Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 1 ILC R&D Program Dr. David Sutter, Senior Program...
-
Upload
barbara-barrett -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 1 ILC R&D Program Dr. David Sutter, Senior Program...
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
1
ILC R&D Program
Dr. David Sutter, Senior Program ManagerOffice of High Energy Physics
Office of Science
March 8-9, 2005
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
Goal and Priority
Goal: Carry out the U.S. preconstruction R&D required to position the ILC for the start of construction.
This means: Focus on improved performance Focus on establishing an international management
structure/laboratory to build and run ILC Focus on reducing cost! Focus on bringing ILC to the U.S.
Priority: Very High!!!
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
International Status
In FY04 ICFA’s ILC Technical Review Panel’s R-1 goals were met by both the warm and cold designs. Therefore, the ILC could be built with either technology.
In FY04 the USLCSG completed a comparative design and cost study of a cold and warm ILC design – positioning the U.S. to go either way.
In FY04 the ILCSC’s International Technology Recommendation Panel (ITRP) recommended that the ILC be built using cold technology.
ITRP recommended the cold technology, not the DESY design.
A new conceptual design must be done using the best technology from both the cold and warm designs.
The ITRP urged a strong R&D program directed at increasing Ez in
superconducting rf cavities.
ICFA approved an organizational structure for the international ILC international organization, the Global Design Effort, to manage the preconstruction R&D.
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
Linear Collider – Global Organization
Organization Chart – The Global Design Effort
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
Cost Model - Preconstruction R&D Period
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
Schedule Model for the ILC
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
ILC – International Issues
Making the GDE operational – ASAP
Barish has accepted
GDE Central Office site & team – where & when?
Organize work packages
R&D Plan – for how many years? – U.S. Govt. has to say!
Conceptual Design – Need to prepare an R&D Plan
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
ILC America Status
Draft R&D Plan done – the cap is gone!
ILC America organization – In progress!
U.S. well positioned to proceed with a cold design
Developing work packages
Paul Grannis to be DOE Program Manager!!
U.S. laboratories- - An impression: moving ahead in all
directions!!!!
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
ILC America Issues
Making ILC America operational – ASAP (July 05?)
− DOE/NSF Approval of organizational Structure
− Director Selection – ASAP (the person in charge!)
ILC America contribution to global R&D Plan
− U.S. Govt. must set the time scale what kind of R&D Plan!
Bridging FY06 at SLAC:
− $8.5M to SLAC, $8.5M to Fermilab, $8.0M in DOE
− SLAC ILC in-house funds in FY05 = $15.2M
− To avoid losing large piece of team in FY06, need ~$6.5M of the $8M in Washington – Unlikely!!!
Office of Science
U.S. Department of Energy
ILC America Funding Profile
FY 99 – 03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07
DOE $19.2/yr 19.6 23.3 25.0 35.0DOE HQ - - - 8.0 35.0 FNAL 3.0/yr 3.0 6.4 8.5 ?SLAC 16.2/yr 14.2 15.2 8.5 ?BNL ? .3 .4 ? ?LBNL ? .7 .3 ? ?LLNL ? 1.0 .3 ? ?
TJNAF et al - - - ? ? University - .4 .7 ? ?
FNAL Per DOE 3.0 6.0 8.5 ?FNAL per Stanfield 2.8 6.9 8.8 ?FNAL per Internal budget (M.P.) 3.0 8.9 11.8 12.2