structure for the
Public Service.
A review of the payroll data and IFMS payments revealed variances between amounts
on the payroll and payments later made to personal accounts resulting into
overpayments amounting to UGX.103,894,344 contrary to Section B (7) of the Uganda
Public Standing Orders, 2010. This was attributed to weak controls in the management
and processing of the payroll, including absence of monthly reconciliations between the
IPPS payroll and the district staff register, hence presenting a risk of errors and fraud
going undetected.
The Accounting Officer acknowledged the finding which he attributed to errors and that
he had since instituted recovery measures.
I have advised the Accounting Officer to ensure that all excess funds paid are recovered
and in future, necessary reconciliations should be made before payments are effected.
7.3 Irregular Procurement of Contractor for Seguku-Kasenge-Buddo - 10Km
Section 43 of the PPDA 2003, requires that all procurements are undertaken in a manner
that promotes transparency, accountability and fairness.
However, contrary to this provision, a firm was awarded a contract to work on Seguku-
Kasenge-Buddo (10 Km) and Lubowa Quality Super market Hill view close (2.1km), at a
contract price of UGX.15,188,224,517, instead of awarding it to a firm that had bided for
the same works at UGX.9,871,635,060, leading to apparent overspending by
UGX.5,316,589,450. It was observed that the lowest bidder was eliminated due to the
failure to back the schedule of general experience with signed agreement forms and
certificates of completion despite verification letters by some of the contracting entities
(Ministry of works and Transport, and Uganda investment Authority) that the firm had
been contracted before, for similar works. It was noted that the evaluation committee
waived off a major criteria of financial performance that required applicants to have an
9
average turnover of UGX.20 Billion for the last 3 years citing noncompliance by all
bidders. However, the successful bidder had an average turnover of UGX.14 billion far
below the other bidders with average turnover of UGX.41.8 Billion and UGX.2 Trillion
respectively.
It was also observed that the successful bidder lacked the experience of having 2
successfully and substantially (70%) completed contracts in the last recent 3 years each
with a value of at least UGX.12 billion as the company only attached certificates
amounting to below UGX.4 Billion and UGX.12 Billion, which was only 10% completed
works. The waiver gave an unfair advantage to the awarded firm leading to unfair
competition and apparent overspending of UGX.5,316,589,450.
The Accounting Officer acknowledged the finding and explained that the Evaluation
team waived off some criteria under Financial Performance under average annual
turnover in line with the job being undertaken and the firm in question did not meet
both the general experience of having contracts in the last recent 5 years prior to the
bid submission deadline with activity in at least 8 months in each of the last recent 5
years (2011, 2012, 2013, 2014& 2015). This was considered a deliberate override of
regulations by the evaluation and contracts committees.
I advised the Accounting Officer to abide by the basic principles of procurement as laid
down in Section 43 and follow up this matter for possible action on whoever is found to
have been responsible for this loss to government.
7.4 Irregular award of Framework Contracts - UGX.214,253,253
Regulation 94(1) of the PPDA Regulations, 2006 requires Council to enter into
framework contracts for repetitive supplies but where the quantity and timing of the
requirement cannot be defined in advance. This is meant to reduce procurement costs
or lead times for a requirement which is needed repeatedly or continuously over a
period of time by having them available on a "call off" basis.
However a review of a sample of the districts’ frame work contracts revealed that, call
off orders were made for procurements amounting to UGX.146,429,768 for items that
were not repetitive in nature and whose need could be defined in advance, thus not
fitting within the definition of framework contracts. Similarly, the district issued call off
10
orders to the tune of UGX.67,823,485 for repair services without comparing the prices of
various suppliers prior to issuance.
The Accounting Officer explained that items that have standardized costs can be
procured under framework contracts for easy procurement. It was observed however
that the practice may have been used to circumvent the requirement for proper
procurement procedures, thus compromising value for money in the procurement.
I advised the Accounting Officer to ensure that going forward, conditions governing
framework contracts are always observed.
7.5 Budget Performance
Regulation 18(3) of LGFAR, 2007 requires budget estimates to be based on objectives to
be achieved in the financial year and that during performance, efforts should be made
to achieve the agreed objectives or targets as per programs of Council.
It was noted that out of the approved budget of UGX.74,355,833,259, a total of
UGX.71,603,629,091 was received resulting into a shortfall of UGX.2,445,480,341 which
represents an underperformance of 3.3%. This was largely attributed to a shortfall in
GOU releases of UGX.906,916,693, as well as transfers from other government units
(especially lower Local Governments) of UGX.1,644,946,275 as shown in the table
below;
Table summarizing the District Revenue Out-turn
Source Budget (Ugx) Actual (Ugx) Variance (Ugx)
Local Revenue 2,483,699,969 2,479,238,002 4,461,967
GoU releases 64,377,818,568 63,470,901,875 906,916,693
Donor funds 521,777,000 632,621,594 110,844,594
Transfers from other
government units
6,972,537,722 5,327,591,447 1,644,946,275
Total 74,355,833,259 71,910,352,918 2,445,480,341
Furthermore, collection of revenue by the lower local governments, as well as budget
cuts by the Ministry of Finance Planning and Economic Development, across the entire
government might have also affected budget performance.
11
In response, management explained that this was a direct result of non-realization of
funding from the observed sources, adding that this issue is perennial, and sometimes
results into failure to fully implement approved work plans for planned service delivery.
I advised the Accounting Officer to carry out a deep analysis of the budget performance
with a view of devising mechanisms to address such shortcomings, especially those
affecting revenue collection by the lower local governments.
7.6 Unsupported Pension Payments - UGX.155,740,590
Article 254(1) and (3) of the Constitution of the Republic of Uganda, 1995 (as amended)
provides that Public Officers shall on retirement receive such pension as is
commensurate with their ranks, salary and length of service. The payments should be
prompt, regular and easily accessible to the pensioners. The payment of pensions
entirely vests with the Ministry of Public Service.
It was noted that Government decentralized the payroll and pension system to
respective votes (MDAs and Local Governments) with effect from the financial year
2014/15. A review of the District IPPS pension payroll revealed that a sum of
UGX.155,740,590 was paid in respect of pension claims without pension files to support
the expenditure. I informed management about the possible risk of financial loss
through inaccuracies of calculation or even payment to non-bonafide pensioners as a
result of lack of supporting documentation.
Although the Accounting Officer stated that the files pertaining to pensioners paid during
the financial year were available, some files were still missing on verification and the
amount included in the above paragraph accordingly excluded the availed files.
I advised the Accounting Officer to engage the Ministry of Public Service to ensure that
all pension claims are supported with personal files to eliminate any risk of fraud during
payment of pensioners.
7.7 Human Resource Issues
7.7.1 Staff in Acting Position
According to Section (A-c) of Uganda Public Service Standings Orders, 2010, on
Appointment Procedures, an appointment on acting basis is expected to last not more
12
than six months, and is subject to the direction by the Appointing Authority. Any period
of acting appointment beyond six months will be null and void and the officer holding
such an appointment shall automatically revert to his or her substantive post, unless the
Appointing Authority extends the appointment for another period of six months, but
shall not exceed 12 months in total.
It was observed that twenty one (21) district staff have been in acting capacity for more
than six months. The Accounting Officer attributed this to delayed verdicts for office
holders on interdiction and transfer of substantive office holders to newly created
Municipalities. He further explained that the district has undergone restructuring and
management was in the process of customizing the new structure.
I await the outcome of the implementation of the new district structure.
7.7.2 Delayed Deletion of Employees - UGX.58,912,157
Section B-a (12) of the Standing Orders 2010, stipulates that payment of a salary to a
Public officer shall be stopped immediately the officer ceases to render services to
Government under whatever circumstances including death.
During the financial year, the district irregularly paid salary totaling to UGX.58,912,157
to staff who had been earmarked for deletion as a result of either retirement, transfer of
service or death. The Accounting Officer attributed this to the Integrated Payroll
Payment System which is expected to automatically delete such cases adding that it was
a challenge if the system had failed to effect such a control, and promised to recover the
monies when the cases are being submitted for gratuity payment.
I advised the Accounting Officer to institute appropriate recovery procedures from the
concerned beneficiaries and in future, ensure that such cases are promptly removed
from the payroll, given that the Accounting Officers are now in charge of their payrolls
following decentralization.
7.7.3 Irregular Recruitment/Transfer of Service from other Local Governments
Paragraph 7 of the Standing Orders 2010; Appointment Procedures (A-C), requires that
appointment on transfer from “Other Public Service” or from a Local Government” to the
13
“Central Government” and vice versa or from one Local Government to another to follow
the normal appointment procedures.
It is a requirement that the Accounting Officer submits the availability of the vacancy to
the District Service Commission for commencement of the recruitment process and in
order to ensure competitiveness, recruitment should be done internally by placing an
internal advert for qualified employees to apply and fill the position, or externally by
sourcing from the open market through advertisement of the position in the print media.
During the financial year, the district recruited 51 staff on transfer from other local
governments without following the procedures spelt out in the Standing Orders. The
vacant positions were neither declared nor advertised internally or in the print media,
but the applicants were recommended and shortlisted for interviews, hence casting
doubt as to how they got to know about the vacant posts. This undermined the
principles of transparency and fair competition, thus denying the would be candidates an
equal opportunity for employment.
In response, management explained that transfer of service by staff from other local
Governments is allowed, and Regulation 17 of the Public Service Commission
Regulations, 2009 allows districts to use their discretion not to advertise.
I noted that the cited Sections were applicable for a limited number and not for such a
big number of positions (51) which casts doubt on transparency in the recruitment
process, due to lack of competition for available positions. I advised the Accounting
Officer to ensure full adherence to the public service standing orders in regard to
recruitment of staff, by ensuring equal opportunity to all potential applicants.
7.8 Over Payment of Pensions - UGX.11,961,297
Section (L-b) (5) of the Public Standing Orders, 2010 states that; a public officer on
retirement shall receive such pension as is commensurate with his/her rank, salaries,
length of service and in accordance with the appropriate law.
Contrary to the regulations, pension payroll analysis carried out revealed that the figures
for IPPS were lower while the actual payments made on IFMS were higher for a number
of pensioners leading to over payment of pensions by UGX.11,961,297.
14
The Accounting Officer attributed this to initial challenges of decentralization of the
pension management, such as delayed access, lack of supplier numbers and delayed
verification, among others in which some pensioners missed payment.
I advised the Accounting Officer to follow up the cases in question and initiate recovery
measures of the amounts involved.
7.9 Award of procurement without confirmation of funds - UGX.30,489,106
Regulation 87(5) of the LGPPDA, 2006 requires an accounting officer to ensure that the
total acquisition cost of procurement is committed prior to contract placement.
Contrary to the above, the district awarded contracts at contract prices above the sum
committed as per LGPP Form 1. As a result, an extra amount of UGX.30,489,106 was
awarded over and above the committed funding, without evidence of availability of the
extra resources. Awarding contracts without prior confirmation of availability of funding
undermines the budgeting process and could result into domestic arrears. This was also
attributed to a weak PDU that failed to guide the Accounting Officer, on what the
regulations require in such instances.
Although the Accounting Officer asserted that the all awards were supported with
confirmation of funds from user departments, on verification, contracts of
UGX.30,489,106, lacked evidence of confirmation of availability of funds.
I advised the Accounting Officer to always ensure confirmation of availability of funds to
avoid risks of accumulation of domestic arrears and litigation in case of delays in
settlement of the related invoices.
7.10 Irregular Contract Award - UGX.181,689,257
Regulation 102(1 and 3) of the Local Government PPDA regulations, 2006, requires a
security to be in a form and from an institution that is wholly acceptable to the Bank of
Uganda and valid for a period prescribed in the tender documents.
It was noted that two construction firms submitted bids for the renovation of Makindye
Sabagabo Sub-county offices (now Makindye Municipal council), at bid prices of
UGX.163,300,355 and UGX.181,689,257. However, the Best Evaluated Bidder submitted
15
a bid security in form of a cheque of UGX.500,000 in favor of Wakiso DLG (Stanbic bank,
dated 5/2/16) which was not a requirement in the bid document.
A review of the standard bid document and the instruction to bidders (clause ITB 18.1),
however, exclusively stated that "A Bid security shall not be required". It was however
noted that the lowest price bidder was evaluated as non-compliant basing on failure to
submit a bid security. This appeared contradictory.
In view of the above, the disqualification of the lowest priced bid on such grounds and
the award of contract in favor of a higher bid is considered irregular and resulted into an
excess expenditure that could have been avoided.
The Accounting Officer stated that the unsuccessful bidder did not provide evidence of
experience of handling contracts of more than one hundred million or works of similar
complex nature and would not pass the technical evaluation stage.
I advised the Accounting Officer to follow the regulations and also exercise due care in
scrutinizing the evaluation reports before accepting the recommendations of the
evaluation and contract Committees.
7.11 Lack of District Land Titles
Regulation 58 (4) of the LGFAR, 2007 provides that the properties and assets of a local
government shall be properly registered, titles issued and valued. It was however,
observed that the district does not hold title for the bulk of the plots of land included in
the schedule, despite the fact that it has made substantial investments there on.
Consequently, the council land is exposed to risk of encroachment and disputes.
The Accounting Officer explained that they have a budget for titling of at least four plots
and will progressively survey and get titles for its land.
I advised the Accounting Officer to expedite the process and ensure land titles are
secured for all land belonging to the district.
7.12 Information Technology (IT) Policy
Section 110 of the LGFAR (2007) requires the chief executive to designate an officer to
ensure that adequate information and communication technology policies are
16
established and are applied to enable adequate security and protection, over computers
and of data held on computers or information systems operated by the Council.
It was observed that the district has a number of computers and their accessories meant
to improve processing of information. However, there are no proper procedures
formulated to guide use of this equipment and there is no designated officer to handle
IT matters contrary to the law. Consequently, there was no effective general and
application controls in existence in the District that would ensure proper logical and
physical access and security over data. Absence of IT controls, poses a risk of wastage
and loss of vital information.
In his response, the Accounting Officer promised to have an information policy in place
to address this issue by end of the financial year.
I advised the Accounting officer to expedite the process of formulating IT policies, to
guide in management of IT resources and also fully harness the use of ICT as a
business enabler.
7.13 Inspection of District Health Centres (HC)
Wakiso district has five (5) Health Centre IVs out of which three (3) Health Centre IVs
and one district hospital were inspected, and the following were noted;
7.13.1 Staffing levels
It was noted that the Health Centres have inadequate staff. Out of the total established
staff of 328, only 259 were filled leaving 68 posts vacant. Notable among the vacant
posts were the critical posts of Senior Nursing Officer as well as Public Health Nurses. In
absence of such vital personnel, the quality of service delivery is likely to be affected.
Details in the table below;
Table showing staffing gaps at Heath Centre visited
HEALTH CENTRE APPROVED
STRUCTURE
FILLED
POSITIONS
VACANT
POSITIONS
Kasangati HC IV 48 39 08
Buwambo HC IV 47 35 12
Wakiso HC IV 43 38 05
Entebbe Hospital 190 147 43
328 259 68
17
The Accounting Officer attributed this to retirement of officers and support staff, and
explained that they had placed a request for recruitment of new staff.
I advised the Accounting Officer to liaise with the responsible authorities to ensure that
the staffing levels at the health centers are improved for better service delivery.
7.13.2 Health Facilities
Medical practice requires that good health facilities in terms of buildings, equipment and
other accessories are provided and maintained in good condition in order to offer quality
health services to the community.
However a physical inspection of the Health Centre IVs, revealed inadequacies, such as:
Inadequate staff quarters, lack of transport facilities, lack of storage facilities,
inadequate delivery beds, poorly maintained buildings, overcrowding, among others.
Absence of good health facilities hinders effective service delivery.
The Accounting Officer stated that they did not receive capital development from
ministry of health for the financial year 2015/2016, but they have continued to advocate
for support for infrastructural development and the need is overwhelming.
I advised the Accounting Officer to liaise with the relevant stakeholders especially
Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development, to ensure that the
development budget of the district is improved to allow improvement of health facilities.
7.13.3 Drug Management
From a sample of key drugs supplied to health centers, I reviewed their usage and
noted the following;
a) Expired Drugs
During the inspection of health centers, it was noted that the facilities had expired drugs
within their stores and no efforts had been made to have the drugs safely disposed as
shown in the table below;
Table showing expired drugs HEALTH CENTRE DRUG QUANTITY EXPIRY DATE
1 Kasangati HCIV Starl Park 18*30 10/2015
RHE 1*24*28 11/2015
RH 5*3*28 10/2015
18
HEALTH CENTRE DRUG QUANTITY EXPIRY DATE
Tetracycline eye 10*1 12/2015
Dextrose 50% 6*1 05/2016
Atropine Sulphate 8*1 04/2016
Chloramphenicol 36*1 12/2015
Septrine 960mg 28*1000 04/2016
Septrine 120mg 2*1000 01/2016
Nevirapine Syrup 8 bottles 03/2016
Alluvia 100mg/25mg 23*60 11/2015
2 Wakiso HCIV Flucanozale 7 bottles 03/2016
Chlorpromazine 1*1000 06/2016
RH Pead 2*3*28 06/2016
Lopinavir/Ritonavir 1*20 06/2016
Benzathine 50vials 03/2016
Bupivacane 140vials 06/2016
PH/NA/CL filling solution 8 bottles 05/2016
3 Entebbe hospital Piriton Tab 2*1000 8/2015
Quinine tab 1*1000 3/2015
Quinine tab 1*1000 9/2015
X-Beta N eye 69 tubes 6/2015
Dexamethasone 30 amps 8/2015
Hydralazine 9 amps 5/2015
Aspirin tab 1*1000 9/2015
I noted that some of the expired drugs had been delivered by the National Medical
Stores (NMS) within a short period to the expiry date. It was not clear why such drugs
remaining with short shelf life would be delivered. The Accounting Officer also alluded to
large quantities supplied of uncommonly used drugs adding that disposal of expired
drugs is a function of Ministry of Health. In the meantime, the District Health Officer
had issued a circular to all facilities not to receive drugs with a remaining expiry shelf life
of three months.
I advised the Accounting Officer to liaise with the Ministry of Health and NMS to ensure
that the expired drugs are safely disposed in accordance with the health drug disposal
standards.
b) Frequent Drug Stock outs
I observed that there were drug stock outs before the next consignments could be
received. Some of the stock outs were of vital drugs necessary for treatment of common
ailments as shown in the table below. Drug stock outs could be attributed to supply of
19
drugs without properly assessing the drug requirements of a health unit.
Table showing drug stock outs HEALTH CENTRE DRUG DRUG STOCK OUT (DAYS)
Kasangati HCIV Dextrose 50% 78
Albendazole 400mg 200
Chlorpromazine 48
Atropine Sulphate 1
Cotton wool 9
Metformin 15
Sputum Containers 318
Nystatin Suspension125ml 370
Metronidazole Syrup 320
Lopinavir/Ritonavir 350
Mebendazole Tabs 688
Wakiso HCIV Cotrimoxazole 13
Albendazole 240
Ceftriaxone 23
Glibenclamide 25
Bendrolfualida 137
Entebbe Hospital Caps Doxycycline 63
Injection X-pen 191
Injection Gentamycin 42
Injection Ceftriaxone 7
Cap Amoxyl 57
Tabs Panadol 19
Tabs Ferrous 63
The Accounting officer attributed the stock outs to delivery of the standard drug kit
mainly to health centers II and III without due consideration to the catchment
population, but they were developing a drug redistribution strategy.
I advised the Accounting Officer to ensure proper assessment of the drug requirements
of the health centers before requisitioning for drugs and other medical supplies.
Meanwhile, I await the outcome of the implementation of the suggested drug
redistribution strategy.
c) Variances in delivery of drugs
A comparison between statements of medicine by NMS and records at Health centers
showed variances in the quantities of the drugs delivered. Cases of over and under
delivery of drugs were noted, as per table below;
20
Table showing variances in drug deliveries HEALTH
CENTRE
CYCLE DRUG NMS
FIGURE
HCIV
FIGURE
(Over)/Under
Delivery
Wakiso HCIV 05 Nifedipine 20 mg R 10 50 (40)
Entebbe Hospital 01 Suture PGA2 372 360 12
01 Suture PGA2 348 360 (12)
04 Set Infusion Acid 725 800 (75)
Buwambo HCIV 05 Paracetamol/Suspension 45 60 (15)
The discrepancies may have resulted from either poor record keeping at the health
centers or dumping of drugs by the NMS. I was however not shown evidence of
complaints to NMS for short deliveries, nor given explanation in regard to over supplies.
Overall, the Accounting Officer stated that they had taken the issue of drug
management seriously by training staff on logistics management to address the gaps
and that they were committed to development of stringent internal controls.
I advised management to strengthen their drug forecasting processes as well as internal
controls over drugs management at Health Centre’s in form of record keeping, as well as
custody and reporting.
7.14 Review of Internal Audit Function
Section 90 of the Local Government Act Cap 243 (as amended), requires every District,
City, Municipal and Town Council to provide for an Internal Audit Department who
should prepare quarterly audit reports and submit them to the Council giving a copy to
the District Public Accounts Committee (DPAC). In addition, ISSAI 1610 allows the
external auditor to place reliance on the work of the internal auditor in accordance with
ISA 315 after consideration that the Internal Audit is likely to be relevant to the Audit.
However, our review of the internal audit department and its operations revealed that
the department was weak. While the district establishment of the department indicated
nine (9) staff, only two (2) were in place. In addition, according to internal audit, the
actual operational funds availed to the department of UGX.169 Million (about 0.001% of
the district budget of UGX.74 Billion) appear to be meagre, given the extent of audit
21
work they would have to undertake across the District. I further noted the absence of
internal audit plans and inadequacies in internal audit reports. In the absence of a
strong and functional internal audit department, the risk of the existence of weak
internal controls cannot be understated.
The Accounting Officer stated that the audit staff were assigned duties in newly created
Municipalities and Town Councils, but they were in a process of formalizing
appointments for internal audit staff.
I advised the Accounting officer to ensure that the Internal Audit Department is
strengthened to enhance the internal control system of the district.
7.15 Status of Prior Year Audit recommendations
A review of the implementation status of the prior year audit recommendations revealed
the following;
Table showing status of prior year audit findings
Findings Recommendations Implementation Status
Auditors Comment
PAYROLL AUDIT:
Over payment of
salary of UGX.2,275,126,315.
The Accounting Officer was
asked to ensure the
recoveries are made
The recovery was
commenced till when
IGG halted the same pending the issuance of
the investigation report.
Not addressed.
Partial recoveries
made and IGG following up the
matter
Salary arrears paid without supporting
records of
UGX.14,600,581
The Accounting Officer was asked to ensure the
recoveries are made
The recovery was commenced till when
IGG halted the same
pending the issuance of the investigation report.
Not yet addressed
Non-remittance of
shared inspection fees to Lower
Councils of UGX 23,068,020
The Accounting Officer was
requested to remit shared revenue to the Lower Local
Governments promptly.
Shared revenue has
now been remitted to the Lower Local
Governments promptly
shared revenue
remitted
Procurements not
in the Procurement Plan
worth
UGX.801,756,780
The Accounting Officer was
advised to integrate new procurement needs into the
district approved
procurement plan for implementation.
Addressed Procurement
needs for the year under review were
integrated into the
district approved procurement plan
for implementation.
Items not taken on Accounting Officer was Addressed The issue has
22
charge
advised to institute proper
controls over stores to
avoid abuse.
been partially
addressed.
Material delivered on site such as
marram and culverts were still
not being taken on charge.
Management of The
Luwero – Rwenzori
Programme: Groups did not
maintain records. Consequently, the
groups did not prepare and submit
quarterly progress
reports to the District
The Accounting Officer was
advised to ensure that the
subject matter specialists regularly monitor the
projects and enforce maintenance of proper
records.
Not addressed The funds were
still unaccounted
for at the time of the audit and
neither had the planning office
been furnished with any activity
reports
Works Department;
Nakusaze-Kiwande – Gomebe in Bussi
2km - although the road is 4km, only
2km were worked
on. The rest of the road was reduced
to a path with no routine
maintenance done
at all. Also the section which was
worked on was narrow.
The Accounting Officer to
ensure close supervision of the road works.
Supervision of works is
being implemented
The narrow
section of the road was widened and
maintenance is labour based
coupled with close
supervision of the district engineer.
However ,there were sections of
the road that were
not wed
Lack of Land Titles
The Accounting Officer was
advised to expedite processing of titles.
The process of
surveying and titling properties owned by
the district local
government was underway.
Not addressed
Outstanding
Commitments totalling to
UGX.391,417,310 remained unsettled
by the end of the
year.
The Accounting Officer was
advised to ensure that creditors are settled
promptly.
The issue has not yet
been addressed
Not addressed
23
The above table shows that not all recommendations have been fully implemented by
the District. The Accounting Officer is accordingly advised to ensure that all audit
recommendations are always implemented, for better service delivery.