Normal Eating is Counter Cultural

14
NORMAL EATING IS COUNTER-CULTURAL Exploring Young Women's Lived, Embodied Experience of Eating Disorder Recovery Andrea LaMarre, MSc. Vanier Doctoral Scholar PhD Student Department of Family Relations & Applied Nutrition University of Guelph Dr. Carla Rice Canada Research Chair, Tier II- Care, Gender & Relationships Department of Family Relations & Applied Nutrition University of Guelph @andrealala89

Transcript of Normal Eating is Counter Cultural

Page 1: Normal Eating is Counter Cultural

NORMAL EATING IS

COUNTER-CULTURAL

Exploring Young Women's Lived, Embodied

Experience of Eating Disorder Recovery

Andrea LaMarre, MSc.

Vanier Doctoral Scholar

PhD Student

Department of Family

Relations & Applied Nutrition

University of Guelph

Dr. Carla Rice

Canada Research Chair, Tier II-

Care, Gender & Relationships

Department of Family Relations &

Applied Nutrition

University of Guelph

@andrealala89

Page 2: Normal Eating is Counter Cultural

BACKGROUND

Eating disorder recovery: a complex &

multifaceted experience

Physical

Psychological

Affective?

What assumptions underlie the term

“recovery”?

Page 3: Normal Eating is Counter Cultural

BACKGROUND

Eating disorder treatment outcomes:

Nutrition and/or weight restoration, restoration of

“normal eating” (Bardone-Cone et al., 2010; Gremillion, 2003; Rance, Clarke & Moller, 2014)

“Recovery”?

Recognition that recovery is more than

weight restoration- but what comprises

“more”?

Page 4: Normal Eating is Counter Cultural

BACKGROUND

Moralized bodies in contemporary Western

societies:

“Healthy-thin” bodies seen as morally, medically,

aesthetically desirable (Saguay & Ward, 2011)

Moral panic & fear around “obesity epidemic”

Bodies under surveillance:

Bodies are political spaces

Body management taken up as social affair

Page 5: Normal Eating is Counter Cultural

BACKGROUND

Biopedagogies: “assemblages” of

information, instructions, directives (Leahy, 2009)

How to live

How to be embodied

What “health” is

How to be healthy & happy (e.g. Harwood, 2010)

How to avoid risk (Fullagar, 2009, p. 124)

How to achieve recovery, wellness (LaMarre, Rice & Bear)

Page 6: Normal Eating is Counter Cultural

BACKGROUND

Do these broader societal messages

(biopedagogies) impact possibility of

achieving or imagining eating disorder

recovery?

Page 7: Normal Eating is Counter Cultural

METHODOLOGY

Narrative interviews (10) (Riessman, 2007)

Digital stories (3)

Participatory, arts-based methods

Centralizing participants’ voices

Narrative thematic analysis on both sources

of data for common themes & particularities

Page 8: Normal Eating is Counter Cultural

PARTICIPANTS

10 women, 20-31 (average age: 25)

All university educated

Diagnoses (not mutually exclusive):

8 anorexia nervosa

3 bulimia nervosa

2 non-diagnosed (1 identified BN, 1 ED-NOS)

Complicating categories of race, ethnicity,

and sexuality

Page 9: Normal Eating is Counter Cultural

RESULTS

Biopedagogy of recovery

Materiality of Eating Disorders & Recovery

Beyond Biometrics

Embodying Counter-Culture

Authenticity and Invisibility

Recovery is an (Embodied) Place

Page 10: Normal Eating is Counter Cultural

DISCUSSION

State/label of “recovered”: potentially

problematic expectations & standards

“Overwhelmingness” of full recovery

Lack of space for vulnerability

Prescriptions for recovery helpful to a certain

extent; then may contravene dominant

biopedagogies

Page 11: Normal Eating is Counter Cultural

DISCUSSION

Recovery biopedagogies may be read as

counter-cultural

Especially post weight-gain, participants

encountered ambiguous prescriptions for health

“Readings” of participants’ bodies & behaviours

differed based on others’ knowledge of their

histories

Page 12: Normal Eating is Counter Cultural

IMPLICATIONS

Working closely with participants:

Co-creating art

Delving deeply into recovery stories

Uncovering complexity

“Recovery” as potentially alienating

Not settling for less; envisioning differently

Page 13: Normal Eating is Counter Cultural

IMPLICATIONS

Making space for multiple perspectives on

recovery, multiple routes to recovery

Not assuming all patients will identify with

the language of recovery

Understanding the counter-cultural quality of

recovery in a society that moralizes bodies

Page 14: Normal Eating is Counter Cultural

REFERENCES

Bardone-Cone, A., Harney, M.B., Maldonado, C.R., Lawson, M.A., Robinson, P., Smith, R. & Tosh, A. (2010). Defining recovery from an eating disorder: Conceptualization, validation, and examination of psychosocial functioning and psychiatric comorbidity. Behavioural Research and Therapy, 48,194-202.

Fullagar, S. (2009). Governing healthy family lifestyles through discourses of risk and responsibility. In J. Wright & V. Harwood (Eds.), Biopolitics and the “obesity epidemic”: Governing bodies (pp. 108–126). New York, NY: Routledge.

Gremillion, H. (2003). Feeding anorexia: Gender and power at a treatment centre. Durham: Duke University Press.

Harwood, V. (2010). Mobile asylums: Psychopathologisation as a personal, portable psychiatric prison. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(4), 437-451.

LaMarre, A., Rice, C. & Bear, M. (Forthcoming) Unrecoverable? Prescriptions and possibilities for eating disorder recovery. In Khanlou, N. & Pilkington, B. (eds). Women's mental health: International perspectives on resistance and resilience in community and society.

Leahy, D. (2009). Disgusting pedagogies. In J. Wright & V. Harwood (Eds.), Biopolitics and the “obesity epidemic”: Governing bodies (pp. 172–182). New York, NY: Routledge.

Rance, N.M., Clarke, V. & Moller, N.P. (2014). “If I see somebody… I’ll immediately scope them out”: Anorexia nervosa clients’ perceptions of their therapists’ body. Eating Disorders, 22, 111-120.

Riessman, C.K. (2007) Narrative methods for the human sciences. Newbury Park, CA, Sage.

Saguy, A.C. & Ward, A. (2011). Coming out as fat: Rethinking stigma. Social Psychology Quarterly, 74(1), 53.