OECD Competitiveness FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. R EGIONAL COMPETITIVENESS 1. Trends 2. A new paradigm...
-
Upload
maria-antonia-benitez-lara -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of OECD Competitiveness FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. R EGIONAL COMPETITIVENESS 1. Trends 2. A new paradigm...
![Page 1: OECD Competitiveness FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. R EGIONAL COMPETITIVENESS 1. Trends 2. A new paradigm for regional policies.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5665b4801a28abb57c920922/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
OECDOECDCompetitiveness FOR
REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT
![Page 2: OECD Competitiveness FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. R EGIONAL COMPETITIVENESS 1. Trends 2. A new paradigm for regional policies.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5665b4801a28abb57c920922/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
RREGIONAL EGIONAL COMPETITIVENESS COMPETITIVENESS
1. Trends
2. A new paradigm for regional policies
![Page 3: OECD Competitiveness FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. R EGIONAL COMPETITIVENESS 1. Trends 2. A new paradigm for regional policies.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5665b4801a28abb57c920922/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
TRENDS IN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Disparities Persisting But
Changing profile
![Page 4: OECD Competitiveness FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. R EGIONAL COMPETITIVENESS 1. Trends 2. A new paradigm for regional policies.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5665b4801a28abb57c920922/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Geographic disparities
Index of Gini 2001
0.060.090.09
0.100.110.110.120.120.120.130.130.130.130.140.140.150.150.150.15
0.170.180.18
0.190.21
0.230.27
0.32
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40
SwedenJapan
GreeceNetherlands
AustraliaFinlandFranceNorwayIrelandSpain
DenmarkCzech Republic
United StatesGermany
ItalyAustria
PortugalOECD average
CanadaHungary
United KingdomKorea
BelgiumPoland
Slovak RepublicMexicoTurkey
![Page 5: OECD Competitiveness FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. R EGIONAL COMPETITIVENESS 1. Trends 2. A new paradigm for regional policies.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5665b4801a28abb57c920922/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Centre-West
South-Southeast
Centre
Northwest
Northeast
TERRITORIAL DISPARITIES
> The incidence of poverty across regions
32 %
70 %
Disparities
![Page 6: OECD Competitiveness FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. R EGIONAL COMPETITIVENESS 1. Trends 2. A new paradigm for regional policies.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5665b4801a28abb57c920922/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Mexico’s Extreme Territorial Challenges
DispersionConcentration
Centre-West
South-Southeast
Centre
Northwest
Northeast
![Page 7: OECD Competitiveness FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. R EGIONAL COMPETITIVENESS 1. Trends 2. A new paradigm for regional policies.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5665b4801a28abb57c920922/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
5258
6470
7682
88
Years
GDP per capita in Italian provinces (1952 - 1996)
![Page 8: OECD Competitiveness FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. R EGIONAL COMPETITIVENESS 1. Trends 2. A new paradigm for regional policies.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5665b4801a28abb57c920922/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
1971 1996
LLMAs by employment rate dynamic areas
![Page 9: OECD Competitiveness FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. R EGIONAL COMPETITIVENESS 1. Trends 2. A new paradigm for regional policies.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5665b4801a28abb57c920922/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
TRENDS IN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Disparities Persisting But
Changing profile
Regions
Fragmented
But Enlarging
![Page 10: OECD Competitiveness FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. R EGIONAL COMPETITIVENESS 1. Trends 2. A new paradigm for regional policies.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5665b4801a28abb57c920922/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
TRENDS IN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Disparities Persisting But
Changing profile
Regions
Fragmented
But Enlarging
Devolution Spread But
Diversified patterns
![Page 11: OECD Competitiveness FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. R EGIONAL COMPETITIVENESS 1. Trends 2. A new paradigm for regional policies.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5665b4801a28abb57c920922/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
RREGIONAL EGIONAL COMPETITIVENESS COMPETITIVENESS
1. Trends
2. A new paradigm for regional policies
![Page 12: OECD Competitiveness FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. R EGIONAL COMPETITIVENESS 1. Trends 2. A new paradigm for regional policies.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5665b4801a28abb57c920922/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
PARADIGM SHIFT IN REGIONAL POLICIES
Traditional
Regional Policies Competitiveness
Enhancing Policies
Objectives
Balancing economic performances by temporarily compensating
for disparities
Tapping under-utilised regional potential for
competitiveness
Strategies Sectoral approach Integrated development
projects
Tools Subsidies and state aids Soft and hard infrastructures
Actors Central government Different levels of government
![Page 13: OECD Competitiveness FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT. R EGIONAL COMPETITIVENESS 1. Trends 2. A new paradigm for regional policies.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062500/5665b4801a28abb57c920922/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
1,294municipios de Alta y Muy Alta
Marginación
19.9millones de personas habitan
en Microrregiones
Microrregiones
Fuente: CONAPO 2000
13municipios de marginación
relativa en 5 estados del país
27municipios con 40% o más de hablantes de lengua indígena
1,334municipios
19.9millones de habitantes
31estados
1,334municipios
263microrregiones
99,891localidades
62,238localidades con menos
de 50 habitantes
the Microregions strategy in Mexico