NINETEEN The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest...

18
Amazonia, Landscape and Species Evolution: A Look into the Past, 1st edition. Edited by C. Hoorn and F.P. Wesselingh. © 2010 Blackwell Publishing NINETEEN The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest: implications of the palynological and palaeobotanical record Carlos Jaramillo 1 , Carina Hoorn 2 , Silane A.F. Silva 3 , Fatima Leite 4 , Fabiany Herrera 1 , Luis Quiroz 5 , Rodolfo Dino 6 and Luzia Antonioli 7 1 Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Republic of Panama 2 University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands 3 Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia-INPA, Manaus, Brazil 4 University of Brasília, Brazil 5 Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Republic of Panama, and University of Saskatchewan, Canada 6 Cidade Universitária – Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 7 Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Abstract Northern South America harbours a highly diversified forest vegetation. However, it is not clear when this remarkable diversity was attained and how it was produced. Is the high diversity the product of a positive speciation–extinction balance that accumulated species over long time periods, or is it the product of high origination rates over short time periods, or both? Middle Cretaceous floras, although very poorly studied, are dominated by non-angiosperm taxa. By the Paleocene, pollen and macrobotanical fossils suggest that the basic phylogenetic composition and floral physiognomy of Neotropical rainforests were already present. Hence there was a profound change in Amazonian flora during the Late Cretaceous, that still needs to be documented. Levels of Paleocene diversity are much lower than those of modern tropical rainforests. By the Early Eocene, however, pollen diversity was very high, exceeding values of modern rainforests. At the Eocene- Oligocene a major drop in diversity coincided with an episode of global cooling. The palynological and palaeobotanical records of Amazonia suggest that high levels of diversity existed during the Miocene, a period when the boundary conditions for sustaining a rainforest (e.g. low seasonality, high precipitation, edaphic het- erogeneous substrate) were met. The predecessor of the present rainforest was formed during the Paleogene and Neogene when the western Amazon lowlands were affected by Andean tectonism, which radically changed drainage systems and promoted wetland development. An overall global cooling during the Neogene also may have affected the rainforest, decreasing its area and expanding adjacent savanna belts. Recent events like the Quaternary ice ages also played a role in the forest dynamics and composition, although it seems to have been minor. In this chapter we will review the main characteristics of the Neogene palynological and palaeobotani- cal records in Amazonia, and we will make some comparisons with pre- and post-Neogene records. The data indicate that the Amazonian rainforest is more likely to be a product of a dynamic geological history stretching back over the past 25 million years rather than the last few hundred thousand years. Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 317 Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 317 10/24/2009 1:56:59 Shobha 10/24/2009 1:56:59 Shobha

Transcript of NINETEEN The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest...

Page 1: NINETEEN The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest ...stri-sites.si.edu/.../PDFs/Jaramilloetal2010_OriginModernAmazon_R.p… · The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest: implications

Amazonia, Landscape and Species Evolution: A Look into the Past, 1st edition. Edited by C. Hoorn and F.P. Wesselingh. © 2010 Blackwell Publishing

NINETEEN

The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest: implications of the palynological and palaeobotanical recordCarlos Jaramillo1, Carina Hoorn2, Silane A.F. Silva3, Fatima Leite4, Fabiany Herrera1, Luis Quiroz5, Rodolfo Dino6 and Luzia Antonioli7

1Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Republic of Panama2University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands3Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazonia-INPA, Manaus, Brazil4University of Brasília, Brazil5Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Republic of Panama, and University of Saskatchewan, Canada6Cidade Universitária – Ilha do Fundão, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil7Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Abstract

Northern South America harbours a highly diversifi ed forest vegetation. However, it is not clear when this remarkable diversity was attained and how it was produced. Is the high diversity the product of a positive speciation–extinction balance that accumulated species over long time periods, or is it the product of high origination rates over short time periods, or both? Middle Cretaceous fl oras, although very poorly studied, are dominated by non-angiosperm taxa. By the Paleocene, pollen and macrobotanical fossils suggest that the basic phylogenetic composition and fl oral physiognomy of Neotropical rainforests were already present. Hence there was a profound change in Amazonian fl ora during the Late Cretaceous, that still needs to be documented. Levels of Paleocene diversity are much lower than those of modern tropical rainforests. By the Early Eocene, however, pollen diversity was very high, exceeding values of modern rainforests. At the Eocene-Oligocene a major drop in diversity coincided with an episode of global cooling. The palynological and palaeobotanical records of Amazonia suggest that high levels of diversity existed during the Miocene, a period when the boundary conditions for sustaining a rainforest (e.g. low seasonality, high precipitation, edaphic het-erogeneous substrate) were met. The predecessor of the present rainforest was formed during the Paleogene and Neogene when the western Amazon lowlands were affected by Andean tectonism, which radically changed drainage systems and promoted wetland development. An overall global cooling during the Neogene also may have affected the rainforest, decreasing its area and expanding adjacent savanna belts. Recent events like the Quaternary ice ages also played a role in the forest dynamics and composition, although it seems to have been minor. In this chapter we will review the main characteristics of the Neogene palynological and palaeobotani-cal records in Amazonia, and we will make some comparisons with pre- and post-Neogene records. The data indicate that the Amazonian rainforest is more likely to be a product of a dynamic geological history stretching back over the past 25 million years rather than the last few hundred thousand years.

Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 317Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 317 10/24/2009 1:56:59 Shobha10/24/2009 1:56:59 Shobha

Page 2: NINETEEN The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest ...stri-sites.si.edu/.../PDFs/Jaramilloetal2010_OriginModernAmazon_R.p… · The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest: implications

318 C. Jaramillo et al.

Introduction

The Cretaceous and Cenozoic history of the Neotropical rain-forest is still not well understood. Very few studies of Cretaceous Amazonian fl oras have been done. Most of the Cretaceous stud-ies have been carried out in the eastern margin of South America (e.g. Herngreen 1973, 1975; Regali et al. 1974; De Lima 1979), and most of them have focused on palynology.

Paleogene records, mainly deriving from northern South America, show that a rainforest with family-level fl oristic com-position and leaf physiognomy similar to modern Neotropical rainforests already existed by the Middle Paleocene (Wing et al. 2004; Doria et al. 2008; Herrera et al. 2008a). However, its diversity was much less than modern lowland Neotropical rainforests (Wing et al. 2004; Jaramillo et al. 2007a). The be-ginning of the Eocene shows a very rapid increase in diversity and the radiation of several Neotropical plant families. Levels of diversity by the Middle Eocene were greater than those of modern Amazonian forests (Jaramillo et al. 2006). Eocene paly-nofl oras contain a large number of pollen taxa that range into the Neogene and are more similar to each other than to the Paleocene palynofl oras. At the Eocene-Oligocene boundary a marked decrease in diversity occurred, and the number of pol-len taxa fell below modern levels. This drop correlates with a major global cooling and the beginning of the Antarctic glacia-tion (Jaramillo et al. 2006).

The Neogene was a period characterized by a changing climate, fl uctuating sea levels and tectonic instability (Zachos et al. 2001). These three phenomena all left their mark in the Amazonian land-scape and its vegetation development (see Chapter 26). Although the Neogene sedimentary record is incomplete, outcrops along the rivers and well data obtained through mineral exploration together have provided us with an insight into the vegetational history.

The record of plant diversity in the Amazons is still incomplete. Nevertheless, palynological and palaeobotanical data reveal that during the Neogene Amazonia already was covered by a highly diversifi ed and multistratifi ed forest that varied in composition and distribution over time under the infl uence of the major events (Hoorn 1993, 1994a, 1994b, 2006). The potential effect on Amazonian forests of global cooling and possible associated changing precipitation patterns over the last 5 million years is unclear. Preliminary evidence suggests a major reduction in area from that formerly covered by rainforest. Areas in northern Venezuela (e.g. Urumaco in Falcon Dept.) that were fl oristically similar to Amazonia during the Late Miocene, became isolated by the rise of the Andes and subsequently underwent a transforma-tion to dry vegetation. There was also an extensive development of tropical savannas, that further encroached on the Amazonian rainforest. The overall effect of this reduction in forested area on Amazonian vegetation is unclear, but it might have caused a loss in diversity. However, it is now evident that the Quaternary gla-cial cycles did not signifi cantly affect diversity in Amazonia (Bush 1994; Rull 2008; see also Chaper 20). Amazonian Holocene cores do not show a signifi cant change in diversity or fl oristic compo-sition. Furthermore, most of the species dated using molecular techniques indicate origination ages older than 2 million years ago (Rull 2008).

Palynology

Cretaceous Amazonia

Cretaceous sequences of intracratonic Brazilian basins are mostly characterized by terrestrial siliciclastic rocks (see Chapters 3 & 7), which often give a poor yield of palynomorphs. The Cretaceous Alter do Chão Formation forms the basal unit of the Javari Group, which represents the beginning of the fi nal sedimentation episode in the Amazonas and Solimões Basins. Fossils are rare in the pre-dominantly fl uvial Alter do Chão Formation and limited to single fi ndings. Price (1960) found a terapode tooth in the upper part of the formation in the 1-NO-1-AM well in the Amazonas Basin. Daemon & Contreiras (1971) dated the formation as Cenomanian to Maastrichtian, based on the correlation with the K-400-K-600 palynozones defi ned in the Barreirinhas Basin by Lima (1971). They also mentioned the occurrence of teeth and fragments of vertebrates in the upper part of the formation.

Daemon (1975) analysed the palynology of two wells that drilled the formation (1-NO-1-AM and 1-AC-1-AM), and esta blished an early Albian to early Cenomanian age for the lower part of the for-mation, and a late Cenomanian to Turonian age for the middle part. The upper part remained undated. The age was given by correlation with the palynostratigraphic scheme of Lima (1971) and Herngreen (1973) for the Barreirinhas Basin. Dino et al. (1999) studied 43 core samples from the Alter do Chão Formation in 1-NO-1-AM and 9-FZ-28-AM wells (Fig. 19.1). They described two sequences in the formation. The predominantly sandy lower sedimentary sequence was formed during the late Aptian-Albian from terrigenous infl uxes fed by cycles of anastomosing fl uvial systems with secondary aeo-lian reworking. At the base, unconformably overlying the Andirá Formation, there are meandering deposits with abandoned channels fi lled with clay. Those clays are rich in vegetal, amber fragments, root prints, fi sh remains, freshwater ostracods and conchostracan frag-ments. The upper sequence accumulated during the Cenomanian. It is almost entirely composed of fi ne-grained sediments that are interpreted to represent fl uvial-deltaic-lacustrine settings.

Dino et al. (1999) identifi ed two distinct palynofl oras (see Fig. 19.1). Characteristic pollen and spores from the late Aptian-Albian palynofl ora (from the lower sequence) and the Cenomanian fl ora from the upper sequence are listed in Tables 19.1& 19.2.

The Cretaceous vegetation was completely dominated by non-angiosperm taxa (ferns and gymnosperms), with very few angio-sperms, unlike modern tropical forests, which are populated chiefl y by angiosperms (Gentry 1982).The presence of large numbers of spores, pollen grains and woody fragments of terrestrial origin, as well as the absence of marine elements, suggests a strong continen-tal infl uence during the deposition of the Cretaceous Alter do Chão Formation. The low frequency of palynomorphs produced by plants better adapted to dry climates (e.g. Classopollis, Equisetosporites and Gnetaceaepollenites) suggests that the Alter do Chão Formation was not deposited under arid climatic conditions.

Paleogene northern South America

Tropical Paleogene palynology of tropical South America has been widely researched since the 1950s (Van der Hammen 1954, 1956a,

Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 318Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 318 10/24/2009 1:56:59 Shobha10/24/2009 1:56:59 Shobha

Page 3: NINETEEN The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest ...stri-sites.si.edu/.../PDFs/Jaramilloetal2010_OriginModernAmazon_R.p… · The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest: implications

Origin of the modern Amazon rainforest 319

1956b, 1957a, 1957b, 1958; Van der Hammen & Wymstra 1964; Van Hoeken-Klinkenberg 1964, 1966; Van der Hammen & García 1966; Gonzalez-Guzman 1967; Germeraad et al. 1968; Doubinger 1973, 1976; Regali et al. 1974; Van der Kaars 1983; Guerrero & Sarmiento 1996; Jaramillo & Dilcher 2000, 2001; Jaramillo 2002; Jaramillo et al. 2005a, 2005b, 2007a; Pardo-Trujillo et al. 2003; Jaramillo & Rueda 2004; Santos et al. 2008), and an electronic morphologi-cal database (Jaramillo & Rueda 2008) has been compiled. About 450 fossil species have been named. Most of the work has been

1-NO-1-AM9-FZ-28-AM

2-MD-1-AM

North Platform

South Platform

Central Trough

os SOUTH HINGE

A B C

63º 30' 57º 30' 51º 30'

1º 00'

3º 00'

5º 00'

51º 30'57º 30'63º 30'

1º 00'

3º 00'

5º 00'

1-AC-1-PA

Fig. 19.1 Locations of the wells analysed and key palynomorphs found in the Cretaceous Alter do Chão Formation. (a) Triorites africaensis; (b) Galeacornea causea; (c) Elateroplicites africaensis.

Table 19.1 Characteristic pollen and spores of the late Aptian-Albian palynoflora from the lower sequence of the Brazilian Alter do Chão Formation.

Araucariacites australis

A. guianensis

Afropollis jardinus

Callialasporites dampieri

Cicatricosisporites avnimelechi

Classopollis alexi

Crybelosporites pannuceus

Cyathidites australis

Dictyophyllidites harrisii

Equisetosporites ambiguus

Exesipollenites tumulus

Inaperturopollenites simplex

Klukisporites variegatus

Sergipea variverrucata

S. simplex

Spheripollenites scabratus

Table 19.2 Characteristic pollen and spores of the Cenomanian palynoflora from the upper sequence of the Brazilian Alter do Chão Formation.

Classopollis alexi

Elateroplicites africaensis (with two appendages)

Galeacornea causea

Gnetaceaepollenites similis

G. crassipolli

G. clathratus

Psilastephanosporites brasiliensis

Triorites africaensis

Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 319Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 319 10/24/2009 1:56:59 Shobha10/24/2009 1:56:59 Shobha

Page 4: NINETEEN The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest ...stri-sites.si.edu/.../PDFs/Jaramilloetal2010_OriginModernAmazon_R.p… · The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest: implications

320 C. Jaramillo et al.

done in Colombia, Venezuela and coastal areas of Brazil. The overall palynofl ora shows a fl uctuation in forest diversity that correlates with global temperatures. Diversity increased in periods of glo-bal warming and decreased during global cooling (Jaramillo et al. 2006). Published data also suggest the absence of extensive savan-nas and a more regional extent of the Amazonian forest reach-ing northern Colombia and Venezuela (Jaramillo 2002), possibly also the result of the slightly more southerly location of the South American continent, which resulted in the region being several degrees closer to the Equator (Pardo-Casas & Molnar 1987).

Paleogene fl oras lack the Asteraceae and have low abundances of Poaceae, which are very common in many Neogene tropical South American fl oras. Eocene fl oras also seem to have been more diverse than Early Miocene fl oras (Jaramillo et al. 2006).

The Paleogene record from the present-day Amazonian region is virtually undocumented due to the absence of outcrops of this age and because this interval has not yet been studied in available cores. Future studies can address this issue by looking at exposed deposits in the sub-Andean zone and Andes of Peru, Bolivia and Ecuador.

Neogene Amazonia

Palynological sampling locations, lithologies and processing methods

The margins of the Amazonian rivers and their overbanks are mostly covered by lush rainforest with a predominance of taxa such as Cecropia, Mauritia and Malvaceae. Occasionally, the densely forested river margins provide a glimpse of the Neogene record that forms a signifi cant part of the Amazonian subsurface. These sediments provide us with an insight into past deposition-al environments and are suitable for palynological analysis and palaeovegetation reconstructions.

The most productive sediments for palynological sampling are organic-rich clays, lignites and siltstone, which are often intercalated in the fl uvial and lacustrine sequences. A detailed impression of the vegetation development in a fl uvial system over time can be obtained by sampling at small intervals of c. 10 cm. Subsequently these samples then should be processed in the laboratory, depending on their lithology, consolidation and pres-ence of calcium carbonate. As palynological particles behave as sediment particles, a concentration of larger or smaller fragments may result, depending on the technique used (Leite 2006). In some studies a clay defl occulating technique was used (Hoorn 1993, 1994a, 1994b, 2006) whereas other studies applied hydrofl uoric acid (HF) (Rebata et al. 2006; Latrubesse et al. 2007) or a combi-nation of HF and decantation. When different processing tech-niques are used, i.e. including different mesh sizes for separating larger and smaller fragments and decanting, the palynological results may be different and, consequently, diffi cult to compare.

Biostratigraphy

Miocene sediments in western Amazonia are known as Pebas Formation (in Peru) and Solimões Formation in Brazil but also the deposits extend into Colombia and Ecuador. The Pebas/Solimões

Formation contains abundant fossiliferous levels with vertebrate, invertebrate and plant remains (e.g. Maia et al. 1977; Latrubesse et al. 2007; see also Chapters 15–18). Outcrop samples generally give a very good snapshot of palaeovegetation and its diversity. Outcrops in the Amazon often occur far apart from each other, do not extend beyond 60 m of vertical exposure, and their strata have low dipping angles. Therefore it is diffi cult to correlate between outcrops and establish their relative age. Core material offers a complementary view of the Amazonian Neogene by obtaining more complete stratigraphic successions that may not be available in outcrops.

A series of exploration wells were drilled in Amazonia during the 1970s (Maia et al. 1977) and remained stored in the Geological Service of Brazil Manaus offi ces (Brazil). These wells have pro-vided an initial biostratigraphic framework (Hoorn 1993) and are currently the subject of further study. The Neogene succession in Amazonia is very condensed, in about 300–600 m of vertical section, making the study of these sediments a complex problem because of both condensation and hiatuses.

Well data permit a subdivision into palynological zones, which have been correlated to Caribbean zonations (Germeraad et al. 1968; Lorente 1986) that have been calibrated with nanoplankton and foraminifera (Muller et al. 1987). The existing biozonation for Amazonia (Hoorn 1993) is complemented with more recent well data from Late Miocene and Pliocene intervals, as shown in Fig. 19.2.

Hoorn (1993) defi ned fi ve palynological zones in northwestern Amazonia:

Verrutricolporites 1 Acme Zone (Early Miocene);Retitricolporites2 Acme Zone (Early Miocene);Psiladiporites3 -Crototricolpites Concurrent Range Zone (late Early to early Middle Miocene);Crassoretitriletes4 Interval Zone (Middle Miocene);Grimsdalea5 Interval Zone (late Middle-early Late Miocene).

These zones were established using the palynological information of 54 samples from two wells: 1AS-4a-AM (04°23´S, 70°55´W) and 1AS-51-AM (01°51´S, 69°02´W) and were correlated with assemblages described by Lorente (1986) for northern Venezuelan sedimentary basins.

Recent palynological studies have found two additional, younger zones in northwestern Amazonian sediments (Silva et al. in press), the Asteraceae- Fenestrites zone and Psilatricolporites caribbiensis zone of Lorente (1986). The most important species for each zone are illustrated in Fig. 19.2, and an overview of taxa is provided in Table 19.3.

The Neogene Amazonian fl uvial landscape and the effect of episodic marine incursions

Early to early Middle Miocene

Mangrove fl oras dominated eastern Amazonia near Belen (Leite 2004), while fl uvial systems of local origin prevailed in western Amazonia (Hoorn 1994a), and scattered lacustrine settings existed near the incipient Andean Eastern Cordillera (Gomez et al. 2009).

Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 320Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 320 10/24/2009 1:57:00 Shobha10/24/2009 1:57:00 Shobha

Page 5: NINETEEN The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest ...stri-sites.si.edu/.../PDFs/Jaramilloetal2010_OriginModernAmazon_R.p… · The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest: implications

1 2 3 4 5 6 2322212019181716151413121110987

NN

18

NN

10

NN

4

NN

3

N7

N9

N10

N15

N17

Pac

hide

rmite

sdi

eder

ixi

Grim

sdal

eam

agna

clav

ata

Mul

timar

gini

tes

vand

erha

mm

enii

Psi

ladi

porit

esm

inim

us

Cra

ssor

etitr

ilete

sva

nraa

dsho

oven

iiC

rass

oret

itrile

tes

Psi

ladi

porit

es

Ret

itric

olpo

rites

Ver

rutr

icol

porit

es

Ver

rutic

olpo

rites

rotu

ndip

orus

-E

chid

ipor

ites

barb

eito

ensi

s

Jand

ufou

riase

amro

gifo

rmis

Ver

rutr

icol

porit

es

Psi

ladi

porit

es–

Cro

totr

icol

pite

s

Cra

ssor

etitr

ilete

s

Grim

sdal

ea

Ast

erac

eae

Hoorn (1993)G

rimsd

alea

Ech

itric

olpo

rites

mar

iste

llae-

Psi

ladi

porit

esm

inim

us

Ech

itric

olpo

rites

spin

osus

Ste

phan

ocol

pite

sev

ansi

i

Pac

hyde

rmite

s di

eder

ixi F

enes

trite

s sp

inos

us

Ech

itric

olpo

rites

spi

nosu

s

Fen

estr

ites

long

ispi

nosu

s

Mul

timar

gini

tes

vand

erha

mm

enii

Grim

sdal

ea m

agna

clav

ata

Cra

ssor

etitr

ilete

s va

nraa

dsho

oven

i

Ech

itric

olpo

rites

mar

iste

llae

Psi

ladi

porit

es m

inim

us

Ver

rutr

icol

porit

es r

otun

dipo

rus

Jand

ufou

ria s

eam

rogi

form

is

Bio

stra

tigra

phic

mar

kers

Ech

idip

orite

s ba

rbei

toen

is

Ret

itric

olpi

tes

sim

plex

Cro

totr

icol

pite

s sp

.

50 �m

Aln

ipol

leni

tes

veru

sE

chitr

icol

porit

es m

cnei

llyi

Ste

phan

ocol

pite

s ev

ansi

i

Psi

latr

icol

porit

es c

arib

bien

sis

Fenestrites longispinosus

Psi

latr

icol

porit

esca

ribbi

ensu

s

Ech

itiric

olpo

rites

-A

lnip

olle

nite

s

Nanoplankton zones

Planktonic foraminifera zones

Germeraad et al. (1968)

Lorente (1986)

Muller et al. (1987)

Ech

itric

olpo

rites

mcn

eylli

Ech

itric

olpo

rites

mcn

eylli

N19

N20/21

PLIOCENE LATEMESSINIAN TORTONIAN SERRAVAL. LANGHIAN BURDIGALIAN AQUITANIAN

EARLY

Ma

MIDDLEMIOCENE

N18

N16

N14

N13

N12

N11 N8

N6 N

5

N4

NN

1

NN

2

NN

5

NN

6

NN

7

NN

8

NN

9

NN

11

NN

12

NN

15/

NN

13

NN

16

NN

17

Fig

. 19.

2 M

ost

impo

rtan

t pa

lyno

stra

tigra

phic

zon

atio

ns f

or t

he S

outh

Am

eric

an t

ropi

cs (m

odifi

ed f

rom

Lei

te 2

006)

, and

som

e of

the

key

tax

a us

ed in

the

zo

natio

ns.

Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 321Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 321 10/24/2009 1:57:00 Shobha10/24/2009 1:57:00 Shobha

Page 6: NINETEEN The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest ...stri-sites.si.edu/.../PDFs/Jaramilloetal2010_OriginModernAmazon_R.p… · The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest: implications

Tab

le 1

9.3

Sum

mar

y of

the

pal

ynom

orph

spe

cies

des

crib

ed f

or t

he N

eoge

ne o

f A

maz

onia

and

the

ir na

tura

l aff

initi

es.

Polle

n/s

po

res

Am

azo

nia

(N

eog

ene)

Ta

xon

om

ic a

ffi n

ity

Ec

olo

gy

A

uth

or*

Bacu

trile

tes

spp.

Sela

gine

llace

aeM

onta

ne a

nd lo

wla

nd f

ores

tVa

n de

r H

amm

en 1

956

ex P

oton

ie 1

956

Bom

baca

cidi

tes

arar

acua

rens

isBo

mba

cace

ae, C

eiba

Rain

fore

st a

nd m

arsh

for

est,

low

land

Hoo

rn 1

994a

Bom

baca

cidi

tes

bacu

latu

sBo

mba

cace

ae, P

achi

ra a

quat

ica

Rain

fore

st a

nd m

ixed

sw

amp

Mul

ler

et a

l. 19

87

Bom

baca

cidi

tes

baum

falk

iiBo

mba

cace

aeLo

wla

nd f

ores

t, a

long

cre

eks

and

river

sLo

rent

e 19

86

Bom

baca

cidi

tes

naci

mie

ntoe

nsis

Bom

bax

Low

land

for

est,

alo

ng c

reek

s an

d riv

ers

(And

erso

n, 1

960)

; Els

ik, 1

968

Bom

baca

cidi

tes

mui

nane

orum

Bom

baco

psis

Low

land

for

est,

alo

ng c

reek

s an

d riv

ers

Hoo

rn 1

993

Bom

baca

cidi

tes

spp.

Bom

baca

ceae

Low

land

for

est,

alo

ng c

reek

s an

d riv

ers

Cou

per

1960

Cla

vain

aper

turit

es c

lava

tus

Cro

ton?

Van

der

Ham

men

& W

ijmst

ra 1

964

Cla

vain

aper

turit

es m

icro

clav

atus

Chl

oran

thac

eae,

Hed

yosm

umM

onta

ne a

nd lo

wla

nd f

ores

tH

oorn

199

4b

Cla

vam

onoc

olpi

tes

sp.

Palm

ae, I

riart

eaLo

wla

nd a

nd p

re-m

onta

ne f

ores

tG

onza

lez-

Guz

man

196

7

Cla

vatr

ilete

s sp

p.Se

lagi

nella

ceae

?Re

gali

et a

l. 19

74

Cor

sini

polle

nite

s oc

ulus

noct

isO

nagr

acea

e, L

udw

igia

Swam

ps(T

hier

gart

194

0); N

akom

an 1

965

Cra

ssie

ctoa

pert

ites

colu

mbi

anus

Legu

min

osae

, Pap

ilion

oide

aeLo

wla

nd f

ores

tD

ueña

s 19

80

Cra

ssor

etitr

ilete

s va

nraa

dsho

oven

ii

Schi

zace

ae, L

ygod

ium

mic

roph

yllu

mM

arsh

es a

nd s

wam

psG

erm

eraa

d et

al.

1968

Cric

otrip

orite

s gu

iane

nesi

sLe

idel

mey

er 1

966

Cro

totr

icol

pite

s an

nem

aria

eEu

phor

biac

eae,

Cro

ton

Low

land

and

mon

tane

for

est

Leid

elm

eyer

196

6

Cyp

erac

eaep

ollis

Cyp

erac

eae

Sava

nnas

and

sw

amps

Kru

tzsc

h 19

70

Cya

thea

cidi

ites

spp.

Cya

thea

cea

Mon

tane

reg

ion

Coo

kson

194

7 ex

Pot

onie

195

6

Del

toid

ospo

ra a

drie

nnis

Pter

idac

eae,

Acr

ostic

hum

aur

eum

Clo

se t

o m

angr

ove

vege

tatio

n(P

oton

ie &

Gel

letic

h 19

33) F

rede

rikse

n 19

73

Echi

dipo

rites

bar

beito

ensi

sPa

lmae

, Kor

thal

sia

fero

xLo

wla

nd f

ores

tM

ulle

r et

al.

1987

Echi

nosp

oris

spp

.Th

elyp

tera

ceae

-Ath

yria

ceae

-Mar

athi

acea

eK

rutz

sch

1967

Echi

perip

orite

s sp

p.M

alva

ceae

Van

der

Ham

men

& W

ymst

ra 1

964

Echi

perip

orite

s ak

anth

osVa

n de

r H

amm

en &

Wijm

stra

196

4

Echi

perip

orite

s es

tela

eM

alva

ceae

-Con

volv

ulac

eae

Coa

stal

veg

etat

ion

Ger

mer

aad

et a

l. 19

68

Echi

tric

olpo

rites

mcn

eilly

iA

ster

acea

eO

pen

vege

tatio

nG

erm

eraa

d et

al.

1968

Echi

tric

olop

orite

s sp

inos

usA

ster

acea

eO

pen

vege

tatio

nG

erm

eraa

d et

al.

1968

Echi

tric

olpo

rites

mar

iste

llae

Bom

baca

ceae

-Mal

vace

aeLo

wla

nd f

ores

tM

ulle

r et

al.

1987

Echi

trile

tes

cf. m

uelle

riSe

lagi

nella

ceae

?Re

gali

et a

l. 19

74

Ephe

drip

ites

renz

onii

Ara

ceae

, Spa

tiphy

llum

Her

bs a

nd e

piph

ytes

Due

ñas

1986

Ephe

drip

ites

sp.

Ephe

drac

eae

Dry

for

est

Bolk

hovi

tina

1953

Fene

strit

es s

pino

sus

Ast

erac

eae

Van

der

Ham

men

195

6 ex

Lor

ente

, 198

6

Fove

otril

etes

orn

atus

Rega

li et

al.

1974

Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 322Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 322 10/24/2009 1:57:02 Shobha10/24/2009 1:57:02 Shobha

Page 7: NINETEEN The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest ...stri-sites.si.edu/.../PDFs/Jaramilloetal2010_OriginModernAmazon_R.p… · The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest: implications

Grim

sdal

ea m

agna

clav

ata

Palm

aeG

erm

eraa

d et

al.

1968

Het

eroc

olpi

tes

inco

mpt

usM

elas

tom

atac

eae,

Mic

onia

?C

omm

on in

Mau

ritia

und

erst

orey

(Am

azon

ia)

Van

der

Ham

men

195

6 ex

Hoo

rn 1

993

Het

eroc

olpi

tes

rotu

ndus

Com

bret

acea

e-M

elas

tom

atac

eae

Hoo

rn 1

993

Het

eroc

olpi

tes

verr

ucos

usM

elas

tom

atac

eae

Mon

tane

clo

ud f

ores

t an

d lo

wla

nd f

ores

tH

oorn

199

3

Ilexp

olle

nite

s sp

.A

quifo

liace

ae, I

lex

Mon

tane

clo

ud f

ores

t an

d lo

wla

nd f

ores

tTh

ierg

art

1937

ex

Poto

nie

1960

Jand

ufou

ria s

aem

rogi

form

is

Bom

baca

ceae

, Cat

oste

mm

aLo

wla

nd f

ores

t, a

long

cre

eks

and

river

sG

erm

eraa

d et

al.

1968

Kuy

lispo

rites

wat

erbo

lkii

Cya

thea

ceae

, Cya

thea

hor

rida

Mon

tane

reg

ion

Poto

nie

1956

Laev

igat

ospo

rites

cat

anaj

ensi

sBl

echn

acea

e, B

lech

num

Low

land

to

high

mou

ntai

ns, s

wam

ps a

nd m

arsh

esG

erm

eraa

d et

al.

1968

Mag

nape

ripor

ites

spin

osus

Gon

zale

z-G

uzm

an 1

967

Mag

nast

riatit

es g

rand

iosu

sPt

erid

acea

e, C

erat

opte

risA

quat

ic f

erns

, sha

llow

lake

s an

d riv

ers

(Ked

ves

& S

ole

de P

orta

196

3) D

ueña

s 19

80

Mar

goco

lpor

ites

vanw

ijhei

Legu

min

osae

, Cae

salp

inio

deae

, Cae

salp

inea

bo

nduc

or

coria

riaC

oast

al v

eget

atio

nG

erm

eraa

d et

al.

1968

Mat

onis

porit

es m

ulle

riM

aton

iace

ae-D

icks

onia

ceae

-Cya

thea

cea,

H

emite

liaPl

ayfo

rd 1

982

Mau

ritid

iites

fra

ncis

coi

Palm

ae, M

aurit

iaLo

wla

nd s

wam

ps(V

an d

er H

amm

en 1

956)

Van

Hoe

ken-

Klin

kenb

erg

1964

Mon

opor

opol

leni

tes

annu

latu

sPo

acea

eO

pen

vege

tatio

n an

d fl o

atin

g m

eado

ws

(Van

der

Ham

men

, 195

4) J

aram

illo

&

Dilc

her

2001

Mul

timar

gini

tes

vand

erha

mm

enii

Aca

ntha

ceae

, Tric

hant

era-

Brav

aisi

aLo

wla

nd f

ores

tG

erm

eraa

d et

al.

1968

Psila

step

hano

colp

orite

s m

arin

amen

sis

Sapo

tace

aeLo

wla

nd f

ores

tH

oorn

199

4a

Psila

step

hano

colp

orite

s m

atap

ioru

m

Hoo

rn 1

994a

Psila

step

hano

colp

orite

s sc

hnei

deri

Rhiz

opho

race

ae?

Coa

stal

man

grov

e ve

geta

tion

Hoo

rn 1

993

Perf

otric

olpi

tes

digi

tatu

sC

onvo

lvul

acea

e, M

erre

mia

Low

land

for

est

Gon

zale

z-G

uzm

an 1

967

Perin

omon

olet

es s

pp.

Asp

leni

acea

e, A

sple

nium

-The

lypt

erac

eae

(The

lypt

eris

)K

rutz

sch

1967

Peris

ynco

lpor

ites

poko

rnyi

Mal

pigh

iace

aeLo

wla

nd f

ores

tG

erm

eraa

d et

al.

1968

Podo

carp

idite

s sp

.Po

doca

rpac

eae,

Pod

ocar

pus

Mon

tane

and

low

land

for

est

Coo

kson

194

7 ex

Cou

per

1953

Poly

adop

olle

nite

s sp

p.Le

gum

inos

ae, M

imos

oide

aeLo

wla

nd f

ores

tPfl

ug

& T

hom

son

1953

Poly

adop

olle

nite

s m

aria

eLe

gum

inos

ae, M

imos

oide

ae, A

caci

aLo

wla

nd f

ores

tD

ueña

s 19

80

Poly

podi

aceo

ispo

rites

pot

onie

iPt

erid

acea

e, P

teris

Low

land

to

high

mou

ntai

nsK

edve

s 19

61

Prot

eaci

dite

s cf

. tria

ngul

atus

Sapi

ndac

eae-

Prot

eaec

eae

Lore

nte

1986

Prox

aper

tites

ter

tiaria

Ann

onac

eae,

Cre

mat

ospe

rma

Low

land

for

est

Van

der

Ham

men

& G

arci

a M

utis

196

5

(Con

tinue

d)

Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 323Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 323 10/24/2009 1:57:02 Shobha10/24/2009 1:57:02 Shobha

Page 8: NINETEEN The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest ...stri-sites.si.edu/.../PDFs/Jaramilloetal2010_OriginModernAmazon_R.p… · The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest: implications

Polle

n/s

po

res

Am

azo

nia

(N

eog

ene)

Taxo

no

mic

affi

nit

yEc

olo

gy

Au

tho

r*

Psila

dipo

rites

min

imus

Mor

acea

e, F

icus

-Art

ocar

pus-

Soro

cea

Low

land

for

est

Van

der

Ham

men

& W

ijmst

ra 1

964

Psila

dipo

rites

red

unda

ntis

Mor

acea

eLo

wla

nd f

ores

tG

onza

lez-

Guz

man

196

7

Psila

mon

ocol

pite

s am

azon

icus

Palm

ae, E

uter

pePo

orly

dra

ined

soi

ls, l

owla

nd f

ores

tH

oorn

199

3

Psila

mon

ocol

pite

s na

nus

Palm

aeLo

wla

nd f

ores

tH

oorn

199

3

Psila

mon

ocol

pite

s rin

coni

iPa

lmae

Low

land

for

est

Due

ñas

1986

Psila

perip

orite

s m

inim

usA

mar

anth

acea

e-C

heno

podi

acea

eRe

gali

et a

l. 19

74

Psila

perip

orite

s m

ultip

orus

Hoo

rn 1

994b

Psila

step

hano

colp

orite

s fi s

silis

Poly

gala

ceae

Leid

elm

eyer

196

6

Psila

step

hano

porit

es h

erng

reen

iiA

pocy

nace

aeLo

wla

nd f

ores

tH

oorn

199

3

Psila

tric

olpi

tes

acer

bus

Gon

zale

z-G

uzm

an 1

967

Psila

tric

olpi

tes

anco

nis

Hoo

rn 1

994a

Psila

tric

olpi

tes

min

utus

Gon

zale

z-G

uzm

an 1

967

Psila

tric

olpi

tes

papi

lioni

form

isRe

gali

et a

l. 19

74

Psila

tric

olpi

tes

pulc

her

Wijm

stra

197

1

Lada

khip

olle

nite

s si

mpl

ex(G

onza

lez-

Guz

man

, 196

7) J

aram

illo

&

Dilc

her

2001

Psila

tric

olpo

rites

aff

. Sap

otac

eae

Sapo

tace

aeLo

wla

nd f

ores

tVa

n de

r H

amm

en 1

956

ex V

an d

er

Ham

men

& W

ijmst

ra 1

964

Psila

tric

olpo

rites

ata

laye

nsis

Hoo

rn 1

993

Psila

tric

olpo

rites

cos

tatu

sD

ueña

s 19

80

Psila

tric

olpo

rites

cra

ssoe

xina

tus

Hoo

rn 1

993

Lana

giop

ollis

cra

ssa

Thea

ecea

e, P

ellic

iera

rhi

zoph

ora

Coa

stal

man

grov

e ve

geta

tion,

beh

ind

Rhiz

opho

ra(V

an d

er H

amm

en &

Wym

stra

196

4)

Fred

erik

sen,

198

8

Psila

tric

olpo

rites

cya

mus

Van

der

Ham

men

& W

ijmst

ra 1

964

Psila

tric

olpo

rites

dev

riesi

iH

umiri

acea

e, H

umiri

aLo

wla

nd f

ores

tLo

rent

e 19

86

Psila

tric

olpo

rites

div

isus

Sapo

tace

aeLo

wla

nd f

ores

tRe

gali

et a

l. 19

74

Psila

tric

olpo

rites

exi

guus

Hoo

rn 1

993

Psila

tric

olpo

rites

gar

zoni

iH

oorn

199

3

Psila

tric

olpo

rites

labi

atus

Sapo

tace

ae, P

oute

riaRa

info

rest

, alo

ng c

reek

s an

d riv

ers

Hoo

rn 1

993

Psila

tric

olpo

rites

mag

nipo

ratu

sLe

gum

inos

ae?

Hoo

rn 1

993

Psila

tric

olpo

rites

nor

mal

isG

onza

lez-

Guz

man

196

7

Psila

tric

olpo

rites

obe

sus

Sapo

tace

aeLo

wla

nd f

ores

tH

oorn

199

3

Ranu

ncul

acid

ites

oper

cula

tus

Euph

orbi

acea

e, A

lcho

rnea

Low

land

and

mon

tane

for

est,

in A

maz

onia

al

ong

river

s(V

an d

er H

amm

en &

Wym

stra

, 196

4)

Jara

mill

o &

Dilc

her

2001

Psila

tric

olpo

rites

silv

atic

usBu

rser

acea

e-Sa

pota

ceae

Low

land

for

est

Hoo

rn 1

993

Tab

le 1

9.3

Con

tinue

d.

Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 324Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 324 10/24/2009 1:57:03 Shobha10/24/2009 1:57:03 Shobha

Page 9: NINETEEN The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest ...stri-sites.si.edu/.../PDFs/Jaramilloetal2010_OriginModernAmazon_R.p… · The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest: implications

Tetr

acol

poro

polle

nite

s tr

ansv

ersa

lisSa

pota

ceae

Low

land

for

est

(Due

ñas

1980

) Jar

amill

o &

Dilc

her

2001

Psila

brev

itric

olpo

rites

tria

ngul

aris

(Van

der

Ham

men

& W

ymst

ra 1

964)

Ja

ram

illo

& D

ilche

r 20

01

Psila

tric

olpo

rites

var

ius

Due

ñas

1983

Psila

tric

olpo

rites

ven

ezue

lanu

sLo

rent

e 19

86

Psila

trile

tes

aff.

Lop

hoso

ria

Psila

trile

tes

aff.

Pyt

irogr

amm

a

Psila

trile

tes

loba

tus

Hoo

rn 1

994b

Psila

trile

tes

peru

anus

Pter

idac

eae,

Pte

ris r

angi

ferin

aLo

wla

nd t

o hi

gh m

ount

ains

Hoo

rn 1

994b

Psila

trip

orite

s co

rsta

njei

Rubi

acea

e, F

aram

ea?

Mon

tane

and

low

land

for

est

Hoo

rn 1

993

Psila

trip

orite

s de

silv

aeLe

gum

inos

ae, C

aesa

lpin

ioid

eae

Low

land

for

est

Hoo

rn 1

993

Psila

trip

orite

s sa

rmie

ntoi

Hoo

rn 1

993

Retib

revi

tric

olpi

tes

retib

olus

Leid

elm

eyer

196

6

Retib

revi

tric

olpi

tes

yava

rens

isH

oorn

199

3

Retim

onoc

olpi

tes

absy

aeM

yris

ticac

eae,

Viro

laM

arsh

and

low

land

rai

n fo

rest

Hoo

rn 1

993

Retim

onoc

olpi

tes

long

icol

patu

sPa

lmae

Low

land

for

est

Lore

nte

1986

Retim

onoc

olpi

tes

max

imus

Palm

aeLo

wla

nd f

ores

tH

oorn

199

3

Retim

onoc

olpi

tes

retif

ossu

latu

sPa

lmae

Low

land

for

est

Lore

nte

1986

Retis

teph

anop

orite

s cr

assi

annu

latu

sBo

mba

cace

ae, Q

uara

ribae

aM

arsh

and

low

land

rai

nfor

est

Lore

nte

1986

Retit

ricol

pite

s le

wis

iiW

ijmst

ra 1

971

Retit

ricol

pite

s an

toni

iG

onza

lez-

Guz

man

196

7

Retit

ricol

pite

s ca

quet

anus

Bom

baca

ceae

-Tili

acea

e?Lo

wla

nd f

ores

tH

oorn

199

4a

Retit

ricol

pite

s co

lpic

onst

rictu

sH

oorn

199

4a

Retit

ricol

pite

s de

pres

sus

Wijm

stra

197

1

Retit

ricol

pite

s la

long

atus

Wijm

stra

197

1

Retit

ricol

pite

s lo

rent

eae

Bom

baca

ceae

, Bom

bax

Low

land

for

est,

alo

ng c

reek

s an

d riv

ers

Hoo

rn 1

993a

Retit

ricol

pite

s m

aled

ictu

sG

onza

lez-

Guz

man

196

7

Retit

ricol

pite

s m

atur

usG

onza

lez-

Guz

man

196

7

Retit

ricol

pite

s si

mpl

exA

naca

rdia

ceae

?Lo

wla

nd f

ores

tG

onza

lez-

Guz

man

196

7

Retit

ricol

pite

s tu

bero

sus

Bom

bace

ae-T

iliac

eae?

Low

land

for

est

Hoo

rn 1

994a

Retit

ricol

pite

s w

ijnin

gae

Ster

culia

ceae

-Tili

acea

e?H

oorn

199

4a

Retit

ricol

porit

es c

aput

oiH

oorn

199

3

Retit

ricol

porit

es c

rass

icos

tatu

sRu

biac

eae

Mon

tane

and

low

land

for

est

Van

der

Ham

men

& W

ijmst

ra 1

964

Retit

ricol

porit

es c

rass

opol

aris

Hoo

rn 1

994a

Retit

ricol

porit

es e

llipt

icus

Van

Hoe

ken-

Klin

kenb

erg

1964

(Con

tinue

d)

Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 325Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 325 10/24/2009 1:57:04 Shobha10/24/2009 1:57:04 Shobha

Page 10: NINETEEN The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest ...stri-sites.si.edu/.../PDFs/Jaramilloetal2010_OriginModernAmazon_R.p… · The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest: implications

Polle

n/s

po

res

Am

azo

nia

(N

eog

ene)

Taxo

no

mic

affi

nit

yEc

olo

gy

Au

tho

r*

Rhoi

pite

s gu

iane

nsis

Tilia

ceae

-Ste

rcul

iace

ae(V

an d

er H

amm

en &

Wym

stra

196

4)

Jara

mill

o &

Dilc

her

2001

Rhoi

pite

s hi

spid

us(V

an d

er H

amm

en &

Wym

stra

196

4)

Jara

mill

o &

Dilc

her

2001

Retit

resc

olpi

tes?

irre

gula

risEu

phor

biac

eae,

Am

anoa

Low

land

for

est,

alo

ng c

reek

s an

d riv

ers

(Van

der

Ham

men

& W

ymst

ra 1

964)

Ja

ram

illo

& D

ilche

r 20

01

Retit

ricol

porit

es k

aars

iiEu

phor

biac

eae,

Dal

echa

mpi

aLo

wla

nd f

ores

tH

oorn

199

3

Retit

ricol

porit

es la

tus

Wijm

stra

197

1

Retit

ricol

porit

es le

ticia

nus

Hoo

rn 1

993

Retit

ricol

porit

es m

ilnei

Hoo

rn 1

993

Retit

ricol

porit

es o

blat

usH

oorn

199

4a

Retit

ricol

porit

es p

oric

onsp

ectu

sLe

gum

inos

aeH

oorn

199

4a

Retit

ricol

porit

es p

ygm

aeus

Hoo

rn 1

994a

Retit

ricol

porit

es s

anta

isab

elen

sis

Hoo

rn 1

994a

Retit

ricol

porit

es s

olim

oens

isH

oorn

199

3

Retit

ricol

porit

es t

icun

eoru

mH

oorn

199

3

Retit

ricol

porit

es w

ijmst

rae

Hoo

rn 1

994a

Retit

ripor

ites

aff.

Dur

oia

Rubi

acea

eM

onta

ne a

nd lo

wla

nd f

ores

t(V

an d

er H

amm

en 1

956)

Ram

anuj

am 1

966

Retit

ripor

ites

dubi

osus

Gon

zale

z-G

uzm

an 1

967

Retis

teph

anop

orite

s an

gelic

usG

onza

lez-

Guz

man

196

7

Rugo

trile

tes

sp.

Van

der

Ham

men

195

6 ex

Pot

onie

195

6

Rugu

tric

olpo

rites

spp

.G

onza

lez-

Guz

man

196

7

Rugu

tric

olpo

rites

arc

usC

hrys

obal

anac

eae,

Lic

ania

Low

land

for

est

and

sava

nnas

Hoo

rn 1

993

Sync

olpo

rites

ani

balii

Sapi

ndac

eae

Low

land

for

est

Hoo

rn 1

994a

Step

hano

colp

ites

sp.

Pass

ifl or

acea

e?Va

n de

r H

amm

en 1

954

ex P

oton

ie 1

960

Step

hano

colp

ites

evan

sii

Mul

ler

et a

l. 19

87

Sync

olpo

rites

spp

.Va

n de

r H

amm

en 1

954

ex P

oton

ie 1

960

Sync

olpo

rites

inco

mpt

usLo

rant

hace

ae?

Van

Hoe

ken-

Klin

kenb

erg

1964

Spiro

sync

olpi

tes

spira

lisG

onza

lez-

Guz

man

196

7

Scab

ratr

ipor

ites

redu

ndan

sG

onza

lez-

Guz

man

196

7

Stria

topo

llis

cata

tum

bus

Legu

min

osae

, Cae

salp

inoi

deae

Low

land

for

est

(Gon

zale

z-G

uzm

an 1

967)

Tak

ahas

hi a

nd

Jux

1989

Sync

olpo

rites

por

icos

tatu

sM

yrth

acea

eM

onta

ne a

nd lo

wla

nd f

ores

tVa

n H

oeke

n-K

linke

nber

g 19

66

Tab

le 1

9.3

Con

tinue

d.

Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 326Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 326 10/24/2009 1:57:05 Shobha10/24/2009 1:57:05 Shobha

Page 11: NINETEEN The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest ...stri-sites.si.edu/.../PDFs/Jaramilloetal2010_OriginModernAmazon_R.p… · The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest: implications

Tric

hoto

mos

ulci

tes

Palm

ae, B

actr

isLo

wla

nd f

ores

tC

oupe

r 19

53

Verr

ucat

ospo

rites

spp

.Pfl

ug

1952

ex

Poto

nie

1956

Verr

ucat

ospo

rites

usm

ensi

sPo

lypo

diac

eae,

Ste

noch

laen

a pa

lust

risTe

rres

tria

l, m

onta

ne a

nd lo

wla

nd f

ores

t(V

an d

er H

amm

en 1

956)

Ger

mer

aad

et a

l. 19

68

Verr

ucat

otril

etes

cf.

bul

latu

sC

yath

eace

ae, A

lsop

hyla

Mon

tane

reg

ion

Van

Hoe

ken-

Klin

kenb

erg

1964

Verr

utric

olpo

rites

rot

undi

poris

Van

der

Ham

men

& W

ijmst

ra 1

964

Verr

utril

etes

spp

.Va

n de

r H

amm

en 1

956

ex P

oton

ie 1

956

Zono

cost

ites

duqu

eiRh

izop

hora

ceae

, Rhi

zoph

ora

Coa

stal

man

grov

e ve

geta

tion

Ger

mer

aad

et a

l. 19

68

Zono

cost

ites

ram

onae

Rhiz

opho

race

ae, R

hizo

phor

aC

oast

al m

angr

ove

vege

tatio

nD

ueña

s 19

80

Alg

ae

Botr

yoco

ccus

Chl

orop

hyta

, Bot

ryoc

occu

sPl

ankt

onic

alg

ae, f

resh

wat

er

Pedi

astr

umC

hlor

ophy

ta, B

otry

ococ

cus

Plan

kton

ic a

lgae

, fre

sh w

ater

Mar

ine

org

anis

ms

Din

ofl a

gella

te c

ysts

Din

ofl a

gella

te c

ysts

Fres

h an

d m

arin

e w

ater

s

Fora

min

ifer

linin

gs

Rew

ork

ed

Gem

mam

onoc

olpi

tes

(Eoc

ene)

Gem

mas

teph

anop

orite

s (P

aleo

gene

)

Elat

erat

e po

llen

(Cre

tace

ous)

Acr

itarc

h (P

aleo

zoic

)

Spor

es (P

aleo

zoic

)

Retit

ricol

pite

s ty

pe 9

20

(Ven

ezue

la)

*Aut

hor

refe

renc

es a

re g

iven

in J

aram

illo

& R

ueda

(200

8).

Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 327Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 327 10/24/2009 1:57:05 Shobha10/24/2009 1:57:05 Shobha

Page 12: NINETEEN The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest ...stri-sites.si.edu/.../PDFs/Jaramilloetal2010_OriginModernAmazon_R.p… · The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest: implications

328 C. Jaramillo et al.

Late Pliocene-Pleistocene

There is a large hiatus in sedimentation in Amazonia during the Pliocene to Early Pleistocene (Latrubesse et al. 2007). Subsidence in the western Amazonian basins ceased and deposition became confi ned to the increasingly incised valleys of the major rivers in the region and the Amazon Fan (see Chapter 11). Potential outcrops and borehole intervals containing Late Pliocene and Pleistocene strata may be found in the sub-Andean zone.

The Neogene of northern South America: the Urumaco region

The Urumaco Formation is formed by Upper Miocene deltaic deposits that were accumulated in the Falcon Basin, western Venezuela. Lithologically, the formation is characterized by a complex alternation of medium- to fi ne-grained sandstone, organic-rich mudstone, coal, shale and thick-bedded limestone coquinas. These sediments were deposited in a prograding strand-plain-deltaic complex. The thickness of the Formation ranges between 1100 and 1800 m (Díaz de Gamero & Linares 1989). Based on lithofacies, the formation is divided into three units. Shales of the Lower and Upper members represent deposition of low-energy suspension on the shelf and prodelta. Hummocky cross-bedded sandstones represent progradation of wave- and storm-dominated deposition in the delta front, locally overlain by massive mudstones and organic-rich fi ne-grained sediments of the interdistributary bay in the Lower member. Channelized sandstones in the Middle member represent deposition in termi-nal distributary channels. Subaquatic dunes formed the sandy fi ll of these highly incised channels. The Upper member was depos-ited mainly on the delta plain.

Palynofl oras from the Urumaco Formation are similar to Miocene fl oras from Amazonia (Table 19.4). The high degree of similarity suggests a continuation of the Amazonian forest into the Urumaco region of northwestern Venezuela during the Miocene.

The latest Miocene-Early Pliocene Codore Formation over-lies the Urumaco Formation. It is composed of grey-mottled to reddish massive-bedded mudstones interbedded with thick- to thin-bedded, massive, fi ne-grained sandstones, and fi ning-upward sequences of thick- to medium-bedded trough cross-stratifi ed, medium- to coarse-grained sandstone. The Codore Formation accumulated in a fl oodplain environment, exposed during long periods to subaerial conditions, refl ecting a fl uctuating water table. The contact between the Urumaco and Codore Formations represents a major change in the dynamics of the sedimentary environments. This change is probably related to the collapse of the gigantic Urumaco Delta during the Late Miocene and its replace-ment with red-bed deposits that show a decrease in subsidence, sediment supply, subaerial exposure and palaeosoil formation, |and possibly correlates with a major uplift of the northern Andes and the eastward shift in the course of a proto-Orinoco River (Diaz de Gamero 1996; Quiroz & Jaramillo in press). A large change has also been documented in the fi sh faunas (see Chapter 17). Floras of the Codore Formation do not resemble Miocene Amazonian palynofl oras, indicating that the Amazon-type of forest in the Urumaco region was replaced by the dry vegetation that domi-nates the region today. This change could also be correlated with

The most characteristic palynological associations in the fl uvial settings contained a wide variety of rainforest taxa belonging to families such as the Arecaceae, Melastomataceae, Sapotaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Leguminosae, Annonaceae and Malpighiaceae amongst many others (see Plate 13 & Table 19.3). The most abun-dant taxa were those nearest to the aquatic depositional environ-ment such as Mauritia (Mauritiidites), a palm that formed palm swamps, accompanied by taxa from the fl uvial overbanks such as Amanoa (Retitrescolpites? irregularis), Alchornea (Ranunculacidites operculatus) and Malvaceae (several types). The aquatic (mostly freshwater) nature of these settings is confi rmed by taxa such as the fern Ceratopteris (Magnastriatites grandiosus), a small aquatic fern bordering lakes and riverbanks (Germeraad et al. 1968) and the algae Botryococcus and Azolla. This predominantly fl uvial setting was occasionally disrupted by marine infl uence, as con-fi rmed by the presence of a brackish-water association formed by the mangrove pollen of Rhizophora (Zonocostites ramonae) and marine palynomorphs such as dinofl agellate cysts and chitinous foraminiferal test linings.

Middle to early Late Miocene

This time period is characterized by smectite-rich Andean-derived sediments and wetland expansion into western Central Amazonia. The pre-existing rainforest was fragmented and extensive wetlands developed. Palynologically, this period is characterized by an increment in the diversity of fern spores, increase of grasses (Monoporopollenites annulatus) and a pre-dominance of palms such as Mauritia, Grimsdalea magnaclavata an extinct taxon, Euterpe and Korthalsia. The palynological assem-blage also includes taxa indicative of an Andean source such as Podocarpus, Hedyosmum, Cyatheaceae, Hemitelia and Alsophyla. Episodic marine intervals are characterized by Rhizophora (Zonocostites ramonae) and marine palynomorphs (see Plate 13 & Table 19.3). There are several intervals with fl uvial environments with tidal infl uence prevailing, although the aquatic environment was predominantly freshwater. The latter environments were dominated by grasses (Monoporopollenites annulatus), Asteraceae (Echitricolporites spinosus) and ferns (Hoorn 1993, 1994b).

Late Miocene-Early Pliocene

The fi nal part of the Neogene Amazonian sedimentary record is represented in the Late Miocene to Early Pliocene sediments in the Acre and Amazonas states (Brazil). Palynological data suggest a diverse and well-structured forest with pollen types belonging to species from all forest strata, including grasses, herbs (Gomphrena), understorey (Rauvolfi a) and canopy species (Geissospermum, Sapium) as well as diverse types of climbing ferns (Lygodium) and epiphytes (Polypodium) (see Plate 13 & Table 19.3). The Amazon river landscape was well established by this time – the environmental stability allowed extensive development of the Amazon terra fi rme forest. Approximately 30 plant families have been identifi ed in this time period, with a predominance of Arecaceae, Poaceae, Malvaceae, Euphorbia-ceae (Alchornea), Malpighiaceae, Humiriaceae (Humiria) and Melastomataceae (Miconia).

Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 328Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 328 10/24/2009 1:57:06 Shobha10/24/2009 1:57:06 Shobha

Page 13: NINETEEN The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest ...stri-sites.si.edu/.../PDFs/Jaramilloetal2010_OriginModernAmazon_R.p… · The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest: implications

Table 19.4 Pollen and sporomorph taxa shared between the Upper Miocene Urumaco Formation of Venezuela and Miocene deposits of western Amazonia.

Bombacacidites araracuarensis

B. baculatus

B. brevis

B. muinaneorum

B. nacimientoensis

B. psilatus

Burseraceae undifferentiated

Catostemma type

Chenopodipollis spp.

Clavainaperturites microclavatus

Crassiectoapertites columbianus

Crassoretitriletes vanraadshooveni

Cyatheacidites annulatus

Cyclusphaera scabrata

Deltoidospora adriennis

Echidiporites barbeitoensis

Echiperiporites akanthos

E. estelae

Echitricolporites maristellae

E. spinosus

Echitriletes muelleri

Fenestrites longispinosus

F. spinosus

Foveotriletes ornatus

Grimsdalea magnaclavata

Heterocolpites incomptus

Jandufouria seamrogiformis

Kuylisporites waterbolkii

Laevigatosporites catanejensis

Lanagiopollis crassa

Magnastriatites grandiosus

Malvacipollis spp.

Margocolporites vanwijhei

Mauritiidites franciscoi franciscoi

M. franciscoi minutus

Melastomataceae type

Monoporopollenites annulatus

Multimarginites vanderhammenii

Pachydermites diederixi

Perfotricolpites digitatus

Perisyncolporites pokornyi

Polyadopollenites mariae

Proteacidites triangulatus

Psilabrevitricolporites triangularis

Psilamonocolpites medius

P. nanus

P. operculatus

P. rinconii

Psilaperiporites minimus

P. multiporatus

P. robustus

Psilastephanocolporites matapiorum

Psilatricolporites caribbiensis

P. costatus

P. devriesii

P. divisus

P. labiatus

P. magniporatus

P. pachydermatus

P. silvaticus

P. vanus

P. venezuelanus

Retitricolpites colpiconstrictus

R. simplex

R. amazonensis

R. caputoi

R. fi nitus

R. kaarsii

R. marianis

R. oblatus

R. poriconspectus

R. santaisabelensis

R. ticuneorum

Retitriletes sommeri

Retitriporites dubiosus

Rhoipites guianensis

R. hispidus

R. squarrosus

Rugutricolporites arcus

Tetracolporopollenites maculosus

T. transversalis

Zonocostites ramonae

Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 329Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 329 10/24/2009 1:57:06 Shobha10/24/2009 1:57:06 Shobha

Page 14: NINETEEN The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest ...stri-sites.si.edu/.../PDFs/Jaramilloetal2010_OriginModernAmazon_R.p… · The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest: implications

330 C. Jaramillo et al.

vegetation and climate, and it has been studied from Quaternary deposits of the Amazon Fan (Piperno 1997). It may be pos-sible to recover phytoliths from older Amazonian rocks if new techniques are applied, as has been done in Eocene rocks from North America (Strömberg 2004).

Evidence of pre-Miocene rainforests in South America

The fossil record of South American fl oras has been compiled previously (Romero 1993; Burnham & Graham 1999; Burnham & Johnson 2004). All evidence collected from macro and micro fossils suggests that during the Eocene, Neotropical rainfor-ests became established in terms of physiognomy, diversity and fl oristic composition. Pre-Eocene evidence for rainforests in South America is scant; however, recent work in Colombia has revealed that these biomes have been present at least since the Late Cretaceous. A Maastrichtian assemblage known as Guaduas fl ora from the central Andes of Colombia, located today at about 2700 m above sea level, has shown that a rainforest was already established (Gutierrez & Jaramillo 2007). This fl ora is still being studied, but preliminary analyses show that leaf physiognomy was dominated by mesophyll-macrophyll leaf sizes with brochido-dromous-eucamptodromous venation and entire margins, there-fore suggesting a warm and wet palaeoclimate, as is seen in today’s tropical rainforest. However, the Guaduas fl ora lacks key fl ori-stic elements that are present in modern Neotropical fl oras (e.g. legumes).

A second assemblage from Colombia is the Cerrejón fl ora (Wing et al. 2004), found in outcrops from Guajira Peninsula and excavated in the open-pit Cerrejón coal mine. This fl ora is Middle-Late Paleocene in age, and it was deposited in ancient lagoonal and fl ooded coastal plains environments (Jaramillo et al. 2007a). The palaeoclimate has been reconstructed from leaf margin and area analysis, giving a mean annual palaeotemperature in excess of 29°C and an annual precipitation greater than 4 m (Herrera et al. 2008b). Floristically, the fl ora is indistinguishable from liv-ing Neotropical fl oras and is dominated by Fabaceae, Arecaceae, Malvaceae, Lauraceae, Araceae, Zingiberales, Menispermaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Annonaceae, Anacardiaceae, Meliaceae and Flacourtiaceae (Doria et al. 2008; Herrera et al. 2008a, 2008b).

These two macrofl oras from Colombia are remarkable evi-dence of ancient tropical biomes, both showing that rainforest leaf physiognomy was established during the early stages of the rainforests in northern South America. Both fl oras also have low plant diversity (Gutierrez & Jaramillo 2007; Jaramillo et al. 2007a; Herrera et al. 2008b).

Macrofossil plant records from the Miocene of the Amazonia

The records of plant macrofossils from Miocene Amazonian deposits are relatively sparse. This is due to vegetation cover of possible outcrops. Furthermore, little attention has been paid in the past to wood and leaf remains, which are commonly men-tioned in stratigraphic studies of Miocene and younger rocks (Hoorn 1994b, 2006; Rossetti & Goes 2004; Campbell et al. 2006;

the extensive development of the tropical savannas in the latest Miocene, which shrunk the rainforest to its modern extent.

Palaeobotany

Plant fossils as a potential tool to reconstruct the Amazon rainforest

Macrofossil plant remains, mostly leaves, woods and seeds, have been widely reported throughout the Amazon drainage basin from Miocene to Quaternary deposits (Hoorn 1994b, 2006; Rossetti & Goes 2004; Campbell et al. 2006; Antoine et al. 2006, Goillot et al. 2007; Latrubesse et al. 2007; Pons & De Franceschi 2007; Olivier et al. 2008). However, only a few plant localities have been extensively collected and studied (Rossetti & Goes 2004; Pons & De Franceschi 2007). Here we briefl y highlight several palaeobotanical methods that should be kept in mind for future studies from Amazonia.

Leaves are among the most abundant fossil remains in fl uvial and lacustrine environments (Burnham et al. 1992), and dicot fossil leaves could be used to reconstruct the palaeoclimate. Leaf margin and area analyses (Wolfe 1979; Wilf 1997; Wilf et al. 1998) can, respectively, be used to reconstruct past mean annual tem-peratures and precipitation. These methods are based on modern correlations that relate margin and area of dicot leaves to climatic parameters. A new method, which relates the area of the fossil leaves to the extant scaling relationship between petiole width squared and leaf mass (Royer et al. 2007), could also be used to reconstruct quantitatively the mean annual precipitation for the Amazon forest in the past.

The macrofossil plant record also could give us clues about the origin and age of the high plant diversity of Amazonia, which is perhaps one of the most discussed topics in angiosperm evolu-tion. For instance, fossil fl owers, seeds, fruits, leaves and wood can be used to assess plant diversity in the geological past (Wing et al. 1995; Wilf & Johnson 2004). Insect damage traces in leaves can also give information about consumers (Wilf et al. 2000), correla-tions between feeding diversity and climate changes, extinctions and plant diversity (Labandeira et al. 2002).

Fossil woods may be frequently identifi ed at family level based on anatomical characters, offering a good opportunity to record plant families in the Amazon Basin. As indicators of climate, tropical fossil woods do not show a strong correlation between temperature and the growth of tree rings (e.g. Chowdhury 1964). However, recent techniques using anatomical characters such as percentages of spiral thickenings present in vessels with a diam-eter less than 100 µm, and ring-porous vessels on dicot woods are well correlated with mean annual temperature (Wiemann et al. 1998). Otherwise, chemical characteristics of fossil woods may be correlated with palaeoclimate proxies (Poole & van Bergen 2006). When fossil woods are found in situ and the base of the trunk is preserved, it is possible to calculate the structure of the forest based on the relationship between basal trunk diameter and tree height (Rich et al. 1986; Lehman & Wheeler 2001).

Phytoliths are microscopic silica fl akes present in the vascular system of only certain plant families, mostly monocots (Piperno 1988). The phytolith record offers a window to past changes of

Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 330Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 330 10/24/2009 1:57:06 Shobha10/24/2009 1:57:06 Shobha

Page 15: NINETEEN The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest ...stri-sites.si.edu/.../PDFs/Jaramilloetal2010_OriginModernAmazon_R.p… · The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest: implications

Origin of the modern Amazon rainforest 331

a specifi c sample size. This is termed rarefaction analysis, a tech-nique that calculates the number of species expected for a given sample size smaller than the actual sample (Sanders 1968). This technique is used to account for differences in diversity result-ing from different sample sizes. All analyses were done in R for Statistical Computing (R-Development-Core-Team 2005) and the R package Vegan (Oksanen et al. 2005).

We compared the rarefi ed palynological diversity at a counting level of 208 grains (the pollen number of the smallest sample in the set) for samples from several Amazonian sites. Palynological data for the Miocene were taken from the literature (Hoorn 1993, 1994a, 1994b, 2006), and several cores from the Quaternary were also used, including Piusbi (Behling et al. 1998), dos Patas (Colinvaux et al. 1996), Curucab (Behling 1996) and Monica (Berrio 2002). All sites were attributed to one of four time inter-vals and the average diversity at a counting level of 208 grains was calculated for each site.

Lower Miocene: Mariñame, Tres Islas, Santa Isabel, core 1 AS04a-AM (181.8 to 275 m); Middle Miocene: Pebas, Iquitos, core AS04a-AM (89 to 2 181.7 m);Upper Miocene: Mocagua, Los Chorros East and West, Santa 3 Sofi a, and Apaporis, core AS04a-AM (23.5 to 88.9 m). Quaternary: Piusbi, Curucab, Monica and Dos Patas.4

There exists a slight trend toward decreasing diversity from the Neogene to the Quaternary (Fig. 19.3). However, the pattern is neither clear nor signifi cant. The outcomes may have been infl u-enced by the fact that the Neogene pollen data were collected with other goals in mind (mainly biostratigraphy and palaeoecology), other than analysing diversity over time. Furthermore, different depositional environments may have been analysed. Given the cooling trend of the Neogene together with the areal reduction of the fl ooded forest, which is a major provider of pollen and spores for the fossil record, a reduction in diversity is to be expected. However, further studies are needed to test this hypothesis.

Antoine et al. 2006; Pons & De Franceschi 2007; Goillot et al. 2007; Latrubesse et al. 2007; Olivier et al. 2008).

A total of 24 angiosperm families have been reported from Miocene rocks of Amazonia. Duarte (2004) described 17 fami-lies corresponding to 19 genera from fossil leaves of the Miocene Pirabas Formation from Brazil. This formation seems to have been deposited in a littoral environment. Among the families reported are Nyctaginaceae, Lauraceae, Dilleniaceae, Theaceae, Caryocaraceae, Chrysobalanaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Rutaceae, Meliaceae, Sapindaceae, Malvaceae, Myrtaceae, Melastomataceae, Rhizophoraceae, Ebenaceae, Rubiaceae and Rapataceae. The aver-age size of these fossil leaves is mesophyll, abundant acuminate apexes are preserved, and most leaves have entire margins suggest-ing a warm and humid climate. However, a more specifi c analysis of the leaf characters has not yet been carried out. Floristically, the Pirabas fl ora contains some of the most important families that make up modern Neotropical lowland rainforests (e.g. Lauraceae, Euphorbiaceae, Meliacaeae and Malvaceae). Fossil leaves related to Malvaceae (Bombacacidites) have also been reported from mangrove deposits of the Miocene Barreiras Formation of Brazil (Dutra et al. 2001).

Fossil woods from the Middle Miocene Pebas Formation of Peruvian Amazonia have been assigned to the Anacardiaceae (Anacardium), Clusiaceae (Calophyllum), Combretaceae (Buche-navia and Terminalia), Fabaceae (Andira/Hymenolobium), Humi- riaceae (Humiriastrum), Lecythidaceae (Cariniana and Eschweilera) and Meliaceae (Guarea) (Pons & De Franceschi 2007). The lack of growth rings and the family composition suggest that these fossil woods were part of terra fi rme lowland tropical rainforests (Pons & De Franceschi 2007). However, additional anato mical characters should be taken into account besides the family com-position to distinguish between riparian and terra fi rme habitat.

Fossil leaves and woods suggest that fl oristically the Miocene rainforests were similar to modern Neotropical lowland rain-forests, even at the generic level. The study of macrofossils from Neogene Amazonia is a promising fi eld, and might yield a better understanding of the palaeoclimate, the evolution of angiosperm families and animal–plant interactions, and the structure of the Miocene rainforests.

Diversity analysis

In this chapter, the word ‘diversity’ is used in its original sense to denote the number of species (Rosenzweig 1995), which is also called ‘richness’. Pollen can be a useful tool for estimating plant diversity through time (e.g. Morley 2000). It mostly refl ects genera and families (Germeraad et al. 1968; Jackson & Williams 2004), indicating that it can be used to track plant diversity at that taxonomic level through geological time.

We assessed Amazonian Neogene within-sample diversity (the number of species in a given sample) using a technique called rarefaction (Sanders 1968; Hurlbert 1971). Estimating the number of species in a sample involves counting the species in a given sample. However, the number of species depends on the number of pollen grains counted; thus, as more grains are counted, more species are found. In order to compare the diver-sity among different samples, data must fi rst be standardized to

10 20 30 40 50 60#species

Quaternary

Late Miocene

Middle Miocene

Early Miocene

Rarefied diversity, cutoff 208

Fig. 19.3 Rarefi ed diversity at a counting level of 208 grains for the Miocene and Quaternary of the Amazonian Basin. Each point represents the average diversity of a site. The bar represents the 95% confi dence interval.

Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 331Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 331 10/24/2009 1:57:06 Shobha10/24/2009 1:57:06 Shobha

Page 16: NINETEEN The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest ...stri-sites.si.edu/.../PDFs/Jaramilloetal2010_OriginModernAmazon_R.p… · The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest: implications

332 C. Jaramillo et al.

in Amazonia, and the birth of the modern Amazon River system. Palaeogeogr Palaeocl 239, 166–219.

Chowdhury, K.A. (1964) Growth rings in tropical trees and taxonomy. J Indian Bot Soc 43, 334–343.

Colinvaux, P.A., Oliveira, P.E.D., Moreno, J.E., Miller, M.C., Bush, M.B. (1996) A long pollen record from lowland Amazonia: forest and cooling in glacial times. Science 274, 85–88.

Daemon, R.F. (1975) Contribuição à datação da Formação Alter do Chão, Bacia do Amazonas. Rev Bras Geoci 5, 78–84.

Daemon, R.F., Contreiras, C.J.A. (1971) Zoneamento palinológico da Bacia do Amazonas. In: 25th Congresso Brasileiro de Geologia 3, 79–88.

De Lima, M.R. (1979) Paleontologia da Formacao Santana (Cretaceo do Nordeste do Brasil); estagio atual de conhecimentos. Anais da Academia Brasiliera de Ciencias 51, 545–556.

Diaz de Gamero, M.L. (1996) The changing course of the Orinoco River during the Neogene: a review. Palaeogeogr Palaeocl 123, 385–402.

Díaz de Gamero, M.L., Linares, O.J. (1989) Estratigrafía y paleontología de la Formación Urumaco, del Mioceno tardío de Falcón noroccidental. In: VII Congreso Geológico Venezuela 1, 419–439.

Dino, R., Silva, O.B., Abrahão, D. (1999) Caracterização palinológica e estratigráfi ca de estratos cretáceos da Formação Alter do Chão, Bacia do Amazonas. In: Boletim do 5º Simpósio sobre o Cretáceo do Brasil. Campus de Rio Claro: UNESP, pp. 557–565.

Doria, G., Jaramillo, C., Herrera, F. (2008) Menispermaceae from the Cerrejon formation, middle to late Paleocene. Am J Bot 95, 954–973.

Doubinger, J. (1973) Pollen and spores from the Paleocene coal basin of Cerrejon (Guajira Province, Colombia). In: Proceedings, 96 Congres National des Société Savantes (Toulouse, 1971) 5, 253–262.

Doubinger, J. (1976) Spore-pollen assemblages from the Tertiary of Colombia. In: Proceedings, Comptes Rendus du 97 Congres National des Societes Savantes (Nantes1972) 4, 9–18.

Duarte, L. (2004) Paleofl orula. In: Rossetti, D.F., Goes, A.M. (eds) O Neogeno da Amazonia Oriental. Belém: Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi, pp. 169–196.

Dutra, T.L., Rossetti, D.F., Stranz, A. (2001) Bombacacceae Kuhnt, 1821 from the Middle Miocene Barreiras Formation (Depositional Sequence B), in Para State, Brazil. In: 17th Congresso Brasileiro de Paleontologia, Boletim de Resumos 1, 77.

Gentry, A.H. (1982) Neotropical fl oristic diversity: phytogeographical connections between Central and South America, Pleistocene climatic fl uctuations, or an accident of the Andean orogeny? Ann MO Bot Gard 69, 557–593.

Germeraad, J.H., Hopping, C.A. Muller, J. (1968) Palynology of Tertiary sediments from tropical areas. Rev Paleobot Palynol 6, 189–348.

Goillot, C., de Franceschi D., Pons D., Antoine, P. (2007) Exceptionally preserved microfossils in the middle Miocene of Amazonian Peru: preliminary palaeoenvironmental implications. Cuadernos del Museo Geominero, Instituto Geológico y Minero de España, Madrid 8, 161–165.

Gomez, A., Jaramillo, C.A., Parra, M., Mora, A. (2009) Huesser horizon: a lake and a marine incursion in northwestern South America during the Early Miocene. SEPM, Palaios 24, 199–210.

Gonzalez-Guzman, A.E. (1967) A Palynologic Study on the Upper Los Cuervos and Mirador Formations (Lower and Middle Eocene), Tibú Area, Colombia. Leiden: E.J. Brill, 68 pp.

Guerrero, J., Sarmiento, G. (1996) Estratigrafía física, palinológica, sedimentológica y secuencial del Cretácico Superior y Paleoceno del Piedemonte Llanero. Implicaciones en exploración petrolera. Geología Colombiana 20, 3–66.

Conclusions

The Amazonian rainforest has had a long and dynamic history. Middle Cretaceous Amazonian fl oras were dominated by non-angiosperm taxa, whereas by the Paleocene, rainforests were dominated by angiosperms and were already populated by the plant families that are dominant in modern tropical Amazonian rainforests. The Neogene uplift of the Andes changed the drain-age system from south-north to west-east, and from rivers being predominantly born in the nutrient-depleted Precambrian cra-tons of South America, to rivers coming from the Andes with high levels of nutrients. The cooling trend of the Neogene probably reduced the area available for rainforests. Although quantitative studies are needed to substantiate this, a qualitative assessment suggests that the receding forest of the Late Miocene might have recovered during the Pliocene and Quaternary, but may not have regained the high diversity of the pre-Late Miocene period.

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by INPA, the Colombian Petroleum Institute, the Smithsonian Paleobiology Endowment Fund, and the Unrestricted Endowments Smithsonian Institution Grants. Juan Carlos Berrio and Herman Behling are thanked for raw pollen data. Special thanks go to M.I. Barreto for her continu-ous support and ideas. Bob Morley and Henry Hooghiemstra are acknowledged for their constructive reviews.

References

Antoine, P.-O., De Franceschi, D., Flynn, J.J., Nel, A., Baby, P., Benammi, M. et al. (2006) Amber from western Amazonia reveals Neotropical diversity during the middle Miocene: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103, 13595–13600.

Behling, H. (1996) First report on new evidence for the occurrence of Podocarpus and possible human presence at the mouth of the Amazon during the Late-glacial. Veg Hist Archaeobot 5, 241–246.

Behling, H., Hooghiemstra, H., Negret, A.J. (1998) Holocene history of the Choco rainforest from Laguna Piusbi, Southern Pacifi c Lowlands of Colombia. Quaternary Res 50, 300–308.

Berrio, J.C. (2002) Late glacial and Holocene vegetation and climatic change in lowland Colombia. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 240 pp.

Burnham, R.J., Graham, A. (1999) The history of neotropical vegetation: new developments and status. Ann MO Bot Gard 86, 546–589.

Burnham, R.J., Johnson, K.R. (2004) South American paleobotany and the origins of neotropical rainforests. Philos T Roy Soc B doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.153.

Burnham, R.J., Wing, S.L., Parker, G.G. (1992) The refl ection of deciduous forest communities in leaf litter: implications for autochthonous litter assemblages from the fossil record. Paleobiology 18, 30–49.

Bush, M. (2004) Amazonian speciation: a necessarily complex model. J Biogeogr 21, 5–17.

Campbell, K.E.J., Frailey, C.D., Romero Pitman, L. (2006) The Pan-Amazonian Ucayali peneplain, Late Neogene sedimentation

Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 332Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 332 10/24/2009 1:57:06 Shobha10/24/2009 1:57:06 Shobha

Page 17: NINETEEN The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest ...stri-sites.si.edu/.../PDFs/Jaramilloetal2010_OriginModernAmazon_R.p… · The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest: implications

Origin of the modern Amazon rainforest 333

Jaramillo, C., Pardo-Trujillo, A., Rueda, M., Harrington, G., Bayona, G., Torres, V., Mora, G. (2007a) Palynology of the Upper Paleocene Cerrejon Formation, northern Colombia. Palynology 31, 153–189.

Jaramillo, C., Rueda, M., Torres, V., Fiorini, F., Cardona, A., Bayona, G. et al. (2007b) Proyecto Cronología de las Secuencias Bioestratigráfi cas del Cenozoico del Piedemonte Llanero. Bucaramanga: Instituto Colombiano del Petroleo y Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute.

Jaramillo, C., Rueda, M., Bayona, G., Santos, C., Florez, P., Parra, F. Biostratigraphy breaking paradigms: dating the Mirador Formation in the Llanos Basin of Colombia. In: Demchuck, T. (ed.) Geological Problem Solving with Microfossils. Tulsa: SEPM Special Publications (in press).

Labandeira, C.C., Johnson, K.R., Wilf, P. (2002) Impact of the terminal Cretaceous event on plant-insect associations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99, 2061–2066.

Latrubesse, E.M., Silva, S., Cozzuol, M., Absy, M. (2007) Late Miocene continental sedimentation in southwestern Amazonia and its regional signifi cance: Biotic and geological evidence. J S Am Earth Sci 23, 61–80.

Lehman, T.M., Wheeler, E.A. (2001) A Fossil dicotyledonous woodland/forest from the Upper Cretaceous of Big Bend National Park, Texas. Palaios 16, 102–108.

Leite, F.P.R. (2004) Palinologia. In: Rossetti D.F., Goes, A.M. (eds) O Neogeno da Amazonia Orienta. Belen: Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi, pp. 55–90.

Leite, F.P.R. (2006) Palinologia da Formação Solimões, Neógeno da Bacia do Solimões, Estado do Amazonas, Brasil: Implicações Paleoambientais e Bioestratigráfi cas. Brasília: University of Brasília, 128 pp.

Lima, E.C. (1971) Bioestratigrafi a da Bacia de Barreirinhas. Internal report Petrobras-RENOR-381. Sao Paulo: Petrobras, 50 pp.

Lorente, M. (1986) Palynology and Palynofacies of the Upper Tertiary in Venezuela. Diss Bot 99, 1–222.

Maia, R.G., Godoi, H.K., Yamaguti, H.S., De Moura, P.A., Da Costa, F.S., De Holanda, M.A., Costa, J. (1977) Projeto Carvão no Alto Solimões. Final Report. Rio de Janeiro: CPRM-DNPM, 35 pp.

Morley, R.J. (2000) Origin and Evolution of Tropical Rainforests. New York: John Wiley, 362 pp.

Muller, J., Di Giacomo, E., Van Erve, A. (1987) A palynologic zonation for the Cretaceous, Tertiary and Quaternary of northern South America. American Association of Stratigraphic Palynologists Contribution Series 19, 7–76.

Oksanen, J., Kindt, R., O’Hara, B. (2005) Community Ecology Package, Package VEGAN 1.7-67 edn. R for Statistical Computing.

Olivier, J., Thierry, O., Roddaz, M., Antoine, P.-O., Londoño, X., Clark, L.G. (2009) First macrofossil evidence of a pre-Holocene thorny bamboo cf. Guadua (Poaceae: Bambusoideae: Bambuseae: Guaduinae) in south-western Amazonia (Madre de Dios – Peru). Rev Palaeobot Palynol 153, 1–7.

Pardo-Casas, F., Molnar, P. (1987) Relative motion of the Nazca (Farallon) and South American plates since Late Cretaceous time. Tectonics 6, 233–248.

Pardo-Trujillo, A., Jaramillo, C.A., Oboh-Ikuenobe, F. (2003) Paleogene palynostratigraphy of the eastern Middle Magdalena Valley, Colombia. Palynology 27, 155–178.

Piperno, D. (1988) Phytolith Analysis: An Archaeological and Geological Perspective. San Diego: Academic Press, 280 pp.

Piperno, D. (1997) Phytoliths and microscopic charcoal from Leg 155; a vegetational and fi re history of the Amazon Basin during the last 75 k.y. Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program. Scientifi c Results 155, 411–418.

Gutierrez, M., Jaramillo, C. (2007) Maastrichtian paleotemperature and paleoprecipitation from the Guaduas Formation, Colombia. Palynology 32, 260.

Herngreen, G.F.W. (1973) Palynology of Albian-Cenomanian strata of Borehole 1-QS-1-MA, State of Maranhao, Brazil. Pollen et Spores 15, 515–555.

Herngreen, G.F.W. (1975) An upper Senonian pollen assemblage of borehole 3-Pia-10-Al, State of Alagoas, Brazil. Pollen et Spores 17, 93–140.

Herrera, F., Jaramillo, C., Dilcher, D., Wing, S.L., Gomez, C. (2008a) Fossil Araceae from a Paleocene neotropical rainforest in Colombia. Am J Bot 95, 1–16.

Herrera, F., Wing, S.L., Jaramillo, C., Gomez, C., Dilcher, D., Wilf, P., Labandeira, C.C. (2008b) Fossils from Colombia reveal tropical rainforest in the Paleocene greenhouse world. Terra Nostra 2, 113.

Hoorn, C. (1993) Marine incursions and the infl uence of Andean tectonics on the Miocene depositional history of northwestern Amazonia: results of a palynostratigraphic study. Palaeogeogr Palaeocl 105, 267–309.

Hoorn, C. (1994a) Fluvial palaeonvironments in the intracratonic Amazonas Basin (Early Miocene-early Middle Miocene, Colombia). Palaeogeogr Palaeocl 109, 1–54.

Hoorn, C. (1994b) An environmental reconstruction of the palaeo-Amazon River system (Middle-Late Miocene, NW Amazonia). Palaeogeogr Palaeocl 112, 187–238.

Hoorn, C. (2006) Mangrove forests and marine incursions in Neogene Amazonia (Lower Apaporis River, Colombia). Palaios 21, 197–209.

Hoorn, C., Guerrero, J., Sarmiento, G.A., Lorente, M.A. (1995) Andean tectonics as a cause for changing drainage patterns in Miocene northern South America. Geology 23, 237–240.

Hurlbert, S.H. (1971) The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecological Monographs 54: 187–211.

Jackson, S.T., Williams, J.W. (2004) Modern analogs in Quaternary paleoecology: Here today, gone yesterday, gone tomorrow? Ann Rev Earth Planet Sci 32, 495–537.

Jaramillo, C.A. (2002) Response of tropical vegetation to Paleogene warming. Paleobiology 28, 222–243.

Jaramillo, C.A., Dilcher, D.L. (2000) Microfl oral diversity patterns of the late Paleocene-Eocene interval in Colombia, northern South America. Geology 28, 815–818.

Jaramillo, C.A., Dilcher, D.L. (2001) Middle Paleogene palynology of central Colombia, South America: A study of pollen and spores from tropical latitudes. Palaeontographica B 258, 87–213.

Jaramillo, C., Rueda, M. (2004) Impact of biostratigraphy on oil exploration. In: III Convencion Tecnica ACGGP, vol. P4. Bogota: ACGGP.

Jaramillo, C., Rueda, M. (2008) A morphological electronic database of Cretaceous-Tertiary fossil pollen and spores from northern South America. Bucaramanga: Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute and Colombian Petroleum Institute (http://biogeodb.stri.si.edu/jaramillo/palynomorph/).

Jaramillo, C., Muñoz, F., Cogollo, M., Parra, F. (2005a) Quantitative biostratigraphy for the Paleocene of the Llanos Foothills, Colombia: Improving palynological resolution for oil exploration. In: Powell, A.J., Riding, J. (eds) Recent Developments in Applied Biostratigraphy. Micropaleontological Society Special Publication, pp. 145–159.

Jaramillo, C., Rueda, M., Parra, F., Rodriguez, G. (2005b) Biostratigraphy breaking paradigms: the absence of the Mirador Formation in the Eastern Llanos of Colombia. In: Proceedings Geological Problem Solving with Microfossils. Houston: Rice University, pp. 41.

Jaramillo, C., Rueda, M., Mora, G. (2006) Cenozoic plant diversity in the Neotropics. Science 311, 1893–1896.

Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 333Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 333 10/24/2009 1:57:07 Shobha10/24/2009 1:57:07 Shobha

Page 18: NINETEEN The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest ...stri-sites.si.edu/.../PDFs/Jaramilloetal2010_OriginModernAmazon_R.p… · The origin of the modern Amazon rainforest: implications

334 C. Jaramillo et al.

Van der Hammen, T. (1956a) A palynological systematic nomenclature. Boletín Geológico 4, 63–101.

Van der Hammen, T. (1956b) Description of some genera and species of fossil pollen and spores. Boletín Geológico 4, 103–109.

Van der Hammen, T. (1957a) Climatic periodicity and evolution of South American Maestrichtian and Tertiary fl oras: a study based on pollen analysis in Colombia. Boletín Geológico 5, 49–91.

Van der Hammen, T. (1957b) Palynologic stratigraphy of the Sabana de Bogota (East Cordillera of Colombia). Boletín Geológico 5, 187–203.

Van der Hammen, T. (1958) Estratigrafía del Terciario y Maestrich-tiano continentales y Tectonogénesis de los Andes Colombianos. Boletín Geológico 6, 67–128.

Van der Hammen, T., García, C. (1966) The Paleocene pollen fl ora of Colombia. Leidse Geologische Mededelingen 35, 105–114.

Van der Hammen, T., Wymstra, T.A. (1964) A palynological study on the Tertiary and Upper Cretaceous of British Guayana. Leidse Geologische Mededelingen 30, 183–241.

Van der Kaars, W.A. (1983) A palynological-paleoecological study of the lower Tertiary coal-bed sequence from El Cerrejón (Colombia). Geología Norandina 8, 33–48.

Van Hoeken-Klinkenberg, P.M.J. (1964) A palynological investigation of some Upper-Cretaceous sediments in Nigeria. Pollen et Spores 6, 209–231.

Van Hoeken-Klinkenberg, P.M.J. (1966) Maastrichtian Paleocene and Eocene pollen and spores from Nigeria. Leidse Geologische Mededelingen 38, 37–48.

Wiemann, M.C., Wheeler, E.A., Manchester, S.R., Portier, K.M. (1998) Dicotyledonous wood anatomical characters as predictors of climate. Palaeogeogr Palaeocl 139, 83–100.

Wilf, P. (1997) When are leaves good thermometers? A new case for Leaf Margin Analysis. Paleobiology 23, 373–390.

Wilf, P., Johnson, K.R. (2004) Land plant extinction at the end of the Cretaceous: a quantitative analysis of the North Dakota megafl oral record. Paleobiology 30, 347–368.

Wilf, P., Wing, S.L., Greenwood, D.R., Greenwood, C.L. (1998) Using fossil leaves as paleoprecipitation indicators: an Eocene example. Geology 26, 203–206.

Wilf, P., Labandeira, C., Kress, W.J., Staines, C.L., Windsor, D.M., Allen, A.L., Johnson, K.R. (2000) Timing the radiations of leaf beetles: hispines on gingers from latest Cretaceous to Recent. Science 289, 291–294.

Wing, S.L., Alroy, J., Hickey, L.J. (1995) Plant and mammal diversity in the Paleocene to early Eocene of the Bighorn Basin. Palaeogeogr Palaeocl 115, 117–155.

Wing, S., Herrera, F., Jaramillo, C. (2004) A Paleocene fl ora from the Cerrejon formation, Guajira Peninsula, northeastern Colombia. In: International Organization of Paleobotany, Seventh Quatrennial Conference, Volume Abstracts. Bariloche, Argentina: IOPC, pp. 146–147.

Wolfe, J.A. (1979) Temperature parameters of humid to mesic forests of eastern Asia and relation to forests of other regions in the Northern Hemisphere and Australasia. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 1106, 1–37.

Zachos, J., Pagani, M., Sloan, L., Thomas, E., Billups, K. (2001) Trends, rhythms, and aberrations in global climate 65 Ma to present. Science 292, 686–693.

Pons, D., De Franceschi, D. (2007) Neogene woods from western Peruvian Amazon and palaeoenvironmental interpretation. Bull Geosci 82, 343–354.

Poole, I., van Bergen, P.F. (2006) Physiognomic and chemical char-acters in wood as palaeoclimate proxies. Plant Ecol 182, 175–195.

Price, L.I. (1960) Dentes de therapoda num testemunho de sonda no Estado do Amazonas. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 32, 79–84.

Quiroz, L., Jaramillo, C. Stratigraphy and sedimentary environments of Miocene shallow to marginal marine deposits in the Urumaco Trough, Falcon Basin, western Venezuela. In: Sanchez-Villagra, M., Aguilera, O., Carlini, A.A. (eds) Urumaco and Venezuelan Palaeontology. The Fossil Record of the Northern Neotropics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press (in press).

R-Development-Core-Team (2005) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

Rebata-H., L.A., Räsänen, M.E., Gingras, M.Y.K., Vieira Jr, V., Barberi, M., Irion, G. (2006) Sedimentology and ichnology of tide-infl uenced Late Miocene successions in western Amazonia: The gradational transition between the Pebas and Nauta formations. J S Am Earth Sci 21, 96–119.

Regali, M., Uesugui, N., Santos, A. (1974) Palinologia dos sedimentos Meso-Cenozoicos do Brasil. Boletim Tecnico da Petrobras 17, 177–191.

Rich, P.M., Helenurm, K., Kearns, D., Morse, S.R., Palmer, M.W. (1986) Height and stem diameter relationships for dicotyledonous trees and arborescent palms of Costa Rican tropical wet forest. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 113, 241–246.

Romero, E.J. (1993) South American paleofl oras. In: Goldblatt, P. (ed.) Biological Relationships Between Africa and South America. New Haven: Yale University Press, pp. 62–85.

Rosenzweig, M.L. (1995) Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 433 pp.

Rossetti, D.F., Goes, A.M. (eds) (2004) O Neogeno da Amazonia Oriental. Belen: Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi, 222 pp.

Royer, D.L., Sack, L., Wilf, P., Lusk, C.H., Jordan, G.J., Niinemets, U. et al. (2007) Fossil leaf economics quantifi ed: calibration, Eocene case study, and implications. Paleobiology 33, 574–589.

Rull, V. (2008) Speciation timing and neotropical biodiversity: the Tertiary-Quaternary debate in the light of molecular phylogenetic evidence. Mol Ecol. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03789.x.

Sanders, H.L. (1968) Marine benthic diversity: a comparative study. Am Nat 102, 243–282.

Santos, C., Jaramillo, C., Bayona, G., Rueda, M., Torres, V. (2008) Late Eocene marine incursion in northwestern South America. Palaeogeogr Palaeocl 264, 140–146.

Silva, S.A.F., Jaramillo, C., Absy, M.L. Neogene palynology of the Solimoes Basin, Brazilian Amazonia. Palaeontographica (in press).

Strömberg, C. (2004) Using phytolith assemblages to reconstruct the origin and spread of grass-dominated habitats in the great plains of North America during the late Eocene to early Miocene. Palaeogeogr Palaeocl 207, 239–275.

Van der Hammen, T. (1954) The development of Colombian fl ora throughout geologic periods: I, Maestrichtian to Lower Tertiary. Boletín Geológico 2, 49–106.

Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 334Hoorn_ch19_Final.indd 334 10/24/2009 1:57:07 Shobha10/24/2009 1:57:07 Shobha