North Korea - prospects for peace
description
Transcript of North Korea - prospects for peace
North Korea - prospects for peace
Tim BealVictoria University of Wellington, New Zealand
United Nations Association, WellingtonThurs 12 July 2007
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 2
Setting the scene
• Thanks
• Title– Why not US: Prospects for Peace?
• A brace of characters
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 3
This (real) gentleman
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 4
Met a fictitious one in 1757
• The occasion?
• Admiral John Byng’s execution
• Fictitious one: Voltaire’s Candide
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 5
John Byng and Candide
• Byng is executed – in this country, it is wise to kill an admiral from
time to time to encourage the others
• Byng was not close enough to the French fleet, but Candide asked– Weren’t the French as far from the English, as
the English from the French?
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 6
US - NK – US
• Just as NK is as far from US as US is from NK, so negotiation has two sides
• Media exclusively focuses on denuclearisation of NK
• What does NK think?
• Two aspects
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 7
NK on denuclearisation
• Not just NK but SK and other countries (i.e. US) in respect of Korean peninsula– US nuclear weapons in SK land and waters, and
long-range weapons elsewhere
• Nuclear programme to– Deter US from attack– Force US to drop ‘hostility’
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 8
Hostility
• NK wants US to accept peaceful coexistence• Lift sanctions
– Large responsibly for devastation of economy• Hundreds of thousands of deaths
• Malnutrition
• Barrier to rehabilitation and development
• In effect, adhere to UN charter• Let us ask Candidian awkward questions
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 9
The importance of questions
• Often it is the asking of questions that is important– The answer falls into place
• Similar to the little boy observing that the emperor was naked
• Power does not like questions
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 10
The portrayal of things
• Events and issues are often portrayed as if the received interpretation is unquestionable
• Vital to ask ‘naive’ questions
• Such as?
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 11
Examples
• Which country threatens peace, NK or US?
• Which country threatens the other, NK or US?
• Does US have a moral right to nuclear weapons denied to NK?
• If we are concerned about nuclear weapons, should we not look at the country which has 10,000 rather than the country which has none?
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 12
In this spirit let us examine some issues
• NK, US and the UN– NK Missile tests July 2006– NK Nuclear test October 2006– US allegations about UNDP in NK January
2007
• BDA affair• Agreement of 13 February 2007• Prospects for peace
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 13
Forthcoming article
• December issue of NZ Journal of Asian Studies
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 14
Tests >resolutions
• Both sets of tests led to ‘unanimous’ condemnatory resolutions, imposing sanctions
• Unanimous is misleading
• Opposition from China and Russia but veto is out of fashion
• Water down and then often ignore
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 15
South Korea
• Also opposed but– Does not have a veto– Cannot openly defy US
• Caught in dilemma and does contradictory things
• Eg suspends aid but continues Kaesong Industrial Complex
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 16
Missile tests
• July 2006 >>Japanese sponsored resolution 1695
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 17
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 18
Candide would be bemused
• Reaffirming that proliferation of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons, as well as their means of delivery, constitutes a threat to international peace and security,
• Why ‘proliferation’ rather than ‘possession’– Once you ask the question you know the
answer– US possesses, US enemies proliferate
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 19
Why concern at NK ballistic missiles?
• Expressing grave concern at the launch of ballistic missiles by the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK), given the potential of such systems to be used as a means to deliver nuclear, chemical or biological payloads,
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 20
Candide’s questions
• Don’t all missiles (even US ones) have this potential?
• Why specify ‘ballistic missiles’ rather than missiles?– NK missiles are ballistic, US tends to employ
non-ballistic (i.e. cruise) missiles– Britain alone has up to 2000 Storm Shadow and
unknown number of Tomahawks
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 21
Moratorium
• Registering profound concern at the DPRK’s breaking of its pledge to maintain its moratorium on missile launching,
• Wasn’t this moratorium (Clinton 1999) self-imposed and contingent on US negotiations on issue continuing?– Bush had broken off negotiations
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 22
Missile tests
• Not illegal
• Very common
• For instance in period June-November 2006 many countries conducted tests of long range missiles– Minor tests and exercises not reported
• Unless NK…
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 23
Tests
• France• India• Pakistan• Russia• US
– 3 tests of Minuteman missiles across Pacific
• UK– No major tests but decided to replace Trident
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 24
October nuclear test
• UN condemnation replicated double standards of July
• US currently does not conduct physical tests but may return to it
• Developing new generation of nuclear weapons and delivery systems– Policy of first use
• And the track record…
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 25
Fig 1: Nuclear tests 1945-2006
1
2
4
45
45
210
715
1030
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
North Korea
Pakistan
India
China
UK
France
Russia
US
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 26
Purpose of NK tests
• Force US back into negotiations– In abeyance because of BDA affair
• Combined with other factors was successful– Middle East– Mid-term elections
• Negotiations were resumed and this led to Agreement of 13 February 2007
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 27
BDA and UNDP affairs
• This agreement was to implement the initial stages of the Joint Statement of 19 September 2005
• JS had been suspended by the Banco Delta Asia (BDA) affair
• In Sept 2005 US Treasury designated BDA as a ‘primary money laundering concern’ under Section 311 of the USA Patriot Act
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 28
BDA charges
• Treasury claimed that BDA was laundering ‘hundreds of millions of dollars’ for NK– Drugs, counterfeit cigarettes, counterfeit
currency
• Produced no evidence, even in private to SK or China
• Audit by Ernst & Young cleared BDA
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 29
Reasons for BDA action
• Derail Joint Statement/ Six Party Talks
• Warning or test against China– Exercise of extraterritoriality against Chinese
bank on Chinese territory
• Practice at using Patriot Act against other enemies eg Iran
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 30
Effect of BDA
• Froze $25m NK money in BDA accounts
• More important, expelled NK from international banking system– ‘financial sanctions’
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 31
Treasury/State conflict
• From late 2006 to date there has been a battle between Treasury and State
• Rice apparently got Bush’s agreement to negotiate with NK and lift financial sanctions
• Talks in Berlin January 2007>>Agreement of 13 February– Financial sanctions to be lifted in 30 days
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 32
Treasury down but not out
• Treasury forced to unfreeze accounts but barred BDA from US banking system– Ensuring sanctions remained
• Four months struggle by State to lift sanctions so Agreement could go ahead
• Successful?– For the moment yes…
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 33
Meanwhile, UNDP affair
• January 2007 Deputy U.S. Ambassador to UN Mark Wallace alleged that NK was diverting hundreds of millions of dollars from UNDP operations there– Also complained that UNDP was paying local
staff in hard currency
• Wallace– Protégé of John Bolton
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 34
UNDP rebuts charges
• If it paid in won it would need to buy that with hard currency, so effect would be the same
• It was only spending a few million in NK each year
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 35
Ban Ki-moon
• Ban widely seen as ”America’s man” immediately order external audits on UN operation in NK
• 1 June Ban announces audit clears UNDP
• US returns to attack with fresh charges
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 36
Charges flimsy
• One was NK had spent money on embassy property abroad at same time as UNDP had been spending money in NK– But currency is fungible
• ‘To Mr. Wallace’s charge that the program had transferred $7 million to its counterpart agency in the North Korean government, the program said that the amount actually had been $175,000 and that most of it had gone for workshops on vegetable growing and seed processing ‘
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 37
Even ridiculous
• Most risible was complaint that UNDP had funded a project on arms control and disarmament, and supplied books
• The one the Americans singled out was…
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 38
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 39
End of Western civilization?
• Jacques E. C. Hymans– Smith College, Massachusetts
• Cambridge University Press– £17.99
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 40
Prospects for peace
• Positions of governments
• Power of governments– Rogue elements
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 41
Japan
• Wants crisis to continue in order to facilitate remilitarisation (and perhaps nuclearisation)
• Uses ‘abduction issue’– NK wants Japan out of Six Party Talks– SK, (Russia, China) and even Rice have
expressed annoyance at Japanese
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 42
China and Russia
• Want peaceful resolution
• Want NK to survive and thrive
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 43
SK
• Wants peaceful resolution
• Wants NK to survive, develop and eventually unify with SK
• Even opposition GNP softening its line on NK
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 44
NK
• Peaceful coexistence with US– Removal of US military threat
• Lifting of sanctions and barriers to economic development
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 45
US
• Much more difficult to pin down
• Ambivalent, incoherent, fluctuating– Depends on who has bush’s ear at any
particular time
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 46
Power of governments
• Unlikely that there are ‘rogue elements’ to disrupt policy– China, Russia (for war)– Japan (for peace)
• However Abe unpopular and Upper House election 29 July
• The Koreas?
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 47
NK
• No doubt some/many in military would prefer present situation to continue or are worried about danger of détente– Giving up nuclear deterrent is no easy thing
• Cf discussion in Britain
• No sign of effective opposition to Kim Jong Il
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 48
Kim Jong Il
• How long will he continue?
• 65
• Reports of bad health - diabetes, heart disease, operations
• However, photo of meeting with Chinese FM on 3 July indicates he is well, and has lost weight
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 49
Kim and Chinese FM Yang Jiechi
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 50
South Korea
• Military is strong but western observers discount possibility of coup– Incidents may be another matter
• Defusing of tension will disadvantage right in forthcoming Presidential elections
• Roh keep to have a summit with Kim– Rumour that Kim will soon visit Kaesong
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 51
United States
• Bush and ‘Strategic incoherence’
• Who speaks for US government• State or Treasury?
• Bush, Cheney, Rice….?
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 52
‘ mixed signals’ on Terrorism List
• In Feb Agreement US agreed to remove NK from terrorism list
• 27 April press conference with Abe Shinzo Bush said that dependent on Japanese satisfaction on abductee issue– Ie never
• However Rice told Abe that abductions ‘no bar to delisting’
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 53
Prospects for peace
• Mainly depends on US
• Washington is unpredictable
• Depends on who has the ear of the president
• There are also two landmines– Financial sanctions– Heavy enriched uranium
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 54
Financial sanctions
• No certain that they have really been removed
• Treasury is still powerful
• NK has hinted that it is watching progress, but is for the moment giving Hill the benefit of the doubt
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 55
HEU
• Ostensible reason for Bush tearing up Agreed Framework that Clinton had signed
• Claimed NK had clandestine uranium weapons programme
• Hill has backtracked somewhat but difficult to see how NK (or Hill) can satisfy US right– Kumchangri solution?
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 56
Process is underway
• Six Party Talks due to reconvene in Beijing on 18 July
• NK has reacted quickly to the ‘settlement of BDA issue’– IAEA visited Pyongyang following day
• Considering accelerating suspension of nuclear programme– NK has issued a warning
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 57
Prospects
• Bush - Unstable, lame duck administration, beset with difficulties
• Washington full of important people, in and out of office, who oppose settlement with NK
• And then there are the landmines…
• Prospects are problematic
UNA Wellington 12 July 2007 58