NuStorm Implementation at Fermilab

3/27/20131

NuStorm Implementation at Fermilab

Michael GeelhoedFermilab AD/EBD

Photo by Marty Murphy

Michael Geelhoed Fermilab AD EBD3/27/20132

• Location• Primary Beamline• Main Injector Specifics• Components • Cost• Safety Considerations

Focus on Fermilab specific aspects

Topics covered yesterday:

Target ModulePion CaptureSpecial Magnet Design

Decay RingFar DetectorNear Detector


Location of Facility


Main Injector Absorber Area



-20 80 180 280 380 480 580 680 780 8800

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

XBEAM (1 sigma)YBEAM (1 sigma)XBEAM (95%)YBEAM (95%)Aper XAper Y

Stationing (ft)

Half

Wid

th (m

m)

NuStorm Primary Beamline


-10 90 190 290 390 490 590 690 790 890

-300

-200

-100

0

100

200

300

400

ALPHAXALPHAY

Stationing (ft)

-10 90 190 290 390 490 590 690 790 8900

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

BETAXBETAY

Beta

(m)

NuStorm Primary Beamline


-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2

-0.25

-0.2

-0.15

-0.1

-0.05

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

Y 1 SigmaX 1 Sigma

X and Y (mm)

X’ a

nd Y

’ (m

r)

-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2

-0.25

-0.2

-0.15

-0.1

-0.05

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

Y 6 sigmaX 6 sigma

X and Y (mm)

X’ a

nd Y

’ (m

r)

Beam on Target

Michael Geelhoed Fermilab AD EBD 103/27/2013

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 5000

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

XBEAM (95%)YBEAM (95%)Aper XAper Y

Half

Wid

th (m

m)

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 5000

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

XBEAM (95%)YBEAM (95%)Aper XAper Y

Stationing (ft)

Half

wid

th (m

m)

Q001 Q002 Q003 Bermpipe

MI Abort line Reconfiguration


Move Q002 and Q003 upstream by 30’ and 23’, along with different currents, NS/Abort beam reduces in size through the bermpipe

Current (Amps) Present Future

Q001 2770.5 1883.2

Q002 2828.0 1423.9

Q003 2770.5 853.0

MI Abort line Reconfiguration


Find a suitable proton beam(Energy, pulse length, structure, etc.)

Beam Parameters:

120 Gev/c protons*1.33 second cycle time**1.57 µs pulse length per “batch”7.0E12 protons per pulse100 kW Beam Power

Available “Now”

Shielded for 400 kW

* Primary Beamline can be converted to 60 Gev/c ** Post 2013 Shutdown

Possible MI Capabilities


Cost Quantity Cost ($M)

Dipoles 11 1.10

Quads 5 1.30

Trims 18 0.26

BPMs 12 0.08

Multiwires 11 0.22

Toroids 3 0.06

Enclosure length 432 ft 4.32

Total 7.34

Total x 3.2 (Contingency + Escalation) 23.50

Estimates provided by Fermilab Technical Division Project CoordinatorEstimates given by Fermilab AD/Instrumentation Dept. for LBNE Estimates provided by Fermilab’s FESS EngineeringEstimate based on Project X Management data

Beamline Components


Magnet Images

Michael Geelhoed Fermilab AD EBD 15

Magnet costs

3/27/2013

Escalated values

Magnet style Series Date Escalation Labor ea Materials ea Total ea Qty Extended Total Comment

B2 Dipole BDM 2008 1.0958 $ 102,523 $ 11,287 $ 113,810 9 $ 1,024,288 Est for LBNE Job 440: Burn, clean-

up, reconstruct

3Q-120 QQQ 2009 1.0711 $ 90,958 $ 170,313 $ 261,271 5 $ 1,306,356 Est for LBNE Job 465 Build new

EDB EDBC 2012 1 $ 5,200 $ 2,700 $ 7,900 2 $ 15,800

Recently rebuilt with PEEK and 4 lg power flags (assumes existing

magnet)

IDH IDH 2004 1.2112 $ 10,780 $ 4,481 $ 15,261 8 $ 122,089 (23) were built in 2004 Job 188

IDV IDV 2004 1.2112 $ 10,780 $ 5,490 $ 16,270 8 $ 130,160 (same as IDH but 22.5% larger

M&S)

$ 2,598,694 * Estimates provided by TJ Gardner TD Project Coordinator


Safety Consideration

Critical Devices include: NSHV1- Single EDB magnet bends beam away from MI Absorber to NS notch NU1H1- 5 B2 magnet string in NU1

Consideration taken: 50’ away from MI beamline center offers protection for construction installation and access


Safety Beamline Map

3/27/2013

MARS15 simulation run for Critical Device Justification N.V. Mokhov, "The MARS Code System User's Guide", Fermilab-FN-628 (1995); N.V. Mokhov, O.E. Krivosheev, "MARS Code Status", Proc. Monte Carlo 2000 Conf., p. 943, Lisbon, October 23-26, 2000; Fermilab-Conf-00/181 (2000); N.V. Mokhov, "Status of MARS Code", Fermilab-Conf-03/053 (2003); N.V. Mokhov, K.K. Gudima, C.C. James et al, "Recent Enhancements to the MARS15 Code", Fermilab-Conf-04/053 (2004); http://www-ap.fnal.gov/MARS/. MARS was developed in part with Government funding provided under DOE Contract DE - AC02 -76CH03000.


Thank You

Special thanks to:Steve Dixon

Tommy LackowskiRonald Jedziniak

TJ GardnerDallas Heikkinen

Robert Riley


Backup Slides

3/27/2013

NuStorm Implementation at Fermilab

Documents

Transcript of NuStorm Implementation at Fermilab