NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its...

NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL

Council Chambers 18 July 2019

I wish to inform you that the 526th Meeting of the TRAFFIC COMMITTEE will be held in the Supper Room, North Sydney at 10.00am on Friday 26 July 2019 when your attendance is requested.

Your attention is directed to the accompanying statement of the business proposed to be transacted at such meeting.

KEN GOULDTHORP GENERAL MANAGER

BUSINESS

1. MinutesConfirmation of Minutes of the previous Meeting held on 14 June 2019.(Circulated)

INFORMATION SHEET

Attending Traffic Committee Meetings

October 2018

The North Sydney Traffic Committee is not a Committee of North Sydney Council, but a

Committee set up as a requirement of Roads and Maritime Services (RMS).

Council has been delegated certain powers from RMS with regard to traffic matters upon its

local roads. A condition of this delegation is that Council must take into account the Traffic

Committee recommendations.

There are four permanent members of the Traffic Committee, each of whom has a single vote

only. The members are:

1. NSW Police

2. Roads and Maritimes Services

3. State Member of Parliament (for the location of the issue to be voted upon)

4. North Sydney Council

Council operates its Traffic Committee on the basis that the single Council vote, upon any

issue, is determined by the majority vote among those Councillors present at the meeting.

Generally, the Mayor chairs Traffic Committee meetings; however, in the Mayor’s absence it

is customary for a pre-elected Councillor to take the chair.

Traffic Committee meetings are held on Fridays. Meeting agendas and reports are published

on Council’s website on the Thursday before the meeting.

Council allows the members of the public to attend and speak at Traffic Committee meetings.

Members of the public gallery are requested to switch off mobile phones for the duration of

the meeting.

Individuals or groups wishing to address the Traffic Committee on a particular item must

register to speak before 5pm on the day prior to the meeting (Thursdays) by contacting

Council’s Traffic Planning Assistant on 9936 8244, or by notifying the officer outside the

meeting venue between 9.40am and 9.55am.

Such items will then be brought forward, in Agenda order, and dealt with before items in

which there is no interest from the public gallery.

As the Chairperson calls the brought forward items on the Agenda, speakers are invited to

stand at the Committee table.

The following points should be noted by members of the public wishing to address the

Traffic Committee:

Addresses must relate to an item on the Agenda;

Addresses should be limited to three (3) minutes, with a possible extension of time at the

discretion of the Chairperson;

Attending Traffic Committee Meetings

October 2018

Addresses should be made to “Mayor, Councillors and Committee Members”;

If you have previously addressed the Traffic Committee on the subject then any further

address must be made to present new information ONLY;

Groups, or persons wishing to present similar points of view, should nominate a

spokesperson - not address the Traffic Committee individually; and

Having made your address and answered any questions put to you by the Committee, you

may take no further part in the debate.

All questions and comments are to be addressed through the Chairperson who will indicate

who is to speak next.

When all representations have been heard, the Traffic Committee will be asked by the

Chairperson for a resolution to determine the matter whilst the interested parties are present at

the table.

After the Traffic Committee has made its determination, the Chairperson will ask speakers to

resume their seats in the gallery and the same process will be repeated for subsequent items.

All Traffic Committee resolutions are referred to the full Council for their approval. The

recommendation sent to the full Council is the recommendation that has the majority vote of

the four permanent members of the Traffic Committee. If Council wishes to proceed contrary

to the majority vote, the RMS and Police have the right to appeal Council’s decision before

the Regional Traffic Committee. Council must notify the RMS and the Police and give them

14 days to decide whether they propose to lodge an appeal on the matter in question.

Any action relative to any issue under appeal to the Regional Committee must then cease

until the matter is determined.

The Sydney Regional Traffic Committee is chaired by an independent chairperson and

submissions and representations are welcomed from all interested parties.

For more information regarding Conduct at Traffic Committee meetings refer to Council’s

Code of Meeting Principles and Practices available from Council’s website or contact

Council’s Governance and Committee Services Manager on 9936 8154.

526th TRAFFIC COMMITTEE - 26 / 7 / 19 Page No 4

2. Matters Arising from the Minutes

3. Matters Arising from Council Resolutions

4. Items for Consideration - see attached reports

Item No. Subject Page

4.1 Delegated Authority 18

4.2 Minor Parking Investigations 26

4.3 Cremorne Parking Area 26 – Parking Restrictions Survey

Results

30

4.4 North Sydney – Parking Area 10 – Parking Restrictions Survey

Results

82

4.5 North Sydney – Parking Area 21 – Parking Restrictions Survey

Results

110

5. Informal Items for Consideration - see attached reports

Item No. Subject Page

5.1 Abandoned Vehicles & Unattended Boat Trailers Processed

Report

127

5.2 Standing Item - Gerard Street and Macpherson Street,

Cremorne - Traffic Control Signals (TCS)

133

5.3 Standing Item - Military Road B-Line 134

6. Local Development Advisory Committee Items for Consideration

Nil

7. General Business

Signed ____________________________

Michaela Kemp, Manager Traffic & Transport Operations

Endorsed by Director of Engineering & Property Services

________________________

Duncan Mitchell

526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 5

ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION 2. (4.1) Delegated Authority

Report of Manager Traffic and Transport Operations, Michaela Kemp Attached is a list of projects given approval under delegated authority to the Traffic & Transport Operations Manager. Approval was given subject to concurrence of Roads and Maritime Services, the NSW Police and the local State Members. Recommending: 1. THAT the information regarding Delegated Authority items be received.

3. (4.2) Minor Parking Restrictions

Report of Manager Traffic and Transport Operations, Michaela Kemp Attached is a list of recommendations made for changes in the parking restrictions. Recommending: 1. THAT the recommendations made for changes in the parking restrictions be received.

4. (4.3) Cremorne Parking Area 26 – Survey Results

Report of Traffic & Transport Engineer, Nathan Wu A parking survey Cremorne Parking Area 26 was sent out on the 8 November 2018 to 1841 residents and property owners, and to Brightmore and Parks Precinct. The survey was also available online. Residents were given until the 4 January 2019 to respond. A total of 215 responses were received. This represents a response rate of 11.7%, which is equivalent to the average response rate of 10 to 12% for parking surveys. The answers received from the residents for the Cremorne Parking Area 26 survey are summarised in the report. Recommended changes to the parking restrictions in Cremorne Parking Area 26 are also attached. Recommending: 1. THAT Council adopt the attached parking restriction recommendations for Cremorne Parking Area 26. 2. THAT Council notify the residents before installing the parking restriction changes in Cremorne Parking Area 26. 3. THAT the new parking restrictions be reviewed six (6) months after the date of installation in Cremorne Parking Area 26.

5. (4.4) North Sydney Parking Area 10 – Survey Results

Report of Manager Parking Meters, Leonie Wishart A parking survey for a section of North Sydney Parking Area 10 was sent out on the 16 May 2019 to 1201 residents, businesses, and to Edward Precinct. Residents were given until 16 June 2019 to respond. A total of 108 responses were received. This represents a response rate of 9%, which is slightly lower that the average response rate of 10 to 12%.


The answers received from the residents for the North Sydney Parking Area 10 survey are summarised in the report. Recommended changes to the parking restrictions in the North Sydney Parking Area 10 are also detailed in the report. Recommending: 1. THAT Council adopt the attached parking restriction recommendations forNorth Sydney Parking Area 10.2. THAT Council notify the residents before installing the parking restrictionchanges in North Sydney Parking Area 10.3. THAT the new parking restrictions be reviewed six (6) months after the dateof installation in North Sydney Parking Area 10.

6. (4.5) North Sydney Parking Area 21 – Survey ResultsReport of Manager Parking Meters, Leonie WishartA parking survey for a section of Crows Nest/North Sydney Parking Area 21was sent out on the 16 May 2019 to 293 residents, businesses, and to HayberryPrecinct. Residents were given until 16 June 2019 to respond. A total of 40responses were received. This represents a response rate of 13.7%, which iswithin the average response rate of 10 to 12%.The answers received from the residents for the Crows Nest/North SydneyParking Area 21 survey are summarised in the report. Recommended changesto the parking restrictions in the Crows Nest/North Sydney Parking Area 21 arealso detailed in the report.Recommending:1. THAT Council adopt the attached parking restriction recommendations forNorth Sydney Parking Area 21.2. THAT Council notify the residents before installing the parking restrictionchanges in North Sydney Parking Area 21.3. THAT the new parking restrictions be reviewed six (6) months after the dateof installation in North Sydney Parking Area 21.

INFORMATION ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION

7. (5.1) Abandoned Vehicles and Unattended Boat Trailers Processed Report Report of Manager Ranger and Parking Services, Mark RichardsonReport of Abandoned Vehicles and Unattended Boat Trailers processed during the reporting period of 25 May 2019 to 3 July 2019.Year to date (2019) Council had investigated 247 reports of abandoned vehicles. Year to date (2019) Council processed 49 reports of unattended boat trailers. Recommending:1. THAT the information concerning the Abandoned Vehicles and Unattended Boat Trailers Processed Report be received.

8. (5.2) Standing Item, Gerard Street and Macpherson Street, Cremorne -Traffic Control Signals (TCS)Report of Sustainable Transport Projects Coordinator, Lindsay Menday


At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation of the North Sydney Traffic Committee: 1. THAT pedestrian signals on Gerard Street at Macpherson Street be expedited as a high priority project and funding be brought forward to progress the project to construction.At the Traffic Committee meeting on 22 March 2019 it was recommended: 1. THAT Gerard Street/ Macpherson Street traffic signals be included as a standing item on future Traffic Committee agendas.The table below provides an update on the status of the project and will be updated at each milestone for the project.

Date Project status April 2019 Consultant brief and request for quotation completed. Quotation

assessment and engagement of a contractor is scheduled for early May 2019.

May 2019 Site survey completed. Consultant quotations to undertake design have been received and are being assessed.

June 2019 Consultant has commenced concept design and traffic assessment. The drafts are scheduled for completion in early August 2019.

Recommending: 1. THAT the information concerning Gerard Street and Macpherson Street Traffic Control Signals Standing Item be received.

9. (5.3) Standing Item - Military Road B-LineReport of Manager Traffic & Transport Operations, Michaela KempAt the Traffic Committee meeting on 3 May 2019, it was agreed to add astanding item for each future traffic committee agenda with regard to B-Line,including matters concerning off-set parking arrangements due to parking lossesalong Military Road, and general traffic and parking matters that arise.The table overleaf outlines the status of current traffic and parking mattersrelating to B-Line.Recommending:1. THAT the information concerning Standing Item - Military Road B-Line bereceived.

LOCAL DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION

Nil

DECISION OF 3720th COUNCIL MEETING

HELD ON MONDAY 24 JUNE 2019

179. EPS01: Traffic Committee Minutes - 14 June 2019

(This Item was considered en globo. See page 163)

Report of Michaela Kemp, Manager Traffic and Transport Operations

This report presents the recommendations of the last meeting of the Traffic Committee

held on 14 June 2019 for Council adoption. The Minutes are attached for information.

The full reports to Traffic Committee can be accessed at:

https://www.northsydney.nsw.gov.au/Council_Meetings/Meetings/Committees/Traffi

c_Committee/2019/14_June_2019

Recommending:

1. THAT the information regarding Delegated Authority items be received. (4.1)

2. THAT Council notes the outcome of the community consultation with regards to proposed speed cushions in Union Street. (4.2)

3. THAT subject to an urgent road surface/speed cushion friction analysis being undertaken and if found to be satisfactory, Council installs three (3) rows of speed cushions in Union Street, McMahons Point as per the attached plan. (4.2)

4. THAT the information concerning the Abandoned Vehicles and Unattended Boat Trailers Processed Report be received. (5.1)

5. THAT the information concerning Gerard Street and Macpherson Street Traffic Control Signals Standing Item be received. (5.2)

6. THAT the information concerning Standing Item - Military Road B-Line be received. (5.3)

7. THAT the community survey regarding offset parking in Parraween Street be expedited. (5.3)

8. THAT an update be provided to the next Traffic Committee on the Parraween Street survey. (5.3)

9. THAT a brief report be submitted to the next Traffic Committee meeting regarding options for additional 15-minute free parking on Parraween Street. (5.3)

10. THAT the representatives of TfNSW be thanked for attending this meeting

and answering questions. (5.3)

11. THAT Council restrict the three-month trial of No Parking Motor

Vehicles Excepted previously proposed for Montague Avenue and Fifth Avenue to

only the northern side of Fifth Avenue, between Brothers Memorial Park and

Ellalong Road, and a further report be submitted to the Committee.

12. THAT Council advise the Willoughby Bay Precinct and residents of this

resolution.

13. THAT the banners at Waverton Station petition be received and no further

action taken.

14. THAT the head petitioner be advised of this resolution.Voting was as follows: For/Against 10/0

Councillor Yes No Councillor Yes No

Gibson Y Barbour Y

Beregi Y Drummond Y

Keen Y Gunning Y

Brodie Y Mutton Y

Carr Y Baker Y

RESOLVED:


2. THAT Council notes the outcome of the community consultation with regards to

proposed speed cushions in Union Street. (4.2)

https://www.northsydney.nsw.gov.au/Council_Meetings/Meetings/Committees/Traffic_Committee/2019/14_June_2019


3. THAT subject to an urgent road surface/speed cushion friction analysis being

undertaken and if found to be satisfactory, Council installs three (3) rows of speed

cushions in Union Street, McMahons Point as per the attached plan. (4.2)

4. THAT the information concerning the Abandoned Vehicles and Unattended Boat

Trailers Processed Report be received. (5.1)

5. THAT the information concerning Gerard Street and MacPherson Street Traffic

Control Signals Standing Item be received. (5.2)

6. THAT the information concerning Standing Item - Military Road B-Line be

received. (5.3)

7. THAT the community survey regarding offset parking in Parraween Street be

expedited. (5.3)

8. THAT an update be provided to the next Traffic Committee on the Parraween Street

survey. (5.3)

9. THAT a brief report be submitted to the next Traffic Committee meeting regarding

options for additional 15-minute free parking on Parraween Street. (5.3)

10. THAT the representatives of TfNSW be thanked for attending this meeting and

answering questions. (5.3)

11. THAT Council restrict the three-month trial of No Parking Motor Vehicles

Excepted previously proposed for Montague Avenue and Fifth Avenue to only the

northern side of Fifth Avenue, between Brothers Memorial Park and Ellalong Road,

and a further report be submitted to the Committee.

12. THAT Council advise the Willoughby Bay Precinct and residents of this resolution.

13. THAT the banners at Waverton Station petition be received and no further action

taken.

14. THAT the head petitioner be advised of this resolution.

ITEM EPS01 REPORTS 24/06/19

N O R T H S Y D N E Y C O U N C I L R E P O R T S

Report to General Manager

Attachments:

1. Traffic Committee Minutes - 14 June 2019

2. Traffic Committee Reports - 14 June 2019

SUBJECT: Traffic Committee Minutes - 14 June 2019

AUTHOR: Michaela Kemp, Manager Traffic and Transport Operations

ENDORSED BY: Duncan Mitchell, Director Engineering and Property Services

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

This report presents the recommendations of the last meeting of the Traffic Committee held on

14 June 2019 for Council adoption. The Minutes are attached for information.


https://www.northsydney.nsw.gov.au/Council_Meetings/Meetings/Committees/Traffic_Com

mittee/2019/14_June_2019

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:

Nil.

RECOMMENDATION:


2. THAT Council notes the outcome of the community consultation with regards to proposed

speed cushions in Union Street. (4.2)

3. THAT subject to an urgent road surface/speed cushion friction analysis being undertaken

and if found to be satisfactory, Council installs three (3) rows of speed cushions in Union Street,

McMahons Point as per the attached plan. (4.2)

4. THAT the information concerning the Abandoned Vehicles and Unattended Boat Trailers

Processed Report be received. (5.1)

5. THAT the information concerning Gerard Street and MacPherson Street Traffic Control

Signals Standing Item be received. (5.2)

6. THAT the information concerning Standing Item - Military Road B-Line be received. (5.3)

7. THAT the community survey regarding offset parking in Parraween Street be expedited.

(5.3)

8. THAT an update be provided to the next Traffic Committee on the Parraween Street survey.

(5.3)

9. THAT a brief report be submitted to the next Traffic Committee meeting regarding options

for additional 15-minute free parking on Parraween Street. (5.3)

10. THAT the representatives of TfNSW be thanked for attending this meeting and answering

questions. (5.3)




Re: Traffic Committee Minutes – 14 June 2019

(2)

11. THAT Council restrict the three-month trial of No Parking Motor Vehicles Excepted

previously proposed for Montague Avenue and Fifth Avenue to only the northern side of Fifth

Avenue, between Brothers Memorial Park and Ellalong Road, and a further report be submitted

to the Committee.


13. THAT the banners at Waverton Station petition be received and no further action taken.



Re: Traffic Committee Minutes – 14 June 2019

(3)

LINK TO COMMUNITY STRATEGIC PLAN

The relationship with the Community Strategic Plan is as follows:

Direction: 5. Our Civic Leadership

Outcome: 5.2 Council is well governed and customer focused

BACKGROUND

In accordance with Council’s Code of Meeting Principles and Practices:

Clause 51.6 - the minutes of a Committee meeting can only be confirmed and adopted by

resolution of that Committee, passed at a subsequent meeting of that Committee.

Clause 51.7 - the recommendations arising at Committee meetings are to be submitted to the

next available Council meeting for adoption.

CONSULTATION REQUIREMENTS

Community engagement is not required.

SUSTAINABILITY STATEMENT

The sustainability implications are of a minor nature and as such did not warrant a detailed

assessment.

DETAIL

This report presents the recommendations of the last meeting of the Traffic Committee held on

14 June 2019 for Council adoption. The Minutes are attached for information.


https://www.northsydney.nsw.gov.au/Council_Meetings/Meetings/Committees/Traffic_Com

mittee/2019/14_June_2019



Minute Book Page No 21

This is Page No 21 of the Minutes of the 525th Traffic Committee Meeting of the North

Sydney Council held on 14 June 2019.

NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL

REPORT OF 525th TRAFFIC COMMITTEE

SUBJECT: PROCEEDINGS OF COMMITTEE AT MEETING HELD IN THE SUPPER

ROOM AT THE ROS CRICHTON PAVILION, NORTH SYDNEY, ON

FRIDAY, 14 JUNE 2019 AT 10.00AM.

PRESENT

Councillor Gibson in the Chair, Councillor Keen.

Staff: Duncan Mitchell, Director Engineering and Property Services

Michaela Kemp, Manager Traffic and Transport Operations

Mark Richardson, Manager Ranger and Parking Services

Maria Coyne, Traffic Operations Officer

Stella Stefan, Road Safety Co-ordinator

Nathan Wu, Traffic and Transport Engineer

Iman Mohammadi, Traffic and Transport Engineer

Srikanth Shastry, Senior Strategic Transport Planner

Ian Curry, Manager Governance & Committee Services (Minutes)

Members: Felicity Wilson, Member for North Shore

Garvin Rutherford, representing Gladys Berejiklian, Member for

Willoughby

Sgt Ryan Edwards, NSW Police

Visitors: Lauren Ebbeck, TfNSW

Carl Yates, TfNSW

Apologies were received from RMS.

At the commencement of business (10.05am) Councillors present were:

Councillor Gibson in the Chair, Councillor Keen.

26. Minutes

The Minutes of the previous meeting held on 3 May 2019, copies of which had been

previously circulated, were taken as read and confirmed.

The Motion was moved by Cr Keen and seconded by Mr Rutherford.

Voting was unanimous.

525th TRAFFIC COMMITTEE - 14//06/19 Page No 22



27. 4.1 Delegated Authority

Report of Manager Traffic and Transport Operations, Michaela Kemp

Attached is a list of projects given approval under delegated authority to the Traffic &

Transport Operations Manager. Approval was given subject to concurrence of Roads

and Maritime Services, the NSW Police and the local State Members.

Recommending:

1. THAT the information regarding Delegated Authority items be received.

The Motion was moved by Ms Wilson and seconded by Mr Rutherford.


Resolved to Recommend:


28. 4.2 Union Street, McMahons Point – Proposed Speed Cushions – Survey Result

Report of Traffic and Transport Engineer, Iman Mohammadi

As part of the 2018/2019 implementation of North Sydney Council’s Local Area Traffic

Management (LATM) Action Plans, it is proposed to install traffic calming devices in

Union Street, McMahons Point. The issue of the speeding motorists was also raised at

the 519th Traffic Committee held on 7th September 2018 where the committee

recommended:

4. THAT Council urgently installs speed bumps along the road and also examine the

kerb blister on the corner of Union Street.

Community consultation took place from 13 March 2019 until 10 April 2019. 236

letters were sent to properties in the surrounding area, Union Precinct committee, and

the survey was available online through Council’s ‘Have Your Say’ webpage. A total

of 49 responses were received, including 4 from the outside survey area.

This report details the outcomes of the community consultation.

Recommending:


proposed speed cushions in Union Street.

2. THAT Council installs three (3) rows of speed cushions in Union Street, McMahons

Point as per the attached plan.

A Motion was moved by Ms Wilson and seconded by Sgt Edwards,





cushions in Union Street, McMahons Point as per the attached plan.







cushions in Union Street, McMahons Point as per the attached plan.




INFORMAL ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION

29. 5.1 Abandoned Vehicles and Unattended Boat Trailers Processed Report

Report of Manager Ranger and Parking Services, Mark Richardson

Report of Abandoned Vehicles and Unattended Boat Trailers processed during the

reporting period of 11 April 2019 to 24 May 2019

• Year to date (2019) Council has investigated 195 reports of abandoned vehicles

• Year to date (2019) Council has processed 37 reports of unattended boat trailers

Recommending:


Trailers Processed Report be received.

The Motion was moved by Cr Keen and seconded by Ms Wilson.




Trailers Processed Report be received.

30. 5.2 Standing Item, Gerard Street and Macpherson Street, Cremorne - Traffic

Control Signals (TCS)

Report of Sustainable Transport Projects Coordinator, Lindsay Menday

At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following

recommendation of the North Sydney Traffic Committee:

1. THAT pedestrian signals on Gerard Street at Macpherson Street be expedited as a

high priority project and funding be brought forward to progress the project to

construction.

At the Traffic Committee meeting on 22 March 2019 it was recommended:

1. THAT Gerard Street/ Macpherson Street traffic signals be included as a standing

item on future Traffic Committee agendas.

The report provides an update on the status of the project and will be updated at each

milestone for the project.

Recommending:

1. THAT the information concerning Gerard Street and Macpherson Street Traffic

Control Signals Standing Item be received.

The Motion was moved by Mr Rutherford and seconded by Cr Keen.



1. THAT the information concerning Gerard Street and Macpherson Street Traffic

Control Signals Standing Item be received.

31. 5.3 Standing Item - Military Road B-Line

Report of Traffic & Transport Operations Manager, Michaela Kemp

At the Traffic Committee meeting on 3 May 2019 it was agreed to add a standing item

for each future traffic committee agenda with regard B-Line, including matters




concerning off-set parking arrangements due to parking losses along Military Road,

and general traffic and parking matters that arise.

The table outlines the status of current traffic and parking matters relating to B-Line.

Recommending:


received.

Lauren Ebbeck and Carl Yates (TfNSW) addressed the Committee regarding the B-

Line project.

A Motion was moved by Cr Gibson and seconded by Ms Wilson,


received.


expedited.


survey.


options for additional 15-minute free parking on Parraween Street.


answering questions.




received.


expedited.


survey.


options for additional 15-minute free parking on Parraween Street.


answering questions.

GENERAL BUSINESS

32. Parking in Fifth Avenue and Montague Street

The Mayor referred to this matter, which is currently the subject of a community survey.

A Motion was moved by Cr Gibson and seconded by Mr Rutherford,

1. THAT Council restrict the three month trial of No Parking Motor Vehicles Excepted

previously proposed for Montague Avenue and Fifth Avenue to only the northern side

of Fifth Avenue, between Brothers Memorial Park and Ellalong Road, and a further

report be submitted to the Committee.







1. THAT Council restrict the three-month trial of No Parking Motor Vehicles Excepted

previously proposed for Montague Avenue and Fifth Avenue to only the northern side

of Fifth Avenue, between Brothers Memorial Park and Ellalong Road, and a further

report be submitted to the Committee.


33. Parking Restrictions Cammeray Sports Complex

The Mayor referred to the submission made by Cammeray Croquet Club regarding

parking in Park Avenue and advised that a report would be submitted to the next

meeting.

34. Banners at Waverton Station

The Mayor tabled a petition regarding the Council banners at Waverton Station.

The Director Engineering and Property Services advised that the banners are changed

over every 3 months.

A Motion was moved by Cr Gibson and seconded by Ms Wilson,

1. THAT the petition be received and no further action taken.




1. THAT the petition be received and no further action taken.


35. Grasmere and Young Street Intersection

Cr Keen advised that this matter had been discussed at the recent Willoughby Bay

Precinct Committee meeting and the Precinct Committee unanimously voted that the

signs be changed from Stop signs to Give Way signs so that the priority be changed to

favour Young Street.

The Manager Traffic and Transport Operations advised that a plan is currently being

prepared to change the priority at the intersection as previously resolved by Council,

including necessary changes to linemarking.

36. “Slow Down” Speed Campaign Signs

The Road Safety Co-ordinator demonstrated the new “Slow Down” Speed Campaign

signs, designed to wrap around trees or poles.

Council staff will assess the optimum and appropriate places to locate these signs.

The meeting closed at 11.37am.

____________________________ ________________________

CHAIRPERSON GENERAL MANAGER

A

Item 4.1 - Traffic - 26/7/19


To the General Manager Attach: 1. List of Items

SUBJECT: (4.1) Delegated Authority

AUTHOR: Report of Manager Traffic and Transport Operations, Michaela Kemp

DESCRIPTION/SUBJECT MATTER:

Attached is a list of projects given approval under delegated authority to the Traffic &

Transport Operations Manager. Approval was given subject to concurrence of Roads and

Maritime Services, the NSW Police and the local State Members.

RECOMMENDATION:


APPROVAL FOR PROJECTS UNDER

DELEGATED AUTHORITY TO THE TRAFFIC & TRANSPORT OPERATIONS MANAGER

526th TRAFFIC COMMITTEE - 26 JULY 2019

No. Street Location

Precinct,

Ward,

Electorate

Issue Recommendation Appr Date ECM Comments

Resident Parking

Nil

Temporary Road Closures

19-061 Clarke Lane,

Crows Nest

Sydney Metro

Between

Clarke Street

and Pacific

Highway

Holtermann,

Tunks,

North Shore

Electorate

Temporary

Road Closure

1. THAT Council raise no objection to

the closure of Clarke Lane between

Clarke Street and Pacific Highway, Crows

Nest from ASAP to Friday 9th August

2019 from 24/7 for the purposes of

barriers to prevent incoming traffic

driving into Clarke Lane Bridge

Construction as per the submitted

application and subject to Council’s

standard road closure conditions.

Approval is subject to managed access to

all affected properties and the applicant

notifying all affected residents/tenants as

per Council’s standard conditions of

approval.

2. THAT should Council receive an

application for an alternative date to carry

out these works due to inclement weather

or operational delays, that application be

approved, subject to Police Permit

approval.

Yes 21/5/19 N/A

19-068 Denison

Street, North

Sydney

1 Denison

Street.

Between Berry

Street and

Spring Street

CBD,

Wollstonecr

aft,

North Shore

Electorate

Temporary

Road Closure


the temporary road closure of Denison St,

North Sydney from 23-25 May 2019 from

7pm-5am for the purpose of stormwater

diversion works, as per the submitted

application and council’s standard road

closure conditions. Approval is subject to

managed access to all affected properties

and the applicant notifying all affected

Yes 24/5/19

N/A

No. Street Location

Precinct,

Ward,

Electorate


residents/tenants as per Council's standard

conditions of approval.






approval.

19-069 Alexander

Lane, Crows

Nest

5-7 Alexander

Street.

Between

Falcon Street

and Hayberry

Street

Hayberry,

Wollstonecr

aft,

Willoughby

Electorate

Temporary

Road Closure


the temporary road closure of Alexander

Lane, Crows Nest on 24th June 2019 from

7am-5pm for the purpose of Standing a

crane for lifting and replacing roofing

sheets, as per the submitted application

and council’s standard road closure

conditions. Approval is subject to



residents/tenants as per Council's standard







approval.

Yes 27/5/19 N/A

19-070 McBurney

Lane, Kirribilli

42 Carabella

Street

Between Peel

Street and

Parkes Street

Bradfield

Victoria,

North Shore

Electorate

Temporary

Road Closure


the temporary closure of McBurney Ln

Kirribilli between Peel Street and Parkes

Street, on 20th June 2019 from 7:00am to

5:00pm for the purposes of lifting

construction materials into site with crane

as per the submitted application and

subject to Council’s standard road closure

conditions. Approval is subject to



Yes 3/6/19 N/A

No. Street Location

Precinct,

Ward,

Electorate


residents/tenants as per Council’s

standard conditions of approval.






approval.

19-071 Little Spring

Street, North

Sydney

88 Walker

Street.

Between Berry

Street and

Spring Street

CBD,

Wollstonecr

aft,

North Shore

Electorate

Temporary

Road Closure


the temporary road closure of Little

Spring St, North Sydney between Berry St

and Spring St on 17th-19th June 2019 from

9:30pm-5am for the purpose of

excavation for upgrade of the existing

Ausgrid electrical network, as per the

submitted application and council’s

standard road closure conditions.

Approval is subject to managed access to

all affected properties and the applicant

notifying all affected residents/tenants as

per Council's standard conditions of

approval.






approval.

Yes 3/6/19 N/A

Special Use Zones

19-058 Cambridge

Street,

Cammeray

18 Cambridge

Street

Bridgeview,

Tunks,

Willoughby

Electorate

Motorbike

Parking

THAT Council installs a 2.5m Motorbike

Only space on the kerb space between the

driveways of 18 Cambridge Street and 12

Cambridge Street, Cammeray as per

attached plan.

Yes 21/5/19 7769080

No. Street Location

Precinct,

Ward,

Electorate


19-066 Zig Zag Lane,

Crows Nest

13 Ernest

Street,

Holtermann,

Tunks,

Willoughby

Electorate

Timed

Loading Zone

THAT the existing Loading Zone on the

northern side of Zig Zag Lan between

Willoughby Lane and Zig Zag Lane be

restricted to “7am-5pm Mon-Fri, 8am-

12:30pm Sat” with additional “No

Stopping other times” to alleviate the

issue, subject to consultation with the

residents and business.

Yes 24/6/19 7711267

Structural Limit Signs

Nil

Warning Signs

19-059 Holtermann

Street, Crows

Nest

At the

intersection of

Alexander

Street

Holtermann,

Tunks,

Willoughby

Electorate

Zig Zag Line

Marking

THAT Council raise no objection to

install Zigzag Line marking in addition to

the “Pedestrian Ahead” warning signs

(which were approved in 2017 by traffic

Committee through delegated Authority,

17/024) in Holtermann Street, in approach

to the Alexander Street roundabout. The

existing pedestrian crossing is located

immediately south of roundabout in

Alexander Street. It is claimed that drivers

looking to their right and turning left from

Holtermann Street into Alexander Street,

may not see/be aware of the pedestrian

crossing immediately after the roundabout

and have ended up with a sudden break.

The need of zig zag lines in addition to

the “Pedestrian Ahead” signs deems

necessary after the recent incidents in the

Crows Nest area with pedestrian fatalities.

Yes 13/6/19 7711205

19-062 High Street,

North Sydney

At the

intersection of

Alfred Street

North

Milson,

Victoria,

North Shore

Electorate

Install Caution

Driveway sign

THAT Council installs “Caution

Driveways” sign on the northern side of

High Street facing traffic departing from

the roundabout at the intersection of High

Street and Alfred Street North.

Yes 21/5/19 7774641

No. Street Location

Precinct,

Ward,

Electorate


19-065 Cremorne

Road,

Cremorne

Point

Western side

north of Rialto

Avenue

Cremorne

Point,

Victoria,

North Shore

Electorate

Install

“Merging

Traffic” sign

THAT Council installs “Merging Traffic”

sign on the western side of Cremorne

Road at approximately 32m north of

Rialto Avenue to warn motorists about

vehicles exiting the service road on the

lower level.

Yes 21/5/19 CRM

6976/2018

RMS additional

comments – can

we install give

way linemarking

at merge point

Signs Across Driveways

19-064 Falcon Street,

North Sydney

220 Falcon

Street, North

Sydney

Registry

Tunks,

Willoughby

Electorate

Signs across

driveway

THAT Council install No Parking signs

across the driveway to no. 220 Falcon St,

North Sydney.

No 7776567 RMS has

objected to this

TDA as Falcon

Street is a state

road.

Traffic Bollards

Nil

Construction Management Plan

19-054 Miller Street,

North Sydney

73 Miller Street CBD,

Wollstonecr

aft,

North Shore

Electorate

CTMP 1. THAT the traffic aspects of the

Construction Traffic Management Plan

prepared by “The Traffic Marshal Pty

Ltd” Rev 2, dated 24 April 2019 for

Development Application 173/18 at 73

Miller St, North Sydney be approved

subject to the conditions of approval.

2. THAT the Work Zones as described in

this CTMP are approved pending

lodgement of a Work zone application

and payment of all applicable fees. The

work zone hours must reflect the DA

approved hours.

Yes 27/5/19 7785140

19-068 Walker Street,

North Sydney

88 Walker

Street

CBD,

Wollstonecr

aft,

North Shore

Electorate

CTMP –

Excavation

Phase only

THAT the traffic aspects of the

Construction Traffic Management Plan

prepared by “Complete Staff Solutions”

Rev 7, dated 15 May 2019 for

Development Application 368/18 at 88

Walker St, North Sydney be approved

subject to the conditions of approval.

Yes 20/6/19 7775333

No. Street Location

Precinct,

Ward,

Electorate


19-079 Carabella

Street,

Kirribilli

85 Carabella

Street (Loretto)

Milson,

Victoria,

North Shore

Electorate

CTMP –

Demolition

Phase only

THAT Council approve the traffic aspects

of the Construction Traffic Management

Plan dated 30 May 2019 prepared by

McLaren Traffic Engineering for, and

limited only to, the demolition activities

of the approved development (SSD7919)

at 85 Carabella Street, Kirribilli subject to

the conditions of approval.

Yes 25/6/19 7793990

19-082 Military Road,

Cremorne

211 Military

Road,

Cremorne

Harrison,

Victoria,

North Shore

Electorate

CTMP

1. THAT the traffic aspects of the

amended Construction Traffic

Management Plan dated 17 June 2019

prepared by McLaren Traffic Engineering

for approved development (Development

Consent 163/17) at 211 Military Road,

Cremorne be approved subject to the


2. THAT the Work Zone on Military

Road as described in this CTMP is

approved under delegated authority of

Council’s Traffic Engineer, with the same

conditions pending lodgement of a Work

zone application and payment of all

applicable fees.

Yes 3/7/19 7790484

Australian Road Rules Compliance Signs

19-063 Carter Street,

Cammeray

At the

intersection of

Arkland Street

The Plateau,

Tunks,

Willoughby

Electorate

Install Give

Way lines and

sings

THAT Council installs a Give Way line

and sign at the intersection of Carter

Street and Arkland Street, Cammeray.

Yes 21/5/19 7692488

Traffic Facilities

19/060 Young Street

and Grasmere

Road,

Cremorne

At the

intersection of

Young Street

and Grasmere

Road

Parks/Bright

more,

Tunks,

Willoughby

Electorate

Speed

Cushions

THAT Council install six speed cushions

on approach to the intersection between

Grasmere Road and Young Street,

Cremorne, as shown on the attached plan.

Yes 27/6/19 7763607

No. Street Location

Precinct,

Ward,

Electorate


19/067 Russell Street,

Wollstonecraft

Wollstonecr

aft,

Wollstonecr

aft,

North Shore

Electorate

Speed

Cushions

THAT Council installs two (2) rows of

speed cushions in Russell Street

Wollstonecraft to alleviate the speeding

issues in the street, after the affected

properties are notified by letterbox

delivery.

Yes 20/6/19 N/A

Council Decisions

19-081 Rowlison

Parade,

Cammeray

The eastern

side of

Rowlinson

Parade

The Bay,

Tunks,

Willoughby

Electorate

Footpath

Replacement

THAT Council proceed with footpath

replacement on the eastern side of

Rowlison Parade, Cammeray as shown on

the attached drawing. The design will

comply with RMS technical directions

and Australian Standards.

Yes 25/6/19 N/A

Item 4.2 - Traffic - 26/7/19


To the General Manager Attach: 1. List of Recommendations SUBJECT: (4.2) Minor Parking Restrictions AUTHOR: Report of Manager Traffic and Transport Operations, Michaela Kemp DESCRIPTION/SUBJECT MATTER: Attached is a list of recommendations made for changes in the parking restrictions. RECOMMENDATION: 1. THAT the recommendations made for changes in the parking restrictions be received.

MINOR PARKING RESTRICTIONS

526th TRAFFIC COMMITTEE - 26 JULY 2019

Street/

Location

Precinct,

Ward,

Issue/ Request Investigation Rec Signs &

Lines

Priority

Standard/

Guideline

ECM

1 Kiara Close,

North Sydney

Milson,

Victoria

Council has received

representations on behalf of

the Proprietors of Strata

Plan 36253 (1 Kiara Close)

enquiring why Council

doesn’t enforce the parking

restrictions in Kiara Close.

Kiara Close is a private road owner by

Proprietors of Strata Plan 36253.

Council benefits from separate Right of

Way easements over Kiara Close for

access and parking respectively. The

easements for parking only apply to

parts of Kiara Close, specifically the

sections which currently consist of

angle parking.

While there are permissive parking

signs in other parts of Kiara Close along

the access roads equivalent to about four

(4) parking spaces, these are contrary to

the terms of the easement which only

allow these areas to be used for vehicles

and pedestrians to pass over but not to

park.

Council’s Solicitor has advised that

because the easements are a private

Right of Way and not a public road, in

order for Council to enforce parking

restrictions in Kiara Close, Council

would need to enter into a formal

parking agreement with the Proprietors.

Council does not have a current parking

agreement with the Proprietors.

Furthermore, should the Proprietors

wish for Council to enforce the parking

on the easements that are currently only

designated for access, then the terms of

the Right of Way would need its terms

varied to allow or permit the parking of

vehicles.

THAT the information

concerning Kiara Close

be received.

N/A N/A 7808655

(MK)

Street/

Location

Precinct,

Ward,


Lines

Priority

Standard/

Guideline

ECM

2 Parraween

Street,

Cremorne

Brightmore/

Harrison,

Tunks

At the Traffic Committee

meeting on 14/6/19 it was

resolved and subsequently

adopted by Council at its

meeting on 24/6/19:

THAT a brief report be

submitted to the next Traffic

Committee meeting

regarding options for

additional 15-minute free

parking on Parraween

Street.

Parking on Parraween Street is mostly 2

Hour Metered Parking 8.30am-6pm

Mon-Fri 8.30am-12.30pm Sat. Recent

inspections revealed that Parraween

Street has an average occupancy of 38%

during the day. Parking occupancy

increases significantly after 6pm when

the parking restrictions expire with

parking demand generated by visitors to

the local businesses and theatre and

residents.

Prior to the installation of the parking

meters in Parraween Street in 2010,

most of the on-street parking was 1

Hour Parking and the average parking

occupancy rate was 91.5%.

Parking demand can be influenced in

two ways, with time restrictions or

through cost disincentives (paid

parking). Using the pricing mechanism

to manage the parking resource means

that it is utilised more efficiently by

motorists.

Council generally aims for a maximum

occupancy rate of 85% to best make use

of the parking resource whilst still

ensuring motorists are able to find a

parking space.

Based on the current parking occupancy

rates in Parraween Street, there may be

scope to trial a period of free parking,

say the first 15 minutes, within the

existing parking restrictions to more

efficiently utilise the parking resource

particularly between 8.30am-6pm.

THAT should the Traffic

Committee support a trial

for a free parking period,

such as the first 15

minutes, at the parking

meters in Parraween

Street that a report be

prepared for Council

outlining the financial

implications prior to

Council making a

decision.

N/A AS2890.1

RMS Pay

Parking

Guidelines

7820815

(MK)

Street/

Location

Precinct,

Ward,


Lines

Priority

Standard/

Guideline

ECM

Council’s parking meters have the

functionality to provide a period of free

parking which can be managed through

the integrated parking sensor

technology. Parking sensors are not yet

installed in Parraween Street due to the

amount of recent development

construction activity in the street over

the past few years which is now

reducing.

The suggested changes to the parking

fee structure will have financial

implications for Council and it may set

a precedent for the free parking to be

expanded to other streets. Therefore, it

is recommended that this be detailed in

a report to Council before any decision

is made to implement a free parking

period in Parraween Street.

Item 4.3 - Traffic - 26/0719

N O R T H S Y D N E Y C O U N C I L

To the General Manager

Attach: 1. Survey Results

2. Proposed Parking Changes

SUBJECT: (4.3) Cremorne Parking Area 26 – Survey Results

AUTHOR: Report of Traffic & Transport Engineer, Nathan Wu


A parking survey Cremorne Parking Area 26 was sent out on the 8 November 2018 to 1841

residents and property owners, and to Brightmore and Parks Precinct. The survey was also

available online. Residents were given until the 4 January 2019 to respond. A total of 215

responses were received. This represents a response rate of 11.7%, which is equivalent to the

average response rate of 10 to 12% for parking surveys.

The answers received from the residents for the Cremorne Parking Area 26 survey are

summarised in the report. Recommended changes to the parking restrictions in Cremorne

Parking Area 26 are also attached.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. THAT Council adopt the attached parking restriction recommendations for Cremorne

Parking Area 26.

2. THAT Council notify the residents before installing the parking restriction changes in

Cremorne Parking Area 26.

3. THAT the new parking restrictions be reviewed six (6) months after the date of installation

in Cremorne Parking Area 26.

Report of Traffic & Transport Engineer, Nathan Wu

Re: Cremorne Parking Area 26 – Survey Results

(2)


Consultation has been undertaken in accordance with Council's Community Egnagement

Protocol

Relates to ECM No: N/A

Standard or Guideline Used: AS2890.5; AS1742.11; NSC Resident Parking Permit Policy

Signs & Lines Priority: 2

Precinct and Ward: Brightmore and Parks Precinct, Tunks Ward

Impact on Bicycles: Nil

Impact on Pedestrians: Nil

Impact on Parking: Some changes to parking restrictions are proposed as outlined in the

report.

DETAIL

Cremorne Parking Area 26 includes Belgrave Street, Ben Boyd Lane, Ben Boyd Road, Earle

Street, Grasmere Lane, Grasmere Road, Oaks Avenue, Park Avenue, Sutherland Lane,

Sutherland Street, View Street, Young Lane and Young Street.

A total of 1841 surveys were mailed out to residents and property owners, and to Registry

Brightmore and Parks Precincts on 8 November 2018. The survey was also available online.

Residents were given until the 4 January 2019 to respond. A total of 215 responses were

received, including 101 hard copy responses and 114 online responses. This represents a

response rate of 11.7%, which is equivalent to the average response rate of 10 to 12% for

parking surveys.

Survey Results

The answers received from Cremorne Parking Area 26 parking survey are summarised in

Attachment 1.

Precinct Comments

At the time of writing Council has not received comments from Brightmore and Parks Precinct

in relation to the survey.

Comments Received

Respondents were asked to provide general comments/feedback as desired. Comments have

been grouped by emerging themes.

Support Parking Restrictions

• Parking for residents and their visitors is very hard due to the number of commuters parking

in area 26. Also, customers of Oaks hotel and nearby restaurants. Restrictions need to cover

weekends and evenings up to 10pm.

• On Park Avenue retain the extended parking to 10 hours per day alongside the golf course

to allow commuters to park there and not on side streets. Extend hours of operation from

8:00 to 23:59 seven days per week.



(3)

• The Parking in Park Avenue at 8 hours has pushed people parking to go to work in to the adjoining streets - I would rather the parking limit was 10 hours to allow all day but not long-term parking at least on the golf course side of the road.

• Thank you for being aware of the parking nightmare in our area. It’s impossible for any visitors to find a parking spot as commuters are taking up all our parking spots all day. The ideal scenario would be 2-hour parking in all the streets with all residents with address ID allowed to park unrestricted.

The sports complex has caused road chaos due to them using the golf club access road. This only fits one car width & cars are reversing back into the oncoming traffic on park avenue.

• We need restrictions on out of area car owners parking long term, unmoved in free parking areas taking up the few spaces for residents & visitors.

This also should apply to commercial trailers, caravans, & camping vans.

• Parking in Cammeray Golf Club drive is inadequate for users for the Oval. There needs to be more parking available for users of the Oval, and the driveway needs to be restricted to golfers.

• Users of the Oval are taking up a lot of car spaces and causing problems for Cammeray Golf Club. It is a very dangerous driveway now. Parking should be restricted to golfers and users of the Club and more parking should be provided for users of the Oval.

• I do however, believe most to area 26 should be 2P (Resident permit excepted) to help with turnover. The current small unlimited parking sections should be maintained to help residence with extra cars. Extending restrictions into Saturday night will help when the streets are busy on the weekends.

• Conversely, we fully applaud restricting parking for 24 m on Park Avenue. We travel on that street every day and now that the road has been narrowed there is a lot of turnover of cars pulling in and out, holding up traffic. There is also regular opening of car doors without looking which not only holds up traffic but is dangerous.

• Parking meters will be a better solution.

• Weekends are a problem, we can rarely find parking in our street due to the children’s park across the street. Parking spaces are not demarked well at all, after the useless waste of space the bike path has caused.

• i recommend 4-hour parking as 2 hours is often insufficient time for visitors.• Eight-hour parking limits would exclude those who park vehicles for extended periods (eg

6 weeks) and go overseas, thus excluding others who need to park in the street.

• In Grasmere Road in Area 26 - On the left-hand side of road only some parts have restrictions. It would be better that from Ben Boyd Road to Park Street had the same restriction. Prefer 4-hour restriction or possible 2 hours. Right hand side the same or none. In View Street - No Parking - on one side. on the turn into Grasmere Road. It is an accident waiting to happen.

• i do object to long term parking by boat trailers, or similar- saw a horse float recently. Park

Avenue - between Ernest Street and Grasmere Road - is becoming more congested, maybe as a result of increased after school activities in Cammeray Park.

• 2-hour restricted parking required in this area. You claim to promote public transport, but you provide "externals" to park here all day.

• Parking meters/parameters would be welcome on Park Avenue - people park too close to street entrances at the moment. Oaks Avenue too busy on Saturdays with sport + Sutherland Rd for residents to find parking.

• Parking is increasing difficult as many commuters park in our street & walk up to Military Road & catch the bus to the city. Their cars are therefore here all day.



(4)

• We support 2-hour parking as a way to eliminate all day parking and, hopefully, free up

spaces for visitors, deliveries and emergencies. A good percentage of unrestricted parking

spots are used as all day or long-term parking. It is almost impossible to receive visitors,

especially the disabled, which include family. Our units have no designated visitor parking.

We recently had cause to consider a home visit from a doctor (no parking).

• I suggest that there would need to be uniformity of parking restrictions in the surrounding

streets as a 2-hour restriction in the neighbouring streets could result in a concentration of

vehicles in any one street with 4 hour restrictions.

P.S. An excellent initiative given the deteriorating parking conditions over the last 2-3

years.

• In summary we support extending the current arrangements on Park Avenue to 9 hours or

12 hours - attached letter provides more detail.

Thank you for the opportunity of providing feedback on the parking issues associated with

streets located in Parking Area 26 in the North Sydney Area. We are long-standing residents

in the area and have observed that the increase in commuter parking in our street, and those

streets close-by, correlates with Council erecting the 8-hour parking limit in Park Avenue.

We wish to put forward another solution which we believe will offset the pressure on

resident parking with competing commuter parking, and at the same time not require

additional parking restrictions or policing of parking by Council rangers. We propose that

the current parking arrangement down Park Avenue, on the Golf Club side be changed from

8 hours to 9 hours. Throughout the day on Mondays to Fridays this space is often left unused

as the 8-hour restriction does not allow enough time for commuters to leave their cars

without sanction. Therefore, the space is left empty, while commuters find space available

in our residential streets.

Working in the City and North Sydney CBD, we often return home by 5.30pm and with

few exceptions, the commuter cars have gone. Our observation is therefore that a 9-hour

parking space would allow commuters enough time to park and encourage use of this

otherwise unused space. We have enclosed a photo of the space identified, indicating the

lack of current use during weekdays. There are enough spaces available on the Golf Club

side to give the reprieve desired so that commuters stop parking in the side streets.

Alternatively, Council could consider changing the above-mentioned Park Avenue signage

to 12 hour anytime, consistent with parking restrictions enforced by Willoughby Council

along Lower Cliff Avenue off Tunks Park. This permits short term parking but limits the

use of space for longer-term parking for vehicles such as boats and trailers. Thank you for

your consideration of our proposal. We would be delighted to provide any further detail

and can be contacted on the numbers below.

Oppose Parking restrictions

• I’m quite happy with current setup. there is always plenty parking space around. i don't

think there is need to do any changes.

• I acknowledge that the area is becoming more densely populated. However, if I have a

guest to stay overnight, they are 1) not allowed to stay on strata property (by-laws), 2) don't

have resident parking permits if these roads are all changed to timed parking. Some streets

need to be left unmetered. Also, I know that commuters from Northern Beaches /Mosman

are abusing "free" untimed parking by using it all-day so that turnover for local businesses

is reduced. Either allow more resident parking permits for those of us to reside here or don't

increase timed parking please.



(5)

• please leave it all alone! it’s hard enough to find a space that's NOT already restricted

parking & those areas always have spaces available for residents with permits. Sometimes

we need street parking - we have a trailer, we sometimes need the garage for a few days to

store thing in temporarily etc and you make it all to hard (and expensive) to get a resident

permit. When i lived in Manly they had a permit you could lend to a visitor to hand on their

mirror and also trailer permits. If you MUST do anything at least do this as it will be a night

mare to (on occasion) have to park the car 1km+ away as we can’t leave it for long enough.

We had 2 cars while we were selling the old one, we don’t want hours of our time wasted

applying for permits; its LESS hassle to find a space! Sometimes my wife borrows a

Friend’s car and needs to park on the street. It’s NOT currently a problem. and to re-iterate

your criteria and cost for a permit is repressive. As noted, we want it all left alone, there is

already TOO MUCH resident permit parking in the area, for example Park Ave is usually

mostly EMPTY of cars as a result!

• Preference is to REMOVE parking restrictions from the area and to remove some of the

poorly placed "No Stopping" zone signs.

• NO parking restrictions at all, please.

• The current parking arrangements are working well.

• I would also like to have a few more all-day parking spots available. DEFINITELY no

reduction in them.

• The small number of unlimited spots currently available support carers parking.

• I have already applied for a parking exemption for area 26 and this was rejected. If changes

are made and I no longer can park in Oaks avenue next to other vehicles with a parking

exemption I will unfortunately have to sell up and move. This is not my desire as I really

enjoy the area where I have lived for over 20 years.

• I do not agree with further parking restrictions nor the installation of parking meters. It is

challenging to park in this area however the responsibility of residents to purchase a

property with the correct number of car spaces for their family and visitors if that's their

need. Streets belong to the community not to residents who happen to purchase with

insufficient car spaces. Honest to goodness isn't life stressful enough already without

additional ugly, parking signs and endless restrictions.

• I am happy with the current parking restrictions in place. On Sutherland Street in particular,

there are always free/available parking spots on our street.

• Yes. I am concerned about this survey. It would be really good if when asked to complete

a survey there was some genuine context around the survey - why it has come up, genuine

concerns of council, residents, businesses or "developers", council revenue, and exactly

what strategies are being proposed to address any foreseen parking/planning problems this

survey assumes in the "c" question for each street that I do want parking restrictions (during

certain times) - which I don't!.

I also very strongly disagree with the statement that the council cannot create extra parking

spaces - of course it can!

I would have thought that if an area is having an issue with parking the first question would

be why a change/increase in parking usage??? If you actually know where the extra parking

demand is coming from, then the council will be in a much better position to come up with

a successful solution!! For example, if demand is due to use of Sports facilities - when is

most demand? Who is using the facilities?? what type of parking do they need? what are

their actual transport needs? Is facilitating more parking going to address the issue??

Similarly, if the issue is parking for shoppers or commuters - then when, why how many,

questions are again very important to consider! if there is to be some proposed future

development of Neutral Bay shopping area (as foreshadowed in a council survey last year)

then what parking and transport options will be included in the development?? If there is

going to be a construction phase in the area (e.g. the tunnels) then what parking measures



(6)

need to be incorporated into the project during the construction phase when workers may

need to park in the area or extra buses put on to transport them to trains etc.?? I am

personally concerned about having parking restrictions - as under North Sydney's parking

permit rules I don't qualify for a parking permit at all!! (I bedroom and 1 car).

Also, in the event the State Govt goes ahead with plans for the tunnels they want to build

at Warringah Freeway Exchange. can it please incorporate a huge green space that covers

the freeway (i.e. not just a foot path) and includes parking for commuters in the void

between the freeway and green space on top. How awesome would it be if the North Sydney

community had a green space that extended from the leafy suburb of Crows Nest from

Anzac Park, over the freeway, through Cammeray Golf Course and on down to Primrose

Park and Middle Harbour Foreshore with a pedestrian access through Fall St to link the

green areas up the council could get a lot of cars parked inside the void above the freeway

and the greenery could help manage pollution from car fumes....while also providing a

magnificent space for the community to enjoy. (cycle ways included - of course!) looking

forward to North Sydney council moving forward with more innovate solutions so we can

all continue to thrive and enjoy our very special part of the World!!

• 1) We have no issue with the current parking restrictions. There is a good mix of restricted

and unrestricted parking and the 6pm Friday ends mean that we can enjoy visitors without

worrying that they will be booked.

• any changes on Young Street should not extend down the hill past Grasmere Road as there

are no commuters parking this far down Young Street.

• This end of Young Street is not congested during week days and is one of the few remaining

streets left with all day free parking for residents and their guests. Changing this will affect

my guests and the owner's future ability to attract other leaseholders. I often work from

home and clients visit me for longer than 2 hours. This will be problematic if no all day

free parking is available. I have lived at this address for over ten years and have observed

no change in the parking options on weekdays and see no reason to alter this. It is too far

for CBD commuters to park and walk to Military road (20 mins up hill) and has not attracted

commuters thus far. It is easy to park here during the week and should remain so.

Introducing paid limited parking would in fact drive me out of this street to live elsewhere.

• i thought it would be best to leave the existing.

• No parking restrictions needed on Earle Street.

• My preference to retain existing restrictions, particularly on Grasmere Road is purely

because i have 1x car + 2 motorbikes and current rules prevent enough resident permits for

all 3. Motorbikes take up 1/6 of the space of a car, and yet are treated the same which is

absurd. One way to address this would be a Grasmere Rd bike parking section on the

children's park end. Thank you.

• Some years ago, a number of residents - 25 Grasmere Rd to Park St, managed to influence

council to put 2 hour parking restrictions signs in front of their properties. Grasmere road

had always been unrestricted parking. this was done for purely selfish reasons - all these

properties have garages. Recently there have been a number of renovations to apartments

going on and the tradies and their vehicles have had unnecessary endless moving of trucks.

In order to comply with restrictions - *This area of Grasmere Rd should revert to

unrestricted.

• As the parking has already been reduced by the "gardens" replacing parking spaces, and

most of the area is 2hr parking or less, further restrictions would be extremely detrimental

to the area.

• 2. Please do not impose any parking restrictions at all in Young St North of its intersection

with Earle Street, Nor in Little Young Street.



(7)

• In my view the problems with parking have in fact been caused by the Council due to 1,

Continued increase in population density allowed by new development approvals 2, The

narrowing of roads is "beautification" which has decreased available parking spaces 3, New

developments without sufficient parking or visitor spaces. Further parking restrictions will

just increase the volume of traffic, increase enforcement costs and become complex to

manage without any clear benefit to residents.

• I have only commented on local streets to me. My answer is based on other changes in

street nearby not dramatically changing. If for instance this did occur and lots more cars

were channelled to our street, then i may well change my answers. I have answered on the

assumption that no significant changes are made to other parking in Grasmere Road/Park

Avenue. For these reasons please keep me informed as to any expected future changes.

Oppose Meters

• no meters ever.

• No meters and no parking restrictions at all.

• The suggestions of parking meters in residential streets sounds more like a revenue raising

exercise, rather than a management tool to reflect concerns from residents and parking

issues. Given that the council removed a parking space in our street a year ago to enable

further landscaping for a bicycle lane, these recommendations from council acting on

'residents concerns' sounds flimsy.

• However, if changes are made, they should not include parking metres. This is purely

revenue raising and no more effective than time limited parking.

• Parking meters in a residential area is ridiculous. It’s fine the way it is. We do not do not

want parking meters or any further restrictions.

• Please do not install parking meters, it makes it more difficult for guests of residents to

visit.

• I object to Council trying to divide our community. Technically I have 2 off street parking

spaces but only the driver’s side door can be opened and then only halfway. Access is

narrow and unable to be used by my wife, daughter or visitors. I use the street parking to

safely load and unload my grand-daughter as well as my shopping. Our visitors should not

have to pay at parking meters and should not be restricted to 30 visits a year.

• Please no parking meters in our area.

• I am NOT in favour of introducing parking meters to residential areas/streets. These streets

are made up of houses and apartments, not shops and restaurants. It is completely

unnecessary to introduce parking meters and would be unreasonable to ask guests or

visitors of ours to have to pay for parking on a residential street.

We already have an unwanted bike path that no one uses, please don't now introduce

unnecessary parking meters at residents’ cost.

• I am strongly against introducing parking meters to area 26. They are an inconvenience for

residence guests and trades people.

• I strongly oppose introduction of parking meters in this residential area. I query the

justification for any changes and would be interested to find out more on the number and

substance of the complaints made leading to the Council considering the introduction of

parking meters. Parking meters are an eyesore and have no place in residential streets.

Please keep me informed on the progress of the proposal and I look forward to receiving

details of further community consultation on this matter.

• We rarely have issues with being able to park in our street. We are concerned that by

making extensive areas metred this would push residents without permits and non-residents



(8)

into non-metred areas. We live on the eastern side of the street and we are concerned that

this would make it harder for us to park outside our house.

• My visitors will not visit if they have to pay for parking in my street.

• I hate parking meters! Please do not allow more to breed. You could easily make more

parking spaces available by modifying garden kerbs in Sutherland St bicycle lanes and

sensible placing of "no parking" signs in Ben Boyd Road.

• No more parking metres please. First Council being very very greedy. We pay enough

Council Rates as it is.

• No parking meters Existing restrictions are sufficient.

• Why do we need parking meters!

• Do you know there are NO parking meters in the shire?

• There is no need to change parking restrictions and definately no metres. That will have no

greater impact and is revenue raising.

• No parking meters, thank you.

• Parking meters around shopping precinct may be appropriate, but not in the residential

surrounds.

• I do not think it is in anyone's interest to put in parking meters in any of these streets. Too

much money spent on bike tracks (Sutherland Street) and bikes still remain on roads and

foot paths! Seems meters only benefit to repay money spent on bike tracks.

• Definitely not. Parking metres will just be money making exercise for Council.

• 1. Rates are increasing more than enough. Please do not add punitive parking metres.

Enforcement

• More enforcement is also needed. Thank you.

• Maybe greater policing by parking officers in the area in question would help car turnover.

• It is increasingly obvious that parking restrictions are ignored by the general public in this

area. Rangers very rarely patrol so the restrictions are only enforced when he council is

made aware of vehicles in the street for extended periods of time. As a resident who as to

pay for a parking permit, this is extremely annoying and frustrating.

• More rangers in the street would be helpful.

• Why don't you put officers around Woolworths parking area to keep it for shoppers and not

for the people who work in the area??? And park for the whole day???

• Parking restrictions only work if they are enforced regularly.

Parking Permits/Parking Areas

• I did not select any of the options in the questionnaire apart form question 9 because there

are no options that I liked. Under the current eligibility of permit, extending parking

restriction and introducing parking meters are not going to make the residents' life any

better but worse.

It has been difficult finding a non-restricted parking spot when I come home every day

anytime between 8.30am-6pm and it has been extremely inconvenient as a resident. When

the visitors parking spots at our unit block are all taken, our visitors including families and

relatives would struggle to find a parking spot.

There have been some changes made on our streets in the past, such as installing the bike

lanes and changing non-restricted parking spots to 2hr limited spots, I assume to improve

everyone's life. Personally, I find those changes unsatisfying, I feel more restricted and

have made our life harder since it simply meant that we lost the non-restricted parking

spots.



(9)

I believe any residents of the area should be entitled to share the off-street parking

regardless of whether they have a garage/car space in their property or not. Residents

of this area should all equally have the right to share the off-street parking. I believe it

is fair if the council provides one permit per house hold regardless of owning a vehicle

or not, but the second or more permits should be purchased.

Therefore, my preferred changes are:

One permit per household to be distributed, second permit and on to be purchased.

Once the residents have received the permit, parking time restrictions such as 2hrs, 3hrs

to be introduced.

I strongly hope that North Sydney Council will come up with a decision that puts the

residents' convenience first. Thank you.

• The current mayor campaigned at the last election not to be so reliant on parking meter

revenue. By forcing residents to pay for parking permits (additional revenue for a

sticker, we already pay council rates) and / or resident's guests, visitors, friends, nanny's

etc to pay for parking when visiting doesn't seem to reflect this.

• It is noteworthy that removing restrictions for residents and ratepayers without an

additional charge doesn't seem to have been considered an option for this survey.

I am reluctant to support parking restrictions, and if necessary, would prefer the model

used in the Northern Beaches. Residents should not be charged for a parking permit.

Ratepayers are already paying.

Like in the Northern Beaches, parking permits should be handed out to ratepayers and

residents for use on motor vehicles (limit of 2). This would then allow 2-4hr parking

restrictions to be ramped up across the council area to 24x7 Mon-Sun to directly target

and impact non-resident commuter parkers, trailers, boats and commercial vehicle

parking.

We do seem to be in a transition period where over several years the Council is slowly

increasing the number of restricted spaces, pushing residents, commuters, trailers,

shoppers and pub drinkers at The Oaks into the remaining and ever reducing number of

unrestricted spaces. Parking space use on Saturday and Sunday mornings show what

would be possible if the area were returned to only local resident use across 7 days.

Improving turnover seems to be a council goal, but how does turnover improve parking

for residents? It does not increase the number of spaces and simply requires shifting

vehicles by the clock. Turnover simply increases churn between spaces.

Removal of long-term boat and trailer parking should be encouraged. This could be

achieved by a free resident parking permit that can be used on motor vehicles only.

• In addition, households should be allowed to purchase additional resident stickers.

• I do not support solutions that force residents to pay for parking through the purchase

of resident permit. If these are given for free to residents, I will support a change in the

parking restrictions.

• 2) We have attempted to receive a residents permit before but were rejected as our house

plans show a 2 car garage. We explained that it was actually only a 1 car garage due to

storage racks that had been inserted by the landlord but were still rejected. We found

this to be unfair, terribly inflexible and just plain petty. This policy/decision needs to

be reconsidered if such draconian measures such as parking meters are being

considered.

• As a rate payer we should be entitled to a resident parking permit in North Sydney and

be able to park in our own street without restrictions. Regardless whether you have i or

2 parking in your garage. Many of us have children with extra cars. Why should

someone outside our area have preference in front or near our residence?

All/most Units blocks in Sutherland St have resident parking + visitor parking -

therefore i see no reason to alter the stats.



(10)

• "Free" parking spots in our area are used all day, probably by commuters going to work all

day, probably by commuters going to work by bus - and leaving cars in our streets all day!

Unfair to residents and their visitors, especially ELDERLY people! and TRADESMEN!

Also: the 2 hour limited spots do NOT allow enough time for visitors (say for lunch)

particularly elderly! The council should provide PARKING AREAS elsewhere, near

PUBLIC TRANSPORT! This would further encourage use of PUBLIC TRANSPORT.

Please consider the Residents! Needs! Thank you!

• Everyone who lives in area should be eligible for resident parking permit holders like

Mosman Council issues.

• As a permanent resident i am unable to park in front of my residence as a cliff face is in

front of my residence and i have to park in front of my residence and i have to park on the

street being young street. It would be appreciated if a permanent parking sticker could be

issued to me and my tenants.

• While i note that any proposal changes would not affect my eastern side of young street

directly, this cash grab dressed as a community driven concern disgusts me. It's double-

dipping- lets increase our chances of income from parking tickets and parking meters &

continue to charge residents for permits to park outside their own home. Free parking for

rate payers please, as many other councils provide, and charge the commuters who park

here to catch the bus to town.

Other

• At the moment if a car parks and another is coming, I cannot proceed walking down the

lane. The footpath is overgrown and unusable. In addition, cars have difficulty passing in

both Young lane and Ben Boyd lane.

• It should be noted that Council removed a several spaces building the bike path and

landscaping on Sutherland Street. This has added to the issues in the street and for strata

schemes trying to manage visitor parking in their buildings. It's not uncommon for

commuters to use visitor parking spaces. The bike path also restricted the width of

Sutherland Street to the point where it's questionable whether it's even wide enough to

support two-way traffic.

Removing the bike path to permit 45degree angle parking would permit dozens and dozens

of cars to park, providing a greater utility to the local community than currently provided

by the poorly utilised bike path.

• Please find attached a letter on the subject. All praise to Council for the extent and

efficiency of the services it provides to residents, commerce and visitors to enjoy. I have

lived in Cremorne for 35 years and believe it’s an outstanding place for families and people

to enjoy. I’m trusting and hoping Council and traffic engineering is sighting against state

government to STOP the proposed Beaches link road tunnel.

An unnecessary and costly proportion which will forever change the nature of our suburb.

• If you are going to install parking meters in Grasmere lane you hopefully make it possible

by installing marked areas opposite SP 10060 & SP 14531. We normally could get 4 cars

parked over there, but often we get very selfish parkers, sometimes parked over there for

the whole day or even for days or months.

My other comments are the appalling and dangerous state the footpaths in the area are. I

am 77 and already had 2 falls on the Military road. First one i contacted the council, because

I ended up with a big hole in my pants. No following up! Council rates are going up and

we expect a safe way to walk to the shops, banks, restaurants etc. Specially the stretch in

Neutral Bay is a disgrace. Lots of elderly people live in this area.

• Please no more cycle paths such as Sutherland Street.



(11)

• I strongly believe it is important that residents receive a summary of this survey so all

residents can trust decisions by Council are made with this survey in consideration.

• Parking on Grasmere Rd between Young St and the bend before Ben Boyd Rd could be

rear to kerb on one side the street is more than wide enough to accommodate this and for

the cost of some signs and white paint would increase car spaces significantly.

• Parking near the corner of Ben Boyd Lane and Grasmere Lane has been restricted due to

the apparent need to clear the corner. This corner has been obstructed by the creation of a

drainage inlet which could be changed to a flat grid and a street sign. Changing these would

free up additional parking space. The property on the corner has been developed with the

corner restricted to allow for better access to the corner. This has been nullified by the drain

and street sign mentioned above.

• It is extremely hard to cross Military Road from Ben Boyd Road travelling south.

When travelling south there are cars parked on the left-hand side of Ben Boyd Road and

the area becomes very congested. I would like to request the area between Grosvenor Lane

and Grosvenor Street is made no parking day and night. It would free up a lane of traffic

and make it much easier to get through the lights and would also make it much easier for

traffic turning into Grosvenor Street and Grosvenor Lane travelling north. Crossing

Military Road should be made much easier.

• My daughter currently resides at the above address with a young family of 2 children. Entry

and exit from her car port entry in Grasmere Lane has become very dangerous with very

limited visibility on entry and exit and often speeding vehicles using Grasmere Lane. I

request Council to please urgently review safety options such as extending the No Parking

area in immediate proximity of the driveway or the erection of an effective Mirror so that

passing vehicles can be better sighted. My daughter has experienced several minor

accidents due to the poor visibility and we are fearful of the risk of serious injury.

• Bike riders aren’t using the bike lanes which is making streets like Sutherland incredibly

dangerous now that it has been narrowed. Do you plan on restricting bike riders to their

purpose built $5 million paths?

• There is an opportunity to increase the supply of on-street parking in Grasmere Road.

Between Young St and Park Ave the traffic is one way.

This would allow for the introduction of either 45/60/90 angled parking, most easily on the

first section west of Young St towards View St.

This would allow for greater capacity for residential parking here.

• Very difficult to see council wasting funds on that bike path that cyclists do not use and

still ride on the roads. Is the council planning to fine those cyclists for disrupting traffic

and endangering lives???????

• I think there is little we can about parking because more cars will be on our roads due to

our quickly growing population.

How about looking at population growth together with the federal and state governments

as part of the solution.

• I strongly object to the installation of bike tracks for a few privileged individuals, who do

not pay rego, or licence fees. Sutherland Road is way too narrow and getting out of a car,

on the driver’s side, is extremely dangerous. Think again.

• If you got rid of the bike paths there would be more parking and more pedestrian safety

• Is it possible to check who is responding to avoid special interest. In a presently unrestricted

section of Grasmere Road. we have at presents and for days at a time. I boat and a horse

float. Also, cans left by people going on holidays.

• Please review safety risks & total blunders created by recent roadworks on Sutherland

Street and Cammeray Golf Club driveway.



(12)

• Sutherland Street The installation of the dedicated BIKE PATH is a total waste of money

and inefficient. Reduced lanes for vehicles and flower beds creates a hazard for driving and

drop off. The BIKE PATH is rarely used - painted lines on the road would have served the

same purpose without the hundreds of thousand $ outlay.

• Council representatives advise that Sutherland St is no narrower than before construction

of the INFREQUENTLY USED bike path. Of this we are not convinced. We recently had

the side of our vehicle extensively damaged by a gentleman attempting to exit his parked

car.

We witnessed a delivery truck reversing down the bike lane in order to make a delivery (no

spot to park).

Vehicles stopping to drop off or collect passengers cause traffic disruption, and danger to

exiting or entering passengers, as there is rarely a vacant spot to pull into. Our part of

Sutherland St is now dangerous to traverse, as is the portion of Park Avenue between Ernest

Street and Sutherland Street.

• Not happy with useless bike paths in this area either!! Waste of rate money, unenforceable,

cyclists also tend to avoid paths!

• Council should restrict over development, not parking.

• There would be more parking available if Council stopped wasting money on turning

parking spaces into gardens which we didn't want, (area is now covered in weeds).

Discussion

The survey results indicate some level of support for timed parking restrictions in some streets.

Detailed recommendations based on the survey responses are listed in Appendix 2. Overall,

there was a strong opposition to parking meters in Area 26 and as such no parking meters have

been recommended in Area 26.

Belgrave Street

1a) In Belgrave Street on the northern side, I am in favour of the following (please tick one):

Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %

Belgrave Street 0% 0% 4 67% 2 33% 6 3%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 0%

Ben Boyd Road 8 25% 4 13% 13 41% 7 22% 32 15%

Earle Street 2 17% 0% 7 58% 3 25% 12 6%

Grasmere Lane 0% 2 50% 1 25% 1 25% 4 2%

Grasmere Road 6 15% 4 10% 19 46% 12 29% 41 19%

Oaks Avenue 2 15% 0% 6 46% 5 38% 13 6%

Park Avenue 0% 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 2%

Sutherland Lane 0% 0% 2 100% 0% 2 1%

Sutherland Street 4 9% 7 16% 11 26% 21 49% 43 20%

Young Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 0%

Young Street 1 3% 2 6% 19 59% 10 31% 32 15%

Anonymous 1 6% 2 12% 10 59% 4 24% 17 8%

Duplicate 0% 0% 2 100% 0% 2 1%

Outside Survey Area 0% 0% 3 60% 2 40% 5 2%

Totals 24 11% 21 10% 101 47% 69 32% 215 100%

1b) The current parking restrictions usually expire at 6:00pm. I would like them to be extended to (please tick one):

6pm

Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %

Belgrave Street 4 67% 0% 0% 0% 2 33% 6 3%

Ben Boyd Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0%

Ben Boyd Road 11 34% 0% 1 3% 0% 20 63% 32 15%

Earle Street 3 25% 1 8% 0% 0% 8 67% 12 6%

Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 2%

Grasmere Road 17 41% 0% 2 5% 0% 22 54% 41 19%

Oaks Avenue 4 31% 2 15% 0% 0% 7 54% 13 6%

Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 2%

Sutherland Lane 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 1%

Sutherland Street 15 35% 0% 1 2% 0% 27 63% 43 20%

Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0%

Young Street 18 56% 1 3% 0% 2 6% 11 34% 32 15%

Anonymous 7 41% 0% 1 6% 0% 9 53% 17 8%

Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 1%

Outside Survey Area 2 40% 0% 0% 0% 3 60% 5 2%

Totals 90 42% 5 2% 5 2% 2 1% 113 53% 215 100%

10pm

Support changes

No Changes No Answer Totals2P 4P

Totals8pm No AnswerMidnight

Residential Street Address


Page 1

1c) I would like the parking restrictions to operate (please tick one):


Belgrave Street 3 50% 0% 0% 3 50% 6 3%

Ben Boyd Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 0%

Ben Boyd Road 11 34% 2 6% 7 22% 12 38% 32 15%

Earle Street 5 42% 2 17% 0% 5 42% 12 6%

Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 2%

Grasmere Road 20 49% 2 5% 4 10% 15 37% 41 19%

Oaks Avenue 4 31% 0% 2 15% 7 54% 13 6%

Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 2%

Sutherland Lane 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 1%


Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 0%

Young Street 16 50% 2 6% 3 9% 11 34% 32 15%

Anonymous 6 35% 3 18% 1 6% 7 41% 17 8%

Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 1%

Outside Survey Area 2 40% 0% 0% 3 60% 5 2%

Totals 92 43% 15 7% 18 8% 90 42% 215 100%

Number % Number % Number % Number %

Belgrave Street 0% 4 67% 2 33% 6 3%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 0%

Ben Boyd Road 0% 22 69% 10 31% 32 15%

Earle Street 1 8% 8 67% 3 25% 12 6%

Grasmere Lane 0% 3 75% 1 25% 4 2%

Grasmere Road 4 10% 24 59% 13 32% 41 19%

Oaks Avenue 2 15% 7 54% 4 31% 13 6%

Park Avenue 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 2%

Sutherland Lane 0% 1 50% 1 50% 2 1%

Sutherland Street 2 5% 20 47% 21 49% 43 20%

Young Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 0%

Young Street 3 9% 17 53% 12 38% 32 15%

Anonymous 0% 12 71% 5 29% 17 8%

Duplicate 0% 2 100% 0% 2 1%

Outside Survey Area 0% 2 40% 3 60% 5 2%

Total 12 6% 126 59% 77 36% 215 100%

Totals

Mon-Fri Only Mon-Sat TotalsNo AnswerMon-Sat

Yes No No Answer



1d) In some areas parking meters make it easier for residents to obtain parking in their street by improving turnover. I would like parking meters* to operate in Belgrave Street.

Page 2

Ben Boyd Lane

2a) In Ben Boyd Lane, I am in favour of the following (please tick one):

Residential Street Address Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %

Belgrave Street 0% 0% 5 83% 1 17% 6 3%

Ben Boyd Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 0%

Ben Boyd Road 3 9% 7 22% 17 53% 5 16% 32 15%

Earle Street 1 8% 0% 8 67% 3 25% 12 6%

Grasmere Lane 0% 2 50% 1 25% 1 25% 4 2%

Grasmere Road 6 15% 4 10% 20 49% 11 27% 41 19%

Oaks Avenue 3 23% 0% 5 38% 5 38% 13 6%

Park Avenue 0% 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 2%

Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 1 50% 0% 2 1%


Young Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 0%

Young Street 2 6% 1 3% 19 59% 10 31% 32 15%

Anonymous 2 12% 2 12% 9 53% 4 24% 17 8%

Duplicate 0% 0% 2 100% 0% 2 1%


Total 22 10% 21 10% 108 50% 64 30% 215 100%


6pm

Residential Street Address Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %

Belgrave Street 3 50% 0% 0% 0% 3 50% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 10 31% 0% 1 3% 0% 21 66% 32 100%

Earle Street 3 25% 1 8% 0% 0% 8 67% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 19 46% 2 5% 2 5% 0% 18 44% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 4 31% 2 15% 0% 0% 7 54% 13 100%

Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 100%

Sutherland Street 15 35% 1 2% 0% 0% 27 63% 43 100%

Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 16 50% 3 9% 0% 2 6% 11 34% 32 100%

Anonymous 8 47% 0% 1 6% 0% 8 47% 17 100%

Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Total 89 41% 10 5% 4 2% 2 1% 110 51% 215 100%

10pm8pm Midnight No Answer

Support changes

No Changes No Answer

Totals

Totals2P 4P

Page 3



Belgrave Street 3 50% 0% 1 17% 2 33% 6 3%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 0%

Ben Boyd Road 18 56% 1 3% 1 3% 12 38% 32 15%

Earle Street 5 42% 2 17% 0% 5 42% 12 6%

Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 2%

Grasmere Road 21 51% 2 5% 3 7% 15 37% 41 19%

Oaks Avenue 4 31% 0% 2 15% 7 54% 13 6%

Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 2%

Sutherland Lane 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 1%


Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 0%

Young Street 15 47% 3 9% 3 9% 11 34% 32 15%

Anonymous 7 41% 3 18% 0% 7 41% 17 8%

Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 1%


Total 101 47% 15 7% 11 5% 88 41% 215 100%

Residential Street Address Number % Number % Number % Number %

Belgrave Street 0% 4 67% 2 33% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 0% 25 78% 7 22% 32 100%

Earle Street 1 8% 8 67% 3 25% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 1 25% 2 50% 1 25% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 2 5% 27 66% 12 29% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 3 23% 6 46% 4 31% 13 100%

Park Avenue 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%


Young Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 3 9% 18 56% 11 34% 32 100%

Anonymous 0% 12 71% 5 29% 17 100%

Duplicate 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%


Total 11 5% 133 62% 71 33% 215 100%

2d) In some areas parking meters make it easier for residents to obtain parking in their street by improving turnover. I would like parking meters* to operate in Ben Boyd Lane

No Answer Totals

Yes No No Answer Total Number

Mon-Fri Only Mon-Sat Mon-Sat

Page 4

Ben Boyd Road

3a) In Ben Boyd Road, I am in favour of the following (please tick one):


Belgrave Street 1 17% 1 17% 3 50% 1 17% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 3 9% 11 34% 16 50% 2 6% 32 100%

Earle Street 2 17% 0% 7 58% 3 25% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 0% 2 50% 1 25% 1 25% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 6 15% 7 17% 23 56% 5 12% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 3 23% 0% 5 38% 5 38% 13 100%

Park Avenue 0% 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 1 50% 0% 2 100%


Young Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 2 6% 2 6% 18 56% 10 31% 32 100%

Anonymous 2 12% 2 12% 9 53% 4 24% 17 100%

Duplicate 0% 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%


Totals 29 13% 32 15% 100 47% 54 25% 215 100%


6pm


Belgrave Street 3 50% 0% 1 17% 0% 2 33% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 13 41% 0% 1 3% 0% 18 56% 32 100%

Earle Street 2 17% 1 8% 1 8% 0% 8 67% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 21 51% 2 5% 2 5% 0% 16 39% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 6 46% 1 8% 0% 0% 6 46% 13 100%

Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 100%

Sutherland Street 15 35% 0% 0% 0% 28 65% 43 100%

Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 15 47% 4 13% 0% 2 6% 11 34% 32 100%

Anonymous 8 47% 0% 0% 0% 9 53% 17 100%

Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Totals 92 43% 10 5% 5 2% 2 1% 106 49% 215 100%

10pm


8pm Midnight No Answer Totals

Totals2P 4P


Support changes

No Changes No Answer

Page 5



Belgrave Street 3 50% 1 17% 1 17% 1 17% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 21 66% 4 13% 1 3% 6 19% 32 100%

Earle Street 4 33% 2 17% 0% 6 50% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 27 66% 2 5% 4 10% 8 20% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 5 38% 1 8% 1 8% 6 46% 13 100%

Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 100%


Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 14 44% 3 9% 4 13% 11 34% 32 100%

Anonymous 5 29% 4 24% 0% 8 47% 17 100%

Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Totals 104 48% 23 11% 13 6% 75 35% 215 100%


Belgrave Street 0% 3 50% 3 50% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 1 3% 26 81% 5 16% 32 100%

Earle Street 1 8% 7 58% 4 33% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 1 25% 3 75% 0% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 3 7% 31 76% 7 17% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 2 15% 8 62% 3 23% 13 100%

Park Avenue 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%



Young Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 3 9% 17 53% 12 38% 32 100%

Anonymous 0% 12 71% 5 29% 17 100%

Duplicate 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%


Totals 13 6% 137 64% 65 30% 215 100%

3d) In some areas parking meters make it easier for residents to obtain parking in their street by improving turnover. I would like parking meters* to operate in Ben Boyd Road.

Totals


Yes No No Answer Totals


Mon-Fri Only Mon-Sat Mon-Sat No Answer

Page 6

Earle Street

4a) In Earle Street, I am in favour of the following (please tick one):


Belgrave Street 1 17% 1 17% 3 50% 1 17% 6 3%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 0%

Ben Boyd Road 2 6% 9 28% 16 50% 5 16% 32 15%

Earle Street 1 8% 2 17% 8 67% 1 8% 12 6%

Grasmere Lane 0% 1 25% 2 50% 1 25% 4 2%

Grasmere Road 5 12% 6 15% 22 54% 8 20% 41 19%

Oaks Avenue 1 8% 1 8% 6 46% 5 38% 13 6%

Park Avenue 0% 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 2%

Sutherland Lane 0% 0% 1 50% 1 50% 2 1%


Young Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 0%

Young Street 1 3% 3 9% 19 59% 9 28% 32 15%

Anonymous 1 6% 1 6% 11 65% 4 24% 17 8%

Duplicate 0% 0% 2 100% 0% 2 1%

Outside Survey Area 0% 1 20% 3 60% 1 20% 5 2%

Totals 16 7% 30 14% 107 50% 62 29% 215 100%


6pm


Belgrave Street 4 67% 0% 0% 0% 2 33% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 9 28% 1 3% 1 3% 0% 21 66% 32 100%

Earle Street 6 50% 0% 0% 0% 6 50% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 2 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 20 49% 2 5% 1 2% 0% 18 44% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 4 31% 2 15% 0% 0% 7 54% 13 100%

Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 14 44% 4 13% 0% 2 6% 12 38% 32 100%

Anonymous 7 41% 2 12% 1 6% 0% 7 41% 17 100%

Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Totals 89 41% 12 6% 3 1% 2 1% 109 51% 215 100%

10pm

Support changes

No changes No Answer Totals2P 4P

Totals


8pm Midnight No Answer

Page 7



Belgrave Street 5 83% 0% 0% 1 17% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 19 59% 1 3% 1 3% 11 34% 32 100%

Earle Street 5 42% 1 8% 0% 6 50% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 2 50% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 24 59% 2 5% 4 10% 11 27% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 5 38% 0% 1 8% 7 54% 13 100%

Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Young Lane 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 100%

Young Street 16 50% 2 6% 3 9% 11 34% 32 100%

Anonymous 8 47% 2 12% 0% 7 41% 17 100%

Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Totals 104 48% 11 5% 10 5% 90 42% 215 100%


Belgrave Street 0% 4 67% 2 33% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 0% 24 75% 8 25% 32 100%

Earle Street 0% 11 92% 1 8% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 1 25% 2 50% 1 25% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 1 2% 32 78% 8 20% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 2 15% 7 54% 4 31% 13 100%

Park Avenue 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 0% 1 50% 1 50% 2 100%


Young Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 2 6% 19 59% 11 34% 32 100%

Anonymous 0% 11 65% 6 35% 17 100%

Duplicate 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%


Totals 8 4% 137 64% 70 33% 215 100%

4d) In some areas parking meters make it easier for residents to obtain parking in their street by improving turnover. I would like parking meters* to operate in Earle Street.


Mon-Fri Only Mon-Sat Mon-Sat No Answer Totals



Page 8

Grasmere Lane

5a) In Grasmere Lane, I am in favour of the following (please tick one):


Belgrave Street 1 17% 0% 3 50% 2 33% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 3 9% 10 31% 16 50% 3 9% 32 100%

Earle Street 1 8% 0% 8 67% 3 25% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 0% 2 50% 2 50% 0% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 7 17% 5 12% 24 59% 5 12% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 2 15% 0% 6 46% 5 38% 13 100%

Park Avenue 0% 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 0% 0% 1 50% 1 50% 2 100%


Young Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 2 6% 2 6% 20 63% 8 25% 32 100%

Anonymous 2 12% 3 18% 11 65% 1 6% 17 100%

Duplicate 0% 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%

Outside Survey Area 1 20% 0% 3 60% 1 20% 5 100%

Totals 23 11% 29 13% 119 55% 44 20% 215 100%


6pm


Belgrave Street 3 50% 0% 0% 0% 3 50% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 12 38% 0% 1 3% 0% 19 59% 32 100%

Earle Street 3 25% 0% 0% 0% 9 75% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 4 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 20 49% 2 5% 2 5% 0% 17 41% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 4 31% 2 15% 0% 0% 7 54% 13 100%

Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 19 59% 0% 0% 2 6% 11 34% 32 100%

Anonymous 9 53% 1 6% 1 6% 0% 6 35% 17 100%

Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%

Outside Survey Area 2 40% 1 20% 0% 0% 2 40% 5 100%

Totals 98 46% 8 4% 4 2% 2 1% 103 48% 215 100%

10pm Totals


Support changes



8pm Midnight No Answer

Page 9



Belgrave Street 4 67% 0% 0% 2 33% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 22 69% 0% 1 3% 9 28% 32 100%

Earle Street 4 33% 1 8% 0% 7 58% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 4 100% 0% 0% 0% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 26 63% 1 2% 5 12% 9 22% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 4 31% 2 15% 1 8% 6 46% 13 100%

Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 16 50% 2 6% 3 9% 11 34% 32 100%

Anonymous 8 47% 4 24% 1 6% 4 24% 17 100%

Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Totals 112 52% 16 7% 13 6% 74 34% 215 100%


Belgrave Street 0% 3 50% 3 50% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 0% 26 81% 6 19% 32 100%

Earle Street 0% 8 67% 4 33% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 1 25% 3 75% 0% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 2 5% 35 85% 4 10% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 2 15% 7 54% 4 31% 13 100%

Park Avenue 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 0% 1 50% 1 50% 2 100%


Young Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 3 9% 19 59% 10 31% 32 100%

Anonymous 0% 15 88% 2 12% 17 100%

Duplicate 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%


Totals 9 4% 149 69% 57 27% 215 100%

5d) In some areas parking meters make it easier for residents to obtain parking in their street by improving turnover. I would like parking meters* to operate in Grasmere Lane.

Mon-Sat Mon-Sat No Answer Totals


Mon-Fri Only



Page 10

Grasmere Road

6a) In Grasmere Road, I am in favour of the following (please tick one):


Belgrave Street 1 17% 0% 3 50% 2 33% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 2 6% 10 31% 16 50% 4 13% 32 100%

Earle Street 2 17% 0% 7 58% 3 25% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 0% 2 50% 1 25% 1 25% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 9 22% 11 27% 20 49% 1 2% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 2 15% 0% 6 46% 5 38% 13 100%

Park Avenue 0% 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 0% 0% 1 50% 1 50% 2 100%


Young Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 2 6% 3 9% 18 56% 9 28% 32 100%

Anonymous 1 6% 1 6% 11 65% 4 24% 17 100%

Duplicate 0% 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%


Totals 25 12% 31 14% 104 48% 55 26% 215 100%


Column Labels

6pm


Belgrave Street 3 50% 0% 0% 0% 3 50% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 11 34% 0% 1 3% 0% 20 63% 32 100%

Earle Street 2 17% 0% 0% 0% 10 83% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 23 56% 3 7% 3 7% 0% 12 29% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 5 38% 1 8% 0% 0% 7 54% 13 100%

Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 19 59% 0% 0% 2 6% 11 34% 32 100%

Anonymous 8 47% 0% 1 6% 1 6% 7 41% 17 100%

Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%

Outside Survey Area 2 40% 1 20% 0% 0% 2 40% 5 100%

Totals 96 45% 5 2% 5 2% 3 1% 106 49% 215 100%

10pm



Support changes


Page 11



Belgrave Street 4 67% 0% 0% 2 33% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 20 63% 1 3% 1 3% 10 31% 32 100%

Earle Street 4 33% 1 8% 0% 7 58% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 31 76% 3 7% 4 10% 3 7% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 6 46% 0% 1 8% 6 46% 13 100%

Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 16 50% 2 6% 3 9% 11 34% 32 100%

Anonymous 7 41% 3 18% 0% 7 41% 17 100%

Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Total 112 52% 14 7% 11 5% 78 36% 215 100%


Belgrave Street 0% 3 50% 3 50% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 0% 25 78% 7 22% 32 100%

Earle Street 0% 8 67% 4 33% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 1 25% 3 75% 0% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 2 5% 37 90% 2 5% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 2 15% 7 54% 4 31% 13 100%

Park Avenue 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 0% 1 50% 1 50% 2 100%


Young Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 3 9% 19 59% 10 31% 32 100%

Anonymous 0% 12 71% 5 29% 17 100%

Duplicate 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%


Totals 9 4% 143 67% 63 29% 215 100%

6d) In some areas parking meters make it easier for residents to obtain parking in their street by improving turnover. I would like parking meters* to operate in Grasmere Road.



Totals



Page 12

Oaks Avenue

7a) In Oaks Avenue, I am in favour of the following (please tick one):


Belgrave Street 2 33% 1 17% 2 33% 1 17% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 6 19% 6 19% 15 47% 5 16% 32 100%

Earle Street 1 8% 1 8% 7 58% 3 25% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 0% 1 25% 2 50% 1 25% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 8 20% 3 7% 18 44% 12 29% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 4 31% 1 8% 7 54% 1 8% 13 100%

Park Avenue 0% 1 25% 1 25% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Young Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 3 9% 1 3% 19 59% 9 28% 32 100%

Anonymous 2 12% 2 12% 9 53% 4 24% 17 100%

Duplicate 0% 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%


Totals 32 15% 23 11% 99 46% 61 28% 215 100%


6pm


Belgrave Street 3 50% 0% 1 17% 0% 2 33% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 10 31% 0% 1 3% 0% 21 66% 32 100%

Earle Street 3 25% 0% 0% 0% 9 75% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 18 44% 1 2% 2 5% 0% 20 49% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 7 54% 2 15% 1 8% 0% 3 23% 13 100%

Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 16 50% 1 3% 2 6% 2 6% 11 34% 32 100%

Anonymous 8 47% 1 6% 1 6% 0% 7 41% 17 100%

Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Totals 90 42% 6 3% 8 4% 2 1% 109 51% 215 100%

10pm




Support changes


Page 13



Belgrave Street 3 50% 1 17% 1 17% 1 17% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 15 47% 4 13% 3 9% 10 31% 32 100%

Earle Street 4 33% 1 8% 0% 7 58% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 20 49% 2 5% 3 7% 16 39% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 9 69% 2 15% 2 15% 0% 13 100%

Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 15 47% 3 9% 4 13% 10 31% 32 100%

Anonymous 6 35% 4 24% 0% 7 41% 17 100%

Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Totals 95 44% 24 11% 14 7% 82 38% 215 100%


Belgrave Street 1 17% 2 33% 3 50% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 0% 25 78% 7 22% 32 100%

Earle Street 0% 8 67% 4 33% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 1 25% 3 75% 0% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 3 7% 24 59% 14 34% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 4 31% 9 69% 0% 13 100%

Park Avenue 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 0% 1 50% 1 50% 2 100%


Young Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 3 9% 19 59% 10 31% 32 100%

Anonymous 1 6% 10 59% 6 35% 17 100%

Duplicate 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%


Totals 15 7% 126 59% 74 34% 215 100%

7d) In some areas parking meters make it easier for residents to obtain parking in their street by improving turnover. I would like parking meters* to operate in Oaks Avenue.

Totals





Page 14

Park Avenue

8a) In Park Avenue, I am in favour of the following (please tick one):


Belgrave Street 2 33% 1 17% 2 33% 1 17% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 7 22% 6 19% 14 44% 5 16% 32 100%

Earle Street 0% 0% 9 75% 3 25% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 0% 2 50% 1 25% 1 25% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 5 12% 7 17% 21 51% 8 20% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 5 38% 0% 7 54% 1 8% 13 100%

Park Avenue 0% 2 50% 2 50% 0% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 0% 1 50% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Young Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 4 13% 1 3% 18 56% 9 28% 32 100%

Anonymous 1 6% 2 12% 10 59% 4 24% 17 100%

Duplicate 0% 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%


Totals 28 13% 28 13% 103 48% 56 26% 215 100%


6pm


Belgrave Street 3 50% 0% 1 17% 0% 2 33% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 11 34% 0% 1 3% 0% 20 63% 32 100%

Earle Street 2 17% 0% 0% 1 8% 9 75% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 19 46% 2 5% 1 2% 1 2% 18 44% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 7 54% 1 8% 2 15% 0% 3 23% 13 100%

Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Young Lane 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 100%

Young Street 17 53% 1 3% 2 6% 2 6% 10 31% 32 100%

Anonymous 9 53% 0% 1 6% 0% 7 41% 17 100%

Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Totals 90 42% 6 3% 8 4% 4 2% 107 50% 215 100%

10pm




Support changes


Page 15



Belgrave Street 3 50% 1 17% 1 17% 1 17% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 13 41% 4 13% 4 13% 11 34% 32 100%

Earle Street 4 33% 1 8% 0% 7 58% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 27 66% 1 2% 2 5% 11 27% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 8 62% 1 8% 2 15% 2 15% 13 100%

Park Avenue 3 75% 0% 1 25% 0% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 16 50% 2 6% 4 13% 10 31% 32 100%

Anonymous 7 41% 3 18% 0% 7 41% 17 100%

Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Totals 100 47% 20 9% 15 7% 80 37% 215 100%


Belgrave Street 1 17% 3 50% 2 33% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 1 3% 20 63% 11 34% 32 100%

Earle Street 0% 10 83% 2 17% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 1 25% 2 50% 1 25% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 2 5% 29 71% 10 24% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 5 38% 7 54% 1 8% 13 100%

Park Avenue 0% 4 100% 0% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 0% 1 50% 1 50% 2 100%


Young Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 4 13% 18 56% 10 31% 32 100%

Anonymous 0% 12 71% 5 29% 17 100%

Duplicate 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%


Totals 17 8% 129 60% 69 32% 215 100%

8d) In some areas parking meters make it easier for residents to obtain parking in their street by improving turnover. I would like parking meters* to operate in Park Avenue.

Totals





Page 16

Park Avenue - Drop-off and Pick-up Zone

Number % Number % Number %

Belgrave Street 3 50% 2 33% 1 17% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 17 53% 12 38% 3 9% 32 100%

Earle Street 4 33% 5 42% 3 25% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 1 25% 3 75% 0% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 17 41% 15 37% 9 22% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 8 62% 1 8% 4 31% 13 100%

Park Avenue 0% 3 75% 1 25% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 0% 1 50% 1 50% 2 100%


Young Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 10 31% 13 41% 9 28% 32 100%

Anonymous 6 35% 5 29% 6 35% 17 100%

Duplicate 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%


Total 85 40% 72 33% 58 27% 215 100%

9) In Park Avenue, I am in favour of introducing a 24m ‘No Parking 4:30–7:00pm, 2 Hour 8:30am–4:30pm permit holders excepted’ zone fronting Cammeray Park to

cater for children drop–off and pick–up at the park during the afternoon sporting events.

Yes No No Answer Total Number

Page 17

Sutherland Lane

10a) In Sutherland Lane, I am in favour of the following (please tick one):


Belgrave Street 1 17% 1 17% 2 33% 2 33% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 3 9% 9 28% 15 47% 5 16% 32 100%

Earle Street 1 8% 0% 7 58% 4 33% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 1 25% 1 25% 1 25% 1 25% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 7 17% 2 5% 21 51% 11 27% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 1 8% 0% 7 54% 5 38% 13 100%

Park Avenue 0% 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 1 50% 0% 2 100%


Young Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 1 3% 1 3% 21 66% 9 28% 32 100%

Anonymous 1 6% 1 6% 10 59% 5 29% 17 100%

Duplicate 0% 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%


Totals 24 11% 19 9% 110 51% 62 29% 215 100%


6pm


Belgrave Street 3 50% 0% 0% 0% 3 50% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 11 34% 0% 1 3% 0% 20 63% 32 100%

Earle Street 4 33% 0% 0% 0% 8 67% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 19 46% 1 2% 2 5% 0% 19 46% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 5 38% 1 8% 0% 0% 7 54% 13 100%

Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 100%


Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 18 56% 1 3% 0% 2 6% 11 34% 32 100%

Anonymous 7 41% 0% 1 6% 0% 9 53% 17 100%

Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Totals 93 43% 5 2% 4 2% 2 1% 111 52% 215 100%

10pm




Support changes


Page 18



Belgrave Street 3 50% 1 17% 0% 2 33% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 20 63% 1 3% 1 3% 10 31% 32 100%

Earle Street 4 33% 1 8% 0% 7 58% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 22 54% 1 2% 3 7% 15 37% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 6 46% 1 8% 1 8% 5 38% 13 100%

Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 100%


Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 17 53% 1 3% 3 9% 11 34% 32 100%

Anonymous 8 47% 1 6% 0% 8 47% 17 100%

Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Totals 111 52% 12 6% 9 4% 83 39% 215 100%


Belgrave Street 1 17% 3 50% 2 33% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 0% 24 75% 8 25% 32 100%

Earle Street 1 8% 6 50% 5 42% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 1 25% 3 75% 0% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 1 2% 29 71% 11 27% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 2 15% 6 46% 5 38% 13 100%

Park Avenue 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%



Young Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 3 9% 19 59% 10 31% 32 100%

Anonymous 0% 11 65% 6 35% 17 100%

Duplicate 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%


Totals 10 5% 135 63% 70 33% 215 100%

Totals





10d) In some areas parking meters make it easier for residents to obtain parking in their street by improving turnover. I would like parking meters* to operate in Sutherland Lane

Page 19

Sutherland Street

11a) In Sutherland Street, I am in favour of the following (please tick one):


Belgrave Street 1 17% 0% 3 50% 2 33% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 4 13% 10 31% 15 47% 3 9% 32 100%

Earle Street 1 8% 1 8% 7 58% 3 25% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 0% 2 50% 1 25% 1 25% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 7 17% 7 17% 17 41% 10 24% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 3 23% 0% 7 54% 3 23% 13 100%

Park Avenue 0% 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 0% 1 50% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Young Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 2 6% 1 3% 18 56% 11 34% 32 100%

Anonymous 2 12% 3 18% 9 53% 3 18% 17 100%

Duplicate 0% 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%


Totals 31 14% 38 18% 104 48% 42 20% 215 100%


6pm


Belgrave Street 3 50% 0% 0% 0% 3 50% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 12 38% 1 3% 1 3% 0% 18 56% 32 100%

Earle Street 3 25% 0% 0% 0% 9 75% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 20 49% 1 2% 3 7% 0% 17 41% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 6 46% 2 15% 0% 0% 5 38% 13 100%

Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 16 50% 1 3% 1 3% 2 6% 12 38% 32 100%

Anonymous 8 47% 1 6% 1 6% 0% 7 41% 17 100%

Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Totals 103 48% 10 5% 6 3% 2 1% 94 44% 215 100%




Support changes


10pm

Page 20



Belgrave Street 3 50% 1 17% 0% 2 33% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 16 50% 6 19% 1 3% 9 28% 32 100%

Earle Street 6 50% 1 8% 0% 5 42% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 23 56% 1 2% 4 10% 13 32% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 8 62% 0% 2 15% 3 23% 13 100%

Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 15 47% 2 6% 3 9% 12 38% 32 100%

Anonymous 7 41% 2 12% 1 6% 7 41% 17 100%

Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Totals 113 53% 25 12% 15 7% 62 29% 215 100%


Belgrave Street 0% 4 67% 2 33% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 1 3% 27 84% 4 13% 32 100%

Earle Street 1 8% 7 58% 4 33% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 1 25% 3 75% 0% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 1 2% 32 78% 8 20% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 2 15% 9 69% 2 15% 13 100%

Park Avenue 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 0% 1 50% 1 50% 2 100%


Young Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 3 9% 18 56% 11 34% 32 100%

Anonymous 0% 13 76% 4 24% 17 100%

Duplicate 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%


Totals 11 5% 161 75% 43 20% 215 100%

Totals





11d) In some areas parking meters make it easier for residents to obtain parking in their street by improving turnover. I would like parking meters* to operate in Sutherland Street.

Page 21

View Street

12a) In View Street, I am in favour of the following (please tick one):


Belgrave Street 2 33% 0% 3 50% 1 17% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 3 9% 8 25% 15 47% 6 19% 32 100%

Earle Street 1 8% 0% 8 67% 3 25% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 0% 2 50% 1 25% 1 25% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 6 15% 8 20% 18 44% 9 22% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 1 8% 0% 7 54% 5 38% 13 100%

Park Avenue 0% 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 0% 0% 1 50% 1 50% 2 100%


Young Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 1 3% 1 3% 20 63% 10 31% 32 100%

Anonymous 1 6% 2 12% 10 59% 4 24% 17 100%

Duplicate 0% 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%


Totals 19 9% 27 13% 102 47% 67 31% 215 100%


6pm


Belgrave Street 4 67% 0% 0% 0% 2 33% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 10 31% 0% 1 3% 0% 21 66% 32 100%

Earle Street 3 25% 0% 0% 0% 9 75% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 20 49% 2 5% 2 5% 0% 17 41% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 5 38% 1 8% 0% 0% 7 54% 13 100%

Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 18 56% 1 3% 0% 2 6% 11 34% 32 100%

Anonymous 8 47% 0% 1 6% 0% 8 47% 17 100%

Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Totals 93 43% 4 2% 4 2% 2 1% 112 52% 215 100%




Support changes


10pm

Page 22



Belgrave Street 5 83% 0% 0% 1 17% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 18 56% 1 3% 0% 13 41% 32 100%

Earle Street 4 33% 1 8% 0% 7 58% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 24 59% 1 2% 5 12% 11 27% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 6 46% 1 8% 1 8% 5 38% 13 100%

Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 17 53% 1 3% 3 9% 11 34% 32 100%

Anonymous 8 47% 1 6% 0% 8 47% 17 100%

Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Totals 104 48% 10 5% 10 5% 91 42% 215 100%


Belgrave Street 0% 4 67% 2 33% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 0% 23 72% 9 28% 32 100%

Earle Street 0% 9 75% 3 25% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 1 25% 3 75% 0% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 1 2% 31 76% 9 22% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 2 15% 7 54% 4 31% 13 100%

Park Avenue 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 0% 1 50% 1 50% 2 100%


Young Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 3 9% 18 56% 11 34% 32 100%

Anonymous 0% 10 59% 7 41% 17 100%

Duplicate 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%


Totals 8 4% 130 60% 77 36% 215 100%

Totals





12d) In some areas parking meters make it easier for residents to obtain parking in their street by improving turnover. I would like parking meters* to operate in View Street.

Page 23

Young Lane

13a) In Young Lane, I am in favour of the following (please tick one):


Belgrave Street 2 33% 0% 3 50% 1 17% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 5 16% 6 19% 14 44% 7 22% 32 100%

Earle Street 1 8% 0% 8 67% 3 25% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 0% 2 50% 1 25% 1 25% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 7 17% 4 10% 19 46% 11 27% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 2 15% 0% 7 54% 4 31% 13 100%

Park Avenue 0% 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 100%


Young Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 2 6% 2 6% 21 66% 7 22% 32 100%

Anonymous 1 6% 2 12% 10 59% 4 24% 17 100%

Duplicate 0% 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%


Totals 28 13% 21 10% 102 47% 64 30% 215 100%


6pm


Belgrave Street 3 50% 0% 1 17% 0% 2 33% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 10 31% 0% 1 3% 0% 21 66% 32 100%

Earle Street 3 25% 0% 0% 0% 9 75% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 19 46% 1 2% 2 5% 0% 19 46% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 4 31% 2 15% 0% 0% 7 54% 13 100%

Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 100%


Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 18 56% 1 3% 0% 2 6% 11 34% 32 100%

Anonymous 8 47% 0% 0% 0% 9 53% 17 100%

Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Totals 92 43% 5 2% 4 2% 2 1% 112 52% 215 100%




Support changes


10pm

Page 24



Belgrave Street 3 50% 0% 2 33% 1 17% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 15 47% 2 6% 3 9% 12 38% 32 100%

Earle Street 4 33% 1 8% 0% 7 58% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 22 54% 1 2% 3 7% 15 37% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 6 46% 0% 2 15% 5 38% 13 100%

Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 100%


Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 15 47% 3 9% 3 9% 11 34% 32 100%

Anonymous 5 29% 4 24% 0% 8 47% 17 100%

Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Totals 95 44% 16 7% 14 7% 90 42% 215 100%


Belgrave Street 0% 5 83% 1 17% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 0% 23 72% 9 28% 32 100%

Earle Street 0% 9 75% 3 25% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 1 25% 3 75% 0% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 1 2% 29 71% 11 27% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 3 23% 6 46% 4 31% 13 100%

Park Avenue 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%



Young Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 3 9% 19 59% 10 31% 32 100%

Anonymous 0% 12 71% 5 29% 17 100%

Duplicate 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%


Totals 9 4% 136 63% 70 33% 215 100%

Totals





13d) In some areas parking meters make it easier for residents to obtain parking in their street by improving turnover. I would like parking meters* to operate in Young Lane.

Page 25

Young Street

14a) In Young Street on the western side, I am in favour of the following (please tick one):


Belgrave Street 1 17% 1 17% 2 33% 2 33% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 10 31% 1 3% 15 47% 6 19% 32 100%

Earle Street 1 8% 0% 8 67% 3 25% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 0% 1 25% 2 50% 1 25% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 7 17% 6 15% 19 46% 9 22% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 2 15% 1 8% 7 54% 3 23% 13 100%

Park Avenue 0% 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Young Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 6 19% 5 16% 21 66% 0% 32 100%

Anonymous 4 24% 1 6% 9 53% 3 18% 17 100%

Duplicate 0% 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%


Totals 38 18% 21 10% 104 48% 52 24% 215 100%


6pm


Belgrave Street 3 50% 0% 0% 0% 3 50% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 10 31% 0% 2 6% 0% 20 63% 32 100%

Earle Street 3 25% 0% 0% 0% 9 75% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 21 51% 1 2% 3 7% 0% 16 39% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 5 38% 2 15% 0% 0% 6 46% 13 100%

Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 18 56% 3 9% 2 6% 2 6% 7 22% 32 100%

Anonymous 8 47% 0% 0% 0% 9 53% 17 100%

Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Totals 95 44% 7 3% 7 3% 2 1% 104 48% 215 100%




Support changes


10pm

Page 26



Belgrave Street 3 50% 1 17% 0% 2 33% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 10 31% 3 9% 8 25% 11 34% 32 100%

Earle Street 4 33% 1 8% 0% 7 58% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 3 75% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 22 54% 1 2% 5 12% 13 32% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 6 46% 1 8% 1 8% 5 38% 13 100%

Park Avenue 2 50% 0% 0% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Young Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 17 53% 2 6% 6 19% 7 22% 32 100%

Anonymous 5 29% 6 35% 0% 6 35% 17 100%

Duplicate 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 100%


Totals 93 43% 20 9% 21 10% 81 38% 215 100%


Belgrave Street 1 17% 3 50% 2 33% 6 100%

Ben Boyd Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%

Ben Boyd Road 0% 24 75% 8 25% 32 100%

Earle Street 1 8% 8 67% 3 25% 12 100%

Grasmere Lane 2 50% 2 50% 0% 4 100%

Grasmere Road 1 2% 32 78% 8 20% 41 100%

Oaks Avenue 3 23% 7 54% 3 23% 13 100%

Park Avenue 0% 2 50% 2 50% 4 100%

Sutherland Lane 0% 1 50% 1 50% 2 100%


Young Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 1 100%

Young Street 6 19% 23 72% 3 9% 32 100%

Anonymous 0% 13 76% 4 24% 17 100%

Duplicate 0% 2 100% 0% 2 100%


Totals 15 7% 144 67% 56 26% 215 100%

Totals





14d) In some areas parking meters make it easier for residents to obtain parking in their street by improving turnover. I would like parking meters* to operate in Young Street.

Page 27

Zone_id Area_id HNO. Street Name Current Restrictions

Total

Spaces Occupancy

Recommended

Changes Comments

683 26 10 Belgrave Street

Clearway 3pm - 7pm

Mon - Fri Unrestricted

Parking other times 8 100% Retain existing

Overall, 47% of respondents support no changes in Belgrave Street.

11.2% support 2 Hour Parking and 9.8% support 4 Hour Parking.

Respondents in this section of Belgrave Street generally support no

changes.

668 26 36 Ben Boyd Lane Unrestricted Parking 2 100%

2 Hour Parking

8.30am - 6pm

Mon - Fri Permit

Holders Excepted

Area 26

Overall, 20% of respondents support parking restrictions in Ben Boyd Lane

(equally support 2 and 4 Hour Parking)

Respondents in this section of Ben Boyd Lane generally support 2 Hour

parking.

669 26 32 Ben Boyd Lane Unrestricted Parking 2 100% Retain existing



Respondents in this section of Ben Boyd Lane generally support

unrestricted parking.

670 26 26 Ben Boyd Lane

2 Hour Parking 8.30am -

6pm Mon - Fri Permit

Holders Excepted Area

26 6 67% Retain existing



Respondents in this section of Ben Boyd Lane generally support 2 Hour

parking.

671 26 24 Ben Boyd Lane Unrestricted Parking 2 100% Retain existing



Respondents in this section of Ben Boyd Lane generally support


621

26

267 Ben Boyd Road Unrestricted Parking

16 81% Retain existing

Overall, 28% of respondents support parking restrictions in Ben Boyd Road

(13%support 2 Hour Parking and 15% support 4 Hour Parking)

43% of Ben Boyd Road respondents support parking restriction.

Respondents in this section of Ben Boyd Road generally support


622 26 243 Ben Boyd Road Unrestricted Parking 2 100%

Convert existing

unrestricted

parking to 2 Hour

8.30am - 6pm

Mon - Fri Permit

Holders Excepted

Area 26




Respondents in this section of Ben Boyd Road generally support parking

restrictions.

Parking Area 26 - Proposed Parking Restrictions

Page 1

623 26 235 Ben Boyd Road








Respondents in this section of Ben Boyd Road generally support parking

restrictions.

624 26 216 Ben Boyd Road Unrestricted Parking 11 100% Retain existing




34% of Ben Boyd Road respondents support 4 Hour parking.

Respondents in this section of Ben Boyd Road generally support


625 26 240 Ben Boyd Road Unrestricted Parking 5 100%

Convert existing

unrestricted

parking to 4 Hour

8.30am - 6pm

Mon - Fri Permit

Holders Excepted

Area 26





Respondents in this section of Ben Boyd Road generally support 4 Hour

parking.

626 26 242 Ben Boyd Road




26 10 80%

Convert eight (8)

existing 2 Hour

parking spaces

along the

frontage of 45

Grasmere Road to

4 Hour Parking

8.30am - 6pm

Mon - Fri Permit

Holders Excepted

Area 26





Respondents in this section of Ben Boyd Road generally support 4 Hour

parking.

624A 26 224 Ben Boyd Road









Respondents in this section of Ben Boyd Road generally support retaining

existing restriction.

Page 2

631 26 1 Earle Street Unrestricted Parking 19 63%

1. Convert three

(3) spaces of

unrestricted

parking fronting

No.1 and No.3

Earle Street to 4

Hour Parking

8.30am - 6pm

Mon - Fri Permit

Holders Excepted

Area 26

Overall, 21% of respondents support parking restrictions in Earle Street

(7% support 2 Hour Parking and 14% support 4 Hour Parking)

25% of Earle Street respondents support parking restriction.

Respondents in this section of Earle Street generally support unrestricted

parking.

632 26 33 Earle Street Unrestricted Parking 14 57% Retain existing

Overall, 21% of respondents support parking restrictions in Earle Street

(7% support 2 Hour Parking and 14% support 4 Hour Parking)

25% of Earle Street respondents support parking restriction.

Respondents in this section of Earle Street generally support retaining

existing restriction.

634 26 Earle Street Unrestricted 2 50% Retain existing

Overall, 21% of respondents support parking restrictions, 50% support no

changes in Earle Street

25% of Earle Street respondents support parking restriction (8% support 2

Hour Parking, 17% support 4 Hour parking)

Respondents in this section of Earle Street generally support no changes.













Page 3

650 26 67 Grasmere Lane Unrestricted Parking 5 100% Retain existing


changes in Grasmere Lane.

50% of Grasmere Lane respondents support parking restriction.

Respondents in this section of Grasmere Lane generally support no

changes.






changes.






changes.






changes.






changes.






changes.

656 26 Grasmere Lane Unrestricted Parking 1 100% Retain existing



50% of Grasmere Lane respondents support parking restrictions.


changes.

Page 4

645 26 50 Grasmere Road Unrestricted Parking 24 92%

Convert existing

four (4)

unrestricted

parking spaces

fronting No.38-40

Grasmere Road to

2 Hour Parking

8.30am - 6pm

Mon - Fri Permit

Holders Excepted

Area 26


changes in Grasmere Road.

49% of Grasmere Road respondents support parking restrictions.

Respondents in this section of Grasmere Road generally support no

changes.

647 26 26 Grasmere Road Unrestricted Parking 27 89% Retain existing





changes.


Convert parking

in front of No.39-

45 Grasmere

Road (approx. 9

spaces) to 4 Hour

Parking 8.30am -

6pm Mon - Fri

Permit Holders

Excepted Area 26




50% of respondents in this section of Grasmere Road support 4 Hour

Parking.


Convert parking

in front of No. 49-

51A Grasmere

Road (approx. 3

spaces) to 4 Hour

Parking 8.30am -

6pm Mon - Fri

Permit Holders

Excepted Area 26



49% of Grasmere Road respondents support parking restrictions (27%

support 4 Hour parking)

Respondents in this section of Grasmere Road generally support parking

restrictions.

Page 5

648A 26 Grasmere Road







49% of Grasmere Road respondents support parking restrictions


restrictions.

649A 26 61 Grasmere Road Unrestricted Parking 1 0% Retain existing



49% of Grasmere Road respondents support parking restrictions


changes.

649B 26 59 Grasmere Road




26 6 50%

Convert parking

in front of No. 49-

51A Grasmere

Road (approx. 3

spaces) to 4 Hour

Parking 8.30am -

6pm Mon - Fri

Permit Holders

Excepted Area 26



49% of Grasmere Road respondents support parking restrictions (27%

support 4 Hour parking)


restrictions.

259 27 23 Oaks Avenue Unrestricted Parking 6 67% Retain existing

Overall, 26% of respondents support parking restrictions in Oaks Avenue.

39% of Oaks Avenue respondents support parking restrictions (31%

support 2 Hour parking and 8% support 4 Hour parking)

Respondents in this section of Oaks Avenue generally support no changes.

260 27 21 Oaks Avenue


















Page 6

262 27 1A Oaks Avenue


















261A 27 9 Oaks Avenue Unrestricted Parking 6 50% Retain existing





627A 27 18 Oaks Avenue Unrestricted Parking 7 71% Retain existing





627B 27 22 Oaks Avenue

No Parking 8.30am -

6pm Mon - Fri 2 0% Retain existing





628 26 45 Park Avenue

4 Hour 8.30am -6Pm

Mon-Fri PH Excepted

area 26 10 50% Retain existing

Overall, 26% of respondents support parking restrictions in Parks Avenue.

50% of Parks Avenue respondents support parking restrictions (0%


Respondents in this section of Parks Avenue generally support no

changes.


8 Hour 8.30am-6pm

Mon-Fri PH excepted

area 26 11 100%

Convert existing 8

Hour parking to 4

Hour 8.30am-

6pm Mon-Fri PH

excepted area 26




Respondents in this section of Parks Avenue generally support 4 Hour

parking.

Page 7


8P 8.30am-6pm Mon-Fri

PH excepted area 26 8 100%

Convert existing 8

Hour parking to 4

Hour 8.30am-

6pm Mon-Fri PH

excepted area 26





parking.



6pm Mon - Fri 9 44%

Convert four (4)

spaces of existing

2 Hour parking to

'No Parking

4:30–7:00pm, 2

Hour

8:30am–4:30pm

permit holders

excepted'

Overall, 26% of respondents support parking restrictions in Parks Avenue

and 40% support introduction of a 24m pick-up and drop-off zone fronting

Cammeray Oval.


support 2 Hour parking, 50% support 4 Hour parking)

Respondents in this section of Parks Avenue generally support parking

restrictions except one resident opposes the part-time pick-up and drop-

off zone.


4 Hour 8.30am -6Pm

Mon-Fri PH Excepted

area 26 6 100% Retain existing

Overall, 26% of respondents support parking restrictions in Parks Avenue

and 40% support introduction of a 24m pick-up and drop-off zone

fronting Cammeray Oval.



Respondents in this section of Parks Avenue generally support no

changes.


8 Hour 8.30am-6pm

Mon-Fri PH excepted

area 26 58 76%

Convert existing 8

Hour parking to 4

Hour 8.30am-

6pm Mon-Fri PH

excepted area 26





parking.

672 26 20 Sutherland Lane




26 5 60%

Convert existing 1

Hour parking to 2

Hour 8.30am-

6pm Mon-Fri PH

excepted area 26

Overall, 20% of respondents support parking restrictions in Sutherland

Lane.

50% of Sutherland Lane respondents support parking restrictions (50%


Respondents in this section of Parks Avenue generally support parking

restrictions.

Page 8

657 26 40 Sutherland Street Unrestricted Parking 5 100%

Convert existing

unrestricted

parking to 4 Hour

8.30am-6pm Mon-

Fri PH excepted

area 26


Street.



Respondents in this section of Sutherland Street generally support 4 Hour

parking restrictions.


Convert existing

unrestricted

parking to 4 Hour

8.30am-6pm Mon-

Fri PH excepted

area 26 except

along the street

frontage of No.22

Sutherland Street

(approx. 8 spaces)


Street.



Respondents in this section of Sutherland Street generally support parking

restrictions except respondents of No.22 Sutherland Street.

659 26 8 Sutherland Street






Street.



Respondents in this section of Sutherland Street generally support no

changes.


Convert existing

unrestricted

parking to 4 Hour

8.30am-6pm Mon-

Fri PH excepted

area 26


Street.




restrictions.

Page 9

661 26 5 Sutherland Street Unrestricted Parking 7 86% Retain existing


Street.




changes.





26 4 50%

Convert existing 2

Hour parking to 4

Hour 8.30am-

6pm Mon-Fri PH

excepted area 26


Street.




restrictions.


Convert existing

unrestricted

parking to 2 Hour

8.30am-6pm Mon-

Fri PH excepted

area 26


Street.




restrictions.







Street.




restrictions.


Convert existing

unrestricted

parking to 2 Hour

8.30am-6pm Mon-

Fri PH excepted

area 26


Street.




restrictions.

Page 10


Convert existing

unrestricted

parking to 2 Hour

8.30am-6pm Mon-

Fri PH excepted

area 26


Street.




restrictions.







Street.




restrictions.

674 26 55A Sutherland Street Unrestricted Parking 4 100%

Convert existing

unrestricted

parking to 2 Hour

8.30am-6pm Mon-

Fri PH excepted

area 26


Street.




restrictions.


Convert existing

unrestricted

parking to 2 Hour

8.30am-6pm Mon-

Fri PH excepted

area 26


Street.




restrictions.







Street.




restrictions.

Page 11


Convert existing

unrestricted

parking to 2 Hour

8.30am-6pm Mon-

Fri PH excepted

area 26


Street.




restrictions.







Street.




restrictions.


Convert existing

unrestricted

parking to 2 Hour

8.30am-6pm Mon-

Fri PH excepted

area 26


Street.




restrictions.

646 26 29 View Street Unrestricted Parking 8 100% Retain existing

Overall, 22% of respondents support parking restrictions in View Street

(9% support 2 Hour parking and 13% support 4 Hour parking)


changes.

646A 26 31 View Street Unrestricted Parking 3 100% Retain existing

Overall, 22% of respondents support parking restrictions in View Street

(9% support 2 Hour parking and 13% support 4 Hour parking)


changes.

675 26 31 Young Lane Unrestricted Parking 6 83% Retain existing

Overall, 23% of respondents support parking restrictions in Young Lane

100% of Young Lane respondents support no changes.

Respondents in this section of Young Lane generally support no changes.

Page 12



100% of Young Lane respondents support no changes




100% of Young Lane respondents support no changes.


642 26 48 Young Street





Overall, 28% of respondents support parking restrictions in Young Street

35% of Young Street respondents support parking restrictions (19%


Respondents in this section of Young Street generally support no changes.


2 Hour Parking 8am -

















2510 26 112 Young Street Unrestricted Parking 26 46% Retain existing





Page 13

Item 4.4 - Traffic - 26/7/19 N O R T H S Y D N E Y C O U N C I L


Attach: 1. Survey Results 2. Proposed Parking Changes

3. Map - Proposed Changes SUBJECT: (4.4) North Sydney Parking Area 10 – Survey Results AUTHOR: Report of Manager Parking Meters, Leonie Wishart DESCRIPTION/SUBJECT MATTER: A parking survey for a section of North Sydney Parking Area 10 was sent out on the 16 May 2019 to 1201 residents, businesses, and to Edward Precinct. Residents were given until 16 June 2019 to respond. A total of 108 responses were received. This represents a response rate of 9%, which is slightly lower that the average response rate of 10 to 12%. The answers received from the residents for the North Sydney Parking Area 10 survey are summarised in the report. Recommended changes to the parking restrictions in the North Sydney Parking Area 10 are also detailed in the report. RECOMMENDATION: 1. THAT Council adopt the attached parking restriction recommendations for North Sydney Parking Area 10. 2. THAT Council notify the residents before installing the parking restriction changes in North Sydney Parking Area 10. 3. THAT the new parking restrictions be reviewed six (6) months after the date of installation in North Sydney Parking Area 10.

Report of Manager Parking Meters, Leonie Wishart Re: North Sydney Parking Area 10 - Survey Results

(2) CONSULTATION REQUIREMENTS Consultation has been undertaken in accordance with Council's Community Engagement Protocol Relates to ECM No: N/A Standard or Guideline Used: AS2890.5; AS1742.11; NSC Resident Parking Permit Policy Signs & Lines Priority: 2 Precinct and Ward: Edward, Wollstonecraft Impact on Bicycles: Nil Impact on Pedestrians: Nil Impact on Parking: Some changes to parking restrictions are proposed as outlined in the report. DETAIL North Sydney Parking Area 10 survey affects Bay Road (between Edward Street and Harriott Street), Priory Road, Toongarah Road and McHatton Street. A total of 1201 surveys were distributed to residents, property owners, businesses, and to the Edward Precinct between 16 and 23 May 2019. The survey was also distributed to North Sydney Demonstration School and the businesses within the area. The survey was also available online. Residents were given until the 16 June 2019 to respond. A total of 108 responses were received, including 52 hard copy responses and 56 online responses. This represents a response rate of 9%. This is slightly lower that the average response rate, usually 10 to 12% for parking surveys. Survey Results The answers received for North Sydney Parking Area 10 parking survey are summarised in Attachment 1. Precinct Comments At the time of writing Council has not received comments from Edward Precinct Comments Received Respondents were asked to provide general comments/feedback as desired. Comments have been grouped by emerging themes.


(3) Support Parking Restrictions • We live at the bottom of McHatton St and work from home, as a consequence we get

to see the constant overstay by parkers at the bottom of McHatton street, the top of the street is not so bad as the school parking times come in and everyone needs to move. However, we regularly see people park for the whole day and never move their cars even though it is a 2 hour limit or alternatively, swap their cars with their friends to game the system. These behaviours cause a ripple effect to the school parents at pick up time with some parents parking across driveways, in driveways or no stopping zones. We have regularly phoned into council to report cars parked illegally however the behavior continues. I firmly believe a one hour one or paid parking (I really don't mind) would limit people from overstaying the 2 hours and force them to move their cars thereby reducing the congestion in the street.

• I notice that the students come down from the ACU around mid to late morning in pairs and swap their cars between their spot and their friend’s spot thereby extending their parking time by another 2 hours. Meters may prevent this sort of behavior. The ACU is well served by public transport.

• Endless traffic in Priory Rd + Toongarah Rd looking for parking is unsettling and dangerous in such a small residential area. Many children and babies live in the area and are subject to the pollution from the endless cars. 1 hour parking means residents and visitors and tradies can access some parking. Parts of Bay Rd, a through road has only 1 hour but needs 2 hour parking to take some focus away from dead end streets.

• In BAY ROAD between Edward and Harriott Streets, 1. f. I would like the parking restrictions to operate Monday to Friday AND PUBLIC HOLIDAYS

• "This is a good initiative and appreciate the survey. I find Toongarah Rd impossible to park in after I leave and come back by 5pm. There are many ACU uni students + commuters that park in this street and leave aggressive rude notes on cars when they aren't able to squeeze in parking spots.

• I don't have a car but can't provide reliable parking for visitors + tradesmen. The volume of traffic is really high for a dead-end street (I think mostly students who just swap places every 2 hours). Meters would only hit those least able to pay. 1 hr parking would make all users look at the very good public transport alternatives.

• Less all day parking in Toongarah Road would go some way to creating more turnover for those seeking short term parking, particularly ACU students. Well marked designated bays as for meter parking would help overcome vehicles using excessive space and prevent the impeding of driveway access.

Oppose Meters • Absolutely NO parking meters • We strongly object to introducing more restrictive parking in McHatton St

particularly meter parking. This is a quiet residential area with visiting family and friends who would have to pay for parking, as would some family members. It represents encroachment of North Sydney CBD on a residential street.


(4) • Please, NO parking meters! What about installing circular timers set in the road (as

in the Council's car park) for Edward St?.

• Very concerned that any change will affect our amenity as residents. Visitors and trades people need up to 2hrs free parking Mon to Fri and unlimited Sat -Sun. Further restrictions especially charging them if meters are installed will be a negative for these occasional parkers. And ultimately a negative for our enjoyment of our home and surrounds.

• Metered parking should be avoided - there is no reason for it in a residential area. Resident complaints about student parking is relevant.

• I feel like more parking permits should be issued to residents. I currently have none because I have 1 garage space but 2 bedrooms. The current times are fine and space frees up after 6pm anyway. I don’t want my visitors to start having to pay for parking and have ugly pay stations on the streets.

• We would like to strongly object to any proposal to change current parking restrictions in McHatton St or surrounding streets ie Crows Nest Road or Bay Road. Given that that houses in McHatton St are large family houses, we all have teenage children and extended family, grandparents and cousins who visit frequently. Even if immediate family members living in the house have residential stickers (which we have to pay for) any visitors to the house including guests, extended family and trades people would be forced to pay for parking. We bought these homes as we wanted to live in quiet residential area. The Councils proposed changes represent a creeping incursion of North Sydney CBD into a residential area with significant on flowing impact to residents and their extended family. Please confirm you have no plans to change parking or introduce meters in these streets.

• I don’t see introducing more paid parking is a equitable way to manage the parking demand to benefit local residents and their visitors if the council is not to waive resident parking permit cost, rather this is a revenue generating approach by the council. Council shall share the statistics on the number of complaints received to public to be more transparent on the decision process of a change. The wording “it is Councils understanding “doesn’t cut it.

• 1. I have not made comments above as I have no difficulties with parking in North Sydney. 2. May apartment has a lock-up garage and some space for visitors. More visitor space would be good but I'm not willing to pay for it. 3. Those meters are very expensive!!

• We recently purchased a house in Toongarah, a major reason for this purchase was the parking conditions. It is easy to get a car park on weekends and we understood the parking conditions on weekdays - no need for change at all

• I fully support the current parking arrangements. I do not see a need for any changes. I am always able to park close to my home.


(5)

• Parking restrictions in these proposed streets should be left at or all changed to 2 hourparking only. This would still ensure vehicle turnover as 2 hours is not that long topark and commuters wouldn't be able to park there all day as NSC ensures thatparking rangers are onsite pretty much most days of the week anyway! Meteredparking is only put in place to raise more funds for the Council and it has very littleimpact on helping residents find parking... the cash raised through fines and meteredparking is then used for useless upgrades such as the unnecessary and expensivereplacement of foothpaths/ gutters on Bay Road and Mount Street as well as leavinggifts and conference expenses for NSC staff which is paid out of our (the residents)Council rates etc....

• We feel that there are already too many restrictions and that the parking should not be restricted further in North Sydney.

• My biggest concern is parking meters. Why there is a need to make these areas "resident exempt" I do not know. These are residential areas, and should be there for residents. This is where we live. This is where we pay rates. In my view, parking meters should not be introduced into residential areas. Parking meters are symbolic of the CBD. I strong oppose introducing aspects of the CBD into residential streets. We should be doing all we can to retain the suburban-ness we are so lucky to have. North Sydney Council have very strong heritage and conservation laws, which I support wholeheartedly. To allow any form of "CBD creep" into these areas would be disastrous in my view. In your letter it is said that the introduction of meters into Edward Street has been a success. But I'd say it's the fact that it is "combined with enforcement" that is the clincher. I'd get rid of meters in Edward St, introduce "2 hour" parking signs with an addition saying "WARNING - REGULARLY ENFORCED".

• Please leave some all day parking in Toongarah Road. No not make the street all restricted parking. Thank you – John.

• The proposed parking changes are another example of Council increasing fees and charges with no increase in services.

Enforcement

• The current parking restrictions work reasonably well and therefore I supportretaining them with the exception of areas close to Pacific Highway and the CBDsuch as Doohat Ave and Lane. The problem with imposing greater parkingrestrictions in the areas identified in the survey is that it will just push the parkingproblem into other streets in Waverton. The area around the school is particularly badaround drop-off and pick-up times, however I think the current restrictions are asgood as can be, especially when accompanied by visible and consistent enforcement.

• As we have found out in the past if there is not sufficient monitoring restrictions arefruitless.

• Increase number of parking inspectors. Fine people for inconsiderate parking (suchas leaving 9/10 of a parking space between their car and the legal parking boundaryand parking across two parking spaces).


(6) Parking Difficulties • The parking is already very limited for residents in the area, particular for the people

that are living in new buildings and are not eligible for residents parking permits. Changes to the restrictions would mean we would consider moving out.

• Please don't change the parking restrictions - we are in a 2 bedroom house with 3 of us

living there (2 of us are the owners) and we all have a car, only 1 car fits in the garage, the other 2 don't, and we are NOT allowed to get parking permits - we haven't been approved!! AND we get public transport to work - where are we meant to park our cars Monday to Friday???!!.

• For market days and events at the stadium, parking on Bay Road and McHatton St is

full with cars. • Apart from the problem of parking, the continual flow of traffic with people (mainly

students from A.C.U), who are looking for somewhere to park creates a real safety problem, especially when the school children are walking home.

• For those who are not eligible for a parking permit, these are the only options to park

anywhere near North Sydney. If trying to prevent commuters, I would propose shifting the start time of the metering to earlier. Our Apartment has an allocated spot in our building, but the owner has sub-leased it separately, so we are not eligible for a parking permit. We already have to park down the hill as there is no suitable parking nearby, changing this will simply force us to park the car down in Waverton or Willoughby.

• I live in a small two bedroom apartment with a garage on title meaning I can’t apply for

a parking permit. The problem is my garage is so small I can’t fit my car in and therefore have to park on the street. I feel there needs to be more permits issued for residents of the area. Plus a reduction in the timing of allowed parking times meaning more turnover from ACU students and commuters parking in my street.

• As a personal opinion. After 6-7pm Monday to Friday, finding parking spots is

relatively easy. But definitely, it is quite difficult during business hours. As a resident in Priory Rd, I find notes on my vehicle windscreen (left by neighbours and visitors) in which all they complain for either parking to close to the home driveways or for not parking as close as possible to others cars and driveways ("park considerably" as they mention on the notes). Delimiting the parking spots is also important in this process you are carrying out, mainly if metered parking won't be applied as it suggests, there would not be any parking boundaries for each car. Many thanks.

• I personally am of the view that parking restrictions should not be extended beyond 6pm

Monday to Friday. As a North Sydney Council resident, I have found it difficult to head to Coles to buy a few household groceries without having to incur fees to park my vehicle nearby. This discourages me from doing my local shopping in the area but drive up to Woolworths instead. Perhaps an end to restrictions outside business hours would bring about greater convenience for local residents.


(7)

Other

• In some areas, specific motor bike parking would be good.

• Can safety of the Priory Rd and Bay Rd intersection be addressed as part of these works?This intersection for cars turning right existing Priory Rd has poor sighting to left (sharp bend in Rd) and right (poor line of sight due to parked cars) along Bay Road. Possibly by reducing a number of the end car spaces along Bay Rd prior to the intersection to improve line of sight for right hand turning cars from Priory Rd? Cars tend to travel fast along Bay after the pedestrian crossing road and this combined with poor line of sight make this a difficult intersection to traverse. Speed bumps may also assist to slow cars down in both directions along Bay Rd.

• Parking permit are being given to residents who already have garages but choose to use the garage for another purpose e.g. another room thus taking up more street parking spaces.

• Note: Please make Doohat Lane a permanent NO PARKING AREA. 24/7. It is a very narrow laneway and often vehicles have trouble entering and exiting the street when there is a parked car. Only one way in and our 24 hours. All residents have to use the laneway. Trucks blow out exhaust fumes when they have to carefully navigate through the narrow laneway. Our only access into our garage is through Doohat Lane on the northern side. The laneway is used 24/7 and often trucks and some cars have difficulty entering/ exiting when there are cards parked in the laneway. Please make it a NO PARKING ZONE.

• The increased demand for parking came with the high-density development on the Pacific Highway. SO it is a problem directly related to approvals for development made by North Sydney Council. The burden or metered parking affects all residents and business and is a poor solution to a problem of the Council and possibly state directives.

• Toongarah Rd: We strongly suggest that to make more parking spaces available using existing parking restrictions that Council mark with white lines the exact parking spaces. This will by my count add at least 20% more spaces. Regularly cars take two spaces & cars parked at low demand times park so that peak demand spaces are very inefficient. I have answered NO to all other streets. I have no basis on which to comment on other residents' needs & concerns & would argue other residents from streets other than Toongarah & Priory Rd residents should refrain from offering comments on Toongarah Rd & Priory Rd residents' needs and concerns.

• 5 mins is not enough to go into school grounds, find your child and return to the car.

• Happy with the current way parking is handled.

• Please do not change any parking rules around North Sydney Dem school.

• I wanted to say do not change, but the choice wasn’t there.


(8)

• Parking payment exemption for localsa. I live, shop go to the post office and have a variety of chores to attend to in my local

area. I can not go anywhere without paying for parking - at times when I move my car due to location on a few occasions in one day I can spend nearly $20 on parking.

b. I would love to see a local exemption offered to people who live in the area similar to those provided by the northern beaches and Mosman councils.

c. It is very expensive to live in an area where nearly all the streets accessible to conduct day to day business are metered. This is very unfair when you live in the area. For example, there are many places you can park in Mosman or the northern beaches that are not metered yet close to shops etc. In North Sydney there are none.

• Taxisa. I know this is a bone of contention that the council is aware of but want to bring it

to your attention again. The taxis take up a lot of parking spaces just sitting waiting for a fare. In fact they often sit on the clearway (during clearway hours) on the Pacific Hwy, outside the post office, on Miller St etc. I have often been blocked by them and restricted from getting a parking space due to a row of taxis. Of course, I understand that they are a service we all need however they are a pest.

• We don't oppose paid parking, but note the initial installation costs, over simpler changes to signage to restrict parking. Marking and numbering of spaces for parking meters could result in the loss of four or five spaces between driveways in Priory & Toongarah Roads, depending on current regulations. Several spaces can currently be occupied by two considerate drivers, without infringing on driveways.

• In the event of parking changes in Priory road I would like council to consider options /opportunities for motorbike parking.

• I am not in favour of the changes proposed. Why am I being penalised for my choice to own a car and live in this area? I think the limited all-day parking spots are essential for those of us whose household need more than one car. Please do not decrease the number of all-day parks > instead work to discourage non-locals from parking in the area by limiting/ reducing the time restrictions.

• Paid parking is just revenue raising. Council must ensure all developments/redevelopments including schools contain off street parking which is sufficient for number of residents/ visitors. Schools must provide own parking and not just allow the problem to impact neighbours.

• Overall, in my opinion, Area 10 is residential parking. Not commuter parking. It is a shame that we have been provided with an Area 10 parking map only, when streets just outside this area affect Area 10 residents. For instance, I live on McHatton St. When trades people need to park their vehicle in my property, I need to park my car somewhere else. My options are to park in the 2 hours parking nearby, and check the car every 2 hours, or move it every 2 hours. Or park just around the corner in Morton Street, which has all day parking. The problem is that Morton St is taken my commuters, who leave their car all day and either walk to North Sydney CBD, or walk to Waverton Station, to commute into the city. This has a negative impact on residents in the area. We do not need commuter parking at all. 2 hour parking could fix this, with larger areas for resident parking. Perhaps residents of North Sydney could be issued with say, five 1 day "resident area" parking windscreen stickers. If there was an area on the sticker where the date could be written in ink, each sticker could be used only once. Residents could


(9)

then park anywhere in North Sydney area "residents parking". So when that emergency arose and a resident needed to find an "immediate emergency" parking space to allow a trades person to use their driveway, it doesn't become a problem. At the end of last year I had my driveway replaced, and some retaining walls built. SO I was without a driveway. I paid for a council permit, I think it was 3 months at a time for residents All parking taken. We need parking permits that apply in a larger area, which is why I have suggested the "North Sydney" area. Just a suggestion.

• 1.Who has complained about difficulties in parking and what discussion has been arranged to discuss the situation. It seems to me that there is no unresolvable problem. How many car spaces are “leased “to car renters and why can’t they provide other free parking at their expense. 2. Has council insisted on free parking in the new buildings being built in North Sydney CBD or setting up parking places to satisfy these developments all of which has an effect on local parking. 3. Has council considered other ways to allow more parking in the North Sydney area, including angled parking including reduction in the size of footpaths levelling Edward Street insistence that the schools provide pick up and drop off areas (within their own land) and insistence that buildings provide sufficient parking for ALL their visitors. 4. I am concerned that you and your associates are not looking at ways to resolve the problem but rather to provide new ways to fine us all. have you looked at angle parking in many streets this could be done. 5. I do not believe that meter parking will do other than make North Sydney less attractive to businesses.

• My biggest concern is there is no drop off zone for school students in Bay Road (btw

Edward and Pacific Hwy Northern zone). There is 15 minute parking, but this seems to get congested and of no benefit to drop offs. The pedestrian crossing in Bay Road has only been attended twice this week by the ‘lolly pop’ lady – I prefer to drop by young child on Bay Road, so he doesn’t need to cross the crossing (which may or may not be attended). Could we have two-three spaces for drop off just past the bus zone to avoid some school child accident.

Discussion The survey results indicate some level of support for timed parking restrictions in Bay Road, Priory Road, Toongarah Road, McHatton Street and Doohat Lane. Detailed recommendations based on the survey responses are listed in Attachment 2. Overall, there was a strong opposition to parking meters in Area 10 and as such no additional parking meters have been recommended in Area 10.

Area 10 – Survey Results

Page | 1

(note: school pick-up and drop off times within this street are not included in this survey

Q.1.b.


Bay Road 13 48% 3 11% 9 33% 2 7% 27 25%

Browns Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 1%

Carr Street 0% 1 50% 1 50% 0% 2 2%

Commodore Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Doohat Avenue 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

Harriott Street 0% 0% 2 100% 0% 2 2%

King Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Lord Street 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

McHatton Street 1 13% 3 38% 1 13% 3 38% 8 7%

Mount Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Northcote Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Pacific Highway 10 67% 0% 3 20% 2 13% 15 14%

Priory Road 10 56% 2 11% 4 22% 2 11% 18 17%

Shirley Road 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

Toongarah Road 5 38% 2 15% 5 38% 1 8% 13 12%

Waverton Avenue 1 33% 0% 2 67% 0% 3 3%

Non-resident owner

Greenwich Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Priory Road 1 33% 0% 1 33% 1 33% 3 3%

Toongarah Road 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 1%

School community

Blues Point Road 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 1%

Duntroon Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Tunks Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Business Owner

Pacific Highway 1 50% 0% 1 50% 0% 2 2%

Grand Total 52 48% 12 11% 31 29% 13 12% 108 100%

Q.1.c.


Bay Road 13 48% 11 41% 2 7% 1 4% 27 25%

Browns Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 1%

Carr Street 0% 2 100% 0% 0% 2 2%


Doohat Avenue 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

Harriott Street 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 2 2%

King Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Lord Street 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

McHatton Street 1 13% 2 25% 2 25% 3 38% 8 7%

Mount Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%


Pacific Highway 10 67% 2 13% 1 7% 2 13% 15 14%

Priory Road 10 56% 2 11% 4 22% 2 11% 18 17%

Shirley Road 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

Toongarah Road 5 38% 6 46% 1 8% 1 8% 13 12%

Waverton Avenue 1 33% 1 33% 1 33% 0% 3 3%

Non-resident owner

Greenwich Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Priory Road 1 33% 1 33% 0% 1 33% 3 3%

Toongarah Road 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 1%

School community

Blues Point Road 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 1%

Duntroon Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Tunks Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Business Owner

Pacific Highway 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 2 2%

Grand Total 53 49% 31 29% 12 11% 12 11% 108 100%

1 Hour Meter Parking

8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri

2 Hour Parking

8.30am - 6pm Mon - FriNo answer Total

1. Survey Results - BAY ROAD between Edward and Harriott Streets,

On the northern side of Bay Road, I am in favour of replacing some of the existing “1/2 Hour Parking 9.30am - 2.30pm &

3.30pm - 6pm Mon – Fri” with (tick one):

Resident Street Address


Bay Road

Retain existing

1 Hour Parking

9.30am - 2.30pm &

3.30pm - 6pm Mon - Fri

2 Hour Meter Parking

9.30am - 2.30pm &

3.30pm - 6pm Mon - Fri

No answer Total

Retain existing

On the southern side of Bay Rd, I am in favour of replacing the existing “1/4 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri” with (tick

one):


Page | 2

Q.1.d. I am in favour of replacing some of the existing “2 Hour Parking” with (tick one):


Bay Road 14 52% 12 44% 0% 1 4% 27 25%

Browns Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 1%

Carr Street 0% 1 50% 1 50% 0% 2 2%


Doohat Avenue 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

Harriott Street 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 2 2%

King Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Lord Street 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

McHatton Street 1 13% 2 25% 1 13% 4 50% 8 7%

Mount Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%


Pacific Highway 10 67% 1 7% 1 7% 3 20% 15 14%

Priory Road 10 56% 1 6% 4 22% 3 17% 18 17%

Shirley Road 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

Toongarah Road 5 38% 4 31% 3 23% 1 8% 13 12%

Waverton Avenue 1 33% 1 33% 1 33% 0% 3 3%

Non-resident owner

Greenwich Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Priory Road 1 33% 0% 0% 2 67% 3 3%

Toongarah Road 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

School community

Blues Point Road 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 1%

Duntroon Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Tunks Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Business Owner

Pacific Highway 1 50% 0% 1 50% 0% 2 2%

Grand Total 54 50% 24 22% 13 12% 17 16% 108 100%

Q.1.e. The current parking restrictions usually expire at 6:00pm. I would like them to be extended to (tick one):


Bay Road 25 93% 1 4% 0% 0% 1 4% 27 0

Browns Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0

Carr Street 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 0

Commodore Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0

Doohat Avenue 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 0

Harriott Street 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 0

King Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0

Lord Street 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 0

McHatton Street 3 38% 1 13% 1 13% 0% 3 38% 8 0

Mount Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0

Northcote Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0

Pacific Highway 13 87% 0% 0% 0% 2 13% 15 0

Priory Road 14 78% 1 6% 0% 1 6% 2 11% 18 0

Shirley Road 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 0

Toongarah Road 9 69% 2 15% 0% 1 8% 1 8% 13 0

Waverton Avenue 3 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3 0

Non-resident owner

Greenwich Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0

Priory Road 2 67% 0% 0% 0% 1 33% 3 0

Toongarah Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0

School community

Blues Point Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0

Duntroon Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0

Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0

Tunks Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0

Business Owner

Pacific Highway 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 0

Grand Total 86 80% 7 6% 1 1% 2 2% 12 11% 108 100%

1 Hour Parking 2 Hour Meter Parking No answer TotalResident Street Address

Retain existing 6pm 10pm Midnight No answerResident Street Address

Total

Retain existing


Page | 3

Q.1.f. I would like the parking restrictions to operate (tick one):


Bay Road 13 48% 12 44% 1 4% 0% 1 4% 27 0

Browns Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 0

Carr Street 0% 1 50% 0% 1 50% 0% 2 0

Commodore Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0

Doohat Avenue 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 0

Harriott Street 0% 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 0

King Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0

Lord Street 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 0

McHatton Street 1 13% 3 38% 1 13% 0% 3 38% 8 0

Mount Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0

Northcote Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0

Pacific Highway 10 67% 3 20% 0% 0% 2 13% 15 0

Priory Road 10 56% 4 22% 0% 2 11% 2 11% 18 0

Shirley Road 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 0

Toongarah Road 5 38% 4 31% 2 15% 1 8% 1 8% 13 0

Waverton Avenue 1 33% 2 67% 0% 0% 0% 3 0

Non-resident owner

Greenwich Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0

Priory Road 1 33% 1 33% 0% 0% 1 33% 3 0

Toongarah Road 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 0

School community

Blues Point Road 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 0

Duntroon Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0

Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0

Tunks Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 0

Business Owner

Pacific Highway 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 0

Grand Total 52 48% 36 33% 4 4% 4 4% 12 11% 108 100%

TotalResident Street Address

Retain existing Monday to Friday ONLY Monday to Saturday Monday to Sunday No answer


Page | 4

Q.2.b. I am in favour of replacing some of the existing “2 Hour Parking” with (tick one):


Priory Road 6 33% 7 39% 5 28% 0% 18 17%

Bay Road 15 56% 8 30% 1 4% 3 11% 27 25%

Browns Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 1%

Carr Street 0% 1 50% 1 50% 0% 2 2%


Doohat Avenue 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

Harriott Street 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

King Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Lord Street 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

McHatton Street 2 25% 2 25% 0% 4 50% 8 7%

Mount Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%


Pacific Highway 11 73% 0% 2 13% 2 13% 15 14%

Shirley Road 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

Toongarah Road 5 38% 4 31% 4 31% 0% 13 12%

Waverton Avenue 2 67% 0% 1 33% 0% 3 3%

Non-resident owner

Priory Road 0% 0% 2 67% 1 33% 3 3%

Greenwich Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Toongarah Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

School community

Blues Point Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Duntroon Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Tunks Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Business Owner

Pacific Highway 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

Grand Total 57 53% 22 20% 17 16% 12 11% 108 100%

Q.2.c. The current parking restrictions usually expire at 6:00pm. I would like them to be extended to (tick one):


Priory Road 16 89% 0% 0% 2 11% 0% 18 17%

Bay Road 24 89% 0% 0% 0% 3 11% 27 25%

Browns Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Carr Street 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

Commodore Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Doohat Avenue 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

Harriott Street 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

King Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Lord Street 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

McHatton Street 3 38% 1 13% 0% 0% 4 50% 8 7%

Mount Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Northcote Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Pacific Highway 13 87% 0% 0% 0% 2 13% 15 14%

Shirley Road 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

Toongarah Road 12 92% 1 8% 0% 0% 0% 13 12%

Waverton Avenue 3 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3 3%

Non-resident owner

Priory Road 2 67% 0% 1 33% 0% 0% 3 3%

Greenwich Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Toongarah Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

School community

Blues Point Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Duntroon Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Tunks Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Business Owner

Pacific Highway 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

Grand Total 90 83% 4 4% 1 1% 2 2% 11 10% 108 100%

2. Survey Results - PRIORY ROAD,

Retain existing 1 Hour Parking2 Hour Meter

ParkingNo answer Total

Priory Road


Resident Street AddressRetain existing 8pm 10pm Midnight No answer Total


Page | 5

Q.2.d. I would like the parking restrictions to operate (tick one):


Priory Road 6 33% 9 50% 0% 3 17% 0% 18 17%

Bay Road 15 56% 8 30% 1 4% 0% 3 11% 27 25%

Browns Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Carr Street 0% 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%


Doohat Avenue 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

Harriott Street 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

King Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Lord Street 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

McHatton Street 2 25% 1 13% 1 13% 0% 4 50% 8 7%

Mount Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%


Pacific Highway 11 73% 2 13% 0% 0% 2 13% 15 14%

Shirley Road 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

Toongarah Road 5 38% 6 46% 1 8% 1 8% 0% 13 12%

Waverton Avenue 2 67% 1 33% 0% 0% 0% 3 3%

Non-resident owner

Priory Road 0% 2 67% 1 33% 0% 0% 3 3%

Greenwich Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Toongarah Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

School community

Blues Point Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Duntroon Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Tunks Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Business Owner

Pacific Highway 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

Grand Total 57 53% 32 30% 4 4% 4 4% 11 10% 108 100%


Retain existingMonday to Friday

ONLYMonday to Saturday Monday to Sunday No answer


Page | 6

Q.3.b.


Toongarah Road 5 38% 3 23% 5 38% 0% 13 12%

Bay Road 17 63% 6 22% 1 4% 3 11% 27 25%

Browns Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 1%

Carr Street 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 2 2%


Doohat Avenue 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

Harriott Street 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

King Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Lord Street 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

McHatton Street 5 63% 0% 0% 3 38% 8 7%

Mount Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%


Pacific Highway 12 80% 0% 1 7% 2 13% 15 14%

Priory Road 5 28% 9 50% 3 17% 1 6% 18 17%

Shirley Road 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

Waverton Avenue 2 67% 0% 1 33% 0% 3 3%

Non-resident owner

Toongarah Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Greenwich Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Priory Road 1 33% 0% 0% 2 67% 3 3%

School community

Blues Point Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Duntroon Avenue 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Tunks Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Business Owner

Pacific Highway 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

Grand Total 63 58% 19 18% 12 11% 14 13% 108 100%

Q.3.c. The current parking restrictions expire at 6:00pm. I would like them to be extended to (tick one):


Toongarah Road 12 92% 1 8% 0% 0% 13 12%

Bay Road 24 89% 0% 0% 3 11% 27 25%

Browns Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 1%

Carr Street 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%


Doohat Avenue 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

Harriott Street 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

King Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Lord Street 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

McHatton Street 5 63% 0% 0% 3 38% 8 7%

Mount Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%


Pacific Highway 13 87% 0% 0% 2 13% 15 14%

Priory Road 16 89% 0% 1 6% 1 6% 18 17%

Shirley Road 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

Waverton Avenue 3 100% 0% 0% 0% 3 3%

Non-resident owner

Toongarah Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Greenwich Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Priory Road 2 67% 0% 0% 1 33% 3 3%

School community

Blues Point Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Duntroon Avenue 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Tunks Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Business Owner

Pacific Highway 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

Grand Total 92 85% 2 2% 1 1% 13 12% 108 100%

1 Hour Parking2 Hour Meter


3. Survey Results - TOONGARAH ROAD,

I am in favour of replacing some of the existing “2 Hour Parking and unrestricted parking” with (tick one):

Toongarah Road

Resident Street AddressRetain existing 8pm Midnight No answer Total

Resident Street AddressRetain existing


Page | 7



Toongarah Road 5 38% 6 46% 1 8% 1 8% 0% 13 12%

Bay Road 16 59% 7 26% 1 4% 0% 3 11% 27 25%

Browns Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Carr Street 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%


Doohat Avenue 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

Harriott Street 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

King Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Lord Street 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

McHatton Street 5 63% 0% 0% 0% 3 38% 8 7%

Mount Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%


Pacific Highway 12 80% 1 7% 0% 0% 2 13% 15 14%

Priory Road 5 28% 10 56% 0% 2 11% 1 6% 18 17%

Shirley Road 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

Waverton Avenue 2 67% 1 33% 0% 0% 0% 3 3%

Non-resident owner

Toongarah Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Greenwich Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Priory Road 1 33% 1 33% 0% 0% 1 33% 3 3%

School community

Blues Point Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Duntroon Avenue 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Tunks Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Business Owner

Pacific Highway 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

Grand Total 61 56% 29 27% 2 2% 3 3% 13 12% 108 100%



ONLY Monday to Saturday Monday to Sunday No answer


Page | 8

Q.4.b. I am in favour of replacing some of the existing “2 Hour Parking and unrestricted parking” with (tick one):


McHatton Street 4 50% 3 38% 0% 1 13% 8 7%

Bay Road 19 70% 4 15% 1 4% 3 11% 27 25%

Browns Lane 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 1%

Carr Street 0% 2 100% 0% 0% 2 2%


Doohat Avenue 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

Harriott Street 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

King Street 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 1%

Lord Street 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

Mount Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%


Pacific Highway 12 80% 0% 2 13% 1 7% 15 14%

Priory Road 9 50% 2 11% 5 28% 2 11% 18 17%

Shirley Road 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

Toongarah Road 7 54% 1 8% 4 31% 1 8% 13 12%

Waverton Avenue 1 33% 2 67% 0% 0% 3 3%

Non-resident owner

Greenwich Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Priory Road 1 33% 0% 0% 2 67% 3 3%

Toongarah Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

School community

Blues Point Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Duntroon Avenue 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 1%

Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Tunks Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Business Owner

Pacific Highway 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

Grand Total 67 62% 16 15% 13 12% 12 11% 108 100%



McHatton Street 6 75% 0% 0% 1 13% 1 13% 8 7%

Bay Road 24 89% 0% 0% 0% 3 11% 27 25%

Browns Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Carr Street 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%


Doohat Avenue 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

Harriott Street 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

King Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Lord Street 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

Mount Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%


Pacific Highway 14 93% 0% 0% 0% 1 7% 15 14%

Priory Road 15 83% 0% 0% 1 6% 2 11% 18 17%

Shirley Road 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

Toongarah Road 10 77% 1 8% 1 8% 0% 1 8% 13 12%

Waverton Avenue 3 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3 3%

Non-resident owner

Greenwich Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Priory Road 2 67% 0% 0% 0% 1 33% 3 3%

Toongarah Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

School community

Blues Point Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Duntroon Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Tunks Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Business Owner

Pacific Highway 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

Grand Total 93 86% 1 1% 1 1% 2 2% 11 10% 108 100%

4. Survey Results - McHATTON STREET,



McHatton Street



Retain existing 8pm 10pm Midnight No answer


Page | 9



McHatton Street 3 38% 3 38% 0% 1 13% 1 13% 8 7%

Bay Road 19 70% 3 11% 2 7% 0% 3 11% 27 25%

Browns Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Carr Street 0% 1 50% 0% 1 50% 0% 2 2%


Doohat Avenue 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

Harriott Street 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

King Street 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Lord Street 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

Mount Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%


Pacific Highway 12 80% 2 13% 0% 0% 1 7% 15 14%

Priory Road 9 50% 5 28% 0% 2 11% 2 11% 18 17%

Shirley Road 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

Toongarah Road 7 54% 2 15% 2 15% 1 8% 1 8% 13 12%

Waverton Avenue 1 33% 2 67% 0% 0% 0% 3 3%

Non-resident owner

Greenwich Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Priory Road 1 33% 1 33% 0% 0% 1 33% 3 3%

Toongarah Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

School community

Blues Point Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Duntroon Avenue 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Tunks Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Business Owner

Pacific Highway 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

Grand Total 65 60% 23 21% 4 4% 5 5% 11 10% 108 100%


Monday to Friday

ONLY Monday to Saturday Monday to Sunday No answer Total


Page | 10

Q.5.b. I am in favour of replacing existing “1/2 Hour Meter Parking” in Doohat Avenue with (tick one):


Doohat Avenue 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 1%

Bay Road 18 67% 5 19% 1 4% 3 11% 27 25%

Browns Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 1%

Carr Street 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 2 2%


Harriott Street 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 2 2%

King Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Lord Street 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

McHatton Street 4 50% 0% 1 13% 3 38% 8 7%

Mount Street 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 1%


Pacific Highway 9 60% 2 13% 3 20% 1 7% 15 14%

Priory Road 10 56% 3 17% 2 11% 3 17% 18 17%

Shirley Road 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

Toongarah Road 8 62% 2 15% 2 15% 1 8% 13 12%

Waverton Avenue 1 33% 0% 2 67% 0% 3 3%

Non-resident owner

Greenwich Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Priory Road 1 33% 0% 0% 2 67% 3 3%

Toongarah Road 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 1%

School community

Blues Point Road 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 1%

Duntroon Avenue 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 1%

Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Tunks Street 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

Business Owner

Pacific Highway 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

Grand Total 62 57% 17 16% 14 13% 15 14% 108 100%

Q.5.c. I am in favour of replacing existing unrestricted parking in Doohat Lane with (tick one):


Doohat Avenue 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 1%

Bay Road 18 67% 3 11% 3 11% 3 11% 27 25%

Browns Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 1%

Carr Street 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 2 2%


Harriott Street 1 50% 0% 1 50% 0% 2 2%

King Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Lord Street 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

McHatton Street 4 50% 0% 1 13% 3 38% 8 7%

Mount Street 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 1%


Pacific Highway 10 67% 3 20% 1 7% 1 7% 15 14%

Priory Road 10 56% 2 11% 3 17% 3 17% 18 17%

Shirley Road 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

Toongarah Road 8 62% 2 15% 2 15% 1 8% 13 12%

Waverton Avenue 1 33% 0% 2 67% 0% 3 3%

Non-resident owner

Greenwich Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Priory Road 1 33% 0% 0% 2 67% 3 3%

Toongarah Road 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

School community

Blues Point Road 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 1%

Duntroon Avenue 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 1%

Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Tunks Street 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

Business Owner

Pacific Highway 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

Grand Total 63 58% 14 13% 15 14% 16 15% 108 100%

5. Survey Results - DOOHAT AVENUE and DOOHAT LANE,


1 Hour Meter

Parking

2 Hour Meter

ParkingNo answer

Doohat Avenue & Doohat Lane

1/2 Hour Parking 1 Hour Parking No answer Total

Total



Page | 11

Q.5.d. The current parking restrictions usually expire at 6:00pm. I would like them to be extended to (tick one):


Doohat Avenue 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 1%

Bay Road 24 89% 0% 0% 0% 3 11% 27 25%

Browns Lane 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Carr Street 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%


Harriott Street 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

King Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Lord Street 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

McHatton Street 4 50% 0% 1 13% 0% 3 38% 8 7%

Mount Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%


Pacific Highway 13 87% 0% 0% 1 7% 1 7% 15 14%

Priory Road 14 78% 0% 0% 1 6% 3 17% 18 17%

Shirley Road 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

Toongarah Road 11 85% 1 8% 0% 0% 1 8% 13 12%

Waverton Avenue 3 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 3 3%

Non-resident owner

Greenwich Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Priory Road 2 67% 0% 0% 0% 1 33% 3 3%

Toongarah Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

School community

Blues Point Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Duntroon Avenue 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Tunks Street 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

Business Owner

Pacific Highway 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

Grand Total 88 81% 2 2% 1 1% 3 3% 14 13% 108 100%

Q.5.e. I would like the parking restrictions to operate (tick one):


Doohat Avenue 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 1%

Bay Road 18 67% 5 19% 1 4% 0% 3 11% 27 25%

Browns Lane 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Carr Street 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 0% 2 2%


Harriott Street 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

King Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Lord Street 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

McHatton Street 4 50% 0% 1 13% 0% 3 38% 8 7%

Mount Street 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%


Pacific Highway 9 60% 3 20% 0% 2 13% 1 7% 15 14%

Priory Road 10 56% 3 17% 0% 2 11% 3 17% 18 17%

Shirley Road 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

Toongarah Road 8 62% 2 15% 1 8% 1 8% 1 8% 13 12%

Waverton Avenue 1 33% 2 67% 0% 0% 0% 3 3%

Non-resident owner

Greenwich Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Priory Road 1 33% 0% 0% 0% 2 67% 3 3%

Toongarah Road 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

School community

Blues Point Road 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Duntroon Avenue 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 1%

Tunks Street 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 1 1%

Business Owner

Pacific Highway 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 2%

Grand Total 62 57% 20 19% 3 3% 7 6% 16 15% 108 100%

Total


Monday to Friday

ONLY Monday to Saturday Monday to Sunday No answer Total

Resident Street AddressRetain existing 8pm 10pm Midnight No answer

Area 10 - Proposed Parking Changes

Zone ID Street Street No.Weekday Average

OccupancyNo. Bays Current Restrictions Proposed Restrictions Comments

Bay Road 84% Existing Hours

26 Bay Road 24-46 94% 92 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10

1 Hour Parking 8.30am-6pm Mon-Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10

Overall 50% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 34% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (12% support metered parking). 80% of respondents want to retain the 6pm time restriction expiry.

Bay Road residents - 52% retain exisiting and 44% requested changes (0% support metered parking). 97% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 92% retain Mon-Fri operation. Generally residents in this section of Bay Road support parking restrictions.

26A Bay Road 22 100% 1 1/4 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri1 Hour Parking 8.30am-6pm Mon-Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10



32 Bay Road School 29% 7

1/4 Min Parking 8.30am - 9.30am 2.30pm - 3.30pm Mon - Fri 1/2 Hour Parking 9.30am - 2.30pm 3.30pm - 6pm Mon - Fri

1/4 Min Parking 8.30am - 9.30am 2.30pm - 3.30pm Mon - Fri 1/2 Hour Parking 9.30am - 2.30pm 3.30pm - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10

1/4P pickup and drop off times not included in this survey



33 Bay Road 11 100% 2

1/4 Min Parking 8.30am - 9.30am 2.30pm - 3.30pm Mon - Fri 2 Hour Parking 9.30am - 2.30pm 3.30pm - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10

Retain

1/4P pickup and drop off times not included in this survey


Bay Road residents - 52% retain exisiting and 44% requested changes (0% support metered parking). 97% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 92% retain Mon-Fri operation.


Retain



Area 10 - Survey Analysis Page 1 of 7




62 Bay Road 23-29A 80% 102 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10

Retain




Retain



Priory Road 95%

18 Priory Road `4-8 100% 122 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10

Retain


Priory Road residents - 33% retain exisiting and 67% requested changes (28% support metered parking). 89% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 83% retain Mon-Fri operation.

20 Priory Road `1 - 15 90% 102 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10



Priory Road residents - 33% retain exisiting and 67% requested changes (28% support metered parking). 89% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 83% retain Mon-Fri operation. Generally residents in this section of Priory Road support parking restrictions.

23 Priory Road 2 90% 102 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10

Retain


Priory Road residents - 33% retain exisiting and 67% requested changes (28% support metered parking). 89% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 83% retain Mon-Fri operation.





24 Priory Road 1 100% 82 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10



Priory Road residents - 33% retain exisiting and 67% requested changes (28% support metered parking). 89% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 83% retain Mon-Fri operation. Generally residents in this section of Priory Road support parking restrictions.

Toongarah Road 96%

1 Toongarah Road 9 100% 2 Unrestricted Parking Retain


Toongarah Road residents - 38% retain exisiting and 61% requested changes (38% support metered parking). 92% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 84% retain Mon-Fri operation.

17 Toongarah Road 2A - 9 90% 102 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10

Retain



21 Toongarah Road `8 - 22 100% 19 Unrestricted ParkingConvert 10 spaces to 2 Hour Parking 8.30am-6pm Mon-Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10


Toongarah Road residents - 38% retain exisiting and 61% requested changes (38% support metered parking). 92% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 84% retain Mon-Fri operation. Generally residents in this section of Toongarah Road support parking restrictions.





22 Toongarah Road 24 100% 12 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10

Retain



113 Toongarah Road `1 - 9 88% 82 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10

Retain



McHatton Street 46%

36 McHatton Street 136 0% 72 Hour Parking 9.30am - 2.30pm Mon - Fri 5 Min Parking 8.30am - 9.30am 2.30pm - 3.30pm School Days

Retain


McHatton Street residents - 50% retain exisiting and 38% requested changes (0% support metered parking). 75% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 76% retain Mon-Fri operation.

36A McHatton Street School 0% 82 Hour Parking 9.30am - 2.30pm Mon - Fri; No Parking 8:30-9:30am, 2:30-3:30pm Mon-Fri School Days

Retain







36B McHatton Street School 55% 112 Hour Parking 9.30am - 2.30pm Mon - Fri 5 Min Parking 8.30am - 9.30am 2.30pm - 3.30pm School Days

Retain



37 McHatton Street School 10% 5

2 Hour Parking 9.30am - 2.30pm Mon - Fri 1/4 Hour Parking 8.30am - 9.30am 2.30pm - 3.30pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10

Retain



37A McHatton Street School 0% 12 Hour Parking 9.30am - 2.30pm Mon - Fri 2 Min Parking 8.30am - 9.30am 2.30pm - 3.30pm Mon - Fri

Retain



38 McHatton Street School 71% 72 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10

Retain


McHatton Street residents - 50% retain exisiting and 38% requested changes (0% support metered parking). 75% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 76% retain Mon-Fri operation. Generally residents in this section of McHatton Street support parking restrictions.

38A McHatton Street School 100% 2 Unrestricted Parking2 Hour Parking 8.30am-6pm Mon-Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10


McHatton Street residents - 50% retain exisiting and 38% requested changes (0% support metered parking). 75% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 76% retain Mon-Fri operation. Generally residents in this section of McHatton Street support parking restrictions.





39 McHatton Street 41 50% 72 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10

Retain



40 McHatton Street 2 92% 62 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10

Retain



41 McHatton Street `2 - 6 86% 72 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10

Retain



Doohat Avenue 49%

10 Doohat Avenue 136 50% 71/2 Hour Meter Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10

Retain

Overall 57% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 29% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (16% support 1P metered and 13% 2P metered parking). 81% of respondents want to retain the 6pm time restriction expiry.

Doohat residents - 0% retain exisiting and 1% requested changes. 1% want to change the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 1% and operation.

10B Doohat Avenue School 38% 71/2 Hour Meter Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10

Retain


Doohat residents - 0% retain exisiting and 1% requested changes. 1% want to change the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 1% operation period.





11 Doohat Avenue School 60% 51/2 Hour Meter Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 10

Retain


Doohat residents - 0% retain exisiting and 1% requested changes. 1% want to change the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 1% and operation.

Doohat Lane 100%

11B Doohat Lane 150 100% 2Unrestricted (rear of 150 Pacific Highway new development )

1/2 Hour Parking 8.30am-6pm Mon-Fri

Overall 58% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 27% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (13% support 1/2P and 14% 1P parking). 81% of respondents want to retain the 6pm time restriction expiry.

Doohat residents - 0% retain exisiting and 1% requested changes. 1% want to change the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 1% operation period.Pacific Highway residents - 67% retain exisiting and 27% requested changes. 1% want to change the existing time restriction expiry of 6pm and 1% operation period.


Area 12Area 10

North Sydney CouncilCopyright:

Copyright © North Sydney Council - No part of this map may be reproducedwithout permission. Commercial decisions should not be made based on information contained in this map without first checking details held by the responsible Government authority.

Further details can be obtained by calling (02) 9936 8100 or e-mail [email protected].

Area 10

Area 9

11

9

1

102

100

21

14

7

12

5

10

3

8

2A

104

13

4

15

108110

8991

2

6106

7

85

4

83

810

3-5

12

21

14

19

40

9 11

15

21-27

13

(38A-38D)

17

7

45

19

43

21

36

9

8

35

1519

10

64

2

1

8-20

31-37

1311

739-41

9

15

17

12

2927

2523

3

1

6

5

267-17

75

21

31

23

16

5

3

68

1

58

1

18

52

21

1

50

7

34

56

41A

70

20

54

1A

39A

3

32

3537

23

62

41

64

66

39

25

27

27A

29

29A

36

43

2

9

22

48

19

38

45

24

4

26

2

17

40

47

5

2A

6

46

8A

15

156-158

170

2B

160

1

40-42

11

211

5452

3

8

9

50

9

5A

4

17

6

7

25-29

174-180

5

53

3828

11

49-51

64

8B

44

20

2-4

15

12

(1A)

6

4846

55

42

31

56

58

17

3

12-14

16

18

8

2224

26

57

57

1010A

1

59

6163

65

67

1111

A

15

150

172

166

33

245

168

225

53

182

1

8

1012

1412

16 108

253

255-259

261

10

18 6

188

10A

(32)

6

30 2

265 8A

28

267

22

26

8

49

65

52

61

55

271

48

50

12

57

53

44

69

46

42

67

63

59

51

5454A

8

56

295

281

273

7-9

58

60

3

190

71

RILEY STREET

ROAD CLOSURE

TOONGARAH

ROAD ROAD

RESERVE

BANK

RESERVE

DON BANK

MUSEUM GARDENS

BROW

NS LA

NE

ROA

D RESERV

E

WAVERTON AVENUE

BANK STREET

RILEY STRE ET

EDWARD STREET

TOONG

ARAH ROAD

ANCRUM STRE ET

NAPIER STREET

OAK STREETCHARLES STREET

OAK LANE

WH

EELE

R

LANE

MCLAREN STREET

MO

RTON STREET

HAZELBANK ROAD

WAVERTO

N LANE

BERRY STREET

PRIO

RY ROAD

BAY ROAD

DOO

HAT LANE

DOOHAT AVENUE

MCHATTON STREET

BROWNS LANE WEST

PACIFIC HIGHW

AY

CROWS NEST ROAD

BROW

NS LANE

CHURCH STREET

CHURCH LANE

ANGELO

STREET

WES

T ST

REET

44

69

13MB

30

12

13MB

88

168A

89MB

70

167

27A

107

103

89A

89A

91MB

16

168

171

71

618

26A

42

36A

34

33

7

32

26

23

43

557

15A17

18

22

13

15

558

89MB

554A

37

1

113

37A

36

21

85

555

41

1314

14MZ

16

16CS

36B

62

38A

38

619D

554

39

24CS

20

73

74

24

554B

13MB

89

13

27

40

13

88MB

31

1802

86

11CS

87MB

10

4

88MB

11

10MB

5

88

11CS

87

10B

87MB

87

1913A

6

87MB

6MB

9

87

6

88MB

8DP

8

28

90

1911

91

1900

92

1900A

1900B

1802A

18991898

19121855

1800

1857

1801

1799A

2

11B

619C

1802

1799

6201858

36A40

41

36B

39

3838A

3737A

36

62

85

26A26

323334

24CS

23 24

17

21

113

1

22 2018

11B

11

10

9

10MB10B11CS11CS

wisleo

Highlight

wisleo

Highlight

wisleo

Highlight

wisleo

Highlight

wisleo

Highlight

wisleo

Highlight

wisleo

Highlight

wisleo

Highlight

Item 4.5 - Traffic - 26/7/2019



Attach: 1. Survey Results

2. Proposed Parking Changes

3. Map - Proposed Changes

SUBJECT: (4.5) North Sydney Parking Area 21 – Survey Results

AUTHOR: Report of Manager Parking Meters, Leonie Wishart


A parking survey for a section of Crows Nest/North Sydney Parking Area 21 was sent out on

the 16 May 2019 to 293 residents, businesses, and to Hayberry Precinct. Residents were given

until 16 June 2019 to respond. A total of 40 responses were received. This represents a

response rate of 13.7%, which is within the average response rate of 10 to 12%.

The answers received from the residents for the Crows Nest/North Sydney Parking Area 21

survey are summarised in the report. Recommended changes to the parking restrictions in the

Crows Nest/North Sydney Parking Area 21 are also detailed in the report.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. THAT Council adopt the attached parking restriction recommendations for North Sydney

Parking Area 21.

2. THAT Council notify the residents before installing the parking restriction changes in North

Sydney Parking Area 21.

3. THAT the new parking restrictions be reviewed six (6) months after the date of installation

in North Sydney Parking Area 21.

Report of Manager Parking Meters, Leonie Wishart

Re: North Sydney Parking Area 21 – Survey Results

(2)


Consultation has been undertaken in accordance with Council's Community Engagement

Protocol

Relates to ECM No: N/A

Standard or Guideline Used: AS2890.5; AS1742.11; NSC Resident Parking Permit Policy

Signs & Lines Priority: 2

Precinct and Ward: Hayberry, Wollstonecraft

Impact on Bicycles: Nil

Impact on Pedestrians: Nil

Impact on Parking: Some changes to parking restrictions are proposed as outlined in the

report.

DETAIL

North Sydney Parking Area 21 survey affects Carlow Street, Tucker Street, Cassins Street and

Cassins Lane.

A total of 293 surveys were distributed to residents, property owners, businesses, and to the

Hayberry Precinct between 16 and 23 May 2019. The survey was also distributed to North

Sydney Boys High School, Marist College North Shore, St Mary’s Catholic Primary School,

and the businesses within the North Sydney Oval building. The survey was also available

online. Residents were given until the 16 June 2019 to respond. A total of 40 responses were

received, including 19 hard copy responses and 21 online responses. This represents a response

rate of 13.8%. The average response rate is usually 10 to 12% for parking surveys.

Survey Results

The answers received for North Sydney Parking Area 21 parking survey are summarised in

Attachment 1.

Precinct Comments

At the time of writing Council has not received comments from Hayberry Precinct.

Comments Received

Respondents were asked to provide general comments/feedback as desired. Comments have

been grouped by emerging themes.



(3)

Oppose Meters

• Current parking restrictions are fine as long as they are monitored and enforced. There

is no need for reduced parking times in this area. There is certainly NO need for metered

parking. Come on N/S Council, you are increasing rates, there is no need to collect

further money from my visitors.

• We are not in favour of the changes suggested and are particularly opposed to parking

meters in residential streets.

• I would hate to have parking meters outside my house. This would mean that all of my

visitors would have to pay! There is no benefit to me to have parking meters. It will be

a significant drawback. IF you do go ahead, then I will have to insist that I get about 50

free passes or else I will be worse off as I will probably end up paying for my visitor's

meter as I will feel guilty if they pay. Businesses like the cafes will suffer. I will make

Sotto and Eighty 88 on West Street aware of this. The only advantage is that you will

get more money. Cars will still park there. It will just make you richer and others poorer.

Leave it as it is please! It's fine as it is as commuters can't park there anyway as it is 2

hour parking! Please keep me updated.

• Please NO parking meters. Happy to have times reduced. Evening/ night parking not

hard in Carlow Street and Cassins Avenue.

• PLEASE NO PARKING METERS. We are a resident area we do not need meters. I

have lived in my house for over 50 years. I get resident parking tickets and always had

no worries. People who buy houses without parking have to realise they can't just park

out the front of their house. Please just leave it the way it is. It is a beautiful area to live

in.

• We are definitely against the introduction of parking meters and associated road

markings - this is a residential area not a business district. Our rates have been increased

greatly and now you are suggesting we pay for our family and friends to visit - while

you spend more money on potentially changing signs, introducing meters etc that are of

no benefit to us.

• No parking meters please.

• a) Only change parking of current unrestricted zones is wanted, to free up more parking

spaces. A minimum of 4 hours parking time must be specified.

b) No change to be made to existing timed street parking zones.

c) Residents I have spoken to do not agree with any meter parking. NOTE: Changing

unrestricted zones to 4hr will free up more street parking and prevent extended parking

by commuters and commercial operators (some cards were parked for 2 months and

police or Council could not remove them!).

• 1) I am not in favour of metered parking.

2) By placing a restriction on the unrestricted zones, it will turn these spots over. A car

repair business in West St uses these car spaces for weeks at a time. By restricting

these to 4 hours Mon-Fri, it will change significantly.

3) Residents should be able to have visitors park in the street at the weekend without

ridiculous constraints NO meter parking installed in any of these streets.



(4)

Other

• Current restrictions are working well and balances the needs of residents and visitors.

• I will only support changes to parking that do not reduce the current number of

unrestricted parking spaces. Without this (as a resident) it would be prohibitively

difficult to park.

• I suggest that residents be entitled to a number of free parking vouchers per year (which

can be used by visitors) (This survey is structured in a way that doesn't allow for all

options, so I have ticked the boxes which were most relevant to myself as a resident.

Thank you!).

• Loading Dock is so annoying. Specially with all the trucks and vans coming and going

with lots of noises.

Discussion

The survey results indicate some level of support for timed parking restrictions in Carlow

Street. Detailed recommendations based on the survey responses are listed in Attachment 2.

Overall, there was a strong opposition to parking meters in Area 21 and as such no additional

parking meters have been recommended in Area 21.


Page | 1

(Note: the 10min parking restriction within this street is not included in this survey)

Q.1.b. I am in favour of replacing the existing parking restrictions including unrestricted zones in Carlow Street with (tick one):

Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %

Carlow Street 6 40% 0% 1 7% 3 20% 3 20% 2 13% 15 38%

Cassins Avenue 7 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 7 18%

Miller Street 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 1 50% 2 5%

Milray Avenue 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 3%

Priory Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Shirley Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

West Street 2 40% 1 20% 2 40% 0% 0% 0% 5 13%

Non-resident owner

West Street 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 3%

Business Owner

Cassins Avenue 4 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4 10%

Miller Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Anonymous 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 3%

Grand Total 23 58% 1 3% 3 8% 3 8% 7 18% 3 8% 40 100%

Q.1.c. Between Monday and Friday, the current parking restrictions expire at 6:00pm or 9:00pm. I would like them both to be changed to (tick one):


Carlow Street 11 73% 1 7% 1 7% 2 13% 0% 15 38%

Cassins Avenue 7 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 7 18%

Miller Street 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 5%

Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Priory Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Shirley Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

West Street 2 40% 2 40% 1 20% 0% 0% 5 13%

Non-resident owner

West Street 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Business Owner

Cassins Avenue 4 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4 10%

Miller Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Anonymous 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Grand Total 31 78% 4 10% 2 5% 2 5% 1 3% 40 100%

No answer Total

1 Hour Meter

ParkingTotalNo answerRetain existing 2 Hour Parking

2 Hour Meter

Parking1 Hour Parking



1. Survey Results - CARLOW STREET

Carlow Street

Retain existing 10pm8pm6pm


Page | 2

Q.1.d. On Saturday, the current parking restrictions expires at 9:00pm or 11:00pm. I would like them both to be changed to (tick one):

Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number % Number %

Carlow Street 10 67% 2 13% 1 7% 1 7% 1 7% 0% 15 38%

Cassins Avenue 7 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 7 18%

Miller Street 0% 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 5%

Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Priory Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Shirley Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

West Street 4 80% 1 20% 0% 0% 0% 0% 5 13%

Non-resident owner

West Street 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%

Business Owner

Cassins Avenue 4 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4 10%

Miller Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Anonymous 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Grand Total 30 75% 5 13% 1 3% 2 5% 1 3% 1 3% 40 100%

Q.1.e. On Sunday, the current parking restriction that expires at 9:00pm. I would like this to be modified to (please tick one):


Carlow Street 11 73% 1 7% 1 7% 2 13% 0% 15 38%

Cassins Avenue 7 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 7 18%

Miller Street 0% 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 5%

Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Priory Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Shirley Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

West Street 4 80% 1 20% 0% 0% 0% 5 13%

Non-resident owner

West Street 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%

Business Owner

Cassins Avenue 4 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4 10%

Miller Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Anonymous 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Grand Total 31 78% 4 10% 2 5% 2 5% 1 3% 40 100%

Resident Street AddressRetain existing No answer Total6pm 8pm 10pm

6pm 8pm 10pmRetain existing No answer Total

Midnight



Page | 3

Q.1.f. I would like the parking restrictions to operate (tick one):


Carlow Street 6 40% 3 20% 2 13% 4 27% 0% 15 38%

Cassins Avenue 7 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 7 18%

Miller Street 0% 1 50% 0% 0% 1 50% 2 5%

Milray Avenue 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 3%

Priory Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Shirley Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

West Street 2 40% 2 40% 0% 1 20% 0% 5 13%

Non-resident owner

West Street 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 3%

Business Owner

Cassins Avenue 4 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4 10%

Miller Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Anonymous 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Grand Total 23 58% 7 18% 2 5% 7 18% 1 3% 40 100%


Monday to Friday

ONLY Monday to Saturday Monday to SundayRetain existing No answer Total


Page | 4

Q.2.b. I am in favour of replacing the existing parking restrictions in Tucker Street with (tick one):


Carlow Street 11 73% 1 7% 1 7% 2 13% 15 38%

Cassins Avenue 6 86% 0% 0% 1 14% 7 18%

Miller Street 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 5%

Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Priory Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Shirley Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

West Street 3 60% 2 40% 0% 0% 5 13%

Non-resident owner

West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Business Owner

Cassins Avenue 4 100% 0% 0% 0% 4 10%

Miller Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Anonymous 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Grand Total 33 83% 3 8% 1 3% 3 8% 40 100%

Q.2.c. Between Monday and Friday, the current parking restrictions expire at 6:00pm. I would like them to be extended to (tick one):


Carlow Street 12 80% 1 7% 2 13% 15 38%

Cassins Avenue 6 86% 0% 1 14% 7 18%

Miller Street 2 100% 0% 0% 2 5%

Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%

Priory Road 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%

Shirley Road 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%

West Street 5 100% 0% 0% 5 13%

Non-resident owner

West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%

Business Owner

Cassins Avenue 4 100% 0% 0% 4 10%

Miller Street 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%

West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%

Anonymous 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%

Grand Total 36 90% 1 3% 3 8% 40 100%

2. Survey Results - TUCKER STREET

Tucker Street


1 Hour Meter

Parking

2 Hour Meter

ParkingNo answer

Resident Street AddressRetain existing 8pm No answer Total

Total


Page | 5

Q.2.d. On Saturdays, the current parking restrictions expire at 11:00pm. I would like them to be modified to (tick one):


Carlow Street 10 67% 2 13% 1 7% 2 13% 15 38%

Cassins Avenue 6 86% 0% 0% 1 14% 7 18%

Miller Street 0% 2 100% 0% 0% 2 5%

Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Priory Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Shirley Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

West Street 4 80% 1 20% 0% 0% 5 13%

Non-resident owner

West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Business Owner

Cassins Avenue 4 100% 0% 0% 0% 4 10%

Miller Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Anonymous 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%

Grand Total 30 75% 6 15% 1 3% 3 8% 40 100%

Q.2.e. I would like the parking restrictions to operate (tick one):


Carlow Street 10 67% 0% 1 7% 2 13% 2 13% 15 38%

Cassins Avenue 6 86% 0% 0% 0% 1 14% 7 18%

Miller Street 0% 1 50% 0% 1 50% 0% 2 5%

Milray Avenue 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%

Priory Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Shirley Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

West Street 2 40% 1 20% 1 20% 1 20% 0% 5 13%

Non-resident owner

West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Business Owner

Cassins Avenue 4 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 4 10%

Miller Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

West Street 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Anonymous 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Grand Total 26 65% 4 10% 3 8% 4 10% 3 8% 40 100%



ONLY Monday to Saturday Monday to Sunday No answer

Resident Street AddressRetain existing 8pm 10pm No answer Total


Page | 6

Q.3.b. I am in favour of replacing some of the existing “2 Hour Parking” with (tick one):


Cassins Avenue 7 100% 0% 0% 0% 7 18%

Carlow Street 11 73% 2 13% 1 7% 1 7% 15 38%

Miller Street 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 2 5%

Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Priory Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Shirley Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

West Street 1 20% 3 60% 1 20% 0% 5 13%

Non-resident owner

West Street 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%

Business Owner

Cassins Avenue 3 75% 1 25% 0% 0% 4 10%

Miller Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Anonymous 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%

Grand Total 28 70% 9 23% 2 5% 1 3% 40 100%



Cassins Avenue 7 100% 0% 0% 7 18%

Carlow Street 11 73% 2 13% 2 13% 15 38%

Miller Street 2 100% 0% 0% 2 5%

Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%

Priory Road 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%

Shirley Road 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%

West Street 5 100% 0% 0% 5 13%

Non-resident owner

West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%

Business Owner

Cassins Avenue 4 100% 0% 0% 4 10%

Miller Street 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%

West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%

Anonymous 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%

Grand Total 36 90% 2 5% 2 5% 40 100%



3. Survey Results - CASSINS AVENUE

Cassins Avenue



Retain existing 10pm No answer Total


Page | 7



Cassins Avenue 7 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 7 18%

Carlow Street 11 73% 0% 1 7% 2 13% 1 7% 15 38%

Miller Street 1 50% 1 50% 0% 0% 0% 2 5%

Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Priory Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Shirley Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

West Street 1 20% 3 60% 0% 1 20% 0% 5 13%

Non-resident owner 0%

West Street 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 3%

Business Owner 0%

Cassins Avenue 3 75% 1 25% 0% 0% 0% 4 10%

Miller Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Anonymous 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Grand Total 28 70% 6 15% 1 3% 4 10% 1 3% 40 100%


Monday to Friday

ONLY Monday to Saturday TotalMonday to Sunday No answer


Page | 8

Q.4.b. I am in favour of replacing some of the existing “2 Hour Parking and unrestricted parking” with (tick one):


Carlow Street 9 60% 2 13% 1 7% 3 20% 15 38%

Cassins Avenue 7 100% 0% 0% 0% 7 18%

Miller Street 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 5%

Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Priory Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Shirley Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

West Street 1 20% 3 60% 1 20% 0% 5 13%

Non-resident owner

West Street 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%

Business Owner

Cassins Avenue 3 75% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 10%

Miller Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Anonymous 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 1 3%

Grand Total 27 68% 7 18% 2 5% 4 10% 40 100%



Carlow Street 11 73% 1 7% 2 13% 1 7% 15 38%

Cassins Avenue 7 100% 0% 0% 0% 7 18%

Miller Street 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 2 5%

Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Priory Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Shirley Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

West Street 5 100% 0% 0% 0% 5 13%

Non-resident owner

West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Business Owner

Cassins Avenue 3 75% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 10%

Miller Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Anonymous 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Grand Total 35 88% 1 3% 2 5% 2 5% 40 100%



Total

4. Survey Results - CASSINS LANE

Cassins Lane

Retain existing 8pm 10pm No answer


ParkingNo answer

Total


Page | 9



Carlow Street 9 60% 2 13% 1 7% 2 13% 1 7% 15 38%

Cassins Avenue 7 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 7 18%

Miller Street 2 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 2 5%

Milray Avenue 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Priory Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Shirley Road 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

West Street 1 20% 3 60% 0% 1 20% 0% 5 13%

Non-resident owner

West Street 0% 0% 0% 1 100% 0% 1 3%

Business Owner

Cassins Avenue 3 75% 0% 0% 0% 1 25% 4 10%

Miller Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

West Street 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Anonymous 0% 1 100% 0% 0% 0% 1 3%

Grand Total 27 68% 6 15% 1 3% 4 10% 2 5% 40 100%

Resident Street AddressTotalNo answerMonday to SundayMonday to Saturday

Monday to Friday

ONLY Retain existing


Zone IDStreet

Street No.Weekday Average Occupancy No. Bays Current Restrictions Proposed Restrictions Comments

Carlow Street 87%

1836 Carlow Street 24-46 100% 52 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 21

Retain

Overall 58% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 37% of respondents requested changes to parking restrictions (11% support metered parking). 77% of respondents want to retain exisiting time restriction expiry.

Carlow Street residents - 40% retain exisiting and 47% requested changes (20% support metered parking). 71% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry and 40% want to retain Mon-Fri or Unrestricted operation - 60% wanted changes to exisiting operation days.

1837 Carlow Street `7-21 94% 82 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 21

Retain



1837A Carlow Street - 93% 710 Minute Parking 8.30am - 10am 4pm - 6pm Mon - Fri

10 Minute Parking 8.30am - 10am 4pm - 6pm Mon - Fri2 Hour Parking 10.00am-4pm Mon-Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 21


Carlow Street residents - 40% retain exisiting and 47% requested changes (20% support metered parking). 71% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry and 40% want to retain Mon-Fri or Unrestricted operation - 60% wanted changes to exisiting operation days. Generally residents in this section of Carlow Street support 2 Hour parking.

1837B Carlow Street - 100% 3 Unrestricted Parking2 Hour Parking 8.30am-6pm Mon-Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 21


Carlow Street residents - 40% retain exisiting and 47% requested changes (20% support metered parking). 71% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry and 40% want to retain Mon-Fri or Unrestricted operation - 60% wanted changes to exisiting operation days.Generally residents in this section of Carlow Street support 2 Hour parking.

1837C Carlow Street - 63% 4 Unrestricted Parking Retain



1837D Carlow Street 5 100% 4 Unrestricted Parking Retain





Zone IDStreet


1838 Carlow Street 69 100% 32 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Thur 8.30am - 11pm Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 21

Retain


Carlow Street residents - 40% retain exisiting and 47% requested changes (20% support metered parking). 71% want to retain the existing time restriction expiry and 40% want to retain Mon-Fri or Unrestricted operation - 60% wanted changes to exisiting operation days .

1839 Carlow Street `6-10 83% 31 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Thur 8.30am - 11pm Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 21

Retain



1840 Carlow Street `12-12A 100% 3 Unrestricted Parking Retain



1841 Carlow Street `14-36 73% 131 Hour Parking 8.30am - 9pm Mon - Sun Permit Holders Excepted Area 21

Retain



Tucker Street 78%

1842 Tucker Street 2 81% 81 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Thur 8.30am - 11pm Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 21

Retain

Overall 83% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking and 11% support metered parking. 83% retain exisitng parking restrictions.

74% from Carlow Street residents do not support changes. No response from Tucker Street residents

1843 Tucker Street - 70% 51 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri 8.30am - 11pm Sat Permit Holders Excepted Area 21

Retain



1843A Tucker Street - 83% 31 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Thur 8.30am - 11pm Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 21

Retain





Zone IDStreet


1844 Tucker Street 38 79% 71 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Thur 8.30am - 11pm Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 21

Retain



Cassins Avenue 90%

1846A Cassins Avenue `2-10 100% 42 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 21

Retain

Overall 70% of respondents do not support changes to exisiting parking. 23% of respondents requested 1 hour parking and 5% support metered parking. 90% want to retain exisitng parking restrictions.

100% Cassins Avenue resident do not support changes.

1846B Cassins Avenue 1 80% 52 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 21

Retain


100% Cassins Avenue resident do not support changes.

Cassins Lane 83%

1845 Cassins Lane - 75% 82 Hour Parking 8.30am - 6pm Mon - Fri Permit Holders Excepted Area 21

Retain


100% Cassins Avenue resident do not support changes.No response from Cassins Lane residents

1846 Priory Road - 90% 3 Unrestricted Parking Retain


100% Cassins Avenue resident do not support changes.No response from Cassins Lane residents


Area 21

North Sydney CouncilCopyright:

Copyright © North Sydney Council - No part of this map may be reproducedwithout permission. Commercial decisions should not be made based on information contained in this map without first checking details held by the responsible Government authority.

Further details can be obtained by calling (02) 9936 8100 or e-mail [email protected].

Area 19

Area 20

Area 21

Area 22

13-15

2418

28

1412

7

10

15

(9) 11

2630

2832

40

(34) (36) (38)

37

35

54

46

83

39

85

56

6268

4446

-48

64

87

60

9189

38-4

042

66

5658

A

36

23

5052

54

2

21

58

70

6

86-8

884

8280

47

7278

76

45

(U1 14)

6359

A

4

73

43

6567

8583

7573

A71

49

8

81

61

5153

96

41

59

77

31

57

33

79

7425

102A

9894

55

92

100

90

104

92A

102

37

(93)

87

106

108

35

71A

6911

411

0

114112106 108 110

104

112

81

43

122

128

126

124

116

130

105

111-121

107109

103

8991

93

89A

107

6

105

103

2

1

101

9997

97A

95

4

134

125

1814

1

108

140

150

(23) (25)

16

22

136

23

26 28 30 32

20 22 24

125B

152

127

148

34 36

138

2-10

12

(7-21)

12A2

4

(264

)

168

270

282

288-

290

292

296

298

283A

300

302

304

170

306

308

310

314

312

(330C)

(330B)

(330A)

330A

330

316

34

BERN

ARD

LA

NE

ROA

D C

LOSU

RE

BERN

ARD

LANE

BERN

ARD

LANE

TUCK

ER S

TREE

T

MYRTLE STREET

EMMETT STREET

FIG TREE LANE (Private Road)

RID

GE

LAN

E

CASSINS AVENUE

CASS

INS

LANE

CU

NN

ING

HA

M S

TREE

T

EMMETT LANE

HAZELBANK PLACE

RIDGE STREET

CARLOW STREET

BERN

ARD

LANE

HAYBERRY LANE

RODB

ORO

UGH

AVEN

UE

HAYBERRY STREET

FALCON STREET

FALCON STREET

MIL

LER

STRE

ET

WES

T ST

REET

FALCON STREET

1765

1795

1788CS

1849

1788

1799

1817

1811CS

1798

1851A

1818

1811

1816

1858

1794

1859

1793

1764

1776

1792

1787

1776CS

1791

1786

1790

1819

1785

1789A

1860

1837C

1838

1789

1837MZ

1784A

1861

1784

1846

1821

1845

1820

1839

1827

1829MB

2248

1844

1834

18411837D

1846C

1843A

2254A

1783

1846A

2092A

1828

1823

1862

1842

1837A

1837B

1843

1840

1846B

1822

1836

1833

1835

1832

1830

1831

1831MB

1831

1829

1829A

1829

2253

2252

1837

1843

18421844

1843A

1837A1836

1841

18371837B

18401839

1837D

1838

1837MZ1837C

1846C

18451846

1846B

1846A

wisleo

Oval

wisleo

Oval

Item 5.1 . - Traffic - 26/7/19


To the General Manager Attach: 1. Abandoned Vehicles and

2. Unattended Boat Trailers Report

SUBJECT: (5.1) Abandoned Vehicles and Unattended Boat Trailers Processed Report

AUTHOR: Report of Manager Ranger and Parking Services, Mark Richardson


Report of Abandoned Vehicles and Unattended Boat Trailers processed during the reporting

period of 25 May 2019 to 3 July 2019.

Year to date (2019) Council had investigated 247 reports of abandoned vehicles.

Year to date (2019) Council processed 49 reports of unattended boat trailers.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. THAT the information concerning the Abandoned Vehicles and Unattended Boat Trailers

Processed Report be received.

Report of Manager Ranger and Parking Services, Mark Richardson (2)

Re: Abandoned Vehicles and Unattended Boat Trailers Processed

ABANDONED VEHICLES PROCESSED DURING THE PERIOD FROM 25 May 2019 to 3 July 2019

Ref #

* indicates

completed

Location Reported

Not Abandoned Actioned as an Abandoned Vehicle

Advised by

owner not

abandoned

Moved so cannot

be considered

abandoned

Unregistered but not

abandoned. Referred

to Police for

enforcement action

Impound

process

commenced

Impounded Disposed at

Auction

044/19* Gillies St, Wollstonecraft (cnr Shirley Rd) 21/1/19 22/1/19 25/2/19 7/6/19

069/19* Opp 7A Spruson St, Neutral Bay 30/1/19 5/2/19 24/2/19 17/5/19

082/19* 1A Christie St, Wollstonecraft 8/2/19 14/2/19 28/2/19 13/5/19

095/19 King St, Waverton (opp 1 McKye St) 7/2/19 14/2/19

ongoing

9/3/19

106/19 Harrison St, Cremorne (cnr Wycombe Rd) 15/2/19 14/2/19

ongoing

12/3/19

109/19* Hazelbank Rd, Wollstonecraft (cnr Ivy St) 16/2/19 14/2/19 18/3/19 21/5/19

119/19 54 Shellcove Rd, Kurraba Point 24/2/19 28/2/19

ongoing

11/6/19

131/19* Near 200 Kurraba Rd, Kurraba Point 4/3/19 4/3/19 12/3/19 17/5/19

146/19 Opp 22 Mackenzie St, Lavender Bay 21/3/19 25/3/19

ongoing

4/4/19

148/19 2 Ivy St, Wollstonecraft 22/3/19 25/3/19

ongoing

12/4/19

151/19 40 Rangers Rd, Cremorne 26/3/19 28/3/19

ongoing

11/4/19

155/19 2 Earle St, Cremorne 27/3/19 28/3/19

ongoing

13/5/19

165/19 Opp 77 Rosalind St, Cammeray 8/4/19 9/4/19

ongoing

179/19 Wood St, Waverton (cnr Balls Head Rd) 28/4/19 2/5/19

ongoing

18/6/19

190/19 19 Raymond Rd, Neutral Bay 13/5/19 21/5/19

ongoing

17/6/19



Ref #

* indicates

completed

Location Reported


Advised by

owner not

abandoned

Moved so cannot

be considered

abandoned


abandoned. Referred

to Police for

enforcement action

Impound

process

commenced


Auction

194/19* 94A Spofforth St, Cremorne 22/5/19 ✓

195/19 Hipwood St, Kirribilli (Car Park) 22/5/19 23/5/19

ongoing

1/7/19

196/19* Waters L, Cremorne 26/5/19 ✓

197/19* 55A Wycombe Rd, Neutral Bay 26/5/19 ✓

198/19* 74-76 Upper Pitt St, Kirribilli 27/5/19 ✓

199/19* 17 Thrupp St, Neutral Bay 27/5/19 ✓

200/19* 4 McDougall St, Kirribilli 27/5/19 ✓

201/19* 76 Merlin St, Neutral Bay 29/5/19 ✓

202/19 74 Merlin St, Neutral Bay 29/5/19 30/5/19

ongoing

203/19* Park Ave, Neutral Bay (cnr Military Rd) 29/5/19 ✓

204/19* Park Ave, Neutral Bay (cnr Military Rd) 29/5/19 ✓

205/19* Brothers Ave, Cammeray (Tunks Park) 29/5/19 ✓

206/19* Gerard St, Cremorne (opp 1 Ada St) 30/5/19 ✓

207/19 2 Stratford St, Cammeray 31/5/19 31/5/19

ongoing

1/7/19

208/19* 30 Grasmere Rd, Cremorne 31/5/19 ✓

209/19* 4 Cassins Ave, North Sydney 30/5/19 ✓

210/19 88 Alfred St Sth, Milsons Point 30/5/19 4/6/19

ongoing

211/19* 8 Rodborough Ave, Crows Nest 2/6/19 ✓

212/19* 184 Kurraba Rd, Kurraba Point 2/6/19 ✓

213/19* 18 Spofforth St, Cremorne 3/6/19 ✓

214/19 Opp 5 Prior Ave, Cremorne Point 3/6/19 4/6/19

ongoing



Ref #

* indicates

completed

Location Reported


Advised by

owner not

abandoned

Moved so cannot

be considered

abandoned


abandoned. Referred

to Police for

enforcement action

Impound

process

commenced


Auction

215/19* 10 Spofforth St, Cremorne 3/6/19 ✓

216/19* 21 Spruson St, Neutral Bay 4/6/19 ✓

217/19* 103 Cremorne Rd, Cremorne point 5/6/19 ✓

218/19 Anzac Ave, Cammeray (o/s Anzac School) 5/6/19 5/6/19

ongoing

219/19 32B Jenkins St, Cammeray 6/6/19 7/6/19

ongoing

220/19* 11 Fernhurst Ave, Cremorne 11/6/19 ✓

221/19* 1 Christie St, Wollstonecraft 11/6/19 ✓

222/19 55 Whaling Rd, North Sydney 12/6/19 12/6/19

ongoing

223/19* Cammeray Rd, Cammeray (opp Park Ave) 13/6/19 ✓

224/19* 42 Carter St, Cammeray 13/6/19 ✓

225/19* 30 Pine St, Cammeray 13/6/19 ✓

226/19* Merlin St, Neutral Bay (cnr Falcon St) 14/6/19 ✓

227/19* Merlin St, Neutral Bay (cnr Falcon St) 14/6/19 ✓

228/19* Carr St, Waverton (opp Clifton St) 14/6/19 ✓

229/19 Vale St, Cammeray (cnr Abbott St) 14/6/19 18/6/19

ongoing

230/19* 24 Wonga Rd, Cremorne 14/6/19 ✓

231/19* 8 Ada St, Cremorne 17/6/19 ✓

232/19* Opp 73 Rosalind St, Cammeray 19/6/19 ✓

233/19* Opp 15 Lodge Rd, Cremorne 22/6/19 ✓

234/19* Opp 14 McDougall St, Kirribilli 24/6/19 ✓

235/19* 66 Kurraba Rd, Neutral Bay 24/6/19 ✓

236/19* Tunks Park, Brothers Ave, Cammeray 24/6/19 ✓



Ref #

* indicates

completed

Location Reported


Advised by

owner not

abandoned

Moved so cannot

be considered

abandoned


abandoned. Referred

to Police for

enforcement action

Impound

process

commenced


Auction

237/19* 242 Ben Boyd Rd, Cremorne 26/6/19 ✓

238/19 44A Shirley Rd, Wollstonecraft 26/6/19 27/6/19

ongoing

239/19* 6 Boronia St, Wollstonecraft 26/6/19 ✓

240/19 41-43 Milray Ave, Wollstonecraft 26/6/19 27/6/19

ongoing

241/19 40 Boyle St, Cremorne Point 28/6/19 28/6/19

ongoing

242/19 8 Lower Wycombe Rd, Neutral Bay 28/6/19 1/7/19

ongoing

243/19* Florence L, Cremorne (cnr Murdoch St) 29/6/19 ✓

244/19 Florence L, Cremorne (cnr Murdoch St) 29/6/19 1/7/19

ongoing

245/19 14 Reed St, Cremorne 29/6/19 1/7/19

ongoing

246/19 Reed St, Cremorne (cnr Florence St) 29/6/19 1/7/19

ongoing

247/19 17 The Boulevarde, Cammeray 30/6/19 1/7/19

ongoing



UNATTENDED BOAT TRAILERS PROCESSED DURING THE PERIOD FROM 25 May 2019 to 3 July 2019

Ref #

* indicates

completed

Location Month Reported

Moved so cannot

be considered

unattended

Actioned as an Unattended Boat Trailer

Impound

process

commenced


Auction

19/035* Opp. 15 Premier Street, Neutral Bay May ✓

19/036* Montpelier Street, Neutral Bay (o/s Forsyth Park) May ✓

19/037* Tunks Park, Cammeray (within car park) May ✓

19/038 57 King Street, Waverton June

19/039* Opp. 11 Wyagdon Street, North Sydney June ✓

19/040 2A Montpelier Street, Neutral Bay June

19/041 Opp.15 Montpelier Street, Neutral Bay June

19/042 68 Wycombe Road, Neutral Bay June

19/043 67 Shellcove Road, Neutral Bay June

19/044 Little Young Street, Cammeray June

19/045 41 Cowdroy Avenue, Cammeray June

19/046 33 Cammeray Road, Cammeray June

19/047 Tunks Park Car Park, Brothers Ave, Cammeray June

19/048 25 Ryries Parade, Cremorne June

19/049 Opp. 36 Reynolds Street, Cremorne June

Item 5.2 - Traffic – 26/7/19



Attach: Nil

SUBJECT: (5.2) Standing Item, Gerard Street and Macpherson Street, Cremorne - Traffic

Control Signals (TCS)

AUTHOR: Report of Sustainable Transport Projects Coordinator, Lindsay Menday


At its meeting of 25 February 2019, Council resolved to adopt the following recommendation

of the North Sydney Traffic Committee:

1. THAT pedestrian signals on Gerard Street at Macpherson Street be expedited as a high

priority project and funding be brought forward to progress the project to construction.

At the Traffic Committee meeting on 22 March 2019 it was recommended:

1. THAT Gerard Street/ MacPherson Street traffic signals be included as a standing item

on future Traffic Committee agendas.

The table below provides an update on the status of the project and will be updated at each

milestone for the project.

Date Project status

April 2019 Consultant brief and request for quotation completed. Quotation

assessment and engagement of a contractor is scheduled for early

May 2019.

May 2019 Site survey completed.

Consultant quotations to undertake design have been received and

are being assessed.

June 2019 Consultant has commenced concept design and traffic assessment.

The drafts are scheduled for completion in early August 2019.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. THAT the information concerning Gerard Street and MacPherson Street Traffic Control

Signals Standing Item be received.

Item 5.3 - Traffic – 26/7/19



Attach: 1. Updates

SUBJECT: (5.3) Standing Item - Military Road B-Line

AUTHOR: Report of Manager Traffic & Transport Operations, Michaela Kemp


At the Traffic Committee meeting on 3 May 2019, it was agreed to add a standing item for

each future traffic committee agenda with regard to B-Line, including matters concerning off-

set parking arrangements due to parking losses along Military Road, and general traffic and

parking matters that arise.

The table overleaf outlines the status of current traffic and parking matters relating to B-Line.

RECOMMENDATION:

1. THAT the information concerning Standing Item - Military Road B-Line be received.

Report of Manager Traffic & Transport Operations, Michaela Kemp

Re: Standing Item – Military Road B-Line (2)

Matter/ Background Update Offset parking

1/7/19: Consultation letters were sent out to residents and businesses on 21/6/17

and posted on Council’s ‘Your Say’ webpage. Submissions close 21/7/19.

At the 523rd Traffic Committee meeting on 22/3/19 it was recommended:

10. THAT the Director Engineering & Property Services negotiate compensation from

Transport for NSW for the loss of meter revenue from 6 on-street parking spaces on

Parraween Street as a result of direct flow-on effects of parking losses on Military Road

associated with the B-Line project. (4.2.1)

11. THAT Council consult with local residents and businesses with regard to parking

changes on Parraween Street at the rear of 330-338 Military Road (Meter ID 5948) to

convert 6 spaces of “2 Hour Meter 8.30am-6pm Mon-Fri 8.30am-12.30pm Sat Permit

Holders Excepted Area 27” to 11.4 metres of “Loading Zone 6am-6pm Mon-Fri 8.30am-

12.30pm Sat” and four (4) spaces of “1 Hour Parking 8.30am-6pm Mon-Fri 8.30am-

12.30pm Sat”; and the parking changes be approved under delegated authority to the

Traffic Engineer, subject to majority support. (4.2.1)

At the 525th Traffic Committee meeting on 14/6/19 it was recommended:


expedited. (5.3)


survey. (5.3)

Traffic and Parking Impacts (General Item)

At the 523rd Traffic Committee meeting on 22/3/19 it was recommended:

2. THAT the Mayor write to the Minister with copies to be sent to the Premier, Member

for North Shore and The Centre for Road Safety requesting that a red light camera be

placed on the intersection of Military Road and Spofforth Street and markings be placed

on the road to discourage vehicles queuing across the pedestrian crossings. (4.1)

29/5/19:

Recommendation adopted by Council 29/4/19. Letter sent 28/5/19.

29/5/19:

Council has collected baseline data in the following streets between April 2018 to

April 2019. Subsequent data will be collected in the next month or so to measure

relative changes in traffic conditions since the tidal flow changes were

implemented.

Wycombe Road

Yeo Street

Rangers Road

Ben Boyd Road

Young Street

Gerard Street

Parraween Street

Waters Road

Winnie Street

Grosvenor Street

Cabramatta Road

Spofforth Street

Spencer Road

Murdoch Street

Public Domain Upgrades in B-Line Military Road Corridor Between Neutral Bay and Cremorne 29/5/19:

Tenders have been called for and received for the public domain upgrades which

will commence in July 2019.

NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its...

Documents

Transcript of NORTH SYDNEY COUNCIL · 2019. 7. 18. · 526th Traffic Committee – 26/07/19 Page No 7 At its...