North Atlantic Wave Heights 2070-2100 · 2019-09-27 · North Atlantic wave height climate towards...
Transcript of North Atlantic Wave Heights 2070-2100 · 2019-09-27 · North Atlantic wave height climate towards...
North Atlantic wave height climate towards the end of the21st century
Øyvind Breivik, Ole Johan Aarnes and Magnar Reistad
RCP85-HISTORIC: annualmean
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
[%]
Ø Breivik et al (MET Norway) North Atlantic Wave Heights 2070-2100 26 September 2018 1 / 14
Outline of presentation
CMIP5 climate projectionsExperiment setupWave model setupTrends in mean and upper percentilesChanges in extremesConclusions and further work
Ø Breivik et al (MET Norway) North Atlantic Wave Heights 2070-2100 26 September 2018 2 / 14
Motivation
CMIP5 models in general do not incorporate wave models, but there is aclear need for estimates of how the wave climate may change in the future
for existing petroleum installations
future offshore wind and wave installations... and because it is a scientific question that needs to be answered
Ø Breivik et al (MET Norway) North Atlantic Wave Heights 2070-2100 26 September 2018 3 / 14
Motivation
CMIP5 models in general do not incorporate wave models, but there is aclear need for estimates of how the wave climate may change in the future
for existing petroleum installationsfuture offshore wind and wave installations
... and because it is a scientific question that needs to be answered
Ø Breivik et al (MET Norway) North Atlantic Wave Heights 2070-2100 26 September 2018 3 / 14
Motivation
CMIP5 models in general do not incorporate wave models, but there is aclear need for estimates of how the wave climate may change in the future
for existing petroleum installationsfuture offshore wind and wave installations... and because it is a scientific question that needs to be answered
Ø Breivik et al (MET Norway) North Atlantic Wave Heights 2070-2100 26 September 2018 3 / 14
CMIP5 scenarios
RCP4.5 (Representative Concentration Pathway to 4.5 W/m2
radiative forcing)
RCP8.5 (8.5 W/m2 radiative forcing)
Source: Wikipedia (Creative Commons Licence)
Ø Breivik et al (MET Norway) North Atlantic Wave Heights 2070-2100 26 September 2018 4 / 14
CMIP5 scenarios
RCP4.5 (Representative Concentration Pathway to 4.5 W/m2
radiative forcing)RCP8.5 (8.5 W/m2 radiative forcing)
Source: Wikipedia (Creative Commons Licence)
Ø Breivik et al (MET Norway) North Atlantic Wave Heights 2070-2100 26 September 2018 4 / 14
CMIP5 models
Model Res (lon/lat) Hist # Future #GFDL-CM3 2.5◦ ×2.0◦ 1970-1999 1 2071-2100 1EC-Earth 1.125◦ ×1.125◦ 1971-2000 3 2071-2100 3MRI-CGCM3 1.125◦ ×1.125◦ 1971-2000 2 2071-2100 1MIROC5 1.4◦ ×1.4◦ 1971-1999 5 2070-2099 3IPSL-CM5A-MR 2.5◦ ×1.25◦ 1971-1999 3 2071-2099 1HadGEM2-ES 1.875◦ ×1.25◦ 1970-1999 1 2081-2099 1
Ø Breivik et al (MET Norway) North Atlantic Wave Heights 2070-2100 26 September 2018 5 / 14
Wave model integrations
The WAM wave model was set up on a domain with 50 km spatialresolution, covering the North Atlantic. Wave fields are output with3-hourly temporal resolution.The wind forcing was interpolated from CMIP5 10-m wind fieldsIce cover was changed once a month based on CMIP5 iceconcentration
Ø Breivik et al (MET Norway) North Atlantic Wave Heights 2070-2100 26 September 2018 6 / 14
Assessing the historical runs
The wave model integrations were compared against the NORA10hindcast archive (Reistad et al, 2011).
Ø Breivik et al (MET Norway) North Atlantic Wave Heights 2070-2100 26 September 2018 7 / 14
Standardising climate projections against historical runsCMIP5 models yield widely different historical wave climate both in termsof bias and activity (variance).
In order to compare their future wave climate, the wave model projectionshad to be standardised against their historical counterparts
H(Hist,RCP)s,annual −HHist
s,annual
std(HHists,annual)
. (1)
Ø Breivik et al (MET Norway) North Atlantic Wave Heights 2070-2100 26 September 2018 8 / 14
Comparison of historical runs against a hindcast
Ø Breivik et al (MET Norway) North Atlantic Wave Heights 2070-2100 26 September 2018 9 / 14
Standardised annual mean, RCP4.5 and RCP8.5
RCP45-HISTORIC: annualmean
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
[%]
RCP85-HISTORIC: annualmean
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
[%]
-10 -5 0
Historic standardized
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
Fu
ture
sta
nd
ard
ize
d
QQ-annualmean: HIST vs FUTURE
RCP45
RCP45 - mean
RCP85
RCP85 - mean
Quantile-quantile distribution of annual mean for a location in the NorthAtlantic (right panel) reveals that RCP8.5 has larger variance thanRCP4.5, but lower overall mean. Both have higher variance than thehistorical climate (x -axis).
Ø Breivik et al (MET Norway) North Atlantic Wave Heights 2070-2100 26 September 2018 10 / 14
Standardised annual 99 percentiles, RCP4.5 and RCP8.5
RCP45-HISTORIC: annualp99
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
[%]
RCP85-HISTORIC: annualp99
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
[%]
-5 0 5
Historic standardized
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
Fu
ture
sta
nd
ard
ized
QQ-annualp99: HIST vs FUTURE
RCP45
RCP45 - mean
RCP85
RCP85 - mean
This tendency is also seen towards the upper percentiles (see right panel),but their overall mean is now more similar.
Ø Breivik et al (MET Norway) North Atlantic Wave Heights 2070-2100 26 September 2018 11 / 14
Standardised annual maxima, RCP4.5 and RCP8.5
RCP45-HISTORIC: annualmax
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
[%]
RCP85-HISTORIC: annualmax
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
[%]
-5 0 5
Historic standardized
-5
0
5
Fu
ture
sta
nd
ard
ized
QQ-annualmax: HIST vs FUTURE
RCP45
RCP45 - mean
RCP85
RCP85 - mean
The annual maxima are quite similar for RCP4.5 and RCP8.5, but bothexhibit larger variance than the historical annual maxima.
Ø Breivik et al (MET Norway) North Atlantic Wave Heights 2070-2100 26 September 2018 12 / 14
Conclusions
1 Annual mean wave height appears to decrease toward the end of thecentury in the North Atlantic, and more so for RCP8.5 than forRCP4.5
2 Upper percentiles decrease less, suggesting that the variance increaseswhile the mean goes down
3 All models show increased wave heights in the Norwegian Sea due toreceding winter ice cover
Ø Breivik et al (MET Norway) North Atlantic Wave Heights 2070-2100 26 September 2018 13 / 14
Open questions
1 Are we moving toward a future wind and wave climate with highervariance but lower mean values in the extratropics?
2 Can we continue to justify running climate GCMs without a wavemodel component?
3 Will the inclusion of a wave model modify the results appreciably?4 In particular, can the extremes be affected by an active wave model?
References:Aarnes, O. J., M. Reistad, Ø. Breivik, E. Bitner-Gregersen, L. I. Eide, O. Gramstad, A. K. Magnusson, B. Natvig and E.Vanem, 2017. Projected changes in significant wave height towards the end of the 21st century: Northeast Atlantic, JGeophys Res: Oceans, 122, pp 3394-3403, doi:10.1002/2016JC012521Aarnes, O. J., Ø. Breivik, and M. Reistad, 2012: Wave Extremes in the Northeast Atlantic. J Climate, 25, 1529–1543,doi:10/bvbr7kAarnes, O. J., S. Abdalla, J.-R. Bidlot, and Ø. Breivik, 2015: Marine wind and wave height trends at differentERA-Interim forecast ranges. J Climate, 28, 819–837, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00470.1.Breivik, Ø., O. J. Aarnes, J.-R. Bidlot, A. Carrasco, and Ø. Saetra, 2013: Wave Extremes in the Northeast Atlanticfrom Ensemble Forecasts. J Climate, 26, 7525–7540, doi:10/mpf.Reistad, M., Ø. Breivik, H. Haakenstad, O. J. Aarnes, B. R. Furevik, and J.-R. Bidlot, 2011: A high-resolution hindcastof wind and waves for the North Sea, the Norwegian Sea, and the Barents Sea. J Geophys Res, 116, 18 pp, C05 019,doi:10/fmnr2m
Ø Breivik et al (MET Norway) North Atlantic Wave Heights 2070-2100 26 September 2018 14 / 14