Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from
description
Transcript of Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from
![Page 1: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Simulations of Pressure Waves induced by Proton Pulses
In search of the answer to the fundamental question: are materials indeed stronger than what we give them credit ?
Nicholas Simos, PhD, PEBrookhaven National Laboratory
INPUT also from
H. Kirk, K. McDonald, S. Kahn, H. Ludewig
![Page 2: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
OVERVIEW
Target Concepts
Simulation Studies
Benchmark Studies
![Page 3: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Background
•All studies suggest that, to push frontier in proton drivers to an order higher
than the existing ones, one must maximize the yield at the source
•Proton drivers with beam power up to 4 MW could become reality
•Challenge in finding suitable target material/configurations that will
withstand intense heating, shock waves and radiation damage
•Experience suggests that without R&D surprises have a way of coming back
![Page 4: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
WHY SIMULATION ?
•Because of complex geometries the ONLY way to identify trouble spots is
through simulation
•Given that we DO NOT have the high power yet (we just talk about it) it is
hard to know how target materials/target systems will REALY respond
•By benchmarking simulations at the available lower beam power we can
REASONABLY extrapolate the processes (as much as the state of knowledge
allows)
ONE thing that we cannot really do is identify FAILURE (failure means
different things to different people)
![Page 5: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Goals
• Find best possible materials that can be used as targets/beam windows under extreme conditions
• Experiment with selected materials, measure responses
• Validate prediction models against measurements to gain confidence in predicting material response and/or failure at anticipated extreme conditions
• USE experimental results to benchmark energy depositions predicted by the various Monte Carlo codes
![Page 6: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
TARGET CONCEPTS
•Solid Targets for Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory•Graphite, carbon-carbon, rotating band
•Beam windows
•Solid Targets for the Neutrino Superbeam (CC composite)
•Targets for Pulsed Neutron Sources
![Page 7: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Graphite Targets - E951
![Page 8: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
ATJ Graphite Energy Depositions
![Page 9: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
ATJ Graphite Strain Data Verification of fundamental modes of target response
Record of strains in the middle of the graphite rod (left) shows a bending frequency between 380-390 Hz
The prediction of the detailed model that implements the supporting/holding fixtures of the target as close to the real setting as possible, predicts a bending frequency of 395 Hz
Also from the record, the axial “ringing” of the target has a period of 260 to 265 microseconds. The fundamental axial period T=2L/c (where L is target rod length and c is speed of sound) is approximately 261 microseconds
The radial “ringing” on the other hand, which from theory is calculated at 150 KHz (or 6.625 microsecond period), is visible only in the strain record filtered by the 500 KHz acquisition
![Page 10: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
![Page 11: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
ATJ Graphite Strain Data
![Page 12: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
ATJ Graphite Strain ComparisonPrediction model has not implemented damping from supports or material
![Page 13: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
ATJ Graphite Strain Data - Predictions
![Page 14: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Strain Comparison: Graphite vs. Carbon-Carbon
BNL E951 Target Experiment 24 GeV 3.0 e12 proton pulse on Carbon-Carbon and ATJ graphite targets
Recorded strain induced by proton pulse
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 0.0002 0.0004 0.0006 0.0008 0.001
Time (sec)
Mic
rost
rain
C-C composite
ATJ Graphite
![Page 15: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Carbon-Carbon Strain Data
![Page 16: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
![Page 17: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
![Page 18: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
E951 WINDOW TEST Station Set-Up
Fiber-optic Strain Gauges & Double window vacuum monitoring
![Page 19: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
What Triggered the Window Experimental Effort
Figure above depicts the tight beam spot requirement (0.5 x 0.5 mm rms) for target experiment at AGS
Induced shock stress in a window structure by 16 TP intensity beam and the spot above will likely fail most materials in a single short pulse ( ~ 2 ns)
Figure (right) depicts prediction of vonMises stress in a stainless steel window for the above conditions. Initial shock stress is ~ 3 x yield strength of material !!
![Page 20: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Mechanism of induced shock stress in windows
•No matter how thin the window is, the reverberation of stress between surfaces is the key issue• vonMises stress amplitude depends on the spot size (initial compressive load amplitude), thickness of window, speed of sound and pulse shape• the measurement of strain on the surface is to be used as benchmark of the ability of the model to predict the stress field in the heated zone• the radial response (stress/strain) and the ability of the pulse to relax depends on the spot size and the pulse structure• smaller spot size does not necessarily mean larger response at a distance• smaller spot size definitely means higher stress field in the vicinity of the heated zone
![Page 21: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Mechanism of induced shock stress in windows
![Page 22: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
![Page 23: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Issues and Material Matrix selection
• FAST proton beam interacting with window and depositing energy in small spot inducing shock waves
• Based on a 24 GeV/16 TP/0.5 mm rms beam MOST materials could fail with a single pulse
• Though thin, failure in window governed by through-thickness response
• Sound speed, material thickness and pulse structure are critical elements
• Material search combined with analytical predictions led to the following materials for testing– Inconel 718 (1mm and 6mm thickness to study the effect)
– Havar
– Titanium Alloy (highest expectation of survivability)
– Aluminum
• Aluminum (3000 series) selected as the one that COULD fail under realistic expectations of AGS beam during E951 (~ 8 TP and 1mm rms)
![Page 24: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Finite Element Models to Capture the Dynamic Response of Windows
![Page 25: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Aluminum Window Strain Waves (beam spot ~ 0.3 x 1mm)
![Page 26: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Aluminum Window Strain Wave Simulation
![Page 27: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Aluminum Window Strain Data Experimental data vs. prediction using the new beam spot (0.3 x 1mm)
![Page 28: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Recorded Aluminum Window Strain Data in back-to-back pulses
![Page 29: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Measured and predicted strains in the 1mm thick Inconel-718
![Page 30: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
RECORDED strains in the Havar Window (back-to-back pulses)
![Page 31: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Lesson: You better have the necessary resolution, or …
E951 - Recorded Strain in the Aluminum Window - Raw Strains (100 KHz) vs. Processed (500 KHz)
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
0.00002 0.000025 0.00003 0.000035 0.00004 0.000045 0.00005 0.000055
secs
mic
ro-s
trai
n
Aluminum Window Strain Data - Raw(100 KHz) vs. Processed (500 KHZ)
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
-0.0001 0.0001 0.0003 0.0005 0.0007 0.0009
secs
mic
rost
rain
s
AL-01-57
Al-01-57 raw
![Page 32: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Illustration of sampling rate on data prediction
![Page 33: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
![Page 34: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
![Page 35: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
![Page 36: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
![Page 37: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Microscopic Evaluation
Of a Particle Bed Target
![Page 38: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
MACROSCOPIC ASSESSMENT OF A PARTICLE BED OPTION
•Utilize poroelastic equations of saturated medium
•Assess pulse attenuation vs. microscopic geometric parameters
•Validate using a controlled experiment
AGL File
![Page 39: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
-0.5
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035 0.04 0.045
![Page 40: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Recent BNL Irradiation Studies
![Page 41: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
![Page 42: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
![Page 43: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
![Page 44: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Solid Target Option: Super-Invar Irradiation Study
Load-Extension Data for Invar Irradiated Samples at various dpa levels
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25
Extension (mm)
Invar-22
Invar-23
Invar-24
Invar-25
non-irrad (#1)
WHY STUDY super Invar ?•High-Z with low CTE (0-150 oC)•How is CTE affected by radiation?•What happens to other important properties?
![Page 45: Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Brookhaven National Laboratory INPUT also from](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062305/56815721550346895dc4c056/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Super-Invar Irradiation Study – Temperature Effects
Effect of Heat Treatment in non-Irradiated Invar Samples
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25
Extension (mm)
Lo
ad (
N)
non treated Invar
Temp (300 C)
Temp (500 C)