No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly...

38
James Griffiths Project Kaka Understanding the effects of 3 yearly aerial 1080 applications for animal pest control

Transcript of No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly...

Page 1: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking

James Griffiths

Project Kaka Understanding the effects of 3 yearly aerial 1080

applications for animal pest control

Page 2: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking

Project Kaka initiated

Switch from possum focused control to multi-pest

control

• 6 year aerial 1080 applications to 10,000ha blocks halted over

(36, 000ha) of Tararua Forest Park - 2007

• 3 year aerial 1080 with pre-feed commenced Nov 2009

(22,000ha)-Otaki to Mt Holdsworth

• Hutt Water Catchment (10,000ha), ongoing aerial 1080 treatment

by GWRC, 6 year cycle, last 1080 application May 2009

Page 3: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking
Page 4: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking

Rationale

• Pre-fed 1080 treatment can control multiple pests

• Rats

• Mustelids

• Possums

• Increased treatment area size, consideration of shape &

edge topography

– reduced pest immigration

• 3 year treatment cycle should allow two good bird

breeding seasons every three years

Page 5: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking

Bird populations

Time

Bir

d

Den

sit

y

3-yearly vs 6 yearly pest control

Page 6: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking

• Comprehensive research programme implemented 2009

• Rodents/Mustlids/Possums

• Birds

• Invertebrates

• Deer

• Forest structure/composition

• Fruit abundance

• Long term - 10 year

• Research partnerships established – DOC R&D, Greater Wellington Regional Council, Landcare Research, AHB & Vic Uni

Can we use 3 yearly 1080 ops to restore a forest ecosystem?

Page 7: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking

Research objectives

1. How does 3-yearly aerial 1080

treatment influence the abundance

and distribution of target pest species

(possums, rats, stoats) and non-target

pests (mice, deer)?

2. How are the abundance and

distribution of target/non-target pest

species related to the abundance and

distribution of vulnerable native

animal and plant species?

Page 8: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking

Research objectives

3. How are the abundance and

distribution of target pest species and

breeding of fruit-feeding birds related

to changes in beech and rimu

seedfall?

4. What is the effect of stopping 6-

yearly aerial 1080 control on

target/non-target pest species and

ecosystem health?

Page 9: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking
Page 10: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking

Methods – 5MBC

• 120 stations/treatment

• random locations – First detection of

individual birds recorded

– Time of detection recorded

– Digital audio recording

(Olympus LS10)

• sampling frequency

– annual

Page 11: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking

Methods – Tracking Tunnels

• Rodents/Mustelids/Weta

• 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area

• At least 1km apart

• 10 tracking tunnels per line

• sampling frequency

– Quarterly – Rodents&Weta

– Jan,Feb – Mustelids

Page 12: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking

Methods – Waxtags

• Possums

• 40 randomly placed transects per treatment /non-treatment

• 30 waxtags per transect

• sampling frequency

– annual

Page 13: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking

Methods – Faecal Pellet Index

• Deer

• 40 randomly placed transects per

treatment/non-treatment

• 30x1m radius plots per transect

• Pellet groups counted in each plot

• Sampling frequency

– annual

Page 14: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking

Methods – Seedrain Traps

• Fruitfall, Stick insect

eggs & Weta frass

• Placed under randomly

selected rimu silver and

beech

• Sampling frequency

– Nov, Feb

Page 15: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking

Methods – Ungulate exclusion plots

• Impact of deer on forest structure and composition

• Randomly selected sites

• Sampling frequency

– 5 years

Page 16: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking

Methods – 20x20m vegetation plots

• Forest/Structure and Composition

– Emphasis on demography/mortality

• Randomly selected from existing plot network

• Tagged palatable/unpalatable stems

• Browse scores recorded for tagged stems

• Sampling frequency

– 10 years

Page 17: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking

Preliminary results – Possums

2012 data to come

Page 18: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

Year

Bite

Mar

k In

dex

2010 2011 2010 2011 2010 2011

Hutt Catchment Non Treatment Project Kaka

1080

app

licat

ion

1080

app

licat

ion

Page 19: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking

Preliminary results - Rats

Page 20: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

mean t

rackin

g r

ate

2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010pre 2010post 2011 2012

Hutt Catchment Non Treatment Project Kaka

10

80

ap

plic

atio

n

10

80

ap

plic

atio

n

Page 21: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking

Preliminary results - Mice

Page 22: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

mean t

rackin

g r

ate

2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010 2011 2012 2009 2010pre 2010post 2011 2012

Hutt Catchment Non Treatment Project Kaka

10

80

ap

plic

atio

n

10

80

ap

plic

atio

n

Page 23: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking

Preliminary results - Stoats

Page 24: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

Year

mea

n tr

acki

ng r

ate

2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012

Hutt Catchment Non Treatment Project Kaka

1080

app

licat

ion

1080

app

licat

ion

Page 25: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking

Preliminary results – Deer

Page 26: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

Year

faecal pelle

t in

dex

2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012

Non Treatment Project Kaka

1080 a

pplic

atio

n

Page 27: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking

Preliminary results – Birds

Page 28: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

1.4

1.6

Rifleman

me

an

nu

mb

er

of b

ird

s p

er

5 m

inu

te b

ird

co

un

t

n=100 n=100 n=100 n=118 n=108 n=118 n=114 n=113 n=117

De

c-0

9

De

c-1

0

De

c-1

1

De

c-0

9

De

c-1

0

De

c-1

1

De

c-0

9

De

c-1

0

De

c-1

1

Hutt Catchment Non Treatment Project Kaka

1080 a

pplication

1080 a

pplication

0.5

1.0

1.5

Whitehead

n=100 n=100 n=100 n=118 n=108 n=118 n=114 n=113 n=117

De

c-0

9

De

c-1

0

De

c-1

1

De

c-0

9

De

c-1

0

De

c-1

1

De

c-0

9

De

c-1

0

De

c-1

1

Hutt Catchment Non Treatment Project Kaka

1080 a

pplication

1080 a

pplication

Page 29: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

Kakariki

me

an

nu

mb

er

of b

ird

s p

er

5 m

inu

te b

ird

co

un

t

n=100 n=100 n=100 n=118 n=108 n=118 n=114 n=113 n=117

De

c-0

9

De

c-1

0

De

c-1

1

De

c-0

9

De

c-1

0

De

c-1

1

De

c-0

9

De

c-1

0

De

c-1

1

Hutt Catchment Non Treatment Project Kaka

1080 a

pplication

1080 a

pplication

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

Tomtit

n=100 n=100 n=100 n=118 n=108 n=118 n=114 n=113 n=117

Dec-0

9

Dec-1

0

Dec-1

1

Dec-0

9

Dec-1

0

Dec-1

1

Dec-0

9

Dec-1

0

Dec-1

1

Hutt Catchment Non Treatment Project Kaka

1080 a

pplication

1080 a

pplication

Page 30: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

Tui&Bellbird

me

an

nu

mb

er

of b

ird

s p

er

5 m

inu

te b

ird

co

un

t

n=100 n=100 n=100 n=118 n=108 n=118 n=114 n=113 n=117

De

c-0

9

De

c-1

0

De

c-1

1

De

c-0

9

De

c-1

0

De

c-1

1

De

c-0

9

De

c-1

0

De

c-1

1

Hutt Catchment Non Treatment Project Kaka

1080 a

pplication

1080 a

pplication

0.0

00

.05

0.1

00

.15

0.2

00

.25

0.3

00

.35

Fantail

n=100 n=100 n=100 n=118 n=108 n=118 n=114 n=113 n=117

De

c-0

9

De

c-1

0

De

c-1

1

De

c-0

9

De

c-1

0

De

c-1

1

De

c-0

9

De

c-1

0

De

c-1

1

Hutt Catchment Non Treatment Project Kaka

1080 a

pplication

1080 a

pplication

Page 31: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking

Acoustic Recorders – Birds

Page 32: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking
Page 33: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking
Page 34: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking
Page 35: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking
Page 36: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking

What next?

• 1080 applied

– Project Kaka area 2013&2016

– Hutt Catchment 2015

• Ensure sampling is consistent and executed to a high standard

• Develop models that accurately predict the effect of treatment

and interactions between animal pests, fruiting events, & native

flora & fauna

• Report on progress

– Stakeholder newsletters

– Internet

– Science literature

Page 37: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking

Acknowledgements

• DOC Graeme Elliott, Maheswaran Rohan, Josh Kemp, Ben Reddiex, Colin Miskelly, Jack Mace, Clare Veltman, Wairarapa and Kapiti AO staff

• Greater Wellington RC – Philippa Crisp, Kim Broad, Owen Spearpoint and field staff

• Landcare Research - Mandy Barron, Wendy Ruscoe, Rob Allen & Peter Bellingham

Page 38: No Slide Title€¦ · Methods – Tracking Tunnels • Rodents/Mustelids/Weta • 20 randomly placed transects per treatment/non-treatment area • At least 1km apart • 10 tracking

Questions?