Northern Long Term Care - LaingBuisson Events...destabilises the care home market –data from CCN...
Transcript of Northern Long Term Care - LaingBuisson Events...destabilises the care home market –data from CCN...
Healthcare intelligence LaingBuisson
How do northern care markets compare with the rest of the UK ?
William Laing, Founder LaingBuisson
First, some national background
LaingBuissonHealthcare intelligence
Copyright LaingBuisson. Not for distribution or inclusion in any document for commercial purposes without permission. Call
0207 833 9123 for further information
Healthcare intelligence LaingBuisson
To date, the state (central and local government combined) has failed to adopt
sensible strategic management of the public-facing care home sector.
Councils (knowingly?) pay less that average costs to care home providers
Cross-subsidisation from private to public payors has become endemic, with
private payer fees 40% + higher than council paid fees for the same
accommodation and, in all probability, the same standard of care.
Most care homes which accept council paid residents depend for their viability
on these cross subsidies
All this has been known for a long time. The case for change has now received
powerful support from the Competition and Markets Authority
State paid fees – failure of market management
Analysis of fee variances in ‘unique room sets' (i.e. groups of rooms of similar or identical specification, where it was possible to compare private and council paid fee rates on a like-
for-like basis)
Number of Unique
Room Sets
Number of private
payers in unique room
Sets
Weighted average
ratio
of private to council
paid fees within
unique room sets
Percentage of cases in
which privately paid
fees were higher than
council paid fees for
like-for-like services
Nursing homes 147 776 1.41 94.6%
Residential homes 304 2,663 1.46 96.7
All homes in sample 451 3,439 1.43 96.0%
CROSS SUBSIDISATION, an unhealthy characteristic which
destabilises the care home market – data from CCN study 2015
CROSS SUBSIDISATION, confirmed by the CMA report in November 2017
“The sector has to some extent maintained provision by charging self-funded residents in homes higher fees, we estimate the average cost for care to a self-funder to be £44,000 a year, around 40% more than local authorities pay on average.
We do not consider this to be sustainable; we have seen very few examples of investment in new care home capacity primarily focussed at the LA-funded sector. The upshot will be that in the future LAs will not be able to provide services to all those with eligible needs. Moreover, the number of elderly people who are likely to need support, and the acuity of their care needs, is likely to increase.”
CMA Care Homes market study final report November 2017, short summary for England
CAPACITY CYCLE – UK Independent Sector Care Homes for older people & dementia
LaingBuissonHealthcare intelligence
Copyright LaingBuisson. Not for distribution or inclusion in any document for commercial purposes without permission. Call
0207 833 9123 for further information
-20,000
-15,000
-10,000
-5,000
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000 OTHER NET CAPACITY CHANGE(extensions & reductions, etc.)
CLOSURES care homesWITHOUT nursing
CLOSURES care homes WITH nursing
NEW REGISTRATIONScare homes WITHOUT nursing
NEW REGISTRATIONScare homes WITH nursing
TOTAL NET CAPACITY CHANGE IN YEAR
CAPACITY SHAKEOUT FOLLOWING GRIFFITHS REFORMS
BLAIR / BROWN BOUNTY .
AUSTERITY
CAPACITY AND DEMAND – UK Independent Sector Homes for older people & dementia
LaingBuissonHealthcare intelligence
Copyright LaingBuisson. Not for distribution or inclusion in any document for commercial purposes without permission. Call
0207 833 9123 for further information
200,000
250,000
300,000
350,000
400,000
450,000
500,000
550,000
600,000
BE
DS
Capacity Occupied Beds
SCENARIO
Rising demand and falling capacity will shift market
power in favour of providers in many localities
Healthcare intelligence LaingBuisson
Profitability of care homes for older people – EBITDAR as % Revenue
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
Barchester (y/e Dec)
Care UK (Residential Care
Division)
Bupa (y/e Dec)
Four Seasons Care Homes
Division (y/e Dec)*
HC-One (y/e Sept)
Caring Homes (y/e March)
Avery Healthcare (y/e March)
AGGREGATE (excluding Avery)
Healthcare intelligence LaingBuisson
Profitability of homecare and supported living – EBITDA as % Revenue
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
MiHomecare, formerly Enara (y/e March) Lifeways (80% plus supported living, y/e Aug)*
City & County Healthcare (y/e March) Mears Group Care Division (y/e Dec)
Allied Healthcare (y/e Jan) Westminster Homecare Ltd (y/e Dec)
Helping Hands (y/e Sept) Alternative Futures (y/e March)
Dimensions (UK) Ltd Turning Point
AGGREGATE HOMECARE
Healthcare intelligence LaingBuisson
Profitability of adult specialist care homes – EBITDAR as % Revenue
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018Priory Specialist Division (y/e Dec) Voyage (y/e March) CareTech (y/e Nov)Care Management Group (y/e Feb) Prime Life (y/e March) Regard (y/e March)AGGREGATE
Healthcare intelligence LaingBuisson
Councils’ unit costs for residential care – external providers 2017/18
England, £530
£0 £100 £200 £300 £400 £500 £600 £700
Darlington Borough Council
Durham County Council
Gateshead Metropolitan Borough Council
Hartlepool Borough Council
Middlesbrough Council
Newcastle upon Tyne City Council
North Tyneside Council
Northumberland County Council
Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council
South Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council
Stockton on Tees Borough Council
Sunderland City Council
North East
Average fees (FOI Request) England
Healthcare intelligence LaingBuisson
Councils’ unit costs for residential care – external providers 2016/17
England, £530
£0 £100 £200 £300 £400 £500 £600 £700
Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council
Blackpool Council
Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council
Bury Council
Cheshire East Council
Cheshire West & Chester Council
Cumbria County Council
Halton Borough Council
Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council
Lancashire County Council
Liverpool City Council
Manchester City Council
Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council
Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council
Salford City Council
Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council
St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council
Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council
Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council
Trafford Metropolitan Borough Council
Warrington Borough Council
Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council
Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council
North West
Average fees (FOI Request) England
Healthcare intelligence LaingBuisson
Councils’ unit costs for residential care – external providers 2016/17
England, £530
£0 £100 £200 £300 £400 £500 £600 £700
Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council
Bradford Metropolitan District Council
Calderdale Council
Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council
East Riding of Yorkshire Council
Hull City Council
Kirklees Metropolitan Council
Leeds City Council
North East Lincolnshire Council
North Lincolnshire Council
North Yorkshire County Council
Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council
Sheffield City Council
Wakefield Metropolitan District Council
York City Council
Yorkshire & the Humber
Average fees (FOI Request) England
Healthcare intelligence LaingBuisson
LA homecare unit costs for Northern Regions, external providers 2016/17 (NHS Digital)
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20£
per
ho
ur
North East North West Yorkshire and the Humber
Unit costs include councils’ SSMSS overheads
Healthcare intelligence LaingBuisson
CQC Ratings (% good or outstanding) vs councils’ unit costs for external residential care
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
£0
£100
£200
£300
£400
£500
£600
£700
Da
rlin
gto
n B
oro
ugh
Co
un
cil
Du
rha
m C
ou
nty
Co
un
cil
Ga
tesh
ea
d M
etr
op
olita
n B
oro
ugh
Co
un
cil
Ha
rtle
po
ol B
oro
ugh
Co
un
cil
Mid
dle
sb
rou
gh
Co
un
cil
Ne
wca
stl
e u
po
n T
yne
Cit
y C
ou
ncil
No
rth
Tyn
esid
e C
ou
ncil
No
rth
um
be
rla
nd
Co
un
ty C
ou
ncil
Re
dca
r &
Cle
ve
lan
d B
oro
ugh
Co
un
cil
So
uth
Tyn
esid
e M
etr
op
olita
n B
oro
ugh
…
Sto
ck
ton
on
Te
es B
oro
ugh
Co
un
cil
Su
nd
erl
an
d C
ity
Co
un
cil
Bla
ck
bu
rn w
ith
Da
rwe
n B
oro
ugh
Co
un
cil
Bla
ck
po
ol C
ou
ncil
Bo
lto
n M
etr
op
olita
n B
oro
ugh
Co
un
cil
Bu
ry C
ou
ncil
Ch
esh
ire
Ea
st
Co
un
cil
Ch
esh
ire
We
st
& C
he
ste
r C
ou
ncil
Cu
mb
ria
Co
un
ty C
ou
ncil
Ha
lto
n B
oro
ugh
Co
un
cil
Kn
ow
sle
y M
etr
op
olita
n B
oro
ugh
Co
un
cil
La
nca
sh
ire
Co
un
ty C
ou
ncil
Liv
erp
oo
l C
ity
Co
un
cil
Ma
nch
este
r C
ity
Co
un
cil
Old
ha
m M
etr
op
olita
n B
oro
ugh
Co
un
cil
Ro
ch
da
le M
etr
op
olita
n B
oro
ugh
Co
un
cil
Sa
lfo
rd C
ity
Co
un
cil
Se
fto
n M
etr
op
olita
n B
oro
ugh
Co
un
cil
St
He
len
s M
etr
op
olita
n B
oro
ugh
Co
un
cil
Sto
ck
po
rt M
etr
op
olita
n B
oro
ugh
Co
un
cil
Ta
me
sid
e M
etr
op
olita
n B
oro
ugh
Co
un
cil
Tra
ffo
rd M
etr
op
olita
n B
oro
ugh
Co
un
cil
Wa
rrin
gto
n B
oro
ugh
Co
un
cil
Wig
an
Me
tro
po
lita
n B
oro
ugh
Co
un
cil
Wir
ral M
etr
op
olita
n B
oro
ugh
Co
un
cil
Ba
rnsle
y M
etr
op
olita
n B
oro
ugh
Co
un
cil
Bra
dfo
rd M
etr
op
olita
n D
istr
ict
Co
un
cil
Ca
lde
rda
le C
ou
ncil
Do
nca
ste
r M
etr
op
olita
n B
oro
ugh
Co
un
cil
Ea
st
Rid
ing o
f Y
ork
sh
ire
Co
un
cil
Hu
ll C
ity
Co
un
cil
Kir
kle
es M
etr
op
olita
n C
ou
ncil
Le
ed
s C
ity
Co
un
cil
No
rth
Ea
st
Lin
co
lnsh
ire
Co
un
cil
No
rth
Lin
co
lnsh
ire
Co
un
cil
No
rth
Yo
rksh
ire
Co
un
ty C
ou
ncil
Ro
the
rha
m M
etr
op
olita
n B
oro
ugh
Co
un
cil
Sh
eff
ield
Cit
y C
ou
ncil
Wa
ke
fie
ld M
etr
op
olita
n D
istr
ict
Co
un
cil
Yo
rk C
ity
Co
un
cil
%
£ p
er
we
ek
Unit cost % good or outstanding
NO CORRELATION BETWEEN CQC RATINGS AND FEES
Healthcare intelligence LaingBuisson
THE GOOD NEWS FOR AFFLUENT ENGLAND ….. BUT NOT SO GOOD FOR THE NORTH
- strong private pay demand
- ultimately based of residential property values
- 80% owner occupation penetration among older people
- will last for a good 30 years
Healthcare intelligence LaingBuisson
Residential property value distributions, norther regions (Land Registry 2016)
Median property values
North East £125,000North West £145,000Yorks/Humber £145,000England £230,000
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
North East North West Yorks / Humber England
Healthcare intelligence LaingBuisson
Prospective
Profitability
of care
homes for
older people
RESIDENTIAL
Source: CareSustain
Healthcare intelligence LaingBuisson
Prospective
Profitability
of care
homes for
older people
NURSING
Source: CareSustain
Healthcare intelligence LaingBuisson
Financial environment:
- challenging for businesses exposed to council funding
- positive for businesses catering primarily for private pay
National Living Wage ‘hit’ likely to be around 6% for low paid staff (higher
than in 2016/17 when mitigated by ‘compression’ effect
Brexit – could be many indirect effects
Development prospects for care homes – generally negative, though some
localities will support new investment
Prospects for 2018/19
Healthcare intelligence LaingBuisson
Competition and Markets Authority recommendations“We are recommending that the Department of Health develop policies and practices to
provide for:
(a) enhanced planning by local authorities, so that accurate and meaningful forecasts of
future care needs and how to meet them can be built;
(b) (b) oversight of local authorities’ commissioning practices to ensure plans will deliver
the care that is needed, and improved support to LAs; and 5
(c) (c) measures to provide confidence to investors that they will receive adequate fee
rates.
Cost to the state: between £200-300 million and £1 billion
WILL IT HAPPEN?