Numerical Modeling and Simulation for Analysis of Fluid Flow and Heat and Mass Transfer in...

download Numerical Modeling and Simulation for Analysis of Fluid Flow and Heat and Mass Transfer in Engineering Applications Son H. Ho, Ph.D. University of South.

If you can't read please download the document

Transcript of Numerical Modeling and Simulation for Analysis of Fluid Flow and Heat and Mass Transfer in...

  • Slide 1
  • Numerical Modeling and Simulation for Analysis of Fluid Flow and Heat and Mass Transfer in Engineering Applications Son H. Ho, Ph.D. University of South Florida January 03, 2008 Falcuty of Applied Sciences University of Technology, HCMC, Vietnam
  • Slide 2
  • Agenda 1.Zero Boil-Off (ZBO) Storage of Cryogenic Liquid Hydrogen (LH2) 2.HVAC&R Indoor Spaces Thermal Comfort and Contaminant Removal a.Refrigerated Warehouse b.Air-Conditioned Room with Ceiling Fan c.Hospital Operating Room 3.Microfluidic Systems Micropumps 4.Portable Blood Cooling System Chillinders
  • Slide 3
  • LH2 in Automotive Applications Hydrogen tank in cars trunk.2005 Honda FCX fuel cell concept car. Shelby Cobras (Hydrogen Car Co.)Hydrogen Hummer (converted by Intergalactic Hydrogen).
  • Slide 4
  • LH2 in Space Applications Centaur upper stage liquid hydrogen/liquid oxygen propelled rocket Transport of liquid hydrogen used in space applications. Hydrogen fuel cell for power supply
  • Slide 5
  • HVAC&R Applications Refrigerated Warehouse Hospital Operating Room
  • Slide 6
  • Governing Equations Conservation of mass: Conservation of momentum: Conservation of energy: Conservation of mass for water vapor: Conservation of mass for contaminant gas:
  • Slide 7
  • Effective Viscosity Effective Thermal Conductivity Mixing Length Turbulence Model
  • Slide 8
  • Cryogenic Liquid Hydrogen Storage Tank with Arrays of Injection Nozzles Fluid: LH2 Axisymmetric Model Steady-State Analysis
  • Slide 9
  • Model and Dimensions Lengthm A1.50 B0.65 C1.30 G0.05 M0.01 N0.02 P D, H, Lvar. F, Q(*) (*) F = D/2 Q = [L (M+N+P)]/2
  • Slide 10
  • Quadrilateral-Element Mesh ~ 35000 elements Refined regular mesh along fluid-solid interfaces Fine mesh at nozzle openings Map mesh inside inlet tube and nozzle head Pave mesh fills the rest of the domain
  • Slide 11
  • Boundary Conditions BoundaryVelocity, m/s Temperature, K Heat flux, W/m 2 Tank wallu r = u z = 0q = 1 Inletu r = 0, u z = 0.01 T = 18 Centerlineu r = 0q = 0 Nozzle head wall u r = u z = 0-
  • Slide 12
  • Velocity and Temperature Distributions Simulation #1 BASE (H = 1.3 m, D = 0.15 m, L = 1.0 m) Streamlines and Speed, m/s Temperature, K
  • Slide 13
  • Effects of Nozzle Depth As the depth H of the nozzle head increases, mean temperature decreases gradually but maximum temperature decreases then increases and has lowest value at the middle of the tank. Design: H 1.3 m for 2.6m- height tank.
  • Slide 14
  • Cryogenic Liquid Hydrogen Storage Tank with Array of Pump-Nozzle Units Fluid: LH2 Axisymmetric Model Steady-State Analysis
  • Slide 15
  • Axisymmetric Model and Dimensions
  • Slide 16
  • Quadrilateral-Element Mesh ~ 18000 elements Refined regular mesh along fluid-solid interfaces Fine mesh at nozzle and inlet Pave mesh fills the rest of the domain
  • Slide 17
  • Boundary Conditions BoundaryVelocity, m/sTemperatureHe at flux Tank wallu r = u z = 0q = 1 W/m Centerlineu r = 0q = 0 Adiabatic section of heat pipe u r = u z = 0q = 0 Evaporator section of heat pipe u r = u z = 0T = 20 K Pump wallu r = u z = 0- Nozzle faceu z = 0, u r = -V-
  • Slide 18
  • Velocity and Temperature Distributions Simulation #1 BASE (G = 0.2 m, H = 1.5 m, P = 0.55 m) Streamlines and Speed, m/s Temperature, K
  • Slide 19
  • Effect of Nozzle Speed and Spraying Gap on Temperature
  • Slide 20
  • Cryogenic Liquid Hydrogen Storage Tank with Lateral Pump-Nozzle Unit Fluid: LH2 3-D Model Steady-State Analysis
  • Slide 21
  • 3-D Model and Dimensions
  • Slide 22
  • 3-D Hexahedral-Element Mesh
  • Slide 23
  • Boundary Conditions EntityVelocity, m/s Temperature, K Flux, W/m 2 Wall0q = 2.0 Symmetry planeu y = 0q = 0 H.P. adiabatic section0q = 0 H.P. evaporator sect.0T = 18 Suction-tube wall0q = 0 Pump-body wall0q = 0.01 Nozzle wall0q = 0 Nozzle face (V: normal velocity at nozzle face) u x = -V, u y = u z = 0 -
  • Slide 24
  • Distribution of Velocity, m/s Streamlines Speed Velocity vector and speed
  • Slide 25
  • Distribution of Temperature, K
  • Slide 26
  • Maximum Temperature: 3-D vs. Axisymmetric Models
  • Slide 27
  • Cryogenic Liquid Hydrogen Storage Tank with Axial Pump-Nozzle Unit Fluid: LH2 Axisymmetric Model Transient Analysis
  • Slide 28
  • Axisymmetric Model and Dimensions
  • Slide 29
  • Quadrilateral-Element Mesh ~ 10000 elements Refined regular mesh along fluid-solid interfaces Fine mesh at nozzle and inlet Pave mesh fills the rest of the domain
  • Slide 30
  • Boundary Conditions BoundaryVelocity, m/sTemperature/ Heat flux Tank wallu r = u z = 0q = 1 W/m Centerlineu r = 0q = 0 Adiabatic section of heat pipe u r = u z = 0q = 0 Evaporator section of heat pipe u r = u z = 0T = 20 K Pump wallu r = u z = 0- Nozzle faceu z = 0, u r = -V-
  • Slide 31
  • Velocity and Temperature Distributions Stage 2, 5 minutes Streamlines and Speed, m/s Temperature, K
  • Slide 32
  • Maximum and Mean Temperatures vs. Elapsed Time in Stage 2
  • Slide 33
  • Maximum and Mean Temperatures vs. Elapsed Time in 3 First Cycles
  • Slide 34
  • Refrigerated Warehouse with Ceiling Type Cooling Unit Fluid: Air Two- and Three-Dimensional Models Steady-State Analysis
  • Slide 35
  • 2-D and 3-D Models
  • Slide 36
  • 2-D and 3-D Mesh Quadrilateral Elements Hexahedral Elements
  • Slide 37
  • Boundary Conditions EntityVelocity, m/sTemp., o C or Flux, W/m 2 Evap. outletu x = V, u y = 0T = 0 Flooru x = u y = 0q=h 6-in concrete (T ground -T) Walls/Ceilingu x = u y = 0q=h 4-in PUR (T ambient -T) Lights (ceil.)u x = u y = 0q = 10 Packagesu x = u y = 0- Evap. coveru x = u y = 0-
  • Slide 38
  • Streamlines and Speed, m/sTemperature, C 2-D Simulation Results
  • Slide 39
  • 3-D Simulation Results (a) Streamlines. (b) Speed, m/s. (c) Pressure, Pa.(d) Temperature, C.
  • Slide 40
  • Effect of Cooling Unit Location on Temperature Distribution
  • Slide 41
  • Thermal Comfort Enhancement using Ceiling Fan in Air-Conditioned Room Fluid: Air Mixture (dry air + water vapor) Two-Dimensional Model Steady-State Analysis
  • Slide 42
  • 2-D Model of Air-Conditioned Room with Ceiling Fan
  • Slide 43
  • 2-D Quadrilateral-Element Mesh
  • Slide 44
  • Boundary Conditions EntityCase # Velocity, m/s Temp., o C Flux, W/m 2 W. Vapor, ~ Flux, kg/m 2.s Inlet1 4u x = 1, u y = 0T = 22w = 0.0148 Fan blades 1- -- 2 4u x = 0,u y = -V Fan motor 1 0 q = 0 q w = 0 2 4q = 10 Lights1 40q = 300q w = 0 Person1 40T = 34q w = 5E-7 Outlet1 4---
  • Slide 45
  • Simulation Results Streamlines and speed, m/s. Temperature, C. Streamlines and speed, m/s. Temperature, C. (a) Ceiling fan not running(b) Ceiling fan running
  • Slide 46
  • Effect of Fan Normal Air Speed on Mean Temperature and Thermal Comfort Mean temperaturePredicted mean vote (PMV)
  • Slide 47
  • PMV Distributions (a) Ceiling fan not running(b) Ceiling fan running
  • Slide 48
  • Thermal Comfort and Contaminant Removal in Hospital Operating Room Fluid: Air Mixture (dry air + water vapor + contaminant gas) Three-Dimensional Model Steady-State Analysis
  • Slide 49
  • Three-Dimensional Model
  • Slide 50
  • 3-D Hexahedral-Element Mesh
  • Slide 51
  • 3-D Simulation Results StreamlinesSpeed, m/s Temperature, CContaminant concentration, mg/kg air
  • Slide 52
  • Mesh Development for Indoor Environmental CFD Modeling
  • Slide 53
  • Geometry Decomposition and Meshing for 2-D Model S = 0.1 m, H = 0.05 m, N = 3 and R = 1.5. 1496 square elements (58%) in total 2570 quadrilateral elements.
  • Slide 54
  • Meshing 2-D Model using Encapsulation Techniques
  • Slide 55
  • Geometry Decomposition for 3-D Model (1)
  • Slide 56
  • Geometry Decomposition for 3-D Model (2)
  • Slide 57
  • Meshing 3-D Model using Encapsulation Techniques (1)
  • Slide 58
  • Meshing 3-D Model using Encapsulation Techniques (2)
  • Slide 59
  • 3-D Mesh: Layers of Refined Element Mesh on Fluid-Solid Interfaces
  • Slide 60
  • 3-D Mesh: 35140 Cubical Elements (62%) in total of 56290 Hexahedral Elements
  • Slide 61
  • Diaphragm Micropump Destination Inlet valveOutlet valve Pump chamber p1p1 p2p2 ss 1122 dd Diaphragm Source 1 22 Valve discs z V dead V = V s1 + V s2 p2*p2* p1*p1* p(t)p(t) p(t)p(t) V s2 V s1 VV 22 11
  • Slide 62
  • Design Requirements Flow rate, QPressure p in-out Notes Requirements10 L/h9 psi SI units2.7810 m/s6210 Pa Units in review paper 0.000167 mL/min 62 kPaLaser (2004) Proposed "MEMS" units 0.00278 mm/s (L/s) 6210 PaAppendix A Size not exceed 1 in 1 in = 25.4 mm 25.4 mm. Interstitial fluid (ISF): m = 0.002 Pa.s; r = 1.019 1.063 g/mL 0.001 g/mm (# water) Assumption: Fully-liquid working fluid (well-primed, absolutely no gas bubble)
  • Slide 63
  • Pump Chamber Simulink Model R 0 p valve pp 1
  • Slide 64
  • Pump Chamber - Simulation Results
  • Slide 65
  • Common actuator configurations
  • Slide 66
  • Thermopneumatic Actuation Driver
  • Slide 67
  • Thermopneumatic micropump based on PCB technology
  • Slide 68
  • TemperatureDeflection Relationship of Diaphragm
  • Slide 69
  • Actuation Chamber Simulink Model
  • Slide 70
  • Actuation Chamber - Simulation Results Experimental Result
  • Slide 71
  • Complete Micropump Simulink Model
  • Slide 72
  • Complete Micropump Simulation Results
  • Slide 73
  • PCBs
  • Slide 74
  • Questions?