North Dorms 11 06

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/north-dorms-11-06 1/86

North Residence HallsSub-District Plan DRAFT

December 1, 2006

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


3

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


4

Acknowledgements

Grateful acknowledgement is given to those of The Ohio

State University community and members of the NorthResidence Halls Sub-District Plan Committee who

contributed valuable time and information to this planning

and design process.

The Ohio State University

Molly Ranz-Calhoon / Director of Facility Planningand Support / Office of Student Affairs

Steve Volkmann / University Landscape Architect Steve Kremer / Assistant Vice President of Student

Affairs Dorothy Leachman / Associate Director, Student

Affairs – FOD

Laura Shinn / Senior Campus Planner – FOD

Kim Moss / Campus Planner – FOD Craig Henry / Project Manager, Architect – FOD

Tim Keegstra / Director of Campus Dining Services

Sarah Blouch / Transportation and Parking Scott Lissner / University ADA Coordinator

Bruce Mauer / Department of Recreational Sports J. Michael Dunn / Director, Department of

Recreational Sports

Cheryl Lyons / Assistant Director of Resident Life Kevin Wagner / Director of Roads and Grounds,

Physical Facilities

Brett Mayo / Associate Director - Housing, FoodServices & Event Centers

Cassie Taylor / Student – Taylor Tower

Eric Schwartz / Student – Taylor Tower

Credits

The Ohio State University North Residence Halls Sub-

District Plan was prepared by the following consultant team:

MSI

Richard Espe / Principal-in-charge

Karen McCoy / Design PrincipalBrad Kissling / Landscape Architectural Designer

Andrew Overbeck / Urban and Regional PlannerMargo Puffenberger / Graphic Designer

DSI

B. J. Arturp / ArchitectDimitri Smirniotopolouis / Architect

Acknowledgements / Credits

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


5

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


6

Table of Contents

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


7

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


9

Executive Summary

The Ohio State University’s North Residence Halls

Campus has an unrealized potential to enhance and

enliven the northeastern edge of campus. The North

Residence Halls Sub-District Plan recognizes this

potential and establishes a framework for the improve-

ment of the campus. The plan, developed by MSI and

DSI in partnership with the OSU North Residence

Halls Advisory Committee, provides a basis for the

renovation and reconstruction of the campus.

As it exists today, the North Residence Halls Campus

is in need of significant improvement. It is an unorga-nized space that is difficult to navigate. It lacks a de-

fined edge, making it ineffective as a gateway to OSU.

Residence halls are nondescript, difficult to access and

lack adequate space for student activities. Open space

is disjointed and, in many cases, unusable. The campus

has an opportunity to improve its image and usability

and provide a better living and learning environment

for its students.

The plan addresses these needs by establishing goals,

policies, and recommendations for both short-termand long-term improvements. The essence of the plan

is expressed in the following five major elements:

• Main Street: This functions as the main interior

east-west pedestrian collector corridor on the

campus and acts as the central organizing feature

for the North Residence Halls.

• Defined quadrangles: Recognizing the original

three-tower organization, the creation of three

new quadrangles organized in concert with the

new building plans creates more usable open space

for student activities.

• New buildings and additions: New buildings are

used to define and organize space. The plan calls

for a new gateway building at the corner of Lane

Avenue and High Street that better defines the

northeastern edge of the OSU Campus. New

residence halls and additions to existing residence

halls will make them more desirable to students

as well as provide more bed space and accommo-

date Living/Learning support space. Existing

structures will be renovated to give each a uniqueidentity.

• Removal of Curl Drive: Reducing the conflict

between automobiles, service vehicles and students

improves walkability and pedestrian wayfinding.

• Integration with the Academic Campus: The new

Dining Commons provides a fitting terminus to the

proposed North Campus Green that is identified

in the OSU Landscape Master Plan. This, along with

defined north-south pedestrian paths, provides a

physical and visual connection with the rest of the

OSU Academic Campus.

The North Residence Halls Sub-District Plan is intend-

ed to be the starting point in what will be a long-term

transformation of the campus. As elements of the plan

are phased in over time, the overall campus aesthetic

and functionality will be dramatically improved. Imple-

menting this plan will result in a more cohesive and de-

fined North Residence Halls Campus that better serves

students and presents a stronger gateway to OSU.

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


10Executive Summary

W . LANE AV E.

W . W OODRUFF AV E.

N .

H I G H S

T .

Barrett

Figure 1. North Residence Halls Sub-District Master Plan LEGEND

Proposed building

Existing building

Taylor Quad

Drackett Quad

Jones Quad

Neilwood

Norton

Archer

Scott

Drackett

NorthCommons Jones

Nosker

Houck

Taylor

Halloran

Haverfield

Blackburn

St. Stephen’sEpiscopal Church

New Residence Hall 3/New North Commons

New ResidenceHall 2

New ResidenceHall 1

GatewayBuilding

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


Chapter 1: Introduction11

1.0 Introduction

The North Residence Halls Sub-District Plan is

intended to establish goals, policies, guidelines and

recommendations for the forthcoming improvements

to the physical facilities. The plan begins by looking at

where the campus is today. In reviewing the history of

campus growth and the state of all exterior facilities,

both natural and man-made, a number of basic issues

are identified. Based on this review, goals and objectives

are presented which are intended to guide both the

Sub-District Plan and the future planning of the North

Campus Residence Halls. With these goals in mind, a

preliminary development program is identified. A listof short-term recommendations has evolved, using the

basic issues, goals and development program as a guide.

As a result of this process, long-range development

concepts and capital improvement projects are identi-

fied. In addition, a set of specific design principles

discusses campus form, building construction, and

landscape improvements. The plan is designed to serve

as a reference for University staff and future project

architects.

The University’s first priority for the next few years

should be to upgrade and improve the facilities, infra-

structure, and designed landscapes already in place.

This Sub-District Plan represents a beginning. It is an

attempt to tackle a broad range of issues and problems

facing the North Residence Halls today. Some of these

problems are dynamic and complex and will require

continued attention.

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


Caption goes here!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Chapter 1: Introduction 12

Figure 2. An aerial view of the North Residence Halls Campus looking west Study area boundary

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


Chapter 2: The Campus Today13

2.0 The Campus Today

2.1 General Campus Background

North Campus is situated between West Woodruff

Avenue and West Lane Avenue and is bordered on

the west by the Fisher College of Business and on the

east by North High Street. The 24 acre area occupies

the northeastern corner of the OSU Campus and is

flanked by commercial and residential uses on High

Street and Lane Avenue. Woodruff Avenue is a main

east-west campus connector and the south side of the

street is entirely made up of academic buildings.

In compiling the North Residence Halls Sub-DistrictPlan, previous OSU master plans were consulted.

These plans include: the Campus Master Plan (1995),

the District Plan for the Academic Core North (1995),

the Landscape Master Plan (1998), and the University

District High Street Streetscape Plan (2005). These

plans were developed independent of each other, but

share a number of common principles and goals:

• Remove Curl Drive

• Create a better living environment for students

• Strengthen connections to the Academic Core

• Improve the spatial definition and quality of

green space

• Improve spatial hierarchy and circulation

• Define space with additional building structures

• Develop a stronger visual connection to Main

Campus

• Treat Lane Avenue as a grand, public, tree-lined

street “urban” in character with buildings set

relatively close to the street

• Respect the “High Street Green” and its required

building setbacks

The North Residence Halls portion of 1995 District Planfor the Academic Core North

The North Residence Halls portion of the 1998 Land-scape Master Plan

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


14

Figure 3. An aerial view of the North Residence Halls Campus

Chapter 2: The Campus Today

W.LANEA VE.

W. WOODRUFFA VE.

N .

H I G H S

T .

Study area boundary

CURL DR.

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



Drackett Tower is one of three towers on North Campus. Houck House needs more space to accommodate Living/Learning programs.

Raney Commons is currently used as a commissary for Daily Grind locations and for scheduled special events.

2.2 Summary of Existing Conditions

2.2.1 Buildings and Facilities

The North Residence Halls Campus is home to several

residence halls (13) and related facilities (3) that rep-

resent 901,000 GSF (0.86 FAR). Built in the 1960’s the

campus has three (3) loosely organized districts each

clustered around a central residential tower, three low

rise (3 story) residential halls and a dining commons.

Over time, these buildings have become dated and do

not offer the type of student accommodations current-

ly desired. In general the campus lacks cohesiveness in

both design and usability. It has no community gathering

spaces, no clear building hierarchy and poor aesthet-ics. As the northeastern gateway to the entire OSU

campus, the North Residence Halls Campus needs to

have a more defined identity and physical presence

consistent with current Ohio State campus planning

standards.

Existing buildings on the campus include student

housing, a food service building, a commissary and a

Living/Learning center. Student housing has 1,368 beds

on the North Residence Halls Campus in 10 houses

and three towers. All student housing facilities have

laundry, mail and vending services. The three commons

buildings are sparsely programmed. North Commons is

the only food service building on the campus currently

used for student meal service. Designed with mid-level

entries, the building has poor ADA accessibility to the

top level and no accessibility to the lower level. Raney

Commons is currently a commissary for all Daily Grind

locations on campus and generates significant service

traffic which is in conflict with the residential campus.

Living/Learning programs are currently held at Royer

Student Activities Center, but more space within each

residence hall is desired to better accommodate the

popular program. Currently every dormitory but onehas a Living/Learning component.

Additionally, along Lane Avenue there are several

small apartments. The four units at 105 West Lane are

currently unoccupied and the units at 115-133 serve

as visiting faculty housing. There are two utility uses

on campus. There is a gas house on Lane Avenue and

electrical and mechanical facilities in the eastern end

of Scott House that will need to be considered as this

plan is implemented.

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


16

Figure 4. Existing figure ground diagram.


Study area boundary

W . LANE AV E.

W .W OODRUFF AV E.

N .

H I G H S

T .

C U R L D R .

Neilwood

Norton

Archer

Scott

DrackettNorthCommons

Jones

Nosker

Barrett

Houck

Taylor

Halloran

Haverfield

Blackburn

Royer

Raney

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



Many service doors are unsightly Many service areas are run-down in appearance and exces-sively large.

Curl Drive is used for service access, parking and busservice.

2.2.2 Vehicular Circulation and Service and Delivery

The majority of the vehicular circulation throughout

the North Residence Halls Campus happens along

Curl Drive, which connects with Neil Avenue on the

west, Lane Avenue on the north, and Woodruff Avenue

on the south. While this drive a llows service vehicles

access to many buildings, its circuitous alignment cre-

ates a vehicular intrusion within the campus. Many of

the walkways are also used as service drives creating

unclear boundaries between pedestrians and vehicles.

Additionally, existing multi-building service areas have

become run-down in appearance, are excessively large

and disrupt the connectivity of the campus pedestrian

corridors.

Bus service runs on Woodruff Avenue on weekdays

with a bus stop roughly at the midpoint of the North

Residence Halls Campus. Evening and weekend bus

service uses Curl Drive from midnight to 6:30 a.m. on

weekdays and all day on weekends.

2.2.3 Parking

Existing parking on the campus is adequate for exist-

ing uses. There are five surface lots and parallel parking

is located on Curl Drive providing approximately 300

spaces. The heavy service use of Curl Drive, however,

creates a conflict between parking capacity and service

vehicles. Parking near buildings is currently provided for

Handicap, RA’s, Hall Directors, Assistant Hall Directors

and graduate students. Curl Drive has a mixture of

metered parking and faculty, staff and graduate student

parking. No parking is permitted on Curl Drive after 2

a.m.

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


Caption goes here!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

18

Figure 5. Existing service areas and parking


LEGEND

Parking lot

Asphalt drive

Service area

Major service dock

Minor service dock

Neilwood

Scott

Norton

Archer


Jones

Nosker

Barrett

Houck

Taylor

Halloran

Haverfield

Blackburn

Royer

Raney

Bus stop

W . LANE AV E.

W .W OODRUFFAV E.

N .

H I G H S

T .

C U R L D R .

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



Walkways on North Campus are in hazardous conditionand provide little campus orientation.

The ramp and stairs outside Archer House impede pedes-trian circulation.

Pedestrian walkways lack a clear hierarchy.

2.2.4 Pedestrian Circulation and Access

Pedestrian circulation throughout the North Resi-

dence Halls is confusing and disjointed. The campus is

an important gateway because of the high volume of students that pass through the area from the significant

amount of off-campus housing to the north. Connec-

tions from north to south leading to the heart of the

academic campus are not obvious and routes are circu-

itous at best. Building locations obstruct both move-

ment and views making it hard to navigate. Likewise,

east-west connections between North Residence Halls

buildings are poor and lack cohesion.

The pedestrian walkway system has no clear hierarchy,

which makes wayfinding difficult. The walkways also

have raised and depressed areas making access to parts

of the campus difficult. The condition of many pedes-trian walkways is poor and they need to be repaired

or replaced. The shared service vehicular access on

pedestrian walkways has contributed to the damage to

surfaces.

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


20Chapter 2: The Campus Today

Figure 6. Existing pedestrian circulation diagram

W . LANE AV E.

W .W OODRUFFAV E.

N .

H I G H S

T .

C U R L D R .

LEGEND

On site destination

Minor interior site movement

Norton

Archer


Jones

Nosker

Barrett

Houck

Taylor

Halloran

Haverfield

Blackburn

Royer

Raney

Neilwood

Major pedestrian movements

Off campus movement

Scott

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



The entrance to Blackburn House has no main entry feel. Raney Commons’ main entrance has no ADA access. The entrance to Halloran House is hidden.

2.2.4 Pedestrian Circulation and Access, Continued

Access into existing buildings is inadequate. Many of the

buildings have multi-level lobbies with both exterior

and interior stairs making conformance to currentADA access standards difficult. Additionally, the main

entrance locations of buildings are not welcoming and

are often not obvious. Many of the accessible entries

are too often located at the rear of buildings. Updating

of buildings to meet current ADA accessibility codes

has resulted in an aesthetic focused on ramps and rail-

ings, which has caused visual clutter.

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



Figure 7. Existing building entrances and ADA access points LEGEND

Main Access/ADA

Minor Access/ADA Minor Access

Main Access

W . LANEAV E.

W . W OODRUFF AV E.

N .

H I G H S

T .

Neilwood

Norton

Archer

Scott

Drackett

NorthCommons

Jones

Nosker

Barrett

Houck

Taylor

Halloran

Haverfield

Blackburn

Royer

Raney

C U R L D R .

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



Many open spaces are unused because they are too shadyand are sparsely planted with grass.

Basketbal l courts are on the edge of campus Open spaces have no real organizat ion

2.2.5 Open Space

Active recreation space on the North Residence Halls

Campus is well defined and usable, but there is a lack of

large, informal and flexible open spaces. What greens-pace does exist between buildings is largely unusable

for student activities because it is either noncontiguous

or because large mature trees shade the area so much

that no grass will grow. The High Street Green is a key

element of the Ohio State image and forms the eastern

edge of campus but it needs to be reinforced because

it is disjointed and no longer properly addresses or

embraces the street on this part of campus.

The campus also has multiple recreation facilities

including sand volleyball, basketball and multi-use

courts. These facilities are currently dispersed a long

the campus edge, which reduces sound impact on theresidence halls.

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



Figure 8. Existing open space diagramLEGEND

Updated hardscape corridor

Hardscape/pavement

Hardscape/plaza

Usable open space

Green space

Athletic courts

Potential open space

W . LANE AV E.

W .W OODRUFFAV E.

N .

H I G H S

T .

C U R L D R .

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



2.2.6 Topography

Moving east to west across the North Residence Halls

Campus there is 30 feet of elevation change. The grade

change on the west side of the site is controlled with aseries of dilapidated walls which divide the large overall

space into smaller, less usable nooks and pathways. Due

to the grade change over the course of some building

lengths, many of the entrances are set between floors

causing accessibility problems. This also creates an issue

with retaining planting beds around the buildings or

retaining window wells that block light into the lower

floor.

Stormwater drainage runs west through the area and

often exceeds capacity during peak storm conditions

which has resulted in flooding in both Archer and

Nosker Houses and ponding in several areas. There isalso an expansive soil issue in the basement of Raney

Commons that has caused the floor to heave.

Series of retaining walls on west side of site in front of Drackett Tower

Retaining wall and lawn panel on the west side of RaneyCommons

Lower floor window well on west side of North Commons

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



Figure 9. Existing topography diagram

744

748

752

756

760

764

768

774

772770

766

762

758

754

750

746

W . LANE AV E.

W . W OODRUFF AV E.

N .

H I G H S

T .

C U R L D R .

Neilwood

Norton

Archer

Scott

Drackett

NorthCommons

Jones

Nosker

Barrett

Houck

Taylor

Halloran

Haverfield

Blackburn

Royer

Raney


8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



2.2.7 Vegetation

The North Residence Halls have a wide mix of mature

vegetation, much of which is overgrown and in poor

health. The existing palette of plant materials is com-plex with many mature hedgerows, ornamental and

evergreen trees that have outgrown their original sites.

Additionally, evergreens and over grown vegetation

near building entrances have formed a barrier between

the building and greenspace, preventing the greenspace

from acting as a courtyard to the building.

Additionally, the proximity of overgrown plants to

building entrances creates a safety risk for the students.

The overabundance of vegetation also has resulted in

shaded spaces that make it difficult for grass to grow.

This prevents many open spaces from being fully uti-

lized by students. While tree removal will be necessary,memorial trees may need to be protected as plans are

implemented.

Proximity of vegetation to buildings creates dangerousareas and blocks light to windows

Overgrown and poorly chosen foundation planting Overgrown planting makes sitting area undesirable

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


Chapter 2: The Campus Today 28

Figure 10. Existing tree documentation LEGEND

Existing shade tree

Existing ornamental

Existing evergreen

W . LANEAV E.

W . W OODRUFFAV E.

N .

H I G H S

T .

C U R L D R .

Neilwood

Norton

Archer

Scott

Drackett

NorthCommons

Jones

Nosker

Barrett

Houck

Taylor

Halloran

Haverfield

Blackburn

Royer

Raney


8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


Chapter 3: Goal Statement29

3.0 Goal Statement

3.1 Campus-wide Goals

The main goals of the plan are to:

• Reinforce the original campus parti by refining

the individual aesthetics of the three residential

subareas of the campus

• Create an interior east-west pedestrian collector

corridor to act as the central organizing element

linking the three distinct campus subareas

• Develop strong north-south pedestrian

connections to the Academic Campus

• Create hierarchy of pathways/spaces

• Create large community outdoor gathering spaces• Create small outdoor gathering spaces for each

residence hall

• Maintain a variety of spaces for both active and

passive recreation

• Remove overgrown vegetation and improve the

general landscape aesthetic to promote campus

views and increase security.

• Provide ADA accessibility for each main entrance

in an architecturally sensitive manner

• Improve individual building identities and clarify

and enhance aesthetics of a ll building entrances

• Increase building transparency (windows on the

campus) for both aesthetics and security

• Improve the function and aesthetics of service areas

• Provide Living/Learning support space in each

residence hall

• Increase dorm beds

• Establish a University gateway building at Lane

Avenue and High Street

• Strengthen the campus edges along High Street,

Woodruff Avenue and Lane Avenue

• Replace surface parking lots on campus with

buildings as off-site parking supply allows

In the following sections, the components and design

elements of the North Residence Halls Sub-District

Plan will be described in greater detail.

3.2 Issue Area Objectives

The North Residence Halls Sub-District Plan is in-

tended to guide the redevelopment of the campus over

the next 25 years. The plan a ims to improve the learn-

ing environment for OSU students and to enhance the

functionality and aesthetics of the campus.

This plan aims to improve the learning environment of theNorth Residence Halls Campus.

Architectural aesthetics will be improved on all buildings The plan will create a more cohesive campus that better serves students.

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


30Chapter 3: Goal Statement

W . LANE AV E.

W .W OODRUFF AV E.

N .

H I G H S

T .

Drackett Quad

Jones Quad

Taylor Quad

Neilwood

Norton

Archer

Scott

Drackett

NorthCommons Jones

Nosker

Barrett

Houck

Taylor

Halloran

Haverfield

Figure 11. North Residence Halls Sub-District Master Plan LEGEND

Proposed building

Existing building

Blackburn


New Residence Hall 3/North Commons

New ResidenceHall 2

New ResidenceHall 1

GatewayBuilding

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


Chapter 4: The Sub-District Plan31

The three new quads will be suitable for large gatherings. The Main Street will allow for a larger circulation patternthe campus

The plan includes small sitting spaces

4.0 The Sub-District Plan

4.1 Principles for Campus Form

The vision for the North Residence Halls Campus is

built around the creation of three distinct quads that

are composed of a tower and associated mid-rise

residence halls. These new quads (Drackett Quad,

Jones Quad, and Taylor Quad) will each have a distinc-

tive identity and community green space defined by

proposed building additions. This identity will be rein-

forced by the use of specific plantings, materials, signage,

artwork and kiosks. The quads will be linked by an east/

west Main Street connector. Each quad will also have a

major north/south pedestrian walkway to the academiccampus. These large, simple gestures pull the individual

elements of the North Residence Halls together while

also improving connections to main campus.

Proposed building additions will include new building

entries, facing Main Street, the north/south connec-

tors to the Academic Campus, or Lane or Woodruff

Avenues where appropriate. The new entry facades

will be transparent, in scale with the buildings and

reinforce individual building identity and quad aesthetic

design themes. Expansion of the buildings vertically was

considered, however vertical expansion did not address

the need for new entry identity or expanded buildingfootprints to accommodate Living/Learning support

space. Vertical expansion of the buildings could neces-

sitate code upgrades in overall building accessibility and

increase construction costs.

Ground floor building additions provide the opportu-

nity to use building expansion to frame the exterior

quad community gathering and green space and provide

an organized architectural framework for the campus.

Further, the fenestration of the proposed architecture

would increase the feeling of security by providing

“windows” on the campus.

To improve the gateway quality of the North Residence

Halls Campus, the plan calls for the development of a stu-

dent facility at Lane Avenue and High Street. This building

will mimic the setback and scale of the new south campus

gateway buildings (including the 80’ setback of the High

Street Green) and provide a stronger visual identity and

gateway for the northeastern edge of campus.

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


32Chapter 4: The Sub-District Plan

W . LANE AV E.

W .W OODRUFF AV E.

N .

H I G H S

T .

Drackett Quad

Jones Quad

Taylor Quad

Figure 12. Diagram illustrating the three new quads that will be the focal points of the campus andthe new buildings and building additions.

Drackett Quad existing

Drackett Quad addition

Taylor Quad existing

Taylor Quad addition

Jones Quad existing

Jones Quad addition

New North Commons

Gateway building

St. Stephen’s Church

Outside project scope

LEGEND

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



4.2 Component Plans

4.2.1 Vehicular Circulation and Service and Delivery

The Plan removes vehicles from the center of theNorth Residence Halls Campus to the edges in order

to reduce the conflict between vehicles and pedestrians.

Replacing Curl Drive with Main Street moves vehicular

circulation to the north and south of campus making

it more pedestrian friendly, while still accommodating

service vehicles.

The Plan establishes informal service drives to the

north and south of Main Street behind the towers and

the low-rise buildings fronting Main Street in order

to consolidate access and separate pedestrian and

vehicular movement. All major pedestrian connectors

are sized to accommodate service, handi-vans and

emergency vehicles and to permit vehicular access to

the residence halls during move in/move out events. The

clustered service areas will accommodate all service

vehicles and allow for emergency access to buildings.

These consolidated service areas must be treated with

enhanced materials and screening to minimize their

visual impact on the campus.

Bus service during the weekday will continue to serve

the north residence halls from Woodruff Avenue. Busroutes for evenings and weekends will drop students

near the northern residence halls through the new

parking lot and the southern residence halls by use of

the east-west pedestrian/service drive.

4.2.2 Parking

With the removal of Curl Drive, there is a need to

increase parking lot space on the campus. Previously,

there were 300 parking spaces. A new surface parking

lot along Lane Avenue provides 213 spaces to accom-

modate parking needs on the campus. This does not

include additional spaces in service areas as currently

parked. Access to the new parking lot will be provided

off Neil Avenue and from a service road south of Lane

that has been moved to the east to allow for more

spaces to be added.

Service areas within pedestrian corridors can be bothaesthetically pleasing and functional

An aesthetically pleasing service drive A well-designed shared vehicular and pedestrian road

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



Figure 13. Diagram illustrating new informal service drives and service areasLEGEND

Service drive

Parking lot

Service access

Shared route

Service

Central service formultiple buildings

W . LANE AV E.

W . W OODRUFF AV E.

N .

H I G H S

T .

Taylor Quad

Drackett Quad

Jones Quad

Neilwood

Norton

Archer

Drackett

NorthCommons Jones

Nosker

Houck

Taylor

Halloran

Haverfield

Blackburn



New ResidenceHall 2

New ResidenceHall 1

GatewayBuilding

Barrett

Scott

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



Figure 14. Sketch illustrating Main Street and new building entrances

4.2.3 Pedestrian Circulation and Access

The plan improves pedestrian circulation and access on

the North Residence Halls Campus. Wayfinding is easier

because obstructed views have been removed and thewalkway system has been simplified and more defined.

The three new quads provide a strong visual identity

and become the organizing elements around which the

walkway system is constructed. North/south connec-

tions are clear and obvious, allowing easy access to the

main academic campus for both North Residence Halls

residents and off-campus students. The Main Street

pedestrian corridor acts as the central artery for east/

west travel through the North Residence Halls Campus.

This interior corridor will be the locus of activity for

the campus connecting all of the quads with High Street.

Building facades will be renovated to address the MainStreet and building additions will add to the energy of

this new corridor. Existing, expanded and new buildings

along Woodruff and Lane Avenues will also be improved

to better address these campus edges.

Going forward, it must also be considered how the cur-

rent business school parking garage along Lane Avenue

interacts with the campus in order to limit pedestrian

and vehicular conflict.

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



Figure 15. Diagram illustrating the new pedestrian circulation on the North Residence Halls CampusLEGEND

Primary interior corridor

Primary corridors toAcademic Campus

Secondary Circulation

Major off campus pedestrian traffic

Minor off campus pedestrian traffic

Major destination

W . LANE AV E.

W .W OODRUFF AV E.

N .

H I G H S

T .

Taylor Quad

Drackett Quad

Jones Quad

Neilwood

Norton

Archer

Drackett

NorthCommons Jones

Nosker

Houck

Taylor

Halloran

Haverfield

Blackburn



New ResidenceHall 2

New ResidenceHall 1

GatewayBuilding

Barrett

Scott

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



ADA access can be integrated into building and walkwaydesign

Sketch illustrating walkways and improved access for Jones Tower

4.2.3 Pedestrian Circulation and Access, Continued

Reorganizing the walkway system and improving build-

ing facades improves access by making building en-

trances more defined and visually evident. By creatingaccess points on buildings that front on the Main Street

corridor, the north/south pedestrian spine, and the

major exterior streets, there are now multiple points

of entry on all sides of each building. This increases the

number of ADA access points and provides ADA access

at the main entrances of all buildings.

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


Chapter 4: The Sub-District Plan 38

Figure 16. Diagram illustrating improved building entrances and ADA access

W . LANE AV E.

W . W OODRUFF AV E.

N .

H I G H S

T .

LEGEND

Main Access/ADA

Minor Access/ADA

Minor Access

Jones

Taylor Quad

Drackett Quad

Jones Quad

Neilwood

Norton

Archer

Drackett

NorthCommons Jones

Nosker

Houck

Taylor

Halloran

Haverfield

Blackburn



New ResidenceHall 2

New ResidenceHall 1

GatewayBuilding

Barrett

Scott

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



The main quads will have a large green space for commu-nity gatherings.

Plaza areas will have low seatwalls for sitting The landscape plan will give the campus a more unifiedappearance.

4.2.4 Open Space

Open space, like many of the other features of the plan,

is organized around the three main quads. These spaces

are not only interconnected by the proposed walkwaysystem, but also are better defined with more usable

spaces that are larger and are more suited to the needs

of the students. The quads are ideal for informal uses,

passive recreation, and community gatherings. There

are also three main greens, Drackett Quad, Jones Quad,

and the Taylor Quad, that are appropriate for passive

and active recreation and community gatherings.

Each dorm and commons building will have its own

front porch/plaza. These areas will have water and

electrical hook-ups and will function as small commu-

nity gathering spaces that will be appropriate for dorm

meetings and social events.

As recommended by the 1998 Landscape Master Plan,

the North Green extends across Woodruff Avenue.

New Residence Hall 3 should be designed to act as its

terminus.

Active recreation facilities will remain scattered

throughout the campus. Through the planning process

it became clear that moving and consolidating the

recreation courts would be too costly. By keeping these

more established facilities on the campus edges, the

potential for noise is reduced while still allowing foreasy access by all campus residents.

The landscape plan for the North Residence Halls will

focus on improving the quality and condition of vegeta-

tion. By imposing more order and removing unneces-

sary or damaged plant material, the campus will have a

more unified appearance and more usable open spaces.

Removing unnecessary vegetation and reducing shaded

areas will enable students to use these open spaces for

active and passive recreation.

The Main Street corridor and key north/south walk-

ways will be tree-lined to further define them and

establish a clear hierarchy. Likewise, the new parking lot

will be adequately screened on all sides to minimize its

visual impact on both the North Residence Halls and

Lane Avenue. On the east side of the campus, the High

Street Green should be reinforced and design should

be in accordance with the 2005 University District

High Street Streetscape Plan.

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



Figure 17. Diagram illustrating proposed open space improvement

Plazas/porches

Open lawn Green space

Athletic courts

LEGEND

W . LANE AV E.

W . W OODRUFF AV E.

N .

H I G H S

T .

Taylor Quad

Drackett Quad

Jones Quad

Neilwood

Norton

Archer

Drackett

NorthCommons Jones

Nosker

Houck

Taylor

Halloran

Haverfield

Blackburn



New ResidenceHall 2

New ResidenceHall 1

GatewayBuilding

Barrett

Scott

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



BEFORE: Unclear and uninviting building entrances

4.2.5 Architectural Improvements,

Renovations and New Buildings

The proposed building program concentrates on add-

ing bed space, creating facilities for the Living/Learningprograms, improving entrances, and constructing new

buildings that strengthen the three quads and improve

the residential character of the campus. Existing resi-

dence halls will be renovated to reduce density from

quads to doubles, enhancing the quality and livability

of the accommodations. Bed space will be increased

by 924 through additions to existing residence halls

and the construction of three new residence halls (see

Table 1 on page 45).

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



Figure 18. AFTER: Architectural rendering of new building additions and entrances looking south from Drackett Quad toward Nort on and Scott houses (foreground) and the NewResidence Hall 3 (background).

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06




Renovations, and New Buildings, continued

The existing four story residence halls will be modifiedto meet the plan goals. Nosker, Haverfield, Halloran,

Houck, Norton, Scott, and Blackburn will have new

additions to accommodate both more bed space and

expanded Living/Learning facilities. Living spaces will be

reconfigured to two-room suites and will have a layout

and size similar to existing units. Each dorm will be

expanded, but the size of additions will vary as shown

on the new building and building expansion plan (see

Figure 20, p. 46). Overall, the additions will add 540

additional beds (see Table 1, p. 45). All existing residence

halls will gain one first floor Living/Learning space. The

space will be flexible and able to provide for on-site

classroom sessions, receptions, living room lounging,

and group study sessions.

Entrances will be improved on all buildings to increase

transparency and better define access points. This will

make the residence halls more inviting and give each

building an individual identity. All of the entrances toresidence towers will be renovated. These revamped

entrances will be two stories tall to better match the

scale of the buildings and provide space for necessary

ADA improvements.

BEFORE: Taylor Tower’s entry lacks definition

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



Figure 19. AFTER: Architectural rendering of the enhanced entrance and additional space added to Taylor Tower

Table 1: Additional Beds

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06




Renovations, and New Buildings, Continued

The existing four story residence halls will be modifiedarchitecturally to incorporate a residential vernacular.

Exterior modifications such as cornice embellishment

and the replacement of existing windows with new

single hung units will give the campus a more residen-

tial feel and make the buildings more visually appealing

and attractive.

The plan calls for both Raney Commons and Royer

Student Activities Center to be removed and replaced

with three new residence halls. The existing single

story buildings no longer provide usable space for

students and house operations that are not compat-

ible with a residential campus. The three new resi-

dence halls shown in the plan will carry forward the

residential architectural aesthetic and incorporate the

same characteristics with respect to new program

spaces and features added to existing residence halls.

The new residence halls will accommodate 384 beds

(see Table 1).

The plan also calls for updated and new dining facilitiesfor the campus. North Commons will remain as the

only dining hall and a new food service and residential

building will be constructed adjacent to Neilwood

Gables. The new facility will utilize the market/café con-

cept that is called for in the OSU food service plan. The

market/café will occupy the first floor with residential

on the second floor.

Renovation of Existing Residence Halls

Existing Beds Existing GSF New Beds New GSF

Archer House na na 104 na

Barrett House 171 35,829 0 1,300

Blackburn House 162 35,832 56 18,900

Halloran House 157 30,269 100 32,000

Haverfield House 164 30,267 96 28,400

Houck House 183 37,790 56 19,200

Norton House 175 35,789 40 13,200

Nosker House 180 38,715 32 10,900

Scott House 176 36,251 56 18,100

Total 1,368 280,742 540 142,000

New Residence Halls

Size Room Type New Beds New GSF

New Residence Hall 1 4 story 4 Bedroom Apartments 128 63,200

New Residence Hall 2 3 story 4 Bedroom Apartments 96 50,400

New Residence Hall 3 4 story* 4 Bedroom Apartments 160 102,500

Total 384 216,100

*Includes 1st floor Commons

Table 1: Additional Beds

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



Figure 20. Diagram of proposed building expansions

W . LANE AV E.

W .W OODRUFF AV E.

N .

H I G H S

T .

LEGEND

New residential building

Existing building

New residential expansion

New building entry

New destination building

Taylor Quad

Drackett Quad

Jones Quad

Neilwood

Norton

Archer

Drackett

NorthCommons Jones

Nosker

Houck

Taylor

Halloran

Haverfield

Blackburn



New ResidenceHall 2

New ResidenceHall 1

GatewayBuilding

Barrett

Scott

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



4.3 Phasing Capital Improvement Projects

4.3.1 Proposed Projects

The recommendations proposed in this Sub-DistrictPlan are too extensive to expect them to be imple-

mented in any short period of time. Certain elements

may be adopted promptly, but any major built element

like buildings, roads or parking may take years to imple-

ment. Even if the University could afford to construct

all pathways at once it would be too disruptive to

campus life.

The most sensible solution is to break down these

proposed changes into individual project areas. For

each area, the University can establish a budget and

schedule for completion. The following tables (Tables

2-4 on pages 49-53) list identifiable projects and assign

an order-of-magnitude cost in 2006 dollars.

Although they are not arranged in order of prior-

ity, the projects of most significant impact should be

those that create the Main Street pathway connecting

High Street to Archer Hall. The second priority should

be to sequence the projects needed to remove Curl

Drive. This includes the construction of the southern

pedestrian/service access and the northern parking

area. These projects begin to define a clear pedestrian-oriented campus environment. Many of the projects

are not dependent on another project’s phasing to be

completed. These projects, such as the new dining com-

mons, gateway building, building additions, tree planting

and removal, can be carried out upon securing appro-

priate funding.

The costs shown in the following tables are based on

2006 construction dollars and should be escalated at

+/- a year for inflation. They do not include soft costs

including, design fees, construction management and

permitting. For budgeting purposes these should be

estimated at +/- 15% of construction costs.

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



Figure 21. Capital improvement project phasing diagram

W . LANEAV E.

W .W OODRUFF AV E.

N .

H I G H S

T .

LEGEND

Jones Quad improvements

Drackett Quad improvements

Taylor Quad improvements

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



A. Drackett Quad Site Work

Project Title of Improvement Cost

A-1. Main Street $253,336

A-2. Service Access $264,107

A-3. Lane Ave. Service / Parking $1,043,051

A-4. Norton Service $109,800

A-6. Circular Quad $1,191,099A-8. Norton / Scott Alley $113,576

A-11. Service Access $923,208

A-13. Blackburn Grounds $123,097

A-15. Scott Grounds $164,341

A-17. North Campus Green Extension $97,597

Sub-Total $4,283,211

Table 2: Drackett Quad Improvements

A. Drackett Quad Building Additions


A-5. Norton Living Addition $2,948,774

A-7. Drackett Tower Entry Addition $718,225

A-9. Scott Entry Addition $697,715

A-10. Norton Entry Addition $412,615

A-12. New Commons / Residence Hall $22,800,977A-14. Blackburn Living Addition $4,033,080

A-16. Scott Living Addition $3,227,218

A-18. North Commons Entry $865,896

Sub-Total $35,704,500

DRACKETT QUAD TOTAL $39,987,711

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



Figure 22. Drackett Quad improvement diagram

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



B. Jones Quad Site Work


B-1. Main Street $334,820

B-2. Service Access $563,528

B-3. Lane Ave. Service / Parking $854,560

B-4. Nosker Grounds $246,060

B-7. Jones Tower Court Yard $267,442B-9. Houck Tower Service $198,916

B-10. Jones Tower Grounds $189,326

B-13. New Building Grounds $193,349

B-14. Egg Green $630,994

B-15. Pedestrian Allee $259,671

B-17. Haverfield Grounds $122,961

B-19. Blackburn Grounds $33,987

B-21. Haverfield Living Grounds $86,982

B-22. Realigned Drive $139,555


B. Jones Quad Building Additions


B-5. Nosker Living Addition $1,830,578

B-6. Nosker Entry Addition $855,300

B-8. Houck Living Addition $4,582,536

B-11. Jones Tower Entry Addition $279,660

B-12. New Focal Living Building $10,685,107B-16. Haverfield Entry Addition $1,215,910

B-18. Blackburn Living Addition $317,333

B-20. Haverfield Living Addition $5,244,161

Sub-Total $25,010,585

JONES QUAD TOTAL $29,141,735

Table 3: Jones Quad Improvements

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



Figure 23. Jones Quad improvement diagram

T bl 4 T l Q d I t

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



C. Taylor Quad Site Work


C-1. Main Street $508,043

C-2. Service Access $292,833

C-3. Lane Ave. Service $317,266

C-4. Pedestrian Alley $198,786

C-5. Taylor Quad Green $301,671C-7. Taylor Tower Grounds $610,546

C-8. Volleyball Grounds $105,806

C-10. Halloran Grounds $143,015

C-11. Athletic Courts Grounds $131,859

C-12. High Street Green $234,079

C-14. New Building Grounds $87,727

C-16. Barrett Grounds $14,132

C-18. North Gateway Building Grounds $342,627


Table 4: Taylor Quad Improvements

C. Taylor Quad Building Additions


C-6. Taylor Tower Entry $251,220

C-9. Halloran Living / Entry Addition $6,568,632

C-13. New Apartment Style Building $15,112,934

C-15. Barrett Entry $346,264

C-17. North Gateway Building $24,685,068Sub-Total $46,964,118

TAYLOR QUAD TOTAL $50,252,507

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



Figure 24. Taylor Quad improvements diagram

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


Chapter 5: Design Principles55

5.0 Landscape Improvement Guide and

Design Guidelines

The quality of the designed landscape of the NorthResidence Halls is poor. This condition is instrumental

in the overall impression and perception of the stu-

dent’s living environment. The general purpose of the

Landscape Improvement Plan is to guide the Univer-

sity toward a better physical and living environment.

The following are the primary goals of the Landscape

Improvement Plan.

• Improve the aesthetic quality of the North

Campus designed landscapes.

• Create a sense of unity and organization

throughout the North Campus.

• Provide a variety of spaces for outdoor sitting and

studying.

A key principle in Campus organization is the ap-

plication of a consistent palette of plantings, paving

and street furniture materials. This does not cur-

rently exist on North Campus. This lack of consistent

treatment causes visual fragmentation and tends to

increase maintenance problems and costs. A consis-

tent application of these elements will unify North

Campus, reinforcing the sense of place and overallimage.

A number of recommended treatments and materi-

als that will help the University create an integrated

landscape treatment are presented in this section of

the plan.

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


Chapter 5: Design Principles 56

Main Street concrete

Concrete

Athletic court

Asphalt

Compacted aggregate

Asphalt paver

Planting bed

Lawn

Grass

Existing tree

Proposed tree

Proposedornamental tree

Proposed building

Existing building

LEGEND

W . LANE AV E.

W .W OODRUFF AV E.

N .

H I G H S

T .

Figure 25. North Residence Halls Landscape Materials Plan

Taylor Quad

Drackett Quad

Jones Quad

Neilwood

Norton

Archer

Drackett

NorthCommons Jones

Nosker

Houck

Taylor

Halloran

Haverfield

Blackburn



New ResidenceHall 2

New ResidenceHall 1

GatewayBuilding

Barrett

Scott

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



5.1 Paving

Paving is one of the most visible components of anylandscape. The pedestrian tends to be more aware

of it than of the surrounding landscape. As a result,

paving can serve many more functions than just that

of providing a place to walk. Paving can show direc-

tion or invitation and create a sense of permanence

or decay. The paving at the North Residence Halls,

although consistent in material, lacks any sense of

order or hierarchy. In addition, the appearance and

poor condition does not favorably enhance the image

of the campus.

In many areas, service access drives are used heavily

by pedestrians. In all such cases, the space will ac-

commodate the pedestrian as a first priority. To that

end, dark value unit pavers will be used as the paving

surface. While the paving width and radii will accom-

modate specific service vehicles, pavement patterns

will be scored to reinforce the pedestrian qualities of

the space.

A hierarchical system of pathways has been developedfor the North Residence Halls Campus. The materials

used throughout the pathway system were selected

for their aesthetic characteristics, durability and com-

patibility with one another. They are used in a manor

to create clean and simple forms and spaces keeping

long site lines and an easily navigable hierarchy. The

three types of pathways in the North Residence Hall

Sub-district Plan are described below.

Main Street

The first tier of pathways is a shared pedestrian/ve-hicular system. This pathway is a minimum of 16’ wide

and designed for pedestrians, but holds the potential

to be used by vehicles when needed, such as on move

in day. Examples of this type of pathway are Main

Street and the east/west pathway providing interior

service access.

Width: 24’-6”

Materials

• Cast-in-Place Concrete: Quarry Finish with

Integral Color, (15’-4” width)

• Compacted Aggregate: Limestone Fines (7’-2”width)

• Granite cobbles: 4” x 4” x 4” split face (2’ width)

Pedestrian/Service Shared East-West Connector

Width: 16’-0”

Materials

• Cast-in-Place Concrete: Flush Curb, Quarry

Finish, (1’-6” width each side)

• Asphalt: Vehicular depth (13’-0” width)

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


Chapter 5: Design Principles 58

Granite cobble Flush concrete curb Compacted aggregate

Quarry stone finish Broom finished concrete Asphalt pavers

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



5.1 Paving, Continued

North/South Pedestrian Connector

The second tier of pathways is the north/south

carriers. These paths are a minimum of 16’ and will

support the heavy pedestrian traffic to and from main

campus, and also provide interior access for service

vehicles and student move-in and move-out days.

Width: 12’-0”

Materials

• Cast-in-Place Concrete: Quarry Finish

with Integral Color (12’-0” width)

• Accent Bands: Compacted Aggregate Limestone

Fines (width varies)

• Granite cobbles; 4” x 4” x 4” split face (2’ width)

Tertiary (Pedestrian) Pathways

The third type of pathway is the pedestrian connec-

tor. These pathways are a minimum of 8’ and serve as

links from one space to another.

Width: 8’-0” Minimum

Materials

• Cast-in-Place Concrete: Broom Finish (15’-4”

width)

Service Courts

Service courts are utilitarian paved areas that support

the service access to buildings, trash and recycling

Dumpsters. Since they are visible portions of the

campus pedestrian pathway system, they need to be

paved in quality materials and patterns. The dark pav-

ing system is used to minimize the visual impact of oil

drips, turning vehicle tires and refuse truck waste.

Width: Varies (see Master Plan)Materials

• Cast-in-Place Concrete: Flush Curb Broom

Finish, (1’-6” width all sides)

• Asphalt: Vehicular depth

• Asphalt Pavers: 6” x 9” accent paver on concrete

base

Accent Materials

Three foot square concrete pavers are set into lawn

panels to create mixed material spaces for gatherings

or individual use.Width: Varies (see Master Plan)

Material

• Cast-place-Concrete or Precast Concrete: 3’x3’

concrete, quarry stone finish / placed 6” apart

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



Paving changes and bollards delineate uses Decorative banding to add pattern and interest Multiple surface materials create a rich environment

Compacted aggregate used in conjunction with concrete Materials in warm color palette Passive open space allows for multiple activities

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



5.2 Streets, Parking Lots and Service

Courts

Vehicular streets, parking lots and service courts that

are not used as pedestrian throughways will receive

asphalt paving. This pavement type will provide suffi-

cient durability with minimal maintenance. Asphalt will

also be cost effective, based on the large quantity that

is often required. Heavy-duty reinforced concrete will

be required in some service court areas where heavy

vehicular loads are expected.

In order to reduce the negative visual and environ-mental impact of large surface parking areas, interior

planting and perimeter screening should be estab-

lished:

• Include interior parking lot islands necessary to

break up large expanses of pavement. Avoid

multiple small islands that create maintenance

problems and provide poor growing conditions

for trees. Provide large, continuous islands that

define primary drive aisles.

• Minimize maintenance requirements of landscape

islands through the proper selection of urban

tolerant trees and low, spreading evergreen

plantings as ground cover.

• For pedestrian safety, avoid dense plantings that

branch to the ground.

• Avoid earth mounds as screening devices

5.3 Landscape Furniture

As noted in the Ohio State University Landscape

Master Plan, a consistency in site furnishings will en-

hance the visual unity of all districts of the University.

Standard benches, tables, trash receptacles, ash urns,

bike racks, tree guards and kiosks have been selected

for their durability, ease of maintenance and styling.

For this reason the North Campus Residence Halls

should follow these established guidelines. The classic

simplicity of this furniture will adapt to almost every

architectural context. The standard color for all fur-

niture will be black to compliment the standard light

poles and fixtures of the University.

The exception to the standard color will be the bikeracks, which will be galvanized and unpainted. Painted

bike racks require heavy maintenance to keep surfaces

painted that have been chipped by bicycles and locks.

Some custom elements are used to define space to

create a unique identity in the North Residence Halls

Campus. Seat walls are used throughout the site to

allow impromptu gathering areas, control movement

and enhance pedestrian corridors. Planter walls are

used along buildings to bring the built environment

scale down to a human level while also softening the

transition between buildings and paving. Columns areused at the entrances to major spaces and building

patios to denote importance.

Pedestrian circulation patterns throughout campus

are constantly changing with the creation of new

buildings and site improvements. Therefore, placing

furniture in the optimum locations is often difficult.

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



Lane Avenue fence Main Street seatwall Column

Planter wall Quad wall option Quad wall option

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



5.3 Landscape Furniture, continued

The following guidelines should be used in the place-

ment of site furniture:

• Group benches at logical gathering spaces such as

courtyards, building entries and small respite areas

along major circulation paths.

• Avoid locating benches parallel and adjacent to

busy pedestrian paths where conflicts may occur.

• Locate benches at the edges of spaces.

• Locate benches with tables in logical student study

areas and dormitory courtyards.

• Locate benches with tables at the edges of largergreen reserve spaces to avoid visual clutter in the

center.

• Provide a minimum of one trash receptacle and

one ash urn at all building entries.

• Provide additional trash receptacles and benches in

close proximity to vendor locations, food services

and dining halls.

• Provide one trash receptacle per every grouping of

two to four benches.

• Locate information kiosks at major pedestrian

intersections.

Materials List

Bench

Manufacturer: DuMor

Model: #207A

Color: Black

Trash Receptacles

Manufacturer: DuMorModel: #207R

Color: Black

Bollard

Type and style of University stndard bollard(s) should

be determined depending upon use (see examples on

p. 64)

Seat Wall

Limestone veneer: 2’x2’ limestone panel veneer

Limestone cap: 3” thick / square nose

Planter Wall

Brick veneer: to match building material


Column

4’x4’ 3’ height

Limestone veneer: 4’x4’ limestone panel veneer


Lane Ave. / Campus edge

Wrought Iron and/or Commercial Grade Aluminum-

Fence: to match existing

Brick Wall and Column: to match existing

Raised Seating Units

2’x2’x2’ concrete cubes: placed in center of unit pav-

ers as shown

Ash Urn

Manufacturer: DCIModel: #10610PWB

Color: Pewter

Bicycle Racks

Manufacturer: DuMor

Model: #83

Color: Galvanized

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



Bench OSU bike rack Receptacle

OSU light OSU sample bollards Ash urn

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



5.4 Planting

The plant selection for the North Residence Halls

Sub-District Plan shall conform to the University

standard. All allees of trees shall be of the same spe-

cies of tree, for example, all of the trees along Main

Street should be London Planetree. All trees in park

like environments shall be randomly selected from the

plant palette for variety.

• Maintain and protect major natural open space

areas like the High Street Green, volleyball courts,and proposed quads.

• Preserve and protect significant mature vegetation.

Select plants that are hardy and do not require

excessive maintenance.

• Remove plants that have outgrown their

usefulness.

• Consider primary plant requirements, such as

preferred soil, water and solar conditions when

selecting new planting material.

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06



Trees used to reinforce forms Simple masses of plants Arcade

Park type Simple ground cover Serviceberry

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


67

6.0 Conclusion

The North Residence Halls Sub-District Plan pro-

vides a basis for the renovation and reconstruction

of the campus. It establishes long-range development

goals and allows for the phasing of improvements. For

those charged with planning the future of the North

Residence Halls, this document can be used as a guide

and reference for future construction and renovation

projects.

This plan is a starting point for what will likely be a

long-term effort to improve the campus. However,by following the initial priorities outlined in the plan

the transformation of the campus will begin to take

shape. Over time as projects are phased in, the overall

image of the campus will be dramatically improved.

The result will be a more aesthetically pleasing and

functional campus that will provide a better living and

learning environment for its students.

Conclusion

Chapter 6: Conclusion

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


68

Cost Estimate

7.0 Cost Estimate

7.0 Cost Estimate

The following opinion of probable construction cost

is based on the conceptual master plan developed for

the entire site and will vary as the detailed design is

worked out for each phase. The estimate is based on

2006 dollars. Outdoor water and electrical hook-ups

for plaza areas and supplemental plant watering are

assumed to be part of the building improvements.

Moveable outdoor furniture for dinning areas, etc. are

not included in this estimate.

The estimate is broken down into three sections:Drackett Quad, Jones Quad and Taylor Quad. The

estimate for each quad is divided into fully detailed

phases that are marked on the key at the beginning

of each section. Totals for each quad are included at

the end of each section and the total for the entire

project including design fees is shown on the last page

of the cost estimate (p.86).

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


69 Cost Estimate

: Legend *Cost Adj. Multipliers(CAM): , EA - Each SY - Square Yard A. Bid Market

, : LF - Linear Foot Allow - allowance B. Time FrameLS - Lump Sum SFT - Square Foot of C. Region of country

: SF - Square Foot Tread D. Complexity of project: AC - Acre FSF - Face Square E. Quantity Factor

: CY - Cubic Yard Foot F. Phasing

, . ,

, . , .

, . ,

. ,

, . ,

, . , , ,

, . ,, . ,

. ,

. ,

. , .

, ,

, . ,

Cost Estimate

Drackett Quad - A

Cost Estimate

, . .

h l ll i n l m , hi - h - r r . i rkl m , hi n r Th hi ni r i - in r ll - ll n . Tim r m

7 r - m m T - r . i n n r - , - r Tr . m l i r

r in - r - r . n i r r r k - i r . h in

T . T r h r r ii i n n

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


Cost Estimate 70

T

. -

. , . .

A. General Conditions1 Mobilization & Demobilization 1 allow $6,400.00 $6,400 3% of construction cost

2 Project Survey & Stakeout 1 allow $3,200.00 $3,200 1.5% of construction cost

General Conditions Subtotal $9,600

B. General Site Infrastructure1 Demo 8,430 SF $1.00 $8,430 r emoval and disposal of existing materials as required

2 Cut / Fill - general grading 312 CY $12.00 $3,744 excavate to subgrade for slabs

3 Drainage / Utilities 8,430 SF $0.80 $6,744 b ased on total scope area

4 E ro si on - se di men ta ti on c on tr ol 1 al lo w $ 3, 00 0.0 0 $ 3, 00 0 s il t fe nc e, s tra w b al es , i nl et s ed ime nt b ag s

General Site Infrastructure Subtotal $21,918

C. Site HardscapePaving

1 Concrete Paving 6,558 SF $8.25 $54,104 quarry stone finish

2 Comp act ed A ggr eg ate 1, 00 6 S F $7 .0 0 $ 7, 04 2 l i mes to ne f in es

3 Granite Pavers 866 SF $25.00 $21,650 4x4 cobble units

Walls

4 2' Seatwall 133 LF $350.00 $46,550 Limestone cap with Limestone panel veneer both sides

Site Hardscape Subtotal $129,346

D. Site Planting 1 Deciduous Trees 19 EA $750.00 $14,250 4" cal.

Site Planting Subtotal $14,250

E. Site Furnishings1 Lighting 5 EA $4,500 $22,500 assume one light per 50 lf of walkway

2 Tree Grates 9 E A $1,500.00 $13,500

Site Furnishings Subtotal $36,000

Phase A-1 Subtotal $211,11420% contingency $42,223

Phase A-1 Total $253,336

T

, . .




Item Description Total Qty. Unit Unit cost ($) Total Cost Remarks * Further verification needed

T

. -

. , . .

ili i n m ili i n ll , . , n r i nr r k ll , . , . n r i n

,

m , . , r m l n i l i in m ri l r ir

ill - n r l r in . ,7 r r l

r in ili i , . ,7 n l r

r i n- im n i n n r l ll , . , il n , r l , inl im n

,

n r in , . , rr n ini h

m r , 7. 7, lim n in

r ni r . , l ni

' ll . , i m n i h im n n l n r h i

,

i Tr 7 . , " l.

,

i h in , , m n li h r l lk

Tr r , . ,

,

-

-

T

Phase A-1 Main Street

, . .



r in - r - r . n i r

r r k - i r . h inT . T r h r r i i i n n

A. General Conditions1 Mobilization & Demobi lization 1 allow $10,000.00 $10,000 3% of construction cost



B. General Site Infrastructure1 Demo 11000 SF $1.00 $11,000 r emoval and disposal of existing materials as required


3 Drainage / Utilities 1,100 SF $0.80 $880 b ased on total scope area

4 E ro si on- se di me nt ati on c ont ro l 1 a ll ow $ 3,0 00 .0 0 $ 3, 00 0 s il t fe nce , s tr aw b al es, i nl et s ed ime nt b ag s




2 Flush Concrete Curb 825 SF $15.00 $12,375

3 Asphalt 157 SY $16.50 $2,591 heavy duty 4/8

4 Asphalt Paver 340 SF $16.00 $5,440

Walls5 Planter Wall 245 LF $175.00 $42,875 L imestone cap with Brick veneer one side


D. Site Planting 1 Ornamental Trees 21 EA $400.00 $8,400

2 Deciduous Trees 9 EA $550.00 $4,950 2" cal.

3 Planting Areas 1,952 SF $5.00 $9,760 bed prep and ground cover


E. Site Furnishings1 Bike Racks 6 EA $250 $1,500

2 Tree Grates 9 EA $1,500 $13,500

3 Lighting 8 EA $4,500 $36,000 assume one light per 50 lf of walkway

4 Trash Receptacles 2 EA $1,000 $2,000




T

, . .

h l ll i n l m , hi - h - r r . i rk

l m , hi n r Th hi ni r i - in r ll - ll n . Tim r m7 r - m m T - r . i n n r

- , - r Tr . m l i r r in - r - r . n i r r r k - i r . h in


T

. -

. , . .

ili i n m ili i n ll , . , n r i n

r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,





,



r ni r . , l ni


,

i Tr 7 . , " l.

,


Tr r , . ,

,

-

-

T

Phase A-2 Service Access

, . .




T . T r h r r i i i n n

A. General Conditions1 Mobilization & Demobili zation 1 all ow $25,000.00 $25,000 3% of construction cost



B. General Site Infrastructure1 Demo 63,118 SF $1.00 $63,118 r emoval and disposal of existing materials as required

2 Cut / Fill - general grading 2,000 CY $12.00 $24,000 excavate to subgrade for slabs

3 Spread ex stripped & stockpiled topsoil 2,000 CY $7.00 $14,000


5 E ro si on- sed ime nt at io n co ntro l 1 a ll ow $ 10 ,0 00 .0 0 $ 10, 00 0 s il t f en ce , st ra w b al es , i nl et sed ime nt ba gsGeneral Site Infrastructure Subtotal $161,612


1 Concrete Paving 14,111 SF $8.25 $116,416 q uarry stone finish


3 Loading Dock Improvements 874 SF $80.00 $69,920

4 6" Concrete Curb 1,925 LF $13.00 $25,025 at parking lot

5 Asphalt 4,955 SY $16.50 $81,758 heavy duty 4/8

6 Asphalt Paver 3,538 LF $16.00 $56,608


8 Lane Ave Wall / Fence System 339 LF $500.00 $169,500 to match existing




3 Seeding/ hydromulch - turf areas 4,293 SY $1.35 $5,796


E. Site Furnishings1 Lighting 12 EA $6,500 $78,000 vehicular lighting



Phase A-3 Total $1,043,051

T

, . .





T

. -

. , . .


,





,



r ni r . , l ni


,

i Tr 7 . , " l.

,


Tr r , . ,

,

-

-

T

Phase A-3 Lane Ave Parking and Service

, . .








B. General Site Infrastructure1 Demo 8360 CY $1.00 $8,360 r emoval and disposal of existing materials as required


3 Spread ex stripped & stockpiled topsoil 300 CY $7.00 $2,100


5 E ros io n- se di me nt at io n co ntro l 1 a ll ow $ 3,0 00 .0 0 $ 3,0 00 si lt f enc e, s tr aw ba le s, i nl et s ed ime nt b ag s



1 Concrete Paving 1,179 SF $8.25 $9,727

2 Flush Concrete Curb 270 SF $15.00 $4,0503 Loading Dock Improvements 200 SF $80.00 $16,000


5 Asphalt Paver 561 S F $16.00 $8,976




2 Deciduous Trees 7 EA $550.00 $3,850







T

Phase A-4 Norton Grounds

, . .





T

. -

. , . .


r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,


ill - n r l r in . ,7 r r lr in ili i , . ,7 n l r


,



r ni r . , l ni


,

i Tr 7 . , " l.

,


Tr r , . ,

,

-

-

T

Cost Estimate

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


71 Cost Estimate

, . .





T

. -

. , . .


,





,



r ni r . , l ni

' ll . , im n i h im n n l n r h i

,

i Tr 7 . , " l.

,


Tr r , . ,

,

-

-

T

Phase A-5 Norton Living Addition

, . .h l ll i n l m , hi - h - r r . i rk


- , - r Tr . m l i r r in - r - r . n i r

r r k - i r . h in


A. General Conditions1 Mobil ization & Demobilizat ion 1 allow $84,000.00 $84,000 3% of constr uction cost



B. General Site Infrastructure1 Cut Removal 1,813 CY $24.00 $43,512 e xcavate to subgrade for basement

2 E ro si on - s ed im ent at io n c ont rol 1 a ll ow $ 3, 000 .0 0 $3 ,0 00 si lt f en ce , st raw b al es , i nl et s ed im en t ba gs


C. Structural Additions1 Basement Area 3,264 SF $100.00 $326,400 Area for basement and utilities

2 Livi ng Area 13,056 SF $150.00 $1, 958,400 Ar ea cal culated for struct ur al additions- four stories @ 3,264 sf per floor

Structural Additions Subtotal $2,284,800

Phase A-5 Subtotal $2,457,31220% contingency $491,462


T

, . .





T

. -

. , . .


r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,





,



r ni r . , l ni


,

i Tr 7 . , " l.

,


Tr r , . ,

,

-

-

T

Phase A-6 Circular Quad

, . .





A. General Conditions1 Mobi lization & Demobil izati on 1 all ow $30,000.00 $30,000 3% of construction cost







5 E ro si on - se di me nta ti on c on tr ol 1 a ll ow $ 5,0 00 .0 0 $ 5, 00 0 s il t f en ce, s tra w b al es, i nl et se di me nt b ag s6 Irrigation 19,368 allow $1.75 $33,894




2 Com pa cte d Ag gre gat e 2 ,5 49 S F $ 7. 00 $ 17, 84 3 l i me st on e fi ne s

3 Granite Pavers 224 SF $25.00 $5,600 4x4 cobble units

Walls4 Steps 355 LF $150.00 $53,250

5 Accessible Ramp 68 LF $200.00 $13,600

6 Handrail 273 LF $75.00 $20,475

7 Seatwall 686 LF $350.00 $240,100 L imestone cap with Limestone panel veneer both sides

8 Column 4 EA $1,500.00 $6,000 galvanized w/ black powder coating

9 Planter Wall 579 LF $175.00 $101,325 L imestone cap w/ brick veneer one side





4 Planting Areas 10,117 SF $7.00 $70,819



2 Bollards 2 EA $1,000 $2,0003 Lighting 13 EA $4,500 $58,500 assume one light per 50 lf of walkway





T

, . .





A. General Conditions1 Mobilization & Demobil izati on 1 al low $20,000.00 $20,000 3% of construction cost



B. General Site Infrastructure1 Cut / Removal 354 CY $24.00 $8,496 e xcavate to subgrade for slabs

2 E ros io n- s ed ime nta ti on c on tr ol 1 al lo w $ 3,0 00 .0 0 $3 ,0 00 si lt fe nc e, s tr aw ba le s, i nl et se di men t ba gs


C. Structural Additions1 Total Area 3,183 SF $175.00 $557,025 Area calculated for structural additions- one story

Structural Additions Subtotal $557,025



T 7

, . .





T

. -

. , . .


,





,



r ni r . , l ni


,

i Tr 7 . , " l.

,


Tr r , . ,

,

-

-

T

Phase A-7 Taylor Tower Entry Addition

, . .





A. General Conditions1 Mobi lization & Demobilization 1 all ow $10,000.00 $10,000 3% of construction cost






4 Drainage / Utilities 3,700 allow $0.80 $2,960 b ased on total scope area

5 E ro si on - se di me nt at io n co ntro l 1 a ll ow $ 3, 00 0.0 0 $3 ,0 00 si lt fe nc e, s tr aw ba le s, i nl et se di me nt b ag s




Walls





3 Seeding/ hydromulch - turf areas 233 SY $1.35 $315

4 Planting Areas 827 S F $7.00 $5,789






T

Phase A-8 Norton / Scott Alley

, . .






r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,

m 7 . ,7 r m l n i l i in m ri l r ir

ill - n r l r in . , r r l

r ri k il il 7. ,

r in ili i ,7 ll . , n l r


,

n r in ,7 . ,

ll 7 . , i m n i h im n n l n r h i

,

rn m n l Tr . ,

i Tr . ,

in h r m l h - r r .

l n in r 7 7. ,7

,

ik k ,

,

-

-

T

, . .

Cost Estimate

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


Cost Estimate 72

Phase A-9 Scott Entry Addition

, . .






r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,



r ri k il il 7. ,



,

n r in ,7 . ,


,

rn m n l Tr . ,

i Tr . ,


l n in r 7 7. ,7

,

ik k ,

,

-

-

T

, . .





A.General Conditions1 Mobi lization & Demobili zati on 1 all ow $17,000.00 $17,000 3% of construction cost



B.General Site Infrastructure1 Cut / Removal 346 CY $24.00 $8,304 e xcavate to subgrade for slabs

2 E ro si on - se di me nt ati on c on tr ol 1 a ll ow $ 3,0 00 .0 0 $ 3, 00 0 s il t f en ce, s tra w b al es, i nl et se di me nt b ag s


C.Structural Additions1 Total Area 3,115 SF $175.00 $545,125 Area calculated for structural additions- one story





r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,

m l . , r r l


,

T l r , 7 . , r l l r r r l i i n - n r

,

-

-

T

, . .





A.General Conditions1 Mobi lization & Demobil izati on 1 al low $27,000.00 $27,000 3% of constructi on cost



B.General Site Infrastructure1 Gra ss re mov al / St ri p to ps oi l 13 4,0 00 S F $ 1.0 0 $1 34 ,0 00 re mo va l an d d is po sal of ex is ti ng ma te ri al s a s r eq ui re d


3 Drainage / Utilities 134,000 allow $0.80 $107,200 based on total scope area

4 E ro si on - se di me nta ti on con tr ol 1 al lo w $1 0,0 00. 00 $1 0,0 00 si lt fe nc e, str aw bal es , i nl et sed ime nt ba gs


C.Site HardscapePaving


2 Flush Concrete Curb 1,449 SF $15.00 $21,735


4 Asphalt Paver 4,526 LF $16.00 $72,416

Walls5 Planter Wall 417 LF $175.00 $72,975 L imestone cap w/ brick veneer one side


D.Site Planting 1 Ornamental Trees 9 EA $400.00 $3,600






2 Bollards 19 EA $1,000 $19,000

3 Lighting 14 EA $4,500 $63,000 a ssume one light per 50 lf of walkway





T

Phase A-11 New Commons Grounds

, . .






r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,



r ri k il il 7. ,



,

n r in ,7 . ,


,

rn m n l Tr . ,

i Tr . ,


l n in r 7 7. ,7

,

ik k ,

,

-

-

T

, . .






r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,



r ri k il il 7. ,



,

n r in ,7 . ,


,

rn m n l Tr . ,

i Tr . ,


l n in r 7 7. ,7

,

ik k ,

,

-

-

T

, . .





ili i n m ili i n ll 7, . 7, n r i n

r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,

m l . , r r l


,


,

-

-

A. General Conditions1 Mobi lization & Demobil izati on 1 all ow $10,000.00 $10,000 3% of construction cost



B. General Site Infrastructure1 Cut / Removal 204 CY $24.00 $4,896 excavate to subgrade for slabs

2 E ro si on - s ed ime nta ti on c on tr ol 1 a ll ow $ 3,0 00 .0 0 $ 3, 00 0 s il t f en ce, s tr aw b al es, i nl et se di me nt b ags






T

Phase A-10 Norton Entry Addition

, . .






r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,



r ri k il il 7. ,



,

n r in ,7 . ,


,

rn m n l Tr . ,

i Tr . ,


l n in r 7 7. ,7

,

ik k ,

,

-

-

, . .





A. General Conditions1 Mobil izati on & Demobili zation 1 all ow $550,000.00 $550,000 3% of construction cost



B. General Site Infrastructure1 Cut / Removal 15,357 CY $12.00 $184,284 e xcavate to subgrade for slabs

2 Er os io n- se di me nt at io n co ntro l 1 a ll ow $ 10, 000 .0 0 $ 10, 00 0 s il t f en ce, str aw ba le s, in le t se di me nt ba gs


C. Structural Additions1 Basement Area 27,643 SF $100.00 $2,764,300 Area calculated for basement and utilities

2 Li ving Area 62,748 SF $150.00 $9,412,200 Area calcul ated for structural additions- 3 stories @ 20,916 sf per floor

3 Di nn in g F aci li ti es A rea 2 7,6 43 S F $ 210 .0 0 $ 5,8 05 ,0 30 Ar ea ca lc ul at ed fo r s tr uc tu ra l a dd it io ns - 1s t st or y


Phase A-12 Subtotal $19,000,81420% contingency $3,800,163

Phase A-12 Total $22,800,977

T

Phase A-12 New Commons / Residence Hall

Cost Estimate

, . .


8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


73 Cost Estimate

Phase A-13 Blackburn Grounds












5 E ros io n- s ed im en tat io n c on tro l 1 a ll ow $3 ,00 0.0 0 $ 3,0 00 s il t f en ce , s tra w b al es , i nl et s ed ime nt b ag sGeneral Site Infrastructure Subtotal $13,304




D. Site Planting 1 Ornamental Trees 2 E A $400.00 $800


3 Seeding/ hydromulch - turf areas 899 SY $1.35 $1,214


E. Site Furnishings1 Lighting 9 EA $4,500.00 $40,500 assume one light per 50 lf of walkway

2 Trash Receptacles 2 EA $1,000.00 $2,000




T




tem Description Total Qty. Unit Unit cost ($) Total Cost Remarks * Further verification needed


r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,

m . , r m l n i l i in m ri l r ir


r ri k il il 7. ,

r in ili i , ll . , n l r


,


,

rn m n l Tr .

i Tr 7 . ,

in h r m l h - r r . ,

,

i h in , . , m n li h r l lk

Tr h l , . ,

,

-

-

T





A. General Conditions1 Mobil ization & Demobilizati on 1 allow $95,000.00 $95,000 3% of constructi on cost




2 E ro si on - s ed ime nta ti on co ntr ol 1 a ll ow $ 3,0 00. 00 $ 3,0 00 s il t fe nce , s tra w ba le s, i nl et s ed ime nt b ag s


C. Structural Additions1 Basement Area 4,507 SF $100.00 $450,700 Area calculated for basement and utilities

2 Li ving Area 18,028 SF $150.00 $2,704,200 Area calcul ated for structural additi ons- four stories @ 4,507 sf per floor




T

Phase A-14 Blackburn Living Addition

, . .






r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,



r ri k il il 7. ,



,

n r in ,7 . ,


,

rn m n l Tr . ,

i Tr . ,


l n in r 7 7. ,7

,

ik k ,

,

-

-

T









3 Spread ex stripped & stockpiled topsoil 135 CY $7.00 $945


5 E ro si on - s ed ime nta ti on c ont ro l 1 a ll ow $ 5,0 00 .0 0 $ 5,0 00 s il t fe nc e, s tr aw ba le s, i nl et s ed ime nt b agsGeneral Site Infrastructure Subtotal $14,148






2 Ornamental Trees 14 EA $400.00 $5,600




E. Site Furnishings1 Lighting 9 EA $4,500.00 $40,500 assume one light per 50 lf of walkway

2 Trash Receptacles 2 EA $1,000.00 $2,000




T

, . .






r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,



r ri k il il 7. ,



,

n r in ,7 . ,


,

rn m n l Tr . ,

i Tr . ,


l n in r 7 7. ,7

,

ik k ,

,

-

-

T

Phase A-15 Scott Grounds


l m , hi n r Th hi ni r i - in r ll - ll n . Tim r m

7 r - m m T - r . i n n r - , - r Tr . m l i r r in - r - r . n i r r r k - i r . h in


A. General Conditions1 Mobil ization & Demobi lization 1 allow $80,000.00 $80,000 3% of constructi on cost




2 Er osi on - se di me nta ti on c ont ro l 1 a ll ow $ 5,0 00 .0 0 $5 ,0 00 s il t f en ce, s tr aw ba le s, i nl et s edi me nt b ags



2 Total Area 14,420 SF $150.00 $2,163,000 Area calculated for structural additi ons- four stori es @ 3,605 sf per floor




T

Phase A-16 Scott Living Addition

, . .h l ll i n l m , hi - h - r r . i rkl m , hi n r Th hi ni r i - in r ll - ll n . Tim r m





r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,



r ri k il il 7. ,



,

n r in ,7 . ,


,

rn m n l Tr . ,

i Tr . ,


l n in r 7 7. ,7

,

ik k ,

,

-

-

T

Cost Estimate

, . .

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


Cost Estimate 74

Phase A-17 North Campus Green Extension

,h l ll i n l m , hi - h - r r . i rk







B. General Site Infrastructure1 Cut / Fill - general grading 400 CY $12.00 $4,800 excavate to subgrade for slabs

2 Drainage / Utilities 16,321 allow $0.80 $13,057 based half of lawn area

3 Irrigation 10,881 allow $1.75 $19,042

4 E ro si on - s ed ime nt ati on co ntr ol 1 a ll ow $ 3,0 00 .0 0 $3 ,00 0 s i lt f en ce , st ra w b al es, i nl et s ed ime nt b ag s


C. Site HardscapePaving 1 Concrete Paving 1,600 SF $8.25 $13,200 q uarry stone finish


D. Site Planting 1 Deciduous Trees 12 EA $550.00 $6,600



E. Site Furnishings1 Lighting 4 EA $4,500.00 $18,000 a ssume one light per 50 lf of walkway




T




r r k - i r . h in



r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,


r in ili i , ll . , 7 h l l n r rri i n , ll .7 ,


,


,

i Tr . ,

in h r m l h - r r , . ,

,


,

-

-

T









2 E ro si on - se di me nta ti on co ntr ol 1 a ll ow $3 ,00 0.0 0 $ 3,0 00 s il t f en ce , st ra w b al es , i nl et s ed ime nt ba gs


C. Structural Additions1 Total Area 3,358 SF $210.00 $705,180 Area calculated for structural additions- two stories




T 7






r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,


r in ili i , ll . , 7 h l l n r

rri i n , ll .7 ,


,


,

i Tr . ,

in h r m l h - r r , . ,

,


,

-

-

T

Phase A-18 North Commons Improvements

Drackett Quad - A $39,987,711

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


75

Cost Estimate

Cost Estimate





, . ,

, . , .

, . ,

. ,

, . ,

, . , , ,

, . ,

, . ,

. ,

. ,

. , .

, ,

, . ,

Jones Quad - B

Cost Estimate


l m hi n r Th hi ni r i - in r ll - ll n Tim r m

, . .

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


Cost Estimate 76

Phase B-1 Main Street

l m , hi n r Th hi ni r i in r ll ll n . Tim r m7 r - m m T - r . i n n r









4 E ro si on- s ed ime nta ti on co ntr ol 1 a ll ow $ 3, 000 .00 $ 3,0 00 si lt fe nce , s tr aw b al es , i nl et s edi me nt b ag s




2 Com pa cte d A gg re ga te 1 ,9 90 S F $ 7. 00 $1 3,9 30 l ime sto ne f in es

3 Granite Pavers 866 SF $25.00 $21,650

Walls

4 2' Seatwall 199 LF $350.00 $69,650 Limestone cap with Limestone panel veneer both sides





2 Tree Grates 28 EA $1,500.00 $42,000


Phase B-1 Subtotal $286,51720% contingency $57,303

Phase B-1 Total $343,820

T






r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,

m . , r m l n i l i in m ri l r ir ill - n r l r in . , r r l

r in ili i , . 7, n l r


,


m r , 7. , lim n in

r ni r . ,


,

i Tr . , " l.

,


Tr r , . ,

,

-

-

T








B. GeneralSite Infrastructure1 Demo 68,848 SF $1.00 $68,848 r emoval and disposal of existing materials as required




5 Er osi on- s ed ime nta ti on co ntr ol 1 a ll ow $ 5, 000 .00 $5 ,00 0 s i lt fe nc e, s tr aw b al es, i nl et s ed ime nt b ag s


C. Site HardscapePaving 1 Flush Concrete Curb 2,308 LF $15.00 $34,620



4 Asphalt Paver 3,684 SF $16.00 $58,944


D. Site Furnishings1 Bike Racks 4 EA $250 $1,000

2 Bollards 9 EA $1,000 $9,000






T






r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,



r in ili i , . 7, n l r


,


m r , 7. , lim n in

r ni r . ,


,

i Tr . , " l.

,


Tr r , . ,

,

-

-

T

Phase B-2 Service Access




r r k - i r . h in





B.GeneralSite Infrastructure1 Demo 67,162 SF $1.00 $67,162 r emoval and disposal of existing materials as required


3 Spread ex stripped & stockpiled topsoil 2,500 CY $7.00 $17,500


5 E ro si on - s ed ime nta ti on c on tr ol 1 a ll ow $ 5, 00 0.0 0 $ 5,0 00 s il t f en ce , s tr aw b al es , i nl et s ed ime nt b ag sGeneral Site Infrastructure Subtotal $173,392


2 6" Concrete Curb 1,200 LF $13.00 $15,600 at parking lot


4 Lane Ave Fence System 410 LF $500.00 $205,000 t o match existing







E. Site Furnishings1 Lighting 12 EA $6,500 $78,000 vehicular lighting




T

Phase B-3 Lane Ave Parking and Service




r r k - i r . h in



r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,

m 7, . 7, r m l n i l i in m ri l r ir

ill - n r l r in , . , r r l

r ri k il il , 7. 7,r in ili i 7, . ,7 n l r


,

n r in , . 7 ,7 7 rr n ini h

" n r r , . , rkin l

h l , . , h

n n m . , m h i in

,

rn m n l Tr . ,

i Tr . ,

in h r m l h - r r , . ,

l n in r 7. ,7

,

i h in , 7 , hi l r li h in

,

-

-

T



- , - r Tr . m l i r










5 E ro si on - s ed ime nta ti on c on tr ol 1 a ll ow $ 3,0 00 .0 0 $ 3,0 00 s il t fe nc e, s tra w ba les , i nl et s ed ime nt b ag s




Walls2 Steps 211 LF $150.00 $31,650

3 Handrail 16 LF $75.00 $1,200


5 Column 1 EA $1,500.00 $1,500 4' square columns w/ Limestone



D. Site Planting 1 Seeding/ hydromulch - turf areas 744 SY $1.35 $1,004




2 Benches 4 EA $1,200 $4,800





T




r r k - i r . h in



r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,

m 7, . 7, r m l n i l i in m ri l r ir


r ri k il il , 7. 7,

r in ili i 7, . ,7 n l r


,

n r in , . 7 ,7 7 rr n ini h

" n r r , . , rkin l

h l , . , h

n n m . , m h i in

,

rn m n l Tr . ,

i Tr . ,

in h r m l h - r r , . ,

l n in r 7. ,7

,

i h in , 7 , hi l r li h in

,

-

-

T

Phase B-4 Nosker Grounds

Cost Estimate



, . .h l ll i l hi h i k

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


77 Cost Estimate

Phase B-5 Nosker Living Addition Phase B-7 Jones Courtyard







B. General Site Infrastructure1 Cut / Removal 293 CY $24.00 $7,032 excavate to subgrade for slabs

2 E ro si on - se di men tat io n c on tr ol 1 a ll ow $ 3, 000 .0 0 $ 3,0 00 s il t fe nce , s tr aw b al es , i nl et se di me nt b ags



2 Total Area 7,917 SF $150.00 $1,187,550 Area calcul ated for structural addi tions- three stories @ 2,639 sf per floor


Phase B-5 Subtotal $1,525,48220% contingency $305,096

Phase B-5 Total $1,830,578


r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,

m l , . , r r l


,

T l r , 7 . ,7 r l l r r r l i i n - ri

,

-

-

T






r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,

m l . 7, r r l


,

m n r , . , r l l r m n n ili i

T l r 7, 7 . , 7, r l l r r r l i i n - hr ri , r l r

, ,

-

-


r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,

m l , . , r r l


,


,

-

-

T






r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,

m l . 7, r r l


,



, ,

-

-





2 E ros io n- s edi me nta ti on co nt ro l 1 a ll ow $ 3,0 00 .0 0 $ 3,0 00 s il t fe nc e, s tra w b al es , i nl et s edi me nt b ag s


C. Structural Additions1 Total Area 3,610 SF $175.00 $631,750 Area calculated for structural additions- two stories




T

Phase B-6 Nosker Entry Addition






r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,

m l . 7, r r l


,



, ,

-

-


r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,

m l , . , r r l


,


,

-

-

T








B. GeneralSite Infrastructure1 Demo 5069 SF $1.00 $5,069 r emoval and disposal of existing materials as required




5 E ro si on - s ed ime nt ati on co ntr ol 1 a ll ow $ 3,0 00 .0 0 $ 3,0 00 si lt fe nc e, s tra w b al es , i nl et s ed ime nt b ag s



2 Concrete Pavers 216 SF $15.00 $3,240

3 Aggregate 318 SF $7.00 $2,226

Walls4 1' Planter Wall 122 LF $175.00 $21,350 L imestone cap w/ brick veneer one side







E. Site Furnishings1 Benches 6 EA $1,200 $7,200


3 Fountain 1 EA $25,000 $25,000




T






r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,

m l . 7, r r l

r i n- im n i n n r l ll , . , il n , r l , inl im n,



, ,

-

-


r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,

m l , . , r r l


,


,

-

-

T

, . .





A. General Conditions1 Mobili zation & Demobi lizati on 1 allow $110,000.00 $110,000 3% of construction cost



B.GeneralSite Infrastructure1 Demo 300 CY $7.00 $2,100 r emoval and disposal of existing materials as required

2 Cut / Remove 2,845 CY $24.00 $68,280 e xcavate to subgrade for slabs

3 E ro si on - s ed ime nt ati on co ntr ol 1 a ll ow $ 3, 000 .0 0 $ 3,0 00 si lt fe nc e, st ra w ba les , i nl et s ed ime nt b ag s



2 Total Area 20,488 SF $150.00 $3,073,200 Area calculated for structural additions- four stories 5,122 sf per floor




T






r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,

m l . 7, r r l


,



, ,

-

-


r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,

m l , . , r r l


,


,

-

-

T

Phase B-8 Houck Living Addition

Cost Estimate

, . .


8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


Cost Estimate 78






r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,

m l . 7, r r l


,



, ,

-

-


r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,

m l , . , r r l


,


,

-

-

T

Phase B-9 Houck / Taylor Service








B.GeneralSite Infrastructure1 Demo 7197 SF $1.00 $7,197 r emoval and disposal of existing materials as required




5 E ro si on - s edi me nta ti on c ont ro l 1 a ll ow $3 ,0 00 .0 0 $ 3,0 00 s il t f en ce , s tr aw b al es , i nl et se di me nt b ag sGeneral Site Infrastructure Subtotal $21,009

C. Site HardscapePaving 1 Concrete Paving 99 SF $8.25 $817 quarry stone finish



4 Asphalt Paver 3,336 SF $16.00 $53,376








T








B.GeneralSite Infrastructure1 Demo 3746 SF $7.00 $26,222 r emoval and disposal of existing materials as required




5 E ro si on - s edi me nta ti on c on tro l 1 a ll ow $ 5,0 00 .0 0 $ 5,0 00 si lt fe nc e, st ra w b al es , i nl et s ed ime nt b ag s







D. Site Planting 1 Deciduous Trees 6 E A $550.00 $3,300


3 Planting Areas 2,046 SF $7.00 $14,322Site Planting Subtotal $18,344


2 Bike Racks 8 EA $250 $2,000




T






r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,

m l . 7, r r l


,



, ,

-

-


r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,

m l , . , r r l


,


,

-

-

T

Phase B-10 Jones






r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,

m 7. , r m l n i l i in m ri l r ir

m . , r r l


,


,

-

-


r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,


il in m l , . , r m l n i l i in r r

m l , . 7, r r l

r ri k il il 7. ,


,

m n r ,7 . , 7 , r l l r m n n ili i

i in r 7, . 7, , r l l r r r l i i n - r ri ,7 r l r

, ,

-

-

T 7






r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,


m . , r r l


,


,

-

-

A. General Conditions1 Mobi lization & Demobi lizati on 1 al low $250,000.00 $250,000 3% of construction cost



B. GeneralSite Infrastructure1 Demo 300 CY $7.00 $2,100 r emoval and disposal of existing materials as required

2 Building Removal 34,000 SF $3.50 $119,000 removal and disposal of existing structure

3 Cut / Removal 6,544 CY $24.00 $157,056 e xcavate to subgrade for slabs


5 E ro si on- s ed ime nta ti on co ntr ol 1 a ll ow $ 3,0 00. 00 $ 3, 000 s il t f en ce , st ra w b al es , i nl et se di men t b ags



2 Li vi ng Area 47,120 SF $150.00 $7,068,000 Area calculated for structural addi tions- four stories @ 11,780 per floor Structural Additions Subtotal $8,246,000

Phase B-12 Subtotal $8,904,25620% contingency $1,780,851

Phase B-12 Total $10,685,107

T 7









2 Cut / Remove 200 CY $24.00 $4,800 excavate to subgrade for slabs

3 E ro si on- s ed ime nta ti on co ntr ol 1 a ll ow $ 3,0 00. 00 $ 3, 000 s il t f en ce , st ra w b al es , i nl et se di men t b ags







r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,



m l , . 7, r r l

r ri k il il 7. ,


,

m n r ,7 . , 7 , r l l r m n n ili i


, ,

-

-

T 7

Phase B-11 Jones Entry Addition






r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,


m . , r r l


,


,

-

-


r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,



m l , . 7, r r l

r ri k il il 7. ,


,

m n r ,7 . , 7 , r l l r m n n ili i


, ,

-

-

T 7

Phase B-12 New Residential Building 1

, . .








B. GeneralSite Infrastructure1 Demo 5229 SF $7.00 $36,603 r emoval and disposal of existing materials as required




5 E ros io n- se di me nta ti on c on tro l 1 a ll ow $5 ,0 00 .0 0 $ 5, 000 s il t fe nc e, s tr aw b al es, i nl et s edi me nt b ags





4 Asphalt 15 S Y $16.50 $248 heavy duty 4/8

5 Asphalt Paver 746 SF $16.00 $11,936

Walls6 Steps 30 LF $150.00 $4,500

7 1' Planter Wall 44 LF $175.00 $7,700 L imestone cap w/ brick veneer one side








2 Bike Racks 8 EA $250 $2,000




T






r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,


m . , r r l


,


,

-

-


r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,



m l , . 7, r r l

r ri k il il 7. ,


,

m n r ,7 . , 7 , r l l r m n n ili i


, ,

-

-

Phase B-13 New Residential Building 1 Grounds

Cost Estimate


, . .

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


79 Cost Estimate








B. GeneralSite Infrastructure1 Demo 39563 CY $7.00 $276,941 removal and disposal of existing materials as required




5 E ro si on - s ed ime nta ti on co ntr ol 1 al lo w $ 5,0 00 .0 0 $ 5,0 00 s il t f en ce , st ra w b al es , i nl et se di men t b ags6 Irrigation 34713 SF $1.75 $60,748


C. Site HardscapePaving 1 Concrete Paving 78 SF $8.25 $644

2 Aggregate 4,772 SF $7.00 $33,404









T




r r k - i r . h in



r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,


m . , r r l


,


,

-

-


r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,



m l , . 7, r r l

r ri k il il 7. ,


,

m n r ,7 . , 7 , r l l r m n n ili i


, ,

-

-

T 7

Phase B-14 Egg Green






r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,


m . , r r l



,

-

-


r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,



m l , . 7, r r l

r ri k il il 7. ,


,

m n r ,7 . , 7 , r l l r m n n ili i


, ,

-

-

T 7

Phase B-16 Haverfield Entry Addition












5 E ros ion - s edi me nta ti on co ntr ol 1 a ll ow $3 ,0 00 .00 $ 3, 000 s il t f en ce , st ra w ba les , i nl et s edi me nt b ag s



2 Co mp ac te d A gg re ga te 5 ,1 08 S F $ 7. 00 $ 35, 756 l ime st on e fi ne s

Walls3 Seatwall 100 LF $350.00 $35,000 Limestone cap with Limestone panel veneer both sides





2 Trash Recepticles 10 EA $1,000 $10,000

3 Benches 40 EA $1,200 $48,000




T





A. General Conditions1 Mobili zation & Demobil ization 1 allow $200,000.00 $200,000 3% of construction cost




2 Cut / Removal 442 CY $24.00 $10,608 e xcavate to subgrade for slabs

3 E ro si on - se di me nt at io n c ont ro l 1 a ll ow $ 3, 000 .00 $3 ,00 0 s i lt fe nc e, s tra w b al es , i nl et se di me nt b ags






T




r r k - i r . h in









5 E ro si on - s ed ime nta ti on co nt ro l 1 al lo w $3 ,0 00 .00 $ 3,0 00 si lt fe nc e, s tr aw b al es , i nl et s edi me nt b ag s




Walls2 Seatwall 40 LF $350.00 $14,000 L imestone cap with Limestone panel veneer both sides






2 Tree Grates 7 EA $1,500 $10,500




T








B.GeneralSiteInfrastructure1 Demo 300 CY $7.00 $2,100 r emoval and disposal of existing materials as required


3 E ros ion - s ed ime nta ti on c ont ro l 1 a ll ow $ 3,0 00 .0 0 $ 3,0 00 s il t f en ce , st ra w ba les , i nl et s ed ime nt b ag s








- , - r Tr . m l i r




r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,


m . , r r l


,


,

-

-


,



m l , . 7, r r l

r ri k il il 7. ,


,

m n r ,7 . , 7 , r l l r m n n ili i


, ,

-

-

T 7

Phase B-15 Pedestrian Allee






r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,



r ri k il il 7. 7r in ili i , . , n l r


,

n r in , . ,

ll . , im n i h im n n l n r h i

,

i Tr . ,


,

i h in 7 , , m n li h r l lk

Tr r 7 , ,

,

-

-

T

Phase B-17 Haverfield Grounds




r r k - i r . h in



r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,



r ri k il il 7. 7

r in ili i , . , n l r


,

n r in , . ,

ll . , im n i h im n n l n r h i

,

i Tr . ,


,

i h in 7 , , m n li h r l lk

Tr r 7 , ,

,

Phase B-18 Blackburn Entry Addition

Cost Estimate


l hi Th hi i i i ll ll Ti

, . .l ll i l m , i - - r r . i rk

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


Cost Estimate 80






r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,


m . , r r l


,


,

-

-


r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,



m l , . 7, r r l

r ri k il il 7. ,


,

m n r ,7 . , 7 , r l l r m n n ili i

i in r 7, . 7, , r l l r r r l i i n - r ri ,7 r l r , ,

-

-

T 7

Phase B-19 Blackburn Grounds






r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,


m . , r r l


,


,

-

-


r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,



m l , . 7, r r l

r ri k il il 7. ,


,

m n r ,7 . , 7 , r l l r m n n ili i


, ,

-

-

T 7








B. General Site Infrastructure1 Demo 540 SF $1.00 $540 r emoval and disposal of existing materials as required

2 Cut / Fill - general grading 20 CY $12.00 $240 excavate to subgrade for slabs


4 Drainage / Utilities 540 SF $0.80 $432 b ased on total scope area

5 E ro si on - s ed ime nta ti on co nt ro l 1 a ll ow $ 3,0 00 .0 0 $ 3, 00 0 s i lt f en ce , s tra w b al es, i nl et s ed im en t b ag sGeneral Site Infrastructure Subtotal $4,352

C. Site HardscapePaving 1 Concrete Paving 540 SF $8.25 $4,455 quarry stone finish



D. Site Planting 1 Deciduous Trees 3 E A $550.00 $1,650






T





A. General Conditions1 Mobil ization & Demobilizati on 1 all ow $149,000.00 $149,000 3% of construction cost





3 E ros ion - s edi me nta ti on co ntr ol 1 a ll ow $ 3,0 00 .0 0 $ 3,0 00 si lt fe nc e, s tr aw b al es , i nl et s ed im ent b ag s



2 Living Area 22,317 SF $150.00 $3,347,550 Area calculated for structural addi tions- three stories @ 7439 sf per floor




T

l ll i l m , i r r . i rkl m , i r T i i r i - i r ll - ll . Tim r m

7 r - m m T - r . i r - , - r Tr . m l i r

r i - r - r . i r r r k - i r . i

T . T r r ri i i








5 Er osi on- sedimentati on contr ol 1 al low $3,000.00 $3,000 sil t f ence, st raw bales, inlet sedim ent bags




2 Asphalt 48 S Y $16.50 $792 heavy duty 4/8

3 Asphalt Paver 803 SF $16.00 $12,848

Walls4 Steps 18 LF $150.00 $2,700


D. Site Plantin1 Deciduous Trees 11 EA $550.00 $6,050



E. Site Furnishin s1 Lighting 2 EA $4,500 $9,000 assume one light per 50 lf of walkway

2 Tree Grates 4 EA $1,500 $6,000




T



- , - r Tr . m l i r










5 E ro si on - se di me nta ti on c on tro l 1 a ll ow $ 3,0 00 .0 0 $ 3,0 00 si lt fe nc e, s tra w b al es , i nl et s ed ime nt ba gs


C. Site HardscapePaving 1 Asphalt 787 SY $16.50 $12,986 heavy duty 4/8




2 Deciduous Trees 19 EA $550.00 $10,4503 Seeding/ hydromulch - turf areas 1,130 SY $1.35 $1,526






T 7






r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,


m . , r r l


,


,

-

-


r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,



m l , . 7, r r l

r ri k il il 7. ,


,

m n r ,7 . , 7 , r l l r m n n ili i


, ,

-

-

T 7

Phase B-20 New Residential Building 2






r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,


m . , r r l


,


,

-

-


r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,



m l , . 7, r r l

r ri k il il 7. ,


,

m n r ,7 . , 7 , r l l r m n n ili i


, ,

-

-

T 7


Jones Quad - B $29,141,735

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


81

Cost Estimate

Cost Estimate





, . ,

, . , .

, . ,

. ,

, . ,

, . , , ,

, . ,

, . ,

. ,

. ,

. , .

, ,

, . ,

Taylor Quad - C

Cost Estimate





l m hi n r Th hi ni r i - in r ll - ll n Tim r m

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


Cost Estimate 82

Phase C-1 Main Street

r r k i r . h in





B. General Site Infrastructure1 Demo/ Strip topsoil 51122 SF $1.00 $51,122 remove existing pavement / strip existing top soil



3 E ro si on - s ed ime nt ati on c on tr ol 1 a ll ow $ 3, 000 .00 $ 3, 00 0 s il t f enc e, s tra w b al es, i nl et s ed ime nt ba gs



2 Co mp act ed A gg re ga te 2 ,3 64 S F $ 7.0 0 $ 16, 548 l ime sto ne fi ne s

3 Granite Pavers 1,043 SF $25.00 $26,075

Walls4 Seatwall 205 LF $350.00 $71,750 Limestone cap with Limestone panel veneer both sides









2 Tree Grates 32 EA $1,500 $48,000


Phase C-1 Subtotal $423,36920% contingency $84,674

Phase C-1 Total $508,043

T








B.GeneralSite Infrastructure1 Demo/ Strip topsoil 14290 SF $1.00 $14,290 remove existing pavement / strip existing top soil




5 E ro si on - s ed ime nta ti on c on tr ol 1 a ll ow $ 3, 00 0. 00 $3 ,0 00 s il t fe nce , s tr aw b al es , i nl et s ed ime nt b ag s



2 Flush Concrete Curb 1,087 SF $15.00 $16,305


4 Asphalt Paver 4,441 SF $16.00 $71,056Site Hardscape Subtotal $120,147




E. Site Furnishings1 Tree Grates 8 EA $1,500 12,000 6'x4' rectangular iron tree grates


3 Bollards 12 EA $1,000 $12,000

4 Bike Racks 6 EA $250 $1,500




T



r r k - i r . h in








4 E ro si on - se di men ta ti on c on tr ol 1 a ll ow $ 5,0 00 .0 0 $5 ,00 0 s i lt f enc e, s tr aw b al es , i nl et se di me nt b ag s






5 Asphalt Paver 3,825 SF $16.00 $61,200









T






r r k ll 7, . 7, . n r i n

,

m ri il . , r m i in m n ri i in il




,

n r in ,7 . , rr n ini h

m r , 7. , lim n in

r ni r , . , 7

ll . 7 ,7 im n i h im n n l n r h i

l n r ll 7 . , i m n ri k n r n i

l mn , . , ' r l mn im n

,

i Tr . , " l.

in h r m l h - r r . 7

l n in r 7. , 7

,


Tr r , , ,

-

-

T

Phase C-2 Service Area

, . .




r r k - i r . h in



r r k ll 7, . 7, . n r i n

,





,


m r , 7. , lim n in

r ni r , . , 7




,

i Tr . , " l.


l n in r 7. , 7

,


Tr r , ,

,

-

-

T

Phase C-3 Lane Avenue Parking and Service




r r k - i r . h in



r r k ll 7, . 7, . n r i n

,





,


m r , 7. , lim n in

r ni r , . , 7




,

i Tr . , " l.


l n in r 7. , 7

,


Tr r , , ,

-

-

T



- , - r Tr . m l i r









4 E ro si on- s ed im en ta ti on co nt ro l 1 a ll ow $ 3,0 00 .0 0 $ 3, 000 s il t fe nc e, s tra w b al es , i nl et s ed im ent b ag s






D. Site Planting 1 Ornamental Tress 21 EA $400.00 $8,400





E. Site Furnishings1 Bollards 8 EA $1,000 $8,000


3 Bike Racks 6 EA $250 $1,500




T

Phase C-4 Pedestrian Allee


l m , hi n r Th hi ni r i - in r ll - ll n . Tim r m7 r - m m T - r . i n n r - , - r Tr . m l i r




r r k ll 7, . 7, . n r i n

,





,


m r , 7. , lim n in

r ni r , . , 7




,

i Tr . , " l.


l n in r 7. , 7

,


Tr r , ,

,

-

-

T

Cost Estimate





8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


83 Cost Estimate

Phase C-5 Quad Green










4 Irrigation 12528 SF $1.75 $21,924

5 E ro si on - se di men tat io n c on tr ol 1 a ll ow $ 3, 000 .0 0 $ 3,0 00 s il t fe nce , s tr aw b al es , i nl et s ed ime nt b agsGeneral Site Infrastructure Subtotal $36,923

C. Site HardscapePaving 1 Concrete Paving 4,879 SF $8.25 $40,252 quarry stone finish

2 Compacted Aggregate 454 SF $7.00 $3,178 l imestone fines



5 Sculpture 1 EA $2,000.00 $2,000 Limestone Slab








2 Bike Racks 6 EA $250 $1,500


Phase C-5 Subtotal $251,392

20% contingency $50,278Phase C-5 Total $301,671

T




r r k - i r . h in





B. General Site Infrastructure2 Cut /Removal 125 CY $24.00 $3,000 excavate to subgrade for slabs

4 E ro si on - s ed im en ta ti on c on tr ol 1 a ll ow $ 1,0 00 .0 0 $ 1,0 00 si lt fe nc e, s tra w ba les , i nl et s ed ime nt b ag s






T










4 E ro si on - s ed ime nta ti on c on tro l 1 al lo w $ 3, 00 0. 00 $3 ,0 00 s il t f en ce , s tr aw b al es , i nl et s edi me nt ba gs



6 Asphalt Paver 2,839 LF $16.00 $45,424









2 Bike Racks 8 EA $1,000 $8,000




T




r r k - i r . h in








4 E ros ion - s ed ime nta ti on c ont ro l 1 a ll ow $ 3,0 00 .0 0 $ 3, 00 0 s i lt f en ce , st ra w b al es, i nl et s ed ime nt b ags




D. Site Planting 1 Ornamental Tress 1 E A $400.00 $400








T






r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,


ill - n r l r in . , r r lr in ili i , . , n l r

rri i n .7 ,


,

n r in , 7 . , rr n ini h

m r 7. , 7 lim n in

l n r ll 7 . 7 ,7 im n ri k n r n i


l r , . , im n l

,

rn m n l Tr . ,

i Tr . , " l.

in h r m l h - r r , . , 7

l n in r ,7 . 7,

,


ik k ,

,

-

-

T

Phase C-6 Taylor Tower Entry Addition






r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,




rri i n .7 ,


,


m r 7. , 7 lim n in



l r , . , im n l

,

rn m n l Tr . ,

i Tr . , " l.

in h r m l h - r r , . , 7

l n in r ,7 . 7,

,


ik k ,

,

-

-

Phase C-7 Taylor Tower Grounds






r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,


ill - n r l r in . , r r lr in ili i , . , n l r

rri i n .7 ,


,


m r 7. , 7 lim n in



l r , . , im n l

,

rn m n l Tr . ,

i Tr . , " l.

in h r m l h - r r , . , 7

l n in r ,7 . 7,

,


ik k ,

,

-

-

T

Phase C-8 Volleyball Grounds






r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,




rri i n .7 ,


,


m r 7. , 7 lim n in



l r , . , im n l

,

rn m n l Tr . ,

i Tr . , " l.

in h r m l h - r r , . , 7

l n in r ,7 . 7,

,


ik k ,

,

-

-

T

Cost Estimate





8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


Cost Estimate 84



r r k - i r . h in


A. General Conditions1 Mobil ization & Demobili zation 1 al low $155,000.00 $155,000 3% of construction cost




2 E ro si on - s ed ime nta ti on c on tro l 1 al lo w $3 ,0 00 .0 0 $ 3, 00 0 s i lt f enc e, s tr aw b al es , i nl et se di me nt b ag s



2 Living Area 27,894 SF $150.00 $4,184,100 Area cal cul ated for structural additi ons- three stori es @ 9,298 sf per floor


Phase C-9 Subtotal $5,473,86020% contingency $1,094,772

Phase C-9 Total $6,568,632

T








B. General Site Infrastructure1 Grass removal/ Stri p topsoi l 3375 SF $1.00 $3,375 remove exi sting pavement / strip existing top soil



4 E ro si on - s ed ime nt ati on c on tr ol 1 a ll ow $ 3, 000 .0 0 $ 3,0 00 s il t fe nce , s tr aw b al es, i nl et s ed ime nt b ag s


C. Site HardscapePaving 1 Concrete Paving 3,234 SF $8.25 $26,681 quarry stone finish

2 Flush Concrete Curb 141 LF $15.00 $2,115 quarry stone finish











2 Bollards 3 EA $1,000 $3,000




T 7







B. General Site Infrastructure1 Demo/ Strip topsoil 2059 CY $1.00 $2,059 remove existing pavement / strip existing top soil



4 E ro si on - s edi me nta ti on c on tro l 1 a ll ow $ 3,0 00 .0 0 $ 3, 00 0 s i lt f en ce , s tra w b al es, i nl et s ed ime nt b ag s

5 Irrigation 15192 SF $1.75 $26,586General Site Infrastructure Subtotal $34,492











T




r r k - i r . h inT . T r h r r i i i n n







4 E ro si on - se di me nta ti on co nt ro l 1 a ll ow $ 3, 00 0. 00 $ 3,0 00 s il t f en ce , st ra w b al es , i nl et se di me nt b ag s

5 Irrigation 27207 SF $1.75 $47,612


C. Site HardscapeWalls1 Seat Wall 174 LF $350.00 $60,900 Limestone cap with Limestone panel veneer both sides







T

Phase C-9 Halloran Living / Entry Addition






r r k ll 7 , . 7 , . n r i n

,

m l , . , r r l


,


i in r 7, . , , r l l r r r l i i n - hr ri , r l r

, ,

-

-

T

Phase C-10 Halloran Grounds






r r k ll 7 , . 7 , . n r i n

,

m l , . , r r l




, ,

-

-

T

Phase C-11 Athletic Courts Grounds






r r k ll 7 , . 7 , . n r i n

,

m l , . , r r l




, ,

-

-

T

Phase C-12 High Street Green







r r k ll 7 , . 7 , . n r i n

,

m l , . , r r l


,



, ,

-

-

T

Cost Estimate


l m , hi n r Th hi ni r i - in r ll - ll n . Tim r m7 r m m T r i n n r


l m , hi n r Th hi ni r i - in r ll - ll n . Tim r m7 T i

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


85 Cost Estimate




A. General Conditions1 Mobil ization & Demobili zation 1 al low $425,000.00 $425,000 3% of constructi on cost




2 Building Removal 34,000 SF $3.50 $119,000 removal and disposal of existing structure


4 E ros ion - s ed ime nta ti on c on tro l 1 a ll ow $ 3,0 00 .0 0 $3 ,0 00 s il t f en ce , st ra w ba les , i nl et s ed ime nt ba gs


C. Structural Additions1 Basement Area 16,584 SF $100.00 $1,658,400 area calculated for basement and utilities

2 Living Area 66,336 SF $150.00 $9,950,400 Area calculated for structural additions- four stories @ 16,584 sf per floor



Phase C-13 Total $15,112,934

T










3 Drainage / Utilities 1,496 SF $0.80 $1,197 b ased on total scope area4 E ro si on - s edi me nta ti on c ont ro l 1 a ll ow $ 3,0 00 .0 0 $ 3,0 00 si lt fe nc e, s tra w ba les , i nl et s ed ime nt b ags



2 Asphalt Paver 194 S F $16.00 $3,104

3 Concrete Paver 441 SF $15.00 $6,615










T






r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,

ill - n r l r in 7 . , r r l


,

T l r , 7 . 7 , r l l r r r l i i n - n r

,

-

-




B. General Site Infrastructure1 Demo/ Strip topsoil 283 SF $1.00 $283 remove existing pavement / strip existing top soil


3 Drainage / Utilities 283 SF $0.80 $226 based on total scope area

4 E ro si on - se di men tat io n c on tro l 1 a ll ow $ 3,0 00 .0 0 $ 3,0 00 si lt fe nc e, s tr aw b al es , i nl et s ed ime nt b ag s



2 Concrete Paver 155 SF $15.00 $2,325




D. Site Planting 1 Seeding/ hydromulch - turf areas 160 SY $1.35 $216

Site Planting Subtotal $216


T 1/19/200652








2 E ro si on - s ed ime nta ti on c on tro l 1 a ll ow $ 1,0 00 .0 0 $ 1, 00 0 s il t fe nce , s tr aw b al es , i nl et s ed ime nt b ag s







r r k ll , . , . n r i n

,

m ri il . r m i in m n ri i in il

ill - n r l r in . r r l

r in ili i . n l r


,

n r in . , rr n ini h

n r r . ,



,


-

T

Phase C-13 New Residential Building 3






r r k ll 7 , . 7 , . n r i n

,

m l , . , r r l


,



, ,

-

-

T

Phase C-14 New Residential Building 3 Grounds






r r k ll 7 , . 7 , . n r i n

,

m l , . , r r l


,



, ,

-

-

T

Phase C-15 Barrett Entry Addition






r r k ll 7 , . 7 , . n r i n

,

m l , . , r r l




, ,

-

-

T

Phase C-16 Barrett Grounds






r r k ll 7 , . 7 , . n r i n

,

m l , . , r r l


,



, ,

-

-

T

*: - - .

: - - .- - .

- : - .: - - .

: - .




- , - r Tr . m l i r

Cost Estimate



T l i

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


Cost Estimate 86



A. General Conditions1 Mobil izati on & Demobi lizati on 1 allow $815,000.00 $815,000 3% of construction cost


General Conditions Subtotal $1,222,000


2 E ros ion - s ed ime nt ati on co nt ro l 1 a ll ow $ 3,0 00 .0 0 $ 3,0 00 s il t f enc e, s tr aw b al es , i nl et s ed ime nt b ag s



2 Up pe r F lo or Are a 7 8,6 06 S F $ 15 0.0 0 $ 11 ,7 90 ,9 00 A re a ca lcu la te d f or s tru ctu ra l a dd it io ns - th re e st ori es @ 2 6,2 02 pe r fl oo r

3 Publi c Area 26,202 S F $175.00 $4,585,350 Area cal cul ated for structural additions-one stroy @ 26,202 per floor



Phase C-17 Total $24,685,068

T

Phase C-17 New Gateway Building











4 E ro si on - s ed ime nt ati on co ntr ol 1 a ll ow $ 3,0 00 .0 0 $ 3,0 00 si lt fe nc e, s tra w b al es , i nl et s ed ime nt b ag sGeneral Site Infrastructure Subtotal $35,089


2 Co mp act ed A gg re ga te 1 ,8 00 S F $ 7.0 0 $ 12 ,6 00 l im es ton e fi ne s










2 Tree Grates 8 EA $1,500 $12,000




T






r r k ll 7, . 7, . n r i n

, ,

m l , . , r r l


,

m n r , . , , r l l r m n n ili i

r l r r 7 , . ,7 , r l l r r r l i i n - hr ri , r l r

li r , 7 . , , r l l r r r l i i n - n r , r l r

, ,

-

-

T

Phase C-18 New Gateway Building Grounds




r r k - i r . h in



r r k ll 7, . 7, . n r i n

, ,

m l , . , r r l


,

m n r , . , , r l l r m n n ili i

r l r r 7 , . ,7 , r l l r r r l i i n - hr ri , r l r

li r , 7 . , , r l l r r r l i i n - n r , r l r

, ,

-

-

T

Taylor Quad - C $50,252,507


r r k - i r . h in


A Drackett Tower Quad $39,987,711

B Graduate Tower Quad $29,141,735

C Taylor Tower Quad $50,252,507

North Residence Improvements $119,381,953

Building Summary




North Residence Building Improvements $107,679,203

Landscape Summary




North Residence Landscape Improvements $11,702,751

15% Design Fees $17,907,293

Total Improvement Cost $137,289,246

T

Total Summary

8/3/2019 North Dorms 11 06


North Dorms 11 06

Documents

Transcript of North Dorms 11 06