Non-Tidal Passaic River Basin Nitrate Improvement Study

22
Non-Tidal Passaic River Basin Nitrate Improvement Study Presentation to NJCWC Presentation by: James Cosgrove, P.E. Kleinfelder, Inc. May 14, 2019

Transcript of Non-Tidal Passaic River Basin Nitrate Improvement Study

Page 1: Non-Tidal Passaic River Basin Nitrate Improvement Study

Non-Tidal Passaic River Basin

Nitrate Improvement Study

Presentation to NJCWC

Presentation by:

James Cosgrove, P.E.

Kleinfelder, Inc.

May 14, 2019

Page 2: Non-Tidal Passaic River Basin Nitrate Improvement Study

2

Agenda

What’s the Issue?

Update Modeling Results

Discussion/Next Steps

Page 3: Non-Tidal Passaic River Basin Nitrate Improvement Study

3

The issue…

*Right Bank (Passaic River side)

Page 4: Non-Tidal Passaic River Basin Nitrate Improvement Study

4

Scenarios:“Buildout Loads”

Current Concentrations + Permitted Flows

“Current Loads”

Upper 95th CL of actual monthly average loads

Upgrade Scenario 1: “Uniform Concentration”

All WWTPs set equal to 8.7 mg/L (an upgrade at ~14 of

the 23 WWTPs)

Upgrade Scenario 2: “Upgrade 8”

4 Upper Passaic WWTPs set to 4 mg/L

Harrison Brook, Long Hill, Berkeley Heights, Chatham

Main/Glen

TBSA, Par-Troy, Hanover & Livingston set to 6.5 mg/L

Upgrade Scenario 3: “Upgrade 6”

4 Upper Passaic WWTPs set to 4 mg/L

Harrison Brook, Long Hill, Berkeley Heights, Chatham

Main/Glen

TBSA & Par-Troy set to 3 mg/L

Water Supply Intake Evaluation

Page 5: Non-Tidal Passaic River Basin Nitrate Improvement Study

5

“Buildout Loads” Scenario(current concentrations + permitted WWTP flow)

Harrison Brook

(Bernards)Warren

Stage VWarren Stage IV

Long Hill Warren Stage I-II

Berkeley Heights

Chatham Hill

Chatham Glen/Main

MCJM

Florham Park

Livingston

Caldwell

RVRSA

Butterworth

Morristown

Hanover

Par-Troy

Wanaque Valley SA

Pompton Lakes

TBSA

Wayne

Verona

Cedar Grove

Page 6: Non-Tidal Passaic River Basin Nitrate Improvement Study

6

“Buildout Loads” Scenario(current concentrations + permitted WWTP flow & 2002 stream flows)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

10/01/01 10/29/01 11/26/01 12/24/01 01/21/02 02/18/02 03/18/02 04/15/02 05/13/02 06/10/02 07/08/02 08/05/02 09/02/02 09/30/02

Nit

rate

(m

g/L

)

Canoe Brook Intake Wanaque South Intake PVWC Intake Nitrate Criteria

Page 7: Non-Tidal Passaic River Basin Nitrate Improvement Study

7

“Current Load” Scenario(current concentrations + actual WWTP flows)

Harrison Brook

(Bernards)

Warren

Stage VWarren Stage IV

Long Hill

Warren Stage I-II

Berkeley Heights

Chatham Hill

Chatham Glen/Main

MCJM

Florham Park

Livingston

Caldwell

RVRSA

ButterworthMorristownHanover

Par-Troy

Wanaque Valley SA

Pompton Lakes

TBSA

Wayne

Verona

Cedar Grove

Page 8: Non-Tidal Passaic River Basin Nitrate Improvement Study

8

“Current Loads” Scenario(current concentrations + actual WWTP flows + 2002 stream flows)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

10/01/01 10/29/01 11/26/01 12/24/01 01/21/02 02/18/02 03/18/02 04/15/02 05/13/02 06/10/02 07/08/02 08/05/02 09/02/02 09/30/02

Nit

rate

(m

g/L

)

Canoe Brook Intake Wanaque South Intake PVWC Intake Nitrate Criteria

Page 9: Non-Tidal Passaic River Basin Nitrate Improvement Study

9

“Uniform Concentration” Scenario (uniform concentrations + permitted WWTP flows + 2002 stream flows)

[8.7 mg/L at all WWTPs]

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

10/01/01 10/29/01 11/26/01 12/24/01 01/21/02 02/18/02 03/18/02 04/15/02 05/13/02 06/10/02 07/08/02 08/05/02 09/02/02 09/30/02

Nit

rate

(m

g/L

)

Canoe Brook Intake Wanaque South Intake PVWC Intake Nitrate Criteria

[8.7 mg/l at all WWTPs]

Page 10: Non-Tidal Passaic River Basin Nitrate Improvement Study

10

“Upgrade 8 WWTPs” Scenario(upgraded concentrations + permitted flows + 2002 stream flows)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

10/01/01 10/29/01 11/26/01 12/24/01 01/21/02 02/18/02 03/18/02 04/15/02 05/13/02 06/10/02 07/08/02 08/05/02 09/02/02 09/30/02

Nit

rate

(m

g/L

)

Canoe Brook Intake Wanaque South Intake PVWC Intake Nitrate Criteria

[4 mg/L at Bernards, Long Hill,

Berkeley Heights, & Chatham Main;

6.5 mg/L at Livingston, Hanover, Par-

Troy, & TBSA]

Page 11: Non-Tidal Passaic River Basin Nitrate Improvement Study

11

“Upgrade 6 WWTPs” Scenario(upgrade concentrations + permitted flows + 2002 stream flows)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

10/01/01 10/29/01 11/26/01 12/24/01 01/21/02 02/18/02 03/18/02 04/15/02 05/13/02 06/10/02 07/08/02 08/05/02 09/02/02 09/30/02

Nit

rate

(m

g/L

)

Canoe Brook Intake Wanaque South Intake PVWC Intake Nitrate Criteria

[4 mg/L at Bernards, Long Hill,

Berkeley Heights, & Chatham

Main; 3 mg/L at Par-Troy & TBSA]

Page 12: Non-Tidal Passaic River Basin Nitrate Improvement Study

12

HUC14 Evaluations

Dead

River Upper

Passaic

Whippany/Rockaway

Middle

Passaic

Pompton/Wanaque

Dead

River

Peckman

River

Page 13: Non-Tidal Passaic River Basin Nitrate Improvement Study

13

Dead River HUC14(Scenario: Upgrade 6 WWTPs)

0

5

10

15

20

25

10/01/01 10/29/01 11/26/01 12/24/01 01/21/02 02/18/02 03/18/02 04/15/02 05/13/02 06/10/02 07/08/02 08/05/02 09/02/02 09/30/02

NO

3-N

(m

g/L

)

Dead River

Instream Target 2030103010100

Page 14: Non-Tidal Passaic River Basin Nitrate Improvement Study

14

Upper Passaic HUC14s(Scenario: Upgrade 6 WWTPs)

0

5

10

15

20

25

10/01/01 10/29/01 11/26/01 12/24/01 01/21/02 02/18/02 03/18/02 04/15/02 05/13/02 06/10/02 07/08/02 08/05/02 09/02/02 09/30/02

NO

3-N

(m

g/L

)

Upper Passaic

Instream Target 2030103010110 2030103010120 2030103010130

2030103010150 2030103010160 2030103010170 2030103010180

Page 15: Non-Tidal Passaic River Basin Nitrate Improvement Study

15

Whippany/Rockaway HUCs(Scenario: Upgrade 6 WWTPs)

0

5

10

15

20

25

10/01/01 10/29/01 11/26/01 12/24/01 01/21/02 02/18/02 03/18/02 04/15/02 05/13/02 06/10/02 07/08/02 08/05/02 09/02/02 09/30/02

NO

3-N

(m

g/L

)

Whippany & Rockaway

Instream Target 2030103020040 2030103020050 2030103030170 2030103020100

Page 16: Non-Tidal Passaic River Basin Nitrate Improvement Study

16

Middle Passaic HUC(Scenario: Upgrade 6 WWTPs)

0

5

10

15

20

25

10/01/01 10/29/01 11/26/01 12/24/01 01/21/02 02/18/02 03/18/02 04/15/02 05/13/02 06/10/02 07/08/02 08/05/02 09/02/02 09/30/02

NO

3-N

(m

g/L

)

Middle Passaic

Instream Target 2030103040010

Page 17: Non-Tidal Passaic River Basin Nitrate Improvement Study

17

Pompton/Wanaque HUCs(Scenario: Upgrade 6 WWTPs)

0

5

10

15

20

25

10/01/01 10/29/01 11/26/01 12/24/01 01/21/02 02/18/02 03/18/02 04/15/02 05/13/02 06/10/02 07/08/02 08/05/02 09/02/02 09/30/02

NO

3-N

(m

g/L

)

Pompton & Wanaque & Ramapo & Pequannock

Instream Target 2030103070070 2030103050080 2030103100070 2030103110020

Page 18: Non-Tidal Passaic River Basin Nitrate Improvement Study

18

Lower Passaic HUCs(Scenario: Upgrade 6 WWTPs)

0

5

10

15

20

25

10/01/01 10/29/01 11/26/01 12/24/01 01/21/02 02/18/02 03/18/02 04/15/02 05/13/02 06/10/02 07/08/02 08/05/02 09/02/02 09/30/02

NO

3-N

(m

g/L

)

Lower Passaic

Instream Target 2030103120030 2030103120070 2030103120080 2030103120100 2030103120110

Page 19: Non-Tidal Passaic River Basin Nitrate Improvement Study

19

Peckman River HUCs(Scenario: Upgrade 6 WWTPs)

0

5

10

15

20

25

10/01/01 10/29/01 11/26/01 12/24/01 01/21/02 02/18/02 03/18/02 04/15/02 05/13/02 06/10/02 07/08/02 08/05/02 09/02/02 09/30/02

NO

3-N

(m

g/L

)

Peckman River

Instream Target 2030103120010 2030103120020

Page 20: Non-Tidal Passaic River Basin Nitrate Improvement Study

20

HUCs Significantly over 10 mg/LPeckman River

HUC14 Evaluation

Page 21: Non-Tidal Passaic River Basin Nitrate Improvement Study

21

Summary of Results

Options to Meet 7.5 mg/L at Intakes

All WWTPs reduce to ~ 9 mg/L

8 WWTPs Upgrade

4 largest upstream WWTPs reduce to 4 mg/L and 4 largest downstream WWTPs

reduce to 6.5 mg/L

Bernards, Long Hill, Berkeley Heights, Chatham Main, Livingston, Hanover, Par-

Troy, TBSA

6 WWTPs Upgrade

4 largest upstream WWTPs reduce to 4 mg/L and 2 largest downstream WWTPs

reduce to 3 mg/L

Bernards, Long Hill, Berkeley Heights, Chatham Main, Livingston, Par-Troy,

TBSA

Evaluation of Nitrate at HUC Outlets

To achieve 10 mg/L everywhere, dischargers in Dead, Upper

Passaic, and Peckman Rivers need to upgrade to near 10 mg/l.

Page 22: Non-Tidal Passaic River Basin Nitrate Improvement Study

22

Discussion Points

Can nitrate exceed 10 mg/l at HUC14 boundaries?

PRBA trading program

Trading would be allowed among WWTPs

NJDEP would modify permits where necessary

Protection for WWTPs that trade

Next Steps