Proposed DriveCam ® Program Board of County Commissioners November 13, 2007.
November 13, 2007
description
Transcript of November 13, 2007
![Page 1: November 13, 2007](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/5681606e550346895dcf94f5/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
PSYC 3640Psychological Studies of Language
Alternative Language Processing (Bilingualism and Sign Language)
November 13, 2007
![Page 2: November 13, 2007](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/5681606e550346895dcf94f5/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Outline
• Research paper (due Nov 27 – last lecture)• Last lecture • Final Exam: Dec 5 (Wednesday) 2-5 p.m.
YH B204 & B206• Bilingualism• Sign language• Bimodal bilingualism (speech + sign)
![Page 3: November 13, 2007](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/5681606e550346895dcf94f5/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Nature of Bilingualism• Are you a bilingual?• Affected by environmental factors: education
system, immigration, social pressure, political environment…etc.
• Bilingualism is not categorical.
Monolingual Bilingual
![Page 4: November 13, 2007](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/5681606e550346895dcf94f5/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Types of Bilinguals• Romaine (1995)
Type 1: one person, one languageType 2: nondominant home language/one language, one environmentType 3: nondominant home language without community supportType 4: double nondominant home language without community supportType 5: nonnative parentsType 6: mixed languages
Romaine, S. (1995). Bilingualism. (2nd ed. ). Oxford: Blackwell.
![Page 5: November 13, 2007](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/5681606e550346895dcf94f5/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
End Product of these SubtypesBilingual children growing up in different linguistic
and social environment would differ in:• (Relative) usage of language
– Overcoming the urge to speak the stronger language– Finding a matching item in the weaker sematic network
• Proficiency of each language– Formal structures of language produced– Levels of comprehension in different contexts, e.g.,
speaking to grandparents on the phone vs. watching the news
![Page 6: November 13, 2007](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/5681606e550346895dcf94f5/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Nature of Bilingualism
ProficiencyU
se
Analysis
Control
![Page 7: November 13, 2007](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/5681606e550346895dcf94f5/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Linguistic Consequences of Bilingualism
• Delay in acquisition of speech sounds to word learning: Effect of two phonetic representations
• Concepts of print: Effect of two references to the same referent
• Limited transfer between languages: Effect of writing system
• Lower receptive vocabulary: Effect of two semantic network
• Lower performance in lexical retrieval: Effect of two semantic network
![Page 8: November 13, 2007](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/5681606e550346895dcf94f5/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Speech Perception and Word Learning
• Fennell, Byers-Heinlein & Werker (2007)
• Habituated to one syllable with an object• Switch to a different syllable with that same object• Monolingual infants showed dishabituation at 17 months,
bilingual infants delayed to 20 months.• Results replicated in heterogeneous bilinguals and
homogeneous bilinguals (Chinese-English & French-English)
Fennell, C. T., Byers-Heinlein, K. & Werker, J. F. (2007). Using speech sound to guide word learning: The case of bilingual infants. Child Development, 78, 1510-1525.
![Page 9: November 13, 2007](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/5681606e550346895dcf94f5/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Concepts of Print: Moving word task (Apperly, Williams & Williams, 2004; Bialystok & Martin, 2003; Bialystok & Senman, 2004; Bialystok, Shenfield & Codd, 2000; Bialystok & Luk, 2007;
Collins & Robinson, 2005)
dogdog dogdog
![Page 10: November 13, 2007](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/5681606e550346895dcf94f5/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Limited Transfer between Languages• Depends on writing system written
representations of language• Phonological awareness Writing system
effect is weaker (Luk & Bialystok, in press)• Nonword decoding writing system effect is
greatest (Bialystok, Luk & Kwan, 2005)
![Page 11: November 13, 2007](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/5681606e550346895dcf94f5/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Receptive Vocabulary(Bialystok, 2007; Oller, Pearson & Cobo-Lewis, 2007)
• Canadian context (N = 963)
405060708090
100110120
5 6 7 8 9Age group
Stan
dard
ized
scor
e
MonoBiling
![Page 12: November 13, 2007](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/5681606e550346895dcf94f5/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Word Retrieval• Verbal fluency is an important screening
measure for degenerative disease.
Letter fluency: B = M
Category fluency: B < M
But we will come back to this findings later…
![Page 13: November 13, 2007](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/5681606e550346895dcf94f5/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Cognitive Consequences of Bilingualism
• Cognitive flexibility• Inhibitory control • Selective attention
Executive Functions
![Page 14: November 13, 2007](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/5681606e550346895dcf94f5/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Cognitive Flexibility(Bialystok & Martin, 2004)
• Dimensional change card-sorting task (DCCS)
Colour game
Shape game
![Page 15: November 13, 2007](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/5681606e550346895dcf94f5/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Inhibitory Control(Bialystok & Senman, 2004; Bialystok & Sheparo, 2005)
Ambiguous Figures
Appearance-reality
![Page 16: November 13, 2007](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/5681606e550346895dcf94f5/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Simon Task(Bialystok, et al., 2004; Martin-Rhee & Bialystok, in press)
Control
Congruent Incongruent
![Page 17: November 13, 2007](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/5681606e550346895dcf94f5/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Simon Task across Lifespan
![Page 18: November 13, 2007](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/5681606e550346895dcf94f5/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Bilingual mind
![Page 19: November 13, 2007](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/5681606e550346895dcf94f5/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Handling two languages….
L2L2
L2
L2
L2L2
L1 L1L1
L1L1
L1L1
L1
L1
Weaker representationStronger
control
![Page 20: November 13, 2007](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/5681606e550346895dcf94f5/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
The verbal fluency task requires both executive functions and proficiency, we know:
(1) bilinguals are better at EF(2) bilinguals are worse in proficiency
![Page 21: November 13, 2007](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/5681606e550346895dcf94f5/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Is in VF really due to bilingualism?
• Young adults (119 bilinguals, 41 monolinguals)
20
25
30
35
40
45
Letter CategoryMono Biling
20
25
30
35
40
45
Letter CategoryMono HP Biling LP Biling
Partial results: Bialystok, Craik & Luk, in press
![Page 22: November 13, 2007](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/5681606e550346895dcf94f5/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Bilingualism and the Brain (Michelli et al., 2004)
• Grey matter density in inferior parietal lobe (BA 40) significantly correlate with proficiency in L2
• Italian-English bilinguals of all levels of proficiency
• Experience changes the anatomical brain structures
![Page 23: November 13, 2007](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/5681606e550346895dcf94f5/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Summary for Bilingualism• Bilingualism is a multidimensional construct that
includes functional usage (how much) and proficiency (how well).
• The cognitive consequences of bilingualism is positive, but limited to nonverbal tasks.
• The linguistic consequences of bilingualism is mixed. Results can be influenced by:– Writing system– Phonetic representation– Semantic network
• Bilingualism also affects brain structure.
![Page 24: November 13, 2007](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/5681606e550346895dcf94f5/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Sign Language• Natural human language• Different modalities compare to speech:
Speech: auditory in, verbal outSign: visual in, manual out
• Similarity: – Linguistic structures (“phonology”, syntax, word)– Diversity in languages (ASL, BSL, MSL, SSL…)
• Difference: – Sound meaning vs. movement meaning– Speech organ vs. bodily parts (arm, hand, facial
expression, gesture)– No tense marker
![Page 25: November 13, 2007](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/5681606e550346895dcf94f5/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Nicaraguan Sign Language Project
• Children began to sign to each other regardless of the oral approach in education.
• They were kept at own homes prior to the educational reform.
• Birth of a sign language purely based on usage.• Language does not arise from one person or two
people… you need a community.• Home signs converge to give birth to a language
system
![Page 26: November 13, 2007](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/5681606e550346895dcf94f5/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
Nicaraguan Sign Language Project
• First vs. Second generation of NSLFluency: 2nd > 1st Efficiency: 2nd > 1st Complexity: 2nd > 1st
• Development of NSL was driven by younger individuals than older ones Critical period
• Process is similar to cerolization (how pidgin language evolves to a native-like language) in spoken language (the Hawaiian example)
![Page 27: November 13, 2007](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/5681606e550346895dcf94f5/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Expression of ASL• Fingerspelling
• Numbers and alphabets
• Noun
• Verb
• Adjective
![Page 28: November 13, 2007](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/5681606e550346895dcf94f5/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
Sign Language and the Brain(Neville et al., 1998; Newman et al., 2002)
![Page 29: November 13, 2007](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062305/5681606e550346895dcf94f5/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
Bimodal Bilingualism
• Bimodal (speech-sign) bilinguals do not have the modality constraint as unimodal (speech-speech) bilinguals.
• Would the positive cognitive consequences of unimodal bilingualism extends to bimodal bilingualism?