NSLS-II Project Overview

1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES

NSLS-II Project Overview

Steve DierkerAssociate Laboratory Director for Light Sources

NSLS-II Project DirectorExperimental Facilities Advisory Committee

May 10, 2007


2006 was a busy year…NSLS-II Project Organization• Created – JanuaryFive Reviews• Lattice and Accelerator Configuration Review – May 11-12• DOE Review – May 16• Cost Review – June 13• DOE Review – July 18• DOE Review – December 12-14One Workshop• Acquisition Strategy Workshop (co-sponsored with SC) – June 20-21Four Advisory Committee Meetings• Held all four NSLS-II advisory committee meetings in OctoberHosted more than 75 Visitors• CDR A/E on board and A/E held several programming meetingsConceptual Design Completed• More than 150 contributors from 17 different institutions• Special site studies (Geotechnical, RFI, Vibration)• Constructability review & independent cost estimate for conventional facilities• Detailed project cost estimate & refined project WBS• Environmental Assessment completed; FONSI approved by BHSO• Required documents (AS, PPEP, ESH, QA, RM, PHA) all complete


NSLS-II Conceptual Design Report


NSLS-II Project ScopePresented at CD-1 Review

Accelerator Systems• Storage Ring• Linac and Booster Injection System

Experimental Facilities• Suite of ~ 5 initial beamlines and instruments

Conventional Facilities• Improvements to Land• Ring Building• Central and distributed Lab/Office Buildings• Utilities

• R&D• Advanced optics for achieving 1 nm and 0.1 meV• Advanced insertion devices


NSLS-II Storage Ring Performance

• Very Broad Spectral coverage• IR through very hard x-rays

• Brightness exceeds any other synchrotron from 10 eV to 20 keV

• > 1021 p/s/0.1%/mm2/mrad2 from ~ 2 keV to ~ 10 keV• Flux exceeds any other synchrotron from 10 eV to 20 keV

• > 1016 ph/s/0.1%bw from ~ 500 eV to ~ 10 keV• Smallest beam size of any synchrotron:

• y = 3.1 m, x = 38.5 m• ’y = 1.8 rad, ’x = 18.2 rad

• Top-off Operation• Current stability better than 1%

• Accommodates 27 user insertion devices (8 m and 5 m) and 30 BM beamlines

X-ray Ring• 3 GeV, 500 mA, top-off injection• Circumference 780 m• 30 cell, Double Bend Achromat• Novel design featuring damping wigglers

and soft bend magnets• Ultra-low emittance (x, y) 0.5, 0.008

nm-rad(Diffraction limited in vertical at 10 keV)

• Pulse Length (rms) 15 psec


NSLS

LOB 3

RF-LINAC AREA

Service Bldg Typ 4

CFN

Ring Bldg

Future JPSI

Future Guest House

Conf. Center

Underpass

Loading

CLOB

NSLS-II Site Plan in CDR

Ring Road

LOB 2

LOB 1

LOB 4

Service Road


CD-1 Review

Principle Recommendations:• Consider moving booster outside of storage ring tunnel• Consider use of NC RF instead of SC RF• Increase the scope of the Experimental Facilities portion of the project to

provide a minimal suite of beamlines which both exploit the unique capabilities of the NSLS-II source and meet the scientific needs of the NSLS user community

• R&D program is appropriate but expand to include mirror metrology • Develop a policy whereby the design, construction, and operation of all

beamlines, both DOE funded as well as non-DOE funded, will be the responsibility of the Experimental Facilities staff

• Increase cost range to $750M - $900M

Overall, successful and very positive regarding design and team


NSLS

CFN

Linac

Booster

JPSI

LOBLOB

LOB

LOB

Storage Ring

LOB

0 100 200 400 FEET

Revised NSLS-II Site Plan


Revised Building Program

• Alternatives to CLOB were evaluated• Space in NSLS will be maximized for NSLS-II administrative and

technical support functions• Only functions in direct support of NSLS-II facility and accelerator

operations will be housed at NSLS-II• Operations Center (OC)• Lab/office Buildings (LOBs)

• OC will include:• Control room, computer room, Ctrl rm Conference & break room, operations

supervisory offices• Entry foyer, viewing gallery and access bridge to electrical mezzanine and

control room area• All of these spaces (and more) were previously included in the CLOB


Project Beamlines

• A minimum suite of insertion device beamlines to meet physical science needs has been identified. These take advantage of the unique source properties of NSLS-II and also provide work horse instruments for large user capacity

• Recommended beamlines:• Nanoprobe (1nm)• Inelastic x-ray scattering (0.1 meV)• Soft x-ray coherent scattering and imaging• Hard x-ray coherent scattering and SAXS• Powder diffraction (damping wiggler source)• EXAFS (damping wiggler source)


Transitioning to Operations

• A phased transition to NSLS-II operations is planned:• CD-4a – Initial Operations

• Beneficial Occupancy of Experimental Floor• Initial limited storage ring operations and limited user operations during

installation and commissioning of beamlines• CD-4b – Start of Operations

• All commissioning goals have been achieved• Transitioning from NSLS to NSLS-II

• Important to begin this transition as early as possible• Continue operations of NSLS until NSLS-II operational (CD-4b)• Move NSLS programs to NSLS-II between CD-4a and CD-4b• NSLS and NSLS-II staff merge to operate NSLS-II


NSLS Beamline Transfer Plan• Evaluated NSLS beamlines in terms of technical suitability for moving to a soft bend,

a 3PW, or an insertion device at NSLS-II• Estimated moving costs and costs for upgrading to be suitable for NSLS-II• The productivity (number of publications and premier publications) and user demand

(hours requested) of the existing NSLS beamlines were evaluated• From this list, and the technical and cost considerations, about 20 bending magnet

beamlines were identified that would support the largest number of users with the greatest scientific impact, covering the following techniques:

• EXAFS, SAXS, powder diffraction, scattering, PX, imaging, microdiffraction, topography, far-IR spectroscopy.

• Estimate that these could accommodate at least 1300 users/yr• Plan to begin transferring these to NSLS-II at CD-4a• Assume that NSLS-II operations funding starts at CD-4a and covers transfer of

selected NSLS beamlines to the new NSLS-II facility as well as initial storage ring operations


NSLS-II Operations Staffing Estimates

FTEs for Operations with No

Beamlines

FTEs for Operations with 66% of

Beamlines (~38)

FTEs for Operations with all

Beamlines (~57)

Scientists 46 172 232

Engineers 32 52 62

Designers 10 30 40

Technicians 89 129 149

Computer Analysts 23 27 29

Admin/Secretarial 35 39 41

Total 235 449 553


NSLS-II Space Requirements at Full Operations

FTEs in Single Offices

FTEs in Shared Offices

FTEs in Bench or Design Area

Total FTEs

NSLS-II LOB 92 107 67 266

NSLS-II OC 6 1 63 70

JPSI 23 12 7 42

NSLS 93 34 48 175

Total 214 154 185 553


NSLS-II Project Organization


Near Term Staffing Plan

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

FY07Oct

FY07Nov

FY07Dec

FY07Jan

FY07Feb

FY07Mar

FY07Apr

FY07May

FY07Jun

FY07July

FY07Aug

FY07Sept

FY08Oct

FY08Nov

FY08Dec

FY08Jan

FY08Feb

FY08Mar

FY08Apr

FY08May

FY08Jun

FY08July

FY08Aug

FY08Sept

Month

Hea

dco

un

t

Project Management and Support Accelerator Systems Division Experimental Facilities Division Conventional Facilities Division

Near Term Staffing plan

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

FY07Oct

FY07Nov

FY07Dec

FY07Jan

FY07Feb

FY07Mar

FY07Apr

FY07May

FY07Jun

FY07July

FY07Aug

FY07Sept

FY08Oct

FY08Nov

FY08Dec

FY08Jan

FY08Feb

FY08Mar

FY08Apr

FY08May

FY08Jun

FY08July

FY08Aug

FY08Sept

Months

hea

dco

un

t

Project Support Scientific (Below Division Level) Engineers Designers Technicians Management (Division Box & above)

Near Term Staffing Projections


Preliminary Cost Estimate ($M)

Cost Range $750M to $900M

Project Management 40Acelerator Systems 181Conventional Facilties 210Experimental Facilties 74Contingency (38% of costs listed above) 190Total Estimated Costs (TEC) 695Research and Development 60Pre-Operations 95Other Project Costs (OPC) 155Total Project Cost (TPC) 850

18 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES18

Preliminary Funding Profile ($M)

• FY07 Start R&D and Title I Design• FY09 Start Construction • Nov 2007 baseline validation planned to support FY09 budget request

Fiscal Year 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 Total

PED (Project Engineering and Design)

3 45 12 60

Construction 138 180 142 95 50 25 5 635

OPC 1 5 22 20 12 15 30 40 10 155

Total 1 5 25 65 162 180 142 110 80 65 15 850


Preliminary Summary Schedule

18 Months Total Schedule Contingency


•DOE Review Feb 7•Radiological Safety Design Workshop Mar 27-28•Stability Workshop Apr 18-20•Accelerator Systems Advisory Committee Apr 23-24•Conventional Facilities Advisory Committee May 8-9•Experimental Facilities Advisory Committee May 10-11•DOE Review May 22•Project Advisory Committee May 24-25•CD-1 ESAAB June 13•User Workshop July 17•EVMS Review and Certification Aug•Internal Review of NSLS-II CD-2 Performance Baseline Aug•NSLS-II Advisory Committee Meetings Sep/Oct•SC Independent Project Review/External Independent Review for CD-2 Nov 6-9

Project Reviews & Workshops in 2007

NSLS-II Project Overview

Documents

Transcript of NSLS-II Project Overview