NHS Hammersmith & Fulham CCG QIPP Performance Report M12 ... · Unique Ref Project Name POD Gross...
Transcript of NHS Hammersmith & Fulham CCG QIPP Performance Report M12 ... · Unique Ref Project Name POD Gross...
1
NHS Hammersmith & Fulham CCG QIPP Performance Report
M12: April-14
Contents
Section 1: Executive Summary
• Financial summary
• Programme summary
Section 2: M12 Finance and Activity
• Financial Summary
• Activity Summary
Section 3: Progress Reports
Part A: Unscheduled Care
• Care Planning and co-ordination
• Excess bed days reduction
Part B: Planned Care
• Dermatology
• Gynaecology
• MSK
• Respiratory adult
• Diabetic medicine
• Peer review of GP referrals
Section 4: Project Confidence Report
Section 5: Key Programme Risks
Appendices
2
The year end forecast shifted adversely by c.2% in M12 due to shifts in prescribing and NEL schemes
Financial summary
• YTD and forecast position: delivered savings of £8,921k against a plan of £10,549k (£1,628k / 15.4% under performance)
• The year end forecast has deteriorated from last month by £240k (the biggest shifts were on prescribing of £140k and £88k on NEL scheme)
• SUS data used for reporting year to date position: M01 to M10 (freeze), M11 (flexed), M12 (forecast)
3
QIPP Year to Date Delivery
YTD Plan £’000
YTD Actual £’000
Variance £’000
Variance %
RAG
10,549 8,921 -1,628 -15.4% A / G
QIPP Full Year Forecast
Full Year Plan £’000
Forecast Net Savings to Year End
£’000
Forecast Variance to Year
End £’000
Forecast Variance to
Year End %
RAG
10,549 8,921 -1,628 -15.4% A / G
Key successes:
• 100% of practices are now on SystmOne. 31% of patients will have a summary care record by end of March 2014. By the 1st April, CLCH will have migrated their Adult Community Health Services to record on SystmOne
• Interim model of Geriatrician support for VW/CIS team agreed with increased level of consultant support for the OPRAC clinic
• MH nurse recruited into CIS with a drug and alcohol background who will be able to support the VW team
• Social worker commencing in April-14
• H&F are within the top 6 London boroughs for use of CMC
• Clinical guidelines are being set up (involving primary, community and secondary care) and clinician educational course is being developed for approval by the group
• Single point of triage to be implemented for Respiratory service initially in shadow form for 2 months from 1st May-14
• Capacity modelling to date for MSK shows that we will achieve a reduction of waiting times to 4 weeks by June-14
4
Part A: Unscheduled care
1. Care Planning and co-ordination: The NEL SUS data has been highly variable in 13/14 with a range of savings achieved from £0 - £180k with no clear direction behind the trend. We have therefore based our M12 forecast on a three-point estimate in order to take into account the potential benefit of delivering the most optimistic scenario (full M12 plan including additional impact from virtual ward) and mitigate the risk of actually achieving the most pessimistic scenario (no year on year savings in M12)
2. Excess bed days: Savings delivered month on month have been highly variable. The In-reach activity went down in Feb-14 due to the fact that the member of staff who was providing this role at Hammersmith Hospital has been signed off on 6 weeks sickness & the CIS have been unable to recruit a locum to cover them. Jan-14 and Feb-14 activity has been affected as a result of a few patients discharged after a long stay
Part B: Planned care
1. Dermatology : This scheme is delivering above the planned level of savings and we expect the year end forecast to be in trend. Given the success, we are looking at how to expand this service with additional clinics next year and support from a second GPwSI. Meeting took place on 6th Feb-14 with CLCH and GP providers to discuss service provision and the specification for 14/15
2. Gynaecology: The single point of triage introduced in May-13 has proven effective and additional clinics put on appear to have been effective in further reducing acute gynaecology activity. A decision has been made to procure this service in 14/15 and the current contract has been extended until 31.12.14. The service will be procured for 3 years
3. MSK: Waiting list catch up clinics began on 6th Jan-14. Physio waiting times have reduced to 9 weeks and 10 weeks for CATS. CATS will show a greater impact in April/May due to difficulties in recruiting ESPs (2wte start in April and 1wte to be trained and starts in May). Capacity modelling to date shows a reduction to 4 weeks waiting by June-14
4. Respiratory: Strategic meetings took place with Acute and Community providers to develop and agree service developments for 14/15. A single point of triage will be implemented, initially in a shadow form for 2 months from May-14. Agreement has been reached to discuss with Imperial and ChelWest to bring existing Acute Sleep service into the Community service. The Sleep consultant will also audit all referrals for 2 months detailing current pathway and outcomes
5. Diabetes: We do not forecast any impact on activity flows until 14/15. As a result of the clinical service review, diabetes leads have been identified in all practices. Collaborative Strategy meetings are taking place. A working group is to be set up to detail the clinical guidelines and patient structured education
6. Peer review: As anticipated, no savings were seen as a result of this scheme this month and none are anticipated for the rest of the year
7. Part C: Prescribing
The year end forecast in the financial ledger has improved significantly this month, now reporting £44k overspend. The QIPP forecast this month has been revised in line with ledger instead of using the Jan-14 ePACT report that forecasts an underspend of £54k
The year end forecast has been revised reflecting an adverse movement in prescribing and NEL
Contents
Section 1: Executive Summary
• Financial summary
• Programme summary
Section 2: M12 Finance and Activity
• Financial Summary
• Activity Summary
Section 3: Progress Reports
Part A: Unscheduled Care
• Care Planning and co-ordination
• Excess bed days reduction
Part B: Planned Care
• Dermatology
• Gynaecology
• MSK
• Respiratory adult
• Diabetic medicine
• Peer review of GP referrals
Section 4: Project Confidence Report (for schemes not requiring progress reports)
Section 5: Key Programme Risks
Appendices
5
Financial Summary
6 (Negative) value or variance reflects under achievement Positive value or variance reflects over performance
Year to date (M12)- Financial Summary Full Year Forecast (Net)
Unique Ref Project Name POD Gross Plan
(£000)
Gross Actual (£000)
Gross Variance
(£000)
Repro Plan
(£000)
Repro Actual (£000)
Repro Variance
(£000)
Net Plan (£000)
Net Actual (£000)
Net Variance
(£000)
Net Variance
(%)
Net Plan (£000)
Net Actual (£000)
Net Variance
(£000)
Net Variance
(%)
HFCCG01a Care Planning and Co-ordination
NEL 2,592 984 -1,608 1,044 405 -639 1,552 579 -973 -62.7% 1,552 579 -973 -62.7%
HFCCG01d Excess Bed Days Reduction XD BDs 132 108 -24 0 0 0 131 108 -22 -16.7% 131 108 -23 -17.6%
HFCCG03 Musculoskeletal Services OPFA / OPFU
338 13 -324 0 0 0 338 13 -325 -96.3% 338 13 -325 -96.3%
HFCCG04 Respiratory Adult OPFA / OPFU
86 12 -75 0 0 0 86 12 -75 -86.4% 86 12 -75 -86.6%
HFCCG05 Diabetic Medicine OPFA / OPFU
53 0 -53 0 0 0 53 0 -53 -100.0% 53 0 -53 -100.0%
HFCCG06 Dermatology OPFA / OPFU
49 88 40 0 0 0 49 88 38 77.2% 49 87 38 77.4%
HFCCG07 Gynaecology OPFA / OPFU
101 79 -22 0 0 0 101 79 -22 -21.6% 101 79 -22 -21.5%
HFCCG08 Peer Review of GP Referrals OPFA / OPFU
169 18 -150 0 0 0 169 18 -151 -89.7% 169 18 -151 -89.3%
HFCCG09 Children Services (Maternity Service Improvement)
688 688 0 0 0 0 688 688 0 0.0% 688 688 0 0.0%
HFCCG10a Current MH Proposals- WLMHT
1,008 1,008 0 216 216 0 788 788 0 0.0% 788 788 0 0.0%
HFCCG10b Current MH Proposals- NHS specialists & Independent sector providers
294 294 0 0 0 0 294 294 0 0.0% 294 294 0 0.0%
HFCCG10c Current MH Proposals- CNWL
100 100 0 0 0 0 100 100 0 0.0% 100 100 0 0.0%
HFCCG11 Community Services (CLCH Contract)
1,500 1,500 0 0 0 0 1,500 1,500 0 0.0% 1,500 1,500 0 0.0%
HFCCG13 Prescribing 900 860 -40 0 0 0 900 856 -44 -4.9% 900 856 -45 -4.9%
HFCCG14 Acute Contracts 3,800 2,850 -950 0 0 0 3,800 2,850 -950 -25.0% 3,800 2,850 -950 -25.0%
Additional Contract Benefits 0 950 950 0 950 950 950 950
Total 11,809 9,554 -2,255 1,260 621 -639 10,549 8,921 -1,628 -15.4% 10,549 8,921 -1,628 -15.4%
7
Activity Summary
(Negative) value or variance reflects under achievement Positive value or variance reflects over performance
Year to date (M12)- Activity Analysis Full Year Forecast (Net) Unique Ref Project Name POD Gross Plan Gross
Actual Gross
Variance Gross
Variance (%)
Gross Plan Gross Actual
Gross Variance
Gross Variance (%)
HFCCG01a Care Planning and Co-ordination NEL 1,188 336 -852 -72% 1,188 394 -794 -66.9%
HFCCG01d Excess Bed Days Reduction XD BDs 528 420 -108 -20% 527 420 -107 -20.3%
HFCCG03 Musculoskeletal Services OPFA / OPFU 2,563 28 -2,535 -99% 2,563 28 -2,535 -98.9%
HFCCG04 Respiratory Adult OPFA / OPFU 539 114 -425 -79% 539 114 -425 -78.8%
HFCCG05 Diabetic Medicine OPFA / OPFU 337 0 -337 -100% 337 0 -337 -100.0%
HFCCG06 Dermatology OPFA / OPFU 458 792 334 73% 458 861 403 87.9%
HFCCG07 Gynaecology OPFA / OPFU 887 538 -349 -39% 887 561 -326 -36.7%
HFCCG08 Peer Review of GP Referrals OPFA / OPFU 1,214 121 -1,093 -90% 1,214 121 -1,093 -90.0%
Total 7,714 2,349 -5,365 -70% 7,713 2,499 -5,214 -67.6%
Contents
Section 1: Executive Summary
• Financial summary
• Programme summary
Section 2: M12 Finance and Activity
• Financial Summary
• Activity Summary
Section 3: Progress Reports
Part A: Unscheduled Care
• Care Planning and co-ordination
• Excess bed days reduction
Part B: Planned Care
• Dermatology
• Gynaecology
• MSK
• Respiratory adult
• Diabetic medicine
• Peer review of GP referrals
Section 4: Project Confidence Report (for schemes not requiring progress reports)
Section 5: Key Programme Risks
Appendices
8
9
Unscheduled Care: Care Planning & Co-ordination Summary
PROGRESS PLAN
Project code HFCCG01a Date form updated 09.04.14
Project name Care Planning and Coordination CCG project lead Rob Sainsbury Reason remedial plan triggered (E.g.. Finance, quality, severe delay, high risk, other difficulty)
QIPP performance under 80% of plan
Condition on which remedial plan will be closed (E.g.. Back on plan, agreed by Board)
QIPP performance over 80% of plan
1. Financial position
Year to date Full year forecast
Month Plan
£'000s Actual £'000s Variance £'000s Variance% RAG
Rating Plan £'000s Forecast £'000s
Variance £'000s Variance %
RAG Rating
M12 1,552 579 -973 -62.7% RED 1,552 579 -973 -62.7% RED
2. Cause of variance from plan (Rationale for current delivery) Issues identified as causing variance from plan
1 It is difficult to quantify the impact on the NEL admissions for patients who have had care plans completed. This is because we are not able to identify the patients involved (due to IG restrictions). The targeted cohort who should receive care plans has not been revised since April-13 because the Combined Predictive Modelling Tool is not updated
2 Clinical system migration to SystmOne has caused some issues with consistent access to care planning templates. This has affected the no of care plan completed during the year but we expect care planning activity to increase significantly in Q4
3 The behavioural shift involved in moving from a re-active to a preventative approach is taking time to embed and awareness of usage of services such as the CIS has taken time to spread
4 Performance impacted by delay in the roll out of GP model supporting VW. CIS, H&SCCs and matrons are in post
Rationale for current forecast
We have revised our forecast this month to deliver a net savings of £579k compared to £666k forecasted last month (adverse movement of £88k). This reflects the delay we have experienced in the roll out of the GP model and we are looking at alternatives with Networks and Acute partners (for e.g.; interim model of geriatrician support for the VW/CIS team has been agreed). The revised forecast takes into account assessment of the current Virtual Ward model in operation. Going forward, we need to increase engagement with Network GPs so that they are beginning to identify patients suitable for Virtual Ward and increase consultant input into the VW model. M12 forecast is based on a 3-point estimate approach in order to take account the potential benefit of delivering the most optimistic scenario
10
Care planning & co-ordination finance and activity trends
Note: Planning for 14/15 is on-going and estimates could change
-£50
£0
£50
£100
£150
£200
M01 M02 M03 M04 M05 M06 M07 M08 M09 M10 M11 M12QIP
P P
lan
Vs
Act
ual
(£
00
0)
QIPP Plan Vs Actual (£000 savings)
Net QIPP Plan
Net Actual & Forecast
500
550
600
650
700
750
1 2 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3
12-13 Actuals (baseline) 13-14 Plan Net of QIPP 14-15 Q1
No
n-e
lect
ive
adm
issi
on
s
Non- Elective activity trend: actual and forecast
12-13 Actual
13-14 Net of Planned QIPP Requirement
13-14 Actual
Forecast
11
Care Planning & co-ordination reprovision activity
Rapid Response Service
Rapid Response is one element of the Community Independence Service (CIS). The CIS provides admission avoidance and early supported discharge for patients and integrated intermediate care support for up to 6 weeks
Rapid Response Activity relates to community based referrals to the Community Independence Service requiring a 2 hour response in order to prevent a hospital admission and/or care home placement
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Jan-13 Feb-13 Mar-13 Apr-13 May-13 Jun-13 Jul-13 Aug-13 Sep-13 Oct-13 Nov-13 Dec-13 Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14
Total Rapid Response referrals per month
Rapid Response
In Reach
Total
010203040506070
Month
Number Of Rapid Response Referrals By Source Per Month Social work team
Self refer
Reablement
Other
London Ambulance
Informal carers
GP
Falls team
District Nurse
Care Home
A&E
12
PROGRESS PLAN
Project code HFCCG01d Date form updated 09.04.14 Project name Excess bed days reduction CCG project lead Rob Sainsbury 1. Financial position
Year to date Full year forecast
Month Plan
£'000s Actual £'000s Variance £'000s Variance%
RAG Rating
Plan £'000s
Forecast £'000s
Variance £'000s Variance %
RAG Rating
M12 131 108 -23 -17.6% AMBER / GREEN 131 108 -23 -17.6%
AMBER / GREEN
2. Cause of variance from plan (Rationale for current delivery) Drivers of current performance
1 Savings delivered month on month based on SUS data are highly variable
2 In-reach services which operates as part of the Community Independence service has seen an increase in the no of referrals and is proving effective to discharge patients from hospital. In Feb-14, there was a drop in activity as member of staff who was providing the role at Hammersmith Hospital has been signed off on a 6 weeks sickness
3 Jan-14 and Feb-14 also saw few patients discharged after a long stay (beyond the trim point)
Rationale for current forecast
Savings delivered month on month are highly variable and taking into account the delivery in recent months, we revised our forecast delivery down from £131k to £108k in M11 and we have maintained this forecast this month. High activity in Jan-14 and Feb-14 is a result of few patients discharged after a long stay
Unscheduled Care: Excess Bed Days Summary
13
Excess bed days finance and activity trends
-£15
£5
£25
£45
£65
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
QIP
P P
lan
Vs
Act
ual
(£
00
0)
QIPP Plan Vs Actual (£000 savings)
Net Target
Net Actual & Forecast
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
1 2 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
12-13 Actuals (baseline) 13-14 Plan Net of QIPP
Exce
ss B
ed D
ays
Act
ivit
y
Excess bed days activity trend
12-13 Actual
13-14 Net of Planned QIPP Requirement
13-14 Actual
Forecast
14
In Reach
The In-reach activity went down in Feb-14 due to the fact that the member of staff who was providing this role at Hammersmith Hospital has been signed off on 6 weeks sickness & the CIS have been unable to recruit a locum to cover them. Agreement has been reached to cover this function across the team and locums are recruited that will then back fill this support
Excess bed days reprovision activity
0
50
100
150
200
Jan-13 Feb-13 Mar-13 Apr-13 May-13 Jun-13 Jul-13 Aug-13 Sep-13 Oct-13 Nov-13 Dec-13 Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14
Total In Reach referrals per month
Rapid Response
In Reach
Total
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Jan-13 Feb-13 Mar-13 Apr-13 May-13 Jun-13 Jul-13 Aug-13 Sep-13 Oct-13 Nov-13 Dec-13 Jan-14 Feb-14 Mar-14
Number Of In Reach Referrals By Source Per Month
St Mary's Hospital
Hammersmith Hospital
Chelsea Westminster Hospital
Charing Cross Hospital
15
PROGRESS PLAN
Project code HFCCG06 Date form updated 09.04.14
Project name Dermatology CCG project lead Julie Scrivens
1. Financial position Year to date Full year forecast
Month Plan
£'000s Actual £'000s Variance £'000s Variance%
RAG Rating
Plan £'000s
Forecast £'000s
Variance £'000s Variance %
RAG Rating
M12 49 87 38 77.4% GREEN 49 87 38 77.4% GREEN
2. Cause of variance from plan (Rationale for current delivery) Drivers of current delivery
1 GPs have a high level of confidence in this service. It is provided by a single, very experienced GPwSI who is known to the networks and attends the Acute MDT meeting
2 The Service is also very popular with patients as it is provided in several locations which are close to home and accessible to patients (Lilliville Surgery and Canberra Health Centre; Minor Surgery operates from Parsons Green Health Centre)
Rationale for current forecast
The forecast is based on the current trend and assumes that over-delivery will continue at its current rate to year end. A meeting has taken place with CLCH and GP providers to discuss the service and understand the specification for 14/15. The service specification is being re-visited and a proposal to enhance the clinical sessions is being considered
Planned care: Dermatology Summary
16
Dermatology finance and activity trends
£0
£2
£4
£6
£8
£10
£12
£14
£16
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
QIP
P P
lan
Vs
Act
ual
(£
00
0)
QIPP Plan Vs Actual (£000 savings)
Net Target
Net Actual & Forecast
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
11-12 Actual 12-13 Actuals (baseline) 13-14 Plan Net of QIPP
Ou
tpat
ien
t A
tten
dan
ces
(Fir
st &
Fo
llow
-up
)
Dermatology acute OP activity trend: actual and forecast
11-12 Actual
12-13 Actual
13-14 Net of Planned QIPP Requirement
13-14 Actual
Forecast
17
PROGESS PLAN
Project code HFCCG07 Date form updated 09.04.14 Project name Gynaecology CCG project lead Julie Scrivens & Michelle
Davidson Reason remedial plan triggered (E.g.. Finance, quality, severe delay, high risk, other difficulty)
QIPP performance under 80% of plan
Condition on which remedial plan will be closed (E.g.. Back on plan, agreed by Board)
QIPP performance over 80% of plan
1. Financial position Year to date Full year forecast
Month Plan
£'000s Actual £'000s Variance £'000s Variance%
RAG Rating
Plan £'000s
Forecast £'000s
Variance £'000s Variance %
RAG Rating
M12 101 79 -22 -21.5% AMBER 101 79 -22 -21.5% AMBER
2. Cause of variance from plan (Rationale for current delivery) Drivers of current performance
1 Single point of triage for all GP referrals has been in place since May-13. This has ensured patient care is directed to the correct service, first time around and in the most timely manner, taking into account patient choice for acute provision
2 Telephone advice and information is also available to support GPs
Rationale for current forecast
Based on savings delivered in the last 3 months, we have revised our forecast this month to deliver net savings of £79k compared to £88k in m11. Current contract has been extended to 31.12.14 to allow for full procurement to take place with plans to develop the service specification to include acute consultant input
Planned care: Gynaecology Summary
18
Gynaecology finance and activity trends
£0
£2
£4
£6
£8
£10
£12
£14
£16
£18
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
QIP
P P
lan
Vs
Act
ual
(£
00
0) QIPP Plan Vs Actual (£000 savings)
Net Target
Net Actual & Forecast
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
11-12 Actual 12-13 Actuals (baseline) 13-14 Plan Net of QIPP
Ou
tpat
ien
t A
tten
dan
ces
(Fir
st &
Fo
llow
-up
)
Gynaecology actue OP activity trend: actual and forecast
11-12 Actual
12-13 Actual
13-14 Net of Planned QIPP Requirement
13-14 Actual
Forecast
19
PROGRESS PLAN
Project code HFCCG03 Date form updated 09.04.14 Project name MSK CCG project lead Julie Scrivens Reason remedial plan triggered (E.g.. Finance, quality, severe delay, high risk, other difficulty)
QIPP performance under 80% of plan
Condition on which remedial plan will be closed (E.g.. Back on plan, agreed by Board)
QIPP performance over 80% of plan
1. Financial position Year to date Full year forecast
Month Plan £'000s Actual £'000s Variance £'000s Variance% RAG
Rating Plan £'000s Forecast £'000s
Variance £'000s Variance %
RAG Rating
M12 338 13 -325 -96.3% RED 338 13 -325 -96.3% RED 2. Cause of variance from plan (Ratio10e for current delivery) Issues identified as causing variance from plan
1 Initial lack of awareness of the Community service on offer has resulted in low levels of referrals from GPs 2 There has been slow re-direction of GP referrals - analysis has demonstrated that a group of practices in Network 2 continued to refer to
Charing Cross Acute Hospital 3 Staffing issues with the Community service- lack of specialist staff in T&O increased the waiting times. Activity has also been impacted with
vacancies existed over the winter months and maternity leave 4 Waiting times- community waits need reducing. The reported waiting times are 9 weeks for Physio, 13 weeks for CATs and 2 week for Pain
management. Waiting times rose in October/November as a result of increased referrals- historically this happens each year. Waiting times rose again due to clinics closed over the Christmas period but wait list initiative clinics began in January-14
5 Impact of waiting list clinics which started in Jan-14 is assumed to be slower than anticipated due to difficulty in ESP staff recruitment for CATs service and a delay in GP confidence returning until the waiting times have reduced to acceptable level
Rationale for current forecast
We have maintained the m11 forecast this month to deliver no further savings in m12. CCG / provider meeting have taken place to discuss the current service and clear actions have been agreed (waiting time lists, reinstallation of patient booking line, DNA reduction, GP education and support peer review). Waiting times need to return to an acceptable level to and 3wte ESPs starting in the CATs service from April/May 2014 will help
Planned care: MSK Summary
20
MSK finance and activity trends
£0
£5
£10
£15
£20
£25
£30
M01 M02 M03 M04 M05 M06 M07 M08 M09 M10 M11 M12
QIP
P P
lan
Vs
Act
ual
(£
00
0) QIPP Plan Vs Actual (£000 savings)
Net QIPP Plan
Net Actual & Forecast
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
11-12 Actual 12-13 Actual (baseline) 13-14 Plan Net of QIPP
Ou
tpat
ien
t A
tten
dan
ces
(Fir
st &
Fo
llow
-up
)
MSK acute OP activity trend: actual and forecast
11-12 Actual
12-13 Actual
13-14 Net of Planned QIPP Requirement
13-14 Actual
Forecast
21
PROGRESS PLAN
Project code HFCCG04 Date form updated 09.04.14 Project name Respiratory Adult CCG project lead Julie Scrivens Reason remedial plan triggered (E.g.. Finance, quality, severe delay, high risk, other difficulty)
QIPP performance under 80% of plan Condition on which remedial plan will be closed (E.g.. Back on plan, agreed by Board)
QIPP performance over 80% of plan
1. Financial position Year to date Full year forecast
Month Plan
£'000s Actual £'000s
Variance £'000s Variance%
RAG Rating
Plan £'000s
Forecast £'000s
Variance £'000s Variance %
RAG Rating
M12 86 12 -75 -86.6% RED 86 12 -75 -86.6% RED 2. Cause of variance from plan (Rationale for current delivery) Issues identified as causing variance from plan
1 Service delivery has been affected following departure of a long standing and well respected Consultant (Irem Patel) in January 2013 . Locum cover was sought and a new consultant (Vince Mac) started on 16th September
2 Performance has been affected as GPs view the current service only suitable for COPD conditions and not a true alternative to the hospital service. Greater clarity is required in regards to what conditions can be treated by both nursing specialist and consultant. GP education programme to be undertaken by the service
Rationale for current forecast
We have revised our forecast this month to deliver savings of £12k, an adverse movement of £8k on previous forecast. New consultant is attending network meeting to offer peer review of referrals and education & training. Consultant has also made effort to review all community follow up patients and discharged where appropriate, back to GP with a management plan. Discussions have started with Community and Acute providers to develop and agree service development for 14/15 including implementing single point of triage
Planned care: Respiratory Summary
22
Respiratory finance and activity trends
Note:. Planning for 14/15 is in progress and estimates may change
£0
£1
£2
£3
£4
£5
£6
£7
£8
M01 M02 M03 M04 M05 M06 M07 M08 M09 M10 M11 M12
QIP
P P
lan
Vs
Act
ual
(£
00
0) QIPP Plan Vs Actual (£000 savings)
Net Target
Net Actual & Forecast
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112 1 2 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112 1 2 3
11-12 Actual 12-13 Actual (baseline) 13-14 Plan Net of QIPP 14-15Q1
Ou
tpat
ien
t A
tten
dan
ces
(Fi
rst
&
Follo
w-u
p)
Respiratory medicine acute OP activity trend: actual and forecast
11-12 Actual
12-13 Actual
13-14 Net of Planned QIPP Requirement
13-14 Actual
Forecast
23
PROGRESS PLAN
Project code HFCCG05 Date form updated 09.04.14 Project name Diabetic medicine CCG project lead Julie Scrivens Reason remedial plan triggered (E.g.. Finance, quality, severe delay, high risk, other difficulty)
QIPP performance under 80% of plan
Condition on which remedial plan will be closed (E.g.. Back on plan, agreed by Board)
QIPP performance over 80% of plan
1. Financial position Year to date Full year forecast
Month Plan
£'000s Actual £'000s Variance £'000s Variance%
RAG Rating
Plan £'000s
Forecast £'000s
Variance £'000s Variance %
RAG Rating
M12 53 0 -48 -100.0% RED 53 0 -53 -100.0% RED 2. Cause of variance from plan (Rationale for current delivery) Issues identified as causing variance from plan
1 Staffing issues- Specialist diabetic nurse vacancy due to retirement and then long term sickness of temporary staff has resulted in increased waiting times
2 Low profile of the Community service offered resulting in low referrals
Rationale for current forecast
Based on issues identified to-date and discussions with GP lead, it's unlikely that any actions to address the issues will delivery savings this year. Hence, the year end forecast is maintained to deliver £0 savings. However, we do expect to see a significant impact next year of rolling out a new service model, with significant focus on patient education, use of practice leads and leverage of the single clinical system which will then be in place. Third Collaborative CWHHE Diabetes Strategy meeting will take place on 24
th April .
Several meetings are due to take place regarding Patient structured education (conversation maps) and are trying to secure a meeting with current provider CLCH to scope future works
Planned care: Diabetic medicine Summary
24
Diabetic medicine finance and activity trends
Note: Planning for 14/15 is in progress and estimates may change
£0
£1
£1
£2
£2
£3
£3
£4
£4
£5
£5
M01 M02 M03 M04 M05 M06 M07 M08 M09 M10 M11 M12
QIP
P P
lan
Vs
Act
ual
(£
00
0) QIPP Plan Vs Actual (£000 savings)
Net Target
Net Actual & Forecast
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112 1 2 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112 1 2 3
11-12 Actual 12-13 Actuals (baseline) 13-14 Plan Net of QIPP 14-15Q1
Ou
tpat
ien
t A
tten
dan
ces
(Fir
st &
Fo
llow
-up
)
Diabetic medicine acute OP activity trend: actual and forecast
11-12 Actual
12-13 Actual
13-14 Net of Planned QIPP Requirement
13-14 Actual
Forecast
25
PROGRESS PLAN
Project code HFCCG08 Date form updated 09.04.14 Project name GP Peer review CCG project lead Sophie Ruiz Reason remedial plan triggered (E.g.. Finance, quality, severe delay, high risk, other difficulty)
QIPP performance under 80% of plan Condition on which remedial plan will be closed (E.g.. Back on plan, agreed by Board)
QIPP performance over 80% of plan
1. Financial position Year to date Full year forecast
Month Plan £'000s Actual £'000s Variance £'000s Variance% RAG
Rating Plan £'000s Forecast £'000s
Variance £'000s Variance %
RAG Rating
M12 169 18 -151 -89.3% RED 169 18 -151 -89.3% RED
If non-financial trigger of remedial plan, include descriptor of current position here: 2. Cause of variance from plan (Rationale for current delivery) Issues identified as causing variance from plan
1 Data analysis has shown that the biggest area of increase in spend from 12-13 to 13-14 is attributed to Vascular Surgery and Gastroenterology. Further work has been done investigating Vascular Surgery activity and follow-up with Trust is underway
2 We have had a discussion with a member of the CCG who has identified waiting list and availability of the leg ulcer community clinic issues
Rationale for current forecast
Detailed analysis done has identified significant differences in what is measured in the network plan (30 specialties and OPFA activity only) and in the QIPP scheme (10 specialties & OPFA and FU activity). The specialities reporting an increase in cost in the QIPP scheme are also reporting an increase in the network plan. Network plan in its entirety is reporting a reduction in expenditure (9 specialities reporting an increase and 21 specialties showing reduction). However, the reductions are seen mostly in the low volume specialties (including a number of paediatric specialties) which we have assumed to be a result of changes in Specialised Commissioning. We have maintained our forecast to deliver £0 savings in m12
Planned care: GP Peer review
26
Peer review (10 top OP specialties) finance and activity trends
£0
£2
£4
£6
£8
£10
£12
£14
£16
£18
£20
M01 M02 M03 M04 M05 M06 M07 M08 M09 M10 M11 M12
QIP
P P
lan
Vs
Act
ual
(£
00
0)
QIPP Plan Vs Actual (£000 savings)
Net Target
Net Actual & Forecast
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
2200
2400
1 2 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
12-13 Actuals (baseline) 13-14 Plan Net of QIPP
Ou
tpat
ien
t A
tten
dan
ces
(Fir
st &
Fo
llow
-up
)
10 top acute OP activity trend (excluding those with community services): actual and forecast
12-13 Actual
13-14 Net of Planned QIPP Requirement
13-14 Actual
Forecast
Contents
Section 1: Executive Summary
• Financial summary
• Programme summary
Section 2: M12 Finance and Activity
• Financial Summary
• Activity Summary
Section 3: Progress Reports
Part A: Unscheduled Care
• Care Planning and co-ordination
• Excess bed days reduction
Part B: Planned Care
• Dermatology
• Gynaecology
• MSK
• Respiratory adult
• Diabetic medicine
• Peer review of GP referrals
Section 4: Project Confidence Report (for schemes not requiring progress reports)
Section 5: Key Programme Risks
Appendices
27
28
Ref Scheme Title Delivery Delivery Rationale Outcome Outcome Rationale Unscheduled Care Schemes HFCCG01d Excess Bed Days Reduction
(contractual lever) Green The impact of reduction in LOS and XS bed days will result in
increased activity for our Community Independence service and our core Community services such as District Nursing
Green Over delivering to-date and forecast to exceed the planned level of savings
Other Scheme HFCCG02 Children Services (Maternity Serv
Improvement) Green Non-recurrent funding agreement has been terminated and
contract agreed with the provider Green The required reduction of £688k
has been agreed in contract with the provider
Mental Health HFCCG10 Current MH proposals- WLMHT (3
work streams: efficiency, IP to Community, Community to Primary Care)
Green Contract negotiations have concluded with WLMHT and review of provider CIP and QIPP has taken place
Green Contract negotiations have delivered the required QIPP of £788k
HFCCG10 Current MH proposals- NHS Specialists & Independent Sector providers (out of area placements)
Green There is a continual process of gatekeeper the referrals made out of area and reviewing out of area placements and step down to less intensive care. This approach is adopted through a mutli-disciplinary panel
Green Monthly monitoring is through review of out of area placement budgets
HFCCG10 CNWL MH Trust SLA (efficiency) Green Contract negotiations have completed with CNWL Green Contract negotiations have delivered efficiencies savings of £100k as planned
Community Services HFCCG11 CLCH Contract (including 2012/13
efficiency) Green Contract negotiations have completed with CLCH Green Contract negotiations have
delivered the required QIPP of £1,500k
Prescribing HFCCG13 Prescribing opportunities Green Savings will be delivered through drugs switching, reduce medicine
related harm, primary care rebates, reduce medicine wastage. Medicine management team will visit each practice and Eclipse and ePAC will inform a view of the best few opportunities for each individual practice
Green Current performance is based on variance reported in the financial ledger of £44k overspend by year end
Confidence for programmes without remedial plans remains high- done
Contents
Section 1: Executive Summary
• Financial summary
• Programme summary
Section 2: M12 Finance and Activity
• Financial Summary
• Activity Summary
Section 3: Progress Reports
Part A: Unscheduled Care
• Care Planning and co-ordination
• Excess bed days reduction
Part B: Planned Care
• Dermatology
• Gynaecology
• MSK
• Respiratory adult
• Diabetic medicine
• Peer review of GP referrals
Section 4: Project Confidence Report (for schemes not requiring progress reports)
Section 5: Key Programme Risks
Appendices
29
30
Ref Title Description of Issue L I R Actions Required
1 Acute contract over-performance
Acute budgets report over performance year to date. Need to understand the reasons at provider
3 2 6 CSU to provide performance reports on timely basis and CCG to raise any concerns with the Customer Accounts Director and Lead CCG Commissioner Need regular updates on provider issues (e.g.: waiting times by specialty, capacity issues)
2 Year 3 Network Plan Failure to deliver the requirements of the Year 3 Network plan will have direct impact on the achievement of QIPP savings (planned and unscheduled)
3 4 12 All practices have signed up to the Network plan. Practice performance review is done on a monthly basis via the GP Portal and Q4 performance will be reviewed in Q1 of 14-15
3 Small contracts management
Need effective contract management and to deal with operational and contractual issues quickly
3 4 12 CCG has not received the level of support for management of contracts this year due to staff changes in CSU. CCG still requires on-going contract management of small contracts this year and in 14-15
4 Inability to change referral behaviour in required timeframe
Referral behaviour of some practices may not change when new services or pathways are put in place. (Note: It is high risk on a number of programmes but its overall potential impact on QIPP is low)
3 2 6 Awareness of Community services available is raised through network meetings and communication with practices. We are also bringing in specialists where relevant to raise awareness including involvement of consultants
5 Prescribing expenditure Difference in forecast expenditure in financial ledger (indicated over spend) and ePACT (indicated under spend)
3 2 6 QIPP forecast has been revised this month in-line with revised ledger forecast of £44k overspend. This is different to £54k underspend forecasted in the Jan-14 ePACT report. Given the lag in ePACT reporting, we have reported QIPP based on ledger position
6 Care Plans SystmOne rollout has affected the level of care planning activity, which may have affected our NEL admissions
3 3 9 Care planning was affected during Q2 following SystmOne migration and availability of a SystmOne care planning template. This has been resolved and care planning should increase in Q4 given on-going work that practices are doing to meet QOF requirements. Compared to Q2 there was 10% (700 care plans) increase in care plan activity in Q3
7 Specialised Commissioning Uncertainty around coding and charging of Specialised commissioning activity
4 2 8 On-going monitoring of this situation
Note: the risks identified and assessed above are related to the delivery of overall QIPP programme of £10.5m
Overall programme risks at this stage in the year are mainly yellow or amber
Appendix 1: Data Sources
31
Ref Title POD Provider(s) Data Source HFCCG01a Care Planning and Co-ordination NEL Imperial & ChelWest
predominantly BIU (SUS)
HFCCG01d Excess Bed Days Reduction XS BD Imperial & ChelWest predominantly
BIU (SUS)
HFCCG03 Musculoskeletal Services OPFA/OPFU Imperial & ChelWest predominantly
BIU (SUS)
HFCCG04 Respiratory Adult OPFA/OPFU Imperial & ChelWest predominantly
BIU (SUS)
HFCCG05 Diabetic Medicine OPFA/OPFU Imperial & ChelWest predominantly
BIU (SUS)
HFCCG06 Dermatology OPFA/OPFU Imperial & ChelWest predominantly
BIU (SUS)
HFCCG07 Gynaecology OPFA/OPFU Imperial & ChelWest predominantly
BIU (SUS)
HFCCG08 Peer Review of GP Referrals OPFA/OPFU Imperial & ChelWest predominantly
BIU (SUS)
HFCCG09 Children Services (Maternity Service Improvement)
- Imperial Ledger
HFCCG10a Current MH Proposals- WLMHT - WLMHT Ledger
HFCCG10b Current MH Proposals- NHS specialists & Independent sector providers
- NHS Specialist & Independent Sector providers
Ledger
HFCCG10c Current MH Proposals- CNWL - CNWL Ledger
HFCCG11 Community Services (CLCH Contract) - CLCH Ledger
HFCCG13 Prescribing - - Ledger HFCCG14 Acute Contracts - Imperial & ChelWest
predominantly Ledger
32
Appendix 2: Activity Re-provision Impact
Ref Title POD Provider(s) Activity Reduction Activity Reprovision
Description Data Source Description Data Source 13/14 Impact
HFCCG01a Care Planning and Co-ordination
NEL Imperial & ChelWest predominantly
Improved case management and care co-ordination will reduce NEL activity for patients identified as high / non-high risk. Better utilisation of admission avoidance schemes and better management of non-complex patients with Ambulatory Care Sensitive conditions should avoid NEL admission. Strengthen MH care planning and improved adherence for patients with LT conditions and MH co-morbidities will improve outcomes and avoid preventable hospital admissions
BIU (SUS) Admission avoidance schemes will result in activity reductions in acute settings and we anticipate an increase in Community services contacts particularly Community Nursing
BIU (from CLCH) 394
HFCCG01d Excess Bed Days Reduction XS BD Imperial & ChelWest predominantly
Reduction in NEL activity will impact on associated XS bed days. Assume care planning and the engagement of Community Independence team will deliver LOS reduction resulting in XS BDs
BIU (SUS) The impact of reductions in LOS and XS Bed days will result in increased activity for our Community Independence Service and our core Community Services such as District Nursing
BIU 420
HFCCG03 Musculoskeletal Services OPFA/OPFU Imperial & ChelWest predominantly
Reduction in Acute activity with increase in referrals to Community service
BIU (SUS) No of attendances in Community service BIU (Community activity)
28
HFCCG04 Respiratory Adult OPFA/OPFU Imperial & ChelWest predominantly
Reduction in Acute activity with increase in referrals to Community service
BIU (SUS) No of attendances in Community service BIU (Community activity)
114
HFCCG05 Diabetic Medicine OPFA/OPFU Imperial & ChelWest predominantly
Reduction in Acute activity with increase in referrals to Community service
BIU (SUS) No of attendances in Community service BIU (Community activity)
0
HFCCG06 Dermatology OPFA/OPFU Imperial & ChelWest predominantly
Reduction in Acute activity with increase in referrals to Community service
BIU (SUS) No of attendances in Community service BIU (Community activity)
861
HFCCG07 Gynaecology OPFA/OPFU Imperial & ChelWest predominantly
Reduction in Acute activity with increase in referrals to Community service
BIU (SUS) No of attendances in Community service BIU (Community activity)
561
HFCCG08 Peer Review of GP Referrals
OPFA/OPFU Imperial & ChelWest predominantly
Seek significant reductions In avoidable referrals to acute setting (i.e. refer patient to the right place) by peer review of GP referrals
BIU (SUS) No of attendances in Community service (as those deemed appropriate for primary care will have £0 impact)
BIU (Community activity)
30
HFCCG09 Children Services (Maternity Service Improvement)
- Imperial Expenditure reduction- contractual agreement Ledger N/A N/A -
HFCCG10a Current MH Proposals- WLMHT
- WLMHT Expenditure reduction- contractual agreement Ledger N/A N/A -
HFCCG10b Current MH Proposals- NHS specialists & Independent sector providers
- NHS Specialist & Independent Sector
providers
Expenditure reduction- contractual agreement Ledger N/A N/A -
HFCCG10c Current MH Proposals- CNWL
- CNWL Expenditure reduction- contractual agreement Ledger N/A N/A -
HFCCG11 Community Services (CLCH Contract)
- CLCH Expenditure reduction- contractual agreement Ledger N/A N/A -
HFCCG13 Prescribing - - Expenditure reduction Ledger N/A N/A -
HFCCG14 Acute Contracts - Imperial & ChelWest predominantly
Contractual agreement Ledger N/A N/A -