Note - dgftcom.nic.indgftcom.nic.in/exim/2000/committee/am06/des1... · Note: 2 2. The quantity of...

RATIFIED

Minutes of M.No.8/06 held on 24.5.05 of ALC-II (DES.I)

The meeting No.8/2006 of ALC-II for the licensing year 2005-2006 was held on 24.5.05 under the Chairpersonship of Dr. Maya D. Kem, Addl. DGFT to consider the applications under duty exemption scheme (Chapter-4) of Foreign Trade Policy 2004-2009/H.B. Procedure Volume-I. The following Officers were present in the meeting:-

S.No. Name of the representatives & their Designation

Room No.

Telephone No. Deptt.

1.

Dr. S.S. Tak, AIA 13A 23793432 MOS, U.B. 2.

Sh. S.P. Taneja, Sr.D.O. 479 23013611 Dept. of HI, U.B. 3.

Sh. Sushil Kumar Jain, D.O. 429A

23010221 Ext.3318

DIPP, U.B.

4.

Sh. K.K. Funda, Asstt. Director (Mech.)

23022220 Ext.2454

DC(SSI), N.B.

5.

Sh. A.K. Bamba, Jt.DGFT 101 23016262 Ext.229

23011671 DGFT, U.B.

6.

Sh. A.K. Srivastava, Dy.DGFT 23016262 Ext.277

DGFT, U.B.

Before considering the individual cases of the agenda of this meeting, the Committee ratified the minutes of ALC M.Nos.4/06 held on 26.4.05, 5/06 held on 3.5.05 & 6/06 held on 10.5.2005 by making amendments in minutes of some of cases. The amended minutes of these cases were as under:-

Case No.A/R-4 M/s. Astra Lighting Ltd., Chandigarh ALC M.No.4/06 F.No.01/80/162/1477/AM.05/DES.I Dated 26.4.05 Export Product

The case regarding amendment in the input output norms fixed against advance license No.2210003403 dt.21.6.04 in ALC M.No.37/05 held on 30.11.04 was considered by the ALC-II as per the agenda. The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting informed the Committee that the firm had requested for enhancement in wastage allowed on some of the inputs in respect of the export product HPSV 70 Watt Lamp on the ground that wastage allowed on the inputs in respect of a similar export product viz. HPSV 250W Lamp in SION at C-224 of Engg. Group is on higher side. The request of the firm was not justified since the SION at C-224 of Engg. Group was applicable for another product. The Committee, therefore, decided to reject the case.

The RLA may take necessary action accordingly.

Case No.A/R-6 M/s. Essem Tecnopinz Pvt. Ltd., Nasik ALC M.No.4/06 F.No.01/80/50/762/AM.05/DES.I Dated 26.4.05 RLA s F.No.31/24/40/168/AM05 Export Product

The case regarding ratification of advance license No.3110017780 dt.14.10.04 was considered by the ALC-II as per the agenda. On the recommendation of the representative of the DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided to ratify the above advance license with the following modifications:-

1. The weight of 1834 Kg. may be added in the quantity of export product.

2

2. The quantity of import item No.1 may be allowed as 3426 Kg. inclusive of 103%

wastage after taking into account 15% recoverable wastage. 3. The quantity of import item No.2 may be allowed as applied for. 4. The quantity of import item No.3 may be allowed as 10,200,000 Nos. with 2% wastage. 5. The quantity of import item No.4 may be allowed as applied for.

Note:- The import of components shall be permitted on net to net basis with accountability clause and the type, technical specifications (including part No. if any) etc. of the Components sought for import should conform to those utilised in the manufacture of the resultant product.


Case No.:30/4/80-ALC2/2005

Party Name:LARSEN & TOUBRO LIMITED

Meet No/Date:4/80-ALC2/2005 26.04.2005

Status:Case Approved

HQ File :01/80/050/01578/AM05/

RLA File :03/24/040/02655/AM05/

Lic.No/Date:0310322306

21.03.2005 Defer Date:

16

Decision :The case regarding ratification of above advance license was considered by the ALC-II in its M.No.4/06 held on 26.4.05 as per the agenda. On the recommendation of the representative of the Deptt. of HI present in the meeting, it was decided to ratify the above advance license with the following modifications. The Committee was also informed that quantities of import item No.3 to 5 are being allowed within 2% of weight of steel to be welded:-

1. The weight of 190 MT may be added in the quantity of export product. 2. The quantity of import item No.1 may be allowed as 1.1 Kg./Kg. content in export product. 3. The quantity of import item No.2 may be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause. 4. The quantities of import item No.3 to 5 may be allowed as 2% of the total weight of Steel to be welded.



3

Case No.:12/4/80-ALC2/2005

Party Name:ABB LIMITED

Meet No/Date:4/80-ALC2/2005 26.04.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/01582/AM05/

RLA File :03/24/040/02233/AM05/


22.03.2005

Defer Date:

18

Decision :The case regarding ratification of above advance license was considered by the ALC-II in its M.No.4/06 held on 26.4.05 as per the agenda. On the recommendation of the representative of the Deptt. of HI present in the meeting, it was decided to ratify the above advance license with the following modifications:-

1. The quantity of import item Nos.1 & 2 and items 5 to 18 may be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause.

2. The quantity of import item Nos.3 & 4 may be allowed on net to net basis.

Note:-

The import of components shall be permitted on net to net basis with accountability clause and the type, technical specifications (including part No. if any) etc. of the Components sought for import should conform to those utilised in the manufacture of the resultant product.


Case No.:31/4/80-ALC2/2005

Party Name:G.B. ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD.,

Meet No/Date:4/80-ALC2/2005 26.04.2005

Status:Case Deferred

HQ File :01/80/050/01586/AM05/

RLA File :04/81/040/00263/AM05/


23.03.2005 Defer Date:31.05.2005

21

Decision :The case regarding ratification of above advance license was considered by the ALC-II in its M.No.4/06 held on 26.4.05 as per the agenda. On the recommendation of the representative of DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the information in respect of S.No.3, 4, 10, 13 & 14 of the Standard Deficiency Format from the firm and re-list the case on 31.5.05.

Case No.:32/4/80-ALC2/2005

Party Name:G.B. ENGINEERING ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD.,

Meet No/Date:4/80-ALC2/2005 26.04.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/01587/AM05/

RLA File :04/81/040/00262/AM05/


23.03.2005 Defer Date:31.05.2005

22

Decision :The case regarding ratification of above advance license was considered by the ALC-II in its M.No.4/06 held on 26.4.05 as per the agenda. On the recommendation of the representative of DIPP present in

the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the information in respect of S.No.3, 4, 10, 13 & 14 of the Standard Deficiency Format from the firm and re-list the case on 31.5.05.

4

S.No.17 Case No.E-72 M/s. Kumar Engineering Works, Delhi. ALC M.No.5/06 F.No.01/80/162/263/AM.05/DES.I Dated 3.5.05 Export Product

The representation regarding clarification about applicability of DEPB Entry No.353 of Engg. Group to export product Non Tip Anti Skid Bowl Belly (Pantone) with Rubber Rings was considered by the ALC-II as per the agenda. The Committee in its earlier meeting held on 23.3.04 found the weight of Bowl as 153 gm and the weight of Rubber Ring as 34 gm. from the sample of the export product. Since the weight of Rubber Ring was more than 5% of the total weight of export product, it would be treated as composite item. The Committee, therefore, at that time concluded that the DEPB rate on the export product would be calculated as per General Note No.11 of the current Schedule of DEPB Rates. The case was also referred to DEPB Committee which accepted the recommendation of ALC. Now the firm represented against the decision of Committees and argued that the Rubber Ring was detachable item and was not chemically fixed or moulded (composite) material as claimed by the Customs authorities and further they had not claimed benefits on the Rubber Rings. They added the concept regarding Rubber Rings had been accepted by Govt. of India vide Public Notice No.67 dt.21.6.04.The Committee also observed that export was made prior to issuance of the very public notice. The Committee took into account the amended DEPB Entry and the fact that separate price and invoice for Rubber Ring and Bowl had been given and decided on the recommendation of the representatives of technical authorities present in the meeting that their sample export product viz. Non Tip Anti Skid Bowl Belly (Pantone) with Rubber Rings would be covered under amended DEPB Entry No.353 of Engg. Group with admissibility of DEPB on Bowl entry.

The case may be referred to the DEPB Committee.

S.No.13 Case No.A-60 M/s. Karnataka Electrical & Mechanical Systems Ltd., Bangalore. ALC M.No.5/06 F.No.01/80/162/715/AM.05/DES.I Dated 3.5.05 RLA s F.No.07/24/40/186/AM05 Export Product

The case regarding ratification of advance license No.0710030690 dt.2.7.04 was considered by the ALC-II as per the agenda. On the recommendation of the representative of the Deptt. of HI present in the meeting, it was decided to ratify the above advance license with the following modifications:-

1. The weight of 28551 Kg. may be added in the quantity of export product. 2. The quantity of import item may be allowed as 68522 Kg. inclusive of 140% wastage after taking into account 1/3rd recovery of wastage.


5

Case No.:1/45/80-ALC2/2004

Party Name:EMKAY EXPORTS,

Meet No/Date:5/80-ALC2/2005 03.05.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/01189/AM05/

RLA File :13/80/040/00141/AM05/


31.12.2004

Defer Date:

10

Decision :The case regarding ratification of above advance license was considered by the ALC-II in its M.No.5/06 held on 3.5.05 as per the agenda. On the recommendation of the representative of the DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided to

ratify the above advance license with the following modifications. They also informed the Committee that quantity of import item No.3 to 5 had been calculated taking clue from Table 6 of Engg. Group.

1. The quantity of import item Nos.1 & 2 may be allowed as applied for. 2. Taking clue from Engg. Table No.6, the quantity of import item Nos.3 to 5 may be allowed as 4.068 MT, 2.034 MT & 0.676 MT respectively.


Case No.:13/45/80-ALC2/2004


Meet No/Date:5/80-ALC2/2005 03.05.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/01298/AM05/

RLA File :13/80/040/00161/AM05/



15

Decision :The case regarding ratification of above advance license was considered by the ALC-II in its M.No.5/06 held on 3.5.05 as per the agenda. On the recommendation of the representative of the DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided to ratify the above advance license with the following modifications:- 1. The quantity of import item Nos.1 & 2 may be allowed as applied for. 2. The quantity of import item No.3 may be allowed as 4.068 MT. 3. The quantity of import item No.4 may be allowed as 2.034 MT. 4. The quantity of import item No.5 may be allowed as 0.678 MT.


Case No.E-6 M/s. Man Industries (India) Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai. ALC M.No.6/06 F.No.01/80/162/720/AM.05/DES.I Dated 10.5.05 Export Product

The case regarding upward revision of DEPB rates and Value Cap in respect of DEPB Entry Nos.473, 474, 475 & 476 of Engg. Group was considered by the ALC-II as per the agenda. The representative of EEPC present in the meeting informed the Committee that proposal of the firm had the approval of Chairman, Steel Pipes, Tubes and fittings thereof and added that import & export data, CIF and FOB price had been verified and certified by them. On the recommendation of EEPC and as per quantities allowed in corresponding SION, the Committee accepted CIF value of all import items as Rs.43,910/- and FOB value as Rs.48,000/MT. The Actual value addition based on the above data was coming to 9.3%. However, the Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to fix value addition as 50% for revision of DEPB rates allowed against the said DEPB Entries. The Committee also recommended to enhance the value cap in respect of the said DEPB Entries to Rs.42000/-.


6

Case No.A/R-15 M/s. Alfa Laval (India) Ltd., Pune. ALC M.No.6/06 F.No.01/80/50/909/AM.05/DES.I Dated 10.5.05 RLA s F.No.31/24/40/185/AM05 Export Product

The case regarding ratification of advance license No.3110018185 dt.11.11.04 was considered by the ALC-II as per the agenda. The representative of the DIPP present in the meeting informed the Committee that finished weight of Components now furnished by the firm did not match with the dimension and size of sheet used. This case was earlier also rejected by the ALC-II in its M.No.40/05 held on 24.1.05 on the same ground. Therefore, the Committee decided to reject the case once again and ask the RLA to take necessary action accordingly immediately.

Case No.A/R-26 M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Bhopal ALC M.No.6/06 F.No.01/80/162/1535/AM.04/DES.I Dated 10.5.05 RLA s F.No.11/24/42/18/AM04 Export Product

The case regarding amendment in the input output norms fixed against advance license No.1110007755 dt.16.2.04 was considered by the ALC-II as per the agenda. On the recommendation of the representative of the DHI present in the meeting, it was decided to amend the said advance license as applied for by the firm vide its letter dt.7.12.04, a photocopy of which may be forwarded to the RLA.


8

The Committee considered the individual cases of the agenda of this meeting and the decisions taken thereon were as under:-

(These minutes were ratified by the ALC-II in its meeting held on 7.6.05.)

Case No.E-9 M/s. Haldex India Ltd., Nashik. ALC M.No.8/06 F.No.01/80/162/1697/AM.05/DES.I Dated 24.5.05 RLA s F.No.JDG/MUM/CENTRAL EXCISE/AM.04/ECA Export Product

The case regarding availing DEPB benefit under S.No.324 of Engg. Group by misdeclaring the export product Slack Adjuster Assembly as Roller for Auto Break Shoe was considered by the ALC-II as per the agenda. The Committee observed that Slack Adjuster Assembly was a complete assembly. The inputs allowed in corresponding SION No.C-1079 of DEPB Entry No. 324 of Engg. Group for export product Roller for Auto Break Shoe were different from the inputs required for manufacture of Slack Adjuster Assembly . The Committee, therefore, concluded that Slack Adjuster Assembly would not be covered under S.No.324 of Engg. Group.


Case No.E-10 M/s. Metal India, Moradabad. ALC M.No.8/06 F.No. 01/80/162/141/AM06/DES-I Dated 24.5.05 Export Product

The case regarding clarification about applicability of DEPB Entry No.353 of Engg. Group to the export product various Table & Kitchen articles made of Stainless Steel which include fittings of Bakelite, Plastic, Rubber, in the shape of Handle, Lid and Anti Gasket etc. was considered by the ALC-II as per the agenda. The Committee in consultation with the representatives of the Technical Authorities present in the meeting and after deliberating upon the case decided that

1. DEPB credit under Sl.No.353 & 354 would be admissible on the item even if the weight of the material, the handle / lid may have been made of, exceeds the 5% of total weight.

2. The value cap will be applicable to the weight of the whole items. 3. If the weight of extraneous material in any item under any Sl.No. exceeds 5% of total weight,

the DEPB credit would be admissible as per the provisions for composite products specified at General Instruction No.11 of DEPB rates.

The case may be referred to DEPB Committee.

Case No.E-11 M/s. Amiya Commerce & Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata.

ALC M.No.8/06 F.No.01/80/162/908/AM.05/DES.I Dated 24.5.05 RLA s F.No.02/49/051/1400/AM04 Export Product Pre-fabricated Steel Buildings

The case regarding clarification about items exported under DEPB Entry No.431 of Engg. Group was considered by the ALC-II as per the agenda. The Committee in consultation with the representatives of the Technical Authorities present in the meeting and after deliberating upon the case decided that the product in question can not be considered as an assembly of various items covered under Para 11 of General Instructions of DEPB rates, therefore the export item under DEPB Sl.No.513 of Engineering Group would not be covered. The Committee decided to maintain its earlier decision and decided to reject the representation of the firm for re-consideration of DEPB benefit on export item Pre-fabricated Steel Buildings.

9

The case may be referred to DEPB Committee.

10

Case No.C-49 M/s. Glastronix, Bangalore. ALC M.No.8/06 F.No.01/80/162/72/AM.06/DES.I Dated 24.5.05 RLA s F.Nos.07/24/42/42/AM03, 07/24/42/48/AM03 &

07/24/42/46/AM04 Export Product

The case regarding clarification about clubbing of advance license Nos.0710018371 dt.7.1.03, 0710018505 dt.13.1.03 & 0710021873 dt.19.6.03 was considered by the ALC-II as per the agenda. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to defer the consideration of the case for want of report from the RLA. The case may be re-listed on receipt of the report of RLA.

Case No.C-50 M/s. Hindustan Platinum Pvt. Ltd., Navi Mumbai. ALC M.No.8/06 F.No.01/80/162/648/AM.05/DES.I Dated 24.5.05 Export Product Gold/Silver/Platinum/Palladium/Rhodium/Iridium/Ruthenium &

Osmium all in the form of Salts / Compounds / Catalysts / Chemicals / Resinate / Paste / in Solution / and as Supported Catalysts.

The case regarding fixation of SION for the above export product was considered by the ALC-II as per the agenda. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to transfer the file relating to this case to JDG, ALC-I as the export product was related to Chemical Division. Case No.C-51 M/s. Indo-US MM Tec Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore. ALC M.No.8/06 F.No.01/80/162/37/AM.06/DES.I Dated 24.5.05 Export Product Complex Shaped Metal Components manufactured through

MIM.

The case regarding fixation of SION for the above export product was considered by the ALC-II as per the agenda. The representative of the DIPP informed the Committee that the case was under study. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration of the case for 28.6.05.

11

Case No.A/R-28 M/s. Glastronix, Bangalore. ALC M.No.8/06 F.No.01/80/162/81/AM.06/DES.I Dated 24.5.05 RLA s F.No.07/81/40/283/AM03 Export Product

The case regarding ratification of advance license No.0710014940 dt.16.7.02 was considered by the ALC-II as per the agenda. The representative of DIPP present in the meeting appraised the Committee of the fact that in a personal hearing held earlier with the representative of the firm in regard to some other case, they were advised to club the subject license with some other licenses to solve the problem. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to call for report from the RLA on the representation of the firm. The case may be re-listed on 28.6.05.

Case No.A/R-29 M/s. Cam-Pro Technologies Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore. ALC M.No.8/06 F.No.01/80/50/1360/AM.03/DES.I Dated 24.5.05 RLA s F.No.07/24/41/35/AM02 Export Product

The case regarding ratification of advance license No.0710019582 dt.6.3.03 was considered by the ALC-II as per the agenda. On the recommendation of the representative of the DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided to ratify the above advance license by allowing the quantity of import item as 500 Nos. on net to net basis.


12

Case No.A/R-30 M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Haridwar. ALC M.No.8/06 F.No.01/80/50/895/AM.05/DES.I Dated 24.5.05 RLA s F.No.05/24/42/46/AM05 Export Product

The case regarding ratification of advance license No.0510142880 dt.10.11.04 was considered by the ALC-II as per the agenda. DHI s written comments were received vide their U.O.No.5(16)/2005-PEXI dt.20.5.05. However since the wastage recommended were gross , the Committee decided to recommend the following after necessary recovery:-

1. The quantity of import item No.13 may be allowed as 1.01 Kg./Kg. content in export product. 2. The quantity of import item Nos.35 to 38 & 129 to 131 may be allowed as 1.03 Kg./Kg. content in export product. 3. The quantity of import item Nos.39 to 41, 80, 118, 122 & 153 may be allowed as 1.02 Kg./Kg. content in export product. 4. The quantity of import item Nos.42 & 43 may be allowed within 2% of weight of Steel to be welded. 5. The quantity of import item Nos.46, 47, 52, 64 & 76 may be allowed as 1.01 Kg./Kg. content in export product. 6. Rest of items may be allowed as applied for. 7. The quantity of Components may be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause.



Case No.A/R-31 M/s. Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., Haridwar. ALC M.No.8/06 F.No.01/80/50/894/AM.05/DES.I Dated 24.5.05 RLA s F.No.05/24/42/47/AM05 Export Product


1. The quantity of import item Nos.8 to 11 & 40 may be allowed as 1.01 Kg./Kg. content in export product. 2. The quantity of import item No.14 may be allowed as 1 Kg./Kg. content in export product. 3. The quantity of import item No.36,37 & 41 may be allowed as 1.03 Kg./Kg. content in export product. 4. The quantity of import item Nos.25, 27 & 34 may be allowed as 1.02 Kg./Kg. content in export product. 5. The quantity of import item Nos.38 & 39 may be allowed within 2% of weight of Steel to be welded. 6. Rest of items may be allowed as applied for. 7. The quantity of Components may be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause. Note:- The import of components shall be permitted on net to net basis with accountability clause and the type, technical specifications (including part No. if any) etc. of the Components sought for import should conform to those utilised in the manufacture of the resultant product.

13


Case No.A/R-32 M/s. Ingersoll-Rand (India) Ltd., Mumbai. ALC M.No.8/06 F.No.01/80/162/319/AM.05/DES.I Dated 24.5.05 RLA s F.No.03/24/40/156/AM05 Export Product


1. The weight of 1325.54 MT may be added in the total quantity of export product. 2. The import item Nos.20 & 46 to 50 may be deleted as per the request of the firm. 3. In regard to quantities of import items No.19, 52 & 53, (2 985925 Sq. Inches), (5 21741 Sq. Inches) & (4 64339 Sq. Inches) respectively may also be added. The quantity of import item No.19, 52 & 53 may be allowed as 1.67 Mtr./Sq.Mtr. content in export product. 4. The quantity of import item Nos.1 to 18, 21 to 45, 51 & 54 may be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause.



Case No.A/R-33 M/s. Lippert Unipol (India) Pvt. Ltd., Aurangabad. ALC M.No.8/06 F.No.01/80/50/674/AM.05/DES.I Dated 24.5.05 RLA s F.No.03/24/40/1275/AM05 Export Product


1. The weight of 216 Kg. may be added in the quantity of export product. 2. The quantity of import item may be allowed as 197.4 Mtr. and in terms of weight, its quantity may be indicated as 162.5 Kg. inclusive of 5% wastage.




1. The weight of 12200 Kg. may be added in the quantity of export product.

14

2. The quantity of import item may be allowed as 22344 Mtr. and in terms of

weight, its quantity may be indicated as 4586 Kg. inclusive of 5% wastage.




1. The weights of 187.2 Kg. & 74.25 Kg. may be added in the quantities of export product Nos.1 & 2 respectively.

2. The quantity of import item may be allowed as 216 Mtr. and in terms of weight, its quantity may be indicated as 190 Kg. inclusive of 5% wastage.




1. The weight of 1442.81 MT may be added in the quantity of export product. 2. The quantity of import item No.32 & 59 may be allowed as 1.67 Mtr./Sq.Mtr. content in export product. UOM of import item No.32 & 59 may also be converted to Sq. Inches . 3. The quantity of import item No.60 may be allowed as 1.59 Mtr./Sq.Mtr. content in export product. UOM of this item may be converted to Sq. Inches . 4. The quantity of import item Nos.1 to 31, 33 to 58, 61 & 70 may be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause.



Case No.A/R-37 M/s. Indiana Gratings Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai. ALC M.No.8/06 F.No.01/86/50/66/AM.02/DES.VII/DES-I Dated 24.5.05 RLA s F.No.03/24/41/20/AM02 Export Product

The case regarding ratification of advance license No.0310102811 dt.20.9.01 was considered by the ALC-II as per the agenda. On the recommendation of the representative of DIPP present in the

15

meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the information in respect of S.No.3, 10 & 14 of the Standard Deficiency Format from the firm and re-list the case on 28.6.05.



1. The weight of 965.49 MT may be added in the quantity of export product. 2. The quantity of import item No.19 may be allowed as 1.67 Mtr./Sq.Mtr. content in export product. In regard to quantity of import item No.19 (2314415 sq.Inches) may also be added. 3. The quantity of import item Nos.1 to 18 & 20 to 32 may be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause.



Case No.A/R-39 M/s. Hindustan Platinum Pvt. Ltd., Navi Mumbai. ALC M.No.8/06 F.No.01/80/162/1683/AM.05/DES.I Dated 24.5.05 RLA s F.No.03/84/40/113/AM02 Export Product

The case regarding amendment in advance license No.0310107424 dt.24.10.01 was considered by the ALC-II as per the agenda. The Committee was appraised of that it had already decided to add the word Wire after the descriptions of export item Nos.1 & 2. Therefore, taking clue from SION at C-1702

of Engg. Group and on the recommendation of the representative of the DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided to add the word Wire after the descriptions of export item No.3 also. The description of import item in respect of all the three above export product may be amended to read as Unwrought Silver / Silver Bullion, having minimum purity 99.9% .


Case No.A/R-40 M/s. L & T Ltd., Mumbai. ALC M.No.8/06 F.No.01/80/50/236/AM.05/DES.I Dated 24.5.05 RLA s F.No.03/24/42/37/AM05 Export Product

The case regarding amendment in advance license No.0310272454 dt.3.6.04 was considered by the ALC-II as per the agenda. The Committee observed that norms against the said license had already been fixed by the ALC in its Meeting No.32/05 held on 30.11.04. Therefore, Committee on the recommendation of the representative of Deptt. of HI present in the meeting and after deliberating upon the case decided to amend/fix norms in respect of following certain items as under:-

16

(i) The total quantity of import item No.10, 14, 87 & 94 to 104 may be allowed on net

to net basis with accountability clause. (ii) The quantity of import item No.105 may be allowed as 1 Kg. / Kg. content in the export

product. A copy of Revised list may also be forwarded to RLA.



Case No.A/R-41 M/s. Lakshmi Precision Tools Ltd., Coimbatore ALC M.No.8/06 F.No.01/80/50/1185/AM.05/DES.I Dated 24.5.05 RLA s F.No.32/24/42/8/AM05 Export Product

The case regarding amendment in the input output norms fixed against advance license No.3210026913 dt.3.1.05 in ALC M.No.41/05 held on 1.2.05 was considered by the ALC-II as per the agenda. The Committee in consultation with the representatives of the Technical Authorities present in the meeting and after deliberating upon the case decided to reject their representation and maintain its earlier decision.

Case No.A-3 M/s. Nicco Corporation Ltd., Kolkata. ALC M.No.8/06 F.No.01/80/162/42/AM.05/DES.I Dated 24.5.05 RLA s F.No.02/24/41/23/AM05 Export Product

The case regarding fixation of input output norms under Para 4.7 of current HBP Vol.I against F.No.02/24/41/23/AM05 allotted to M/s. Nicco Corporation Ltd., Kolkata was considered by the ALC-II as per the agenda. The Committee observed that the firm was under Blacklist. The Committee after deliberating upon the case decided to ask the RLA to explain as to why they were referring the application to ALC for ratification of norms in regard to an application against which advance license had not been issued by them. This had caused confusion in the past also. The case may be re-listed on receipt of report from RLA.

******

17

Directorate General of Foreign Trade

Ministry of Commerce & Industry, Maulana Azad Road, Udyog Bhawan New Delhi -110011 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Para 4.7 Officewise Statement

MEETING NUMBER :

8/80-ALC2/2005 MEETING DATE : 24.05.2005

Case No.:6/1/85-ALC3/2005

Party Name:MOTHERSON SUMI SYSTEMS LTD

Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005

Status:Transferred to Different Section

HQ File :01/85/050/00290/AM05/

RLA File :25/80/041/00005/AM05/



1

Decision :The case regarding ratification of above advance license was considered by the ALC-II in its M.No.8/06 held on 24.5.05 as per the agenda. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to transfer the file relating to this case to JDG, ALC-I as the export product was a Plastic item.

Case No.:1/46/81-ALC2/2004

Party Name:ELECTROHMS PVT.LTD.,

Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005


HQ File :01/81/050/00912/AM05/

RLA File :07/24/041/00043/AM05/


27.12.2004 Defer Date:28.06.2005

2

Decision :The case regarding ratification of above advance license was considered by the ALC-II in its M.No.8/06 held on 24.5.05 as per the agenda. The reply of the firm, in original, was handed over to the representative of Deptt. of HI for examining the case. The Committee, therefore, decided to defer the consideration of the case for 28.6.05.

Case No.:1/3/84-ALC3/2005

Party Name:ASSOCIATED CABLES PVT. LTD.

Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005


HQ File :01/84/050/00687/AM05/

RLA File :03/24/040/02579/AM05/


24.03.2005 Defer Date:28.06.2005

3

Decision :The case regarding ratification of above advance license was considered by the ALC-II in its M.No.8/06 held on 24.5.05 as per the agenda. On the recommendation of the representative of DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the information in respect of S.No.16 of the Standard Deficiency Format from the firm and re-list the case on 28.6.05.

Case No.:1/8/80-ALC2/2005

Party Name:LAKSHMI PRECISION TOOLS LIMITED,

Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005

Status:Case Approved 4

HQ File :01/80/050/00003/AM06/

RLA File :32/24/042/00011/AM05/



18

Decision :The case regarding ratification of above advance license was considered by the ALC-II in its M.No.8/06 held on 24.5.05 as per the agenda. On the recommendation of the representative of the Deptt. of HI present in the meeting, it was decided to ratify the above advance license by allowing the quantity of import item as 100 Nos. on net to net basis.


Case No.:2/8/80-ALC2/2005

Party Name:MIKROTEK MACHINES LTD.,

Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/00026/AM06/

RLA File :07/24/040/00559/AM05/


05.04.2005 Defer Date:28.06.2005

5

Decision :The case regarding ratification of above advance license was considered by the ALC-II in its M.No.8/06 held on 24.5.05 as per the agenda. On the recommendation of the representative of the Deptt. of HI present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and re-list the case on 28.6.05:-

1. Weight of export product as well as imported blanks. 2. Break up of quantities of each type product to be exported & corresponding sizes & quantities of blanks to be imported.

Case No.:3/8/80-ALC2/2005

Party Name:GARGI ENTERPRISES,

Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/00044/AM06/

RLA File :07/24/040/00770/AM05/



6


Case No.:4/8/80-ALC2/2005

Party Name:EPE PROCESS FILTERS&ACCUMULATORS P.LTD.,

Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/00061/AM06/

RLA File :09/24/040/00004/AM06/



7

Decision :The case regarding ratification of above advance license was considered by the ALC-II in its M.No.8/06 held on 24.5.05 as per the agenda. On the recommendation of the representative of the DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided to ratify the above advance license by allowing the quantity of import item as 1.02 Square Mtr./ Square Mtr. content in export product.


Case No.:17/8/80-ALC2/2005

Party Name:NICOMET INDUSTRIES LTD.

Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005

Status:Case Deferred 8

HQ File :01/80/050/00116/AM06/

RLA File :03/95/040/00033/AM06/


21.04.2005 Defer Date:28.06.2005

19

Decision :The case regarding ratification of above advance license was considered by the ALC-II in its M.No.8/06 held on 24.5.05 as per the agenda. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to defer the consideration of the case for 28.6.05 and remind the Deptt. of Mines to expedite their comments.

Case No.:18/8/80-ALC2/2005

Party Name:ADITYA VIDYUT APPLIANCES LTD.,

Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/00120/AM06/

RLA File :03/94/040/00040/AM06/



9


1. The words �containing 43680 Kg. of Copper Wire� may be added after the description of export product. 2. The quantities of both import items may be allowed as 1 Kg./Kg. content in export product.


Case No.:19/8/80-ALC2/2005


Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/00121/AM06/

RLA File :03/95/042/00003/AM06/


25.04.2005 Defer Date:28.06.2005

10

Decision :The case regarding ratification of above advance license was considered by the ALC-II in its M.No.8/06 held on 24.5.05 as per the agenda. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to defer the consideration of the case for 28.6.05. A copy of the application of the firm may be forwarded to the DIPP for their comments.

Case No.:20/8/80-ALC2/2005


Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/00122/AM06/

RLA File :03/95/040/00015/AM06/


25.04.2005 Defer Date:28.06.2005

11


Case No.:5/8/80-ALC2/2005

Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED

Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/00077/AM06/

RLA File :04/24/042/00101/AM05/


25.04.2005 Defer Date:28.06.2005

20

Decision :The case regarding ratification of above advance license was considered by the ALC-II in its M.No.8/06 held on 24.5.05 as per the agenda. On the recommendation of the representative of Deptt. of HI present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the information in respect of S.No.4 & 10 of the Standard Deficiency Format from the firm and re-list the case on 28.6.05.

Case No.:6/8/80-ALC2/2005

Party Name:BHARAT HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED

Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/00078/AM06/

RLA File :04/24/042/00102/AM05/


25.04.2005 Defer Date:28.06.2005

13

Decision :The case regarding ratification of above advance license was considered by the ALC-II in its M.No.8/06 held on 24.5.05 as per the agenda. On the recommendation of the representative of Deptt. of HI present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the information in respect of S.No.4 & 10 of the Standard Deficiency Format from the firm and re-list the case on 28.6.05.

Case No.:21/8/80-ALC2/2005

Party Name:DESMET CHEMFOOD ENGINEERING PVT LTD

Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/00124/AM06/

RLA File :03/94/040/00058/AM06/



14

Decision :The case regarding ratification of above advance license was considered by the ALC-II in its M.No.8/06 held on 24.5.05 as per the agenda. On the recommendation of the representative of the DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided to ratify the above advance license with the following modifications:-

1. The quantity of import item No.1 may be allowed as applied for inclusive of 5% wastage. 2. The quantity of import item No.2 may be allowed as 3.992 MT inclusive of 2% wastage.


Case No.:23/8/80-ALC2/2005

Party Name:DESMET CHEMFOOD ENGINEERING PVT LTD

Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/00132/AM06/

RLA File :03/94/040/00071/AM06/



21


1. The weight of 15.153 MT may be added in the quantity of export product. 2. The quantity of import item No.1 may be allowed as 10779 Kg. inclusive of 5% wastage. 3. The quantity of import item Nos.2 to 6 may be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause.



Case No.:24/8/80-ALC2/2005

Party Name:ADITYA VIDYUT APPLIANCES LTD.,

Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/00133/AM06/

RLA File :03/94/040/00039/AM06/



16


1. The words �containing 14640 Kg. of Copper Wires� may be added after the description of export product. 2. The quantities of both import items may be allowed as 1 Kg./Kg. content in export product.


Case No.:7/8/80-ALC2/2005

Party Name:LOHIA METALS PRIVATE LIMITED

Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/00084/AM06/

RLA File :04/24/040/00015/AM06/


27.04.2005 Defer Date:28.06.2005

17

Decision :The case regarding ratification of above advance license was considered by the ALC-II in its M.No.8/06 held on 24.5.05 as per the agenda. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to defer the consideration of the case for 28.6.05 and remind the Deptt. of Mines to expedite their comments.

Case No.:8/8/80-ALC2/2005


Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/00086/AM06/

RLA File :13/80/040/00006/AM06/



22


1. The weights of 18.20 MT & 14.697 MT may be added in the quantities of export product Nos.1 & 2 respectively. 2. The quantity of all import items may be allowed as applied for.


Case No.:9/8/80-ALC2/2005


Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/00087/AM06/

RLA File :13/80/040/00007/AM06/



19


1. The quantity of import item Nos.1 & 2 may be allowed as applied for. 2. Taking clue from Engg. Table No.6 of Engg. Group, the quantities of import item Nos.3 to 5 may be allowed as 3.683 MT, 1.829 MT & 0.606 MT respectively.


Case No.:10/8/80-ALC2/2005

Party Name:GILLETTE DIVERSIFIED OPERATIONS PRIVATE LTD.

Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/00090/AM06/

RLA File :04/24/040/00348/AM05/


28.04.2005 Defer Date:28.06.2005

20

Decision :The case regarding ratification of above advance license was considered by the ALC-II in its M.No.8/06 held on 24.5.05 as per the agenda. On the recommendation of the representative of DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the information in respect of S.No.4, 10, 13 & 14 of the Standard Deficiency Format from the firm and re-list the case on 28.6.05.

Case No.:11/8/80-ALC2/2005


Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/00091/AM06/

RLA File :04/24/040/00347/AM05/


28.04.2005 Defer Date: 21

Decision :The case regarding ratification of above advance license was considered by the ALC-II in its M.No.8/06 held on 24.5.05 as per the agenda. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to transfer the file relating to this case to DES-II Section as the export product was an electronic item.

23

Case No.:12/8/80-ALC2/2005


Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/00092/AM06/

RLA File :04/24/040/00356/AM05/


28.04.2005

Defer Date: 22


Case No.:13/8/80-ALC2/2005


Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/00093/AM06/

RLA File :04/24/040/00349/AM05/



23


1. The quantity of import item Nos.1 & 2 may be allowed as 1.05 Kg./Kg. content in export product. 2. The quantity of import item Nos.3 to 5 may be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause.



Case No.:14/8/80-ALC2/2005

Party Name:NADI AIRTECHNICS PRIVATE LTD.,

Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/00094/AM06/

RLA File :04/81/040/00004/AM06/



24

Decision :The case regarding ratification of above advance license was considered by the ALC-II in its M.No.8/06 held on 24.5.05 as per the agenda. It was noted that the firm has applied for import of components alone, as input, on net to net basis without any wastage. Therefore, it was decided to ratify the above license by allowing the import of components as per conditions stipulated in General Note No.4 for Engg. Product inserted by Public Notice No.46 dated 6.11.2002.


24

Case No.:15/8/80-ALC2/2005

Party Name:KINECO PVT. LTD.

Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/00096/AM06/

RLA File :17/24/040/00002/AM06/


29.04.2005

Defer Date: 25

Decision :The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to transfer the file relating to this case to JDG, ALC-I as the export product was related to Chemical Division.

Case No.:16/8/80-ALC2/2005


Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/00098/AM06/

RLA File :04/24/040/00008/AM06/



26


1. The quantity of import item Nos.30 & 31 may be allowed as per packing policy. 2. The rest of import items which are Components may be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause.



Case No.:26/8/80-ALC2/2005

Party Name:BRILLIANT INTERNATIONAL

Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/00143/AM06/

RLA File :03/24/040/02674/AM05/


29.04.2005 Defer Date:28.06.2005

27

Decision :The case regarding ratification of above advance license was considered by the ALC-II in its M.No.8/06 held on 24.5.05 as per the agenda. On the recommendation of the representative of the DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the following information/clarification from the firm and re-list the case on 28.6.05:-

1. Information in respect of S.No.3, 4, 10, 13, & 14 of the Standard Deficiency Format with regard to Components to be manufactured out of raw material mentioned at S.No.2 (a to d), 4(a) and M S Sheet/Strip at S.No.5(b).

Case No.:22/8/80-ALC2/2005

Party Name:FIAMM MINDA AUTOMOTIVE LTD.,

Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/00127/AM06/

RLA File :05/24/040/00007/AM06/



25

Decision :The case regarding ratification of above advance license was considered by the ALC-II in its M.No.8/06 held on 24.5.05 as per the agenda. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the above license as per SION at S.No.C-2006 of Engg. Group amended recently.


Case No.:25/8/80-ALC2/2005

Party Name:KSP ENGINEERING CO.

Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/00138/AM06/

RLA File :05/24/040/00524/AM05/


02.05.2005 Defer Date:28.06.2005

29

Decision :The case regarding ratification of above advance license was considered by the ALC-II in its M.No.8/06 held on 24.5.05 as per the agenda. On the recommendation of the representative of DIPP present in the meeting, it was decided by the Committee to call for the information in respect of S.No.3, 10, 13 & 14 of the Standard Deficiency Format from the firm and re-list the case on 28.6.05.

Case No.:28/8/80-ALC2/2005

Party Name:GODREJ & BOYCE MFG. CO. LTD.,

Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/00151/AM06/

RLA File :03/94/040/00044/AM06/


02.05.2005 Defer Date:28.06.2005

30


Case No.:27/8/80-ALC2/2005

Party Name:ELKAY TELELINKS LTD.

Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/00144/AM06/

RLA File :05/24/040/00018/AM06/


03.05.2005 Defer Date:28.06.2005

31

Decision :The case regarding ratification of above advance license was considered by the ALC-II in its M.No.8/06 held on 24.5.05 as per the agenda. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to refer a copy of the application of the firm to the DOT for their comments. The case may be re-listed on 28.6.05.The case regarding ratification of above advance license was considered by the ALC-II in its M.No.8/06 held on 24.5.05 as per the agenda. The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to refer a copy of the application of the firm to the DOT for their comments. The case may be re-listed on 28.6.05.

Case No.:29/8/80-ALC2/2005


Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/00152/AM06/

RLA File :03/94/040/00042/AM06/


03.05.2005 Defer Date:28.06.2005

26


Case No.:30/8/80-ALC2/2005


Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/00153/AM06/

RLA File :03/94/040/00050/AM06/


03.05.2005 Defer Date:28.06.2005

33


Case No.:31/8/80-ALC2/2005


Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/00154/AM06/

RLA File :03/94/040/00043/AM06/


03.05.2005 Defer Date:28.06.2005

34


Case No.:32/8/80-ALC2/2005

Party Name:COIL CO PVT LTD

Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/00155/AM06/

RLA File :05/88/040/00004/AM06/



35


1. Taking clue from SION at C-1996 of Engg. Group, the quantity of import item No.1 may be allowed as 9467 Kg. 2. The quantity of import item No.2 may be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause.



27

Case No.:33/8/80-ALC2/2005

Party Name:COIL CO PVT LTD

Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/00156/AM06/

RLA File :05/88/040/00005/AM06/


04.05.2005

Defer Date:

36

Decision :The case regarding ratification of above advance license was considered by the ALC-II in its M.No.8/06 held on 24.5.05 as per the agenda. The Committee, on the recommendation of the representative of the DIPP present in the meeting and after deliberating upon the case, decided to ratify the above license as per SION at S.No.C-1996 of Engg. Group.


Case No.:34/8/80-ALC2/2005

Party Name:GANSONS LTD

Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/00162/AM06/

RLA File :03/24/042/00403/AM05/



37

Decision :The case regarding ratification of above advance license was considered by the ALC-II in its M.No.8/06 held on 24.5.05 as per the agenda. It was noted that the firm has applied for import of components alone, as input, on net to net basis without any wastage. Therefore, it was decided to ratify the above license by allowing the import of components as per conditions stipulated in General Note No.4 for Engg. Product inserted by Public Notice No.46 dated 6.11.2002.


Case No.:37/8/80-ALC2/2005


Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/00165/AM06/

RLA File :03/95/040/00085/AM06/


04.05.2005 Defer Date:28.06.2005

38


Case No.:35/8/80-ALC2/2005

Party Name:FIEM INDUSTRIES LTD.

Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/00163/AM06/

RLA File :05/24/040/00058/AM06/



28


1. The quantity of import item Nos.1 to 3 may be allowed as 1.05 Kg./Kg. content in export product. 2. The combined quantity of import item Nos.4 & 5 may be allowed within 3% of FOB value. 3. The quantity of import item Nos.6 to 9 may be allowed on net to net basis with accountability clause.



Case No.:36/8/80-ALC2/2005

Party Name:FIEM INDUSTRIES LTD.

Meet No/Date:8/80-ALC2/2005 24.05.2005


HQ File :01/80/050/00164/AM06/

RLA File :05/24/040/00059/AM06/


05.05.2005 Defer Date: 40

Decision :The Committee, after deliberating upon the case, decided to transfer the file relating to this case to JDG, ALC-I as the export product was a Plastic item.

Date:07.06.2005 Place:New Delhi

Devi Ram Meena Licence Assistant/ Console Operator

Note - dgftcom.nic.indgftcom.nic.in/exim/2000/committee/am06/des1... · Note: 2 2. The quantity of...

Documents

Transcript of Note - dgftcom.nic.indgftcom.nic.in/exim/2000/committee/am06/des1... · Note: 2 2. The quantity of...