'

o

New. HampshireV hh

fed C Mgenbaumhc6 dent andjChief buurive Offner

NYN 92017

February 11, 1992

United States Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, D.C. 20555

Attention: Document Control Desk

References: Facility Operating License No. NPF.86, Docket No. 50 443

Subject: New llampsbite Yankee Semiannual Fitness.For. Duty Report

Gentlemen:

In accordance with the requirements of 10CFit 26.71(d), enclosed please find the Newllampshire Yankee Serniatnual l'itness for Duty Fenort. This report includes data from July1,1991 through December 31, 1991.

Should you have any questicna regarding this report, please contact hit. lituce R.Scyrnour, Security hianager, at (603) 474 9521, extension 4015.

Yety truly youts,

h&/fA &*^'Ted C. Feigenbaum

!!nclosure(s)TCF:ALL/ss

cc: hir. Thomas T. MartinRegional AdministratorU.S Nuclear llegulatory CommissionRegion i475 Allendale RoadKing of Prussia, PA 19406

hir. Gordon II !!dison, Sr. Project hianagerProject Directorate 13Division of Reactor ProjectsU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555

hir Noel DudicyNRC Senior Resident inspectorP.O. Box 1149Scabrook, NH 03874

9202190439 920233gDR ADOCK 09000443

PDR--,

f|New Hampshire Yankee Division of Public Service Company of New Hampshire ;|P.O. Box 300 * Soabrook, NH 03874 * Telephone (603) 474 9521 '

_

_. . _ _ - . . _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ ._ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . __ _ _ _ _ _

,-

.,.

4

New Ilampshire Yankco4l'c|>tuary 3 g, 3993.

' -

i

ENCLOSURE TO NyN.92017

.

$'

_ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ - . . _ . . _ _ .

* July - December 1991 New llampshire 'innkeei

9

4

.

. .

:

New flampshire Yankee Semiannual Fitness-for-Duty Report_

for period ending December 31, 1991 i

Table _Q U ontantaIEAGR

- 1. Performance Data Sheets (NUMARC format) .......... 01.

II. Management Summary ;;

1. Program Effoctiveness ........ ............... 03 |f2. Initiatives ...................................-03;

'3. Re po rt et Ev e nts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 4

>

4. Olind Specimens ...............................-05 ;

III. Graphic Analysis

1. Total Screenings vs. Positive Screenings ..... 06 ;

2. Positive-Percentage of Screenings ............ 06 !

3. Positive Screenings (Licensee Personnel) 07. . . . . .

' 4. Positive Screenings (Contractor Personnel) . _07'

. . .

5. Total and Positive tests by Day of.the Week .. 08 ;

6. Substances by Day of the Week ................ 08 1

7. Distribution of Random Screenings ............. 09i

8.' Random Screenings by Day of the Week ......... 09L

:?

s

t

6

5

-

'

,- + #y p s r-- , .'vwu tw ye r y'5y -+ - _ < - y -r sw c- pwm,, -sw+y-,- - ,c-3.cr, . - ww w ,9- .w+,,-e.w..---n-= --em-- e.a-scw-,-va - - - -

, . - _ __ _. _ _ . _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ -._

:

.

'' July - Ibcember 1991 New ilampshiro Yankee Page 01aFitness for Duty Program :

'

Performance Data' Personnel Subject to 10CFR 26.

4

,

h

New llampshire Yankee December 31, 1991

'' ewnewEne,P.O. Box 300Seabrook Nil 03874

Locavon

Bruce R. Seymour (603) 474-9521 x4015

Contact Narre - Phee CncWe Wea code)

Cutoffs: ScreervConfirmation (ng'ml) O Appendix A to 10CFR 20

'Marijuana 100 / 15 Amphetamines 1000 / 500 N/A /Cocaine 300 / 150 Phencyclidine 25 / 25 N/A /Oplates 300 / 300 Alcohol (% DAC) 0.04 N/^ /

Long Term Short TermTesting Results Contractor Contractor

Licensee Employees Personnel Personnel,

Average Nurnber with ' ~ '< -Unescorted Access 869 g g 76 714'

# # Referred Access # # # #,Categories Tested Positive to EAP Restored Tested Positive Tested Posillve

- , ej.s'Pre employment

28 0 m 0 0 4 0

, .- - - _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __------_ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___

t

t

.luly - December 1991 New Itampshire Yankee PnE*' 02'

!'

*-,

e

'

-.

>

4 -,

St

_.

3 '

3 $ f'

-.

.

tS :

!+ .. .. :

g' ' noe A p p Q o o s$; ;-; ,- o,

.

. .. - < .E N8" 1A '10

" t- o o o -

| | }o

n+

w a,g R / 5e x :t e. - -, ~ o .o od / 9 ...,6g 1

g.

:;; / 8- 'N C b'

"

' ,, o o o sS ]

"

;

g-

1u ,;

-

i

g'

3u ,N

}$w

s s

2 I zfR .e e y 5 -b I 3 I I 2 h i

"

. e .e.

- .-- -= . .-- _

:!'

July - December 1991 New llampshire Yankee Page 03' $

I.

'

PROGRAM eel'ICTIVENESS*.-

New Hampshiro Yankee has been involved in the systematic-

collection and analysis of objective FFD data since the inception iof the current regulations. The information collected for this !period is presented in the graphic analysis beginning after the ;management summary in this report.

During this period NHY brought in over 600 short term contractorsto work a refueling outage. Approximately seven hundred andfifty pre-badging and random tests were conducted on those shortterm contractors, resulting in 10 positive tests. If those :refueling outage related tests are deducted from the total tests, '

the positive percentage rate for non-outage related tests isapproximately 0.55% for this period.

For the. year, 1991, the positive percentage-rate, not includingthe-refueling outage tests, was 0.4%.- This rate is lower than :the 0.75% positive percentage rate NHY experienced in 1990. |There were no drug or alcohol related accidents or incidents in1991.which had the possibility of affecting public health orsafety.

All available evidence indicates that the continued support of fmanagement and' employees has provided the basis for the FFDprogram's effectiveness in achieving-a workplace free from the

~i

effects of drugs and alcohol.

INITIATIVES

The followingLitems are a summary of initiatives talen by NewHampshire Yankee based-on program reviews and identified *

weaknesses. i

1. Installed additional facsimile machine to minimize delay inreceiving test results during refueling outags period.

,

2. Recertified all collection personnel in the operation of theRBT III, evidential grade breath analysis unit. RecertifiedScreening Facility Supervisors and Technicians in thecalibration of this unit. -A ractory representativeconducted all training and certification.

3. Enhanced FFD computer program to track use of individualbreath analysis machinos to better forecast maintenance andreplacement of units.

- - .. . . . - - . . _ . . . , . . . _ , . - - _ , _ . - _ . _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . - - . .

t

i

. July - December 1991 New llampshire Yankee Page 04 ;*;

|.

I.4.- Developed administrativ'3 process to track and revoke access ;

for persons unavailable for behavior observation and |testing.

i,

5. Completed annual inspection and records audit of contracted';

testing. laboratory. The laboratory was found to be in +compliance with all NRC requirements.

|!!

!

!

!i

!,

SUMMARY LIST OF TELEE}iQ111 GALLY REPORTED EVENTS I

DuringLthis period there was one (1) telephonically reported ievent as required by 10 CFR Part 26.

1

_Date of Event! September 26,.1991:i

Position of Individuali short Term contractor supervisor |How discovered: Follow-up >

i

Substance: Cocaine ,

Management Action Takent Terminated employment as tsquiredby NHY FFD Procedure 11402. t

Conducted management review ofprior work to determine ifthere were any possiblecompromises in the implementation *of company policies or iprocedures.

,

i

f

P

b

h

~ ~ - _ - - - . _ - _ - - . - - - - .-- - _- _ _ _ _-.___ -

!. -

- New llampshire Yankee Par,e 05July - December 1991'

DLillD SPECJ]iEllS ,!!

'

To ensure laboratory quality control, NilY contracted with DuoResearch Inc., Annapolis, MD, to provide blind performance test '

specimens that were submitted to the contracted lillS-certifiedlaboratory, SmithKline Beecham C1]nical Laboratories, Philadelphia, 'PA, in accordance with the NRC Guidelines (10 CFR 26, Appendix A). iApproximately 80 percent of these blind performance test specimens !were blank (1.c. certified to contain no drug) and the remaining i

Isamples were positive for one or more drugs per sample in adistribution such that all the drugs to be tested were included in ,

'

approximately equal frequencies of challenge.

During the last six months of 1991, NilY submitted 179 blind iperformance test specimens to SmithKline Beecham Clinical ,Laboratories with the following remaltst ;

!

Hegativet 143 (80%)

Positivet _1ft (20%) l

179* i4

*This total includen five samples containing a high concen-tration of the over-the-counter stimulant ophedrine that were sontto challenge the laboratory on its ability to distinguish this drug

'

from methamphetamine. This was prompted by a number of falsepositive reports generated in three other laboratories. All fivesamples were correctly reported negative. {

One of the blind specimens, containing cocaine metabolite, wasincorrectly reported as negative. Duo Research conducted anunannounced inspection _and record audit and determined that thisincorrectly reported result did not constitute unsatisfactoryperformance.

;Another blind specimen submitted during this period containingd-mothamphetamino and d-amphetamine was incorrectly reported by the 1contracted laboratory as-positive for both substances. The correctresult should have been positive only for d-methamphetamine. DuoResearch conducted an unannounced inspection and determined thecause to be a protocol violation and an administrative falsopositive. The inspection report emphasizes that the consequence ofa similar error on a real specimen would not- place the donor in anyjeopardy, since amphetamino must be- present -in order for

,

| methamphetamine to be reported as positive. The NRC was[ telephonically notified of this incident,f-

!!

,

e -- v -w - w e ,- sv Ev+a+-ee-w'm.,,--- - - - , em-+.m-we-e--+1w.ww--w-rw---,e-------e---mw-srew=. ire--e+=,---wet--+w1.ese--w-i--me-=-wwwm e--r-se n -e . .,wwww-s ww w rem -e - "

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ . _ - _ - _ _ _ - _ . _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _

-

July - December 1991 New Itampshire Yankee Pap.c 06'

!

.

-,.

.

. . . _ ._ ____._ _ _ _ . _ . ._ . . . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ ,

'Ibtal Screenings vs. Positive Screeningst

!_ ,._ .

876 [ \ ,'Randorn 4

_

!Pre.Iladging 636.

9

lPre.Ilmployment | 32 h

}r 9 !Follow.Up 93 l;. .;q l-

i ,

9 h)1'

For Causei

Other 9-- .--.....---1_ --- - .-.

1200 800 400 0 2 4 6 8 10 12iC Total Screenings EU Positive Screenings ,

Total Screenings: 1655Tt,tal Positive Screenings: 15

Positive Percentage of Screenings ,

g4g __ _. _ , _ . . _ _ . . _ _ . . _ . _ _ - . . _ _ _ __

13%

12% -11.11 %

i

11% mwirN

m$ :$10%

W9% -e ~a8% ME - -

Vcu u7% Tut 4g

kNN.ykb6% ;.$g f. ,

'Q!6, %.p~

4%.q,m

3% :fM.Sqscia25 1.42%

1.08%0.46% ' 3 qeeps Y[YMEM- I@MIh*-

1415 -$U$ i-J0%

Random Pre. Badge Pre.limploy Follow.Up For Cause Other

|i. - .- .- >

-- - _ _ - _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - _ - - - _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - - _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

*. , . i

t July - December 1991 New flampshire Yankee _Page 07 t,

b*

;-.

-.

._ . . _ - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ , _ -

ri

Positive Screenings :Lktatee Pertpunel. i

L

f

- P 3 _ _ -- _ _ _ _ . - _ _ . _ . _ _ _ ;e -- ,I r !

v 2 .,e-

Se it rI

- e ,, %.-eR ' Wk),.

+

-

.f. g J.L$j@,

M [g ik - a- _ _. |c 1 <s mandom -- Pre.nedse : Pre. Employ I'ollow.Up For Cause Other

.i

C Alcohol (1) C Matijuana (1) BBM cocaine (1) IC Oplates (0) CEl Phestyclidlae (0) E25 - Amphetssalmes (0) i

-;

A :.

Positive Screenin ,'e iContractor Psnendl

f,

,

pJ >P. to - --, ,"s , - 31.

. . s >

f7 -- e 6 - I

~ S 5 -4"N_.. Dc. 4 ~ p(sy$ ' [T -. * 0 ' N .R

'

MA fa 2 n n,y. m.; -g .t - - ; . . 8_ ,

3 g. u ;__L 4__ -i . -- L. _8 - Random Pse. Badge - Pre Ilmploy Folles Up for Cause - Other -

- 4

O Alcobol O) ED Marijmens (4) MK cocaine (s)C Oplates (0) CU Phencyclidloo (0) (23 Amphetamines (0)

,

, w- ww -. , e %w , w+.,~.w4w.c,.a+=-- -~*-~-...%wm.: +s a.2- . - -e.+ . - - , . - . ,.-**+.s---.-e.

t

-.,.'_U.-.+._ .,s., ., ,. .--,,,,_.v., ,,,,m,-.,Ee- y . , , -ww.4 --+..~w .w w. 4 . - - -- m,-,--w-..,. -, ,.w . w. . . , , - -4 , , t .

-.

'

July - 1)ecember 1991 N:w ilatupahlre Yankee Page 08'

.

.

---e-**,~. w-.--e.-.. ..wme.-% .~-~~._.:--..a,.. . _ . . _ _ . . _ . . , , . . . , _ , . -_#..,m.m.....--,..._...sm.~._ _ . _ .

Total and Positive Screeningsby Day of the Week ,

|

~=;;~ ',;;;;:n;q.;.=,;;:::r;;dP| ;1 h ? - ~L

-..w- + .u , =.:..... I ~d n , ;81Monday ,~ ~ m*. . mdy . . 7,,-m- e .k., .y.v e,4 I ..m . .

. jm...[4 gt4 ~c.d ."KQ| Tuesdayi

_. , . _ _ _ . . - _.._ . . . .. .- m: . . ,b. _.~. .i._y- -., .),

! Wednesday T.1 _f 7. ,.c. 4 Pip 3,,dh.y.

.,,q. ., .

~A,~... g.g. L4,,, . .., s ,-n.,, ,,) iThursday . . , ,.

-_g~~-*- ~,~~S~ 7,mv ... .f.

n

.#. ~ a 7... s.. t.I.

,

,.

lFriday+ - . , - , . -

Saturday i,- ;., . a.,

. ,,.,__ ,,

Sunday '_ . -1 1-fuuu rt adu_Lm mntrr: _ .a _.. _u_ L __L ._.n_ _ --

1000 100 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 :

E3 Total screeninsi m3 Positive screenings

Substance by Day of the Week

P 6 - - - ~ - ~'-- - ' - - - - - - - - - - '

Osi $*g ,

ie 4 -

r(e

s 3 - > g m,- .r

-: 3s 4

!)e 2~

<

e. .

.>

| --j

-. ._ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _-- _ - . _

'. -i: ..'July - Dseceber 1991 New llampshire Yankee Page 09 !

.

. .

. ,

&- - .,- n n

Distribution of Random Screenings !over time of day |

i|

|1000. - - - ".

Nuun0 :' !t

-

gg,- _____ ___ ____ __,

io- g i

S~

c .,t ;

10| ---!- - - --e

,

i lhlhJ :107:00 ' 11:00 !$:00 - 19:00 23:00 03:00

*

Time of Day . i

Total Randoen Screenings: 876

,

Random Screenings by aDay of the Week [:

.

!

. 200r - ,, , ,

i

JR ,,p / p'g~e 7,.,,, .,3a -,-.,, , , + . nn- , > ~, t

%:;; @: [a .150- ,5 :d | UN

, ;,!'.y, ~ + , .

.

", g,' ' >'

d,3 * M.6 ,?sf|g

,

,O 1":;f;f 'Q , ,',3|,y;