Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel …le.utah.gov/interim/2014/pdf/00003198.pdfAre...

31
Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel Mission and Performance Measurements Presented by Michael E. Christensen, PhD. Director Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel Prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel

Transcript of Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel …le.utah.gov/interim/2014/pdf/00003198.pdfAre...

Page 1: Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel …le.utah.gov/interim/2014/pdf/00003198.pdfAre your bill drafting policy objectives met? Biennial Survey: 2004 to 2012 4.00 4.55

Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel

Mission and Performance Measurements

Presented by Michael E. Christensen, PhD.

Director

Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel

Prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel

Page 2: Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel …le.utah.gov/interim/2014/pdf/00003198.pdfAre your bill drafting policy objectives met? Biennial Survey: 2004 to 2012 4.00 4.55

Utah Legislature

Bills Requested, Introduced, and Substituted2003 to 2014 General Session

977 957 951

1022 1032

1122

10561112

1206 1190 11721222

706673 670

719 732 744704 714

782 764 748784

277 297252

313 339387

306 331358 363

392

463

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Bills Requested Bills Introduced Substitute Bills Prepared

Prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel

Page 3: Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel …le.utah.gov/interim/2014/pdf/00003198.pdfAre your bill drafting policy objectives met? Biennial Survey: 2004 to 2012 4.00 4.55

Utah Legislature

Priority Bills Requested2003 to 2014 General Session

178

198185

218

193

220 215 214

231244

234244

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel

Page 4: Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel …le.utah.gov/interim/2014/pdf/00003198.pdfAre your bill drafting policy objectives met? Biennial Survey: 2004 to 2012 4.00 4.55

Information Technology Projects

• Managed purchase/integration of cell phones into legislative environment• Voting system developed in-house after purchased system had problems• Assisted in website redesign• Updated bill tracking system• Inserted code section links in bills• Automation of documents into SharePoint• Migrated from Novell to Microsoft Office 365• Replaced legislative phone system with current technology (Mitel)• Pushed bill information system to Utah Interactive• Managed shift from Real Audio to cloud-based streaming system

Prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel

Page 5: Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel …le.utah.gov/interim/2014/pdf/00003198.pdfAre your bill drafting policy objectives met? Biennial Survey: 2004 to 2012 4.00 4.55

Other Legal Services• Litigation – represented the Legislative institution’s interest in court as a

plaintiff, defendant, or “friend of the court.” (Number and scope have dramatically increased since 2008.)• 2 Briefs and Arguments to the Utah Supreme Court (S.B. 2; ethics initiative)• 7 Briefs and Arguments to the State District Courts

• Issues Involving Substantial Legal Analysis• GRAMA requests• Ethics initiative analysis• Navajo Trust Fund Settlement• Health care reform• Federalism issues• FLDS trust fund issues• Others

Prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel

Page 6: Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel …le.utah.gov/interim/2014/pdf/00003198.pdfAre your bill drafting policy objectives met? Biennial Survey: 2004 to 2012 4.00 4.55

Legislator Survey

Are your bills provided in a timely manner?Biennial Survey: 2004 to 2012

3.70

4.194.02 4.03 3.94

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

2004 2006 2008 2010 2012

Mean Score Using a 1-5 Scale, with 1 being Poor and 5 being Excellent

Prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel

Page 7: Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel …le.utah.gov/interim/2014/pdf/00003198.pdfAre your bill drafting policy objectives met? Biennial Survey: 2004 to 2012 4.00 4.55

Legislator Survey

Are your bill drafting policy objectives met?Biennial Survey: 2004 to 2012

4.00

4.55 4.524.38

4.54

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

2004 2006 2008 2010 2012

Mean Score Using a 1-5 Scale, with 1 being Poor and 5 being Excellent

Prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel

Page 8: Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel …le.utah.gov/interim/2014/pdf/00003198.pdfAre your bill drafting policy objectives met? Biennial Survey: 2004 to 2012 4.00 4.55

Legislator Survey

Was the bill drafter helpful?Biennial Survey: 2004 to 2012

4.30

4.59 4.61 4.59 4.56

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

2004 2006 2008 2010 2012

Mean Score Using a 1-5 Scale, with 1 being Poor and 5 being Excellent

Prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel

Page 9: Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel …le.utah.gov/interim/2014/pdf/00003198.pdfAre your bill drafting policy objectives met? Biennial Survey: 2004 to 2012 4.00 4.55

Legislator Survey

Overall Bill QualityBiennial Survey: 2004 to 2012

4.00

4.41 4.48 4.44 4.46

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

2004 2006 2008 2010 2012

Mean Score Using a 1-5 Scale, with 1 being Poor and 5 being Excellent

Prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel

Page 10: Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel …le.utah.gov/interim/2014/pdf/00003198.pdfAre your bill drafting policy objectives met? Biennial Survey: 2004 to 2012 4.00 4.55

Legislator Survey

Quality of Staff Support for Interim CommitteesBiennial Survey: 2004 to 2012

4.40

4.69 4.714.48 4.39

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

2004 2006 2008 2010 2012

Mean Score Using a 1-5 Scale, with 1 being Poor and 5 being Excellent

Prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel

Page 11: Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel …le.utah.gov/interim/2014/pdf/00003198.pdfAre your bill drafting policy objectives met? Biennial Survey: 2004 to 2012 4.00 4.55

Legislator Survey

Quality of Staff Presentations in Interim CommitteesBiennial Survey: 2004 to 2012

4.30

4.59 4.554.40

4.15

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

2004 2006 2008 2010 2012

Mean Score Using a 1-5 Scale, with 1 being Poor and 5 being Excellent

Prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel

Page 12: Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel …le.utah.gov/interim/2014/pdf/00003198.pdfAre your bill drafting policy objectives met? Biennial Survey: 2004 to 2012 4.00 4.55

Legislator Survey

Quality Rating of ResearchBiennial Survey: 2004 to 2012

4.104.34 4.33 4.38 4.28

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

2004 2006 2008 2010 2012

Mean Score Using a 1-5 Scale, with 1 being Poor and 5 being Excellent

Prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel

Page 13: Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel …le.utah.gov/interim/2014/pdf/00003198.pdfAre your bill drafting policy objectives met? Biennial Survey: 2004 to 2012 4.00 4.55

Legislator Survey

Quality Rating for All AttorneysBiennial Survey: 2004 to 2012

4.364.52 4.55 4.45 4.50

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

2004 2006 2008 2010 2012

Mean Score Using a 1-5 Scale, with 1 being Poor and 5 being Excellent

Prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel

Page 14: Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel …le.utah.gov/interim/2014/pdf/00003198.pdfAre your bill drafting policy objectives met? Biennial Survey: 2004 to 2012 4.00 4.55

Legislator Survey

Quality Rating for All Policy AnalystsBiennial Survey: 2004 to 2012

4.58 4.664.51 4.44

4.68

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

2004 2006 2008 2010 2012

Mean Score Using a 1-5 Scale, with 1 being Poor and 5 being Excellent

Prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel

Page 15: Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel …le.utah.gov/interim/2014/pdf/00003198.pdfAre your bill drafting policy objectives met? Biennial Survey: 2004 to 2012 4.00 4.55

Legislator Survey

Rating of OLRGC’s Ability to Provide Nonpartisan ServicesBiennial Survey: 2004 to 2010

4.20

4.494.66

4.48

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

2004 2006 2008 2010

Mean Score Using a 1-5 Scale, with 1 being Poor and 5 being Excellent

Prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel

Page 16: Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel …le.utah.gov/interim/2014/pdf/00003198.pdfAre your bill drafting policy objectives met? Biennial Survey: 2004 to 2012 4.00 4.55

Legislator Survey

Quality Rating of the Legislative WebsiteBiennial Survey: 2004 to 2012

4.404.52

4.66 4.63

4.10

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

2004 2006 2008 2010 2012

Mean Score Using a 1-5 Scale, with 1 being Poor and 5 being Excellent

Prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel

Page 17: Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel …le.utah.gov/interim/2014/pdf/00003198.pdfAre your bill drafting policy objectives met? Biennial Survey: 2004 to 2012 4.00 4.55

Legislator Survey

Quality Rating of Briefing PapersBiennial Survey: 2004 to 2012

4.204.41

4.24 4.34

4.65

0.00

1.00

2.00

3.00

4.00

5.00

2004 2006 2008 2010 2012

Mean Score Using a 1-5 Scale, with 1 being Poor and 5 being Excellent

Prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel

Page 18: Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel …le.utah.gov/interim/2014/pdf/00003198.pdfAre your bill drafting policy objectives met? Biennial Survey: 2004 to 2012 4.00 4.55

Award-winning Briefing Papers

• September 2010 – A History of the Property Tax in Utah• 2011 NCSL Notable Document Award

• November 2009 – Utah’s Economy: What Happened & Where Do We Go From Here?• 2010 NCSL

• March 2007 – Tax Relief and Reform• 2007 NCSL

• March 2007 – Understanding Medicaid: A Policymaker’s Introduction• 2006 NCSL

• 2 awards in 2003

• 2 awards in 2002

Prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel

Page 19: Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel …le.utah.gov/interim/2014/pdf/00003198.pdfAre your bill drafting policy objectives met? Biennial Survey: 2004 to 2012 4.00 4.55

Interim Committee Chair Survey

Committee ABi-annual Survey: 2012

• Senate Chair• She’s an excellent drafter and very responsive.

• He not only does what is asked, he anticipates things.

• They are awesome.

• House Chair• He is first-rate; top notch.

Prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel

Page 20: Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel …le.utah.gov/interim/2014/pdf/00003198.pdfAre your bill drafting policy objectives met? Biennial Survey: 2004 to 2012 4.00 4.55

Interim Committee Chair Survey

Committee BBi-annual Survey: 2012

• Senate Chair• They are all great, so collaborative, so complimentary of each other.

Absolutely wonderful.

• House Chair• She is very good, pleasant, smart.

• She is great, responsive, pleasant, good drafter, sharp.

• She seems pleasant and professional.

Prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel

Page 21: Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel …le.utah.gov/interim/2014/pdf/00003198.pdfAre your bill drafting policy objectives met? Biennial Survey: 2004 to 2012 4.00 4.55

Interim Committee Chair Survey

Committee CBi-annual Survey: 2012

• Senate Chair• He is great – excellent. He worked really hard contacting all the agencies. “No

complaints about that guy.”

• House Chair• Very approachable, very conscientious, works hard. Not as knowledgeable as

some of your more seasoned staff in their areas, but that is just because of time.

Prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel

Page 22: Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel …le.utah.gov/interim/2014/pdf/00003198.pdfAre your bill drafting policy objectives met? Biennial Survey: 2004 to 2012 4.00 4.55

Interim Committee Chair Survey

Committee DBi-annual Survey: 2012

• Senate Chair• Simply outstanding. She has done some really hard things for me and done

them well. Just terrific.

• Simply outstanding. He has just been great.

• House Chair• She is outstanding – worked very hard for me, just outstanding.

• Outstanding, first rate. I have worked with him for so long I think he can read my mind.

Prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel

Page 23: Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel …le.utah.gov/interim/2014/pdf/00003198.pdfAre your bill drafting policy objectives met? Biennial Survey: 2004 to 2012 4.00 4.55

Interim Committee Chair Survey

Committee EBi-annual Survey: 2012

• Senate Chair• They were fabulous. Give them high marks. They were always waiting on me,

not the other way around. Just excellent. Your whole staff is wonderful.

• House Chair• He is absolutely outstanding. Could not ask for more. Did everything.

Prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel

Page 24: Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel …le.utah.gov/interim/2014/pdf/00003198.pdfAre your bill drafting policy objectives met? Biennial Survey: 2004 to 2012 4.00 4.55

Interim Committee Chair Survey

Committee FBi-annual Survey: 2012

• Senate Chair• He is just great. We have been a team for years and he is terrific. Give him the

highest mark and add 10%.

• No complaints. Very good. Bright and capable, excellent. “In fact, across the board, your staff is just outstanding.”

• House Chair• He is just amazing, so smart, so quick to pick things up. His ability to do

spreadsheet work is unbelievable, outstanding.

Prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel

Page 25: Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel …le.utah.gov/interim/2014/pdf/00003198.pdfAre your bill drafting policy objectives met? Biennial Survey: 2004 to 2012 4.00 4.55

Interim Committee Chair Survey

Committee GBi-annual Survey: 2010

• House Chair• Very knowledgeable. More than helpful, very capable, interested, engaged

and I appreciate that. I really appreciate how she tells me, “This has got to be up to you, not me the drafting attorney. This is a policy issue.” It lets me be clearly engaged in the important stuff.

• My first experience with him was that he was dry and dull. But someone told me that if I gave him a chance I would find out that he is a good attorney that is very fun to be around. She was right. He has turned out to be delightful and fun to work with. I appreciate him very much.

Prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel

Page 26: Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel …le.utah.gov/interim/2014/pdf/00003198.pdfAre your bill drafting policy objectives met? Biennial Survey: 2004 to 2012 4.00 4.55

Interim Committee Chair Survey

Committee HBi-annual Survey: 2008

• Senate Chair• I keep thinking that I can’t get better than I have had in the past, but he is

exceptional. He is as good as any I have ever had. I am not one who is a big user of email, but I found myself emailing him two to three times a week last summer because he is so responsive. He is emailing me with information or thoughts about things and asked if I had thought of this or that. He is on top of it.

Prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel

Page 27: Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel …le.utah.gov/interim/2014/pdf/00003198.pdfAre your bill drafting policy objectives met? Biennial Survey: 2004 to 2012 4.00 4.55

Interim Committee Chair Survey

Committee IBi-annual Survey: 2008

• House Chair• He is excellent. Let me tell you how great he is. Yesterday (February 25, 2009)

I blew it and did not get an amendment ready for my bill, which was third from the top on Third Reading. When I realized it I called him and asked him to get the amendment over to me as soon as he could, not thinking he could possibly get it done and in the system in time. Five minutes later he came over to me with the amendment and had it entered in the system. I was so grateful and so amazed. He is terrific.

Prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel

Page 28: Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel …le.utah.gov/interim/2014/pdf/00003198.pdfAre your bill drafting policy objectives met? Biennial Survey: 2004 to 2012 4.00 4.55

Interim Committee Chair Survey

Committee JBi-annual Survey: 2008

• Senate Chair• Speaking of all the staff of Committee J, he said, “I think I have the best staff

(of any committee chair). They are the best – very competent people. I am very happy (with their services).”

• He is just tremendous – knows how to respond to legislators and stakeholders and what his position is.

• She did great work this last summer. She is very bright and I think works very hard. I appreciate her a great deal.

Prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel

Page 29: Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel …le.utah.gov/interim/2014/pdf/00003198.pdfAre your bill drafting policy objectives met? Biennial Survey: 2004 to 2012 4.00 4.55

Interim Committee Chair Survey

Committee KBi-annual Survey: 2008

• House Chair• All are excellent. They are life savers to me as the chair. They are like Radar

O’Reilly, as soon as I think of something they have it done for me. They are amazing that way.

Prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel

Page 30: Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel …le.utah.gov/interim/2014/pdf/00003198.pdfAre your bill drafting policy objectives met? Biennial Survey: 2004 to 2012 4.00 4.55

Interim Committee Chair Survey

Committee LBi-annual Survey: 2010

• House Chair• Whenever I have interacted with your staff I have always been treated as if I

am number one. I don’t know how you instill this in your employees, but it is appreciated.

Prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel

Page 31: Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel …le.utah.gov/interim/2014/pdf/00003198.pdfAre your bill drafting policy objectives met? Biennial Survey: 2004 to 2012 4.00 4.55

Interim Committee Chair Survey

Committee MBi-annual Survey:

• Senate Chair• You have created a very high standard over there Mike, and your people are

measuring up to it.

Prepared by the Office of Legislative Research and General Counsel