NYSDEC Dam Safety Design Criteria and Ensuring A ... · INDIAN BROOK RESERVOIR DAM REHABILITATION...
Transcript of NYSDEC Dam Safety Design Criteria and Ensuring A ... · INDIAN BROOK RESERVOIR DAM REHABILITATION...
INDIAN BROOK RESERVOIR DAM REHABILITATION
NYSDEC Dam Safety Design Criteria and Ensuring A Sustainable Water Supply
September 19, 2018
© Arcadis 2017
Today’s Presenters
24 September 2018
2
Certified Project Manager and Construction Engineer for the IBRD Rehabilitation855 Route 146 Clifton Park, NY 12065518 250 [email protected]
MIKE KOSIER, PEAssociate Vice President
Principal in Charge for the Village of Ossining
CAROLYN LOWE, PEVice President
44 South Broadway White Plains, NY 10602914 641 [email protected]
© Arcadis 2017
Agenda
324 September 2018
• Learning Objectives (2 minutes)• The Basics (Dam Types, Terminology,
Purposes, Owner Responsibilities) (7 minutes)
• Dam Conditions and Failures (3 minutes)
• New York State Dam Safety Regulations (3 minutes)
• Case Study – Village of Ossining IBRD (10 minutes)
• Q&A – (5 minutes)
© Arcadis 2017
Learning Objectives• Identify various types of dams, their functions and their hazard
classifications
• Understand how dams can fail
• Explain why dam regulations came into effect
• Describe some of the NYS DEC Dam Safety Requirements
• Apply dam safety design criteria to an existing Class C, High Hazard earthen dam through the use of a case study
The BasicsDam Types, Terminology, Purposes, Owner Responsibilities
524 September 2018
© Arcadis 2017
What is a Dam?Definition: An artificial barrier and appurtenant structures constructed for the purpose of storing water.
In NYS a permit is required to construct and operate a dam if: • It is at least 10 feet high.• Or it stores 1 million gallons or more (3.07 acre feet)• Or it has a drainage area of 1 square mile.
Note: Height and impoundment measured at top of dam
© Arcadis 2017
Example Dam Types• Earthen / Embankment
• Masonry Gravity
• Concrete Gravity
• Concrete Arch
• Composite
© Arcadis 2017
Earthen / Embankment Dam
© Arcadis 2017
Typical Earthen Dam Cross Section
© Arcadis 2017
Dam Components and Terminology
Embankment
Toe
Chute
Spillway
Stilling Basin
Impoundment
Abut
men
tAbut
men
t
Groin
CrestWave Protection
Indian Brook Reservoir Dam
© Arcadis 2017
Dams in the U.S.• National Inventory of Dams ~90,580 Dams
• Dams as Part of our Nation’s Infrastructure:
- Water Supply (9.4%) - Tailings (9.4%)
- Flood Control (15.6%) - Irrigation (9.6%)
- Hydropower (3.0%) - Fire & Farm Ponds (13.7%)
- Navigation (0.3%) - Other Purposes (5.2%)
- Recreation (33.8%)
© Arcadis 2017
Owner Responsibilities
• Inspection
• Maintenance & Repair
• Operation
• Monitoring
• Emergency Action
Dam safety programs oversee owner to protect downstream lives, property, and natural resources
Dam Conditions and Failures
1324 September 2018
© Arcadis 2017
Condition of DamsU.S. Dams Received a "D" for "Poor" on ASCE’s 2017 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure
NYS Dams Received a “C-” in ASCE’s 2015 Report Card
• $152 Million Needed in NY State for the Rehabilitation of High and Intermediate Hazard Dams
© Arcadis 2017
Principle Modes of Dam Failures
© Arcadis 2017
Failures Have Lead to Dam Regulations• 1929 - CA enacts first dedicated dam safety
regulations - Following 1928 St Francis Dam Failure
• 1970’s failures lead to public concern over dam safety (178 people died & $1 billion estimated damages)
• 1970s to early 1980s dam inventory & inspections
• State Regulatory Programs
o ~ ½ by end of 1970so ~ ½ by end of 1980s o DE (2005) & AL (2006+)
© Arcadis 2017
Regulatory AgenciesFederally Regulated Dams
• US Bureau of Reclamation
• US Army Corps of Engineers
• Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
• Unites States Department of Agriculture
Non-Federal Dams
• Federal Emergency Management Association (Administer the National Dam Safety Program)
• State Dam Safety Programs
New York State Dam Safety Regulations
1824 September 2018
© Arcadis 2017
NY State Dam Safety Program
• NY dam safety provisions derive from the Conservation Law of 1911 (then 1985 Guidelines for Design of Dams - Revised 1989)
• Technical review of proposed work• Regulatory inspection by DEC engineers• Enforcement (repair or removal of unsafe dams)• Emergency planning and response• Bond Act Dam Safety Funding
© Arcadis 2017
Dam Classification and Owner Responsibility
© Arcadis 2017
How to Determine Hazard Classification?• Dam Break Analysis
• Develop Inundation Limits & Flood Velocities in Downstream Drainageway
– Class A: Damage to isolated farm buildings, undeveloped lands, country roads
– Class B: Damage to homes, main highway, public utilities– Class C: Potential for loss of life, serious damage to homes,
commercial buildings, etc.
• Hazard Classification Can Change!
© Arcadis 2017
A Hazard Dam Owner Responsibility• Operate and maintain a safe dam
• Prepare and implement an Operation & Maintenance Plan
• Record property transactions for parcel containing the dam
• Conduct Hazard Class verification by a PE every 10 yrs
© Arcadis 2017
B Hazard Dam Owner Responsibility• Operate and maintain a safe dam• Prepare and implement an Operation & Maintenance Plan• Record property transactions for parcel containing dam• Conduct an inspection by PE every 4 yrs• Conduct an engineering assessment by PE every 10 yrs• Prepare an Emergency Action Plan and conduct exercises• Report flow in auxiliary spillway• Submit annual certification
© Arcadis 2017
C Hazard Dam Owner Responsibility• Operate and maintain a safe dam
• Prepare and implement an Operation & Maintenance Plan
• Record property transactions for parcel containing dam
• Conduct an inspection by PE every 2 yrs
• Conduct an engineering assessment by PE every 10 yrs
• Prepare an Emergency Action Plan and conduct exercises
• Report flow in auxiliary spillway
• Submit annual certification
• Demonstrate financial assurance for life of dam
© Arcadis 2017
Actions for Dam Repair / RehabilitationPermits are required for work on all dams in NYS unless:
• Less than 15 feet high and 3 million gallons
• Less than 6 ft high regardless of impoundment
• Less than 1 million gallons regardless of height
Case Study – Indian Brook Reservoir Dam (IBRD) Rehabilitation
2624 September 2018
© Arcadis 2017
About the IBRD• Built in 1889 to provide water storage for the Village
• Earthen embankment dam with a concrete/masonry core wall
• Improved in 1909, nothing significant since
• Maximum height 34 ft
• Maximum storage 365 acre-ft (119 mil gal)
• High Hazard, Class C• Minor flooding of two residential structures• Damage to the Croton Aqueduct and Quaker Bridge Road• Significant flooding and probable loss of life at the WTP
(staffed 24/7)
© Arcadis 2017
Site Aerial – Before
Crest
Embankment
Toe
Chute
Spillway
Gate House
Stilling Basin
WTP
© Arcadis 2017
Project History• NYCRR Part 673 Dam Safety Regulations revised in
August of 2009• April 30, 2010 Village received a letter from NYSDEC
citing unsound condition rating• May 2011 Engineering Assessment Report confirmed:
– Spillway, spillway chute and stilling basin did not have sufficient capacity
– Low level outlet (mud) pipe inadequate– Embankment stability didn’t meet all published safety factors– Crest elevation varied and did not provide adequate freeboard
© Arcadis 2017
Design ImprovementsRequired:
• Modifications to the Spillway, Spillway Chute and Stilling Basin
• New Filtered Toe Drain
• New Intake Structure, Low Level Outlet and Supply Pipes
• Stump/Vegetation Removal along the Crest and Embankment
• Leveling of the Dam Crest and Corewall
• Wave Protection Improvements
Optional:
• New Floating Dock System to Access Sampling Locations
• Construction of a Safer Access Bridge
© Arcadis 2017
Spillway and Access Bridge – Before• Multi-level broad crested weir
with two 4.6 ft wide openings
• Crest EL of 188.5
• Narrow footbridge for maintenance access
© Arcadis 2017
Spillway and Access Bridge – After
• 2-cycle labyrinth weir
• Weir height EL 188.5
• Wider access bridge
© Arcadis 2017
Spillway Outlet and Chute – Before• Masonry block lined,
trapezoidal channel
• 180 ft in length
• Channel depths of 4-6 ft
© Arcadis 2017
Spillway Outlet and Chute – After
• Rectangular, smooth concrete channel
• Minimum height of 5 ft and width of 10 ft
© Arcadis 2017
Stilling Basin – Before• Concrete overflow weir
• 28 ft wide, crest EL 162.8
• Concrete blocks on crest
© Arcadis 2017
Stilling Basin – After
• Crest lowered to EL 159
• Sidewalls raised with fencing
• Low level outlet provided
© Arcadis 2017
Embankment Toe – Before• Moisture at toe with
vegetation but
• No internal erosion, piping, soil heave or boil
© Arcadis 2017
Embankment Toe – After
• 8” perforated pipe in drainage stone and filter sand
• (2) clean outs
© Arcadis 2017
Embankment Toe – After• One of a number of
piezometers with new pedestal and access cover
• Routinely measuring ground water level
• Toe drain discharge chamber with weir for flow measurement
• Observe discharge quality
© Arcadis 2017
Dam Crest and Wave Protection – Before• Undulating crest
• Minimal riprap and much vegetation on upstream side
© Arcadis 2017
Dam Crest and Wave Protection – After
• Crest leveled to EL 193
• Corewall raised
• Riprap installed
© Arcadis 2017
LLO & Supply Piping• Trenchless installation
• 60” casing pipe
• (2) 16” and (1) 18” pipe
© Arcadis 2017
Successful Project!• Upgrade the almost 130-year old IBRD to meet current regulatory and
industry safety and operational standards
• Ensure sustainability for the Village’s water supply
• Deliver the best water quality available
© Arcadis 2017
Assessment of Learning
• Can you identify various types of dams, their functions and their hazard classifications?
• How can dams fail?• Why did dam regulations come into
effect?• Can you describe some of the NYS
DEC Dam Safety Requirements?• Can you apply dam safety design
criteria to an existing Class C, High Hazard earthen dam?
© Arcadis 2017
Thank you!Questions/Discussion
24 September 2018