Students: Avi Urman Kobi Maltinsky Supervisor: Rivkin Ina Semester: Spring 2012.
NVU F urman Center
-
Upload
hashim-davis -
Category
Documents
-
view
19 -
download
0
description
Transcript of NVU F urman Center
![Page 1: NVU F urman Center](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032607/56812fbc550346895d953e2f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
NVUFurman Center
BY THE NUMBERS:
Exploring Neighborhood Inequality
@FurmanCenterNVU#State of NYC
![Page 2: NVU F urman Center](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032607/56812fbc550346895d953e2f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Income inequality in New York City has become more pronounced since 1990
21%
19%
15%
10%
20%
20%
20%
Distribution of Income (2013$) Across Households, New York City
2012
30%
5%3
%0% $0-
$20,000$20,001 -$40,000
$40,001 -$60,000
$60,001 -$100,000
$100,001 -$250,000
> $250,000
![Page 3: NVU F urman Center](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032607/56812fbc550346895d953e2f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
19%
16%
16%
23%
23%21
%19%
15%
20%
20%
10%
20%
Distribution of Income (2013$) Across Households, New York City
1990
2012
30%
5%3
%0% $0-
$20,000$20,001 -$40,000
$40,001 -$60,000
$60,001 -$100,000
$100,001 -$250,000
> $250,000
Income inequality in New York City has become more pronounced since 1990
![Page 4: NVU F urman Center](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032607/56812fbc550346895d953e2f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
19%
16%
16%
23%
23%21
%19%
15%
20%
20%
10%
20%
Distribution of Income (2013$) Across Households, New York City
1990
2012
30%
5%3
%0% $0-
$20,000$20,001 -$40,000
$40,001 -$60,000
$60,001 -$100,000
$100,001 -$250,000
> $250,000
Income inequality in New York City has become more pronounced since 1990
![Page 5: NVU F urman Center](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032607/56812fbc550346895d953e2f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
19%
16%
16%
23%
23%21
%19%
15%
20%
20%
10%
20%
Distribution of Income (2013$) Across Households, New York City
1990
2012
30%
5%3
%0% $0-
$20,000$20,001 -$40,000
$40,001 -$60,000
$60,001 -$100,000
$100,001 -$250,000
> $250,000
Income inequality in New York City has become more pronounced since 1990
![Page 6: NVU F urman Center](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032607/56812fbc550346895d953e2f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Share of Households in the Top Income Decile
Share of Households in the Bottom Income Decile
The highest- and lowest-income households are spatially isolated in New York City
![Page 7: NVU F urman Center](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032607/56812fbc550346895d953e2f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Violent crime rates improved in every neighborhood, but significant gaps remain
6.6
5.04
2
6
Average Neighborhood Violent Crime Rate by Income (2013$) of Household
2000 2013
10
87.6
-2.6
0NYC
$0-$20,000
$20,001 -$40,000
$40,001 -$60,000
$60,001 -$100,000
$100,001 -$250,000
> $250,000
![Page 8: NVU F urman Center](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032607/56812fbc550346895d953e2f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Violent crime rates improved in every neighborhood, but significant gaps remain
7.6
8.9
7.9
7.7 7.
3 6.6
6.4
5.0
5.8 5.
25.0 4.
6 4.2 3.
8
2
4
6
8
Average Neighborhood Violent Crime Rate by Income (2013$) of Household
2000 2013
10
-3.1
-2.6
0NYC
$0-$20,000
$20,001 -$40,000
$40,001 -$60,000
$60,001 -$100,000
$100,001 -$250,000
> $250,000
![Page 9: NVU F urman Center](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032607/56812fbc550346895d953e2f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Violent crime rates improved in every neighborhood, but significant gaps remain
5.0 4.
6 4.2 3.
8
2
4
Average Neighborhood Violent Crime Rate by Income (2013$) of Household
2000 2013
10
8
65.8
0NYC
$0-$20,000
$20,001 -$40,000
$40,001 -$60,000
$60,001 -$100,000
$100,001 -$250,000
> $250,000
5.2
5.0
![Page 10: NVU F urman Center](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032607/56812fbc550346895d953e2f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Student performance has improved, but disparities persist
34%
37%
37%
39%
41%
46%
20%
60%
Share of Students Performing at Grade Level in Math
2000
2012
80%
0% $0 -
$20,000$20,001 -$40,000
$40,001 -$60,000
$60,001 -$100,000
$100,001 -$250,000
> $250,000
![Page 11: NVU F urman Center](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032607/56812fbc550346895d953e2f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Student performance has improved, but disparities persist
34%
37%
37%
39%
41%
46%
59%
61%
62%
64%
65%
20%
Share of Students Performing at Grade Level in Math
2000 2012
80%
70%
0% $0 -
$20,000$20,001 -$40,000
$40,001 -$60,000
$60,001 -$100,000
$100,001 -$250,000
> $250,000
60%
![Page 12: NVU F urman Center](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032607/56812fbc550346895d953e2f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Student performance has improved, but disparities persist
34%
37%
37%
39%
41%
46%
59%
61%
62%
64%
65%
20%
40%
60%
Share of Students Performing at Grade Level in Math
Math (2000) Math (2012)
80%
70%
24%
25%
0% $0 -
$20,000$20,001 -$40,000
$40,001 -$60,000
$60,001 -$100,000
$100,001 -$250,000
> $250,000
![Page 13: NVU F urman Center](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032607/56812fbc550346895d953e2f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Student performance has improved, but disparities persist
20%
40%
60%
Share of Students Performing at Grade Level in Math
2000
2012
80%
0% $0 -
$20,000$20,001 -$40,000
$40,001 -$60,000
$60,001 -$100,000
$100,001 -$250,000
> $250,000
70%
65%64%
61% 62%59%
![Page 14: NVU F urman Center](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032607/56812fbc550346895d953e2f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
19%
16%
16%
23%
23%
3%
21% 19
%15%
20%
20%
5%
10%
20%
Distribution of Income (2013$) Across Households, New York City
1990
2012
30%
0% $0 -
$20,000$20,001 -$40,000
$40,001 -$60,000
$60,001 -$100,000
$100,001 -$250,000
> $250,000
Increasing income inequality is not unique to New York City
![Page 15: NVU F urman Center](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032607/56812fbc550346895d953e2f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
12%
19% 17%
16%
24%
24%
20%
21% 20
%20%
10%
Distribution of Income (2013$) Across Households, Los Angeles
1990
2012
30%
5%
4%
0% $0-
$20,000$20,001 -$40,000
$40,001 -$60,000
$60,001 -$100,000
$100,001 -$250,000
> $250,000
Income inequality has increased inLos Angeles
![Page 16: NVU F urman Center](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032607/56812fbc550346895d953e2f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
18%
19%
18%
18%
21%
16%
10%
20% 19
%
20%
Distribution of Income (2013$) Across Households, Chicago
1990
2012
30%
26%
3%1
%0% $0-
$20,000$20,001 -$40,000
$40,001 -$60,000
$60,001 -$100,000
$100,001 -$250,000
> $250,000
22%
Income inequality has increased inChicago
![Page 17: NVU F urman Center](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032607/56812fbc550346895d953e2f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
15%
20% 18
%
25%
20%
4%2%
15%
20%
17%
21%
23%
10%
20%
Distribution of Income (2013$) Across Households, Houston
1990
2012
30%
$0-$20,000
$20,001 -$40,000
$40,001 -$60,000
$60,001 -$100,000
$100,001 -$250,000
> $250,000
Income inequality has increased inHouston
![Page 18: NVU F urman Center](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032607/56812fbc550346895d953e2f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18%
19% 17
%
18%
1%
17%
18%
12%
2%
0%
Distribution of Income (2013$) Across Households, Philadelphia
1990
2012
30%
29%27%
23%20%
$0-$20,000
$20,001 -$40,000
$40,001 -$60,000
$60,001 -$100,000
$100,001 -$250,000
> $250,000
Income inequality has increased inPhiladelphia
![Page 19: NVU F urman Center](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032607/56812fbc550346895d953e2f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
16%
19% 18
%
19%19%17
%
21%
17%
22%
10%
3%
20%
Distribution of Income (2013$) Across Households, United States
1990
2012
30%
26%
2%
0% $0-
$20,000$20,001 -$40,000
$40,001 -$60,000
$60,001 -$100,000
$100,001 -$250,000
> $250,000
Income inequality has increased throughout the United States
![Page 20: NVU F urman Center](https://reader030.fdocuments.us/reader030/viewer/2022032607/56812fbc550346895d953e2f/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Income inequality has increased in New
York City The highest and lowest earners
are spatially isolated
Neighborhood conditions have improved at all income levels, but significant gaps persist
Rising income inequality is not unique to New York City