Non-Prompt Tracks with the SiD Baseline Detector
description
Transcript of Non-Prompt Tracks with the SiD Baseline Detector
![Page 1: Non-Prompt Tracks with the SiD Baseline Detector](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083006/56813e5a550346895da8540b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Non-Prompt Tracks with the SiD Baseline Detector
6th SilC Meeting Torino, Italk
December 17 2007
Bruce Schumm
Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics
![Page 2: Non-Prompt Tracks with the SiD Baseline Detector](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083006/56813e5a550346895da8540b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Many have contributed…
SLAC: Tim Nelson
Kansas State: Dima Onoprienko, Eckard von Toerne
Santa Cruz: Chris Betancourt, Chris Meyer, Tyler Rice, Lori Stevens, Bruce
Schumm, Eric Wallace
![Page 3: Non-Prompt Tracks with the SiD Baseline Detector](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083006/56813e5a550346895da8540b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
In all its glory:The SiD Tracker
![Page 4: Non-Prompt Tracks with the SiD Baseline Detector](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083006/56813e5a550346895da8540b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
“Inside-Out” Tracking requires 4 VXD layers
For e+e- qq, 5% of charged tracks originate outside of rorg = 2cm
“Cheat” these particles and their hits away (remove them from the banks). How well can we do on remaining “non-prompt” tracks?
![Page 5: Non-Prompt Tracks with the SiD Baseline Detector](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083006/56813e5a550346895da8540b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Initial Tool: Axial Barrel Track Finder (ABTF)
Originally written by Tim Nelson to find tracks when VXD is tired or sick.
Finds tracks in 5-layer central tracker by extending three-hit seeds inward.
Optimized for non-prompt tracks (relax IP constraint, add a few tricks) by UCSC students.
UCSC students also added capability to use modular z information
![Page 6: Non-Prompt Tracks with the SiD Baseline Detector](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083006/56813e5a550346895da8540b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Apply to qq events at Z Pole and at Ecm = 500 GeV (require at least 4 hits; all fakes are 4-hit)
pythiaZPolebbbar-0-1000_SLIC_ v1r9p3_sidaug05.slcio, no beam no brem
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
0 0.5 1 1.5
Log base 10 of segmentation length (in cm)
N u m
b e r
o f
T r a
c k s
Found 5
Found 4
Missed
Fake
1cm 5cm 10cm 30cm
Combining all three 500GeV data sets
0
100
200
300
400
500
0 0.5 1 1.5
Log base 10 of segmentation length (in cm)
N u m
b e r
o f
T r a
c k s
Found 5
Found 4
Missed
Fake
1cm 5cm 10cm 30cm
![Page 7: Non-Prompt Tracks with the SiD Baseline Detector](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083006/56813e5a550346895da8540b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Kansas State’s “Garfield” Algorithm
Extrapolates calorimeter “stubs” into tracker, attaching hits as appropriate
Adapted by UCSC students to run as third-pass tracker, after “cheating” and ABTF
Goal: improve efficiency and/or clean up 4-hit tracks and, if we can, reconstruct the 3-hit tracks.
![Page 8: Non-Prompt Tracks with the SiD Baseline Detector](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083006/56813e5a550346895da8540b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Start with Z-Pole Events
Axial Barrel4 Hit Tracks
0102030405060708090
30cm 10cm 5cm 1cm
Z Segmentation
Nu
mb
er o
f T
rack
s
# MCP's
AB Found
AB Fake
Missing
ABTF 4-hit tracks already fairly pure; can Garfield help with leftovers?
![Page 9: Non-Prompt Tracks with the SiD Baseline Detector](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083006/56813e5a550346895da8540b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Garfield gets a few more. But what about 3-hit tracks?
Garfield4 Hit Tracks
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
30cm 10cm 5cm 1cm
Z Segmentation
Nu
mb
er
of
Tra
ck
s
# MCP's
GAR Found
GAR Fake
Missing
![Page 10: Non-Prompt Tracks with the SiD Baseline Detector](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083006/56813e5a550346895da8540b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Not so exciting.Can we reliably reconstruct tracks that originate outside the second tracking layer?
3 Hit Tracks
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
30cm 10cm 5cm 1cm
Z Segmentation
Nu
mb
er o
f T
rack
s
# MCP's
GAR Found
GAR Fake
Missing
![Page 11: Non-Prompt Tracks with the SiD Baseline Detector](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083006/56813e5a550346895da8540b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Seeds-to-Stubs ProgramInstead, UCSC students proposed matching precise three-hit tracker seeds to Garfield stubs
Helix – Stub Matching (optimized for Z qq)• Base Difference < 2 mm• Phi Difference < 100 milliradians• Curvature Ratio ( (seed - stub)/ seed ) < 10
e.g.: Position-matching for isolated muons
(mm)
![Page 12: Non-Prompt Tracks with the SiD Baseline Detector](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083006/56813e5a550346895da8540b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Seed-to-Stubs Performance; Z qq
Of a total of 20 3-hit particles:
• 12 were reconstructed as 3-hit tracks, with only 4 fakes
• Two additional 4-hit particles were found
BUT: Performance vastly worse for e+e- qq at Ecm = 500 GeV. Could optimize for this type of event, but do we want to?
Algorithm tuning dependent on signature under exploration
![Page 13: Non-Prompt Tracks with the SiD Baseline Detector](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083006/56813e5a550346895da8540b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Next Steps: GSMB?
With Jonathan’s help, will generate meta-stable e+e- stau+ stau- with stau+ +
+ gravitino
Signature will be stiff charged track with kink (1-prong tau) or star (3-prong tau) in midst of tracker
Challenge will be to reconstruct kink again SM background of e+e- +
-
We’ve just started on this.
![Page 14: Non-Prompt Tracks with the SiD Baseline Detector](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083006/56813e5a550346895da8540b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
3-Hit Tracks & Non-Prompt Signatures
Probably need 5+1 layers for prompt track
If we require 4 hits for non-prompt tracks, sensitive region for kinked tracks is very limited.
![Page 15: Non-Prompt Tracks with the SiD Baseline Detector](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022083006/56813e5a550346895da8540b/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
ConclusionsIn the abstract, four-hit tracks (Rorg < 46 cm, compared to Rmax = 125 cm) seem possible with tracker + cal assist
Three-hit tracks (Rorg < 72 cm) very scenario-dependent, so trying to look at meaningful signature (GSMB)… what else?
Use these signatures to pin down value of z segmentation
What about detector concepts other than SiD?
Note: Much of this work done with junior and senior UG physics majors.