"NO MORE TAXES"

By Stephen R. Renfrow

An Expose' devoted to theTRUE AMERICAN!

A beginners guide to theTAX REVOLUTION.

The Most UnbelievableFRAUD IN HISTORY!

But the TRUTH WillSET YOU FREE!

ii

NOTICETO ALL PUBLIC SERVANTS

THIS IS PRIVATE PROPERTY AND AS SUCH ALL RIGHTS GUARANTEED BY THECONSTITUTION, WHICH YOU HAVE TAKEN AN OATH TO UPHOLD ANDDEFEND ARE HEREBY CLAIMED.

PLEASE NOTE: NO CLAIMS OR DEMANDS OF ANY KIND WILL BE RECOGNIZEDWITHOUT FULL DUE PROCESS OF LAW. IF YOU FEEL YOU MUST CONTACT MEOFFICIALLY, YOU CAN DO SO BY MAIL. ADDRESS ALL CORRESPONDENCE TO:

STEPHEN R. RENFROWc/o Non DomesticP. O. BOX 32534

Palm Beach Gardens,Florida state republic [PZ33420]

NOTE: BE SURE YOU PERSONALLY SIGN ALL DOCUMENTS, DEMANDS ORREQUESTS AS REQUIRED BY LAW.

WARNINGU.S. CRIMINAL CODE: TITLE 18

SEC. 241. CONSPIRACY AGAINST RIGHTS OF CITIZENS

IF TWO OR MORE PERSONS CONSPIRE TO INJURE, OPPRESS, THREATEN OR INTIMIDATE ANYCITIZEN IN THE FREE EXERCISE OR ENJOYMENT OF ANY RIGHT OR PRIVILEGE SECURED TOHIM BY THE CONSTITUTION OR LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES, OR BECAUSE OF HIS HAVINGSO EXERCISED THE SAME; ORIF TWO OR MORE PERSONS GO IN DISGUISE ON THE HIGHWAY, OR ON THE PREMISES OFANOTHER, WITH THE INTENT TO PREVENT OR HINDER HIS FREE EXERCISE OR ENJOYMENT OFANY RIGHT OR PRIVILEGE SO SECURED, SHALL BE FINED NOT MORE THAN $10,000 ORIMPRISONED NOT MORE THAN TEN YEARS OR BOTH; AND IF DEATH RESULTS, THEY SHALLBE SUBJECT TO IMPRISONMENT FOR ANY TERM OF YEARS OR FOR LIFE.

SEC. 242. DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW

WHOEVER, UNDER COLOR OF LAW, STATUTE, ORDINANCE, REGULATION, OR CUSTOM,WILLFULLY SUBJECTS ANY INHABITANT OF ANY STATE, TERRITORY, OR DISTRICT TO THEDEPRIVATION OF ANY RIGHTS, PRIVILEGES, OR IMMUNITIES SECURED OR PROTECTED BYTHE CONSTITUTION OR LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES, OR TO DIFFERENT PUNISHMENTS,PAINS, OR PENALTIES, ON ACCOUNT OF SUCH INHABITANT BEING AN ALIEN, OR BY REASONOF HIS COLOR, OR RACE, THAN ARE PRESCRIBED FOR THE PUNISHMENT OF CITIZENS, SHALLBE FINED NOT MORE THAN $1,000 OR IMPRISONED NOT MORE THAN ONE YEAR, OR BOTH;AND IF DEATH RESULTS SHALL BE SUBJECT TO IMPRISONMENT FOR ANY TERM OF YEARS ORFOR LIFE.

iii

The READER hereby accepts full responsibility for the use of or interpretation of the

contents of this Book. The READER is strongly encouraged to investigate all assertions

made herein by personal investigation of the public record. The AUTHOR simply states that

the enclosed material is to bring forth pertinent and valuable information to the READER

concerning facts that he has come to know. This Book is not legal or professional advice, and

is only informational in nature and scope.

The AUTHOR, Stephen R. Renfrow, is a sovereign American Citizen pursuant to the

Declaration of Independence, an act of separation by the American colonies on July 4, 1776,

and in consequence he is one of the holders of the inherent political power of American

rulership, hence is entitled by birthright to all the unalienable common law rights attendant to

said sovereign citizenship.

The subject contents of this Book concern only matters of American sovereignty

which per force can only be of interest to the author and his fellow sovereign American

Citizens, or who may want to be. Any person(s) who may have reason to believe that they are

not sovereign American Citizens or who represent interests, either foreign or domestic, which

are foreign to the principles of a sovereign people enunciated by said act of 1776, may not

object to the author's distribution of these materials upon grounds that he is not licensed to

practice law, or other similar grounds, inasmuch as this Book is merely the business of

political intercourse between one sovereign American Citizen and his fellow sovereign

American Citizens - each of whom is a holder of the inherent political power of the American

Nation.

The AUTHOR makes no representation that he is in any manner a member, an

associate, or affiliated within any private lawyer or attorney organization or syndicate, or that

the herein material contains any legal advice that may be characterized as pertaining to or

iv

being of the exclusive province or jurisdiction of any private lawyer or attorney organization

or syndicate or in point of fact any manner of legal advice whatsoever.

Consequently, any person upon a thoughtful review of this Book, who determines

henceforth to exercise their unalienable rights, must be mindful that their acts are their own

free acts of "sovereignty-of-one", hence they must be prepared to defend their own acts. So,

stated once again, the AUTHOR assumes no responsibility for the acts of other sovereign

American Citizens in the exercise of their unalienable rights.

THE CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

COMMON LAW COPYRIGHT 1988 - 1998

v

TABLE OF CONTENTSPage

Introduction . . . . . . . 1Something Has To Be Done . . . . . . 2

Chapters

CHAPTER 1 YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ..................................................1-3

CHAPTER 2 WHERE DID WE GO WRONG?.......................................................2-12

GREAT QUOTES ON THE FED ISSUE .................................................................................2-13MISTAKE ADMITTED......................................................................................................2-15WHERE WE ARE TODAY!...............................................................................................2-16A SHADOW GOVERNMENT? ...........................................................................................2-18

CHAPTER 3 TAX AND SPEND MENTALITY .......................................................3-21

OUR TRUE DEBT............................................................................................................3-24

CHAPTER 4 IRS 90% BLUFF -- VIOLATES THE LAW! ........................................4-25

A PLAY ON WORDS.......................................................................................................4-26ARE YOU A TAXPAYER?................................................................................................4-29'SHALL' MEANS 'MAY'.................................................................................................4-30'MUST' MEANS 'MAY' ..................................................................................................4-33

CHAPTER 5 A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE..........................5-38

HOW DO WE GET BACK CONTROL? ...............................................................................5-39FACTS AND FALLACIES: .........................................................................................5-40

CHAPTER 6 DOES THE IRS REALLY COLLECT TAXES? ..................................6-42

FRB ENDORSEMENT:.....................................................................................................6-43HOW THE DEBT HAS BEEN CREATED: ..............................................................................6-44CAN YOU SPELL FRAUD?........................................................................................6-45

CHAPTER 7 WHAT HAPPENED TO OUR SOVEREIGNTY? ............................7-47

THE THREE UNITED STATES..................................................................................7-47TWO TYPES OF CITIZENSHIPS ...............................................................................7-48WHAT CAN YOU DO? ...............................................................................................7-49

CHAPTER 8 HOW TO STOP PAYING INCOME TAXES .......................................8-51

FEDERAL DECISIONS ABOUT YOUR MONEY ....................................................................8-54WHY REVOKE YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER?..........................................................8-55

CHAPTER 9 CONTROLLING BIG BROTHER ........................................................9-62

PRIVILEGES VS RIGHTS ...........................................................................................9-64"INCOME" NOT DEFINED.........................................................................................9-6516TH AMENDMENT DID NOT AMEND THE CONSTITUTION ..............................9-66

vi

TRUSTING OUR GOVERNMENT .............................................................................9-66ARTICLE TWO ...........................................................................................................9-67******* A TRUE PATRIOT ******* .....................................................................9-70

CHAPTER 10 RECOMMENDED READING..........................................................10-71

VIDEO'S ....................................................................................................................10-72WORKSHOP MATERIALS......................................................................................10-73ORGANIZATIONS....................................................................................................10-74NEWSLETTERS AND MAGAZINES .......................................................................10-74REFERENCE BOOKS ...............................................................................................10-75BBS - WWW..............................................................................................................10-76

CHAPTER 11 DEFINITIONS {WORDS TO KNOW}.............................................11-79

CHAPTER 12 CITES AND QUOTES ........................................................................12-85

IN GENERAL.............................................................................................................12-85ABOUT THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE ...................................................................12-86ABOUT SOCIAL SECURITY ............................................................................................12-91ABOUT THE LAW .........................................................................................................12-92ABOUT MONEY, BANKING & THE FEDERAL RESERVE ..................................................12-93ON THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT......................................................................12-104SOME GREEN QUOTES ................................................................................................12-109

CHAPTER 13 ****** EXHIBITS ******CHAPTER 13 ****** EXHIBITS ******.....................................................13-111

CHAPTER 14 FORMS SECTIONCHAPTER 14 FORMS SECTION ...................................................................14-130

WHAT TO DO WHEN THE COUNTY RECORDER "REFUSES TO RECORD" .........................14-130

TABLE OF DIAGRAMSTHE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM 5-41FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICTS 5-41Our Government is the Nations biggest employer! 9-69

1-1

INTRODUCTION

An Excerpt from:

"THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK"

by H. S. Kenan

On December 23, 1913, a privately owned Federal ReserveCorp. of International Bankers, mostly foreigners wasunconstitutionally and surreptitiously foisted upon theAmerican people by a small remnant of traitors in the Congressof the United States after a the majority of loyal Congressmenhad gone back home for Christmas. This treason against theUnited States is the most colossal, fantastic unbelievablefraud ever perpetuated upon a so called civilized nation andunder this Federal Reserve System has resulted in the theft ofsome 36 Billion dollars in silver, and under this arch -swindle ever since its unconstitutional beginning in 1913,this same Federal Reserve has forced the greatest andmightiest nation in the history of the world to suffer theabsurdity and indignity of applying to individuals to maintainits credit!

1-2

SOMETHING HAS TO BE DONE !

A majority of the people, and millions worldwide, realize that we (United States ofAmerica) have a problem that is growing continuously stronger and seemingly out ofcontrol. I am talking about the change in the nature of the United States of Americafrom a free society to a socialist state. Our ever-eroding freedoms, that our foundingfathers fought and died for. The main culprit - "The IRS Gestapo"! They haveprocedures set up to intimidate, to harass and to drive individuals and businessesinto bankruptcy and they contend that this is the most efficient way to collect taxes.Something has to be done !

The IRS can seize property, confiscate records and levy bank accounts, allwithout accusing the taxpayer of a crime and all without due process! Within it's ownbureaucratic sphere, can arraign and convict a taxpayer while acting as judge, juryand prosecution. Something has to be done!

The IRS has struck fear into practically everyone from Congress on down. Theyhide their abuses by ruining the careers of elected officials who try to expose IRSatrocities. In their struggle to overcome and destroy the will of the people, they havesucceeded in creating an atmosphere of intimidation and abuse in which fear andhate are cultivated which drives people into resistance to the system. Somethinghas to be done !

When the IRS wins their cases and extracts its tribute, the agency swells innumbers and becomes more powerful in their scheme for domination. Doesn't thissound like a police state? Did the 16th Amendment repeal the 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th,8th, 9th and 10th Amendments? Something has to be done !

I know you don't think the way the IRS does in that "all revenue of the individualsand corporations in the U.S. belongs to the government and whatever is left in theprivate hands is a gift from the government"! I assume you know that the IRSGestapo is not the only Federal Agency driving us to the brink of Totalitarianism.Others have followed through the cracks opened in civil and constitutional law by theexcesses of bureaucratic regulations in an attempt to get out from under the controlof the legislative branch which created and funds them. Something has to be done !

We cannot allow ourselves to slip into Totalitarianism, but I believe we, thepeople, can control or abolish these monstrosities at the expressed will of themajority. IT IS UP TO YOU AND ME!

Therefore, a proper grounding in the founding principles comprising the basis forthe American system of limited government, deemed suitable to the needs of a freepeople, is positively necessary.

Stephen R. RenfrowStephen R. Renfrow 1-15-1988

1-3

Chapter 1Chapter 1 YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTSYOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTSProtect Or Lose Them

The biggest question inmost people's minds is, "Whyrefuse to pay 'IncomeTaxes'?" Because by knowingthe Law, you are notrequired to, and by knowingthe economics of doing so,you wouldn't want to!

1. No Legal Money:Article 1, Section 10, of the United StatesConstitution provides that "No State shall makeanything but gold and silver coin a tender inpayment of debts." It is therefore impossible foranyone to legally pay income tax. All FederalReserve Notes and other bank notes in circulationare unconstitutional and void as lawful money - andtherefore, cannot be considered as taxable income,because they are "loaned money". (This is why theIR Code does not even define "Income" and should bedeclared null and void due to vagueness.)

Furthermore, in Article 1, Section 8, par. 5 - POWERS OFCONGRESS, "to coin money, regulate the value thereof, and offoreign coins and fix the standards of weight and measures".In 1913, Congress unlawfully relinquished this right to theFederal Reserve Corporation (FRC), which was set up by theInternational Bankers (foreigners). Its purpose is to even-tually ruin our country financially.

The Federal Reserve Corporation is not a branch of ourFederal Government. It is owned by private individual bankersand financiers, who through the fractional reserve bankingmethods (creating money out of thin air) has created anational debt structure so huge, that National Bankruptcy isimminent, unless Congress will nationalize the bankingindustry to pay off the national debt and create interest freemoney. The wealth of a nation should not be concentrated inthe hands of a few corrupt moneylenders, who through theirwealth, can control every facet of its citizens lives. MeyerAmschel Rothschild, king of the International Bankers, oncesaid, "Permit me to issue the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws."!

2. Illegal Laws: All administrative rules promulgated

1-4

by the Sec. of the Treasury and his agents that arerepugnant to the U.S. Constitution are null andvoid. See U.S. Supreme Court decision of Marburyvs. Madison, 1803.2 Lawyers Ed.60: "Law repugnant to theConstitution is void."

The rules and regulations of the IRS have been decided inthe U.S. Supreme Court to be in violation of the 4th, 5th,6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 10th and 13th Amendments to theConstitution and also Article 1, Section 8 and so are there-fore VOID and have NO LEGALITY AT ALL!

3. PRIVACY: Amendments 4 and 5 guarantee againstbeing a witness against self and make it quiteevident that you are not required to provide thegovernment with any records of income.

4. TREASON: Article 3, Section 3, provides thatgiving aid and comfort to our enemies is treason.By paying federal income taxes for aid to foreigntyrants, a citizen is committing treason. There isno authority in the U.S. Constitution for givingU.S. assets to friendly nations, let alone financingno-win-wars with aid to communist nations.

5. EQUALITY: Amendment 14 provides that "no Stateshall make or enforce any law which shall abridgethe privileges or immunities of citizens of theU.S., nor shall any State deprive any person oflife, liberty or property, without due process oflaw, nor deny any person within its jurisdiction theequal protection of the laws."

6. UNIFORMITY: Article 1, Section 8, par.1 providesthat all tax must be uniform. The 16th Amendmentdoes not say "heavy" or "progressive". You willfind those words in the Communist Manifesto writtenby Karl Marx. The purpose of the personal tax, hesaw as a means to destroy the free enterprise systemin the developed nations. The 16th Amendment didnot add any additional taxing authority, it simplyseparated income from its source. (more later)

7 SLAVERY: Amendment 13 prohibits slavery or in-voluntary servitude. (more later) Conscription istherefore illegal and paying taxes to support it forundeclared wars, anywhere one dictator fightsanother for a non-existent republic, is not only

1-5

ludicrous but also illegal.

8. RELIGION: The First Amendment guarantees ourreligious beliefs and free speech. I cannot pay forany undeclared war such as Vietnam, the Mid Eastcrisis or . . .? I believe a Christian may defendhimself but should not join any army and, in anyevent, cannot pay for a conscripted slave army.

9. UNCONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT BUSINESS: The 10thAmendment provides that "The powers not delegated tothe U.S. by the Constitution, nor prohibited by itto the States, are reserved to the Statesrespectively, or the people." This is very plainterms. It means that the TVA and 700 or moregovernment businesses - tax, rent and interest free- which have lost astronomical billions and continueto do so, are illegal operations and must be sold tothe private sector, rather than financed by taxes.

10. TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION: By paying apersonal tax, people pay tribute to the owners ofthe Federal Reserve system monopoly, which manyMaintain is illegal. The seven men of the OpenMarket Committee are appointed, and not elected, butcollect most of the multi Billions in annualinterest on the National debt, which is estimated tobe approx. $$$ 10 TRILLION! This interest is paidby the taxpayers --- YOU!

The Supreme Court1 of the United States has declared thatthe rules and regulations of the IRS Code are void and have NOLEGALITY AT ALL! "...An unconstitutional law, in legalcontemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never beenpassed. . .No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law andno courts are bound to enforce it." Suprised? Good! Becausethe rules and regulations of the IRS have been proven in courtto be in violation of the 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, 10thand 13th Amendments to the Constitution and also Article 1,Section 8 of the Constitution!2 MORE surprises:

Did you know that the IRS cannot audit your records UNLESS,you give them your consent? Section 7210 of the IR Code is theBig Bluff. This is based on deceit to try and get you to waiveyour Constitutional Rights. However, the Supreme Court3 had

1 See: 16th American Jurisprudence 2nd Section 1772 See: Pollock vs. Farmers Loan and Trust Co., 158 U.S. 601 (1895)3 See: Reisman Vs. Caplan, 375 U.S. 440

1-6

this to say, "That one cannot refuse to appear in response toan IRS summons. After one has appeared and asserted the rightnot to testify (the 5th) or produce records (the 4th) one isnot subject to prosecution, or any penalty under Sec. 7210."

If youget a summonsto appear -show up witha News cameraand Reporterand when theIRS employeeasks you foryour books &records or aincriminatoryquestion,just say "Your question may tend to incriminate me, and Irefuse to answer under my right protected by the 5th Amendmentof the Bill of Rights and I refuse to turn over any books andrecords which are protected under the 4th Amendment of theBill of Rights in the Constitution of the United States ofAmerica." The End! Never will that IRS employee summonsanybody again?? Of course if your not as brave or bold as Iam, take a tape recorder and two witnesses as is the case inany confrontation with the IRS. When they called me one time(and only once), in 1978, to come down to their office and tobring my books and records (which is an audit), I said "If Icome down, can anything I say be used against me in a court oflaw?" After a short pause he said, "Yes sir I believe so!"Then I said, "If I come down, and if I bring any of my booksand records, can they be used against me in a court of law?"Once again after a short pause he said "Yes sir, I'm afraidso!" Then I said, "Well I don't see any point in coming, doyou? Because I'm not going to waive my Constitutional Rights!"He in turn said, "I guess not sir, I will inform my superiorsof your position." You see, when they threaten you with finesor punishments, stand on your Constitutional Rights (if youknow what they are) they are bluffing. You hold all the Aces!

DID YOU KNOW that YOU have not had any 'income' and havenot earned any real 'dollars' since March 18, 1968? TheSupreme Court4 said,"...income may be defined as the gainderived from capital, from labor, or from both combined...".Note the word 'gain' or profit, from which a company derives again or profit! Labor and capital are economic equals and 4 See: Stattons' Independence Vs. Hawbert, 231 U.S. 406, pages 414 & 415

1-7

since the government cannot tax capital, neither can it taxlabor whether its value is received through wages, salariesetc. in the guise of an 'income' or 'profits' tax. So inother words the income tax is a corporate excise tax, but isnot even levied as such so no corporation has to pay either!(more details later) What about the 16th Amendment?

The Supreme Court ruled5 that the 16th Amendmentestablished the income tax as an excise tax and that taxes onincome do not have to be apportioned and therefore fall intoArticle 1, Section 8, Clause 1! So in essence the court saidthat the 16th Amendment gave the government the right to taxincome without apportionment - IF it imposed the tax as anexcise tax. However, if it is levied as a direct tax, it doesnot fall within the 16h Amendment guidelines and is illegalfor want of apportionment. If you read the Brushaber decision,the Supreme Court explicitly claims that the 16th Amendment DidNot overturn the Pollock decision (as some claim). In fact,the Court interpreted the 16th Amendment as a clarification,and states that;

"… the 16th amendment cannot be understood to grant the federal government any new power of taxation."

Brushaber vs. Union Pacific RR (see footnote)

In effect, the Federal government always had the power totax incomes, But, (and this is the big one) the gov't mustApportion Direct Taxes and Apply The Rule of Uniformity. Theproblem with the Income Tax is:

1. If they want it to be a direct tax, it must beapportioned. Of course, it is not apportioned, so tocollect it as a direct tax would make the taxunconstitutional.

2. If the gov't wants to collect it as an indirect tax, thenthey must contend with the following two decisions;

(a) Redfield vs. Fischer - in which the court ruledthat, unlike a corporation, an individual could notbe taxed (excised) for the "privilege" of existing.Additionally, the court stated that an individualsright to live and own property were rights uponwhich excise taxes could not be imposed.

5 See: Brushaber vs. Union Pacific RR, 240 U.S. 1, 1916, 36 S.Ct 236, 240 U.S. 1 See also: Pollock vs. Farmers Loan and Trust Co. N.Y. 1895, 125 S.Ct 673, 157 U.S. 429

1-8

(b) Jack Cole vs. Commissioner - in which the courtruled that individuals have the right to income orearnings and that right could not be taxed as a"privilege".

On top of all this (a paperback book could be written onthese two issues alone) if you will take what is called adollar bill from your wallet or purse, you will see that ithas printed at the top "Federal Reserve Note". These FRN'Sare issued by an organization that is not even a part of ourGovernment! These are just promissory notes, a promise to paynothing!(more later) According to the Constitution and theFederal Statute Book, a dollar MUST be redeemable for a givenamount of Gold or Silver. Your FRN'S cannot be redeemed foranything. It can only be exchanged for something else. TheFRN has NO TRUE VALUE! Do you pay 'income taxes' on'promissory notes'? Before March 1968, the Dollar could beredeemed for a given amount - the "Face Value"! Thereforethese FRNs are not Constitutional Dollars!

DID YOU KNOW that YOU commit perjury every time you sign a1040 form? How? By inserting figures as being Dollarsreceived by you and signing under "Penalties of Perjury". Toprevent the IRS from falsely accusing you of committingperjury, you commit perjury. You may wish the IRS to perceivethis 'money question' to be nothing more than a technicality,but they hope that you are ignorant of it! It is a courtproven fact that every 1040 you signed since 1968, you havecommitted perjury and the IRS may charge you with filing afraudulent return. They know it and hope you remain ignorantof it. You see, because you've signed a document with the IRSunder penalty of perjury, saying that you owe them money . . .they can and do take it to court and any judge has to upholdyour promise to pay, ONLY because of Your ignorance.

DID YOU KNOW that YOU hasten the downfall of the Con-stitution of the United States of America by cooperating withthe IRS? By cooperating with the same persons who wereresponsible for the Federal Reserve System, you are aiding andabetting the destruction of the United States of America alongwith the Council of Foreign Aid, the Trilateral Commission,Internal Revenue Tax and Audit Services Inc.6 (why someemployees quit when they find out the truth) and the FederalReserve Corp. to name a few. All of which are dedicated todestroying the economic structure of our great country and forno other reason than their own selfish desires to establish a

6 Legal name for the IRS, see "EXHIBITS" for a copy of their Articles of Incorporation in Delaware.

1-9

one world government, a New World Order (which is communism)and thereby control every citizen of the world. Conspiracyanyone???

Isn't it about time that we quit paying for our owndestruction? Witness what Senator Malone said in 1957 duringthe hearings of the Senate Finance Committee; "I believe, Iactually believe this, that if the people of this nation fullyunderstood what the Congress has done to them for 49 years,they would move on Washington, they would not wait for anelection . . . It all adds up to a preconceived plan todestroy the economic and social independence of the U.S. Now,not only is there no authority on the part of Congress todelegate its responsibility . . . to coin money and regulatethe value thereof . . . Under Article 1, Sec.8 Par.5 of theConstitution, but the Supreme Court, in the case of Ling SuFan Vs. the U.S., held the power to be Non Delegable."

We here in America have nothing to fear from Russia, orCuba or any other country to our Constitution. When yourPresident, Congressman or Senator takes office, he mustaccording to Article 6, Par. 3, take an oath to support theConstitution. Now I ask you, Does your Congressman or Senatorsupport the Constitution? How can you assume he is, whenthrough their action permits outside interest to further erodeand weaken the Constitution?

DID YOU KNOW that the IRS and its employees would notviolate your Constitutional rights, if they know that you knowthem and will use your rights? Lately many lawsuits have beenbrought up against the IRS employees individually forviolating the rights of American Citizens. This has caused theIRS much concern and some suits against the individual.However, when the Citizen showed a willingness to stand on hisConstitutional Rights, the cases have been dropped! AllAmerican Citizens are protected under the Constitution againstbeing compelled to be a witness against themselves, havingproperty taken from them with out due process of law and beingdirectly taxed except on the basis of apportionment. Forspecific recommendations, see the chapter "Controlling BigBrother".

DID YOUKNOW that whenyou willinglycooperate withan IRS

1-10

employee, you could be accused and tried for TREASON againstthe United States of America! When you willingly cooperatewith the IRS, you are violating and waiving the 4th, 5th, 6th,7th, 8th, 9th, 10th & 13th Amendments as well as Article 1,Section 8 of the Constitution of the United Sates of America.Isn't it about time we stand up for America and challenge anyrules or laws that are contrary to our Rights and religiousbeliefs? We have a moral obligation to ourselves and ourchildren that we restore America again to the Land of theFree, Home of the Brave.

DID YOU KNOW that there are some True Americans who havenot filed a 1040 and they have NEVER BEEN CONVICTED? It wouldbe impossible for me to list the millions of Citizens who donot pay any income tax or file a return. The IRS has evenadmitted that the numbers are growing, about 2000 new membersa day! I know that I will not be a party to the destruction ofthe United States and therefore will not pay any 'income tax'until our Constitution is once again given rule over Americaor until our Lord comes back to Earth to regain his throne andtitle as King of Kings. Even he only wants 10% (and on this point - Ido not recommend cheating). When he said give unto Caesar what ishis and unto the Lord what is his, does not all that is,belong to our God in Heaven - who created all that is?

>>> Even ourselves!?! <<<

1-11

Have Americans Really Lost

Their

F R E E D O M ?

Let's take a Look

at

Where We Stand!

THE GRADUATED INCOME TAX

Assessment: The principal here is that the more you earn, the higher your percent of tax.The harder you work, the less you get proportionately. The more you produce and contributeto society, the less you get proportionately. You are penalized for your increasedproductivity. This type of thinking runs contrary to the American principle of reward forhard work and ingenuity. You, most certainly, can add a few more objections of your own.

2-12

Chapter 2Chapter 2 WHERE DID WE GO WRONG?WHERE DID WE GO WRONG?

In a Republic, every Citizen is recognized as havingcertain inalienable and absolute rights. And the sole purposeof government is to protect and secure those rights.Alternatively, in a Democracy individuals are absorbed intothe body politic and are granted privileges (they call rights)which vary according to the will of the "State"7, i.e.Congress, i.e. lackeys and stooges of the "Rich Men" of theEarth who are trying to establish a NEW WORLD ORDER.

We the People have been fooled and tricked into tradingour Rights for Privileges. How did this happen - You ask?

"Lenin was right. There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existingbasis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hiddenforces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which notone man in a million is able to diagnose."

- John Maynard Keynes, 1883-1946

In the beginning years of our nation, the issue rose overthe establishment of a banking system. Alexander Hamilton, afriend of the International Bankers, sponsored legislation tocreate a Central Bank. He stated that,

<- Alexander Hamilton

Thomas Jefferson argued that,

Remember what Meyer Amschel Rothschild 7 A smoke and mirror screen to fool the people, described later as a municipal corporate entity having onlyjurisdiction over the District of Columbia, territories, possessions and enclaves of this entity.

". . . although privately owned and notauthorized by the Constitution, the Bankwould work in partnership with Governmentto facilitate control over the economy."

"Central control over the money supply wouldlead to a dictatorship by those few with theirhands on that supply and their greed wouldeventually plunge this Country into perpetualdebt."

2-13

said,

"Permit me to issue the money of a Nation, and I care not who makes its laws."

Of course, Jefferson eventually lost out his battle toprotect the Rights of the People and the Bank of the U.S. wasestablished in 1791. However, experiencing the imposition ofpaper money and the national tyranny, the people eventuallysaw through their evil plan and would not allow Congress torenew the Bank Charter after 1811.

But as you know, the International Bankers would not giveup. They hatched a sinister plan, following the Civil War,leading to the formation of the Federal Reserve Bank in 1913and the unlawful8 adoption of the 14th & 16th Amendments to theConstitution for the United States of America. Here is whatsome great men of our country had to say about the Fed issue:

Great Quotes on the Fed Issue

"If the American People ever allow the private banks to control the issue ofcurrency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that willgrow up around them will deprive the People of all property until their children willwake up homeless on the continent their forefathers conquered."

- Thomas Jefferson, 1791

"Whoever controls the volume of money in any country is master of all itslegislation and commerce."

- Pres. James Garfield, 1880

"This Act establishes the most gigantic trust on Earth … When the President signsthis Act, the invisible government by the money power, proven to exist by the MoneyTrust Investigation, will be legalized. The new law will create inflation whenever thetrust wants inflation . . . from now on, depression will be scientifically created."

- Congressman Charles Lindbergh Sr., 1913Commenting on the Federal Reserve Act

of 1913. His foresight provedaccurate 16 years later.

8 See "THE LAW THAT NEVER WAS" , by M.J. (Red) Beckman and Bill Benson, Documented Proof that itwas never ratified by 3/4's of the States as required by the Supreme Law of the Land. In addition, Judge Ellett -Utah supreme court, said in State vs. Phillips, PR 2nd 540 p.941,942 (1975) "I cannot believe that any court, infull possession of its faculties, could honestly hold that the amendment was properly approved and adopted."

2-14

"It is well enough that the People of the Nation do not understand our banking andmonetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution beforetomorrow morning."

- Henry Ford Sr., 1863 - 1947

". . . the Federal Reserve and its member banks, are not government institutions.They are private monopolies which prey upon the People of these United States forthe benefit of themselves and their foreign customers. . ."

"Every effort has been made by the Fed to conceal its powers, but the truth is - theFed has usurped the government. It controls everything here (in Congress) and itcontrols all our foreign relations. It makes and breaks governments at will."

- Congressman Louis T. McFaddenRemarks to Congress 1934

"Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions theworld has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the FederalReserve banks. The Federal Reserve Board, a Government Board, has cheatedthe Government of the United States and the people of the United States out of

enough money to pay the national debt. The depredations and the iniquities ofthe Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks acting together havecost this country enough money to pay the national debt several times over. Thisevil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of the United States; hasbankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. It has donethis through the maladministration of that law by which the Federal ReserveBoard, and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it."

- Congressman Louis T. McFaddenCongressional Record, House pages 1295 and 1296 on June 10, 1932

"There is no question that the Fed runs our nations monetary policy because it hascomplete and final governmental authority to manage the United States moneysupply. The American public should know that if the Federal Reserve system memberbanks that vote for . . . Reserve Bank Directors, approximately 60 banks, with over130 Billion dollars in assets, are foreign owned. . ."

"In the New York Federal Reserve District, 33 percent of the medium sized memberbanks and 25 percent of the large member banks . . . are foreign owned."

- Congressman Henry B. GonzalezThe Federal Reserve Accountability Act 1993

President Woodrow Wilson signed the Federal Reserve Acttwo days before Christmas in 1913. Since then we have had theshame of witnessing the Stock Market crash of 1929, the GreatDepression that followed, and 9 Recessions, and the Debt hasrisen to over $80,000+ for every man, woman and child in thiscountry! As will be shown later, they always understate the

2-15

National Debt. Here is what Wilson said after that fatefulevent of signing the FRB Act:

Mistake Admitted

"We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completelycontrolled and dominated Governments in the world - no longer a Government offree opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and vote of the majority, but aGovernment by the opinion and duress of small groups of dominant men."

- President Woodrow Wilson

The incredible power of the Fed over the economy isuniversally admitted. Some people, especially in the bankingand academic communities, even support it. On the other hand,there are those, both in the past and in the present, thatspeak out against it. One of these men was President John F.Kennedy. His efforts were detailed in Jim Marrs' 1990 book:Crossfire:

"Another overlooked aspect of Kennedy's attempt to reform American societyinvolves money. Kennedy apparently reasoned that by returning to theconstitution, which states that only Congress shall coin and regulate money, thesoaring national debt could be reduced by not paying interest to the bankers of theFederal Reserve System, who print paper money then loan it to the government atinterest. He moved in this area on June 4, 1963, by signing Executive Order11,110 which called for the issuance of $4,292,893,815 in United States Notesthrough the U.S. Treasury rather than the traditional Federal Reserve System. Thatsame day, Kennedy signed a bill changing the backing of one and two dollar billsfrom silver to gold, adding strength to the weakened U.S. currency."

Kennedy's comptroller of the currency, James J. Saxon,had been at odds with the powerful Federal Reserve Board forsome time, encouraging broader investment and lending powersfor banks that were not part of the Federal Reserve system.Saxon also had decided that non-Reserve banks could underwritestate and local general obligation bonds, again weakening thedominant Federal Reserve banks.

A number of "Kennedy bills" were indeed issued - theauthor has a five dollar bill in his possession with theheading "United States Note" - but were quickly withdrawnafter Kennedy's death. According to information from theLibrary of the Comptroller of the Currency, Executive Order11,110 remains in effect today, although successiveadministrations beginning with that of President LyndonJohnson apparently have simply ignored it and instead returned

2-16

to the practice of paying interest on Federal Reserve notes.Today we continue to use Federal Reserve Notes, and thedeficit is at an all time high.

Where We Are Today!

The role of private bar associations is essential to theperpetuation of monopolistic banking and commercialprivileges! Allow me to explain.

Private lawyering syndicates, a.k.a. Bar Associations,are a prohibited nobility which by incremental insinuationshave entirely seized control of all key offices of Americangovernment, local, state, and national in order to assuretotal effective rule by bar members for and on behalf ofthemselves - and their clients, the "paper aristocracy"9.

In seeking to rule the world and destroy the uniquelyAmerican republican form of government, which the sovereignAmerican people had established pursuant to their individualand collective political law power via ratification of theirrespective states, and their mutual national Constitution, thebankers and their monopolistic-oriented commercial interestsallies committed many crimes. To further their enterprise andto create the illusions and deceptions that their crimesagainst the people and their republics were legalized, thebankers and the law merchants proceeded in the same manner asany other class of career criminals - through their corporaficta syndicates. They hired and formed alliances with themost cunning and conniving lawyers and judges that their moneycould buy.

These alliances earlier forged in England and thecontinent of Europe, spread to the American colonies and, thussubsequent to the American Declaration of Independence, intothe newly formed state republics and the so-called nationalrepublic.

In colonial America and in the early decade of theAmerican republican form of state and federal governments,attorneys trained attorneys. However, there was no requirementthat they belong to a private fraternal bar association inorder to practice their trade in American courts. In fact, anyCitizen could stand for or represent another Citizen in thestates and federal courts. 9 A species of nobility, which is unconstitutional - See Article I, Sect.10, Clause 1. It was well understood inwell-educated circles that should a class having special privileges be allowed, the people's "republican form ofgovernment" would cease to exist.

2-17

There was no law, nor could there be such a law eitherthen nor now, that only "bar" admitted attorneys or lawyerscould hold certain public offices in the states and in thefederal government (look at your state constitution?). In the state andfederal republics such laws would have been intolerable as itwas well understood that there was no constitutional power todeny the people at large the right to hold any public officeas a gift of the people.

It was understood that state constitutions and thefederal constitution were the rightful issue of the peoplepursuant to political law - political law being the exclusivedomain of the sovereign people.

It was understood that law, which might issue from thestate legislatures and the federal legislature, were pursuantto civil law - civil law being the exclusive domain of theelected representatives of the people. It was also understood,that political law was superior to civil law. It was thereforeunderstood, that any civil law, which alleged to abrogate orderogate the political law was void, prima facie.

Whereas early state constitutions denied lawyers andbankers from holding any manner of public office, today manykey offices are denied to all who are not members of thelawyering bar associations. Today state constitutions areprima facie no more than de facto instruments masquerading asthe will of the people. Therefore, these de facto stateconstitutions are the product of the will of a private,privileged class of lawyers, and not the product of thepeoples' political law.

Moreover, the three branches of our, so-called"republican" form of government, have also been turned over tothe same privileged minority group. People in the know arewell aware that the bulk of all legislation which issues forthfrom the state and federal legislatures is generated wholecloth by private committees of lawyers and then passed on therespective legislatures for their rubber stamp approval.

The proposition that the state governments and thefederal government are nothing more than de facto, corporaficta enterprises exclusively in the hands of a private classof lawyers proceeding in their administration for and onbehalf of the privileged banker class is an open secret,apparently to everyone who cares to know, notwithstanding aprofound ignorance in much of the nation. Who could be in a

2-18

better position to express this sentiment, than Judge RobertH. Bork could as he did on page 130 of his book;

"The Tempting of America: The Political Seduction of the Law"where he said;

"… we are governed not by law or elected representatives but by unelected,unrepresentative, unaccountable committees of lawyers applying no will but theirown."

The idea that only members of bar associations couldoccupy certain offices of the peoples' governments or thatonly members of bar associations could represent members ofthe sovereignty in their own courts was anathema. Thepromotion of this idea is nothing more than a hoax perpetratedupon the ignorant and the witless and is unequivocally treasonagainst the sovereign American people.10

Due to Official corruption of our Freedom and Rightsbeing violated, and our Sovereignty usurped, the result hasbeen and is - widespread poverty, economic chaos, a failingeducational system, social discontent, and a criminal justicesystem at war with the people it was sworn to serve! TheirAnswer for all our woes?

"It's the result of our complex society that we nowlive in, therefore You need more taxes, more government,more prisons, more police, and more sacrifice on the partof We the People."

Do you believe that?!? This is simply Not True! But, itis a perfect example of what they spew forth from theirmouths!! Just more propaganda, brainwashing, and bureaucraticB.S. !!!

A Shadow Government?

You must ask yourself; How do government officials whopromote "fourth branch11 of government" administrative agency

10 From "Where We Are Today" to this point - is an excerpt from the workshop book on Travel As Of Right byJames B. Wood III, c/o Cubex, Suite 174 7350 S. Tamiami Trail, Sarasota, Florida 34231 U.S.A.

11 Fourth Branch of Gov't - private corporate entities created by legislative bodies in the de facto, corpora fictacapacities inasmuch as American legislatures have no derived power "in the gift of the people" to create thempursuant to de jure authority. Being private and not legitimately a part of the "republican form of gov't." these

2-19

schemes overcome the Doctrine of Usurpation of DelegatedPowers argument when the little de facto, corpora fictachartered enterprises are clearly outside of the Separation ofPowers Doctrine, which is one of the foundation pillars of theAmerican "republican form of government"? The answer should beobvious: They DON'T. They simply employ by skill and artificethe necessary legal metaphysical flimflam to bamboozle theunwitting into accepting at face value the legality, nevermind the constitutionality, of their purely private, de facto,corpora ficta authority and then enforce it through theirpurely private, quasi police powers!

"The real rulers in Washington are invisible, and exercise power from behind thescenes."

Felix Frankfurter, attorney for the framersof the Federal Reserve Act and later

Supreme Court justice, quoted from Curtis B. Dall,FDR: My Exploited Father-In-Law,

Pg67, Action Associates, Washington D.C., 1970.

"Outwardly we have a constitutional government. We have operating within ourgovernment and political system, another body representing another form ofgovernment."

Senator William Jenner,In a speech on Feb. 23, 1954

NOTE: If an officer, employee, or agent violates theterms and conditions of the contract he made with thesovereign people, when he swore an oath to uphold any stateand/or federal constitution, then he proceeds under color ofoffice and color of law. Such breaches of contract with thesovereign people represent acts of treason against the peopleand are not merely acts of treason against The State. Beingtreason against the sovereign people, it is the commission offelony offenses against the people. enterprises are all said to enjoy "quasi" powers. They enjoy quasi executive, quasi legislative, quasi judicial,and quasi police powers all under one departmental head. They con everyone into the idea that these privateagencies are all legitimate parts of a constitutionally based "republican form of government" and thenconcentrate these powers. Why must they be private? Because if a state or the federal legislature admitted thatthese agencies, which they have created, were public components of the executive branch, or what have you,then they would have to admit that the government has been overthrown. The art of rulership through illusionsand deceptions. Everyone learns in school, that according to the Constitution, we have three branches ofgovernment whose powers must be kept separated lest full blown tyranny break out…. HELLO!?!?!?

2-20

For an excellent collection of treatises, law reviewarticles, etc. addressing the matter of the people's law,namely, the common law of immemorial antiquity, and the roleof state and federal governments in protecting said people'slaw versus their de facto role of protecting their own privatestatutes to the detriment of the people's common law, see:

"The Rights Retained by the People:The History and Meaning of the Ninth Amendment",

Edited by Randy E. Barnett, George Mason University Press,Fairfax Virginia, Volume I, 1989, Volume II, 1993.

FREEDOM OF CHOICE

ALWAYS EXISTS

FOR THOSE

WHO SEEK IT

3-21

Chapter 3Chapter 3 TAX and SPEND MENTALITYTAX and SPEND MENTALITYCan They Go On?

As a nation we are now giving the taxcollector over $200 Billion more than we spend onfood, clothing and shelter in a year! We see andhear every week about our governments wasteful spending habitsand continued tax hikes. We have shrunk from the globes mostpowerful nation to the worlds largest debtor nation. This iscausing a global economic and financial imbalance due to thedecaying moral fiber and greed of our country! The U.S. hasthe worst per capita debt in the entire world, even Mexico!Federal debt in 1976 was $600 Billion. Today it is over $2.2Trillion (govt. figures end of 1987). That is $10,000 forevery man, woman and child! As the government continues toprint fake dollars to "monetize" the escalating deficits,inflation is inevitable. Since the country is financiallybankrupt, destitute due to the gross ineptitude and politicalcowardice of our leaders. Never before had the world'seconomic superpower also been its biggest debtor. Now theUnited States is totally dependent on the prospect that Japanand Europe will buy massive issues of its Treasury debt (morepromises to pay). Foreigners are now, and have been, incontrol of America's purse strings!

Our government is so destitute, take the Wall Streetcrash of 10/19/87, which was engineered in Washington. Theannounced recall of the dollar - supposed to be in 1989. TheGraham Rudman Deficit Reduction Act. This was supposed to gointo effect by law in November 1987 with $23 Billion inspending cuts. Instead, we got $9 Billion in unspecified taxincreases for 1988, $14 Billion in extra taxes promised for1989, PLUS $400 Million in IRS funding to increase auditingand collections for 1988. What happened to the Senate Hearingand Investigative Committee on IRS abuses? The result is $5Billion in extra tax collections expected for 1988. It isquite clear that more taxes and IRS strong arming tactics areon the agenda.

As the mountain of debt keeps rising it exceeds thecapacity of individuals, companies or even government torespond. Mortgage delinquencies alone hit an all time high.Businesses and Banks too, are overextended. On one day - May31, 1985 seven banks failed in four states. In 1987 alone, onaverage, a bank closed everyday. Moreover, over 50% were dueto fraud! Who do you think footed the bill? YOU did!

3-22

This places a perpetual financial burden and debt uponevery unborn citizen!

Even the Federal Governments credit is not infinite.Former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul A. Volcker expressedconcern that too many Americans take for granted institutionslike the FDIC, which in 1986, had reserves totaling $18.2Billion against insured deposits of about $1.6 Trillion! By1989, we could owe some $1 Trillion to the rest of the world,with annual interest outflows of $100 Billion! In short, oureconomy today is far more vulnerable than in 1929, when thedebt was considerably less fearsome. Where will ourextravagance lead us? How will it end? The Fed's tactics hascaused unemployment to mount and living standards to suffer.They need to be taught to live within their means!

In order for us to trim governments spending power andhabits, we must cut their throats at the source. The sourcebeing, the taxes we pay voluntarily. And start puttingAmericans in office with good moral fiber and economic sense.If you are one of these individuals, run for office! Dare tomake a change. Our Lawyers need to be bold enough to challengecourt decisions, to stand up for individual rights andfreedoms. Instead of just saying "I might get disbarred". WhenI asked one attorney to help me fight the IRS, he said, "Areyou kidding! The same people that run the Federal Reservestarted up the Bar!" So! Does this mean we have lost already?NO! Court Judges, Lawyers, Doctors are being found andpunished for immoral conduct and drug abuse everyday. Recentlyin Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Supreme Court suspended 15Judges from their duties after federal prosecutors found theyhad accepted cash gifts from a union. The average gift wassaid to be $300, none larger than $500! It is astounding somany took gifts and sold their integrity for so little.

You do not have to be an attorney to run for Office. Infact, since they represent the judicial branch by beingextensions of the court, and if they hold an Office whichrepresents the executive branch, does this not violate theseparation of powers statute? We would be better off to putsomeone in Office that has contributed something to society inthe form of goods and services that is productive, which spursthe economy. No wonder our government spend thrifty partnersoperate the way they do! For the most part, they come fromnon-productive, pencil pushing individuals, that are only goodfor writing laws so thick the President doesn't want or havethe time to read, and confuses the public with its jargon.

3-23

We should not rely on our government for so manyservices. Only Russia or China should since they arecommunist. Only a communist nation has a progressive incometax, centralization of credit, abolition of all right ofinheritance, abolition of land for public purposes,centralization of the means of transportation andcommunication, equal liability of all to labor, free educationfor all children. You see, what the government subsidizes, itcontrols. We need truth in education not integration. For eachof the 10 planks in Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto there isalready an equal act or executive order passed in the U.S.The Marxist income tax started out at 1% never to go above 2%.What is the IRS Gestapo extorting from you? Total control ofthe money, the economy, the people by an all-powerful state -this is COMMUNISM! Today its called DEMOCRACY12!

How about this - the Government loves inflation! Why?Because when they need more money quickly, the Fed's justmanipulate the money supply and *** POOF ***, higher pricesand taxes! The truth is the government has been spending about25% of the budget on defense. With 33% of revenue from incometaxes, it still has more than needed to defend our country.And with a few exceptions, is their only real job. The restshould be left to states, municipal governments, privatecitizens and free enterprise. Woodrow Wilson said,

"The history of liberty is the history of the limitation ofgovernmental power, not the increase of it."

Dr. Gary North, author of over 20 books, articlesappearing in over 40 journals and newspapers, president of theInstitute of Christian Economics and executive director of theAmerican Bureau of Economic Research said,

"The Central Planners will try to solidify their stronghold throughout the world. In the U.S., a series of crisiswill be used as the justification for a huge increase ingovernment planning and controls. In order to convince thepublic that they deserve more and more authority, they willengineer one crisis after another. It will stir up thegreatest clash of apposing views . . . since the earlyChristians took on Rome and won. You are extremely privilegedto live at the crossroads of a new direction in humancivilization. Make no mistake; America will be the primarybattleground for this conflict. The casualties will becountless. Not the bloody casualties of war, but the heartstopping, appalling casualties of failed institutions, brokendreams and wasted lives."

12 If you think about it, it is really just a combination of "Fascism" and "Capitalism".

3-24

Our True DebtHere are his most conservative figures of our true debt;(as of 1986)

Declared Debt $2.11 Trillion Social Security 5.80 TrillionCivil Service Pensions 500 BillionMilitary Retirement 500 BillionOther: Medicare

Medicaid 1.20 Trillion+

TOTAL FEDERAL DEBT $ 10 Trillion+

Mark Skousen, a former CIA Economic Officer, consideredWashington's #1 financial insider because of his contacts atthe White House, Fed, all branches of government and worldmoney center, said;

"As we move closer to the election, Bush and Dukakis will bespouting enough economic promises to launch a fleet of hot airballoons. Don't you believe a word of it! Their solutions areabsolutely irrelevant. Why? Because the person who's reallyrunning the economy is not the President at all, but thesecond most powerful man in America, the Chairman of theFederal Reserve. Most Americans would be shocked to discoverthat the Federal Chairman by law, is completely independent.(from our gov't) And this is the Greatest Secret of the MoneyTemple that the Federal Reserve, by controlling our nationsmoney supply, has become the most important factor shaping thefuture of our economy and the value of every investment youown." (emphasis added)

Isn't it about time we stand up for America and our greatConstitution, and challenge any laws that are contrary to ourGod given, Constitutionally secured Rights, Freedoms, andReligious Beliefs? You can do something NOW! Write yourCongressmen and Senators, ask what are they doing aboutcertain issues, and voice your opinions. VOTE! Encourageleaders in your community and state to run for Office. Boycottgive away programs and bills that limit your Freedom andRights that do nothing to spur production. Remember you have aRight to "Peaceful Assembly" and to "Protest". We need tofight organized crime, and abolish the IRS, revoke the FederalReserve charter and be a Sovereign Union once again.

4-25

Chapter 4Chapter 4 IRS 90% BLUFF -- VIOLATES THE LAW!IRS 90% BLUFF -- VIOLATES THE LAW!What Can We Do About It?

DID YOU KNOW, that there is nothing in the IRS Code (IRC)with respect to income taxes that requires any Citizen or anyCorporation to:13

1. File tax returns2. To pay such taxes or have them withheld3. Pay estimated taxes4. Submit to IRS Audits or turn over books & records5. Report wages commissions or dividends paid6. Surrender property under IRS Liens or Levy notices

NOTE: A BLUFF is only effective against the uninformedCitizen. Once an individual becomes aware of this bluff, thebluff becomes less and less effective as the individualincreases in knowledge. So remember; "Knowledge is Power".

Senator Henry Bellman of Oklahoma, testifying before theSenate Finance Committee October 2, 1969 said,

"In a recent conversation with an official at the InternalRevenue Service, I was amazed when he told me that 'If thetaxpayers of this country ever discover that the IRS operateson 90% bluff, the entire income tax system will collapse!'"(emphasis added)

To begin with, Title 26 of the United States Code, theIncome Tax Code (IRC) is the legal basis for all of the IRS'actions. And, believe it or not, the IRC was diabolicallywritten to deceive us! We must use THEIR Code to determine OURtax liability and to find the truth. But, just as its titlesays, it is a CODE! And has to be "translated" or "brokendown" into normal, everyday language to be easily understood.

First, you must understand that in the IRS Code, thewords "include" and "includes", mean "restricted to what isidentified." One of the most difficult things to come to gripswith is that the IRC intentionally plays word games to confuseus. By taking everyday words, and re-defining them to meansomething else, the Lawyering Syndicate and the IRS, attempts

13 Except for resident aliens and foreign corporations for the privilege of working or doing business in America.Also elected officials, officers and employees of our federal government. See the book "The Federal Zone:Cracking the Code of Internal Revenue", by Mitch Modeleski.

4-26

to trick you into "compliance." Always Remember, the IRC isexactly what it is called - a CODE - that must be translated!

A Play On Words

Now, let's see some examples of this word trickery byseeing how important terms are defined for use in theregulations. The following definitions are direct quotes fromTitle 26, the Federal Income Tax Code. To begin with, we haveto go way in the back to find this one;

Section 7806. Construction of Title(a) Cross References - The cross references in this title to

other portions of the title, or other provisions of law,where the word "see" is used, are made only forconvenience, and shall be given no legal effect.

(b) Arrangement and Classifications - No inference,implication, or presumption of legislative constructionshall be drawn or made by reason of the location orgrouping of any particular section or portion of thistitle, nor shall any table of contents of this title begiven any legal effect. The preceding sentence alsoapplies tot he sidenotes and ancillary tables containedin the various prints of this Act before its enactmentinto law.

In other words, just ignore it! There can be "no legal effect"given to any heading, subheading, etc. Furthermore;

Section 7701(a)(9):"UNITED STATES. - The term `United States' when used in ageographic sense includes only the States and the Districtof Columbia."

This sounds like what we have always believed - Atlanticto Pacific, coast to coast, all the states, but wait! What dothey mean by "State"? Look at the very next paragraph.

Section 7701(a)(10):"STATE. - The term `State' shall be construed to include theDistrict of Columbia, where such construction is necessary tocarry out provisions of this title."

The word "State" means just the "District of Columbia?"This means that we can substitute "District of Columbia" forthe word "States" in the definition for "United States!" So,the "United States" which the Internal Revenue Code and theInternal Revenue Service have jurisdiction over is limited tothe District of Columbia and the District of Columbia!?!

4-27

But, just hold on! Wait a minute here! How do we know thedefinition of "State" means that the 50 States of the "UNION"are not included? Let us be SURE that the 50 separate STATESare NOT included in the "United States" as defined.

Section 6103(b)(5) of the IRC has a unique definition of"State", dealing with areas used for Procedure andAdministration. These are the places from which you canlegally file documents.

Section 6103:"(B) DEFINITIONS. -For purposes of this section-"

...So, it is clear that the definitions ARE ONLY FOR THISSECTION...

"(5) STATE. - The term `State' means - any of the 50 States,the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, theVirgin Islands, the Canal Zone, Guam, American Samoa, and theCommonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and..."[emphasis added]

(The rest of the definition is about municipalities.)

Therefore, if you are a federal employee who needs tofile tax forms, you can do it from any of the places listed inthis definition, including "any of the 50 States." But, weplainly see the "United States"14 which imposes the InternalFederal Income Tax, DOES NOT include the 50 States - it isJUST the District of Columbia, otherwise known as -"Washington D.C."!

As a Citizen of one of the independent, Sovereign States,one of the stars on the flag, you are also a Citizen of theUnion of the States, but not the District of Columbia. TheDistrict of Columbia does not have a star on the flag, and isNOT part of the Union. In addition, the citizens of the"federal zone" do not have the protection of a Constitution ora Bill of Rights. The IRS will assert in a court of law, thatyou waived your rights since you signed under "penalty ofperjury" that you are one of those people and you swore thatyou owe the tax! (see page 4 Chapter 1)

According to the IRS (and usually including the 1040

14 "The United States is a foreign corporation with respect to the states." New York Re. Merriam, 16 S. Ct. 1073; See also - Hooven & Allison Co. vs. Evatt 1945

4-28

booklet they send you), the income tax is based upon VoluntaryCompliance (more detail later). Even the Supreme Court15 admittedthis,

"Our tax system (income) is based upon voluntary assessmentand payment not upon distraint (force)." (emphasis added)

Because the IRS is pushed to collect, collect andcollect, the employees are given promotions and pay raises(bonuses) when they do confiscate banking accounts, cars,padlock businesses etc. However, these illegal actions areslowly coming to a halt as more and more Citizens stand ontheir Rights and file suits16 against these individuals. TheLAW and the supreme Court is on your side! You see, if the"income tax" was mandatory, it would be unconstitutional,because it has been twice declared unconstitutional already.

Please UNDERSTAND...we are NOT saying you should become a"TAX PROTESTER"! We believe that you should pay ALL the taxesyou are legally obligated to pay! In addition, if you work forthe Federal Government, are a citizen of the Federal Districtof Columbia (or live on federal land), and receive "income" aslegally defined, you must pay Federal Tax each year to theInternal Revenue Service.

However, if you, like most people in this country, livein one of the 50 States, and work in private business, you donot owe a cent in FEDERAL INCOME TAXES (because -- you,legally, don't have any FEDERAL "income")!

In fact, the Federal Income Tax is EXACTLY what it claims-- a tax on "FEDERAL" income! Moreover, the "Internal" RevenueService has power ONLY over the INTERNAL revenue of thefederal government. To prove to you that the IRS Code isdesigned to extract taxes from FEDERAL employees, let's take alook at the definition for "EMPLOYEE."

Section 3401(c):

"EMPLOYEE. - For purposes of this chapter, the term `employee'includes an officer, employee, or elected official of the United States, a State, or anypolitical subdivision thereof, or the District of Columbia, or any agency orinstrumentality of any one or more of the foregoing. The term `employee' alsoincludes an officer of a corporation."

15 See Flora Vs. U.S. 362 US 145 page 17616 See Title 42 USC, Section 1983 and 1988; See also the list of Reference Books at "Recommended Reading".

4-29

To be an "EMPLOYEE", you have to WORK FOR THE GOVERNMENT,or be an officer of a corporation! And guess what this meansregarding having your employer take money out of yourpaycheck? But what if you are an "officer of a corporation" asstated in the Code (above)? Well, you will learn that yourbusiness does not even QUALIFY to pay taxes, under theInternal Revenue Code!

Section 7701(a)(3):

"CORPORATION. - The term `corporation' includes associations,joint-stock companies, and insurance companies."

That doesn't sound like YOUR Company, does it? And,further study of the Tax Code will reveal that the"corporation" must be formed in, doing business in, orreceiving "income" from - the District of Columbia, otherwiseit is considered to be a "foreign corporation"! So much forthe "officer of a corporation" problem in the "Employee"definition. Further, if your business is not incorporated,take a look at the definition provided for a "TRADE ORBUSINESS ".

Section 7701(a):"TRADE OR BUSINESS. - The term `trade or business' includes the performance ofthe functions of a public office." [emphasis added]

Are You A Taxpayer?

Still think you are a "Taxpayer"? The deceptive term"taxpayer" is a legal term created by combining the words"tax" and "payer". The general understanding of the term'smeaning is different from its legal definition in the IRC.Section 7701(a)(14) gives the legal definition of the term"taxpayer" in relation to income tax. It states:

Section 7701(a)(14)"The term 'taxpayer' means any person subject to any internal revenue tax."

You see, all internal revenue taxes are excise taxes.Note that the section does not say that all persons are"taxpayers" subject to internal revenue tax. Corporations are"taxpayers", for they are "persons" subject to an internalrevenue (excise) tax. But remember the Corp. definition.

The term "taxpayer" is used extensively throughout the

4-30

IRC, in IRS publications, news articles, and instructionalliterature as a verbal trap to make uninformed Citizensbelieve that all individuals are subject to federal income taxand to the requirements of the IRC. These materials state that"taxpayers" are required to file returns, keep records, supplyinformation, etc. Such statements are technically correct,because "taxpayers" are those legal "persons" previouslydescribed that are subject to an excise tax, but unprivilegedindividuals are not "taxpayers" within the meaning of the IRC.

The confusion about the meaning of the term leads mostpeople to mistakenly assume that they are "taxpayers" becausethey pay other taxes such as sales taxes and real estatetaxes. Those people are taxpayers, not "taxpayers" as definedin the IRC. When they read articles and publications relatedto income tax, describing the legal requirements for"taxpayers", they erroneously believe that the term applies tothem as individuals. It is very important to understand thatthe IRC requirements apply to IRC-defined "taxpayers" only,and not to unprivileged individuals. Corporations and othergovernment-privileged legal entities are "taxpayers under theInternal Revenue Code"; unprivileged individuals are not,unless they voluntarily file income tax returns showing theyowe taxes, thus legally placing themselves in theclassification of "taxpayers". Because of its legaldefinition, the term "taxpayer" should never be used inrelation to income tax, except to describe those legalentities subject to a federal excise tax.

'SHALL' means 'MAY'

In general use, the word "shall" is a word of commandwith a mandatory meaning. In the IRC, "shall" is a directoryword that has a mandatory meaning when applied tocorporations. The IRC contains a series of directory statutesusing the word "shall" in describing the actions called for inthose sections of the Code. The provisions of these directorystatutes are requirements for corporations, becausecorporations are created by government and, consequently, aresubject to government direction and control. Sincecorporations are granted the privilege to exist and operate bygovernment-issued charters, they do not have theconstitutionally guaranteed rights of individuals. Thisgovernment-granted privilege legally obligates corporations tomake a "return" of profits and gains earned in the exercise oftheir privileged operations when directed to do so by the IRC.

4-31

This is why the tax form is called a "return".

However, directory words in the Code merely imply thatindividuals are required to perform certain acts, butdirectory words are not requirements for individuals when amandatory interpretation of the directory words would conflictwith the constitutionally guaranteed rights of individuals.Courts have repeatedly ruled that in statutes, when amandatory meaning of the word "shall" would create aconstitutional conflict, "shall" must be defined as meaning"may". The following are quotes from a few of these decisions.The U.S. Supreme Court stated:

"As against the government the word "shall" when used in statutes, is to be construedas "may," unless a contrary intention is manifest."

Cairo & Fulton R.R. Co. vs Hecht, 95 U.S. 170

In a decision of the Supreme Court of Wisconsin:

""Shall" in a statute may be construed to mean "may" in order to avoid constitutionaldoubt."

George Williams College vs Village of Williams Bay, 7 N.W.2d 891

In the decision of Gow vs Consolidated Coppermines Corp., thecourt stated:

"If necessary to avoid unconstitutionality of a statute, "shall" will be deemedequivalent to "may" ...."

Gow vs Consolidated Coppermines Corp., 165 Atlantic 136

Sections 6001 and 6011 of the IRC are cited in thePrivacy Act notice in the IRS 1040 instruction booklet inorder to lead individuals to believe they are required toperform services for tax collectors. Note the use of the word"shall" in the following sections of the Code:

IRC Sec. 6001"Every person liable for any tax imposed by this title, or for the collection thereof,shall keep such records, render such statements, make such returns, and comply withsuch rules and requirements as the Secretary may from time to time prescribe."

IRC Sec. 6011"When required by regulations prescribed by the Secretary any person made liablefor any tax imposed by this title, or for the collection thereof, shall make a return orstatement according to the forms and regulations prescribed by the Secretary."

4-32

Note that Sections 6001 and 6011 apply to "every personliable" and "any person made liable", but not to"individuals". In addition, THERE IS NO SECTION IN THE IRCTHAT MAKES INDIVIDUALS LIABLE FOR PAYMENT OF INCOME TAXbecause any law imposing a federal tax on individuals would beunconstitutional, for it would violate the taxing limitationsin the U.S. Constitution which prohibit direct taxation ofindividuals by the federal government. People are oftenconfused when reading the Code because, under Subtitle A,Chapter 1, which covers income taxes, Part 1 of Subchapter Ahas the misleading title of "Tax on Individuals". The title(remember - no legal effect)is misleading because Part 1 imposes thetax on "income", but contains no requirement for individualsto pay it. But an individual becomes a "person liable" forthe tax when he files an income tax form, thereby swearingthat he is liable for (owes) the tax.

The Privacy Act notice in the instruction booklet for IRSForm 1040 also shows that disclosure of information byindividuals is not required. The notice states:

"Our legal right to ask for information is Internal Revenue Code sections 6001 and6011 and their regulations."

The IRS does not say that those sections require individualsto submit the information; those sections only give the IRSthe authority to ask for it.

IRC Sec. 6012 states:"Returns with respect to income taxes under Subtitle A shall be made by thefollowing: (1)(A) Every individual having for the taxable year gross income which equals or exceeds the exemption amount ...."

Subsections (2) through (6) list corporations, estates,trusts, partnerships, and certain political organizations asalso being subject to this section.

Any requirements compelling unprivileged individuals tokeep records, make returns and statements, or to involuntarilyperform any other services for tax collectors, would beviolations of constitutionally protected rights.

The Thirteenth Amendment to the United StatesConstitution forbids compelling individuals to performservices involuntarily. The Amendment states:

4-33

"Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as punishment for crimeswhereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States,or any place subject to their jurisdiction."

The Fourth Amendment, in the Bill of Rights of theConstitution for the United States of America, states that thepeople's right to privacy of their papers shall not beviolated by government. To compel individuals to discloseinformation taken from their papers would violate this right.

The Fifth Amendment in the Bill of Rights protects theright of individuals not to be required to be witnessesagainst themselves. To compel individuals to discloseinformation by submitting statements or information on a taxreturn form, all of which could be used against them incriminal prosecutions, would violate their Fifth Amendmentright.

These examples show some constitutional conflicts thatwould result from defining the word "shall" as meaning "isrequired to". Thus, "shall" in the above mentioned statutesmust be interpreted as meaning "may". Consequently, forindividuals, keeping records, making statements, and makingreturns are clearly voluntary actions that are not required bylaw.

'MUST' means 'MAY'

Most people have never studied the IRC and theirunderstanding of the law is generally based on hearsay,newspaper articles and IRS instructional materials. Theseinstructions make frequent use of the deceptive word "must" indescribing the things that the IRS wants you to do, because"must" is a forceful word that people mistakenly believe tomean, "are required". Very few people realize that "must" is adirectory word similar to "shall" and that, in IRSinstructions to the public, it means "may", the same as theword "shall".

In the legal definition of the word "must" in Black's LawDictionary, it states:

"... [I]t is often used in a merely directory sense, and consequently is a synonym forthe word "may" not only in the permissive sense of that word, but also in themandatory sense which it sometimes has."

4-34

Because of the constitutional conflicts explained earlierin this book, the word "must", similar to the word "shall",cannot have a mandatory meaning for individuals. It thereforemeans "may" when used in IRS instruction publications.

The IRS instructions for Form 1040 state that you "must"file a return if you have certain amounts of income. IRSwithholding instructions state that employers "must" withholdmoney from paychecks for income tax, "must" withhold socialsecurity tax (an income tax also - explained later), and "must" send tothe IRS any W-4 withholding statement claiming exemption fromwithholding, if the wages are expected to usually exceed $200per week. An understanding of the legal meaning of the word"must" exposes the deception by the IRS and makes it clearthat the actions called for are voluntary actions forindividuals that are not required by law. If these actionswere required by law, the instructions would not use the word"must", but would say that the actions were "required".

Beware of the "Notice of Levy" and "Final Demand" noticesfrom the IRS??? The IRC section 6331 provides that Notices ofLevy can only apply to the accrued salaries and wages ofFederal employees!

IMPORTANT NOTE: They leave this sub par. (a) off of their formthey send to you or your employer!!! Talk about DECEIT. Thisis FRAUD if they send it to YOU, a non-Federal employee, keepit for court evidence.

Sec. 6331 Levy and distraint(a) Authority of Secretary If any person liable to pay any tax neglects or refuses topay the same within 10 days after notice and demand, it shallbe lawful for the Secretary to collect such tax (and suchfurther sum as shall be sufficient to cover the expenses ofthe levy) by levy upon all property and rights to property(except such property as is exempt under section 6334)belonging to such person or on which there is a lien providedin this chapter for the payment of such tax. Levy may be madeupon the accrued salary or wages of any officer, employee, orelected official, of the United States, the District ofColumbia, or any agency or instrumentality of the UnitedStates or the District of Columbia, by serving a notice oflevy on the employer (as defined in section 3401(d)) of suchofficer, employee or elected official….

NO KIDDING!?! That is what the Tax Code SAYS!!! Now -

4-35

Notice what Section 7401 says;

Section 7401. Authorization No civil action for the collection or recovery of taxes,or of any fine, penalty, or forfeiture, shall be commencedunless the Secretary authorizes or sanctions the proceedingsand the Attorney General or his delegate directs that theaction be commenced.

In other words, they need a court order and have to takeyou to court before forcibly taking property from you or yourbusiness. This is to comply with your 4th & 5th AmendmentRights as well. In addition, I suppose they would have a hardtime convincing the Judge that they have a case because of -non voluntary compliance!?! Beware: some Judges are Ignorant!Or - Are They???

Section 7203: Willful failure to file return, supplyinformation or pay tax. (text omitted, irrelevant)

One of their biggest scares, is also fallacious, since itdoes not mention any specific tax, or say who is required topay or make a return, and doesn't refer to any code sectionwhere it can be found. Moreover, because it does not allege anoffense, gives NO Federal JUDGE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION toprosecute anyone! On this basis alone it will be thrown out ofcourt, if you mention it. You see, you have to know yourRights and stand on them in order to win. "Use it or lose it"- as they say!

Section 6651: Failure to file tax return or pay tax.

refers only to distilled spirits, tobacco and firearms!

Section 7401 (f):"For general jurisdiction of the district courts of the U.S.in civil actions involving internal revenue see sections 1340of Title 28 of the U.S. Code." (emphasis added)

So Federal courts only have civil not criminaljurisdiction in tax matters and there are no provisions in theU.S. Criminal Code (Title 18) that establish any income taxcrimes!!! Therefore all criminal trials in connection withfederal income taxes have been ILLEGAL! Shocked? But wait - Noone can be lawfully prosecuted for income tax evasion becauseno such crime exists or is listed in Title 18, the U.S.Criminal Code!!!

4-36

Ask them for the IRC section which shows/proves liabilityfor Subtitle A taxes!?! The fact that the IRS Code doesn'tcontain a provision establishing the liability is proof thatanything the IRS does to compel the payment of income taxes isillegal, fraudulent, conspiracy and of course a felony! Tocatch them at their own game, once you receive a "tax bill"(all correspondence must be signed, but is usually unsigned to keep from violating Sec.7214) and you have not filed a return, simply ask them for theassessment record made by them. Since the IRS cannot assessyou, only you can assess yourself, they will not send you one.WARNING: They may say they have one, but they will sayanything to bluff you. You hold all the aces. If they send youanything, keep it as court evidence for fraud.

Section 6203. Method of assessment. ...upon request of thetaxpayer, the Secretary shall furnish the taxpayer a copy ofthe record of assessment. And . . .

Section 6201. Assessment authority(a) Authority of Secretary.(1) Taxes shown on Return. The Secretary shall assess alltaxes determined by the taxpayer. (emphasis added)

So if the corporation or taxpayer refuses to assessitself, the government has no authority to assess any incometax and by law, no income tax can possibly be due! You see,the IRS Code was cleverly and diabolically written, so as notto be mandatory to the general populace or it would beunconstitutional.

The Supreme Court has decided that the definition ofincome is the same definition that has been used in theCorporation Excise Tax Act of 1909. Nothing that was receivedby private persons was defined as income under that Act.Therefore, nothing received by private persons today can bedefined as income. According to the 16th Amendment and thedefinition of income therein, it is possible for a person tomake a lot of money but at the same time have no "income".This occurs when the money the person makes is not defined asincome under the Corporation Excise Tax Act of 1909. This Actonly refers to the income of corporations. Therefore, in orderfor one to have income, one must be a corporation or beinvolved with a revenue taxable activity.

4-37

"If no information or return is filed, [the] Internal Revenue Service cannot assess you".- Gary Makovski, Special IRS Agent,

testifying under oath in US. vs. Lloyd

Furthermore, the Constitution for the United States ofAmerica provides in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1 and the16th Amendment that:

"Congress shall have the power to lay and collect taxes ..."

Nevertheless, are (supposedly) collected by the Secretary ofthe Treasury, an executive officer under Article 2, Section 2,Clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States of America.The executive department has NO constitutional authority tolay or collect a tax on the people of America, and thereforeneither does a particular corporate business or quasi agencynamed Internal Revenue Tax and Audit Services Inc.

NOTE: There are many (25+ pages) more cites that arerelevant to these issues discussed. See the end of this bookat "Cites and Quotes" for additional ammunition!

I hope many politicians read these pages. Are they reallyignorant of all this? Or, do they just hope you are???

5-38

Chapter 5Chapter 5 A BRIEF HISTORY of the FEDERAL RESERVE A BRIEF HISTORY of the FEDERAL RESERVEThe IRS Con in a Nutshell

"The high office of President has been used to foment a plot to destroy theAmerica's freedom, and before I leave office I must inform the citizen of hisplight."

President John F. Kennedy(1917 - 1963)

(at Columbia University, 10 days before his assassination)

Congress allowed creation of the Federal Reserve Bank(FRB, a private corporation) in 1913. Eight "families" ownedall the stock; Rothschilds of Europe, Lazards of Paris, IsraelMoses Seifs of Italy, Warburgs of Germany, and the Lehmans,Kuhn-Loebs, Goldman-Sacks, and Rockefeller all of New York.Foreigners own a total of 76% of the FRB. When the FRB putmoney into circulation gold and silver were needed in reserveto be paid on demand to anyone with a gold or silvercertificate (money). However, in 1933, we came off the goldstandard and in 1963, we came off the silver standard. Todaywe have a private group of bankers in control of our money ata cost of 2½ cents per bill ($1, $10, $50, $100) regardless offace value and loaning it back to us at face value plusinterest. By 1989, our alleged interest debt to the FRB wasmore than 10 Trillion dollars. Since 1913 they havecontinually loaned the U.S. Treasury newly printed money (notmoney they earned) at a certain interest rate which hasescalated until now (1993) to be a national debt of approx. 70Trillion dollars!

During the 1920's, the FRB began loaning money to thepublic through their privately owned banks. Many people usedthis money to invest in small businesses and the Stock Market.This began a period of great prosperity for the Americanpeople, known as the "Roaring 20's". Then in 1928 the eight"families" pulled their money out of the Stock Market and atthe same time made it difficult for "We the People" to borrowmoney. This created a recession making it necessary to pullmoney out of the Stock Market in order to survive. The StockMarket came crashing down, followed by the "Great Depression".

Then the eight families went back into the Stock Marketto buy up companies for pennies on the dollar. Since then theFRB has manipulated for profit inflation and deflation in1932, 1937, 1957, 1966, 1970, 1976, 1982 and the presentrecession as Americans go broke.

5-39

The overspending U.S. Government, being unable to repaythe loans and their interests, gave the legislators incentiveto create a new income tax for Federal employees in 1934(hence the name internal revenue tax) which was fraudulentlyused to include all American Citizens17. The "Free EnterpriseSystem" is what made America great. Do not confuse this with"Capitalism", as it is termed today.

These eight families with their capital do not like freeenterprise. They are now controlling input into our schoolcurriculum, media, Congress, Judges etc. They are constantlybuying up businesses to create monopolies. They do not likecompetition. The graduated income tax is forced on theAmerican people to keep small businesses and the public fromcompeting with them. The harder one works the heavier the tax.This has taken away our incentives to work. Therefore, peopleare rewarded for not working, thereby taking away any self-respect they may have. Meanwhile the eight families setthemselves up in "Trusts" to become exempt from paying the taxthey initiated on the American people.

This deception and cover-up has gone on long enough.{However, a constantly growing number of people are actingagainst it.} The FRB is loaded with money. The proof being inthat they continually loan Millions and even Billions to othercountries without any expectation of full payment. The Factthat the IRS continually shuts down businesses and confiscatespossessions of people in debt (illegally) to them and thengives that money away to other countries kind of makes themlook anti-American doesn't it??? Isn't America mostlycomprised of its Citizens and not of the government? The truepatriots are standing against the IRS & the "Federal Reserve"Bankers (FRB)!!!

How Do We Get Back Control?We the people can get back control of our printing

presses. Section 31 of the Federal Reserve Act allows Congressall of the power needed to terminate the FRB. The governmentcould then print up U.S. Treasury Notes based on the amount ofconsumer goods and services needed. They could then loan theStates and People money at 4% interest, avoiding the FRB'susury, which has taken away America's hope for a brighterfuture.

17 There is a difference between Citizen and citizen. See the preamble to the Constitution and the 14th

Amendment. 14th Amendment citizen is a slave for the gov't. A Citizen is a free individual sovereign Possessing all of his God given, constitutionally secured, rights and freedoms. You must claim your Sovereign status!

5-40

FACTS AND FALLACIES:

Fallacy: The IRS is a governmental branch that collectsincome tax for the support of our government.

Fact: The IRS is a private non-governmental corporation18

that collects taxes which goes into the FederalReserve Bank19, which is also a privatecorporation independent of our government.

Fallacy: United Sates law requires Citizens to pay incometax.

Fact: The IRS code itself (Title 26) states that itscontents are not to be given any legal effect!

• Senator Daniel Inouye of Hawaii wrote "Based onresearch done by the Congressional ResearchService, there is no law that specifically andunequivocally requires anyone to pay income tax."

• On the beginning page of the tax return form booklet it states "that government in a freecountry can only be financed through voluntarycompliance." (Laws demand compliance.)

• The Internal Revenue code is merely a system offederal regulations, having never been enactedinto positive law, and the Constitution forbidsthe enacting of any laws which abrogate our rights,protected by the Constitution.

Fallacy: The Constitution gives unlimited power to thePresident, Congress and the supreme Court. Theycan do anything they please unless the constitu-tion says they cannot.

Fact: Our government is a gov't of limited, specific, enu-merated powers. The Constitution spells out theselimits and if it doesn't enumerate a specific power,then the President, Congress or supreme Court cannotlawfully engage in such conduct.

18 Anyone can obtain a copy of its papers of incorporation submitted to the State of Delaware in 1933. See 'EXHIBITS' No official government branch ever incorporates! Only private businesses incorporate!

19 See next Chapter: Returned Income Tax payment checks show an endorsement stamp on the back that says "Pay to any FRB branch . . .". The Federal Reserve Corp. is independent of the U.S. Treasury.

5-41

THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

FEDERAL RESERVE DISTRICTS

6-42

Chapter 6Chapter 6 DOES THE IRS DOES THE IRS REALLY COLLECT TAXES?REALLY COLLECT TAXES?YOU Decide for Yourself!

If the IRS reallycollects "income taxes",wouldn't the money theycollect be going intothe U.S. Treasury so itcould be spent into theeconomy of the UnitedStates? As we have

already mentioned - NO! Nevertheless, we have all been toldfor many years that the taxes collected by the IRS goes to runthe United States government. Even the IRC in Section 7809(a)states the following:

(a) General Rule: Except as provided in subsections (b) and (c) and in section 7651,7652, 7654 and 7810 under the gross amount of all taxes and revenue received underthe provisions of this title and collections of whatever nature received or collected byauthority of any Internal Revenue law, shall be deposited daily into the Treasury ofthe United States under instructions of the Secretary as internal revenue collections,by the officer or employee receiving or collecting the same, without any abatement ordeduction on account of salary, compensation, fees, cost, charges, expenses, claims ofany description. A certificate of such payment, stating the name of the depositor andthe specific account on which the deposit was made, signed by the Treasurer of theUnited States, designated depositary, or proper officer of a deposit bank, shall betransmitted to the Secretary.

Even upon examination of all of the cross referencesthere is nothing to indicate that the monies collected are togo anywhere but to the United States Treasury. Is that wherethe money really goes? Let us examine some FACTS . . .

One sure way to find out who cashes a check is to simplylook on the back of the check and see who actually endorsedit. I challenge you to look on the back of any check sent tothe IRS in payment of "taxes". The IRS uses a rubber stamp toendorse checks. A common and well accepted practice amonglarge businesses. Do any of the endorsements you have foundindicate that any of the checks cashed by the IRS went to theUnited States Treasury? It must per the Internal Revenue code,their own regulations! The real truth is that not one dime ofthe "tax" money sent to the IRS has ever gone directly to theU.S. Treasury! Where does it go? Simply look at the rubberstamp endorsement. It may say something similar to thefollowing;

6-43

FRB Endorsement:

PAY ANY F.R.B. BRANCH OR GEN. DEPOSITORY FOR CREDITU.S. TREAS. THIS IS PAYMENT OF U.S. OBLIG. MUST BE PAIDIN PAR N.P. DO NOT WIRE NON-PAYMENT 20-09-0900 DIR IRS

CTR. KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI

Regardless of which type of endorsement your canceledcheck may have on it, please note that neither one says "payto the order of the United States Treasury" or "for deposit tothe U.S. Treasury". I challenge anyone to prove otherwise. Themoney does not go to the U.S. Treasury or to run thegovernment! It never has! The FRB keeps it -- as a partialpayment on the (fake) National Debt! None of it is left overto run the country! Fake??? Yes, More on that Later.

Every time you hear a politician state that it is the"taxpayer's money" that they're watching out for; every timeyou hear a television commentator tell you what is being donewith "the taxpayer's money" -- they are LYING to you! TheCongress of the United States, which authorizes the spendingof ALL the money the federal government spends each year, doesNOT spend "the taxpayer's money" -- they BORROW every DIME!And they want YOU to Pay it back!!!

The endorsements mentioned above say that the money is tobe deposited to any Federal Reserve Bank for CREDIT of U.S.Obligations. What obligations? Let us examine what and whomthe Federal Reserve Bank is and where these "obligations" comefrom.

Again, we will find that the American people have beenduped into believing things that are not the way we have beentold they are. First of all, the Federal Reserve Bank is NOTFederal. As mentioned in the previous chapter, the FRB isopenly and admittedly a PRIVATE institution. It is owned by agroup of families, which are stockholders in the corporation.The FRB is no different from any other private firm. They arein business for only one purpose -- to make (take your) money!

You see, the IRS is really a private corporation itself,and is nothing but a collection agency for the FRB. The "tax"money collected, is then loaned out to whom ever it wants to,all over the world! The FRB has never been audited, whichhelps to keep the information about where the money actuallygoes, secret and private.

6-44

Since the FRB is a private corporation, it will thereforenot be too difficult to understand where the "national debt"comes from, how it has been created, and why it even exists.Again, we find that we have all been duped! The "nationaldebt" has been created by the FRB! Here's basically -

How the Debt has been created:

1. The United States Treasury owns the Bureau of Printingand Engraving (B.O.P.E.), the agency that creates what wecall money. Remember, the FRNs being used are of no realvalue. They are no longer backed by silver or of gold.(see 'EXHIBITS' on bills used as evidence in SupremeCourt)

2. For example, let's say today the U.S. Treasury ordersthe B.O.P.E. to print 1,000 FRNs

3. The total printing cost for any denomination ($1, $100)of a dollar bill is $20.60 per 1,000 bills. The B.O.P.Ehaving printed the notes now sells them to the U.S.Treasury for $20.60.

4. The Federal Reserve Bank now calls the U.S. Treasuryand wants to purchase 1,000 one dollar federal reservenotes. Upon receiving the order, the Treasury sells the1,000 FRNs to the FRB for $20.60.

5. The U.S. Treasury then calls the Federal Reserve Bankand says, "We are broke, and need to borrow 1,000 onedollar notes to run our government with today."

6. The FRB says, "Fine, here's a $1,000 loan." (handingthem back the same $1,000 that they just purchased for$20.60) In case you didn't notice, $979.40 just disap-peared into someone's pocket. I think it was the FRB's!To top this act off even further the FRB will chargeinterest on this loan. They call this seigniorage - Icall it fraud and theft!!!

7. The fiasco doesn't stop here. At this point, the FRBsays it doesn't trust the Treasury, and demands someform of security for the loan. (sound familiar?)

8. The U.S. Treasury gives the FRB a U.S. Treasury Bondfor security of the loan, interest bearing against thepeople of the United States . . . YOU !!!

6-45

NOW I ASK YOU ... DO YOU STILL BELIEVE WE HAVE A NATIONALDEBT??? WE DON'T!!! If you can see the truth above, themoney with which to repay the "debt" has never been createdand furthermore does not even exist!!!

CAN YOU SPELL FRAUD?

In order to illustrate this fact, let's say the FRBloaned the U.S. Treasury $100.00 in created paper money in1913 (when the FRB was created) at an interest rate of 6%. Theaccumulated interest over a 70 year period is in excess of$12,000. None of this amount can be paid. You must understandthat $100 is all that was created in the first place! Wheredoes the money to pay the balance with come from, if it hasnever been created?

Some people have trouble understanding this conceptbecause they have paid back loans with interest. In order foryou to accomplish this, however, you must also understand thatsomeone else must borrow money to put enough money back intocirculation to enable the first borrower to obtain enoughmoney to pay back a loan with interest. Now, the secondborrower has a problem, as there is not enough money incirculation to pay his interest. Meaning a further shortage ofthe amount of interest the first borrower took out of themoney pool to pay off his interest. And on and on it goes.

Presently the FRB and its (private) shareholders havecreated (fictitiously) a debt against the people of the UnitedStates of approximately 70 TRILLION dollars (1996 est.)! Theinterest on the fictitious national debt is currently growingat a rate of over $100,000+ per SECOND!!! This means thatevery person now alive in the Unites States has been obligatedto a fake debt in excess of $700,000! And this is supposedlyowed to the FRB or rather the shareholders? ThoseInternational Bankers!!!

Yes, there's still more. Even as unbelievable as it mayseem already. During Jimmy Carter's term of office, the FRBcame to him demanding more security or collateral for the debtthe FRB says the U.S. owed them. Being the fine, up-standingcitizen (puppet) he was, he turned over all of the birthcertificates and marriage licenses of every person in the U.S.to the Department of Commerce. Because of this, each citizenof this country now has a "Government Assumed Power ofAttorney" placed against all of our lives. Which basically

6-46

means that we are considered to be indentured slaves. Ourlabor is the collateral for repayment of the fraudulentnational debt. Our present day government views us as no moreimportant than cattle! This same "Government Assumed Power ofAttorney" is what has given the HRS (and other 3 letterbureaucracies) the authority it has been granted, in casesthey decide warrants investigations and/or the confiscation ofchildren from private citizens. Sound familiar???

The people of this country must wake up NOW, if any ofthese things are going to change. We, the people have allowedthese monstrosities to happen simply because we no longer evenknow what our rights are that our forefathers fought for us tokeep. They fought and died for these sacred principles,morals, beliefs, ethics, rights and freedoms. Almost none ofus it seems, know what the U.S. Constitution says or what iteven stands for! The Constitution and the Bill of Rights arethe PEOPLE'S PROTECTION FROM the government! It is thepeople's job to enforce it. Moreover - The Right to Keep andBear Arms - is the Enforcement Amendment. How can We, thepeople enforce anything if we don't even know what it says???

7-47

Chapter 7 WHAT HAPPENED TO OUR -

SOVEREIGNTY?

The Supreme Court has defined three meanings to the termUnited States. One of which, is a foreign country to the 50States that make up our Nation, called the united States ofAmerica. YUP, here we go again with the play on words!

THE THREE UNITED STATES

1. The "United States of America".2. The corporate "United States".3. These "united States".

"UNITED STATES" is the legal, formal name of the FEDERALGOVERNMENT and the lands it owns. The U.S. Supreme Court hasdeclared that, unless you are a resident of the District ofColumbia, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa,Northern Mariana Islands or another American possession, orare a naturalized citizen who was born in another country, youare, properly, a Sovereign Citizen of the State where you wereborn, and you are residing or are domiciled in the State whereyou live. As a Citizen of one of the Sovereign States, you arealso a Citizen of the UNION of States named "United States ofAmerica" - BUT - you have NEVER been a citizen of the "UnitedStates."

"FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. A union or confederation of sovereign states, created eitherby treaty, or by the mutual adoption of a federal constitution, for the purpose of presenting tothe world the appearance of a single state, while retaining the rights and power of internalregulation and administration, or at least of local self-government."

- Bouvier's Law Dictionary

The corporate "United States", (the District of Columbia,a municipal corp. entity, a foreign country) has limitedjurisdiction over the individual nation States. It has NOlegal jurisdiction over the people of these States - except byindividual voluntary application and color of contract! What?In other words, you have to voluntarily "waive your freedomsand rights" in order to be subject to their jurisdiction! Theywill say in a court of law, "Your honor - this person waived

7-48

his sovereignty, rights and freedoms, and gave them over to usin exchange for some gov't sugar titty!" Well, something likethat. Do you get the picture? But in effect, you cannot waiveyour rights! Or they would not be unalienable!! In otherwords, you can not alienate yourself from yourself!!!Nevertheless, they have the audacity to legislate it in toexistence and think that it is then Law! If it's morallywrong, or against God's Law, or is unconstitutional, it isVoid and has no legality at all! Unless you do not Care!?!?

TWO TYPES OF CITIZENSHIPS

1. Sovereign State Citizenship with inalienable Rights.

2. Federal citizenship with privileges and duties only.

The primary contract in question is the Social Securityapplication, or the SS5,20 which is entirely voluntary. Wereyou informed of this when you applied? Were you informed ofany Rights you may be waiving by signing? NO?!?!

Well my friend, that is FRAUD and it is Tyranny! Butwait, what about your birth certificate, W4, 1040, banksignature card, or your Drivers License? NO???

Well guess what? Any contract entered into withoutconsent, or is made under fraudulent pretenses, or withoutfull disclosure, is null and void! And may be declared so andtherefore rescinded and made as though it did not exist.

In reference to the #2 type of citizenship above, the 14th

Amendment freed slaves but only if they agreed to be subjectsof Congress! This is voluntary servitude or statutory slaveryimposed by Congress via the 14th Amendment! It is termed"Federal citizenship"!

Do you really want to be a 14th Amendment slave, a secondclass "Federal citizen"? Subject to a corporate municipalentity, the U.S., who only has jurisdiction in the District ofColumbia, it's possessions, territories and enclaves, by someadhesion contract you may or may not have signed, that wasperpetrated upon you by FRAUD? OR, would you rather be a FREESovereign Citizen? Exempt from any direct tax (income tax),estate tax, inheritance tax, property tax, as these taxes

20 See "Why Revoke Your SSN?" -- in the next chapter.

7-49

violate the restrictions on government, which is plainlystated in the Constitution for the United States of Americaand various State Constitutions as well!

So how do we support our government - you ask? Simple,see Article 1, Sec. 8 of the Constitution.

"Congress shall have the power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises. . ."

Would that be enough - you ask? Certainly! Once we trimdown the big fat bureaucracy, it would be more than enough. Infact, over 2/3's of the Federal government income is derivedfrom sources other than the "income tax". (see the GraceCommission Report) So,

WHAT CAN YOU DO?

1. Resolve to regain your rightful station by throwingoff the deceitful prejudices of a lifetime of publiceducation and elitist-controlled print and electronicmedia; and

2. Unswervingly commit yourself to acquiring theknowledge of your American birthright and how tosuccessfully defend it when challenged21; and

3. Practice abstinence from voluntary participation as asubscriber, beneficiary, associate member (whatever)of the privileges and benefits proffered by quasi defacto, corpora ficta governmental bodies masqueradingas official government offices by;

4. Revoking the Social (in)Security application, andrescind signatures on all 1040's and IRS forms;22 and

5. Close your Bank account and reopen by properlyexecuting a W-8 form (Foreign Status Certificate). DoNOT sign the Bank's signature card - this gives themjurisdiction, and

21 I strongly urge you to get Mr. Woods workshop materials on the "Right To Travel". The most authoritativework I've seen or read, from A to Z - everything you need to know regarding setting up a prima facie caseagainst the state actors for a Title 42 and/or Title 18 lawsuit. See "Recommended Reading" for details.22 See the next chapter for specifics on how to use the Forms available in this Book.

7-50

6. Protect your assets - place You and Your Business in aForeign or Off-Shore Trust, and

7. Demand the IRS prove jurisdiction over You, in writingsigned under penalty of perjury (as required by IRCSec. 6065). Demand is made under authority of theF.O.I.A. Title 5, Sec. 552(a), and

8. Be prepared to defend your position through research,and your due diligence, etc. Are you accepting anygov't. sugar titty? If so, they will use this againstyou! Know your Rights and stand on them. And finally;

9. Actively and aggressively practicing your fundamental,unbridgeable, unalienable rights while alwaysrespecting and observing your duty and obligation notto infringe upon the same birthrights of your fellowsovereign Americans.

REPUBLIC | DEMOCRACY

People - Sovereign | Person (14th) SubjectGod - given Rights | PrivilegesFreedom | Compelled PerformanceThou Shalt Not | Thou ShallBilateral Contract | Unilateral ContractSeparation of Church | 501C-3 ( privilege granted

And State | by the STATE )Innocent till proven | Guilty till proven innocent

Guilty |Travel Freely | need a LicenseTrue Production | No incentive - the STATE

| wants you to rely on it!

IS ANY OF THIS MAKING SENSE TO YOU NOW?

Recite the "Pledge of Allegiance" to Yourself my friend. Or -do you still pledge allegiance to the most beautiful Flag inthe World - the "Stars & Stripes"? And to the REPUBLIC forwhich it stands? For LIBERTY - FREEDOM - JUSTICE? Under GOD?

8-51

Chapter 8 HOW TO STOP PAYING INCOME TAXESLegally and Morally!

Allow me to recap our understanding of the IRS Code.

1. It is based upon Self-Assessment, 2. And Voluntary Compliance.

In other words, you have to assess yourself because theIRS does not have the authority to! Section 6201(a) "TheSecretary shall assess all taxes determined by the taxpayer orby the Secretary as to which returns or lists are made underthis title."

You also have to voluntarily comply with the IR Code(Title 26)(see 'EXHIBITS') because it was never passed into"positive law"23! And is only the;

"official restatement of the general and permanent law . . . no new law is enacted andno law repealed. It is prima facie the law. It is presumed to be the law. Thepresumption is rebuttable by production of prior unrepealed Acts of Congress atvariance with the code."

Preface: The Code of the Laws of the United States.

And as mentioned before, the IRC is at variance with many ofour Constitutional Rights!

So you see, if it were mandatory, it would be unconsti-tutional. Surely, your employer does not want to deprive youof your rights! So used to, you simply told him you wanted tofile a new W-4 (authorization by you for him to withhold) andon the third line write Exempt, and he can't withhold taxesfrom your check. However, because the W-4 misrepresents the IRCode, section 3402(n), we simply spell it our for them. Moreproof of their misleading deceitfulness. Notice the differencebetween "No Liability" and "No Tax Owed" as is on the W-4! Sonow you simply send him a "Affidavit of Exemption", "SocialSecurity Letter" as well as the "Affidavit of Rescission andRevocation", the "Social Insecurity Affidavit" and the"Affidavit of Sovereign Status" (see 'Forms Section' at end of

23 The FACT that Title 26 is NOT positive law means that the title itself is not considered Law, but merely areflection of the underlying statutes. If it were accepted into positive law, it would only mean that it could beused as "law" without directly referring to the underlying statutes. It does not mean that Title 26 cannot beenforced, or that it's not mandatory, but that Title 26 can be challenged more easily by using the underlyingstatutes in contra-respect to inadequacies within the code itself.

8-52

book). Be sure to ALWAYS send all your correspondence viaCertified Mail Return Receipt Requested. Giving you proof yousent it and they received it!

The "Affidavit of Rescission and Revocation" needsspecial attention, since it explains your position on thesubject and effectively revokes your Social Insecurity Number.Now you will never have to use it again and they cannot trackyou down or your finances. Invest it yourself and retireearly! This would put it back in the private sector where itshould be, where it can do the most good. Not in the hands ofthe government (or Bankers) to be squandered away on freebies,foreign wars and research on the how and why of bugs!According to Title 5 USC, Sect. 556(d), when jurisdiction ischallenged the burden of proof reverts to the gov't agency.This is why it works! After all you've read - How can theyprove jurisdiction? (especially after you file all the forms)

Read and Know the "Declaration of Sovereign Status" andthe "Affidavit of Rescission & Revocation" then put your infoin the blanks, take it to the County Clerks office at yourlocal Court House, notarize and record them. Tell her you wanta Certified Proof copy. Lightly pencil over the notarizationand court seal. Make enough copies of the Declaration andAffidavit.

The certified proof copy of the Declaration & Affidavityou send to the Department of the Treasury24, the SSA, youremployer, IRS District Director, and always allow a copy foryour records. Once you do this, you are saying that you nolonger recognize the IRS as having any authority orjurisdiction over you and you do not classify yourself as a"taxpayer" within the meaning of the rules and regulations ofthe IRS! You are a "Nontaxpayer"! This is your right topetition! And Legally!

But won't they march on to my property and take possession ?

Of course not,(see 'Controlling Big Brother')they would need a court order! And what wouldthe charge be, not voluntarily complying?

What about year end and April 15th ?You simply do not file! That's right,

24 NOTE: This will also be asked, in the letter, to be forwarded to the President, your Congressman and Senators! But you may want to send them a copy anyway, just to make sure, and to help us all make a statement, as well as voice your opinion and presence.

8-53

YOU DO NOT FILE!!!

Why? Because there is Nothing in the Law that requiresyou to File! And Nothing making you Liable for the "IncomeTax" that is not even defined in Title 26, the IR Code!Beginning to see the picture? The IRC was diabolically writtento deceive you, which is nothing short of FRAUD - pure andsimple! In fact, if you get charged with violating Title 26,you should immediately reject that Title as law, by not doingso, one inadvertently accepts as law something, which isadmittedly only prima facie law. (see Chapter 11 Definitions)

In essence then, you will have 4 packages to send; Refer tothe 'FORMS SECTION' at the end of this book for actual forms,and to NOTICE at beginning thereof.

1. TO THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION(a) "Notice and Demand" Letter to SSA, attached to(b) "Affidavit of Rescission and Revocation", and(c) "Declaration of Sovereign Status" (certified copy of both,

original will be Public Record).

2. TO THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY(a) Letter to Secretary of Treasury(b) Copy of the letter sent to Employer, stapled to(c) "S.S. Affidavit" (notarized copy)(d) Cover Letter to Secretary, stapled to(e) "Affidavit of Rescission and Revocation"

(certified copy), and(f) "Declaration of Sovereign Status" (certified copy).

3. TO THE DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE TAX ANDAUDIT SERVICES INC.(a) "Notice and Demand" Letter to District Director IRS(b) Copy - Cover Letter to Sec. of Treasury, attached to(c) Cert. Copy of "Declaration of Sovereign Status", and(d) Cert. Copy of "Affidavit of Rescission & Revocation"

4. TO YOUR EMPLOYER(a) "Notice and Demand Regarding W-4" to Employer

(Original - Notarized)(b) S.S. Affidavit (Original - Notarized)(c) Letter for employer to send to Dept. Treasury (opt.)(c) Notarized original - "Affidavit of Exemption". (Use

when hired or to change original, DO NOT fill out IRS form W-4 this willinvalidate your affidavit and gives them jurisdiction over you.)

(e) Copy of "Affidavit of Revocation & Recession" (opt.)

8-54

Federal Decisions about Your MoneyHere is what the federal courts have said about your abilityto keep your own money:

"Any one may so arrange his affairs that his taxes shall beas low as possible; he is not bound to choose that patternwhich will best pay the Treasury; there is not even apatriotic duty to increase one's taxes."

- Helvering vs. Gregory, Federal Reporter, 2nd series, Vol. 69, Page 810 (1934)

Justice Hugo Black declared in United States vs.Kahriger, 345 U.S. 22 (1953):

"The United States has a system of taxation by confession."

Of course, confessions are not legal or valid under theConstitution if they are compelled. To ensure that taxassessment confessions are not coerced, Congress mandated thatthey have a jurat crafted and intended by IRC 7206, and bylaw, see Title 18 U.S.C. § 1621, to be signed willfullymeaning "voluntarily". Justice Black did not state thevoluntary nature of the confession by which the self-assessment of income taxes is made on IRS Form 1040 but everylawyer knows that a legal and valid confession must be"voluntary,"25, and "the product of a rational intellect and afree will,"26.

Moreover, the Supreme Court admitted the nature of thetax return confession when the Court stated that:

"Our tax system is based upon voluntary assessment andpayment, not upon distraint."

- Flora vs. United States,362 U.S. 145 (1960)

These are not idle words inasmuch as the Supreme Courtruled in 1973, that under the legal doctrine of stare decisis;

"the people have a right to rely upon the decisions of thisCourt and not be needlessly penalized for such reliance."

- United States vs. Mason, 412 U.S. 391

According to IRC 7206, a tax return is premised anddependent upon a person's knowledge and belief as verified bythe person's willful subscription of the tax return's jurat; 25 See: Bram vs. United States, 168 U.S. 532, 542 (1897)26 See: Townsend vs. Sain, 372 U.S. 293, 307 (1963)

8-55

hence, it is axiomatic that there can be no law requiring aperson to willfully make and sign under penalties of perjury avalid, self-assessed Form 1040 tax return. If such anillogical rule exists, it is an oxymoron invented by the legalsophisticates, lackeys and stooges of the "moral elite" (orthe "rich men27" of the Earth, as they are called in theBible)!

It is not the rule of law or the payment of taxes thatPitman Buck, Jr. and his wife protested in Buck vs. UnitedStates, 967 F.2d 1060 (5th Cir. 1992), but the government'srule of tyranny that compels individuals to either completethe Form 1040 and sign its prescribed jurat under thesubterfuge that it was made and signed willfully or else pay a$500 penalty imposed under color of IRC 6702 and/or evenworse, be prosecuted and face one year in prison under theridiculous charge (IRC 7203) of willful failure to file a taxreturn that by the Code's intent (IRC 7206) is to be willfullymade and signed conscientiously. One need not be a cum laudegraduate of a law school to know that a coerced statement —whether about taxes or murder — though by a signed juratdeclares that it was made under penalties of perjury isnonetheless a statement verified by a lie.

The recently published book, The Colossal Fraud of'Involuntary Perjury' and Other Enforced Newspeak, Tricks andScams of Big Brother, proves that the federal government's useof threats, monetary penalties and incarceration ofindividuals in order to coerce them and others through fearand intimidation to fill out and sign — allegedly underpenalties of perjury — IRS Form 1040 constitutes nothing lessthan colossal fraud. The case of Buck vs. United States, 756F.Supp. 1040 (S.D.Tex. 1991), 967 F.2d 1060 (5th Cir. 1992),974 F.2d 1337 (5th Cir. 1992), 113 S.Ct. 1052 (1993), is butone of many cases of court-sanctioned subversions of law andmiscarriages of justice involving the misapplication of theIRC 6702 and 7203.

Why Revoke your Social Security Number?

The Social Security Administration personally attaches toall persons with a SSN a regional jurisdiction by agreement

27 " … Do not rich men oppress you, and draw you before the judgment seats? Do not they blaspheme thatworthy name by the which ye are called?" James 2:6,7 "Go to now, ye rich men, weep and howl for yourmiseries that shall come upon you. Your riches are corrupted, and your garments are moth-eaten. Your gold andsilver is cankered; and the rust of them shall be a witness against you, and shall eat your flesh as it were fire. Yehave heaped treasure together for the last days." James 5:1-3

8-56

and subjects the person to a foreign collection agent, theIRS, and a United States court of regional strict liabilitystatutory power. Also, Social Security is administered by anunauthorized regional venue with districts, not de jureStates, therefore there has been a false government created.Transitioning persons from State sovereignty to a regionalforeign territorialism under the unauthorized federal regionaljurisdiction of the "United States"/District of Columbia, aswas previously mentioned in the Chapter "What Happened To OurSovereignty?".

The Social Security Administration does not informapplicants that they will be defined as an artificial personby agreement and statute (Title XI Sec. 1101 [a] [31 S.S. Act1935); and thus they would become a "person" who only hadprivileges and immunities and no organic Constitutionalsecured rights to life, liberty and property, also see Section1101(a) When used in this Act--" (3) The term "person" meansan individual, a trust or estate, a Partnership, or acorporation." Social Security Act, 49 State 620 at 647 (1935).

The Social Security Administration does not informapplicants that Social Security registration would reform thegeographical area of the States into Regions and Districtswithin regions28, not States, repealing all State boundariesand creating a fourth branch of government, not authorized,pursuant to the Supremacy Clause. (Title XI Sec 1101 [a] [2]S.S. Act 1935) also pursuant to Title 42 State Agreement; theterm State is defined as the District of Columbia and the termGovernor is defined as the Mayor of the District of Columbia,the Social Security Administration has no jurisdiction toinvolve any one of the several State Republics in this FRAUD.

The Social Security Administration does not informapplicants that they will become a subject of the District ofColumbia (Title XI Sec. 1101 [a] [1] S.S. Act 1935) nor dothey instruct applicants that as a child under the legal ageof 18 they could not enter into such an agreement nor do theyinform applicants that the Social Security Application waslimited to United States citizens, which no one born in one ofthe several State Republics is at birth. Further, theapplication had a perjury clause for those who are within theUnited States, which anyone born in one of the several StateRepublics is not; pursuant to Title 28, Sec. 1746 (2).

The Social Security Administration does not informapplicants that the definitions in the Social Security Act do 28 This is known as the "Zip Code" trick!

8-57

not conform to definitions in standard dictionaries; and, theyused a public office and place of trust and a (supposed)superiority of knowledge to deceive applicants into joining.After careful examination of the Social Security Act, 74thCongress, Session I, Ch. 531, August 14, 1935, page 636,Section 702, Duties of Social Security Board, the term "SocialInsurance" is used.

"Social Insurance - a comprehensive welfare plan established by law,generally compulsory in nature, and based on a program which spreads the cost ofbenefits among the entire population rather than on individual recipients. The federalgovernment began to use depreciating insurance programs to raise revenue forinternational operations in 1935, with the passage of the Social Security Act. Thebasic federal and state approaches to social insurance presently in use are: Old Age,Survivors, and Disability Insurance (i.e. Social Security); Medicare and Medicaid;unemployment insurance; and worker's compensation."

Black's Law Dict. 5ED.2 724.

Further, in 1938 according to the Ashwander court,29

"anyone who partakes of the benefits or privileges of a given statute, or anyone whoeven places himself into a position where he may avail himself of those benefits atwill, cannot reach constitutional grounds to redress grievances in the courts againstthe given statute." (emphasis added)

The Social Security Administration does not informapplicants when people, as State Citizens, applied for andaccepted a Social Security Number! They also accepted itsdefinition of "person", and they too, then, are taxed for theprivilege of Federal Employment and citizenship and stateresidence (Federal) through the personal income tax, state andfederal. The people of the States were deceived by this actbecause the government violated the Preamble and law of TheCreator. The government allowed the Constitution to be alteredoutside the bounds of the Preamble (Amendments 13-26) and thusthe state Citizens fell victim to government over man insteadof man over government. Even our Churches subscribe to theU.S. Government for a tax-exempt status! (see end of this chapter under"Godhead") Ignoring God's Law!!!

Social Security (FICA) is a voluntary social insurancepolicy which, by submission, suborns You, the Affiant, anotherwise Free, Natural, Citizen of your state of birth intothe Federal, corporate, jurisdiction same said as a FederalEmployee or Employer, that has been created within regionalconcepts, under the authority of the United States

29 Ashwander vs. T.VS.A., 297 U.S. 288, 346, 56 S.Ct. 466, 482, 80 L.Ed. 688 (1938)

8-58

Constitution, 14th Amendment, to divest the posterity of theirbirthright in the Statute of 1776 (The Declaration ofIndependence) and to reduce the posterity to mere subjects ofthe United States, in order to raise revenue for the cause ofthe New World Order, and, thereby, reduce the sovereignty ofthe several 50 States to no affect, as districts, in a schemeof centralized/international government through the nationalsocialist scheme of the Social Security Act.

The Social Security (FICA) social insurance scheme isdeployed to limit, by supersedeas quasi contract, yourpersonam of de jure jus sanguinis "State Citizen", withintent, through misrepresentation, to impair, extort anddivest you of naturally-given Inalienable Rights, otherwiseprotected by the limitations and prohibitions set out in theOrganic Law for the united States of America by requiring youthrough uninformed, implied and direct, consent (submission)to surrender or limit the affect of your personam of StateCitizen, to accomplish ends wholly beyond the sphere markedout by the Declaration of Independence (1776), the originalConstitution for the United States of America (1787), the Billof Rights (1791) and the original Constitution for your stateof birth.

The Social Security scheme (FICA) is a stealthyencroachment on, and an easy way, via government-controlledmedia blitz propaganda, to circumvent, the limitation(s) andguarantee(s), provided by "We the People", against singularcentralized, international government, specifically, but notlimited to, the limitations and guarantees against abridgmentand subordination of your inalienable and Unalienable Rightsgranted by The Creator, as expressed and asserted in theoriginal Constitution for your state of birth, the Declarationof independence (1776), as set out in the originalConstitution for the United States of America (1787) and itsBill of Rights (1791), and, as earlier expressed and assertedin the Declaration and Resolves of The First ContinentalCongress (1774). How's that for legalese?

Participation in Social Security, a social insurancepolicy, and the agency (power of attorney) scheme thereunder,is an attempt by creatures of the government and co-parties,to compel one into a joint venture, with regional (interstateand international) statutory implications, of an intragovernmental nature, in the unauthorized jurisdiction(s) thatnow exist by the United States, codified pursuant todeclaratory Amendments not authorized for Citizens of theStates, in the Constitution for the United States of America.

8-59

Only as an adult and not a child, and by informedconsent, with full disclosure, can the government exercise anunauthorized intragovernmental authority over a Citizen, inthe jurisdiction(s) of the "United States", outside thelimitations of the original Constitution (1787) and the Billof Rights (1791).

All power (right) belongs within the Citizen, to acceptor deny control, in areas of law which are not within thejurisdiction of the organic Constitution for the United Statesof America (1787) and the Constitutions for the several Statesof the Union, that could pertain, or attempt to pertain, to aCitizen, as one of "We the People" of the several States,found in the Preamble to the Constitution for the UnitedStates of America (1787), which power (right) is protected bythe limitations and prohibitions set out in the 9th and 10thArticles in Amendment to the Organic Constitution (Bill ofRights [1791]).

UNDERSTAND NOW? - It should be self evident that, in allcases which undermine and destroy, either directly orindirectly, a sovereign American Citizen's fundamental,unabridgeable, unalienable rights, pursuant to his inherentpolitical power and sovereignty, are always Acts of Treason!

IMPORTANT NOTE

It must be remembered that a non-taxpayer, a Free Individual Sovereign Citizen hasNO RECOURSE through the IRS for a refund or rebate, since you no longer recognize theirauthority (especially now that you realize they have none)! So this is putting your employeron notice that if he illegally (by violating your rights to due process) withholds money fromyou, without a court order, then he is responsible and would be the party to sue. (more later)

If you want to make a correction to your Status during the year (as apposed to the end)file the "Affidavit of Exemption" with your Employer, and at the first of the following year,file a 1040EZ with no income (or whatever your checking/savings earned - even though this is not'income' but may be said to show good faith) claiming the money withheld as a "Refund Due".Then file the rest of the paperwork claiming your Sovereign status as a free individualCitizen reserving all your God given rights - and never have to file again!

Now, CONGRATULATIONS for a raise and feeling FREE. Thereis really nothing quite like it! If you are self-employed, youstill get a raise, you're operating at a greater profitspurring on your local economy and doing our country somegood! Mainly by helping to restore the validity of our greatConstitution and this nation! Surely it was worth somethingfor our forefathers to leave their country for, to fight for,to die for, to build this country under its provisions and

8-60

restraints on government, by the people, of the people, andfor the people, with Liberty and Justice for all of us.

GODHEAD

The majority of Americans have, in fact, wittingly orunwittingly converted wholly and without reservation, asevidenced by their deeds and acts, to become true believers in"the STATE" as their God-head!

In America, Christianity has been the greatest religiouscasualty in the rise of the twin religions of Democracy and"the STATE" as the peoples' new religions of choice. Whilemillions continue to pay lip service to Christianity, theydirect their worshipful respects, always first to Democracyand "the STATE". The truth of this proposition is prima facieevidenced by the acts of most alleged Christianitypractitioners, as opposed to their lip service. A mereintroductory list of such acts would include the following:

(1) They petition "the STATE" for permission to preachtheir Christian message by obtaining state-issuedcorporate charters for their churches,

(2) They deal in usurious contracts by way of mortgageson church property,

(3) They seek licenses from the state for permission tomarry,

(4) They register their children with "the STATE" atbirth,

(5) They send their children to state-controlled schools,

(5) They subscribe to "the STATE's" social insurancescheme, et cetera.

Clearly by their acts and deeds, "the STATE", in the nameof Democracy, is their religion and their God-head -- for theywould sooner offend their Christian God than "the STATE" anytime they are put to the pinch.

Like true believers in any religion, those Americans arefound to be slavishly committed to the dogma propagated by"the STATE's" priesthood and do accept with out reservationsits private corporate tenets, its private corporate benefits,its private corporate demands, and its private corporate

8-61

rulings without ever once questioning its de facto, corporaficta authority that is strictly private in nature yetmasquerading as the people's bona fide government.**

Shouldn't it be,

FREEDOM, LIBERTY and JUSTICE FOR ALL!!!

* * Godhead -taken in part from the workshop materials of Mr. James B. Wood III "Right To Travel". c/o Cubex, Suite 174, 7350 S. Tamiami Trail, Sarasota, Florida 34231 U.S.A.

9-62

Chapter 9Chapter 9 CONTROLLING BIG BROTHERCONTROLLING BIG BROTHERBecause We're Big Daddy!

Our Constitution only authorizes our government tocollect taxes to provide for the common defense and promotethe general welfare. Not to provide welfare or specificwelfare of some at the expense of others! Many people I talkto, seem to think that if they stop paying "Income Tax", ourgovernment will come to a halt. Do you really believe thatafter all you have read so far? They under estimate the hiddentaxes they do not see. Remember the "Windfall Oil ProfitsTax". How much are you paying at the pumps now? Do you knowthe tax bracket your Doctor is in? Why do you think his billis so high? Why don't you just tell him that you will pay ½the bill and give the other ½ to some other patient who saysthey cannot afford it, OR your favorite charity. What would hesay to that? Get the picture?

It should be clear at this point that the "InternationalBanking Cartel" is the true rulers of this nation. They ownthe Federal Reserve Corp.! Remember what Meyer AmschellRothschild once said,

"Permit me to issue the money of a Nation, and I care not who makes its laws."

I sincerely believe that the Federal Reserve monopoly canbe banned, abolished, and booted out - at the expressed willof the people. It is "We the People" who have to stand up andbe counted for who we are and what we believe in!

Now what are some methods of control we can establish anduse effectively? Obviously, a lot has already been mentioned.But foremost, in any written correspondence with the IRS (orits employees) always respond questioning them on theirtactics/violations, etc. and make sure you send it CertifiedMail - Return Receipt. This is because you may need proof ofeverything and in order to setup your prima facie evidence tosue them in Federal court, or defend yourself in court (ofproper jurisdiction). Also, petitioning and writing yourcongressman and senators, voicing your opinions and askingtheirs. Getting involved in the political arena yourself!Encouraging and endorsing a knowledgeable and favorablecandidate, etc.

What about Jury duty?

9-63

If you are called to jury duty in a relevant case, armedwith the knowledge you have now (and hopefully expand on)consider carefully your decision. Each member of the jury hasthe right to decide among the facts presented and the courtsopinion of Law! Jury nullification is a very powerful weapon.Warning: Never let a Federal Judge know you are aware of jurynullification30 or aware of the criminal nature of the IRS! Ithas been found that they even check the tax records ofindividual jurors, can you imagine! Spread the NEWS, tell yourfriends and associates about this expose' or any books youaccumulate on the subjects.

NEVER GO TO TAX COURT or USE IRS FORMS! You can have IRSemployees (they call them officers???), federal prosecutors orjudges, etc. - ARRESTED - if they seek to compel yourcompliance with so called "income tax laws" that don't exist.Moreover, they cannot claim immunity, since they will beoperating outside of federal law. Example; If a IRS employeetries to take your property by filing a lien or fraudulent useof "Notice of Levy", simply ask him what section of the codemakes you liable and authorizes him to do what he did? Asalways, have a witness or two (reporter) and or recorder. Theymay be guilty of trespass, conspiracy to defraud, larceny,assault and battery, conversion of funds, and/or otherfederal, state or local crimes, not to mention the IRC itself(see IRC 7214). Make a citizens arrest (need two witnesses) andcall the county Sheriff. In front of the Sheriff or Deputy,Demand that the IRS personnel show;

1. The Code section that makes you liable for the tax & 2. The Code section that authorizes him to collect upon

distraint, or by force.

You can also ask for protection if you know of say, aseizure before hand. Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of CriminalProcedure provide that if a private Citizen has personalknowledge that a crime has been committed (be sure of your facts) youcan swear out a complaint to the nearest Federal Magistrateagainst such individuals demanding that they be arrested. Orat the discretion of the court, issued a summons and affordeda hearing based on those charges. I call your attention toTitle 18 (the U.S. Criminal Code), Section 241, "Conspiracy ofRights of Citizens" and Section 242, "Deprivation of RightsUnder Color of Law". Section 241 requires 2 or more to

30 See 'RECOMMENDED READING' on how to get the "Citizens Rule Book" for only $1.00 A must to have on person, incl. Declaration of Independence, Constitution, Bill of Rights, Jury Duty & Rights etc.

9-64

conspire, such as two IRS personnel.

All American Citizens are protected by the Constitution against:

1. Being compelled to be a witness against themselves; Meaning you do not have to answer to an IRS audit!

2. Having property taken from you without due process of law; So, have them arrested!

3. Being directly taxed except on the basis of appor- tionment among the states; So, why pay?

In case of an employer disregarding your "Affidavit ofExemption", or "Notice & Demand Re: Withholding" keep the suiton the state level in the nature of a "Show Cause Order" as towhy the company is not honoring the Affidavit and/or youremployment contract. This is "Breach of Contract" on theemployer and should not become a federal issue. The Feds wouldnot be a party to the suit and must not be included in it. Notax was determined, assessed, by IRS or employee, nor is thegovernment seeking to collect or claim that it is owed!

If you are charged with say, Section 7203, "WillfulFailure to File...", you need to file a Motion to Dismiss31

because of No Subject Matter Jurisdiction because;

1. 7203 applies only to returns required to be filed.

2. No section of the Code establishing liability.

3. Code specifically confers civil jurisdiction on Federal courts in tax cases - Not criminal!

4. Because the income tax is NOT levied pursuant to any of the taxing clauses of the Constitution, therefore, the accused could not be required to perform any act with respect to it.

Allow me to clarify a few more issues for our petitioningto our governing body and possibly for your Peace of Mind.

PRIVILEGES Vs RIGHTS

31 Must be submitted before arraignment so issue is raised before any plea is made. NEVER PLEA - Get it Dismissed. Also "TAX EVASION" can be dismissed at arraignment, see #3 & #4 above.

9-65

As an American Citizen, we have RIGHTS not privileges asgranted by some King. Therefore, if our government had thepower to tax Rights, it would have the power to abolish them.The power to tax is the power to destroy! In the guise to taxthe privilege - our government is taxing our Freedoms andRights to enjoy the use of, to buy, sale, consume, bequeath,give away - property including but not limited to wages,labor, real estate, rents, royalties, dividends, business,corporations etc. Does organizing a corporation in Americainvolve a receipt of a privilege? Not unless you are a foreigncorporation! Does living in the U.S. involve a privilege? Notunless you are an alien! These and Federal employees are theonly entities the "income tax" is aimed at. Although, the IRSwould wish you to remain ignorant of this, it is beingrevealed to you now in this Book. If our Rights could betaxed, then they would not be inalienable as established bythe word of God, and in the Declaration of Independence.Article 1, Section 9 of the Constitution bars the granting ofnobility - or privileges! In other words, either you have aright to do something or you do not!

Ex: Corporate charters are granted only by State Governments,so any Federal claim of a privilege is a violation of the 9thand 10th Amendments and constitutionally repugnant.

"INCOME" NOT DEFINED

The Supreme Court32 has said,

"The general term 'income' is not defined in the Internal Revenue Code."

How can the IRS tax what it can not define? It cannot! Thisincludes the "Social InSecurity Tax" which is just anotherincome tax. However, the Supreme Court33 said,

". . . income may be defined as the gain derived from capital, from labor, or from both combined."

Note: Not everything that comes in, but a gain or profit, thatis derived! This is a Profits Tax!

You mean we are taxed for making a profit? 32 See: U.S. Vs Ballard 535 F2d 400, 404 (1976); See also: Simpson vs. U.S. D.C. Iowa 1976, 423 F. Supp 720; See also: Prescott vs. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue C.A. 561 F2d 1287.33 See: Stratton Independence vs. Howbert 231 U.S. 406 p. 415; also Southern Pacific Co. vs. John Z. Lowe Jr. 247 U.S. 330, 1918.

9-66

Every government authority has admitted that income taxesare excise taxes, so therefore can only lawfully be levied asexcise taxes. It is further acknowledged by the highestgovernment sources that the tax is being levied as a direct(corp. & income) tax. Without apportionment in directviolation of the 16th Amendment and the taxing clauses of theConstitution of the United States of America!

16th AMENDMENT DID NOT AMEND THE CONSTITUTION

The 16th Amendment in effect simply put the income taxinto the section that provided for excise and other indirecttaxes34 - Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1 (see also page 1-7).It only gives the government authority to tax "income fromwhatever source derived"! The key word is FROM! Ex: Incomederived from commissions (money you earned and put in the bankto earn interest) is not the same thing as commissions (yourpaycheck). If you pay a tax on wages, rents, dividends etc.,you are paying a tax on the source and not on the income fromthese sources. This can only be a corporate profit! Moreover,remember that they are being levied as a direct tax, not as anexcise tax. Yes, this is unlawful, but not if you volunteeryour money to be squandered away to anybody and everything.That's your stupidity!!!

TRUSTING OUR GOVERNMENT

We the People, put our trust in the government, as ourpublic servants, to provide protection:

1. Against our common enemies, foreign or domestic, who woulddeny us our unalienable rights as a free people. This meanspreserving the public peace against internal convulsions,civil disturbances within the states and defense againstforeign invasions.

2. Of the people's common law rights by providing judicialforums wherein the people could obtain redress of grievancewhen fellow sovereigns or their government violated theircommon law rights.

34 See also; Brushaber vs. Union Pacific R. R. Co. N.Y. 1916, 36 S.Ct 236, 240 U.S. 1, 60 L.Ed 493; Simmonsvs. U.S., C.A. MD 1962 308 F2d 160; Pledger vs. CIRCA 5, 1981, 641 F2d 287, certiorari denied 102 S.Ct 504,454, U.S. 964, 70 L.Ed. 2d 379

9-67

Therefore, in all matters wherein American governmentalbodies engage in activities unrelated to those subjects,wherein these governmental bodies' powers of sovereignty lie,no duty and obligation to support these activities rests withthe sovereign people. After all, it's just private business!

ARTICLE TWO

"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a FREE state, the right ofthe People to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

The term "militia" was defined by all states who ratifiedthe Constitution, as the PRIVATE CITIZEN. The SecondAmendment is the "ENFORCER" Amendment, and is designed toprotect the people from a central government bent uponTREASON!

The Constitution is a document of FREEDOM, and to securethat freedom, and their free state, ARMS ARE REQUIRED. Thearms must be in the hands of the people, and under control ofthe people, for it is the individual who is the sovereignunder the Constitution. The "militia" is not the "standingarmy" or the "National Guard", for they work for, and areagents of the "Federal" government.

As long as the Federal government obeys the Constitution,which is the highest law of the land, the people remain free.But, if the government attempts to circumvent theConstitution, then the People have the Right to rise up, witharms, and put down the INSURRECTION OF GOVERNMENT. The onlyway America could be submerged under the United Nations(U.N.), thereby forfeiting our Sovereignty as a free nation -the U.S.A., is to commit Treason against the Constitution. TheU.N. Charter is a Communist/Illuminist Constitution - with NOFREEDOMS! In FACT, Public Law 87-297 and State Dept. Document7277 clearly portray the intent to disarm America and placeher under the U.N.

As the Second Amendment is the legal basis for the"militia", it must either be "reinterpreted" or removed underany pretext, as the "militia" is a form of "standing army" tothe GLOBALISTS and therefore must be destroyed. The fastestway to accomplish this is to claim the "militia" is not thereal militia, but rather a group of people bent upon"insurrection". They become "terrorists", and are labeled assuch by the media. At the same time they are labeled"terrorists", the argument is made that there is no longer any

9-68

need for a Second Amendment!

To be sure that the "militia" is seen as a group of"radicals" and "terrorists", "incidents" will occur and the"militia" will be blamed. If they cannot be blamed outright,they will be "connected" in some way. The media will DEMONIZETHE MILITIA!

Therefore my friends,

the FIGHT for our GUNS IS THE LAST STRAW!

It is my contention and belief that it is the FederalGovernment that is directly responsible for the nationsfalling standard of living and its financially bankruptcondition. The more taxes Americans send to Washington tosupport it, the worse it will become. We may be able to dosomething about it today,

While we still have a choice!

AM I THE RADICAL? ARE YOU ?

By Now, You should know - WHO IS !!!

9-69

THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH

Our Government is the Nations biggest employer!

? WHY ?

9-70

******* A TRUE PATRIOT *******

I had a dream the other night, I did not quite understand,A figure walking through the mist, with flintlock in his hand.His clothes were torn and dirty, as he stood there by the bed,He took off his three-cornered hat, and speaking low, he said,

We fought a revolution, to secure our liberty.We wrote the Constitution as a shield from tyranny.

For future generations, this legacy we gave,In this, the land of the free, the home of the brave.

The freedom we secured for you, we hoped you would always keep,But tyrants labored endlessly, while your parents were asleep.

Your freedoms gone, your courage lost, you're no more than a slave.In this, the land of the free, the home of the brave.

You buy permits to travel, and permits to own a gun,Permits to start a business, or to build a place for one.

On land that you believe you own, you pay a yearly rent,Although you have no voice in choosing how the money is spent.

Your children must attend a school that does not educate,Your Christian values cannot be taught, according to the State.

You read about the current news, in a regulated press,You pay a tax you do not owe, just to please the IRS.

Your money is no longer made of silver or of gold,You trade your wealth for paper, so your life can be controlled.

You pay for crimes that make our nation turn from God in shame,You have taken Satan's number, as you have traded in your name.

You have given government control to those who do you harm,So they can padlock churches, and steal the family farm.

And keep our country deep in debt, put men of God in jail,Harass your fellow countrymen, while corrupting courts prevail.

Your public servants do not uphold the solemn oath they have sworn.Your daughters visit doctors so their children will not be born.

Your leaders ship artillery and guns to foreign shores,And send your sons to slaughter, fighting other people's wars.

Can you regain the freedom, for which we fought and died?Or don't you have the courage, or the faith to stand with pride?

Are there no more values for which you will fight to save?Or do you wish your children to live in fear and be a slave?

Sons of the Republic, ARISE and take a Stand!Defend the Constitution, the Supreme Law of the Land!

Preserve our great Republic and each God given Right,And prey to God to keep the torch of Freedom burning bright!

Author Unknown

10-71

Chapter 10Chapter 10 RECOMMENDED READINGRECOMMENDED READING

BOOKS

"TAX FRAUD - IRS STYLE; THE POWER OF INDUCED FEAR", by Sarah Daniels, Ex IRS agent

"LAW THAT NEVER WAS", by Lowell H. Beecraft Jr.Attorney at Law, Huntsville Alabama

"HOW THE IRS SEIZES YOUR DOLLARS AND HOW TO FIGHT BACK",by George Hansen Congressman, Fireside Books

"RIGHTS OF JURORS IN CRIMINAL CASES",by the Honorable B.F. Thomas (1874)

"THE GREAT INCOME TAX HOAX", by Irwin Schiff

"THE BIGGEST CON, HOW THE GOVERNMENT IS FLEECING YOU",by Irwin Schiff

"THE SOCIAL SECURITY SWINDLE, HOW ANYONE CAN DROP OUT",by Irwin Schiff

"HOW ANYONE CAN STOP PAYING INCOME TAXES", by Irwin Schiff

"HOW AN ECONOMY GROWS and WHY IT DOESN'T", by Irwin Schiff

"FEDERAL MAFIA", by Irwin Schiff

Mr. Irwin Schiff's books can be purchased through FreedomBooks, 60 Skiff Street Suite 30, Hamden Conn. PZ06517

The following organization can be reached to purchase thefollowing videos & literature and to join their group ofPatriots who band together and help each other in case ofanyone being incarcerated in violation of their Rights! Whenwriting, ask for a copy of their exclusive newsletter,"Reasonable Action".

SAVE -A- PATRIOT FELLOWSHIP Fax 410-857-5249P. O. Box 91 BBS 410-857-4455Westminister, MD 21158 www.taxtruth4u.com

[ NOTE: See "WARNING" on page 10-74, and Remember about filing IRS Forms! ] S.A.P.does offer lots of good info, but always use caution when evaluating any "literature". Eventhis Book - Investigate everything for Yourself!

10-72

"Citizens Rule Book" send $1 to Whitten Printers 1001 S.5thStr. Phoenix, AZ 85004 Ph.(602) 258-6406

VIDEO'S

Contact C.A.L.L., see under "Organizations".(prices subject tochange)

"THE KENNEDY ASSASSINATION" $20Conspiracy and cover up 2hrs by Epperson

"THE NEW WORLD ORDER" $20Why "New World Order" appears on the great seal

"THE RUBY CREEK MASSACRE" $15

"THE WACO INCIDENT" $20

"THE BATF STORY" $15

"VIETNAM AMERICA'S BETRAYAL AND TREASON" $40

"SOVEREIGNTY OR SLAVERY" 6 hrs. $20by Attny Bill Marrero, Case law supporting thepower & liberty of the sovereign American.

"IRON MOUNTAIN" $40What the gov't is not telling us, the plan to 2 Tapestake over in the name of peace.

"THE CLINTON CHRONICLES" $20

"THE REAL JANET RENO", by Attny Jack Thompson $20What she has in store for our country.

"AMERICA IN PERIL", by Mark Kornke $20The deception that our gov't has us under.

"AMERICA IN PERIL II", by Mark Kornke $20What they have and will do in our society.

"LIBERTY IN THE BALANCE" $32America, The Fed & the IRS

(order this video from Mosaic Media, c/o 366 N. Allen Ave. #235, Pasadena California91106-TDC; Cash or Money Order Only)

10-73

There are some excellent books, tapes and video's available from Texe Marrs, president ofLiving Truth Publishers. He offers a Free Newsletter about Bible prophecy and world events,secret societies, the New Age movement, cults, and the occult challenge to our Christianity.You Must Write to them and ask for their newsletter - "FLASHPOINT";

TO BOOKs & VIDEOsLiving Truth Ministries CIRCLE OF INTRIGUE (must read)1708 Patterson Road BIG SISTER IS WATCHING YOUAustin, Texas 78733 DARK MAJESTY

AMERICA SHATTEREDMYSTERY MARK OF THE NEW AGEDARK SECRETS OF THE NEW AGENEW AGE CULTS AND RELIGIONSNEW AGE LIES TO WOMEN

WORKSHOP MATERIALS

THE MOST AUTHORITATIVE WORK out there on the most basic of Freedoms, isthe "RIGHT TO TRAVEL" Workshop Materials, by James B. Wood III, author andpublisher. Write him at: c/o CUBEX, Suite 174, 7350 S. Tamiami Trail, Sarasota, Florida34231 U.S.A. No better starting place exists both as a forum for the sovereign Citizen whowishes to assert his sovereign's birthright by exercising and, most importantly, successfullydefending all of his sovereign, unalienable rights, than by learning how to exercise anddefend his right to travel. Here is the Preface in Book 1 of this 3 volume set;

"Boldly stated, these workshop materials will show you how to beat all traffictickets every time. You will learn that traffic regulatory laws within the states of theAmerican Union, also known as, these united States of America, are not public lawsas you likely understand the term, but rather, are private laws enacted by statelegislatures in undelegated de facto, corpora ficta capacity in the guise of their beingpublic laws. You will learn how to tell the difference.

You will learn that the only persons (or vehicles) subject to these private lawsare those who are found to be members of specifically named classes of personsproceeding in matters of private business (or classes of vehicles being used in matterof private business) of state legislatures.

You will learn that no state legislature has the delegated power to require youto have a valid driver license or register your motor vehicle with any instrumentalityof the state legislature.

You will learn that even if you hold a valid driver license (or your motorvehicle is registered with the state) that no provision of statute may be enforcedagainst you if no certified/promulgated rule or regulation has been publishedspecifically applicable to said provision of statute wherein said rule or regulation

10-74

specifically names a class of persons (or class of vehicles) of which you are clearly amember at the time you are stopped while motoring.

You will learn the suppressed truth about your natural, fundamental,unabridgeable, unalienable right to travel!"

These materials cost about $185 and is Worth every penny! If you decide to embarkon your Sovereign Journey, I highly recommend getting "Right To Travel" workshopmaterials, BEFORE buying anything Else! It is written with the Florida Statutes therein, butcan be used to create the same materials tailored to your State's Statutes with a little researchand work. The second volume is all Motions, etc. to File in a Court Case. You simple needyour State's Statutes substituted for the Florida Statutes therein. Should you decide to do this,Email me at info@homebiznet.nu , so that I can include you in a database and WWW Sitefor any body within your state to be able to contact you regarding the Right To Travel issue.This can represent a nice additional income stream for you! Be the First in Your State! Mr.Wood will even visit your area if enough people purchase the materials.

WARNING: There is a lot of Patriot garbage being circulated out there, with possibly goodintentions, however, they are going off on a tangent and not addressing the real issues. DONOT FALL VICTIM TO THEM - they do not work. They could be simply -MISINFORMATION.

ORGANIZATIONS

Save A Patriot Fellowship (S. A. P. F.) Visit their great site [ www.taxtruth4u.com ]P. O. Box 91, Westminister, Maryland 21158

C.A.L.L. - Citizens Against Legal Loopholes, Email to: callsd@aol.com, or write to:P.O. Box 361, Del Mar, California 92014

Common Law Information Center - Write to them and ask for info on The RestorationFoundation of America, and a copy of "FREEDOM FACTS":c/o P. O. Box 2197, Orofino, Idaho 83544

American Rights Litigators:2390 Old US Hwy 441 Suite 3, Mt. Dora Florida 32757

North American Freedom Council - Write for Catalog to:P.O. Box 646, Boonville, Indiana 47601

NEWSLETTERS and MAGAZINES

"CRIMINAL POLITICS" to subscribe call 1-800-543-0486 or Email:crimpol@iac.net, or write to Patterson Strategy Organization,P.O.Box 37812, Cincinnati, Ohio 45222. Last known - $10/issue.

10-75

"The New Sovereign" 17220 Newhope Ste. 201, Fountain Valley,California Republic. Gives you, every other month, the latestnews, winning court cases, useful legal cites, history andarticles by top thinkers and legal researchers.

Ask for a copy of "The End Times and Victorius Living", writeto: Paw Creek Ministries, 5110 Tuckaseegee Road, Charlotte,North Carolina 28208

Ask for a copy of "The REVELATOR", pbl. By The ChristianAmerican Research Leaque, c/o Box 911, Cocoa, Florida 32922

REFERENCE BOOKS

(check your local library or law library)

"CIVIL RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES LITIGATION: The Law ofSection 1983" 3rd Ed. 2vols. By Sheldon H. Nahmod

"CIVIL ACTIONS AGAINST STATE GOVERNMENT: Its Divisions,Agencies, and Officers", 2nd Ed. 2vols. Both above published byShepards/McGraw Hill, Inc.

"WORDS AND PHRASES" (check your local library)

"BLACKS LAW DICTIONARY" (check your local library)

"TRYING CASES TO WIN" by Herbert Jay Stern, Published by John Wiley & Sons Inc.

"LEGAL GUIDE FOR POLICE: Constitutional Issues",by John C. Klotter

"CIVIL LIABILITY IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE", by H.E. Barrineau III

"CIVIL LIABILITY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS",by Joyce Blalock

"LACOE'S FORMS FOR PLEADING", pub. By Harrison Co.

10-76

BBS - WWW

Ken Adler <kenadler@loop.com>SysOp of The Sovereignty Workshop BBS (818) 762-1288Containing a vast, free library of files teaching the public about state Citizenship, theirconstitutionally protected rights, and tax avoidance.--------------------------------------------------------------------------

HTTP://www.fordpublishing.demon.co.uk

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

In Pursuit of Libertyhttp://w3.ag.uiuc.edu:8001/liberty/isil/pursuit.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Constitution SocietyThe Constitution Society is a private non-profit organization dedicated to research and publiceducation on the principles of constitutional republican government.http://www.constitution.org/

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Liberty on Line We have created Liberty Online in order to publish and promote the works of the menwho forged this nation, the first of its kind, based upon ideas. The words of these men shouldnot be forgotten; yet in the history books force-fed to our children, they are glossed-over intwo sentences while every particular evil that has befallen us is trumpeted as the "RealAmerica". No greater disservice could we do to the inheritors of this nation than to pervert itsideals as is being done today. http://hypermall.com/LibertyOnline/index.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Federal Judicial SystemThe Federal Judicial Center is the federal courts' agency for research and continuingeducation. http://www.fjc.gov/

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Restoring AmericaThis site is dedicated to those Americans who still believe that this nation is a Republicgoverned by law, not men, and that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land and mustbe restored to that position.

10-77

"We, the People, are the rightful masters of both the Congress and the Courts. Not tooverthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who have perverted it." - AbrahamLincoln.

"It is not the function of our Government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is thefunction of the citizen to keep the Government from falling into error." - U.S. Supreme Courtin American Communications Association v. Douds, 339 U.S. 382,442 http://www.techmgmt.com/restore/restore.htm

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Excellent Patriot Site"A Political Center for Christians Who Have 'Smelt a Rat'" http://members.aol.com/crwnrts/anti-fed/homepage.htm

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Legal Ethics & ReformIf you are interested in finding a solution to the perplexing problems being caused byAmerica's lawyers and legal system, you should find this Web Site useful. http://webusers.anet-stl.com/%7ehvmlr/hm_pg.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Another Excellent SiteSee what an "enrolled agent" has to say!http://www.nothinbut.net/~wwatts/

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Taxpayer:

Based on the information you have provided, we agree that you are not required to file anincome tax return. We may contact you in the future, if further issues arise requiringclarification. At present, no further response is needed on the above account.

Sincerely yours,

Chief, Collection Branch

Every year thousands of people across the United States receive the above letter from theInternal Revenue Service even though they earned well above what's considered theminimum adjusted gross income. Some earn from $10,000 to hundreds of thousands ofdollars and some even in the millions of dollars yet they receive the above letter from theInternal Revenue Service. It's called a 2358C letter and it is given to those that the IRSdeems are not required to file a 1040 Income Tax Return. Why?

10-78

There are proper procedures to follow to obtain one of these letters and the IRS is required togive you this information but only if you provide them with the proper documentation. Thepeople mentioned above as well as 1000's upon 1000's every year learn the truth and file theproper paperwork via certified mail or in person to the Internal Revenue Service without theassistance of an attorney, CPA, accountant, tax preparer, etc., and they either walk out oftheir local IRS Service Center with a copy of the above letter or they are mailed one within10 days as required by the Internal Revenue Code once a Determination Letter hasbeen requested.

If you are tired of paying the Income Tax and tired of giving up 1/3 or up to 50% or more ofeach and every dollar you earn to the Internal Revenue Service or even if you are just curiousand would like more information we beg of you to please send any message to the auto-email-responder below.

notaxes@southwestweb.com

SUBSCRIBE TO: THE TAX FREEDOM 101 REPORT.

To receive "THE TAX FREEDOM 101 REPORT" a weekly ezine, e-mail us atnewsletter@taxfreedom101.com and type "SUBSCRIBE" in the subject line.Past issues are archived at http://www.nossn.com/tf101 and are sorted by date.

Last but not least is a very dear and close patriot friend of mine, Lynne Meredith.Author of "Vultures In Eagles Clothing" and "How To Cook a Vulture". She is a greatresearcher and has loads of materials available. Including Pure Trusts, Common LawMarriages, Travel & Registration, Citizen's Passport, and a Web Site.

http://www.freedommall.com

ARE YOU ALONE?

MOST CERTAINLY NOT!

And HELP Abounds to those who seek it!

Are YOU Ready?

11-79

Chapter 11 DEFINITIONSDEFINITIONS {Words to Know}{Words to Know} Actual Damages - Actual Damages are real damages to compensatefor loss or injuries that have actually occurred. This is incontrast to "nominal" damages (a small amount paid where thereis no real loss) or "punitive" damages (intended to punish theparty who must pay damages).

Affiant - The person who makes and subscribes an affidavit. Affidavit - A written or printed declaration of facts, madevoluntarily, and confirmed by the oath or affirmation of theparty making it, taken before a person having authority toadminister such oath or affirmation. ....See alsoCertification; Jurat; Verification.

Agent - The person to whom a power of attorney is given. Anagent has authority to act on behalf of the grantor, asspecified by the grantor in a power of attorney document.

Assignee - A person or entity to whom an assignment of rightsor property has been made. For example, a payee may assignhis or her rights to receive the payments under a promissorynote to a third person.

Assignor - A person or entity who has made an assignment ofrights or property.

Attorney in Fact - The person to whom authority is given undera Power of Attorney. An attorney in fact is sometimesreferred to as a "proxy" under a Health Care Power ofAttorney. See also "Agent." Authority - Permission. Right to exercise powers; to implementand enforce laws; to exact obedience; to command; to judge.Control over; jurisdiction. Often synonymous with power. Thepower delegated by a principal to his agent. Belief - A conviction of the truth of a proposition, existingsubjectively in the mind, and induced by argument, persuasion,or proof addressed to the judgment." Certification - The formal assertion in writing of some fact.The act of certifying or state of being certified."

11-80

Confession - A voluntary statement made by a person chargedwith the commission of a crime or misdemeanor, communicated toanother person, wherein he acknowledges himself to be guiltyof the offense charged, and discloses the circumstances of theact or the share and participation which he had in it.

See 18 U.S.C.A. § 3501, Subsections (d) and (e) to wit;Title 18 U.S.C.A. § 3501:

"(d) Nothing contained in this section shall bar the admissionof any confession made or given voluntarily by any person toany other person without interrogation by anyone, or at anytime the person who made or gave such confession was not underarrest or other detention.(e) As used in this section, 'confession' means any confessionof guilt of any criminal offense or any self-incriminatingstatement made or given orally or in writing."

NOTE: Subsections (d) and (e) of the U. S. Code are quoted toshow that the legal definition of "confession" is notrestricted or applied solely to persons "charged with thecommission of a crime or misdemeanor." Encumber - To burden with legal claims.

Federal Reserve System- Network of twelve central banks towhich most national banks belong and to which state charteredbanks may belong. Membership rules require investment ofstock and minimum reserves.

Federal Reserve Act - Law which created Federal Reserve bankswhich act as agents in maintaining money reserves, issuingmoney in the form of bank notes, lending money to banks, andsupervising banks. Administered by Federal Reserve Board.

Fraud on court - A scheme to interfere with judicial machineryperforming task of impartial adjudication, as by preventingopposing party from fairly presenting his case or defense. Itconsists of conduct so egregious that it undermines theintegrity of the judicial process.

Grantor - A person who grants another person or entity (anagent) the authority and power to act on behalf of the grantorin accordance with the powers set forth in a power of attorneydocument.

Guarantor - A secondary party who becomes obligated to repay adebt for the party primarily responsible who has failed torepay the obligation.

11-81

Injunction - A court order that orders a party to do orrefrain from doing a certain act (or acts). For example, aninjunction might be obtained to prevent a copyright infringerfrom reprinting copyrighted materials.

Intellectual Property - Property that can be protected underfederal law, including copyrightable works, ideas,discoveries, and inventions. Such property would includenovels, sound recordings, a new type of mousetrap, or a curefor a disease.

Intent - The determination or resolve to do a certain thing,or the state of mind with which something is done.

Intestacy - State laws that provide for the distribution of adecedent's estate if the decedent does not have a will.

Intestate - To die without a will, in which case the propertyof a decedent's estate is distributed under state laws ofintestacy to the decedent's heirs.

Inalienable Rights - Rights which can never be abridgedbecause they are so fundamental.(see also Unalienable)

Individual - As a noun, this term denotes a single person asdistinguished from a group or class, and also, very commonly,a private or natural person as distinguished from a partner-ship, corporation or association...." Intimidation - Unlawful coercion; extortion; duress; puttingin fear. To take, or attempt to take, 'by intimidation' meanswillfully to take, or attempt to take, by putting in fear ofbodily harm. Such fear must arise from the willful conduct ofthe accused, rather than from some mere temperamental timidityof the victim; however, the fear of the victim need not be sogreat as to result in terror, panic, or hysteria.

Involuntary confession - Confession is 'involuntary' if it isnot the product of an essentially free and unrestrained choiceof its maker or where maker's will is overborne at the time ofthe confession. Term refers to confessions that are extractedby any threats of violence, or obtained by direct or impliedpromises, or by exertion of improper influence. Jurat - Certificate of officer or person before whom writingwas sworn to. In common use term is employed to designatecertificate of competent administering officer that writing

11-82

was sworn to by person who signed it. The clause written atthe foot of an affidavit, stating when, where, and before whomsuch was sworn. Perjury - In criminal law, the willful assertion as to amatter of fact, opinion, belief, or knowledge, made by awitness in a judicial proceeding as part of his evidence,either upon oath or in any form allowed by law to besubstituted for an oath, whether such evidence is given inopen court, or in an affidavit, or otherwise, such assertionbeing material to the issue or point of inquiry and known tosuch witness to be false. Prima Facie - At first sight; on the first appearance; on theface of it; so far as can be judged from first disclosure;presumably; a fact presumed to be true unless disproved bysome evidence to the contrary. (State ex rel, Herbert Vs. Whims, 68 Ohio app.39, 38n.E2nd, 596, 599.)

Prima facie evidence - Evidence good and sufficient on itsface. Such evidence as, in the judgment of the law, issufficient to establish a given fact, or the group or chain offacts constituting the party's claim of defense, and which ifnot rebutted or contradicted, will remain sufficient. Evidencewhich, if unexplained or uncontradicted, is sufficient tosustain a judgment in favor of the issue, which it supports,but which may be contradicted, by other evidence. Quasi - As if; almost as it were; analogous to. This term isused in legal phraseology to indicate that one subjectresembles another, with which it is compared, in certaincharacteristics, but that there are intrinsic and materialdifferences between them. Cannon vs. Miller, 22 Wash. 2d 227,155 P. 2d 500, 503, 507. A term used to mark a resemblance,and supposes as difference between two objects. It isexclusively a term of classification. It implies thatconception with which comparison is instituted by strongsuperficial analogy or resemblance. It is often prefixed byEnglish words, implying mere appearance or want of reality orhaving some resemblance to a given thing.

Remedies - The means by which a right is enforced or by whichthe violation of a right is prevented or compensated.

Revocation - A document under which a grantor takes away(revokes) the authority and power of the agent to act onbehalf of the grantor. When one rescinds his/her signature onany document thereby (revoking) any and all obligationsthereunder as well as voiding (see Void) the document.

11-83

Sovereignty - A person, body, or state in which independentauthority is vested; a chief ruler with supreme power; a kingor other ruler in a monarchy.

Subpoena - A subpoena is a command to appear at a certain timeand place to give testimony upon a certain matter. A subpoenaduces tecum requires production of books, papers and otherthings. Summons - Instrument used to commence a civil action orspecial proceeding and is the means of acquiring jurisdictionover a party. [Cite omitted.] Writ or process directed to thesheriff or other proper officer, requiring him to notify theperson named that an action has been commenced against him inthe court from where the process issues, and that he isrequired to appear, on a day named and answer the complaint insuch action.

Unalienable - Inalienable; incapable of being aliened, that ismay not be sold or transferred; (see Inalienable Rights)

Verification - Confirmation of correctness, truth, orauthenticity, by affidavit, oath, or deposition." Affidavit oftruth of matter stated and object of verification is to assuregood faith in averments or statements of party.

Void - Having no legal effect or consequence.

Voidable - Having no legal effect or consequence if the partyaffected so chooses.

Voluntary - Unconstrained by interference; unimpelled byanother's influence, spontaneous; acting of one's self. [Citesomitted.] Done by design or intention. Proceeding from thefree and unrestrained will of the person. Produced in or byan act of choice. Resulting from free choice, withoutcompulsion or solicitation.

Ward - A person for whom a guardianship and/or conservatorshipis established. (example: if no will or Trust is exists, andboth parents die, the child or children becomes ward of thestate)

Willful - Proceeding from a conscious motion of the will;voluntary; knowingly; deliberate. Intending the result, whichactually comes to pass; designed; intentional; purposeful; notaccidental or involuntary.

11-84

Witness - In general, one who, being present, personally seesor perceives a thing; a beholder, spectator, or eyewitness. Aperson whose declaration under oath (or affirmation) isreceived as evidence for any purpose, whether such declarationbe made on oral examination or by deposition or affidavit.Code Civs. Proc. Cal. § 1878. A person attesting genuinenessof signature to document by adding his signature.

Witness tampering - The Federal Victim and Witness ProtectionAct prohibits the intimidation and harassment of witnessesbefore they testify, as well as prohibiting retaliation, orthreats of retaliation, against witnesses after they testify.18 U.S.C.A. § 1512-1515.

12-85

Chapter 12Chapter 12 CITES AND QUOTESCITES AND QUOTES

IN GENERAL

"You have rights antecedent to all earthly governments; rightsthat cannot be repealed or restrained by human laws; rightsderived from the Great Legislator of the Universe."

John Adams, 2nd Presidentof the United States

"Study the Constitution. . .Let it be preached from thepulpit, proclaimed in legislatures, and enforced in courts ofjustice."

Abraham Lincoln, 16th Presidentof the United States

"PROCLAIM LIBERTY THROUGHOUT ALL THE LAND UNTO ALL THEINHABITANTS THEREOF."

Liberty Bell inscriptionLEVS. XXV X

"My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge . . ."Hosea 4:6

"We must obey GOD rather than men."Acts 5:29

"If my people which are called by my name, shall humblethemselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from theirwicked ways; then will I hear from Heaven, and will forgivetheir sin, and will heal their land."

II Chron. 7:14

"If men, through fear, fraud, or mistake, should in termsrenounce or give up any natural right, the eternal law ofreason and the grand end of society would absolutely vacatesuch renunciation. The right to freedom being the gift of GOD,it is not in the power of man to alienate this gift andvoluntarily become a slave."

Samuel AdamsFather of the American Revolution

12-86

About The Internal Revenue Service

"The individual, unlike the corporation, cannot be taxed forthe mere privilege of existing. The corporation is anartificial entity, which owes its existence and charter powersto the state; . . . but the individual's rights to live andown property are natural rights for the enjoyment of which anexcise cannot be imposed."

Redfield vs. Fisher, 292 P. 813,819

"In a recent conversation with an official at the InternalRevenue Service, I was amazed when he told me that 'If thetaxpayers of this country ever discover that the IRS operateson 90% bluff the entire system will collapse' ".

- Henry Bellmon, Senator (1969)

"... the key question is: can we define 'income' in a fair andreasonably straightforward manner? Unfortunately we have notyet succeeded in doing so".

-Shirley Peterson, former IRS Commissioner, April 1993

"I don't like the income tax. Every time we talk about thesetaxes, we get around to the idea of 'from each according tohis capacity and to each according to his needs'. That'ssocialism. It's written into the Communist Manifesto. Maybe weought to see that every person who gets a tax return receivesa copy of the Communist Manifesto with it so he can see what'shappening to him".

-T. Coleman Andrews,Commissioner of Internal Revenue,

May 25, 1956 in US. News & World Report

"Our federal tax system is, in short, utterly impossible,utterly unjust and completely counterproductive [it] reekswith injustice and is fundamentally un-American... it hasearned a rebellion and it's time we rebelled".

-President Ronald Reagan,May 1983, Williamsburg, VA

"Congress has taxed INCOME, not compensation."

- Conner vs. U.S. 303 F Supp. 1187 (1969)

12-87

"The general term 'income' is not defined in the InternalRevenue Code"

United States vs. Ballard, 535 F2d 400, at 404

"In order, therefore, that the clauses cited from Article I ofthe Constitution may have proper force and effect...it becomesessential to distinguish between what is and is not 'income'... Congress cannot by any definition it may adopt concludethe matter, since it can not by legislation alter theConstitution"

Eisner vs. Macomber, 252 US 189, at 206

"There would seem to be no room to doubt that the word incomemust be given the same meaning in all the Income Tax Acts ofCongress that was given to it in the Corporation Excise TaxAct and that what that meaning is has now become definitelysettled by decisions of the court".

Merchant's Loan and Trust Co. vs. Smietanka,255 US 509, at 518-519

"Taxable 'income' can only be derived from revenue taxableactivities. Statements alleging some sort of taxable activitymust be made in order to support the legal conclusion that theaccused had 'taxable income', etc., or the indictment isinvalid and the court does not have authority to hold atrial."

Russell vs. United States,369 US 749, at 765

"The income tax is, therefore, not a tax on income as such. Itis an excise tax with respect to certain activities andprivileges, which is measured by reference to the income,which they produce. The income is not the subject of the tax.It is the basis for determining the amount of tax"

House Congressional Record,March 27, 1943, p 2580

"(Excise taxes are) taxes laid upon the manufacture, sale orconsumption of commodities within the country, upon licensesto pursue certain occupations and upon corporate privileges".

Cooley, Constitutional Limitations,7th Ed., p 680 as cited in Flint vs.Stone Tracy Co., 220 US 107, at 151

12-88

"Income, within the meaning of the 16th Amendment and theRevenue Act means gain... and, in such connection, gain meansprofit... proceeding from property severed from capitol,however invested or employed and coming in, received or drawnby the taxpayer for his separate use, benefit and disposal...Income is neither a wage nor compensation for any type oflabor."

Stapler vs. United States,21 F. Supp. 737, at 739

"The claim that salaries, wages and compensation for personalservices are to be taxed as an entirety and therefore must bereturned by the individual who has performed the serviceswhich produced the gain is without support either in thelanguage of the Act or in the decisions of the courtsconstruing it. Not only this, but it is directly opposed toprovisions of the Act and to regulations of the U.S. TreasuryDept. which either prescribe or permit that compensation forpersonal services be not taxed as an entirety and be notreturned by the individual performing the services. It is tobe noted that by the language of the Act it is not salaries,wages or compensation for personal services that are to beincluded in gross income. That which is to be included isgains, profits and income derived from salaries, wages orcompensation for personal service."

- Lucas vs. Earl, 281 US 111

"If no information or return is filed, [the] Internal RevenueService cannot assess you".

- Gary Makovski, Special IRS Agent, testifying under oath in US. vs. Lloyd

"Our tax system is based upon voluntary assessment andpayment, not upon distraint".

- United States Supreme Court, in Flora vs. United States

"Our tax system is based on individual self-assessment andvoluntary compliance".

-Mortimer Caplin,Internal Revenue Audit Manual (1975)

"The United States has a system of taxation by confession".-Hugo Black,

12-89

Supreme Court Justice,in U.S.A. vs. Kahriger

"Only the rare taxpayer would be likely to know that he couldrefuse to produce his records to IRS agents... Who wouldbelieve the ironic truth that the cooperative taxpayer faresmuch worse than the individual who relies upon hisconstitutional rights".

-Judge Cummings, U.S. Federal Judge,in US. vs. Dickerson (7th Circuit 1969)

"Let me point this out now. Your income tax is 100 percentvoluntary tax, and your liquor tax is 100 percent enforcedtax. Now, the situation is as different as night and day.Consequently, your same rules just will not apply...".

-Dwight E. Avis,former head of the Alcohol and Tobacco

Tax Division of the IRS,testifying before a House Ways

and Means subcommittee in 1953

"The purpose of the IRS is to collect the proper amount of taxrevenues at the least cost to the public, and in a manner thatwarrants the highest degree of public confidence in ourintegrity, efficiency and fairness. To achieve that purpose,we will encourage and achieve the highest possible degree ofvoluntary compliance in accordance with the tax laws andregulations...".

-Internal Revenue Manual,Chapter 1100, section 1111.1

"Fear is the key element for the IRS in achieving its mission.Without fear, the IRS would have a difficult time maintainingour so-called system of voluntary compliance ...". "Given theopportunity, the IRS will take the easy way out and grabwhatever it can... the IRS does not really care about you andwhat your future....... may be".

-Santo Presti,former IRS Criminal Investigation Agent

and author of "IRS In Action"

12-90

"The IRS is an extraordinary example of the end justifying themeans. The means of this agency is growth. It is interestingthat the revenue officers within the IRS refer to taxpayers as'inventory'. The IRS embodies the political realities of theselfish human desire to dominate others. Thus, the end of thisgigantic pretense of officialdom is power, pure and simple.The meek may inherit the earth, but they will never receive apromotion in an agency where efficiency is measured by thenumber of seizures of taxpayers' property and by the number ofcitizens and businesses driven into bankruptcy".

- George Hansen,Congressman and author of "To Harass Our People"

"I have sat on many a promotion panel where the first questionof panel members was 'How many seizures have you made?"'.

-Joseph R. Smith, eighteen-year IRS agent,

testifying before Congress

"The agency that is so strict on the way Americans keep theirbooks cannot even pass a financial audit".

-Ted Stevens, RepublicanSenator from Alaska

"Eight decades of amendments... to [the] code have produced avirtually impenetrable maze... The rules are unintelligible tomost citizens... The rules are equally mysterious to manygovernment employees who are charged with administering andenforcing the law".

- Shirley Peterson, Former IRS Commissioner,April14, 1993 at Southern Methodist University

"some techniques can be used only in connection with a full-scale program due to the nature of the tax situation and theneed to avoid unnecessary taxpayer reaction. An example wouldbe income tax returns compliance efforts aimed at the non-business taxpayer".

-Internal Revenue Service Manual,

12-91

Section 5221 "Returns Compliance Programs"

"This [audit] was made extremely difficult because [IRS]existing Systems were not designed to provide reliablefinancial information... on their operations".

-Comptroller Bowsher, Government Accounting Office,

on the first-ever audit of the IRS in 1993.

"The wages of the average American worker, after inflation andtaxes, have decreased 17% since 1973, the only Westernindustrial nation to so suffer".

-Martin Gross,author of "The Tax Racket:

Government Extortion From A to Z"

About Social Security

"When you pay social security taxes, you are in no way makingprovision for your own retirement. You are paying the pensionsof those who are already retired. Once you understand this,you see that whether you will get the benefits you arecounting on when you retire depends on whether Congress willlevy enough taxes, borrow enough, or print enough money...

-W. Allen Wallis, former Chairmanof the 1975 Advisory Council

on Social Security, May27, 1976

"There is no prospect that today's younger workers willreceive all the Social Security and Medicare benefitscurrently promised them".

-Dorcas Hardy,former Social Security Commissionerand author of "Social Insecurity",

quoted in the December 1995 Reader's Digest.

12-92

"All we have to do now is to inform the public that thepayment of social security taxes is voluntary and watch themass exodus".

-Walter E. Williams,John M. Olin Distinguished Professor of Economics at George

Mason University in Fairfax, VA, January 24, 1996.

About The Law

"The Constitution is a written instrument. As such it'smeaning does not alter. That which it meant when adopted, itmeans now.

-United States Supreme Court in South Carolina vs. United States (1905)

"The Constitution prohibits any direct tax, unless inproportion to numbers as ascertained by the census..... [and]... prohibits Congress from laying a direct tax on the revenuefrom property of the citizen without regard to state lines...

- United States Supreme Court in Pollack vs. Farmers' Loan & Trust Company (1895)

"... [the 16th Amendment] conferred no new power oftaxation... [and]... prohibited the ... power of incometaxation possessed by Congress from the beginning from beingtaken out of the category of indirect taxation to which itinherently belonged...".

-United States Supreme Courtin Stanton vs. Baltic Mining (1916)

"To lay with one hand the power of government on the propertyof the citizen, and with the other to bestow it on favoredindividuals... is none the less robbery because it is...called taxation".

-United States Supreme Courtin Loan Association vs. Topeka (18 ?)

"...the intent of the lawmaker is to be found in the languagethat he has used".

12-93

-United States Supreme Courtin U.S. vs. Goldberg (1897)

"Because of what appears to be a lawful command on thesurface, many Citizens, because of their respect for whatappears to be law, are cunningly coerced into waiving theirrights due to ignorance".

-United States Supreme Courtin US. vs. Minker, 350 US 179 at 187

"No State shall... coin money; emit bills of credit; make anything but gold and silver coin a tender in payment ofdebts...".

-United States Constitution, Article 1, Section 10, Clause 1

"... bank records are not the depositor's private papers andhaving given the information to the bank, the depositor has nolegitimate expectation of continued privacy... Records of anindividual's accounts with banks are not the individual'sprivate papers protected against compulsory production by the4th Amendment, but instead are the business records of thebanks".

-United States Supreme Courtin US. vs. Miller

"In questions of power, then, let no more be said ofconfidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by thechains of the Constitution".

-Thomas Jefferson

About Money, Banking & The Federal Reserve

"100% of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest onthe Federal Debt ... all individual in-come tax revenues aregone before one nickel is spent on the services taxpayersexpect from government"

12-94

-Grace Commission report submitted to President

Ronald Reagan on January 15, 1984

'In 1833, a small group of Socialists met in London,announcing their intentions of converting the British economicsystem from capitalism to socialism. This group chose the name"Fabian Society". One of the leading members of the FabianSociety, author George Bernard Shaw, perhaps summed it up bestwhen he said, quote: "... Socialism means equality of incomeor nothing... under socialism you would not be allowed to bepoor. You would be forcibly feed, clothed, lodged, taught, andemployed whether you like it or not. If it were discoveredthat you had not character enough to be worth all thistrouble, you might possibly be executed in a kindly manner;but whilst you were permitted to live you would have to livewell"

-Edgar Wallace Robinsonin his 1980 booklet titled

"Rolling Thunder"

"Of all contrivances for cheating the laboring classes ofmankind, none has been more effective than that which deludesthem with paper money".

- Daniel Webster

"All the perplexities, confusion and distress in America rise,not from defects in their Constitution or Confederation, notfrom want of honor or virtue, so much as from downrightignorance of the nature of coin, credit and circulation".

-John Adams, in a letter to Thomas Jefferson in 1787

"Gold is still the ultimate store of wealth. It is the worldsonly true money. And there isn't much of it to go around. Allof it ever mined would fit into a small building - a 56 footcube. The annual world production would fit into a 14-footcube, roughly the size of an ordinary living room. If eachChinese citizen were to buy just one ounce, it would take upthe annual supply for the next 200 years".

- Mark Nestmann, author of

12-95

"How To Achieve Personal And Financial Privacy In A Public Age"

"... the privilege of creating and issuing money... is thegovernment's greatest creative opportunity... [saving] thetaxpayers immense sums of money...".

-Abraham Lincoln

"If the American people ever allow private banks to controlthe issue of their currency first by inflation and then bydeflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up aroundthem will deprive the people of all property until theirchildren will wake up homeless on the continent their fathersconquered".

-Thomas Jefferson in 1802in a letter to then Secretary

of the Treasury, Albert Gallatin

"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to ourliberties than standing armies".

- Thomas Jefferson

"Give me control over a nation's currency and I care not whomakes its laws"

- Baron M.A. Rothschild (1744 - 1812)

"Under the surface, the Rothschilds long had a powerfulinfluence in dictating American financial laws. The lawrecords show that they were powers in the old Bank of theUnited States [abolished by Andrew Jackson]".

-Gustav Myers, author of"History of the Great American Fortunes"

12-96

"If Congress has the right under the Constitution to issuepaper money, it was given to be used by themselves, not to bedelegated to individuals or corporations".

- Andrew Jackson

"The few who can understand the system will either be sointerested in its profits, or so dependent on its favors, thatthere will be no opposition from that class, while on theother hand, the great body of the people, mentally incapableof comprehending the tremendous advantages that capitalderives from the system, will bear its burdens withoutcomplaint and perhaps without even suspecting that the systemis inimical to their interests".

- John Sherman,protege of the Rothschild banking family,

in a letter sent in 1863 to New York Bankers,Morton, and Gould, in support

of the then proposed National Banking Act

".. we conclude that the [Federal] Reserve Banks are notfederal ... but are independent privately owned and locallycontrolled corporations... without day to day direction fromthe federal government."

- 9th Circuit Court inLewis vs. United States, June 24, 1982

"when you or I write a check there must be sufficient funds inour account to cover that check, but when the Federal Reservewrites a check, it is creating money".

-Boston Federal Reserve Bankin a publication titled

"Putting It Simply"

"We make money the old fashioned way. We print it".

-Art Rolnick,former Chief Economist,

Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank

"This is a staggering thought. We are completely dependent onthe commercial Banks. Someone has to borrow every dollar wehave in circulation, cash or credit. If the Banks create ample

12-97

synthetic money we are prosperous; if not, we starve. We areabsolutely without a permanent money system. When one gets acomplete grasp of the picture, the tragic absurdity of ourhopeless position is almost incredible, but there it is. It isthe most important subject intelligent persons can investigateand reflect upon. It is so important that our presentcivilization may collapse unless it becomes widely understoodand the defects remedied very soon."

-Robert Hemphill, Credit managerof Federal Reserve Bank in Atlanta.

"Historically, the United States has been a hard moneycountry. Only [since 1913] has the United States operated on afiat money system. During this period, paper money hasdepreciated over 87%. During the preceding 140-year period,the hard currency of the United States had actually maintainedits value. wholesale prices in 1913... were the same as in1787".

-Kenneth Gerbino,former chairman of the American Economic Council

"About all a Federal Reserve note can legally do is wipe outone debt and replace it with itself another debt, a note thatpromises nothing. If anything's been paid, the payment occursonly in the minds of the parties...".

- Tupper Saucy,author of" The Miracle On Main Street"

"By a continuing process of inflation, governments canconfiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of thewealth of their citizens. There is no subtler, no surer meansof overturning the existing basis of society than to debauchthe currency. The process engages all the hidden forces ofeconomic law on the side of destruction, and does it in amanner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose".

- John Maynard Keynes,economist and author of

"The Economic Consequences Of The Peace"

12-98

"Inflation has now been institutionalized at a fairly constant5% per year. This has been determined to be the optimum levelfor generating the most revenue without causing public alarm.A 5% devaluation applies, not only to the money earned thisyear, but to all that is left over from previous years. At theend of the first year, a dollar is worth 95 cents. At the endof the second year, the 95 cents is reduced again by 5%,leaving its worth at 90 cents, and so on. By the time a personhas worked 20 years, the government will have confiscated 64%of every dollar he saved over those years. By the time he hasworked 45 years, the hidden tax will be 90%. The governmentwill take virtually everything a person saves over alifetime".

- G. Edward Griffin,historian and author of

"The Creature From Jekyll Island"

"The real truth of the matter is, and you and I know, that afinancial element in the large centers has owned thegovernment of the US. since the days of Andrew Jackson.History depicts Andrew Jackson as the last truly honorable andincorruptible American president".

- President Franklin D. Roosevelt, November 23, 1933 in a

letter to Colonel Edward Mandell House

"The Founding Fathers of this great land had no difficultywhatsoever understanding the agenda of bankers, and theyfrequently referred to them and their kind as, quote, 'friendsof paper money'. They hated the Bank of England, inparticular, and felt that even were we successful in winningour independence from England and King George, we could nevertruly be a nation of freemen, unless we had an honest moneysystem. Through ignorance, but moreover, because of apathy, asmall, but wealthy, clique of power brokers have robbed us ofour Rights and Liberties, and we are being raped of ourwealth. We are paying the price for the near-comatose levelsof complacency by our parents, and only God knows what mightbecome of our children, should we not work diligently to shakethis country from its slumber! Many a nation has lost itsfreedom at the end of a gun barrel, but here in America, wejust decided to hand it over voluntarily. Worse yet, we paidfor the tyranny and usurpation out of our own pockets with

12-99

"voluntary" tax contributions and the use of a debt-laden fiatcurrency!".

-Peter Kershaw, author of the 1994 booklet "Economic Solutions"

Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's viewsconfided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the U.S.,in the field of commerce and manufacturing, are afraid ofsomebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is apower somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, sointerlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had betternot speak above their breath when they speak in condemnationof it."

-Woodrow Wilson -In his book entitled The New Freedom (1913)

"The fact is that there is a serious danger of this countrybecoming a pluto-democracy; that is, a sham republic with thereal government in the hands of a small clique of enormouslywealth men, who speak through their money, and whoseinfluence, even today, radiates to every corner of the UnitedStates."

-William McAdoo -President Wilson's national campaign

vice-chairman, wrote in Crowded years (1974)

"The powers or financial capitalism had (a) far-reaching aim,nothing less than to create a world system of financialcontrol in private hands able to dominate the political systemof each country and the economy of the world as a whole. Thissystem was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by thecentral banks of the world acting in concert, by secretagreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences.The apex of the systems was to be the Bank for InternationalSettlements in Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned andcontrolled by the world's central banks which were themselvesprivate corporations. Each central bank...sought to dominateits government by its ability to control Treasury loans, tomanipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level ofeconomic activity in the country, and to influence cooperativepoliticians by subsequent economic rewards in the businessworld."

12-100

-Prof. Carroll Quigleyin his book Tragedy and Hope

"In a small Swiss city sits an international organization soobscure and secretive....Control of the institution, the Bankfor International Settlements, lies with some of the world'smost powerful and least visible men: the heads of 32 centralbanks, officials able to shift billions of dollars and alterthe course of economies at the stroke of a pen."

-Keith Bradsher of theNew York Times, August 5, 1995

"Banking was conceived in iniquity and was born in sin. TheBankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave themthe power to create deposits, and with the flick of the pen,they will create enough deposits to buy it back again.However, take it away from them, and all the great fortuneslike mine will disappear and they ought to disappear, for thiswould be a happier and better world to live in. But, if youwish to remain the slaves of Bankers and pay the cost of yourown slavery, let them continue to create deposits."

-Sir Josiah Stamp -President of the Bank of England

in the 1920's, and thesecond richest man in Britain.

"The Federal Reserve Bank of New York is eager to enter intoclose relationship with the Bank for InternationalSettlements....The conclusion is impossible to escape that theState and Treasury Departments are willing to pool the bankingsystem of Europe and America, setting up a world financialpower independent of and above the Government of the UnitedStates....The United States under present conditions will betransformed from the most active of manufacturing nations intoa consuming and importing nation with a balance of tradeagainst it."

-Rep. Louis McFadden -(Chairman of the House Committee on Banking and Currency)

quoted in the New York Times (June 1930)

12-101

"(The Great Depression resulting from the Stock Market crash)was not accidental. It was a carefully contrivedoccurrence....The international bankers sought to bring abouta condition of despair here so they might emerge as rulers ofus all."

-Rep. McFadden testified in Congress (1933).There were at least two attempts on his life by gunfire.He died of suspected poisoning after attending a banquet.

"The Federal Reserve (Banks) are one of the most corruptinstitutions the world has ever seen. There is not a manwithin the sound of my voice who does not know that thisNation is run by the International Bankers."

-Rep. Louis T. McFadden

"Whoever controls the volume of money in any country isabsolute master of all commerce and industry."

-President James A. Garfield

"History shows that the money changers have used every form ofabuse, intrigue, deceit and violent means possible to maintaincontrol over governments by controlling the money and theissuance of it."

-President James A. Madison

"Nothing did more to spur the boom in stocks than the decisionmade by the New York Federal Reserve bank, in the spring of1927, to cut the rediscount rate. Benjamin Strong, Governor ofthe bank, was chief advocate of this unwise measure, which wastaken largely at the behest of Montagu Norman of the Bank ofEngland....At the time of the Banks action I warned of itsconsequences....I felt that sooner or later the market had tobreak."

-Money baron Bernard Baruchin Baruch: The Public Years (1960)

"Thus corporations finally claimed the full rights enjoyed byindividual citizens while being exempted from many of theresponsibilities and liabilities of citizenship. Furthermore,in being guaranteed the same right to free speech asindividual citizens, they achieved, in the words of PaulHawken, 'precisely what the Bill of Rights was intended toprevent: domination of public thought and discourse.' The

12-102

subsequent claim by corporations that they have the same rightas any individual to influence the government in their owninterest pits the individual citizen against the vastfinancial and communications resources of the corporation andmocks the constitutional intent that all citizens have anequal voice in the political debates surrounding importantissues."

-David C. Korten, in his book,When Corporations Rule the World

"Give me control over a man's economic actions, and hence overhis means of survival, and except for a few occasional heroes,I'll promise to deliver to you men who think and write andbehave as I want them to."

-Benjamine A. Rooge

" The Federal Reserve Bank is nothing but a banking fraud andan unlawful crime against civilization. Why? Because they"create" the money made out of nothing, and our Uncle SapGovernment issues their "Federal Reserve Notes" and stamps ourGovernment approval with NO obligation whatever from theseFederal Reserve Banks, Individual Banks or National Banks,etc.

-H.L. Birum, Sr.American Mercury, August 1957, p. 43

"I consider the foundation of the Constitution as laid on thisground that "all powers not delegated to the United States bythe Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, arepreserved to the states or to the people.

" ... To take a single step beyond the boundaries thusspecially drawn around the powers of Congress is to takepossession of a boundless field of power, no longersusceptible of any definition. The incorporation of a bank,and the powers assumed by this bill (chartering the first Bankof the United States), have not, been delegated to the UnitedStates by the Constitution."

-Thomas Jefferson -in opposition to the chartering of

the first Bank of the United States (1791).

12-103

"The money power preys on the nation in times of peace, andconspires against it in times of adversity. It is moredespotic than monarchy, more insolent than autocracy, moreselfish than bureaucracy. It denounces, as public enemies, allwho question its methods or throw light upon its crimes."

-Abraham Lincoln

"Whoever controls the volume of money in any country isabsolute master of all industry and commerce."

-President James A. Garfield

********************The following statements were made during hearings of theHouse Committee on Banking and Currency, September 30, 1941.Members of the Federal Reserve Board call themselves"Governors". Governor Eccles was Chairman of the FederalReserve Board at the time of these hearings.

Congressman Patman: "How did you get the money to buy thosetwo billion dollars worth of Government securities in 1933?"

Governor Eccles: "Out of the right to issue credit money."

Patman: "And there is nothing behind it, is there, except ourGovernment's credit?"

Eccles: "That is what our money system is. If there were nodebts in our money system, there wouldn't be any money."

Congressman Fletcher: "Chairman Eccles, when do you thinkthere is a possibility of returning to a free and open market,instead of this pegged and artificially controlled financialmarket we now have?"

Governor Eccles: "Never, not in your lifetime or mine."

*******************

"Mr. Speaker, we are now in Chapter 11... Members of Congressare official trustees presiding over the greatestreorganization of any bankrupt entity in world history".

-James Trafficant, Congressman,March 17, 1993 in the Congressional Record

12-104

"The individual, unlike the corporation, cannot be taxed forthe mere privilege of existing. The corporation is anartificial entity, which owes its existence and charter powersto the state; . . . but the individual's rights to live andown property are natural rights for the enjoyment of which anexcise cannot be imposed."

Redfield vs. Fisher, 292 P. 813, 819

"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to ourliberties than standing armies. Already they have raised up amoney aristocracy that has set the government at defiance. Theissuing power should be taken from the banks and restored tothe government to whom it properly belongs."

- President Thomas Jefferson-

ON THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT

"… we are governed not by law or elected representatives butby unelected, unrepresentative, unaccountable committees oflawyers applying no will but their own."

- "The Tempting of America:The Political Seduction of the Law"

Book by, Judge Robert H. Bork, pg. 130.

"... You are a den of vipers and thieves. I intend to rout youout, and by the grace of the Eternal God, will rout you out".

-President Andrew Jackson,(upon evicting a delegation of

international bankers from the Oval Office)

"The real menace to our republic is the invisible governmentwhich, like a giant octopus, sprawls its slimy length over ourcity, state and nation. At the head is a small group ofbanking houses generally referred to as 'internationalbankers'. This little coterie of powerful internationalbankers virtually run our government for their own selfishends."

Don Bell, "Who Are Our Rulers?"American Mercury, Sept. 1960, pg. 136.

12-105

"Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are US governmentinstitutions. They are not... they are private creditmonopolies which prey upon the people of the US. for thebenefit of themselves and their foreign and domesticswindlers, and rich and predatory moneylenders. The sack ofthe United States by the Fed is the greatest crime in history.Every effort has been made by the Fed to conceal its powers,but the truth is the Fed has usurped the government. Itcontrols everything here and it controls all our foreignrelations. It makes and breaks governments at will".

-Congressman Charles McFadden,Chairman, House Banking and

Currency Committee, June 10, 1932

"I see in the near future a crisis approaching. It unnerves meand causes me to tremble for the safety of my country... theMoney Power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign,by working upon the prejudices of the people, until the wealthis aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed. Ifeel at this moment more anxiety for the safety of my countrythan ever before, even in the midst of war."

-Abraham Lincoln, - In a letter written to William Elkin

just after the passage of theNational Banking Act of 1863

{less than five months before he was assassinated.}

"In the United States today we have in effect two governments. . . we have the duly constituted Government, Then we have anindependent, uncontrolled and uncoordinated government in theFederal Reserve System, operating the money powers which arereserved to Congress by the Constitution."

- Congressman Wright PatmanHouse Banking Committee, 1967

"The real rulers in Washington are invisible, and exercisepower from behind the scenes."

- Felix Frankfurter, attorney for the framersof the Federal Reserve Act and later

Supreme Court justice, quoted from Curtis B. Dall,FDR: My Exploited Father-In-Law,

Pg. 67, Action Associates, Washington D.C., 1970.

"Outwardly we have a constitutional government. We haveoperating within our government and political system, anotherbody representing another form of government."

12-106

- Senator William Jenner,In a speech on Feb. 23, 1954

"We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the mostcompletely controlled and dominated Governments in the world -no longer a Government of free opinion, no longer a Governmentby conviction and vote of the majority, but a Government bythe opinion and duress of small groups of dominant men."

-President Woodrow Wilson

"We the people, are the rightful masters of both Congress andthe Courts -- not to overthrow the Constitution, but tooverthrow the men who pervert the Constitution."

-President Abraham Lincoln

"I believe there are more instances of the abridgment offreedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments ofthose in power than by violent and sudden usurpation's."

-President James Madison

"The high office of President has been used to foment a plotto destroy the American's freedom, and before I leave office Imust inform the citizen of his plight."

- Pres. John F. Kennedy, 11/12/63

"Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge amongthe people."

- President John Adams

"The strongest reason for the people to retain the right tokeep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protest themselvesagainst tyranny in government."

-President Thomas Jefferson

"God forbid we should be 20 years without a Revolution."-President Thomas Jefferson

"Firearms stand next in importance to the Constitution itself.The very atmosphere of firearms everywhere restrains evilinterference--they deserve a place of honor with all that isgood."

-President George Washington

"The BIBLE is the rock on which our REPUBLIC rests."-President Andrew Jackson

12-107

"It does not require a lawyer to interpret the provisions ofthe Bill of Rights. They are as clear as the TenCommandments."

- President Herbert Hoover

"God grants liberty only to those who love it, and are alwaysready to guard and defend it."

- Daniel Webster

"Whatever makes men good Christians makes them good citizens."- Daniel Webster

"The United Nations is the greatest fraud in history. Itspurpose is to destroy the United States."

- Congressman John E. Rankin

"The Constitution of the United States needs to bereconsidered and altered … to create a whole new structure ofgovernment… Building a Third Wave civilization on the wreckageof Second Wave institutions involves the design of new, moreappropriate political structures … The system that served usso well must, in its turn, die and be replaced."

- Alvin & Heidi Toffler'sMarxist book, Creating A New Civilization

"The Masters are working according to a Plan … which willdemonstrate a large measure of world unity … marked byuniversality … that aims at expanding human consciousness …founded in love and … goodwill…"

- Alice Bailey, inThe Beacon, Sept/Oct. 1975,

Pub. The Lucis Trust35

"They provide the vision and mould public opinion … the grouphas servers of humanity in every country … They are gatheredfrom all branches of human enterprise … The know exactly whatthey seek to do. They emphasize the brotherhood of nations,the unity of faith, and economic interdependence … They can beregarded as the embodiment of the emerging kingdom of God onEarth." 35 The LUCIS TRUST was formerly incorporated in 1924 as LUCIFER PUBLISHING, and has been given by the UN responsibility to maintain it's strange and occultic Meditation Room located in the UN Bldg. in NY.

12-108

- Alice Bailey, inThe New Group of World Servers,

Pub. World Goodwill, NY

"I claim … the existence of a conspiracy for the destructionof the Western world as the prelude for shepherding mankindinto a sheep's pen run as a prelude to One World tyranny."

- A. K. Chesterton, in his bookThe New Unhappy Lords: An Exposure of Power Politics

"Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of societyconstitute an invisible government which is the true rulingpower of our country. Our minds are molded … largely by men wehave never heard of."

- Walter Bernays, in his bookPropaganda, 1928

"Our task of creating a socialist America can only succeedwhen those who would resist us are totally disarmed."

- Sara Brady, Chairman,Handgun Control, to Sen. Metzanbaum,

The National Educator, Jan. `94

"Waiting periods are only a step. Registration is only a step.The prohibition of private firearms is the goal. The enemy ofour government and our country are the Christians."

- Janet Reno; confessed lesbian andAttny General of the United States of America

"When we got organized as a country and we wrote a fairlyradical Constitution with a radical Bill of Rights, giving aradical amount of individual freedom to Americans...""And so a lot of people say there's too much personal freedom.When personal freedom is being abused, you have to move tolimit it. That's what we did in the announcement I made lastweekend on the public housing projects, about how we're goingto have weapon sweeps and more things like that to try to makepeople safer in their communities."

- Pres. Bill Clinton,3-22-94, MTV's "Enough is Enough"

"We can't be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rightsof ordinary Americans..."

12-109

- Pres. Bill Clinton(USA TODAY, 11 March 1993, page 2A)

"Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light"36 so "it is no great thing if his ministersalso be transformed as the ministers of righteousness"37 and shall seek to "deceive the veryelect"38 of the righteous in the earth.

"And they had a king over them," in the last days, "which is the angel of the bottomless pit"39."And they worshipped the dragon, which gave power unto the beast: and they worshipped thebeast, saying, Who is like unto the beast? Who is able to make war with him?"40

"And it was given unto him to make war with the saints, and to overcome them: and powerwas given him over all kindreds, and tongues, and nations. And all that dwell upon the earthshall worship him, whose names are not written in the book of life of the Lamb slain from thefoundation of the world."41

"And he doeth great wonders, so that he maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth inthe sight of men, And deceiveth them that dwell on the earth by the means of those miracleswhich he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth,that they should make an image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live.And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast shouldboth speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should bekilled. And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive amark in their right hand, or in their foreheads; And that no man might buy or sell, save hethat had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name. Here is wisdom. Lethim that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man;and his number is Six hundred threescore and six."42

"… whosoever killeth you will think that he doeth God service."John 16:2, KJV

Some Green quotes

"In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threatof global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill, … All thesedangers are caused by human intervention.... The real enemy, then, is humanity itself."

declared members of the Club of Romein a sweeping 1991 report on global governance.

36 2 Corinthians 11:1437 2 Corinthians 11:1538 Matthew 24:2439 Revelation 9:1140 Revelation 13:441 Revelation 13:7,842 Revelation 13:13-18

12-110

"We, in the green movement, aspire to a cultural model in which killing a forest will beconsidered more contemptible and more criminal than the sale of six-year-old children toAsian brothels."

Carl Amery, German Greens

"If I were reincarnated I would wish to be returned to earth as a killer virus to lower humanpopulation levels."

Prince Philip of Great Britain,leader of World Wildlife Fund

Wildlands Project Director Reed Noss: "The collective needs of non-human species must takeprecedence over the needs and desires of humans."

Food Summit Speeds UN Agenda

13-111

Chapter 13Chapter 13 ****** EXHIBITS ************ EXHIBITS ******

Follows This Page

13-112

1st Page - Article of Incorporation for

INTERNAL REVENUE TAX AND AUDIT SERVICES INC.

13-113

13-114

13-115

13-116

13-117

Since you may have a hard time reading this, everything with a asterisk (*) has been enactedinto law, however any appendix to that title has not been enacted as law.

NOTE: Title 26 (the Internal Revenue Code) does not have an asterisk (*) and was neverpassed into Law!!!

13-118

13-119

13-120

13-121

13-122

13-123

13-124

13-125

13-126

13-127

13-128

13-129

14-130

Chapter 14 FORMS SECTION

PLEASE NOTE:

THE ONLY DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO RECORD AS A MATTER OF PUBLICRECORD IS

1) DECLARATION OF ORIGINAL STATUS OF THIS AFFIANT

2) AFFIDAVIT OF RESCISSION AND REVOCATION DUE TO FRAUD

YOU WILL THEN BE ABLE TO SEND A CERTIFIED COPY TO ANY ENTITY ASA MATTER OF PUBLIC RECORD OF YOUR SOVEREIGN STATUS.

What to do when the County Recorder "Refuses to Record"

1) Get a WRITTEN explanation, reason, or other "excuse" from the perpetrator. This is yourfirst link in your "chain of evidence". Make no mistake, any documents regarding real orpersonal property or your rights to real or personal property, is recordable documents. Yourrights, property (real and personal) rights and rights thereto, IS Your Personal Property. Lookat the statute in your State!

2) Send CERTIFIED MAIL a "Notice and Demand for Exhibition or Presentment withoutDishonor" per your states Commercial Code (a permutation of the UCC) section 3-505/501demanding for them to produce for your inspection;

A) The statute or law passed by the legislature which authorizes them to condemn thePublic Record" for their personal private use.

B) Their Bar/Lawyer I.D. Number which authorizes them to make "Legaldeterminations" as issued to them by the State Bar Association or the State supremeCourt.

C) The statute or law passed by the legislature which authorizes them to edit and/orcensor documents prior to recordation.

Give them reasonable time to respond (30 days?) and to comply with your DEMANDto prove written authority, and put them ON NOTICE that the "Law of Principal and Agent"specifies that "The agent is PERSONALLY liable for acts not authorized by the Principal".(NO supposed corporate veil of immunity).

14-131

3) When they fail to produce the WRITTEN AUTHORITY Demanded by you after the"authorized time", send CERTIFIED MAIL a "Notice of Default noticing them that theyhave Defaulted by not answering. In it provide a "right to cure" Default - by recording yourpapers without further interference or suffer the consequences - Allow more time (10-30days).

4) Send them CERTIFIED MAIL, a Notice of Amount Due' for the damages caused by theirinjury to you (or your property rights) by their defalcation, dereliction of duty, default, andunauthorized "Refusal to Record" in a sizeable amount ($1000. 00?). Again, give themreasonable time (50 days) to pay this to you.

5) After the above time plus 4 or 5 days for the mail, send them CERTIFIED MAIL, a FinalNotice of Amount Due" for the damages caused by their injury to you. Again, give themreasonable time (30 days) to pay this to you.

6) After the above time plus 4 or 5 days for the mail, go to the County peace Officer(Sheriff), present copies of the two CERTIFIED MAIL Demands for payment, sign aDistress Warrant" or "Distraint Warrant" stating that you have NOT been paid, and have theSheriff go get your money or sell their car, mobile home, trailer, boat, or whatever to getyour money for you - just like the Consumer Finance lenders and the IRS do it.

7) At any stage of this procedure, you can send them a letter and offer to settle (''Right toCure Default") if they will "Perform their sworn duty" and ''Record without debate" yourdocument. When they fail or refuse, go on to the next step. The purpose here is to forcethem to do WHAT THEY ARE PAID TO DO, not to make money selling their possessions.You might even offer to give them back their possessions if they will "Record withoutquestion" your document. This is to show "Good Faith".

8) If the Sheriff refuses to perform his "Sworn Duty" to execute upon your "Distraint/DistressWarrant", inform him that "You personally will perform his sworn duty FOR HIM and in hisbehalf. Tell him that of course the next up in the hierarchy will be informed that he hasrefused to perform his own "Sworn Duty" but that he continues to cash his pay checks whichis Fraud since he only performs "Selective Enforcement" of the law. That itself is unlawful.The Sheriff should not expect very many votes to regain his office next election due to theself inflicted "publicity" because you may have to sue him personally for money damages tohis Dereliction of Duty, Defalcation, Embezzlement of Public Funds and damages due to hisinjury to you and/or property rights.

9) Send to Sheriff CERTIFIED MAIL, a Notice and Demand For Production or ExhibitionWithout Dishonor of the law or statute that authorizes his to:

A) Perform "Selective enforcement of the law"

B) To accept The People's pay and not execute on Warrants.

D) To personally edit and censor documents, or refuse to perform his duty undersworn oath (which is Perjury).

14-132

10) If either Sheriff or Recorder of Deeds say that they take their orders from somegovernment lawyer, GET THAT IN WRITING. This becomes your second link in your"Chain of Evidence" or "Preponderance of Evidence", that you are and will be creating.

Only AFTER you get the above "Admission and Confession" inWRITING, leave their office. Then perform #2 - the statute or law passed bythe legislature that authorizes them to relinquish their office over to another(whoever, regardless if government attorney or not) while continuing to acceptand negotiate (Cash) pay checks themselves after having turned over theiroffice to said "others." Remember that you are exposing a HUMONGOUSSCAM. The Lawyers club has usurped the government from the Legislature(and from The People) and YOU are exposing this fact. Do not expect Satan togive up easy and go home. He and his minions never have before, so whyexpect them to Now? They are all part of the "New Communist WorldDictatorial Despotic Tyrannical order" and they are the "Politburo of the Party."They truly BELIEVE that they are the Chosen Few to dictate the lives of theSheeple on behalf of the World (International Corporate Money MafiaMasters).

Page 1 of 3

DECLARATION OF ORIGINAL STATUS REGARDING CITIZENSHIP OF THIS AFFIANT

* * * * * * *

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, ______________________________ ,as affiant, first being duly sworn on oath, do hereby put forth, affirm and give notice to wit:

1. Pursuant to Public Law 97-280, the Congress has declared as law that the Bible is God'sword.

2. Jesus the Christ, as Son of God, is the head of this nation - America, and that we are "OneNation under God", his father.

3. I am the adopted son/daughter of the King - Christ Jesus, and therefore, I am a joint heir tohis throne upon this Earth.

4. I was born free of the Adamic Race and am endowed with unalienable rights by God. Inaddition to these God given rights, I am a member of the posterity identified in the preambleto the Constitution for the united States of America (1787-1791) and the Declaration ofIndependence (1776).

5. I was born in (if in USA) _______________, _________________ on ____/____/____ andhereby claim my birthright and all the powers that shall and do enure to me by virtue of mybirthright. Or by Naturalization/Birth unto American parents, with date and Court ofNaturalization (if applicable): ____________________________________________, or dateand state of first permanent abode: ____/____/____,____________________________.

6. I live by rights that are antecedent to, and concurrent with, the said Constitution and the firstten articles in amendment thereof.

7. My Citizenship is based on my birthright/naturalization as a member of the Posterity and notthe "general citizenship" created by the 14th Amendment to the Constitution for the unitedStates of America.

8. As declared and affirmed herein, I am a individual Sovereign Citizen who lives by Rights,and not the privileges and immunities as conferred by the said 14th Amendment.

9. Additionally, I am a National Citizen of the Great Republic of the continental united States ofAmerica by virtue of my citizenship in a Sovereign State of the Union.

10. I am not a citizen, subject, resident, or inhabitant of the U. S. or the District of Columbia,(and also known as Washington D.C.) its territories, or its political subdivisions, possessionsetc., as outlined pursuant to Article 1, Section 8,Clause 17 of said Constitution, nor am I amember of the armed forces.

Declaration of Original Status (cont.)

Page 2 of 3

11. Additionally, I am a non-resident alien to the United States aforementioned - a foreign nationruled by legislative democracy, which is not the Republic of the united States of America.

12. I hereby claim, as to the operational jurisdiction of the U.S. Courts, remedy under UniformCommercial Code (U.C.C.) 1-207 and recourse under U.C.C. 1-103.

13. The use of "Without Prejudice" or "All Rights Reserved", in connection with my signatureindicates that I have reserved my Common Law right not to be compelled to perform underany contract that I did not enter into knowingly, voluntarily and intentionally. Furthermore, Ido not accept the liability associated wit the compelled benefit of any unrevealed contract orcommercial agreement.

14. I hereby assert the limitations protecting my private records and effects, which are given bythe Fourth Article in Amendment to the Constitution for the united States of America, to wit:

"The right of the People to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrantsshall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath of Affirmation, andparticularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to beseized."

15. This claim asserts the above limitations on any employee, agent, officer, affiliate, assigns,and counterparts whomever of any U.S. government entity or agency of that entity or anycompany assuming identity of such entity or agency; And hereby reinstates same accordingto my status as Citizen put forth above.

16. Because of the frauds perpetrated against me by various state, federal and foreign agencies asregards to my Rights given unto me by the almighty God - the Creator, and guaranteed to meand protected by the Constitution for the united States of America, I hereby forthwith revokeany and all agreements and contracts, constructive or otherwise, which may be claimed bythe agencies referenced herein and such agreements and contracts are hereby made null andvoid, ab initio.

17. The facts stated herein are correct, true, and submitted in good faith for the cause ofinducement of Fraud perpetrated upon the undersigned Citizen.

___________________________________Affiant, All Rights Reserved

C/o Non Domestic__________________________________________

_____________________, ________________________ Republic, Postal Zone [ __________ ]

Declaration of Original Status (cont.)

Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE

WHEREFORE, it being the will and intent of said affiant that this declaration be made publicso that all may know and see the same, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter this declaration intothe Public Records of the State of _________________, in _________________ County, this_______ day of __________, in the year of our Lord ________, and to deliver to the affiant acertified copy of the same.

NOTARIZED STATEMENT OF AUTHENTICITY

Subscribed and sworn to before me, this ____day of ___________ in the year of ourLord_____, a Notary Public in and for the State of ___________, County of ________________,by the affiant, _____________________________ who executed the foregoing instrument andacknowledged that he/she has personal knowledge of the facts and matter therein set forth andalleged and that each and all these facts and matters are true and correct, that he/she executed thesame as his/her free will and deed.

Personally known to me ____ or provided I.D. type ___________________________.

Witness my hand and seal.___________________________________

My Commission expires: _______________________________.

AFFIDAVIT OF EXEMPTION : TITLE 26 USC 3402 [n]

TO: ________________________________________ DATE: _________________(employer’s name)

This is my sworn affidavit establishing my “exemption” from withholding with respect to incometaxes, certifying that:

1. I incurred no liability for income tax imposed under subtitle A ( IRS Code) for the preceding year;2. I anticipate I will incur no liability for income tax imposed under subtitle A for the current year; and3. I have a right to a full refund of any and all amounts withheld for both years.

You can see by checking these sworn statements of undisputed facts against the statute itself, thatthey fulfill all the requirements contained in the law. The IRS Code makes it perfectly clear that “notwithstanding any other provisions of this section...” (i.e. Section 3402[n] ) that you “...shall not berequired to deduct and withhold any tax...” from my wages if I provide you with the certified statementcontained in this affidavit. Let me further point out that under law (Section 3402[n] ) I am not required toprovide you or the IRS with any other document or statement because this affidavit fulfills all therequirements contained in the law.

I hereby revoke and rescind all W4 withholding allowance certificates previously signed andsubmitted by me. I hereby declare them to be null and void, and declare this affidavit to be the onlydocument in legal force with respect to withholding from my earnings. Let me further remind you that noletter, mimeographed letter, or computer letter or alleged regulation can abrogate or supersede my swornstatement and the clear language and intent of the law as shown below.

INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 3402 (n)

(n) Employees Incurring No Income Tax Liability. -- Notwithstanding any other provision of this section,an employer shall not be required to deduct and withhold any tax under this chapter upon a payment ofwages to an employee if there is in effect with respect to such payment a withholding exemptioncertificate (in such form and containing such other information as the Secretary may prescribe) furnishedto the employer by the employee certifying that the employee -- (1) incurred no liability for income tax imposed under Subtitle A for his preceding taxable year, and (2) anticipates that he will incur no liability for income tax imposed under Subtitle A for his current

taxable year.The Secretary shall by regulations provide for the coordination of the provisions of this subsection withthe provisions of subsection (f).

All Rights Explicitly Reserved, Without Prejudice

Name: _____________________________ Signature: _________________________________

Subscribed and sworn to before me, this ____day of _____________ in the year of our Lord _______, aNotary Public in and for the State of _____________, County of ________________, by the abovenamed affiant, who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he/she has personalknowledge of the facts and matter therein set forth and alleged and under the penalty of perjury, that eachand all these facts and matters are true and correct, that he/she executed the same as his/her free will anddeed, under the Laws of these united States of America. Personally known to me ____ or provided I.D.type ________________.Witness my hand and seal _________________________________________ (seal)My Commission Expires: ________________________________

S.S.AFFIDAVIT

To: ______________________________________ as the Employer, whose address

is; _________________________________________________________________________ .

1. I, _______________________________, swear under the penalty of perjury that I haveno income that is taxable under 26 USC 3101.

2. I have never been made liable for any such tax pursuant to 26 USC 6201.

3. I have never received a copy of any assessment for any such tax, pursuant to 26 USC6203.

4. I received no notice of any liability for any such tax, pursuant to 26 USC 6303.

5. Therefore, you have no legal basis for withholding any "income" taxes (allegedlyimposed by 26 USC 3101) from my wages.

6. I understand that you will rely upon this affidavit in making your determination not towithhold from my wages any taxes imposed pursuant to 26 USC 3101.

Signature:_______________________________________________Date:_______________{All Rights Reserved - Without Prejudice}

Subscribed and sworn to before me, this ____day of ___________ in the year_____, aNotary Public in and for the State of ___________, County of ________________, by theaffiant, _____________________________ who executed the foregoing instrument andacknowledged that he/she has personal knowledge of the facts and matter therein set forth andalleged and that each and all these facts and matters are true and correct, that he/she executed thesame as his/her free will and deed.

Personally known to me ____ or provided I.D. type ___________________________.

Witness my hand and seal.___________________________________

My Commission expires: _______________________________.

Secretary of the Treasury15th Street & Pennsylvania Ave. N.W.Washington, D.C. 20220

Date: __________

Dear Mr. Secretary,

I have been threatened with a lawsuit by my employee named

_____________________________, if I remove any "income taxes"

from his wages as imposed by 26 USC 3101.

Attached is his/her affidavit swearing that he has no

income subject to tax, and further that he/she has never been

notified by the government that such a tax was ever assessed or

recorded. He/She also swears, that he has never received any

notice of "liability" for such a tax pursuant to 26 USC Sections

6201, 6203, and 6303.

Not wishing to expose myself to any liability in this

matter, I will no longer withhold such taxes from said persons'

wages until you notify me in writing that the government will

pay any and all costs of litigation and will indemnify me

against all claims and losses I might incur (pursuant to 26 USC

3102(b)) should I disregard his/her sworn statement.

Very truly yours,

( Enter Your Name & Address ) DATE: _________________

CERTIFIED MAIL #: ___________________

Secretary of the Treasury15th Street & Pennsylvania Ave. N.W.Washington, D.C. 20220

Dear Mr. Secretary,

Section 6201 of the IRS Code states that you are "required to make the … assessments ofall taxes … imposed by this title". Section 6203 further states that the assessment shall be madeby "recording the liability of the taxpayer in the office of the Secretary" and "upon request of thetaxpayer, the Secretary shall furnish the taxpayer with the record of the assessment".

This is to advise you that I would like to be furnished a copy of the record of my taxassessment (pursuant to Sections 6201 and 6203) for any "income" taxes for which I may beliable for under Sections 3101(a) and (b) of the Internal Revenue Code. Please furnish me withany such current certified assessment and a certified proof copy of any assessments made for allprevious years. I also note that Section 6303 of the IRS Code states that the Secretary shall "…within 60 days after making of an assessment pursuant to Section 6203, give notice to eachperson liable for the unpaid tax, stating the amount and demanding payment thereof.".

This is to inform you that I am notifying my employer that until such time as I receivefrom you a certified proof copy of any assessment so made and signed under penalty of perjuryby a designated IRS employee as required in Sect. 6065, and proof that I have been "made liable"for Section 3101 "income" taxes pursuant to Sections 6201, 6203, and 6303, that he (myemployer) is to immediately stop the withholding of all such "income" taxes from my wages.

Very truly yours,

______________________________All Rights Reserved

encl. Copy of SS Affidavit and Letter sent to Employer.

( Enter Your Name & Address ) DATE: _________________

CERTIFIED MAIL #: ___________________

LETTER OF NOTICE AND DEMAND

District DirectorInternal Revenue Service Center,Internal Revenue Tax & Audit Services Inc.( Enter Address: City, State & Zip )

Sir:

Please find enclosed a copy of my "AFFIDAVIT OF ORIGINAL STATUS" concerningmy status as a free Sovereign National Citizen, and the "AFFIDAVIT OF REVOCATION ANDRESCISSION" both previously provided to the Social Security Administration, the Secretary ofTreasury, and filed as a matter of Public Record. The Affidavit(s) is retroactive in effect and isrelevant to any and all materials ever submitted to the Internal Revenue Tax and Audit ServicesInc. (hereafter referred to as - "IRS") by me, or any party, concerning me. The Affidavit(s) andthis letter, should be made a permanent part of any file or files pertaining to me that are kept inyour records.

It is my desire and intention to comply with and obey any and all laws that apply to me asa free sovereign individual Citizen. I have received no response from any Government entitytaking exception to my position and status so defined. This is of course prima facie evidence thatno one takes exception to, and therefore agrees with, the positions and statements contained insaid Affidavit(s).

NOTICE is hereby given that all records and files held by the "IRS", its employees,agents or assigns, whomever, are the creation and result of inducement(s) of FRAUD perpetratedupon said Sovereign Citizen; and,

That any and all power of attorney or agency, certification of authority, consent or otherauthority, whether implied or direct, represented in or by the aforesaid records or files, arehereby denied by said undersigned Sovereign Citizen, fully and completely as if said records andfiles were never created and never existed, the same being a result of inducement(s) of fraud or acontinuation thereof.

WHEREFORE, Demand is hereby made that the "IRS" order any and all files andrecords concerning the undersigned Citizen, held by the IRS, its agents, affiliates, officers,assigns, or other counterparts whomever, be closed and sealed as required by the limitations setforth by the Fourth Article in Amendment to the Constitution for the united States of America,pursuant to my assertion of said limitations herein and in the attached AFFIDAVIT OFORIGINAL STATUS, which includes therein, Assertion of Fourth Article Limitations ByAffidavit.

If you do not agree with the above findings, or do not intend to comply with the abovedemand, you have 30 days to take judicial action in a court of Article III judicial authority toestablish the validity of your records. In addition, you must forward to me the grounds and basison which the IRS takes its position and makes its claim, and the name and position of thatindividual making said claim - signed under penalty of perjury as required by your Rules, knownas Internal Revenue Code (hereinafter referred to as "IRC") Section 6065. If you do not intend tofile judicial action in a court of Article III judicial authority, immediately close and seal all saidrecords and files as demanded without further acknowledgement.

IMPORTANT NOTICE TO IRS PERSONNEL

As a free sovereign individual Citizen, possessing all my constitutionally secured rights,including my right not to be deprived of my property without due process of law, I will considerany document or communication issued and/or transmitted by any employee of the IRS, or theU. S. its agencies, or assigns, foreign or domestic, for the purpose of obtaining property from meor property held for me by others, in imposing the income/excise tax under what is known as 26USC on me, to be a malicious, conspiratorial and fraudulent action committed for the purpose ofviolating my sovereign, unalienable rights and may be prosecuted as such. Among suchdocuments are those letters and 668 forms directed to financial institutions and/or employers, aswell as IRS form 668(y). In addition, NOTICE OF TAX LIEN under IR Code, the execution andrecording of which would establish legal notice of a claim against me, or any claim against me,would be fraudulent action since I am not in the legal status of a "taxpayer".

The issuance of any of the various forms bearing number 668, such as 668A - "NOTICEOF LEVY" and 668W - "NOTICE OF LEVY ON WAGES, SALARY, and OTHER INCOME",on which I am identified as a "taxpayer" who allegedly owes money to the IRS, or the U. S. itsagencies, foreign or domestic, or the Federal Reserve Corp., for the payment of the excise tax on"income" would constitute violations of provisions of Section 7214 of the IR Code, and may beprosecuted as such. Demanding payment of money from me, or from others in possession ofmoney due me, would be a direct violation of 26 USC 7214 (a)(2) because it would be a demandfor a sum other than is authorized by law, and therefore may be prosecuted as such. As a freesovereign individual Citizen, a nontaxpayer in relation to 26 USC, I am not subject to anyinternal revenue tax, thus any claim against me for any amount violates 26 USC 7214 (a)(2).

In addition to the fraudulent nature of the act of sending out a "NOTICE OF LEVY"form, or other such form bearing the number 668, to a third party for the purpose of deceivinghim into believing that there has been a levy when there has been no levy executed, or any suchforms on which I am identified as a "taxpayer" and/or indicating that an income tax is owed byme would be fraudulent documents because of my legal status as a nontaxpayer who is notsubject to any internal revenue tax. Any forms and/or communications containing suchstatements or false identifications would be violations of 26 USC 7214 (a)(7) which providespenalties for any officer or employee of the IRS or U.S. who makes or signs any fraudulentcertificate or statement, and may be prosecuted as such.

Although there might be some employees of the "IRS" that believe that they can issueand/or transmit documents and/or communications anonymously, thereby attempting to avoidresponsibility, they should be aware that in the decision of U.S. Supreme Court in Bivens vs. SixUnknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388, ruled that;

"… government cannot refuse to disclose the identities of any of its personnel that areinvolved in a violation of a citizen's rights".

The Court further ruled;

"… the citizen whose right is violated, has the right of action for punitive damagesagainst the offending government personnel as individuals."

In addition, issuing and/or transmitting such documents and/or communications may alsobe prosecuted as violations under 42 USC §1983, §1986; 18 USC §241, and if sent through themail 39 USC §4005, as well as other applicable federal and state statutes.

Sincerely

_________________________________All Rights Reserved

Cc: (enter here the names of your congressmen and senators that you will send a copy to)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *INSTRUCTIONS - Affidavit of Revocation and Rescission - INSTRUCTIONS

Read the Following very carefully before using this Affidavit:

Be aware that once you file this Affidavit you will no longer be eligible for Social In-SecurityBenefits! As we all know, it is very unlikely to survive past the year 2000, since the entiresystem is Bankrupt and exists only on the Credit of our children.

Before sending this Affidavit to the Social Security Administration and the Secretary ofTreasury, take it to your county courthouse and have it recorded as a matter of Public Record.Ask the Clerk for a "certified proof copy" of it. When you receive the true copy, take a leadpencil and lightly blacken the raised court seal, then make copies of this to send with the coverletter (previous page) supplied herein. Use this cover letter only, as the Affidavit can beinvalidated by a cover letter asking for an IRS or any governmental response. Asking for aresponse could be considered as an implied recognition of authority. (they will try every trick inthe book) You should also send copies to others as the case may require, but simply state that itis for their information only. Never quote the law, court cases, or anything else that requires aresponse. The less you say the better! Let the Affidavit talk for you.

If your state has a state income tax, check the state statutes to see if the state income tax liabilityis based on the federal income tax liability. If there is no federal income tax liability, then there isno state income tax liability. Make sure, if applicable, that the head of your state income taxdivision gets a copy of the letter the Secretary of the Treasury and the Affidavit.

Any future correspondence from either the STATE, or your State, or IRS plunderers should beanswered with a firm resolve, that you will not back down from what has been sworn to in yourAffidavit. All initial correspondence from the plunderers has to contain a Privacy Act Notice(IRS form 609) and or the applicable state requirement stating the authority the plunderer has toaccost you. Any absence of such a statement of authority should be challenged, before doinganything else. Stand on your Rights - You hold all the Aces!

You cannot file an IRS W4 form with your Employer, or any other IRS or state income taxforms, once you execute and forward the Affidavit to whomever. Because the filing of any suchforms with anybody, will invalidate the Affidavit. In other words, YOU will be giving back tothem - "implied" (read - presumed) Jurisdiction over you. We believe this Affidavit may preventthe U.S. Attorney from removing a suit for "conversion" from a state court to the federal court, ifa suite is filed in your state court for Constructive Fraud against any persistent plunderer.

Since the S.S.A. usually does not forward the Documents as requested, we send a copy of the"NOTICE AND DEMAND" letter you sent to the IRS, along with the "Affidavit of OriginalStatus", and the "Affidavit of Rescission and Revocation" to the Secretary of Treasury, as well asanybody else you deem necessary to notify, or who wants proof.

*** INSTRUCTIONS ONLY *** DO NOT SEND THIS PAGE !!!

From:Name _____________________________________c/o Non Domestic _________________________________________________________ Judicial District, ________________________ (city) ________________ state Republic

To: Social Security Administration Certified Mail # ______________________Office of the CommissionerBaltimore, Maryland 21235

RE: Files and Records pertaining to ____________________________________________

ENCLOSURE: Assertion of Fourth Article Limitations by Affidavit

LETTER OF NOTICE AND DEMAND

NOTICE is hereby given that all records and files held by the "Social SecurityAdministration", its employees, agents or assigns, and counterparts whomever, are the creationand result of inducement(s) of FRAUD perpetrated upon the undersigned Sovereign Citizen;and,

That any and all power of attorney or agency, certification of authority, consent or otherauthority, whether implied or direct, represented in or by the aforesaid records or files, arehereby denied by said undersigned Sovereign Citizen, fully and completely as if said records andfiles were never created and never existed, the same being a result of inducement(s) of fraud or acontinuation thereof.

WHEREFORE, DEMAND is hereby made that the Office of Commissioner, SocialSecurity Administration, order any and all files and records concerning the undersigned Citizen,held by the SSA, its agents, affiliates, officers, assigns, or other counterparts whomever, beclosed and sealed as required by the limitations set forth by the Fourth Article in Amendment tothe Constitution for the united States of America, pursuant to my assertion of said limitationsherein and in the attached AFFIDAVIT OF ORIGINAL STATUS, which includes therein,Assertion of Fourth Article Limitations By Affidavit.

If you do not agree with the above findings, or do not intend to comply with the abovedemand, you have 30 days to take judicial action in a court of Article III judicial authority toestablish the validity of your records. If you do not intend to file judicial action in a court ofArticle III judicial authority, immediately close and seal all said records and files as demandedwithout further acknowledgement.

Dated: __________________ Signature: _____________________________________

Printed Name: __________________________________All Rights Explicitly Reserved Without Prejudice

( Enter Your Name & Address ) DATE: _________________

CERTIFIED MAIL #: ___________________

Secretary of the Treasury15th Street & Pennsylvania Ave. N.W.Washington, D.C. 20220

Dear Mr. Secretary,

Would you please be so kind as to forward the enclosed

affidavit to the appropriate governmental office(s) so that

proper notice can be taken thereof, and suitable action to

comply with its mandate therewith.

Thank You.

Sincerely,

____________________________All Rights Reserved

Cc: (enter here the names of your congressmen and senators that you will send a copy to)

Page 1 of 8

AFFIDAVIT OF RESCISSION AND REVOCATIONDUE TO CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD

_____________________________ state]affirmed:

_____________________________ county]

I, the undersigned, being of legal age, duly sworn and affixing my signature hereto, hereby put forth, affirmand give notice of the following statements of facts to wit:

STATEMENT OF ORIGINAL STATUS

1. This document follows the filing of another document named, "DECLARATION OF ORIGINAL STATUSREGARDING THE CITIZENSHIP OF THIS AFFIANT", and is an integral part hereof of this document, andtherein means that I am a Free Sovereign Citizen of __________________________ state republic and therebyin the united States of America and in fact protected by the original Constitution for the united States ofAmerica (1787), including its Preamble and the Bill of Rights (1791) and retain the unalienable rights from Godthe Creator, in positive law embodied in the Declaration of Independence (1776), binding upon myself and myparentage, this day and for all time; and,

STATEMENT OF CAUSE

2. That I was unaware that a completed, signed, and submitted "Form 1040" and/or "income tax return" and/or"W-4 Employee's Withholding Allowance Certificate" - the authorization document that allows an employer towithhold a worker's money from his pay, are voluntarily executed instruments which could be used as primafacie evidence against me in criminal trials and civil proceedings to show that I had voluntarily waived myconstitutionally secured rights and that I had voluntarily subjected myself to the federal income/excise tax, tothe provisions of the Internal Revenue Code (hereafter referred to as the "IRC"), and to the authority of theInternal Revenue Service (hereafter referred to as the "IRS") by signing and thereby affirming under penalty ofperjury that I was in effect a "person" subject to the tax; and,

3. That I was unaware of the legal effects of signing and filing and income tax return as shown by the decision ofthe United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit in the 1974 ruling in the case of Morse vs. U.S., 494 F2d876, 880, wherein the Court explained how a Citizen became a "taxpayer" by stating:

"Accordingly, when returns are filed in Mrs. Morse's name declaring income to her for 1944 and 1945, andmaking her potentially liable for the tax due in that income, she became a taxpayer within the meaning ofthe Internal Revenue Code." (emphasis added)

4. That I was unaware that the signing and filing of an income tax return and other IRS forms are acts of voluntarycompliance for a free sovereign individual Citizen; that I was unaware that in a court of law the completed IRSdocuments can become prima facie evidence sufficient to sustain a legal conclusion by a judge that the signorhas voluntarily changed his legal status from that of a free sovereign individual Citizen who is not subject toany federal tax and who possesses all of his God-given Constitutionally secured rights when dealing withgovernment, to the legal status of a "taxpayer" (any individual, trust, estate, partnership, association, companyor corporation subject to a federal excise tax,) a "person" who is subject to a federal excise tax and is thereforesubject to the authority, jurisdiction and control of the federal government under Title 26 of the United StatesCode, the statutes governing federal taxation and to the regulations of the IRS, thereby imposing the tax onhimself and allegedly waiving his/her God-given Constitutionally secured rights and freedoms in respect to thefederal income/excise tax statutes and their administration by the IRS and establishing himself as one who hasprivileges only, but no rights in dealings with the IRS, the same as a corporation; that it is my understandingthat the change of status resulting from the signed IRS documents is very similar to the change of status thatoccurs when one enlists in the military service and voluntarily takes an oath that subjects him/her to theauthority, jurisdiction and control of the federal government under Title 10 of the United States Code, the

Affidavit of Rescission and Revocation (cont.)

Page 2 of 8

statutes governing the armed forces and the regulations of the military service, thereby waiving his/herConstitutionally protected rights in relation to dealings with the military services; and,

5. That my attention has recently been directed to the fact that an official Internal Revenue Service form letter (FL1264) states: "The fact that you sent us [IRS] this form 1040 shows that you recognize your obligation to file…"; that it has never been my intention, or desire, to show the Internal Revenue Service, or anyone else, that Irecognize any such obligation; that as a freeman, I legally do not have such an obligation; and,

6. That I am a free sovereign united States Citizen, a freeman and I am endowed by my Creator with numerousinalienable rights including my rights to "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness", which rights arespecifically identified in the Declaration of Independence and protected by the Constitution for the united Statesof America; that my birthright or citizenship to "pursuit of happiness" has been interpreted by both the framersof the Constitution and the U.S. Supreme Court as including my inalienable rights to contract, to acquire, to dealin, to sell, rent, and exchange properties of various kinds, real and personal, without requesting or exercisingany privilege or franchise from government; that I have learned that these inalienable property rights alsoinclude my right to contract for the exchange of my labor-property for other properties such as wages, salaries,and other earnings, that I have never knowingly or intentionally waived any of these inalienable rights; and,

7. That I understand that if the exercise of rights were subjected to taxation, the rights could be destroyed byincreasing the tax rates to unaffordable levels; therefore courts have repeatedly ruled that government has nopower to tax the exercise of any rights of citizens, as shown by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Murdockvs. Penna., 318 U.S. 105 (1943) which stated:

"A state may not impose a charge for the enjoyment of a right granted by the Federal Constitution."

8. That for years past I have been influenced by numerous and repeated public warnings made by the IRS viaradio, television, the printed press and other public communication media warning of the "deadline" for filing a"Form 1040 Income Tax Return" and/or other IRS forms and documents; and,

9. That in addition to the aforesaid warnings, I have also been influenced by misleading and deceptive wording ofthe IRS publications, IRS-generated news articles, the pressure of widespread rumors and misinformed publicopinion, and the advice and assurance of lawyers, CPAs and income tax preparers which misled me toincorrectly believe that the 16th Amendment to the Constitution for the united States of America authorizedCongress to impose a direct tax on me, my property, my exchanges of property and/or property received as aresult of exercising my constitutionally secured right to contract; that I was further misled into believing I had alegal duty and obligation to file a "Form 1040 Income Tax Return", a "Form W-4 Employee's WithholdingAllowance Certificate" and/or other IRS forms and documents; and,

10. That I have also been influenced, misled and alarmed by rumors, misinformed public opinion and the adviceand assurance of lawyers, CPAs and income tax preparers to the affect that "the IRS will get you", and that itwould be a crime punishable by fine and/or imprisonment if I did not fill out, sign and file with the IRS a "Form1040"; and,

11. That in addition to all the reasons stated in paragraphs 8, 9, and 10 above, I was influenced by the common andwidespread practice of employers who either knowingly or unknowingly mislead their employees to believe thatthey are all subject to withholding of "income taxes" from their earnings, either with or without theirpermission, based upon the employer's possible mistaken assumption that they, as employers, are required bylaw to withhold "income taxes" from the paychecks of their employees; and,

12. That I have also been influenced and impressed by the IRS's annual public display and indiscriminate offeringof large quantities of the "Form 1040" in banks, post offices, libraries, and through the U.S. Mail which alsoreminded me of and induced me to respond by filling out, signing, and sending to the IRS a "Form 1040"; and,

13. That said "Form 1040" contained no reference to any law or laws which would explain just exactly who is or isnot subject to or liable for the income tax, nor did it contain any notice or warning to anyone that merelysending said completed "Form 1040" to the IRS would waive my right to privacy secured by the 4th Amendmentand my right to not be witness against myself secured by the 5th Amendment of the Constitution for the unitedStates of America, and that the "Form 1040" would in itself constitute legal evidence admissible in a court of

Affidavit of Rescission and Revocation (cont.)

Page 3 of 8

law, that the filer is subject to and liable for the income/excise tax even though, and regardless of the fact, that Ias a free individual, am actually and legally not subject to, or liable for any income/excise tax and have no legalduty or obligation whatsoever to complete and file a "Form 1040"; and,

14. That at no time was I ever notified or informed by the IRS, by any of its agents, or employees, nor by anylawyer, CPA, or tax preparer of the fact that the 16th Amendment as correctly interpreted by the U.S. SupremeCourt, in such cases as Brushaber vs. Union Pacific R.R. Co. 103 (1916) identified the income tax as an indirectexcise tax in accordance with Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1 of the Constitution for the united States of America,and that the 16th Amendment does not authorize a tax on individuals; and,

15. That at no time was I ever notified or informed by the IRS, its agents, or employees, nor by any lawyer, CPA,or any tax preparer of the fact that because of various rulings of the U.S. Supreme Court in such cases as Flintvs. Stone Tracy Co., 220 U.S. 107 (1911), and Pollock vs. Farmer's Loan and Trust Co., 157 U.S. 492 (1895),the indirect excise tax on incomes identified by the 16th Amendment is actually a tax upon corporationprivileges granted by government and measured by the amount of corporate income (see Corporations Tax Act,Statutes at Large, 1909, vol. XXXVI, section 38, page 112); that this excise tax may also be imposed on certainother privileges provided by government and measured by income; that such occupations of privilege includeAttorneys [see Springer VS. U.S., 102 U.S. 586 (1881)]; that this excise tax may also be imposed upon criminalgains or profits; and,

16. That my attention has been called to Report No. 80-19A, titled "Some Constitutional Questions Regarding theFederal Income Tax Laws" published by the American Law Division of the Congressional Research Service ofthe Library of Congress, updated January 17, 1980; that this publication described the tax on "income"identified in the 16th Amendment, as an indirect excise tax; that this report stated: "The Supreme Court, in adecision written by Chief Justice White, first noted that the 16th Amendment did not authorize any new type oftax, or did it repeal or revoke the taxing clauses of Article I of the United States Constitution, quoted above.",and further stated: "Therefore, it can clearly be determined from the decisions of the United States SupremeCourt that the income tax is an indirect tax, generally in the nature of an excise tax.", thus proving in my mindthat the "income tax" is not a tax on ME as an individual, but is rather a tax as described by the U.S. SupremeCourt in Flint vs. Stone Tracy Co., 220 U.S. 107 (1911), wherein the court defined excise taxes as:

"… taxes laid upon the manufacture, sale, or consumption of commodities within the country, upon licenseto pursue certain occupations, and upon corporate privileges.",

none of which classifications apply to ME; and,

17. That I was unaware of the truth of the IRS's rarely publicized statement that the "income" tax system is basedupon "voluntary compliance with the law and self-assessment of tax"; that it has never been my intention ordesire to voluntarily self-assess an excise tax upon myself; that I always thought that compliance was requiredby law; and,

18. That I have examined sections 6001, 6011, 6012, 7203, and 7205 of the IRC and am convinced and satisfiedthat I am not now, and never was any such "person" or individual referred to by these sections; and,

19. That after careful study of the IRC and consultations on the provisions of the Code with lawyers, taxaccountants, and tax preparers, etc. I have never found or been shown any section of the IRC that imposed anyrequirement on ME as a free sovereign unprivileged individual to file a "Form 1040 Income Tax Return", orthat imposed a requirement upon me to pay a tax on "income", or that would classify me as a "person liable", a"person made liable", or a "taxpayer", as the term taxpayer is defined in 26 U.S.C. Section 7701 (a)(14) whichstates: "The term 'taxpayer' means any person subject to any internal revenue tax." ; and,

20. That after the study and consultations mentioned in the paragraph above, the only mention of any possiblerequirement upon ME, as an individual, to pay a tax on "income" that I could find or was shown in 26 U.S.C.was the title of Part 1 under Subtitle A, Chapter 1, Subchapter A, which is deceptively titled "Tax onIndividuals"; that a careful study and examination of this part of the Code showed no provision in the body ofthe statutes imposing any liability or requirement upon me as an individual for payment of a federal excise taxon "income"; that my study and consultations mentioned in paragraph 18 showed that the law is determined bythe actual wording contained in the body of a statute, and not by the title; that the title of a statute is merely a

Affidavit of Rescission and Revocation (cont.)

Page 4 of 8

general guide to the statute, and the title has no force or effect at law; and,

21. That after study and consultations mentioned in paragraph 19, my attention was called to Section 61 (a) of theIRC which lists items that are sources of "income" and to these facts: that the IRS Collection Summons Form6638 (12-82) confirms that these items are sources, not "income", by stating that the following items are"sources": "wages, salaries, tips, fees, commissions, interest, rents, royalties, alimony, state or local tax refunds,pensions, business income, gains from dealings in property, and any other compensation for services (includingreceipt of property other than money."); that sources are not income, but sources become "income" if they areentered as "income" on a signed "Form 1040" because the signer affirms under penalty of perjury that the itemsentered in the "income" section of the "Form 1040" are "income" to the signer; that Section 61 (b) clearlyindicates which Sections of the Code identify and list items that are included in "income" by stating: "For itemsspecifically included in gross income, see Part II, (Section 71 and following)" ; and,

22. That my attention was then called to the said Part II, titled: "Items Specifically Included in Gross Income"; thatI studied sections 71 through 87 and noticed that wages, salaries, commissions, tips, interest, dividends,pensions, rents, royalties, etc., are not listed as being included in "income" in those sections of the code; that, infact, those items are not mentioned anywhere in any of these sections of the IRC; and,

23. That after further study, it appears clear to me that the only way that property received by me as a free,sovereign, unprivileged individual in the form of wages, salaries, commissions, tips, interest, dividends, rents,royalties, and/or pensions could be, or could have been legally considered to be "income" is if I voluntarilycompleted and signed a "Form 1040 Income Tax Return", thereby affirming under penalty of perjury thatinformation on the "Form 1040" was true and correct, and that any amounts listed on the "Form 1040" in the"income" block are "income", thereby acknowledging under oath that I am, or was subject to the tax and have,or had a duty to file a "Form 1040 Income Tax Return" and/or other IRS forms, documents, and schedules, noneof which instruments I have ever signed with the understanding that they were voluntarily signed; and,

24. That after study and consultations mentioned in paragraph 19, my attention was called to IRC Chapter 21, titled"Federal Insurance Contributions Act" (social security), to Subchapter A of Chapter 21 titled "Tax onEmployees", which includes Section 3101 wherein the (social security) tax is identified as a tax on "income",not as an "Insurance Contribution", and not as a "Tax on Employees", or on wages or earnings; that myattention was further called to these facts: There is no provision in the code that imposes the tax on employeesor requires them to pay the tax; a voluntarily signed completed "W-4 Employee's Withholding AllowanceCertificate" allows an employer to withhold money from a worker's pay for (social security) "income" tax, eventhough the worker has claimed on the form to be "exempt" from the graduated "income" tax; an employer hasno authority to withhold money from a worker's pay for the (social security) "income" tax, the graduated"income" tax, or any IRS imposed penalty/assessment if there is no voluntarily signed "W-4" form in force; and,

25. That I was unaware, that the Social Security (FICA) is a voluntary social insurance policy which, bysubmission, subordinates me, an otherwise free sovereign Citizen, in the Federal jurisdiction that has beencreated within regional concepts, to divest the Posterity of their birthright in the Statute of 1776 (TheDeclaration of Independence) and to reduce the Posterity to mere subjects of the United States (U.S.) and ,thereby, reduce the sovereignty of the several States to no affect, as districts, in a scheme of centralizedgovernment throughout the national socialist scheme of the Social Security Act; and,

26. That I was unaware, that the Social Security scheme (FICA) is a stealthy encroachment on, and an easy way tocircumvent, the limitation(s) and guarantee(s), provided by "We the People", against singular centralizedgovernment, specifically, but not limited to, the limitations and guarantees against abridgement andsubordination of my Inalienable and Unalienable God-given Rights, as expressed and asserted in theDeclaration of Independence (1776), as set out in the original Constitution for the united States of America(1787), and its Bill of Rights (1791), and as earlier expressed in the Declaration and Resolves of the FirstContinental Congress (1774); and,

27. That according to my further studies, I find that the Social Security (FICA) social insurance scheme is deployedto limit my title of "Citizen", with intent through misrepresentation to divest, impair, and extort me of my God-given Unalienable Rights (viz., natural rights), otherwise protected by the limitations set out in the Organic Lawfor the united States of America, by requiring me through uninformed, direct, and implied consent (submission)to surrender or limit the affect of my title of American Citizen, to accomplish ends completely beyond the scope

Affidavit of Rescission and Revocation (cont.)

Page 5 of 8

delineated by the Declaration of Independence (1776), the original Constitution for the united States of America(1787), and its Bill of Rights (1791); and,

28. That I was unaware that participation in the "Social Security", social insurance policy scheme, and the agency(power of attorney) scheme thereunder, was/is an attempt by agents of the government to compel me into a jointventure, with regional (interstate in international) statutory implications, of an intragovernmental nature, in theunauthorized jurisdiction(s) that now exist in the United States, codified pursuant to declaratory Amendmentsnot provided for in the Constitution for the united States of America (1787); and,

29. That only by my informed consent can the government exercise an unauthorized intragovernmental authorityover me, in the jurisdiction(s) of the United States, outside the limitations of the original Constitution (1787)and the Bill of Rights (1791); and,

30. I, the undersigned, directly or indirectly, was deceived into believing that I was required, or could be required,to obtain a Social Security Account and Number in order to exercise my basic rights of Life, Liberty, and thePursuit of Happiness; and,

31. The application for Social Security Account (SS-5) contains no warning of its implications or conditions, nordoes it set forth where its implications or conditions might be discovered; and,

32. That with reliance upon the aforementioned U.S. Supreme Court rulings and upon my constitutionally protected5th and 9th Amendment Rights to lawfully contract, to work, and to lawfully acquire and possess property, I amconvinced and satisfied that I am not now, nor was I ever subject to, liable for, or required to pay anyincome/excise tax, that I am not now and never was a "taxpayer" as the term is defined and used in the IRC, andthat I have never had any legal duty or obligation whatsoever to file any "Form 1040" or make any "income taxreturn", sign any "Form W-4 Employee's Withholding Allowance Certificate", "Application for a SocialSecurity Number (SS-5)" or any other Internal Revenue or Social Security Administration forms, submitdocuments or schedules, pay any income tax, keep any records, or supply any information to the IRS or SSA;and,

RESCISSION FOR CAUSE

33. Therefore the U.S. Congress, the IRS, the SSA, by deceptive and misleading words and statements in their"Codes", publications, generated news articles, ad nauseum, COMMITTED CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD bymisleading and deceiving ME, as well as the general public, into believing that I was required to file "Form1040 Income Tax Returns", "Form W-4 Employee's Withholding Certificates", "Form SS-5", and other IRS andSSA forms, documents, and schedules, and also to keep records, supply information, and to pay "income taxes";and,

34. All power (right) belongs within ME, to accept or deny control, in areas of law which are not within thejurisdiction of the organic Constitution for the united States of America (1787) and the Constitutions for theseveral States, that could pertain, or attempt to pertain, to me, as one of "We the People" of the Preamble to theConstitution for the united States of America (1787), which power (right) is protected by the limitations set outin the 9th Article in Amendment to the organic Constitution [Bill of Rights (1791)]; and,

35. WHEREFORE, by the reason of the aforestated facts, that I the undersigned free sovereign Citizen, having beenduped, misled, and deceived into submission, without my informed consent, by the(se) device(s) and cloak(s) ofthe Government(s) of the United States and the several States, do hereby exercise my Right upheld by variouscourt decisions, to REVOKE, RESCIND, REPUDIATE, ASSEVERATE, CANCEL and to otherwise renderNULL and VOID, both currently and retroactively to the time of signing, based upon CONSTRUCTIVEFRAUD perpetrated upon me by the U.S. Congress, IRS, SSA, and others unknown, all "Form 1040 IncomeTax Returns", all "Form W-4 Employee's Withholding Allowance Certificates", the application for the aforesaidSocial Insurance scheme, all other IRS and SSA forms, schedules, and documents ever signed and/or submittedby me, and all my signatures on any of the aforementioned items, to include the "SOCIAL SECURITY"account, bearing account number ___________________________, and the agency represented thereby, andspecifically deny any consent, whatsoever, to be governed by this unauthorized jurisdiction, for the past presentand future; that this revocation and rescission is based upon my rights in respect to the cases of Tyler vs.Secretary of State, 184 A.2d 101 (1962), and also El Paso Natural Gas Co. vs. Kysar Insurance Co., 605 Pacific2d. 240 (1979) which stated:

Affidavit of Rescission and Revocation (cont.)

Page 6 of 8

"Constructive fraud as well as actual fraud may be the basis of cancellation of an instrument."; and,

36. WHEREFORE, formal notice is also given that I, the undersigned, hereby repudiate all statutory benefits andobligations of the aforesaid social insurance scheme; that I absolutely will not use accounts establishedthereunder, identifying numbers or other identifiers, which represent said account, except to repudiate same;and that I will not apply for, receive, collect, or attempt to apply for, receive or collect, any privileges or benefitestablished under said social insurance scheme, except for any monies previously paid in and held on account;and, that said numbered account will be treated as though it never had been established, nor applied for, norassigned; and,

INTENT

37. That my intent is to reclaim my title as a free, lawful and natural American Sovereign Citizen of the unitedStates of America, and Co-Heir to the Organic Law as stated in The Declaration of Independence (1776), andas restated in the Preamble to the Constitution for the united States of America (1787), which I am in fact bysaid Organic Law; to claim my God-given Rights declared by the Statute of 1776, and the limitations ongovernment set out in the original Constitution for the united States of America (1787) and its Bill of[Limitations] Rights (1791); and to re-establish myself as an American Citizen (de jure), pursuant to my rightsas Co-Heir to the Statute of 1776 and the Organic Law, to the end of preserving the Republic of the unitedStates of America, as formed by the Constitution for the united States of America (787), and further limited bythe Bill of Rights (1797); and,

38. This further, I do hereby declare that I am not and never was a "taxpayer" as that term is defined in the InternalRevenue Code, a "person liable" for any Internal Revenue tax, or a "person" subject to the provisions of thatCode, and declare that I am, and have always been, a "nontaxpayer"; that courts have recognized andacknowledged that individuals can be nontaxpayers, to wit:

"… for with them Congress does not assume to deal and they are neither of the subject nor of the object ofrevenue laws …",

as stated by the Court in Long vs. Rasmussen, 281 F. 236 (1922), and also Delima vs. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 176,179 and Gerth vs. United States, 132 F. Supp. 894 (1955); and,

NOTICE TO TRESPASSERS

39. This notice is to all who would subject me to a deprivation of my rights and corresponding responsibility, as anAmerican Citizen pursuant to the Statute of 1776 (The Declaration of Independence). All claimants have 30days from the date of filing of this "Affidavit of Rescission and Revocation" to make any claims such claimantsmay wish to assert in a court of organic Article III judicial authority; failure to do so is an admission of Estoppeland latches upon all comers. Any further deprivation of my vested rights as an American Citizen by anygovernmental agent(s) or agency(ies) will be, by its taking place, a declaration of Mixed War between codifiedstatutory law and common law, waged against me, by whatever person or entity who might perpetrate suchtrespass, and will be remedied by whatever action is necessary and lawful taking into account the moral gravityof the deprivations in the particular instance; and,

40. The information and statements contained herein are correct and true, and are executed in good faith and underpenalties of perjury are set forth for cause, superseding any previous denials I have made to date; and mysignature and seal hereafter are the voluntary act by my own hand.

JUDICIAL NOTICE

I HEREBY NOTICE any court and prosecutor that pursuant to U.S. SupremeCourt case HAFER Vs. MELO, No. 90-681, November 1991 any judicial actions thatviolate the constitutional rights of individuals may be used as a cause of action in civillitigation against those performing said acts, without any form of immunity.

Affidavit of Rescission and Revocation (cont.)

Page 7 of 8

CIVIL RIGHTS - Immunity: State officials sued in their individual capacities are"persons" subject to suits for damages under 42 USC 1983; Eleventh Amendment does notbar such suits in Federal Court. (Hafer vs. Melo, No. 90-681, page 4001).

NOTARIZED SIGNATURE

STATE OF _________________

__________________ COUNTY

BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, this day personally appeared

___________________________________, who first being duly sworn, says he/she is the

UNDERSIGNED/AFFIANT mentioned herein, that he/she has read the foregoing "AFFIDAVIT

OF RESCISSION AND REVOCATION" and has specific and personal knowledge of the facts

and matter therein set forth and alleged and that each and all these facts and matters are true and

correct, that he/she executed the same as his/her free will and deed.

_______________________________________ (seal) sui juris, non assumpsit

All Rights Explicitly Reserved Without Prejudice

c/o Non Domestic _______________________________________ ____________________________state republic

Postal Zone [ ____________ ]

Personally known to me ____ or provided I.D. type ___________________________.

Witness my hand and seal.___________________________________

My Commission expires: _______________________________.

Affidavit of Rescission and Revocation (cont.)

Page 8 of 8

AFFIDAVIT OF TRUE COPY CERTIFICATION AND SERVICE

State of _______________ ]County of _______________ ]

I, the undersigned Sovereign American Citizen, hereby put forth, declare, and affirm, thatthe original of the foregoing instrument was served by hand upon the Office of the Clerk ofCourt of _________________ County, State of __________________ to be filed as a matter ofPublic Record. In addition, a true copy of these originals are sent by certified/return receipt mail#_______________________________, to the Social Security Administration, BaltimoreMaryland 21235, and to the District Director of Internal Revenue Service,_______________________________________________. Both placed in the United StatesMail on this ______ day of ___________________, in the year of our Lord ______.

1. "DECLARATION OF STATUS REGARDING CITIZENSHIP OF THIS AFFIANT"2. "AFFIDAVIT OF RESCISSION AND REVOCATION DUE TO FRAUD"

CLERK OF COURT NOTICE: You are instructed to enter these documents into the PublicRecords for the benefit of the all party(s). This may be considered evidence and is not to betampered with in any way, shape, form, or manner.

CLERK OF COURT CAVEAT: CIVIL RIGHTS - Immunity: State officials sued intheir individual capacities are "persons" subject to suits for damages under 42 USC 1983;Eleventh Amendment does not bar such suits in Federal Court. (Hafer vs. Melo, No. 90-681, page 4001). In the event this document is not filed into the public record by this Office,a lawsuit shall be filed in U.S. District Court for violation of federal law and possibly StateCourt with respect to your nonperformance regarding your liability of public trust.

Signature ________________________________________________Propria Persona, sui juris, non assumpsit, All Rights Reserved

Mail Address:________________________________c/o Non-Domestic ____________________________________________________________, ____________________ state republic

Subscribed, sealed, and affirmed before me this _________day of _____________, in the year ofour Lord _______ in the County of ________________________________. My commission

expires : ________________________________

Signature: ___________________________________, Notary Public (seal)

Page 1 of 5

( Enter Your Name & Address ) DATE: _________________

CERTIFIED MAIL #: ___________________

( Enter Name and Addressof Business to Send to )

RE: Request for new IRS Form W-4

NOTICE AND DEMAND TO EMPLOYER

This Notice is my response to your request for me to sign and submit a new InternalRevenue Service (IRS) "Form W-4 Employee's Withholding Allowance Certificate" to permitthe withholding of money from my earnings, by you, for the payment of federal income/excisetax. There are certain facts of which you should be aware in order to understand the law, and myposition in this matter. I am submitting this letter to inform you of these facts.

The United States courts of law have ruled very clearly that the Internal Revenue Code(26 U.S.C.) applies to only those persons who are in the legal status of a "taxpayer" and that itdoes not apply to nontaxpayers. "Taxpayer" is a legal term that is defined in Section 7701(a)(14)of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC), which states:

"The term 'taxpayer' means any person subject to any internal revenue tax."

When an individual voluntarily files his first tax return, files his first W-4 form, or firstpays an "income" tax, the IRS thereafter considers him/her to be a "taxpayer". As a "taxpayer",he is considered to have voluntarily waived his constitutionally secured rights and to haveprivileges only, in relation to the administration of the tax and the IRC, to which he is thenconsidered to be subjected to. The change in status similar to when one voluntarily takes the oathto joining the military service and he thereby subjects himself to military law.

A nontaxpayer, in respect to the IRC, is one who is not subject to any internal revenuetax and is therefore not subject to any provisions of the IRC nor to the jurisdiction of the IRS.This FACT is shown by the ruling in the case of Economy Plumbing and Heating vs. U.S., 470F.2d 585, at 589 (1972) wherein the Court reaffirmed and quoted from the decision in the case ofLong vs. Rasmussen, 281 F236, at 238 (1922) which stated:

"The revenue laws are a code or system in regulation of tax assessments and collection.THEY RELATE TO TAXPAYERS, AND NOT TO NONTAXPAYERS. The latter arewithout their scope. NO PROCEDURE IS PRESCRIBED FOR NONTAXPAYERS, andNO ATTEMPT is made to ANNUL any of THEIR RIGHTS and remedies in due course oflaw. With them Congress does not assume to deal, and they are neither of the subject norof the object of the revenue laws." (Emphasis added)

NOTICE AND DEMAND - Regarding W-4 (cont.)

Page 2 of 5

This letter is my Legal Notice to you of my legal status as a free individual sovereignCitizen, possessing all of my God-given, constitutionally protected and secured rights andfreedoms, a nontaxpayer in respect to all federal income/excise taxes and the IRC. Further, I amnot engaged in any revenue taxable activity. My status as a nontaxpayer is a matter of publicrecord in the County of ____________________, State of __________________________USA.The Secretary of the Treasury, IRS, Social Security Administration (SSA), as well as numerousCongressmen and Senators have all been notified of this fact and have been sent a copy ofAffidavits executed by me further establishing this fact, along with a copy of a cover letterrelating to the Affidavits. A copy of these documents is included with this letter for theinformation of your company and your company's counsel. Neither the Secretary of the Treasury,the Commissioner of the SSA, the District Director of the IRS, nor any of their agents orcounsels, have taken any exception to any of the statements in these Affidavits, nor have theyever made any claim that I am one who is in the legal status of a "taxpayer", or that I am subjectto the provisions of the IRC.

The certification line on the IRS form W-4, that your company requested me to sign andsubmit, states that the signer is one who is "entitled" (allowed or privileged) to make a "claim"for exemptions under the IRC for determining how the withholding of the signer's money is to becomputed. Only those people who are in the legal status of a "taxpayer", in respect to the federalexcise tax, are "entitled" to make an exemption claim to the IRS for exemptions under the IRC.As a nontaxpayer, in respect to the income/excise tax, I am not a person required to sign andsubmit an IRS form W-4, to give your company my permission to withhold any money from myearnings that are due me.

Due to the wording of the statement, on the IRS form W-4 which is signed under penaltyof perjury, I cannot sign it without making a false statement, because I am not one who is"entitled" to make a "claim" to the IRS under the IRC. Under federal law, in 28 USC 1746, astatement certified "under penalty of perjury" has the same force of law, for federal procedures,as a sworn oath or a notarized affidavit; thus, signing and certifying a false statement "underpenalty of perjury" on the IRS form W-4, would be a felony. I positively refuse to commit such aviolation of the law, simply to satisfy your desire for me to fill out a form!

As a free individual sovereign Citizen, I have the constitutionally protected right not to bedeprived of my property without "due process of law". A right protected and secured by the dueprocess clause of the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution for the united States of America."Due process of law" means having an opportunity for a lawful hearing in a court of competentjurisdiction to adjudicate the issues in controversy. No form letter, notice, directive or otherdocument from a Internal Revenue Tax & Audit Services Inc. employee, or a government oragency employee, nor even a statute passed by Congress, can nullify my right to due process.

An order from a court of competent jurisdiction, which is issued after a hearing toadjudicate the validity of a claim, is the only document that could give you lawful authorityto take money from my earnings without my consent. Without such a court order, anywithholding of money from my earnings, without my permission, would violate my right to dueprocess and would make your company, and any of its involved employees, liable for both civiland criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to fullest extent of the law.

NOTICE AND DEMAND - Regarding W-4 (cont.)

Page 3 of 5

Because of ignorance, and confusion about the law, in the minds of most employers,there are some important points of which you should be aware. Subsection 3402(f)(2)(a) of theIRC, which applies to withholding, states:

"… the employee shall furnish the employer with a signed withholding exemptioncertificate …" (emphasis added)

The statute does not state that an employee is required to furnish one. Subsections 3402(a) and (b) also use the directory word "shall". Those sections state that employers "shall" deductand withhold from employee's earnings. They do not state that employers are required to deductand withhold. Unless there is a valid IRS form W-4 in force to give the employer permission totake an employee's money for taxes, THE EMPLOYER HAS NO AUTHORITY TO DEDUCTAND WITHHOLD ANY MONEY WHATSOEVER. Courts have repeatedly ruled that instatutes the word "shall" must be defined as meaning "may" if necessary to avoid constitutionalconflicts.

In the decision on Cairo & Fulton R.R. Co. vs. Hecht, 95 U.S. 170, the U.S. SupremeCourt stated:

"As against government the word 'shall' when used in statutes is to be construed as 'may', unless a contrary intention is manifest."

And in the decision of George Williams College vs. Village of Williams Bay, 7 N.W. 2d 891, theSupreme Court of Wisconsin stated:

"'Shall' in a statute may be construed to mean 'may' in order to avoid constitutionaldoubt."

Further, in the decision of Gow vs. Consolidated Coppermines Corp., 165 A 136, the Courtstated:

"If necessary to avoid unconstitutionality of a statute, 'shall' will be deemed equivalent to'may' …"

These decisions and others, very clearly show that in respect to me, the word "shall" mustbe defined as meaning "may" in 26 USC 3402. To interpret the words "shall deduct andwithhold" as meaning that your company is "required to deduct and withhold" my moneywithout my permission and without an order from a court of competent jurisdiction, wouldrequire your company to commit a violation of my right not to be deprived of my propertywithout due process of law. This situation would prima facie, create a clear constitutionalconflict, and would make the statute unconstitutional, according to the court decisions.

Those in your company who determine policy should understand that as an individualpossessing all of my constitutionally secured rights, I have the right not to be deprived of myproperty without due process of law. No statute can constitutionally require or authorize anyoneto violate this right, thus the words "shall furnish the employer with a signed withholdingexemption certificate" and "shall deduct and withhold" cannot be defined as statements ofrequirements, but must be interpreted as meaning "may furnish" and "may deduct and withhold".

NOTICE AND DEMAND - Regarding W-4 (cont.)

Page 4 of 5

The words, "Requirement of Withholding", are used as descriptive headings ofsubsections 3402 (a) and (b) of the IRC. These words are deceiving and confusing unless thereader understands that in IRC subsection 7806(b), it states:

"No … table of contents, table of cross references, or similar outline, analysis ordescriptive material relating to the contents of this title shall be given any legal effect."(Emphasis added)

Therefore, the descriptive headings which state, "Requirement of Withholding", legally create norequirement to withhold, but do create misunderstanding by employers who are not familiar withthe provisions of the "coded" IRC.

As further evidence that there is no requirement, for me, to file an IRS form W-4, noticethe wording in the instructions that is attached to the blank form. Nowhere in the instructionsdoes it say that anyone is "required" to file the form; instead, it repeatedly uses the word "must"in relation to filing. If employees were required to file the IRS form W-4, the word "required"would be used in the instructions to eliminate confusion and any question as to whether or notfiling is required. In the definition of word "must" in the 5th Edition of Black's Law Dictionary,which the legal profession uses, it states:

"… it is often used in a merely directory sense, and consequently is a synonym for theword 'may' not only in the permissive sense of that word, but also in the mandatory sensewhich it sometimes has." - Black's Law Dictionary

According to this definition, it is clear that the word "must" does not mean "required" by law, butthe word "must" is used to deceive employees into believing that they are required by law to signand submit W-4 forms to their employers.

The IRS deceives and intimidates, ignorant or uninformed employers, into unauthorizedwithholding by citing IRC section 3403, which scares them into submission. Section 3403 states:

"The employer shall be liable for the payment of tax required to be deducted andwithheld under this chapter…"

NOTE: Without an employee's consent to withhold, there can be no "tax required to be deductedand withheld", so there can be no liability on the employer for not withholding. No law canconstitutionally require an employer to deprive an employee of his property without due processof law.

The enclosed copy of the Affidavits is directed to you for your attention. I suggest thatyou, your personnel, and counsel read them carefully. These documents are of the utmostimportance, as it revokes and rescinds all my signatures on any W-4 forms ever signed by me,rendering them null and void. This specifically applies to any IRS forms in your possession,which I have previously signed.

AS OF THIS DATE, YOUR COMPANY NO LONGER HAS MY PERMISSIONTO DEDUCT ANY MONEY FROM MY EARNINGS. I DEMAND TO RECEIVE MY

NOTICE AND DEMAND - Regarding W-4 (cont.)

Page 5 of 5

FULL PAY AT ALL TIMES WITH NO DEDUCTIONS FOR ANY FEDERAL ORSTATE TAX, AND NO DEDUCTIONS OF THE FLAT RATE FEDERALINCOME/EXCISE TAX (social security), deceptively called F.I.C.A. (Federal InsuranceContributions Act) TAX.

Please note that according to the Court's statements in the Economy Plumbing decision(supra), no procedures are available to a nontaxpayer under the IRC, thus a nontaxpayer has nostanding to make a claim for a refund. As evidence of this, see the decision on the case of Morsevs. U.S. 494 F.2d 876 (1974) wherein the IRS denied a claim for refund on the grounds that theclaimant allegedly was not in the legal status of a "taxpayer". Therefore, as a nontaxpayer, I haveno legal standing under the IRC to make a claim to the IRS for a refund of monies paid in myname by your company. So, please do not try to lead me to believe that I can get my money backfrom the IRS by filing a claim for a refund. MY REMEDY WOULD BE TO SUE YOURCOMPANY FOR CONVERSION OF FUNDS, and believe me, I and others whom I do notcare to name, would not hesitate to prosecute to the fullest extent of the law.

If it is the position of this company, that it has the authority to withhold funds from myearnings without my permission, I demand that your legal counsel, or company representative oncompany letterhead, notify me IMMEDIATELY IN WRITING of the statute, regulation,directive or other basis you rely on to take the position that it gives you the authority to overridemy constitutionally protected and secured right not to be deprived of my property without dueprocess of law as guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment of the Bill of Rights to the Constitution forthe united States of America. You have 10 days to comply with this Notice and Demand.

In the event that I should be discharged from my employment with the company, as adirect or indirect result of exercising my constitutionally secured and protected right to demandfull payment of my earned property, such discharge will involve the company and its personnelin violation of my civil rights as protected by federal and state laws and create violations of 42U.S.C. § 1983, § 1986, and 18 U.S.C. § 241, § 242 which provide for both civil and criminalpenalties, not to mention actual, compensatory and punitive damages, and will be prosecuted assuch to the fullest extent of the law.

I am sending this information to you in hopes of preventing a violation of my rights as aresult of ignorance of the applicable law. It is my desire and intention to maintain friendlyrelations and cooperation with the company and its personnel.

However, since the company and its personnel are hereby put on legal notice, as to thepertinent points of law applicable to my situation, I will consider any action by the companyand/or its personnel depriving me of my property without due process of law, to be a willfulknowing violation of my rights and a malicious act. In case of such unlawful action, it is myintention to initiate legal action against the company, and any involved personnel, forcompensatory and punitive damages, and attorney fees, and for criminal penalties as provided bylaw.

Sincerely,

_________________________________All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice

Page 1 of 4

( Enter Your Name & Address ) DATE: _________________

CERTIFIED MAIL #: ___________________

RE: IRS Withholding Form W-9

( Enter Name and Addressof Business to Send to )

NOTICE AND DEMAND REGARDING WITHHOLDING

Gentlemen,

Your company's request for me to sign and return an IRS form W-9 was recentlyreceived. In the request, I was told that I "must sign and return" said form. This is to inform yourcompany that I cannot comply with your request to sign the "W-9" form, without making a falsestatement, which I refuse to do. The form refers to a "taxpayer identification number", and I, notbeing one who is in the legal status of a "taxpayer", as that term is used and defined in the"Internal Revenue Code" (IRC), therefore cannot submit any such number as I have no suchnumber.

If the word "must", as used in your request, is intended to mean that I am required by lawto sign and return the form, you are in error as to your understanding of the applicable law. It ismy belief that your legal counsel, who must have reviewed it, understands that such action is notrequired by law, otherwise I would have received a written notice stating that I am required tosign and return the form, along with a "Privacy Act Notice" and a "Paperwork Reduction ActNotice". Furthermore, the title of the "W-9" form "Payers Request for Taxpayer IdentificationNumber" clearly indicates that it conveys a request, not a requirement.

In reference to a sheet titled "INSTRUCTIONS", that usually accompanies the aforesaidform, it makes reference to Section 3406 (a)(1)(c) of the IR Code. In 3406 (a) bearing thesubheading "(a) Requirement to Deduct and Withhold", it states that if certain conditions exist,such as set forth in 3406 (a)(1)(c), "then the payor shall deduct and withhold from such paymenta tax equal to 20 per cent of such payment." The subsection does not state that the payor isrequired to deduct and withhold, only that the payor "shall deduct and withhold." Courts haverepeatedly ruled that in statutes, the word "shall" must be defined as meaning "may", if necessaryto avoid constitutional conflicts.

The U.S. Supreme Court has stated:

"As against the government the word 'shall' when used in statutes, is to be construed as'may', unless a contrary intention is manifest.", -- Cairo & Fulton R.R. Co. vs. Hecht, 95U.S. 170.

"'Shall' in a statute may be construed as to mean 'may' in order to avoid constitutionaldoubt.", -- George Williams College vs. Village of Williams Bay, 7 N.W. 2d 891.

NOTICE AND DEMAND REGARDING WITHHOLDING (cont.)

Page 2 of 4

"If necessary to avoid constitutionality of a statute, 'shall' will be deemed equivalent to'may'...", Gow vs. Consolidated Coppermines Corp., 165 A. 136.

These decisions and others quite clearly show that the word "shall" must be defined asmeaning "may" in IRC Sect. 3406. Because to interpret the words "shall deduct and withhold" asmeaning that payors are required to deduct and withhold part of the money due to anystockholder, bank savings account recipient, parties to a real estate settlement, or any otherlawful contractual purposes, without an order from a court of competent jurisdiction wouldrequire you, or any other company, to commit a violation of the recipient's right not to bedeprived of his property without due process of law. This situation would, prima facie, create aclear constitutional conflict and would make the statute unconstitutional.

If those in your company who determine policy, can understand, that as an individualpossessing all of my God-given, constitutionally secured and protected rights and freedoms,including my right not to be deprived of my property without due process of law, as protected bythe 5th Amendment of the Bill of Rights for the Constitution of the united States of America, nostatute can constitutionally require anyone to violate that right, thus the word "shall" must beinterpreted as meaning "may" in the IRC.

Due process of law, does not mean some form letter or words from an employee of somequasi, de facto, administrative agency such as the so called "IRS", or a government or agencyemployee, or wannabe. Because even a statute passed by Congress can not nullify my right todue process. Due process means after one has had an opportunity for a proper hearing andadjudication in a court of competent jurisdiction to rule on issues of law relating to the questionat issue.

In case your company is confused as to the significance of the title of 3406 (a) whichstates: "Requirement to Deduct and Withhold", I suggest that they read section 7806(b) of theIRC which states:

"no table of contents, table of cross reference, or similar outline, analysis or descriptivemanner relating to the contents of this title, be given any legal effect." (emphasis added)

Therefore, the descriptive manner in the form of the subtitle: "Requirement to Deduct andWithhold", has no legal effect.

There is a major point on which your personnel might be confused. Most peoplemistakenly assume that the IRC imposes a tax on individuals. Careful reading of Subtitle A, thepart of the Code relating to income (excise) tax, will show that there is no section imposing aliability on any individual for payment of the tax on income. Therefore, by the IRC, individualsper se, do not meet the definition of the legal term "taxpayer", as defined in sect. 7701(a)(14) towit:

"The term 'taxpayer' means any person subject to any internal revenue tax."

NOTICE AND DEMAND REGARDING WITHHOLDING (cont.)

Page 3 of 4

My status as a nontaxpayer in respect to IRC is established as a fact at law and is on fileas a matter of public records. Neither the de facto, corpora ficta entity known as the "InternalRevenue Tax and Audit Services Inc.", the Secretary of the Treasury, the Commissioner of theSSA, nor any of their agents or counsels, have taken any exception to any of the statements inthose documents, nor have they ever made any claim that I am one who is in the legal status of a"taxpayer", as that term is used and defined by the U.S. Supreme Court or the IRC, or that I amsubject to the provisions of the IRC.

Furthermore, Section 3406 (a)(1)(c) mentioned above, is not applicable to me, as I am notin the legal status of a "taxpayer". I am, in fact, a nontaxpayer in respect to the IRC and asdefined by U.S. Supreme Court. As a nontaxpayer, neither am I subject to anything in the IRC.As evidence of the accuracy of this statement, I call your attention to the following decision:

"The revenue laws are a code or system in regulation of tax assessments and collection.They relate to taxpayers, and not to nontaxpayers. The latter are without their scope. Noprocedure is prescribed for nontaxpayers, and no attempt is made to annul their rightsand remedies in due course of law. With them Congress does not assume to deal, andthey are neither of the subject nor of the object of the revenue laws.", - EconomyPlumbing and Heating vs. U.S., 470 F. 2d 585, 589 (1972); reaffirmed and quoted from,Long vs. Rasmussen, 281 F. 236, (1922).

The implication of the material your company sent to me is that your company willdeduct and withhold a certain percentage of my money, earned and due me, and held in trust byyou. I cannot and will not consent to that. I have tried to explain the basic points of generalmisunderstanding by companies in this regard. I hope that your company understands that it hasno authority to withhold my money due me without my consent or a court order, from a court ofcompetent jurisdiction.

This letter is to give your company Legal Notice of my legal status and of the fact that Iam not authorizing, and never have authorized, your company to withhold any money from fundsdue me. I Demand full payment of all interest, dividends, commissions, etc. declared withoutany deductions or withholding from them. If it is the policy or intention of this company or anyof its personnel to withhold money from payments due me, please inform me, in writing, of sucha policy or intention and the grounds on which your company and/or its personnel rely asjustification for depriving me of my property, rights or rights to property without due process oflaw. Again I remind you that one must be in the legal status of a "taxpayer" as defined in IRC inorder to be subject to the tax or subject to withholding.

Please note, that according to the Court's statements in the Economy Plumbing decision(supra), no procedures are available to a nontaxpayer under the IRC, thus a nontaxpayer has nostanding to make a claim for a refund. As evidence of this, see the decision on the case of Morsevs. U.S. 494 F.2d 876 (1974) wherein the IRS denied a claim for refund on the grounds that theclaimant allegedly was not in the legal status of a "taxpayer". Therefore, as a nontaxpayer, I haveno legal standing under the IRC to make a claim to the IRS for a refund of monies paid in myname by your company. So, please do not try to lead me to believe that I can get my money backfrom the IRS by filing a claim for a refund. MY REMEDY WOULD BE TO SUE YOURCOMPANY FOR CONVERSION OF FUNDS, and believe me, I and others whom I do notcare to name, would not hesitate to prosecute to the fullest extent of the law.

NOTICE AND DEMAND REGARDING WITHHOLDING (cont.)

Page 4 of 4

If it is the position of this company, that it has the authority to withhold funds from myearnings without my permission, I demand that your legal counsel, or company representative oncompany letterhead, notify me IMMEDIATELY IN WRITING of the statute, regulation,directive or other basis you rely on to take the position that it gives you the authority to overridemy constitutionally protected and secured right not to be deprived of my property without dueprocess of law as guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment of the Bill of Rights to the Constitution forthe united States of America.

It is my intention to avoid litigation by putting your company and its personnel on priorlegal notice as to the facts and the law that is applicable in this situation. Please notify me inwriting of your company's position as to whether or not it intends to recognize and honor myrights by making full payment of all interest, dividends, commissions, etc. without anydeductions or withholding of money from them. If my rights are to be violated, I can take noother position than that your company is acting with willful disregard of my rights, and is awillful act performed with malice, thus creating violations of statutes providing for criminalpenalties as well as civil penalties and creating grounds for compensatory and punitive damages.

Sincerely,

_________________________________All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice

Page 1 of 5

( Enter Your Name & Address ) DATE: _________________

CERTIFIED MAIL #: ___________________

RE: IRS "NOTICE OF LEVY"

( Enter Name and Addressof Business to Send to )

NOTICE AND DEMAND REGARDING NOTICE OF LEVY

Gentlemen,

According to the recent correspondence to me, from you (this company), you havereceived an executed copy of an IRS "Notice of Levy" form. It is apparent that this form was sentto you in error, for the purpose of deceiving and inducing you to voluntarily deprive me of myproperty without due process of law, and to give my property over to the IRS. Due to the manymisconceptions, misunderstandings, and ignorance about the lack of legal force of a "Notice ofLevy" form, I am writing to you to call your attention to certain facts, and law, pertaining to theform and to my circumstances.

This letter is Legal Notice of my status as a free individual sovereign Citizen, possessingall of my God-given, constitutionally protected and secured rights and freedoms, a nontaxpayerin respect to all federal income/excise taxes and the IRC. Further, I am not engaged in anyrevenue taxable activity. My status as a nontaxpayer is a Fact at Law, and a matter of publicrecord. The Secretary of the Treasury, IRS, Social Security Administration (SSA), as well asnumerous Congressmen and Senators have all been notified of this fact and have been sent acopy of Affidavits executed by me further establishing this fact, along with a copy of a coverletter relating to the Affidavits. A copy of these documents is included with this letter for theinformation of your company and your company's counsel. Neither the Secretary of the Treasury,the Commissioner of the SSA, the District Director of the IRS, nor any of their agents orcounsels, have taken any exception to any of the statements in these Affidavits, nor have theyever made any claim that I am one who is in the legal status of a "taxpayer", or that I am subjectto the provisions of the IRC.

The enclosed copy of the Affidavits is directed to you for your attention. I suggest thatyou, your personnel, and counsel read them carefully. These documents are of the utmostimportance, as it revokes and rescinds all my signatures on any W-4 forms ever signed by me,rendering them null and void. This specifically applies to any IRS forms in your possession,which I have previously signed.

AS OF THIS DATE, YOUR COMPANY NO LONGER HAS MY PERMISSIONTO DEDUCT ANY MONEY FROM MY EARNINGS. I DEMAND TO RECEIVE MYFULL PAY AT ALL TIMES WITH NO DEDUCTIONS FOR ANY FEDERAL ORSTATE TAX, AND NO DEDUCTIONS OF THE FLAT RATE FEDERAL INCOME/EXCISE TAX (social security), deceptively called FICA (Federal Insurance Contributions Act)TAX.

NOTICE AND DEMAND RE: "Notice of Levy" (cont.)

Page 2 of 5

If it is the position of this company, that it has the authority to withhold funds from myearnings without my permission, I demand that your legal counsel, or company representative oncompany letterhead, notify me IMMEDIATELY IN WRITING of the statute, regulation,directive or other basis you rely on to take the position that it gives you the authority to overridemy constitutionally protected and secured right not to be deprived of my property without dueprocess of law as guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment of the Bill of Rights to the Constitution forthe united States of America. You have 10 days to comply with this Notice and Demand.

In the event that I should be discharged from my employment with the company, as adirect or indirect result of exercising my constitutionally secured and protected right to demandfull payment of my earned property, such discharge will involve the company and its personnelin violation of my civil rights as protected by federal and state laws and create violations of 42U.S.C. § 1983, § 1986, and 18 U.S.C. § 241, § 242 which provide for both civil and criminalpenalties, not to mention actual, compensatory and punitive damages, and will be prosecuted assuch to the fullest extent of the law.

As a free individual sovereign Citizen possessing all of my constitutionally protected andsecured rights and freedoms, including the right not to be deprived of my property without dueprocess of law, I'm not in the legal status of a "taxpayer" as that legal term is used and defined inthe IRC. As such, I am a nontaxpayer in relation to the IRC and according to court decisions, noprovisions in the IRC, nor IRS forms, and no IRS directives or form letters apply to me. To helpyou understand these facts, I call your attention to the ruling in the case of Economy Plumbingand Heating vs. U.S., 470 F.2d 585, at 589 (1972) wherein the Court reaffirmed and quoted fromthe decision in the case of Long vs. Rasmussen, 281 F236, at 238 (1922) which stated:

"The revenue laws are a code or system in regulation of tax assessments and collection.THEY RELATE TO TAXPAYERS, AND NOT TO NONTAXPAYERS. The latter arewithout their scope. NO PROCEDURE IS PRESCRIBED FOR NONTAXPAYERS, andNO ATTEMPT is made to ANNUL any of THEIR RIGHTS and remedies in due course oflaw. With them Congress does not assume to deal, and they are neither of the subject norof the object of the revenue laws." (Emphasis added)

If you will read the body of the printed message and other statements on the "Notice ofLevy" form that you received from the IRS, you will see that the form, and its message, appliesto a "taxpayer" only. It does not apply to any other entity. In order to understand the significanceof the legal term "taxpayer", one must understand its definition for use in the IRC, which isfound in Section 7701(a)(14), to wit:

"The term 'taxpayer' means any person subject to any internal revenue tax."

As stated above, I am not one who is in the legal status of a "taxpayer" as defined andused in the IRC. This fact is further explained in the enclosed affidavit titled, "AFFIDAVIT OFRESCISSION AND REVOCATION DUE TO CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD", which I again callto your attention.

Although the IRC and its provisions do not apply to me in my legal status as anontaxpayer in respect to the "Code", I am submitting the following information to you to help

NOTICE AND DEMAND RE: "Notice of Levy" (cont.)

Page 3 of 5

you to better understand the fraudulent nature of the IRS's demand that you give my money tothem, and the deception that is practiced by sending a "Notice of Levy" form to an employer,even when it relates to one who is in the legal status of a "taxpayer", in respect to the IRC!

The proper use, of the "Notice of Levy" form, is to notify the owner of property seized bythe United States government, that a claim has been placed against the property for payment of alien for a unpaid tax assessment. The sending of a "Notice of Levy" form does not create orimpose any lien on the property. If the IRS claims that a lien exists, IRC Sec. 7403(a) providesthat an action must be filed in a U.S. District Court in order to enforce the claim of lien. Section7403(b) requires that all persons having an interest in the property must be notified of the action.Needless to say, I have never been notified of any court action to rule on any IRS claim of lien -Have You? Without court action, there can be no court order pertaining to any lien or claimagainst my property, even if I was in the legal status of a "taxpayer"! Imagine that!

"… Levy may be made upon the accrued salary or wages of any officer, employee, orelected official of the United States, …" its agencies etc. IRC Section 6331(a)

Note: They leave this [subparagraph (a)] off the "Notice" they send you. Also note, that Iam not a employee of the United States government or any of its agencies or instrumentality's, adnauseum. So, it should be clear that, according to those provisions of Section 6331, no authorityis created for the Secretary to collect any tax by a so called "levy" on MY property (wages,salary, rents, dividends, interest, commissions, etc.), or rights to property, even if I were in thelegal status of a "taxpayer"!

"… Except as otherwise provided in subsection (e), a levy shall extend only to propertypossessed and obligations existing at the time thereof." IRC Section 6331(b)

This clearly limits property subject to "levy" to that which is in the possession of theUnited States government, its agencies, etc., such as payroll money to be paid out to governmentemployees as quoted from Sec. 6331(a) mentioned above.

"…The effect of levy on salary or wages payable to or received by a taxpayer shall becontinuous …" IRC Section 6331(e) (emphasis added)

These words prove that one must be in the legal status of a "taxpayer" as defined in theIRC in order to have salary or wages that could be affected by a "levy". Again, I remind you, thatI am not in the legal status of a "taxpayer". Therefore, according to the wording of the statuteitself, it does not even apply to me.

As further evidence of the fraudulent nature of the "Notice of Levy" form sent to you, Icall your attention to IRC Section 6502(b), to wit:

"The date on which a levy on property or rights to property is made shall be the date onwhich the notice of seizure provided in section 6335(a) is given." (emphasis added)

I have received no notice of seizure because there has been no seizure. DUH!!!Without a seizure, there can be no legitimate notice of seizure and without a notice of seizure,

NOTICE AND DEMAND RE: "Notice of Levy" (cont.)

Page 4 of 5

there can be no levy. Since there has been no levy, there can be no legitimate "Notice of Levy"sent. In any case, if there had been a levy, the notice would be sent to the owner of the propertypossessed by government, and not to his/her employer. It should be apparent to you now, that the"Notice of Levy" form was sent to you for the purpose of deceiving and intimidating you intogiving my property to the IRS without a court order, thereby causing YOU to VIOLATE my dueprocess of law rights! These facts alone should make it clear the fraudulent nature of the formand the deceptive intent of the one sending the form to you - my employer. And note here annow that you are being made aware by this NOTICE AND DEMAND, of this FRAUD, andshould you continue along with the IRS, will be considered a wanton and malicious act ofCONSPIRACY TO COMMIT FRAUD.

In case any of your company personnel are confused about the possibility of the IRShaving the authority to seize my earnings, I call your attention to IRC Section 7608(b)(2)(c)which, allegedly, authorizes a IRS employee "to make seizures of property subject to forfeitureunder the internal revenue laws." Note that it must be, property subject to forfeiture, in order tobe subject to seizure. Note that property subject to forfeiture is defined in Sections 7301, 7302and 7303. Section 7301 defines it as: "Any property on which … any tax is imposed by thistitle…" (such as distilled spirits, tobacco products, etc.) raw materials from which such propertyis made (mash, sugar, etc. from which whiskey is made), equipment and facilities used to makethe product (a still, pumps, buildings, etc.) packages (cigarette packs, barrels, boxes, etc.),conveyances transporting the property (cars, trucks, etc. used to haul it). Sec. 7202 defines it asproperty used in violation of internal revenue laws. In addition, Sec. 7303 lists counterfeitstamps, fraudulent bonds, permits, etc. as being "property subject to forfeiture" also.

My earnings do not meet any of the definitions of property subject to forfeiture, therefore,they are not property subject to seizure, regardless of any IRS form that might be served on orsent to you by the IRS. In hopes of preventing your company from making a mistake that wouldsubject it to loss and damages, I call your attention to IRC 6332(a), to wit:

"… any person in possession of property … subject to levy upon which a levy has beenmade shall upon demand of the Secretary, surrender such property … to the Secretary…"(emphasis added)

Note that the statute does not say that any person is "required" to surrender property, itreads "shall … surrender". "Shall" is not a mandatory word when used in statutes, according tonumerous court decisions. Furthermore, the directory words "shall surrender" apply to "propertyupon which a levy has been made" (property already possessed by the U.S. government) ONLY.It should now be absolutely clear to anyone, checking the sections of the IRC that I havementioned, that there has been no levy made on my property. Therefore, Sec. 6332(a) does noteven direct anyone to surrender my property to the IRS.

Employers are sometimes bluffed into voluntarily surrendering property to IRSemployees who cite Sec. 6332(c(1) & (2) which relate to enforcement of a levy. These sectionsrelate to property of a "taxpayer" that is "subject to levy". As a nontaxpayer, these sectionscannot apply to me or my property or rights to property. Furthermore, only property "upon whicha levy has been made" (property possessed by the U.S. government) is subject to surrender asprovided by Sec. 6332(a). Any enforcement provisions under Sec. 6332(c) are limited to the

NOTICE AND DEMAND RE: "Notice of Levy" (cont.)

Page 5 of 5

surrender provisions under subsection (a) which apply to "property upon which a levy has beenmade", only. Thus, the enforcement provisions are limited to those persons having custody ofproperty already possessed by the U.S. government and its instrumentality's. An example of sucha person is a custodian of seized property in a government warehouse.

Another deception that is sometimes practiced by the IRS to induce companies tovoluntarily surrender property to the IRS, is by leading company personnel to believe that they,and therefore the company, are protected against lawsuit by the IRC, if property is voluntarilysurrendered. This deception is perpetrated by IRS employees deliberately misinterpreting Sec.6332(d) which provides protection from lawsuit resulting from surrender of property upon whicha levy has been made (i.e. seized property surrendered to the IRS by the custodian of agovernment warehouse). If property upon which a levy has not been made is surrendered, thereis no protection whatsoever against lawsuits, because it is being done outside of the law. Inaddition, the limited protection against lawsuit applies against damage claims of a "taxpayer"only. There is no protection against damage claims of a free individual sovereign Citizen (anontaxpayer in respect to the IRC).

If Section 6332(d) is read and studied, it should be apparent that the statute affords noprotection whatsoever to you, against any legal action that I might take against your company orits personnel, as a result of any unlawful action depriving me of my property without due processof law. Without an order from a court of competent jurisdiction, there can be no compulsion foryour company to surrender my property to the IRS!!!

I am sending this information to you in hopes of preventing a violation of my rights as aresult of ignorance of the applicable law. It is my desire and intention to maintain friendlyrelations and cooperation with the company and its personnel.

However, since the company and its personnel are hereby put on legal notice, as to thepertinent points of law applicable to my situation, I will consider any action by the companyand/or its personnel depriving me of my property without due process of law, to be a willfulknowing violation of my rights and a malicious act. In case of such unlawful action, it is myintention to initiate legal action against the company, and any involved personnel, forcompensatory and punitive damages, and attorney fees, and for criminal penalties as provided bylaw.

Sincerely,

_________________________________All Rights Reserved Without Prejudice

WOULD YOU

AS A

FREE-THINKING AMERICAN

CONVICT ANYONE

FOR STANDING UP

FOR

HIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS

AND

RESISTING TYRANNY ?