NYC Oncology Investor...8 Targeting CPI -resistance is a High Unmet Need Multiple Mechanisms Prevent...

32
THE NEW FRONTIER OF IMMUNO-ONCOLOGY NYC Oncology Investor November 12-13, 2019

Transcript of NYC Oncology Investor...8 Targeting CPI -resistance is a High Unmet Need Multiple Mechanisms Prevent...

  • T H E N E W F R O N T I E R O F I M M U N O - O N C O L O G Y

    NYC Oncology InvestorNovember 12-13, 2019

  • 2

    Safe Harbor

    Forward Looking StatementsThis presentation may contain forward-looking statements that are based on our current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry as well as management's beliefs and assumptions. Words such as "anticipates," "expects," "intends," "plans," "believes," "seeks,” "estimates," "may," "will," and variations of these words or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are neither promises nor guarantees, but involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, the following: we have incurred significant losses, are not currently profitable and may never become profitable; our need for additional funding, which may not be available; our limited operating history; the unpredictable nature of our early stage development efforts for marketable drugs; the lengthy and expensive process of clinical drug development, which has an uncertain outcome; potential delays in enrollment of patients which could affect the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals; potential delays in regulatory approval, which would impact the ability to commercialize our product candidates and affect our ability to generate revenue; our reliance on third parties to manufacture our product candidates, which may delay, prevent or impair our development and commercialization efforts; ability to attract and retain key executives, and other factors.

    These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore actual results could differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, While we may elect to update such forward-looking statements at some point in the future, we disclaim any obligation to do so, even if subsequent events cause our views to change.

  • The PIONYR Opportunity

    • Myeloid TuningTM therapies to enhance anti-tumor immunity as single agents and in combination• Deep myeloid biology expertise; integrated capabilities from target discovery to clinical trials• Advancing a pipeline of highly differentiated antibodies and mechanisms for a range of solid cancers • Compelling pre-clinical efficacy and safety data for two First in Class programs • Planning two INDs and Phase 1 trials in 2020

    9 12 18 21 24 27 30

    Dosed Dosed Dosed Dosed

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    Day post implant

    Tum

    or v

    olum

    e (m

    m3 )

    TME Target Discovery Platform 2 INDs in 2020 with differentiated Development Candidates

    Myeloid TuningTM Target Pipeline

    PY314

    PY159TAMs1

    TANs2

    MDSCs3

    1. Tumor Associated Macrophages, 2. Tumor Associated Neutrophils, 3. Myeloid Derived Suppressor Cells, 4. Dendritic Cells

    DCs4

    Confidential 3

  • 4

    Cells other than T-cells can also regulate the anti-tumor immune response

    Effective in only a small subset of patients; Other drivers of immunosuppression in TME

    Innovating Beyond Conventional IO Targets

    Current Approaches

    Matthew Krummel PIONYR FOUNDER

    Professor, UCSF

    YERVOY (ipi)Allison, Krummel et al

    UC BerkeleyNobel winning research

    Limitations

    StimulatoryT Cell targets

    Checkpoint Inhibitors

    PIONYR:“MyeloidTuning”

    Krummel et al. UCSF

  • 5

    Targeting Myeloid Cell Populations Provides Rich Immuno-oncology Opportunities

    Inhibitory myeloid cells• Tumor-associated

    macrophages (TAMs)

    Stimulatory myeloid cells• Dendritic cells (DC)

    • Inhibitory myeloid cells can “crowd out” stimulatory myeloid cells

    TUMOR

    CD4TH1

    Treg

    CD8

    B

    NK

    CD4TH2

    Neutrophils/gMDSC

    Mast

    Patrollingmonocytes

    Conv. Mono.mMDSC

    TAMs

    DC

    Adapted from Cancer Growth and Metastasis, 2014, 7:9

    • IO is currently dominated by lymphocyte targets

    • Targeting TME-associated myeloid cells offers a new IO frontier

    Krummel lab. Cancer Cell 2014, 26:638Intervital imaging of genetically engineered mice

  • Myeloid TuningTM

    Myeloid TuningChanging the function and/or composition of myeloid cells within the tumor microenvironment in order to generate effective anti-tumor immunity

    Tumor-associated

    suppressive

    myeloid cells

    (TAMs, TANs, MD

    SC)

    Tumor-associated proinflammatory myeloid cells

    Tumor growth

    Tumor destruction

    Confidential 6

    PY314PY159

    Front. Immunol. 2019, 10:1611

    Tumor destruction

    Tumor growth

  • 7

    PIONYR’s Myeloid Tuning in Perspective:Mechanisms to Activate Anti-tumor Immunity

    Direct activation of adaptive and innate anti-tumor immune cells

    Examples: • Interferons• Interleukins• Vaccines• TNFSFR agonists

    • anti-CD40• anti-CD137

    Reverse dysfunctional adaptive anti-tumor immune cells

    Examples (Check-point Inhibitors) • anti-CTLA4• anti-PD-1• anti-PD-L1• anti-LAG3• Etc• Etc

    Disable suppressive myeloid cells to unleash anti-tumor immunity• Highly selective deletion of TME

    myeloid suppressive cells

    • “Hotwiring” suppressive myeloid cells to stimulatory state

    Pushing the accelerator Releasing the brakes Pionyr: Turbocharge the engine

    PY314

    PY159

    Example:

    Example:

    • TLR agonists• CAR-Ts• CD3 bi-

    specifics

  • 8

    Targeting CPI-resistance is a High Unmet NeedMultiple Mechanisms Prevent CPIs From Achieving Higher Response Rates

    Indication ORR (%) No Response (%)Melanoma 33.7 66.3

    NSCLC 19.2 80.8RCC 25.0 75.0

    Bladder 14.8 85.2Gastric 30.0 70.0

    Pancreatic 17.0 83.3

    A majority of cancer patients do not respond to CPI therapies

    Presented by Timothy Chan at the 2018 ASCO Annual Meeting

    Mechanisms of CPI resistance

    • Immune suppressive cellso Inhibitory Myeloid cells (eg, TAMs) – PIONYR focuso Inhibitory Lymphoid cells (eg, Tregs)

    • Impaired tumor antigen processing/presentationo Stimulatory Myeloid cells (eg, DC) PIONYR focus

    • Alternate immune checkpoints (eg, LAG3, TIM3)• Lack of sufficient or suitable neo-antigens• Impaired intratumor immune infiltration (eg, CD8+ CTLs)• Impaired IFNg signaling• Metabolic/inflammatory mediators (eg, IDO, A2AR)• Severe T cell exhaustion• T cell epigenetic changes (eg, histone deacetylase)

    Adapted from BJC 2018, 118:9

  • 9

    The Ratio of Stimulatory to Inhibitory Myeloid Cells Correlates with Patient Survival

    Ø Patients with relatively low numbers of inhibitory myeloid cells control their disease better

    Ø Myeloid Tuning increases the ratio of stimulatory to inhibitory myeloid cells

    Stimulatory/Inhibitory Myeloid Cell Ratio in Metastatic Melanoma

    Ratio Low

    Ratio High

    p = 0.00495OS

    Sin

    ce M

    etas

    tasi

    s

    Time (Months)

    Myeloid ratio was measured using signature genes (underlying data from Bogunovic et al. 2009, 106:20429)

  • 10

    Advancing a Pipeline of First-in-Class IO Programs

    Drug Candidate (Target) Target Validation mAb Generation and Optimization IND-enabling

    Activities IND

    PY314 (TREM2)

    PY159 (TREM1)

    Discovery Engine

    Q3 2020

    Q3 2020

    Surgical “Deletion” of immunosuppressive M2-like TAMs

    “Reprogrammer” of suppressive M2-like TAMs, TANs and MDSCs

    PY265 (undisclosed)

    PY359 (undisclosed)

  • 11

    PY314 Deletes TREM2+ TAMs and Converts CPI Resistance to Sensitivity• Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are likely a major resistance mechanism to Checkpoint Inhibitors

    • TREM2 is a highly specific TAM cell surface marker

    • Depleting TAMs removes multiple mechanisms that subvert anti-tumor immunity and promote tumor growth

    • Preclinical models show strong anti-tumor activity of anti-TREM2 + anti-PD-1 in anti-PD-1-resistant tumors

    • Patients with high TREM2 expression have poor survival probability

    • PY314 has wide therapeutic window; is well tolerated in GLP non-human primate (NHP) study

    • PY314 biomarker assays have been established

    • Highly favorable Pre-IND meeting with FDA

    • Expression data suggests PY314 will have broad solid tumor application; especially gastric and ovarian

  • “Surgical” Deletion of a Specific Subset of TAMs Eliminates Multiple Pro-tumor, Immuno-suppressive Mechanisms

    12 Adapted from Nature Reviews Cancer. 2016, 16:447

    “M2-like” macrophages promote:

    Production of arginase, IL-10, PD-L1, NO, and TGFb

    Secretion of EGF, IL-6, and TNF

    Production of cysteine cathepsins, MMPs, and EGF

    Production of VEGFA, Sema4D, and IL-8

    IMMUNOSUPPRESSION

    TUMOR CELL PROLIFERATION

    TUMOR CELL INVASION

    ANGIOGENESIS

    • Increased CD8+ T cells• Increased NKp46+ NK cells• Increased MHCIIHigh TAMs (“M1-like”)

    Removal of “M2-like” macrophages with PY314 promotes anti-tumor immunity:

  • 13

    PY314m Enhances the TME Immune Landscape

    PY314m therapy decreases tumors

    PY314m therapy increases CD8+ and NKp46+ NK cells

    PY314m therapy decreases M2-like TAMs and increases M1-like TAMs

    EMT6 tumor PD study

    Dosing: isotype control or PY314m

    (anti-TREM2) (30 mg/kg)

    2 doses 5 d apart; tumors harvested 2 d

    post second dose

    TAMs

    M2-like M1-likeCD8+T cells

    NKp46+NK cells

    Contr

    ol

    PY31

    4mCo

    ntrol

    PY31

    4m

    Contr

    ol

    PY31

    4m

    Contr

    ol

    PY31

    4m

    Contr

    ol

    PY31

    4m

  • 14

    PY314m Has Single Agent Anti-Tumor Activity in the EMT6 Mammary Tumor Model

    Isotype (20 mpk)

    Anti-PD-1 (5 mpk)

    Anti-PY314m (15 mpk)

    Anti-PY314m (15 mpk)+ anti-PD-1 (5 mpk)

    6 9 12 15 21 24 27

    Dosed Dosed Dosed Dosed

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    Day post implant

    Tum

    or v

    olum

    e (m

    m3 )

    18 Isoty

    pe

    Anti-

    PD-1

    15 m

    g/kg

    Ant

    i-TRE

    M2

    15 m

    pk A

    nti-T

    REM2

    +Ant

    i-PD-

    10

    1000

    2000

    3000

    Tum

    or v

    olum

    e (m

    m3 )

    Isotyp

    e

    Anti-P

    D-1

    (30%

    CR)

    PY31

    4m

    (40%

    CR)

    PY31

    4m

    + anti

    -PD-

    1

    (40%

    CR)

    • 10 mice per group • Dosing initiated when

    tumors reached ~70 mm3• EMT6: mouse mammary

    tumor

  • 15

    • 10 mice per group • Dosing initiated when tumors reached

    ~100 mm3• CT26: mouse colon carcinoma

    9 12 15 18 21 27 30

    Dosed Dosed Dosed Dosed

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    Day post implant

    Tum

    or v

    olum

    e (m

    m3 )

    9 12 15 18 21 27 30

    Dosed Dosed Dosed Dosed

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    Day post implant

    Tum

    or v

    olum

    e (m

    m3 )

    Isotype (15 mpk)

    Anti-PD-1 (5 mpk)

    PY314m (10 mpk)

    PY314m (10 mpk)+ anti-PD-1 (5 mpk)

    CR: 20% (range 20-60%)

    9 12 15 18 21 27 30

    Dosed Dosed Dosed Dosed

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    Day post implant

    Tum

    or v

    olum

    e (m

    m3 )

    PY314m anti-tumor activity was observed in 7/8 syngeneic models tested to date as monotherapy and/or in combination with anti-PD-1

    PY314m Plus Anti-PD-1 Inhibits Tumor Growth in the Anti-PD-1 Resistant CT26 Colon Tumor Model

  • 16

    PY314m Plus Anti-PD-1 Induces Immune Memory

    BALB/c mice that were tumor-free from previous studies after PY314m + anti-PD-1 treatment were re-challenged with CT26 tumor cells

    0 10 20 300

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    Day post implant

    Tum

    or v

    olum

    e (m

    m3 ) Naive (N=5)

    Rechallenge (N=4)

  • 17

    TREM2 Expression is Higher in Diverse Cancers, and Inversely Correlates With Patient SurvivalTREM2 expression in

    gastric cancer

    Healthytissue

    Gastriccancertissue

    TREM2 expression levels in colorectal cancer inversely correlate

    with patient survival probability

    TREM2High

    TREM2Low

    Time (months)

    Sur

    viva

    l pro

    babi

    lity

    n=37n=413

    n=192

    Log2

    TR

    EM

    2 ex

    pres

    sion

    TREM2 expression inverse correlation with patient survival also seen in:• Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)

    • Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC)

    High TREM2 RNA expression also seen in:• Ovarian

    • NSCLC

    • Breast Cancer

    • HNSCC

    • Melanoma

  • 18

    PY314 IND is On Track for early July 20202018 2019 2020

    A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D

    CMC

    Research

    Toxicology

    Bioanalytics

    Regulatory

    Clinical

    CLDProcess Dev

    MCB GMP Production

    Rodent Pilot ToxGLP Tox

    GLP TCR

    GMP F/F

    GMP Stability

    Pre-INDIND Prep

    INDProtocol Concept Development CRO Engagement

    Finalize Protocol Invest Brochure

    Label

    FPI

    Tox Material

    Dose Ranging PK/PDBiomarker Assay Implementation

    MOA

    NHP Pilot Tox

    Biomarker/Translation

    PK/ADA Assay Development and Tech Transfer

    Pre-IND Prep

    Clinical Protocol Development

  • 19

    PY159 Reprograms TREM1+ Suppressive Myeloid Cells into Stimulatory Myeloid Cells• Reprogramming TAMs from immune suppressive to immune stimulatory can unleash anti-tumor immunity

    • TREM1 is expressed by immuno-suppressive TAMs, myeloid-derived suppressive cells (MDSCs), and tumor-associate neutrophils (TANs)

    • Anti-TREM1 mAb, PY159, induces production of cytokines and immuno-stimulatory cell surface proteins on myeloid cells that can recruit lymphocytes and enhance antigen presentation

    • Preclinical models demonstrate strong anti-tumor activity of PY159

    • Patients with high TREM1 expression have poor survival probability

    • The anti-mouseTREM1 mAb is well tolerated in mice; single and multi dose in pilot NHP is well-tolerated

    • PY159 biomarker assays are being established

    • Expression data suggest PY159 will have broad application

  • 20

    PY159’s MOA: Reprogramming of Suppressive Myeloid Cells

    TREM1PY159

    Anti-tumor immune cell

    recruitment and activation

    • T cells• NK cells • DC• Macrophages

    TREM1

    +TREM1+Pro-tumor

    myeloid

    suppressor cells

    PY159-mediated

    TREM1 cross-linking

    TREM1

    Reprogramming

    towards anti-tumor

    myeloid cells

    TREM1

    Secretion of pro-inflammatory

    cytokines, and induction of

    co-stimulatory molecules

    TREM1+

    Anti-tumor

    myeloid

    stimulatory cells

    Tumor

    destruction

  • 21

    aa

    PY159 Promotes Anti-tumor Activity via Selective Secretion of Immune-enhancing Cytokines

    Figure adapted from: https://www.biooncology.com/pathways.html

    Immune Desert

    Immune Excluded

    Inflamed

    Treatment Strategies

    • Generate/Release/Deliver Antigens

    • Enhance Antigen Presentation and T Cell Priming

    • Redirect and Engage T Cells

    Treatment Strategies• Recruit T cells to Tumor

    • Address Stromal Barrier

    • Redirected and Engage T Cells

    Treatment Strategies• Invigorate T Cells

    • Redirect And Engage T Cells

    PY159

    PY159-induced factors Function

    IFN-g, IL-1a, IL-12, TNFSF9, CXCL9, CXCL10, CCL17

    T cell recruitment and activation

    IFN-g, CXCL1,CXCL5, CXCL11,

    CXCL15, CCL4, CSF1

    Myeloid cell recruitment and activation

    IFN-g, CXCL10, TNFSF9

    Enhance antigen presentation

    IFN-g, CXCL10, IL-12, CCL4

    NK cell activation

    IFN-g, CXCL9, CXCL10 Required for anti-PD-1 efficacy

    TNFSF10, FasL, GzmA, GzmB Direct tumor cell killing

    PY159 can target Immune Excluded and Immune Desert TMEs

  • 22

    • 10 mice per group• Dosing initiated when tumors

    reached ~100 mm3• MC38: murine colon carcinoma • CT26: murine colon carcinoma

    9 15 18 21 24 27

    Dosed Dosed Dosed Dosed

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    Day post implant

    Tum

    or v

    olum

    e (m

    m3 )

    PY159m has Significant Efficacy as Single Agent in MC38, and as Combo in CT26 Models

    9 12 18 21 24 27 30

    Dosed Dosed Dosed Dosed

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    Day post implant

    Tum

    or v

    olum

    e (m

    m3 )

    MC38 mono-therapy CT26 combo-therapy

    Isotype (20 mpk)

    Anti PD-1 (5 mpk)

    PY159m (15 mpk)

    PY159m (15 mpk)+ anti PD-1 (5 mpk)

    6 10 12 14 16 20 22 24

    Dosed Dosed Dosed

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    Day post implant

    Tum

    or

    volu

    me

    (mm

    3 )

    ControlControl + anti-PD-1Afuc PI-9067 + ControlAfuc-PI-9067 + anti-PD-1

    CR: 20% (range 20-40%)

    PY159m anti-tumor activity seen in 5/6 syngeneic models tested to date as monotherapy and/or in combination with anti-PD-1

  • 23

    PY159m Induces Immune Memory

    BALB/c mice that were tumor-free from previous studies after anti-PY159m + anti-PD-1 treatment were re-challenged with CT26 tumor cells

    0 10 20 30 400

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    Day post implant

    Tum

    or v

    olum

    e (m

    m3 ) Reimplant CT26

    Historical CT26

    Reimplant CT26 (N=6)

    Historical CT26 (N=6)

    0 10 20 30 400

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    Day post implant

    Tum

    or v

    olum

    e (m

    m3 ) Reimplant CT26

    Historical CT26

    Reimplant CT26 (N=6)

    Naive CT26 (N=6)

    0 10 20 30 400

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    Day post implant

    Tum

    or v

    olum

    e (m

    m3 )

  • 24

    CD4CD8

    NK

    B

    Plasma

    TAM

    Monocyte(mMDSC)

    Treg

    pDC

    Cell populations TREM2 TREM1

    tSNE plots of single cell sequencing results from CD45+ immune infiltrate sorted from human ovarian tumor dissociated cells(neutrophils are not included in the analysis)

    TREM2 + TREM1

    TREM1 is Predominantly Expressed on Human Tumor Associated Monocytes (mMDSC)

  • 25

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    + + +++

    + +

    +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + ++++ +++++ + +

    p = 0.02

    0.00

    0.25

    0.50

    0.75

    1.00

    0 50 100 150 200Time

    Surv

    ival p

    roba

    bilit

    y

    Strata + +trem1median=TREM1hi trem1median=TREM1low

    TREM1 Expression is Higher in Diverse Cancers, and Inversely Correlates With Patient Survival

    TREM1 expression in colorectal cancer

    TREM1 expression levels in gastric cancer inversely correlate with

    patient survival probability

    TREM1High

    TREM1Low

    Time (months)

    Sur

    viva

    l pro

    babi

    lity

    n=192

    TREM1 expression inverse correlation with patient survival also seen in:• Breast cancer

    • Pancreatic cancer

    High TREM1 mRNA expression seen in:• NSCLC

    • HNSCC

    • Ovarian

    • Stomach

    • Bladder

    Log2

    TR

    EM1

    expr

    essi

    on

    Healthytissue

    Colorectalcancertissue

    0

    2

    4

    6

    N Tnorm

    TREM

    1

    n=41 n=282

  • 26

    PY159 IND is On Track

    2018 2019 2020A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D

    CMC

    Research

    Toxicology

    Bioanalytics

    Regulatory

    Clinical

    CLDProcess Dev

    MCB GMP Production

    GLP Tox

    GLP TCR

    GMP F/F

    GMP Stability

    Pre-INDPre-IND Prep IND Prep

    INDProtocol Concept Development

    Clinical Protocol Development

    CRO Engagement

    Finalize Protocol Invest Brochure

    Label

    FPI

    Tox Material

    Dose Ranging PK/PD

    Biomarker/Translation Biomarker Assay Implementation

    PK/ADA Assay Development and Tech Transfer

    NHP Pilot Tox

  • 27

    PY314 Clinical Hypotheses

    • The presence of TREM2 positive cells in tumor infiltrates is a mechanism of both primary and acquired resistance to CPI therapies

    • Patients with tumors that have higher levels of TREM2 positive inhibitory myeloid cells are more likely to respond to PY314 mono-therapy or CPI combination therapy

    • PY314 therapy:o Convert CPI resistance to responseo Convert CPI stable disease to responseo Augment primary CPI response-better RR, longer PFS or OS

    • Demonstration of objective tumor responses in patients with prior CPI resistance will be used for both assets as initial POC in order to de-risk clinical development in the smallest number of patients

  • 28

    First-in-Human Trials Strategy: Efficient and Cost-Effective Path to PoC • Clinical indication selection ongoing

    o IHC screening for target in TMAso Acquisition of tissue samples from CPI resistant patientso Thought leader consultation

    • Establish single agent safety and in combination with approved CPIo Dose finding in subjects with a histologic diagnosis from 4-5 groups where TREM1 or TREM2 is

    implicated in resistance selected for clinical progression on or after CPI based therapy

    • Expansion Cohorts enriched for subjects with tumors that are target positive on contemporaneous biopsy by IHC obtained for study enrollmento IHC diagnostic LDT developed at PIONYR to be utilized for the patient selection

    • If threshold RR achieved in a given tumor type, increase that expansion cohort size and plan phase II/III trialso Seek “breakthrough therapy” (BT) designation and/or determine if there is a path to Accelerated Approval

    in specific indications

  • 29

    Level 1 + CPI

    Level 2 + CPIPY314Level 2

    PY314Level 3

    PY314Level 1

    PY314Level 4

    Level 4 + CPI

    Timeline

    Expansion cohorts of one or more dose

    levels may start once safety declared

    3 +3 design for initial dose escalation

    6 months 12 months

    First-in-Human Trial Strategy:Simultaneous Determination of Single Agent and CPI Combo Safety

    18 months

    Level 3 + CPI

  • 30

    Experienced Team, Strong Syndicate R&D Leadership with deep IO expertise

    Steven James PRESIDENT AND CEO

    Michel Streuli, Ph.D. SVP, CHIEF SCIENTIFIC OFFICER

    Leonard Reyno, M.D. SVP, CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER

    Monte Montgomery SVP, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

    Alicia Levey, Ph.D. SVP, CHIEF BUSINESS OFFICER

    Kevin Baker, Ph.D. SVP, PRECLINICAL & PROJECT MANAGEMENT

    Evan Greger VP, CMC AND PROCESS DEVELOPMENT

  • 31

    PIONYR’s Pipeline Provides Strategic Optionality

    Myeloid Tuning

    Self-develop products

    $$$

    RegionalLicensing

    Deals$$

    M&A$$$

    Target Discovery

    Deals$$

    Co-Dev/ Co-Mktng

    Deals$$$

    IPO$$$

    1Q 2020:Ø Pharma dealØ Series C financingØ 3rd Dev Candidate

    3Q 2020:Ø PY314 INDØ PY159 IND

    4Q 2020:Ø FPI PY314 and PY159

  • Key PIONYR Messages• Myeloid TuningTM through selective depletion and reprogramming of myeloid suppressive cells is a differentiated and orthogonal approach to tumor immunotherapy

    • PY314 and PY159 are first-in-class therapies with the potential for mono or combo therapy across multiple tumor types, including those that are CPI resistant

    • PIONYR will have 2 clinical programs in 2020 and potential for 2 additional DCs

    • PIONYR’s discovery engine yields novel targets for oncology and other myeloid relevant indications

    PY314 PY159

    DCs for Targets PI-114 & 115

    CD4CD8

    NK

    B

    Plasma

    TAM

    Monocyte(m M DS C)

    Treg

    pDC