Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive...

133
Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of submarine installed equipment. Welch, Mark Steven Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School http://hdl.handle.net/10945/19474

Transcript of Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive...

Page 1: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive

Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection

1984

Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of

submarine installed equipment.

Welch, Mark Steven

Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School

http://hdl.handle.net/10945/19474

Page 2: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic
Page 3: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic
Page 4: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic
Page 5: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic
Page 6: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic
Page 7: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic
Page 8: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic
Page 9: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic
Page 10: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL

Monterey, California

THESISNUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF THE ELASTIC SHOCK RESPONSE

OF SUBMARINE INSTALLED EQUIPMENT

by

Mark Steven Welch

September 1984

Thesis Advisor: Y . S. Shin

Approved for public release, distribution unlimited

T221521

Page 11: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic
Page 12: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

Unclassified

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (Whan Data Entered)

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE READ INSTRUCTIONSBEFORE COMPLETING FORM

1. REPORT NUMBER 2. GOVT ACCESSION NO 3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NUMBER

4. TITLE (and Subtitle)

Numerical Analysis of the Elastic Shock

Response of Submarine Installed Equipment

5. TYPE OF REPORT & PERIOD COVERED

Master's Thesis;September 1984-

6. PERFORMING ORG. REPORT NUMBER

7. AUTHORfsJ

Mark Steven Welch

8. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUM3ERf«J

9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS

Naval Postgraduate SchoolMonterey, California 93943

10. PROGRAM ELEMENT. PROJECT, TASKAREA 4 WORK UNIT NUMBERS

11. CONTROLLING OFFICE NAME AND ADDRESS

Naval Postgraduate SchoolMonterey, California 93943

12. REPORT DATE

SppfPmhpr 198413. NUMBER OF PAGES

11414. MONITORING AGENCY NAME 4 ADDRESS)"// dllterent from Controlling Office) 15. SECURITY CLASS, (of thte report)

Unclassified

15«. DECLASSIFICATION/ DOWNGRADINGSCHEOULE

16. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (of this Report)

Approved for public release, distribution unlimited

'7. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (ot the abstract entered In Block 20, If different from Report)

18. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

19. KEY WORDS (Continue on reverse aide If necessary and Identify by block number)

DDAM, ELSHOK, Finite Element, Finite Difference, Modal Analysis,Elastic Shock Response, Submarine Shock, Submarine-Installed Equipment

20. ABSTRACT (Continue on reverse aide If necessary and Identify by block number)

Motivated by a lack of explosive test data on nuclear submarines,

the Navy has sought other means to qualify installed equipment in

submarine shock environments. The currently used method for non-shocktestable items is the Dynamic Design Analysis Method (DDAM) developedby the Naval Research Laboratory in the early 1960's. With the advent

of large-scale computing power, newer numerical methods have become

DD | JAN 73 1473 EOITION OF 1 NOV 65 IS OBSOLETE

S N 0102- LF- 014- 6601]_

UnclassifiedSECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (When Data Bntarad)

Page 13: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

UnclassifiedSECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE fWh«o Dmtm Enffd)

available to predict equipment responses. This investigation is a

comparative study of DDAM and ELSHOK; a new generation numerical shockresponse code. The limitations and strong points of both methods areexamined using illustrative examples.

S'N 0102- LF-014-6601

UnclassifiedSECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS P AGZ(Wh.n Dmt. Bnt.t.d)

Page 14: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

Ap p r o'-,' e d i or public release, d i s t r i bu t i on unl i m i ted

Numerical Analysis o-f the Elastic Shock Responseof Su bmar i n e Installed Eq u i pmen

t

by

Mar k Steven WelchLieutenant, United States Nay y

B . S.

, Un i y e r s i t y of M i c h i gan , 1 978

Su brn i 1 1 e d in partial -fulfill me n t o+ therequirements tor the degree o+

MASTER OF SCIENCE IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING

f r om the

NAMAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOLSep t ember , 1 984

Page 15: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

' /? r

ABSTRACT

Motivated by a lack o-f explosive test data on nuclear

submarines, the Navy has sought other means to qual i ty in

stalled equipment in submarine shock environments. The

currently used method for n on -shock testable items is the

Dy n am i c De s i gn An a 1 ys i s Me t h od ( DDAM ':> de v e 1 op e d by the

Nav a 1 Re se ar c h Labor a t or y in the earl y 1 ?6S ' s . Ul i t h the

advent o + large-scale computing power, newer numerical

methods have become available to predict equipment re-

sponses. This investigation is a comparative study of

DDAM and ELSHOK ; a new generation numerical shock responsi

code. The 1 imitations and strong points o+ both methods

are examined using illustrative examples.

Page 16: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I . I NTRODUCT I ON 8

A . BACKGROUND S

B. THE STATE OF CURRENT SHOCK DESIGN ANALYSIS 11

C . PURPOSE FOR THIS INVESTIGATION 13

I I . DYNAMIC DESIGN ANALYSIS METHOD ( DDAM) 15

A . DESCRI FT I ON OF DDAM 15

B . DESIGN SHOCK INPUTS 17

C . USING DDAM 1 ?

III. EXPLOSIVE SHOCK RESPONSE USING ELSHOK 29

A. GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF OPERATION 28

B. ORGANIZATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ELSHOK 21

B . 1 . Phase I - She 1 1 and Fluid Anal ys is 22

B . 2 . Ph ase II - Substructure Ana 1 ys i s .......... 25

B . 3 . Phase III - T i me I n tegrat i on . 25

B . 4 . Ph ase IV - Plotting 27

B . 5 . De i 1 e c t i on Ca 1 c u 1 a t i on s

.

27

IV . MODELS USED IN THE ANALYSIS 23

A. FINITE ELEMENT/FINITE DIFFERENCE MODELS 23

B. SUBMARINE HULL MODELING USING B0S0R4 23

C. SUBSTRUCTURE MODELING USING SAP IV 39

C . 1 . Substructure Case I Mode 1 48

C.2. Substructure Case I I Model 41

C . 3 . Substructure Case III Model 41

Page 17: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

K>

.

ANALYS IS 44

A . CASE ANALYS I S PROCEDURE 45

U I . RESULTS 55

A . CASE I (1, 00 6 LB CASE) 55

B . CASE II < 29 , 000 LB CASE) 56

C . CASE III (10 ,000 LB CASE) 58

MI I . CONCLUSIONS 60

L I ST OF REFERENCES 64

APPENDIX A : DDAM USER'S MANUAL AND PROGRAM LISTING 66

A . USING THE DDAM PROGRAM 66

A . 1 . Option Selections 66

A . 2 . Op t i on C 1 ] Execu t i on 63

A . 3 . Option C 2 ] Execution 6?

B . PROGRAM LI STING - DDAM 71

C. PROGRAM JACOBI - INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE 34

D

.

PROGRAM LI STING - JACOBI 34

APPENDIX B : PROGRAMS USED TO CONVERT VELOCITY HIST0R-..99IES TO DEFLECTION HISTORIES

APPENDIX C : TYPI CAL CASE I ANALYS I

S

93

A

.

SAPI V INPUT DATA FOR CASE I 93

B

.

PI CRUST INPUT DATA FOR CASE I 94

C

.

USLOB INPUT DATA FOR CASE I 95

D. LISTING - USLOB OUTPUT FOR CASE I 97

E

.

INTEGRATI ON USING SIMPS1 106

INITIAL DISTRIBUTION LIST 113

Page 18: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

LIST OF FIGURES

Paq e

1 . Organ i zat i on ot the ELSHOCK Computer Code .23

2. Fu 11" Model Used to Capture Gross Response of 32

Submar i ne

3. Compartment Model Dep ict ing Area ot I

n

teres t ........ 35

4 . Shell -Subs t rue tur e Con -figuration....... 33

5

.

Case I Equ i pmen t and Finite El emen t Mode 1 ..... 42

6

.

Case II & III Finite El emen t Mode 1 43

7

.

Relative Me 1 oc i t i e s Used to Calculate Relative 4?De-flection Between Mass and Base -for Case I

8

.

Case II & III Relative Velocity Ca 1 c u 1 a t i on s f or .... 48A t hwar t sh i p an d Me r t i c a 1 3h oc K Wav e

s

9 . Shock Con-f i gurat i cms for Case I . . 58

1 8 . Shock Conf i gurat i ons tor Case II ....51

1 1 . Shock Conf i gurat i cms for Case III .52

Page 19: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

I . INTRODUCTION

A. BACKGROUND

Modern combat vessels must be designed with the

capabil i ty to survive moderately severe shock loadings

induced by the underwater explosion o-f conventional or

nuc 1 ear weapons . In the scope o-f this i nvest i gat i on ,

survival includes the mission survival of the platform. It

mu s t ma i n t a i n its ab i 1 i t y to utilise all mac h i n e r y an

d

w e a p o n s s ystems to car r y o u t i t s p r i ma r y m i s s i o n f o 1 1 ow i n

g

an underwater explosive attack. Although the vessel may

withstand considerable hull damage and maintain its

structural integrity, failure of internal equipment can

render it useless as a weapon and thereby eliminate its

v a 1 u e in time of crisis. This i n v e s t i ga t i on e x am i n e s the

shock loading of internal equipment in submarines and some

of the methods available to analyse shock response.

In view of the fact that a submarine can not be

expected to survive a direct hit by any modern,

high -intensity weapon, many attempts have been made to

specify a level of shock loading for the purpose of design

e v a 1 u a t i on . The current sp e c i f i c a t i on s f or bu i 1 d i n

g

submarines contain the shock requirements to be met by the

Page 20: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

builders and v e n dor s of installed e q u i pmen t . Gen e r- a 1 1 y ,

al 1 equipment is to pass a series of shock tests, in the

installed con-f i gurat i on as outlined by MIL-3-90 1C CRef.13,

where shock testing is practical . This document specifies

standard explosive and mechanical test -Fixtures and

procedures -for conducting the tests. The suitabil i ty of an

e q u i pmen t design or installation is e y a 1 u a t e d ac c or ding t o

its ability to -function as i n t e n de d during an d a f t e r e a c

h

sh oc k i mpu 1 se . Eq u i pme n t testing is very e x p e n s i y e an d

requires a great deal of preparation. In the case of

equipment design, it is often not practical to evaluate an

installation prior to the tin a 1 de s i gn . I n some i n s t an c e s

,

the direct testing ot" installed components may not be

poss i bl e from the aspec t of proh i bi t i ve size or we i gh t . In

these cases, a design analysis is specified.

The design analysis for shock response was first

proposed in the United States during World War II. Hull

damage reports indicated the degree of suceptibil i ty of

installed equipment to shock loadings from bombs and depth

charges. Based on limited testing and observations, a

shock design factor was specified. A series of curves were

used to depict the variation of shock design factor with

equipment weight to yield an equivalent static design

force. This force was used to specify mounting hardware

and main structural members for the equipment installation

Page 21: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

an d v ar i e d w i t h mo t i on i n p u t direction. The met h od p r ov e

d

t o be si mp 1 e in ap p 1 i c a t i on but reflected a 1 ac k of real i sm

w i t h e x per i me n t a 1 tests.

In the late 1 958 " s , nude ar p owe r p 1 an t s we r e

i n c or p or a t e d into su bmar i n e designs to afford t h em gr e a t e

r

independence f r om the frequent su r f ac i n g r e q u i r erne n t s

inherent in c on vent i on a 1 su bmar i n e op e r a t i on s . Nu c 1 e ar

p ow e r plant t e c h n o 1 o

g

y was n ew a n d t h u s h a d n o p r e v i o u

s

history of shock resistance. The acquisition cost of

nuclear components is high and the new dangers associated

with t h e i r damage f r om u nderwa t e r e x p 1 os i on sp ar k e d a

renewed interest in underwater explosion testing and design

analysis. From the late 1958

" s through the middle 1968' s,

most of the currently used standards for su bmar i De-

installed equipment shock, design were adopted.

The Dynamic Design Analysis Method (DDAM) was proposed

by the Naval Research Laboratory and accepted by the Navy

as a design evaluation requirement in 1963 CRef 23. The

details of this specification will be discussed more fully

later; h owe v e r , the basic principle is stated here. DDAM i s

a simpl if ied modal analysis method which util izes shock

i npu t s wh i c h we r e emp i r i c a 1 1 y de r i v e d f r om u n de rwa t e

r

explosion tests of real istic ship and submarine instal-

lations. It is assumed that the equipment and its four

dation together make up a system which responds as a 1 i near-

el a s t i c structure to the input which i s de sc r i be d by a

18

Page 22: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

design shock spectrum. The success-ful u t i 1 ization of DDAM

to evaluate equipment response to a d e s i g n s h o c k input i s

dependent on the abi 1 i ty of the design shock spectrum to

re -f 1 e c t ace u r a t e 1 y the structural en v i r onme n t e x i s t i n g in

g i v en installation. Th i s w ill be influenced by the size

and weight of the submarine test subject, the structural

system employed in the construction of the submarine, and

the i n terac t i on be twe en the e q u i pme n t , f ou n da t i on an d h u 1 1

structure used to derive the design shock spectrum.

B. THE STATE OF CURRENT SHOCK DESIGN ANALYSIS

Since its adoption, DDAM has been used without

modification to qual i f y ship and submarine equipment

i n s t a 1 1 a t i on de s i gn s . The or i g i n a 1 de s i gn sh oc k sp e c t r urn

C Re f . 2 ] r ema ins intact w i t h ou t re v i s i on . Sh or 1 1 y after

the adoption of DDAM as a design requirement, underwater

e x plosive testing of nuclear su bmar i n e s was ban n e d due t o

the inherent risks involved. This ban was relaxed in 1983

for the low level explosive test of a SSN 633 class

su bmar i n e . Me c h an i c a 1 and explosive test s of e q u i pme n

t

installations on shock simulation platforms are the only

regular check of designs meeting the standards imposed by

DDAM. A danger exists with this kind of verification in

that the tests may be designed to accurately reproduce the

input motions provided for in the design shock spectrum

u t i 1 i zed wi th DDAM.

1 1

Page 23: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

In recent years the increasing availabil i ty of large

computers and the rapid development ot numerical methods

have provided the engineer with new tools to use in the

analysis of submarine shock response problems.

Finite-Element/Finite-Difference methods allow tor the

analysis ot structure and -fluid responses and the work ot

Geers [Ret. 33 provides a means to incorporate fluid-

structure interaction effects. Several computer codes have

been developed to analyze installed equipment response to

shock waves based on these formulations. One of them is the

Elastic Shock (ELSHOK) code developed by UJeidlinger

Associates under Defense Nuclear Agency and Office of Naval

Research funding CRef.43. The motivation for this work has

been to investigate mode r n su bmar i n e u n de rwa t e r e x p 1 os i v

e

shock response in conjunction with a testing program using

small to large scale models and shaped, explosive, tapered

charges. Throughout its development, ELSHOK has been

validated using these highly controlled tests. In the low

level explosive test of the SSN 688 class submarine, ELSHOK

was used to predict the level of equipment responses prior

to the tests and to increase the level of confidence

associated with the tests. This code has now been made

available to the Naval Postgraduate School by the Defense

Nuclear Agency along with support from Weidl inger Associates

12

Page 24: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

C . PURPOSE FOR THIS INVESTIGATION

DDAM is a design tool . Its -function is to provide a

numerical method by which the engineer can check his design

as to its adequacy for installation in a submarine. It is

intended to be c on se r v a t i v e and s t r a i gh t f orwar d t o ap p 1 y .

When DDAM was -first proposed [Ref.4], its authors warned

that the design shock -factors specified [Re f.2] were not

abso 1 u t e 1 y de t e rm i n e d and sh ou 1 d be re v i ewe d as e x p 1 os i v e

testing progressed and data was accumulated. Although

testing procedures for installed equipment components have

bee ome v e r y sop h i s t i c a t e d , these s i mu 1 a t or s may not accur-

ately reflect the response of installations in modern day

submarines. Without the abil i ty to carry out high-

i n t e n s i t y sh oc k test s on real submarines, v e r i f i c a t i on of

the design shock spectrum used in DDAM can not be

accompl i shed as intended. The evolution of numerical codes

capable of simulating the response of installed equipment

to a specified shock loading makes available a means to

check the appl icabil i ty of the originally proposed design

shock factors provided in DDAM to modern submarines. There

is no flexibility bu i 1 t into DDAM to all ow desi gn for other

than the originally prescribed shock input magnitude. DDAM

makes no separate account for equipment/structure inter-

action effects.

13

Page 25: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

The purpose of this investigation is to examine the

response o-f several equipment models installed in a present

day scale, 699Q long ton (LT) submarine using DDAM and

ELSHOK. The equipment models range in weight -from

1,000-23,000 pounds. Simple models are used to make

c or re 1 a t i on s p oss i b 1 e be twee n the two me t h ods and wor- s t

case results are obtained. Additionally, equipment/hull

interactions are investigated for their possible in-fluence

on overall equipment response.

14

Page 26: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

I I . DYNAM I C DESI GM ANA LYS I S MET H D

A. DESCRIPTION OF DDAM

As- men t i oned in the in troduc t i on , DDAM i s a s i mp 1 i f i ed

modal analysis method which utilizes shock inputs which

we r e emp i r i c a 1 ly de r i v e d f r om u n de rwa t er e x p 1 os i on test s o-f

real istic ship and submarine installations. Although the

analysis is identical -For both types of vessels, all refer-

ences in this document will be to submarines. In order to

utilize DDAM to evaluate a design, several assumptions must

be sat i sf i ed.

1.) The equipment and -foundation make up a 1 i nearlye 1 ast i c system

.

2.) The structure can be represented reasonablywell using a lumped parameter model

.

3.) The structure is hard mounted to the rest ofthe su bmar i n e . No bo 1 1 om i n g , or damp e d mou n

t

are all ow e d

.

I n Nav y shock requi r erne n t s , equipment sh oc k classi-

fications are based on a graded system. These grades run

from A for mission critical items, to C for items that

could indirectly affect the ability of the vessel to

function as intended. For instance, a locker which become'

15

Page 27: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

adr i f t an d could injure personnel or sur r ou nd i ng e q ui

pmen

t

could be grade C. The grade of the item is speci-fied by

contract and determines the degree of shock qua! if i cat ion

it must undergo to be considered safe -For installation. In

this study, all equipment models were considered grade A.

The ideal way to compute the elastic shock response of

an installed equipment is to consider the entire structure

< submarine and equipment) as an elastic system. The normal

modes and natural -frequencies of this system can then be

determined and the response of each normal mode to the

water appl ied pressure loadings computed. The modal

responses can then be superimposed to get the resultant

equipment response. In an everyday design method such as

DDAM, this approach is impractical . To simpl ify the above

procedure, DDAM util izes the concept of a shock spectrum.

Any point on the complete structure can be designated as a

reference point which can then be considered to be a fixed

base for the equipment on one side of it. The dynamic

response of this portion can then be computed by

superposition of normal mode responses to the motion of the

fixed base . I n DDAM , this mot i on is spec i f i ed as a step

input to each normal mode and is calculated by empirical

equations based on underwater explosion tests of models and

submarines [Ref. 53. A detailed treatment of the

mathematical basis for DDAM is given by Butt [Ref. 61.

16

Page 28: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

I n o r de r to use DDAM , a lumped parameter model of the

equipment must be -formulated to obtain the matrix

ex press i on

:

CM3 CX> + CK3 OO = <.%y (1)

which has the associated eigenvalue problem

CM] cx ia] C d)2 3 = CK3 CXj*] <2>

where CX )a ] is the matrix of eigenvectors and Cw£ 3 is the

diagonal matrix of natural -frequencies. The advantage of

this procedure is that it all ow s uncoupling of the

equations ot motion and subsequent solution o-f the dynamic

problem in terms of its component modes. Careful

-formulation o-f the equations of motion to capture all the

dominant characteristics o-f the equipment leads to good

results with only a small number o-f modes. When DDAM was

developed, it was intended to be used pr i mar i 1 y in hand

computations. The major difficulty encountered in the use

of DDAM was the solution of the eigenvalue problem which

can readily be handled today with smal 1 computers. The

normal mode theory upon which DDAM is based is well

establ i shed in shock and vibration practice. The area of

concern is the adequacy of the adopted design inputs to

reflect present day submarine building practices.

B. DESIGN SHOCK INPUTS

The specification of design shock inputs for use in

DDAM calculations determines the usefulness of this method

17

Page 29: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

in the e v a 1 u a t i on of e q u i pme n t i n s t a 1 1 a t i on de s i gn s . DDAM

i s a s t andar d . The de s i gn i n p u t v a 1 u e s mu s t p r ov i de

c on s i s t e n t f i x e d-base d e q u i pme n t e x c i t a t i on s f or- the br oad

base of submarine platforms in use today to simulate a

"standard" underwater explosion. To simulate this requi re-

men t here, c h ar ge we i gh t s an d s t an dof f s we r e selected so t h a

t

each case corresponded to a constant value of energy flux

den si ty ; i.e.,

w7"R * = Const a n t < 3

)

In this equation, W is the equivalent weight of the charge

in pounds of TNT and R is the standoff distance from the

hull in feet. The submarine platforms in use today range in

size from about 4,688-13,786 LT . Each submarine hull is

characterized by its own modal properties (mass distri-

bution, natural frequencies, mode shapes). The same piece

of equ i pment as is i nstal 1 ed in a smal 1 submar i ne wi 1 1

demonstrate a different response when installed in the same

configuration, in a large submarine. The effect of hull/

equipment interaction becomes an important consideration in

large pieces of equipment tuned to one or more natural fre-

quencies of the hull structure. The design shock input used

with DDAM must incorporate these factors so that when it is

said that a piece of equipment meets the specification for

qual i f i cat i on , the qual i f i cat i on 1 evel is the same for al 1

su bmar i n e c 1 asse s

.

18

Page 30: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

In the p u b 1 i c a t i on s reqardi n q DDAM , little is said

abou t the or i g i n s of the p ar t i cu 1 ar sh ock i n p u t sp ectr um

uti 1 ized to evaluate equipment response. It has been

emp i r i c a 1 1 y de r i v e d t o p r ov i de y a 1 u e s c on s i stent w i t h the

data upon which it is based. In the event that it is

decided to design submarines to resist underwater explosions

of a different shock intensity than the one chosen for the

present method, a major effort would be required to

construct a data base upon which to base the new input

y a 1 u e s .

C. USING DDAM

Since the de v e 1 opme n t of DDAM , n ew t oo 1 s hay e replaced

the si i de rules of engineers. Among them are the readily

available desktop computers. In the course of this work, it

was necessary to use DDAM to analyse simple structures of

fewer than 58 degrees of freedom. To this end, a computer

program has been written in the BASIC computer language to

carry out the required computations. A 1

i

sting and short

users'' manual can be found in Appendix A. The program was

verified by c omp ar i n g re su 1 t s w i t h h an d c a 1 c u 1 a t i on s an

d

publ i shed sample problems.

1?

Page 31: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

III. EXPLOSWE SHOCK RESPONSE ANALYSIS USING ELSHQK

A. GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF OPERATION

The ELSHOK computer code [Ret. 4] calculates the

transient response of a submerged, ring-stiffened shell of'

r e v o 1 u t i on , w i t h or w i t h ou t i n t e r n a 1 struct u r e , to an

underwater shock wave emanating from an explosive source

placed at an arbitrary location away -from the shell . The

structure is considered to be 1 i nearly elastic, and the

surrounding fluid is treated as an infinite ac oust i c

medium. Modal structural analysis is used in all phases of

the calculations. Internal equipment response is treated

by coupl i ng the free -free modes of the empty ring-stiffened

shell and the fixed-base modes of the internal equipment

through use of dynamic boundary conditions CRefs. 7,83.

The structure-fluid interaction is approximated by means of

the Doub 1 y Asymp t o t i c Ap p r ox i ma t i on < DAA ) due t o 6e e r s

CRef. 33. The form of the DAA used is that obtained when

the normal fluid displacement of the structure—fl ui d

interface is expanded using surface expansion functions

which are orthogonal over the wet surface of the submarine.

At frequencies of zero and infinity, the pressure -ve 1 oc i ty

relations are exact so that in transient analysis, the DAA

yields exact results at early and late times, and by the

29

Page 32: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

nature of its formulation provides a. smooth transition

between these two 1 imits. In effect, the DAA el lows for

uncoupling of the fluid field problem from the structural

field probl em

.

The structural problem solved by ELSHOK is separated

into two parts. A modal subs true tur i ng procedure is used to

solve the dynamic response problem for internal equipment.

The advantage of this is to el iminate the need to handle the

modes and natural frequencies of the combined structural

problem, as well as the requirement for a combined system

stiffness matrix. Interaction forces and moments, and

compatibility of deformation at the she 11 -subs true tur e

attachment points are used to solve for the dynamic response

of the component parts.

Referring to the ideal case of DDAM formulated without

the use of a shock input value; ELSHOK is a numerical means

to arrive at the input to the substructure without depend-

ence on an explosive testing database and with the added

advantage that interaction effects between the hull and

substructure are taken into account. ELSHOK performs a

t r an s i e n t anal y s i s wh e r e as DDAM utilizes a s i mp 1 i f i e

d

"front end" to arrive at the maximum forces and deflections

in a given response problem for a single magnitude of

1 o a d i ng.

21

Page 33: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

B. ORGANIZATION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ELSHOK

The ELSHOK code is implemented as a series o-f seven

programs. The major components are:

1. B0S0R4 - structural analyzer for shell CRe-f. 93

2. ACESNID - virtual mass processor

3. PI FLASH - she 11 --flu id processor

4. SAPIU - structural analyzer -for substructureCRe-f. 16]

5. PI CRUST - substructure processor

6. USLOB - time integration processor

7. PUSLOB - plotting processor

Figure 1 depicts the general relationship among the

code modules. The numbers above correspond to the

chronological execution order to be -followed in a given

analysis. In order to carry out an analysis using ELSHOK,

a lumped parameter model o-f the submarine being analyzed

must be -formulated or available as well as the equipment

model . More will be said about models later. The compu-

tations are carried out in -four phases.

B . 1 . Phase I - Shell and Fluid Analysis

B0S0R4 is a -finite difference code used to

capture the e-ffects of the submarine hull structure on the

overall response. Two models are actually used: a full

mode 1 con t a i n i rig i n -f orma t i on abou t the ma j or c on + i gu r a t i on

Page 34: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

ta

UJCO<Xa.

\

uOT K5 •-I «/»

a. <n3

<Ui Xa. Uu <<r uj

9w O UJw z a;

q. f5 o« < 32 "*~ UJ h-_ K «Jiujai* X 3OT I- </»

2*> -

i* -

, « << a> CO

8*

EkM «cuj cr

I iCOUJ

KO09

. • a50 2H o COec ae uj

S <<a

< -iz<

Kx OQ» CO

^ it. OSo en

o3

<QUJOocUJ

as _-I «9 COu. „, <Jj « J_, O u.iu O —a a.

UJCO<Xa.

UJCO<X,a.

—--—-—— --» I- (—

-

J °o «1U uj

IS

CO

o-JCO3

u eno o' ICOO 35 a-

' • ' 1

r\UICO<Xa.

0i

en

TJOOLUJ

3Q.

£OO

oXCO_JUJ

a*

o

co

N

C

encO

I

c3ai

23

Page 35: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

of the submarine and its general dynamic properties, and a

compartment model representing the local ized area of

interest on the hull . The -full model is used to capture

the gross effects of the response such as rigid body

translation and whipping (N = 1 modes), and roll ing and

tw i s t i n g < N = 8 t or s i on a 1 mode s ) of th e entire structure.

The compartment model is used to capture local details o-f

the response in the area o-f interest <N = 8 breathing and

N£2 modes). N is the integral number o-f circumferential

way e s or h armon i c s in the circumferential d i s t r i bu t i on s of

the surface expansion functions. For each N, a separate

B0S0R4 calculation is required. The B0S0R4 code provides

the i

n -vacuo free-free modes and natural frequencies of the

submar i ne hull.

The second part of phase I is the use of ACESNID

to compute the virtual mass array, which is used in the

late t i me c on t r i bu t i on of the DAA . Th e virtual mass ar r av-

is determined from the solution, based on simple sources,

of a steady-state low frequency problem in which normal

displacements corresponding to the surface expansion

functions are appl i ed to the surface of a cavity of

revolution in an infinite fluid having t h e same size and

shape as the wet surface of the submarine. Only one run of

this module is required for all values of N considered.

24

Page 36: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

The f i n a 1 step in p h a s e I is the e :<: ecut i o n o

f

PI FLASH to compile the data from all B0S0R4 runs end

ACESNI D into a she 1 1 -and--f 1 u i d tile -for 1 a ten use . The

anal /sis done for the work in this thesis considered only

the hull response o-f one submarine so only one

she 1 1 -and—f 1 u i d tile was needed for all subsequent

cal cu 1 at i ons

.

B . 2 Phase II - Substructure Analysis

SAP I 'J i s a common 1 y ay a i 1 abl e finite el emen t code

used in the ELSHOK code to perform the modal analysis of

each substructure (equipment model). The equipment

i n s t a 1 1 a t i on is first cast i n t o an ap p r op r i a t e finite

element representation and then SAP IV is used to solve for

the desired mode shapes and frequencies. This information

is placed in a substructure mode file along with the

geometry, stiffness and mass information. The mass, mode,

and frequency information were also used in the DDAM

an a 1 y s i s f or c omp ar a t i u e p urp ose s

.

The tinal step in phase II is the execution of the

PI CRUST code. This code prepares the input for phase III

calculations by placing the above modal information on a

substructure file. Additionally, it calculates influence

coefficients corresponding to the base or support motions of

the substructure and accounts for the user-specified

connect i y i ty

.

25

Page 37: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

B . 3 . Phase III - Time Integration

Following the completion of Phases I and II, the

she 1 1 -and-f 1 u i d tile is merged with the substructure -file

to form the input tile for USLOB which is ELSHOK's time

integration processor. USLOB allows specification o+' the

charge weight and geometry. For the problems of concern

here , an e x p on e n t i a 1 1 y de c ay i n g , emp i r i c a 1 mode 1 was used

to represent the explosive shock source. It i s of the

form

:

P I(R) = Ki<W 1/s/R)K2 exp <-t/e > (4)

where;

Pi<R> = the incident pressure at a radius R fromthe explosion (on the hull)

Ki

t

W

So

Ks

K 4

= a multiplicative constant for incidentpressure

= a spatial decay constant for incidentpressure

= time after arrival of shock wave at pointof interest

= weight of spherical charge

= Ks W 1/s< W 1/s / R >K4

= multiplicative constant for time constantof exponential decay

= spatial decay constant for time constantof exponential decay

In all the cases, the geometry was such as to maintain con-

stant energy flux according to eq.<3>. The integration in

time is done using a modified version of the Runge-Kutta

26

Page 38: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

n umer i c a 1 i n t e gr a t i on sc h erne , During the i n t e gr a t i on

,

USLOB ou t p u t =• v e 1 oc i t y h i •=, t or i es f or- user-spec i t i ed p o i n t

s

o n t hi e hull a n d s u b s t r

u

cture .

B.4. Phase IV - Plotting

Phase IV capabi 1 i t i es we re not utilized in this i rive

ti gat ion. However, ELSHOK does have the capabi 1 i ty to gen-

erate plot -files c on t a i n i n g velocity his t or y i n f orma t i on f or

processing on a graphics terminal .

B . 5 . De f 1 e c t i on Ca 1 c u 1 a t i on s

As men t i on e d pre v i ou s 1 y , ELSHOK p r odu c e s Mel oc i t y

histories at the points of interest on the substructure.

DDAM produces maximum deflections or -forces at the same

points for similar models. In order to make comparisons

between the two methods, it was decided to convert the

v e 1 oc i t y hist or i es f r orn ELSHOK to de-f 1 ec t i on h i s t or i e s u s i n g

an .integrator based on Simpson's 1/3 Rule. For each

equipment case, a separate program was written in BASIC to

accomodate the variations in configuration between each

model and the d i -f -f erences in output -from the USLOB code due

to point o-f interest specification. These proqr am s a r

e

1 isted in Appendix B.

27

Page 39: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

I ',•'. MODELS USED IN THE ANALYSIS

A. FINITE ELEMENT/FINITE DIFFERENCE MODELS

The idea, of r e p r e se n t i n 9 a q i v e n dom 5. i n a s a col 1 e c t i o

n

of discrete elements or values was not first appl i ed in

finite element/finite difference methods. Early mathemati-

cians estimated the v alue of Tt to nearly 48 decimal places

by representing the circle w i t h a p o 1 ygon of a f i n i t e 1

y

large number of sides. The polygon used by the mathemati-

cians is a model of the circle they wished to represent.

In modern numerical methods, it is realized that very few

problems in the real world can be analyzed without the use

of simpl ifying models. B0S0R4, the finite difference code

in ELSHOK used to describe the dynamic behavior of the sub-

marine hull, requires a greatly simplified model of its

real world counterpart. Similarly, both DDAM and ELSHOK

use a substructure model to capture the fixed-base

properties of installed equipment.

B. SUBMARINE HULL MODELING USING B0S0R4

Ac t u a 1 su bmar i n e hulls ar e v ^ry c omp lex structures.

However, they do possess certain characteristics that can

be used to simpl i f y their model ing. From the aspect of

submarine hull shock response, the hull is a free -free ring

stiffened cylinder with suitable end closures. The

28

Page 40: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

internal weights of machinery and other outfitting must be

accounted tor but these items can be smeared into their

adjacent hull structure. The model thus becomes a cyl inder

whose cross sections reflect the density of the submarine

at a given frame. Since a cyl inder is a surface of

revolution, the properties of each cross section need only

be specified at one point. The reader will notice that any

hard structure serving to stiffen the hull in a non-

ax i symme tr i c sense, such as non-circular frames or massive

machinery foundations, can not be represented in this

fashion. If these structures are in the area of interest

in the hull, they should be modeled as internal structures

in phase II of ELSHOK.

The B0S0R4 code allows the submarine hull model to be

constructed by specifying the properties of the submarine

hull along a line of revolution. A numerical complication

enters the problem when dealing with models of submarines

because the structure often repeats itself regularly along

its axis of revolution. With such a configuration, there

are many modes in which the motion of the stiffeners is of

smal 1 amp 1 i tude compared to that of the shel 1 . The bays

between the rings vibrate at frequencies which may

approximate those corresponding to a simply-supported

cyl inder of the same geometry as the bay. Multiple or

closely-spaced eigenvalues correspond to modes in which

29

Page 41: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

one or more of the bays is vibrating while others are

unaffected. To avoid eigenvalue difficulties, the prudent

measure is to analyse as small a segment of shell as

p oss i b 1 e in or de r t o av o i d n ume r i c a 1 difficulties with

multiple, or closely-spaced eigenvalues as indicated by

Bushnell [Ref. ?3 . In submarine shock analysis, the

interest is in the gross response contributions of the

entire hull to a given section of interest. The authors of

ELSHOK have allowed for this through the use of two models.

A full model is used to obtain the gross contributions

of the entire hull structure in the N = 9 < torsional) and

N = 1 < tr an si at i onal and whipping) modes. This will include

such things as bulkheads, heavy ring stiffeners, and end

closures. A compartment model is then used to obtain more

detailed information about the particular section of

interest. In this way, responses away from the section of

interest do not have to be carried through the remaining

calculations since they do not affect the response of this

area anyway.

Due to security restrictions placed in information re-

garding the construction techniques and arrangements of U.S.

nuclear submarines, it was not possible to model an actual

submarine for use in the analysis work contained in this

thesis. With the aid of We i dl inger Associates of New York,

however, a model resembl ing a general submarine hull struc-

ture of 690 long tons displacement was obtained. This

39

Page 42: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

model is available through the U.S. Naval Postgraduate

School but is not included here so that restrictions do not

have to be pi aced on the circulation of this work

.

Figure 2 is a schematic depiction of the full subma-

rine. The submarine being modeled has been cut into 149

slices along the longitudinal axis. In the model, in for-

mat i on regard i ng Young' s modu 1 us, Po i sson "' s ratio, mass

density, thermal expansion coefficient, plating hal f-

thickness and whether or not stiffeners are smeared is pro-

vided for each one of these points. Twenty-six discrete

rings are represented along the axis of the model , twenty

of which are in the local area of interest. These rings

represent frames in the real submarine where T-st i f f ener

s

give increased stiffness to the hull. In actuality, these

stiffeners are spaced fairly evenly along the entire model

,

but smearing them outside the area of interest will not

appreciably affect the vibrational characteristics in the

area of interest. Using the B0S0R4 code, modal analysis

using finite difference techniques is carried out. Table

1 is a listing of the natural frequencies and wave numbers

for each mode retained in the analysis. Seven N = U

torsional modes, and thirty-eight N = 1 rigid body

displacement and whipping modes have been retained for the

full mode 1 .

31

Page 43: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

cH- Oo —U> D

X O<r :>

$Z aui«-U

93 eujrejj

33 eurejj

3S eureuj

S3 1 eurejj

Z3I 3UK?J-|

S9 aureuj

9^ dure jj

901 eurejj

3 U au«»jd

611 eurejj

£ J.N3W93S

fr .LN3W93S

.c

«u en

4J

c *J

Oi l/i

E 0)

*-> s- Lu Oi

«u -M

CL C£ <—

t

o

Oi 01

ui ._

£

Oi s- 4-L.

Hi C•*-> —C— T3

Oi

h- -•

Oi

UI

C

u Q.U>

C Oi

Oi

r

tme

as

dUI

m

Q. Oi

£ £Oi

rt

u U»L.

M• •

OiaU

Z^oOi

UI

=>

__

0)

TJ

z—p—

3UL

1

Oi

c3en

Page 44: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

MODE N FREQ( Hz )

MODE FREQ<Hz:'

1

3

5/

?

1 i

1315171?21

23

/L9

31

3335373941

4345 8

3.597563E-2.877235E+1 . 29881 6E+1 .391 155E+2.38 5725E+2.992269E+3.4H510E+3.563254E+3.716095E+3.S47244E+4 .027563E+4 . 295375E+4.492591E+5.2611 56 E+5.544796E+5.994369E+6. 31 21 91 E+

6.574109E+6.761096E+4.013475E-1 . 465699E+3.821633E+4.57960 4E+

0i00

10

12141618202224

2830

343633404244

i 4 . 716345E-02l / ,8901 12E+001 1 .793631 E+01l 1 897726E+8

1

1 2 . 728 91 8E+ 011 3 228725E+011 o . 49S256E+0 1

1 Q 5908 94E+011 O 88 6356E + 1

1 O 962965E+011 4 .0591 42E+811 4 390 227E+8

1

1 4 916127E+811 c1 _l 289662E+8

1

< c .63478 1 E+011 6 . 131432E+011 6 .521966E+811 6 . 632896E+0 1

1 6 . 345927E+017 584749E+8 8

jL . 342798 E+ 8

1

3 855958E+01

TABLE I - Wave Numbers and Frequencies o+ Full Model

Page 45: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

Figure 3 is a schematic representation of the compart-

ment < 1 oc a 1 ar e a of interest) mode 1 used in this ana 1 y s i s

.

In this model , all frames are modeled as discrete ring

s t i -f f e n e r s . S i n c e c omp a. t i b i 1 i t y mu s t be ma i n t a i n e d be twee

n

the two models, ( compar t-men t and ful 1 > , there is a one to

one correspondence in the area ot" interest between points

in each model . The compartment model is used to obtain the

modal contributions corresponding to N I 2 (normal , merid-

ional, and circumferential displacements). As mentioned

prey i ousl y , def ormat i cms or mot i ons occur i ng beyond the

region of interest should be unimportant for the N = 8

breathing modes and modes corresponding to N i 2. Each

bounding ring or bulkhead is very stiff in its own plane

and moves primarily in that plane for local i zed loading.

Table 2 is a 1 i sting of the natural frequencies and

circumferential wave numbers for each mode retained in the

analysis. For the compartment model , 25 modes corres-

ponding to N =2, 24 modes corresponding to N = 3, 24 modes

corresponding to N = 4 and 25 modes corresponding to N = 8

have been retained. A total of 254 modes were found by

B030R4 for the full and compar tmen t models. Of these

modes, 143 were retained for further calculations in phase

II and III of ELSHOK. The 111 modes that were dropped

affect responses primarily outside of the area of interest.

34

Page 46: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

XSL<TS

3(-

OLL

£& aurejj

c

o o

m o— >

6<5 eurej-j

981 eurejj

CM

ZUJ

ZCDUJCO

5ZCDUJCO

h

I-

|_J

U1

4)

C4i

-w

C•-H />

TJH" Hi

IDn

•Ti i

Hi uL c<r —C7t ui

C c— m--• cu a>— M-an-a< .—

a -*-

Ul

«—

m L.

"D—>

z <v

E-t-1

c ~-

a< ,_

£ TS

*->

L.

<n a>

a -^

£zo

1

w

CO

a*

c_

3cn

<I

35

Page 47: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

CD (33 CD ujI

CD CD CD CO C^

LULLJUJLUUJLULULULUUJUJUJLULULULUco -o *3- ^3" to cd ««3- rN. r^. ^-o m ^r r*-- —• o. «««y -o co 03 r^- o. o-< to cv« rj to tt- cl* co -o co

o —• "*o <r o- to cd — * ou *r ^r •—. -o r*- co r-*-uofN^cncoc^c^uoco^cNjcniorrcDr^-CM-o On co en ck co ^a- m *<j rN. co cd rv* to go cd

on CO CO -o -J- in ij—> Wiro o- Pv en cu LO cm LT)m ro rr> -O ». in ou CEi

CM rn Ml UT cm ~j-

r~- Ul in CI J o~ cm CM LOro cu p^ o cm p- o fM

CD CD CD CD CD CD CCJ CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD

o in -o CJLU c-i CO -<JDr LJ ^o MlU. -o *ST

»o CU

LU UJ U.J LU LJ.J LU UJ LU LU LU LU LU LU LUo* cm ok co cd *o -~~ in co ck --. cd in xjcm

oo-<j-,NCK(N-oir)iN.NNXjm -o co c>~ r^_ cm ^sr —

>

rj o-. co o- en cm*o ck cm o. evi co >o -=r co tx> -o on -« co»j- m pi co *-« r^ p*~ co -—

cm p*_ ok r) cocm oci ~~* -nr oo co co co cm Ok pk

in c>CO COCO CO

^r «=r in »o

cu in-o co—

coCD ok

cu COOk CMLO —U "i CD

ro<»-inir)<o-o>oNN'^o)0.(Misai!Dooa!mcoo>o.ch«CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD

—.. co in r^.- ok —* co in pk ok ~— co uo p%-minmmmM3-o'"0>o-or-^PK.p^fK_ —•comp^o^—^coinp--oocococoajaKOKOKOK

"0

z

c

£**

c

a.

eoo

0)

uca.

3cra»

cu.

Dc

i7y» CD CO CD CD CD

U-J |_U LU UJ UJ LU LXJ UJ UJ UJ LU UJ LU LUen cd co •<—

u j o-i *o o^ cd ^-. cni -*r co rocvj <j co r^. ok o) uo oo r^j evi *j- m m r^-.

evi r^- *^" (tk- on, co *"d" o-i ro r^. u-> ca o* >otri cm tt co on its n *a- u~> -—

»

^r no ^o u"j•j- on io fN, or* r^- •-< no -o rN. ro o*. oo •*-*

co cd co rN_ o* «a- oo cd o- m o. co <» -h

conni/js)rsNoocDoocoov^rom'f^in>Ofs.NcuoocD(N

U.J 1 ll UJ Ul UJ LUI->- ro -<.' CO r-- rvj(N rj rv o- ps. D-U J ir> CO co in tN"3- o^. u~> TC5 r^- CO n dafs. TJ- o-. CO -o CM

UJ LU LU UJ LU~*J O- CO ai HJ

LT1 XJ CO CDT a_i CO Pn. -oCO in LO COtT> CM in O" CO~CJ •^-t T3- CO -3"

CM«NCNlNCN(NCNCNtNCV(CMCN enenenencnencnenenencn-a-

CNj tj- *<> co CD evi *t >o CO CD cvj ^J- vd cd » in tr -o CO a) in v "O co co—* ^—* —- *-* •-—« cvj evi evi evi cni en en en en en ^j- *r <kt *3' •**' io

CD eta CD CD CD T** CD <Tp CD *—^ CD CD CD OO CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD

UJ UJ UJ *LU UJUJLUUJUJUJLUUJUJUJU.JUJLUUJUJUJLUUJUJUJUJCK^CONVCNN^^ojCKCvrN.osinis-«'-<NCOcncDin«, a)CD CO «—• CM CO O-. CD l-v. ^O CK. UO *3~ CD rN. -—• -"O CO O C^n. uO CD CN| CO CD uorN_ cnj cd cd no cr-- ^ to cd co r^. o-- on co ^t no *-> cd cd fN, cd *<j ck. o«- coco co cd -*o evi tjo co cd —• *o *o evi r^- to oo co —* evi rN, ^- to uo cni •-. ^-»"O T3" CO -HD lO rvi fN*. LO ^*" ^3" CO fN, CD LO CO CO ^O lO *-

« >0 ^O O- —' 0-4 On^ co *o co co ^-< to co co "o oo evi cd to to co rN. co ~* t>.^3* rN. co rN- o.

pn. eve n^inNNNCocococN^Nnv^i/i^y)NrNCococKevi evi evi cni cni evi cm cni cm csj cni cni oj en en en en en en en en en en co co

«

co to r-N. t>s -^-. co to rN. o*. *-• co to n ck ^ n m n ck —* co 10 rN. o*

La.

JD

E

Z

3

LU_JCO

<ri-

36

Page 48: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

Figure 4 is a schematic of the general shell structure

model end notation conventions used in the remainder of the

E L SH K a n a 1 y s i s . Two coordi n a t e s y s t ems a r e u s e d . X , Y a n

d

Z refer to the submarine global coordinate -frame and x , y

and z refer to the substructure local coordinate frame. In

both systems, the x-axes run from aft to forward and the

z-axis orientation is related to the 2 axis in the global

system by the angle <xQ where re fers to the substructure.

The variable s is used to locate points along the meridian

of the -full model , and u , v , and w are used for local shel 1

displacements and motions located circumferentie.il>' by the

angle 0. This concludes the discussion of the submarine

model used in ELSHGK

.

One of the conveniences real i zed in using a DDAM

analysis to carry out design checks is the absence of a

submar i ne model in the computations. The design shock'

values are intended to provide all inputs to the substruc-

ture model . The penalty which must be weighed here is the

lack of regard which this places on the pecul iarities of e.

given submarine structure. On the other hand, the ELSHOK

submarine model is difficult to construct requiring a great

deal of information end skill to properly model a given

hull , but the price is paid only once for each submarine

class. All subsequent calculations in this thesis are

carried out utilizing the same shell model calculations.

37

Page 49: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

UJJJLson

L3Ol

H-Coo0>

C3

•*->

o3C*»

COI

111

I

Ta.

£_

3

Page 50: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

C. SUBSTRUCTURE MODELING USING SAP IV

I n bo t h DDAM an d ELSHOK calculations, a subs t r u c t u r

e

model is -formulated to determine the modes, masses, and

natural -frequencies ot the equipment system being design

checked. UJh e n DDAM was first de

v

eloped, a compute r p r ogr am

was available which could solve the eigenvalue problem for

up to twenty degrees o-f -freedom. However, the scare i ty of

compute r r e s o u r c e s dictated t h a t most users utilize h a n

d

c omp u t a t i on s f or this p u r p ose . Con se q u e n 1 1 y , mos t earl y

design checks were limited in scope. DDAM is well suited

to tabular methods o-f computation but with the common

av a i 1 ab i 1 i t y of sma 1 1 c omp u t e r s t oday , h an d c omp u t at i on

s

are no longer required, and the restrictions on degrees o-f

•freedom are largely removed. This is not to say that great

numbers o-f degrees o-f freedom are required in every case.

By careful e x am i n a t i on of the equipment i n s t a 1 1 a t i on be i n

g

checked, the major response contributions can be captured

using a small number of modes. In the cases considered in

this thesis, emp h as i s was place d on using e q u i v a lent models

for DDAM and ELSHOK rather than closely model ing a real

component in a submarine as it would be in each case in

actual practice. The interest here 1 ies in how the results

compare, for the same models.

Phase II of ELSHOK utilizes the SAP IV finite element

code to model submar i ne-i nstal 1 ed equipment. Because

3?

Page 51: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

ELSHOK is written util izing program modules which execute

independent!'/ and exchange data through output tiles, the

SAPI 1 -' code could be used to run the mode. 1 analysis of

equipment models tor DDAM end ELSHOK thus ensuring equival-

ence in input to both methods. The models selected tor

analysis were kept small so that comparisons could be made

w i t h ou t e x c e ss i v e c omp 1 i c a t i on

.

Three equipment models have been examined tor this

thesis. Case I is a cantilever foundation model with a

1098 lb weight attached to its free end. Cases II and III

are a simple beam foundation supporting two weights at

center sp an an d h a v i n g a 1 1 ac hme n t p o i n t s on two se p ar ate,

d i sc r e t e r i n g s t i f f e n e r s .

C . 1 . Su bs tructure Case I Mode 1

The case I model development is depicted in

figure 5 . The mode 1 represents a 1 8 88 lb v a 1 v e su p p or t e d by

a cantilever foundation. The foundation is built up from

A ISC C 18x38 steel channels CRef. 11] and the value is

rigidly fixed to the free end. Since the intent w as n o t t

o

q u a 1 if y any p ar t i c u 1 ar v a 1 v e design, the entire v a 1 v e h as

been modeled as a particle (lumped mass). The beam mass is

represented by six lumped masses. The foundation is

designed to be fixed to a discrete-ring stiffener in the

subrnar i ne in an upr i ght posi t i on . Al though 3-d i mens i onal

mo t o i on h as been all owe d , the max i mum deflection occurs in

the at hwar t sh i p direction i n r e sp on se t o a s i de -on sh oc k

Page 52: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

I oad i n 9 . Th i s c ase i s r e pr e sen t a. t i v e of a r e 1 at i u e 1 y

equipment install a t i o n

.

C . 2 . Su bs t r u c t ur

e

asf I Model

The case II model development is depicted in

figure 6. The model represents a foundation constructed

f r om A I SC U 27x 177 I -be ams E Ref . 11] supporting two 10,8 8

8

1 b we i gh t s . Th e +" ou n da t i on s t rue t ur e i s r epresen t e d by 1 S

beam elements and 1? masses. It spans two discrete

st i ffeners to which its ends are fixed. This model is

representative o-f a large pump or turbomach i ner y

i nst al 1 at i on

.

C . 3 . Substructure Case III Model

The case III model i s similar to the c a s e II

model except the foundation structure has been changed to

A ISC U.I 27x144 I-beams [Ref. Ill and the supported weights

have been reduced to 5,808 lb apiece. This model

represents an intermediate we i gh t e q u i pme n t in s t a 1 1 a t i on

such as a main feed pump.

41

Page 53: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

AISC C 18X38 Steel FoundationProper ties

I X x = 333.1 in. 4

l yy = 286.8 in. 4

J = 548.8 in. 4

web thickness = 0.673 in.

-flange thickness = 0.436 in.

area o-f channel = 8.82 in. 2

y

i

Sec t i on A-A

A A4v

\\\\\\\w\\\A\\u

REAL WORLD FOUNDATIONAND MASS

FINITE ELEMENT MODELFOR DDAM & ELSHOK

Figure 5 - Case I Equipment and Finite Element Model

Page 54: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

AISC W 27X177 SteelProper t i es

Foundat i on

I xx

yy

= 6740 in. 4

= 556 in. 4= 29 . 1 in

web thickness = 9.725 in

flange thickness = 1.190 in

area o-f beam =52.2 in

AISC W 27X1 14 SteelProper t i es

Foundat i on

I xx

yy

= 4999 in.**

= 159 in. 4

= 7.36 in

web thickness = 9.579 in

flange thickness = 9.932 in

area o-f beam = 33.6 in

CASE I I

->%

Section A-A

CASE I I I

n

Section A-A

FR 94 —o

o

o—o--f FR 95

Figure 6 - Case II & III Finite Element Model

43

Page 55: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

K>. ANALYSIS

The goal of the anal /sis procedure used in this inves-

tigation is two-told. The primary objective is to analyze

equivalent substructures using DDAM and ELSHOK so a com-

parison of the maximum predicted deflections can be made.

Secondly, any hu 1 1 /subs true tu re interaction effects are to

be noted. The analysis is com pi icated by several factors.

All the calculations are based on constant energy flux which

is dependent on charge weight and standoff. Since DDAM

shock inputs ultimately represent the results of explosive

shock tests, the geometry of the "analytical charge" is

invisible to the user and assumed in the empirical shock

spectrum. ELSHOK uses inputs of charge weight and standoff

to calculate shock loading by eq . (4) so the effects of

their variation will change the transient response of the

substructure even though the shock intensity is constant.

In this analysis, three sets of charge weight and standoff

were used. A further compl i cat ion results due to the fact

that DDAM only can be used to calculate maximum relative

deflections or forces. ELSHOK calculates transient

velocities incurred by the model which must be converted to

max i mum relative deflections.

44

Page 56: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

A. CASE ANALYSIS PROCEDURE

Each case analysis was begun by first constructing the

e q u i pmen t mode Is to be investigated using SAP I u . A dyn am i

c

analysis was performed to find the natural frequencies and

mode shapes of the model . This information was saved along

w i t h the ma s s m a t r i x f or- s u b s e q u e n t DDAM c a 1 c u 1 a t i o n s .

Using PI CRUST, the SAP IV data was then reduced to a suit-

able form to be merged with the hull structure/fluid data

f r om Phase I c a 1 c u 1 a t i on s . Finally, all the re su 1 t i n g da t

a

were integrated using the USLOB code to compute the tran-

sient v e 1 oc i t y profiles for e ac h equipment install a t i on

c on f i gu r a t i on and c h ar ge we i gh t/s t an dof f set.

The PI CRUST code was used to specify the installation

configuration of each model . Model coordinate system orien-

tation to the hull system is determined by the angle <y.c> j n

fig. (4). The location of the equipment along the longi-

tudinal axis is also specified. For example, in the case I

model , the angle is 270 degrees and the base attachment is

at frame 95 in the submarine model (within the compartment

model). For the case II and III models, two different

or i e n t a t i on s we r e i n v e s t i ga ted, on e w i t h the mode 1 mou n t e d

a thwart ship and the other with the model mounted verti-

cally, i .e., shock input from the side and bottom of the

submar i ne

.

45

Page 57: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

The USLOB code allows input of charge weight arid

standoff. To investigate how these parameters affect the

transient response of the substructure, three sets of val-

ues were used for these parameters based on three different

charge weights. The parameters chosen are 1 i sted in the

foil ow i n g table.

Charge We i gh

t

(lbs TNT)Standoff Distance

< I nches/Fee t

)

5,80818,88015,800

1 ,414/1 17.92,000/166.72,450/20 4.2

TABLE III - Charge Weights and Standoffs for Analysis

After selection of all factors affecting the geometry

of the p r ob 1 em , the time step incr erne n t and integration

limits were specified. In each case, enough time steps

were chosen to capture the peak response amp 1 itudes. This

number was found by trial and error.

After calculation of the velocity profiles for a given

model , this information was integrated using Simpson's 1/3

rule to obtain a deflection history and the maximum deflec-

t i on response of the mode 1 . As alluded to earlier, the

models were constructed so that suitable differences taken

between the velocity profiles of designated points would

yield the relative deflection, at any instant in time, of

46

Page 58: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

t h e p o i n t in ques t i on . This p r oc e du r e un-f or t una t e 1 y re-

lies, to a certain extent, on symmetry in the model . For

instance, in the case I model , the de-flection o-f the weight

on the end o-f the cantilever in the athwartship direction

can be obtained by integrating the d i + + e r e n c e be t w e e n t h

e

velocity histories o-f the base and the tip o-f the beam,

Figures (7) and <8> show schematically the differences

taken to calculate de-flections -for each model con-figura-

t i on .

y tip, athwar tsh i p

Ubase , athwar tsh i p

-^SHOCKWAVE

v re1 - ^base , athwar tsh

i

p_ ^t i p , athwar tsh

i

p

Figure 7 - Relative Velocities Used to CalculateRelative De-flection Between Mass andBase -for Case I

47

Page 59: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

V5,vert

HOCKWAVE

Vertical Relative Velocity of Nodes 3 & 6 wrt fixed baseNodes (shock wave from ATHWARTSHI P>

l^5,vert

Vertical Relative Velocity of Nodes 3 & 6 wrt fixed baseNodes (shock wave from below keel)

v3,rel = ^3,vert - <Vi,vert + V2,vert>/2^6,rel = ^6, vert - <^4,vert + V5 jVe rt>/2

Figure 8 - Case II & III Relative Velocity Calculations forAthwartship and Vertical Shock Waves

48

Page 60: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

After the ELSHOK res-ul t s were obtained tor each mode 1 ,

DDAM was u se d to calculate the max i mum de f 1 e c t i on s u s i n

g

the inform a t i o n s a v e d f r om the SA P I '• .-' runs. A file w a s c o n -

structed, using an editing program, to input the masses,

natural frequencies, and mode shapes for the model to the

DDAM program. During execution, the program util izes

p r omp t s t o q u e r y the u s e r abou t the t y p e o f i n s t a 1 1 a t i o

n

and shock input direction. The maximum relative deflection

is calculated by the NRL formula C Re f . 123:

Jm = abs(Jj ,max> + -JZ<^1i

> £ -dj ,max £ <5>

where;

*b --':: Ji ,max > = the largest modal deflection of a

point on the model

•^j = modal relative deflection at a point onthe model

^rri= max i mum re 1 at i v e de f 1 e c t i on of a p o i n t on

the model

This formula is used to reflect the fact that all modes do

n o t e x peri ence their max i mum de 1 e c t i on s si rnu 1 t an e ou s 1 y .

F i gures < ?) , (. 1 > , and (11) summar i ze the mode 1

configurations and shock input directions for cases I, II,

and III. Tables IV, V, and VI are summaries of the in-

formation used in the DDAM and ELSHOK calculations of these

cases. A full case I analysis is presented in Appendix C.

4?

Page 61: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

<: a )

1414"

5000 lb TNT

(b)

2600"

1 1 b TNT

2450"

15000 lb TNT

Figure ? - Shock con-f i curat i ons tor Case I

Page 62: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

>: a >

414

>8 lb TNT

29

1 1 b TNT

( r ">

2450"

15000 1 b TNT

(d)

1414"

•880 1 b TNT

Figure 10 - Shock con+iqurat ions tor Case II

51

Page 63: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

1414"

513 lb TNT

b)

1414"

50 lb TNT

Figure 11 - Shock conf i Durations tor Case III

Page 64: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

TABLE I1

-,-1 - Case I Inputs to DDAM and ELSHQK

Number of Degrees o-f Freedom 18Number o-f Connected Degrees of Freedom 3

Number o-f Unconnected Degrees o-f Freedom 15

Number of Interface Points 1

Number o-f Frequencies I n An alysi s 10

Su bs tructure Na t ur a. 1 Frequencies ( c p s

)

1 445.41 5 760 8.71 8 12169.62 10 54.85 6 9558.05 9 12284.83 1343.57 7 10454.9 10 1 80 14.24 4037.85

Numbe r of T i me S t e p s In the An a 1 y s is 1281Size of Time Steps 8.5E-6 sec

TABLE U - Case II Inputs to DDAM and ELSHQK

Number of Degrees of Freedom 34Number of Connected Degrees of Freedom 4

Number of Unconnected Degrees of Freedom 38

Numbe r of Interface Po i n t s 4

Number of Frequencies In Analysis 5

S u b s t ructure Natural F r e q u e n c i e s ( c p s

)

1 48 . 7743 4 551 . 1432 392 . 398 5 583.7233 392.58 8

Number of Time Steps In the Analysis 1281Size of Time Steps 1.8E—5 sec

Page 65: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

TABLE 'v'l - Case III Inputs to DDAM and ELSHOK

Number o-f Degrees o-f FreedomNumber o-f Connected Degrees o-f FreedomNumber o-f Unconnected Degrees of Freedom

Number of Interface Points

Numbe r o-f Frequencies In Anal ys i s

Substructure Natural Frequencies (cps)

344

3 1?

4

18

1 52 . 76252 3S8.9 9913 331 .8614 537.98 3

578 . 532353.9711213.45

1213.511 433 . 73

18 1492.67

Number o-f Time Steps In the AnalysisSize o-f Time Steps

1 38 1

2.8E-5 sec

54

Page 66: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

UI . RESULTS

Although the number of cases end their permutations

e x p 1 or e d in this i n u est i get i on e.r e n o t numer ou s , the y h av e

been c o n t r i v e d to a

c

cent u a t e the s i m i 1 a r i tie s end differ-

ences between the DDAM and EL 3 HOK methods of analysis. As

men t i oned prey i ousl y , ELSHOK prou i des a greet deal more

information about the shock response of submar

i

ne- i ns tal 1 ed

equipment then DDAM. However, DDAM is not intended to be a

theoretical tool but rather is simply a design check. For

this re e.son , wh ere ELSHOK w ill predict different max i mum

deflections depending on charge weight and standoff, DDAM

w ill predict only on e '> a 1 u e f or- a 1 1 v ar i a t i on s .

A. CASE I (1,08@ LB CASE)

The predicted r e s p o n s e s o f DDAM a n d E L S H K c om p a r e w e 1 1

for th i s case . The DDAM cal cu 1 at i on y i e 1 ds a max i mum de-

f lection of 8. 8 143" for the end of the cantilever beam when

subjected to an a thwart ship shock input, whereas the ELSHOK

c a 1 cu 1 a t i on predicted a 0.8131" de f 1 e c t i on f or a 1 8 , 8 6 1

b

charge and a 2,000 inch standoff as in fig <?b>. The

15,0 8 8 lb and 5,886 1 b c h ar ge s bo t h c au se d s 1 i gh 1

1

y 1 owe

r

de f 1 e c t i on s . In this case, DDAM i s mor e c on se r vat i v

e

< abou t ?'/. > t h an the ELSHOK calculation. This illustrate s

that wh ere the e q uipme n t we i gh t i s on 1 y abou t 1,888 lb.

5'

Page 67: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

little inter.H.cti on i s t o be e x pec t e d be twee n the hull

r e sp on se wh i c h i s r e 1 a t i v e 1 y 1 ow frequenc y , an d the hi gh e r

f r e q u e n

c

y equipment r e sp on se . The highest hull frequenc y

i s on 1 >•• abou t 1 9 9 Hz . Cou p 1 i ng e f -f e c t s be twee n t h

e

responses ot the equipment mass and the hull mass are

i ns i gn i f i gan t due to the large ratio of the masses. It the

mass of only segment five in the full model is considered

to be the entire hull mass, then the effective mass of the

hull is about 4199 slugs. The mass of the model is less

than 2 . ? si ugs . Th i s y i e 1 ds a mass ratio of abou t 9 . 99973

.

DDAM is based upon the approximation that the hull mass can

be con si dered infinite wh i ch i mp lies a mass ratio of

9.99009... providing no account for coupl i ng other than

t h r ou gh t h e saf e t y fact or bu i 1 t into i t s de s i gn sp ectr urn

.

The close agreement betw e e n EL 3H K a n d DDAM i s p r ob ab

1

y due

to the lack of response coupl ing in both methods of

anal ys i s

.

B. CASE II (20,000 LB CASE)

Two e q u i pme n t configurations we r e i n v e s t i ga ted in the

ELSHOK analyses for this case. In the problem geometry in

wh i ch the submar i ne is s i de 1 oaded, f i gure (?c> , the

maximum deflection is again in good agreement with that

predicted by DDAM; 0.2433 inches in the former versus

9.2744 in the latter. However, the input motion to the

structure is not pr i mar i 1 y in the d i rec t i on of max i mum

de f 1 e c t i on in this instance. In the sec on d c on f i qu r a t i on

56

Page 68: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

o-f t h i s c a s e , c o r r e = p o n d i n g t o f i qu r e < ? d ) , a mu c h gr e a t e r

de-f 1 ec t i on < 1 33% gr e a t e r ) is predicts d by ELSHOK . There

are two p o s •=• i b 1 e e x p 1 a n a t i o n s . S cm e hull / s tructur-e

interaction is to be expected because the fundamental

natural -frequency o-f the substructure is 43.3 Hz which

falls in the middle of the entire range of hull frequen-

cies. If, as in the former case, a hull effective mass of

4189 slugs is assumed, and the model mass is 67.4 slugs in

t h i s c a s e , then the rati o o f the ma s s e s is mere a s e d t o

8 . 8 164 or abou t 1.6 percent. In this e x amp 1 e , the influ-

ence of coupl i ng on the response can be expected to amp 1 i f

>

the expected result for an infinite mass hull system

c on s i de r ab

1

y . A 1 so a sou r c e of u n c e r t a i n t y is the test da t a

upon which the shock input spectrum used in DDAM is based.

Mos t e x p 1 o =i v e tests a r e set u p w i t h the c h a r g e q e om e t r y o f

figure (9c) to avoid problems associated with bubble migra-

tion to the hull due to bouyancy effects. In the second

configuration, figure <?d), the charge was situated as if

it had detonated beneath the keel of the s u bm a r i n e , a

realistic p oss i b i 1 i t y wh e n c on s i de r i n g mode r n we ap on s

t ac t i c s bu t per h ap s n o t s i mu 1 a t e d we 11 bye x p 1 os i k> e test-

ing. This particular configuration subjects the structure

t o gr e a t e r sh oc k i n p u t mo t i on s in its mor e flexible d i r e c

-

t i on p r odu c i ng the larger deflections, h owe v e r DDAM

provides the same inputs for both problems.

57

Page 69: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

C. CASE III (10,808 LB CASE)

Two equipment c on t i gu r a t i on s we r e i n v e s t i ga t e d in the

ELSHOK analysis -For this case. The results are very

s i m i 1 ar t o the result s f or c ase II. I n t h e c on f i gu r a t i on

of Fig. 1 8 ( a) , a max i mum de-f 1 ec t i on of 8.21 34 i nch was

pred i c ted and in the conf i gurat i on of Fig 18 < b) , a max i mum

de f 1 e c t i on of 8 .692 i n c h was pre d i c t e d by ELSHOK wh ere as

DDAM predicted a maximum of 8.2743 inch for both config-

urations. Again, the same possible causes can be cited for

the 1 ar ge ( 1 58% ) difference in the sec on d i n s t an c e . In

this case the fundamental frequency of the foundation is

52.7 Hz. The mass of the equipment model in this case is

36 .

8

s 1 u gs y i e 1 d i n g a mass rat i o be twee n the hull an d

substructure of about 8.88377.

A summary of the calculated results is presented in

Tab 1 e '••' I I . W i t h the limited calculations available i n t h i =•

work, no attempt could be made to deduce systematical 1>•' the

exact cause for discrepancies between ELSHOK and DDAM in

cases II and III.

53

Page 70: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

CO

_l

co111

cc

Llo><r

3co

LU_im<X

C O II II

•—II

/**.II~ I II

II c II

CO CO II—

II

z II•w" II

O _J II II

»—

1

II II

H LU II

O II II

LU II II

-1 II II

LU II

LU II II

O II II

II II

II II

z II II

=> z IIs-^

II

z II•

II

- <r II c II

X II•—

II

£ ° II

II

N^ II

II

" d II

II II

II II

II

li

II H

II II

LL II II

LL II•-«.

II

O II II

O II cz II

—II

<E II•^

II

1- II II

co II

II ^\ II

II t II

LU H II 2 II

CD X II h- II

a: o II II

<r - IIi/i

II

I LU II A II

CJ 3 II—

II

II Srf" II

II II

1- II II

a. i II/-•.

II

t-i CD II 1/1 II

D MII JD II

a LU •—II

LU 3 II-^

!!

a:LUCOzDZLUCO

<ro

li co li

II H II

II -« II

II Z II

II Z> II

l>- IT; 00 00 CO CD -r.—

(

CO <N CO CO CO o. 00 iNrH -H ••—

1

CO --1 T CO —i !>

CO (T-| CO ^-i iN CN o iN 'Ij

• > • a »

CO co CO CD © © © f^l

m CO CO •3" T *7*- T CO CO•d- <T 3- <r rr 4 T •o

,-. —

.

•^H r-- N r-- r-- r-- r--

£j co CO C-i IN iN CM iN iN

i^i 'S co CO CD CO CD © CD

*T CD o •*• © CD T <r --r

i—

«

d' U"J *—

t

CD in i—

t

•-- t—

i

•^ CD <* ^r CD i- -rr T rr•»—

1

CM CM iN i.N

s< t^l >S co CD •5J CD CD CD•II' o CD co CD •ZH' CD CD CDcd <s> CO i^i CD CD CD © CDU"i CD in U"i CD in lfj U"i

• ,_CD CD

,_ © 'Si' CO CDCD CO CD © CO © C^t © OCD © CD co (KS CD ,^i CD CD-« •—

(

t—i C2i © CD CD •Si CD»—

*

iN iN

Ti JLi U TI *— ._

i

'Ti JJ ij

Page 71: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

UII CONCLUSIONS

Since its adoption by the naval shock community, DDAM

has provided an easy-to-use and convenient means to design

check equipment i n s t a 11 a t i on s p r op ose d tor su bmar i n e s . It

is independent of any well defined submarine structural

input and can be appl ied early in the overall design pro-

cess before such details are well developed. However, the

same qual i t i es that all ow for the f 1 ex i bi 1 i ty i n DDAM may

a 1 so c on t r i bu t e to p oss i b 1 e in ac c u r ac i e s wh en t h i s me t h od

i s ap plied to su bmar i n e s of r ad i c a 1 1 y different size or

design than the ones reflected in the empirical Design

Spec trum

.

The work in this thesis is in no way construed to be

an all-encompassing e v a 1 u a t i o n o f DDAM a n d ELSH K . F r om

the infinite number of possible equipment configurations

and sizes, three simple models have been selected which ex-

am i n e on 1 y the hull mou n t e d e q u i pme n t p r ob 1 em . The intent

of this investigation has been to examine the capabi 1 i ty of

the two methods to predict the shock response of these

equipments and not to rank one against the other. ELSHQK

or any variation of this code is much too complex and

computer resource intensive to use as a design tool and was

not intended for this purpose.

68

Page 72: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

In the c a s e of e q u i pm e n t w h o s e res p o n s e is rel a t i v e 1

y

high frequency compared to the hull response, DDAM and

ELSHOK de-flection predictions are in good agreement. The

maximum hull response frequency is 1 i mi ted to about 106 Hz

•for the 6900 LT submarine used in this work. The good cor-

relation is attributed to the lack of interaction and

coupl ing effects between the hull and substructure. When

the response frequencies of the substructure approached

those of the hull and the mass of the substructure became a

s i gn i f i c an t p or t i on of the ov era 1 1 sys t em , the c omp ar i son

s

be twe e n ELSHOK an d DDAM deflection predictions we r e not

good

.

The indications of this work are that DDAM does not

correctly reflect the hu 11 -substructure response coupl ing

amplification which becomes apparent when the substructure

response is tuned to the hull response. Additionally, the

empirical database upon which DDAM is rel i ant for shock

input may fail to represent the heavy equipment problem

we 1 1 .

More basic research remains to be done before many of

the questions or criticisms posed by this thesis can be

considered conclusive. Due to the scarcity of publ i shed

reports describing the input data used to generate the

design shock values used by DDAM, the appl i cat ion of this

method as a general design qual if

i

cat ion should be regarded

61

Page 73: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

with caution. The basis of the Design Spectrum used in

DDAM shou Id be ava i 1 abl e tor analysis end rey i s i on

.

Additional work remains to be done to determine where

the discrepancies between ELSKOK and DDAM first become sig-

nificant. The cases analyzed here represent both ends of

the substructure response spectrum but lend 1 ittle infor-

mation to what happens in the transition region between the

low-interact ion and high- i

n

ter ac t i on frequency response

regimes.

DDAM sh ou 1 d be retained as a de sign check met h od

.

However, some modifications are recommended here. The

present Design Shock inputs used in DDAM should be updated

to reflect the i ncresed size of modern day submarines. If

the details of the original formulation were known or

revealed, the current values could be updated by generating

n ew an a 1 y t i c a 1 da t a based on c omp u t e r s i mu 1 a t i on s . This

new spectrum c ou Id then be verified by e

x

plosive testing.

It is apparent from the hu 11 -subs true ture coupling phe-

nomenon noted here that a modified shock spectrum should be

formulated for each new class of submarine which would

reflect the peculiarities of this class versus the previous

ones .

At the present time, when new submarines cost bill ions

of dollars and are by no means numerous, e'.'^ry effort must

be made to ensure their survival in an underwater explosive

62

Page 74: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

shock: environment. This should include taking a new look

a. t DDAM a n d ensuring it u p h o 1 d s the s t a n d a r d s s e t b y n a. v a 1

shock: pol icy. There is a great deal o+ tlexibi 1 i ty inher-

ent in DDAM and together with modern numerical techniques

it can be updated to reflect current technology.

63

Page 75: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

LIST OF REFERENCES

1. Department of the Navy Military SpecificationM I L-S-98 1 C < NAVY ) , Shock Tests. H.I. ( H i qh-Impac t

)

Shipboard Machinery, Equipment, and Systems,Re q u i r erne n t s For , 15 January 1963

2.

3.

Naval Research Laboratory Memorandum Report 1396,Interim Pes ion Values For Shock Pes ion of ShipboardEqu i pmen t , by R. 0. Belsheim and 6. J. G'Hara, February1 963

Seers, T. L., "Residual Potential and ApproximateMethods For Three-D i mens i onal Fluid-StructureInteract i on Pr ob 1 ems " , Journal of the AcousticalSociety of America , v. 49, No. 5, (Part 2>

,

pp. 1585-1516, 1971

4. R. Vasudevan and D. Ranlet, Submerged Shock Responseof a Linearly Elastic Shell of Revolution ContainingInternal Structure : User's Manual For the ELSHQCKCode , Weidl i nger Associates, New York, New York, May1932

5. Naval Research Laboratory Report 5545, Shock Pes i qn ofShipboard Equipment , by R. 0. Belsheim andG . J .

•' Har a , Se p t ember 1 96Q

6. Butt, L., Naval Ship Shock Design Analysis , lecturenotes presented at Naval Postgraduate School , ME 4982,Winter 1934

7. D. Ranlet, F. L. D i Magg i o , H. H. Bleich and M. L Baron,"Elastic Response of Submerged Shells With InternallyAttached Structures to Shock Loading'Journal of Computers and Structures ,

I n tern at i onalNo . 3 ,

pp. 355-364, June 1977

3. D. Ranlet and F. L. DiMaggio, "Transient Response ofShells With Internally Attached Structures",International Journal of Computers and Structures ,

v. 9, No. 5, pp. 475-431, November 197S

64

Page 76: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

9 . D . Bushne 1 1 , S tress, Stabi ) i t y and K> i br a t i on of"

Complex Branched Shells of Resolution : Analysis andUser's Manual tor BQSQR4 . LMSC-D24 366 5, LockheedM i ss 1 e s and Sp ac e Comp any, Inc., Su n n y v a 1 e , Ca 1 it or n i a ,

March 1972

18. Earthquake Engineering Research Center Report No.EERC 73-1 1 , SAP II'-A Structural Analysis Program torStatic and Dynamic Response of Linear Systems , byK. J. Bathe, E. L. Wilson and F. E. Peterson,Un i \> e r s i t y ot" Ca 1 i t* or n i a , Berkley, Ca 1 i t or n i a , Ap r i 1

1974

11. American Institute ot Steel Construction, Inc., Manualot Steel Construction , 7th ed.

, pp. 50-51, 1978

12. Naval Sea Sy s t ems Comrnan d , NAUSEA 8968-LP-8 6 6-38 1 8

,

Shock Design Criteria tor Surface Ships , p . 21, Ma

y

1 976

13. He i 1 born , J . , Science and Engineering ProgramsApp 1 e II Ed i t i on , pp. 97 - 184, Osborne/McGraw Hill ,

1981

65

Page 77: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

APPENDIX A : DDAM USER 'S MANUAL AND PROGRAM LISTING

The DDAM Program contained herein provides an easy

means to per -form a small to medium-scale DDAM analysis of a

g i y en internal e q u i pme n t design. The p r ogr am i s wr i 1 1 e n in

IBM PC BASIC language and is not restricted to submarine

analyses only but includes the standard DDAM case

p oss i b i 1 i t i e s . The sol u t i on a 1 gor i t hm foil ows t h e me t h od

cited in Ref . 2

.

A. USING THE DDAM PROGRAM

A . 1 . Option Selecti on s

The DDAM program is menu-dr i u en and written to bem

se 1f -e x p 1 an a t or y

.

Pr i or to s t ar ting the p r ogr am , i t mu s t

be available on a diskette along with the BAS I CA . COM

program

.

To start the program type:

BAS I CA<ENTER)< F3> DDAM < ENTER

>

<F2>

The -first command 1 i ne loads and executes the BASIC inter-

preter and the second 1 ine loads the DDAM program. The

third line starts e x e c u t i on of" the DDAM Pr ogr am .

Upon starting, the title of the program (DDAM) is

written on the screen and several seconds later a message

66

Page 78: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

ap p^ar s de scr i b i n g the p r ov i de d f unc t i on s . Foil ow t h e

d i rect i o n s

.

Four execution options will appear tor source of

data and program exit to the operating system. They are:

[1] Input Mode Shapes and Mass Matrix tor theproblem from Keyboard

C2] Input Mode Shapes and Mass Matrix from a

d i sk file

C 3 ] Input a M a ss Ma t r i x a n d S t i f f n e s s M a t r i x

for pre v i ou s 1 y f ormu 1 a t e d equations of mo t i on

C5] Ex i t to DOS

Mo option C4] is present; however, provisions have been

made to install a user-def

i

ned subroutine at line 25688 in

the program.

Option CI] is useful for small problems and is not

recommended for situations involving more than four degrees

of freedom. It allows all data input to be carried out

using the keyboard. In larger problems, the entry of mode

shapes becomes tedious and error prone.

Option [2] is recommended for most problems. It

allows the use of a diskfile tor input. The file is

user-specified and utilizes a free -format data structure.

The information must be present in the tile in a set order

wh i c h i s de sc r i be d later.

67

Page 79: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

Selection of option C3] causes a message to be

displayed stating that the JACOB I program must -first be

run to solve the eigenvalue problem tor mode shapes and

natural -frequencies. This program 1 i sting -follows the DDAM

listing in this appendix. I n c or p or a t i n g the JACOB I p r ogr am

in DDAM would have reduced significantly the size o-f pro-

blem which could be handled. The JACOB I program is in-

cluded as a convenience to the reader and was not integral

to the analysis o-f the case studies done in this thesis.

I t s op e r a t i on i s de sc r i be d later.

A . 2 . Op t i on [ 1 ] Ex e c u t i on

Se 1 ec t i ng op t i on C 1 3 all ows i npu t o-f the masses ,

modes, and natural -frequencies of the problem from the

keyboard. The number of modes and masses are first input.

A mass input subroutine queries the user interactively for

the diagonal entries of the mass matrix. After input is

completed, the diagonal elements are displayed enabling the

user to make corrections as necessary. A zero correction

terminates mass matrix input. Next, the program asks tor-

input of the natural frequencies of the system. It re-

quires one natural frequency for each mode shape. The

input format is similar to the one used to input the mass

elements. The natural frequencies are required in units of

radians/second. Each mode shape is then input. After-

initial i z i ng each mode, a correction option is provided.

68

Page 80: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

The p r ogr am n e x t calculates the participation -factors an d

mods 1 we i g h t s +' or- t h e p r ob 1 em .

Fo 1 1 ow i n g these p r e 1 i m i n ar y step s , DDAM r e q u i re s

i n t orma t i on to -Fix the installation details i or the equip-

ment and type of analysis to be carried out. The standard

cases o t Ret'. 2 are all ow e d . On c e '

t h e case is -fixed, the

Des i gn Values are. calculated and d i sp 1 aye d as DA ( 1 > . . . DA ( n

>

where n is the number of modes selected tor the analysis.

The Design Values are the equivalent static accelerations

calculated +' r om empirical f ormu las f or each mode .

Several output options are provided. Modal forces

or de f 1 e c t i on s or bo t h can be selected. After se 1 e c t i on,

the appropriate calculations are made and the results dis-

played. I n i t i a 1 1 y a p r i n t op t i on was se p ar a t e 1 y p r ov i de d

.

Howe v e r , in the present version, se 1 e c t i on ot the d i sp 1 ay

to screen option with printer on will cause output to go to

the screen and the printing device. Disabl i ng the printer

will cause output to go only to the screen. Following

the output options, choices are provided to change the

equipment installation type and repeat the analysis or to

exit the program.

A . 3 . Option C 2 3 Execution

Selecting option [2] allows input of masses, nat-

ural frequencies, and mode shapes from a disk file. After

the data is read in, the program execution is similar to

that in option C13. Option [23 prompts the user for the

69

Page 81: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

dimension of the mass matrix, the number o-f modes in the

analysis, and the name of the input file. The input file

is a free -format ASCII file containing the masses, natural

frequencies, and mode shapes for the problem. This file

may be constructed from structural analyzer (SAPIM) output

or any other problem formulation method using a suitable

edit or p r ogr am . ( EDL I N , the edit or- p r ov i de d w i t h t h e "I BM

Disk Operating System" is not recommended for this purpose

due to its line orientation.) The format for the input

file foil ows

:

mass< 1

)

.... mass(m) (si ugs)omega ( 1 ) .... omega 1' m> (rad/s)p h i < 1 , 1) .... p h i < 1 , n

)

p h i < m , 1

)

.... p h i < m , n ">

where m = number of masses andn = number of modes in the analysis

In the above format, the data is read in sequentially from

left to right. The data is echoed to the screen and/ or ,

printer in order to provide a check for proper input

ope rat i on

.

Page 82: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

B. PROGRAM LISTING - D A M

DDDD DDDD AAA> ftAi

i ft A i

PfTl rnl

DO D DD D A A Mi M Mi

OD DD DAAAAAAAAmmnmn Mi H Mi

DD D DD D A A m m

DDDO DDDD A A'Ai kJfcJm m

DYNtfllC DESIGN ANALYSIS METHOD

18 CLS: KEY OFF : LOCATE 3,1,8

28 PRINT"**********************************************************************

*****

21 PRINT'**

**"

30 PRINT"**

***

48 PRINT"**

**"

58 PRINT"**

**"

68 PRINT"****"

78 PRINT'**

**'

88 PRINT"**

**"

98 PRINT'**

**"

186 PRINT'**

**"

118 PRINT'**

**

128 PRINT'**********************************************************************

*****

121 DIM MASS(48)

122 DIM PHI (48, 48)

123 DIM U<48)

124 DIM MX(48,48),MX2(48,48),SUM1(48),SUM2(48),P(48)

125 DIM UA(48)

127 DIM V8(48),A8<48),DA<48)

128 DIM AA<48>,VA<48>,F(48,48),DEFL<48),DELTA<48,48)

138 FOR I = 1 TO 5888 : NEXT I

148 CLS: LOCATE 1,1,8

158 PRINT" The purpose of this program is to allow the user a convenient me th

od" -.PRINT

168 PRINT" by which to carry out a snail to medium sized DDAM analysis of a gi ye

n" sPRINT

178 PRINT'piece of equipment. Familiarity with NORMAL MODE ANALYSIS and some u

n-':PR!NT

188 PRINT'derstanding of the theory behind DDAM is prerequisite to confident us

e" sPRINT

1?8 PRINT'of this program. The program is prompt driven but the user should hav

e "sPRINT

288 PRINT'available to him / her either s'sPRINTsPRINT

218 PRINT" A.) Mode Shapes and a Mass Matrix for the'

228 PRINT" problem of interest." :PRINT:PRINT

238 PRINT' B.) A Mass Matrix and Stiffness Matrix from"

71

Page 83: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

248 PRINT5

previously formulated EQUATIONS of MOTION": PR INT

:PR1NT:PR1NT

258 PRINT' ( Press ANY key to continue )':L0CATE 25,1,8

268 A$ = INKEY$: IF A* = " THEN 248

278 CIS:

288 LOCATE 5,1,8

298 PRINT" In order to initialize the program input, choose one of the follow

ing*:PRINT

388 PRJNT'raenti selections =—

>

a:PRIMT:PRINT

318 LOCATE 18,28,8

328 LOCATE 11,28,8

325 LOCATE 13,28,8

326 LOCATE 14,28,8

338 LOCATE 16,28,8

348 LOCATE 17,28,8

358 LOCATE 18,28,8

368 LOCATE 28,28,8

sPRINT'M Input Mode Shapes and Mass Matrix"

[PRINT' for the problem from keyboard'

iPRINT'm Input Mode Shapes and Mass Matrix"

sPRINT' from a disk file *

:PRINT'[31 Input a Mass Matrix and Stiffness Matrix"

: PRINT' for previously formulated equations ofsPRINT' motion"

:PRINT'C5] Exit to DOS'

378 A* = INKEY* : IF A* >= CHR$<49) AND A* <= CHR$(53) GOTO 488

388 IF A* = " GOTO 378

398 BEEP : GOTO 378

488 B = WL<A$) : CLS

418 ON B GOSUB 5888,15888,28888,25888,588

588 SYSTEM :END

688 ' *********************************************************************iH*<*

681 ' SUBROUTINE TO INPUT MASS MATRIX683 '****»*********************«***********»»»***»»********************<****

685 INPUT "Enter the dimension of the Mass Matrix => "; N

618 IF N <= 28 GOTO 622

628 PRlNTsPRINTsPRINT"***** PROBLEM SIZE IS LIMITED TO 28 X 28 MATRICES ****

» ' sPRINT: PR INT: GOTO 688

621 PRlNTsPRINTsPRINT

622 INPUT 'Enter the number of modes you wish to use =) ";M

638 CLS: PRINT'***** Enter the elements of the DIAGONAL Mass Matrix ****** :PRI

NT sPRINT

648 PRINT* If you make an error you will have an opportun-'

658 PRINT' ity later to correct it.'sPRlNT sPRINT

678 FOR I = 1 TO N

688 PRINT" M(";I;',*;I;') = 'ssINPUT* *, MASS(I)

698 IF (I = 5) OR (I = 18) OR (I = 15) THEN CLS

788 IF MASS(I) 8 GOTO 738

718 PRINT' ***** MASS MATRIX MUST BE POSITIVE DEFINITE — INPUT NON-ZERO VALU

E *****

728 PRINT: GOTO 688

738 PRINT: NEXT I

748 CLS

758 FOR I = 1 TO N

768 PRINT "M'jIiYjl;') = *;MASS<I),

778 NEXT I

788 PRlNTsPRINTsPRINT

798 PRINT'Enter diagonal element number to correct mistaken entries or"

888 PRINT: INPUT * Enter < ZERO ) to continue =>', RESPONSE

72

Page 84: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

813 IF RESPONSE = 8 THEN RETURN

328 IF RESPONSE <= 8 OR RESPONSE ) N THEN CLS : SOTO 758 ELSE I = RESPONSE

858 PRINT: PRINT j INPUT 'Enter correct element value => ", fid)

868 PRINT ;PRINT"M(';I ;Y;lj') CHANGED TO jHASSd)

878 FOR I = 1 TO 1588 : NEXT I : CLS : GOTO 758

888 RETURN

1818 ' SUBROUTINE TO INPUT MODE SHAPES1828 'J************************************************************************

1858 CLS: LOCATE 5,1,8

1868 PRINT'***** Enter OMEGA'S corresponding to Mode Shapes *****":PR1NT

1878 PRINT8

( smallest to largest )':PRINT;PRINT

1888 FOR I = 1 TO M

1898 PRINT ' oraega<"jIj") = a

;:INPUT' ',U(I)

1188 IF (1=5) OR (1=18) OR (1=15) THEN CLS

1118 NEXT I

1128 CLS : FOR I = 1 TO M

1138 PRINT'QMEGA<";I;a

) = ";W<D,

1148 NEXT I

1158 PRINT:PR1NT:PRINT

1168 PRINT 'Enter frequency number to correct mistaken entries or ':PR1NT

1178 INPUT'

Enter < ZERO ) to continue =>', RESPONSE

1188 IF RESPONSE = 8 THEN GOTO 1238

1198 IF RESPONSE <= 8 OR RESPONSE > N THEN CLS : GOTO 1128 ELSE I = RESPONSE

1288 PRINT sPRlNTi INPUT "Enter correct frequency value => ', U(I)

1218 PRINT : PRINT" OMEGAC; I ;') changed to ';U(D

1228 FOR I = 1 TO 2888 : NEXT I : GOTO 1128

1238 CLS: LOCATE 5,1,8

1248 PRINT'***** Enter EIGENVECTOR'S corresponding to Mode Shapes ****** :PRUfT

1258 PRINT' ( begin with Mode One )':PRINT:PRINT

1268 FOR I = 1 TO M

1278 FOR J = 1 TO N

1288 PRINT" MODE SHAPE ";I;' Phi(';J;') = 'jsINPUT' \PH1(I,J)

1298 IF (J=5) OR (J=1B) OR (J=15) THEN CLS : LOCATE 5,1,8

1388 NEXT J

1385 CLS : PRINT -.PRINT

1318 PRINT '*************** MODE NUMBER ';!;' a**************'

1328 PRINT: PR INT: FOR J = 1 TO N

1338 PRINT' Phi('iJi') = ";PHI(I,J),

1348 NEXT J

1358 PRINT :PRINT

1368 PRINT'Enter element number in mode to change or'iPRINT

1378 INPUT' Enter < ZERO > to continue =) ', RESPONSE

1388 IF RESPONSE = 8 THEN GOTO 1438

1398 IF RESPONSE (= 8 OR RESPONSE > N THEN CLS: GOTO 1318 ELSE J = RESPONSE

1488 PRINT: INPUT'Enter correct element value =>';PHI(I,J):PRINT

1418 PRINT'Phi(';J;') CHANGED TO ' jPHKI , J)

1428 FOR K = 1 TO 2888 : NEXT K : CLS : GOTO 1318

1438 CLS:NEXT 1

1448 RETURN

5888 '**************************************************************************

73

Page 85: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

5985 ' SUBROUTINE TO DRIVE MODE/MASS INPUT

5820 LOCATE 5,1,8

5838 PRINT' The program has been initialized to allow user input of the'iPRINT

5840 PRINT'Mode Shapes and Mass Matrix. H you desire one o-f the other op-'iPR

INT

5858 PRINT'tions, PRESS < escape key >; otherwise => ,:PRINT:PRINT

5855 PRINT" PRESS < space bar ) to continue )'

5868 A$ = INKEY* : IF A* = CHRK27) GOTO 279

5870 IF A* CHR$(32) GOTO 5060

5075 CLS ; LOCATE 5,1,0 : GOSUB 600

5080 CLS : LOCATE 5,1,8 : GOSUB 1000

5090 CLS : GOSUB 6898

5199 CLS: LOCATE 25,1,9

5119 PRINT

5129 GOSUB 8999

5139 CLS: GOSUB 8200

5140 CLS : GOSUB 10000

6880 'a************************************************************************

6810' SUBROUTINE TO FIND PARTICIPATION

6028' FACTORS

6030 ' a************************************************************************

6949 LOCATE 25,1,9

6950 T$(l) = TIME*

6868 PRINT1

CALCULATING PARTICIPATION FACTORS = start : ';TINE*

6080 FOR I = 1 TO M

6898 FOR J = 1 TO N

7888 MX<I,J) = MASS(J) * PHI(I,J)

7818 MX2U,J) = MX<1,J) * PHKI.J)

7828 NEXT J

7838 NEXT I

7848 FOR I = 1 TO M

7858 SUMKI) = MX(1,1)

7868 SUM2(I) = MX2(I,1)

7879 FOR J = 2 TO N

7989 SUMKI) = SUMKI) + MX(1,J)

7998 SUM2<I) = SUH2U) + MX2<I,J)

7198 NEXT J

7119 NEXT I

7129 FOR I = 1 TO M

7139 P<I) = SUMKI) / SUH2(I)

7149 NEXT I

7159 FOR I = 1 TO M

7169 MBAR(I) = Pd) * SUMKI)

7179 NEXT I

7189 LOCATE 25,69,9 : PRINT" done: ";TIME*

7199 DUmf = M

7299 IF DUMMY ) 19 THEN K7. = M/2 ELSE K7. = M

7218 L=1:J=8

7215 LOCATE 5,1,8

7229 PRINT"***** PARTICIPATION FACTORS AND MODAL MASSES ****** ;PRINT:PRINT

74

Page 86: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

7221 LPRINT"***** P FACTORS AND MODAL MASSES *****'

7222 LPRINT

7225 PRINT8

N MODAL PARTICIPATION MODAL MASS"

7226 pp-j ='M »#.JHHw#rAAA M.mmAAAAI

7227 LPRINT" N MODAL PARTICIPATION MODAL MASS*

7238 FOR I = L TO KZ

7248 PRINT USING PP* ; I,P<I),HBAR(1)

7241 LPRINT USING PP$ ; I,P(I) ,MBAR(I)

7258 J = J + 1

7268 NEXT I

7278 IF DUMMY > 18 AND J < 11 THEN A* = INKEYJiGOTO 7288 ELSE GOTO 7311

7288 PRINT :PRINT:PRINT

7281 LPRINT :LPR1NT

7298 PRINT" PRESS ANY KEY TO CONTINUE...'

7388 IF A* = '" THEN GOTO 7388

7318 U = M : L = 18s CLS : GOTO 7215

7311 PRINT :PR!NT:PR1NT" PRESS ANY' KEY TO CONTINUE...'

7328 A* = INKEY* i IF A* = " THEN GOTO 7328

7338 RETURN

8888y *************************************************************************

8818 ' SUBROUTINE TO CALCULATE MODAL8828

' WEIGHTS8838 ' *************************************************************************

8835 CLS:LOCATE 5,1,8

8848 PRINT****** CALCULATED MODAL WEIGHTS *****'

8841 LPRINT"***** CALCULATED MODAL WEIGHTS *****"

8845 ww$ = "m m.mm'8846 PRINT : PRINT " N WEIGHT IN KIPS'

8847 LPRINT ' N WEIGHT IN KIPS"

8858 PRINT

8851 LPRINT

8878 FOR I = 1 TO M

8888 WA(I) =386 * SUMl',1) * P(I) / 1888

8898 PRINT USING WW ; I,WA(I)

8891 LPRINT USING WW*; I,WA(I)

8895 NEXT 1

8188 LPRINT:LPRINT:PR1NT:PRINT:PRINT' Press any ke

y to continue..."

8118 A* = 1NKEY*: IF A* = "" THEN GOTO 8118

8128 RETURN

8288 '*************************************************************************

8218' SUBROUTINE TO DETERMINE GEOMETRY

8228' OF ANALYSIS AND A <B) , V (8) , D (A)

8238 '*************************************************************************

8248 PRINT" Some information is now needed to complete the details about th

e"

8258 PRINT'type of vessel the structure I am analyzing is installed in and whet

her'

8268 PRINT' or not the analysis is to consider elastic or elastic-plastic de -for-

ma-

"

8278 PRINT" t ions."

75

Page 87: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

8289 PRINT! PRINT

8298 PRINT'PLEASE ENTER ONE OF THE FOLLOWING

3388 LOCATE 9,28,8: PRINT" [11 SUBMARINE

8318 LOCATE 11,28,8 PRINT'm SUBMARINE

8328 LOCATE 13,28,8 PRINT"[33 SUBMARINE

8338 LOCATE 15,28,8 PRINTS] SURFACE SHIP

8348 LOCATE 17,28,8 PRINT" [51 SURFACE SHIP

8358 LOCATE 19,28,8 PRINT" [63 SURFACE SHIP

=)•

( hull mounted system )'

( deck mounted system )'

( shell plating mounted system )'

( hull mounted system )"

( deck mounted system )"

( shell plating mounted system )'

8368 A* = INKEY*: IF A$>=CHR*<49) AND A$ <= CHR*(54) GOTO 8398

8378 IF A* = *" THEN GOTO 8368

8388 BEEP: GOTO 8368

8398 B = VAL(A$):CLS

8488 PRINT'ENTER => III for ELASTIC ANALYSIS' :PRINT:PR1NT

8418 PRINT" 123 for ELASTIC - PLASTIC ANALYSIS"

8428 A* = INKEY* : IF A* >= CHR*<49) AND A$ <= CHR$<58) GOTO 8458

8438 IF A* = "" THEN GOTO 8428

8448 BEEP: GOTO 8428

8458 C = VAL(A*>

8468 IF C=2 AND (B = 3 OR 8 = 6) THEN GOTO 3478 ELSE GOTO 8583

8478 PRINT:PRINT:PRINT:PRINT'***** ELASTIC - PLASTIC OPTION NOT AVAILABLE FOR **

**#* iPRINT

3488 PRINT****** SHELL PLATING MOUNTED SYSTEMS *****'

3431 LOCATE 18,28,8

3482 PRINT" PRESS ANY KEY TO CONTINUE ....

8433 M = INKEf* : IF A$ =

8498 CLS:GOTO 8248

3598 CLS:LOCATE 5,1,8

8518 PRINT" ENTER =*>8528 PRINT"

8538 PRINT"

8548 A$ = INKEY$: IF A$ >= CHR$(49) AND A$ <= CHR*(51) GOTO 8578

8558 IF A$ = "" THEN GOTO 8548

8568 BEEP: GOTO 3548

8578 D = WL(A*>

3571 IF B = 1 THEN LPR1NT" SUBMARINE \ hull mounted system )";

8572 IF B = 2 THEN LPRINT" SUBMARINE ( deck mounted system )";

8573 IF B = 3 THEN LPRINT" SUBMARINE < shell plating mounted system )";

8574 IF B = 4 THEN LPRINT" SURFACE SHIP ( hull mounted system )";

8575 IF B = 5 THEN LPRINT" SURFACE SHIP ( deck mounted system )";

8576 IF B = 6 THEN LPRINT" SURFACE SHIP < shell plating mounted system )";

8577 IF C = 1 THEN LPRINT" for ELASTIC ANALYSIS"

8578 IF C = 2 THEN LPRINT" for ELASTIC - PLASTIC ANALYSIS"

8579 IF D = 1 THEN LPRINT:LPRINT " for motion in VERTICAL direction" sLPRINT

8588 IF D = 2 THEN LPRINT:LPR1NT " for motion in ATHUARTSHIP direction" :LPR!NT

8581 IF D = 3 THEN LPRINTsLPRINT " for motion in FORE AND AFT direction" : LPRINT

8598 FOR I = 1 TO N

8688 IF B 1 THEN GOTO 8688

8618 A8(I) = 18.4* <<488+UA«I))/<2B+UA(I)))

8628 W<I) = 28! * <(438+UA<I))/(188+WA<I)))

8638 IF (0=1 OR D=2) AND C=l THEN MULT1=1 :MULT2=1 : GOTO 9118 ELSE

8648 IF (D=3 AND C=l) THEN MULT1=.4:MULT2=.4 : GOTO 9118 ELSE

76

THEN GOTO 8483

[13 for notion in VERTICAL direct ion' :PRINT

[23 for motion in ATHWARTSHIP direct ion" sPRINT

[33 for motion in FORE AND AFT direct ion'

Page 88: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

3659 IF (0=1 OR D=2) AND 02 THEN MULT 1*1 :MULT2=,5 : GOTO 9118 ELSE

8668 MULT1=.4 : MULT2=.2

8678 GOTO 9118

8688 IF B 2 THEN GOTO 8788

8698 ABCI) = 5,2 * ((488 UA<I))/<28 + UA(I)))

8788 VB(I) = 18! * ((488+UAd))/(188+UA(I)))

8718 IF (D=l AND Ol) THEN MULTi=l:MULT2=l : GOTO 9118 ELSE

8728 IF (D=2 AND C=l) THEN MULT 1=2 :MULT2=2 : GOTO 9118 ELSE

8738 IF (D=3 AND C=l) THEN MULT1=.8:MULT2=.8 ; GOTO 9118 ELSE

8748 IF (D=l AND C=2) THEN MULT1=1:NULT2=.5 : GOTO 9118 ELSE

8758 IF (D=2 AND C=2) THEN MULT 1=2 :MULT2=1! ; GOTO 9118 ELSE

8768 MULT1 = .8 : MULT2 = .4

8778 GOTO 9118

8788 IF B <> 3 THEN GOTO 8858

3798 A8(I) = 52 * ((488+UAd))/<28+WA(I)))

8888 V8(I) = 188 * ((488+UAd))/(188+UAd))>

8818 IF 0=1 THEN MULT1=1 :MULT2=1 : GOTO 9118 ELSE

8329 IF 0=2 THEN MULT1=.2:MULT2=.2 ; GOTO 9118 ELSE

8338 MULT1 = .88 : MULT2 = .88

8848 GOTO 9118

8858 IF B <) 4 THEN GOTO 8958

A8(I) = 28 * ((37.5 + UA(I))*<12 + UA(I))/(6 + UA(I)A2))

V8(I) = 68 * ((12 + WA(l))/(6 + UA(l)))

IF (D=l AND C=l) THEN MULT1=1 :MULT2=1 : GOTO 9118 ELSE

IF (D=2 AND C=l) THEN MULT1=.4:MULT2=.4 : GOTO 9118 ELSE

IF (D=3 AND Ol) THEN MULT1=.2:MULT2=.2 : GOTO 9118 ELSE

8918 IF (D=l AND C=2) THEN MULT1=1:MULT2=.5 : GOTO 9118 ELSE

8928 IF (D=2 AND 0=2) THEN MULT1=.4:MULT2=.2 : GOTO 9118 ELSE

8938 MULT1 = .2 : MULT2 = .1

8948 GOTO 9118

8958 IF B (> 5 THEN GOTO 9858

8968 AB(I) = 18 * ((37.5 + WA(I))*<12 + WA(l))/(6 + WAd) A2>)

8978 V8<!) = 38 * ((12 + UA(l))/(6 UA(1)))

8988 IF (D=l AND C=l) THB^ MULT1=1 :MULT2=1 : GOTO 9118 ELSE

8998 IF (D=2 AND Ol) THEN MULT1=.4:MULT2=.4 : GOTO 9118 ELSE

9888 IF (D=3 AND Ol) THEN MULT1=.4:MULT2=.4 : GOTO 9118 ELSE

9818 IF (D=l AND 02) THEN MULT1=1 :MULT2=.5 : GOTO 9118 ELSE

9828 IF (0=2 AND 02) THEN MULT1=.4:MULT2=.2 : GOTO 9118 ELSE

9838 MULT1 = .4 : MULT2 = .2

9848 GOTO 9118

9858 A8(I) = 48 * ((37.5 UA(I))*<12+ UA(I))/(6 UA<I))A2)

9868 V8(I) = 128 ((12 + UA(I))/(6 + UA(1)))

9088 IF 0=1 THEN MULT1=1:MULT2=1 : GOTO 9118 ELSE

9898 IF 0=2 THEN MULT1=.2:MULT2=.2 : GOTO 9118 ELSE

9188 MULT1 = .1 : MULT2 = .1

9118 V8d) = MULT2 * VB(1) : A8(I) = MULT1 * A8(l) : NEXT I

9128 FOR I = 1 TO M

9138 AA(I) = A0(I) * 386

9140 VAd) = VBd) * U(I)

9158 IF ABS(AAd)) > ABSCJAd)) TO DA(I) = VAd) ELSE OA(I) = AA(I)

916B IF ABS(DAd)) < 2316 THEM DA(3) = 2316

77

Page 89: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

9179 NEXT I

9171 CLS: LOCATE 5,1,9

9172 FOR I = 1 TO Hi PRINTa

CA';a

;I;") = "jDAd),

9173 NEXT 1

9174 PRINT:PRINT:PRINTS

Press any key to continue ..."

9175 A* = INKEY*:1F A* = " THEN GOTO 9175 ELSE CLS : LOCATE 5,1,9

9176 FOR I = 1 TO H : LPRINT : LPRINT "DA<" ;I j"> = 'iDA(I): NEXT 1 : LPRINT

9189 RETURN

19999 '**#*#*#*************«*****************************#*****«**************

19919 ' SUBROUTINE TO CALCULATE MODAL19929 ' F R C E.S R E F L E C T I N S

19939 '************************************************************************

n-forraat

19949 LOCATE 5,1,9

18959 PRINT Almost done. ... Please ENTER the number o-f the type o-f in

ion

19868 PRINT sPRINTVou desire as output1 )'

18878 LOCATE 18,1,8 PRINT" [1] MODAL FORCES"

18839 LOCATE 12,1,8 PRINT" 12] MODAL DEFLECT I QNS"

18898 LOCATE 14,1,8 PRINT' [31 FORCES & DEFLECT 2 ONS"

19895 LOCATE 16,1,9 PRINT" E4] CHANGE ANALYSIS TYPE'

19996 LOCATE 18,1,9 PRINT" [51 EXIT TO DOS"

18188 A* = 1NKEY*: If" A* >= CHR$<49> AND A* <= CHR$<53) THEN GOTO 18148

18118 IF A$ = " THEN GOTO 18199

19139 BEEP : GOTO 18188

18148 FLAG1 = VAL<A$) : CLS

18158 IF FLAG1 = 2 THEN GOTO 18228

18155 IF FLAG1 = 4 THEN GOTO 16168

18156 IF FLAG1 = 5 THEN SYSTEM

18168 REM ****** CALCULATE MODAL FORCES ********

18178 FOR I = 1 TO M

18188 FOR J = 1 TO N

18198 F < I , J > = P(I) * MASS(J) < PHKI.J) * DA(1)

18299 NEXT J

18218 NEXT I

18228 IF FLAG1 = 1 THEN GOTO 12888

18239 REM ****** CALCULATE MODAL DEFLECTIONS *********

19249 FOR I = 1 TO H

19259 FOR J = 1 TO N

19269 DELTA(l.J) = PHK1,J) * P<I) * DA(I) / U(I)A2

18298 NEXT J

18388 NEXT 1

18318 FOR J = 1 TON18328 BIGGEST = 9

18338 FOR I=

1 TO M

18348 IF BIGGEST < ABS(DELTA(I,J))

18358 NEXT I

18368 S = 8

18378 FOR I=

1 TO M

18388 IF I = K THEN GOTO 19499

18398 S = S DELTA(I,J)A2

THEN BIGGEST = ABS(DELTA(I ,J)): K=I

19488 NEXT I

78

Page 90: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

18418 DEFL(J) = ABS(DELTA>;K,J)) + SQR(S)

13428 NEXT J

12888 REM ********* OUTPUT RESULTS ***********

12818 CLS : LOCATE 5,1,8

12828 PRINT ENTER [13 TO ECHO RESULTS TO SCREEN" :P

RIHTiPRINT

12838 PRINT'

[2] TO ECHO RESULTS TO PRINTER3

:

PRINT:PRINT

12848 AS = INKEY*

12858 IF A* >= CHR$<49) AND A* <= CHW(58) THEN GOTO 12878

12860 IF A* = " THBJ GOTO 12848 ELSE BEEP: GOTO 12848

12878 FLAG2 = VAL<A*)

12888 IF FLAG2 = 2 THB< GOTO 12388

12898 IF FLAG1 = 2 THEN GOTO 12198

12188 FOR I = 1 TO M

12118 CLS : LOCATE 5,1,8 : PRINT' *** M D A L FORCES FOR MODE<

B

; I;

" ) Mbs3 **»" :PRINT

12111 LPRINhLPRINT" *** M D A L FORCES FOR MODE (';!;') Nb53 ***'

: LPRINT

12112 LPRINT ' N *: LPRINT

12114 PRINT ' N ": PRINT

12115 m = #* MJIHUW**** 1

12128 FOR J = 1 TO N

12138 PRINT USING FF* ; J,F(I,J)

12131 LPRINT USING FF* ; J,F(I,J)

12148 NEXT J

12158 PRINT:PR1NT:PR1NT:PRINT

12168 PRINT' Press any key to continue ...'

12178 A* = INKEYS: IF A* = " THEN GOTO 12178

12188 NEXT I

12190 IF FLAG1 = 1 THEN GOTO 12280

12200 CLS: LOCATE 5,1,0

12218 PRINT* *** D E F L E C T I N S AT MASS ATTACHMENT Pi

I N T S ***"

!

; PRINT :PRINT

12211 LPRINT : LPRINT'** DEFLECTIONS AT MASS ATTACHMENT POINTS **':LPRINT

12215 DM = '«. »«»«#«'

12220 FOR I = 1 TO N

12230 PRINT' DELTA C;I;') = ';

12231 LPRINT" DELTA <";I;") = ";

12232 LPRINT USING DM ; DEFL(I);

12233 LPRINT" in."

12235 PRINT USING DM ; DEFL(I);

12236 PRINT "in."

12240 NEXT I

12250 PRINT :PRINT:PRINT

12251 LPRINT: LPRINT

12260 PRINT" Press any key to continue

12270 A* = INKEY* : IF AS = '" THEN GOTO 12278

12288 CLS : LOCATE 5,1,8

12298 GOTO 18888

79

Page 91: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

12396 PRINT " OPTION NOT AVAILABLE YET;=> USE < Prtsc > KEY*

12318 FOR I = 1 TO 3888 : NEXT I GOTO 12888

15888 '**************»»*****************************»**********************

15818 ' SUBROUTINE TO INPUT MASS/MODES15828 ' F R H D I S K F I L E

15838 ' ****<*******»«<*»*******************************^**********************-»

15848 CLS : LOCATE 5,1,8

15858 PRINT" The program has been initialized to allow user input of the*: PRINT

15868 PRINT'Mode Shapes, Frequencies, and Masses via an input file." :PRINT

15878 PRINT : PRINT* H you desire one of the other options," :PR1NT:PRINT

15888 PRINT" PRESS <escape key); otherwise =)":PRINT : PRINT

15898 PRINT1

PRESS <space bar) to continue "

15188 A* = INKEY* : IF A* = CHRK27) GOTO 278

15118 IF A* <> CHR*(32) GOTO 15188

15128 CLS:LOCATE 5,1,8

15138 INPUT "Enter the dimension of the Mass Matrix =) ";N

15148 IF N <= 58 THEN GOTO 15178

15158 PR1NT:PR1NT:PR1NT"***** PROBLEM SIZE IS LIMITED TO 58 DEG OF FREEDOM ****

*15168 FOR 1 = 1 TO 1888 : NEXT I : GOTO 15138

15178 PRINT:PRINT:INPUT'Er.ter the number of modes you wish to use =) ";M

15175 PRlNT:PRlNT:INPUT"Enter the input file name =) ",FIN$

15188 CLS

15198 '******Mi**************i*********M***********u************************

15288 ' INPUT MASS,FREQ, AND PHI

15218 '**«********««***********»*******<****«*****«****************************

15228 OPEN FIN* FOR INPUT AS ill

15248 FOR I = 1 TO N

15258 INPUT til, MASSd)

15268 NEXT I

15278 FOR I = 1 TO M

15288 INPUT II, U<»15298 U<I) = U<1) * 6.283185

15388 NEXT I

15318 FOR J = 1 TO N

35338 FOR I = 1 TO M

15348 'INPUT Bl, PHI (I, J)

15358 NEXT I

15368 NEXT J

15378 ' **»*********<*****»*****<»*****»*«*******»****»********«»************

15388 •' OUTPUT MASS, OMEGA, AND PHI

15398 ' ***********<**««**************»**«»***********<«*********«**********

15488 LOCATE 5,1,8 : PRINT'MASS MATRIX DIAGONAL ELEMENTS ': PRINT

15481 LPRINT****** MASS DIAGONAL ELEMENTS *****"

15482 LPRINT

15485 MM$ = 'ill »«.IHHJM*AAA

15418 FOR I = 1 TO N

15428 PRINT USING MM* ; 1,MASSd)

15421 LPRINT USING MM* ; I,MASSd)

15438 NEXT I

15431 PRINTiPRINT" ....PRESS ANY KEY TO CONTINUE"

Page 92: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

15432 A* = INKEY* : IF A* = " THB4 GOTO 15432

15434 CLS

15449 PRINT SPRINT SPRINT

15458 PRINT'FREGUENCIES USED IN ANALYSIS <RPS)":PRINT

15451 LPRINT

15452 LPRINT'***** FREQUENCIES USED IN ANALYSIS (RPS)

****": LPRINT

15468 FOR I = 1 TO N

15478 PRINT I;" ";U<I>

15471 LPRINT Ij" *;W(I)

15488 NEXT I

15481 PRINT sPRINT' ....PRESS ATiY KEY TO CONTINUE'

15482 A* = INKEY* : IF A$ = " THEN GOTO 15432

15484 CLS

15498 PRINT sPRINT sPRINT

15491 LPRINT : LPRINT

15588 PRINT'MODES USED IN ANALYSIS' sPRINT

15581 LPRINT'***** MODES USED IN ANALYSIS *****' sLPRINT

15518 K = M : U* = "M.»#*##**** '

15528 IF K > 5 THEN GOTO 15688

15538 FOR J = 1 TO N

15548 FOR 1 = 1 TO N

15558 PRINT USING U$j PHI (I, J);

15551 LPRINT USING U»; PHK1.J);

15568 NEXT I

15579 PRINT '*

15571 LPRINT '"

15588 NEXT J

15598 PRINT sPRINT

15591 LPRINT : LPRINT

15592 PRINT: PRINT" ....PRESS ANY KEY TO CONTINUE'

15593 A* = INKEY* : IF A* = " THEN GOTO 15593

15594 CLS: GOTO 15749

15688 FOR J = 1 TO N

15618 FOR I = 1 TO 5

15628 PRINT USING U$i PHI (I, J)

j

15621 LPRINT USING U$j PHI (I, J);

15638 NEXT I

15648 PRINT ''

15641 LPRINT ''

15658 NEXT J

15668 PRINT sPRINT sLPRINTsLPRINT

15661 PRINT" . . . .PRESS ANY KEY TO CONTINUE'

15662 A$ = INKEY* : IF At = " THEN GOTO 15662

15663 CLS: PRINT: PRINT

15678 FOR J = 1 TO N

15688 FOR I = 6 TO N

15698 PRINT USING \ii\ PHKI.J);

15691 LPRINT USING U$; PHI (I, J);

15788 NEXT I

15718 PRINT ''

81

Page 93: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

15711 LPRINT ""

15729 NEXT J

15730 PRINT :PRINT:LPRINT:LPRINT

15731 PRINT" ,.., PRESS AM KEY TO CONTINUE'

15732 A$ = INKEY* : IF A$ = " THEN GOTO 15732

15734 CLS: PRINT : PRINT

15735 CLOSE til

15748 'J***********************************************************************

15758'• NORMALIZE MODE SHAPES

15748 ' ************************************************************************

15778 FOR I = 1 TO M

15788 BIG =8!

15798 FOR J = 1 TO N

15888 IF BIG < PHKI.J) TH^ BIG = PHK1.J)

15818 NEXT J

15828 FOR J = 1 TO N

15838 PHKI.J) = PHI(I,J)/BIG

15848 NEXT J

15858 NEXT I

15868 'J***********************************************************************

15878 ' OUTPUT NORMALIZED NODE SHAPES

15888 '************************************************************************

15898 PRINT'NQRMALIZED MODES USED IN ANALYSIS': PR INT :LPR1NT

15891 LPRINT'***** NORMALIZED MODES FOR ANALYSIS ******

15892 LPRINT

15988 K = M

15918 IF K ) 5 THEN GOTO 15988

15928 FOR J =1 TO N

15938 FOR I = 1 TO M

15948 PRINT USING U$; PHI (I, J);

15941 LPRINT USING U$;PHKI,J);

15958 NEXT I

15948 PRINT ''

15961 LPRINT ''

15978 NEXT J

15971 PRINT: PRINT' . . . .PRESS ANY KEY TO CONTIN

15972 A* = INKEY* : IF At = " THEN GOTO 15972

15973 CLS

15988 LPRINT : LPRINT : GOTO 16128

15998 FOR J =1 TO N

16888 FOR 1 = 1 TO 5

16818 PRINT USING W; PHKI.J);

16811 LPRINT USING U$; PHI(1,J);

16828 NEXT I

16838 PRINT '8

16831 LPRINT ''

16848 NEXT J

16858 PRINT :PRINT :LPRINT:LPRINT

16851 PRINT' ....PRESS ANY KEY TO CONTINUE'

16852 A* = INKEY* : IF A$ = " THEN GOTO 15852

16853 CLS

82

Page 94: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

16968 FOR J = 1 TO N

16873 FOR 1= 6 TO N

16838 PRINT USING U*; PHI (I, J);

16881 LPRINT USING U$; PHKI,J);

16898 NEXT I

16188 PRINT'

16181 LPRINTb g

16118 NEXT J

16128 PRINT :PRINT:LPRINT:LPRINT

16121 PRINTI

....PRESS ANY KEY TO CONTINUE3

16122 A* = INKEY* : IF A$ = " THEN GOTO 16122

16138 CLS : GOSUB 6898

16148 CLS : LOCATE 21,1 ,8

16158 PRINT

16155 CLS : G0SU8 8888

16168 CLS s GOSUB 8288

16178 CLS : GOSUB 18888

28888 CLS

28818 LOCATE 5,1,8

28828 PRINT'*** YOU MUST FIRST USE THE PROGRAM JACOBI TO SOLVE EI6ENVALUE ***'

28838 PRINT'*** PROBLEM. IT WILL CALCULATE NATURAL FREQUENCIES AND MODE ***"

28848 PRINT"*** SHAPES THAT CAN THEN BE USED TO RUN THE DDAM PROGRAM. ***'

28858 PRINT: PRINT: PRINT:

28868 PRINT' ENTER <F3> JACOBI (RETURN)': PRINT

28878 PRINT" <F2>'

28888 STOP

25888 CLS:PRJNT'*** USER MAY USE OPTION 4 TO INSTALL HIS/HER SUBROUTINE ***'

25818 PRINT" *** BEGINNING AT LINE 25888.***"

25828 FOR 1 = 1 TO 5888 : NEXT I : GOTO 278

83

Page 95: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

C. PROGRAM JACOB I - INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE

The toll owing BASIC program may be used as is or

modi tied by the user to solve the Eigenvalue problem once

the e qua t i on s of mo t i on ar e f ormu 1 a t e d . It is se 1+" e x p 1 an -

a tor y i n e x ecut i on w i t h the exceptions that the A ma t r i x

replaces the stiffness matrix and the B matrix replaces th<i

mass matrix. The program only requires that the upper tri-

angle elements of the stiffness matrix be sup pi i ed along

with the diagonal elements of the mass matrix.

D. PROGRAM JACOB! LISTING (Adapted +rora ret. 13)

4 CLS

5 REM —CYCLIC JACOBI METH0D=

18 DIM AU8.18), B<iB),UUe,19>

1? REM =INPUT DATA=

28 GOSUB 78

28 REINITIALIZE-38 GOSUB 668

48 GOSUB 988

45 REM =0UTPUT RESULTS=

58 GOSUB 758

68 GOTO 3888

65 REM = INPUT 0ATA=

78 PRINT

88 PRINT * CYCLIC JACOBI METHOD"

168 PRINT

188 PRINT

198 PRINT ' ENTER THE SIZE OF PROBLEM (i.e. no. o-f rows)'

288 PRINT

84

Page 96: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

218 INPUT "N = "; N

228 LPRINT 'PROBLEM DIMENSION = '; N

238 INPUT 'NUMBER OF SIGNIFICANT FIGURES = 8

; Si

248 LPRINT

258 PRINT

268 PRINT ' ENTER THE UPPER TRIANGULAR ELEMENTS OF MATRIX A i by columns >:'

278 PRINT

288 LPRINT "UPPER ELEMENTS OF MATRIX A ='

298 LPRINT

328 FOR J = 1 TO N

338 PRINT

348 PRINT * ENTER UPPER PART OF COLUMN "; J

358 PRINT

368 FOR I = 1 TO J

378 PRINT " ACiljYjJj") = "l

388 INPUT Ad, J)

381 LPRINT " A(";I;Y;J;") = "! A(I,J)

382 LPRINT

398 NEXT I

488 PRINT

448 PRINT

458 NEXT J

468 FOR I = 1 TO N

478 II = I-

1

488 FOR J = 1 TO II

498 Ad, J) = A(J,I)

588 NEXT J

518 NEXT 1

528 PRINT

538 PRINT ' ENTER ELEMENTS OF DIAGONAL MATRIX B:'

531 LPRINT ELEMENTS OF DIAGONAL MATRIX B'

532 LPRINT

548 PRINT

578 FOR I = 1 TO N

538 PRINT ' B<*;I;*) = ';

598 INPUT BCD

591 LPRINT " B(';3;8

) = jB<I)

688 NEXT I

618 PRINT

611 LPRINT

658 RETURN

655 REM INITIALIZE TOLERANCE AND MAX NO. OF ROTATIONS =668 2 = 2 * SI

678 Tl = 1/(18AZ)

638 PRINT

698 CLS: PRINT "TOLERANCE = "jTl

691 LPRINT "TOLERANCE = B;T1

788 R = 5*N*N

718 Rl = 8

728 T2 = .1

738 Nl = N -1

85

Page 97: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

748 RETURN

744 REM =OUTPUT EI6ENS0LUTI0N=

758 PRINT

768 PRINT

778 PRINT "SOLUTION"

771 LPRINT

738 PRINT

781 LPRINT

732 LPRINT 'a*************** SOLUTION a*****************

783 LPRINT

888 PRINT ' NUMBER OF ROTATIONS REQUIRED = ';R1

881 LPRINT "NUMBER OF ROTATIONS REQUIRED = ";R1

382 LPRINT

883 LPRINT

818 PRINT

828 PRINT

838 FOR J = 1 TO N

848 PRINT

358 PRINT ' EIGBWALUE ";J;" IS • ;B<J>

851 LPRINT "EIGBWALUE ';J;' IS " ;B< J)

852 LPRJNT

853 LPRINT 'ITS EIGBWECTOR IS"

848 PRINT

878 PRINT ' ITS EIGENVECTOR IS

888 PRINT

898 FOR I = 1 TO N

988 PRINT IK I, J)

981 LPRINT U(I,J)

982 LPRINT

918 NEXT I

928 PRINT

921 LPRINT

938 PRINT ' PRESS SPACE BAR TO CONTINUE'

948 IF INKEY* = " " THEN 942

941 GOTO 948

942 CLS

958 PRINT

968 NEXT J

97fl RETURN

975 REM =EIGENPROBLEM SOLUTION=

988 GOSUB 1338

985 REM =PERFORM ONE CYCLE OF ROTATIONS=

998 GOSUB 1298

995 REM = CHECK TOLERANCE =1888 IF XI < Tl THEN 1118

1885 REM = CHECK NO. OF ROTATIONS =1818 IF Rl > R THEN 1848

1828 T2 = .1 * XI

1838 GOTO 998

1848 PRINT

1858 PRINT " *** ERROR ***"

84

Page 98: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

1851

1668

1878

1871

1888

1881

1898

1891

1168

1118

1128

1138

1148

1158

1148

1178

1188

1198

1288

1218

1228

1238

1248

1258

1268

1278

1288

1298

1388

1318

.1328

1338

1348

1358

1368

1365

1378

1388

1398

1488

1418

1415

1428

1438

1448

1458

1468

1478

1488

1498

1588

LPRINT '*****************<** ERROR <******************'

PRINT

NO CONVERGENCE ATTAINED"

NO CONVERGENCE ATTAINED*

WITH *;R1;S

ROTATIONS"

UITHa;Rl;" ROTATIONS'

PRINT

LPRINT

PRINT

LPRINT

PRINT

LPRINT

END

G0SU8 1838

RETURN

FOR I = 1 TO N

FOR J = 1 TO N

U(I,J) = 8

NEXT J

U<I,I) = 1

NEXT I

FOR I = 1 TO N

Bl = SQR(B(D)

B(I) = 1 / Bl

NEXT I

FOR I = 1 TO N

FOR J = 1 TO N

Ad, J) = B(I) * A<I,J) * B(J)

NEXT J

NEXT I

RETURN

XI = 8

FOR K = 1 TO Nl

Kl = K + 1

FOR L = Kl TO N

Al = A(K,K)

A2 = A(K,L)

A3 = A(L,L)

X = A2 * A2 /(Al » A3)

REM = CHECK IF ROTATE

IF X ) XI THEN 1398

GOTO 1888

XI = X

IF X < T2 THEN 1888

Rl = Rl + 1

REM = COMPUTE ANGLE =IF Al = A3 THEN 1478

2 = .5 * (Al - A3) /A2

21 = 1 + 1/ (Z * Z)

T = -Z * (1 + SQR(ZD)

GOTO 1488

T = 1

C = 1 / SQR( 1 + T * T)

S = C * T

S2 = S * S

IS NEEDED =

87

Page 99: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

1518 C2 = C * C

1523 A'K.L) = 8

1525 REM = TRANSFORM DIAGONAL ELEMENTS =1538 A8 = 2 * A2 * C * S

1548 A(K,K) = Al *C2 + A8 + A3 * S2

1558 A(L,L) = Al * S2 - A8 A3 * C2

1555 REM = TRANSFORM OFF DIAGONAL ELEMENTS =1568 FOR 1 = 1 TO N

1578 IF I < K THEN 1689

1588 IF I > K THEN 1648

1598 GOTO 1748

1688 A8 = A(I,K)

1618 A(I,K) = C * A8 + S * A<I,L)

1628 A(I,L) = -S * A8 + C * A(I,L)

1638 GOTO 1748

1648 IF I < L THEN 1678

1658 IF I ) L THEN 1718

1668 GOTO 1748

1678 A8 = A(K,I)

1688 A(K,I) = C * A8 S * A(I,L)

1698 A(I,L) = -S * A8 + C * A(I,L)

1788 GOTO 1748

1718 A8 = A(K,I)

1728 A(K,I) = C * A8 + S * A<L,I)

1738 A(L,I) = -S * A8 C * A(L,I)

1748 NEXT I

1745 REM = TRANSFORM MATRIX U TO GENERATE EIGENVECTORS =1758 FOR 1 = 1 TO N

1768 U8 = LKl.K)

1778 IK1,K) = C * U8 + S * U(I,L)

1788 U<J,L) = -S * U8 + C * U(1,L)

1798 NEXT I

1888 NEXT L

1818 NEXT K

1828 RETURN

1825 REM = NORMALIZE EIGENVECTORS =1838 FOR I = 1 TO N

1848 FOR J = 1 TO N

1858 UU,J) = U(I,J) < B(I)

1868 NEXT J

1878 NEXT I

1888 FOR I = 1 TO N

1898 8(1) = A(I,I)

1988 NEXT I

1985 REM = ORDER EIGENSQLUTION =1918 FOR I = 1 TO Nl

1928 11=1+11938 Z = B(I)

1948 M = I

1958 FOR J = 11 TON1968 IF Z < B(J) THEW 1998

Page 100: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

1978 Z = B(J )

1988 M = J

1998 NEXT J

2888 B<H) = 8(1)

2818 8(1) = L

2828 FOR J =1 TON

2838 Z = U<J ,D

2848 IKJ,I) = U(J,M)

2858 U(J,M)_ 7- L

28*8 NEXT J

2878 NEXT I

2888 RETURN

3888 PRINT'

END OF PROGRAM

3818 END

89

Page 101: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

APPENDIX B: PROGRAMS USED TO CONVERT VELOCITY HISTQRIE'

TO DEFLECTION HISTORIES

1 e

28 ' PROGRAM ** SIMPS1 ** USED FOR CASE I

38 ' INTEGRATES VELOCITY HISTORY WRT TIME TO OBTAIN DEFLECTIONS

48'

58 CLS : DIM A$<3)

68 F(l)=8 : F(2)=8 : F(3)=8 : FORMIC' *.m* ' : F0RM2*=" JHi.MIHHI*'

78 INPUT" ENTER THE NAME OF AN INPUT FILE ",F1LEIN» : PRINT

88 INPUT" ENTER THE ORDINATES TO INTEGRATE OVER " .NUMBER : PRINT

98 INPUT" ENTER THE SIZE OF THE INTEGRATION INTERVAL ",H

188 CLS

118 OPB^ FILEIN* FOR INPUT AS 111 : OPEN "D1SPR2.0UT" FOR OUTPUT AS S2

1 28'

138 ' USE SIMPSON'S 1/3 RULE TO CALCULATE DEFLECTIONS

1 48

158 INPUT »l,M)TIHE(8)

)VELll(8),VEL12(8),VEL13';8)

)VELdl(8),VEL62(8),VEL63(8)

168 FOR I = 1 TO 2

178 INPUT m,MJIME(I),VELlh'I),VEL12<l),VEL13':i),VEL6HI),VEL62(I),VEL63(l)

188 NEXT I

198 V1A = VEL6H8) - VEL1K8)

288 V1B = VEL6K1) - VELIKI)

218 VIC = VEL6K2) - VEL1K2)

228 Ql = (VIA + 4*V1B + VIC) * H / 3

238 V2A = VEL62<8) - VEL12<8)

248 V2B = VEL62H) - VEL12U)

258 V2C = VEL62<2) - VEL12(2)

268 Q2 = (V2A + 4*V2B t V2C) * H / 3

278 V3A = VEL63<8) - VEL13<8)

288 V3B = VEL63(1) - VEL13(1)

298 V3C = VEL63(2) - VEL13<2)

388 Q3 = (V3A + 4«V3B + V3C) * H / 3

318 F(l) = F(l) + Ql

328 F(2) = F<2) + Q2

338 F(3) = F<3) G3

348 T = TIME(l) * 1888

358 FOR 1 = 1 TO 3

368 IF ABS(QMAXd)) ) ABS(FU)) THEN GOTO 388

378 OMAX(I) = F<3) : TMAX(I) = T

388 NEXT I

398 PRINT 112

,

" T = ";: PRINT #2, USING FORMl$;T;

488 PRINT »2, 'usee DX = '; : PRINT #2, USING FQRH2*;F(1);

418 PRINT 112, "in. DY = ';: PRINT 112 , USING FORM2$;F<2);

428 PRINT 112, "in. DZ = ";: PRINT #2, USING F0RM2*;F<3); :PRINT #2,

" i n.

438 VEL1K8) = VEL1K2) : VEL12<8) = VEL12(2) : VEL13<8) = VEL13<2)

98

Page 102: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

448 VEL6K8) = VEUK2) : VEL62-9) = VEL62<2) : UEL63<8) = VEL63<2)

458 IF M + 2 < NUMBER THB4 GOTO 168

468 AMD = '(X) = *: A$<2) = '(Y) = '

: A$<3) = a u) = 8

478 FOR I = 1 TO 3

488 PRINT #2, "THAX'jAid); : PRINT 82, USING FORMtt;TMAX(I)

j

485 PRINT »2," msec DMAX" |A*<I> | ! PRINT »2, USING FQRM2*jQHAX<I);

486 PRINT 82," in.'

498 NEXT I

589 CLOSE 81 : CLOSE 82

16

28 ' PROGRAM H S1MPS2 ** USED FOR CASES II AND III

38 ' INTEGRATES VELOCITY HISTORY URT TIME TO OBTAIN DEFLECTIONS

4e

58 CLS : DIM A*<3)

68 F<1)=8 : F(2)=8 : FORNIX' 88.8*88 ': F0RM2f=

a88.88888*

'

79 INPUT" ENTER THE NAME OF AN INPUT FILE ',FILEIN$ : PRINT

38 INPUT* BITER THE QRDINATES TO INTEGRATE OVER ".NUMBER ; PRINT

98 INPUT ENTER THE SIZE OF THE INTEGRATION INTERVAL ",H

188 CLS

118 OPB^ F1LEINJ FOR INPUT AS 81 : OPEN 'DISPR2.0UT" FOR OUTPUT AS 82

115 PRINT 82, "H = ';H;D SEC

128 - -

138 ' USE SIMPSON'S 1/3 RULE TO CALCULATE DEFLECTIONS

1 48 '-158 INPUT 81 ,M,T1ME(8) ,VEL12<9) ,VEL92(9) ,VEL52<8) ,VEL112<8) ,VEL192(8) ,VEL152(8)

168 FOR I = 1 TO 2

178 INPUT 81,M,TlME':i),VEL12(I),VEL?2':i),VEL52<l),VEL112(l),VEL192(I),VEL152':i)

188 NEXT I

198 VIA = (VEL12(8) + VEL92(8))/2 - VEL52(8)

288 V1B = (VEL12(1) VEL92(l))/2 - VEL52U)

218 VIC = <VEL12(2) + VEL92(2))/2 - VEL52(2)

228 Ql = (VIA + 4*V1B + VIC) * H / 3

238 V2A = (VELU2(8) + VEL192(8))/2 - VEL152(8)

248 V2B = (VEL112U) + VEL192(l))/2 - VEL152U)

258 V2C = (VEL112(2) + VEL192<2))/2 - VEL152<2)

268 Q2 = (V2A + 4*V2B + V2C) * H / 3

318 F(l) = F<1) + Ql

328 F(2) = F(2) + Q2

348 T = TIME(l) * 1888

358 FOR I = 1 TO 2

368 IF ABS(QMAXd)) > ABS(F«D) THEN GOTO 388

378 QMAX(I) = F(I) : TMAX(I) = T

388 NEXT I

398 PRINT 82, ' T = ';: PRINT 12, USING FORMl$;T;

488 PRINT 82, "msec D(5,Y) = '; : PRINT 82, USING F0RM2*;F<1);

91

Page 103: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

418 PRINT #2, "in. 0(15,Y) = ';: PRINT 82, USING F0RM2*;F<2);

428 PRINT 82, 'in."

438 VEL12(8) = VEL12(2) : VEL?2<8) = VEL92<2) : VEL52(8) = MEL52<2)

448 VEL112(8) = UEL112<2) : UEL192<0) = VEL192(2) : VEL152(8> = VEL152<2)

458 IF M + 3 < NUMBER THEN GOTO 148

468 A$<1) = 'O.Y) = ': A*<2) = "(15,Y) = '

478 FOR I = 1 TO 2

488 PRINT 112 , "TMAX'jAKDj : PRINT H2, USING F0Rf11*;TMAX<I);

485 PRINT 82,' msec DNAX";A*<I);: PRINT 82, USING F0RM2*;QHAX(I>;

486 PRINT 82," in.'

498 NEXT I

588 CLOSE ttl : CLOSE 82

92

Page 104: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

APPENDIX C - TYPICAL CASE I ANALYSIS

As noted in Chapter M , the first step in each analysis

was the construction of an appropriate SAP Ik-1 model of the

equipment substructure under consideration. In this case,

the model represents a 1,99 9 lb valve attached to the free

end of a can t i 1 ever f oundat i on

.

A. SAP IV INPUT DATA FOR CASE I

The following data file was used to generate the modal

information for the Case I model CRef. 193.

HEADING CARD

CASE 1 — VALVE ON CANTILEVER FOUNDATION

MASTER CONTROL CARD

7,1 ,9,6,1 ,9,9,0,9,9

NODAL PT DATA

, 1 , 1 , , , 1 , 1 , 1 , . , . , . , 1 , .

, 2 , 1 , , , , 1 , 1 , . , . , 5 . , 1 , 9 . 9

0,6,1 ,0,0,0,1 ,1 , . , 9 . , 25 . ,1 ,9.9, 7 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 , 1 . , . , 1 . , . 9

TYPE 2 - 3D BEAM ELEMENTS

2,5,1 ,0,1

MATERIAL PROPERTIES

1 , 30 . 0E6 , . 3 , 7 . 29E-4 ,9.9

ELEMENT PROPERTY CARD

1 , 1 7 . 64 , 9 . , 9 . , 53? . 95 , 333 . 95 , 20 6 .

9

93

Page 105: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

9.8,0.8,9.0, 8 .

0.8,8.8,8.0,8.8.0,0.9,0.6,0.00.0,0.0,0.0,0.0

BEAM DATA CARDS

1 ,1 ,2,7,1 ,1 ,0,0,0,0,000000,15,5,6,7,1 ,

1

,0,8,0,0,000000,1

CONCENTRATED MASS ON FREE END

6,0,2.591 ,2.591 ,2.591 ,8.8,8.8,8.00,0, 8 . 8 0,0.000,0.000,0.0, . 8 , 8 .

D i NAM I C ANALY S I S CAR D ( I N ACC RDANC E WITH RE F . 4

0,0,0,0.8,0.0,0,0.01 ,0

1,1,1,1,1,1,1

END OF DATA < DUMMY TITLE CARD)0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0

The output -from the SAP IV code is not included here but

all the essential i n -forma, t i on is included in the USLOB code

ou tpu t .

B. PI CRUST INPUT DATA FOR CASE I

The PI CRUST code is used to process the SAP I 1 ,' output

and calculate influence coefficients corresponding to the

base or support motions of the substructure. Additionally,

connect i'>

i t y be twe en the hull an d i ou n da t i on is specified

and a substructure file is produced.

The fol lowing input -file was used -For CASE I :

LIST OPTIONS

1,1,1,1,0,1,1,1,0,00,1,1,1,1,1,0,1,0,0

M DA L SPEC I F I CAT I ON

94

Page 106: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

5,8,0

CONNECTIVITY

1,5,16270

MODES FROM SAP IV INCLUDED IN ANALYSIS

1,2,3,4,5

END

The output 1 i sting from the PI CRUST code is not

included here but all essential output -from these

c a 1 c u 1 a t i on s is i nc 1 uded i n t h e USLOB ou tp u t .

C. USLOB INPUT DATA FOR CASE I (1414" STANDOFF)

The -foil owing input data, was suppl i ed to the USLOB

code to specify the parameters for the time integration

and associated output. A total of 1201 time steps are

specified for the integration i n t e r v a 1 , each c ok> e r i n g an

interval of 5.0E-6 seconds. The XXXX parameters denote

parameters for eq. 5 which are ommitted due to the

sensitivity of this e q u a t i on

.

The following input data correspond to the USLOB output

included in t h i s a p p e n d i x

.

TIME STEP AND CONTROL CARD FOR INTEGRATION

1201,1,1,9,11,1,1

EQUATION (5) PARAMETER SPECIFICATION

5 . E-6 , XXXX ,1606,0.5000., XXXX , XXXX , XXXX , XXXX

Page 107: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

OUTPUT OPTIONS

6,1 ,8,8,8,8,0,8,1 ,

8

0,8,1,1,8,0,8,1,8,8

SHELL VELOCITY OUTPUTS AT EACH TIME STEP

1,5,10

SUBSTRUCTURE VELOCITY OUTPUTS AT EACH TIME STEP

1 ,1 , 1 ,2,1 ,3,6,1 ,6,2,6,3( Th i s n o t a t i on specifies the x , y , z t r an s 1 a t i on = ot t h i

b a s e a n d tip n o d e •= o + the •= u b

s

tructure respect i v e 1 y . )

IND

96

Page 108: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

D. LISTING - USLOB OUTPUT FOR CASE I

CASE 1-- VALVE ON FOUNDATION VERT DISPL

CONTROL PARAMETERS FOR SUBSTRUCTURE

NPOINT = 7 NDOF = 18

NCDOF = 3 NUDOF = 15

NFREQ = 18 NFACE =1

NSYMTY = 8 NFORCE = 13

CONNECTION DATA FOR INTERFACE POINTS

SHL SUB X Y 2 XX YY ZZ LSGPT LF1ND DEGCON

56 1 1 1 1 8 8 8 5818 27 2.788888E+82

8DEGROT = 9.888888E+81

1 EQUATION NUMBERS FOR SUBSTRUCTURE 1

POINT X Y Z

1 1 2 3

2 4 5 6

37i 8 ?

4 18 11 12

5 13 14 15

6 16 17 18

7 8 8 8

XX YY ZZ

FIXED-BASE NATURAL FREQUENCIES FOR SUBSTRUCTURE

MODE FREQ MODE FREQ MODE FREQ MODE FREQ

1 4.45541E+82 2 1.85485E+83 3 1.34387E+33 4 4.83785E+83

5 7.68871E+83 6 9.55885E+83 7 1.84549E+B4 3 1.21696E+84

9 1.22848E+84 18 1.88142E+84

1 COMPACTED FIXED-BASE MODES FOR SUBSTRUCTURE

1

1 1.9139E-18

2 3.1568E-28

3 -1.2482E-81

4 3.8186E-18

5 6.2987E-28

6 -2.4745E-81

7 5.7852E-18

8 9.4185E-28

•1.2482E-81

8.9711E-89

•4.8588E-28

2.4745E-81

1.7988E-88

-9.6785E-28

•3.6971E-81

2.6743E-88

3

9.5498E-18

1.2482E-81

3.7187E-11

1.9853E-89

2.4745E-81

5.9782E-11

2.8465E-89

3.6971E-81

4

6.2397E-12

1.1183E-12

-1.4719E+88

L8836E-11

1.8086E-12

-2.3685E+08

9.9888E-12

1.7811E-12

5

2.4775E-11

1.6989E-13

-2.3785E+88

3.9865E-11

2.7333E-13

-1.4497E+88

3.9373E-11

2.6992E-13

97

Page 109: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

9 -3.6971E-81 -1.4468E-19

18 7.5646E-18 -4.9829E-81

11 1.2478E-19 3.5459E-88

12 -4.9828E-81 -1.9173E-19

13 9.3838E-13 -6.3836E-81

14 1.5485E-19 4.4886E-83

5.8957E-11 -2.3393E488 1.4839E+88

3.7743E-89 5.9893E-12 2.3492E-11

4.9828E-81 i .8677E-12 1.6163E-13

3.5172E-11 -1.3957E+88 2.3572E+88

4.6843E-89 -3.9555E-13 -1.5718E-12

6.8836E-81 -5.9949E-14 -1.8775E-14

15 -6.8336E-81 -2.3794E-19 -2.3536E-12 9.3383E-82 -4.2362E-82

6

1.4719E+88

1.3626E-13

2.4183E-18

2.3685E+88

2.1925E-13

-1.5816E-18

2.3393E+88

8 2.1655E-13

9 -1.4369E-18

18 1.3957E+88

1.2928E-13

2.4276E-18

-9.3383E-82

-8.6446E-15

-2.2918E-12

11

13

14

15

16

3.5428E-14

2.2993E-11

-2.3685E+88

5.3848E-14

3.6999E-11

1.4719E+88

4.9358E-14

3.6543E-11

1.4538E+88

2.7551E-14

2.1883E-11

2.3754E+88

•1.9932E-15

1.4588E-12

2.2428E-32

8

1.2133E-28

1.4719E+88

-3.3664E-12

1.5886E-26

•2.3685E+88

5.4581E-12

1.1252E-28

•2.3393E+88

•5.4572E-32

4.4918E-21

•1.3957E+88

3.3858E-12

4.7535E-22

9.3383E-82

•2.3883E-14

1.2895E-12

6.6535E-13

-1.4634E+88

-7.6588E-13

1.8688E-12

2.3693E+88

-4.6836E-12

1.B516E-12

-2.3724E+88

-6.5986E-12

6.2577E-13

1.4715E+88

5.2983E-12

4.1996E-14

•1.8835E-82

-2.3785E+88

9.7987E-11

-1.8812E-12

-1.4497E+88

5.7223E-U

-3.7449E-12

1.4839E+88

-6.835BE-11

-5.6847E-12

2.3572E+88

-1.8783E-18

-7.4239E-12

-4.2362E-82

-7.7491E-12

-9.2163E-12

1 SUBSTRUCTURE CONTROL PARAMETERS

SUB NFREQ NOOF HCDOF NPTS LOCQ NEQB NBLOCK NROUFC

1 18 18 3 7 518 15 1 3

NBLFOR KOLBAR NBLBAR 8E6FRQ 8EGSBL BE6BAR BE6F0R

1 254 1 1 1 1 1

CONTROL PARAMETERS FOR SOLUTION

NTIME = 1281 NEQS = 638

NSKIP = 2 NRECS = 681

NCHRG =1 NTHETA = 17

NQUAD = 9 NDELTA = 21

NFINE = 11 NQDOT = 264

KOUPLE = 2 NSUBS =1

SOLUTION PARAMETERS

TOTALM = 3.541492E+B4 AREA = 3.639844E+86

RHOFLU = 9.452168E-85 CFLU = 6.888888E+84

DELT = 5.888888E-86 TEND = 6.B88888E-83

XLOAD = 8.844888E+82 STOFF = 1.414888E+83

RLOAD = 1.686888E+83 ORNRAD = 8.

98

Page 110: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

DATA FOR EMPIRICAL PRESSURE-TIME HISTORY

UCHRG = 5.388888E+83

P2MLT = XXXXXXXXXXXX

PZEXP = xxxxsoocooow

SURCUT = XJOOOOOOOOOW

THMLT = XXXXXXXXXXXX

THEXP = XXXXXXXXXXXX

VELOCITY DISTRIBUTION AT SHELL STATION 56 (SEGMENT 5 POINT 16)

STEP TIME UOOT< 8) UDOT( 98) WD0T(188) WD0K278)

1

3

8.

1.8688E-85

8.

4.9444E-81

8.

7.5446E-82

8,

1.7639E-81

8.

7.5445E-82

5 2.8888E-85 1.8855E+88 2.8722E-81 6.5644E-81 2.8728E-31i/ 3.8888E-85 3.8391E+88 5.3428E-81 1.3885E+88 5.8418E-81

9 4.8888E-85 6.1484E+88 9.3465E-81 2.8219E+8B 9.3436E-81

11 5.8888E-85 8.6881E*39 1.3193E+88 2.7669E+88 1.3136E+83

13 6.8888E-85 1.1347E+81 1.7214E+88 3.4983E+88 1.7282E+8B

15 7.8888E-85 1.4145E+81 2.1416E+88 4.2275E+88 2.1397E+88

17 8.8888E-85 1.7883E+81 2.5792E+8B 4.9559E+88 2.5763E+88

19 9.8888E-85 2.8132E+81 3.8265E+68 5.6665E+88 3.8224E+88

21 1.8888E-84 2.3241E+81 3.4895E+88 6.3713E+88 3.4848E+88

23 1.1888E-84 2.6547E+81 3.9697E+88 7.8994E+88 3.9625E+88

25 1.2888E-84 2.9933E+81 4.4593E+88 7.8237E+88 4.4582E+B8

27 1.3888E-84 3.3481E+81 4.9651E+88 8.5656E+88 4.9539E+88

29 1.4888E-84 3.7123E+81 5.4786E+88 9.3141E+88 5.4658E+88

31 1.5888E-84 4.8922E+81 6.8854E+88 1.B391E+81 5.9891E+88

33 1.6888E-84 4.4771E+81 6.5359E+88 1.8856E+B1 6.5167E+88

35 1.7888E-84 4.8745E+81 7.8787E+88 1.1647E+81 7.8482E+88

37 1.3888E-84 5.2721E+81 7.6848E+88 1.2411E+81 7.5788E+88

39 1.9888E-84 5.6819E+81 8.1394E+88 1.3288E+81 8.1897E+88

41 2.8888E-84 6.8891E+81 8.6698E+88 1.3957E+81 8.6353E+88

43 2.1888E-84 6.5836E+81 9.1899E+88 1.4723E+81 9.1519E+88

45 2.2888E-84 6.9161E+81 9.7844E+88 1.5459E+81 9.6618E+88

47 2.3888E-84 7.3292E+81 1.8289E+81 1.6185E+81 1.8161E+91

49 2.4888E-84 7.7437E+81 1.8788E+81 1.6899E+81 1.8648E+81

51 2.5888E-84 3.1493E+81 1.1188E+81 1.7569E+81 1.1122E+81

53 2.6888E-84 8.5686E+81 1.1643E+81 1.8247E+81 1.158BE+81

55 2.7888E-84 8.9672E+81 1.2897E+81 1.8895E+81 1.2827E+81

57 2.8888E-84 9.3669E+81 1.2528E+81 1.9589E+81 1.2451E+81

59 2.9888E-84 9.7634E+81 1.2918E+81 2.81B6E+81 1.2835E+81

61 3.8888E-84 1.8154E+82 1.3381E+81 2.8669E+81 1.32B9E+81

63 3.1888E-84 1.8542E+82 1.3669E+81 2.1219E+81 1.3578E+81

65 3.2B88E-84 1.8933E+82 1.4826E+81 2.1774E+81 i .3918E+91

67 3.3888E-84 1.1317E+82 1.4379E+81 2.2388E+81 1.4261E+81

69 3.4888E-84 1.1781E+82 1.4712E+81 2.2828E+61 1.4585E+81

71 3.5888E-84 1.2886E+82 1.5834E+81 2.3353E+81 1.4896E+81

73 3.6888E-84 1.2465E+82 1.5354E+81 2.3858E+81 1.5285E+81

75 3.7888E-84 1.2846E+82 1.5655E+81 2.4379E+81 1.5494E+81

77 3.8888E-84 1.3226E+82 1.5948E+81 2.4892E+81 1.5767E+81

99

Page 111: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

7? 3

81

83

85 4

37 4

89 4

91

93

95

111

113

97 4

99 4

181 5

183 5

185 5

187 5

189 5

115 5

117 5

119 5

121

123

125

127

129

131

133

135

137

139

141

143

145 7

147 7

149 7

151 7

153 7

155 7

157 7

159 7

161 8

163 8

165 8

167 8

169 8

171 8

173 8

175 8

177 8

179 8

.9888E-84

.8888E-84

.1888E-84

.2388E-84

.3888E-84

.4888E-84

.5888E-84

6888E-84

.7888E-84

.8888E-84

.9888E-84

.8888E-84

.1888E-84

.2888E-84

.3888E-84

.4888E-84

.5888E-84

.6888E-84

.7888E-64

.8888E-84

.9888E-84

.8888E-84

.1888E-84

.2888E-84

.3888E-84

4988E-84

.5888E-84

.6988E-84

.7888E-84

.8888E-84

.9888E-84

.8888E-84

.1888E-84

.2888E-84

.3888E-84

.4888E-84

.5888E-84

.6888E-84

.7888E-94

.3888E-84

.9888E-84

.8888E-84

.1888E-84

.2888E-84

.3888E-84

.4888E-84

.5888E-84

.6888E-84

.7B88E-84

.8888E-84

.9888E-84

1.3599E+82

1.3974E+82

1.4349E+82

1.4719E+82

1.5886E+92

1.5454E+82

1.5817E+82

1.6175E+82

1.6533E+82

1.6838E+82

1.7237E+82

1.7588E+82

1.7928E+82

1.8255E+82

1.8585E+82

1.8918E+82

1.9229E+82

1.9548E+82

1.9845E+82

2.8147E+82

2.8442E+82

2.8738E+82

2.1818E+82

2.1283E+82

2.1558E+82

2.1811E+82

2.2867E+82

2.2317E+82

2.2563E+82

2.2885E+82

2.3841E+82

2.3271E+92

2.3497E+82

2.3719E+82

2.3936E+82

2.4147E+82

2.4354E+82

2.4558E+82

2.4757E+82

2.4958E+82

2.5139E+82

2.5325E+82

2.5588E+82

2.5685E+82

2.5857E+82

2.6826E+82

2.6193E+82

2.6355E+82

2.6518E+82

2.6663E+82

2.6813E+82

1.6222E+8

1.6498E+8

1.6748E+8

1.6937E+8

1.7222E+8

1.7432E+8

1.7639E+8

1.7843E+B

1.8817E+8

1.8188E+8

1.8342E+8

1.3487E+8

1.8681E+8

1.8714E+8

1.8824E+8

1.8988E+8

1.3957E+8

1.9813E+8

1.9863E+8

1.9871E+8

1.9874E+8

1.9876E+8

1.9857E+8

1 .8995E+8

1.8932E+8

1.8869E+8

1.8798E+8

1.8681E+8

1.8572E+8

1.8463E+8

1.8348E+8

1.8189E+8

1.8935E+8

1.7382E+8

1.7723E+8

1.7531E+8

1.7336E+8

1.7146E+8

1.6961E+8

1.6736E+8

1.6584E+8

1.6279E+8

1.6862E+9

1.5889E+8

1.5546E+8

1.5298E+8

1.5839E+B

1.4778E+8

1.4488E+8

1.4288E+8

1.3917E+8

2.5382E+91 1.6836E+

2.5834E+81 1.6291E+

2.6395E+61 1.6526E+

2.6885E+81 1.6759E+

2.7371E+81 1.6979E+

2.7366E+81 1.7174E+

2.3358E+81 1.7365E+

2.3322E+81 1.7553E+

2.9384E+81 1.771BE+

2.9778E+81 1.7856E+

3.8233E+81 1.8B88E+

3.3677E+81 1.8127E+

3.1125E+81 1.8223E+

3.1558E+81 1.8317E+

3.1964E+81 1 .8488E+

3.2371E+81 1.8463E+

3.2765E+81 1.8581E+

3.3136E+61 1.8537E+

3.3489E+81 1.8565E+

3.3347E+81 1.8552E+

3.4182E+81 1.8533E+

3.4496E+81 1.8512E+

3.4789E+81 1.8471E+

3.5874E+81 1.8336E+

3.5335E+81 1.3388E+

3.5583E481 1.8213E+

3.5823E+81 1.8118E+

3.6856E+81 1.7978E+

3.6277E+81 1.7844E+

3.6484E+81 1.7711E+

3.6682E+81 •1.7564E+

3.6873E+81 1.7389E+

3.7854E+81 1.7211E+

3.7222E+81 1.7834E+

3.7379E+81 1.6851E+

3.7534E+81 1.6635E+

3.7676E+81 1.6415E+

3.7886E+81 1.6281E+

3.7924E+81 1.5993E+

3.8842E+81 1.5744E+

3.8147E+81 1.5489E+

3.8242E+81 1.5248E+

3.8326E+81 1.5881E+

3.8487E+91 1.4725E+

3.8481E+81 1.4448E+

3.8542E+81 1.4161E+

3.8594E+81 1.3883E+

3.8648E+81 1.3686E+

3.8688E+81 1.3294E+

3.8718E+81 1.2985E*

3.8738E+B1 1.2682E+

81

81

81

81

Page 112: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

131 9.8888E-84 2.6961E+82 1.3643E+81 3.8739E+9 1.2383E+81

183 9.1888E-84 2.7182E+B2 1.3335E+91 3.3746E+9 1.2968E+81

185 9.2888E-84 2.7238E+92 1.3819E+8! 3.8746E+8 1.1725E+B1

187 9.3888E-84 2.7372E+92 1.2789E+81 3.8734E+9 1.1397E+91

189 9.4888E-84 2.7585E+82 1.24B6E+81 3.8713E+9 1.1877E+81

191 9.5888E-84 2.7633E+82 1.2188E+81 3.3636E+9 1.8754E+81

193 9.6888E-84 2.7755E+82 1.1765E+81 3.3652E*8 1.8483E+81

195 9.7888E-84 2.7873E+82 1.1429E+81 3.86BSE+8 I 1.8852E+81

197 9.8A88E-84 2.7991E+82 1.1188E+B1 3.8552E+8 9.7897E+88

199 9.9888E-84 2.3186E+92 1.8773E+81 3.8489E+8 9.3739E+8B

281 1.8888E-83 2.8216E+82 1.8442E+81 3.3421E+8 9.8253E+88

283 1.8188E-83 2.8328E+82 1.8989E+81 3.3346E+9 3.6684E+88

285 1.B288E-B3 2.3423E+82 9.7388E+88 3.8257E+8 3.2991E+8B

287 1.8388E-83 2.3524E+82 9.3938E+88 3.8163E+9 i 7.9448E*83

289 1.8488E-83 2.8623E+82 9.8543E+89 3.8361E+8, 7.5959E+88

211 1.8588E-83 2.8715E+82 8.7864E+88 3.7956E+8 1 7.2392E+08

213 1.8688E-83 2.8892E+82 8.3494E+88 3.7849E+8 6.8749E+88

215 1.8788E-83 2.3887E+82 7.9933E+88 3.7734E+8 [ 6.5125E+88

217 1.8888E-B3 2.8971E+82 7.6462E+88 3.7611E+B 6.1599E+88

219 1.8988E-83 2.9B54E+82 7.3836E+88 3.7489E+8 5.8128E+88

221 1.1888E-83 2.9138E+82 6.9413E+88 3.7345E+8' 5.4468E+88

223 1.1188E-83 2.9231E+82 6.5667E+98 3.7286E+9 5.8696E+88

225 1.1288E-83 2.9272E+82 6.1998E+88 3.7858E+8 4.7889E+88

227 1.1388E-83 2.9342E+82 5.3414E+88 3.6898E+8 1 4.3419E+88

229 1.1488E-83 2.9411E+82 5.4887E+88 3.6729E+8 3.9896E+88

231 1.1588E-83 2.9473E+82 5.1168E+88 3.6555E+8 1 3.6193E+88

233 1.1688E-83 2.9531E+82 4.7374E+89 3.6375E+8 3.2426E+88

235 1.1788E-83 2.9589E*82 4.3669E+88 3.6185E+8 1 2.8762E*88

237 1.1888E-83 2.9646E+82 4.8833E+88 3.5985E+8 2.5183E+88

239 1.1988E-83 2.9783E+82 3.6475E+88 3.5777E+8 2.1684E+99

241 1.2888E-83 2.9752E+82 3.2711E+88 3.5571E+8 1.7998E+88

243 1.2188£-83 2.9796E+82 2.8911E+88 3.5359E+8 1 1.4288E+89

245 1.2288E-83 2.9841E+82 2.5193E+88 3.5138E+8 1.8673E+99

247 1.2388E-83 2.9886E+82 2.1528E+88 3.4989E+8 1 7.1232E-81

249 1.2488E-83 2.9929E+82 1.7896E+88 3.4676E+8 3.6192E-81

251 1.2588E-83 2.9966E+82 1.4168E+88 3.4442E*8 I 3.2835E-93

253 1.2688E-B3 2.9999E+82 1.8388E+88 3.42B5E+8 -3.5943E-91

255 1.2788E-83 3.8831E+82 6.6715E-81 3.3959E+8 1 -7.1455E-81

257 1.2888E-83 3.8863E+82 2.9858E-81 3.3787E+8 -1.8653E+88

259 1.2988E-83 3.8894E+82 -6.5765E-82 3.3451E+8 t -1.4187E+88

261 1.3888E-83 3.8121E+82 -4.3242E-81 3.3198E+8 [ -1.7571E+88

263 1.3188E-83 3.8142E+82 -8.8686E-81 3.2925E+8 1 -2.1181E+88

265 1.3288E-83 3.8164E+82 -1.1766E+88 3.2647E+8 1 -2.4572E+8B

267 1.3388E-83 3.8185E+82 -1.5432E+88 3.2363E+8 1 -2.8888E+88

269 1.3488E-83 3.82B6E+82 -1.9846E+88 3.287BE+8 1 -3.1364E+88

271 1.3588E-83 3.8225E+82 -2.2646E+88 3.1774E+8 1 -3.4782E+88

273 1.3688E-83 3.8236E+82 -2.6328E+88 3.1478E+8 i -3.8184E+88

275 1.3788E-83 3.8246E+82 -2.9962E+88 3.1175E+8 1 -4.1462E+88

277 1.3388E-B3 3.8256E+82 -3.3578E+88 3.B869E+8 [ -4.4775E+88

279 1.3988E-33 3.8267E+32 -3.7125E+88 3.8553E+8 I -4.8823E+88

281 1.4888E-83 3.B278E+82 -4.8645E+88 3.8233E+8 1 -5.1225E+88

181

Page 113: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

283

235

287

239

291

293

295

297

299

381

1.4188E-83

1.4288E-83

1.4388E-83

1.4438E-83

1.4588E-83

1.4688E-33

1.4788E-83

1.4888E-83

1.4988E-83

1.5888E-83

3.823BE+82

3.8238E+82

3.8279E+82

3.8288E+82

3.B281E+82

3.8277E+82

3.B267E+82

3.8257E+82

3.8247E+82

3.8239E+82

-4.4214E+88

-4.7756E+88

-5.1262E+88

-5.4737E+88

-5.8188E+88

-6.1611E+88

-6.5818E+B8

-6.8489E+88

-7.1776E+8B

-7.5121E+88

2.9917E+81

2.9599E+31

2.9276E+91

2.8944E+81

2.3686E+81

2.3263E+81

2.7936E+81

2.7599E+81

2.7255E+81

2,<S?83E+81

-5.4463E+88

-5.7662E+88

-6.8813E+98

-6.3928E+88

-6.6982E+88

-7.3821E+88

-7.3824E+88

-7.5999E+88

-7.3941E+88

-8.1858E+88

( This history is abbreviated for illustrative purposes.)

1VEL0CITY DISTRIBUTION ALONG SUBSTRUCTURE 1

STEP

1 8

3 1,

5 2

7 3,

9 4

11 5,

13 6

15 7,

17 8

19

21

41

43

59

61

23 1

25 1

27 1

29 1

31 1

33 1

35 1

37 1

39 1

45 2

47 2

49 2

51 2

53 2

55 2

57 2

63 3

65 3

67 3

69 3

TIME

8888E-85

8888E-85

8888E-85

8888E-85

8888E-85

8888E-85

8888E-85

8888E-85

8888E-85

8888E-84

1888E-84

2888E-84

3888E-84

4888E-84

5888E-84

6888E-84

7888E-84

8888E-84

9888E-84

8888E-84

1888E-84

2888E-84

3888E-84

4888E-84

5888E-84

6888E-84

7888E-84

8888E-84

9888E-84

8888E-84

1888E-84

2888E-84

3888E-84

4888E-84

VEL< 1,1) VEL( 1,2)

7.6928E-84

-3.6167E-83

3.8848E-83

1.6429E-82

2.6541E-82

3.8728E-82

5.2889E-82

6.8819E-82

8.6191E-82

1.8522E-81

1.2514E-81

1.4552E-81

1.6745E-81

1.9827E-81

2.1381E-81

2.3783E-81

2.6285E-81

-2.8685E-81

3.1149E-81

-3.3681E-81

3.6129E-81

-3.8688E-81

-4.1829E-81

-4.3351E-81

-4.5582E-81

-4.7767E-81

-4.9885E-81

-5.1832E-81

-5.3628E-81

-5.5399E-81

-5.7835E-81

-5.8558E-81

-5.9947E-81

-6.1224E-81

6.4883E-83

•2.8788E-82

•3.3246E-82

3.7845E-82

2.6866E-82

3.9282E-94

4.4851E-82

1.8789E-81

1.3835E-81

2.9143E-81

4.1258E-81

5.5122E-81

7.1856E-81

8.8589E-81

1.8795E+88

1.2921E+88

1.5173E+88

1.7626E+98

2.8222E+88

2.2978E+88

2.5879E+88

2.8949E+88

3.2141E+88

3.5481E+88

3.8942E+88

4.2558E+88

4.6265E+88

5.8121E+88

5.4117E+88

5.8235E+88

6.2448E+88

6.6781E+89

7.1191E+88

7.5694E+88

VEL< 1,3)

8.

7.5445E-82

2.8728E-81

5.8418E-91

9.3436E-81

1.3186E+88

1.7282E+88

2.1397E+88

2.5763E+88

3.8224E+88

3.4343E+88

3.9625E+88

4.4582E+88

4.9539E+88

5.4658E+88

5.9891E+88

6.5167E+88

7.8482E+88

7.5788E+88

8.1897E+88

8.6353E+88

9.1519E+88

9.6618E+98

1.8161E+8

1.8648E+8

1.1122E+8

1.1588E+8

1.2827E+8

1.2451E+8

1.2835E+8

1.32B9E+8

1.3578E+8

1.3918E+8

1.4261E+8

1.4585E+8

VEL< 6,1) UEL( 6,2) VEL( 6,3)

6.6872E-87

1.9828E-86

1.6589E-86

-3.5152E-88

-4.3943E-86

-2.8539E-85

-1.2167E-84

-3.7888E-84

-8.8628E-84

-1.7341E-83

-3.1668E-83

-5.1171E-83

-7.7118E-83

-1.1817E-82

-1.5895E-82

-1.9996E-82

-2.5775E-82

-3.2514E-82

-4.8329E-82

-4.9349E-82

-5.9691E-82

-7.1427E-82

-8.4681E-82

-9.9248E-82

-1.1536E-91

-1.3297E-81

-1.5288E-81

-1.7266E-81

-1.9473E-91

-2.1829E-81

-2.4339E-81

-2.7882E-81

-2.9812E-81

-3.2768E-81

-1.9765E-85

-3.3974E-85

1.2365E-85

4.4999E-85

-1.6797E-84

-9.1328E-84

-2.3448E-63

-4.2651E-83

-6.B883E-83

-6.8775E-83

-5.5941E-83

-1.2343E-83

7.8835E-83

2.8123E-82

3.8738E-82

6.3995E-82

9.7299E-82

1.4836E-81

1.9492E-81

2.6265E-81

3.4499E-81

4.4315E-81

5.5824E-81

6.9154E-81

8.4451E-81

1.8138E+88

1.2161E+88

1.4379E+88

1.6854E+88

1.9593E+88

2.2683E+88

2.5898E+88

2.9461E+88

3.3327E+88

-4.3583E-14

1.4181E-12

3.8135E-18

1.3865E-88

1.8281E-87

1.5878E-86

8.6295E-86

3.7798E-85

1.3459E-84

4.9597E-84

1.8688E-83

2.5841E-83

5.3195E-83

1.8372E-82

1.8757E-82

3.1738E-92

5.8628E-82

7.6685E-82

1.1865E-81

1.5337E-81

2.8586E-81

2.6573E-6!

3.3527E-81

4.1357E-81

5.8861E-81

5.9653E-81

7.8155E-81

8.1594E-81

9.3985E-81

1.8733E+88

1.2163E+88

1.3635E+88

1.5299E+88

1.7881E+88

182

Page 114: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

71 3.588BE-84 -6.2468E-8! 8.838BE+88 1.4896E+0 -3.5835E-81 3.7494E+3S 1.879IE+83

73 3.6888E-84 -6.3518E-81 8.4943E+88 1.5285E+8 -3.9826E-81 4.1969E+88 2.B673E+B8

75 3.7888E-84 -6.4496E-81 8.9686E+88 1.5494E+8 -4.2323E-B1 4.6753E+88 2.2639E+88

77 3.8888E-84 -6.5416E-81 9.4589E+88 1.5767E+8 -4.5715E-81 5.1844E+88 2.4788E+B8

79 3.9888E-84 -6.6229E-81 9.9375E+88 1.6836E+3 -4.9189E-81 5.7236E+86 2.6857E+88

81 4.8888E-84 -6.7834E-81 1.8431E+B1 1.6291E+81 -5.2736E-B1 6.2922E+88 2.9H2E+BB

33 4.1888E-84 -6.7756E-81 1.8931E+81 1.6526E+8 -5.6347E-81 6.8896E+86 3.1478E+88

85 4.2888E-84 -6.8457E-81 1.1437E+81 1.6759E+8 -6.8813E-81 7.5155E+8S 3.3937E+88

87 4.3888E-84 -6.9893E-81 1.1948E+81 1.6979E+8 -6.3723E-81 8.1693E+8S 3.6513E+88

8? 4.4888E-84 -6.9747E-81 1.2465E+81 1.7S74E+81 -6.7464E-B1 8.3583E+68 3.9219E+88

91 4.5888E-84 -7.B376E-81 1.2989E+81 1.7365E+8 -7.1217E-81 9.5574E+8S 4.2843E+88

93 4.68B8E-B4 -7.1828E-81 1.3512E+81 1.7553E+8 -7.4965E-81 1.8289E+81 4.4993E+88

95 4.7888E-84 -7.1622E-81 1.4843E+B1 1.7713E+8 -7.3691E-8S 1.1844E+31 4.3869E+88

97 4.8888E-84 -7.2251E-81 1.4538E+81 1.7856E+8 -8.2331E-81 1.1819E+81 5.1266E+88

99 4.9888E-84 -7.2391E-B1 1.5118E+81 1.8888E+8 -3.6322E-81 1.2614E+81 5.4588E+88

iei 5.8888E-84 -7.3577E-81 1.5659E+81 1.8127E+8 -8.9682E-81 1.3426E+81 5.3882E+88

183 5.1888E-84 -7.4298E-81 1.6288E+81 1.8223E+8 -9.3189E-81 1.4253E+81 6.1527E+88

185 5.2888E-84 -7.5894E-81 1.6768E+81 1.3317E+8 -9.6536E-81 1.5395E+81 6.5146E*8B

187 5.3888E-84 -7.5834E-81 1.7311E+81 1.8483E+3 -9.9372E-B1 1.5958E+81 6.3856E+88

189 5.4888E-84 -7.6648E-81 1.7371E+81 1.8463E+8 -1.8311E+8B 1.6814E+81 7.2652E+88

111 5.5888E-84 -7.7556E-81 1.8433E+81 1.3581E+8 -1.8623E+88 1.7686E+31 7.6533E+83

113 5.6888E-84 -7.8511E-81 1.8995E+81 1.8537E+8 -1.3923E+B8 1.8562E+81 8.8496E+88

115 5.7888E-84 -7.9475E-81 1.9559E+81 1 .8565E+8 -1.1239E+88 1.9442E+81 3.4533E+33

117 5.8888E-84 -8.8498E-81 2.8129E+81 1.8552E+8 -1.1488E+83 2.8321E+81 8.8657E+8B

119 5.9888E-84 -8.1562E-81 2.8782E+81 1.8533E+3 1 -1.1735E+B8 2.1199E+61 9.2848E+88

121 6.8888E-84 -8.2643E-81 2.1275E+81 1.8512E+8 -1.1974E+88 2.2B74E+81 9.7185E^88

123 6.1888E-84 -8.3884E-81 2.1851E+81 1.8471E+8 -1.2197E+83 2.2944E+B1 1.8142E+8!

125 6.2888E-84 -8.5826E-81 2.2436E+81 1.8386E+8 -1.24B3E+88 2.3886E+81 1.8579E+81

127 6.3888E-84 -8.6285E-81 2.3823E+81 1.3388E*8 -1.2592E+88 2.4659E+3! 1.1821E+81

129 6.4888E-84 -8.7428E-81 2.3688E+B1 1.8213E+8 -1.2764E+88 2.5499E+81 1.1468E+81

131 6.5888E-84 -8.8781E-81 2.4194E+81 1.3118E+8 -1.2919E+88 2.6325E+8) 1.1919E+81

133 6.6888E-84 -8.9966E-81 2.4788E+81 1.7973E+8 -1.3857E+88 2.7136E+81 1.2375E+81

135 6.7888E-84 -9.1225E-61 2.5388E+81 1.7844E+8 1 -1.3176E+83 2.7938E+81 1.2836E+81

137 6.8888E-84 -9.2519E-81 2.5971E+81 1.7711E+8 -1.3277E+8B 2.3786E+8! 1.3382E+81

139 6.9888E-84 -9.3799E-81 2.6562E+81 1.7564E+8 -1.3368E+88 2.9464E+81 1.3774E+81

141 7.8888E-84 -9.5874E-81 2.7162E+81 1.7389E+8 -1.3425E+8B 3.82B1E+81 1.4258E+81

143 7.1888E-84 -9.6374E-81 2.7768E+81 1.7211E+8 -1.3473E+88 3.B916E+81 1.4738E+81

145 7.2888E-84 -9.7783E-81 2.8354E+81 1.7834E+8 -1.3584E+88 3.1688E+81 1.5215E+81

147 7.3888E-84 -9.3938E-81 2.8958E+81 1.6851E+8 -1.3519E+88 3.2277E+81 1.5783E+81

149 7.4888E-84 -1.8821E+88 2.9552E+81 1.6635E+8 -1.3518E+B8 3.2922E+B1 1.6193E+81

151 7.5888E-84 -1.8158E+88 3.8155E+81 1.6415E+8 -1.3582E+8B 3.3543E+81 1.6685E+81

153 7.6888E-84 -1.8277E+88 3.8755E+81 1.62B1E+8 -1.3472E+88 3.4148E+81 1.7177E+81

155 7.7888E-84 -1.3396E+88 3.1352E+81 1.5993E+8 -1.3429E+88 3.4713E+81 1.7669E+81

157 7.8888E-84 -1.8519E+88 3.1957E+81 1.5744E+8 -1.3371E+88 3.5263E+8! 1.8159E+81

159 7.9888E-84 -1.8647E+88 3.2563E+81 1.5489E+8 -1.3381E+88 3.5789E+3I 1.3647E+81

161 8.8888E-84 -1.B765E+88 3.3167E+81 1.5248E+8 -1.3219E+88 3.6292E+B1 1.9131E+81

163 8.1888E-84 -1.8881E+88 3.3766E+81 1.5881E+8 [ -1.3125E+88 3.6772E+81 1.9611E+81

165 3.2888E-84 -1.1882E+88 3.4372E+81 1.4725E+8 -1.3B21E+B8 3.7231E+81 2.B835E+81

167 8.3888E-84 -1.1121E+88 3.4988E+81 1.444BE+B -1.2989E+88 3.7669E+81 2.8555E+81

169 8.4888E-84 -1.1235E+88 3.5586E+81 1.4161E+8 [ -1.2789E+8B 3.8888E+81 2.1819E+81

171 8.5888E-84 -1.1348E+88 3.6139E+81 1.3888E+8 [ -1.2664E+88 3.8498E+81 2.1477E+81

183

Page 115: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

173 8.6888E-84 -j .1463E+38 3.6798E+3 1.3686E+81 -1 .2532E+83 3.8875E+81 2.1929E+81

175 8.7888E-84 -1. 1572E+88 3.7488E+8 1.3294E+81 -1 .2397E+88 3.9247E+B1 2.2374E+81

177 8.3888E-84 -1 .1679E+83 3.8888E+8 1.2985E+31 -1 .2257E+88 3.9685E+81 2.231 1E+81

17? 3.9888E-84 -1 .1785E+88 3.8613E+8 1.2632E+81 -1 .2115E+88 3.9951E+81 2.3248E+81

181 9.8888E-84 -1 .1392E+88 3.?213E*8 [ 1.2388E+3! -1 .1971E+33 4.B287E+81 2.3663E+81

133 9.1888E-84 -1 .1993E+88 3.9821E+81

1.2868E+81 -1 .1826E+38 4.8615E+81 2.4878E+81

135 9.2888E-84 =1 .2898E+88 4.8438E+6 1 1.1725E+81 -1 .1681E+88 4.8937E*81 2.4471E+31

187 ?.3888E-84 -1 .2193E+88 4.1833E+8 1.1397E+31 -1 .1539E+88 4.1257E+B1 2.4862E+81

189 9.4888E-84 -1 .2291E+88 4.1641E+8 1 1.1877E+81 -1 .1399E+88 4.1575E+31 2.5245E+B1

191 9.5888E-84 -1 .2383E+8B 4.2248E+8 1.8754E+81 -1 .1264E+88 4.1894E+81 2.5617E+31

193 9.6888E-84 -1 2473E+88 4.2849E+8 1.8483E+81 -1 .1135E+88 4.2216E+81 2.5988E+81

195 9.788BE-84 -1 .2564E+88 4.3457E+8 1.3852E+81 -1 .1812E+8B 4.2542E+81 2.6333E+31

197 9.8888E-84 -i .2655E*83 4.4862E+8 9.7897E+88 -1 .88?5E*88 4.2873E+81 2.6676E+8!

199 9.9888E-84 -1 .2737E+88 4.4661E+8 9.3739E+88 -1 .8786E+88 4.3213E+B1 2.7887E+81

281 1.8888E-83 -1 .2818E+88 4.5263E+3 9.3253E+88 -1 3636E+88 4.3563E+31 2.7325E+81

283 1.8188E-83 -1 .2398E+88 4.5878E+8 8.6684E+88 -1 .8594E+88 4.3926E+81 2.7629E+81

285 1.3288E-83 -1 .2982E+38 4.6477E*8 8.2991E+88 -1 .8512E+88 4.4383E+81 2.7918E+81

287 1.8388E-83 -1 .3857E+88 4.7879E+8 7.9448E+B8 -1 .8441E+B3 4.4696E+B1 2.8192E+81

289 1.8488E-83 -1 .3129E+88 4.7676E+3 7.5959E+88 -1 .8381E+38 4.5185E+81 2.3448E+81

211 1.8588E-83 -1 .3288E+88 4.8279E+8 7.2392E+B8 -1 .8334E+88 4.5533E+81 2.8687E+81

213 1.8688E-83 -1 .3272E+98 4.8885E+8 1 6.8749E+88 -1 .8388E+88 4.5988E+81 2.8988E+8!

215 1.8788E-83 -1 .3338E+88 4.9498E+8 6.5125E+88 -1 .8288E+88 4.6447E+81 2.9111E+82

217 1.8888E-83 -1 .3399E+88 5.8889E+8 1 6.1599E+88 -1 .8273E+88 4.6936E+31 2.9294E+81

219 1.8988E-83 -1 .3468E+8B 5.8684E+8 [ 5.8128E+88 -1 .B238E+88 4.7447E+81 2.9458E+81

221 1.1888E-83 -1 .3523E+88 5.1285E+8 1 5.4463E+88 -1 .3331E+88 4.7982E+81 2.?682E+81

223 1.1188E-83 -1 .3579E+88 5.1889E+8 [ 5.8696E+88 -1 .8335E+88 4.8541E+81 2.9727E+81

225 1.1288E-83 -1 .3633E+88 5.2498E+8 1 4.7889E+88 -1 .8384E+B8 4.9124E+81 2.9831E+81

227 1.1388E-83 -1 .3683E+88 5.3885E+8 [ 4.3419E+88 -1 .8446E+88 4.9731E+81 2.9916E+81

229 1.1488E-83 -1 .3738E+88 5.3676E+8 1 3.9396E+88 -1 .8522E+B8 5.8363E+81 2.9988E+81

231 1.1588E-83 -i .3777E+88 5.4274E+8 1 3.6193E+83 -1 .8613E+88 5.1814E+81 3.3824E+31

233 1.1688E-83 -1 .3828E+88 5.4876E+8 ! 3.2426E+88 -1 .871?E+88 5.1698E+81 3.8848E+31

235 1.1788E-83 -1 .3868E+88 5.5473E+8 [ 2.8762E+88 -1 .8838E+88 5.2389E+81 3.8856E+81

237 1.1888E-83 -1 .3988E+8B 5.6866E+8 [ 2.5133E+88 -1 .8971E+99 5.3111E+81 3.3831E+81

239 1.1988E-83 -1 .3936E+88 5.6654E+3 2.1684E+88 -1 .1118E+8B 5.3853E+31 2.9992E+81

241 1.2888E-83 -1 .3?6?E+88 5.7248E+3 1 1.7998E+8B -1 1276E+88 5.4617E+81 2.9931E+31

243 1.2188E-83 -1 .4888E+88 5.7844E+8 1.4288E+88 -1 .1445E+88 5.5398E+81 2.9858E+81

245 1.2288E-83 -1 .4838E+88 5.8437E+8 1 1.8673E+88 -1 .1626E+88 5.6197E+81 2.9749E+81

247 1.2388E-83 -1 .4858E+88 5.9825E+8 [ 7.1232E-81 -1 .1817E+88 5.7812E+81 2.9627E+81

24? 1.2438E-83 -1 .4888E+8B 5.9686E+8 I 3.6192E-81 -1 .2917E+88 5.7848E+81 2.9434E+81

251 1.2588E-83 -1 .4188E+88 6.8192E+8 [ 3.2835E-83 -1 •2227E+88 5.3681E+81 2.9323E+31

253 1.2688E-83 -1 .411?E+83 6.3781E+8 1 -3.5943E-81 -1 .2445E+88 5.9533E+81 2.9134E+8!

255 1.2788E-83 -1 .4137E+88 6.1368E+8 [ -7.1455E-81 -1 .2671E+88 6.8395E+81 2.8925E+81

257 1.2888E-83 -1 .4151E+38 6.1958E+8 1 -1.8653E+88 -1 .2?85E+88 6.1264E+81 2.8692E+81

259 1.2988E-B3 -1 .416BE+88 6.2524E+8 -1.4187E+88 -1 .3144E+88 6.2138E+81 2.8435E+81

261 1.3888E-83 -; .4166E+88 6.3181E+8 [ -1.7571E+88 -1 .3387E+88 6.3814E+81 2.8153E+31

263 1.3188E-83 -1 .4174E+88 6.3636E+8 I -2.1181E+88 -1 .3633E+88 6.3898E+81 2.7845E+81

265 1.3288E-83 -1 .4178E+88 6.4268E+8 1 -2.4572E+88 -1 .3882E+88 6.4765E+81 2.7512E+81

267 1.3388E-83 -1 .417?E+88 6.4846E+8 [ -2.8888E+88 -1 .4131E+8B 6.5636E+81 2.7154E+81

269 1.34B8E-B3 -1 .4175E+88 6.5419E+8 I -3.1364E+88 -1 .4388E+88 6.6581E+81 2.6772E+81

271 1.3588E-83 -1 .4168E+88 6.5998E+8 1 -3.4782E+88 -1 .462?E+8B 6.7368E+81 2.6365E+81

273 1.3688E-83 -1 .4163E+88 6.6568E+8 1 -3.8184E+88 -1 .4875E+88 6.8289E+81 2.5933E+81

184

Page 116: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

275 1.3788E-83 -1 .4156E+88 4.7146E+81 -4.1462E+83 -1 .5129E+88 6.9847E+81 2.5478E+81

277 1.3888E-83 -1 .4142E+88 6.7718E+81 -4.4775E+88 -i .5368E+83 6.9878E+91 2.588BE+B1

279 1.3988E-83 -1 .4123E+98 6.8285E+81 -4.8823E+88 -1 .5596E+88 7.8478E+91 2.4498E+81

281 1.4888E-83 -1 .4189E+88 6.8845E+81 -5.1225E+B8 -1 .5825E+88 7.1469E+31 2.3973E+81

233 1.4188E-83I"1 .4891E+38 6.9415E+31 -5.4463E+88 -1 .6646E+88 7.2241E+81 2.3426E+8!

285 1.4288E-83 -1 .4878E+88 6.9984E+81 -5.7662E+88 -1 .6259E+99 7.2993E+81 2.2854E+81

287 1.4388E-93 -1 .4844E+83 7.8549E+81 -6.8813E+88 -1 .6441E+88 7.3724E+91 2.2264E+81

289 1.4488E-83 -1 4818E+88 7.1118E+81 -6.3928E+88 -1 .6652E+88 7.4433E+81 2.1652E+91

291 1.4588E-B3 -1 .3987E+83 7.1664E+81 -6.6982E+88 -1 .6832E+98 7.5118E+81 2.1818E+81

293 1.4688E-83 -1 .3956E+38 7.2228E+81 -7.8821E+88 -1 .6999E+88 7.5779E+81 2.8363E+81

295 1.4788E-83 .3921E+88 7.2788E+81 -7.3824E+88 -1 .7154E+88 7.6414E+81 1 .9683E+91

297 1.4888E-83 -1 .3884E+88 7.3338E+81 -7.5999E+88 -1 .7295E+88 7.7823E+8I 1.8994E+81

299 1.4938E-93 -1 .3844E+88 7.3892E+81 -7.3941E+88 -1 .7421E+88 7.7685E+81 1-.3288E+81

381 1.5888E-83 -1 .3881E+88 7.4448E+91 -8.1858E+88 -! .7533E+83 7.8161E+81 1 .7546E+81

(This history is abbreviated for illustrative purposes.)

185

Page 117: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

E. INTEGRATION USING SIMPS1

The -final step in the ELSHOK analysis o-f Case I is to

u se an ap p r op r i a t e i n t e gr a t i on algorithm t o c a 1 c u 1 a t e a

de f 1 e c t i on hist or y f r om the v e 1 oc i t y i n -f orma t i on p r ov i de d

by the USLOB code. Simpson's 1/3 rule was chosen in this

work and in this example, implemented in the -form o-f

S I MPS 1 . BAS wh i c h appears in ap p e n d i :••< B .

Th e t o 1 1 ow i n g is an entire output listing -f r om t h i s

p r ogr am . In the 1 i s t i n g , the c oor d i n a t e d i r e c t i on s ar

e

defined as:

X = -fore and aftY = vertical or normal to the hullZ = athwar tsh i ps

T = 8.8198 msec DX = 8.888688 in. DY = 8.968886 in. DZ = -3.386682

T = 8.8386 msec DX = 8.888888 in. DY = 8.888881 in. DZ = -8.888814

T = 8.8598 msec DX = 8.888881 in. DY = ' 8.888681 in. DZ = -8.389348

T = 8.8788 msec 0X = 8.888882 in. DY = 8.869999 in. DZ = -8.888883

T = 8.8988 msec DX = 8.869884 in. DY = -8.389984 in. DZ = -8.899144

T = 8.1196 msec DX = 8.888886 in. DY = -9.689912 in. DZ = -9.999223

T = 8.1389 msec DX = 8.386999 in. DY = -9.999926 in. DZ = -9.999322

T = 9.1599 msec DX = 9.999913 in. DY = -9.888847 in. DZ = -9.988441

T = 9.1799 msec DX = 9.998918 in. DY = -8.883875 in. DZ = -8.888581

T = 9.1999 msec DX = 9.999923 in. DY = -8.888112 in. DZ = -8.688741

T = 8.2188 msec DX = 9.999929 in. DY = -8.883157 in. DZ = -8.888928

T = 8.2388 msec DX = 9.999936 in. DY = -8.988218 in. DZ = -8.881116

T = 3.2588 msec DX = 9.999943 in. DY = -6.888271 in. DZ = -8.881329T _1~ 8.2789 msec DX = 8.868858 in. DY = -8.899339 in. DZ = -8.881555

T = 9.2999 msec DX = 8.888856 in. DY = -9.888414 in. DZ = -8.881793

T = 9.3199 msec DX = 8.888663 in. DY = -8.998493 in. DZ = -8.882843

T = 9.3388 msec DX = 8.888869 in. DY = -8.388577 in. DZ = -8.882295

T = 8.3589 msec DX = 8.888874 in. DY = -8.888662 in. DZ = -8.882555

T = 9.3799 msec DX = 8.888879 in. DY = -8.888748 in. DZ = -8.882819

T = 8.3988 msec DX = 9.999982 in. DY = -8.888832 in. DZ = -9.883886

T = 8.4199 msec DX = 9.999984 in. DY = -8.888913 in. DZ = -8.863354

T = 9.4399 msec DX = 9.988885 in. DY = -8.888988 in. DZ = -8.883628

T = 8.4588 msec DX = 8.888685 in. DY = -8.881857 in. DZ = -8.883883

T = 8.4789 msec DX = 9.889984 in. DY = -8.881117 in. DZ = -3.884141

T = 8.4989 msec DX = 9.999981 in. DY = -3.981167 in. DZ = -8.884392

T = 9.5198 msec DX = 8.888877 in. DY = -8.891296 in. DZ = -8.884634

186

Page 118: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

T = 8.5388 msec OX = 8.888873 in. DY = -8 881233 in. DZ = -3.884364

T = 8.5588 msec DX = 8,888867 in. DY = -8 381248 in. DZ = -8.685881

T = 8.5788 msec DX = 8.888868 in. DY = -8 881251 m. DZ = -8,885283

T = 8.5988 msec OX = 8.838853 in. DY = -9 831241 in. DZ = -3,835468

T = 8.6188 msec OX = 8.888846 in. DY = -6 881219 in. OZ = -8.335634

T = 8.6388 msec OX = 8.888838 in. OY = -8 331186 in. OZ = -8.885739

T = 8.6588 msec OX = 8.888838 in. DY = -8 881144 in, DZ = -8.885983

T = 8.6788 msec OX = 8.886821 in. DY = -8 881993 in. DZ = -9.386894

T = 8.6988 msec ox = 8.888814 in. DY = -8 881835 in, DZ = -8.884879

T = 8.7188 msec DX = 8.888886 in, DY = -8 388972 in. DZ = -8.386129

T = 8.7388 msec DX = -8.888881 in. DY = -8 888985 in. DZ = -8.886152

T = 8.7588 msec DX = -8.888888 in, OY = -8 888837 in. DZ = -3.886146

T = 8.7788 msec DX = -8.888814 in. DY = -8 388778 in. DZ = -8.886113

T = 8.7988 msec DX = -8.888819 in. DY = -8 888786 in. DZ = -8.336858

T = 8.8188 msec DX = -8.888824 in. DY = -8 886646 in. DZ = -3.885957

T = 8.8388 msec DX = -8.888827 in. DY = -8 888592 in. DZ = -3.335835

T = 8.8588 msec DX = -8.888838 in. DY = -8 888546 in. DZ = -8.885683

T = 8.8788 msec DX = -8.888832 in. DY = -8 838589 in. DZ = -8.365582

T = 8.8988 msec DX = -8.888832 in. DY = -8 888483 in. DZ = -8.885291

T = 8.9188 msec DX = -8.888832 in. DY = -8 888467 in. DZ = -8.885858

T = 8.9388 msec DX = -8.888831 in. DY = -8 388462 in. DZ = -8.884781

T = 8.9588 msec DX = -8.888829 in. DY = -8 988469 in. DZ = -8.884484

T = 8.9788 msec DX = -8.888825 in. DY = -8 888438 in. DZ = -8.884158

T = 8.9988 msec DX = -8.888822 in. DY = -8 888516 in. DZ = -3.983886

T = 1.8188 msec DX = -8.888817 in. DY = -8 888555 in. DZ = -8.883426

T = 1.8388 msec OX = -8.888812 in. DY = -8 888683 in. DZ = -8.883821

T = 1.8588 msec DX = -8.888886 in. DY = -8 888658 in. DZ = -8.882592

T = 1.8788 msec DX = 8.888888 in. DY = -8 888719 in. DZ = -8.882141

T = 1.8988 msec OX = 8.888886 in. DY = -8 888783 in. DZ = -6.381668

T = 1.1188 msec DX = 8.888813 in. DY = -8 886858 in. DZ = -8.881175

T = 1.1388 msec DX = 8.886819 in. DY = -8 888917 in. DZ = -6.888663

T = 1.1588 msec DX = 8.886826 in. DY = -8 868982 in. DZ = -8.638135

T = 1.1788 msec DX = 8.888632 in. DY = -8 881844 in. OZ = 8.888483

T = 1.1988 msec DX = 8.888837 in. DY = -8 381188 in. DZ = 8.889965

T = 1.2188 msec DX = 8.888843 in. DY = -8 881149 in. DZ = e. 881533

T = 1.2388 msec DX = 8.888847 in. DY = -8 881189 in. DZ = 3,882111

T = 1.2588 msec DX = 8.888651 in. OY = -8 881219 in. DZ = 8.882697

T = 1.2788 msec DX = 8.888854 in. DY = -8 881238 in. DZ = 3.883298

T = 1.2988 msec 0X = 8.888856 in, DY = -8 881246 in. DZ = 8.883887

T = 1.3188 msec DX = 8.888857 in. OY = -8 381242 in. DZ = 8.834486

T = 1.3388 msec DX = 8.888857 in. DY = -8 881226 in. DZ = 8.865685

T = 1.3588 msec OX = 8.888856 in. DY = -8 ,881199 in. OZ = 8.835632

T = 1.3788 msec DX = 8.888854 in. OY = -8 881161 in. DZ = 8.886274

T = 1.3988 msec OX = 8.888851 in. OY = -8 881113 in. DZ = 8.386868

T = 1.4188 msec DX = 8.868647 in. DY = -8 881857 in. DZ = 3.387437

T = 1.4388 msec DX = 8.886842 in. DY = -8 888993 in. OZ = 8.688884

T = 1.4588 msec DX = 8.888837 in. DY = -8 888924 in. DZ = 8.868558

T = 1.4788 msec DX = 8.886838 in. DY = -8 888852 in. DZ = 8.889898

T = 1.4988 msec DX = 8.888823 in. OY = -8 888777 in. DZ = 8.889621

T = 1.5188 msec DX = 8.888815 in. DY = -8 888783 in. DZ = 8.818127

T = 1.5388 msec DX = 8.888887 in. DY = -8 888632 in. OZ = 8.818612

187

Page 119: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

T = 1.5599 msec DX = -8.888881 in. DY = -8.888564 in. DZ = 8 611875

T = 1.5739 msec DX = -8.888819 in. DY = -8.938583 in. DZ = 811514

T = 1.5999 msec DX = -8.888819 in. DY = -9.888449 in. DZ = 8 311927

T =1 .6188 msec OX = -8.888828 in. DY = -8.388483 in. DZ = 8 312312

T = 1.6399 msec DX = -8.888836 in, DY = -8.888368 in. DZ = 8 612667

T = 1.6598 msec DX = -3.388845 in. DY = -8.838344 in. DZ = 9 812998

T _1~ 1.6789 msec DX = -8.388053 in. DY = -8.888331 in. DZ = 8 813282

T = 1.6993 msec DX = -8.888868 in. DY = -8.888329 in. DZ = 8 813548

T = 1.7188 msec DX = -8.888867 in. DY = -8.888339 in. DZ = 8 813764

T = 1.7389 msec DX = -8.888872 in. DY = -8.988359 in. DZ = 8 313952

T = 1.7588 msec DX = -8.888877 in. DY = -8.008398 in. DZ = 8 814164

T = 1.7788 msec DX = -8.888082 in. DY = -8.888438 in. DZ = 8 ,814219

T = 1.7988 msec DX = -8.888885 in. DY = -8.888477 in, DZ = 8 814297T -1

— 1.3188 msec DX = -8.888887 in. DY = -3.388531 in. DZ = 8 314336

T = 1.8388 msec DX = -8.808838 in. DY = -8.838588 in. DZ = 8 314337

T = 1.8588 msec DX = -8.888888 in. DY = -8.888648 in, DZ = 8 814299

T = 1.3788 msec DX = -8.888887 in. DY = -8.888789 in. DZ = 8 814222

T = 1.8988 msec DX = -8.888885 in. DY = -8.388769 in. DZ = 8 814135

T = 1.9138 msec DX = -8.888883 in. DY = -8.888824 in. DZ = 8 813958

T = 1.9388 msec DX = -8.888879 in. DY = -8.888875 in. DZ = 3 813755

T = 1.9588 msec DX = -8.888875 in. DY = -8.988919 in. DZ = 9 813522

T = 1.9788 msec DX = -8.888878 in. DY = -8.888954 in. DZ = 8 313251

T = 1.9983 msec DX = -8.888864 in. DY = -8.888988 in. DZ = 8 012943

T = 2.8188 msec DX = -8.888358 in. DY = -8.388995 in. DZ = 9 812598

T = 2.8300 msec DX = -8.008851 in. DY = -8.888999 in. DZ = 812218

T = 2.8598 msec DX = -8.388845 in. DY = -8.388991 in. DZ = 3 311384

T = 2.8788 msec DX = -8.888838 in, DY = -8.388971 in. DZ = 8 811355

T = 2.8988 msec DX = -8.888832 in. DY = -8.888940 in. DZ = 8 818875

T = 2.1188 msec DX = -8.888025 in. DY = -8.000898 in. DZ = 8 818363

T = 2.1388 msec DX = -0.000019 in. DY = -8.888846 in. DZ = 3 889822

T = 2.1588 msec DX = -8.888814 in. DY = -8.880786 in. DZ = 8 889252

T = 2.1788 msec DX = -9.888889 in. DY = -0.888713 in. DZ = 8 888654

T = 2.1988 msec DX = -8.888835 in. DY = -8.880645 in. DZ = 8 888833

T = 2.2188 msec DX = -8.888881 in, DY = -8.888568 in. DZ = 8 307383

T = 2.2388 msec DX = 8.388881 in, DY = -8.898489 in. DZ = 8 886713

T = 2.2588 msec DX = 8.888003 in. DY = -8.888418 in. DZ = 8 886824

T = 2.2788 msec DX = 8.388884 in. DY = -8.888333 in. DZ = 8 885318

T = 2.2980 msec DX = 8.888883 in. DY = -8.888268 in. DZ = 3 384595

T = 2.3188 msec DX = 8.888882 in. DY = -8.888193 in. DZ = 8 803858

T = 2.3388 msec DX = -8.388888 in. DY = -8.838133 in. DZ = 8 383111

T = 2.3588 msec DX = -8.888884 in. DY = -8.800082 in. DZ = 8 882354

T = 2.3788 msec DX = -8.888888 in. DY = -0.883341 in. DZ = 8 881589

T = 2.3988 msec DX = -8.888813 in. DY = -8.680011 in. DZ = 8 388828

T = 2.4188 msec DX = -8.888819 in. DY = 0.000007 in. DZ = 8 860048

T = 2.4388 msec DX = -8.000026 in. DY = 9.088813 in. DZ = -8 388724

T = 2.4588 msec DX = -8.388833 in. DY = 3.986838 in. DZ = -3 381493

T = 2.4788 msec DX = -8.888841 in. DY = -8.880008 in. DZ = -8 862258

T = 2.4988 msec DX = -8.888849 in. DY = -9.900035 in. DZ = -3 883817

T = 2.5188 msec DX = -8.888857 in. DY = -0.888871 in. DZ = -8 833765

T = 2.5380 msec DX = -8.888865 in. DY = -8.888116 in. DZ = -8 364582

T = 2.5500 msec DX = -8.888874 in. DY = -8.888167 in. DZ = -0 805226

108

Page 120: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

T = 2.5789 msec DX = -8 899982 in. DY = -8.889223 n. DZ = -8 695933

T = 2.5989 msec OX = -8 999898 in. OY = -9.989282 n. DZ = -8 996623

T = 2.6199 msec OX = -8 698998 in. DY = -9.898342 n. OZ = -8 637294

T -i

— 2.6399 msec DX = -8 898185 In. DY = -9.399492 n. DZ = -8 337942

T = 2.6599 msec DX = -9 888111 in. DY = -9.999453 n. DZ = -3 888566

T = 2.6789 msec OX = -9 888117 in. DY = -9.888519 n. OZ = -8 899166

T = 2.6999 msec DX = -9 688122 in. DY = -9.888555 n. DZ = -8 889739

T = 2.7199 msec OX = -9 888126 in. DY = -8.888592 n. DZ = -8 619281

T = 2.7398 msec DX = -9 688129 in. DY = -8.888629 n. OZ = -8 819794

T = 2.7599 msec OX = -9 886131 in. DY = -8.838633 n. DZ = -9 911274

T = 2.7788 msec DX = -9 888132 in. DY = -8.88864<i n. OZ = -9 911729

T = 2.7988 msec DX = -9 888131 in. DY = -8.886639 n, -3 912133

T = 2.8188 msec OX = -8 888138 in. DY = -8.888623 n. OZ = -6 812516

T = 2.8388 msec DX = -9 888128 in. OY = -8.988595 n. DZ = -8 312358

T = 2.3588 msec DX = -9 888125 in. DY = -8.688556 n. DZ = -6 813155

T = 2.8788 msec DX = -9 888121 in. DY = -9.399587 n. DZ = -8 813421

T = 2.8988 msec DX = -9 888116 in. DY = -9.999449 n. DZ = -9 813648T _

1~ 2.9188 msec DX = -9 886111 in. DY = -9.999384 n. DZ = -8 813837

T = 2.9388 msec DX = -9 888165 in. DY = -8.888313 n. DZ = -8 813987

T = 2.9588 msec DX = -9 888898 in. DY = -6.889233 n, DZ = -8 814897

T = 2.9788 msec DX = -9 899991 in. DY = -9.999161 n, DZ = -6 814166

T = 2.9988 msec DX = -9 999984 in. DY = -9.888885 n. DZ = -8 814196

T = 3.8188 msec DX = -9 999977 in. DY = -8.888819 n. DZ = -6 814185

T = 3.8388 msec DX = -9 999979 in. DY = 9.899961 n. OZ = -8 814135

T = 3.8568 msec DX = -9 989963 in. DY = 9.999126 n. DZ = -8 314846

T = 3.8788 msec DX = -8 998656 in. DY = 9.999184 n. DZ = -9 813917

T = 3.8988 msec DX = -9 689959 in. DY = 9.999233 n. DZ = -8 813751

T = 3.1188 msec DX = -9 888844 in. DY = 9.999272 n. DZ = -3 813548

T = 3.1398 msec DX = -8 888839 in. DY = 9.999299 n. DZ = -8 313389

T = 3.1588 msec DX = -8 888835 in. DY = 9.899315 in. DZ = -8 813834

T = 3.1788 msec DX = -8 888831 in. DY = 9.999329 n. DZ = -8 812726

T = 3.1988 msec DX = -8 888828 in. DY = 9.999312 in. DZ = -8 812385

T = 3.2188 msec DX = -8 888827 in. DY = 9.999294 n. DZ = -9 812811

T = 3.2388 msec DX = -8 888826 in, DY = 9.999264 in. DZ = -9 811688

T = 3.2588 msec DX = -8 886826 in. DY = 9.999225 n. DZ = -8 811176

T = 3.2788 msec DX = -8 888827 in. DY = 9.999177 n. DZ = -8 818715

T = 3.2988 msec DX = -8 866838 in. DY = 9.999123 n. DZ = -8 818231

T = 3.3188 msec DX = -8 888833 in. DY = 9.988863 n. DZ = -8 889723

T = 3.3388 msec DX = -8 888837 in. OY = 9.988688 n. DZ = -8 889192

T = 3.3588 msec DX = -8 888642 in. DY = -8.888864 n. DZ = -8 888642

T = 3.3788 msec DX = -8 888847 in. DY = -8.999127 n. DZ = -8 888876T _1~ 3.3988 msec DX = -8 388854 in. DY = -9.999138 n. DZ = -8 687492

T = 3.4189 msec DX = -8 888668 in. DY = -8.999244 n. DZ = -8 886897

T = 3.4389 msec DX = -8 868868 in, DY = -8.888294 in. DZ = -8 886299

T = 3.4599 msec DX = -8 889975 in. DY = -8.899336 n. DZ = -8 885673

T = 3.4799 msec DX = -8 988883 in. DY = -9.888368 in. DZ = -8 885658

T = 3.4999 msec DX = -8 888891 in. DY = -8.888398 n. DZ = -8 884422

T = 3.5198 msec DX = -8 888898 in. DY = -8.899499 in. DZ = -9 993791

T = 3.5399 msec DX = -8 888185 in. DY = -9.999399 n. DZ = -9 993159

T = 3.5588 msec DX = -8 888112 in. DY = -9.999387 in. DZ = -9 992539

T = 3.5788 msec DX = -8 886119 in. DY = -8.888362 n. DZ = -9 991995

189

Page 121: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

T = 3.5988 rasec DX = -8 988125 in. DY = -8.338327 in. DZ = -8.881286

T = 3.6188 rasec OX = -8 888138 in. DY = -8.833231 in. DZ = -8.898677

T = 3.6388 rasec DX = -8 088134 in. DY = -8.889227 in. DZ = -9.888879

T = 3.6598 msec DX = -8 888138 in. DY = -8.388165 in. DZ = 8.388583

T = 3.6788 rasec DX = -8 888148 in. DY = -8.888897 in. DZ = 8.881878

T = 3.6988 rasec OX = -8 888142 in. DY = -8.388824 in. DZ = 8.881632

T = 3.7188 msec DX = -8 888142 in. OY = 8.888858 in. DZ = 8.882167

T = 3.7388 rasec OX = -8 888142 in. OY = 8.888125 in. DZ = 8.882681

T = 3.7588 msec 0X = -8 888148 in. DY = 8.388197 in. DZ = 8.883174

T = 3.7788 rasec DX = -8 888137 in. DY = 8.388266 in. OZ = 8.383643

T = 3.7988 msec DX = -8 888134 in. DY = 8.888338 in. DZ = 8.864886

T = 3.3188 msec DX = -8 838138 in. DY = 8.888387 in. DZ = 3.884581

T = 3.3388 rasec DX = -3 888124 in. DY = 8.388434 in. DZ = 8.884889

T = 3.3588 rasec DX = -8 888118 in. DY = 8.838472 in. DZ = 8.885246

T = 3.8788 msec DX = -8 868112 in. OY = 8.388499 in. DZ = 8.885571

T = 3.8988 msec DX = -8 888185 in. DY = 8.888514 in, OZ = 8.885865

T = 3.9188 rasec DX = -8 888897 in. OY = 8.888518 in. DZ = 8.886125

T = 3.9388 msec DX = -8 388839 in. DY = 8.888589 in. DZ = 8.386351

T = 3.9588 rasec DX = -8 883881 in. DY = 8.388489 in. DZ = 8.886543

T = 3.9788 msec DX = -8 888873 in. DY = 8.888453 in. DZ = 9.636699

T = 3.9988 msec DX = -8 888865 in. DY = 8.886418 in. DZ = 8.886819

T = 4.8198 rasec DX = -8 898858 in. DY = 3.388369 in. DZ = 8.886985

T = 4.8388 msec DX = -8 888851 in. DY = 8.888313 in. DZ = 8.886953

T = 4.8599 msec DX = -8 888944 in. DY = 8.888252 in. DZ = 8.886966

T = 4.8799 msec DX = -8 999938 in. OY = 8.899187 in. OZ = 8.886944

T = 4.8988 rasec DX = -8 388832 in. DY = 9.998121 in. DZ = 8.886384

T = 4.1188 msec DX = -8 888828 in. DY = 9.888856 in. DZ = 3.886789

T = 4.1388 rasec DX = -8 388824 in. DY = -8.888887 in. DZ = 8.396659

T = 4.1588 msec DX = -8 888821 in. DY = -8.888865 in. DZ = 8.886494

T = 4.1788 rasec DX = -8 888828 in. DY = -8.888113 in. DZ = 8.686294

T = 4.1988 msec DX = -8 888819 in. DY = -8.888162 in. DZ = 6.886862

T = 4.2188 msec OX = -8 888819 in. DY = -8.888197 in. DZ = 8.885796

T = 4.2388 rasec DX = -8 888828 in. OY = -8.888222 in. DZ = 8.885588

T = 4.2588 rasec DX = -8 889822 in. OY = -8.888236 in. OZ = 8.885174

T = 4.2788 msec DX = -8 888325 in. DY = -8.888238 in. DZ = 8.884318

T = 4.2988 rasec DX = -8 888829 in. DY = -8.888228 in. DZ = 8.884436T _

1

- 4.3188 rasec DX = -8 888634 in. DY = -8.886287 in. DZ = 8.884827

T = 4.3388 msec DX = -8 888839 in. OY = -8.339175 in. DZ = 8.883593

T = 4.3588 rasec DX = -8 888845 in. OY = -8.888132 in. DZ = 8.883135

T = 4.3788 msec DX = -8 888852 in. DY = -8.888881 in. DZ = 8.882657

T = 4.3988 msec DX = -8 888858 in. DY = -8.888821 in. DZ = 8.682158

T = 4.4199 rasec DX = -8 888865 in. DY = 8.868844 in. DZ = 8.881641

T = 4.4398 msec DX = -8 888872 in. DY = 8.888114 in. DZ = 8.881189

T = 4.4589 msec DX = -8 838879 in. DY = 8.888187 in. OZ = 8.888562

T = 4.4799 msec DX = -8 888886 in. DY = 8.886268 in. OZ = 8.888665

T = 4.4988 msec OX = -8 888893 in. DY = 8.888331 in. DZ = -8.888563

T = 4.5188 msec DX = -8 888899 in. DY = 8.888399 in. DZ = -8.881138

T = 4.5388 rasec DX = -8 888184 in. DY = 8.888462 in. DZ = -8.381719

T = 4.5588 rasec DX = -8 888189 in. OY = 8.888517 in. DZ = -8.382383

T = 4.5788 rasec DX = -8 888113 in. DY = 8.888565 in. DZ = -8.832888

T = 4.5988 msec OX = -8 888116 in. DY = 8.988682 in. DZ = -8.883472

113

Page 122: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

T = 4.6188 msec DX = -8 999118 in. DY = 9 999629 in. DZ = -8.884853

T = 4.6389 msec DX = -9 999119 in. DY = 3 999644 in. D2 = -3.394629

T = 4.6588 msec DX = -8 999129 in. DY = 9 999643 in. DZ = -8.885196

T = 4.6788 msec DX = -9 999119 in. DY = 9 988648 in. DZ = -8.835754

T = 4.6998 msec OX = -9 888117 in. DY = 9 888628 i n DZ = -8.886299

T = 4.7188 msec DX = -9 898114 in. DY = 9 888598 in, DZ = -8.886831

T = 4.7388 msec DX = -9 999119 in. DY = 9 888558 in. DZ = -8.887345

T = 4.7588 msec DX = -8 999185 in. DY = 9 888581 in. DZ = -8.387341

T = 4.7788 msec DX = -9 998188 in. DY = 9 889445 in. DZ = -8.838318

T = 4.7988 msec DX = -8 888893 in. DY = 9 999383 in. DZ = -8.888772

T = 4.8188 msec DX = -9 898886 in. DY = 8 999318 in. DZ = -8.899282

T = 4.8388 msec DX = -8 888879 in. DY = 8 999251 in. DZ = -8.889683

T = 4.8588 msec DX = -8 838871 in. DY = 9 999134 in. DZ = -8.999987

T = 4.8788 msec DX = -8 899962 in. DY = 8 988128 in. DZ = -8,319337

T = 4.8988 msec DX = -8 999954 in. DY = 9 889969 in. DZ = -9.919658

T = 4.9188 msec DX = -8 999945 in. DY = 9 899995 in. DZ = -9.913943

T = 4.9388 msec DX = -8 999837 in. DY = -8 999942 in. DZ = -9.811295

T = 4.9588 msec DX = -8 888828 in. DY = -8 999979 in. DZ = -9.911429

T = 4.9788 msec DX = -8 888828 in. DY = -8 899197 in. DZ = -9.811618

T = 4.9989 msec DX = -8 888813 in. DY = -8 999124 in. DZ = -9.811771

T = 5.8188 msec DX = -8 388896 in. DY = -8 999129 in. DZ = -8.811883

T = 5.8388 msec DX = 8 988888 in. DY = -9 999123 in, DZ = -8.811969

T = 5.8589 msec DX = 8 888886 in. DY = -9 999195 in. DZ = -8.812812

T = 5.8788 msec DX = 8 889811 in. DY = -8 899976 in. DZ = -9.912917

T = 5.8988 msec DX = 9 888814 in. DY = -8 983937 in. DZ = -8.911985

T = 5.1188 msec DX = 9 999917 in. DY = 8 999912 in, DZ = -8.811914

T = 5.1389 msec DX = 8 998919 in. DY = 9 991498 in. DZ = -8.811896

T = 5.1588 msec DX = 8 999819 in. DY = 8 891561 in. DZ = -8.311659

T = 5.1788 msec DX = 8 888819 in. DY = 8 991629 in. DZ = -8.911474

T = 5.1988 msec DX = 8 888818 in. DY = 9 991798 in. DZ = -8.811252

T = 5.2188 msec DX = 8 999916 in. DY = 9 981771 in. DZ = -8.813992

T = 5.2388 msec DX = 8 999913 in. DY = 9 981842 in. DZ = -8.818696

T = 5.2589 msec DX = 8 999999 in. DY = 9 331989 in. DZ = -8.818363T _

1~ 5.2799 msec DX = 8 999994 in. DY = 9 881971 in. DZ = -8.889996

T = 5.2999 msec DX = -9 999991 in. DY = 9 882827 in. DZ = -8.389594

T = 5.3188 msec DX = -8 999997 in, DY = 9 832374 in. DZ = -8.889168

T = 5.3389 msec DX = -9 999913 in. DY = 9 882112 in. DZ = -8.888694

T = 5.3598 msec DX = -9 999919 in. DY = 9 882139 in. DZ = -9.888198

T = 5.3799 msec DX = -9 889926 in. DY = 9 882155 in. DZ = -8.897674

T = 5.3998 msec DX = -8 998832 in. DY = 9 882163 in. DZ = -9.997122

T = 5.4188 msec DX = -8 888838 in. DY = 9 882152 in. DZ = -8.996544

T = 5.4388 msec DX = -8 988844 in. DY = 9 882133 in. DZ = -9.995943

T = 5.4588 msec DX = -8 888858 in. DY = 9 882184 in. DZ = -9.985318

T = 5.4798 msec DX = -8 888855 in. DY = 9 882864 in. DZ = -9.994674

T = 5.4988 msec DX = -8 889959 in. DY = 9 882815 in. DZ = -8.884818

T = 5.5188 msec DX = -8 999963 in. DY = 9 891959 in. DZ = -8.883329

T = 5.5388 msec DX = -8 999966 in. DY = 9 981898 in. DZ = -8.992634

T = 5.5589 msec DX = -8 999968 in. DY = 9 881832 in. DZ = -9.991927

T = 5.5799 msec DX = -8 999969 in. DY = 9 881764 in. DZ = -9.991299

T = 5.5999 msec DX = -9 999969 in. DY = 9 881696 in. DZ = -9.999483

T = 5.6199 msec DX = -9 999968 in. DY = 9 881638 in. DZ = 9.999248

111

Page 123: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

T = 5.6389 msec DX = -9.999966 in. DY = 8 891567 in, DZ = 8.988933

T = 5.6588 msec DX = -8.888963 in. DY = 8 891519 in, DZ = 8.881728

T = 5.6799 msec DX = -8.899359 in. DY = 8 991461 in. DZ = 8.882456

T = 5.6998 msec DX = -9.999854 in. DY = 8 991428 in, DZ = 8.883189

T = 5.7199 msec DX = -8.999949 in. DY = 8 991389 in. DZ = 8.683917

T = 5.7399 msec DX = -9.988842 in, DY = 8 391369 in. DZ = 8.834633

T = 5.7599 msec DX = -8.888835 in. DY = 8 991369 in. DZ = 8.995358

T = 5.7799 msec DX = -8.888827 in. DY = 8 891363 in. DZ = 8.896951

T = 5.7988 msec DX = -8.888819 in. DY = 8 881377 in. DZ = 9.996737

T = 5.8188 msec DX = -8.888818 in. DY = 8 881483 in. DZ = 8.837488

T = 5.3388 rasec DX = -8.889991 in. DY = 8 881439 in. DZ = 8.888661

T = 5.8588 msec DX = 8.888688 in. DY = 8 381485 in. DZ = 9.888694

T = 5.3788 msec DX = 8.888817 in. DY = 9 981539 in. DZ = 8.889385

T = 5.8988 msec DX = 8.888925 in. DY = 9 881599 in. DZ = 3.889892

T = 5.9189 msec DX = 8.888834 in. DY = 9 881665 in. DZ = 8.818454

T = 5.9388 msec DX = 8.896942 in. DY = e 881734 in. DZ = 9.313998

T = 5.9588 msec DX = 9.998849 in. DY = 9 961884 in. DZ = 8.811497

T = 5.9788 msec DX = 9.888856 in. DY = 9 991873 in. DZ = 8.811974

T = 5.9988 msec DX = 8.888862 in. DY = 9 991939 in. DZ = 8.812428

TrttX(X) = 3.7 189 msec DtttX(X) = -8 .988142 in.

TMAX(Y) = 5.3988 msec DHAX(Y) = 9 .882168 in.

TMAX<Z ) = 1.8389 msec DKAX(Z) = 9.914337 in.

112

Page 124: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

I N I T I AL D I STR I BUT I ON L I S"

De fense Technical I n f orrna t i on CenterCe.mer on Stat i onA 1 e x a n dr i a , 'v' i r g i n i a 2 2 3 1 4

Library, Code 9142N a v a I P o s tor a d u a t e S c h o o

1

Men t e r e y , Ca 1 i f or n i a 93943

Professor Y. S. Shin, Code 69SGDe p ar tme n t o-f Me c h an i c al En g i n e e r i n gN a y e. 1 P o s t g r a d u a t e S c h o o 1

Montere y , Calif o r n i a 9 39 4

3

Department Chairman, Code 69De par tme n t of Me c h an i c a 1 En g i n e e r i n gN a '•,' a 1 Postgraduate S c h o o )

M ontere y , Calif o r n i a 9 39 4

3

D. RanletWe i dl i nger Assoc i ates333 Seven t h Av e n u

e

N ew Y o r k , N ew Y o r k 1 8 8 8 1

M.L. BaronU) e i d 1 i n g e r Ass o c i ate s33 3 S e v e n t h A v e n u e

New York, New York 18891

L . Bu 1

1

W e i d 1 i n g e r As s o c

;

ate s

528 2 W e = t M i 1 i t a r >• H i g hw a yChesapeake , U i r g i n i a 23321

T . L . G e e r sLockheed M i s s 1 e a n d S p a c e Com p a n

y

3251 Hanover StreetPal o Alto, Cal i f orn i a 9438 4

J. Gagor i k , Code 8 3R24Na v a 1 S e a S y stem s Comm a n

d

Wash i n g t on , D . C . 28 362

No . Cop

1 13

Page 125: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

IS. B . Whang , Code 1 750 .

2

Hull Group Head, Submarine ProtectionD i w i s i on

David Taylor Naval Ship Research andDe v e 1 opme n t Cen t e

r

Bethesda, Maryland 29814

1 1 . LCDR J. Whi te , USNSSPSDefense Nuclear AgencyWashington, D.C. 28305

12. E . Sev i n

Defense Nuclear AgencyWash i n g t on , D . C . 26 38

5

13. LT H. Reams, USNPublic Works DepartmentBldg. 210-2Wash i n g t o n N a v y Y a r dWashington, D.C. 29374

14. LT M . S . We 1 c h , USNDepartment Head Class 35Surface War-fare Officers SchoolNewpor t , RI 2341

15. Professor R. E. Newton, Code 6?NeDepartment of Mechanical EngineeringNaval Postgraduate SchoolMon t e r e y , CA 93943

1 14

Page 126: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic
Page 127: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

1 3 3 7

Page 128: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic
Page 129: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic
Page 130: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic
Page 131: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic
Page 132: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic

1Th« „ ^^^^^^^ "" *- ^^J??

210333

^OJ

ThesisW393^2c.l

WelchNumerical analysis of

the elastic shock re-sponse of submarine in-stalled equipment.

;is ofre-5 in-

36

1

NOV 88 3 2 6 8 6

210333

ThesisW393U2 Welchc.l Numerical analysis of

the elastic shock re-sponse of submarine in-

stalled equipment

.

Page 133: Numerical analysis of the elastic shock response of ... · Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1984 Numerical analysis of the elastic