6.1

35.6

12.5

15.2

PROPOSED LOT 4AREA: 602.8m²

34.6

34.4

20.6

17.5

17.5

PROPOSED LOT 5AREA: 665.4m²

PROPOSED LOT 3AREA: 603.4m²

PROPOSED LOT 2AREA: 604.0m²

PROPOSED LOT 1AREA: 639.5m²

19.5

17.5

19.3

34.4

FILE

:Z:\P

roje

ct_f

iles\

Pro

ject

s_20

17\1

7-15

8_44

17 S

pruc

e A

venu

e-B

urlin

gton

\01-

Cur

rent

_Dra

win

gs\1

7-15

8L.d

wg

LA

YO

UT:

1_V

eg m

anLA

ST

SA

VE

D B

Y:S

cott,

Mon

day,

May

7, 2

018

10:3

4:00

AM

PLO

TTE

D B

Y:S

cott

Mon

day,

May

7, 2

018

12:1

8:06

PM

KEY MAP - N.T.S.

REVISIONS/ SUBMISSIONS

# DATE DESCRIPTION

STAMP

adesso design inc.landscape architecture

Hamilton, ON L8P 4B4t. 905.526.8876

218 Locke Street South, 2nd Floor

www.adessodesigninc.ca

proj

ect #

: 17

-158

NOTE:Vegetation inventory undertaken by Nate Torenvliet,ISA Certified Arborist (ON-1782A) on December 15,2017.

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONISSUED FOR REVIEW & COMMENTS ONLY

LEGEND

existing tree number (refer to chart)

existing vegetation to remain

existing elevations

1 2018-05-07 First submission

Zarin HomesCLIENT

MUNICIPALITY

PROJECT

City of Burlington

4417 Spruce Avenue

L-1SHEET

VegetationManagement Plan

MUNICIPAL FILE NUMBER

2

tree protection fence- see detail D1, L-2

0 5 10

1:250

3

(m)

existing vegetation to be removed

property line

SPRUCE AVENUE

HEN

DER

SON

RO

AD

TUC

K D

RIV

E

lot lines- refer to base plan

north

SITE

Lake

shore Rd

HendersonPark

ShoreacresPark

Breckon Park

Tuck Dr

Tuck Dr

Tuck Dr

Linden AvePoplar Dr

Spruce A

ve

Spruce A

ve

Henderson Ave

Wilson Ave

Wilson Ave

Brecko

ngate Ct

Cottonwood D

r

Appleby Lane

Juniper Ave

Adrian

Ave

Hawthorne Dr

BURLINGTON

Elm Cr

Goodram Dr

north

1 2

4

5 7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26*

27*2829

30

31

32

34

35

33

3637

38

39

404142

43

45

46

44

47

48

49

50

63

1. Trees 3-13 are infested with Emerald AshBorer and should be removed.

2. The removal of these trees should not beconditional to the proposed Zoning By-lawAmendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision.

EMERALD ASH BORER

*TREE PROTECTION FENCE1. Trees 23 and 24 are infested with Emerald

Ash Borer and should be removed.2. The final location of tree protection fencing

for trees 26 and 27 to be coordinated withhouse and driveway layout.

TREE PROTECTION FENCE- SEE DETAIL D1, L-2

TREE PROTECTION FENCE- SEE DETAIL D1, L-2

TREE PROTECTION FENCE- SEE DETAIL D1, L-2

TREE PROTECTION FENCE- SEE DETAIL D1, L-2

TREE PROTECTION FENCE- SEE DETAIL D1, L-2

TREE PROTECTION FENCE- SEE DETAIL D1, L-2

TREE PROTECTION FENCE- SEE DETAIL D1, L-2

1. The area within the dripline of all existing trees shall be properlyprotected with temporary fencing.

2. The area within the protective fencing shall remain undisturbed withno construction activity, grade changes, surface treatment,compaction, or excavation. Area shall not be used for the storage ofbuilding materials or equipment access/storage or project relatedgarbage.

3. Tree protection measures shall be installed prior to any demolition,tree removal or construction and shall remain until the completion offine grading and sodding or seeding.

4. Prune all trees for dead, diseased, weak or hazardous branches only.also trim back branches which will interfere with construction, prunefor structural restoration where necessary.

5. No stockpiles and/or excavated material shall be placed within thetree preservation area.

6. No rigging cable shall be wrapped around or installed to trees.7. Where root systems of protected trees are exposed directly adjacent

to or damaged by construction work they are to be root pruned andthe area back filled with topsoil to prevent root desiccation.

8. Any fine grading within the preservation area is to be done by hand.no heavy equipment is permitted within the preservation zone.

9. Sediment accumulations to be removed by subdivider/builder whensediment deposits reach within 150mm of top of filter fabric barrier.

10. A copy of the approved and signed Vegetation Management Planwill be on site for the duration of construction and available uponrequest.

* CROWN CLASSDominant- (D) Emergent canopy (receives full sunlight)Co-dominant - (C) Not fully emergent (top of canopy receives sunlight)Intermediate - (I) Sub-canopy tree (receives partial sunlight)

* CONDITION - consideration of trunk integrity, crown structure and crown vigorGood - few or no issues related to trunk integrity, crown structure or crown vigorFair - minor issues related to trunk integrity, crown structure (form, some dead ordamged branches) or crown vigor (20-80% healthy foliage)Poor - issues with trunk integrity such as cavities or exposed dead wood, poorcrown structure (poor form, no clear leader, significant dead or damagedbranches) or poor crown vigor (<20% healthy foliage)

FILE

:Z:\P

roje

ct_f

iles\

Pro

ject

s_20

17\1

7-15

8_44

17 S

pruc

e A

venu

e-B

urlin

gton

\01-

Cur

rent

_Dra

win

gs\1

7-15

8L.d

wg

LA

YO

UT:

2_V

eg m

an c

hart

LAS

T S

AV

ED

BY

:Sco

tt, M

onda

y, M

ay 7

, 201

8 10

:34:

00 A

M P

LOTT

ED

BY

:Sco

tt M

onda

y, M

ay 7

, 201

8 12

:17:

41 P

M

REVISIONS/ SUBMISSIONS

# DATE DESCRIPTION

STAMP

adesso design inc.landscape architecture

Hamilton, ON L8P 4B4t. 905.526.8876

218 Locke Street South, 2nd Floor

www.adessodesigninc.ca

proj

ect #

: 17

-158

NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONISSUED FOR REVIEW & COMMENTS ONLY

1 2018-05-07 First submission

Zarin HomesCLIENT

MUNICIPALITY

PROJECT

City of Burlington

4417 Spruce Avenue

L-2SHEET

Vegetation Inventoryand Details

MUNICIPAL FILE NUMBER

NOTE:Vegetation inventory undertaken by Nate Torenvliet,ISA Certified Arborist (ON-1782A) on December 15,2017.

EXISTING VEGETATION IDENTIFICATION TABLE

ROOT PROTECTION ZONE NOTES:

TREE/UNITNO.

SPECIES (COMMON NAME) SPECIES (BOTANICAL NAME)

Private

Private

Private

Private

Private

Private

Private

Private

Private

Private

Private

SAVE

SAVE

REMOVE

REMOVE

REMOVE

REMOVE

REMOVE

REMOVE

REMOVE

REMOVE

REMOVE

EAB infested

EAB infested

EAB infested

EAB infested

EAB infested

EAB infested

EAB infested

EAB infested

Fair

C

multi

multi

40

30

15

35

30

25

15

30

30,30

C

S

C

C

C

C

S

D

D

C

Fair

DBH (cm) CROWNCLASS*

CONDITION* VEGETATION VALUE & PHYSICAL CONSTRAINTS POTENTIAL IMPACTS FROM CONSTRUCTION OWNERSHIP RECOMMENDATION

Ulmus pumila

Fraxinus americana

Ulmus pumila

Siberian Elm

White Ash

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

Private REMOVEEAB infestedC2012

Private REMOVEEAB infestedC1513

Public SAVEOff propertyC60Robinia pseudoacaciaBlack Locust14

Public SAVED40Acer platanoidesNorway Maple15

Public SAVEOff propertyD6Malus sp.Crab Apple16

Public SAVENot surveyed, off propertyD6Malus sp.Crab Apple17

Public SAVENot surveyed, off propertyD6Malus sp.Crab Apple18

Public SAVENot surveyed, off propertyD6Malus sp.Crab Apple19

Public SAVEOff propertyD40Acer platanoidesNorway Maple20

Public SAVENot surveyed, off propertyD6Malus sp.Crab Apple21

Public SAVENot surveyed, off propertyD6Malus sp.Crab Apple22

Private REMOVEEAB infestedC50Fraxinus americanaWhite Ash23

Private REMOVEEAB infestedC40Fraxinus americanaWhite Ash24

PrivateSome dieback in the canopyC80Ulmus pumilaSiberian Elm25

Private SAVEWide spread formC40Acer platanoidesManitoba Maple26

Private SAVESome dieback in canopyC50Acer platanoidesNorway Maple27

Private REMOVESome dieback in canopyC50Acer platanoidesNorway Maple28

Private REMOVEGrading in root zone due to proposed buildingDeadC35Acer platanoidesNorway Maple29

Private SAVEC55Acer platanoidesNorway Maple30

Private REMOVEC60Gleditsia tricanthosHoney Locust31

Private SAVED35Gleditsia tricanthosHoney Locust32

Private SAVED40Picea pungensColorado Spruce33

PrivateD20Malus sp.Crab Apple34

PrivateNot surveyedC30Picea glaucaWhite Spruce35

PrivateD55Picea pungensColorado Spruce36

PrivateD60Picea pungensColorado Spruce37

PrivateOff propertyD25Acer platanoidesNorway Maple38

PrivateSome dieback in canopyD25Malus sp.Crab Apple39

PrivateC35Gleditsia tricanthosHoney locust40

PrivateC60Gleditsia tricanthosHoney locust41

PrivateD25Malus sp.Crab Apple42

PrivateOff propertyD40Gleditsia tricanthosHoney Locust43

PrivateC30Malus sp.Crab Apple44

PrivateC25Malus sp.Crab Apple45

PrivateC25Malus sp.Crab Apple46

PrivateD25Malus sp.Crab Apple47

PrivateD55Gleditsia tricanthosHoney Locust48

PrivateC60Acer platanoidesNorway Maple49

PrivateC35Betula papyriferaWhite Birch50

Siberian Elm Not surveyed

Fraxinus americanaWhite Ash

Fraxinus americanaWhite Ash

Fraxinus americanaWhite Ash

Fraxinus americanaWhite Ash

Fraxinus americanaWhite Ash

Fraxinus americanaWhite Ash

Fraxinus americanaWhite Ash

Fraxinus americanaWhite Ash

Fraxinus americanaWhite Ash

Fraxinus americanaWhite Ash

Fraxinus americanaWhite Ash

Poor

Poor

Poor

Poor

Poor

Poor

Poor

Poor

Poor

Poor

Poor

EAB infested

Good

Good

Good

Good

Good

Good

Good

Good

Good

Poor

Poor

Fair

Fair

Fair

Poor

Poor

Fair

Good

Good

Good

Fair

Good

Good

Good

Good

Fair

Good

Fair

Fair

Good

Good

Good

Good

Good

Good

Fair

Poor

Off property

Grading in root zone due to proposed building

Grading in root zone due to proposed building

Off property

SAVE

SAVE

SAVE

SAVE

SAVE

SAVE

SAVE

SAVE

SAVE

SAVE

SAVE

SAVE

SAVE

SAVE

SAVE

SAVE

SAVE

None

None

None

None

None

None

None

None

None

None

None

None

None

None

Off property

1. The Owner and Contractor must be aware of the Migratory BirdsConvention Act, 1994 - specifically;

· No tree removal or construction activity shall contravene theAct.

· Construction activities with the potential to harm migratory birdsor their nest should be restricted from April 1 to July 31.

· If work must occur during the migratory bird breeding season, anest survey should be taken by a qualified avian biologist.

· A mitigation plan (showing active nests and appropriatebuffers) may be required for review and approval by theCanadian Wildlife Services.

1. The Owner and Contractor must be aware of the Ontario ForestryAct, 1990 - specifically;Every person who injures or destroys a tree growing on the boundarybetween adjoining lands without the consent of the land owners isguilty of an offence under this Act. 1998, c. 18, Sched. I, s. 21.

Tree Protection (City of Burlington Std. Dwgs.)SCALE: NTS

1D

None

None

None

None

None

None

None

None

None

None

None

None

None

None

None

TBD; potential grading in root zone

None

None

TBD; potential conflict with proposed driveway

TBD; potential conflict with proposed driveway

TBD; potential conflict with proposed driveway

TBD; potential conflict with proposed driveway

TBD; potential conflict with proposed driveway

TBD; potential conflict with proposed driveway

TBD; potential conflict with proposed driveway

TBD; potential conflict with proposed driveway

TBD; potential conflict with proposed driveway

TBD; potential conflict with proposed driveway

None

Grading in root zone due to proposed building

Grading in root zone; review with detailed lot grading

Grading in root zone; review with detailed lot grading

None

REMOVE

BOUNDARY TREES:

MIGRATORY BIRDS AND NESTS: