Oakland to San Jose Phase 2A Planning Studies ... · Oral Presentation 50%. Qualifications and...
Transcript of Oakland to San Jose Phase 2A Planning Studies ... · Oral Presentation 50%. Qualifications and...
Oakland to San Jose Phase 2A Planning Studies, Environmental Documentation, and Final Design RFSOQ
Pre-Submittal MeetingOctober 16, 2018Capitol Corridor Joint Powers Authority (CCJPA)
Agenda
• RFSOQ Overview
• Key Project Elements
• CCJPA DBE Program
• RFSOQ Dates and Process
• Evaluation Criteria
• Q&A
RFSOQ Overview• Complete pre-construction planning, environmental, and
engineering design for Oakland to San Jose Phase 2A Service Expansion Project Budget: $5 million initially, but will expand as scope is developed with
more details Schedule: 6 years Work Directive-based
• Primary Project goals Reduce travel time for passenger rail services between Oakland and
Newark Increase overall railroad capacity between Oakland and Newark Reduce freight and passenger rail conflicts Provide better opportunities for intermodal connections between
Peninsula and East Bay
Key Project Elements
Key Project Elements• Industrial Parkway
• Vital for optimizing freight rail movements
DRAFT Conceptual Alternative
• Niles Junction/Shinn connection• Vital for optimizing freight
rail movements• Consolidation of rail lines
can open “rail locked” parcels to land use changes
Option A
Option B
Option C
DRAFT Conceptual Alternative
DRAFT Conceptual Alternative
DRAFT Conceptual Alternative
Key Project ElementsProposed intermodal (rail + bus) station at intersection of Coast Subdivision and SR 84, in the Ardenwood Fremont/Newark area:
• Two-level station (passenger rail on bottom and bus/highway on top)
• Median busway facility connecting with SR 84
• Parking structure
Key stakeholders:• Caltrans• AC Transit• Private shuttle providers • Cities of Fremont and Newark
Key Project Elements• RTC modeling (UPRR led) to scope rail network capacity
• Ridership modeling Passenger rail AC Transit Private shuttle providers
• Environmental documentation analyses Some creek crossings Noise impacts Freight rail impacts
• Public outreach Local communities Public agencies
CCJPA DBE Program
CCJPA/BART DBE Policy
• The CCJPA, through BART, its managing agency, is committed to carrying out the all of the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Requirements of 49 CFR Part 26, as amended
• Ensure non-discrimination• Create a level playing field
CCJPA DBE Program
DBE Goal: NO Goal
* BART Office of Civil Rights will be monitoring the overall Agreement for DBE participation per your DBE commitment goal, if any
DBE Program Still Applies
* DBE primes, including DBE JV partners, will not count towards the DBE commitment
* Monthly DBE reports will be due, if DBEs listed
* Substitutions of DBEs will require replacement with DBEs or good faith efforts
* DBEs, as listed on Exhibit 1, must perform a commercially useful function
* DBEs will be counted only for the work for which they are certified
CCJPA DBE Program
Certifications:
• DBEs must be certified prior to the proposal submission date• DBEs must be certified by the California Unified Certification Program
(CUCP)• www.bart.gov/about/business/ocr/• www.californiaucp.com
RFSOQ Dates and Process
SOQ Submission
Nov 30
Notification for Oral
InterviewsDec 14
Oral Interviews
Jan 11
All questions about the RFSOQ received at this meeting and over email will be recorded and the answers will be made available online at http://www.capitolcorridor.org/opportunities.
Evaluation CriteriaProject Team Qualifications
25%
Qualifications and relevant experience of the Key Personnel relative to the Scope of Services.
Overall strength and approach of the Project Team, including any previous working relationships among the team members. Project Team’s approach and understanding of the project should be included in SOQ, including a draft project schedule.
Experience of the Firms
25%
Demonstrated experience and capability of the firms on similar environmental documentation and railroad engineering design projects for Class I freight/passenger rail operators, including projects performed directly for UPRR following their design standards. Experience in intermodal transit center design and planning, including busways and park-and-ride facilities should also be demonstrated.
Oral Presentation
50%
Qualifications and experience of the Project Team.
Proposer’s approach to the Project and demonstrated technical knowledge of Project requirements.
Q & A