NIV for Severe CAP?
Transcript of NIV for Severe CAP?
Massimo Antonelli, MD
Dept. of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
Rome - Italy
Conflict of interest Resaerch Grant: Starmed Orion Pfizer Toray Honoraria: Pfizer Covidien Scientific Board: Cubist Covidien Drager Toray
Erwan L’Her, AJRCCM
2005; 172:1112-1118
Antonelli, NEJM 1998;339:429-35 (RCT)
Physiologic Effects of Noninvasive Ventilation during ALI Erwan L’Her, et AL, AJRCCM 2005; 172:1112-1118
Problems
• Require a continuous and prolonged application of pressures to maintain oxygenation
• May need a rapid intubation after NIV failure
• Must be trated in the ICU
Immunocompromised
Noninvasive ventilation for treating ARF in AIDS patients with Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia
Confalonieri M. Intensive Care Med 2002 28 (9): 1233-1238
48 AIDS patients
24 pts (NIV) 24 pts (ETI) P value
N° invasive devices Pneumothorax Positive blood colture Septic Shock Duration of MV LOS in ICU LOS in Hospital SOFA on study day 7 ICU survival 2-month survival 6 month survival
2+2 2 (8.3%) 2 (8%) 6 (25%) 6+2 7+4 13+5 5.7+1.4 75% 58% 25%
5+0 9 (38%) 7 (29%) 13 (54%) 7+1 10+4 24+17 6.5+1.94 38% 21% 16%
0.0001 0.033 0.133 0.078 0.034 0.013 0.004 0.072 0.022 0.020 0.678
RESULTS NIV Standard Treatment p value
Intubation - no./no.total (%) 12/26 (46) 20/26 (77) 0.03
Hematological malignancies 8/15 (53) 14/15 (93) 0.02 Immunosuppressor 3/9 (33) 5/9 (56) 0.32 AIDS 1/2 (50) 1/2 (50) 0.83
Ventilation (D) Total 6 3 6 5 0.59
Ventilation (D) Survivors 5 2 3 5 0.12
LoS in the ICU (D) Survivor 7 3 10 4 0.06
Mortality ICU 38% 69% 0.03
Complications- no. (%) 13 (50) 21 (81) 0.02 Complications death 10 (38) 18 (69) 0.03 V.A.P. and/or Sinusitis -no. (%) 3 (12) 9 (35) 0.05
G. Hilbert, N ENGL J MED 2001; 304(7): 481-486
A trial of Helmet CPAP?
1302 patients with hematological
Malignancies and ARF
1028 (79%) MV with ETI
ICU Deaths 511(49.7%)
GiVITI: Italian Observatory on 300 ICUs Data from the last 2 years
274 (21%) NIV
147(54%) Successful
SAPS II 59 ±17
127 (46%) Failure
SAPS II 60 ± 14
ICU Deaths 28(19%)
ICU Deaths 78 (61%)
Gristina, Antonelli, et Al, Crit Care Med. 2011 Oct;39(10):2232-2239.
Risk factor for failure
At Multivariate analysis two major risks factors for NIMV failure: •SAPS II score (OR=2.012, 95% CI: 1.006–4.026; P=0.04 •ALI/ARDS (OR= 2.266, 95%CI: 1.346–3.816; P=0.002).
Gristina, Antonelli, et Al, Crit Care Med. 2011 Oct;39(10):2232-2239.
Not immunocompromised
6 (21%) ETI
LoS in ICU 1.8±0.7 days
7 (25%) Deaths in ICU
APACHE II 20±5
28 Pts. NIPSV (FM)
14 (50%) ETI
LoS in ICU 6±2 days
6 (21%) Deaths in ICU
APACHE II 18±5
28 Pts Standard MT
P<0.04
Confalonieri, AJRCCM 1999;160:1585-1591
CAP + 2 or >of the following: severe dyspnea, AMC, Parad.AM
RR > 25 b/min, Pa O2 < 68 (FiO2 .4) or P/F < 250 if FiO2 >.5,
PaCO2 > 50, pH < 7.33, COPD pts included
P=NS
Jolliet, Intensive Care Med 2001;27:812-821: non COPD, ARF
due to CAP, PaO2:FiO2 104±48, PaCO2 40±10, APACHE II 13±5
24 CAP Pts
8(34%)successful
Age 37±12 PaO2 80± 15
16(66%) Failures
Age 55 ±15
PaO2 63± 11
8(100%) ICU Survivors 8(50%)Survivors
P<0.05
LoS in ICU and Hospital shorter
P/F 104±48 to 153±49
Noninvasive PSV in non COPD pts with CPE and severe CAP: acute effects and outcome
Domenighetti G. Intensive Care Med (2002) 28: 1226-1232
Prospective observational study
CPE (15 pts) CAP (18 pts)
Time of NIPSV (h) 9.6+6.3 37.3+36
ICU mortality 1(6.6%) 5(28%)
NIPSV failure 1/15 (6.6%) 7/18 (38%)
p
0.04
0.01
ns
Worsening of gas
Hemodynamics
Agitation
1
0
0
3
2
2
NIV in Severe Hypoxemic ARF: A RCT Miquel Ferrer, AJRCCM 2003;168: 1438–1444
46/51(91%) of the NIV pts had pulmonary infiltrates and 19(37%) true PN or ARDS
ICU mortality 18%
The concept of timing
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
CP
E (
n=
99)
Pu
lm c
on
t (n
=72)
Inh
PN
(n
=8)
Ate
lect.
(n
=28)
NP
(n
=18)
AR
DS
p (
n=
27)
CA
P (
n=
38)
AR
DS
exp
(n
=59)
Pu
lm f
ibr/
PE
(n
=5)
No
. o
f p
ati
en
ts
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
pe
rce
nta
ge
of
failu
res
N° patients % failures • 354 consecutive patients with hypoxemic ARF
• in 7 Centers (Europe and USA):
• PaO2/FiO2 < 200
breathing O2 (Venturi)
• RR>30, AC accessory muscles or paradoxical abd. Mot.
• COPD excluded
86 ARDS (P/F < 200, bil. Pulm.infiltrates, absence
of LVF)
• 108 (30%) failure
• 264 (70%) success.
Antonelli et Al.
Intensive Care Med
2001;27:1718-28
Multivariate Analysis
• ARDS or PN (OR 3.9, 95% CI 2.3-6.5)
• PaO2:FiO2 1h < 146 (OR 2.65, 95%CI 1.5-4.6)
• SAPS > 35 (OR 1.85, 95%CI 1.1-3.2)
• Age > 40 yr. (OR 1.79, 95%CI 0.92-3.23)
Were all factors independently associated with the risk of failure of NIV
Antonelli Intensive Care Med. 2001; 27:1718-28
Clin Microbiol Infect 2013; 19: 249–256
D 4.2% D 26.5 %
D 24.2 %
7569
2685 (36%)
NIV
1033(37%)
NIV Failure
D 426 (41%)
1652 (63%)
NIV Success
D 145 (9%)
4884(64%)
IMV
D 1522 (31%)
Yrs 2005-2010
NIV FOR PNEUMONIA ON ICU ADMISSION
2018 patients from 37 centers were included in the propensity-score model. Of these, 956 (47%) received NIMV as first approach
Overall, 2823 Pts died in hospital (38.1%). Mortality was higher in the IMV than in the NIMV group (42% vs. 31%; p<0.0001).
300 250 200 150 100 50
Low Tidal Volume Ventilation
Higher PEEP
HFO
Prone Positioning
ECMO
Low – Moderate PEEP
Neuromuscular Blockade
PaO2/FiO2
Increasing Severity of Lung Injury
Mild ARDS Moderate ARDS Severe ARDS
Incr
eas
ing
Inte
nsi
ty o
f In
terv
en
tio
n
NIV
ECCO2-R
iNO
Antonelli, CCM 2007;35(1);18-25
Conclusion
• RT and not RT suggest that NIV could be attempted in CAP1-4,results are however conflicting.
• Failure rate is high
• ICU environment and strict criteria for intubation are mandatory
• The extensive use of NIV for pts with severe CAP cannot be reccommended 5-
7
1. Antonelli, ICM, 2001;27:1718-28 2. Confalonieri, AJRCCM 1999;160:1585-91 3. Hilbert, NEJM 2001; 304(7): 481-486 4. Ferrer 2003;168: 1438–1444
5. Domenighetti, ICM, 2002; 28: 1226-1232 6. Keenan, JAMA 2000;284;2376 7.Carrillo, ICM 2012;38:458-66