Objectives Compare locations in North America Potential for moisture problems Different driving...

22
Objectives • Compare locations in North America • Potential for moisture problems • Different driving forces • Analyze potential for moisture problems in cooling climates • Focus on wall assemblies • Critically examine design solutions • Discuss example from ASHRAE Journal article

Transcript of Objectives Compare locations in North America Potential for moisture problems Different driving...

Page 1: Objectives Compare locations in North America Potential for moisture problems Different driving forces Analyze potential for moisture problems in cooling.

Objectives

• Compare locations in North America• Potential for moisture problems• Different driving forces

• Analyze potential for moisture problems in cooling climates• Focus on wall assemblies

• Critically examine design solutions• Discuss example from ASHRAE Journal

article

Page 2: Objectives Compare locations in North America Potential for moisture problems Different driving forces Analyze potential for moisture problems in cooling.

BSC Approachhttp://www.buildingscience.com/designsthatwork/default.htm

http://www.buildingscience.com/designsthatwork/hygro-thermal.htm

• Divide nation (or world) into “zones” based on hygro-thermal parameters

• Design building codes and strategies to address the important sources and driving forces• Ignore unimportant driving forces

• Result should be buildings that are climate specific

Page 3: Objectives Compare locations in North America Potential for moisture problems Different driving forces Analyze potential for moisture problems in cooling.

Hot-Humid Climates

• More than 20” of rainfall and one of the following:• a 67°F (19.5°C) or higher wet bulb temperature for 3,000

or more hours during the warmest six consecutive months of the year; or

• a 73°F (23°C) or higher wet bulb temperature for 1,500 or more hours during the warmest six consecutive months of the year.

• What do we know about temperature and vapor pressure differences?

• What do we know about building construction?• What problems are likely?

Page 4: Objectives Compare locations in North America Potential for moisture problems Different driving forces Analyze potential for moisture problems in cooling.

Strategies for Hot-Humid Climates

• Interior and exterior air retarders

• Walls must be able to dry to the inside• No significant vapor retarders

• Don’t insulate edge of foundation. Why?

• Unvented attic

Page 5: Objectives Compare locations in North America Potential for moisture problems Different driving forces Analyze potential for moisture problems in cooling.

Disadvantages?

• Training construction workers• Every strategy involves air retarder system• Many strategies require exterior rigid insulation

• Risk of trying new ideas

• Defining appropriate zones without defining too many zones

• Relying on higher quality construction

Page 6: Objectives Compare locations in North America Potential for moisture problems Different driving forces Analyze potential for moisture problems in cooling.

Summary

• Compare locations in North America• Potential for moisture problems• Different driving forces

Page 7: Objectives Compare locations in North America Potential for moisture problems Different driving forces Analyze potential for moisture problems in cooling.

Diagnosing/Designing

• Consider• Moisture transport mechanisms• Driving forces• Moisture sources

Page 8: Objectives Compare locations in North America Potential for moisture problems Different driving forces Analyze potential for moisture problems in cooling.

Building in Austin

• Comparing options

1. Paint interior walls with vapor barrier paint.

2. Increase ventilation for dilution.

3. Seal building to limit infiltration.

4. Set thermostat to lower set point.

5. Balance HVAC to have positive pressure in building.

Page 9: Objectives Compare locations in North America Potential for moisture problems Different driving forces Analyze potential for moisture problems in cooling.

Paint interior walls with a vapor barrier paint

• Good idea or bad idea?

• What does VB paint do?

• What driving force is this addressing?

Page 10: Objectives Compare locations in North America Potential for moisture problems Different driving forces Analyze potential for moisture problems in cooling.

Data

• Austin ASHRAE 1% DB = 96 °F, WB =74 °F• RH = 35.7 %, w = 0.013 lb/lb • pw= 0.8417 psi × 35.7 % = 0.300 psi

• Inside 78°F 50% RH, w = 0.010 lb/lb• pw= 0. 4751 psi × 50 % = 0.237 psi

• Latex primer/sealer = 6.28 perms• perm = grain/(hr∙ft2∙in Hg)

• Vapor “barrier” paint = 0.45 perms• What is water vapor flux through paint?

• Do you want it to be high or low?

Page 11: Objectives Compare locations in North America Potential for moisture problems Different driving forces Analyze potential for moisture problems in cooling.

Governing Equation For Diffusion

• w water vapor flux [M/t/A, kg/s/m2]

• µ permeability [perms∙in, perm = grain/(hr∙ft2∙in Hg)]• Permeance [ng/(s·m2·Pa)]

• p is water vapor pressure

• x is distance along flow path

• Water diffuses from high vapor pressure to low vapor pressure

• Permeability is a function of temperature in materials• Very ugly non-linear relationship

x

pw

d

d

Page 12: Objectives Compare locations in North America Potential for moisture problems Different driving forces Analyze potential for moisture problems in cooling.

Increase ventilation for dilution

• What is driving force?

• What are indoor and outdoor humidity ratios?• w = 0.013 lb/lb out• w = 0.010 lb/lb in

• Dilution is not the solution to this pollution

Page 13: Objectives Compare locations in North America Potential for moisture problems Different driving forces Analyze potential for moisture problems in cooling.

Seal building to limit infiltration

• What are positive and negative consequences of air sealing?

• Assume going from 1 ACH to 0.35 ACH• How much does this reduce moisture source?• Assume 15000 ft3

building• Reduction in infiltration airflow of 163 CFM• Reduction in latent load of 2400 Btu/hr• Reduction in water vapor source of 2.2 lb/hr

• Does air sealing address driving force?

Page 14: Objectives Compare locations in North America Potential for moisture problems Different driving forces Analyze potential for moisture problems in cooling.

Set thermostat to lower set point

• Use more energy

• Provide more dehumidification

• Also, cool down surfaces and potentially raise dew point temperature

• Do we have a greater potential for condensation?

Page 15: Objectives Compare locations in North America Potential for moisture problems Different driving forces Analyze potential for moisture problems in cooling.

Balance HVAC to have positive pressure in building

• How do we achieve this?• Supply more air than

return

• Intentional return leak

• Seal supply ducts

• What driving force does this address?

• Also provides ventilation

Page 16: Objectives Compare locations in North America Potential for moisture problems Different driving forces Analyze potential for moisture problems in cooling.

When designing

• Always go back to first principles• Moisture sources• Driving forces• Material properties/geometry

Page 17: Objectives Compare locations in North America Potential for moisture problems Different driving forces Analyze potential for moisture problems in cooling.

Lstiburek Articles

• A little tongue-in-cheek

• Very good summary of material

• Elaborate on some examples in the article

Page 18: Objectives Compare locations in North America Potential for moisture problems Different driving forces Analyze potential for moisture problems in cooling.

Slabs?

• How do you pour a slab?

• Why do some places use sand?• Is sand a good capillary medium?

Page 19: Objectives Compare locations in North America Potential for moisture problems Different driving forces Analyze potential for moisture problems in cooling.
Page 20: Objectives Compare locations in North America Potential for moisture problems Different driving forces Analyze potential for moisture problems in cooling.

Rain on the Brick Sun Trick

Page 21: Objectives Compare locations in North America Potential for moisture problems Different driving forces Analyze potential for moisture problems in cooling.
Page 22: Objectives Compare locations in North America Potential for moisture problems Different driving forces Analyze potential for moisture problems in cooling.

Objectives

• Analyze moisture transport in buildings

• Assess conditions for condensation

• Diagnose mold growth

• Evaluate design strategies

• Key component of healthy building design• Particularly controlling moisture without

compromising energy efficiency