Office of Career and Technical Education (CTE) Presenters: Mike Mulvihill and Sandra Crowley
description
Transcript of Office of Career and Technical Education (CTE) Presenters: Mike Mulvihill and Sandra Crowley
MS Department of EducationMDE/MIS DATA CONFERENCE 2011July 18-22, 2011 Jackson Convention Complex
Office of Career and Technical Education (CTE)
Presenters: Mike Mulvihill and Sandra Crowley
1
Discussion of Federal Reporting for Vocational Education
Perkins IV Accountability: Acronyms and Definitions
Program Performance: Perkins IV Core Indicators
Sample Performance Measures
Student/Teacher Schedule Match
2
Perkins IV Accountability: Acronyms and Definitions
CAR – Consolidated Annual Report
STATE Performance Levels - Final Agreed Upon Performance Levels (FAUPL)
LOCAL Performance Levels - Individual Program Performance Levels (IPPL)
Concentrators – Students who completed Year 1 of a 2-year program and enrolled in Year 2.
Participants – Students enrolled in a vocational program.
3
Perkins IV Accountability: Acronyms and Definitions
Racial Ethnicity (7 permitted values)
American Indian or Alaska Native Asian Black or African American Hispanic/Latino Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander White Two or more races
4
Perkins IV Accountability: Acronyms and Definitions
Vocational Student Indicators
Limited English Proficient Disabled Economically Disadvantaged Migrant Single Parent Displaced Homemakers Nontraditional
5
Perkins IV Accountability: Acronyms and Definitions
Placement of Vocational Students
Continued Education Military Employment Field Trained Employment Field Not Trained Not Employed Other
6
Secondary Perkins IV Core Indicators
1S1 - Academic Attainment – Reading & Language Arts
1S2 - Academic Attainment – Mathematics
2S1 - Technical Skills Attainment – MS CPAS
3S1 - Secondary School Completion
4S1 - Student Graduation Rates
7
Secondary Perkins IV Core Indicators
5S1 - Secondary Placement
6S1 - Nontraditional Participation
6S2 - Nontraditional Completion
8
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES1S1 FAUPL (State CAR)
Column1
Column2
Column 6
Indicator and Citation
MeasurementDefinition
Year Two*7/1/08–6/30/09
1S1Academic
Attainment– Reading/Lang
uage Arts113(b)(2)(A)(i)
Numerator: Number of concentrators who completed both years of a 2-year program who have met the proficient or advanced level on the statewide high school reading/language arts assessment administered by the state under Section 1111(b)(3) of the ESEA
Denominator: Number of concentrators who completed both years of a 2-year program who took the ESEA assessments in reading/language arts and who have left secondary education in the reporting year
L: 80.00%
A:
9
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES 1S1 - IPPL (LEA Program Data)
1S1 NUMERATOR: A 2-Year Welding program had 13 concentrators who completed both years of a 2-year program who have met the proficient or advanced level on the statewide high school reading/language arts assessment administered by the state under Section 1111(b)(3) of the ESEA.
1S1 DENOMINATOR: The program had 16 concentrators who completed both years of a 2-year program who took the ESEA assessments in reading/language arts and have left secondary education in the reporting year.
10
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES (Actual Calculation for 1S1 - IPPL)
1S1 IPPL in percent (%) = The 1S1 Numerator divided by the 1S1 Denominator multiplied by 100 1S1 IPPL% = 13 / 16 X 100 = 81.00% 81.00% is greater than the 1S1 FAUPL required value of 80.00%
The program exceeded the required core indicator value.
11
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES1S2 FAUPL (State CAR)
Column1
Column2
Column 6
Indicator and Citation
MeasurementDefinition
Year Two*7/1/08–6/30/09
1S2Academic
Attainment– Mathematics
113(b)(2)(A)(i)
Numerator: Number of concentrators who completed both years of a 2-year program who have met the proficient or advanced level on the statewide high school mathematics assessment administered by the state under Section 1111(b)(3) of the ESEA
Denominator: Number of concentrators who completed both years of a 2-year program who took the ESEA assessments in mathematics and who have left secondary education in the reporting year
L: 91.00%
A:
12
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES 1S2 - IPPL (LEA Program Data)
1S2 NUMERATOR: A 2-Year Welding program had 15 concentrators who completed both years of a 2-year program who have met the proficient or advanced level on the statewide high school mathematics assessment administered by the state under Section 1111(b) (3) of the ESEA.
1S2 DENOMINATOR: The program had 16 concentrators who completed both years of a 2-year program who took the ESEA assessments in mathematics and who have left secondary education in the reporting year.
13
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES (Actual Calculation for 1S2 - IPPL)
1S2 IPPL in percent (%) = The 1S2 Numerator divided by the 1S2 Denominator multiplied by 100 1S2 (%) = 15 / 16 X 100 = 94.00% 94.00% is greater than the 1S2 FAUPL required value of 91.00%
The program exceeded the required core indicator value.
14
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES2S1 FAUPL (State CAR)
Column1
Column2
Column 6
Indicator and Citation
MeasurementDefinition
Year Two*7/1/08–6/30/09
2S1 Technical
Skill Attainment 113(b)(2)
(A)(ii)
Numerator: Number of concentrators who passed technical–skill assessments that are aligned with industry-recognized standards, if available and appropriate, during the reporting year
Denominator: Number of concentrators who took technical– skill assessments during the reporting year
L: 63.00%
A:
15
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES 2S1 - IPPL (LEA Program Data)
2S1 NUMERATOR: A 2-Year Welding program had 11 concentrators who passed technical–skill assessments (CPAS) that are aligned with industry-recognized standards, if available and appropriate, during the reporting year.
2S1 DENOMINATOR: The program had 16 concentrators who took technical– skill assessments during the reporting year.
16
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES (Actual Calculation for 2S1 - IPPL)
2S1 IPPL in percent (%) = The 2S1 Numerator divided by the 2S1 Denominator multiplied by 100 2S1 (%) = 11 / 16 X 100 = 68.75% 68.75% is greater than the 2S1 FAUPL required value of 63.00%
The program exceeded the required core indicator value.
17
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES3S1 FAUPL (State CAR)
Column1
Column2
Column 6
Indicator and Citation
MeasurementDefinition
Year Two*7/1/08–6/30/09
3S1Secondary
School Completion
113(b)(2)(A)(iii)(I-
III)
Numerator: Number of concentrators who completed both years of a 2-year program reported as graduated using your state’s approved calculation for graduation rate as defined in your state’s ESEA accountability workbook
Denominator: Number of concentrators who completed both years of a 2-year program who have left secondary education in the reporting year
L: 64.7%
A:
18
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES 3S1 - IPPL (LEA Program Data)
3S1 NUMERATOR: A 2-Year Welding program had 11 concentrators who completed both years of a 2-year program reported as graduated using the state’s approved calculation for graduation rate as defined in the state’s ESEA accountability workbook.
3S1 DENOMINATOR: The program had 16 concentrators who completed both years of a 2-year program and left secondary education in the reporting year.
19
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES (Actual Calculation for 3S1 - IPPL)
3S1 IPPL in percent (%) = The 3S1 Numerator divided by the 3S1 Denominator multiplied by 100 3S1 (%) = 11 / 16 X 100 = 68.75% 68.75% is greater than the 3S1 FAUPL required value of 64.7%
The program exceeded the required core indicator value.
20
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES4S1 FAUPL (State CAR)
Column1
Column2
Column 6
Indicator and Citation
MeasurementDefinition
Year Two*7/1/08–6/30/09
4S1Student
Graduation Rates
113(b)(2)(A)(iv)
Numerator: Number of concentrators who completed both years of a 2-year program reported as graduated using your state’s approved calculation for graduation rate as defined in your state’s ESEA accountability workbook
Denominator: Number of concentrators who completed both years of a 2-year program who have left secondary education in the reporting year
L: 64.7%
A:
21
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES 4S1 - IPPL (LEA Program Data)
4S1 NUMERATOR: A 2-Year Welding program had 11 concentrators who completed both years of a 2-year program reported as graduated using the state’s approved calculation for graduation rate as defined in the state’s ESEA accountability workbook.
4S1 DENOMINATOR: The program had 16 concentrators who completed both years of a 2-year program and left secondary education in the reporting year.
22
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES (Actual Calculation for 4S1 - IPPL)
4S1 IPPL in percent (%) = The 4S1 Numerator divided by the 4S1 Denominator multiplied by 100 4S1 (%) = 11 / 16 X 100 = 68.75% 68.75% is greater than the 4S1 FAUPL required value of 64.7%
The program exceeded the required core indicator value.
23
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES5S1 FAUPL (State CAR)
Column1
Column2
Column 6
Indicator and Citation
MeasurementDefinition
Year Two*7/1/08–6/30/09
5S1SecondaryPlacement113(b)(2)
(A)(v)
Numerator: Number of students placed in military, advanced education, or employment
Denominator: Number of concentrators who completed both years of a 2-year program who have left secondary education in the reporting year
L: 90.2%
A:
24
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES 5S1 - IPPL (LEA Program Data)
5S1 NUMERATOR: A 2-Year Welding program had 14 students placed in military, advanced education, or employment
5S1 DENOMINATOR: The program had 16 concentrators who completed both years of a 2-year program who have left secondary education in the reporting year.
25
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES (Actual Calculation for 5S1 - IPPL)
5S1 IPPL in percent (%) = The 5S1 Numerator divided by the 5S1 Denominator multiplied by 100 5S1 (%) = 14 / 16 X 100 = 87.50% 87.50% is less than the 5S1 FAUPL required value of 90.2%
The program did not meet the required core indicator value.
26
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES6S1 FAUPL (State CAR)
Column1
Column2
Column 6
Indicator and Citation
MeasurementDefinition
Year Two*7/1/08–6/30/09
6S1Nontradition
al Participation 113(b)(2)(A)
(vi)
Nontraditional ParticipationNumerator: Number of CTE participants from underrepresented gender groups who participated in a program that leads to employment in nontraditional fields during the reporting year
Denominator: Number of CTE participants who participated in a program that leads to employment in nontraditional fields during the reporting year
L: 16.6%
A:
27
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES 6S1 - IPPL (LEA Program Data)
6S1 NUMERATOR: A 2-Year Welding program had 6 (females) CTE participants from underrepresented gender groups who participated in a program that leads to employment in nontraditional fields during the reporting year.
6S1 DENOMINATOR: The program had a total of 48 CTE participants who participated in the program that leads to employment in nontraditional fields during the reporting year.
28
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES (Actual Calculation for 6S1 - IPPL)
6S1 IPPL in percent (%) = The 6S1 Numerator divided by the 6S1 Denominator multiplied by 100 6S1 (%) = 6/ 48 X 100 = 12.50% 12.50% is less than the 6S1 FAUPL required value of 16.6%
The program did not meet the required core indicator value.
29
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES6S2 FAUPL (State CAR)
Column1
Column2
Column 6
Indicator and Citation
MeasurementDefinition
Year Two*7/1/08–6/30/09
6S2Nontradition
al Completion113(b)(3)(B)
(vi)
Numerator: Number of CTE concentrators from underrepresented gender groups who completed a program that leads to employment in nontraditional fields during the reporting year
Denominator: Number of CTE participants who participated in a program that leads to employment in nontraditional fields during the reporting year
L: 14.6%
A:
30
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES 6S2 - IPPL (LEA Program Data)
6S2 NUMERATOR: A 2-Year Welding program had 5 CTE participants from underrepresented gender groups who completed a program that leads to employment in nontraditional fields during the reporting year.
6S2 DENOMINATOR: The program had a total of 48 CTE participants who participated in a program that leads to employment in nontraditional fields during the reporting year.
31
SAMPLE PERFORMANCE MEASURES (Actual Calculation for 6S2 - IPPL)
6S2 IPPL in percent (%) = The 6S2 Numerator divided by the 6S2 Denominator multiplied by 100 6S2 (%) = 5/ 48 X 100 = 10.42% 10.42% is less than the 6S2 FAUPL required value of 14.6%
The program did not meet the required core indicator value.
32
SAMPLE CAR for MississippiCore Indicator
L = State-adjusted performance level
A = State-actual performance
7/1/09- 6/30/10
1S1 Secondary Academic Attainment–Reading
L: 51.00%A: 82.45%
1S2 Secondary Academic Attainment –Mathematics
L: 59.00%A: 62.05%
2S1 Technical Skill Attainment
L: 66.00%A: 55.54%
3S1 Secondary School Completion
L: 67.00%A: 50.44%
4S1 Graduation Rates
L: 67.00%A: 50.44%
5S1 Secondary Placement
L: 90.20%A: 85.81%
6S1 Nontraditional Participation
L: 16.70%A: 19.71%
6S2 Nontraditional Completion
L: 14.70%
A: 18.66%33
SAMPLE DISTRICT SUMMARY REPORT
NOTE: Programs must meet or exceed seven of the nine Core Indicators, with four of them mandatory—Reading/LA, Mathematics, Occ. Skills, and Graduation.
34
MATCHING STUDENT SCHEDULE TO TEACHER SCHEDULE
If these schedules do not match, student roster data will not populate for those students. 35
Contact Information:
Mike Mulvihill, Bureau DirectorOffice of Career and Technical EducationTelephone: (601) 359-3088Fax: (601) 359-6619Email: [email protected]
Sandra CrowleyDivision DirectorTelephone: (601) 359-3974Fax: (601) 359-6619Email: [email protected]
36