Non-Destructive tests on normal and high strength concrete MN- NDT o… · slabs and several 150 mm...
Transcript of Non-Destructive tests on normal and high strength concrete MN- NDT o… · slabs and several 150 mm...
Non-Destructive tests on normal and high strength concrete
S M R Lopes*, University of Coimbra, Portugal
M c S Neponmuceno, University of Beira Interior, Portugal
26th Conference on OUR WORLD IN CONCRETE & STRUCTURES: 27 - 28 August 2001, Singapore
Article Online Id: 100026005
The online version of this article can be found at:
http://cipremier.com/100026005
This article is brought to you with the support of
Singapore Concrete Institute
www.scinst.org.sg
All Rights reserved for CI‐Premier PTE LTD
You are not Allowed to re‐distribute or re‐sale the article in any format without written approval of
CI‐Premier PTE LTD
Visit Our Website for more information
www.cipremier.com
53
26th Conference on Our World in Concrete & Structures: 27 - 28 August 2001, Singapore
Non-Destructive tests on normal and high strength concrete
S M R Lopes*, University of Coimbra, Portugal Me S Neponmuceno, University of Beira Interior, Portugal
Abstract
One of the most important concrete properties for structural concrete design or re-design is the compressive
strength. Furthermore, other important concrete properties can be derived from the compressive strength. This
property is typically obtained by standardised crushing tests on cast cubes or cylinders.
However, cast cubes or cylinders may not be available for testing and, therefore, alternative tests need to be
considered. The most reliable alternative test is the core test, which needs specimens extracted from the
structure. Obviously, this is a very destructive test and other less destructive tests have been developed and
deserve some attention.
Some of non-destructive or partially destructive tests were carried out by the authors on normal and high strength
concrete and compared with cube/cylinder common tests and also with core tests. This paper presents results
from this study. Test procedures and reliability of non-destructive tests are analysed and discussed. Conclusions
are presented.
Keywords: High Strength Concrete, Concrete Standards, Surfuce Hardness Tests, Ultrasonic Tests
1. Introduction
Many of the concrete properties can be predicted from its compressive strength. Moreover, this property is often
the only one checked for a large amount of new common concrete structures. Compliance with specification is
typically achieved by means of testing a set of concrete cubes or cylinders 28 years old in accordance with
standards for sampling, curing and testing [8, 9, 10, 11, 18].
The compressive tests are of outmost importance for the quality control of the concrete produced in site.
However, the values from the tests can only be accepted as indicating the "potential strength" of the concrete and
may differ from the actual strength of the concrete structure. The differences at 28 days are noticeable if the
environmental conditions of the structures are very different to those imposed to the cubes by following the
standards procedures. This has been studied and confirmed by several investigators, such as Prince and Hynes
[19]. The knowledge, as close as possible, of the in situ concrete strength is, in some situations, necessary in
order to estimate, for instance: the time when precast concrete members can be moved and transported, the time
of prestress, removal of moulds or propping, etc. The in situ strength of concrete may be evaluated by different
test apparatus presenting differences, including: accuracy, destruction to the concrete structure, speed,
immediacy of results and costs.
26th Conference on Our World in Concrete & Structures: 27 - 28 August 2001, Singapore
Non-Destructive tests on normal and high strength concrete
S M R Lopes*, University of Coimbra, Portugal M C S Neponmuceno, University of Beira Interior, Portugal
Abstract
One of the most important concrete properties for structural concrete design or re-design is the compressive
strength. Furthermore, other important concrete properties can be derived from the compressive strength. This
property is typically obtained by standardised crushing tests on cast cubes or cylinders.
However, cast cubes or cylinders may not be available for testing and, therefore, alternative tests need to be
considered. The most reliable alternative test is the core test, which needs specimens extracted from the
structure. Obviously, this is a very destructive test and other less destructive tests have been developed and
deserve some attention.
Some of non-destructive or partially destructive tests were carried out by the authors on normal and high strength
concrete and compared with cube/cylinder common tests and also with core tests. This paper presents results
from this study. Test procedures and reliability of non-destructive tests are analysed and discussed. Conclusions
are presented.
Keywords: High Strength Concrete, Concrete Standards, Surface Hardness Tests, Ultrasonic Tests
1. Introduction
Many of the concrete properties can be predicted from its compressive strength. Moreover, this property is often
the only one checked for a large amount of new common concrete structures. Compliance with specification is
typically achieved by means of testing a set of concrete cubes or cylinders 28 years old in accordance with
standards for sampling, curing and testing [8, 9, 10, 11, 18].
The compressive tests are of outmost importance for the quality control of the concrete produced in site.
However, the values from the tests can only be accepted as indicating the "potential strength" of the concrete and
may differ from the actual strength of the concrete structure. The differences at 28 days are noticeable if the
environmental conditions of the structures are very different to those imposed to the cubes by following the
standards procedures. This has been studied and confirmed by several investigators, such as Prince and Hynes
[19]. The knowledge, as close as possible, of the in situ concrete strength is, in some situations, necessary in
order to estimate, for instance: the time when precast concrete members can be moved and transported, the time
of prestress, removal of moulds or propping, etc. The in situ strength of concrete may be evaluated by different
test apparatus presenting differences, including: accuracy, destruction to the concrete structure, speed,
immediacy of results and costs.
54
The most destructive in situ concrete test, the compression testing of cores, is also the most reliable for the
evaluation of the compressive strength of concrete. Being the most reliable method of assessing in situ strength,
this method is limited in application by consideration of cost, damage and delays caused by laboratory sample
preparation and testing. Sealed cylinders under temperature matched curing that reproduces the environmental
conditions in the structure gives also results with similar reliability. The compressive strength can also be
estimated by in situ non-destructive or partially destructive tests. However, these tests do not give direct readings
of this property, and empirical correlations need to be used to estimate the concrete strength. The correlations
add some uncertainties to the estimation of the concrete strength and this is a disadvantage when compared to
core testing. However, this disadvantage can be overcome if proper correlations are used.
Non-destructive tests have some advantages, including: fast procedures, immediacy of results, lower costs, and
low levels of damage to the structure. Interest on these tests has been growing since the sixties and this led to
developments on test equipments and techniques. Test apparatus can be simple, economical and user friedly or
complicate, expensive and highly specialised. They were first developed for application on normal strength
concrete and recently, some of them were adapted for high strength concrete.
Some of the tests are not truly non-destructive and are designated by partially destructive. A general introduction
on all non-destructive and partially destructive tests is presented in this paper and two of them, those truly non
destructive, are detailed explained. An experimental programme envolving these two kind of tests, Surface
Hardness Tests and the Ultra Sonic Tests, is also presented. Ten sets of specimens corresponding to ten different
concrete mixes were cast for this investigation. Concrete average strength varied from 17 MPa to 82 MPa. Each
set consisted of a 550x500x170 mm normal strength concrete slab or a 750x500x170 mm high strength concrete
slabs and several 150 mm cubes.
2. Remarks on NDT
Non-destructive tests are specially directed to hardened concrete [4] and they are a part of a bigger set of tests
used in concrete technology. Three main test classes are generally identified, as suggested by Bungey and
Millard [7] or as presented in European Standard ENV206 [9]:
1. Control tests, normally carried out by contractor or concrete producer in order to adjust mixes to ensure the
quality of the produced concrete.
2. Conformity tests carried out by the inspection body to check the compliance with specifications III
accordance with a pre-defined plan of sampling and testing.
3. Secondary or extraordinary tests carried out on the hardened concrete of the structure or on specimens
extracted from the structure. This class of tests may be required if the conformity tests are not conclusive or
if they are not available for instance, when the concrete strength of an old structure needs to be known. The
long term monitoring tests of the concrete structure also fall in this category.
As far as extraordinary tests are concerned, the European standard ENV206 states (see Cause C.2.2.2):
"An extraordinary inspection is necessary:
if severe discrepancies are dectected during a routine inspection (re-inspection);
when there has been no production for a period of more than six months;
on request of the producer e.g. because of changes in the production conditions;
if requested by the certification body, given due justification"
Secondary tests can be divided into two main groups [7]:
a. Non-Destructive Tests, NDT
The most destructive in situ concrete test, the compression testing of cores, is also the most reliable for the
evaluation of the compressive strength of concrete. Being the most reliable method of assessing in situ strength,
this method is limited in application by consideration of cost, damage and delays caused by laboratory sample
preparation and testing. Sealed cylinders under temperature matched curing that reproduces the environmental
conditions in the structure gives also results with similar reliability. The compressive strength can also be
estimated by in situ non-destructive or partially destructive tests. However, these tests do not give direct readings
of this property, and empirical correlations need to be used to estimate the concrete strength. The correlations
add some uncertainties to the estimation of the concrete strength and this is a disadvantage when compared to
core testing. However, this disadvantage can be overcome ifproper correlations are used.
Non-destructive tests have some advantages, including: fast procedures, immediacy of results, lower costs, and
low levels of damage to the structure. Interest on these tests has been growing since the sixties and this led to
developments on test equipments and techniques. Test apparatus can be simple, economical and user friedly or
complicate, expensive and highly specialised. They were first developed for application on normal strength
concrete and recently, some of them were adapted for high strength concrete.
Some of the tests are not truly non-destructive and are designated by partially destructive. A general introduction
on all non-destructive and partially destructive tests is presented in this paper and two of them, those truly non
destructive, are detailed explained. An experimental programme envolving these two kind of tests, Surface
Hardness Tests and the Ultra Sonic Tests, is also presented. Ten sets of specimens corresponding to ten different
concrete mixes were cast for this investigation. Concrete average strength varied from 17 MPa to 82 MPa. Each
set consisted of a 550x500x170 mm normal strength concrete slab or a 750x500x170 mm high strength concrete
slabs and several 150 mm cubes.
2. Remarks on NDT
Non-destructive tests are specially directed to hardened concrete [4] and they are a part of a bigger set of tests
used in concrete technology. Three main test classes are generally identified, as suggested by Bungey and
Millard [7] or as presented in European Standard ENV206 [9]:
1. Control tests, normally carried out by contractor or concrete producer in order to adjust mixes to ensure the
quality of the produced concrete.
2. Conformity tests carried out by the inspection body to check the compliance with specifications m
accordance with a pre-defined plan of sampling and testing.
3. Secondary or extraordinary tests carried out on the hardened concrete of the structure or on specimens
extracted from the structure. This class of tests may be required if the conformity tests are not conclusive or
if they are not available for instance, when the concrete strength of an old structure needs to be known. The
long term monitoring tests of the concrete structure also fall in this category.
As far as extraordinary tests are concerned, the European standard ENV206 states (see Cause C.2.2.2):
"An extraordinary inspection is necessary:
if severe discrepancies are dectected during a routine inspection (re-inspection);
when there has been no production for a period of more than six months;
on request of the producer e.g. because of changes in the production conditions;
if requested by the certification body, given due justification"
Secondary tests can be divided into two main groups [7]:
a. Non-Destructive Tests, NDT
55
The non-destructive tests are normally defined as not prejudicial to the performance of the tested
member of the structure. This also includes the methods that cause some surface damages to chosen
locations of the structure. These tests were designated ''Near to Surface Tests" by British Standards
[6]. All NDT can be carried out on site with no need to extract specimens. However, the removal of
finishing materials is probably necessary.
b. Tests on Specimens Extracted from the Structure
Specimens extracted from the structure are normally cores, which may be taken to the laboratory for
crushing tests or for visual inspection or other physical, chemical or petrographic tests. For chemical
tests, the size of the specimens is very small when compared to that required for crushing tests.
Non-destructive tests can be applied to new or old structures. For new structures, the main applications are the
quality control or as additional tests to confirm the quality of materials or work. For old structures, they are
normally related with the assessment the integrity and the evaluation of structural safety for future use [4]. Table
1 (next two pages) presents a list of the most common non-destructive tests.
According to British Standard, BS 1881: Part 201 [4], some of non-destructive tests cause some surface damages
and may be designated by partially destructive tests.
Other important fact is the growing use of high-strength concrete. Some of the tests were developed for normal
strength concrete and some investigation on the applicability of the tests to HSC is still being studied.
Furthermore, the definition of "High Strength Concrete" is not concensual and can even vary geographically [1,
19]. Also a few decades before, a concrete with a compressive strength of around 35-40 MPa was already
considered as "High Strength Concrete". For the current investigation, the authors considered compressive
strengths over 60 MPa as High Strength.
During the last years, a large amount of investigation has been carried out on High Strength Concrete and the
applicability ofNDT to HSC is also being a topic under investigation. An investigation programme was carried
out in both the Universities of Coimbra and Coviihll in order to study the aplicability of NDT to high strength
concrete [13, 14, 15, 17]. Two of the studied tests, the Surface Hardness Tests and the Ultra Sonic Tests, are
reported in this paper.
3. Surface Hardness Tests
3.1 Introduction
The surface hardness is a property that may be measured on the concrete surface and, typically, its value
increases with time and with concrete strength. This observation led to the development of testing equipment and
procedures to read this property and to the development of correlation curves in order to estimate the
compressive strength of the concrete. However it was not possible to find a general relationship between surface
hardness and compressive strength of concrete [5, 7, 16]. Despite of that, it is possible to find good correlations,
if the calibrations are developed for a set of specific circumstances for a particular situation [16]. This is an
interesting method not only for assessing the concrete strength but also for other applications, as explained later.
The test methods developed to measure the surface hardness may fall into two categories, early methods based
on the measurement of the size of identation caused by a steel ball, and later methods based on the measurement
of the height of rebound of a mass from the surface.
The most common apparatus used to measure this property is the so called Schmidt type N hammer with an
impact energy of2.2 Nm, because this is the most adequate for normal strength concrete (compressive strengths
of20MPa to 60 MPa).
The non-destructive tests are normally defined as not prejudicial to the performance of the tested
member of the structure. This also includes the methods that cause some surface damages to chosen
locations of the structure. These tests were designated "Near to Surface Tests" by British Standards
[6]. All NDT can be carried out on site with no need to extract specimens. However, the removal of
finishing materials is probably necessary.
b. Tests on Specimens Extracted from the Structure
Specimens extracted from the structure are normally cores, which may be taken to the laboratory for
crushing tests or for visual inspection or other physical, chemical or petrographic tests. For chemical
tests, the size ofthe specimens is very small when compared to that required for crushing tests.
Non-destructive tests can be applied to new or old structures. For new structures, the main applications are the
quality control or as additional tests to confirm the quality of materials or work. For old structures, they are
normally related with the assessment the integrity and the evaluation of structural safety for future use [4]. Table
1 (next two pages) presents a list of the most common non-destructive tests.
According to British Standard, BS 1881: Part 201 [4], some of non-destructive tests cause some surface damages
and may be designated by partially destructive tests.
Other important fact is the growing use of high-strength concrete. Some of the tests were developed for normal
strength concrete and some investigation on the applicability of the tests to HSC is still being studied.
Furthermore, the defmition of "High Strength Concrete" is not concensual and can even vary geographically [1,
19]. Also a few decades before, a concrete with a compressive strength of around 35-40 MPa was already
considered as "High Strength Concrete". For the current investigation, the authors considered compressive
strengths over 60 MPa as High Strength.
During the last years, a large amount of investigation has been carried out on High Strength Concrete and the
applicability ofNDT to HSC is also being a topic under investigation. An investigation programme was carried
out in both the Universities of Coimbra and Covilha in order to study the aplicability of NDT to high strength
concrete [13, 14, 15, 17]. Two of the studied tests, the Surface Hardness Tests and the Ultra Sonic Tests, are
reported in this paper.
3. Surface Hardness Tests
3.1 Introduction
The surface hardness is a property that may be measured on the concrete surface and, typically, its value
increases with time and with concrete strength. This observation led to the development of testing equipment and
procedures to read this property and to the development of correlation curves in order to estimate the
compressive strength of the concrete. However it was not possible to find a general relationship between surface
hardness and compressive strength of concrete [5, 7, 16]. Despite of that, it is possible to find good correlations,
if the calibrations are developed for a set of specific circumstances for a particular situation [16]. This is an
interesting method not only for assessing the concrete strength but also for other applications, as explained later.
The test methods developed to measure the surface hardness may fall into two categories, early methods based
on the measurement of the size of identation caused by a steel ball, and later methods based on the measurement
of the height of rebound of a mass from the surface.
The most common apparatus used to measure this property is the so called Schmidt type N hammer with an
impact energy of 2.2 Nm, because this is the most adequate for normal strength concrete (compressive strengths
of20MPa to 60 MPa).
56
Table 1- Quick description ofNDT [4]
General applications Quality Investigation Mould and Comparison of Evaluation of Investigation of
Main property Main application control on the quality proping the concrete the potential damage Surface damage Type of Method directly of work removal, quality of the durability imposed by equipment
measured by prestress or structure fire, ice, test load application chemical atack
or similar cases Related with Estimation of in
Pull-out test; Lok-test type strength situ concrete X X Moderate / Mechanical strength small
Related with Estimation of in Pull-out test; Capo-test type strength situ concrete X X X X Moderate / Mechanical
strength small Related with Estimation of in
Internal fracture test strength situ concrete X X X X Moderate / Mechanical strength small
Resistance to Estimation of in Break-off test bending situ concrete X X Substancial/ Mechanical
strength moderate Direct tension Estimation of in
Pull-off test strength situ concrete X X X Moderate / Mechanical strength small
Related with Estimation of in Penetration resistance test strength situ concrete X X X Moderate / Mechanical
strength small Surface Comparative
Surfuce hardness hardness survey X X X X Very small Mechanical I
I
Screed test Surface depth Quality control small Mechanical of mortars X X X I
Dynamic response Dynamic Integridade de none Mechanical / response estacas e pilares X X X electronical
Ultrasonic pulse velocity Modulus of Comparative none electronical elasticity survey X X X X X X Internal Monitoriza91io
Acoustic emission cracking dos ensaios de X X none electronical carga
Layout of steel Cover depth bars inside Location of steel X X X none Electromagnetic
concrete bars
Table 1- Quick description ofNDT [4]
General applications Quality Investigation Mould and Comparison of Evaluation of Investigation of
Main property Main application control on the quality proping the concrete the potential damage Surface damage Type of Method directly ofwork removal, quality of the durability imposed by equipment
measured by prestress or structure fire, ice, test load application chemical atack
or similar cases Related with Estimation of in
Pull-out test; Lok-test type strength situ concrete X X Moderate / Mechanical strength small
Related with Estimation of in Pull-out test; Capo-test type strength situ concrete X X X X Moderate / Mechanical
strength small Related with Estimation of in
Internal fracture test strength situ concrete X X X X Moderate / Mechanical strength small
Resistance to Estimation of in Break -offtest bending situ concrete X X Substancial/ Mechanical
strength moderate Direct tension Estimation of in
Pull-off test strength situ concrete X X X Moderate / Mechanical strength small
Related with Estimation of in Penetration resistance test strength situ concrete X X X Moderate / Mechanical
strength small Surface Comparative
Surfuce hardness hardness survey X X X X Very small Mechanical
Screed test Surface depth Quality control small Mechanical of mortars X X X
Dynamic response Dynamic Integridade de none Mechanical / response estacas e pilares X X X electronical
Ultrasonic pulse velocity Modulus of Comparative none electronical elasticity survey X X X X X X Internal Monitoriza91io
Acoustic emission cracking dos ensaios de X X none electronical carga
Layout of steel Cover depth bars inside Location of steel X X X none Electromagnetic
concrete bars
57
Table 1- Quick description ofNDT [4] (continued)
General applications Quality Investigation Mould and Comparison of Evaluation of Investigation of
Main property Main application control on the quality proping the concrete the potential damage Surface Type of Method directly of work removal, quality of the durability imposed by damages equipment
measured by prestress or structure fire, ice, test load application chemical atack
or similar cases
Radar Internal Location of X X none Electronic interfaces voids or bars
Radiography Relative Location of X X none Radioactive density voids or bars
Radiometria Densidade Controle de X X X none Radioactive qualidade
Neutron absorsion Moisture Comparation of none Nuclear content moisture content X X
Carbonation depth Concrete Durability Moderate! Chemical alcalinity survey X X X none
Surface initial absortion Surface Suface small absortion permeability X X Hydraulic
Suface permeability Suface Suface small permeability permeability X Hydraulic
Medi9ao da resistividade Resistividade Examede small Electrical durabilidade X X
Potencial of bar Risc of Half-cell potential electrod corrosion in bars X Very small Electrical Strain or craking measurements Strains, crack Monitoring 6ptical,
width structural X X X X X small mechanic or movements electronic
Temperature Structural Termography radiation integrity and X X none Optical, infrared
maping location of voids Maturity measurements Maturity Monitoring in chemical!
situ strenght X small electrical Dynamical
Ressonance frequency Modulus of Quality control X none Electronic Elasticity
Table 1- Quick description ofNDT [4] (continued)
General applications Quality Investigation Mould and Comparison of Evaluation of Investigation of
Main property Main application control on the quality pro ping the concrete the potential damage Surface Type of Method directly of work removal, quality of the durability imposed by damages equipment
measured by prestress or structure fire, ice, test load application chemical atack
or similar cases
Radar Internal Location of X X none Electronic interfaces voids or bars
Radiography Relative Location of X X none Radioactive density voids or bars
Radiometria Densidade Controle de X X X none Radioactive qualidade
Neutron absorsion Moisture Comparation of none Nuclear content moisture content X X
Carbonation depth Concrete Durability Moderate / Chemical alcalinity survey X X X none
Surface initial absortion Surface Suface small absortion permeability X X Hydraulic
Sufuce permeability Suface Suface small permeability permeability X Hydraulic
Medi9iio da resistividade Resistividade Exame de small Electrical durabilidade X X
Potencial of bar Risc of Half-cell potential electrod corrosion in bars X Very small Electrical Strain or craking measurements Strains, crack Monitoring Optical,
width stmctural X X X X X small mechanic or movements electronic
Temperature Stmctural Termography radiation integrity and X X none Optical, infrared
maping location of voids Maturity measurements Maturity Monitoring in chemical/
situ strenght X small electrical Dynamical
Ressonance frequency Modulus of Quality control X none Electronic Elasticity
58
3.2 Tests Results
Table 2 shows the results of surface hardness obtained on normal strength concrete by means of a Schmidt Type
N hammer apparatus, with tests being made by holding the apparatus vertically or horizontally against the
concrete surface.
Table 3 shows similar results to those of Table 2 but for high strength concrete.
Table 2 - Surface hardness tests on normal strength concrete
Surface hardness test (Rebound Number - R) Compressive strength of 150 mm cubes Apparatus hold vertically Apparatus hold horiwntally
Series (fem) (facing down) No. Average Standard Coefficient Average Standard Coeff. of Average Standard Coeff. of
value deviation of variation value deviation variation value deviation variation [MPaJ [MPa] [%] [%] [%]
N27 23.80 2.62 11.00 29.53 1.02 3,5 29.98 l.25 4.17 (3) (12) (13)
N29 37.43 0.87 2.33 32.10 0.84 2.62 32.06 1.31 4.09 (4) (12) (14)
N30 42.33 1.74 4.11 35.,37 1.54 4.35 3l.86 l.60 5.01 (4) (12) (14)
N31 53.18 1.94 3.65 41.57 1.49 3.59 38.84 1.93 4.96 (4) (12) (14)
N33 17.70 0.47 2.66 23.10 0.91 3.92 25.33 0.70 2.78 (4) (10) (12)
.. Note: the number m parenthesIs mdlcates the amount of readmg locatIOns and for each locatIOn an average of 5 indIVIdual readings was considered.
Table 3 - Surface hardness tests on high strength concrete
Surface hardness test (Rebound Number - R) Compressi ve strength of 150 mm cubes Apparatus hold vertically Apparatus hold horiwntally
Series (fern) (facing down) No. Average
I
Standard Coefficient Average Standard Coeff. of Average Standard Coeff. of value deviation of variation value deviation variation value deviation variation [MPa] [MPa] [%] [%] [%]
N34 8l.94 1.12 1.37 50.82 0.84 l.64 53.52 1.16 2.18 (3) (10) (12)
N35 78.35 2.17 2.77 50.80 0.66 1.29 52.92 1.05 1.98 (3) (9) (12)
N36 49.12 1.02 2.08 42.28 0.78 l.84 40.47 1.19 2.94 (3) (10) (12)
N37 58.27 0.82 1.41 44.42 1.20 2.71 46.10 0.71 1.54 (3) (9) (12)
N38 67.77 1.56 2.30 48.60 1.01 2.09 49.00 0.93 1.91 (3) (9) (12)
Note: the number in parenthesis indicates the amount of reading locations and for each location an average of 5 individual
readings was considered.
3.2 Tests Results
Table 2 shows the results of surface hardness obtained on nonnal strength concrete by means of a Schmidt Type
N hammer apparatus, with tests being made by holding the apparatus vertically or horizontally against the
concrete surface.
Table 3 shows similar results to those of Table 2 but for high strength concrete.
Table 2 - Surface hardness tests on nonnal strength concrete
Surface hardness test (Rebound Number - R) Compressive strength of 150 mm cubes Apparatus hold vertically Apparatus hold horizontally
Series (fern) (facing down) No. Average Standard Coefficient Average Standard Coeff. of Average Standard Coeff. of
value deviation of variation value deviation variation value deviation variation [MPa] [MPa] [%] f%] [%]
N27 23.80 2.62 11.00 29.53 1.02 3,5 29.98 1.25 4.17 (3) (12) (13)
N29 37.43 0.87 2.33 32.10 0.84 2.62 32.06 1.31 4.09 (4) (12) (14)
N30 42.33 1.74 4.11 35.,37 1.54 4.35 31.86 1.60 5.01 (4) (12) (14)
N31 53.18 1.94 3.65 41.57 1.49 3.59 38.84 1.93 4.96 (4) (12) (14)
N33 17.70 0.47 2.66 23.10 0.91 3.92 25.33 0.70 2.78 (4) (10) (12)
.. Note: the number m parenthesIs mdlcates the amount of readmg locatIOns and for each locatIOn an average of 5 mdlvldual readings was considered.
Table 3 - Surface hardness tests on high strength concrete
Surface hardness test (Rebound Number - R) Compressive strength of 150 mm cubes Apparatus hold vertically Apparatus hold horizontally
Series (fern) (facing down) No. Average Standard Coefficient Average Standard Coeff. of Average Standard Coeff. of
value deviation of variation value deviation variation value deviation variation [MPa] [MPa] [%] [%] [%]
N34 81.94 1.12 1.37 50.82 0.84 1.64 53.52 1.16 2.18 (3) (10) (12)
N35 78.35 2.17 2.77 50.80 0.66 1.29 52.92 l.05 1.98 (3) (9) (12)
N36 49.12 1.02 2.08 42.28 0.78 1.84 40.47 1.19 2.94 (3) (10) (12)
N37 58.27 0.82 1.41 44.42 1.20 2.71 46.10 0.71 1.54 (3) (9) (12)
N38 67.77 1.56 2.30 48.60 1.01 2.09 49.00 0.93 1.91 (3) (9) (12)
Note: the number in parenthesis indicates the amount of reading locations and for each location an average of 5 individual
readings was considered.
59
4. Ultrasonic Tests
4.1 Introduction
The Ultrasonic test method is a truly non-destructive test and the first reports of the application of this method to
concrete appeared in the mid forties. The method is based on the measurement of the velocity of mechanically
generated pulses through concrete.
The test equipment must provide a means of generating pulses, transmitting these to the concrete, receiving and
amplifYing the pulses and measuring and displaying the time taken. Normally, the fmal results are the velocity of
propagation of ultrasonic pulses, in km/s.
In general, ultrasonic tests may be applied to:
1. Measurement of concrete uniformity;
2. Detection of cracking and honeycombing;
3. Measurement of changes of concrete properties with time;
4. Strength estimation
5. Measurement of elastic and dynamic modulus
4.2 Test Results
Tables 4 and 5 show the results of ultrasonic tests for normal strength concrete. Table 4 is for pulses traveling
parallel to the casting direction while Table 5 is for pulses traveling perpendicular to the casting direction.
Tables 6 and 7 show the results of ultrasonic tests for high strength concrete. Table 6 is for pulses traveling
parallel to the casting direction while Table 7 is for pulses traveling perpendicular to the casting direction.
Table 4 - Ultrasonic tests on normal strength concrete (parallel to casting)
Compressive strength of ISO mm cubes (fem) Ultrasonic pulse velocity (V) Series Parallel to casting direction No. Average value Standard Coefficient of Avemge value Standard Coefficient of
[MPa] deviation variation [km/s] deviation variation [MPal [%] ~s] [%]
N27 23.80 2.62 11.00 4.371 0.081 1.86 (3) (6)
N29 37.43 0.87 2.33 4.306 0.080 1.86 (4) (11)
N30 42.33 1.74 4.11 4.419 0.084 1.90 (4) (13)
N31 53.18 1.94 3.65 4.478 0.097 2.16 (4) (12)
N33 17.70 0.47 2.66 4.076 0.072 1.78 (4) (10)
Note: the number in parenthesis indicates the number of readings
4. Ultrasonic Tests
4.1 Introdnction
The Ultrasonic test method is a truly non-destructive test and the first reports of the application of this method to
concrete appeared in the mid forties. The method is based on the measurement of the velocity of mechanically
generated pulses through concrete.
The test equipment must provide a means of generating pulses, transmitting these to the concrete, receiving and
amplifying the pulses and measuring and displaying the time taken. Normally, the [mal results are the velocity of
propagation of ultrasonic pulses, in km/s.
In general, ultrasonic tests may be applied to:
1. Measurement of concrete uniformity;
2. Detection of cracking and honeycombing;
3. Measurement of changes of concrete properties with time;
4. Strength estimation
5. Measurement of elastic and dynamic modulus
4.2 Test Results
Tables 4 and 5 show the results of ultrasonic tests for normal strength concrete. Table 4 is for pulses traveling
parallel to the casting direction while Table 5 is for pulses traveling perpendicular to the casting direction.
Tables 6 and 7 show the results of ultrasonic tests for high strength concrete. Table 6 is for pulses traveling
parallel to the casting direction while Table 7 is for pulses traveling perpendicular to the casting direction.
Table 4 - Ultrasonic tests on normal strength concrete (parallel to casting)
Compressive strength of 150 mm cubes (fem) Ultrasonic pulse velocity (V) Series Parallel to casting direction No. Average value Standard Coefficient of Average value Standard Coefficient of
[MPa] deviation variation [km/s] deviation variation [MPa] [%] [km/s] [%]
N27 23.80 2.62 11.00 4.371 0.081 1.86 (3) (6)
N29 37.43 0.87 2.33 4.306 0.080 l.86 (4) (11)
N30 42.33 1.74 4.11 4.419 0.084 1.90 (4) (13)
N31 53.18 1.94 3.65 4.478 0.097 2.16 (4) (12)
N33 17.70 0.47 2.66 4.076 0.072 1.78 (4) (10)
Note: the number in parenthesis indicates the number of readings
60
Table 5 - llitrasonic tests on normal strength concrete (perpendicular to casting)
Compressive strength of 150 mm cubes (f,oJ Ultrasonic pulse velocity (V) Series Perpendicular to casting direction No. Average value Standard Coefficient of Average value Standard Coefficient of
[MPa] deviation variation [lan/s] deviation variation [MPa] [%] [km/s] [%]
N27 23.80 2.62 11.00 4.195 0.018 0.43 (3) (7)
N29 37.43 0.87 2.33 4.403 0.026 0.59 (4) (7)
N30 42.33 1.74 4.11 4.367 0.036 0.82 (4) (7)
N31 53.18 1.94 3.65 4.476 0.012 0.28 (4) (7)
N33 17.70 0.47 2.66 4.064 0.028 0.70 (4) (4)
Note: the number ill parenthesIs mdicates the number of readings
Table 6 - Ultrasonic tests on high strength concrete (parallel to casting)
Compressive strength of 150 mm cubes (t...) Ultrasonic pulse velocity (V) Series Parallel to casting direction No. Average value Standard Coefficient of Average value Standard Coefficient of
[MPa] deviation variation [km/s] deviation variation [MPa] [%] [km/s] [%]
N34 81.94 1.12 1.37 4.425 0.020 0.45 (3) (6)
N35 78.35 2.17 2.77 4.574 0.067 1.46 (3) (9)
N36 49.12 1.02 2.08 4.460 0.067 1.49 (3) (9)
N37 58.27 0.82 1.41 4.559 0.043 0.95 (3) (9)
N38 67.77 1.56 2.30 4.521 0.057 1.27 (3) (9)
Note: the number m parenthesIs mdicates the number of readings
Table 7 - llitrasonic tests on high strength concrete (perpendicular to casting)
Compressive strength of 150 mm cubes (fem) Ultrasonic pulse velocity (V) Series Perpendicular to casting direction No. Average value Standard Coefficient of Average value Standard Coefficient of
[MPa] deviation variation [km/s] deviation variation [MPa] [%] [km/s] [%]
N34 81.94 1.12 1.37 4.565 0.010 0.22 (3) (3)
N35 78.35 2.17 2.77 4.615 0.006 0.13 (3) (3)
N36 49.12 1.02 2.08 4.445 0.039 0.87 (3) (3)
N37 58.27 0.82 1.41 4.524 0.086 1.91 (3) (3)
N38 67.77 1.56 2.30 4.548 0.021 0.46 (3) (3)
Note: the number ill parenthesIs mdicates the number of readings
Table 5 - Ultrasonic tests on normal strength concrete (perpendicular to casting)
Series No.
N27
N29
N30
N31
N33
Compressive strength of 150 mm cubes (fern)
Average value [MPa]
23.80 (3)
37.43 (4)
42.33 (4)
53.18 (4)
17.70 (4)
Standard Coefficient of deviation variation
[MPa] [%]
2.62 11.00
0.87 2.33
1.74 4.11
1.94 3.65
0.47 2.66
Note: the number in parenthesis indicates the number of readings
Ultrasonic pulse velocity (V) Perpendicular to casting direction
Average value [km/s]
4.195 (7)
4.403 (7)
4.367 (7)
4.476 (7)
4.064 (4)
Standard Coefficient of deviation variation
[kmls] [%] 0.018 0.43
0.026 0.59
0.036 0.82
0.012 0.28
0.028 0.70
Table 6 - Ultrasonic tests on high strength concrete (parallel to casting)
Compressive strength of 150 mm cubes (fem) Ultrasonic pulse velocity (V) Series Parallel to casting direction No. Average value Standard
I Coefficient of Average value Standard Coefficient of
[MPa] deviation variation [km/s] deviation variation [MPaJ [%] [kmls] [%]
N34 81.94 1.12 1.37 4.425 0.020 0.45 (3) (6)
N35 78.35 2.17 2.77 4.574 0.067 1.46 (3) (9)
N36 49.12 1.02 2.08 4.460 0.067 1.49 (3) (9)
N37 58.27 0.82 1.41 4.559 0.043 0.95 (3) (9)
N38 67.77 1.56 2.30 4.521 0.057 1.27 (3) (9)
Note: the number III parenthesIs mdicates the number of readings
Table 7 - Ultrasonic tests on high strength concrete (perpendicular to casting)
Compressive strength of 150 mm cubes (fern) Ultrasonic pulse velocity (V) Series Perpendicular to casting direction No. Average value Standard Coefficient of Average value Standard Coefficient of
[MPa] deviation variation [kmls] deviation variation [MPa] [%] [km/s] [%]
N34 81.94 1.12 1.37 4.565 0.010 0.22 (3) (3)
N35 78.35 2.17 2.77 4.615 0.006 0.13 (3) (3)
N36 49.12 1.02 2.08 4.445 0.039 0.87 (3) (3) I
N37 58.27 0.82 1.41 4.524 0.086 1.91 (3) (3)
N38 67.77 1.56 2.30 4.548 0.021 0.46 (3) (3)
Note: the number III parentheSIS mdicates the number of readmgs
61
5. Discussion of the Results
5.1 Surface Hardness Tests
5.1.1 Accuracy of Assessment
The coefficient of variation of the individual readings obtained on different slab locations, with the apparatus in
a vertical position facing down varied from 1.29% to 4.35%, being the average value 2.76% (see Tables 2 and
3). If the readings were separated into normal strength concrete and high strength concrete, the average values
would be 3.60% and 1.91 %, respectively. These values indicate a decrease of the coefficient of variation as the
concrete strength increases.
BS 1881: Part 202 [5] indicates that the coefficient of variation for individual readings of harness surface tests
varies from 2% to 15%, being typically around 10%. The values obtained in the investigation reported here are
in the lower zone of the range presented by BS 1881 : Part 202 because of the homogeneity of the concrete
achieved in laboratory conditions.
To show the variability of the results more clearly, a set of graphs were plotted. For the graphics study the
readings were divided into two groups: tests on vertical direction and tests on horizontal direction. Fig. 1 shows
the coefficient of variation versus rebound number and versus concrete strength and the conclusions presented
above are now clear.
!eV;tic-aI7;;din~'------------ --I 1.--V~rti~~R~adi~g~------"- -----,-, -_. --;
~ 5,5 ~_~rizontal readings _, ________ _ ~ 5,5 l~_., _~_oriz~_~.t~~.e~_~s _ . ____ '_ i "' "' Ol 5,0 c '0
Ol 5,0 c '0
.. .. .. '" '" ~ 4,5 ro
~ 4,5 ro • •
:J :J "0 4,0 's;
"0 4,0 'S; '0 '0 ,'0 3,5 '0
,'0 3,5 '0
• c 0 3,0 ~
c 0
3,0 ~ .~
2,5 > '0
.~
> 2,5 '0
C 2,0 <D '0
c 2,0 <ll '0 • Y = 6,34966 - 0,084995 • X Y = 4,72253 - 0,03466' X •
~ 1,5 0
~ 1,5 0 0 0
1,0 20 25 30 35 55
1,0 10 40 45 50 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Surface Hardness Readings R. Compression Strength of 150 mm cubes [MPaJ,
Fig. 1 - Coefficient of variation of surface hardness tests versus compressive strength
5.1.2 Relationships between Test Readings and Concrete Strength
a) Normal Strength Concrete
Fig. 2 shows two graphs of the results presented in Table 2. The results show that a relationship between
compressive strength and rebound number is possible for normal strength concrete. The results are closer to the
correlation line for horizontal readings. The results of the horizontal readings are more scattered because, for
these tests, the Schmidt hammer was fired against the vertical sides of the concrete slabs with visually were not
as homogenous as the bottom side.
90
5. Discussion of the Results
5.1 Surface Hardness Tests
5.1.1 Accuracy of Assessment
The coefficient of variation of the individual readings obtained on different slab locations, with the apparatus in
a vertical position facing down varied from 1.29% to 4.35%, being the average value 2.76% (see Tables 2 and
3). If the readings were separated into normal strength concrete and high strength concrete, the average values
would be 3.60% and 1.91 %, respectively. These values indicate a decrease of the coefficient of variation as the
concrete strength increases.
BS 1881: Part 202 [5] indicates that the coefficient of variation for individual readings of harness surface tests
varies from 2% to 15%, being typically around 10%. The values obtained in the investigation reported here are
in the lower zone of the range presented by BS 1881 : Part 202 because of the homogeneity of the concrete
achieved in laboratory conditions.
To show the variability of the results more clearly, a set of graphs were plotted. For the graphics study the
readings were divided into two groups: tests on vertical direction and tests on horizontal direction. Fig. 1 shows
the coefficient of variation versus rebound number and versus concrete strength and the conclusions presented
above are now clear.
!eV;tic-aI7;;din~'------------ --I 1.--V~rti~~R~adi~g~------"- -----,-, -_. --;
~ 5,5 ~_~rizontal readings _, ________ _ ~ 5,5 l~_., _~_oriz~_~.t~~.e~_~s _ . ____ '_ i "' "' Ol 5,0 c '0
Ol 5,0 c '0
.. .. .. '" '" ~ 4,5 ro
~ 4,5 ro • •
:J :J "0 4,0 's;
"0 4,0 'S; '0 '0 ,'0 3,5 '0
,'0 3,5 '0
• c 0 3,0 ~
c 0
3,0 ~ .~
2,5 > '0
.~
> 2,5 '0
C 2,0 <D '0
c 2,0 <ll '0 • Y = 6,34966 - 0,084995 • X Y = 4,72253 - 0,03466' X •
~ 1,5 0
~ 1,5 0 0 0
1,0 20 25 30 35 55
1,0 10 40 45 50 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Surface Hardness Readings R. Compression Strength of 150 mm cubes [MPaJ,
Fig. 1 - Coefficient of variation of surface hardness tests versus compressive strength
5.1.2 Relationships between Test Readings and Concrete Strength
a) Normal Strength Concrete
Fig. 2 shows two graphs of the results presented in Table 2. The results show that a relationship between
compressive strength and rebound number is possible for normal strength concrete. The results are closer to the
correlation line for horizontal readings. The results of the horizontal readings are more scattered because, for
these tests, the Schmidt hammer was fired against the vertical sides of the concrete slabs with visually were not
as homogenous as the bottom side.
90
62
.s:::~
bh'" 60
5~ Vertical readings 60
Horizontal readings .b~
'" '" 50 (\,) (\,) 50 >.0
.- ::! '" ° ~ S as 40 So 0.,., 0_
40
fern = - 30,69968 + 2,02844 R ""'''"' o 0
30 "'"....., g S tatS
30 fern =- 52,39411 + 2,76087 R
>'-' (\,) 20 00
20
'" t ~ 10
20 25 30 35 40 45
Average values of Rebound Number Average values of Rebound Number
Fig. 2 - Compressive strength versus rebound number for normal strength concrete
b) High Strength Concrete
Similarly to Fig. 2, Fig. 3 shows the relationships between average compressive strength and average values of
rebound number for high strength concrete. As for normal strength concrete, The results show that a relationship
between compressive strength and rebound number is possible for high strength concrete. For this concrete, the
results are closer to the correlation line when compared with graphs of Fig. 2 for normal strength concrete .
.s:::~
-S~ bh'" 5~ 80
Vertical readings 5~ Horizontal readings .b~ 80
.b~ '" '" '" '" ~~ ~~ .- ::! '" ° ";i 8 ~ S
~ S 70 as 70 as So So 0.,., 0.,., 0_ 0_ ""'''"' ""'''"' o 0 o 0 60 "'"....., 60
ga fern = - 97,89197 + 3,48181 R g S tar.S
~~ >'-' fern = - 54,82662 + 2,51688 R >'-' (\,)
(\,) 00 50 00 50 ~ •
~ ~ ~ 42 44 46 46 50 52 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54
Average values of Rebound Number Average values of Rebound Number
Fig. 3 - Compressive strength versus rebound number for high strength concrete
5.2 Ultrasonic Tests
5.2.1 Accuracy of Assessment
From Tables 4 to 7 some conclusions can be drawn. For instance, for both normal strength concrete and high
strength concrete the coefficient of variation was typically higher for readings parallel to casting direction when
compared with those perpendicular to casting. For normal strength concrete the average value of coefficient of
variation equalled 0.56% and 1.92%, respectively for readings parallel to casting and readings perpendicular to
casting. Similarly, for high strength concrete, those values were 0.72% and 1.12%, respectively. These figures
..c~ _ oj
60 OJ) 0-;
ii:;S Vertical readings 60
Horizontal readings I-<~
t;; en
~2 ._ ;:l en U
50 50
O'l S as 40 SO OV) u_
40
fern = - 30,69968 + 2,02844 R
4-..4-.. o 0 30
~E '"2cS
30 fern = - 52,38411 + 2,76087 R
>'-' <l) 20 OJ)
20
'" I-< <l)
> <: 10 20 25 30 35 40 45
Average values of Rebound Number Average values of Rebound Number
Fig. 2 - Compressive strength versus rebound number for normal strength concrete
b) High Strength Concrete
Similarly to Fig. 2, Fig. 3 shows the relationships between average compressive strength and average values of
rebound number for high strength concrete. As for normal strength concrete, The results show that a relationship
between compressive strength and rebound number is possible for high strength concrete. For this concrete, the
results are closer to the correlation line when compared with graphs of Fig. 2 for normal strength concrete .
..c~
..c~ th'" _ oj
Vertical readings ::::0-;
OJ) 0-; !:'!6 Horizontal readings ii::8 80 80 t:~ t;; en en '" ~] <l) <l) >.D ._ ;:l
en U '00 a O'l S O'l S 70 as 70 as So SO OV) OV) Cl_ Cl_ ""'''''' ""'''''' o 0 o 0 60
~E 60
~E fern = -97,89197 + 3,48181 R
d~ -;r,E >'-' fern = - 54,82862 + 2,51888 R >'-' 0)
0) OJ) 50 OJ) 50 ~ ~ >
~ <: 42 44 46 48 50 52 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54
Average values of Rebound Number Average values of Rebound Number
Fig. 3 - Compressive strength versus rebound number for high strength concrete
5.2 Ultrasonic Tests
5.2.1 Accuracy of Assessment
From Tables 4 to 7 some conclusions can be drawn. For instance, for both normal strength concrete and high
strength concrete the coefficient of variation was typically higher for readings parallel to casting direction when
compared with those perpendicular to casting. For normal strength concrete the average value of coefficient of
variation equalled 0.56% and 1.92%, respectively for readings parallel to casting and readings perpendicular to
casting. Similarly, for high strength concrete, those values were 0.72% and 1.12%, respectively. These figures
63
also show that the difference between readings parallel and perpendicular to casting direction is smaller for high
strength concrete when compared to those of normal strength concrete, which may indicate more homogeneity in
high strength concretes.
Fig. 4 shows the standard deviation and the coefficient of variation of ultrasonic tests. Although being difficult to
defend that a relationship is possible, the visual observation of the graphs shows a slight decrease of the standard
deviation and of the coefficient of variation as the concrete strength increases .
•
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 60 90
Average values of compressive strength (fcm) ofl50 mm cubes [MPa]
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Average values of compressive strength (fcm) ofl50 mm cubes [MPa]
90
Fig. 4 - Standard deviation and coefficient of variation of ultrasonic tests
5.2.2 Relationships between Test Readings and Concrete Strength
a) Normal Strength Concrete
Fig. 4 shows the compressive strength versus ultrasonic pulse velocity for normal strength concrete. The
correlation line of readings parallel to casting for normal strength concrete is not very good since the points are
somehow scattered. However, the correlation for readings perpendicular to casting is better as can be seen in Fig.
5.
-='d 60
~~ "til '" ~] 50 .- ::; '" u g; S as 40 So 0.,., u_
'<-<,<-< o 0 30 "',-.. g S "il~ >'-'
20 '" OJ)
'" ~ ~ 10
4,0
fem = 0,000 15 * exp (2.855 * V)
-=~ 60 '00'" 5~ ./:I~
'" '" ~~ 50
"VJ 5 g; S as 40 So 0.,., u_
'<-<,<-< o 0 30 "',-.. g S tatS >'-'
'" 20 OJ)
~ ~ 10
4,0
Parallel to casting
4,1 4,2 4,3 4,4 4,5
fcm=O,OOOI3*exp(2,89 * V)
Perpendicular to casting
4,1 4,2 4,3 4,4 4,5
Average values of ultrasonic pulse velocity, v [kmls] Average values of ultrasonic pulse velocity, v [kmls]
Fig. 5 - Compressive strength versus ultrasonic pulse velocity for normal strength concrete
also show that the difference between readings parallel and perpendicular to casting direction is smaller for high
strength concrete when compared to those of normal strength concrete, which may indicate more homogeneity in
high strength concretes.
Fig. 4 shows the standard deviation and the coefficient of variation of ultrasonic tests. Although being difficult to
defend that a relationship is possible, the visual observation of the graphs shows a slight decrease of the standard
deviation and of the coefficient of variation as the concrete strength increases.
0,1 .~ r;;' 0:---o E ~~ 0,0
l::c ;:1--
"'" u 0,06 0,.2 0: " 0 ;. .~ ~
0,04 ';;: -; (l) 0-'d
"8 to 'd 0: $l VJ.
w m w @ ~ 00 m 00 00
Average values of compressive strength (fcm) ofl50 mm cubes [MPa]
.~~ Be ~ ~ 2,0
.:g.g "'"u o 0 1,5
§~ .~ ~ 'c"3 1,0 ~ 0-
"" o ~ 0,5
" -0 i:S Il) 0,0 o
U
Average values of compressive strength (fcm) ofl50 mm cubes [MPaj
Fig. 4 - Standard deviation and coefficient of variation of ultrasonic tests
5.2.2 Relationships between Test Readings and Concrete Strength
a) Normal Strength Concrete
Fig. 4 shows the compressive strength versus ultrasonic pulse velocity for normal strength concrete. The
correlation line of readings parallel to casting for normal strength concrete is not very good since the points are
somehow scattered. However, the correlation for readings perpendicular to casting is better as can be seen in Fig.
5.
..t:~ 00 ~ '" on"" ~6 1;; '" " " 50 .2:: '"§ '" u ~ E aE 40 Eo Olr) u~
"'""'" o 0 30 "',-.. g E ta~ ;.~
20 " on ~ ~ 10
..t:~ 60 tD~
§::8 ... ~ 1;; '" " " 50 ;.""
__ ;:I
'" u ~ E aE 40 Eo Olr) u~
"'"4-< o 0 30 enr-. ~ E ~~ ;.~
" 20 on ~ ;.
<r: 10
fem = O,00013*cxp (2,89 * V)
fem = 0,000 15 *' exp (2,855 * V)
Parallel to casting Perpendicular to casting
4,0 4,1 4,2 4,3 4,4 4,5 4,0 4,1 4,2 4,3 4,4 4,5
Average values of ultrasonic pulse velocity, v [lnn/s] Average values of ultrasonic pulse velocity, v [kmls]
Fig. 5 - Compressive strength versus ultrasonic pulse velocity for normal strength concrete
64
a) ffigh Strength Concrete
Fig. 6 shows the compressive strength versus ultrasonic pulse velocity for high strength concrete. The readings
parallel to casting for high strength concrete are very scattered and a correlation line can not be found. A
correlation line for readings perpendicular to casting is possible to be drawn, as can be seen in Fig. 6. However
as the concrete strength increases the points became more scattered, mainly for concrete strength above 70 MPa
(or velocity equals to 4.55 km/s).
Due to the exponential type correlation line, particular precautions need to be taken for pulse velocities greater
than 4.55 km/s, since a small variation ofthe pulse velocity may lead to great variations of the concrete strength.
80
70
80
50 Parallel to casting
4,42 4,44 4,46 4,48 4,50 4,52 4,54 4,56 4,58
Average values of ultrasonic pulse velocity, v [km/s]
80
70
60
50
fem = 0,00039 * exp (2.645 • V)
• Perpendicular to casting
4,45 4,50 4,55 4,80 4,65
Average values of ultrasonic pulse velocity, v [km/s]
Fig. 6 - Compressive strength versus ultrasonic pulse velocity for high strength concrete
6. Conclusions
6.1 Surface Hardness Tests
As far as the hardness test method is concerned, the analysis of the results of tests carried out by of a Schmidt
hammer Type N, with impact energy of 2,207 N.m lead to the following conclusions:
The hardness test can be successfu1ly used in high strength concrete up to 82 MPa, measured in 150 mm
cubes;
The standard deviation from the individual readings of the rebound number, which can be expected in any
location of the high strength concrete up to 82 MPa was approximately constant, thus revealing typical
values between 0.66 and 1.93 being the average value 1.11;
The standard deviation is the statistical parameter which better evaluates the repetitiveness of the hardness
test;
The coefficient of variation from the individual readings of the rebound number, which can be expected in
any location of the high strength concrete up to 82 MPa (evaluated in 150mm cubes) decreases as the
concrete increases.
a) High Strength Concrete
Fig. 6 shows the compressive strength versus ultrasonic pulse velocity for high strength concrete. The readings
parallel to casting for high strength concrete are very scattered and a correlation line can not be found. A
correlation line for readings perpendicular to casting is possible to be drawn, as can be seen in Fig. 6. However
as the concrete strength increases the points became more scattered, mainly for concrete strength above 70 MPa
(or velocity equals to 4.55 km/s).
Due to the exponential type correlation line, particular precautions need to be taken for pulse velocities greater
than 4.55 km/s, since a small variation of the pulse velocity may lead to great variations of the concrete strength.
80
70
60
50 Parallel to casting
4,42 4,44 4,46 4,46 4,50 4,52 4,54 4,56 4,58
Average values of ultrasonic pulse velocity, v [km/s]
80
70
60
50
fern = 0,00039 * exp (2,645 .. V)
Perpendicular to casting
4,45 4,50 4,55 4,60 4,65
Average values of ultrasonic pulse velocity, v [kmls]
Fig. 6 - Compressive strength versus ultrasonic pulse velocity for high strength concrete
6. Conclusions
6.1 Surface Hardness Tests
As far as the hardness test method is concerned, the analysis of the results of tests carried out by of a Schmidt
hammer Type N, with impact energy of2,207 N.m lead to the following conclusions:
The hardness test can be successfully used in high strength concrete up to 82 MPa, measured in 150 mm
cubes;
The standard deviation from the individual readings of the rebound number, which can be expected in any
location of the high strength concrete up to 82 MPa was approximately constant, thus revealing typical
values between 0.66 and 1.93 being the average value 1.11;
The standard deviation is the statistical parameter which better evaluates the repetitiveness of the hardness
test;
The coefficient of variation from the individual readings ofthe rebound number, which can be expected in
any location of the high strength concrete up to 82 MPa (evaluated in 150mm cubes) decreases as the
concrete increases.
65
The coefficient of variation from the individual readings of the rebound number, which can be expected in
any location for a normal strength concrete between 17 MPa and 53 MPa was typically between 2.62% and
5.01% being the average value 3.90%.
The coefficient of variation from the individual readings of the rebound number which can be expected in
any location of a high strength concrete between 49 MPa and 82 MPa, was typically between 1.29% and
2.94% being the average value 2.01%.
For compressive strength of concrete between 17 MPa and 82 MPa (measured in 150mm cubes and
produced from similar materials and on the basis of the same Faury's curve, with different strengths and
mixes), a good correlation between surface hardness and compressive strength of concrete was found.
6.2 mtrasonic Tests
The experimental results presented in this paper lead to the following conclusions:
Tests indicate a slight reduction of the standard deviation and of the coefficient of variation, when both the
compressive strength and the ultrasonic pulse velocity increase.
The coefficient of variation of the individual readings of ultrasonic pulse velocity in a location of a good
quality surface of high strength concrete, between 17 MPa and 53MPa (referred to 150mm cubes) showed an
average value of 0.56% in readings on moulded faces.
The coefficient of variation of the individual readings of ultrasonic pulse velocity in a location of a good
quality surface of concrete strengths between 49 MPa and 53 MPa, showed an average value of 1.12 in
readings on moulded faces;
The maximum coefficient value of variation of ultrasonic pulse velocity obtained in different locations (test
slabs), among the tested concrete (with the same materials and different Ale values) was of2.16%.
It is possible to establish a correlation between the ultrasonic pulse velocity (by direct readings between
moulded faces) and compressive strength (between 17 MPa and 70 MPa), when the variable is the ratio
water/concrete (in mass) and are kept constant some parameters, including: the maturity, the type of
materials and the reference Faury's curve;
The value of pulse velocity obtained by direct reading, involving a moulded face and a non-moulded face
diverged in a large extent from the direct reading among moulded faces;
The correlation between high strength and ultrasonic pulse velocity obtained by direct readings involving a
moulded face and a non-moulded face showed great dispersion of results.
The correlation curve between the ultrasonic pulse velocity and compressive strength is an exponential type
curve which seems to be more acceptable than a straight, as proposed by Bungey and Millard [24];
For concrete strengths from 45 MPa to 50 MPa and possibly up to 82 MPa, the correlation curve between
the ultrasonic pulse velocity and compressive strength of concrete tends to a straight when granitic
aggregates are used;
The correlation between the ultrasonic pulse velocity (direct reading on moulded faces) and the compressive
strength of concrete might indicate a loss of reliability for compressive strengths above 70 MPa .. This can be
caused by the exponential type of the correlation. Any slight variation of ultrasonic pulse velocity above
4,55 km/s would result on a great variation ofthe value of the compressive strength of concrete.
The coefficient of variation from the individual readings of the rebound number, which can be expected in
any location for a normal strength concrete between 17 MPa and 53 MPa was typically between 2.62% and
5.01% being the average value 3.90%.
The coefficient of variation from the individual readings of the rebound number which can be expected in
any location of a high strength concrete between 49 MPa and 82 MPa, was typically between 1.29% and
2.94% being the average value 2.01%.
For compressive strength of concrete between 17 MPa and 82 MPa (measured in 150mm cubes and
produced from similar materials and on the basis of the same Faury's curve, with different strengths and
mixes), a good correlation between surface hardness and compressive strength of concrete was found.
6.2 Ultrasonic Tests
The experimental results presented in this paper lead to the following conclusions:
Tests indicate a slight reduction of the standard deviation and of the coefficient of variation, when both the
compressive strength and the ultrasonic pulse velocity increase.
The coefficient of variation of the individual readings of ultrasonic pulse velocity in a location of a good
quality surface of high strength concrete, between 17 MPa and 53MPa (referred to 150mm cubes) showed an
average value of 0.56% in readings on moulded faces.
The coefficient of variation of the individual readings of ultrasonic pulse velocity in a location of a good
quality surface of concrete strengths between 49 MPa and 53 MPa, showed an average value of 1.12 in
readings on moulded faces;
The maximum coefficient value of variation of ultrasonic pulse velocity obtained in different locations (test
slabs), among the tested concrete (with the same materials and different Ale values) was of2.16%.
It is possible to establish a correlation between the ultrasonic pulse velocity (by direct readings between
moulded faces) and compressive strength (between 17 MPa and 70 MPa), when the variable is the ratio
water/concrete (in mass) and are kept constant some parameters, including: the maturity, the type of
materials and the reference Faury's curve;
The value of pulse velocity obtained by direct reading, involving a moulded face and a non-moulded face
diverged in a large extent from the direct reading among moulded faces;
The correlation between high strength and ultrasonic pulse velocity obtained by direct readings involving a
moulded face and a non-moulded face showed great dispersion of results.
The correlation curve between the ultrasonic pulse velocity and compressive strength is an exponential type
curve which seems to be more acceptable than a straight, as proposed by Bungey and Millard [24];
For concrete strengths from 45 MPa to 50 MPa and possibly up to 82 MPa, the correlation curve between
the ultrasonic pulse velocity and compressive strength of concrete tends to a straight when granitic
aggregates are used;
The correlation between the ultrasonic pulse velocity (direct reading on moulded faces) and the compressive
strength of concrete might indicate a loss of reliability for compressive strengths above 70 MPa .. This can be
caused by the exponential type of the correlation. Any slight variation of ultrasonic pulse velocity above
4,55 km/s would result on a great variation of the value of the compressive strength of concrete.
66
7. References
[1] ALMEIDA, Ivan R.- High Strength and High Performance Concrete, PhD thesis, LNEC, Lisbon, Portugal,1990 (in Portuguese)
[2] ASTM C597-83 - Standard Test Method for Pulse Velocity Through Concrete, Philadelphia, American Society for Testing and Materials, 1983.
[3] British Standard BS 1881 :Part 203: 1986 - Testing Concrete: Recommendations for Measurement of Velocity of Ultrasonic Pulses in Concrete, London, British Standard Institution.
[4] British Standard BS 1881: Part 201: 1986 - Testing Concrete: Guide to the Use of Non-destructive Methods of Test for Hardened Concrete, London, British Standards Institution.
[5] British Standard BS 1881: Part 202: 1986 - Testing Concrete: Recommendations for Surface Hardness Testing by Rebound Hammer, London, British Standards Institution.
[6] British Standard BS 1881: Part 207: 1992 - Testing Concrete. Recommendations for the Assessment of Concrete Strength by Near-to-surface Tests, London, British Standards Institution.
[7] BUNGEY, J. H; MILLARD, S. G. - Testing of Concrete in Structures, 3.3 ed., London, Chapman & Hall, 1996.
[8] CEN - Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures, Dec. 1992.
[9] CEN - European Standard prEN206-1I25 "Concrete - Part 1: Specification, performance, production and conformity", CEN, Brussels, 1999 (final draft).
[10] Especifica~o LNEC E226-1968 - Concrete: Compressive tests, LNEC, Lisbon, Portugal,1968 (in Portuguese).
[11] Especifica~o LNEC E255-1971 - Concrete: Preparation of Specimens for Compressive and Bending Tests, LNEC, Lisbon, Portugal, 1971 (in Portuguese)
[12] GON<;AL YES, Arlindo F. - New NDT for the Evaluation of Concrete Strength in Structures, Mem. No. 671, 1986. LNEC, Lisbon, Portugal, 1986 (in Portuguese)
[13] LOPES, Sergio; NEPOMUCENO, Miguel - A Comparative Study of Penetration Resistance Apparatus on Concrete, in «Proceedings ofICCE/4», Hawaii, David Hui Edition, Jul. 1997, p. 615-616.
[14] LOPES, Sergio; NEPOMUCENO, Miguel- Evaluation of In-place Concrete Strength by Near-to-surface Tests. «12th European Ready Mixed Concrete Congress», Lisbon, APEB, June 1998, p. 338 - 347.
[15] LOPES, Sergio; NEPOMUCENO, Miguel - High Strength Concrete: Penetration Resistance Tests on High Strength Concrete, in «First International Conference on High Strength Concrete, July 13-18, 1997», ASCE, USA, 1999, ISBN 0-7844-0419-4, p. 425-433.
[16] MALHOTRA, V. M - Surface Hardness Methods, in «Handbook on Nondestructive Testing of Concrete», Florida (EUA), CRC Press Inc., 1991, p. 1- 18.
[17] NEPOMUCENO, Miguel - Non Destructive Tests on Concrete, Scientific Thesis, University of Beira Interior, Covilha, Portugal, 1999 (in Portuguese).
[18] PORTO EDITORA - Portuguese Code for Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete Structures Regulamento de Estruturas de Betao Armado e Pre-esfon;:ado (Dec. Lei 349-cl83, 30/July), Porto, Portugal,1993 (in Portuguese)
[19] PRICE, W. F.; HYNES, J. P. - In-situ Strength Testing of High Strength Concrete. «Magazine of Concrete ResearcID>, 48, No 176, Sept 1996, p. 189-197.
7. References
[1] ALMEIDA, Ivan R.- High Strength and High Performance Concrete, PhD thesis, LNEC, Lisbon, Portugal,1990 (in Portuguese)
[2] ASTM C597-83 - Standard Test Method for Pulse Velocity Through Concrete, Philadelphia, American Society for Testing and Materials, 1983.
[3] British Standard BS 1881 :Part 203: 1986 - Testing Concrete: Recommendations for Measurement of Velocity of Ultrasonic Pulses in Concrete, London, British Standard Institution.
[4] British Standard BS 1881: Part 201: 1986 - Testing Concrete: Guide to the Use of Non-destructive Methods of Test for Hardened Concrete, London, British Standards Institution.
[5] British Standard BS 1881: Part 202: 1986 - Testing Concrete: Recommendations for Surface Hardness Testing by Rebound Hammer, London, British Standards Institution.
[6] British Standard BS 1881: Part 207: 1992 - Testing Concrete. Recommendations for the Assessment of Concrete Strength by Near-to-surface Tests, London, British Standards Institution.
[7] BUNGEY, J. H.; MILLARD, S. G. - Testing of Concrete in Structures, 3: ed., London, Chapman & Hall, 1996.
[8] CEN - Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures, Dec. 1992.
[9] CEN - European Standard prEN206-1/25 "Concrete - Part 1: Specification, performance, production and conformity", CEN, Brussels, 1999 ( final draft).
[10] Especifica<;ao LNEC E226-1968 - Concrete: Compressive tests, LNEC, Lisbon, Portuga1,1968 (in Portuguese).
[11] Especifica<;ao LNEC E255-1971 - Concrete: Preparation of Specimens for Compressive and Bending Tests, LNEC, Lisbon, Portugal, 1971 (in Portuguese)
[12] GON<;:AL VES, Ar1indo F. - New NDT for the Evaluation of Concrete Strength in Structures, Mem. No. 671, 1986. LNEC, Lisbon, Portugal, 1986 (in Portuguese)
[13] LOPES, Sergio; NEPOMUCENO, Miguel - A Comparative Study of Penetration Resistance Apparatus on Concrete, in «Proceedings ofICCE/4», Hawaii, David Hui Edition, JuI. 1997, p. 615-616.
[14] LOPES, Sergio; NEPOMUCENO, Miguel- Evaluation of In-place Concrete Strength by Near-to-surface Tests. «12th European Ready Mixed Concrete Congress», Lisbon, APEB, June 1998, p. 338 - 347.
[15] LOPES, Sergio; NEPOMUCENO, Miguel - High Strength Concrete: Penetration Resistance Tests on High Strength Concrete, in «First International Conference on High Strength Concrete, July 13-18, 1997», ASCE, USA, 1999, ISBN 0-7844-0419-4, p. 425-433.
[16] MALHOTRA, V. M. - Surface Hardness Methods, in «Handbook on Nondestructive Testing of Concrete», Florida (EUA), CRC Press Inc., 1991, p. 1 - 18.
[17] NEPOMUCENO, Miguel - Non Destructive Tests on Concrete, Scientific Thesis, University of Beira Interior, Covilha, Portugal, 1999 (in Portuguese).
[18] PORTO EDITORA - Portuguese Code for Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete Structures Regulamento de Estruturas de Betao Armado e Pre-esfor<;ado (Dec. Lei 349-c/83, 30/July), Porto, Portugal,1993 (in Portuguese)
[19] PRICE, W. F.; HYNES, J. P. - In-situ Strength Testing of High Strength Concrete. «Magazine of Concrete ResearcID>, 48, No 176, Sept 1996, p. 189-197.