NOMINAL RIGIDITIES IN A DSGE M BASIC CALVO-YUN MODEL · tit t tttt t t tst ss ttsst pPP x py E y E...
Transcript of NOMINAL RIGIDITIES IN A DSGE M BASIC CALVO-YUN MODEL · tit t tttt t t tst ss ttsst pPP x py E y E...
1
NOMINAL RIGIDITIES IN A DSGEMODEL: BASIC CALVO-YUN MODEL
OCTOBER 9, 2008
October 9, 2008 2
DIFFERENTIATED-GOODS FIRMS
DSGE Calvo-Yun Model
Optimal-pricing condition
With sticky prices, optimal Pi balances current and future marginal revenues against current and future marginal costs until the next (expected) price re-optimization
Differentiated firm i’s (and hence the aggregate) markup will be time-varying
As “initial marginal revenues” > “initial marginal costs” to balance against “later marginal revenues” < “later marginal costs”See King and Wolman (1999)
Conduct full non-linear analysis (around distorted steady state)Later: typical New Keynesian analysis (around efficient steady state)
|1 0s t i i
ts
t s t s s ss s
t t
t
P PE P y mcP P
ε
εα ε
−∞
−+
=
⎧ ⎫⎛ ⎞ ⎡ ⎤−⎪ ⎪− =⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟ ⎢ ⎥⎝ ⎠ ⎣ ⎦⎪
Ξ⎪⎩ ⎭
∑
Real marginal revenue
As inflation erodes the relative price of firm i
2
October 9, 2008 3
OPTIMAL-PRICING CONDITION
DSGE Calvo-Yun Model
Optimal-pricing condition
Define
Optimal-pricing condition:Emphasizes that optimal Pi balances current and future mr against current and future mc
Write recursively (following SGU (2005 NBER Macro Annual))
|1 0s t it it
t t s t s s ss t s s
P PE P y mcP P
εεαε
−∞
−+
=
⎧ ⎫⎛ ⎞ ⎡ ⎤−⎪ ⎪Ξ − =⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟ ⎢ ⎥⎝ ⎠ ⎣ ⎦⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭
∑
1|
1s t it itt t t t s t s s
s t s s
P PPx E P yP P
εεαε
−∞
−+
=
⎧ ⎫⎛ ⎞ −⎪ ⎪= Ξ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭
∑
1 2t tx x=
2|
s t itt t t t s t s s s
s t s
PPx E P y mcP
ε
α−
∞−
+=
⎧ ⎫⎛ ⎞⎪ ⎪= Ξ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭
∑
PDV of nominal marginal revenues until next price change
PDV of nominal marginal costs until next price change
1 2,t tx x
October 9, 2008 4
OPTIMAL-PRICING CONDITION
DSGE Calvo-Yun Model
Some notation and definitions
itit
t
PpP
≡
itP
1it itP P+ =
Relative price of good i in period t
Evolution of nominal price if no price change
Nominal price of good i in period t
3
October 9, 2008 5
OPTIMAL-PRICING CONDITION
DSGE Calvo-Yun Model
Some notation and definitions
1
1
1
1
1
1
it iit
it
t
t t
it t
t
t
t
P PP PPP
p
P
pP
π
+
+ +
+
+
+
=
= =
=
Relative price of good i in period t
Evolution of nominal price if no price change
As long as no nominal price change, a firm’s relative price erodes at the rate of inflation
(πt+1 = Pt+1/Pt)
Nominal price of good i in period t
itit
t
PpP
≡
itP
1it itP P+ =
October 9, 2008 6
OPTIMAL-PRICING CONDITION
DSGE Calvo-Yun Model
Write recursively
1|
1s t it itt t t t s t s s
s t s s
P PPx E P yP P
εεαε
−∞
−+
=
⎧ ⎫⎛ ⎞ −⎪ ⎪= Ξ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭
∑
1tx
1 11 1
1| 1 |21
1 1 s tt it t it s itt t t t t t t t s t s s
s tt t t t t s
P P P P P Px y E y E y mcP P P P P P
ε ε εε εα αε ε
− − −∞
−++ + +
= ++
⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞− −⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪= + Ξ + Ξ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭
∑
Divide by Pt; write out first two terms
4
October 9, 2008 7
OPTIMAL-PRICING CONDITION
DSGE Calvo-Yun Model
Write recursively
1|
1s t it itt t t t s t s s
s t s s
P PPx E P yP P
εεαε
−∞
−+
=
⎧ ⎫⎛ ⎞ −⎪ ⎪= Ξ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭
∑
1tx
1 11 1
1| 1 |21
1 1 s tt it t it s itt t t t t t t t s t s s
s tt t t t t s
P P P P P Px y E y E y mcP P P P P P
ε ε εε εα αε ε
− − −∞
−++ + +
= ++
⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞− −⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪= + Ξ + Ξ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭
∑
Divide by Pt; write out first two terms
Pit+1 = Pit while no price change opportunity
1 11 1 1
1| 1 |21
1 1 s tit t it s itt t t t t t t t s t s s
s tt t t t s
P P P P Px y E y E y mcP P P P P
ε ε εε εα αε ε
− − −∞
−+ ++ + +
= ++
⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞− −⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪= + Ξ + Ξ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭
∑
October 9, 2008 8
OPTIMAL-PRICING CONDITION
DSGE Calvo-Yun Model
Write recursively
1|
1s t it itt t t t s t s s
s t s s
P PPx E P yP P
εεαε
−∞
−+
=
⎧ ⎫⎛ ⎞ −⎪ ⎪= Ξ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭
∑
1tx
1 11 1
1| 1 |21
1 1 s tt it t it s itt t t t t t t t s t s s
s tt t t t t s
P P P P P Px y E y E y mcP P P P P P
ε ε εε εα αε ε
− − −∞
−++ + +
= ++
⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞− −⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪= + Ξ + Ξ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭
∑
Divide by Pt; write out first two terms
Pit+1 = Pit while no price change opportunity
1 11 1 1
1| 1 |21
1 1 s tit t it s itt t t t t t t t s t s s
s tt t t t s
P P P P Px y E y E y mcP P P P P
ε ε εε εα αε ε
− − −∞
−+ ++ + +
= ++
⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞− −⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪= + Ξ + Ξ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭
∑Use definitions
11 11| 1 1 1 |
2
1 1 s t s itt it t t t t t it t t t s t s s
s t t s
P Px p y E p y E y mcP P
εε εε εα π α
ε ε
−∞
− − −+ + + + +
= +
⎧ ⎫⎛ ⎞− − ⎪ ⎪⎧ ⎫= + Ξ + Ξ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟⎩ ⎭ ⎝ ⎠⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭
∑
5
October 9, 2008 9
OPTIMAL-PRICING CONDITION
DSGE Calvo-Yun Model
Write recursively
1|
1s t it itt t t t s t s s
s t s s
P PPx E P yP P
εεαε
−∞
−+
=
⎧ ⎫⎛ ⎞ −⎪ ⎪= Ξ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭
∑
1tx
1 11 1
1| 1 |21
1 1 s tt it t it s itt t t t t t t t s t s s
s tt t t t t s
P P P P P Px y E y E y mcP P P P P P
ε ε εε εα αε ε
− − −∞
−++ + +
= ++
⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞− −⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪= + Ξ + Ξ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭
∑
Divide by Pt; write out first two terms
Pit+1 = Pit while no price change opportunity
1 11 1 1
1| 1 |21
1 1 s tit t it s itt t t t t t t t s t s s
s tt t t t s
P P P P Px y E y E y mcP P P P P
ε ε εε εα αε ε
− − −∞
−+ ++ + +
= ++
⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞− −⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪= + Ξ + Ξ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭
∑Use definitions
11 11| 1 1 1 |
2
1 1 s t s itt it t t t t t it t t t s t s s
s t t s
P Px p y E p y E y mcP P
εε εε εα π α
ε ε
−∞
− − −+ + + + +
= +
⎧ ⎫⎛ ⎞− − ⎪ ⎪⎧ ⎫= + Ξ + Ξ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟⎩ ⎭ ⎝ ⎠⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭
∑1 1/it it tp p π+ +=Use
October 9, 2008 10
OPTIMAL-PRICING CONDITION
DSGE Calvo-Yun Model
Write recursively 1tx
111
1| 1 1 |21
1 1 s tit s itt it t t t t t t t t s t s s
s tt t s
p P Px p y E y E y mcP P
ε εε ε εα π α
ε π ε
− −∞
− −+ + + +
= ++
⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞− −⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪= + Ξ + Ξ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭
∑
6
October 9, 2008 11
OPTIMAL-PRICING CONDITION
DSGE Calvo-Yun Model
Write recursively 1tx
Rearrange
111
1| 1 1 |21
1 1 s tit s itt it t t t t t t t t s t s s
s tt t s
p P Px p y E y E y mcP P
ε εε ε εα π α
ε π ε
− −∞
− −+ + + +
= ++
⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞− −⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪= + Ξ + Ξ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭
∑
1 111| 1 1 |
2
1 1 s t s itt it t t t t t it t t t s t s s
s t t s
P Px p y E p y E y mcP P
εε εεε εα π α
ε ε
−∞
− − −+ + + +
= +
⎧ ⎫⎛ ⎞− − ⎪ ⎪⎧ ⎫= + Ξ + Ξ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟⎩ ⎭ ⎝ ⎠⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭
∑
October 9, 2008 12
OPTIMAL-PRICING CONDITION
DSGE Calvo-Yun Model
Write recursively 1tx
Rearrange
111
1| 1 1 |21
1 1 s tit s itt it t t t t t t t t s t s s
s tt t s
p P Px p y E y E y mcP P
ε εε ε εα π α
ε π ε
− −∞
− −+ + + +
= ++
⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞− −⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪= + Ξ + Ξ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭
∑
1 111| 1 1 |
2
1 1 s t s itt it t t t t t it t t t s t s s
s t t s
P Px p y E p y E y mcP P
εε εεε εα π α
ε ε
−∞
− − −+ + + +
= +
⎧ ⎫⎛ ⎞− − ⎪ ⎪⎧ ⎫= + Ξ + Ξ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟⎩ ⎭ ⎝ ⎠⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭
∑1
1itp ε−+Multiply and divide by
111 1
1| 1 1 1 |21
1 1 s tit s itt it t t t t t it t t t s t s s
s tit t s
p P Px p y E p y E y mcp P P
ε εε ε εε εα π α
ε ε
− −∞
− − −+ + + + +
= ++
⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞− −⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪= + Ξ + Ξ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭
∑
7
October 9, 2008 13
OPTIMAL-PRICING CONDITION
DSGE Calvo-Yun Model
Write recursively 1tx
Rearrange
111
1| 1 1 |21
1 1 s tit s itt it t t t t t t t t s t s s
s tt t s
p P Px p y E y E y mcP P
ε εε ε εα π α
ε π ε
− −∞
− −+ + + +
= ++
⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞− −⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪= + Ξ + Ξ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭
∑
1 111| 1 1 |
2
1 1 s t s itt it t t t t t it t t t s t s s
s t t s
P Px p y E p y E y mcP P
εε εεε εα π α
ε ε
−∞
− − −+ + + +
= +
⎧ ⎫⎛ ⎞− − ⎪ ⎪⎧ ⎫= + Ξ + Ξ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟⎩ ⎭ ⎝ ⎠⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭
∑1
1itp ε−+Multiply and divide by
111 1
1| 1 1 1 |21
1 1 s tit s itt it t t t t t it t t t s t s s
s tit t s
p P Px p y E p y E y mcp P P
ε εε ε εε εα π α
ε ε
− −∞
− − −+ + + + +
= ++
⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞− −⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪= + Ξ + Ξ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭
∑
Have generated a recursive term
October 9, 2008 14
OPTIMAL-PRICING CONDITION
DSGE Calvo-Yun Model
Write recursively 1tx
Rearrange
111
1| 1 1 |21
1 1 s tit s itt it t t t t t t t t s t s s
s tt t s
p P Px p y E y E y mcP P
ε εε ε εα π α
ε π ε
− −∞
− −+ + + +
= ++
⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞− −⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪= + Ξ + Ξ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭
∑
1 111| 1 1 |
2
1 1 s t s itt it t t t t t it t t t s t s s
s t t s
P Px p y E p y E y mcP P
εε εεε εα π α
ε ε
−∞
− − −+ + + +
= +
⎧ ⎫⎛ ⎞− − ⎪ ⎪⎧ ⎫= + Ξ + Ξ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟⎩ ⎭ ⎝ ⎠⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭
∑1
1itp ε−+Multiply and divide by
111 1
1| 1 1 1 |21
1 1 s tit s itt it t t t t t it t t t s t s s
s tit t s
p P Px p y E p y E y mcp P P
ε εε ε εε εα π α
ε ε
− −∞
− − −+ + + + +
= ++
⎧ ⎫ ⎧ ⎫⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞− −⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪= + Ξ + Ξ⎨ ⎬ ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭ ⎩ ⎭
∑
Express recursively
111 1
1| 1 11
1 itt it t t t t t t
it
px p y E xp
εε εε α π
ε
−−
+ + ++
⎧ ⎫⎛ ⎞− ⎪ ⎪= + Ξ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭
x1 expressed recursively
Have generated a recursive term
8
October 9, 2008 15
OPTIMAL-PRICING CONDITION
DSGE Calvo-Yun Model
Both recursively 1 2,t tx x1
11 11| 1 1
1
1 itt it t t t t t t
it
px p y E xp
εε εε α π
ε
−−
+ + ++
⎧ ⎫⎛ ⎞− ⎪ ⎪= + Ξ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭
x1 expressed recursively
2 1 21| 1 1
1
itt it t t t t t t t
it
px p y mc E xp
εε εα π
−− +
+ + ++
⎧ ⎫⎛ ⎞⎪ ⎪= + Ξ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭
x2 expressed recursively
October 9, 2008 16
OPTIMAL-PRICING CONDITION
DSGE Calvo-Yun Model
Both recursively
Optimal-pricing condition expressed compactly
Now can use usual numerical solution methods
1 2,t tx x1
11 11| 1 1
1
1 itt it t t t t t t
it
px p y E xp
εε εε α π
ε
−−
+ + ++
⎧ ⎫⎛ ⎞− ⎪ ⎪= + Ξ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭
x1 expressed recursively
2 1 21| 1 1
1
itt it t t t t t t t
it
px p y mc E xp
εε εα π
−− +
+ + ++
⎧ ⎫⎛ ⎞⎪ ⎪= + Ξ⎨ ⎬⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠⎪ ⎪⎩ ⎭
x2 expressed recursively
1 2t tx x=
9
October 9, 2008 17
AGGREGATE PRICE LEVEL
DSGE Calvo-Yun Model
Aggregate price index follows from Dixit-Stiglitz aggregation
1 11 1 1 *1
10 0
t it it itP P di P di P diα
ε ε ε ε
α
− − − −−= = +∫ ∫ ∫
adjustersnon-adjusters
Obtained by substituting demand functions into D-S aggregator
October 9, 2008 18
AGGREGATE PRICE LEVEL
DSGE Calvo-Yun Model
Aggregate price index follows from Dixit-Stiglitz aggregation
1 11 1 1 *1
10 0
t it it itP P di P di P diα
ε ε ε ε
α
− − − −−= = +∫ ∫ ∫
adjustersnon-adjustersEmphasize optimal new price
Obtained by substituting demand functions into D-S aggregator
10
October 9, 2008 19
AGGREGATE PRICE LEVEL
DSGE Calvo-Yun Model
Aggregate price index follows from Dixit-Stiglitz aggregation
1 11 1 1 *1
10 0
t it it itP P di P di P diα
ε ε ε ε
α
− − − −−= = +∫ ∫ ∫
adjustersnon-adjustersEmphasize optimal new price
1 *11 (1 )t tP Pε εα α− −−= + −
KEY: Because adjusters were randomly selected, average (aggregate) price of non-adjusters is same as previous period’s average (aggregate) price
Fraction 1 - α re-set price optimally (and symmetrically)
Obtained by substituting demand functions into D-S aggregator
October 9, 2008 20
AGGREGATE PRICE LEVEL
DSGE Calvo-Yun Model
Aggregate price index follows from Dixit-Stiglitz aggregation
1 11 1 1 *1
10 0
t it it itP P di P di P diα
ε ε ε ε
α
− − − −−= = +∫ ∫ ∫
adjustersnon-adjustersEmphasize optimal new price
1 *11 (1 )t tP Pε εα α− −−= + −
KEY: Because adjusters were randomly selected, average (aggregate) price of non-adjusters is same as previous period’s average (aggregate) price
Obtained by substituting demand functions into D-S aggregatorTRACTABILITY DUE TO THE
CALVO RANDOM-ADJUSTMENT ASSUMPTION
Fraction 1 - α re-set price optimally (and symmetrically)
11
October 9, 2008 21
AGGREGATE PRICE LEVEL
DSGE Calvo-Yun Model
Aggregate price index follows from Dixit-Stiglitz aggregation
1 11 1 1 *1
10 0
t it it itP P di P di P diα
ε ε ε ε
α
− − − −−= = +∫ ∫ ∫
adjustersnon-adjustersEmphasize optimal new price
1 *11 (1 )t tP Pε εα α− −−= + −
1 *11 (1 )t tpε εαπ α− −= + − EQUILIBRIUM EVOLUTION OF AGGREGATE INFLATION –depends on relative price set by firms currently adjusting nominal price
Obtained by substituting demand functions into D-S aggregator
KEY: Because adjusters were randomly selected, average (aggregate) price of non-adjusters is same as previous period’s average (aggregate) price
TRACTABILITY DUE TO THE CALVO RANDOM-ADJUSTMENT ASSUMPTION
Fraction 1 - α re-set price optimally (and symmetrically)
October 9, 2008 22
AGGREGATE PRICE LEVEL
DSGE Calvo-Yun Model
Aggregate price index follows from Dixit-Stiglitz aggregation
1 11 1 1 *1
10 0
t it it itP P di P di P diα
ε ε ε ε
α
− − − −−= = +∫ ∫ ∫
adjustersnon-adjustersEmphasize optimal new price
1 *11 (1 )t tP Pε εα α− −−= + −
1 *11 (1 )t tpε εαπ α− −= + − EQUILIBRIUM EVOLUTION OF AGGREGATE INFLATION –depends on relative price set by firms currently adjusting nominal price
Obtained by substituting demand functions into D-S aggregator
Optimal-pricing condition1 2t tx x=
Together form the “aggregate supply” block of New Keynesian sticky-price model
KEY: Because adjusters were randomly selected, average (aggregate) price of non-adjusters is same as previous period’s average (aggregate) price
TRACTABILITY DUE TO THE CALVO RANDOM-ADJUSTMENT ASSUMPTION
Fraction 1 - α re-set price optimally (and symmetrically)
12
October 9, 2008 23
PRICE DISPERSION
DSGE Calvo-Yun Model
Calvo model implies dispersion of relative pricesAs does Taylor model (see Chari, Kehoe, McGrattan (2000 Econometrica for an example))……but not Rotemberg model (quadratic cost of nominal price adjustment)
October 9, 2008 24
PRICE DISPERSION
DSGE Calvo-Yun Model
Calvo model implies dispersion of relative pricesAs does Taylor model (see Chari, Kehoe, McGrattan (2000 Econometrica for an example))……but not Rotemberg model (quadratic cost of nominal price adjustment)
Dispersion often ignored until recently...…due to linearization around a zero-inflation steady state (typical simple New Keynesian model soon…)With better numerical tools, easier to take account of dispersion
13
October 9, 2008 25
PRICE DISPERSION
DSGE Calvo-Yun Model
Calvo model implies dispersion of relative pricesAs does Taylor model (see Chari, Kehoe, McGrattan (2000 Econometrica for an example))……but not Rotemberg model (quadratic cost of nominal price adjustment)
Dispersion often ignored until recently...…due to linearization around a zero-inflation steady state (typical simple New Keynesian model soon…)With better numerical tools, easier to take account of dispersion
Price dispersion the basic source of welfare losses of non-zero inflation
Because it implies quantity dispersion across intermediate producers……which is inefficient because Dixit-Stiglitz aggregator is symmetric and concave in every good i
October 9, 2008 26
PRICE DISPERSION
DSGE Calvo-Yun Model
Calvo model implies dispersion of relative pricesAs does Taylor model (see Chari, Kehoe, McGrattan (2000 Econometrica for an example))……but not Rotemberg model (quadratic cost of nominal price adjustment)
Dispersion often ignored until recently...…due to linearization around a zero-inflation steady state (typical simple New Keynesian model soon…)With better numerical tools, easier to take account of dispersion
Price dispersion the basic source of welfare losses of non-zero inflation
Because it implies quantity dispersion across intermediate producers……which is inefficient because Dixit-Stiglitz aggregator is symmetric and concave in every good i
The basic driving force of optimal policy in any NK model
14
October 9, 2008 27
PRICE DISPERSION
DSGE Calvo-Yun Model
For firm i, ( , )itit t t it it
t
Py y z f k nP
ε−⎛ ⎞
= =⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
October 9, 2008 28
PRICE DISPERSION
DSGE Calvo-Yun Model
For firm i,
Integrating over i
( , )itit t t it it
t
Py y z f k nP
ε−⎛ ⎞
= =⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
1 1
0 0
( , )itt t it it
t
Py di z f k n diP
ε−⎛ ⎞
=⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠∫ ∫
15
October 9, 2008 29
PRICE DISPERSION
DSGE Calvo-Yun Model
For firm i,
Integrating over i
( , )itit t t it it
t
Py y z f k nP
ε−⎛ ⎞
= =⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
1 1
0 0
( , )itt t it it
t
Py di z f k n diP
ε−⎛ ⎞
=⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠∫ ∫
Symmetric choices of k/n ratio across all firms i…
1 1
0 0
,1it tt t it
t t
P ky di z f n diP n
ε−⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞
=⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠∫ ∫
October 9, 2008 30
PRICE DISPERSION
DSGE Calvo-Yun Model
For firm i,
Integrating over i
( , )itit t t it it
t
Py y z f k nP
ε−⎛ ⎞
= =⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠
1 1
0 0
( , )itt t it it
t
Py di z f k n diP
ε−⎛ ⎞
=⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠∫ ∫
ts≡
1 1
0 0
,1it tt t it
t t
P ky di z f n diP n
ε−⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞
=⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠∫ ∫
A measure of dispersion: relative price dispersion leads to dispersion of factor usage across differentiated firms, hence dispersion of quantity across differentiated firms
Express st recursively
Symmetric choices of k/n ratio across all firms i…
16
October 9, 2008 31
PRICE DISPERSION
DSGE Calvo-Yun Model
1 1 *
0 0
it it itt
t t t
P P Ps di di diP P P
ε ε εα
α
− − −⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞
= = +⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠∫ ∫ ∫
Re-setters all choose same price
*
0
(1 ) t it
t t
P P diP P
ε εα
α− −
⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞= − +⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠∫
October 9, 2008 32
PRICE DISPERSION
DSGE Calvo-Yun Model
1 1 *
0 0
it it itt
t t t
P P Ps di di diP P P
ε ε εα
α
− − −⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞
= = +⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠∫ ∫ ∫
Re-setters all choose same price
*
0
(1 ) t it
t t
P P diP P
ε εα
α− −
⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞= − +⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠∫
Pit = Pit-1 for firms that cannot re-set price
*1
0
(1 ) t it
t t
P P diP P
ε εα
α− −
−⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞= − +⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠∫
17
October 9, 2008 33
PRICE DISPERSION
DSGE Calvo-Yun Model
1 1 *
0 0
it it itt
t t t
P P Ps di di diP P P
ε ε εα
α
− − −⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞
= = +⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠∫ ∫ ∫
Re-setters all choose same price
*
0
(1 ) t it
t t
P P diP P
ε εα
α− −
⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞= − +⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠∫
*1
0
(1 ) t it
t t
P P diP P
ε εα
α− −
−⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞= − +⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠∫
Multiply by (Pt-1/Pt-1)-ε
*1 1
10
(1 ) t t it
t t t
P P P diP P P
ε ε εα
α− − −
− −
−
⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞= − +⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠∫
Pit = Pit-1 for firms that cannot re-set price
October 9, 2008 34
PRICE DISPERSION
DSGE Calvo-Yun Model
1 1 *
0 0
it it itt
t t t
P P Ps di di diP P P
ε ε εα
α
− − −⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞
= = +⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠∫ ∫ ∫
Re-setters all choose same price
*
0
(1 ) t it
t t
P P diP P
ε εα
α− −
⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞= − +⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠∫
*1
0
(1 ) t it
t t
P P diP P
ε εα
α− −
−⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞= − +⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠∫
Multiply by (Pt-1/Pt-1)-ε
*1 1
10
(1 ) t t it
t t t
P P P diP P P
ε ε εα
α− − −
− −
−
⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞= − +⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠∫
1tsα −≡tεπ≡
Pit = Pit-1 for firms that cannot re-set price
18
October 9, 2008 35
PRICE DISPERSION
DSGE Calvo-Yun Model
1 1 *
0 0
it it itt
t t t
P P Ps di di diP P P
ε ε εα
α
− − −⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞
= = +⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠∫ ∫ ∫
Re-setters all choose same price
*
0
(1 ) t it
t t
P P diP P
ε εα
α− −
⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞= − +⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠∫
*1
0
(1 ) t it
t t
P P diP P
ε εα
α− −
−⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞= − +⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠∫
Multiply by (Pt-1/Pt-1)-ε
*1 1
10
(1 ) t t it
t t t
P P P diP P P
ε ε εα
α− − −
− −
−
⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞= − +⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠∫
1tsα −≡tεπ≡
Pit = Pit-1 for firms that cannot re-set price
1
0 0
1it itt
t t
P Ps di diP P
ε εα
α
− −⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞
= =⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠∫ ∫
Because of Calvorandom adjustment and all adjusters choose same price
October 9, 2008 36
PRICE DISPERSION
DSGE Calvo-Yun Model
1 1 *
0 0
it it itt
t t t
P P Ps di di diP P P
ε ε εα
α
− − −⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞
= = +⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠∫ ∫ ∫
Re-setters all choose same price
*
0
(1 ) t it
t t
P P diP P
ε εα
α− −
⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞= − +⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠∫
*1
0
(1 ) t it
t t
P P diP P
ε εα
α− −
−⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞= − +⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠∫
Multiply by (Pt-1/Pt-1)-ε
*1 1
10
(1 ) t t it
t t t
P P P diP P P
ε ε εα
α− − −
− −
−
⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞= − +⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠∫
tεπ≡
NOTE:
α= 0: st = 1 (no dispersion)
α > 0: st > 1 (dispersion)
Pit = Pit-1 for firms that cannot re-set price
Because of Calvorandom adjustment and all adjusters choose same price
1tsα −≡
1
0 0
1it itt
t t
P Ps di diP P
ε εα
α
− −⎛ ⎞ ⎛ ⎞
= =⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠∫ ∫
19
October 9, 2008 37
RESOURCE CONSTRAINT
DSGE Calvo-Yun Model
Summarized by three conditions
( , )t t tt
t
z f k nys
=
1 (1 )t t t t ty c k k gδ+= + − − +
*1(1 )t t t ts p sε εα απ−−= − +
“Usual” resource constraint
Some output is a pure deadweight loss
(note st < 1 cannot occur)
Law of motion for deadweight loss
1 1
0 0
,t it t itk k di n n di= =∫ ∫
And using factor market clearing conditions here
October 9, 2008 38
RESOURCE CONSTRAINT
Yun 1996 Model
Summarized by three conditions
Law of motion for st represented using laws of motion for both Pt-1and P*t-1
See equations (25) and (26)
( , )t t tt
t
z f k nys
=
1 (1 )t t t t ty c k k gδ+= + − − +
*1(1 )t t t ts p sε εα απ−−= − +
“Usual” resource constraint
Some output is a pure deadweight loss
(note st < 1 cannot occur)
Law of motion for deadweight loss
= 0 in Yun model
20
October 9, 2008 39
OTHER MODEL DETAILS
Yun 1996 Model
Cash/credit to motivate money demandi.e., Lucas and Stokey (1983), Chari, Christiano, and Kehoe (1991)
(Habit persistence (i.e., time-non-separability) in leisure)As in Kydland and Prescott (1982); unimportant for main results…
Could have been cashless…
October 9, 2008 40
OTHER MODEL DETAILS
Yun 1996 Model
Cash/credit to motivate money demandi.e., Lucas and Stokey (1983), Chari, Christiano, and Kehoe (1991)
(Habit persistence (i.e., time-non-separability) in leisure)As in Kydland and Prescott (1982); unimportant for main results…
Exogenous AR(1) money growth processAlso “endogenous” money supply process, but not as interesting
Exogenous AR(1) TFP process
Could have been cashless…
21
October 9, 2008 41
OTHER MODEL DETAILS
Yun 1996 Model
Cash/credit to motivate money demandi.e., Lucas and Stokey (1983), Chari, Christiano, and Kehoe (1991)
(Habit persistence (i.e., time-non-separability) in leisure)As in Kydland and Prescott (1982); unimportant for main results…
Exogenous AR(1) money growth processAlso “endogenous” money supply process, but not as interesting
Exogenous AR(1) TFP process
Indexation of prices to average (i.e., steady-state) inflationFor firms not re-setting price, (will see again in Christiano, Eichenbaum, and Evans (2005 JPE))
Approximated and simulated using “usual” methodsUsing King, Plosser, Rebelo (1988) linear approximation method
(One…) predecessor to SGU algorithm
1it itP Pπ −=
Could have been cashless…
October 9, 2008 42
NOMINAL EFFECTS OF STICKY PRICES
Yun 1996 Model
Effects on inflation not very different compared to flex-price case
Flexible Prices
Sticky Prices
22
October 9, 2008 43
NOMINAL EFFECTS OF STICKY PRICES
Yun 1996 Model
Effects on inflation not very different compared to flex-price case
Flexible Prices
Sticky Prices
Lack of inflation persistence in basic Calvo-Yun model (now) well-known –see Steinsson (2001 JME)
October 9, 2008 44
REAL EFFECTS OF STICKY PRICES
Yun 1996 Model
Effects on GDP much bigger the stickier are prices
Flexible Prices
Sticky Prices
23
October 9, 2008 45
MARKUP DYNAMICS
Sticky-Price Mechanism
Money (i.e., nontechnology) shock output expands
With zt, kt fixed, output expansion due to increased (equilibrium) hours
October 9, 2008 46
MARKUP DYNAMICS
Sticky-Price Mechanism
Money (i.e., nontechnology) shock output expands
With zt, kt fixed, output expansion due to increased (equilibrium) hours
Downward-sloping product demand curves individual (differentiated) firms must expand their output (partial equilibrium)
Recall aggregate output a shifter of firm i demand function
Can only be achieved in the short-run if a given firm i hires more labor at any real wage
24
October 9, 2008 47
MARKUP DYNAMICS
Sticky-Price Mechanism
Money (i.e., nontechnology) shock output expands
With zt, kt fixed, output expansion due to increased (equilibrium) hours
Downward-sloping product demand curves individual (differentiated) firms must expand their output (partial equilibrium)
Recall aggregate output a shifter of firm i demand function
Can only be achieved in the short-run if a given firm i hires more labor at any real wage
S
Labor
Real wage D
1( , )
t
t n t t t
wz f k n μ
= Sticky-price (or sticky-wage) model delivers endogenously-countercyclical markup
tmc=
October 9, 2008 48
DSGE STICKY-PRICE MODELS
Summary and Roadmap
Nominal rigidities embedded in DSGE modelMonetary shifts quantitatively “big” effects on output(Re-)articulates “old” Keynesian ideasGoodfriend and King (1997 NBER Macroeconomics Annual): the New-Neoclassical Synthesis
25
October 9, 2008 49
DSGE STICKY-PRICE MODELS
Summary and Roadmap
Nominal rigidities embedded in DSGE modelMonetary shifts quantitatively “big” effects on output(Re-)articulates “old” Keynesian ideasGoodfriend and King (1997 NBER Macroeconomics Annual): the New-Neoclassical Synthesis
Output effect not very long-lasting (peak response occurs in period of monetary shock, inconsistent with data)
The “Persistence Puzzle”Examined in Chari, Kehoe, and McGrattan (2000 Econometrica) (next) and Christiano, Eichenbaum, and Evans (2005 JPE)
October 9, 2008 50
DSGE STICKY-PRICE MODELS
Summary and Roadmap
Nominal rigidities embedded in DSGE modelMonetary shifts quantitatively “big” effects on output(Re-)articulates “old” Keynesian ideasGoodfriend and King (1997 NBER Macroeconomics Annual): the New-Neoclassical Synthesis
Output effect not very long-lasting (peak response occurs in period of monetary shock, inconsistent with data)
The “Persistence Puzzle”Examined in Chari, Kehoe, and McGrattan (2000 Econometrica) (next) and Christiano, Eichenbaum, and Evans (2005 JPE)
Inflation not very persistentSteinsson (2001 JME): “backward-looking price-setting”
26
October 9, 2008 51
DSGE STICKY-PRICE MODELS
Summary and Roadmap
Nominal rigidities embedded in DSGE modelMonetary shifts quantitatively “big” effects on output(Re-)articulates “old” Keynesian ideasGoodfriend and King (1997 NBER Macroeconomics Annual): the New-Neoclassical Synthesis
Output effect not very long-lasting (peak response occurs in period of monetary shock, inconsistent with data)
The “Persistence Puzzle”Examined in Chari, Kehoe, and McGrattan (2000 Econometrica) (next) and Christiano, Eichenbaum, and Evans (2005 JPE)
Inflation not very persistentSteinsson (2001 JME): “backward-looking price-setting”
A Phillips Curve?
Optimal policy?