NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC...

38
© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. Current Projects within Advanced Nuclear Technology David B. Scott Senior Technical Leader NRC Standards Forum September 08, 2016 NRC Standards Forum

Transcript of NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC...

Page 1: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Current Projects within AdvancedNuclear Technology

David B. ScottSenior Technical Leader

NRC Standards ForumSeptember 08, 2016

NRC Standards Forum

Page 2: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

Content

2© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Overview– EPRI– Nuclear Sector– Advanced Nuclear Technology (ANT)

Projects expected to have influence on standards– Engineering, Procurement, and Construction– Materials and Components– Modern Technology Application

List of projects with potential influence on standards– Engineering, Procurement, and Construction– Materials and Components– Modern Technology Application

List of proposed 2017 and 2018 Projects

Page 3: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

EPRI is Focused on…

Collaborating with members and other stakeholders to addresstheir needs

Applying innovative ideas to solve industry challengesProviding fact-driven decision making for the benefit of the public

3© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 4: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

Conducting Research Today

Generation• Advanced Fossil Plants, Carbon

Capture, Utilization and Storage• Combined Cycle• Environmental Controls• Major Component Reliability• Materials and Chemistry• Operations and Maintenance• Power Plant Water Management•Renewables

Power Delivery and UtilizationDistribution Utilization• Distribution• Energy UtilizationTransmission• Information, Communication, and

Cyber Security• Grid Operations and Planning• Transmission and Substations

Environment• Generation Environmental Sciences:

Air and Multimedia• Generation Environmental Sciences:

Land and Water• Energy Delivery and Utilization

Environmental Sciences• Strategic Analysis and Technology

Assessments• Occupational Health and Safety

Nuclear• Materials Degradation/Aging• Fuel Reliability• Used Fuel and High-Level Waste

Management• AP NDE Characterization• Equipment Reliability• Risk and Safety Management• Chemistry and Radiation Safety• Strategic Initiatives

4© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 5: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

Nuclear Sector Membership

U.S. Nuclear Power Plants

Source: NEI Website, 2009

U.S. Participants Non-U.S. ParticipantsGlobal

Breadth and Depth

All U.S. nuclearowners/operators

(100 reactors, includesWatts Barr Unit 2)

20 countries, >220 reactors

~80% of the world’scommercial nuclear

units

Participants Encompass Most Nuclear Reactor Designs

5© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 6: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

ANT Program MissionThe EPRI Advanced Nuclear Technology (ANT) Program leads Research and Development

(R&D) through EPRI’s collaborative model to proactively evaluate and address issues regarding the near-term deployment of advanced light water reactors.

The ANT Program is a scientific research program for those around the world and at various stages of new nuclear plant development and deployment, concentrating on the economic,

technical, regulatory, and social issues that could affect the ability to license, construct, start-up, and operate advanced light water reactors.

6© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 7: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

ANT Program Overview Accelerates and focuses work targeted at new plants

– Work not already being done in other areas of EPRI

Primary focus is on light water reactor designs– Gen III, Gen III+, and light water small modular

reactor (SMR) designs

Increasing focus on longer term designs– Advanced Reactors (Gen IV) and non-light water SMRs

Address multiple stakeholders– Global issues and various stages of deployment

Target issues where EPRI can have an impact– Clear value in our collaborative environment

7© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 8: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

ANT Technical Focus Areas

Engineering, Procurement, and Construction– Siting, design, construction materials, and construction

activities of the physical plant, including modular construction

Materials and Components– Primarily class 1, 2, and 3 piping systems and related

components such as valves, heat exchangers, and pumps– Optimize methods for fabricating, installing, joining,

inspecting, and operating M&C (includes chemistry)– New applications of materials and components

Modern Technology Application– Maximize the use of existing, enabling, emerging, and non-

nuclear specific, technology in new nuclear plants

8© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 9: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

Projects expected to have influence on standards

9© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 10: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

List of Active EPC Projects (To be completed in 2016)

2009-07: Next Generation Attenuation Model for the Central and Eastern U.S.

2012-06: High Strength Reinforced Rebar 2012-15: New Steam Generator Thermal - Hydraulics

Code (Triton) 2015-04: Demonstration of Self-Consolidating

Concrete (SCC) and SCC Structural Members 2015-08: Emergency Planning Zone - Size Evaluation 2015-09: Seismic High Frequency Loadings 2015-10: Mass Concrete Modeling & Temperature

Control 2015-11: Assessment of Moisture Tolerant Coatings for

Decreasing Open Top Construction Time 2015-13: SMR Aerosol Project (TI, DOE, & ANT)

10© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 11: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

2009-07: Next Generation Attenuation (NGA) Model for the Central andEastern United States

• Attenuation prediction equations are used to calculate seismic hazards for a given site• There is a large level of uncertainty in the prediction of ground motions due to seismic event

given a specific distance and magnitude of the dynamic actionIssue: • The increased certainties lead to conservative hazards levels for the sites

• Industry could use a more accurate probabilistic seismic hazard analysis

Scope:

• Perform a comprehensive review of ground motions within central and eastern United States• This project will include building computer models utilizing more accurate seismological

constraints• Develop update equations for prediction of ground-motions• Provide ample opportunity for technology transfer of findings of the model

SDO / CODE:

• SDO/CODE: NRC• Document: 10CFR50• Status: Submittal of report by PEER to NRC scheduled for 3/31/2017

11© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 12: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

2012-06: High Strength Reinforced Rebar

Issue:

• Currently, reinforcing steel for concrete in nuclear related structures is limited to 40 and 60 ksisteel (and some limited uses of 80 ksi steel)

• Use of higher-strength steel has not been studied in a sufficient manner for ACI codecommittees to accept its widespread use

• Use of higher strength steel would reduce cost of material, labor, and congestion of steel

Scope:

• Evaluate reinforcing steel up to 120 ksi• Concentrate testing on areas where steel congestion is the highest• Include anchorage testing of hooked bars and headed bars and shear capabilities of headed bar

reinforcement

SDO/ CODE:

• SDO/CODE: ACI• Document: ACI 318 and 349• Status: Presented to ACI 318 to pursue revisions will be made in next code cycle

12© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 13: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

2015-04: Demonstration of Self-Consolidating Concrete (SCC) and SCCStructural Members

• There is insufficient awareness of the construction and mechanical aspects of using SCC

• Under utilization of SCC in spite of the potential benefits – quality and scheduleIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC

Scope:• Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional concrete• Demonstration of SCC in mockups to evaluate plastic properties and application

SDO/ CODE:

• SDO/CODE: ACI• Document: ACI 301• Status: final report before end of 2016

13© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 14: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

2015-08: Emergency Planning Zone – Size Evaluation

Issue:

• The NEI SMR Working Group has developed a white paper to outline an approach for ascalable EPZ

• The risk informed methodology is agreeable in principle to the US NRC, but needs to bedeveloped

Scope:

• The project will convene an industry expert group on EPZ sizing and fully develop a plan of action to develop a final methodology. The project will engage the US NRC to alert them earlyin the process about the project.

SDO/ CODE:

• SDO/CODE: NRC• Document: NUREG 0396 (based on SECY-11-0152)• Status: final report before end of 2016

14© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 15: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

2015-09: Seismic High Frequency Loadings

Issue:

• Recent remapping of seismic hazard maps indicate that some sites are within a seismic zonewhich includes high-frequency, low-displacement seismic action.

• In spite of this, the Nuclear Industry today must evaluate systems, components and structures for dynamic responses that are of high frequency and low displacement characteristics.

• These evaluations can be time consuming, conservative, and lead to unnecessary design modifications.

Scope:• Evaluations of the Systems, Components, and Structures should be made to show that the high

frequency seismic spectra are non-damaging.

SDO/ CODE:

• SDO/CODE: NRC• Document: NUREG 0800• Status: deliverable planned for 1Q 2017

15© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 16: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

2015-10: Mass Concrete Modeling and Temperature Control

Issue:

• Construction specifications limiting early age temperature to 70˚ C (158˚ F) for DEF• Construction specifications limit temperature differential to 20˚ C (35˚ F)• Research does not take into account supplementary cementitious material (SCM)

Scope:

• Utilize finite element modeling in concrete structures for prediction of internal strains/stresses andtemperature limits

• Validate higher temps for mass concrete at early ages

SDO/ CODE:

• SDO/CODE: ACI• Document: ACI 301• Status: project to be completed in 2018

16© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 17: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

2015-13: SMR Aerosol Project (TI, DOE, & ANT)

Issue:

• Reactor containment performance is a critical defense-in-depth barrier for the prevention of radioactive release in the event of a nuclear accident

• RG 1.183 allows the use of aerosol natural deposition correlationsto quantify post-accidentnuclear containment decontamination factors

• Studies suggest that the smaller containment vessel volume to surface area ratio wouldsignificantly enhance decontamination factors for these smaller designs.

Scope:

• Develop data to support use of decontamination factors based on natural phenomenon• Develop correlation for large LWRs, iPWR-specific source terms• Test using a SMR test loop with varying parameters (e.g.; temperature, pressure, containment

value/surface area ratio, particle size, particle velocity, steam concentration)

SDO/ CODE:

• SDO/CODE: NRC• Document: Regulatory Guide 1.183, Alternate Radiological Source Terms for Evaluating Design

Basis Accidents and Nuclear Power Plants• Status: project scheduled for completion at end of 2017

17© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 18: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

List of Active M&C Projects (Applicable to SDO) 2010-11: Methodology for Risk Informed Strategies 2012-01: Water Chemistry Guidelines for Advanced Light Water Reactors 2013-*1: Powder Metallurgy and Hot Isostatic Processing Methods

(DOE / TI) 2013-03: PWSCC Initiation Testing for Alloy 690 Weld Metals 2013-07: Residual Stress (RS) Guidelines 2014-02: Elimination of Dissimilar Metal Welds (DMWs) 2014-03: ASME Code Acceptance of HDPE 2014-06: Thick Section Component Welding 2015-01: Real Time NDE for Welding 2015-03: Environmentally Assisted Fatigue – Long-Term Collaboration

and Testing 2015-05: Additive Manufacturing of Powder Metallurgy Cans for Valves 2015-06: Alloy Code Development for Powder Metallurgy (ASTM and

ASME) 2015-07: Pre-filming Steam Generator Tubing Evaluation 2016-02: PM-HIP Manufacturing Demonstration of ALWR and SMR

Components 2016-06: Advanced Manufacturing Program (TI)

18© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 19: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

2010-11: Methodology for Risk Informed Strategies

Issue:

• Risk informed (RI) strategies are currently being used for nuclear new-builds.• Utilities use these practices during various phases of the licensing process for the

sites (e.g.; design certification, early site permit, and combined construction and operation license application)

• Updated and improved risk-informed strategies can be used to file relief requests

Scope:

• Project is a multiyear, multi phased project• Tasks include developing methods for RI procurement, test cases for RI procurement,

pilot submittal requests, updates to RI based on site feedback to RI procurement process

SDO/ CODE:

• SDO/CODE: ASME and NRC• Document: PRA Standard; 10CFR50.69• Status: ASME balloting for updated PRA Standard expected in 2016. A petition for

rule change in 10CFR50.69 has been issued to address language interpretations.

19© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 20: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

2013-*1: Powder Metallurgy and Hot Isostatic Processing (PMHIP) Methods (DOE/TI)

Issue:

• In nuclear power plant construction, the majority of fabrication and manufacturing techniques include casting and forging; advanced techniques are not common

• PM-HIP technology is an advanced, state-of-the-art technique which could providesignificant benefit to the industry (e.g.; reduced costs, reduced energy, reduced emissions, improved installation, improved schedule)

Scope:

• Model near-net shape components• Develop test coupons, PM/HIP components with varying base materials (e.g.; low

alloy, nickel-based allow, and austenitic stainless steel)• Perform mechanical and metallographic testing

SDO/ CODE:

• SDO/CODE: ASME and ASTM• Document: ASME Section II A988-11, A989-11, CC N-834; ASTM B834-13• Status: ASTM B834-15 is approved. ASME is working to incorporate ASTM A988,

A989, and B834

20© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 21: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

2013-03: PWSCC Initiation Testing for Alloy 690 Weld Metals

Issue:

• Inspection intervals for SCC are based on assumption that cracks exist on day 1 and crack growth until safety critical.

• However, crack initiation and expansion to detectable levels represent ~80% of component life.

• Additional time date for crack initiation and propagation is needed.

Scope:

• Develop SCC time data for crack initiation and growth• Testing will be focused on Alloy 690 welds (A52 and A152 weld metals)• Perform literature review and determine if technical justification for expanding

inspection interval times

SDO/ CODE:

• SDO/CODE: ASME• Document: dependent upon weld location (see subsequent slide with table)• Status: code case revisions to support decreased inspection frequencies

21© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 22: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

22© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Area ASME Regulation

Upper Head ASME CC N-729-1

10 CFR 50.55a(g)(6)(ii)(D)

Pressurizer ASME CC N-722-1

10 CFR 50.55a(g)(6)(ii)(E)

Lower Head ASME CC N-722-1

10 CFR 50.55a(g)(6)(ii)(E)

DM Welds ASME CC N-770-1

10 CFR 50.55a(g)(6)(ii)(F)

Page 23: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

2013-07: Residual Stress (RS) Guidelines

Issue:

• Residual Stress is a key component of SCC which is plaguing LWRs• Poor performance and failures NRC shutdown orders; costly repair, replace,

inspection and mitigation aging management solutions; owner/regulator uncertainty inmanaging stress levels; over $10 billion dollars spent on SCC

• Optimized performance is required from initial start-up through 80-year life.

Scope:

• Phase 1: Guideline definition, generic surveys, workshops, feasibility, assessments, scoping and gap identification, and detailed R&D plan

• Phase 2: Modeling and validation of processes that contribute to component RSs• Phase 3: Prepare a guideline on management of RS in advance nuclear plants

SDO/ CODE:

• SDO/CODE: ASME• Document: ASME, Section III• Status: no planned action at this time

23© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 24: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

2014-03: ASME Code Acceptance of HDPE

Issue:

• ASME does not have code in place to prescribe acceptable application of HDPE• Utilities are unable to plan and schedule the installation for HDPE, Class 3 safety-

related (SR) piping• EPRI has performed several years of research about the use of HDPE for non safety-

related piping and can leverage this experience

Scope:

• Perform R&D for code cases related to the use of HDPE for safety-related piping application

• Develop test plan to evaluate essential variables for HDPE in SR application• Aiming to receive unconditional approval of HDPE for SR piping

SDO/ CODE:

• SDO/CODE: ASME• Document: ASME Code Case N-755-2 and Appendix XXVI to ASME Section III• Status: ASME Code Case is approved. The NRC has not endorsed the Code Case. The work in

this project is systematically addressing each of the NRC’s questions.

24© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 25: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

2015-03: Environmentally Assisted Fatigue – Long-Term Collaboration and Testing

Issue:

• NRC-approved methodologies result in typically conservative fatigue estimates and component usage factors

• ASME Code process: difficulty obtaining consensus and revision• Lab data and plant experience discrepancy = differing technical positions

Scope:

• Systematic approach addressing gaps from prior EPRI research• Evaluate existing analytical rules and develop test data that is representative of real-

plant experience• New plants application of RG 1.207 in concert with NRC involvement

SDO/ CODE:

• SDO/CODE: ASME and NRC• Document: ASME Section III; NUREG 6720; NUREG/CR-6909; RG 1.207• Status: RG 1.207 on periodic review basis at NRC

25© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 26: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

2015-06: Alloy Code Development for Powder Metallurgy (ASTM and ASME)

Issue:

• Alloys 600, 690, and 718 are not recognized in ASTM B834-13 for nickel-based alloys using PM-HIP.

• Currently, ASME Section II does not recognize/reference two additional specifications– ASTM A988-11 and A989-11 – which are focused on PM-HIP development of components.

• PM-HIP techniques can provide nuclear power plants with improved methods for component fabrication.

Scope:

• Perform literature review and interface with OEMs to determine if supporting case studies exist for application of PM-HIP for ALWR and SMR components

• Enhance technology transfer by conducting workshop on PM-HIP• Develop and submit data packages for updating specification and code

SDO/ CODE:

• SDO/CODE: ASME and ASTM• Document: ASME Section II A988-11, A989-11, CC N-834; ASTM B834-13• Status: ASTM B834-15 is approved. ASME is working to incorporate ASTM A988,

A989, and B834

26© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 27: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

2016-06: Advanced Manufacturing Program (TI)

Issue:

• Many of today’s manufacturing methods remain unchanged or have shown limited progress resulting in manufacturing methods that are antiquated, expensive, and slow.

• There are a number of innovative and cutting edge technologies that can fundamentally transform and revolutionize the fabrication and manufacture of new nuclear plants that need to be developed for nuclear implementation.

Scope:

• This strategic program will advance a number of innovative manufacturing technologies while assessing their feasibility for specific nuclear applications.

• Examples include; PM-HIP (powder metallurgy – hot isostatic processing), electron beam welding (EBW), and laser diode cladding.

SDO/ CODE:

• SDO/CODE: ASME• Document: ASME Section II, III, and IX• Status: plan to develop code changes around Dissimilar Metal Welds, Electron Beam

Welding, and In-Service Inspection

27© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 28: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

List of Active MTA Projects (To be completed in 2016)

2014-08: Advanced Battery Qualification 2015-02: Technology for SMR Staff Optimization 2015-12: PIM Archive and Lessons Learned 2016-01: Cyber Security During Construction 2016-03: Augmented Reality for New Plant Applications

28© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 29: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

2014-08: Advanced Battery Qualification

Issue:

• Need exists for reliable long-term emergency power for nuclear power plants (NPPs) and extend coping times during a LOOP.

• Currently, IEEE 535 limits 1E DC power only application to vented lead acid batteries.

Scope:

• Identify standards, technical issues, regulatory positions• Analysis and categorization of digital assets; vulnerability assessments• Develop guidance/framework, perform pilot project with utility

SDO/ CODE:

• SDO/CODE: IEEE• Document: IEEE 535• Status: project complete; Advanced Nuclear Technology: Advanced Battery

Evaluation for 1E Service Qualification; EPRI 3002007408

29© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 30: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

Projects with potential influence on standards

30© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 31: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

List of Active EPC Projects (Potential SDO application)

2009-07: Next Generation Attenuation Model for the Central and Eastern U.S.

2012-06: High Strength Reinforced Rebar 2012-15: New Steam Generator Thermal - Hydraulics

Code (Triton) 2015-04: Demonstration of Self-Consolidating Concrete

(SCC) and SCC Structural Members 2015-08: Emergency Planning Zone - Size Evaluation 2015-09: Seismic High Frequency Loadings 2015-10: Mass Concrete Modeling & Temperature

Control 2015-11: Assessment of Moisture Tolerant Coatings

for Decreasing Open Top Construction Time 2015-13: SMR Aerosol Project (TI, DOE, & ANT)

31© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 32: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

List of Active M&C Projects (To be completed in 2017+) 2010-11: Methodology for Risk Informed Strategies 2012-01: Water Chemistry Guidelines for Advanced Light Water Reactors 2013-*1: Powder Metallurgy and Hot Isostatic Processing Methods (DOE / TI) 2013-03: PWSCC Initiation Testing for Alloy 690 Weld Metals 2013-07: Residual Stress (RS) Guidelines 2014-02: Elimination of Dissimilar Metal Welds (DMWs) 2014-03: ASME Code Acceptance of HDPE 2014-06: Thick Section Component Welding 2015-01: Real Time NDE for Welding 2015-03: Environmentally Assisted Fatigue – Long-Term Collaboration and Testing 2015-05: Additive Manufacturing of Powder Metallurgy Cans for Valves 2015-06: Alloy Code Development for Powder Metallurgy (ASTM and ASME) 2015-07: Pre-filming Steam Generator Tubing Evaluation 2016-02: PM-HIP Manufacturing Demonstration of ALWR and SMR

Components 2016-06: Advanced Manufacturing Program (TI)

32© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 33: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

rights reserved.

List of Active MTA Projects (To be completed in 2017+)

2014-08: Advanced Battery Qualification 2015-02: Technology for SMR Staff Optimization 2015-12: PIM Archive and Lessons Learned 2016-01: Cyber Security During Construction 2016-03: Augmented Reality for New Plant Applications

Source: Westinghouse Electric

33© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All

Page 34: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

Proposed 2017 and 2018 Projects

34© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 35: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

Proposed 2017 and 2018 Projects – EPC

35© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Engineering, Procurement & Construction (EPC)

EPC RFA #1: Increase Efficiency and Reduce Cost of New Nuclear Construction

EPC 2017-C Investigating Mechanical Splicing of Reinforcing Steel

EPC 2017-D Optimization of Concrete Placements

EPC 2017-E Feasibility Study of Using Existing Software for Flow Simulation of SCC

EPC 2018-B Field Guide for Reinforcing Steel Inspections

EPC 2018-C Image Processing for Data Development of Construction As-Builts and Inspection

EPC RFA #2: Development of Collaborative Engineering, Design Tools, and Processes

EPC 2017-A Vertical Response Motion Computation in SSI Analysis of Embedded Structures

EPC 2017-B Ground Motion Kappa Parameter Reassessment

EPC 2018-A Alternative Methods and Materials to Reinforce Concrete

EPC RFA #3: Improve Quality of Supply Chain for Nuclear

N/A No projects for prioritization

Page 36: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

Proposed 2017 and 2018 Projects – MTA

36© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Modern Technology Application (MTA)

MTA RFA #1: Advanced Monitoring Technology and Data Management

MTA 2017-B Assessment of Automation Technologies to Reduce Chemistry and Radiochemistry O&M Costs

MTA 2017-E Gaps and Opportunities for Sensor Applications

MTA 2018-C Technical Evaluation of Using IPAWS Notification System

MTA RFA #2: Technologies to Improve Human Performance, Machine Interaction, and Operational Effect.

MTA 2018-A Alarm Prioritization and Filtering Methodology Improvement

MTA 2017-C Evaluation of Indoor Positioning Systems

MTA 2018-B Common Robotic Platforms

MTA RFA #3: Gaps for Use of Digital Systems Technologies in New Plants

MTA 2017-A Risk Informed Cyber Security Methods

MTA 2017-D I&C Obsolescence – Long Term Hardware Storage and Aging Mechanism

Page 37: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

Proposed 2017 and 2018 Projects – M&C

37© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.

Materials & Components (M&C)

M&C RFA #1: Advanced Fabrication and Manufacturing Techniques

M&C 2017-C Additive Manufacturing Development

M&C 2018-D Evaluation of New Anti-Corrosion Surface Treatment Technologies for New Plants

M&C 2018-E Development of Adaptive Feedback Welding for Repair and Fabrication

M&C RFA #2: Material Performance and Inspection

M&C 2017-A Investigation of New Residual Stress Mitigation Techniques

M&C 2017-B Comprehensive Identification of New Plant NDE Needs

M&C 2017-D Guidance on the Application of HDPE Piping

M&C 2018-A Economic Evaluation of Upgrading Materials for New Plants

M&C 2018-B PWSCC Testing and Revision to Alloy 690 Tubing Specification

M&C RFA #3: New Materials Development

M&C 2018-C Support of Advanced 52 Weld Metal Development and Enhancement

Page 38: NRC Standards ForumIssue: • SCC is sensitive, reliability is unknown for nuclear structures, SCC vs. CC Scope: • Evaluate mechanical properties of SCC in comparison with conventional

Together…Shaping the Future of Electricity

38© 2016 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.