Not Just Blowin' Smoke
-
Upload
steve-anderson -
Category
Documents
-
view
38 -
download
1
Transcript of Not Just Blowin' Smoke
![Page 1: Not Just Blowin' Smoke](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062514/55b5829cbb61eb22098b46ba/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Not Just Blowin’ SmokeMarijuana Legalization Initiatives and the 2012
Presidential Election.
![Page 2: Not Just Blowin' Smoke](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062514/55b5829cbb61eb22098b46ba/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Initiative- proposal of a new law or constitutional amendment placed on the ballot by petition
Referendum- proposal to repeal a law that was previously enacted by the legislature placed on the ballot by citizen petition
Ballot Initiatives
![Page 3: Not Just Blowin' Smoke](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062514/55b5829cbb61eb22098b46ba/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Studies have shown that voter turnout is higher in states that permit initiatives on the ballot, particularly when salient issues are being contested (Tolbert, Grummel, & Smith, 2001)
Direct democracy may also stimulate voter interest because of the nature of the propositions—they may tend to address timely and controversial public policy debates (Kimball, D. C., & Kropf, M. 2006)
Literature has shown effects in turnout in midterm elections, but evidence is mixed in presidential elections. (Schlozman et all, 2008), (Tolbert and Smith 2005)
Democratic and Republican parties have given financial support to committees sponsoring or opposing ballot measures consistent with their platforms (Smith & Tolbert, 2001)
Initiatives and referenda serve to educate, and thus persuade, voters by producing higher levels of interest, political knowledge, and political discussion (Smith & Tolbert, 2004)
The Literature
![Page 4: Not Just Blowin' Smoke](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062514/55b5829cbb61eb22098b46ba/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
The Literature cont’dStudies indicate that support for the gay marriage bans did not lead to higher turnout or a positive effect of support for Bush in Ohio (Jackman, 2004; Freedman, 2004)
Others suggest measures may have helped support Bush's victory across 11 states with the gay marriage bans, though they did not boost turnout compared to the 2000 election (Campbell and Monson, 2005)
![Page 5: Not Just Blowin' Smoke](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062514/55b5829cbb61eb22098b46ba/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Voting on MarijuanaMarijuana related initiatives have been on the ballot since in 1972
From 1972 to the initiatives upcoming in 2016, marijuana related initiatives will have been on the ballot on fifty occasions
![Page 6: Not Just Blowin' Smoke](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062514/55b5829cbb61eb22098b46ba/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Voting on Marijuana cont’d Prop 215 first to pass in 1996 in California
Results for President (Blue=Clinton) Prop.215 (Green=Yes)
![Page 7: Not Just Blowin' Smoke](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062514/55b5829cbb61eb22098b46ba/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Obama and LegalizationSimilar groups supported Clinton and Medical Marijuana
These same groups may support Obama for reelection
![Page 8: Not Just Blowin' Smoke](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062514/55b5829cbb61eb22098b46ba/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Hypotheses Support for the legalization measures resulted in higher support for President Obama
Legalization did not result in higher turnout in each of three states in 2012 vs 2008
![Page 9: Not Just Blowin' Smoke](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062514/55b5829cbb61eb22098b46ba/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Data and methodsData collected from 2010 Census, CNN elections results and Fox news exit polls
Regression analysis and ArcGIS mapping for distribution
![Page 10: Not Just Blowin' Smoke](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062514/55b5829cbb61eb22098b46ba/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
ResultsExit polls showed support
Source: CNN (Blue=Obama, Red=Romney)
![Page 11: Not Just Blowin' Smoke](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062514/55b5829cbb61eb22098b46ba/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Coloradon=64*Significant at .05 level**Significant at .01 level
Yes on 64 1.022** (.136) 1.030** (.144) -.003 (.039)
Population .000* (7.630) 6.230 (.000) -2.980 (2.380)
College Degree .281 (.111) .267 (.116) -.020 (.023)
Median Income -.001* (.000) -.001* (.000) -.001* (.000)
Median Age -.525* (.231) -.577* (.237) -.024 (.047)
White -.174 (.153) -.011 (.029)
African American .240 (.939) .181 (.028)
Female .439 (.486) .028 (.093)
Obama 2008 1.079* (.116)
Kerry 2004 -.068 (.125)
Constant 15.734 (12.910) 12.591 (34.189) .834 (6.460)
R-squared 0.67 0.69 0.98
Results cont’d
![Page 12: Not Just Blowin' Smoke](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062514/55b5829cbb61eb22098b46ba/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Yes on 502 1.446** (.177) 1.473** (.199) .105 (.097)
Population 5.340 (2.910) 4.540 (4.330) 2.040 (1.110)
College Degree -.076 (.124) -.093 ( .137) -.085 (.037)
Median Income -.000 (.000) -.000 (.000) .000 (.000)
Median Age -.200 (.131) -.171 (.165) -.075 (.056)
White .206 (.274) .064 (.071)
African American 1.151 ( 1.183) .222 (.323)
Female .264 (1.187) -.120 (.304)
Obama 2008 .493* (.204)
Kerry 2004 .509* (.189)
Constant -15.875 (7.580) -48.970 (52.111) -2.865 (13.354)
R-squared 0.82 0.83 0.99
Washingtonn=39*Significant at .05 level**Significant at .01 level
Results cont’d
![Page 13: Not Just Blowin' Smoke](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062514/55b5829cbb61eb22098b46ba/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Yes on 80 1.665** (.125) 1.683** (.151) .106 (.107)
Population 9.310 (4.890) 4.650 (8.320) 4.230 (2.520)
College Degree -.163 (.122) -.175 (.127) -.019 (.039)
Median Income .000 (.000) .000 (.000) -.000 (.000)
Median Age -.575** (.132) -.601** (.157) -.071 (.057)
White -.129 (.192) -.001 (.057)
African American -.129 (.192) .244 (.471)
Female .027 (.689) -.205 (.205)
Obama 2008 .999** (.061)
Kerry 2004 -.0126 (.032)
Constant -9.023 ( 9.22) 3.92025 (36.838) 8.65 (10.934)
R-squared 0.93 0.94 0.99
Oregonn=36*Significant at .05 level**Significant at .01 level
Results cont’d
![Page 14: Not Just Blowin' Smoke](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062514/55b5829cbb61eb22098b46ba/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Obama 2012 -.090 (.075)
Yes on legalization .073 (.098)
Population 1.930 (6.080)
College Degree .090 (.059)
Median Income .000 (.000)
Median Age .276* (.131)
White .007 (.074)
African American -.026 (.451)
Female .120 (.238)
Constant 56.134** (16.632)
Turnout
ColoradoR-squared= .30n=64*Significant at .05 level**Significant at .01 level
![Page 15: Not Just Blowin' Smoke](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062514/55b5829cbb61eb22098b46ba/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Obama 2012 -.098 (.064)
Yes on legalization .034 (.118)
Population -7.320 (1.510)
College Degree .361 (.053)
Median Income .000 (.000)
Median Age .342* (072)
White .115 (.099)
African American .192 (.421)
Female -.868 (.419)
Constant 90.192** (18.681)
Turnout
WashingtonR-squared= .81n=39*Significant at .05 level**Significant at .01 level
![Page 16: Not Just Blowin' Smoke](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062514/55b5829cbb61eb22098b46ba/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Obama 2012 .053 (.119)
Yes on legalization -.131 (.211)
Population -7.200 (4.710)
College Degree .280** (.080)
Median Income .000 (.000)
Median Age .523** (.117)
White -.032 (.109)
African American .514 (.884)
Female -.826 (.421)
Constant 96.699** (24.132)
Turnout
OregonR-squared= .66n=36*Significant at .05 level**Significant at .01 level
![Page 17: Not Just Blowin' Smoke](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062514/55b5829cbb61eb22098b46ba/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
ArcGIS
Support for ObamaSupport for Amendment 64
![Page 18: Not Just Blowin' Smoke](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062514/55b5829cbb61eb22098b46ba/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Counties that have approved salesRevenue by county for August 2014
![Page 19: Not Just Blowin' Smoke](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062514/55b5829cbb61eb22098b46ba/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Recreational DispensariesRevenues
![Page 20: Not Just Blowin' Smoke](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062514/55b5829cbb61eb22098b46ba/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Conclusions In the current environment, it is difficult to prove a person voted specifically for either legalization or President Obama and voted for the other as a result of the first choice
Increasing amount of money and effort spent on ballot initiatives
With legalization initiatives, there will ample data from numerous elections concerning both medical and recreational measures