NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

65
347 Madison Avenue New York. NY 10017·3739 212878·7000 Tel 8 Metropolitan Transportation Authority State of New York March 12,2010 Dear Prospective Proposer: The Metropolitan Transportation Authority, on behalf of the Long Island Rail Road Company, and Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company, invites all qualified firms to submit Proposals for Provision of Wireless Broadband Services in Long Island Rail Road and Metro-North Railroad Trains and Stations. Enclosed is the entire Request for Proposals ("RFP") package. Please read the instructions carefully. All responses to the RFP are due no later than l\I1ay 17, 2010. If you are interested in responding to this RFP, please complete and return the enclosed questionnaire (pink sheet) at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your interest in the MTA. Real Estate Department The agencies of the MTA MTA New York City Transit MTA Long Island Bus MTA Bridges and Tunnels MTA Bus Company MTA Long Island Rail Road MTA Metro-North Railroad MTA Capital Construction

description

347 Madison Avenue New York. NY 10017·3739 212878·7000 Tel8Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityState of New YorkMarch 12,2010Dear Prospective Proposer: The Metropolitan Transportation Authority, on behalf of the Long Island Rail Road Company, and Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company, invites all qualified firms to submit Proposals for Provision of Wireless Broadband Services in Long Island Rail Road and Metro-North Railroad Trains and Stations. Enclosed is the entire Request for Propo

Transcript of NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

Page 1: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

347 Madison Avenue New York. NY 10017·3739 212878·7000 Tel

8 Metropolitan Transportation Authority State of New York

March 12,2010

Dear Prospective Proposer:

The Metropolitan Transportation Authority, on behalf of the Long Island Rail Road Company, and Metro-North Commuter Railroad Company, invites all qualified firms to submit Proposals for Provision of Wireless Broadband Services in Long Island Rail Road and Metro-North Railroad Trains and Stations. Enclosed is the entire Request for Proposals ("RFP") package. Please read the instructions carefully.

All responses to the RFP are due no later than l\I1ay 17, 2010.

If you are interested in responding to this RFP, please complete and return the enclosed questionnaire (pink sheet) at your earliest convenience.

Thank you for your interest in the MTA.

Real Estate Department

The agencies of the MTA

MTA New York City Transit MTA Long Island Bus MTA Bridges and Tunnels MTA Bus Company MTA Long Island Rail Road MTA Metro-North Railroad MTA Capital Construction

Page 2: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

DMetropolitan Transportation Authority

Request for Proposals (RFP)

For Provision of Wireless Broadband Services in Long Island Rail Road

and Metro-North Commuter Railroad

Trains and Stations

Issued: March 12, 2010

EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY AUTHORIZED BY THE PROJECT MANAGER (see p. 2) OR AS OTHERWISE EXPRESSLY AUTHORIZED BY NEW YORK STATE FINANCE LAW §§ 139-J AND 139-K, DURING THE "RESTRICTED

PERIOD" OF THIS SOLICITATION, NEITHER PROPOSERS, NOR ANY EMPLOYEE, AGENT OR CONSULTANT OR PERSON ACTING ON BEHALF OF PROPOSERS, MAY "CONTACT" BOARD MEMBERS,

OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES (OTHER THAN THE PROJECT MANAGER AND ANY OTHER PERSONS EXPRESSLY DECLARED BY MTA TO BE

DESIGNATED POINTS OF CONTACT FOR THIS RFP) OR CONSULTANTS OF MTA OR ANY OF ITS AFFILIATES~OR SUBSIDIARIES, THE STATE OF

NEW YORK OR ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY REGARDING THIS RFP AND RELATED MATTERS. FAILURE TO OBSERVE THIS

REQUIREMENT MAY RESULT IN THE PROPOSER'S DISQUALIFICATION FROM CONSIDERATION PURSUANT TO THIS RFP. THE TERMS

"CONTACT" AND "RESTRICTED PERIOD" ARE DEFINED IN NEW YORK STATE FINANCE LAW §§ 139-J AND 139-K AND THOSE "CONTACTS"

THAT ARE CONSIDERED TO BE IMPERMISSIBLE ARE DESCRIBED THEREIN.

Page 3: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

The Basics of this RFP

Pursuant to this Request for Proposals ("RFP"), Metropolitan Transportation Authority ("MTA "), together with the Long Island Rail Road ("LlRR") and Metro­North Commuter Railroad ("Metro-North") and together with LlRR, the "Railroads"), are soliciting proposals from private entities for a license to provide on-train and/or station WiFi services for the Railroads' customers.

Key Business Objective

The Railroads' key business objective for a WiFi network is to improve passenger satisfaction. Our current thinking is that the WiFi service should be marketed as a product of the service provider, not as a Railroad-provided service. We believe that having WiFi service available to our customers would be beneficial and that we should facilitate that result if a private company is prepared to make the required investment in a manner that we determine to be appropriate.

Support of Other Business Objectives Will be Considered Favorably

The Railroads will look favorably on proposals that also:

• provide the Railroads with a wireless communications resource that could be used by the Railroads for Railroad operational purposes and/or in support . of revenue-generating activities such as digital advertising initiatives; and

• have a likelihood of providing the Railroads with license fee revenues from the service provider and/or a share in user-generated revenues.

The Railroads Will Incur No Costs

Given the current fiscal environment, MTA has determined that it is not appropriate to spend any MTAor Railroad dollars on such an undertaking.

Threshold Conditions

Proposals must meet all of the following conditions:

1. All the successful proposer{s) must accept sole responsibility for all costs of the initiative, including but not limited to all flagging, labor and other force account costs incurred by the Railroads in supporting the initiative.

2. The successful proposer{s) must commit to complete the proposed installation within a specified time frame and must provide substantial financial security guaranteeing such obligation.

RFP for Wireless Broadband Services March 12,2010

Page 1

Page 4: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

3. The installation, operation, maintenance and removal after termination of the associated equipment and appurtenances must not interfere with the operations of the Railroads.

4. The customer amenity provided must be of sufficient benefit to the Railroads and their customers and have sufficient functional longevity to justify the undertaking.

MTA will only consider proposals that, in addition to meeting the conditions described above, identify (A) a viable turn-key implementation plan with commitments from all of the critical participants and (B) a financing plan that identifies the source of all required funding and demonstrates an appropriate level of commitment from the funding sources.

Exclusive Licenses for WiFiService

MTA expects to grant exclusive licenses for the on-board WiFi component of the service. But proposers are not required to make a proposal for all of the Railroads' trains and stations. Proposals may be made for deployment at specific stations or on specific rail lines or specific equipment fleets and MTA and the Railroads reserve the right to allocate groups of trains, lines and stations to different proposers.

Project Manager

Please direct all questions regarding this RFP and all responses to this RFP to George McDonald, the Project Manager ("Project Manager") for this RFP:

Metropolitan Transportation Authority Real Estate Department 347 Madison Avenue" 8th Floor New York, New York 10017 Attn: George McDonald Email: [email protected]

Pre-Proposal Conference

A pre-proposal conference will be held at 10:00 a.m. on April 7, 2010 at MTA Headquarters, 347 Madison Avenue, New York, NY. It is anticipated that after the pre-proposal conference a Metro-North M-7 train car will be available for inspection in Grand Central Terminal. Please pre-register for the pre-proposal conference by emailing the Project Manager with the names of the attendees and the company they represent.

RFP for Wireless Broadband Services March 12,2010

Page 2

Page 5: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

Proposal Due Date

Proposals must be received by the Project Manager at the above address no later than 5:00 PM EDT on May 17, 2010.

$5,000 Refundable Participation Fee

A refundable participation fee in the amount of $5,000, by check payable to "Metropolitan Transportation Authority", must be included with the proposal submission and is a condition to consideration of a proposal. These checks will be deposited into an MT A account. At the time that a proposal is no longer under consideration, MTA will return the $5,000 to such proposer (given the low interest rates on short term deposits, interest on such deposited amounts will not be paid). For those proposals, if any, for which definitive documents are exe9uted and delivered, the application of the $5,000 will be addressed in such definitive documents.

Reimbursement for MTA and Railroad Solicitation Costs

After the initial review of proposals and consideration of the amount of MTA and Railrqad resources that will be required to review and evaluate proposals and meet and negotiate with proposers, MTA reserves the right to require that a proposer agree to pay for all subsequent MTA and Railroad costs associated with further consideration of such proposer's proposal. In that event, MTA may require that a proposer pre-fund an MTA account from which such costs will be paid or reimbursed to MTA and the Railroads.

Installation and Railroad Labor Costs

Widespread deployment of a WiFi network on Railroad trains will require the successful proposer(s) to address the cost and logistics of installation, monitoring and repair of equipment. It is difficult for the Railroads to take train cars out of service but an effort will be made to accommodate the required work based on mutually agreed upon pre-determined schedules. In addition, given equipment movements, it may not be possible for a Railroad to ensure that particular cars operate on particular lines (which is an important consideration if the equipment on particular train cars must be matched with wayside equipment). Installation and maintenance of wayside equipment and associated utilities is also difficult in the Railroads' environment given the potential for service disruption and use of space otherwise needed for operational purposes.

It is anticipated that a deployment will, require the substantial involvement of the Railroads' employees, including flagging and protection. design review, inspection and, depending on the work and the applicable collective bargaining agreements, actual construction. installation and maintenance work. The cost of such services by the Railroads (at the applicable fully burdened rates) will be the

RFP for Wireless Broadband Services March 12, 2010

Page 3

Page 6: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

responsibility of the successful proposer, and required to be paid to the Railroads . via a pre-funded account.

Background

On July 1, 2009, MTA and the Railroads issued a Request for Expressions of Interest (RFEI) for Provision of Wireless Broadband Services in Long Island Rail Road and Metro-North Commuter Railroad Trains and Stations. MTA and the Railroads received seventeen responses and met with seven respondents to discuss their submissions. Subsequently, MTA and Railroad staff have also had discussions with and visited other railroads that have implemented Wi-Fi on train service for their customers and for railroad operations.

MT A recently invited two respondents to undertake limited on-train technical evaluations of their proposed systems. At this time, it is not yet known whether either or both of those technical evaluations will proceed. Participation in such a technical evaluation is· not a pre-condition to responding to the RFP; however, MTA reserves the right to require that a proof of concept trial be conducted prior to awarding any license(s). The technical parameters for the limited on-train technical evaluations described above are set forth in Exhibits C and D and provide a general sense of what the Railroads would be seeking if they were to require a proof of concept trial as part of an award process in connection with this solicitation.

Service Territory

URR operates between New York City and Long Island and within Long Island. Metro-North operates three rails lines (Hudson, Harlem, and New Haven) emanating north from Grand Central Terminal to their respective terminals in Poughkeepsie, NY; Wassaic, NY; and New Haven, Connecticut. Service on the New Haven Line is subject to an operating agreement with the Connecticut Department of Transportation. West of Hudson service in Orange and Rockland Counties is provided by New Jersey Transit (under contract to Metro-North) on two lines (the Port Jervis and Pascack Valley Lines), pursuant to a contract with Metro-North. LlRR and Metro-North are, respectively, the largest and second largest commuter railroad services in the nation and operate every day of the year, although frequency of service varies by route, day of the week and time of day.

RFP for Wireless Broadband Services March 12, 2010

Page 4

Page 7: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

MTA Long Island Rail Road and MTA Metro-North Railroad Commuter Services(I)

Revenue Actual Main Passengers Route Line Passenger

fu! Stations Miles Track Cars thousandsi2

) Miles

MTA Long Island Rail 87,358 124 319.1 594.1 1,138 Road MTA Metro-North 80,501 124 385.0 754.0 1,126 Railroad

Totals 167,859 248 704.1 1348.1 2,264

Additional information relating to MTA and the Railroads, including route maps, and organizational and financial information, is available on their consolidated website at www.mta.info.

Proposers should be aware that there are other wireless technology initiatives within the areas served by the Railroads. Metro-North expects to award soon. a license agreement that will provide a distributed antenna system within Grand Central Terminal ("GCT"), the Grand Central Terminal Train Shed, and the Park Avenue Tunnel. As part of that agreement, a license for a distributed antenna system providing wireless telecommunications and WiFi services will be awarded for all of those facilities, with the exception of the Park Avenue Tunnel. Providers of services under that license does not preclude an entity from being a provider of are permitted to provide the services being solicited in this RFP.

Certain portions of the right-of-way on which the Railroads operate are owned by and under the control of Amtrak (LlRR: East River Tunnels and portions of Penn Station) or New Jersey Transit (specifically in New York, the Pascack Valley Line). Use of such right-of-way for installation of equipment and cable may require the consent of Amtrak or New Jersey Transit or other third parties. Certain of the trains and select stations operated by Metro-North are owned by the State of Connecticut (or municipalities in Connecticut) and installation of' equipment on those trains/stations will require the consent of said governmental agencies. In Metro-North's territory, because of the complexity of the system, including overhead catenary electrical systems, buried lines, protected watershed and River view sheds, new WiFi infrastructure/towers along the right-of-way may prove to be very difficult to approve or implement, so alternative approaches should be considered to make the system operable.

(1) Certain of the stations, track and passenger cars are not owned by MT A, MTA Long Island Rail Road or MTA Metro-North Railroad.

(2) The number of revenue passengers is determined in part by ascribing an assumed frequency of use to holders of weekly and monthly commutation tickets.

RFP for Wireless Broadband Services March 12, 2010

Page 5

Page 8: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

Proposed Design

The proposal must document the proposed design and architecture of the system to be used, including a list of materials to be used, software, functionality of each

. module and all the connections between system components. The proposer is not required to disclose confidential intellectual property in the proposal, but should include sufficient information to allow MTA and the Railroads to understand the proposed system and cost inclusive of Railroad labor. All installation plans will be subject to the Railroads' review and approval, and Railroad operational procedures must be adhered to at all times.

Technical Parameters

MTA has reviewed a variety of alternative technological approaches for the provision of on-train WiFi service. As a general matter, MTA is open to the use of any specific technology as long as (1) it meets the minimum functional requirements described herein, (2) the customer amenity that is provided is of sufficient value and has sufficient functional longevity to justify the undertaking, and (3) the installation, operation, maintenance and removal of the associated equipment and appurtenances after license termination does not interfere with the operations of the Railroads.

MTA and the Railroads have defined certain basic technical parameters for the wireless broadband system, while encouraging maximum flexibility and creativity by proposers. The technical parameters set forth below are defined at a summary level. If these technical parameters cannot be met, the proposer should address the reason why, and provide justification for any proposed substitute requirements.

A. Network architecture. Minimize need for equipment installations both on-train, in station, and along right-of-way. The Railroads prefer solutions that require minimal changes and impacts to their network, physical infrastructure and right-of-way.

B. Devices to be supported. Laptops, handheld devices, PDAs, mobile phones and other manned or unmanned devices. The proposed network must support 802.11 b/g/n wireless standards for access to the internet.

C. Bandwidth requirements. Ability to support numerous simultaneous customer users under realistic systems load. conditions. Additional bandwidth for use for Railroad operational applications would be preferred.

D. No Interference. No interference with Railroad equipment or operations.

RFP for Wireless Broadband Services March 12,2010

Page 6

Page 9: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

E. Uninterrupted Service. Uninterrupted service through the service territory.

F. Reliability. Fault tolerance mechanisms to mitigate and/or eliminate single pOints of failure and ensure high reliability.

G. Customer Service. 24x7 end user help desk capabilities.

Relationship with Digital Advertising Initiatives

. The Railroads expect to be actively pursuing the implementation of digital advertising in their stations and on their trains in the future. Digital advertising equipment on trains requires wireless communications (and one of the options for communicating with digital advertising equipment in stations is wireless connectivity). In addition, the installation of digital advertising equipment on a train car requires that the train car be taken out of service for a similar duration as is required for installation of the WiFi network equipment that is the subject of this RFP.

It is probable that the digital advertising equipment on a train car will be able to use the WiFi network that is the subject of this RFP for its wireless communications, thus reducing both cost and the· equipment footprint. In addition, it may be possible for the digital advertising equipment and the WiFi network equipment to be installed simultaneously (co-located), resulting significantly less interference with Railroad operations and achieve program cost s'avings.

If a proposer wants to propose integrating its WiFi network with a digital advertising initiative, such an integrated proposal should be submitted as an alternative proposal accompanying a base proposal for a stand-alone WiFi network.

Proposers should be aware that even if integrated proposals are received, MTA and the Railroads may decide to either (a) amend this RFP to expand it to expressly include digital advertising (in which case revised and/or additional proposals may be solicited from existing and new proposers) or (b) defer solicitation of all digital advertising' initiatives to a later date and/or through a different process.

It should also be noted that CBS Outdoor Group Inc. is the current licensee for advertising on the Railroads' stations and trains. MTA would need to consider how any digital advertising initiative on the Railroads' stations and trains would affect that existing arrangement.

RFP for Wireless Broadband Services March 12. 2010

Page 7

Page 10: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

RFP Response

Proposals must be received by the Project Manager at the above address no later than 5:00 PM EDT on May 17, 2010.

Proposers must provide ten (10) hard copies, together with ten (10) CD ROM discs of the following:

1. A transmittal letter, on the proposer's letterhead, signed by a corporate officer or an authorized agent, identifying the contact person who will be responsible for answering any questions that the MTA or the Railroads may have. Include the telephone numb~r and fax number for such contact person.

2. A check for the $5,000 refundable participation fee, payable to "Metropolitan Transportation Authority".

3. A description of the proposer and its experience:

a. Name, street address, mailing address if different, email address, and telephone and facsimile numbers of the proposer.

b. Year established and state in which the firm was incorporated or otherwise organized.

c. A narrative description and organization chart depicting the management of the proposer's organization and its relationship to any other business entities. For joint ventures, please describe the role of each of the venturers.

d. A description of the overall operations of the proposer, including the number and scope of other similar projects currently ongoing or set to begin in the near future.

e. A narrative description of proposer's relevant prior operating experience.

f. A description of proposer's existing wireless broadband coverage level in each of the Railroad's service area.

g. Any additional information not specifically listed above that demonstrates experience relevant to wireless broadband deployment on trains and/or in railroad stations.

RFP for 'Wireless Broadband Services March 12, 2010

PageS

Page 11: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

4. A description of the implementation being proposed, including descriptions of:

a. Network architecture and radio frequency details.

1. A functional specification, flow diagram and topology layout of the network elements to be deployed.

2. The techno~ogies to be utilized for in-car and station coverage, trackside transport network, backhaul to terrestrial base stations or satellites and backhaul to an internet peering point and their expected evolution in performance over the next five-year period, indicating which standards they are in compliance with and whether the products used will be certified for interoperability.

3. Spectrum bands, modulation techniques and channel width to be used.

4. Bandwidth specifications.

5. How telecommunications provisioning and services will be provided and by whom.

6. Comments on scalability, ease of installation and· maintenance, and adaptability to future technology evolution.

7. How the network will interface with any existing or planned wireless broadband networks currently available in the Railroad environment.

8. Security and encryption features.

b. Design and Installation Plan

1. How architecture and design services will be performed and by whom.

2. How ·program and project management services will be performed and by whom.

3. Proposed design and installation schedule and phasing.

c. Supported Applications.

1. Applications and devices to be supported.

RFP for Wireless Broadband Services March 12,2010

Page 9

Page 12: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

d. Infrastructure.

1 . Equipment to be installed on trains, in stations and along right of way, power and space requirements, regulatory permits required, etc.

2. Electric power requirements.

3. Fiber optic cable requirements.

e. Equipment.

1. Names of suppliers who will provide key equipment and the nature of their commitments to the project.

2. Performance specifications and results in comparable environments.

f. Installation and construction requirements.

1. Means and methods.

2. Utilization of existing infrastructure (such as attachment to existing poles, stations, etc.)

3. Maintenance and emergency accessibility requirements.

4. Who will be performing installation services.

5. How in-train equipment will be installed, including timeframes, and assumptions of who will be performing any labor (including which services are to be. provided by Railroad personnel pursuant to labor agreements).

6. If any wayside installations are required, a description of such installations, how they will be performed, and assumptions of who will be performing any labor (including services to be provided by Railroad personnel).

7. If a systems integrator will be utilized, please identify the company and duties to be performed.

8. Methods to be utilized to ensure that service interruptions are minimized.

RFP for Wireless Broadband Services March 12, 2010

Page 10

Page 13: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

g. Operations

1. How customer service will be provided and by whom..

2. How network monitoring and management services will be performed and by whom.

3. How network maintenance and upgrade services will be performed and by whom.

4. How business and operations support systems (BSS/OSS) services will be performed and by whom.

5. How customer service and technical support services will be performed and by whom.

6. How software hosting and facilities service will be performed and by whom.

7. How customer billing, revenue tracking and compensation to the railroads will be managed and reported.

h. Railroad Utilization of Services

1. Extent, if any, to which the Railroads can utilize the proposer's wireless broadband infrastructure for Railroad operations, including, but not limited to:

i. On-board ticket sales and management of passenger information

ii. Transmission of train diagnostic information iii. Feed for advertising and agency-related communications

i. Cost Estimate

1. A detailed cost estimate shall be provided, specifying cost estimates. for design, equipment, infrastructure, and installation costs, including the cost of. services to be provided by Railroads' personnel

RFP for Wireless Broadband Services March 12. 2010

Page 11

Page 14: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

5. A description of the proposer's commercial offer and plan of financing:

a. Proposer's Commercial Offer to MTA and the Railroads

1. Describe license fees, if any, that will be paid by the proposer to the Railroads for the right to install the equipment and provide the exclusive WiFi services.

2. Describe whether and how fees for services will be charged to the end user and whether the Railroads will share in such revenues.

3. Describe whether the Railroads will be charged for the use of the network for operational or revenue-generating purposes, and if, how such fees would be determined.

4. Describe operational bandwidth and services that will be provided at no cost to the Railroads.

5. Describe any future initiatives, i.e., WiFi / Cellular phones, including projected revenues and compensation to the Railroads for all current and future services;

b. Financing Plan

1. Identify the sources of all required funding and the level of commitment from the funding sources.

c. Marketing Plan

1. Describe the prop'osed marketing plan, including branding and pricing.

6. If desired by the proposer, submission of an alternate proposal integrating its WiFi network with a-digital advertising initiative.

7. If desired by the proposer. a signed copy of the Non-Disclosure Agreement (Exhibit A).

Evaluation and Selection

Based on a review and evaluation of the Proposals, and selection of proposers, as described more fully below, MTA and/or the Railroads may enter into discussions, negotiations and/or agreements with one or more of the proposers

RFP for Wireless Broadband Services March 12. 2010

Page 12

Page 15: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

for the provision of wireless broadband services on some or all of the stations and trains operated by the Railroads.

MTA and the Railroads may at any time disqualify Proposals that, in the sole and absolute discretion of the MTA and the Railroads, fail to comply with the requirements of this RFP or are not considered to be within the range of value justifying further consideration.

MTA and the Railroads will review all Proposals for completeness and compliance with the terms and conditions of this RFP, and may, at this or any other stage of the RFP process, request from any or all of the proposers additional material, clarification, confirmation, or modification of any submitted Proposal, including Proposals' that are incomplete or nonconforming as submitted. Except at the request or with the consent of the MTA (which consent shall be in the sole and absolute discretion of the MTA and the Railroads), proposers will not be unilaterally entitled to change their Proposals once submitted.' .

MTA may req uest some or all of the proposers to make oral presentations of their proposals.

In evaluating the Proposals, MTA and the Railroads will consider such criteria as, in their sole and absolute discretion, they deem to be in the best interests of the MTA.. The criteria listed below are of significant concern to the MTA:

1. Overall value to MTA and the Railroads, taking into consideration:

(a) the benefits of the propos!3d customer amenities;

(b) clear demonstration of financial ability and commitment to undertake the project;

(c) the likelihood that the proposer will perform in accordance with its obligations, including compliance with schedule, reliability and financing requirements, and' proposed financial security for such performance;

(d) any adverse effect on the Railroads during the installation, maintenance and operation of the network, including service interruptions;

(e) the functional longevity of the proposed technology solution;

(f) the quantity, certainty and timing of the proposed financial return to the MTA, if any; and

RFP for Wireless Broadband Services March 12, 2010

Page 13

Page 16: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

(g) the potential for the Railroads to utilize the proposer's wireless broadband infrastructure for Railroad operations and the commercial terms of such utilization.

2. Proposer's experience and competence in the design, installation, operation, management, and marketing of projects of a scale, complexity, and quality similar to that proposed.

3. Compliance with the RFP.

4. Quality of proposer's design, installation and operations teams, including equipment suppliers, with particular focus on key personnel.

5. Proposed time frame for commencement and· completion of each of the elements of the project.

6. Proposer's previous record of performance in business dealings with any municipal, state, or federal agencies, including the MTA.

As stated above, MTA and the Railroads reserve the right to consider criteria other than the foregoing and to assign to each of the above and to such other criteria as are considered such weight as MTA may in its absolute discretion determine.

MTA and the Railroads reserve the right to negotiate any and all terms of any transaction with one or more proposers.

Procurement Lobbying Law Provisions.

This solicitation is subject to New York State Finance Law §§ 139-j and 139-k (the "Lobbying Law Provisions"). For purposes of the Lobbying Law Provisions the Designated Point of Contact is the Project Manager:

George McDonald ([email protected]) Project Manager Metropolitan Transportation Authority Real Estate Department 347 Madison Avenue, 8th Floor New York, New York 10017

Pursuant to the Lobbying Law Provisions, all "Contacts" (which are defined as "any oral, written or electronic communication with a governmental entity under circumstances where a reasonable person would infer that the communication was intended to influence the governmental procurement") during the Restricted Period of this RFP (which commenced on March 12, 2010 and ends on the final

RFP for Wireless Broadband Services March 12,2010

Page 14

Page 17: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

approval of an agreement by the MTA Board) must be made only with the Designated Point of Contact. During such Restricted Period, no Contacts, other than the Permitted Contacts described below and Contacts with the Designated Point of Contact shall be made with any member, officer or employee of MTA or its subsidiaries and affiliates, the State or any other governmental entity .

. There are certain exceptions to this general rule. The following types of Contacts are permitted during the Restricted Period:

1. Proposals: the submission of written Proposals in response to this RFP.

2. Complaints: complaints by a proposer regarding the failure of the Designated Point of Contact to respond in a timely manner to authorized proposer Contacts, provided such complaints are made in writing to the MTA General Counsel. Such written complaints will become a part of the transaction record. Written complaints shall be mailed to:

Metropolitan Transportation Authority 347 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10017 Attention: General Counsel

3. Oral Presentations and Discussions with Proposers: scheduled presentations by a proposer to MTA, the Evaluation Committee or the Selection Committee describing its Proposals and/or scheduled discussion by MTA or the Selection Committee with proposers.

4. Negotiations: After a proposer has. been preliminarily designated, communications between that proposer and MTA for the purposes of negotiation.

5. Review of Award: Following award to another proposer, a proposer's request to the Designated Point of Contact for a review of the award.

6. Protests and Complaints: (a) contacts by proposers in protests, appeals or other review proceedings (including the apparent successful proposer and his or her representatives) before the MTA seeking a final administrative determination, or in a subsequent judicial proceeding; or (b) complaints of alleged improper conduct in this transaction to the New York Attorney General, MTA Inspector General, a district attorney, or a court of competent jurisdiction, and where such communications and any responses thereto are made in writing and shall be entered in the transaction record pursuant to section one hundred sixty-three of the state finance law; or (c) complaints of alleged improper conduct in this RFP process. All protest and complaint contacts to MTA or the Railroads must be made directly to the General Counsel of MT A at:

RFP for Wireless Broadband Services March 12,2010

Page 15

Page 18: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

Metropolitan Transportation Authority 347 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10017 Attention: General Counsel

Protests and complaints made to MTA Board members, officials, employees (other than the Project Manager, the General Counsel and any other persons expressly declared by MT A to be designated points of contact for this RFP) or consultants of MTA or any of its affiliates or subsidiaries, the State of New York or any other governmental entity shall be considered an impermissible Contact.

A finding that a proposer has knowingly and willfully violated the limitation on' the Contacts rule will result in a determination of non-responsibility for such proposer, and MTA will not enter into an agreement with such proposer and its subsidiaries, and any related or successor entity with substantially similar function, management, board of directors, officers and shareholders, unless MTA finds that such designation is necessary to protect public property or public health or safety, and that the proposer is the only source capable of supplying the required article of procurement within the necessary timeframe, provided, that, MTA is required to include in the procurement record a statement describing the basis for such a finding.

The Lobbying Law Provisions require MTA to obtain specific information regarding prior non-responsibility determinations relating to each proposer. This information must be collected in addition to the information that is separately obtained pursuant to New York State Finance Law §163(9). The information required to be disclosed is set forth in the Disclosure of Prior Non-Responsibility Determinations Form (Exhibit B, Form 1) which must be completed by proposer and submitted with its Proposal. The Lobbying Law Provisions also require that each proposer affirm and certify as to its compliance with the Lobbying Law Provisions. The required Affirmation and Certification Form (Exhibit B, Form 2) and must be completed by proposer and submitted with its Proposal.

EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY AUTHORIZED BY THE PROJECT MANAGER (see p. 2) OR AS OTHERWISE EXPRESSLY AUTHORIZED BY NEW YORK STATE FINANCE LAW §§ 139-J AND 139-K, DURING THE "RESTRICTED PERIOD" OF THIS SOLICITATION, NEITHER PROPOSERS, NOR ANY EMPLOYEE, AGENT OR CONSULTANT OR PERSON ACTING ON BEHALF OF PROPOSERS, MAY "CONTACT" BOARD MEMBERS, OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES (OTHER THAN THE PROJECT MANAGER AND ANY OTHER PERSONS EXPRESSLY DECLARED BY MTA TO BE DESIGNATED POINTS OF CONTACT FOR THIS RFP) OR CONSULTANTS OF MTA OR ANY OF ITS AFFILIATES OR SUBSIDIARIES, THE STATE OF NEW YORK OR ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL ENTITY REGARDING THIS RFP AND RELATED MATTERS. FAILURE TO OBSERVE THIS REQUIREMENT MAY RESULT IN

RFP for Wireless Broadband Services March 12,2010

Page 16

Page 19: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

THE PROPOSER'S DISQUALIFICATION FROM CONSIDERATION PURSUANT TO THIS RFP. THE TERMS "CONTACT" AND "RESTRICTED PERIOD" ARE DEFINED IN NEW YORK STATE FINANCE LAW §§ 139-J AND 139-K AND THOSE "CONTACTS" THAT ARE CONSIDERED TO BE IMPERMISSIBLE ARE DESCRIBED THEREIN.

General Matters

Requests for clarification concerning this RFP should be made by mail or email to the Project Manager at the above address. Neither the Project Manager nor any other employee of the MTA, or the Railroads, is authorized to give interpretations of this RFP or additional information regarding the requirements of this RFP directly to individual proposers. Interpretations or additional information with respect to this RFP, if provided, will be communicated to all registered proposers by email or written addenda.

Neither MTA nor the Railroads will be responsible for any costs or expenses incurred in preparing and submitting information in response to this RFP. The MTA and the Railroads assume no contractual or other obligations as a result of the issuance of this RFP, the preparation or submission of materials by a proposer, the evaluation of materials, the proposers conducting of presentations, or the selection of any proposer. There may be no claims whatsoever for reimbursement from the MTA or the Railroads or any of their consultant~ or agents for such costs.

If proposers desire their submission to be subject to the terms of a Non­Disclosure Agreement, MTA and the Railroads are willing to enter into the Non­Disclosure Agreement set forth as Exhibit A. Subject to the terms of that Non­Disclosure Agreement, MTA and the Railroads shall be entitled to retain and use, without compensation to any party responding to this RFP, all information submitted, including but not limited to any concept, element or idea (including financial plans and ownership structures) disclosed 'in or evident from the foregoing or which may be revealed during any communications with proposers. Public access to material submitted by proposers in response to this RFP shall be governed by the relevant provisions of the Freedom of Information Law, which constitutes Article 6 of the New York State Public Officers Law ("FOIL"), and regulations adopted pursuant thereto. If any proposer submits information that it believes to be a trade secret or otherwise exempt from disclosure under FOIL, it must specifically identify such information and state in writing the reasons why the information should be exempt from disclosure.

The MT A and the Railroads will not pay for or refund any costs and expenses incurred by a proposer in responding to this RFP.

RFP for Wireless Broadband Services March 12, 2010

Page 17

Page 20: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

The MTA and the Railroads reserve the right, at any time, in their sole and absolute discretion and without liability, to (a) accept or reject any or all Proposals, (b) withdraw this RFP without notice, (c) use the Proposals as a basis for negotiation with one or more proposers and/or with parties other than those responding to this RFP and/or on terms other than those set forth herein, including to enter into definitive agreements for the deployment of one or more wireless broadband networks without undertaking any further solicitation process, or (d) waive compliance with and/or change any of the terms of this RFP.

Under no circumstances will the MTA and the Railroads be liable for any costs and expen~es associated with the. preparation, clarification, submission, or negotiation of submissions submitted in response to this RFP.

This RFP does not constitute an offer to sell, lease or license any property of MTA or the Railroads. None of the MTA, the Railroads, or any a'ffiliate or subsidiary of any of the foregoing. shall incur any obligation or liability on account of any submission made in connection with this RFP unless and until an agreement setting forth all the terms and conditions of a transaction has been fully negotiated and a written agreement incorporating such terms and conditions has been fully executed and unconditionally delivered by all the parties thereto and all necessary consents and approvals have been obtained including. without limitation, approval of such written agreement by the MTA Board.

MTA and the Railroads make no representations or warranties whatsoever with respect to this RFP, including, without limitation, representations or warranties as to the accuracy or completeness of any information or assumptions contained in this RFP or otherwise furnished to proposers; the ridership of the Railroads; the suitability of the Railroads' facilities for the implementation of wireless broadband service; and any environmental conditions existing on the property of the Railroads. proposers shall make their own analysis and evaluation of the income potential and profits and expense of any wireless broadband deployment,as well as the physical condition, operation, layout, size, systems and integrity of the Railroads' facilities, and proposers shall not rely upon any statement or information given to proposers by the MTA or the Railroads, including without limitation, any information contained in this RFP or in any other documents cited in this RFP or made available during this RFP process.

RFP for Wireless Broadband Services March 12.2010

Page 18

Page 21: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

MINORITY AND WOMEN-OWNED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE

It is the policy of the MT A that Minority and Women-owned Business Enterprises (MIWBEs) shall have the maximum opportunity to participate in the performance of this engagement. The proposer shall describe in detail past participation of MIWBE firms on recently completed projects.

The proposer must indicate whether its team will include MIWBE participation. The proposer shall describe in detail how MIWBE firms will be utilized on the proposed wide scale wireless broadband implementation.

RFP for Wireless Broadband Services March 12,2010

Page 19

Page 22: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

EXHIBIT A: Form of Non-Disclosure Agreement

RECIPROCAL NON-DISCLOSURE AND CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT

1. This Reciprocal Non-Disclosure and Confidentiality Agreement (the . "Agreement") is made and entered into as of the day of 2009 by, between and among [Proposer], a [corporation], and its affiliates and subsidiaries (collectively, "Proposer") having its principal place of business at [ADDRESS] and the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, a New York public benefit corporation, its subsidiaries Long Island Rail Road and Metro-North Commuter Rail Road Company (collectively, "MTA"), having its principal place of business at 347 Madison Avenue; Real Estate, 8th floor, New York, NY 10017. Proposer and MTA shall hereinafter collectively be referred to as the "Partiesfl and individually as the "Party".

2. The Parties desire to discuss certain business transactions and to exchange information for the purpose of exploring a potential business relationship regarding the deployment of a wireless broadband network on the MT A's trains and in the MTA's stations ("Purpose"). In order to facilitate these discussions and in order for the Parties to receive from each other, either orally or in writing, certain technical and business information. under terms that will protect the confidential and proprietary nature of such information, the Parties have entered into this Agreement. For purposes herein, any confidential technical or business information of third persons furnished or disclosed confidentially, as set forth herein, by one Party to the other shall be deemed the disclosing Party's information and, accordingly, shall be subject to t4e terms and conditions of this Agreement.

3. Each Party may find it beneficial to disclose to the other Party certain information that may include, but is not limited to, trade secrets, discoveries, ideas, concepts, know-how, techniques, designs, specifications, drawings, maps, blueprints, diagrams, flow and other technical, financial or business information (the "Information"). Such Information, which is provided in written, encoded, graphic, or other tangible form shall be deemed to be confidential and proprietary if it is clearly marked confidential. If the Information is provided orally, it shall be deemed to be confidential and proprietary if it is so identified by the disclosing Party at the time of such disclosure. Either Party may confirm, within five (5) days of making oral confidential statements, that such information was confidential and proprietary. The Information disclosed as set forth above shall be deemed "Confidential Information."

4. The Parties agree that they shall hold such Confidential Information in confidence, with the same care a Party uses for its own Confidential Information, which, in no event shall be less than a reasonable standard of care, and shall use same solely for the Purpose, and further agree that they shall not make disclosure of any such Confidential Information to anyone except those employees and consultants necessary to review such Confidential Information. Prior to providing the Confidential Information to any consultant, a Party will ensure that a nondisclosure agreement or an agreement with similar protections, is in place with each consultant that is substantially similar to this Agreement. Prior to providing the Confidential Information, each employee or

RFP for Wireless Broadband Services March 12.2010

Page 20

Page 23: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

consultant to whom such disclosure is to be made, shall be notified that such Confidential Information is received in confidence and shall be kept in confidence by such employee or consultant as set forth in this Agreement. In the event such Confidential Information must be disclosed by either Party to third persons for the Purpose, each Party shall, prior to such disclosure, obtain written consent from the other Party and obtain from the third person a written agreement regarding confidentiality of the Confidential Information, the terms of which shall be substantially similar to those contained herein.

5. The obligation of non-disclosure and confidentiality shall not apply to any Confidential Information: (a) previously known to either Party free of any obligation to keep it confidential; (b) that has been or which becomes publicly known, through no wrongful act of either Party; ( c) which is rightfully received from a third party who is under no obligation of confidence to either Party; (d) which is independently developed by the recipient Party without resort to the Confidential Information that has been disclosed pursuant to this Agreement; or ( e) which MT A determines is required to be disclosed in order to comply with applicable law or regulation (including without limitation, the New York Freedom of Information Law) or with any requirement imposed by judicial or administrative process, or any governmental or court order but only to the extent required and, provided that the recipient Party in each such instance before making such disclosure first: 0) promptly notifies the other Party of a required disclosure upon receipt of a governmental or court order or upon receipt of a request for disclosure under the New York Freedom of Information Law, and Oi) cooperates with the other Party in making, if available under applicable law, a good faith effort to obtain a protective order or other appropriate determination against, or limiting disclosure or· use of the Confidential Information, at no cost to the recipient Party.

6. All Confidential Information shall remain the exclusive property of the disclosing Party. The disclosure of Confidential Information by the disclosing Party shall not constitute an express or implied grant to the recipient Party, of any rights to or under the disclosing Party's patents, copyrights, trade secrets, trademarks or any other intellectual property rights. All Confidential Information shall be returned to the disclosing Party upon written request. In the event the Parties decide not to enter into a business relationship regarding the subject matter hereof, then all such disclosed Confidential Information shall be returned to the Party who provided such Confidential Information upon request. Notwithstanding the foregoing, MT A shall have no obligation to return any Confidential Information provided to it by Proposer as part of Proposer's response to MTA'sRequest for Proposals, provided however, that MTA shall continue to have the obligation to protect the confidentiality of such Confidential Information pursuant to the terms hereof.

7. Neither this Agreement, nor any rights hereunder, in whole or in part, shall be assignable or otherwise transferable by either Party and the obligations contained in this Agreement shall survive and continue for a period of five (5) years from the date of this Agreement, except if the Parties agree to incorporate this Agreement by reference into a business agreement or contract as contemplated by the Purpose, in which case notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, the obligations contained in this Agreement shall then continue and survive from the date of initial disclosure of

RFP for Wireless Broadband Services March 12. 2010

Page 21

Page 24: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

Confidential Information through the term of such business agreement or 'contract and after its expiration.

8. This Agreement shall be governed by and constituted and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of New York without regards to conflicts of law. Failure to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of any other term hereof.

9. The recipient Party acknowledges that remedies at law may be inadequate to protect the disclosing Party against any actual or threatened breach of this Agreement by the recipient Party or by its representatives and, without prejudice to any other rights and remedies otherwise available to the disclosing Party, the recipient Party agrees to allow the seeking of injunctive or other equitable relief in the disclosing Party's favor, without the requirement of providing proof ofactual damages.

10. This Agreement contains the sole and entire agreement between the Parties related to the disclosure of Confidential Information with respect to the Purpose. This Agreement may only be modified in a writing executed by both Parties. Should any provision of this Agreement be deemed illegal or otherwise unenforceable, that provision shall be severed and the remainder of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

11. This Agreement shall not create, nor will it create an obligation to form a joint venture, partnership or other formal business relationship of any kind nor will it prohibit either Party from engaging in similar discussions with a similar Purpose, with any other third party.

12. If a legal action between or among any Parties arises from this Agreement or the conduct of any Party with respect to any disclosing Party's Confidential Information, a prevailing Party shall recover from the other Party or parties to the action its reasonable attorney fees and costs of suit.

13. This Agreement may be executed by facsimile and in counterparts.

IN WITNESS HEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the date and year written above.

[RESPONDENT]

Name: Title:

METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

Name: Title:

RFP for Wireless Broadband Services March 12, 2010

Page 22

Page 25: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

EXHIBIT B, FORM 1

NEW YORK STATE FINANCE LAW SECTIONS 139-j and 139-k CERTIFICATION

General Information

All procurements (which are defined to include entering into license agreements) by the MTA in excess of $15,000 annually are subject to New York State's State Finance Law Sections 139-j and 139-k, effective January 1, 2006 (the "Procurement Lobbying Law').

Pursuant to the Procurement Lobbying Law, all "contacts" (defined as oral, written or electronic communications with the MTA intended to influence a procurement) during a procurement must be made with one or more designated Point(s) of Contact only. Exceptions to this rule include written questions during the bid/proposal process, communications with regard to protests, contract negotiations and RFP conference participation. Nothing in the Procurement Lobbying Law inhibits any rights to make an appeal, protest or complaint under existing administrative or judicial procedures.

Violations of the policy regarding permissible contacts must be reported to the appropriate MTA officer and investigated accordingly. The first violation may result in a determination of non-responsibility and ineligibility for award to the violator and its subsidiaries, affiliates and related entities. The penalty for a second violation within four (4) years is ineligibility for bidding/proposing on a procurement and/or ineligibility from being awarded any contract for a period of four (4) years. The MTA will notify the New York State Office of General Services ("OGS") of any determinations of non-responsibility or debarments due to violations of the Procurement Lobbying Law. Violations found to be "knowing and willful" must be reported to the MT A Executive Director and OGS.

Moreover, the statutes require the MTA to obtain certain affirmations and certifications from bidders and proposers. This Certification contains the forms with which to comply, together with additional information and instructions.

RFP for Wireless Broadband Services March 12,2010

Page 23

Page 26: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

Instructions New York State Finance Law §139-k (2) obligates the MTA to obtain specific information regarding prior non-responsibility determinations. This information must be collected in addition to the information that is separately obtained pursuant to New York State Finance Law §139-k, an offerer must be asked to disclose whether there has been a finding of non-responsibility made within the previous four (4) years by any governmental entity due to: (a) a violation of New York State Finance Law § 139-j or (b) the intentional provision of false or incomplete information' to a governmental entity.

As part of its responsibility determination, New York State Finance Law § 139-k(3) mandates consideration of whether an offerer fails to timely disclose accurate or complete information regarding the above non-responsibility determination. In accordance with law, no procurement contract shall be awarded to any offerer that fails to timely disclose accurate or complete information under this section, unless the factual elements of the limited waiver provision can be satisfied on the written record.

RFP for Wireless Broadband Services March 12, 2010

Page 24

Page 27: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

Disclosure of Prior Non-Responsibility Determinations

Name of Proposer:________________________

Address:

Name and Title of Person Submitting this Form:

Has any governmental entity1 made a finding of non-responsibility regarding the Proposer or any Affiliate thereof in the previous four years? DYes DNo

If yes: Was the basis for such finding of the non-responsibility due to a violation of State Finance Law §139-j? DYes DNo

Was the basis for such finding of non-responsibility due to the intentional provision of false or incomplete information to a governmental entity? DYes [lNo

If yes, please provide details regarding the finding of non-responsibility below.

Governmental Entity: _______________

Year of Finding of Non-Responsibility: ____________

Basis of Finding of Non-Responsibility:

(Add additional pages as necessary)

Has any governmental entity terminated a procurement contract with the Proposer or any Affiliate thereof due to the intentional provision cif false or incomplete information? DYes DNo

A "governmental entity" is: (1) any department, board, bureau, commission, division, office, council, committee or officer of New York State, whether permanent or temporary; (2) each house of the New York State Legislature; (3) the unified court system; (4) any public authority, public benefit corporation or commission created by or existing pursuant to the public authorities law; (5) any public authority or public benefit corporation, at least one of whose members is appointed by the governor or who serves as a member by virtue of holding a civil office of the state; (6) a municipal agency, as that term is defined in paragraph (ii) of subdivision(s) of section one-c of the Legislative Law; or (7) a subsidiary or affiliate of such a public authority. (SFL §139-j, paragraph 1.a.)

RFP for Wireless Broadband Services March 12,2010

Page 25

1

Page 28: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

EXHIBIT B, FORM 2

NEW YORK STATE FINANCE LAW SECTIONS 139-; and 139-k CERTIFICATION

Proposer's Affirmation and Certification

By signing below, the undersigned:

a) Affirms that the Proposer understands and agrees to comply with the policy regarding permissible contacts in accordance with New York State Finance Law Sections 139-j and 139-k.

b) Certifies that all information provided to the MT A with respect to New York State Finance Law §139-j and §139-k is complete, true and accurate.

Name of Proposer:._____________________

Authorized Signature: ____________________

Name of Authorized Signatory : ________________

Title:_________________________

Date: ______________

MTA's Right to Terminate:

The MTA and the Railroads reserve the right to terminate the future agreement among MTA, the Railroads and the Proposer in the event it is found that the foregoing certification, in accordance with New York State Finance Law § 139-k. was intentionally false or intentionally incomplete. Upon such finding, the MTA and the Railroads may exercise their termination right by providing written notification to the Proposer in accordance with the written notification terms of such agreement.

RFP for Wireless Broadband Services March 12, 2010

Page 26

Page 29: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

EXHIBITC

LIRR Wireless Broadband Proof of Concept Parameters

Below are the minimum requirements to conduct WiFi technical evaluation installations on LIRR trains:

• The technical evaluation to be conducted on a train of select test car(s) specified by LIRR Maintenance of Equipment (MOE) departments will specify and oversee the wireless access point installation on board our trains. Demonstrate that the necessary WiFi equipment can be installed on LIRR passenger rail cars without interfering with the LIRR rail operations. Show how the installation of WiFi equipment on LIRR passenger train equipment can be carried out under current LIRR and labor rules. LIRR prefers temporary on-train antenna or other system component installations.

• The technical evaluations ~e to be conducted over a minimum track length specified by LIRR and where trains can achieve a rate of speed of at least 60 MPH.

• The network within each car is to provide a WiFi hotspot in the 2.4 GHz range (IEEE 802.11 b / g / n standards based).

• Commonly available handsets such as Palm, Blackberry, smart phones and others must be able to access and maintain the WiFi Internet connection.

• If your proposed technical evaluation requires way-side equipment, details are to be provided (describe what is required, including electric power, poles or other structure attachments, etc.). Provide detailed description of potential trackside locations. Show how the trackside construction process can operate under current LIRR work and labor rules. All equipment and way side infrastructure will be provided by the proposer. Prefer adjacent to ROW antenna site installation where possible. Where ROW antenna installation is necessary the installation should be temporary.

• Describe in detail all system components (from the backhaul connections to train devices) including access point servers, power sources/options and cabling or construction requirement.

• Provide requirements-for ROW signal strength testing. IfROW surveying is required, proper safety certification is required.

• Outline installation timeframe and step-by-step timeline/duration of technical evaluation.

• Demonstrate how the Service Provider's Network Operations function will be able to monitor the on train WiFi network.

• Acceptance test plans must be developed and approved by LIRR. • Technical evaluation should require very little or no infrastructure support from

LIRR resources (i.e. power, facilities, poleline mounting space etc.). If support is required it must be clearly defined up-front and subject to LIRR approval and associated costs.

• LIRR may consider third party installations, subject to our labor rules.

RFP for Wireless Broadband Services March 12, 2010

Page 27

Page 30: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

• All associated costs for any technical evaluation installations including LIRR support labor are to be the responsibility of the Service Provider.

The basic methodology for technical evaluation is expected to be as follows:

a. Maintain an internet connection on a moving train for the defined distance. b. In a static test environment, prove that WiFi coverage is feasible on LIRR

passenger car models and forms such that the signal adequately propagates. c. Prove that the WiFi signal does not adversely impact passenger car "on train

systems". d. Show that the WiFi signals will not adversely impact LIRR trackside

communications and systems currently in place. e. Collect and share data with respect to installation ease, time durations, manpower

& material used. f. Demonstrate to LIRR how the Service Provider would rectify future interference

issues that impact on / off-board Communications & Signal systems after the proposed WiFi system is deployed and in operation.

g. Demonstrate that WiFi eqqipment can be adapted to the LIRR's infrastructure and applicable operating environment.

h. Demonstrate that a sufficient number of users on a single car using standard internet applications (such as Google, Facebook, iTunes) can use the WiFi service, and complete an analysis of their service levels.

1. Measure the total available bandwidth per passenger railcar and complete an analysis ofassumptive usage patterns.

J. Demonstrate that the necessary WiFi equipment can be installed trackside with minimal interference to the LIRR's rail operations.

k. Test and demonstrate pre-agreed maintenance practices for a variety of scenarios covering both trackside and on train equipment.

l. Measure. footage between devices, station structures, height and distance of attachment options from railroad tracks.

m. Conduct acceptance tests. n. Obtain customer feedback through research (surveys or focus groups). Funds for

the research should be provided by the Service Provider, while the project Will be organized and supervised by MTA and LIRR research staff.

o. WiFi equipment installed for testing must not interfere with plain sight and physical access to electric breakers, switches or any equipment utilized by transportation service employees for operations and/or trouble shooting.

p. Employees contracted for the installation and maintenance of WiFi equipment must identify themselves to LIRR crew members and advise if their duties require access to onboard facilitiesllockers.

q. LIRR Transportation Services must be notified of WiFi equipped train cars. r. A description of WiFi related enclosures and apparatus including locations. s~ Electronic means of disabling WiFi access within the operating compartments of

LIRR train cars.

RFP for Wireless Broadband Services March 12,2010

Page 28

Page 31: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

EXHIBITD

Metro-North Wireless Broadband Proof of Concept Parameters

Below are the minimum requirements to conduct WiFi technical evaluation installations on Metro-North trains and stations:

• The technical evaluation installations are to be operational for at least 1 - 2 months.

• The technical evaluation to be conducted on a train of select test car(s) specified by Metro-North

• All associated costs for any technical evaluation installations including Metro- . North support labor are to be the responsibility of the WiFi service provider. Metro-North may consider third party installations, subject to our labor rules.

• The technical evaluations are to be conducted over a minimum track length specified by Metro-North and where trains can achieve a rate of speed of at least 60 MPH.

• The network within each car is to provide a WiFi hotspot in the 2.4 GHz range (IEEE 802.11 bIg I n standards based).

• Commonly available handsets such as Palm, Blackberry, smart phones and others must be able to access and maintain the WiFi Internet connection.

• If your proposed technical evaluation requires way-side equipment, details are to be provided (describe what is required, including electric power, poles or other structure attachments, etc.) All equipment and way side infrastructure will be provided by AT&T.

• At the discretion of Metro-North, select stations may be equipped with (1 ) Access Points that will communicate with train roof mounted antennas and provide wide band services while train is stationary in-station and Metro-North may wish to see a fixed display of integrated in-station train information I promotional information on LCD station screen(s) (placed in vandal proof casing).

• Describe the Service Provider's Network Operations Center (NOC) that will support the technical evaluation, including location, functions, etc.

• Feasibility of test area to include ParkAvenue Tunnels. • Must test for potential interference with existing on board RF systems and other

Metro-North communications and operating systems. • Need to provide a Professional Engineer with expertise to conduct external

testing.

The basic methodology for proof of concept evaluation is expected to be as follows:

1. Technical evaluations: Involves an end-to-end test checking throughput data rate and other parameters (web access, different frequency bands, interference etc) .

. RFP for Wireless Broadband Services March 12. 2010

Page 29

Page 32: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

2. Users I testers during the technical evaluation period will be representatives of MT AlMetro-North and/or railroad passengers with WiFi enabled handsets to test (applications such as email, web surf, sports, stock-watch and news headlines). Need to provide what is the degradation of many users: Provide outline in detail of technical bandwidth being proposed and minimum levels to be provided.

3. Business trials: Based on the theme oflook and feel ofequipment, advertising, branding arrangements and others criteria that must be discussed.

(a) The Service Provider to absorb all technical evaluation run costs including railroad flagging and force account expenses.

(b) Installation and alteration work to railroad cars and right-of-way are to be as limited as possible with as low impact upon the railroad resources as possible.

(c) A time line for the project implelIlentation of the technical evaluation once approved by the MTA and Metro-North.

All associated costs for the technical evaluation, including LIRR and Metro­North flagging and other force account costs will be the sole responsibility of the Service Provider.

RFP for Wireless Broadband Services March 12, 2010

Page 30

Page 33: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

MTA METRO-NORTH RAILROAD

PASSENGER COUNTS

2007

Page 34: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

,

TABLE 1 2007 INBOUND STATION BOARDINGS SUMMARY (I)

I) WEEKDAY

LINE

AM

PEAK

WEEKDAY

OFF PEAK

TOTAL

WEEKDAY

Hudson Line

Harlem Line

New Haven Line

18,132

28,002

39,199

7,347

17,169

22,807

25,479

45,171

62,006

TOTAL EAST OF HUDSON 85,333 47,323 132,656

Port Jervis Line ,

Pascack Valley Line

2,131

800

408··

35

2,539

835

TOTAL WEST OF HUDSON 2,931 443 3,374

METRO NORTH TOTAL 88,264 47,766 136,030

II) WEEKEND

LINE SATURDAY SUNDAY

TOTAL

WEEKEND

Hudson Line

Harlem Line

New Haven Line

11,287

17,353

28,066

9,255

13,463

21,372

10,542

30,816

49,438

TOTAL EAST OF HUDSON 56,706 44,090 100,796

Port Jervis Line

Pascack Valley Line

446

122

444

123

890

245

TOTAL WEST OF HUDSON 568 567 1,135

METRO NORTH TOTAL 57;1.74 44,657 101,931

(l) Calculated by factoring the most recent on/off counts for each line to reflect 2007 ridership, based on

ticket sales data. Totals include transfers.

Page 35: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

TABLE 2 2007 WEEKDAY INBOUND RIDERSHIP BY LINE SEGMENT (I).

HARLEM, HUDSON AND NEW HAVEN LINES

WEEKDAYAM TOTAL

LINE/SEGMENT PEAK OFF PEAK WE.EKDAY

HUDSON LINE

Lower Hudson 12,017 4,978 16,995

Upper Hudson 6,115 2,369 8,484

18,132 7,347 25,479TOTAL HUDSON LINE

HARLEM LINE

Lower Harlem 18,810 12,274 31,084

Upper Harlem 8,674 4,442 13, I 16

Dover Plains/Wassaic 518 453 971

28,002 17,169 45,171TOTAL HARLEM LINE

NEW HAYEN LINE

Inner New Haven 20,558 15,011 35,569

Outer New Haven 15,520 7,03\ 22,551

New Canaan Branch 4871,969 2,456

Danbury Branch \ ,021 131 1,152

Waterbury Branch 147 278131

39,199TOTAL NEW HAVEN LINE 62,00622,807 = 85,333 47,323METRO NORTH TOTAL 132,656

(I) Calculaled byfaclOring the most recent on/offcounlsfor each line lO reflect 2007 ridership, based on

ticket sales data. Totals include transfers.

Page 36: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

TABLE 3 2007 WEEKEND INBOUND RIDERSHIP BY LINE SEGMENT (I)

HARLEM, HUDSON AND NEW HAVEN LINES

TOTAL

LINE/SEGMENT SATURDAY SUNDAY WEEKEND

HUDSON LINE

Lower Hudson 6,076 4,884 10,960

Upper Hudson 5,211 4,371 9,582

TOTAL HUDSON LINE 11,287 9,255 20,542

HARLEM LINE

Lower Harlem 11,427 7,800 19,227

Upper Harlem 5,385 4,878 10,263

Dover Plains/Wassaic 541 785 1,326

TOTAL HARLEM LINE 17,353 13,463 30,816

NEW HAVEN LINE

Inner New Haven 14,944 10,518 25,462

Outer New Haven 12,150 9,714 21,864

New Canaan Branch 475 538 1,013

Danbury Branch 238 260 498

Waterbury Branch 259 342 601

TOTAL NEW HA VEN LINE 28,066 21,372 49,438

METRO NORTH TOTAL 56,706 44,090 100,796

(I) Calculated by factoring the most recent on/offcounts for each line 10 reflect 2007 ridership, based on

ticket sales data. Totals include transJers.

Page 37: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

TABLE 4

2007 HUDSON LINE WEEKDAY INBOUND STATION BOARDINGS(I)

STATION

AM

PEAK

WEEKDAY

OFF PEAK

TOTAL

WEEKDAY

Poughkeepsie 982 782 1,764

New Hamburg

Beacon

851

1,860

247

568

1,098 2,428

Cold Spring

Garrison

307

262

12J

79

428

341

Peekskill

Cortlandt

1,061

792

428

144

1,489

936 Croton-Harmon (2)

Ossining

Scarborough

Philipse Manor

Tarrytown

2,661

975 742

238 1,760

924

534

123 48

1,123

3,585

1,509

865 286

2,883

Irvington

Ar~sley-on-Hudson

Dobbs Ferry

Hastings-on-Hudson

630 186

810

831

308

134

376

303

938 320

1,186

1,134

Greystone

Glenwood

Yonkers

Ludlow

369

237

631

174

124

96 470

91

493

333

1,101

265

Riverdale

Spuyten Duyvil

Marble Hill

University Heights

Morris Heights

627

933 124

22

47

95

131

51

5

25

722

1,064

175

27

72

Harlem-I 25th Street 20 17 37

TOTAL HUDSON LINE 18,132 7,347 25,479

(I) Calculated byjac/oring 2006 On/OffCounts based on ficket sales data 10 reflect 2007 ridership In·els.

(2) Station totals include transfers.

Page 38: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

TABLES

2007 HUDSON LINE WEEKEND INBOUND STATION BOARDINGS (I)

STATION SATURDAY SUNDAY TOTAL

WEEKEND

Poughkeepsie 1,742 1,589 3,331

New Hamburg 484 366 850

Beacon 1,404 1,075 2,479

Breakneck Ridge II 6 17

Cold Spring 418 376 794

Garrison 268 207 475

Manitou 3 5 8

Peekskill 716 612 1,328

Cortlandt 165 135 300

Croton-Harmon (2) 1,275 974 2,249

Ossining 689 684 1,373

Scarborough 135 98 233

Philipse Manor 42 48 90

Tarrytown 1,427 1,079 2,506

Irvington 212 212 424

Ardsley-on-Hudson 116 45 161

Dobbs Ferry 415 386 801

Hastings-on-H udson 403 273 676

Greystone 122 71 193

Glenwood 165 142 307

Yonkers 551 489 1,040

Ludlow 105 70 175

Riverdale 136 89 225

Spuyten Duyvil 164 140 304

Marble Hill 79 38 117

University Heights 7 8 15

Morris Heights 29 29 . 58

Harlem-125th Street 4 -

9­ 13

ITOTAL HUDSON LINE 11,287 9,255 20,542

(I) Calculated by jactoring 2006 On/OffCounts based on ticket sales data to reflect 2007 ridership levels_

(2) Station totals include transfers_

Page 39: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

TA8LE 5

2007 HARLEM LINE WEEKDAY IN80UND ST A nON 80ARDINGS (1)

STATION

AM

PEAK

WEEKDAY

OFF PEAK

TOTAL

WEEKDAY

Wassaic

Tenmile River

67

9

245

13

312

22

Dover Plains

Harlem Valley-Wingdale

82

78

49

41

131

119

IPawling

IPatterson

197

85

58

47

255

132

Southeast (2) 969 730 1,699

Brewster 781 486 1,267

Croton Falls 414 177 591

Purdys 436 125 561

Goldens Bridge 814 222 1,036

Katonah 814 444 1,258

Bedford Hills 428 298 726

Mount Kisco 900 647 . 1,547

Chappaqua 1,605 517 2,122

Pleasantville 618 420 1,038

Hawthorne 596 257 853

Valhalla 299 119 418

North White Plains (2) 1,468 956 2,424

White Plains (2) 3,653 5,632 9,285

Hartsdale 2,153 662 2,815

Scarsdale 2,992 1,321 .4,313

Crestwood 1,393 398 1,791

Tuckahoe 1,032 393 1,425

Bronxville 2,119 991 3,110

Fleetwood 1,700 568 2,268

Mount Vernon West (2) 793 308 1,101

Wakefield 312 82 394

Woodlawn 720 272 992

Williams Bridge 133 46 179

Botanical Garden 145 146 291

Fordham 170 446 616

Tremont 9 7 16

Melrose 9 I 10

Harlem-I 25th Street 9 45 54

ITOTAL HARLEM LINE 28,002 17,169 45,111

(I) Calculated by jOctoring 2005 OnlOjJCounts based on ticket safes data to reflect 2007 ridership levels.

(2) Station totals include transfers.

Page 40: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

TABLE 9

2007 HARLEM LINE WEEKEND INBOUND STATION BOARDlNG~ (1 )

.

STATION SATURDAY SUNDAY

TOTAL

WEEKEND

Wassaic

Tenmile River

226

23

365

50

591

7J

Dover Plains

Harlem Valley-Wingdale

109

61

131

99

.240

160

Appalachian Trail

Pawling

Patterson

4

80

38

0

\09

31

4

189

69

Southeast (2) 1,001 1,051 2,052

Brewster 608 682 1,290

Croton Falls 283 205 488

Purdys 172 98 270

Goldens Bridge 258 234 492

Katonah 580 492 1,072

Bedford Hills 345 377 722

Mount Kisco 743 710 1,453

Chappaqua 560 415 975

Pleasantville 474 333 807

Hawthorne 244 195 439

Mount Pleasant 10 6 16

Valhalla 107 80 187

North White Plains (2) 801 607 1,408

White Plains (2) 4,339 3,1 13 7,452

Hartsdale 756 446 1,202

Scarsdale J,169 820 1,989

Crestwood 455 242 697

Tuckahoe 461 277 738

Bronxville 1,075 716 1,791

Fleetwood 738 505 1,243

Mount Vernon West (2) 383 218 601

Wakefield 143 80 223

Woodlawn 446 284 730

Williams Bridge 76 53 129

Botanical Garden 220 209 429

Fordham 324 207 531

Tremont I I 2

Melrose I 3 4

Harlem-I 25th Street 39 19 58

TOTAL HARLEM LINE 17,353 13,463 30,816 .

(/) Calculated by factoring 2005 OnlOjJCounts based on ticket sales data to reflect 2007 ridership leve/s.

(2) Station totals include transfers.

Page 41: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

· .

TABLE6 2007 NEW HAVEN LINE WEEKDA Y INBOUND STATION BOARDlNGS(I)

AM TOTAL

STATION PEAK ~ WEEKDAY

Waterbury 47 109 156

Naugatuck 19 II 30

Beacon Falls 16 5 21

Seymour 10 8 18

Ansonia 16 9 25

Derby Shelton 23 5 28

Danbury 187 7J 260

Bethel 169 19 188

Redding 51 7 58

Branchville 196 ·13 209

Cannondale 109 5 114

Wilton 220 12 232

Merritt-7 89 2 91

New Canaan 890 293 1,183

Talmadge Hill 312 36 348

Springdale . 445 80 525

Glenbrook 322 78 400

New Haven-Stale SI. 8 36 44

New Haven 2,130 1,856 3,986

Milford 1.051 439 1.490

Stratford 1.034 286 1320 Bridgeport (2) 2,383 1,151 3,534

Fairfield 2.057 696 2,753

Southport 263 54 317 Green's Farms 539 79 618

Westport 1.788 812 HOO East Norwalk 423 118 541 South Norwalk (2) 1,407 782 2,189

Rowayton 484 51 535

Darien 958 445 1,403

Noroton Heights 995 226 1,221 Stamford (2) 3.51/ 4,668 8,179

Old Greenwich 585 280 865 Riverside 555 190 745

Cos Cob 618 197 815

Greenwich 1,544 1,507 3,051

Port Chester 1,329 1,093 2,422

Rye 1,400 1,142 2,542

Harrison 1,437 836 2,273

Mamaroneck 1,438 1,032 2,470

Larchmont 2,725 1,051 3,776

New Rochelle 2.560 1,752 4,312

Pelham 1,873 586 2,459

Mount Vernon East 968 6\3 1,581

Fordham 3 43 46

Harlem-I 25th Street '12 21 33

ITOTALNEW HAVEN LINE 39,199 22,807 62,006

(I) Calculated byfactoring 20()/ OnIOjJCounlS based on lickt sales dala 10 reflect 2007 ridership level>

(1) Siation 101als include 1ransfers.

Page 42: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

TABLE 10 2007 NEW HAVEN LINE WEEKEND INBOUND STATION BOARDINGS(I)

STATION SATURDAY SUNDAY TOTAL

WEEKEND Waterbury

Naugatuck Beacon Falls Seymour

Ansonia

Derby Shelton

193 20

1

8 14

23

228

33

10 13 29

29

421

53 II 21 43

52

Danbury

Bethel

Redding·

Branchville

137

35

10

23

118

52

15

35

255 87

25

58

Cannondale

Wilton

Memtt·7

13

16 4

17

19 4

30 35 8

New Canaan

Talmadge Hill Springdale

Glenbrook

290 28

86 71

360

36

86 56

650 64

172 127

New Haven-State SI. (3)

New Haven

NA 4,132

NA 3,416

NA 7,548

Milford Stratford

828

610

597

334

1,425

944 Bridgeport (2) 1.985 1.500 3,485

Fairfield Southport

Green's Fanns

Westport

1,182

73 51

1,107

836

60

70 993

2,018

133 121

2,100

East Norwalk South Norwalk (2)

154 1,034

86 975

240

2,009

Rowayton

Darien

NorotOll Heights Stamford (2)

33 568

393 4,124

50

505

292 3,256

83 1,073

685 7,380

Old Greenwich Riverside

Cos Cob Greenwich

269

107 223

1,164

213 130 125

829

482

237

348 1,993

Port Chester Rye

1.337 909

974

653

2,311

1,562 Hamson

Mamaroneck

Larchmont

768

977

1,224

543

703

693

UII

1,680

1,917

New Rochelle

Pelham

Mount Vernon East

2.074

827

876

1,408

483

503

3.482

1,310

1,379

Fordham 41 2 43

Harlem-I 25th Street 24 3 27

!TOTALNEW HAVEN LINE 28,066 21.372 49,438

(I) Calculated byfactoring 2001 OniO/fCOUI1!S based on ticket sales data 10 reflect 2007 ridership level,

(2) StOlion totals include transfers.

(3) No Weekend Sen:ice to'from New Haven-State St. stOlion.

Page 43: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

TABLE 7

2007 WEST OF HUDSON WEEKDAY INBOUND STATION BOARDINGS (I)

1) PORT JERVIS LINE (2)

STATION

AM

PEAK

WEEKDAY

OFF PEAK

TOTAL

WEEKDAY

Port Jervis

Otisville

Middletownffown of Walt kill

Campbell Hall

Salisbury Mills/Cornwall

Harriman

Tuxedo

Sloatsburg

102 26

486 142 472 717 138 48

64

8 86 21 54

134 35 6

166 34

572 163 526 851 173 54

ITOTAL PORT JERVIS LINE 2,131 408 2,539

2) P ASCACK VALLEY LINE (2)

AM WEEKDAY TOTAL

STATION PEAK OFF PEAK WEEKDAY

Spring Valley 83 . 15 98

Nanuet 446 7 453 Pearl River 271 13 284

835ITOTAL PASCACK VALLEY LINE 800 35

(I) Reflects actual Spring 2007 on/off counts/or the Port Jervis Line and Fall 2007 on/off counts/or the

Pascack Valley Line.

(2) New York State portion only.

Page 44: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

TABLE 11

2007 WEST OF HUDSON WEEKEND INBOUND STATION BOARDINGS (l)

1) PORT JERVIS LINE (2)

STATION SATURDAY SUNDAY

TOTAL

WEEKEND

Port Jervis

Otisville

MiddletownITown of Wallkill

Campbell Hall

Salisbury Mills/Cornwall

Harriman

Tuxedo

Sloatsburg

33

3 112

8 25

218

35 12

64

29

92

17 38

130 68 6

97

32 204

25

63 348

103 18

ITOTAL PORT JERVIS LINE ·446 444 890

2) P ASCACK VALLEY LINE (2)

TOTAL

STATION SATURDAY SUNDAY WEEKEND Spring Valley 42 52 94 Nanuet 38 27 65 Pearl River 42 44 86

ITOTAL PASCACK VALLEY LINE 1221 123 245

(I) Reflects actual Spring 2007 on/offcounts for the Port JervIs Line and Fall 2007 on/offcounts for the

Pascack Valley Line.

(2) New York State portion only.

Page 45: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

MTA LONG ISLAND RAIL ROAD

PASSENGER COUNTS

2006

Page 46: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

APPENDIX D LlRR STATION 2006 WEEKDAY PASSENGER COUNTS

Total East I West Commuters in Numerical Order

EASTBOUNDWESTBOUND East! West Total. AMPe.k Midday Off Peek PM Reverse Peak Sub Total Total

Sutlon On Off On Off On Off ()I\-L Off AM Reverse Peak Midday Off Peak PM Peak Sub Total Total

On ' Off On Off On Off On I Off Pennsylvania Station 203,982 0 86,379 0 14,820 0 8,830 0 110,029 110,029 5,557 0 19,046 o 69,348 o 93,953 o 93,953 Flatbush Ave 29,900 0 10,699 0 2,228 0 1,524 0 14,451 14,451 3,848 0 4,366 o 7,235 o 15,449 o 15,449 Jamaica 21,765 1,389 3,467 1,729 1,492 667 2,703 3,785 7,662 11,447 1,504 473 1,472 2,146 2,511 2,212 5,487 4,831 10,318 Ronkonkoma 17,276 5,746 0 1,252 0' 298 0 7,296 0 7,298 0 477 0 3,005 o 6,500 o 9,982 9,982 Hicksville 18,215 5,584 190 1,586 159 476 84 7,646 433 8,079 348 501 385 2,218 436 4,248 1,169 6,967 8,136 Huntington 11,113 4,935 292 1,854 ' 198 697 478 7,486 968 8,454 67 76 84 603 82 1,787 213 2,448 2.659 Gre.t Neck 11,024 3,011 111 1,682 22 956 25 5,649 158 5,807 31 681 65 851 101 3,488 197 5,020 5.217 Mineola 10.348 2,498 379 1,549 319 723 233 4,768 931 8.699 187 688 184 1,032 403 2,175 754 3,895 4,849 Long Beach 8.721 2,022 0 1,266 0 1,202 0 4,490 0 4,490 0 333 -0 1,876 o 2,022 o 4,231 4,231 Bayside 8.849 2,882 8 820 94 216 62 3,918 164 4,082 127 179 37 733 46 3,445 210 4,357 4,587 Port Washington 7,993 2,396 0 1,181 0 557 0 4,134 0 4,134 0 586 0 1,104 o 2,169 o 3,859 3,859 Rockville Centr& 11.850 2,209 99 765 143 249 93 3,223 335 3,558 84 231 140 499 248 2,090 472 2,820 3,292 Merrick 8,767 3,381 52 575 50 168 5 4,124 107 4,231 92 6S 84 452 24 1,816 200 2,336 2.638 Baldwin 8,743 2,744 35 446 112 170 44 3,362 191 3,553 290 122 99 498 26 2,155 415 2,775 3.190 Babylon 6.586 2,312 36 817 34 273 0 3,402 70 3,472 0 433 0 1,057 8 1,616 8 3,106 3,114 Bellmore 8,535 2,800 27 703 59 165 62 3,668 148 3,818 114 236 122 649 27 1,571 263 2,456 2,719 Hunterspolnt Ava 6,479 0 3,443 0 3,443 3.443 3,036 o 3,036 o 3,036 Manha••et 8.315 2,399 26 625 28 398 13 3,622 67 3,689 4 293 28 354 6 1,941 38 2,588 2.828 Mlliapequa 5,919 2,436 20 295 124 47 81 2,778 225 3.003 112 175 77 415 84 2,053 273 2,643 2,918 Wanugh 5,781 2,353 98 624 106 339 38 3,316 242 3,558 10 142 29' 431 102 1,509 141 2,082 2,223 Wood.lde 6,728 498 1,270 123 532 50 700 671 2,502 3,173 634 75 707 88 937 114 2,278 277 2,555 Syonet 5,497 2.123 63 622 26 256 17 3.001 106 3,107 1 306 16 442 20 1,605 37 2,353 2,390 Lynbrook 6,476 1,746 71 550 84 227 100 2.523 255 2,778 136 270 151 51.0 209 1,422 496 2.202 2,698 Deer Park 5,417 2.089 82 401 116 302 29 2.792 227 3.019 22 213 52 506 138 1,467 212 2,186 2,398 !'reeport 5,029 1.236 399 547 112 155 127 1,938 638 2,576 376 285 117 432 69 1,194 562 1,891 2.453 Bethpage 4,963 2,988 90 506 39 234 15 3,728 144 3.872 5 53 25 264 24 720 54 1,037 1,091 Valley Stream 4,852 1,754 32 519 32 138 87 2,411 151 2.562 56 154 66 536 38 1,440 160 2,130 2,290 Fannlngdale 4,626 1,477 215 519 59 436 46 2,432 . 320 2,752 319 314 158 224 212 646 689 1,184 1,873 Cold Spring Harbor 4,166 1,491 21 180 17 157 5 1,828 43 1,871 11 252 5 317 15 1,695 31 2,264 2,295 Weatbury 3.903 1,255 48 446 37 189 29 1,890 114 2,004 44 177 84 389 55 1,150 183 1.716 1,899 Hampstead 3.614 948 0 539 0 276 0 1,763 0 1.763 0 774 0 471 o 606 o 1,851 1,851 Se.ford 3,608 1,525 5 386 44 109 56 2,020 105 2,125 46 80 35 343 4 975 85 1,398 1,483 Llndanhurst Cantrall.llp

3,583 3,574

1,277 1,210

14 22

250 474

24 35

51 92

7 12

1,578 1,776 '

45 69

1,623 1,845

74 19

106 109

43 65

507 498

262 32

968 1,006

379 116

1,581 1,613

1.980 1,729

Wyandanch Hew Hyde Park

3,617 3,451

1,495 1,112

86 25

250 448

78 40

20 123

21 26

1,765 1,683

185 91

1,950 1.774

54 28

138 52

54 41

329 707

66 54

926 795

174 123

1,393 1,554

1,1167 1,877

Mas.apequa Park Amityville Floral Park Little Neck Oceanside BrentwoOd Copiague Northport Broadway Rosedale Douglaston Patchogue

3.345 3.086 2,991 2,888 2.786 2,750 2,661 2,593 2,430 2.391 2,375 2,327

1.293 797

1,497 1.132 1,372 1.041

939 1064

968 1.037 1,021

472

12 53 7 3

20 29 34 19 7 1 0

10

259 289 237 492 160 347 265 288 243 153 326 348

16 50 30 8

31 25 66 16 43

6 19 26

67 124 102 171 98 31 59 56 78 23 85

100

11 63 12 23

2 6

36 19 21

8 6

1,619 1.210 1.e36 1.795 1.630 1,419 1,263 1,408 1,289 1,213 1,432

920

39 166 49 34 53 60

136 54 71 15 25 37

1.658 1,376 1,885 1,829 1,883 1,479 1,399 1,462 1.360 1,228 1.457

957

2 39 25 14 6

12 9

23 77 43

0 27

108 224 73 42

105 211

42 153

33 51 80

211

19 170

6 10 20 13 44 73 32 9 0

30

279 328 170 204 188 398 563 148 180 194 144 578

20 211

6 2

17 o

107 15 19

5 1

110

1.259 737 826 785 767 637 497 719 729 861 693 414

4'­420

37 26 43 25

160 111 128

57 1

167

1,646 1,289 1,069 1,031 1,060 1.246 1,102 1,020

942 1.106

917 1,203

1,687 1,709 1,108 1,057 1,103 1,271 1,282 1.131 1,070 1.183

918 1,370

Page 47: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

--

APPENDIXD lIRR STATION 2006 WEEKDAY PASSENGER COUNTS

Total East 1 West Commuters in Numerical Order

WESTBOUND East! West Totals AM Peak Midday Off P..~ PM Reverse Peak Sub Total Total

L Station On I Off On I Off On I Off On I Off

EASTBOUND

Midday Off PeakAM Reverse Pe.k PM Peak Sub Total Total On I Off On I Off On I Off On I Off

Island Park 2.220 977 6 213 4 95 1 1.285 11 1.296 5 91 5 115 1 641 11 913 924 Flushing 2.136 231 70 199 193 76 281 506 544 1.050 235 82 168 159 112 330 515 511 1,08& Stewsrt Manor 1,926 881 2 149 17 65 2 1.095 21 1',116 11 47 13 48 1 689 25 784 809 Kings Park 1.876 625 6 226 4 72 12 923 22 945 22 80 15 136 13 665 50 881 931 Port Jeflltrson 1.793 686 Q 296 0 49 0 1,031 O· 1.031 0 113 o .268 o 381 o 762 762 Laurelton 1,766 543 5 137 3 42 23 722 31 153 21 31 3 139 o 808 24 976 1,002 Woodmere 1,749 585 14 210 15 119 11 914 40 964 4 125 4 145 3 514 11 784 795 Cedarhurst 1,144 640 6 189 2 108 1 931 9 946 2 172 1 177 3 443 6 792 798 Nassau Blvd 1.741 372 19 274 18 268 21 914 58 972 0 101 6 97 31 534 37 732 769 Kew G.rdens 1,631 590 37 154 15 47 32 791 84 875 100 21 68 149 38 380 206 550 756 Bay Shore 1,622 603 31 176 23 82 11 861 65 926 18 95 29 155 21 378 68 628 698 Smithtown 1.608 700 17 153 48 92 65 945 130 1,075 3 72 18 115 10 315 31 502 533 Queens Village 1,582 621 8 173 28 45 17 839 53 892 43 26 11 92 6 512 60 630 690 Hewlett 1,533 558 6 126 1 61 3 745 10 765 12 8e 6 110 2 560 20 758 778 Merlllon Avenue 1,533 632 9 8S 0 39 2 757 11 168 7 27 7 177 14 533 28 737 765 Inwood 1,461 555 5 168 4 13 2 796 11 607 4 45 2 114 5 474 11 633 644 Stony Brook 1,448 377 4 295 11 83 2 155 17 772 6 134 11 161 16 346 35 641 616 Ea.t Rockaway 1,401 534 20 194 47 36 8 764 75 839 9 40 15 96 9 .393 33 529 662 Garden City 1,401 427 1 185 2 35 0 647 3 650 2 228 1 133 o 381 3 748 151 Locust Manor 1,360 576 1 122 9 42 7 740 17 167 7 36 8 98 4 450 19 584 603 Gibson 1,244 515 9 125 9 38 11 678 29 707 14 34 15 75 7 392 - 36 501 531 Country Life Presl 1,236 493 3 55 7 99 25 647 35 682 1 81 1 58 4 409 6 548 554 Auburndale 1.234 513 0 101 17 15 36 689 53 742 27 5 9 82 5 364 41 451 492 East New York 1,127 10 181 10 86 .3 117 23 444 467 290 8 202 8 144 8 636 24 660 Forest Hills 1.116 469 82 75 60 42 128 586 270 856 43 12 49 44 28 84 120 140 260 Greenlawn 1.100 441 20 98 12 15 2 554 34 688 2 14 29 69 10 388 41 471 512 S.yville 1,086 334 0 163 6 81 578 7 685 6 34 o 181 3 277 9 492 501 Lawrence 385976 4 133 2 84 602 7 609 2 89 1 63 o 211 3 363 366 Plandome 971 413 12 75 1 21 4 509 17 526 0 35 13 35 1 361 14 431 445 Centre Avenue 958 376 7 82 7 32 6 470 20 490 2 25 8 61 5 367 15 453 468 Benerose 951 342 4 60 1 15 3 417 8 425 6 16 12 182 10 300 28 498 526lakeview 868 421 0 84 3 8 0 493 3 496 0 11 o 36 o 325 o 372 372Eaat Williston 869 396 3 19 0 15 4300 3 433 0 10 o 45 6 365 6 420 426Nostrsnd Ave 866 1 62 3 132 2 201 6 395 401 221 0 130 9 93 2 444 11 455 Roslyn 823 256 a 72 5 a8 5 416 18 434 2 94 7 55 3 228 12 377 389Islip 820 372 5 71 3 20 3 463 11 474 18 15 6 118 7 182 31 315 346MUlTay Hili 794 289 2 103 8 34 426'23 33 459 33 11 9 54 4 224 46 289 335Carle Plac;e 772 290 7 66 13 27 12 383 32 415 12 51 8 67 8 211 28 329 351Westwood 711 281 1 50 5 0 10 331 16 401 0 6 o 44 o 254 o 304 304Sea Cliff 602 272 18 32 1 21 0 325 19 344 0 15 1 46 12 184 13 245 258­Albert&on 694 206 4 36 0 19 0 261 4 265 3 26 1 32 1 266 5 324 329St.Jam.. 588 224 6 55 4 13 2 292 12 304 11 21 1 .78 o 173 12 272 284Glen Head 549 257 2 26 4 30 2 313 8 321 3 20 4 32 1 168 8 220 228Oakdale 501 256 5 49 1 24 0 .329 6 335 3 34 2 60 4 63 9 157 166Loc;uat Valley 479 149 4 32 6 35 9 216 19 235 0 38 6 31 12 157 18 226 244Glen Street 478 155 3 45 2 37 2 237 7 244 1 33 4 42 3 151 8 226 234Mastic-Shirley 440 201 6 16 2 6 5 223 13 236 2 9 1 8 6 178 9 195 204Hempstead Gardens 369 171 0 15 0 5 0 191 0 191 0 7 o 9 o 162 o 178 178

Page 48: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

APPENDIXD LIRR STATION 2006 WEEKDAY PASSENGER COUNTS

Total East I West Commuters in Numerical Order

WESTBOUND EASTBOUND East! West Totals AM Peak Midday Off Peak PM Reverse Peak S\lb Total Total

Station On OffOn Off On Off On Off AM Rayar.. Peak

On Ao

Off .9

Midday Off Peak On Off

10 15

PM Paak On I .6

Off ...123

Sub Total On . . Off . .­147

Total

163Glen Cove 368 153 0 Far Rockaway 316 142 0 West Hempstead 313 154 0 Great River 311 104 1 Speonk 283 120 2 Greenvale 282 88 1 Malyeme 236 129 0 Hollis 228 99 3 CysterBay 226 52 0 St.Albans 187 70 2 ue 115 0 eo RIYerhead 62 16 0 Plnelawn 50 0 Bellport 47 24 0 Medford 41 22 0 East Hampton 39 13 2 Southampton 28 6 2 Montauk 23 6 0 Westhampton 15 0 0 Hampton Bays 11 1 0 MattitUck 11 4 1 Yaphank 9 4 0 Bridgehampton 8 3 1 Greenport 5 0 0 Amagansett 4 1 Southold 3 1 0 Total 568,383 109,426 108,820

Source: 2006 URR Origin And Destination Study

33 2 13 4 199 6 205 16 45 0 17 0 204 0 204 o 19 0 25 o 68 o 112 112 12 0 4 0 170 0 170 o 10 0 15 o 118 o 143 143 49 1 8 2 161 4 165 3 9 3 65 1 65 7 139 146 25 6 11 9 156 17 173 20 9 10 9 3 59 33 77 110 17 1 6 0 111 2 113 3 27 0 23 1 95 4 145 149 11 0 1 1 141 1 142 0 3 0 12 o 78 o 93 93 13 9 2 6 114 18 132 4 5 .0 6 o 81 4 92 96 36 0 28 0 116 0 116 0 20 0 43 o 46 o 109 109 16 .2 7 0 93 4 97 6 2 7 13 1 61 14 76 90

0 80 80 35 o 35 o 35 16 0 0 0 32 0 32 0 0 0 14 o 6 o 20 20

8 8 0 0 8 8 16 0 12 10 12 o o 10 24 34 5 0 0 0 29 0 29 0 0 0 3 1 14 1 17 18 2 0 0 0 24 0 24 0 0 0 1 o 16 o 17 17 5 0 7 3 25 5 30 1 5 1 o o2 2 7 \I 2 0 5 0 13 2 15 0 7 0 4 o o o 11 11

10 0 1 0 17 0 17 0 1 0 5 o o o 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 3 1 0 O' o 12 3 15 4 0 1 0 6 0 6 0 1 0 4 o o o 5 5 1 0 0 '0 5 1 6 0 0 0 0 o 5 o 5 5 2 0 0 0 6 0 II 0 0 0 1 o 2 o 3 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 4 0 1 0 3 o o o 4 4 3 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 o 2 o 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 1 o o o 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 o o• 2 2 2

33,889 22,469 13,879 17,014 157,193 148,303 305,496 15,738 12,917 29,177 32,504 87,087 85,464 132,002 130,885 262.887

Page 49: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

APPENDIXD LIRR STATION 2006 WEEKDAY PASSENGER COUNTS

Total East I West Commuters in Alphabetical Order

WESTBOUND East! West

Total. AM Peak Midday Off P,.k PM R,v,,.., Pllk Sub Total Total Station On Off On Off On Off On Off

EASTBOUND

AM R,v,,.., P,.k Midday Off P,.k PM Peak SubTotal Total On Off On Off On Off On Off

Albertson 694 206 4 36 0 19 0 261 4 265 3 26 1 32 1 266 5 324 329 Amagansett 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 ,2

Amityville 3,085 797 53 289 50 124 63 1,210 166 1,376 39 224 170 328 211 737 420 1,289 . 1,709 Auburndale 1,214 573 0 101 17 15 36 689 53 742 27 5 9 82 5 364 41 451 492 Babylon 6,586 2,312 36 817 34 273 0 3,402 70 3,472 0 433 0 1,057 8 1,616 6 3,106 3,114 Baldwin 6,743 2,744 35 448 112 170 44 3,362 191 3,553 290 122 99 498 26 2,155 415 2,775 3,190 Bay Shore 1,622 603 31 176 23 82 11 861 65 926 18 95 29 155 21 378 68 628 696 Bayside 8,649 2,882 8 820 94 216 62 3,918 164 4,082 127 179 37 733 46 3,445 210 4,357 4,567 Bellerose 1151 342 4 60 1 15 3 417 8 426 6 16 12 182 10 300 28 498 626 Bellmore 6,535 2,800 27 703 59 Hi5 62 3,668 148 3,816 114 236 122 649 27 1,571 263 2,456 2,719 Bellport 47 24 0 5 0 0 0 29 0 29 0 0 0 3 1 14 1 17 18 Bethpage 4,963 2,988 90 506 39 234 15 3,728 144 3,872 5 53 25 264 24 720 54 1,037 1,091 Bren1Wood 2,750 1,041 29 347 25 31 6 1,419 60 1,479 12 211 13 398 0 637 25 1,246 1,271 Bridgehampton 8 3 1 0 0 0 0 3 1 4 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 4 4 Broadway 2,430 968 7 243 43 78 21 1,289 71 1,360 77 33 32 180 19 729 128 942 1,070 Carte Place 772 290 7 66 13 27 12 383 32 415 12 51 B 67 8 211 28 329 367 Cedarhurst 1,744 640 6 189 2 108 1 937 9 946 2 172 1 177 3 443 6 792 798 Central Islip 3,574 1,210 22 474 35 92 12 1,776 69 1,845 19 109 65 498 32 1,006 116 1,613 1,729 Centre Avenue 958 376 7 62 7 32 6 470 20 490 2 25 B 61 5 367 1S 453 468 Cold Spring Harbor 4,165 1,491 21 180 17 157 5 1,828 43 1,871 11 252 5 317 15 1,695 31 2,264 2,295 Copiague 2,661 939 34 265 66 59 36 1,263 136 1,399 9 42 44 563 107 497 160 1,102 1.262 Country Life Press 1,236 493 3 55 7 99 25 647 35 682 1 81 1 56 4 409 6 548 554 Deer Park 5,417 2,089 62 401 116 302 29 2,792 227 3,019 22 213 52 506 136 1,467 212 2,186 2,398 Douglaston 2.375 1,021 0 326 19 85 6 1,432 25 1,457 0 80 0 144 . 1 693 1 917 918 East Hampton 39 13 2 5 0 7 3 25 5 30 1 5 1 2 0 0 2 7 9 East New York East Rockaway

1,127 1,401

10 634

181 20

10 194

86 47

3 36

177 8

23 764

444 75

467 839

290 9

8 40

202 15

8 96

144 9

8 393

636 33

24 529

660 562

East Williston. 859 396 3 19 0 15 0 430 3 433 0 10 0 45 6 365 6 420 426 Far Rockaway 316 142 0 45 0 17 0 204 0 204 0 19 0 25 0 68 0 112 112 Farmingdale 4,6211 1,477 216 519 59 436 46 2,432 320 2,752 319 314 158 224 212 646 689 1,164 1,873 Flatbush Ave 29.900 0 10,699 0 2,226 0 1,524 0 14,451 14.451 . 3,848 0 4,366 o . 7,235 0 15,449 0 15.449 Floral Park 2,991 1,497 7 237 30 102 12 1,636 49 1,885 25 73 6 170 6 626 37 1,069 1,106Flushing 2,136 231 70 199 193 76 281 506 544 1,050 235 82 168 159 112 330 515 571 1,086Forest Hills 1,116 469 82 75 60 42 128 586 270 856 43 12 49 44 28 54 120 140 260 Freeport 5,029 1,236 399 547 112 155 127 1,938 638 2,576 376 265 117 432 69 1,194 562 1,891 2,453 Garden City 1,401 427 1 185 2 35 0 647 3 650 2 228 1 133 ,0 387 3 748 751 Gibson 1.244 515 9 125 9 38 11 678 29 707 14 34 15 75 7 392 36 501 537 Glen Cove 368 153 0 33 2 13 4 199 6 205 0 9 10 15 6 123 16 147 163 Glen Head 1149 257 2 26 4 30 2 313 8 321 3 20 4 32 1 168 8 220 228 Glen Street Great Neck Great River Greenlawn Greenport Greenvale Hampton Bays Hempstead Hempftead Gardens

478 11.024

311 1.100

5 262

11 3,814

369

155 3,011

104 441

0 88

1 946 171

3 111

1 20

0 1 0 0 0

45 1,882

49 98

3 17 4

539 15

2 22

1 12

0 1 0 0 0

37 956

8 15

0 6 1

276 5

2 25

2 2 0 0 0 0 0

237 5,649

161 554

3 111

6 1,763

191

7 158

4 34 0 2 0 0 0

244 5,807

165 588

3 113

6 1,763

191

1 31

3 2 0 3 0 0 0

33 581

9 14 0

27

774 7

4 65

3 29 0 0 0 0 0

42 851

65 69

0 23 4

471 9

3 101

1 10

0 1 0 0 0

151 3,48a

65 388

2 95

0 606 162

8 197

7 41

0 4 0 0 0

226 5,020

139 471

2 145

5 1,651

178

234 8,217

146 512

2 149

5 1,851

178

Page 50: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

APPENDIX 0 LlRR STATION 2006 WEEKDAY PASSENGER COUNTS

Total East I West Commuters in Alphabetical Order

WESTBOUND Eastl West Totals AM Peak Mlddav Off Peak PM Reverse Peak Sub Total Total

Station On Off On Off On Off On Off

EASTBOUND

AM Reverse Peak Midday Off Peak PM Peak Sub Total Total On Off On Off On Off On Off

Hewlett 1,1133 sse 6 126 1 61 3 745 10 755 12 88 S 110 2 560 20 758 778 Hicksville 16,215 5;584 190 1,586 159 476 84 7,646 433 8,079 348 SOl 3S5 2,218 436 4,248 1,169 6,967 8,136 HolII. 228 99 3 13 9 2 6 114 18 132 4 5 0 6 0 81 4 92 96 Hunterspolnt Ave 6.479 0 3,443 0 3,443 3,443 3,036 0 3,036 0 3,036 Huntington 11.113 4,935 292 1.654 198 697 476 7,486 968 8,454 67 76 64 603 62 1,767 213 2,446 2.659 Inwood 1.451 555 5 168 4 73 2 796 11 807 4 45 2 114 5 474 11 633 644 Island Park 2.220 977 6 213 4 95 1 1,285 11 1,296 5 91 5 175 1 647 11 913 924 ISlip 820 372 5 71 3 20 3 463 11 474 18 15 6 118 7 "182 31 315 346 Jamaica' 21,765 1,369 3.467 1,729 1,492 667 2.703 3,765 7,662 11,447 1,504 473 1,472 2.146 2.511 2,212 5,487 4,831 10.318 KewGardens 1.631 590 37 154 15 47 32 791 84 875 100 21 68 149 38 380 206 550 756 Klnga Park 1.876 625 6 226 4 72 12 923 22 945 22 BO 15 136 13 665 50 881 931 Lakeview 868 421 0 64 3 8 0 493 3 496 0 11 0 36 0 325 0 372 372 Laurelton 1,155 543 5 137 3 42 23 722 31 753 21 31 3 139 0 BOB 24 97B 1,002 Lawrence 975 365 4 133 2 84 602 7 609 2 89 63 0 211 3 363 366 Lie 115 0 80 0 80 80 35 0 35 0 35 Lindenhurst 3,583 1,277 14 250 24 51 7 1,576 45 1,623 74 106 43 507 262 966 379 1,581 1,960 little Neck 2,886 1,132 3 492 8 171 23 1,795 34 1,829 14 42 10 204 2 785 26 1,031 1,057 Locust Manor 1,360 576 122 9 42 7 740 17 757 7 36 8 98 4 450 19 584 603 Locust Vaney 479 149 4 32 6 35 9 216 19 235 0 38 6 31 12 157 18 226 244 Long Beach 8,721 2,022 0 1,266 0 1,202 0 4,490 0 4,490 0 333 0 1,876 0 2,022 0 4,231 4,231 Lynbrook 5,476 1,746 71 550 84 227 100 2,523 255 2.778 136 270 151 510 209 1,422 496 2.202 2.698 Malverne 235 129 0 11 0 1 1 141 1 142 0 3 0 12 0 76 0 93 93 Manhasset 6,315 2,399 26 825 28 398 13 3.622 67 3,689 4 293 28 354 6 1,941 38 2,588 2.626 Massapequa 5.919 2.436 20 29.5 124 47 81 2,778 225 3,003 112 175 77 415 84 2,053 273 2,643 2,916 Massapequa Park 3,345 1,293 12 259 16 67 11 1,619 39 1.658 2 108 19 279 20 1,259 41 1,646 1,687 Mastic-Shirley 440 201 6 16 2 6 5 223 13 236 2 9 1 8 6 178 9 195 204 Mattituck 11 4 1 1 0 0 0 5 1 6 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 5 5 Medford 41 22 0 2 0 0 0 24 0 24 0 0 0 1 0 16 0 17 17 Merilion Avenue" U33 632 9 86 0 39 2 757 11 768 7 27 7 177 14 533 26 737 7&5 Merrick Mineola Montauk

6,767 10,348

23

3,381 2,496

6

52 379

0

575 1,549

10

50 319

0

188 723

1

5 233

0

4,124 4,768

17

107 931

0

4,231 5,699

11

92 167

0

68 686

1

84 164

0

452 1,032

5

24 403

0

1,616 2,175

0

200 754

0

2,336 3,695

6

2,636 4,649

6 Murray Hili 794 269 2 103 8 34 23 426 33 469 33 11 9 54 4 224 46 269 335 Nas.au Blvd 1,741 372 19 274 18 268 21 914 58 972 0 101 6 97 31 534 37 732 769 New Hyde Park Northport Noatr.nd Ave Oakdale Oceanside Oyster Bay Patchogue Pennsylvania Station Plnelawn Plandome Port Jefferson Port Washington Queens Village Riverhead

3,451 2,593

866 501

2.786 225

2,327 203,982

50 971

1,793 7,993 1,582

52

1,112 1064

1 256

1,372 52

472 0

413 686

2,396 621

16

25 19 62

5 20

0 10

86,379 0

12 0 0 a 0

448 288

3 49

160 36

346 0 8

75 296

1,181 173

16

40 16

132 1

31 0

26 14,820

8 1 0 0

28 0

123 56

2 24 98 28

100 0 0

21 49

551 45

0

26 19

201 0 2 0 1

8,830 0 4 0 0

17 0

1,683 91 1,408 54

6 395 329 6

1,630 53 116 0 920 37

o 110.029 6 6

509 17 1,031 0 4,134 0

839 53 32 0

1,714 1,462

401 335

U83 116 957

110,029 16

526 1,031 4,134

892 32

28 23

221 3 6 0

27 5.557

0 0 0 0

43 0

52 153

0 34

105 20

211 0

12 35

113 586

26 0

41 73

130 2

20 0

30 19,048

10 13

0 0

11 0

707 54 148 15

9 93 60 4

188 11 43 0

576 110 o 69,348

12 0 35 1

268 0 1,104 0

92 6 14 0

795 719

2 63

767 46

414 0 0

361 381

2,169 512

6

123 111 444

9 43

0 167

93.953 10 14 0 0

60 0

1,554 1,020

11 157

1,060 109

1.203 0

24 431 762

3,859 630

20

1,677 1,131

465 166

1,103 109

1,370 93,953

34 445 762

3,859 690

20

Page 51: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

APPENDIXD LIRR STATION 2006 WEEKDAY PASSENGER COUNTS

Total East' WestCommuters in Alphabetical Order I

Sub Total Total Station

~

WESTBOUND

II On I Off I On I Off I On I Off II On I Off I Rockville Centre 6.860 2,209 99 765 143 249 93 3.223 335 3,558 64 231 140 499 248 2,090 472 2,820 3,292 Ronkonkoma 17.278 5,146 a 1,252 a 29B 0 1,296 0 7.296 a 477 a 3,005 0 6,500 a 9,982 9,982 Ro.edale 2.391 1,031 1 153 6 23 8 1,213 15 1,228 43 51 9 194 5 861 57 1,106 1,163 Roslyn 823 256 8 72 5 86 5 416 16 434 2 94 7 55 3 226 12 377 389 Sayville 1,086 334 0 163 6 61 1 578 7 585 6 34 0 161 3 277 9 492 1101 Sea Cliff 802 272 18 32 1 21 0 325 19 344 0 15 1 46 12 184 13 245 258 Se.ford 3.608 1,525 5 386 44 109 56 2,020 105 2.125 46 60 35 343 4 975 65 1,398 1.4.83 Smithtown 1,808 700 11 153 48 92 65 945 130 1,075 3 72 18 115 10 315 31 502 533 Southampton 26 6 2 2 0 5 0 13 2 15 a 7 0 4 0 a 0 11 11 Southold 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 a 0 0 0 a 2 a 2 2 Speonk 283 120 2 25 6 11 9 156 17 113 20 9 10 9 3 59 33 77 110 St. Albans 187 10 2 16 2 7 0 93 4 97 6 2 7 13 1 61 14 16 90 St. Jame. 688 224 6 55 4 13 2 292 12 304 11 21 78 0 173 12 272 284 stewart Manor 1.1125 881 2 149 17 65 2 1,095 21 1,118 11 47 13 48 689 25 764 809 Stony Brook 1.448 377 4 295 11 63 2 755 11 772 6 134 11 161 18 346 35 641 676 Syo..et 5,497 2,123 63 622 26 256 17 3,001 106 3.107 1 306 16 442 20 1,605 37 2,353 2.390 Valley Stream 4,852 1,754 32 519 32 138 87 2,411 151 2.562 56 164 66 536 38 1,440 160 2,130 2,290 Wantagh 5,781 2,353 98 624 106 339 38 3,316 242 3,558 10 142 29 431 102 1,509 141 2,082 2,223 We.t Hempstead 313 154 0 12 0 4 0 170 0 170 0 10 0 15 0 118 a 143 143 Westbury 3,903 1,255 46 446 37 '189 29 1,890 114 2,004 44 177 84 389 55 1.150 183 1,716 1,899 Westhampton 15 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 11 3 1 0 0 0 12 3 15 Westwood 711 261 50 5 0 70 331 76 407 a 6 0 44 0 254 0 304 304 Woodmere 1,7411 565 14 210 15 119 11 914 40 954 4 125 4 145 3 514 11 764 195 Woodside 5,728 498 1,270 123 532 50 700 671 2,502 3,173 634 75 707 88 937 114 2,278 277 2,555 Wyandanch 3,517 1,495 66 250 76 20 21 1,765 185 1,950 64 136 54 329 66 926 174 1,393 1,567 Yaphank 9 4 0 2 a a a 6 a 6 0 a a 1 0 2 a 3 3 Total 568,383 109,425 108,820 33.889 22,469 13,879 17.014 157,193 148.303 305.496 15,738 12,917 29,177 32,504 87,087 86,464 132,002 130,685 262,881

AM Reverse Peak On I Off

EASTBOUND

Midday Off Peak PM Peak Sub Total Total On I Off On I Off On I Off

Source: 2006 LIRR Origin And Oestlnatlon Study

Page 52: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

APPENDIX D LIRR STATION 2006 WEEKEND PASSENGER COUNTS

Total East I West Commuters in Numerical Order

Eastl West Totals . Saturday

Statlon On Off

WESTBOUND

Sunday SUBTOTAL TOTAL SaturdaY On Off ON 1 OFF On Off

EASTBOUND

Sunday 'On I Off

SUB TOTAL ON

-- ­I OFF TOTAL

Pennlyivanla Station 86,380 0 23.631 0 21.450 0 45.081 411,081 21.450 0 19.849 0 41.299 o 41,299 Jamaica 28,716 3.828 3.642 3.326 3.676 7.154 7.31.8 14,472 3.132 4.452 2.834 3.826 5,966 8,278 14,244 Flatbush Ave 13,863 0 2.188 0 2.631 0 4.819 4,819 4.604 0 4.440 0 9.044 o 9,044 Mineola 10,287 2.795 848 1.818 476 4.613 1.324 5,937 413 2.637 268 1.032 681 3.669 4.350 Hicksville 10,011 2.560 536 2.235 189 4.795 725 5,520 489 1.798 291 1.913 780 3,711 4,491 Woodside 9.004 290 2.216 145 1.568 435 3.784 4.219 2,390 193 2,085 117 4,475 310 4,785 Huntington a,728 1.592 516 1.859 273 3,451 789 4,240 21 2.645 633 1.189 654 3.834 4,488 Ronkonkoma a,090 2,391 0 3.116 0 5,507 0 5,507 0 1.796 0 787 o 2.583 2,583 Freeport 6,206 977 317 755 436 1,732 753 2.485 877 924 940 980 1.817 1.904 3,721 Babylon 5,824 1.318 12 1,464 50 2.782 62 2,844 13 1,403 10 1,554 23 2,957 2,980 Great Neck 5.691 1.703 94 1.535 38 3,238 132 3.370 72 941 78 1.230 150 2,171 2.321 Port WashIngton 5,186 1.330 0 675 0 2.005 0 2,005 0 2.142 0 1,039 o 3.181 3,181 Merrick 4,360 1.045 64 953 76 1,998 140 2,138 10~ 950 127 1.041 231 1,991 2.222 Brentwood 4,333 1.105 64 852 65 1,957 129 2,086 96 1,150 58 943 154 2,093 2,247 BaysIde 4,107 1.211 67 997 56 2.208 123 2,331 75 702 95 904 170 1,606 1,776 Deer Park 3.893 974 27 774 48 1,748 75 1.823 82 1,305 37 646 119 1,951 2,070 Long Beach 3,858 1.006 0 862 0 1.868 0 1,868 9 1.170 0 811 9 1.981 1,990 BaldWin 3,835 866 91 704 54 1.570 145 1,715 592 746 45 737 637 1,483 2,120 Wyandanch 3,568 691 198 510 123 1.201 321 1,622 393 441 427 785 620 1.226 2,046 Syosset 3,462 990 43 791 49 1,781 92 1,873 46 935 39 569 85 1,504 1,589 Manhasset 3,425 916 59 710 22 1,626 81 1,707 68 879 65 706 133 1,585 1,718 Flushing 3,247 354 622 376 417 730 1.039 1,769 472 369 399 238 871 607 1,478 Westbury 3,085 703 101 558 37 1,261 138 1,399 252 786 85 563 337 1,349 1,686 Central Islip 3.043 840 54 651 21 1.491 75 1,566 90 715 54 618 144 1,333 1,477 Rockville Centre 3,037 723 133 670 99 1.393 232 1,625 223 592 166 431 389 1.023 1,412 Wantagh 2,883 709 35 490 84 1,199 119 1,318 26 842 93 604 119 1.446 1,565 Farmingdale 2,766 638 107 397 48 1,035 155 1.190 70 677 160 659 230 1,336 1,566 Hempstead 2,272 544 0 487 0 1,031 0 1,031 13 640 0 588 13 1.228 1,241 Massapequa Park 2,180 645 35 328 90 973 125 1,098 58 525 29 470 87 995 1,082 Bellmore 2,065 517 65 378 20 895 65 980 75 576 20 414 95 990 1,085 Broadway 1.977 647 69 461 33 1,108 102 1,210 55 365 99 248 154 613 767 Patchogue 1.910 193 46 450 96 643 144 787 112 377 366 288 478 645 1,123 Vallay Stream 1.866 496 42 433 51 929 93 1,022 29 381 56 378 85 759 844 Bethpage 1,805 469 50 388 39 657 89 946 70 465 36 268 106 753 859 Bay Shore 1,717 266 40 684 64 952 104 1,056 51 308 52 250 103 558 661 Forest Hills 1.712 245 182 162 222 407 404 811 282 165 322 132 604 297 901 Lynbrook 1.695 274 141 457 54 731 195 926 . 175 376 79 139 254 515 769 Massapequa 1,646 309 29 434 42 743 71 814 110 317 42 363 152 680 832 Little Neck 1.641 520 14 351 11 871 25 896 14 389 14 228 28 617 645

. Copiague 1,519 358 57 235 28 593 85 678 180 432 44 185 224 617 841 Cold Spring Harbor 1,501 539 66 289 45 828 111 939 5 427 2 128 7 555 562 Nostrand Ave KewGardens

1,500 1.489

5 389

408 49

0 282

355 90

5 671

763 139

768 810

375 104

6 220

342 160

9 195

717 264

15 415

732 679

Seaford 1.445 568 57 139 10 707 67 774 31 433 11 196 42 629 671 Lindenhurst Auburndale Amityville Stony Brook

1,339 1,336 1,321 1,257

400 318 146 446

25 27 24 12

166 281 331 336

9 38 56 16

568 599 477 782

34 65 80 28

602 664 557 810

45 21 42 12

464 287 406 372

17 29 56 6

211 335 260

57

62 50 98 18

675 622 666 429

737 672 764 447

Page 53: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

APPENDIX D LlRR STATION 2006 WEEKEND PASSENGER COUNTS

Total East I West Commuters In Numerical Order

Eastl West Totals Saturday

Station On I Off

WESTBOUND

Sunday SUBTOTAL TOTAL Saturday On I Off ON I OFF On I Off

----7­

EASTBOUND

Sunday SUBTOTAL TOTAL On Off ON I OFF

Rosedale 1,218 417 24 235 7 652 31 683 307 9 212 16 519 535 East New York 1,217 25 290 2 227 27 517 544 353 9 304 7 657 16 673 Laurelton 1,159 388 10 183 3 571 13 584 6 409 13 147 19 556 1175 Sayville 1,163 274 60 201 24 475 84 559 12 427 17 138 29 565 694 Floral Park 1,135 460 53 192 28 652 81 733 19 188 20 175 39 363 402 Northport 1,133 173 18 205 65 378 . 83 461 126 263 81 202 207 465 672 New Hyde Park 1,067 295 38 237 23 532 61 593 55 214 26 169 81 383 464 Island Park 1,030 256 2 332 5 588 7 695 2 224 1 208 3 432 435 Douglaston 1,023 309 5 242 4 551 9 560 10 251 0 202 10 453 463 Port Jelferson 983 210 0 224 0 434 0 434 0 306 0 243 0 549 549 Oceanside 974 275 11 287 7 562 18 580 10 144 11 229 21 373 394 Queens Village 936 414 15 131 10 545 25 570 17 177 7 165 24 342 355 Cedarhurst 792 197 4 236 9 433 13 446 67 76 2 201 69 277 34& Hewlett 757 329 9 168 8 497 17 514 12 153 3 75 15 228 243 Locust Manor 756 196 23 168 5 364 28 392 4 205 8 147 12 352 364 WOOdmere 746 152 11 133 7 285 18 303 8 89 12 334 20 423 443 Garden City 743 263 5 151 2 414 7 421 2 202 4 114 6 316 322 Nassau Blvd 733 229 5 168 14 397 19 416 10 144 8 155 18 299 317 Murray Hili 715 191 41 171 35 362 76 438 36 111 34 96 70 207 277 Merlllon A venue 672 207 8 177 10 384 18 402 -7 125 9 129 16 254 270 Stewart Manor 597 148 27 160 15 308 42 350 11 118 11 107 22 ,225 247 Kings Park 560 155 19 117 21 272 40 312 35 103 17 93 52 196 248 Carle Place 558 131 10 86 18 217 28 245 10 163 14 126 24 289 313 Gibson 537 126 12 130 21 256 33 289 6 185 1 56 7 241 248 Smithtown 526 105 25 115 15 220 40 260 22 156 14 74 36 230 256 Plandome 524 103 14 140 7 243 21 264 4 109 12 135 16 244 260 Centre A venue 518 186 10 122 16 308 26 334 4 114 9 57 13 171 184 Loeust Valley 467 121 8 72 5 193 13 206 13 174 2 72 15 246 261 Roslyn 450 128 7 107 4 235 11 246 4 98 4 98 8 196 204 Islip 428 116 25 81 12 197 37 234 22 115 9 46 31 163 194 East ROCkaway 424 133 27 78 22 211 49 260 13 83 9 59 22 142 164 Montauk 419 113 10 70 2 183 12 195 12 115 12 85 24 200 224 Southampton 418 66 14 77 8 143 22 165 30 60 17 146 47 206 253 Mastic-Shirley 400 111 14 116 4 227 18 245 2 80 29 44 31 124 156 Bellerose 396 131 15 71 :3 202 18 220 14 78 4 80 18 158 176 Glen Street 376 101 6 72 2 173 8 181 14 104 9 68 23 172 195 EastHampton 346 80 2 104 9 184 11 196 32 44 11 63 43 107 150 Lawrence 332 101 0 97 1980 0 198 7 58 0 69 7 127 134 Far Rockaway 3211 47 0 95 2 142 2 144 2 80 13 90 15 170 186 Speonk 288 63 4 112 0 175 4 179 24 41 20 24 44 65 109 Inwood 283 52 0 128 0 180 0 180 0 49 1 53 1 102 103 GlenCovl 279 57 11 52 6 109 17 126 10 77 1 65 11 142 153 Brldg&lIampton 260 41 3 58 1 99 4 103 19 44 8 86 27 130 157 Oyster Bay 258 76 0 45 0 121 0 121 0 100 0 37 0 137 137 GI&nHead 252 34 18 62 0 -96 18 114 7 51 2 78 9 129 138 Hampton Bays 250 57 7 36 4 1193 104 18 37 11 80 29 117 146 Sea Cliff 243 42 7 50 4 92 11 103 10 73 4 53 14 126 140 Hollis 236 57 7 61 11 118 18 136 8 49 6 37 14 86 100

Page 54: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

APPENDIX 0 LIRR STATION 2006 WEEKEND PASSENGER COUNTS

Total East I West Commuters in Numerical Order WESTBOUND EASTBOUND

East! West Totals Saturday Sunday SUB TOTAL TOTAL Saturday Sunday SUBTOTAL TOTAL

_ .Statlon On Off On Off - ON OFF On J O~ On Off ON OFF Weathampton 235 34 13 40 3 74 16 90 10 29 40 66 50 95 145 St. James 230 79 4 50 10 129 14 143 1 42 3 41 4 83 87 Greenlawn 216 50 8 38 10 88 18 106 12 50 6 42 18 92 110

. Greenport 184 52 0 75 0 127 0 127 0 27 0 30 0 57 57 Amagansett 183 17 0 44 6 61 6 61 15 53 11 37 26 90 116 Great River 179 79 24 24 4 103 28 131 2 20 3 23 5 43 48 Greenvale 173 40 5 39 1 79 6 85 7 47 2 32 9 79 88 Malverne 172 83 0 23 1 106 1 107 0 41 0 24 0 65 65 Oakdale 168 45 1 57 4 102 5 107 0 16 3 42 3 58 61 Rlvemead 157 30 3 44 5 74 8 82 8 22 8 37 16 59 75 East Williston 154 33 2 21 '). 54 4 58 35 37 2 22 37 59 96 Plnelawn 146 24 2 54 1 18 3 81 5 13 3 43 8 56 84 Albertson 141 49 0 25 2 74 2 76 0 44 3 18 3 62 65 Country Life Press 138 27 2 32 1 59 3 62 5 35 0 36 5 71 76 St. Albans 116 24 19 19 4 43 23 66 16 10 2 22 18 32 50 Lakeview 114 27 8 34 0 61 8 69 0 16 1 28 1 44 45 West Hempstead 92 24 0 24 0 48 0 48 0 18 0 26 0 44 44 Southold 75 20 1 30 1 50 2 52 4 6 6 7 10 13 23 Mattituck 61 23 0 33 0 56 0 56 () 0 0 5 0 5 5 Westwood 54 18 3 11 () 29 3 32 2 15 1 4 3 19 22 Hempstead Gardens 45 10 0 14 0 24 0 24 0 8 1 12 1 20 21 Bellport 42 13 0 16 0 29 0 29 0 5 0 8 0 13 13 Medford 10 1 1 2 2 3 5 0 2 0 3 0 5 5 Yaphank 10 0 0 1 0 2 2 4 0 4 0 8 0 8 Hunterspoint Ave 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LIC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 318.950 48.594 38,134 41,402 34,120 89.996 72,254 162,250 39,160 46,279 35,978 35,283 75.138 81.562 156.700

Source: 2006 URR Origin And Destination Study

Page 55: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

APPENDIX D LIRR STATION 2006 WEEKEND PASSENGER COUNTS

Total East I West Commuters in Alphabetical Order

East! West Totals Saturday

Station On I Off

WESTBOUND

Sunday SUBTOTAL TOTAL Saturday on Off ON OFF On Off

EASTBOUND

Sunday SUBTOTAL TOTAL I On Off ON OFF

Albtrtaon 141 49 0 25 2 74 2 76 0 44 3 18 3 65 Amagansett 183 17 0 44 6 61 6 67 15 53 11 37 26 90 116 Amityville 1.321 146 24 331 56 477 80 667 42 406 56 260 98 666 764 Auburndale 1,336 318 27 281 38 599 65 664 21 287 29 335 50 622 672 Babylon 6,824 1,318 12 1,464 50 2,782 62 2,844 13 1,403 10 1,554 23 2,957 2,980 Baldwin 3,835 866 91 704 54 1,570 145 1,715 592 746 45 737 637 1,483 2,120 Bay Shore 1,717 268 40 684 64 952 104 1.058 51 308 52 250 103 558 661 Bayside 4,107 1,211 67 997 56 2,208 123 2,331 75 702 95 904 170 1,606 1,776 Bellerose 396 131 15 71 3 202 18 220 14 78 4 80 lB 15s 176 Bellmore 2.065 517 65 378 20 895 65 980 75 576 20 414 95 990 1,085 Bellport 42 13 0 16 0 29 0 29 -0 5 0 8 0 13 13 Bethpage 1.806 469 50 388 39 857 89 946 70 485 36 268 106 753 869 Brentwood 4.333 1,105 64 852 65 1,957 129 2,086 96 1,150 58 943 154 2,093 2.247 Bridgehampton 280 41 3 58 1 99 4 103 19 44 8 86 21 130 157 Broadway 1,917 647 69 461 33 l,10B 102 1.210 55 365 99 248 154 613 167 Carle Place 658 131 10 86 18 217 28 245 10 163 14 126 24 289 313 Cedarhurst 792 197 4 236 9 433 13 446 67 76 2 201 69 277 346 Central Islip 3,043 840 54 651 21 1,491 75 1.666 90 715 54 618 144 1,333 1,477 Centra Avenue 618 186 10 122 16 308 26 334 4 114 9 57 13 171 184 Cold Spring Harbor 1,501 539 66 289 45 828 111 939 427 1285 2 7 555 662 Copiague 1,519 358 57 235 28 593 85 676 180 432 44 185 224 617 841 Country Life Press 138 27 2 32 59 3 62 5 35 a 36 5 71 16 Oeer Park 3.893 974 27 774 48 1,748 75 1,823 82 1,305 37 846 119 1951 2,070 Oouglaston 1.023 309 242 45. 551 9 560 10 251 0 202 10 453 463 East liampton 345 80 2 104 9 184 11 196 32 44 11 63 43 107 150 East New York 1,217 25 290 2 227 27 517 544 353 9 304 7 657 16 673 East Rockaway 424 133 27 78 22 211 49 260 13 63 9 59 22 142 164 East Williston 154 33 2 21 2 54 4 68 35 37 2 22 37 59 96 Far Rockaway 329 47 0 95 2 142 2 144 2 60 13 90 15 170 185 Farmingdale 2,756 638 107 397 48 1,035 155 1.190 70 677 160 659 230 1,336 1.666 Flatbush Ave 13,863 0 2,188 a 2,631 0 4,819 4,819 4,604 0 4,440 0 9,044 0 9.044

_ Floral Park 1,136 460 53 192 28 652 81 133 19 188 20 115 39 363 402 Flushing 3,247 354 622 376 417 730 1,039 1.769 472 369 399 238 871 607 1.478 Forast Hilts 1,112 245 162 162 222 407 404 811 282 155 322 132 504 297 901 Freeport 6,206 977 317 755 436 1,732 753 2,485 877 .924 940 960 1,817 1,904 3.721 Garden City 743 263 5 151 2 414 7 421 2 202 4 114 6 316 322 Gibson 537 126 12 130 21 256 33 289 6 185 1 56 7 241 248 Glen Cove 279 57 11 52 6 109 17 126 10 77 1 65 11 142 163 Glen liead 262 34 18 62 0 96 18 114 7 51 2 78 9 129 138 Glen Street 316 101 6 72 2 173 8 181 14 104 9 68 23 172 196 Great Neck 5,891 1,703 94 1,535 38 3,238 132 3,310 72 941 78 1,230 150 2,171 2.321Great River 119 79 24 24 4 103 26 131 2 20 3 23 5 43 48Greenlawn 216 50 8 38 10 88 18 106 12 50 6 42 18 92 110 Greenport 184 52 0 75 0 127 0 127 0 27 0 30 0 57 57 Greenvale 113 40 5 39 79 6 85 7 47 2 32 9 79 88liampton Bays 250 57 7 36 4 93 11 104 18 37 11 80 29 117 146 Hempstead 2.272 544 0 487 0 1,031 0 1.031 13 840 0 588 13 1,228 1,241Hempatead Gardens 45 10 a 14 0 24 0 24 0 8 12 20 21

Page 56: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

APPENDIXD LlRR STATION 2006 WEEKEND PASSENGER COUNTS

Total East I West Commuters In Alphabetical Order

WESTBOUND EASTBOUND East! West Totals Saturday Sunday SUBTOTAL TOTAL Saturday Sunday SUB TOTAL TOTAL

StatIon On Off On Off ON OFF On Off On Off ON OFF Hewlett 757 329 9 168 8 497 17 514 12 153 3 75 15 228 243 Hicksville 10.011 2,560 536 2,235 189 4,795 725 5,520 489 1,798 291 1,913 760 3,711 4,491 Hollis 236 57 7 61 11 118 18 136 8 49 6 37 14 86 100 Hunter.polnt Ave 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 HuntIngton 8,128 1,592 516 1,859 273 3.451 789 4.240 21 2,645 633 1,189 654 3,634 4,488 Inwood 283 52 0 128 0 180 0 180 0 49 1 53 1 102 103 Island Park 1,030 256 2 332 5 588 7 595 2 224 1 208 3 432 435 Islip 428 116 25 81 12 197 37 234 22 115 9 48 31 163 194

. Jamaica 28.116 3,828 3,642 3,326 3,676 7,154 7,318 14,472 3,132 4,452 2,834 3,826 5,966 8,278 14,244 KewGardens 1.489 389 49 282 90 671 139 810 104 220 160 195 264 415 679 KIngs Park 560 155 19 117 21 272 40 312 35 103 17 93 52 196 248 Lakeview 114 27 8 34 0 61 8 69 0 16 1 28 1 44 45 Laurelton 1,159 388 10 183 3 571 13 584 6 409 13 147 19 556 575 Lawrence 332 101 0 97 0 198 0 198 7 58 0 69 7 127 134 LIC 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 Lindenhurst 1,339 400 25 168 9 568 34 602 45 464 17 211 62 675 737 Little NeCk 1,641 520 14 351 11 871 25 896 14 389 14 228 28 617 645 Locust Manor 756 196 23 168 5 364 28 392 4 205 8 147 12 352 364 Locust Valley 467 121 8 72 5 193 13 206 13 174 2 72 15 246 261 Long Beach 3,858 1,006 0 862 0 1.868 0 1,868 9 1,170 0 811 9 1,981 1,990 Lynbrook 1,695 274 141 457 54 731 195 926 175 376 79 139 254 515 789 Malverne 112 83 0 23 1 106 1 107 0 41 0 24 o 65 65 Manhasset 3,425 916 59 710 22 1,626 81 1,707 68 879 65 706 133 1,585 1,118 Massapequa 1,646 309 29 434 42 143 71 814 110 317 42 363 152 680 832 Massapequa Park 2,180 645 35 328 90 973 125 1,098 58 525 29 470 87 995 1,082 Mastic-Shirley 400 111 14 116 4 227 18 245 2 80 29 44 31 124 155 Mattituck 61 23 0 33 0 56 0 56 0 0 0 5 o 5 5 Medford 10 1 1 1 2 2 3 5 0 2 0 3 o 5 5 Merlllon Avenue 672 207 8 177 10 364 16 402 7 125 9 129 16 254 270 Merrick 4,360 1,045 64 953 76 1,998 140 2,138 104 950 127 1,041 231 1,991 2,222 Mineola 10.287 2,795 846 1,818 476 4,613 1.324 5,937 413 2,637 268 1,032 681 3,669 4,350 Montauk 419 113 10 70 2 183 12 195 12 115 12 65 24 200 224 Murray Hili 715 191 41 171 35 362 76 438 36 111 34 96 70 207 277 Nassau Blvd 733 229 5 168 14 397 19 416 10 144 8 155 18 299 317 New Hyde Park 1,057 295 38 237 23 532 61 593 55 214 26 169 81 383 464 Northpon 1,133 173 18 205 65 378 63 461 126 263 81 202 207 465 672 Nostrand Ave 1,500 5 408 0 355 5 763 768 375 6 342 9 717 15 732 Oakdale 168 45 1 57 4 102 5 107 0 16 3 42 3 58 61 Oceanside 974 275 11 287 7 562 18 580 10 144 11 229 21 373 394 Oyster Bay 258 76 0 45 0 121 0 121 0 100 0 37 o 137 137 Patchogue 1,910 193 46 450 98 643 144 787 112 377 366 268 478 645 1.123 Pennsylvania Stetlon Plnelawn Plandome

86.380 145 524

0 24

103

23,631 2

14

0 54

140

21,450 1 7

0 76

243

45081 3

21

45,081 81

264

21,450 5 4

0 13

109

19,649 3

12

0 43

135

41,299 8

16

0 56

244

41,299 64

260 Port Jefferson 983 210 0 224 0 434 0 434 0 306 0 243 o 549 549 Port Washington Quaens Village Riverhead

5.186 938, 157

1,330 414

30

0 15

3

675 131 44

0 10 5

2,005 545 74

0 25

8

2.005 570 82

0 17 6

2,142 177 22

0 7 8

1,039 165 37

o 24 16

3161 342

59

3.181 366

75

Page 57: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

APPENDIXD LlRR STATION 2006 WEEKEND PASSENGER COUNTS

Total East I West Commuters In Alphabetical Order

East} West Totals Saturday

St.tlon On I Off

WESTBOUND

Sunday SUBTOTAL TOTAL Saturday On I Off oN OFF On I Off

EASTBOUND

Sunday SUBTOTAL TOTAL On Off ON OFF

Rockville Centre 3,037 723 133 670 99 1,393 232 1,625 223 592 166 431 389 1,023 1,412 Ronkonkoma 8.090 2,391 0 3,116 0 5,507 0 5,507 0 1,796 0 787 0 2,583 2,583 Rosedale 1.218 417 24 235 7 652 31 683 7 307 9 212 16 519 535 ROllyn 450 128 7 107 4 235 11 246 4 96 4 98 8 196 204 Sayvllla 1,153 274 80 201 24 475 84 518 12 427 17 138 29 565 584 Saa Cliff 243 42 7 50 4 92 11 103 10 73 4 53 14 126 140 Seaford 1,445 568 57 139 10 707 67 774 31 433 11 196 42 629 671 Smithtown 526 105 25 115 15 220 40 260 22 156 14 74 36 230 265 Southampton 418 66 14 77 6 143 22 165 30 60 17 146 47 206 253 Southold 75 20 1 30 1 50 2 52 4 6 6 7 10 13 23 Speonk 288 63 .4 112 0 175 4 179 24 41 20 24 44 65 109 St. Albans 116 24 . 19 19 4 43 23 66 16 10 2 22 16 32 50 St. James 230 79 4 50 10 129 14 143 1 42, 3 41 4 63 87 Stewart Manor 597 148 27 160 15 308 42 350 11 118 11 107 22 225 247 Stony Brook 1,257 446 12 336 16 782 28 810 12 372 6 57 18 429 447 Syosset 3,462 990 43 791 49 1781 92 1,873 46 935 39 569 65 1,504 1,689 Valley Stream 1,866 496 42 433 51 929 93 1,022 29 361 56 376 65 759 844 Wantagh 2,883 709 35 490 84 1,199 119 1,318 26 842 93 604 119 1,446 1,665 West Hempstead 92 24 0 24 0 46 0 48 0 18 0 26 0 44 44 Westbury 3,085 703 101 556 37 1,261 138 1,399 252 766 85 563 337 1,349 1.686 Weathampton 235 34 13 40 3 74 16 90 10 29, 40 66 50 95 146 Weatwood 54 18 3 11 0 29 3 32 2 15 1 4 3 19 22 Woodmere 746 152 11 133 7 285 18 303 8 89 12 334 20 423 443 Woodside 9,004 290 2,216 145 1,568 435 3,784 4.219 2,390 193 2,065 117 4,475 310 4.785 Wyandanch 3.568 691 196 510 123 1,201 321 1.522 393 441 427 785 820 1,226 2.046 Yaphank 10 0 1 0 1 0 2 2 4 0 4 0 8 0 8 Total 318.950 48,594 38.134 41.402 34.120 89.996 72.254 162.250 39,160 48.279 35,978 35.283 75.138 81,562 156,700

Source: 2006 LIRR Origin And Destln.tion Study

Page 58: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

-a » en en m z G') m::u

I\) 0e

e m 0) 3:

0 G') ::u » -a ::I:-n en

3: -I » 3: m -I::u 0 z I

0::u -I ::I: ::u »-r::u 0 » 0

3: -I » r 0 Z

-G')

en » r z » 0 z

0 ::u » r ::u 0 » 0

Page 59: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

DEMOGRAPHICS

Base: Total Respondents

Gender Male Female

Age Mean Age

Household status Mean Number of Person in HH

Ethnicity White Black/African American Asian Hispanic

Income Less than $35,000 $35,000 to less than $75,000 $75,000 to less then $200,000 $200,000 or more Mean (000)

Education HS Grad or Less (Net) Some College or More (Net)

LlRR - 2006 Inbound

Commuter (200)

%

55 45

45.2

3.4

75 9 3 6

5 14 51 15

132

11 86

Occasional (202)

%

37 63

51.6

2.9

84 5 3 5

9 17 53 8

111.3

12 86

Page 60: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

Base:TotaIResponden~

Gender Male Female

Age Mean Age

Household Status Mean Number of Person in HH

Ethnicity White Black/African American Asian Hispanic

Income Less than $35,000 $35,000 to less than $75,000 $75,000 to less than $200,000 Over $200,000 Mean (000)

Education HS Grad or Less (Net) Some College or More (Net)

DEMOGRAPHICS

MNR-2006 Inbound

Commuter Occasional (203) (203)

% %

60 36 40 64

45.2 51.1

3.1 2.8

81 88 4 3 3 3 4 1

1 7 9 17

43 52 33 10

183.9 116.1

8 9 88 .87

Page 61: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

Internet! MTA Website Awareness and Usage

• By and large, the vast majority of MNR and LI RR Customers have Internet access (both at home and work), most have visited the MTA website recently and many have used the site as an informational tool.

- Metro-North Commuters and Occasionals are more likely in 2007 th<an in 2005 to have mobile Internet access.

- LlRR Commuters and Occasionals have virtually the same mobile Internet access in 2007 as in 2005. .

• A majority of MNR and LI RR Customers have visited the MTA'website in the past 30 days, but only a minority know or have bookmarked the MTA website address.

- . Each year, gradually more LlRR Commuters are saying that they have ever visited the MTA website. The trend is similar for MNR Commuters, yet showed a slight decline in 2007.

• A majority of Customers of both rail lines have used the website to access train schedules.

- Commuters and Occasionals of both lines use the MTA website as an information tool, especially for train schedules, information about specific travel destinations, and travel directions.

Page 62: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

Incidence of Internet Access

The vast majority of both Metro-North and LlRR Customers have Internet access - with better than six in ten having access both at home and work.

(Base: Total Respondents)

Metro-North Customers LIRR Customers (920/0 Have Internet Access) (900/0 Have Internet Access) .

66% 62%

20% 23% 8%6% 5%

Home Work . Both No Internet Home Work Both No Internet Access Access

01. Do you have access to the Internet at home or at work or both?

Page 63: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

Incidence of Mobile Internet Access

Better than four in ten Metro-North Customers report that they have mobile Internet access. About one-quarter o(LlRR Customers have mobile Internet access.

(Base: Total Respondents)

Metro-North Customers LIRR Customers (42% Have Mobile Internet Access) (27% Have Mobile Internet Access)

Access via: Access via: 33%

23CYo 23% 12%

Cell Phone PDA Cell Phone PDA

02. Do you have access to the Internet on a cell phone?

03. Do you have access to the Internet on a PDA?

Page 64: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

, .

Inci.dence of Mobile Internet Access (Trended LIRR)

LlRR Customers have virtually the same likelihood of having mobile Internet '" access in 2007 as they had in 2005 .. Slightly more Commuters hav~ Internet access on their cell phone.

(Sase: Total Respondents)

LIRR Customers

Cell Phone ' PDA

Commuters Occasionals Commuters Occasionals

\_ 2005 ~ 2007\

D2. Do you have access to the Internet on a cell phone?

D3. Do you have access to the Internet on a PDA?

Page 65: NYC MTA Wireless Broadband RFP 2010

MTA WIRELESS BROADBAND SERVICES RFP

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND ADDENDA RELATING TO THIS RFP WILL BE SENT TO ONLY THOSE WHO FILL OUT AND RETURN THIS FORM

[ ] We intend to respond to the MTA WIRELESS BROADBAND SERVICES RFP. Please send addenda relating to this RFEI and keep our company on MTA's mailing list for communications opportunities.

[ ] We DO NOT intend to respond to this RFP. Please do not send addenda, but keep our company on MTA's mailing list for future communications opportunities.

Name:

Title:

Company:

Address:

City: _____ _ _ _____State:__ Zip Code: _ _ _

_ _ ________Email:_____ _ ____ _Telephone:

Please return this form to: Metropolitan Transportation Authority Real Estate Department - Mailing List Section 347 Madison Avenue - 8th Floor New York, NY 10017

Attn: WIRELESS BROADBAND RFP