Northwest Power and Conservation Council Revised Carbon Dioxide Methodology Regional Technical Forum...

14
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Revised Carbon Dioxide Revised Carbon Dioxide Methodology Methodology Regional Technical Forum Regional Technical Forum April 18, 2004 April 18, 2004

Transcript of Northwest Power and Conservation Council Revised Carbon Dioxide Methodology Regional Technical Forum...

Page 1: Northwest Power and Conservation Council Revised Carbon Dioxide Methodology Regional Technical Forum April 18, 2004.

Northwest Power and ConservationCouncil

Revised Carbon Dioxide Revised Carbon Dioxide MethodologyMethodology

Regional Technical ForumRegional Technical Forum

April 18, 2004April 18, 2004

Page 2: Northwest Power and Conservation Council Revised Carbon Dioxide Methodology Regional Technical Forum April 18, 2004.

slide 2

Northwest Power and ConservationCouncil

History of RTF EstimatesHistory of RTF Estimates

OriginalOriginal– Based on $15/ton CO2 & Gas-fired CCCTBased on $15/ton CO2 & Gas-fired CCCT– Result: 6 mills/kWh adder to avoided costResult: 6 mills/kWh adder to avoided cost

Then 5Then 5thth Plan Placeholder Plan Placeholder– Value of CO2 $0 to $30/ton & Gas CCCTValue of CO2 $0 to $30/ton & Gas CCCT– Expected value ~$3/ton CO2 Expected value ~$3/ton CO2 – Result: 1.2 mills per kWh adderResult: 1.2 mills per kWh adder

Page 3: Northwest Power and Conservation Council Revised Carbon Dioxide Methodology Regional Technical Forum April 18, 2004.

slide 3

Northwest Power and ConservationCouncil

Proposed RevisionProposed Revision Both Both AmountAmount & & ValueValue of CO2 avoided of CO2 avoided

depends on when it is avoideddepends on when it is avoided Incorporate time-based value same as for Incorporate time-based value same as for

electricityelectricity– Shape of Savings (kWh)Shape of Savings (kWh)– Physical production (pounds per kWh)Physical production (pounds per kWh)– Value of CO2 avoided ($/ton)Value of CO2 avoided ($/ton)

Expected value of CO2 from 5Expected value of CO2 from 5 thth Plan Plan

Page 4: Northwest Power and Conservation Council Revised Carbon Dioxide Methodology Regional Technical Forum April 18, 2004.

slide 4

Northwest Power and ConservationCouncil

Typical “On-Peak” Savings ProfilesTypical “On-Peak” Savings Profiles

Shape of Savings - On Peak

0

5

10

15

20

25

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Month

Per

cen

t o

f An

nu

al M

easu

re S

avin

gs

Occ

uri

ng

in M

on

th

Commercial AirConditioning

Street Lighting

SF ResidentialWeatherization

ResidentialLighting

Page 5: Northwest Power and Conservation Council Revised Carbon Dioxide Methodology Regional Technical Forum April 18, 2004.

slide 5

Northwest Power and ConservationCouncil

Typical “Off-Peak” Savings ProfilesTypical “Off-Peak” Savings ProfilesShape of Savings - Off Peak

0

5

10

15

20

25

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Month

Per

cen

t o

f An

nu

al M

easu

re S

avin

gs

Occ

uri

ng

in M

on

th

Commercial AirConditioning

Street Lighting

SF ResidentialWeatherization

Residential Lighting

Page 6: Northwest Power and Conservation Council Revised Carbon Dioxide Methodology Regional Technical Forum April 18, 2004.

slide 6

Northwest Power and ConservationCouncil

Expected Value of CO2Expected Value of CO2From 5From 5thth Power Plan Power Plan

$0

$1

$2

$3

$4

$5

$6

$7

$8

Quarter

$ pe

r To

n C

O2

Page 7: Northwest Power and Conservation Council Revised Carbon Dioxide Methodology Regional Technical Forum April 18, 2004.

slide 7

Northwest Power and ConservationCouncil

Physical CO2 AvoidedPhysical CO2 AvoidedFrom Latest Aurora™ ModelingFrom Latest Aurora™ Modeling

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

2005 2010 2015 2020 2025

Po

un

ds p

er

kW

h

1 Weekday On Peak2 Weekday Shoulder & Weekend Days3 Week Nights4 Weekend Nights

Page 8: Northwest Power and Conservation Council Revised Carbon Dioxide Methodology Regional Technical Forum April 18, 2004.

slide 8

Northwest Power and ConservationCouncil

Timing-Based Value CO2Timing-Based Value CO2

ShapeShape of Savings (kWh)of Savings (kWh)

Value of CO2 Avoided ($/ton)Value of CO2 Avoided ($/ton)

Value of CO2 Avoided Value of CO2 Avoided

**

==

Shape of Savings - On Peak

0

5

10

15

20

25

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Month

Per

cen

t o

f An

nu

al M

easu

re S

avin

gs

Occ

uri

ng

in M

on

th

Commercial AirConditioning

Street Lighting

SF ResidentialWeatherization

ResidentialLighting

$

**

Physical CO2 Avoided (lbs/kWh)Physical CO2 Avoided (lbs/kWh)

$0

$1

$2

$3

$4

$5

$6

$7

$8

S-200

7

S-200

8

S-200

9

S-201

0

S-201

1

S-201

2

S-201

3

S-201

4

S-201

5

S-201

6

S-201

7

S-201

8

S-201

9

S-202

0

S-202

1

S-202

2

S-202

3

S-202

4

S-202

5

Quarter

$ p

er

Ton C

O2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

2005 2010 2015 2020 2025

Pou

nd

s p

er

kW

h

Weekday On Peak Weekend DaysWeek Nights Weekend Nights

Page 9: Northwest Power and Conservation Council Revised Carbon Dioxide Methodology Regional Technical Forum April 18, 2004.

slide 9

Northwest Power and ConservationCouncil

Results for Selected Savings ShapesResults for Selected Savings Shapesand and 20-Year Measure Life20-Year Measure Life

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

Flat

Syst

em L

oad

Shap

e

Res. S

pace

Hea

ting

Irrg

igat

ed A

g

Comm

ercia

l Light

ing

Stre

et L

ight

Comm

ercia

l AC

Segm

ent 1

Segm

ent 2

Segm

ent 3

Segm

ent 4

CO

2 A

dd

er

in m

ills

per

kW

h Placeholder Estimate Revised Estimate

Page 10: Northwest Power and Conservation Council Revised Carbon Dioxide Methodology Regional Technical Forum April 18, 2004.

slide 10

Northwest Power and ConservationCouncil

Change from PlaceholderChange from Placeholder

Shape of SavingsValue of CO2

Avoided

Total Regional Benefit

Flat 7% 0.18%System Load Shape 6% 0.13%Residential Space Heating 8% 0.16%Irrgigated Ag 10% 0.23%Commercial Lighting 6% 0.15%StreetLight 12% 0.28%Commercial AC 8% 0.16%Elec Segment 1 1% 0.03%Elec Segment 2 1% 0.02%Elec Segment 3 26% 0.71%Elec Segment 4 26% 0.70%

Page 11: Northwest Power and Conservation Council Revised Carbon Dioxide Methodology Regional Technical Forum April 18, 2004.

slide 11

Northwest Power and ConservationCouncil

How Much CO2 Is This?How Much CO2 Is This?

Regional CO2 Production in 2025Regional CO2 Production in 2025– About 50 million tons/yearAbout 50 million tons/year

Electricity Saved per YearCO2 Saved

per Year1 kWh 1 pound1 MWa 4400 tons2600 MWa (2025 Target) 11 million tons

Page 12: Northwest Power and Conservation Council Revised Carbon Dioxide Methodology Regional Technical Forum April 18, 2004.

slide 12

Northwest Power and ConservationCouncil

EndEnd

Page 13: Northwest Power and Conservation Council Revised Carbon Dioxide Methodology Regional Technical Forum April 18, 2004.

slide 13

Northwest Power and ConservationCouncil

Average Carbon Cost Average Carbon Cost ComparisonComparison

$0

$5

$10

$15

$20

S-05 S-07 S-09 S-11 S-13 S-15 S-17 S-19 S-21 S-23 S-25Year

Exp

ecte

d V

alu

e C

arb

on

Co

st

(20

04

$/

ton

)

5th Plan Existing RTF

Page 14: Northwest Power and Conservation Council Revised Carbon Dioxide Methodology Regional Technical Forum April 18, 2004.

slide 14

Northwest Power and ConservationCouncil

Change from PlaceholderChange from Placeholder If CO2 @ $15/ton If CO2 @ $15/ton

Shape of SavingsPV Electric

System CO2

Total Regional Benefit

Flat 530% 13%System Load Shape 518% 12%Residential Space Heating 547% 11%Irrgigated Ag 540% 13%Commercial Lighting 524% 12%StreetLight 568% 14%Commercial AC 527% 11%Elec Segment 1 477% 10%Elec Segment 2 480% 11%Elec Segment 3 700% 19%Elec Segment 4 675% 18%