Observational Constraints on the Global Methane Budget Ed Dlugokencky NOAA Earth System Research...

download Observational Constraints on the Global Methane Budget Ed Dlugokencky NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory Global Monitoring Division Boulder, Colorado.

If you can't read please download the document

description

SourceBousquet (Tg/yr)IPCC Range (Tg/yr) Anthropogenic Energy110± Enteric fermentation90± Rice agriculture31± Biomass burning50± Waste55± Natural Wetlands147± Termites23± Oceans19±64-15 Total525± SinksBousquet (Tg/yr)IPCC (Tg/yr) Troposphere448± Stratosphere37± Soil21± Total Global CH 4 Budget by Source Bousquet et al., 2006, Nature, 443, , doi: /nature05132.

Transcript of Observational Constraints on the Global Methane Budget Ed Dlugokencky NOAA Earth System Research...

Observational Constraints on the Global Methane Budget Ed Dlugokencky NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory Global Monitoring Division Boulder, Colorado USA Outline CH 4 Budget Data Sampling and measurements Quality control Long-term trends Anomalies in CH 4 growth rate Eruption of Mt. Pinatubo Economic collapse of former Soviet Union Recent changes in atmospheric CH 4 Potential for climate feedbacks in Arctic SourceBousquet (Tg/yr)IPCC Range (Tg/yr) Anthropogenic Energy110 Enteric fermentation90 Rice agriculture31 Biomass burning50 Waste55 Natural Wetlands147 Termites23 Oceans1964-15 Total525 SinksBousquet (Tg/yr)IPCC (Tg/yr) Troposphere448 Stratosphere37 Soil21 Total Global CH 4 Budget by Source Bousquet et al., 2006, Nature, 443, , doi: /nature05132. *Weekly samples*Portable sampler*Analyzed by GC/FID * Cooperative*Broad participation*GMD Global Cooperative Air Sampling Network Quality Control Barrow, AK: [CH 4 ](t) = [CH 4 ] ss -([CH 4 ] ss -[CH 4 ] 0 )e -t/ Lifetime 9.4 yr Average Emissions = 559 10 Tg CH 4 Trend = 0.5 0.5 Tg CH 4 yr -1 (95% c.l.) Emissions = d[CH 4 ]/dt + [CH 4 ]/ Trend = 0.0 0.6 Tg CH 4 yr -1 (95% c.l.) Growth rate (ppb/yr) 1991: Pinatubo and the CH 4 Lifetime Eruption: 15 June MT SO 2 oxidized to SO to 5 km 3 ash Affects [OH] by affecting photochemistry: Direct absorption of UV by SO 2 Scattering of UV by ash and aerosols Dlugokencky, E. J., E. G. Dutton, P. C. Novelli, P. P. Tans, K. A. Masarie, K. O. Lantz, and S. Madronich (1996), Geophys. Res. Lett., 23(20), 27612764, doi: /96GL02638. Chemistry (Largest term in CH 4 budget) OH + CH 4 CH 3 + H 2 O O 3 + h (330 290 nm) O( 1 D) + O 2 O( 1 D) + H 2 O 2 OH Rate of formation O( 1 D) = j [O 3 ] j = F() () () d Also affected CO O 3 + h (330 290 nm) O( 1 D) + O 2 O( 1 D) + H 2 O 2 OH Rate of formation O( 1 D) = j [O 3 ] Source: BP Statistical Review of World Energy, June 2012 Interpolar Difference fSU collapse Summary so far: High quality obs constrain CH 4 budget Decreasing CH 4 GR approach to SS Assuming constant , emissions constant Significant IAV Pinatubo decreased [OH] observed increased CH 4 and CO Economic collapse in fSU affected observed latitude gradient Globally averaged CH 4 Potential causes: Anthropogenic emissions Anthropogenic emissions Expect gradual changes Source: BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2012 Potential causes: Sink Loss rate ( [OH]) CH 3 CCl 3 analysis suggests not (-2 to +1%) PCE suggests not (I. Simpson, UCI) CO suggests not Potential causes: Biomass burning Increased Amazon CH 4 fluxes in wet years. Precipitation anomalies in tropical wetlands. (Source: GPCP) Potential causes: Tropical wetlands Increased tropical emissions consistent with 0.4 decrease in 13 C since 2007 La Nia Source: GPCP El Nio ~ ENSO and tropical precipitation anomalies Potential causes: Arctic processes Rate of T increase is 3X global average Wetland emissions sensitive to soil T E T = E T 0 Q 10 (T-T 0 /10) where Q 10 = E T+10 /E T ~1000 Pg C in top 3 m permafrost soils Melting PF expands wetland area and releases carbon 30 to 170 Pg CH 4 in Arctic Ocean hydrates GISS: 2007 T anomalies 2007 also very wet CH 4 and 13 C suggest source with 13 C = -66 Bousquet et al., ACP, Dlugokencky et al., GRL, : Tropical WL NOAA VPs Arctic WLs - 13 CH 4 at ALT 2008: Inversions are inconsistent. Data suggest anomalous emissions in tropics and mid- latitudes. High N latitudes recovered. *NOAA CT-CH is consistent. IPY puts focus on the Arctic Methane Bubbles in the Arctic Ocean Give Climate Scientists the Willies (Discover, Sept., 2008) Study says methane from ocean floor is 'time bomb (CTV.ca, 27 Sept. 2008) Arctic 'methane chimneys' raise fears of runaway climate change (The Guardian 23 Sept. 2008) Methane 'Fart' from the Earth Poses Enormous Global Warming Risk (Independent, 24 Sept. 2008) AIRS CH 4 : ppb NSIDC: Sea Ice Loss (%) Intercept ~ -65 Consistent with wetland source (Hydrates = -53 ) Data from Fisher (RHUL) Westbrook et al., GRL, 2009 No recent changes in Arctic emissions based on polar zonal means. Economic collapse in fSU Difference between northern and southern polar annual means Potential causes: Arctic wetlands and clathrates? Only 2007 Conclusions Since 2007, CH 4 increasing globally: ~6 ppb yr -1 from Causes of increase: Wetlands (tropics and Arctic) In response to T and precip. anomalies Not yet at Arctic tipping point Since 2008, Arctic increasing at global rate IPD indicates emissions have not yet increased Extra Slides Summary of Long Term Trends in CH 4 Global burden of CH 4 ~5000 Tg (2011) Global CH 4 increased 180 ppb since 1983 Rate of increase decreasing steady state Constant emissions with lifetime of ~9 yr Inter-annual variability in growth rate Exploit for process information AI 4 obscures mid-day sun Compliments of Paul Novelli, NOAA ESRL Residuals for 30 N to 90 N Residuals for 17.5 N to 17.5 S Residuals for 30 S to 90 S